Skip to main content

AAIB Bulletin: 9/2014 G-CLUE EW/G2013/07/26

Piper PA-34 Seneca II · Other Documents

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document is an accident report concerning the Piper PA-34-200T Seneca II, specifically registration G-CLUE. It details an incident that occurred on July 28, 2013, when the aircraft was unable to confirm the down-and-locked status of its left main landing gear during an approach to land. The report outlines the sequence of events leading to the emergency landing, the mechanical failures encountered, and the subsequent examination of the aircraft post-accident. The report serves as a critical analysis of the factors contributing to the incident, including maintenance issues and mechanical failures, aimed at improving safety and operational protocols for the aircraft type.

  • Aircraft Model: Piper PA-34-200T Seneca II
  • Incident Date: July 28, 2013
  • Failure of left main landing gear to lock down during approach
  • Emergency extension system was deployed but left gear collapsed on landing
  • Hydraulic pump failure and lack of lubrication were key factors in the incident.

Document

Source

Originally published by assets.publishing.service.gov.uk. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Other Documents
Year
2014
Pages
4
File size
270 KB
Publisher
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Documentation completeness
5/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Piper PA-34 Seneca II.

More Piper PA-34 Seneca IImanuals & documents

In this document

Accident Synopsis

The aircraft, a Piper PA-34-200T Seneca II, was attempting to land but could not confirm the down-and-locked status of the left main landing gear. After several attempts to resolve the issue, the pilot returned to Durham Tees Valley Airport and deployed the emergency extension system. Upon landing, the left main landing gear collapsed, leading to damage to the aircraft.

Description of MLG Extension/Retract System

The Seneca II uses a hydraulic system powered by a single reversible electric pump to operate the landing gear. Normal operation involves a switch on the instrument panel. If hydraulic pressure is lost, the gears are designed to free-fall. The downlock mechanism uses hooks that engage to indicate the gear is locked down.

Examination of the Aircraft

Post-accident examination revealed that the downlock hooks were not engaging properly due to corrosion and lack of lubrication. The hydraulic pump was found to be inoperative, with burned-out brushes and excessive wear on the commutator.

Maintenance Requirements

The aircraft was subject to the CAA Light Aircraft Maintenance Programme, requiring detailed inspections of the landing gear every 150 flying hours. This includes checks of both normal and emergency retraction/extension systems.

Discussion

The report discusses the factors leading to the landing gear failure, attributing it to the failure of the hydraulic pump and mechanical issues with the left main landing gear's ability to lock down. It emphasizes the importance of regular maintenance and inspections to prevent similar incidents.

Safety notes

  • Ensure regular maintenance and lubrication of landing gear components to prevent mechanical failures.
  • Monitor the condition of hydraulic systems and replace worn components promptly.

Full document text

46 ©Crown copyright 2014 AAIB Bulletin: 9/2014 G-CLUE EW/G2013/07/26 ACCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: Piper PA-34-200T Seneca II, G-CLUE No & Type of Engines: 2 Continental Motors Corp TSIO-360-EB piston engines Year of Manufacture: 1979 (Serial no: 34-7970502) Date & Time (UTC): 28 July 2013 at 1140 hrs Location: Durham Tees Valley Airport Type of Flight: Private Persons on Board: Crew - 2 Passengers - None Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - N/A Nature of Damage: Damage to left engine, propeller, main landing gear, flap and aileron Commander’s Licence: Private Pilot’s Licence Commander’s Age: 53 years Commander’s Flying Experience: 2,500 hours (of which 200 were on type) Last 90 days - 45 hours Last 28 days - 5 hours Information Source: Aircraft Accident Report Form submitted by the pilot Synopsis The aircraft was intending to land at a private airstrip but the pilot was unable to obtain a green down-and-locked cockpit indication for the left Main Landing Gear (MLG). He returned to Durham Tees Valley Airport where, despite several attempts, he was still unable to receive confirmation that the gear was locked down. The emergency extension system was used but, during the subsequent landing roll, the left MLG collapsed. It was found that a combination of factors, including corrosion and a lack of lubrication, had led to stiffness in the downlock mechanism such that it would not lock the gear down fully after free-falling under gravity following emergency extension. The electric pump which supplies hydraulic power under normal gear extension/retraction had burnt out. History of the flight Whilst attempting to land at a private airfield some 20 nm from Durham Tees Valley Airport, the pilot found that only the green down-and-locked indicator lights for the right MLG and the nose landing gear illuminated. This indicated that the left MLG had not extended. The pilot recycled the gear selection, but the same indications remained, so he climbed to 2,000 ft to assess the situation. He checked the fuses and swapped the indicator bulbs but the left MLG green down-and-locked light did not illuminate, so he decided to return to Durham. 47 ©Crown copyright 2014 AAIB Bulletin: 9/2014 G-CLUE EW/G2013/07/26 Upon arrival, he requested a fly-by of the control tower so that they could check the status of the landing gears. He selected gear down again but this time received no green down-and- locked lights at all and could not see the nose gear in the mirror on the left nacelle; this was confirmed visually by the tower who reported that all the gears appeared to be retracted. A further reselection still did not result in any green down-and-locked lights. The pilot then advised the tower that he would deploy the emergency extension on the next approach and asked whether he should land on the grass or the ashphalt runway; he was told to use the runway. Having performed the emergency extension checklist procedures, the landing gears extended under free-fall and the tower confirmed that all three appeared to be down. However the pilot states that he still had no green down-and-locked lights, but continued the approach, touching down as gently as possible on all three gears at stall speed. As soon as the wheels touched down, he isolated the fuel and electrics but, as he applied gentle braking, he felt the left side of the aircraft slowly sink towards the runway and saw the left propeller make contact with the ground before the aircraft came to a halt. The two pilots evacuated the aircraft using the normal entry door which had been left ajar as a precaution. The emergency services attended but there was no fire. Description of MLG extension/retraction system The PA-34 Seneca uses hydraulic power supplied by a single reversible electric pump/ reservoir to raise and lower the landing gear. Normal gear selections are made using a switch on the instrument panel labelled up and down. When up is selected, fluid pressure on the retract side of the pistons acts in that sense and the down line returns fluid to the reservoir. When fully retracted, the gears remain in that position due to hydraulic pressure in the actuator jacks; there are no uplocks. When a down selection is made, the pump operates in the opposite sense and the up line becomes the return line. If hydraulic pressure is lost, all three gears should drop under their own weight. In addition to a loss of hydraulic pressure, the gears are designed to free-fall if the emergency extension valve is pulled. The main gear downlock mechanism comprises a conventional over-centre sidestay, kept in lock by a pair of hooks engaging on a pin (Figure 1). Engagement of the hooks also actuates a microswitch to illuminate the associated down-and-locked green light in the cockpit. Under a normal, powered extension, the final movement of the actuator engages the hooks, but in a free-fall extension, a spring is used to engage the downlock hooks. If any one of the three gears fails to downlock, a gear-unsafe red warning light illuminates. 48 ©Crown copyright 2014 AAIB Bulletin: 9/2014 G-CLUE EW/G2013/07/26 Figure 1 MLG downlock with hooks shown correctly engaged on pin Examination of the aircraft Following the accident, during recovery of the aircraft to a hangar, it was observed that the downlock hooks (Figure 1) would not engage and an improvised strut was used to secure the downlock to allow for towing to a hangar. Here the gear was retracted using a hand pump, since the aircraft electro-hydraulic pump also appeared to be inoperative, followed by a free-fall emergency extension. It was found that the nose and right main gears fell under gravity and locked normally but the left gear remained partially ‘up’ and had to be pulled down manually. The centre pivot bolt (Figure 1) was slightly slackened off and lubrication was applied to the downlock mechanism. Further free-fall extensions were

Show full text

successful inasmuch as the gear dropped fully down under gravity but the downlock hook still did not engage; levering the hook into engagement with a screwdriver was necessary to overcome stiffness caused by corrosion and lack of lubrication. The inoperative hydraulic pump was also examined; after checking that all solenoids were working, the electric motor was opened for internal inspection. It was found that the brushes had completely burned out and the commutator was excessively worn. Maintenance requirements The CAA Light Aircraft Maintenance Programme (LAMP), to which G-CLUE was operated, required a detailed visual inspection of the landing gear components plus a check of the normal and emergency retraction/extension operating system every 150 flying hours. Both the examination and function checks are to be carried out with the aircraft on jacks. Maintenance history The aircraft had been at a maintenance organisation for maintenance work and an annual inspection starting in August 2012 at 4,619.5 airframe hours. The work was completed in November 2012. Following some additional rectification, the Airworthiness Review Certificate was signed on 1 March 2013 and it was intended that the aircraft would return to service on that date. However, upon takeoff, after the maintenance, it was found that the landing gear would not retract, so the aircraft was flown to Blackpool with the gear extended. On arrival the Downlock hooks Centre pivot bolt 49 ©Crown copyright 2014 AAIB Bulletin: 9/2014 G-CLUE EW/G2013/07/26 pilot carried out a touch-and-go, after which the gear retracted. Whilst carrying out some circuits the landing gear appeared to operate normally. The aircraft was then left at a maintenance organisation at Blackpool for additional maintenance, which included an action to address a problem with the ‘Undercarriage light on’. The rectification action recorded by the maintenance organisation was ‘Microswitch adjusted, retraction test carried out’. The aircraft departed Blackpool on 21 March 2012 and flew for approximately 8 hours 30 minutes until the day of the accident. Discussion It is considered that the inability of the left MLG to lock down was the result of two separate factors: the first was the failure of the electro hydraulic pump that prevented normal extension of the landing gear, the second was the inability of the left MLG to fully lock-down under gravity because of overtightness of the pivot bolt in addition to corrosion and lack of lubrication. In the experience of the engineer who examined the aircraft post-accident, intermittent operation of the landing gear is often a symptom of excess wear of the brushes and commutator in the electro-hydraulic pump.