Skip to main content

PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Cessna Series Airplanes

CESSNA 175 · Airworthiness Directives

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document is an Airworthiness Directive (AD) applicable to Cessna series airplanes, specifically addressing the Cessna 150, 172, 175, and 182 models. It mandates the immediate replacement of early type nose gear forks on aircraft that have accumulated 1,500 hours of service. The directive was issued due to safety concerns regarding the integrity of the nose gear forks, which could lead to failure during operation. The document outlines compliance requirements and provides a grace period for replacement to ensure that aircraft operators can address the issue without undue burden. This AD is crucial for maintaining the airworthiness of the affected aircraft models and ensuring pilot and passenger safety.

  • Immediate replacement of early type nose gear forks is required for Cessna 175 aircraft with 1,500 hours of service.
  • Replacement must be completed within 300 hours after reaching 1,500 hours of service.
  • Applicable part numbers for replacement are P/N 0442503-497, 0543043-497, or 0543043-498.
  • The directive is effective from November 9, 1971.
  • A grace period is provided for compliance after January 1, 1972.

Document

Source

Originally published by archives.federalregister.gov. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Airworthiness Directives
Year
1971
Pages
3
File size
607 KB
Publisher
archives.federalregister.gov
How rare is it?
652CESSNA 175 registered worldwide · 586 active

Common. One of the most common aircraft types we track.

Documentation completeness
4/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the CESSNA 175.

More CESSNA 175manuals & documents

Similar aircraft

If you fly the CESSNA 175, you may also be researching these.

In this document

Applicability

The Airworthiness Directive applies to Cessna 150, 172, 175, and 182 series airplanes. It specifically targets those aircraft that have accumulated 1,500 hours of total time in service.

Compliance Requirements

Aircraft operators must replace earlier type nose gear forks with the specified part numbers (P/N 0442503-497, 0543043-497, or 0543043-498) for any aircraft that has reached or exceeded 1,500 hours of service. This replacement must occur within the first 300 hours of service after reaching the 1,500-hour threshold.

Effective Date

The amendment to the Airworthiness Directive becomes effective on November 9, 1971. Operators are advised to comply with the replacement requirements promptly to ensure safety.

Grace Period

A grace period of 300 hours is allowed for compliance after January 1, 1972, for aircraft that reach 1,500 hours of service after that date.

Safety Considerations

The directive emphasizes the importance of replacing the nose gear forks to prevent potential failures that could compromise the safety of the aircraft during operation.

Safety notes

  • Failure to comply with the replacement requirement may lead to nose gear failure during operation, posing a safety risk.

Full document text

RULES AND REGULATIONS 21279 § 29.1387 Position light system dihedral angles. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, each forward and rear position light must, as installed, show unbroken light within the dihedral an gles described in this section, * * • * * (e) If the rear position light, when mounted as far aft as practicable in ac cordance with § 29.1385(c), cannot show unbroken light within dihedral angle A (as defined in paragraph (d) of this sec tion), a solid angle or angles of ob structed visibility totaling not more than 0.04 steradians is allowable within that dihedral angle, if such solid angle is within a cone whose apex is at the rear position light and whose elements make an angle of 30° with a vertical line pass ing through the rear position light.. (Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C. 1 354(a ), 1421, and 1423, sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(C )) Issued in Washington, D.C., on Octo ber 28, 1971. K . M . S m i t h , Acting Administrator. [FR Doc.71-16166 Filed ll-4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 5 am] [Docket No; 71-C E -13-A D ; Arndt. 39-1327] PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Cessna Series Airplanes Amendment 39-1323 (36 F.R. 20417) effective October 23, 1971, applicable to Cessna 150, 172, 175, and 182 series air planes is an airworthiness directive which requires, in part, immediate replacement of early type nose gear forks on aircraft which have accumulated 1,500 hours time in service. The Agency did not intend to require such replacement prior to Janu ary 1, 1972. In addition, after further evaluation it appears that a parts avail ability problem could develop. Accord ingly, Paragraph C is being revised to allow a 300 hour grace period after Janu ary 1, 1972, to effect replacement of the discrepant nose gear forks. Since this amendment is relaxatory in nature, compliance with the notice and public procedure provisions of the Ad ministrative Procedures Act is not nec essary and good cause exists to make this amendment effective in less than 30 days. In consideration of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (31 F.R. 13697), § 39.13 of part 39 of the FAR’s, amend ment 39-1323 (36 F.R. 20417), is amended by changing Paragraph C so that it now reads as follows: C. For those airplanes with 1,500 or more total hours time in service as of January 1, 1972, and for those airplanes upon the ac cumulation of 1,500 hours total time in serv ice after January 1, 1972, within the first 300 hours time in service thereafter, replace earlier type forks with applicable nose gear lork p /N 0442503-497, 0543043-497, or 0543043-498 or newer nose gear forks identi- ed in current Cessna parts catalogs. This amendment becomes effective No- * vember 9,1971. (Secs. 3 1 3 (a ), 601 and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C. 135 4 (a ), 1421 and 1423, sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Issued iii Kansas City, Mo., on Octo ber 27, 1971. C h e st e r W . W e l l s , Acting Director, Central Region. [FR Doc.71-16168 Filed l l -4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 5 am] [Docket No. 10982; Arndt. 39-1329] PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Hawker-Siddeley Model DH-125 Airplanes Amendment 39-1251 (36 F.R. 13776), AD 71-16-2 requires modification of the Rotax voltage sensing unit on Hawker- Siddeley Model DH-125 airplanes. After issuing Amendment 39-1251 (AD 71- 16-2), the FAA has determined that, through inadvertence, the applicability statement of the AD is erroneous in that it fails to limit applicability of the AD to the specific serial number airplanes that require the modification. Therefore, the AD is being amended to limit its ap plicability to specific Hawker-Siddeley Model DH-125 series 1A and 1A-522 airplanes. Since this amendment corrects the ap plicability statement and imposes no ad ditional burden on any person, notice and public procedure hereon are unnec essary and the amendment may be made effective in less than 30 days. In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (14 CFR § 11.89), § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Fed eral Aviation Regulations, Amendment 39-1251 (36 F.R. 13776), AD 71-16-2, is amended by amending the applicability statement to read: Ha w k e r -S iddelev Av ia tio n , Ltd. Applies to Hawker-Siddeley Model DH-125 series 1A serial numbers 25013, 25014, 25016, 25018, 25021, 25022, 25026, 25027, 25030, 25031, 25034 through 25039, 25042, 25051 through 25053, 25057, and 25058; and series 1A-522 serial numbers 25017, 25020, 25023, 25029, 20532, 25033, 25043, 25046, 25047, 25060, 25064, 25065, 25066, 25068, 25070, 25073, through 25075, 25078, 25079, 25082 through 25084, 25086 through 25088, 25091, 25093, and 25095 airplanes. This amendment becomes effective No vember 5,1971. (Secs. 3 13 (a ), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423, sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(C)) Issued in Washington, D.C., on Octo ber 29,1971. R. S. Sliff, Acting Director, Flight Standards Service. [FR Doc.71-16169 Filed l l -4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 5 am] [Docket No. 71-SO -115; Arndt. 39-1328] PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Grumman G—159 Airplanes. A proposal to amend Part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to include an airworthiness directive requiring in spection of the wing to fuselage fittings for cracks and repair, if necessary, on Grumman Model G -159 airplanes was published in the F ederal R egister, 36 F.R. 12696. Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the mak ing of the amendment. No objections were received. In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (31 F.R. 13697), § 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regula tions is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive. G r u m m a n . Applies to all Model G-159 airplanes. Compliance required as indicated.

Show full text

To detect cracking in the wing to fuselage attachment fittings at butt line 9 of Grum man Model G -159 airplanes, accomplish the following: a. W ithin 6 months time in service after the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished, inspect the wing to fuselage attachment fittings, P /N s 159WM10064 and 159WM10065 (P /N 159WM10223 assembly), and P /N 159WM10045 at butt line 9 left and right, wing front beam for cracks, deforma tion, gaps, or improper shimming in accord ance with Grumman Gulfstream I Aircraft Service Change No. 190, dated June 28, 1971, or later FAA approved revision or in a m an ner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Southern Region. b. If cracks, deformation, gaps, or im proper shimming are found when conducting the inspection required by paragraph a., within 100 hours time in service after detec tion correct in accordance with Aircraft Service Change 190 or in a manner approved by the Chief, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, FAA Southern Region. c. Upon request of the operator, an FAA maintenance inspector, subject to prior ap proval of the Chief, Engineering and M anu facturing Branch, FAA Southern Region, may adjust the inspection time to coincide with inspections for wing corrosion required by AD 6 7-4-1. This amendment becomes effective November 26,1971. (Secs. 3 1 3 (a ), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423, sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transporta tion Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(C)) Issued in East Point, Ga., on Octo ber 27,1971. Ja m e s G . R ogers, Director, Southern Region. [FR Doc.71-16170 Filed ll-4 r -7 1 ;8 :4 6 am] No. 214—Pt. I—.—2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 214— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1971 21280 RULES AND REGULATIONS [Docket No. 11003; Arndt. 65-19] PART 65— CERTIFICATION: AIRMEN OTHER THAN FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS Military Air Traffic Control Tower Op erators; Experience Requirements for Facility Rating The purpose of this amendment to Part 65 of the Federal Aviation Regula tions is to allow military air traffic con trol tower operators to meet the practical experience requirements for a facility rating at a particular tower by having at least 6 months of experience as an air traffic control tower operator. However, that experience need not be had Cl) at that tower without a facility rating or (2) at a different tower with a facility rating there, as required of other Control tower operators. Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the mak ing of this amendment by a notice of pro posed rule making (notice 71-11) issued on April 23, 1971, and published in the F ederal R eg ister on April 29, 1971 (36 F.R. 8051). Due consideration has been given to all comments presented in response to the notice. Four of the seven public comments received in response to the notice con curred in the proposal. The other three opposed the proposal. One of these as serted that the proposal would result in a derogation of safety. Another asserted that (1) if an Air Force controller were transferred frequently during the 6- month period, he might not acquire ade quate practical experience; (2) under the proposed rule civilian and military con trollers at joint-use facilities might not have the same qualifications; and (3) the proposed rule would lower standards without consideration of established air traffic control procedures and the need for maintaining the highest degree of safety in aviation. The third opposing commentator asserted that the facility ratings placed on certificates would be degraded. The FAA does not agree that any of these asserted results will be caused by this rule. The rule does not entitle an Air Force controller to a facility rating so that he may immediately control air traffic. It only relieves him of waiting 6 months at a particular tower, if he has satisfactorily served elsewhere as an air traffic control tojver operator for at least 6 months. He is still required to pass the skill requirements under § 65.37 that are applicable to each operating position in the tower at which the rating is sought. Safety would not be derogated because the rating will not be issued until the individual passes the practical test and demonstrates his competence as an air traffic control tower operator at the particular airport. It has therefore been determined to issue the amendment for the reasons stated in the notice. In its response to the notice, the Di rectorate of Operations, U.S. Air Force, recommended changing “ air traffic con trol tower operator” to “ air traffic con troller” so that the time served by controllers providing only radar ap proach control service could be applied to the 6 months experience requirement. However, this change is not necessary as to radar approach control service per formed as an airport traffic control func tion of a particular tower. While per forming this service a Rerson is serving as an air traffic control tower operator, and the time involved is applied to the 6 months experience requirement. In consideration of the foregoing, § 65.39 of the Federal Aviation Regula tions is amended, effective December 6, 1971, by adding the following flush para graph at the end thereof: § 6 5 .3 9 Practical experience require ments : facility rating. * * * * * However, an applicant who is a member of an Armed Force of the United States meets the requirements of this section if he has satisfactorily served as an air traffic control tower operator for at least 6 months. (Secs. 313(a) and 601, Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421. Sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act; 49 U.S.C. 1 65 5 (c)) Issued in Washington, D.C., on Octo ber 28, 1971. K . M . S m i t h , Acting Administrator. [FR Doc.71-16167 Filed ll-4r-7 1 ;8:4 5 am] [Airspace Docket No. 71-R M -8] PART 71 ■!—DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE PORTING POINTS Alteration of Control Zones and Transition Area On September 15,1971 a notice of pro posed rule making was published in the F ederal R eg ister (36 F.R. 18476) stating that the Federal Aviation Administration was considering an amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that would alter the description of the Great Falls, Mont. (International Air port), the Great Falls, Mont. (Malm- strom Air Force Base) control zones and the Great Falls, Mont, transition area. Interested persons were given 30 days in which to submit written comments, suggestions, or objections. No objections have been received and the proposed amendment is hereby adopted without change. Effective date. These amendments shall be effective 0901 G.m.t., January 6, 1972. (Sec. 3 07 (a ), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1348(a); and of sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Issued in Aurora, Colo., on October 27, 1971. M . M . M a r t in , Director, Rocky Mountain Region. In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055) the follow ing control zones are amended to read as follows: G reat F alls, M o n t . (I nternational A ir po r t) W ithin a 5-mile radius of the Great Fails International Airport (latitude 47° 29 '0 0 " N., longitude 1 11 °2 2'00 " W .) within 3 y2 miles each side of the Great Falls VORTAC 225° radial, extending from the 5-m ile radius zone to 10 miles southwest of the VORTAC; within 3 % miles each side of the Great Falls VOR TAC 045° radial, extending from the 5-mile radius zone to 19 miles northeast of the VORTAC. G reat F alls, M o n t . (M alm strom Air F orce B ase) W ithin a 5-m ile radius of the Malmstrom AFB (latitude 4 7 °3 0 '0 5 " N„ longitude 111°11'20'' W .); within 3 y2 miles each side of the Malmstrom AFB VOR 037° radial, ex tending from the 5-mile-radius zone to 15 % miles northeast of the VOR; within 3 y2 miles each side of the Malmstrom AFB TAC AN 227° radial, extending from the 5-mile-radius zone to 7 miles southwest of the TAC AN; exclud ing those portions within the Great Falls International Airport control zone. In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140) the follow ing transition area is amended to read as follows : G reat F alls, M o n t . That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 17-mile radius of the Malmstrom Air Force Base (latitude 4 7 °3 0 '0 5 '' N., longitude 1 11°11'20" W.) and within 3 y2 miles each side of the Truly RBN 180° bearing, extending from the 17-mile radius area to 9 miles south of the RBN; and that, airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 40-mile radius of Malmstrom AFB; within 12 miles north and 8 miles south of the Great Falls VOR 074° radial, extending from the 40-mile- radius area to 61 miles east of the VOR; and within 12 miles south and 8 miles north of the Great Falls VOR 272° radial extending from the 40-mile-radius area to 56 miles west of the VOR. [FR Doc.71-16104 Filed ll-4 -7 1 ;8 :4 5 am] [Airspace Docket No. 71-SO-159] PART 71— d e s ig n a t io n o f federal AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE PORTING POINTS Alteration of Transition Area The purpose of this amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is to alter the Alexander City, Ala., tran sition area. The Alexander City transition area is described in § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140). In the amendment, an 11-mile extension is predicated on the 171° bearing from Alexander City RBN. Effective Novem ber 25, 1971, the procedure turn bearing for the NDB-A Instrument Approach Procedure will be changed to the 181 bearing and the altitude will be increased to 2,300 feet MSL. These changes require that the extension be redesignated to the 181° bearing and reduced to 8.5 miles m length. Since these amendments are minor in nature and reduce the burden on the public, notice and public proce dure hereon are unnecessary. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36 , NO. 214— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1971 RULES AND REGULATIONS 21281 In consideration of the foregoing, Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is amended, effective 0901 G.m.t., Novem ber 25, 1971, as hereinafter set forth. In §71.181 (36 F.R. 2140), the Alex ander City, Ala., transition area is amended as follows: “* * * 171° bearing * * *■” and “ * * * 11 miles south * * * ” are deleted and “ * * * 181° bearing * * * ” and “ * * * 8.5 miles south * * * ” are sub stituted therefor. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 U.S.C. 1348(a); sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Issued in East Point, Ga., on Octo ber 28,1971. Ja m e s G . R ogers, Director, Southern Region. {FR Doc.71-16175 Filed ll-4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 6 am] [Airspace Docket No. 71-SO -148] PART 71— d e s ig n a t io n o f f e d e r a l AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE PORTING POINTS Alteration of Control Zone On September 25, 1971, a notice of proposed rule making was published in the F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 19037), stating that the Federal Aviation Ad ministration was considering an amend ment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that would alter the St. Petersburg, Fla. (Albert-Whitted Air port) , control zone. Interested persons were afforded an opportunity to participate in the rule making through the submission of com ments. All comments received were fav orable. • ' ; v '' • ' ' ■; In consideration of the foregoing, Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is amended, effective 0901 G.m.t., Jan uary 6, 1972, as hereinafter set forth. In §71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the St. Petersburg, Ha. (Albert-Whitted Air port) control zone is amended to read: St . Petersburg, F la . (A lbert-W hitted A irp o rt) Within a 5-mile radius of the Albert- Whitted Airport (lat. 2 7°4 5 '5 3'' N., long. 82°37'39" W .); within 1.5 miles each side of the St. Petersburg VORTAC 159° radial, extending from the 5-m ile radius zone to 1 mile south of the VORTAC, excluding the portion within the St. Petersburg and M ac- Dill AFB control zones. This control zone s effective during the specific dates and wines established in advance by a Notice to ’rmen- The effective date and time will hereafter be continuously published in the Airman’s Information Manual. in6?; 307 (a)> Federal Aviation Act of 1958, U.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6 (c ), Department of transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Issued in East Point, Ga., on Octo ber 29, 1971. Ja m e s G . R ogers, Director, Southern Region. [FR Doc.71-16176 Filed ll-4 -7 1 ;8 :4 6 am] [Airspace Docket No. 71-N W -15] PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE PORTING POINTS Alteration of Control Zone On September 10,1971, a notice of pro posed rulemaking was published in the F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 18214) stat ing that the Federal Aviation Adminis tration was considering an amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regu lations that would alter the description of the Boise, Idaho control zone. Interested persons were given 30 days in which to submit written comments, suggestions, or objections. No objections were received. In consideration of the foregoing, the proposed amendment is hereby adopted without change. Effective date. This amendment shall be effective 0901 G.m.t. January 6, 1972. (Sec. 3 07(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), and sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) Issued in Seattle, Wash., on October 27,1971. C. B. Walk, Jr., Director, Northwest Region. In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055), the descrip tion of the Boise, Idaho, control zone is amended as follows: Add to the text “ * * * and within 2 miles west and 5 miles east of the Boise VORTAC 179° radial extending from the 5-mile radius zone to 7 miles south of the VORTAC.” [FR Doc.71-16172 Filed ll -4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 6 am] [Airspace Docket No. 71-R M -14] PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE PORTING POINTS Alteration of Transition Area On October 15, 1971, F.R. Doc. 71- 14718 was published in the F ederal R egister (36 F.R. 20035) adopting an amendment to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that altered the transition area for Livingston, Mont. Subsequent to the publication of this document, it was discovered the recip rocal of the 085° radial (265°), needed to describe a 1,200-foot portion of the transition area, was inadvertently omitted in the description of the transi tion area. Therefore, action is taken herein to correct this omission. Since this change is minor in nature and imposes no additional burden on any person, notice and public procedure hereon are unnecessary, and the effective date as originally adopted may be retained. In consideration of the foregoing, in § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140) the description of the Livingston, Mont. 1,200-foot transition area as amended by (36 F.R. 20035) is further amended by deleting “ * * * the Livingston VORTAC 085° radial * * *” and substituting “ * * * the Livingston VORTAC 085° and 265° radiais * * *” therefor. (Sec. 3 0 7 (a ), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), and sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c) Issued in Aurora, Colo., on October 29, 1971. M. M. M a r t in , Director, Rocky Mountain Region. [FR Doc.71-16173 Filed ll -4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 6 am] [Airspace Docket No. 71-R M -17] PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE PORTING POINTS Establishment of Control Zone and Transition Area On September 9, 1971, a notice of pro posed rule making was published in the F ederal R eg ister (36 F.R. 18109) stating that the Federal Aviation Administra tion was considering amendments to Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that would establish the Dillon, Mont, control zone and transition area. Interested persons were given 30 days in which to submit written comments, suggestions, or objections. No objections have been received and the proposed amendments are hereby adopted without change. Effective date. These amendments shall be effective 0901 G.m.t., January 6, 1972. (Sec. 3 0 7 (a ), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), and sec. 6 (c ), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1 65 5 (c)) Issued in Aurora, Colo., on October 28, 1971. M . M . M a r t in , Director, Rocky Mountain Region. In § 71.171 (36 F.R. 2055) the follow ing control zone is added: D il l o n , M o n t . W ithin a 6-m ile radius of the Dillon Air port, Dillon, Mont, (latitude 4 5 °1 5 '2 0 " N., longitude 1 1 2 °3 3 '1 0 " W .) and within 3 miles each side of the Dillon VORTAC 025° radial, extending from the 6-m ile-radius zone to 8.5 miles northeast of the VORTAC. In § 71.181 (36 F.R. 2140) the follow ing transition area is added: D il lo n , M o n t . That airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within 9.5 miles north -' west and 6 miles southeast of the Dillon VORTAC 025° radial, extending from the VORTAC to 24 miles northeast; and that airspace extending upward from 11,700 feet MSL within 7.5 miles west and 10.5 miles east of the Dillon VORTAC 168° and 348° radiais extending from 4.5 miles north to 19.5 miles south of the VORTAC. [FR Doc.71-16174 Filed ll-4 - 7 1 ;8 :4 6 am] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 36, NO. 214— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1971

Type certificate, explained

What's in the CESSNA 175 TCDS

A Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) is the FAA's record of what an aircraft type was approved as. It is the source of truth for weights, seating, fuel and the rules the design was certified against. Expand any line to see what it means.

TCDS 3A17Rev 45· Issued 2003
Read the full TCDS

597 CESSNA 175 parts for sale

See all →

Parts listed for sale by vetted eBay sellers — confirmed on eBay at checkout.