What is the publication date of the current AIP edition?

The current edition of the AIP is the Twenty-Ninth Edition, published on 22 January 2026.

When was the first amendment to the AIP issued?

Amendment 1 to the AIP was issued on 9 July 2026.

Who publishes the AIP?

The AIP is published by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

What should I consult for the latest information?

Readers are advised to consult NOTAM for the latest information.

What sections does the AIP include?

The AIP includes various sections such as general information and en route details.

Aeronautical Information Publication ( AIP ) Basic with Amendment 1

AIP Basic with Amd 1 dtd 7/9/26

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

TWENTY-NINTH EDITION

22 JANUARY 2026

CONSULT NOTAM FOR LATEST INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

TWENTY- NINTH EDITION DATED 22 JANUARY 2026

AMENDMENT 1

9 JULY 2026

CONSULT NOTAM FOR LATEST INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

AIP United States of America 9 JUL 26

AIP Amendment 1

Page Control Chart

9 JULY 2026

REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED GEN 0.4 − 1 through GEN 0.4 − 8 . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 0.4 − 1 through GEN 0.4 − 8 . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 0.6 − 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 0.6 − 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 1.7 − 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 1.7 − 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 1.7 − 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 22 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 23 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 1.7 − 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 30 through GEN 1.7 − 107 . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 − 30 through GEN 1.7 − 113 . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 2.1 − 1 and GEN 2.1 − 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.1 − 1 through GEN 2.1 − 3 . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 2.2 − 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.2 − 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.2 − 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.2 − 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 2.6 − 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.6 − 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.6 − 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 2.6 − 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 3.5 − 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 3.5 − 17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 3.5 − 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 3.5 − 18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 3.5 − 61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 3.5.61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 GEN 3.5 − 62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 GEN 3.5.62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 2 through ENR 1.1 − 4 . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 2 through ENR 1.1 − 4 . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.1 − 73 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 73 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 74 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 74 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.1 − 75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.1 − 76 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.1 − 76 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.4 − 11 and 1.4 − 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.4 − 11 and 1.4 − 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.5 − 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 27 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 28 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.5 − 49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 50 and ENR 1.5 − 51 . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 50 and ENR 1.5 − 51 . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.5 − 52 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 52 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 87 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 87 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 88 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.5 − 88 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 1.10 − 1 through ENR 1.10 − 19 . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.10 − 1 through ENR 1.10 − 20 . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 4.4 − 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 4.4 − 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 4.4 − 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 4.4 − 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 5.3 − 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 5.3 − 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 5.3 − 4 through ENR 5.3 − 7 . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 5.3 − 4 through ENR 5.3 − 7 . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Eighth Edition AIP 9 JUL 26 United States of America ENR 5.3 − 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 5.3 − 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 6.1 − 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 6.1 − 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 6.1 − 6 and ENR 6.1 − 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 6.1 − 6 and ENR 6.1 − 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 6.1 − 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 6.1 − 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.1 − 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.1 − 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.1 − 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.1 − 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 7.5 − 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.5 − 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 ENR 7.5 − 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.5 − 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.2 − 1 through ENR 7.2 − 50 . . . . . . . . 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.2 − 1 through ENR 7.2 − 51 . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 Appendix 1 − 1 through Appendix 1 − 21 . . . 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 13 through Appendix 1 − 23 . . 9 JUL 26 Index 1 − 1 through Index 1 − 8 22 JAN 26 Index 1 − 1 through Index 1 − 9 . . . . . . . . . . . 9 JUL 26 Twenty − Sixth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 0.4 − 1 AIP GEN 0.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

GEN 0.4 Checklist of Pages

PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 1.7 − 17 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 64 9 JUL 26 PART 1 − GENERAL (GEN) 1.7 − 65 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 18 22 JAN 26 GEN 0 1.7 − 66 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 19 9 JUL 26 0.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 67 9 JUL 26 20 1.7 − 22 JAN 26 0.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 68 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 21 9 JUL 26 0.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 69 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 22 22 JAN 26 0.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 70 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 23 9 JUL 26 0.4 − 1 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 71 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 24 22 JAN 26 0.4 − 2 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 72 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 25 22 JAN 26 0.4 − 3 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 73 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 26 22 JAN 26 0.4 − 4 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 74 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 27 22 JAN 26 0.4 − 5 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 75 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 28 22 JAN 26 0.4 − 6 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 76 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 29 22 JAN 26 0.4 − 7 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 77 9 JUL 26 30 1.7 − 9 JUL 26 0.4 − 8 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 78 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 31 9 JUL 26 0.6 − 1 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 79 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 32 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 80 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 33 9 JUL 26 GEN 1 1.7 − 81 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 34 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 82 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 35 9 JUL 26 1.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 83 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 36 9 JUL 26 1.2 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 84 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 37 9 JUL 26 1.2 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 85 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 38 9 JUL 26 1.2 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 86 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 39 9 JUL 26 1.2 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 87 9 JUL 26 40 1.7 − 9 JUL 26 1.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 88 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 41 9 JUL 26 1.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 89 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 42 9 JUL 26 1.4 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 90 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 43 9 JUL 26 1.4 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 91 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 44 9 JUL 26 1.4 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 92 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 45 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 93 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 46 9 JUL 26 1.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 94 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 47 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 95 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 48 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 96 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 49 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 97 9 JUL 26 50 1.7 − 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 98 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 51 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 99 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 52 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 100 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 53 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 101 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 54 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 102 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 55 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 9 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 103 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 56 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 104 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 57 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 11 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 105 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 58 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 12 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 106 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 59 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 13 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 107 9 JUL 26 60 1.7 − 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 14 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 108 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 61 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 15 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 109 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 62 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 16 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 110 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 63 9 JUL 26 1.7 − 111 9 JUL 26 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.4 − 2 AIP GEN 0.4 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 1.7 − 112 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 7 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 22 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 113 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 8 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 23 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 9 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 GEN 2 3.3 − 10 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 2 22 JAN 26 2.1 − 1 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 11 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 3 22 JAN 26 2.1 − 2 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 12 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 4 22 JAN 26 2.1 − 3 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 13 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 5 22 JAN 26 2.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 14 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 6 22 JAN 26 2.2 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 15 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 7 22 JAN 26 2.2 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 16 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 8 22 JAN 26 2.2 − 4 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 17 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 9 22 JAN 26 2.2 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 18 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 10 22 JAN 26 2.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 19 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 11 22 JAN 26 2.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 20 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 12 22 JAN 26 2.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 21 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 13 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 22 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 14 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 23 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 15 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 24 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 4 9 JUL 26 3.5 − 16 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 25 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 17 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 26 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 6 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 18 9 JUL 26 3.3 − 27 22 JAN 26 2.6 − 7 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 19 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 28 22 JAN 26 2.7 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 20 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 29 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 21 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 30 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 22 22 JAN 26 GEN 3 3.3 − 31 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 23 22 JAN 26 3.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 32 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 24 22 JAN 26 3.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 33 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 25 22 JAN 26 3.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 34 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 26 22 JAN 26 3.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 35 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 27 22 JAN 26 3.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 28 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 29 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 30 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 4 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 31 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 4 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 32 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 6 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 33 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 6 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 7 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 34 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 7 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 8 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 35 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 8 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 9 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 36 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 9 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 10 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 37 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 10 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 11 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 38 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 11 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 12 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 39 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 12 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 13 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 40 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 13 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 14 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 41 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 14 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 15 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 42 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 15 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 16 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 43 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 17 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 44 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 18 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 45 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 19 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 46 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 4 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 20 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 47 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 21 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 6 22 JAN 26 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 0.4 − 3 AIP GEN 0.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 3.5 − 48 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 77 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 7 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 49 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 78 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 8 22 JAN 26 50 3.5 − 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 79 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 9 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 51 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 80 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 10 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 52 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 81 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 11 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 53 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 82 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 12 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 54 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 83 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 13 22 JAN 26 55 3.5 − 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 14 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 84 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 56 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 15 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 85 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 57 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 16 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 86 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 58 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 17 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 87 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 59 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 18 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 88 22 JAN 26 60 3.5 − 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 19 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 89 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 61 9 JUL 26 3.6 − 20 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 90 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 62 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 21 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 91 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 92 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 22 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 63 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 23 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 64 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 93 22 JAN 26 65 3.5 − 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 94 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 24 22 JAN 26 3.7 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 66 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.7 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 67 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 68 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 69 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 4 22 JAN 26 GEN 4 70 3.5 − 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 5 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 71 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 6 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 72 22 JAN 26 4.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 73 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 74 22 JAN 26 75 3.5 − 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 76 22 JAN 26 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.4 − 4 AIP GEN 0.4 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PART 2 − EN ROUTE (ENR) 1.1 − 46 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 96 22 JAN 26 ENR 0 1.1 − 47 22 JAN 26 1.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 0.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 48 22 JAN 26 1.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 0.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 49 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 50 1.1 − 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 2 22 JAN 26 ENR 1 1.1 − 51 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 52 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 2 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 53 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 54 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 55 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 56 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 57 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 9 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 58 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 59 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 11 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 9 22 JAN 26 60 1.1 − 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 12 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 61 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 13 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 11 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 62 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 14 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 12 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 15 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 63 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 13 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 16 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 64 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 14 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 65 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 17 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 15 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 18 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 66 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 16 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 19 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 67 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 17 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 68 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 18 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 69 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 19 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 3 22 JAN 26 70 1.1 − 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 20 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 71 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 21 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 72 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 22 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 73 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 23 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 74 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 24 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 75 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 25 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 9 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 76 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 26 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 77 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 27 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 11 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 78 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 28 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 12 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 79 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 29 22 JAN 26 80 1.1 − 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 13 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 30 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 81 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 14 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 31 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 82 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 15 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 32 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 83 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 16 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 33 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 84 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 17 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 34 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 85 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 18 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 35 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 86 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 19 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 36 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 87 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 20 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 37 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 88 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 21 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 38 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 89 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 22 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 39 22 JAN 26 90 1.1 − 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 23 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 40 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 91 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 24 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 41 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 92 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 25 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 42 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 93 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 26 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 43 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 94 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 27 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 44 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 95 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 45 22 JAN 26 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 0.4 − 5 AIP GEN 0.4 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 1.5 − 28 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 78 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 10 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 29 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 79 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 11 9 JUL 26 30 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 80 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 12 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 31 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 81 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 13 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 32 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 82 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 14 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 33 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 83 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 15 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 34 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 84 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 16 9 JUL 26 35 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 85 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 17 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 36 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 86 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 18 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 37 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 87 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 19 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 38 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 88 9 JUL 26 1.10 − 20 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 39 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 89 22 JAN 26 1.11 − 1 22 JAN 26 40 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 90 22 JAN 26 1.11 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 41 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 91 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 42 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 92 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 43 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 93 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 44 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 4 22 JAN 26 45 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 46 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 47 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 48 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 49 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 9 22 JAN 26 50 1.5 − 9 JUL 26 1.6 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 51 9 JUL 26 1.6 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 11 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 52 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 9 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 12 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 53 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 13 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 54 22 JAN 26 1.6 − 11 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 14 22 JAN 26 55 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.12 − 15 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 56 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.13 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 57 22 JAN 26 1.7 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.14 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 58 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.14 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 59 22 JAN 26 1.14 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 2 22 JAN 26 60 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.14 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 61 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 62 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 63 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 64 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 7 22 JAN 26 65 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.8 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 66 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.9 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 67 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.9 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 68 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 1 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 69 22 JAN 26 1.15 − 9 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 2 9 JUL 26 70 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 3 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 71 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 4 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 72 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 5 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 73 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 6 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 74 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 7 9 JUL 26 75 1.5 − 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 8 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 76 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.10 − 9 9 JUL 26 1.5 − 77 22 JAN 26 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.4 − 6 AIP GEN 0.4 − 6 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 1.16 − 8 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 30 22 JAN 26 5.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 9 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 31 22 JAN 26 5.6 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 10 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 32 22 JAN 26 5.6 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 11 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 33 22 JAN 26 1.16 − 12 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 34 22 JAN 26 ENR 6 1.16 − 13 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 35 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 36 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 37 22 JAN 26 ENR 2 6.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 38 22 JAN 26 2 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 39 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 40 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 6 9 JUL 26 ENR 3 4.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 7 9 JUL 26 3.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.1 − 8 22 JAN 26 3.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.4 − 2 22 JAN 26 3.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 2 22 JAN 26 4.4 − 3 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 3 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.4 − 4 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 2 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 4 22 JAN 26 4.4 − 5 9 JUL 26 6.2 − 5 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 3 22 JAN 26 4.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 3.5 − 4 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 6 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 7 22 JAN 26 3.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 ENR 5 6.2 − 8 22 JAN 26 ENR 4 5.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 9 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 5.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 10 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 5.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 11 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 5.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 12 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 5.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 13 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 5.1 − 6 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 14 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 6 22 JAN 26 5.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 15 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 7 22 JAN 26 5.2 − 2 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 17 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 8 22 JAN 26 5.2 − 3 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 18 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 9 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 19 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 10 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 2 22 JAN 26 6.2 − 20 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 11 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 3 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 12 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 4 9 JUL 26 4.1 − 13 22 JAN 26 ENR 7 5.3 − 5 9 JUL 26 4.1 − 14 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 6 9 JUL 26 4.1 − 15 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 7 9 JUL 26 4.1 − 16 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 8 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 17 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 9 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 18 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 10 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 19 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 6 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 11 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 20 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 7 22 JAN 26 5.3 − 12 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 21 22 JAN 26 7.1 − 8 9 JUL 26 5.3 − 13 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 22 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 1 9 JUL 26 5.3 − 14 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 23 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 2 9 JUL 26 5.3 − 15 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 24 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 3 9 JUL 26 5.3 − 16 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 25 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 4 9 JUL 26 5.3 − 17 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 26 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 5 9 JUL 26 5.3 − 18 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 27 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 6 9 JUL 26 5.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 28 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 7 9 JUL 26 5.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 4.1 − 29 22 JAN 26 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 0.4 − 7 AIP GEN 0.4 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 7.2 − 8 9 JUL 26 7.2 − 50 9 JUL 26 8.3 − 5 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 9 9 JUL 26 7.2 − 51 9 JUL 26 8.3 − 6 22 JAN 26 10 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 7.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 11 9 JUL 26 7.3 − 2 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 12 9 JUL 26 7.3 − 3 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 3 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 13 9 JUL 26 7.3 − 4 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 4 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 14 9 JUL 26 7.3 − 5 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 5 22 JAN 26 15 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 7.3 − 6 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 6 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 16 9 JUL 26 7.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 7 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 17 9 JUL 26 7.4 − 2 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 8 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 18 9 JUL 26 7.4 − 3 22 JAN 26 8.4 − 9 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 19 9 JUL 26 7.4 − 4 22 JAN 26 8.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 20 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 7.4 − 5 22 JAN 26 8.5 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 21 9 JUL 26 7.4 − 6 22 JAN 26 8.5 − 3 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 22 9 JUL 26 7.5 − 1 9 JUL 26 8.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 23 9 JUL 26 7.5 − 2 22 JAN 26 8.7 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 24 9 JUL 26 7.5 − 3 22 JAN 26 8.8 − 1 22 JAN 26 25 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 7.6 − 1 22 JAN 26 8.8 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 26 9 JUL 26 7.7 − 1 22 JAN 26 8.8 − 3 22 JAN 26 7.8 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 27 9 JUL 26 8.8 − 4 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 28 9 JUL 26 7.8 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 29 9 JUL 26 7.8 − 3 22 JAN 26 30 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 7.9 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 31 9 JUL 26 7.10 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 32 9 JUL 26 7.11 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 33 9 JUL 26 7.12 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 34 9 JUL 26 7.13 − 1 22 JAN 26 35 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 7.2 − 36 9 JUL 26 ENR 8 7.2 − 37 9 JUL 26 8.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 38 9 JUL 26 8.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 39 9 JUL 26 8.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 40 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 8.2 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 41 9 JUL 26 8.2 − 3 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 42 9 JUL 26 8.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 43 9 JUL 26 8.3 − 2 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 44 9 JUL 26 8.3 − 3 22 JAN 26 45 7.2 − 9 JUL 26 8.3 − 4 22 JAN 26 7.2 − 47 9 JUL 26 7.2 − 48 9 JUL 26 7.2 − 49 9 JUL 26 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.4 − 8 AIP GEN 0.4 − 8 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America PAGE DATE PAGE DATE PAGE DATE 1.1 − 29 22 JAN 26 APPENDIX PART 3 − AERODROMES 1.1 − 30 22 JAN 26 (AD) Appendix 1 − 1 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 31 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 2 9 JUL 26 AD 0 1.1 − 32 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 3 9 JUL 26 AD 0.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 33 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 4 9 JUL 26 AD 1 1.1 − 34 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 5 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 1 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 35 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 6 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 36 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 7 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 3 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 37 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 8 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 38 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 9 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 5 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 39 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 10 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 6 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 40 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 11 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 7 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 41 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 12 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 8 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 42 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 13 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 9 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 43 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 14 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 10 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 44 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 15 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 11 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 45 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 16 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 12 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 46 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 17 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 13 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 47 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 18 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 14 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 48 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 19 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 15 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 49 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 20 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 16 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 50 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 21 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 17 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 51 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 22 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 18 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 52 22 JAN 26 Appendix 1 − 23 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 19 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 53 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 20 22 JAN 26 1.1 − 54 22 JAN 26 INDEX 1.1 − 21 22 JAN 26 1.2 − 1 22 JAN 26 Index I − 1 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 22 22 JAN 26 1.3 − 1 22 JAN 26 Index I − 2 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 23 22 JAN 26 1.4 − 1 22 JAN 26 Index I − 3 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 24 22 JAN 26 1.5 − 1 22 JAN 26 Index I − 4 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 25 22 JAN 26 AD 2 Index I − 5 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 26 22 JAN 26 AD 2 − 1 22 JAN 26 Index I − 6 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 27 22 JAN 26 Index I − 7 9 JUL 26 1.1 − 28 22 JAN 26 Index I − 8 9 JUL 26 AD 3 Index I − 9 9 JUL 26 AD 3 − 1 22 JAN 26

GEN 0.5 List of Hand Amendments to the AIP − Not applicable

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration

Next: PART I. GENERAL →

PART I. GENERAL

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PART 1 GENERAL (GEN)

AIP GEN 0.6 − 1 AIP GEN 0.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

GEN 0.6 Table of Contents to Part 1

GEN 1. National Regulations and Requirements GEN 1.1 Designated Authorities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 1.1 − 1 GEN 1.2 Entry, Transit, and Departure Aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 1.2 − 1 GEN 1.3 Entry, Transit and Departure of Passengers and Crew . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 1.3 − 1 GEN 1.4 Entry, Transit, and Departure of Cargo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 1.4 − 1 GEN 1.5 Aircraft Instruments, Equipment, and Flight Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 1.5 − 1 GEN 1.6 Summary of National Regulations and International Agreements/Conventions . . . GEN 1.6 − 1 GEN 1.7 Differences From ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures . . . . GEN 1.7 − 1 GEN 2. Tables and Codes GEN 2.1 Measuring System, Aircraft Markings, and Holidays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.1 − 1 GEN 2.2 Abbreviations Used in AIS Publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.2 − 1 GEN 2.3 Chart Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.3 − 1 GEN 2.4 Location Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.4 − 1 GEN 2.5 List of Radio Navigation Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.5 − 1 GEN 2.6 Conversion Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.6 − 1 GEN 2.7 Sunrise/Sunset Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 2.7 − 1 GEN 3 . Services GEN 3.1 Aeronautical Information Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.1 − 1 GEN 3.2 Aeronautical Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.2 − 1 GEN 3.3 Air Traffic Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.3 − 1 GEN 3.4 Communication Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.4 − 1 GEN 3.5 Meteorological Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.5 − 1 GEN 3.6 Search and Rescue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.6 − 1 GEN 3.7 Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 3.7 − 1 GEN 4 . Charges for Aerodromes/Heliports and Air Navigation Services GEN 4.1 Fees and Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 4.1 − 1 GEN 4.2 Air Navigation Facility Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEN 4.2 − 1 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

PART 1 − GENERAL (GEN)

GEN 0.

GEN 0.1 Preface

1. Name of the Publishing Authority 1.1 The United States of America Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) is published by the authority of the Federal Aviation Administration.

2. Applicable ICAO Documents 2.1 The AIP is prepared in accordance with the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARP) of Annex 15 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and the Aeronautical Information Services Manual (ICAO Doc 8126). Charts contained in the AIP are produced in accordance with Annex 4 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and the Aeronautical Chart Manual (ICAO Doc 8697). Differences from ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures are given in subsection GEN 1.7 .

3. The AIP Structure and Established Regular Amendment Interval 3.1 The AIP Structure The AIP is made up of three Parts; General (GEN), En Route (ENR), and Aerodromes (AD); each divided into sections and subsections as applicable, containing various types of information subjects.

3.1.1 PART 1 − General (GEN) PART 1 consists of five sections containing information as briefly described hereafter: 3.1.1.1 GEN 0 . − Preface; Record of AIP Amendments; Checklist of AIP Pages; and Table of Contents to PART 1.

3.1.1.2 GEN 1 . National Regulations and Requirements − Designated Authorities; Entry, Transit and Departure of Aircraft; Entry, Transit, and Departure of Passengers and Crew; Transit, and Departure of Cargo; Aircraft Instruments, Equipment, and Flight Documents; Summary of National Regulations and International Agreements/Conventions; and Differences from ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices, and Procedures.

3.1.1.3 GEN 2. Tables and Codes − Measuring System, Time System, and Aircraft Markings; Abbreviations Used in AIS Publications; Chart Symbols; Location Indicators; List of Radio Navigation Aids; Conversion Tables; and Sunrise/Sunset Tables.

3.1.1.4 GEN 3 . Services − Aeronautical Information Services; Aeronautical Charts; Air Traffic Services; Communication Service; Meteorological Services; Search and Rescue; and Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Communications.

3.1.1.5 GEN 4. Charges for Aerodromes/Heliports and Air Navigation Services − Fees and Charges; and Air Navigation Facility Charges.

3.1.2 PART 2 − En Route (ENR) PART 2 consists of seven sections containing information as briefly described hereafter: 3.1.2.1 ENR 0. − Table of Contents to PART 2.

3.1.2.2 ENR 1. General Rules and Procedures − General Rules; Visual Flight Rules; Instrument Flight Rules; ATS Airspace Classification; Holding, Approach, and Departure Procedures; ATS Surveillance Services and Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 United States of America Procedures ; Barometric Altimeter Errors and Setting Procedures; Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors, Setting Procedures, and Cold Temperature Airports (CTA); Air Traffic Flow Management and Airspace Management; Flight Planning (Restriction, Limitation or Advisory Information); Addressing of Flight Plans for Domestic or International Flight Planning; National Security and Interception Procedures; Unlawful Interference; Traffic Incidents; Medical Facts for Pilots; Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) and Area Navigation (RNAV).

3.1.2.3 ENR 2. Air Traffic Services Airspace.

3.1.2.4 ENR 3. ATS Routes − Lower ATS Routes; Upper ATS Routes; Area Navigation Routes; Helicopter Routes; Other Routes; and En Route Holding.

3.1.2.5 ENR 4. Navigation Aids/Systems − Navigation Aids − En Route; Special Navigation Systems; Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); Name − Code Designators for Significant Points; and Aeronautical Ground Lights — En − Route.

3.1.2.6 ENR 5. Navigation Warnings − Prohibited, Restricted, and Other Areas; Military Exercise and Training Areas; Other Activities of a Dangerous Nature and Other Potential Hazards; Air Navigation Obstacles; Aerial Sporting and Recreational Activities; and Bird Migration and Areas with Sensitive Fauna.

3.1.2.7 ENR 6. Helicopter Operations − Helicopter IFR Operations; and Special Operations.

3.1.2.8 ENR 7. Oceanic Operations − General Procedures; Data Link Procedures; Special Procedures for In − Flight Contingencies in Oceanic Airspace; Operational Policy 50 NM Lateral Separation; Operational Policy Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) and Performance − Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS); North Atlantic (NAT) Route Clearance Procedures; North Atlantic (NAT) Timekeeping Procedures; North Atlantic (NAT) Safety Information; Y − Routes; Atlantic High Offshore Airspace Offshore Routes Supporting Florida Airspace Optimization; Reduced Separation Climb/Descent Procedures; New York Oceanic Control Area (OCA) West Flight Level Allocation; and Gulf of America RNAV Routes Q100, Q102, and Q105.

3.1.2.9 ENR 8. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS); General; Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS); Large UAS (MGOW 55 Pounds Or More); Airspace Access for UAS; UAS Pilot Testing, Certification and Responsibilities; Advanced Air Mobility; UAS Operations on Airports; and Other Information and Best Practices.

3.1.3 PART 3 − Aerodromes (AD) PART 3 consists of three sections containing information as briefly described hereafter: 3.1.3.1 AD 0. − Table of Contents to PART 3.

3.1.3.2 AD 1. Aerodromes/Heliports − Introduction; Aerodrome/Heliport Availability and Conditions of Use; Rescue and Firefighting Service and Snow Plan; Index to Aerodromes and Heliports; Grouping Aerodromes/Heliport; and Status of Certification of Aerodromes.

3.1.3.3 AD 2. Aerodromes.

3.1.3.4 AD 3. Heliports.

3.2 Regular Amendment Interval Regular amendments to the AIP will be issued every 6 months on Aeronautical Information Regulation and Control (AIRAC) effective dates listed in TBL GEN 0.1 − 1 . A list of all AIRAC effective dates are contained in TBL GEN 0.1 − 2 .

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 0.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 0.1 − 1 Publication Schedule New Edition or Cutoff Date Effective Date Amendment for Submission of Publication Twenty − Ninth 7 AUG 25 22 JAN 26 Edition Amendment 1 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 Amendment 2 9 JUL 26 24 DEC 26 Amendment 3 24 DEC 26 10 JUN 27 Thirtieth Edition 10 JUN 27 25 NOV 27 Amendment 1 25 NOV 27 11 MAY 28 Amendment 2 11 MAY 28 26 OCT 28 Amendment 3 26 OCT 28 12 APR 29 TBL GEN 0.1 − 2 AIRAC System Effective Dates 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 22 JAN 21 JAN 20 JAN 18 JAN 17 JAN 19 FEB 18 FEB 17 FEB 15 FEB 14 FEB 19 MAR 18 MAR 16 MAR 15 MAR 14 MAR 16 APR 15 APR 13 APR 12 APR 11 APR 14 MAY 13 MAY 11 MAY 10 MAY 9 MAY 11 JUN 10 JUN 8 JUN 7 JUN 6 JUN 9 JUL 8 JUL 6 JUL 5 JUL 4 JUL 6 AUG 5 AUG 3 AUG 2 AUG 1 AUG 3 SEP 2 SEP 31 AUG 30 AUG 29 AUG 1 OCT 30 SEP 28 SEP 27 SEP 26 SEP 29 OCT 28 OCT 26 OCT 25 OCT 24 OCT 26 NOV 25 NOV 23 NOV 22 NOV 21 NOV 24 DEC 23 DEC 21 DEC 20 DEC 19 DEC 4. Service to Contact in Case of Detected AIP Errors or Omissions 4.1 In the compilation of the AIP, care has been taken to ensure that the information contained therein is accurate and complete. Any errors or omissions that may be detected, as well as any correspondence concerning the Aeronautical Information Publication, should be submitted electronically to 9-AJV-P-HQ-Correspondence@faa.gov 5. Subscription Information 5.1 This publication is distributed electronically to all who subscribe to receive email notifications through the FAA’s website. All organizations are responsible for viewing, downloading, and subscribing to receive email notifications when changes occur to this order. Subscriptions to air traffic directives can be made through the Air Traffic Plans and Publications website at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ or directly via the following link: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAFAA/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAFAA_39 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 0.3 − 2 22 JAN 26 United States of America GEN 0.3 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 1. NATIONAL REGULATIONS AND

REQUIREMENTS

GEN 1.1 Designated Authorities

1. Introduction 1.1 This section contains the contact information for certain designated U.S. authorities that are directly involved with flights that enter, exit, or transit U.S. territorial airspace.

2. Designated Authorities 2.1 Certain designated authorities concerned with facilitation of aircraft operations in the U.S. can be contacted as follows: 2.1.1 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for: 2.1.1.1 Customs requirements, including Advanced Passenger Information System (APIS) at https://www.cbp.gov.

2.1.1.2 CBP Service Offices/Ports of Entry at www.cbp.gov/contact/ports .

2.1.2 U.S Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for TSA security programs at https://www.tsa.gov /.

2.1.3 U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for foreign aircraft licensing and permits at https://www.transportation.gov.

2.1.4 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) at https://www.faa.gov.

2.1.5 Additional designated authorities are listed with contact information on the FAA Prohibitions, Restrictions, and Notices website located at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/us_restrictions /.

3. Applicable ICAO Documents 3.1 National regulations and practices concerning facilitation of international air transport are being carried out at all international airports as far as possible in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Standards and Recommended Practices of Annex 9 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Differences from certain Annex 9 provisions exist only in those cases where it has not yet been possible to amend national legislation accordingly. Continuous efforts are being made to eliminate these differences.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 1.2 Entry, Transit and Departure of Aircraft

1. General 1.1 All aircraft operators that conduct flights into or over U.S. territorial airspace must comply with the following: 1.1.1 National security requirements contained in AIP Section ENR 1.12, National Security and Intercept Procedures; REFERENCE − FAA Notices to Airmen (NOTAMS), Special Notices, at ( http://www.faa.gov/pilots/flt_plan/notams /).

FAA Prohibitions, Restrictions, and Notices website located at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/us_restrictions/.

1.1.2 All applicable sections of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 91, General Operating and Flight Rules, particularly Subpart H, Foreign Aircraft Operations and Operations of U.S. Registered Civil Aircraft Outside of the United States; and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft; 1.1.3 All applicable sections of Title 49, United States Code (USC), Transportation, particularly Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs (sections 40101 through 50105); 1.1.4 All applicable sections of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) requirements in Title 19 USC Part 122, Air Commerce Regulations.

1.2 U.S. CBP designates the airport of entry or other location for international aircraft that land or depart within U.S. territorial airspace. For information pertaining to U.S. CBP Service Offices/Ports of Entry, see AIP GEN 1.1, paragraph 2.1.1 .

1.3 Subject to the observance of the applicable rules, conditions, and limitations of the Federal Aviation Regulations and the Department of Transportation (DOT)/Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), Office of International Aviation, as described below, foreign civil aircraft registered and manufactured in any foreign country which is a member of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) may be navigated in the U.S. Foreign civil aircraft manufactured in a country which at the time of manufacture was not a member of ICAO may be navigated in the U.S. if the country has notified ICAO that the aircraft meets the standards described in the Chicago Convention or if a notice has been filed with the DOT/OST, Office of International Aviation, through diplomatic channels, that the aircraft meets the standards described in the Chicago Convention.

1.4 Aircraft registered under the laws of foreign countries, not members of the ICAO, may be navigated in U.S.

territory only when authorized by the DOT/OST, Office of International Aviation.

1.5 All foreign civil aircraft operated to, from, or within the U.S. must carry on board effective certificates of registration and air worthiness issued by the country of registry. Also, each member of the flight crew must carry a valid airman certificate or license authorizing that member to perform their assigned functions in the aircraft.

1.6 Transportation of firearms by aircraft passengers. Regulations of the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division of the Internal Revenue Service make it unlawful for any person knowingly to deliver or cause to be delivered to any common or contract carrier for transportation or shipment in interstate or foreign commerce, to persons other than licensed importers, licensed manufacturers, licensed dealers, or licensed collectors, any package or other container in which there is any firearm or ammunition without written notice to the carrier that such firearm or ammunition is being transported or shipped; except that any passenger who owns or legally possesses a firearm or ammunition being transported aboard any common or contract carrier for movement with the passenger in interstate or foreign commerce may deliver said firearm or ammunition into the custody of the pilot, captain, conductor or operator of such common or contract carrier for the duration of the trip.

1.7 Miscellaneous Information 1.7.1 Commercial air transport operators in the U.S. must adhere to Annex 6 − Operation of Aircraft with the proviso that aircraft which have no operators’ local representative available to them will be required to carry a Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.2 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 fixed fuel reserve of not less than 45 minutes at the approved fuel consumption rate plus a variable reserve equivalent to 15% of the fuel required from departure to destination and to an alternate if an alternate is required; or where the reserve calculated in accordance with the above exceeds two hours at the approved fuel consumption rate − two hours reserve fuel.

2. Public Health 2.1 Public Health Measures Applied to Aircraft 2.1.1 At airports without Public Health Service Quarantine staff, the Customs, Immigration, or Agriculture Officer present will represent the Public Health Service.

2.1.2 No public health measures are required to be carried out with respect to aircraft entering U.S. territory except that disinfection of an aircraft may be required if it has departed from a foreign area that is infected with insect − borne communicable disease, and the aircraft is suspected of harboring insects dangerous to public health.

Disinfection is defined as: “The operation in which measures are taken to kill the insect vectors of human disease present in carriers and containers.” 2.1.3 Disinfection must be the responsibility of the air carrier and must be subject to monitoring by the Director of the Public Health Service.

2.1.4 Disinfection of the aircraft must be accomplished immediately after landing and blocking. The cargo compartment must be disinfected before the mail, baggage, and other cargo are discharged, and the rest of the aircraft must be disinfected after passengers and crew deplane.

2.1.5 Disinfection must be performed with an approved insecticide in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The current list of approved insecticides and sources may be obtained from the Division of Quarantine, Center for Prevention Services, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

2.1.6 All food and potable water taken on board an aircraft at any airport and intended for human consumption thereon must be obtained from sources approved in accordance with Title 21 CFR Parts 1240 and 1250.

2.1.7 Aircraft inbound or outbound on an international flight must not discharge over the U.S. any excrement or waste water or other polluting materials. Arriving aircraft must discharge such matter only at servicing areas approved under regulations cited in paragraph 2.1.6 above.

2.1.8 Aircraft on an international voyage (that are in traffic between U.S. airports) must be subject to inspection when there occurs on board, among passengers or crew, any death, or any ill person, or when illness is suspected to be caused by insanitary conditions.

3. Scheduled Common Carriage Flights 3.1 General 3.1.1 Generally, when an operator of an aircraft advertises its transportation services to the general public or particular classes or segments of the public for compensation or hire, it is a common carrier. In turn, the transportation service the operator performs is considered to be in common carriage. The scheduled flights into, from and landing in the territory of the U.S. for purposes of loading or unloading passengers, cargo and mail (revenue flights), must first obtain from the U.S. DOT/OST, Office of International Aviation (X − 40), a foreign air carrier permit. Applications for common carrier authority must be filed with X − 40. If X − 40, with the President’s approval, determines that the carrier is fit, willing, and able to perform the service it proposes and that the service is in the public interest, X − 40 must issue the carrier a foreign air carrier permit, subject to the disapproval of the President of the U.S.

3.1.2 The scheduled flights in transit across the territory of the U.S. or landing for reasons other than for the purpose of loading and unloading of passengers, cargo or mail (nonrevenue flights), which are registered in a State which is a party to the International Air Services Transit Agreement, must submit a notice of transit to X − 40.

The notice of transit must be submitted at least 15 days prior to the flight and must include: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.2.1 Name, country of organization and nationality (including the nationality of all ownership interests) of the operator; 3.1.2.2 Name of the country in which the aircraft to be used in the service is registered; 3.1.2.3 A full description of the proposed operations including the type of operations (passenger, property, mail, or combination), date of commencement, duration and frequency of flights, and routing (including each terminal and intermediate point that will be served); 3.1.2.4 Copies of advertising of the flights, if advertised in the U.S.

3.1.3 If the notice is timely filed, the flights may be operated in the absence of a contrary notification from X − 40.

3.1.4 Scheduled flights in transit across the territory of the U.S. or landing for reasons other than for the purpose of loading and unloading of passengers, cargo or mail (nonrevenue flights), which are registered in a State which is not a party to the International Air Services Transit Agreement, must obtain prior permission from X − 40 at least 15 days prior to the flight. All permission requests must include the same information as requested in paragraph 3.1.2 (see also paragraph 1.4). The carrier may not transit U.S. territory unless and until it receives a foreign aircraft permit to do so from X − 40.

3.1.5 The permission to transit U.S. territory as described above also includes the right to make stops in the U.S.

for technical purposes (for example, refueling and servicing of the aircraft) as long as the stopover does not exceed 24 hours. Stopovers which do exceed 24 hours are permitted only in those cases where a transfer of passengers, property or mail to another aircraft is necessary for the safety of the aircraft, passengers, property, or crew. Stopovers for the pleasure or convenience of passengers are not included in the transit authority.

3.2 Documentary Requirements for Clearance of Aircraft 3.2.1 The undermentioned documents must be submitted to U.S. authorities for clearance on entry and departure of aircraft. All documents listed below must follow the ICAO standard format as set forth in the relevant appendixes to Annex 9, and are acceptable only when furnished in English.

3.2.2 Aircraft Documents Required (Arrival and Departure) TBL GEN 1.2 − 1 Required by General Passenger Cargo Declaration Manifest Manifest Customs 1 0 1 Agriculture Plant and 1 0 1 Quarantine Immigrations 1 0 1 Public Health 1 0 0 Total 4 0 3 4. Nonscheduled, Noncommon Carriage Flights 4.1 General 4.1.1 Nonscheduled, noncommon carriage flights are transportation services for remuneration or hire that are not offered to the general public.

4.1.2 Nonscheduled flights in transit across the territory of the U.S. or landing for reasons other than the purposes of loading and unloading passengers, cargo or mail (nonrevenue flights) which are registered in a State which is a member of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) may do so without the necessity of obtaining prior permission, provided passengers are not permitted to leave the airport during stopover or provided that each stopover does not exceed 24 hours. Stopovers which do exceed 24 hours are permitted only Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.2 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 in those cases where a transfer of passengers, property or mail to another aircraft is necessary for the safety of the aircraft, passengers, property, or crew. Stopovers for the pleasure or convenience of passengers are not included in the transit authority.

4.1.3 Nonscheduled flights landing in the territory of the U.S. for reasons of loading or unloading passengers, cargo or mail (revenue flights), must obtain prior permission from the DOT/OST, Office of International Aviation (X − 40), at least 15 days prior to the flight. All permission requests must include: 4.1.3.1 Name and address of applicant.

4.1.3.2 Aircraft make, model, and registration or identification marks.

4.1.3.3 Country in which the aircraft is registered.

4.1.3.4 Name and address of registered owner of aircraft.

4.1.3.5 Type of flight(s) (passenger, cargo, or agricultural or industrial operation).

4.1.3.6 Purpose of flight(s).

4.1.3.7 Date of the flight(s).

4.1.3.8 Routing of the flight(s).

4.1.3.9 Number of flights.

4.1.3.10 Name of charterer.

4.1.3.11 Charter price.

4.1.4 Applications should be made on DOT/OST, Office of International Aviation Form 4509; however, if time does not permit, applications by telegram will be accepted as long as they include the information described above. Telegraphic applications must include a prepaid voucher sufficient to allow a sixty word reply. The permit must be carried aboard the aircraft during flight over U.S. territory.

4.2 The following commercial air operations require preflight authorization from X − 40: 4.2.1 Agricultural and industrial operations which include, but are not limited to, such services as crop dusting, pest control, pipeline patrols, mapping, surveying, banner towing, or skywriting.

4.2.2 Occasional and infrequent planeload charter flights carrying persons or property to and/or from the U.S.

The number of these flights that may be performed is limited to six in any calendar year. Foreign civil aircraft are not permitted to transport persons or property or mail for compensation or hire between points wholly within the U.S.

4.2.3 Continuing cargo operations for one or more contractors. Applicants may be authorized to serve up to 10 different contractors in a 12 − month period; however, authorization may be granted only if it is clear that the service is not in common carriage and the carrier and contractor enter into a contract which provides for (a) continuing cargo operations for a period of at least 6 months; (b) an absolute or minimum number of flights or volume of cargo to be transported; and (c) a guarantee by the contractor to the carrier to pay for the minimum number of flights to be performed or volume of cargo to be transported whether or not he/she uses the capacity.

Continuing cargo operations wholly within the U.S. cannot be authorized.

4.2.4 Persons wishing to operate foreign civil aircraft from, to, or within the U.S. other than as described in this section may request permission to perform those services by filing an application with X − 40. The application should include the information described above in this section. Permission to perform these services may be granted if X − 40 finds that the service is consistent with applicable law and is in the interest of the public of the U.S.

4.2.5 Nonscheduled flights in transit across the territory of the U.S. or landing with or without purposes of loading and unloading passengers, cargo or mail (revenue or nonrevenue flights) which are registered in a State which is not a member of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) must obtain prior permission Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.2 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 from X − 40 at least 15 days prior to the flight. All permission requests must include the same information as requested in paragraph 4.1.3 . (See also paragraph 1.4 ).

4.3 Documentary Requirements for Clearance of Aircraft 4.3.1 Same requirements as for scheduled flights.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 1.3 Entry, Transit and Departure of Passengers and

Crew

1. General 1.1 Visit the following sites for visa, passport, and other U.S. Customs information: 1.1.1 https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international − visitor s 1.1.2 https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international − visitors/applying − admission − united − state s 1.1.3 https://www.cbp.gov/travel/us − citizens/know − before − you − go/your − trip 1.1.4 https://www.cbp.gov/travel/trusted − traveler − programs/global − entry/international − arrangements 1.2 APIS: Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) enhances border security by providing officers with pre − arrival and departure manifest data on all passengers and crew members. For further APIS information, see the following website: https://www.cbp.gov/travel/travel − industry − personnel/advance − passenger − information − system .

2. Public Health Requirements 2.1 Disembarking passengers are not required to present a vaccination certificate except when coming directly from an area infected with cholera, yellow fever, or smallpox. Smallpox vaccination is necessary only if, within the 14 days before arrival, the traveler has been in a country reporting smallpox.

2.2 The pilot in command of an aircraft destined for a U.S. airport must report immediately to the Quarantine Station at or nearest the airport at which the aircraft will arrive, the occurrence, on board, of any death or an ill person among passengers or crew. Ill person is defined as: 2.2.1 Temperature of 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius) or greater accompanied by rash, glandular swelling, or jaundice, or which has persisted for more than 48 hours; or 2.2.2 Diarrhea, defined as the occurrence in a 24 − hour period of three or more loose stools or of a greater than normal (for the person) amount of loose stools.

2.3 The pilot in command is responsible for detaining the aircraft and persons and things arriving thereon and keeping them free from unauthorized contact pending release when required by the Foreign Quarantine Regulations of the Public Health Service described in Title 42 CFR part 71.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 1.4 Entry, Transit, and Departure of Cargo

1. Requirements Concerning Cargo and Other Articles 1.1 Customs entry and clearance of cargo and unaccompanied baggage destined for points within U.S. territory must be completed at the first international airport of entry.

1.2 Transshipment of cargo and other articles must be dealt with at the first international airport of entry according to related regulations. All aircraft entering the U.S. or arriving any place in the U.S. from any other place in the U.S. carrying residue foreign cargo must not depart from the place of landing without receiving permission from the Customs officer.

2. Agricultural Quarantine Requirements 2.1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Plant Protection and Quarantine Division (PPQ), has strict requirements regarding the entry, handling and disposition of garbage and galley refuse on all flights arriving from any foreign country, except Canada (7 CFR Parts 94 and 330). A list of sanitary international airports approved by PPQ can be secured from any PPQ office at major airports (see Aerodrome Section).

2.2 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) specifies regulations for inspecting aircraft and persons moving from Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the U.S.

Virgin Islands. The person moving the aircraft must contact and offer an inspector the opportunity to inspect the aircraft (7 CFR Parts 318.13 and 318.58).

2.3 Meat, meat products, milk, live birds, poultry, or other domestic farm animals can only enter the U.S. under certain conditions from certain countries under the regulations of the PPQ.

2.4 No insects or other plant pests must knowingly be transported into the U.S. If the pilot of any aircraft has reason to believe any flying or crawling insects are aboard his/her aircraft, such information should be relayed to the nearest PPQ office or inspector when landing.

2.5 Permits are required to bring most fruits, vegetables, plants, seeds, etc., into the U.S. from foreign countries.

A guide to restricted or prohibited products can be secured from any PPQ office.

2.6 Dogs, cats, monkeys, psittacine birds (parrot family), turtles, shipments of disease organisms and vectors, and dead bodies are subject to entry restrictions prescribed in the Foreign Quarantine Regulations of the Public Health Service (42 CFR Part 71, Subject J).

3. Exportation of Aircraft, Cargo, and Other Articles 3.1 All U.S. and foreign registered aircraft departing the U.S. for a foreign destination on a temporary sojourn must have export authorization. The two types of export authorization are a license exception (AVS) and a license. Detailed information on both the license exception and the license can be obtained from: The U. S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Export Administration Exporter Counseling Division Washington, DC 20230 Telephone: (202) 482 − 4811 Facsimile: (202) 482 − 3617 3.2 A license exception (AVS) is an authorization to export the aircraft if certain criteria are satisfied. This exception does not require an application nor will there be an issuance of a license document prior to the flight.

REFERENCE − 15 CFR Section 740.15 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.4 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.3 License exception AVS authorizes an operating civil aircraft of foreign registry that has been in the U.S. on a temporary sojourn to depart from the U.S. under its own power for any destination, provided that: 3.3.1 No sale or transfer of operational control of the aircraft to nationals of Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, or Syria has occurred while in the U.S.

3.3.2 The aircraft is not departing for the purpose of sale or transfer of operational control to nationals of Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan, or Syria; and 3.3.3 It does not carry from the U.S. any item for which an export license is required and has not been granted by the U.S. Government.

3.4 License exception AVS authorizes a civil aircraft of U.S. registry operating under an Air Carrier Operating Certificate, Commercial Operating Certificate, or Air Taxi Operating Certificate issued by the Federal Aviation Administration or conducting flights under operating specifications approved by the Federal Aviation Administration pursuant to 14 CFR Part 129 of the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration, may depart from the U.S. under its own power for any destination provided that: 3.4.1 The aircraft does not depart for the purpose of sale, lease or other disposition of operational control of the aircraft or its equipment, parts, accessories, or components to a foreign country or any national thereof.

3.4.2 The aircraft’s U.S. registration will not be changed while abroad.

3.4.3 The aircraft is not to be used in any foreign military activity while abroad; and 3.4.4 The aircraft does not carry from the U.S. any item for which a license is required and has not been granted by the U.S. Government.

3.5 License exception AVS authorizes any other operating civil aircraft of U.S. registry to depart from the U.S.

under its own power for any destination, except to Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, and North Korea (flights to these destinations require a license), provided that: 3.5.1 The aircraft does not depart for the purpose of sale, lease or other disposition of operational control of the aircraft, or its equipment, parts, accessories, or components to a foreign country or national thereof.

3.5.2 The aircraft’s U.S. registration will not be changed while abroad.

3.5.3 The aircraft is not to be used in any foreign military activity while abroad.

3.5.4 The aircraft does not carry from the U.S. any item for which an export license is required and has not been granted by the U.S. Government; and 3.5.5 The aircraft will be operated while abroad by a U.S. licensed pilot, except that during domestic flights within a foreign country, the aircraft may be operated by a pilot currently licensed by that foreign country.

3.6 A license authorizes the departure of the aircraft within the special limitations set forth in the license document. It is issued only on the basis of a formal application requesting the issuance of a license prior to the flight.

3.7 Once it has been determined that an export license is required, an application for the license should be submitted to the Bureau of Export Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. An application consists of Form BXA − 748P (multipurpose application). This form and information on the application process can be obtained free of charge from either the U.S. Department of Commerce in Washington or any of its District Offices. (See paragraph 4. ) 3.8 Applications for validated licenses by non − U.S. citizens require that the applicant appoint an agent subject to U.S. jurisdiction to act in his/her behalf. If an emergency situation necessitates the expedition of the application process, contact the Counseling Division Staff of the Bureau of Export Administration (telephone 202 − 482 − 4811) or any Department of Commerce District Office for assistance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4. Department of Commerce District Office Locations TBL GEN 1.4 − 1 City Nevada Reno State New Jersey Newark Alabama Birmingham New Mexico Albuquerque Alaska Anchorage New York Buffalo Arizona Phoenix New York New York California Los Angeles North Carolina Greensboro California San Francisco Ohio Cincinnati Colorado Denver Ohio Cleveland Connecticut Hartford Oregon Portland Florida Miami Pennsylvania Philadelphia Georgia Atlanta Pennsylvania Pittsburgh Georgia Savannah Puerto Rico San Juan Hawaii Honolulu South Carolina Columbia Illinois Chicago Indiana Indianapolis Tennessee Memphis Iowa Des Moines Texas Dallas Texas Houston Louisiana New Orleans Utah Salt Lake City Maryland Baltimore Washington Seattle Massachusetts Boston West Virginia Charleston Michigan Detroit Wisconsin Milwaukee Minnesota Minneapolis Wyoming Cheyenne Missouri St. Louis Nebraska Omaha 5. Regulations Concerning Civil Movement of Arms, Ammunition, and Military Type Aircraft 5.1 Importation of military type aircraft and the carriage or importation of firearms or ammunition are regulated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Division of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

5.2 A permit must be obtained from the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division for the importation of certain military type aircraft regardless of demilitarization. Aircraft that are exempt from permits are specifically listed in the regulations on Importation of Arms, Ammunition and Implements of War (26 CFR Part 180).

5.3 A permit must be obtained from the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division for the importation of firearms and ammunition for commercial transactions.

5.4 Transportation or shipment of firearms or ammunition in interstate or foreign commerce to persons other than licensed importers, licensed manufacturers, licensed dealers or licensed collectors, without written notice to the carrier that such firearms or ammunition is being transported or shipped is unlawful.

5.5 Any passenger who owns or legally possesses a firearm or ammunition being transported aboard any common or contract carrier for movement with the passenger must deliver said firearm or ammunition into the custody of the pilot, captain, conductor, or operator of such common or contract carrier for the duration of the trip.

5.6 Applications for permits should be made on Form 6 (Firearms), preferably 30 days in advance of importation. Form IRS − 4522, International Import Certificate, may also be required by the exporting country and should accompany applications on Form 6 (Firearms) when necessary.

5.7 Exportation of military type aircraft are regulated by the U.S. Department of State, Office of Munitions Control.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.4 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.8 A license must be obtained from the Office of Munitions Control, Department of State, for the exportation from the U. S. of certain military type aircraft regardless of demilitarization. Aircraft that are exempt from licenses are specifically listed in the regulations on International Traffic in Arms (22 CFR Part 121). Applications for licenses are made as follows: 5.8.1 For permanent export, on Form DSP − 5. Apply at least 30, preferable 60, days in advance. A Form DSP − 63a may also be required from the importing country.

5.8.2 For temporary export, on Form DSP − 73. Apply at least 10 days in advance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 1.5 Aircraft Instruments, Equipment, and Flight

Documents

1. General 1.1 Commercial air transport aircraft operating in the U.S. airspace must adhere to the provisions of Annex 6, Operation of Aircraft, Part One, Chapter Six (Airplane Instruments, Equipment and Flight Documents) and Chapter Seven (Airplane Communications and Navigation Equipment).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 1.6 Summary of National Regulations and

International Agreements/Conventions

1. Summary of National Regulations 1.1 Air regulations for the U.S. and areas under its jurisdiction are published in Title 14 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 1 − 199, entitled the Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation. It is essential that persons engaged in air operations in the U.S. airspace be acquainted with the relevant regulations. Copies of the 14 CFR parts may be purchased from the: Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Publishing Office Attn: New Orders P.O. Box 979050 St. Louis, MO 63197 − 9000 Telephone: 202 − 512 − 1800 1.2 Title 14, Chapter I, of the CFR is available electronically at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 GEN 1.7 Differences From ICAO Standards,

Recommended Practices and Procedures

NOTE − See GEN 1.6 for the availability of Title 14 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1 − 199.

ANNEX 1 − PERSONNEL LICENSING Chapter 1 Definitions and General Rules Concerning Licences Remote co − pilot Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations are not currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

Remote flight crew Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations member are not currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

Remote pilot Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations are not currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

Remote pilot station Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations (RPS) are not currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

Remotely piloted The United States has not formally established a definition for the term “RPA.” Instead, the aircraft (RPA) FAA defines Unmanned Aircraft in 14 CFR 1.1. Unmanned aircraft means an aircraft operated without the possibility of direct human intervention from within or on the aircraft.

The registration requirements established in 14 CFR parts 47 and 48 therefore apply to Unmanned Aircraft.

Remotely piloted Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations aircraft system are not currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

(RPAS) (Applicable until 25 − Nov − 2026) 1.2.5.2 Balloon pilots exercising commercial pilot privileges are required to hold a second class medical certificate. Private balloon and glider pilots are not required to hold medical certificates but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency.

The FAA does not provide operational rules specific to RPAS operations allowed internationally. Medical requirements are pending development of associated operational rules.

Regarding certificates issued to Mechanics and Repairmen under 14 CFR part 65, Medical Assessment is NOT applicable.

The FAA does not issue a multi − crew license.

1.2.5.2.2 U.S. commercial pilots engaging in single-crew commercial air transport operations carrying passengers have a 12-month validity on their medical assessments regardless of age.

1.2.5.2.3 U.S. commercial pilots have a 1 − year validity on their medical assessments regardless of age.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.2.5.2.4 Balloon pilots, at the private pilot certificate level, as well as glider pilots are not required to hold medical certificates but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency. Certain holders of U.S. private pilot licenses (operating domestically) are not required to hold an FAA medical certificate but must meet U.S. (“Basic Med”) regulations effective May 1, 2017. “Basic Med” requires a medical education course every 24 months and medical examination every 48 months.

For operations of small Unmanned Aircraft systems under 14 CFR part 107, while medical certification is not a requirement, a participant for the operation must meet a performance − based requirement prohibiting participation in the operation if he or she knows or has reason to know that he or she has a physical or mental condition that would interfere with the safe operation of the small unmanned aircraft system.

More complex UAS operations enabled under traditional aviation rules must meet applicable medical requirements unless otherwise exempted.

1.2.5.2.5 U.S. private pilots required to hold an FAA 3rd class certificate who have passed their 40th birthday have a 24-month validity on their medical assessments. Free balloon and glider pilots are not required to hold medical certificates but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency.

1.2.5.2.6 The United States does not defer medical examinations. However, the United States has not established the medical assessment appropriate to the license for a “remote flight crew member.” Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational rules for international operations are not currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

1.2.9.6 During the student pilot application process, a practical test, flight review, instrument proficiency check (IPC), or pilot − in − command (PIC) proficiency check, the individual conducting testing, training, a review, or any required regulatory check should evaluate if the applicant for an FAA certificate or holder of an FAA certificate demonstrates the FAA Aviation English Language Standard (AELS).

Chapter 2 Licences and Ratings for Pilots 2.1.9.2 The FAA only allows pilots to log SIC flight experience in an aircraft that requires an SIC by type design or by an operational requirement.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.1.9.3 ICAO Annex 1, Personnel Licensing. Chapter 2A, Licences and ratings for pilots, 2.1.9 Crediting of flight time, 2.1.9.3 sets forth that, “The holder of a pilot licence, when acting as co − pilot at a pilot station of an aircraft certificated to be operated with a co − pilot, shall be entitled to be credited in full with this flight time towards the total flight time required for a higher grade of pilot licence.” However, ICAO standards do not recognize the crediting of flight time when a pilot is not required by the aircraft certification or the operating rules under which the flight is being conducted. Thus, § 61.51(f)(4) does not satisfy the standards specified by ICAO Annex 1, 2.1.9.3.

Section 61.51(f)(4) – Paragraph (f)(4) of § 61.51, Pilot Logbooks, clarifies that a person designated as second − in − command (SIC) by a government entity may log SIC time during public aircraft operations (PAO) if the aircraft used is a large aircraft as defined in § 1.1, a turbo − jet powered airplane, or if the aircraft holds or originally held a type certificate that requires a second pilot. This language was adopted by the Public Aircraft Logging of Flight Time, Training in Certain Aircraft Holding Special Airworthiness Certificates, and Flight Instructor Privileges final rule 89 FR 80310, dated October 2, 2024.

Paragraph (f)(4)(iii) provides that an applicant for an airline transport pilot certificate who logs second in command time under § 61.51(f)(4) of this section in an aircraft that is not type certificated for two pilots is issued an airline transport pilot certificate with the limitation, “Holder does not meet the pilot in command aeronautical experience requirements of ICAO,” as prescribed under Article 39 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation if the applicant does not meet the ICAO requirements contained in Annex 1, Personnel Licensing, to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.

Article 39 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Endorsement of certificates and licenses, states: a. Any aircraft or part thereof with respect to which there exists an international standard of airworthiness or performance, and which failed in any respect to satisfy that standard at the time of its certification, shall have endorsed on or attached to its airworthiness certificate a complete enumeration of the details in respect of which it so failed.

b. Any person holding a license who does not satisfy in full the conditions laid down in the international standard relating to the class of license or certificate which he holds shall have endorsed on or attached to his license a complete enumeration of the particulars in which he does not satisfy such conditions.

Therefore, an applicant is entitled to an airline transport pilot certificate without the ICAO limitation specified under this paragraph when the applicant presents satisfactory evidence of having met the ICAO requirements and otherwise meets the aeronautical experience requirements of § 61.159 or § 61.161, as applicable.

Notably, no limitation will be applied to the pilot certificate if SIC hours were obtained in a PAO using an aircraft holding a type certificate that requires more than one pilot, provided that those hours were completed in compliance with all other applicable FAA regulations.

2.1.10 The United States currently limits all 14 CFR part 121 operations to age 65 but has no age restriction on all other commercial air transport operations (such as 14 CFR part 135 operations).

2.3.1.4 U.S. private pilots required to hold an FAA Third − Class medical certificate must meet the requirements of an FAA Third − Class medical certificate which are equivalent to ICAO Class 2 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.4.2.6; 6.4.2.6.1; 6.4.2.6.2; 6.4.2.9.1; 6.4.3.2 (b); 6.4.3.2.1 (c); 6.4.3.2.3; 6.4.3.4; and 6.4.3.4.1.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.4.1.4 U.S. commercial pilots must meet the requirements of an FAA Second − Class medical certificate which are equivalent to ICAO Class 1 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.3.2.6.2; 6.3.2.9.1; 6.3.3.2 (b); 6.3.3.2.1 (c); 6.3.3.4; 6.3.3.4.1; 6.3.4.1.1; and 6.3.4.1.2.

2.5.1.1 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.1.2 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.1.3 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.2.1 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.2.2 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.2.3 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.3.1 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.3.2 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.3.3 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.4.1 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.5.4.2 The U.S. does not issue an MPL.

2.6.1.4 U.S airline transport pilots must meet the requirements of an FAA First − Class Medical Certificate which are equivalent to ICAO Class 1 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.3.2.6.2; 6.3.2.9.1; 6.3.3.2 (b); 6.3.3.2.1 (c); 6.3.3.4; 6.3.3.4.1; 6.3.4.1.1; and 6.3.4.1.2. However, pilots exercising ATP privileges as Second − in − Command in 14 CFR part 121 need only hold a second class medical assessment.

2.7.1.3.1 U.S. private pilots required to hold an FAA Third − Class medical certificate who hold an airplane instrument rating are not required to comply with ICAO Class 1 hearing standards.

U.S. hearing requirements for FAA First- and Third-Class medical certificates are equivalent to ICAO Class 1 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6.

2.8.2.2 The United States does not issue an MPL.

2.9.1.5 U.S. glider pilots are not required to hold a medical certificate but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency.

2.10.1.5 U.S. free balloon pilots who exercise commercial balloon privileges are required to hold a second class medical certificate but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency.

Chapter 3 Licences for Flight Crew Members other than Licences for Pilots 3.2.1.5 U.S. flight navigators must meet the requirements of an FAA Second − Class medical certificate which are equivalent to ICAO Class 1 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.3.2.6.2; 6.3.2.9.1; 6.3.3.4; 6.3.3.4.1; 6.3.4.1.1; and 6.3.4.1.2.

3.3.1.5 U.S. flight engineers must meet the requirements of an FAA Second − Class medical certificate which are equivalent to ICAO Class 1 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.3.2.6.2; 6.3.2.9.1; 6.3.3.2 (b); 6.3.3.2.1 (c); 6.3.3.4; 6.3.3.4.1; 6.3.4.1.1; and 6.3.4.1.2.

Chapter 4 Licences and Ratings for Personnel other than Flight Crew Members 4.2.1.3 The United States does not require 4 years of experience to qualify to take the written examination for a mechanic’s airframe and powerplant license. The FAA does not require two years of experience in addition to a training course, for mechanic applicants.

U.S. regulations require minimum experience of 30 months for an applicant/person to qualify to take the written test and practical test in order to obtain an airframe and powerplant certificate.

4.2.2.4 The United States does not allow an approved maintenance organization to appoint non-licensed personnel to exercise the privileges of 4.2.2 within the U.S.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.3.2 Non − FAA air traffic controllers must meet the requirements of an FAA Second − Class medical certificate which meets the intent of ICAO Class 3 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.5.2.6, 6.5.2.6.1, 6.5.3.2 (b), 6.5.3.2.1.(c), 6.5.3.2.3, 6.5.3.4, 6.5.3.4.1, 6.5.4.1.2.

4.4.1.1 The United States requires that an applicant be at least 18 years of age.

4.4.1.3.1 Minimum experience requirements for certification of operational positions vary within air traffic control facilities according to multiple factors, such as operational complexity.

4.4.1.4 Non − FAA air traffic controllers must meet the requirements of an FAA Second − Class medical certificate which meets the intent of ICAO Class 3 with exceptions specified in Chapter 6 under 6.5.2.6, 6.5.2.6.1, 6.5.3.2 (b), 6.5.3.2.1.(c), 6.5.3.2.3, 6.5.3.4, 6.5.3.4.1, 6.5.4.1.2.

4.6.1.1 The United States requires the applicant shall not be less than 23 years of age.

Chapter 5 Specifications for Personnel Licences 5.2.1 FAA Credentials and CTO Certificates issued to air traffic controllers do not contain the holder’s date of birth due to restrictions related to the protection of personally identifiable information.

Chapter 6 Medical Provisions for Licencing: Please note : References containing 6.3 refer to airline transport pilots and commercial pilots; 6.4 refer to private pilots, free balloon pilots, glider pilots, student pilots, flight engineers, and flight navigators; and 6.5 refer to air traffic controllers.

6.1.1 The United States has not established a specific medical assessment standard for the remote pilot license.

6.2.3.2 The United States uses a variety of methods for testing visual acuity that meet the intent of ICAO Recommended Practice. Illumination levels are set by manufactured standards.

6.3.1.2 An FAA first-class medical certificate is required when exercising the privileges of an airline transport pilot and an FAA second-class medical certificate is required when exercising the privileges of a commercial pilot, a flight engineer, or a flight navigator. The United States has no provisions for MPL.

6.3.2.6 Electrocardiography is not required for airline transport pilots at first issue unless the individual is age 35 or older and not for commercial pilots, flight engineers, or flight navigators unless clinically indicated.

6.3.2.6.1 Electrocardiography is required in re-examination of airline transport pilot applicants over the age of 40 every 12 months. Electrocardiography is not specifically required for commercial pilots, flight engineers, or flight navigators unless clinically indicated.

6.3.2.6.2 Electrocardiography is required in re-examination of airline transport pilot applicants over the age of 40 every 12 months. Electrocardiography is not specifically required for commercial pilots, flight engineers, or flight navigators unless clinically indicated.

6.3.3.2 (b) A specific requirement that a [spare] set of suitable correcting spectacles be kept readily available when exercising the privileges of the license is not established.

6.3.3.2.1 (c) A specific requirement that a set of suitable correcting spectacles be kept readily available when exercising the privileges of the license [with contact lenses] is not established.

6.3.3.2.3 The demonstration of compliance with visual acuity by providing a full ophthalmic report is not required.

6.3.3.4 The demonstration of compliance with the visual requirements to be made with only one pair of corrective lenses is not specifically required.

6.3.3.4.1 A requirement that a second pair of near-correction spectacles be kept available when exercising the privileges of the license is not established.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.3.4.1.1 Applicants are not required to demonstrate normal hearing against a background noise that reproduces or simulates the masking properties of flight deck noise upon speech and beacon signals.

6.3.4.1.2 Applicants are not required to take a practical hearing test.

6.4.1.1 U.S. free balloon pilots exercising commercial pilot balloon privileges must hold a second class medical certificate. Private free balloon pilots and glider pilots are not required to hold a medical certificate but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency.

6.4.1.2 U.S. free balloon pilots exercising commercial pilot balloon privileges must hold a second class medical certificate. Private free balloon pilots and glider pilots are not required to hold a medical certificate but are prohibited from operating during periods of medical deficiency.

Certain holders of U.S. private pilot licenses (operating domestically) are not required to hold an FAA medical certificate but must meet U.S. (“Basic Med”) regulations effective May 1, 2017. “Basic Med” requires a medical education course every 24 months and medical examination every 48 months.

6.4.2.6 Electrocardiography for applicants for third-class airman (private pilot) medical certification is not required at first issue unless clinically indicated.

6.4.2.6.1 Electrocardiography for applicants for FAA third − class airman (private pilot) medical certification is not required unless clinically indicated.

6.4.3.4 The demonstration of compliance with the visual requirements to be made with only one pair of corrective lenses is not specifically required.

6.4.3.4.1 A requirement that a second pair of near-correction spectacles be kept available when exercising the privileges of the license is not established.

6.5.1.1 The United States has not established a specific medical assessment standard for the remote pilot license, therefore a U.S. remote pilot would not undergo specific medical examination.

6.5.1.2 The United States has not established a specific medical assessment standard for the remote pilot license.

6.5.2.6 Electrocardiography is required for FAA air traffic controllers at first issue but not for non-FAA ATCs unless clinically indicated.

6.5.2.6.1 Electrocardiography is required for FAA ATCs but not for non-FAA ATCs unless clinically indicated.

6.5.3.2 (b) A specific requirement that a [spare] set of suitable correcting spectacles be kept readily available when exercising the privileges of the license is not established.

6.5.3.2.1 (c) A specific requirement that a set of suitable correcting spectacles be kept readily available when exercising the privileges of the license [with contact lenses] is not established.

6.5.3.2.3 The demonstration of compliance with visual acuity by providing a full ophthalmic report is not required.

6.5.3.4 The demonstration of compliance with the visual requirements to be made with only pair of corrective lenses is not specifically required.

6.5.3.4.1 A requirement that a second pair of near-correction spectacles be kept available when exercising the privileges of the license is not established.

6.5.4.1.1 Applicants are not required to demonstrate normal hearing against a background noise that reproduces or simulates an air traffic control working environment.

6.5.4.1.2 The FAA does not provide the option of a practical hearing test, but instead requires an FAA air traffic control specialist (ATCS) who does not initially meet hearing standards to undergo audiology evaluation for unaided pure tone audiogram at ATCS frequencies and other specified testing, for each ear separately.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 2 − RULES OF THE AIR Chapter 1 Definitions Advisory Advisory service is provided in terminal radar areas and the outer areas associated with Class C Airspace and Class E airspace areas.

Aerodrome There are no more Control Zones (Airport Traffic Zones) or Airport Traffic Areas (ATA). In the Traffic Zone 7110.65, PCG, Controlled Airspace covers the defined dimensions of airspace. Class D was formerly the ATA (normally a 5NM radius around the airport). The old Control Zones were extensions of the ATA to encompass (ILS) Approach Paths.

Airborne The U.S. uses “traffic alert collision avoidance system (TCAS).” TCAS is an airborne collision Collision avoidance system based on radar beacon signals and operates independent of ground based Avoidance equipment. TCAS I generates traffic advisories only. TCAS II generates traffic advisories and System resolution (collision avoidance) advisories in the vertical plane.

(ACAS) Air − taxiing The U.S. uses “air taxi” below 100 feet above ground level (AGL) and “hover taxi” for this maneuver actual height may vary, and some helicopters may require hover taxi above 25 feet AGL to reduce ground effect turbulence or provide clearance for cargo slingloads.

Air traffic References to this are embedded in AIP, ENR 7.1 − 3.1.1, ENR 7.1 − 3.1.5, and ENR 7.1 − 5.2 Note services unit without an accompanying definition.

Alternate 1) The U.S. definition does not include the information that defines this concept. Additionally, the Aerodrome U.S. uses the term “airport” in place of “aerodrome.” 2) The definition annotated as [ICAO] is not congruent with the Annex 2 Amdt 47 text.

Altitude The U.S. defines “altitude” using the imperial measurement of feet.

Approach The U.S. not only includes arriving and departing controlled flights but also includes en route Control Service controlled flights. Additionally, as opposed to Annex 2 Amdt 47, the U.S. specifies the control facility that provides the service.

Approach The U.S. defines “Approach Control Facility.” Control Unit Appropriate The U.S. does not define “Appropriate ATS Authority.” The P/CG does contain a definition ATS Authority annotated as [ICAO] that adds “In the United States, the “appropriate ATS authority” is the Program Director for Air Traffic Planning and Procedures, ATP − 1.” Apron The U.S. adds reference to seaplane operations to the definition.

Area control The U.S. equivalent facility for an Area Control Centre (ACC) is an Air Route Traffic Control centre Center (ARTCC).

Area control The U.S. does not use the term “area control service” to indicate controlled flight in controlled service areas.

Automatic 1) The U.S. separately defines ADS − B, ADS − B Out, and ADS − B In.

Dependent 2) The U.S. defines ADS − B as surveillance whereas Annex 2 Amdt 47 does not.

Surveillance − 3) While the Annex 2 Amdt 47 definition specifies aircraft, aerodrome vehicles, and other objects, Broadcast the U.S. specifies aircraft or vehicle, and makes no mention of other objects.

(ADS − B) Ceiling The U.S. specifies what the “lowest layer” consists of, which can include obscurations other than clouds.

The U.S. imposes no altitude limit in its definition.

Changeover The U.S. defines the makeup of the point as “ … a point along the route or airway segment between point two adjacent navigation facilities or waypoints where changeover in navigation guidance should occur.” Command and Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational rules allowing for international Control (C2) operations are not currently addressed/implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

Link Control Area The term is used throughout U.S. documentation without an actual FAA definition. The Annex 2 definition is included and annotated [ICAO].

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Controlled The U.S. does not define “Controlled Aerodrome.” The terms Control Tower, Approach Control, aerodrome etc. are used in lieu.

Controlled The U.S. does not define “Controlled Flight.” Flight Controller − pilot The U.S. specifies digital communications, textual messages, and radio relay stations.

data link communications (CPDLC) Control Zone The U.S. renamed “control zone” as “surface based controlled airspace.” Danger Area The term “danger area” is not used within the U.S. or any of its possessions or territories.

Data Link While the U.S. does not define “Data Link Communications,” it does define “CPDLC” and Communication “ADS − C.” s Detect and The U.S. does not define “Detect and Avoid.” Avoid Estimated Time The U.S. limits the applicability to airport landing operations.

of Arrival Expected The U.S. does not define “Expected Approach Time.” Approach Time Flight The U.S. does not operate flight information centers (FICs). In the U.S., the services provided by information FICs are performed by air traffic control (ATC) facilities, flight service stations (FSSs), and rescue centre coordination centers (RCCs).

Flight Level The U.S. uses the measurement of a level of constant atmospheric pressure related to a reference datum of 29.92 inches of mercury instead of 1 013.2 hectopascals (hPa).

Heading The U.S. does not define “Heading.” Height The U.S defines Height as the height above ground level (or AGL) expressed in meters or feet.

Instrument The U.S. does not define “Instrument approach operations.” Approach Operations Instrument The U.S. does not include a reference to “holding or en route obstacle clearance criteria” application Approach in its definition.

Procedures Level The U.S. uses “altitude” or “flight level” rather than “level” and “cruising altitude” rather than “cruising level.’’ The term “level” is not used to mean “height,” “altitude,” or “flight level.” Manoeuvring In the U.S., the term “movement area” means “the runways, taxiways, and other areas of an Area airport/heliport which are utilized for taxiing, hover taxiing, air − taxiing, take − off and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and parking areas. At those airport/heliports with a tower, specific approval for entry onto the movement area must be obtained from ATC.” The U.S. does not use an all − inclusive term to denote the movement area plus loading ramps and parking areas of an airport, nor does the U.S. use the term “maneuvering area’’ in any related context.

Movement area In the U.S., the term “movement area” means “the runways, taxiways, and other areas of an airport/heliport which are utilized for taxiing, hover taxiing, air − taxiing, take − off and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and parking areas. At those airport/heliports with a tower, specific approval for entry onto the movement area must be obtained from ATC.” The U.S. does not use an all − inclusive term to denote the movement area plus loading ramps and parking areas of an airport, nor does the U.S. use the term “maneuvering area’’ in any related context.

Radiotelephony The U.S. Does not define “Radiotelephony.” Remote pilot Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations are not station currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Remotely The United States has not formally established a definition for the term “RPA.” Instead, the FAA Piloted Aircraft defines Unmanned Aircraft in 14 CFR § 1.1 as an aircraft operated without the possibility of direct (RPA) human intervention from within or on the aircraft. The registration requirements established in 14 CFR parts 47 and 48 therefore apply to Unmanned Aircraft.

Remotely Remote Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) − specific operational for international operations are not Piloted Aircraft currently implemented in 14 CFR regulations.

System (RPAS) RPA observer Rather than “RPA Observer” the FAA uses the term “Visual Observer.” Repetitive flight The U.S. uses the term “stored flight plan” for domestic operations.

plan (RPL) Signal Area The U.S. does not define “Signal Area.” Special VFR The U.S. uses the definition “Special VFR Operations” in place of “Special VFR Flight.” Flight Taxiway The U.S. does not define “Taxiway.” It does define “Rapid Exit Taxiway” under “High Speed Taxiway” but not the other two definitions embedded in Annex 2 Am47.

Traffic The U.S. uses the term Traffic Advisory.

Information Transition In U.S. domestic airspace, “transition altitude,” “layer” and “level” are not used; however, in the altitude U.S., flight levels begin at FL 180 where the reference datum of 29.92 inches of mercury is used as the constant atmospheric pressure. Below FL 180, altitudes are based on barometric pressure readings. QNH and QFE altimeter settings are not provided in domestic U.S. airspace.

Unmanned Free The U.S. does not define “Unmanned Free Balloon.” The U.S. definition of Unmanned Aircraft Balloon (UA) states Unmanned Free Balloon is not a UA.

Visual The United States defines “Visual line − of − sight aircraft operation” as follows: “With vision that is line − of − sight unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, the remote pilot in command, the visual (VLOS) observer (if one is used), and the person manipulating the flight control of the small unmanned operation aircraft system must be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight in order to: (1) Know the unmanned aircraft’s location; (2) Determine the unmanned aircraft’s attitude, altitude, and direction of flight; (3) Observe the airspace for other air traffic or hazards; and (4) Determine that the unmanned aircraft does not endanger the life or property of another.

(b) Throughout the entire flight of the small unmanned aircraft, the ability described in paragraph (a) of this section must be exercised by either: (1) The remote pilot in command and the person manipulating the flight controls of the small unmanned aircraft system; or (2) A visual observer.” Chapter 3 General Rules 3.1.8 In addition, aircraft shall not be flown in formation flight when passengers are carried for hire.

3.1.9 The United States has not specified safety requirements applicable to international RPAS operations.

3.1.10 14 CFR part 101 prescribes rules governing the operation in the United States, of any unmanned free balloon that— (i) Carries a payload package that weighs more than four pounds and has a weight/size ratio of more than three ounces per square inch on any surface of the package, determined by dividing the total weight in ounces of the payload package by the area in square inches of its smallest surface; (ii) Carries a payload package that weighs more than six pounds; (iii) Carries a payload, of two or more packages, that weighs more than 12 pounds; or (iv) Uses a rope or other device for suspension of the payload that requires an impact force of more than 50 pounds to separate the suspended payload from the balloon.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.2.2 When weather conditions permit, regardless of whether an operation is conducted under instrument flight rules or visual flight rules, vigilance shall be maintained by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft. When a rule of this section gives another aircraft the right − of − way, the pilot shall give way to that aircraft and may not pass over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear.

3.2.3.2 d) The U.S. national regulations do not require aircraft on the movement area of an airport, whose engines are running, to display lights which indicate that fact from sunset to sunrise.

3.2.5 Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within a Class B, C, or D surface area except for the purpose of landing at, or taking off from, an airport within that area.

In addition, in the case of a helicopter approaching to land, avoid the flow of fixed − wing aircraft.

In addition, no person may, within a Class B, C, or D surface area operate an aircraft to, from, or on an airport having a control tower operated by the U.S. unless two − way radio communications are maintained between that aircraft and the control tower.

3.3.1.2 In the U.S., ATC flight plans are not required for VFR flight in Class C, D, or E airspace.

3.3.1.2 e) Requirements pertaining to filing flight plans for flights operating across U.S. borders and for identification purposes are described in 14 CFR Part 9l (Section 91.84) and Part 99.

3.6.2.4 When meteorological conditions fall below the minimum specified for en route VFR flights, the pilot of the aircraft shall not continue his/her flight in such conditions, except in emergency, beyond the extent necessary to return to his/her departure point or to the nearest suitable landing point.

3.6.5.2 Two − way Radio Communications Failure (Communicati a. It is virtually impossible to provide regulations and procedures applicable to all possible on Failure) situations associated with two − way radio communications failure. During two − way radio communications failure, when confronted by a situation not covered in the regulation, pilots are expected to exercise good judgment in whatever action they elect to take. Should the situation so dictate they should not be reluctant to use the emergency action contained in 14 CFR Section 91.3(b) b. Whether two − way communications failure constitutes an emergency depends on the circumstances, and in any event, it is a determination made by the pilot. 14 CFR Section 91.3(b) authorizes a pilot to deviate from any rule in Subparts A and B to the extent required to meet an emergency.

c. In the event of two − way radio communications failure, ATC service will be provided on the basis that the pilot is operating in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.185. A pilot experiencing two − way communications failure should (unless emergency authority is exercised) comply with 14 CFR Section 91.185 quoted below 1. General. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each pilot who has two − way radio communications failure when operating under IFR shall comply with the rules of this section.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.6.5.2.2 In the event of two − way communications failure in the U.S., ATC service is predicated on pilot compliance with the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 (Section 91.185). If the failure occurs in IMC, or if VFR cannot be complied with, each pilot is to continue the flight according to the following: Route a) By the route assigned in the last ATC clearance received; b) If being radar vectored, by the direct route from the point of failure to the fix, route, or airway specified in the vector clearance; c) In the absence of an assigned route, by the route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance; or d) In the absence of an assigned route or a route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance, by the route filed in the flight plan.

Altitude − At the HIGHEST of the following altitudes or flight levels FOR THE ROUTE SEGMENT BEING FLOWN: a) The altitude or flight level assigned in the last ATC clearance received; b) The minimum altitude/flight level as prescribed for IFR operations; or c) The altitude or flight level ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance.

IFR conditions − If the failure occurs in IFR conditions, or if subparagraph 2 above cannot be complied with, each pilot shall continue the flight according to the following: (a) Route.

(1) By the route assigned in the last ATC clearance received; (2) If being radar vectored, by the direct route from the point of radio failure to the fix, route, or airway specified in the vector clearance; (3) In the absence of an assigned route, by the route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance; or (4) In the absence of an assigned route of a route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance by the route filed in the flight plan.

(b) Altitude. At the HIGHEST of the following altitudes or flight levels FOR THE ROUTE SEGMENT BEING FLOWN: (1) The altitude or flight level assigned in the last ATC clearance received; (2) The minimum altitude (converted, if appropriate) to minimum flight level as prescribed in 14 CFR Section 91.121(c) for IFR operations; or (3) The altitude or flight level ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.6.5.2.2 a) Annex 2 references maintaining last assigned speed, level, or minimum flight altitude for a specified amount of time depending on radar coverage. 91.185 does not require last assigned speeds and altitudes be maintained for specified amounts of time.

3.9 There is no Class F airspace in the U.S. Basic VFR weather minimums are listed in the table below.

Except as otherwise authorized by the appropriate air traffic control unit for special VFR flights within Class B, C, D, or E surface areas, no person may operate an aircraft under VFR when the flight visibility is less, or at a distance from clouds that is less than that prescribed for the corresponding altitude and class of airspace in the table below.

Class G Airspace: Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph a) of this section, the following operations may be conducted in Class G airspace below 1,200 feet above the surface: 1) Helicopter. A helicopter may be operated clear of clouds if operated at a speed that allows the pilot adequate opportunity to see any air traffic or obstruction in time to avoid collision.

2) Airplane. When the visibility is less than 3 statute miles but not less than 1 statute mile during night hours, an airplane may be operated clear of clouds if operated in an airport traffic pattern within one − half mile of the runway.

Except as provided in 4.2, no person may operate an aircraft under VFR within the lateral boundaries of the surface areas of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport when the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet.

Except as provided in 4.2, no person may take − off or land an aircraft, or enter the traffic pattern area of an airport under VFR, within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designed for an airport: 1) unless ground visibility at that airport is at least 3 statute miles; or 2) if ground visibility is not reported at that airport, unless flight visibility during landing or takeoff, or while operating in the traffic pattern is at least 3 statute miles Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Basic VFR Weather Minimums Airspace Flight Visibility Distance from Clouds Class A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not Applicable Not Applicable Class B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles Clear of Clouds Class C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal Class D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal Class E Less than 10,000 feet MSL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal At or above 10,000 feet MSL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 statute miles 1,000 feet below 1,000 feet above 1 statute mile horizontal Class G 1,200 feet or less above the surface (regardless of MSL altitude).

For aircraft other than helicopters: 1 statute mile Clear of clouds Day, except as provided in § 91.155(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 statute miles 500 feet below Night, except as provided in § 91.155(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal For helicopters: Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ½ statute mile Clear of clouds Night, except as provided in § 91.155(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 statute mile Clear of clouds More than 1,200 feet above the surface but less than 10,000 feet MSL.

Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 statute mile 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal Night . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal More than 1,200 feet above the surface and at or above 5 statute miles 1,000 feet below 10,000 feet MSL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 feet above 1 statute mile horizontal Chapter 4 Visual Flight Rules 4.2 In the U.S., no person may operate an aircraft beneath the ceiling under VFR within the lateral boundaries of controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport when the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet. No person may take − off or land an aircraft (other than a helicopter) under special VFR (SVFR) unless ground visibility is at least 1 statute mile or if ground visibility is not reported, unless flight visibility is at least 1 statute mile.

The U.S. restricts the ceiling to 1,000 ft. and ground visibility of 3 miles and greater.

4.3 The U.S. does not prohibit VFR flight between sunset and sunrise.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.4 In the U.S., VFR flight is not permitted within Class A airspace designated in 14 CFR Part 71 unless otherwise authorized by ATC.

In the U.S., an ATC clearance is needed for VFR flight only in Class B airspace area.

The U.S. limits VFR flights up to FL 180.

4.5 The U.S. limits VFR flights up to FL 180.

4.7 In addition, grid tracks are not used to determine cruising altitudes in polar areas. True tracks are used to determine cruising levels above FL 230 in the area north of Alaska bounded by the true North Pole to 72 00 00 N, 141 00 00 W; to 72 00 00 N, 158 00 00 W; to 68 00 00 N, 168 58 23 W; to point of beginning. The U.S. has named this area the Anchorage Arctic CTA/FIR for national reference purposes.

4.8 In U.S. Class C and D airspace/areas, an ATC clearance is not required for VFR flights.

Chapter 5 Instrument Flight Rules 5.1.2 In the U.S., minimum altitudes for IFR flights are 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown in mountainous terrain and 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown in non − mountainous terrain.

5.2.2 See difference under paragraph 4.7.

5.3.1 See difference under paragraph 4.7.

Further 1) The regulations covering the selection and use of alternate airports in respect to ceiling and differences visibility minima, require that: which exist by Unless otherwise authorized by the FAA Administrator, no person may include an alternate airport virtue of the in an IFR flight plan unless current weather forecasts indicate that, at the estimated time of arrival at fact that the the alternate airport, the ceiling and visibility at that airport will be at or above the alternate airport Annex contains weather minima.

no comparable 2) Operation under IFR in Class A, B, C, D, or E airspace malfunction reports: standards for the U.S.

a) The pilot − in − command of each aircraft operated in Class A, B, C, D or E airspace under national IFR shall report as soon as practical to ATC any malfunctions of navigational, approach, or regulations.

communication equipment occurring in flight.

b) In each report the pilot − in − command shall include: 1) aircraft identification.

2) equipment affected.

3) degree to which the capability of the pilot to operate under IFR in the ATC system is impaired; and 4) nature and extent of assistance desired from ATC.

3) When an aircraft has been cleared to maintain ‘‘VFR conditions on top,’’ the pilot is responsible to fly at an appropriate VFR altitude, comply with VFR visibility and distance from cloud criteria, and to be vigilant so as to see and avoid other aircraft.

4) Aircraft speed: a) Unless otherwise authorized by the FAA Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 kt (288 m.p.h.).

b) Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within Class B, C, or D surface area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 kt (230 m.p.h.). This paragraph 4b) does not apply to operations within Class B airspace. Such operations shall comply with paragraph 4a) of this section.

c) No person may operate an aircraft in the airspace underlying Class B airspace, or in a VFR corridor designated through Class B airspace, at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 kt (230 m.p.h.).

d) If the minimum safe airspeed for any operation is greater than the maximum speed prescribed in this section, the aircraft may be operated at that minimum speed.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5) Operating rules and pilot and equipment requirements for flight in Class B airspace.

a) Operating rules. No person may operate an aircraft within Class B airspace except in compliance with the following rules: 1) No person may operate an aircraft within Class B airspace unless that person has received an appropriate authorization from ATC prior to operation of that aircraft in that area.

2) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each person operating a large turbine engine − powered airplane to or from a primary airport shall operate at or above the designated floors while within the lateral limits of the Class B airspace.

3) Any person conducting pilot training operations at an airport within Class B airspace shall comply with any procedures established by ATC for such operations in Class B airspace.

b) Pilot requirements. No person may take off or land a civil aircraft at an airport within Class B airspace or operate a civil aircraft within Class B airspace unless: 1) The pilot − in − command holds at least a private pilot certificate; or 2) The aircraft is operated by a student pilot who has met the requirements (14 CFR Part 61 (Section 61.95)).

c) Communications and navigation requirements. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft within Class B airspace unless that aircraft is equipped with: 1) For IFR operations, an operable VOR or TACAN receiver, and 2) For all operations, an operable two − way radio capable of communications with ATC on appropriate frequencies for that Class B airspace.

d) Transponder requirements. No person may operate an aircraft in Class B airspace unless the aircraft is equipped with the applicable operating transponder and automatic altitude reporting equipment.

6) Operating rules and pilot and equipment requirements for operating in Class C airspace.

a) General. For the purpose of this section, the primary airport is the airport designated in 14 CFR Part 71, for which the Class C airspace is designated. A satellite airport is any other airport within the Class C airspace.

b) Deviations. An operator may deviate from any provisions of this section under the provisions of an ATC authorization issued by the ATC facility giving jurisdiction of the Class C airspace. ATC may authorize a deviation on a continuing basis or for an individual flight, as appropriate.

c) Arrivals and overflights. No person may operate an aircraft in Class C airspace unless two − way radio communication is established with the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class C airspace prior to entering that area and is thereafter maintained with the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class C airspace while within that area.

d) Departures. No person may operate an aircraft within Class C airspace except as follows: 1) From the primary airport or satellite airport with an operating control tower, unless two − way radio communication is established and maintained with the control tower, and thereafter as instructed by ATC while operating in the Class C airspace.

2) From a satellite airport without an operating control tower, unless two − way radio communication is established as soon as practical after departing and thereafter maintained with the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class C airspace.

e) Traffic patterns. No person may take off or land an aircraft at a satellite airport within Class C airspace except in compliance with FAA arrival and departure traffic patterns.

f) Equipment requirements. Unless otherwise authorized by the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class C airspace, no person may operate an aircraft within Class C airspace unless that aircraft is equipped with the applicable equipment specified in 14 CFR Part 91 (Section 91.215).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7) Except for persons operating gliders below the floor of Class A airspace, no person may operate an aircraft in Class B, C, D, or E airspace of the 48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia above 10,000 feet MSL, excluding that airspace at and below 2,500 feet AGL, unless that aircraft is equipped with an operable radar beacon transponder having at least a Mode 3/A 4096 − code capability, replying to Mode 3/A interrogation with the code specified by ATC, and automatic altitude reporting equipment having a Mode C capability that automatically replies to Mode C interrogations by transmitting pressure altitude information in 100 − foot increments.

8) Compliance with ATC clearances and instructions: a) When an ATC clearance has been obtained, no pilot − in − command may deviate from that clearance, except in an emergency, unless an amended clearance is obtained. A pilot − in − command may cancel an IFR flight plan if that pilot is operating in VFR weather conditions outside of Class A airspace. If a pilot is uncertain of the meaning of an ATC clearance, the pilot shall immediately request clarification from ATC.

b) Except in an emergency, no person may operate an aircraft contrary to an ATC instruction in an area in which ATC is exercised.

c) Each pilot − in − command who, in an emergency, deviates from an ATC clearance or instruction shall notify ATC of that deviation as soon as possible.

d) Each pilot − in − command who is given priority by ATC in an emergency shall submit a detailed report of that emergency within 48 hours to the manager of that ATC facility, if requested by ATC.

e) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person operating an aircraft may operate that aircraft according to any clearance or instruction that has been issued to the pilot of another aircraft for radar ATC purposes.

Appendix 1 SIGNALS 4.1.1 The flashing white signal to aircraft in flight, meaning ‘‘land at this aerodrome and proceed to apron’’ is not used in the United States.

In addition, the alternating red and green signal to aircraft on the ground or in flight means exercise extreme caution.

Appendix 5 UNMANNED FREE BALLOONS (Note.— See Chapter 3, 3.1.10 of the Annex) 1. 14 CFR part 101 prescribes rules governing the operation in the United States, of any unmanned free balloon that— (i) Carries a payload package that weighs more than four pounds and has a weight/size ratio of more than three ounces per square inch on any surface of the package, determined by dividing the total weight in ounces of the payload package by the area in square inches of its smallest surface; (ii) Carries a payload package that weighs more than six pounds; (iii) Carries a payload, of two or more packages, that weighs more than 12 pounds; or (iv) Uses a rope or other device for suspension of the payload that requires an impact force of more than 50 pounds to separate the suspended payload from the balloon.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 th PANS ATM Doc 4444 16 Edition CHAPTER 1 DEFINITIONS Advisory Air - The U.S. does not define, it refers to Advisory Service.

space Advisory Route The U.S. does not define, it refers to Advisory Service.

Aerodrome The U.S. does not define.

Traffic Air Traffic Ad - In the U.S., “Advisory Service” is intended for IFR and VFR aircraft.

visory Service Airborne Colli - The U.S. uses traffic alert and collision avoidance system (TCAS).

sion Avoidance System Aircraft U.S. uses “Aircraft” to mean the airframe, crew members, or both.

AIRMET In the U.S., AIRMET stands for Airmen’s Meteorological Information which is a concise description of an occurrence or expected occurrence of specified en route weather phenomena that may affect the safety of aircraft operations, but at intensities lower than those that require the issuance of a SIGMET. An AIRMET may be issued when moderate turbulence, low-level wind shear, strong surface winds greater than 30 knots, moderate icing, freezing level, mountain obscuration, or IFR conditions are occurring or are expected to occur.

Air-report The U.S. does not normally use the term “air-report.” Pilot weather reports (PIREPs), position, and operational reports are used. PIREPs include reports of strong frontal activity, squall lines, thun - derstorms, light to severe icing, wind shear and turbulence (including clear air turbulence) of mod - erate or greater intensity, volcanic eruptions and volcanic ash clouds, and other conditions pertin - ent to flight safety. They may include information on ceilings, visibility, thunderstorms, icing of light degree or greater, wind shear and its effect on airspeed, or volcanic ash clouds, but do not usually include air temperature.

Air-taxiing The U.S. uses “air taxi” below 100 feet above ground level (AGL) and “hover taxi” for this ma - neuver actual height may vary, and some helicopters may require hover taxi above 25 feet AGL to reduce ground effect turbulence or provide clearance for cargo slingloads.

Air Traffic U.S. defines as Air Traffic Control System Command Center.

Flow Manage - ment Altitude U.S. uses “Altitude” to mean indicated altitude mean sea level (MSL), flight level (FL), or both.

Approval Re - U. S. uses “APREQ.” quest Area control The U.S. does not use the term “area control service” to indicate controlled flight in controlled service areas.

ATS route In U.S. domestic airspace, the term “ATS route” is not used. Routes in the U.S. include VOR air - ways, jet routes, substitute routes, off-airway routes, RNAV routes and colored airways. The U.S.

also uses instrument departure procedures (DPs), and standard terminal arrivals (STARs).

Control zone The U.S. uses “surface area” in place of the ICAO term “control zone.” Surface area is defined as the airspace contained by the lateral boundary of the Class B, C, D or E airspace designated for an airport that begins at the surface and extends upward.

Controlled air - The U.S. uses the following definition of controlled airspace found in 14 CFR Section 1.1: “Con - space trolled airspace means an airspace of defined dimensions within which air traffic control service is provided to IFR flights and to VFR flights in accordance with the airspace classification.” Course, bear - U.S. uses “Course, bearing, azimuth, heading, and wind direction” information and it shall always ing, azimuth, be magnetic unless specifically stated otherwise.

heading, and wind direction Cruising level The U.S. uses the term “cruising altitude.” Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Decision alti - Approach with vertical guidance (VNAV).

tude Emergency The U.S. does not utilize classification system of emergency phases Phase Expedite U.S. uses “EXPEDITE” by ATC when prompt compliance is required to avoid the development of an imminent situation. Expedite climb/descent normally indicates to a pilot that the approximate best rate of climb/descent should be used without requiring an exceptional change in aircraft hand - ling characteristics.

Flight informa - In the U.S., the services provided by flight information centers (FICs) are conducted by air traffic tion centre control (ATC) facilities, flight service stations (FSSs), and rescue coordination centers (RCCs).

Ground Effect The U.S. does not define, but is referred to in “Hover Taxi.” Holding In the U.S., a hold procedure is also used during ground operations to keep aircraft within a spe - procedure cified area or at a specified point while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control.

Hot Spot This is a known term , but not specifically defined in 7110.65.

Level The U.S. uses “altitude” or “flight level” rather than “level.” Miles U.S. uses “Miles” to mean nautical miles unless otherwise specified, and means statute miles in conjunction with visibility.

Minute U.S. uses “minute plus 30 seconds”, except when time checks are given to the nearest quarter minute.

Movement area In the U.S., the “movement area” is equivalent to the ICAO “maneuvering area” which does not include parking areas.

Near Parallel In the U.S., these are not defined as non-intersecting runways aligned 15 degrees or less apart Runways Position Sym - The U.S. definition differs in that it refers to mode of tracking, rather than position of an aircraft or bol vehicle Repetitive The U.S. uses the term “stored flight plan” for domestic operations.

flight plan (RPL) Runway Incur - This is a well − known term in NAS, but is not defined in the 7110.65 sion Stopway The U.S. does not define a “stopway” as a rectangular area.

Taxiway Ref (a), the US does not define as “portion of an apron designated as a taxiway intended to provide a) Aircraft access to aircraft stands only.” stand taxilane Ref (b), the US does not define as “portion of a taxiway system located on an apron, providing taxi b) Apron taxi - route across an apron.” way Ref (c), the US defines as High Speed Taxiway.

c) Rapid exit taxiway Terminal con - In the U.S., the term “terminal control area” has been replaced by “Class B airspace.” Standard trol area IFR services should be provided to IFR aircraft operating in Class B airspace.

Transition In U.S. domestic airspace, transition altitude, layer, and level are not used. U.S. flight levels begin altitude, at FL 180 where a barometric altimeter setting of 29.92 inches of mercury is used as the constant transition layer, atmospheric pressure. Below FL 180, altitudes are based on barometric pressure readings.

and transition level Uncertainty The U.S. does not utilize emergency phase classifications.

Phase Visibility Definitions are different.

Visual Ap - In the U.S., aircrews may execute visual approaches when the pilot has either the airport or the proach preceding aircraft in sight and is instructed to follow it.

Will U.S. uses “Will” means futurity, not a requirement for the application of a procedure.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 CHAPTER 4 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES 4.2 In the U.S., flight information and alerting services are provided by ATC facilities, FSSs, and RCCs.

4.3.2.1.1 Transfer of control points vary depending on numerous factors.

4.3.2.1.3 Transfer of control varies.

4.3.2.1 Transfer of control points vary depending on numerous factors.

4.3.3.1 Transfer of control varies.

4.3.3.1a/ b The U.S. does not “release” aircraft. Handoff is used.

4.4.1 In the U.S., flight information and alerting services are provided by ATC facilities, FSSs, and RCCs.

4.4.1.3 The U.S. uses a flight plan format different from the ICAO model discussed in Appendix 2. The U.S. ATS facilities will transmit ICAO repetitive flight plans (RPLs) even though a different format is used for stored flight plans.

4.4.2.1.1 The U.S. accepts flight plans up to 24 hours prior to Estimated Off –Block Time (EOBT).

4.5.6.2 U.S. ATS controllers do not normally include clearance for transonic acceleration in their ATC clearances.

4.5.7.3 and In U.S. domestic airspace, transition altitude, layer, and level are not used. U.S. flight levels begin 4.10.4 at FL180 where a barometric altimeter setting of 29.92 inches of mercury is used as the constant atmospheric pressure. Below FL 180, altitudes are based on barometric pressure readings. QNH and QFE altimeter settings are not provided in domestic U.S. airspace.

4.5.7.5 The flight crew shall read back to the air traffic controller safety-related parts of ATC clearances.

4.6.1.5 The U.S. allows speed adjustments to be assigned in 5 knot increments.

4.6.3.2 The U.S. uses different speed control phraseologies. Specifically, Doc 4444 uses “Maximum Speed” whereas the US uses “Maximum Forward Speed”. Doc 4444 uses “Minimum Clean Speed” whereas the US uses “Slowest Practical Speed.” 4.6.3.7 In the US, speed control is not to be assigned inside Final Approach Fix or 5 NM from runway end.

4.8.2 U.S. Controller phraseology differs slightly and does not include a time check.

4.8.3 ATS units are not required to advise a pilot who has canceled an IFR flight plan that IMC conditions are likely to be encountered along the route of flight; however, if a pilot informs a controller of a desire to change from IFR to VFR, the controller will request that the pilot contact the appropriate FSS.

4.9.1.1 FAA uses different wake turbulence categories and weight groups for wake turbulence separation minimums.

4.9.1.2 FAA uses different wake turbulence categories and weight groups for wake turbulence separation minimums.

Not all FAA facilities are authorized to use the provisions of FAA JO 7110.126.

4.9.2 In the U.S., the word “heavy” is used in all communications with or about heavy jet aircraft in the terminal environment. In the en route environment, “heavy” is used in all communications with or about heavy jet aircraft with a terminal facility, when the en route center is providing approach control service, when the separation from a following aircraft may become less than five miles by approved procedure, and when issuing traffic advisories.

4.10.1.1, Flight levels (at or above 18,000msl, except oceanic) and in feet below 18,000 ft MSL, including 4.10.1.2, around airports (vs. ICAO QFE – height above field/threshold when near airports).

4.10.4.6 4.11.2.2 Reporting the assigned speed with each frequency change by pilots is not a requirement.

4.11.3 d) Controllers are required to forward this information to the next controller.

4.11.1.1 The U.S. has different criteria to make position reports. FAA Order JO 7110.65, 5 − 1 − 8. Position Reporting.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration Nineteenth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.11.1.3 After an aircraft receives the statement “radar contact” from ATC, it discontinues reporting over compulsory reporting points.

4.12.2 and The U.S. does not normally use the term “air-report.” Pilot weather reports (PIREPs), position, and 4.12.3 operational reports are used. PIREPs include reports of strong frontal activity, squall lines, thun - derstorms, light to severe icing, wind shear and turbulence (including clear air turbulence) of mod - erate or greater intensity, volcanic eruptions and volcanic ash clouds, and other conditions pertin - ent to flight safety. They may include information on ceilings, visibility, thunderstorms, icing of light degree or greater, wind shear and its effect on airspeed, or volcanic ash clouds, but do not usually include air temperature.

4.13.4 The difference is the length of time for retention.

CHAPTER 5 SEPARATION METHODS AND MINIMA 5.2.1 In U.S. airspace, only conflict resolution (not separation) is provided between IFR and VFR opera - tions. Separation is provided between IFR and Special VFR (SVFR) aircraft only within the lateral boundaries of Class B, C, D, or E control zones (the U.S. term is surface areas) below 10,000 feet MSL.

5.2.1.1 In U.S. Class A and B airspace, separation is provided for all aircraft. In U.S. Class C airspace, separation is provided between IFR and SVFR aircraft; conflict resolution is provided between IFR and VFR operations.

5.4.1.2.1.2 U.S. Lateral separation criteria and minima values differ somewhat.

5.4.2.2.1.1 c/ d The U.S. uses 22 kt instead of 20 kt and 44 kt instead of 40 kt.

5.4.2.4.1 FAA uses Mach number technique for application of longitudinal separation with turbojet aircraft only.

5.4.2.5.1 FAA uses Mach number technique for application of longitudinal separation with turbojet aircraft only.

5.4.2.7.3.2 d)2). The FAA’s Advanced Technologies and Oceanic Procedures (ATOP) automation platform is de - signed to ensure that separation will not decrease below required minima for same track aircraft should either the reference or maneuvering aircraft turn during the ITP. This allows the controller to issue a clearance to perform an ADS − B ITP climb/descent maneuver if required separation is maintained or increased and either the reference or maneuvering aircraft has a turn in its flight plan.

5.5.2 Whenever the other aircraft concerned are within 5 minutes flying time of the holding area.

5.6 U.S. Allows 2 minute separation standard when courses diverge within 5 minutes after departure.

5.7 U.S. Requires departing aircraft to be established on a course diverging by at least 45 degrees from the reciprocal of the final approach course.

5.8.2.1 FAA uses different wake turbulence categories and differing minima.

FAA requires 3 minutes separation for a Large or Heavy aircraft landing behind a Super aircraft.

5.8.3.1 FAA uses different wake turbulence categories and differing minima.

For Heavy, Large, or Small aircraft departing behind a Super aircraft, taking off from the same runway or a parallel runway separated by less than 2,500 feet, FAA requires that takeoff clearance may not be issued to following aircraft until 3 minutes after the preceding aircraft begins takeoff roll.

5.8.3.2 FAA Consolidated Wake Turbulence (CWT) is based on nine weight groups. FAA time-based wake turbulence separation minima differs from ICAO standards.

5.8.3.4 FAA Consolidated Wake Turbulence (CWT) is based on nine weight groups. FAA time-based wake turbulence separation minima differs from ICAO standards.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 21 AIP GEN 1.7 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 5.8.4.1 The U.S. includes B757 in heavy category for wake turbulence purposes. DOC 4444 does not stipulate.

For Heavy, Large, or Small aircraft taking off behind a departing Super aircraft on an intersecting runway or nonintersecting runway if flight paths will cross; FAA requires 3 minutes wake turbulence separation.

5.8.4.2 FAA Consolidated Wake Turbulence (CWT) is based on nine weight groups. FAA time-based wake turbulence separation minima differs from ICAO standards.

5.8.4.3 FAA Consolidated Wake Turbulence (CWT) is based on nine weight groups. FAA time-based wake turbulence separation minima differs from ICAO standards.

5.8.5.2 FAA Consolidated Wake Turbulence (CWT) is based on nine weight groups. FAA time-based wake turbulence separation minima differs from ICAO standards.

5.9 In the U.S., pilot applied visual separation may be applied when other approved separation is as - sured before and after the application of visual separation, between aircraft up to but not including 18,000 feet. This may include in Class B and Class C airspace. There are no restrictions to daylight hours nor is it restricted to Classes D and E airspaces. The pilot is not required to request to main - tain visual separation from another aircraft, nor is the pilot of the other aircraft required to agree to the use of visual separation.

CHAPTER 6 SEPARATION IN THE VICINITY OF AERODROMES 6.3.2.4 In the U.S.: a) An altitude to maintain is not normally issued in conjunction with a climb via clearance. If no altitude is assigned, pilots should climb to the “Top Altitude” depicted on the SID. ATC will assign an altitude when the “Top Altitude” is identified as “Assigned by ATC”; b) While on a climb via clearance, if a new clearance is issued to an altitude to maintain (for example, “Climb and maintain flight level one eight zero”), all published altitude restrictions on the SID are cancelled; c) A clearance to “climb via SID except maintain” cancels all remaining published altitudes on the SID that are above the cleared altitude; d) A clearance to “climb via SID except cross” instructs pilots to comply with the issued crossing restriction and all other restrictions on the SID; e) The phraseology “climb unrestricted” is not used. A climb and maintain (altitude) authorizes the pilot to climb unrestricted to the assigned altitude.

6.3.2.5 In the U.S., if the communications failure occurs in IFR conditions, or if VFR cannot be complied with, each pilot shall continue the flight according to the following requirements: Route a) By the route assigned in the last ATC clearance received; b) If being radar vectored, by the direct route from the point of failure to the fix, route, or airway specified in the vector clearance; c) In the absence of an assigned route, by the route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance; or d) In the absence of an assigned route or a route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance, by the route filed in the flight plan.

Altitude - At the highest of the following altitudes or flight levels for the route segment being flown: a) The altitude or flight level assigned in the last ATC clearance received; b) The minimum altitude as prescribed in 14 CFR Part 91 (Section 91.121(c)) for IFR operations; or c) The altitude or flight level ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance.

6.3.3.3 Arriving aircraft − delay of 10 minutes or more.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.5.2.4 In the U.S.: a) A descend via clearance authorizes pilots to descend at pilot discretion to meet published restrictions on a STAR. Pilots are not authorized to descend without being issued an altitude; b) An altitude to maintain is not normally issued in conjunction with a descend via clearance. If no altitude is issued, the pilot is expected to descend to the lowest published altitude on the STAR; c) While on a descend via clearance, if a new clearance is issued to an altitude to maintain (for example, “Descend and maintain flight level two eight zero”), all published altitude restrictions on the STAR are cancelled; d) A clearance to “descend via STAR except maintain” cancels all remaining published altitudes on the STAR that are below the cleared altitude; e) A clearance to “descend via STAR except cross” instructs pilots to comply with the issued crossing restriction and all other restrictions on the STAR; f) The phraseology “descend unrestricted” is not used. A descend and maintain (altitude) authorizes the pilot to descend unrestricted to the assigned altitude.

6.5.3.1 The 7110.65 does not stipulate flight crew concurrence of Controller initiated Visual Approach.

6.5.3.5 U.S. requires ATC to inform following aircraft behind Heavy/B757 aircraft of manufacturer and model information.

6.5.5.2 Onward clearance time. 7110.65 PG EXPECT FURTHER CLEARANCE (TIME)- The time a pilot can expect to receive clearance beyond a clearance limit.

6.7.3.1.2 U.S. has no criteria for separate radar controllers in conducting Parallel approaches.

6.7.3.2.1 a) When conducting Dual and Triple Simultaneous Independent Approaches using High Update Rate Table 6 − 1 Surveillance, the FAA allows the minimum distance between runway centerlines to be 3100 feet.

6.7.3.2.4 c The United States does not require the final vector to final to enable the aircraft to be established on the final approach course track, in level flight for at least 3.7 km (2.0NM) prior to intercepting the glide path or vertical path for the selected instrument approach procedure.

6.7.3.2.10 U.S. has no parallel approach obstacle assessment surfaces (PAOAS) Criteria.

6.7.3.2.10 The U.S. has no criteria for a “45 degree track”.

6.7.3.2.11 (a) The U.S. has no criteria for both controllers to be advised when visual separation is applied.

6.7.3.4.1 (f) The U.S. requires that adjacent missed approach procedures do not conflict.

6.7.3.6.3 (b) The U.S. has no surveillance radar approach (SRA).

6.7.3.6.3 (c) In the U.S., aircrews may execute visual approaches when the pilot has either the airport or the preceding aircraft in sight and is instructed to follow it. A contact approach is one wherein an air - craft on an IFR flight plan, having an air traffic control authorization, operating clear of clouds with at least 1 mile flight visibility and a reasonable expectation of continuing to the destination airport by visual reference in those conditions, may deviate from the instrument approach proced - ure and proceed to the destination airport by visual reference to the surface. This approach will only be authorized when requested by the pilot and the reported ground visibility at the destination airport is at least 1 statute mile.

CHAPTER 7 PROCEDURES FOR AERODROME CONTROL SERVICE 7.4.1.1 U.S. has no start up procedures, taxi clearance.

7.4.1.2.1 (f) U.S. does not require time check prior to taxi.

7.6.3.1.1.3 In the U.S. the FAA does not publish standard taxi routes to be used at an airport in the national AIP.

7.6.3.2.3.2 In the U.S., for movements of other than aircraft traffic (i.e., vehicles, equipment, and personnel), steady green means cleared to cross, proceed, go; flashing green is not applicable; flashing white means return to starting point on airport; and alternating red and green means a general warning signal to exercise extreme caution.

7.6.3.2.3.3 U.S. controllers do not flash runway or taxiway lights to instruct aircraft to “vacate the runway and observe the tower for light signal.” Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 23 AIP GEN 1.7 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 7.10.2 In the U.S., landing clearance to a succeeding aircraft in a landing sequence need not be withheld if the controller observes the positions of the aircraft and determines that prescribed runway separ - ation will exist when the aircraft crosses the landing threshold. Controllers issue traffic information to the succeeding aircraft if it has not previously been reported.

7.10.3.1 U.S. Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO) include landing and holding short of an intersect - ing runway, taxiway, predetermined point, or approach/departure flight path.

7.11.4 and U.S. category 1, 2, & 3 (SRS) aircraft weights differ. Separation standards are greater, due to in - 7.11.6 creased size and weight categories.

7.13.1.1.2 U.S. does not specify separation standards on taxiways.

Special VFR operations may be conducted in the U.S. under the following weather minimums and 7.15 requirements below 10,000 feet MSL within the airspace contained by the upward extension of the lateral boundaries of the controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport. These minimums and requirements are found in 14 CFR Section 91.157.

Special VFR operations may only be conducted: (1) With an ATC clearance; (2) Clear of clouds; (3) Except for helicopters, when flight visibility is at least 1 statute mile; and (4) Except for helicopters, between sunrise and sunset (or in Alaska, when the sun is 6 degrees or more below the horizon) unless: (i) The person being granted the ATC clearance meets the applicable requirements for instrument flight; and (ii) The aircraft is equipped as required in 14 CFR Sec. 91.205(d).

7.15 No person may take off or land an aircraft (other than a helicopter) under special VFR: (1) Unless ground visibility is at least 1 statute mile; or (2) If ground visibility is not reported, unless flight visibility is at least 1 statute mile.

CHAPTER 8 ATS SURVEILLANCE SERVICES 8.5.5.1 U.S. validation of mode C readouts allow up to 300 feet variance from pilot reported altitudes.

8.6.5.2 The U.S. has not implemented cold temperature corrections to the radar minimum vectoring alti - tude.

8.7.3.2 (b) The U.S. only allows visual observance of runway turn-off points.

8.7.3.4 Separate a Heavy aircraft operating directly behind a Super aircraft or following a Super aircraft conducting an instrument approach by 6 miles unless the Super aircraft is operating above FL 240 and above 250 knots.

Consider parallel runways less than 2,500 feet apart as a single runway because of the possible effects of wake 8.7.3.5 FAA Consolidated Wake Turbulence (CWT) is based on nine weight groups. FAA distance-based wake turbulence separation minima differs from ICAO standards.

8.7.3.6 Separate a Heavy aircraft operating directly behind a Super aircraft or following a Super aircraft conducting an instrument approach by 6 miles unless the Super aircraft is operating above FL 240 and above 250 knots.

Consider parallel runways less than 2,500 feet apart as a single runway because of the possible effects of wake.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 8.8.3.2 In the U.S., if the communications failure occurs in IFR conditions, or if VFR cannot be complied with, each pilot shall continue the flight according to the following requirements: Route a) By the route assigned in the last ATC clearance received; b) If being radar vectored, by the direct route from the point of failure to the fix, route, or airway specified in the vector clearance; c) In the absence of an assigned route, by the route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance; or d) In the absence of an assigned route or a route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance, by the route filed in the flight plan.

Altitude − At the highest of the following altitudes or flight levels for the route segment being flown: a) The altitude or flight level assigned in the last ATC clearance received; b) The minimum altitude as prescribed in 14 CFR Part 91 (Section 91.121(c)) for IFR operations; or c) The altitude or flight level ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance.

8.8.4.2 The U.S. does not specify that applicable separation can be utilized during emergency situations.

8.9.3.6 U.S. specifies maximum intercept angle of 30 degrees for fixed wing aircraft vectored to final approach course.

CHAPTER 9 FLIGHT INFORMATION SERVICE AND ALERTING SERVICE 9.1.3.2.1 ATC facilities in the CONUS will no longer receive AIRMET advisories to broadcast and will therefore not broadcast AIRMETs; operators have other methods, such as the G − AIRMET, of receiving AIRMET information over the CONUS.

9.1.3.7 The U.S. does not have special procedures for the transmission of information to supersonic air - craft.

9.1.4.1.1 Class F airspace is not used in the U.S. Traffic advisories are provided in Class C airspace and, workload permitting, in Class D, Class E, and Class G airspace.

9.2.1.2 The U.S. does not use “operations normal” or “QRU” messages. U.S. controllers are not normally familiar with the term “uncertainty phase.” CHAPTER 10 COORDINATION 10.1.3.1 Except for a VFR aircraft practicing an instrument approach, an IFR approach clearance in the U.S. automatically authorizes the aircraft to execute the missed approach procedure depicted for the instrument approach being flown. No additional coordination is normally needed between the approach and en route controllers. Once an aircraft commences a missed approach, it may be radar vectored.

10.1.4.2.2 U.S. does not require ETA to be forwarded at least 15 minutes prior to ETA.

CHAPTER 11 AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES MESSAGES 11.1.2 U.S. uses different emergency messages. FAA Order JO 7110.10, Chapter 3, Emergency Services.

CHAPTER 12 PHRASEOLOGIES 12.2.7 US ATC does not allow conditional clearances described for example: “SAS 941, BEHIND DC9 ON SHORT FINAL, LINE UP BEHIND.” Note − This implies the need for the aircraft receiving the conditional clearance to identify the air - craft or vehicle causing the conditional clearance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.3.1.2 m) U.S. does not use this phraseology. 7110.65 4-5-7. ALTITUDE INFORMATION PHRASEO- General to LOGY CLIMB/ DESCEND AT PILOT’S DISCRETION 1. The pilot is expected to commence require action descent upon receipt of the clearance and to descend at the suggested rates specified in the AIM, when conveni - 4-4-9, Adherence to Clearance, until reaching FL 280. At that point, the pilot is authorized to con - ent tinue descent to FL 240 within the context of the term “at pilot’s discretion” as described in the AIM. f. When the “pilot’s discretion” portion of a climb/descent clearance is being canceled by m) WHEN assigning a new altitude, inform the pilot that the new altitude is an “amended altitude.” EX - READY (in- AMPLE- “American Eighty Three, amend altitude, descend and maintain Flight Level two six struction) ; zero.” 12.3.1.2 (n) U.S. does not use “maintain own separation and VMC ’from,’ ’above,’ or ’below’ . . . ,” U.S. con- MAINTAIN trollers say “maintain visual separation ’from’ that traffic.” OWN SEPAR- Meteorological conditions are expressed in terms of visibility, distance from cloud, and ceiling, ATION AND equal to or better than specified minima.

VMC [FROM (level) ] [TO (level) ]; and (o) MAINTAIN OWN SEPAR - ATION AND VMC ABOVE ( or BELOW, or TO) (level) ; 12.3.1.2 aa) The U.S. does not have specific phraseology examples that cover this issue. However, phraseology Clearance to contained in the 7110.65 covers how to change altitudes and altitude restriction in a SID.

cancel level re - striction(s) of the vertical pro - file of a SID during climb.” (z) CLIMB TO (level) [LEVEL RESTRIC - TION(S) (SID designator) CANCELLED (or) LEVEL RESTRIC - TION(S) (SID designat - or) AT (point) CAN - CELLED]; Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.3.1.2 ff) The U.S. does not have specific phraseology examples that cover this issue. However, phraseology Clearance to contained in the 7110.65 covers how to amend or cancel altitude restrictions.

cancel level re - striction(s) of the vertical pro - file of a STAR during descent.

gg) DESCEND TO (level) [LEVEL RE - STRICTION(S) (STAR designator) CANCELLED (or) LEVEL RESTRIC - TION(S) (STAR designat - or) AT (point) CAN - CELLED].

12.3.1.2 a) 2) U.S. uses “MAINTAIN BLOCK (altitude) THROUGH (altitude).” TO AND 7110.65, Para 4-5-7. g. ALTITUDE INFORMATION MAINTAIN BLOCK (level) TO (level); 12.3.1.6 U.S. has no phraseology or approved procedure to advise aircraft to change call signs. The U.S.

CHANGE OF has procedures for a duplicate aircraft identification watch and notification to airline operators but CALL SIGN does not publish national procedures for on-the-spot temporary changes to aircraft call signs in accordance with ICAO guidelines.

12.3.1.7 The U.S. requires issuance of azimuth, distance, direction, type, and altitude.

TRAFFIC IN - FORMATION 12.3.1.8 b) In the U.S., the criterion for a variable wind is: wind speed greater than 6 kt and direction varies by METEOROLO - 60 degrees or more. If the wind is >1 kt but <6 kt, the wind direction may be replaced by ”VRB” GICAL CON- followed by the speed or reported as observed. “VRB” would be spoken as “wind variable at DITIONS <speed>.” 12.3.1.8 d), e), U.S. controllers do not give wind speed, visibility, or RVR values in metric terms. RVR values are and f) given in 100- or 200-foot increments while RW values are given in Venule increments.

METEOROLO - GICAL CON - DITIONS 12.3.1.8 j) U.S. controllers do not use the term “CAVOK.” However, the ceiling/sky condition, visibility, and obstructions to vision may be omitted if the ceiling is above 5,000 feet and the visibility is more than 5 miles.

12.3.1.8 l) and In the US, controllers and pilots exchange altimeter setting by reference to inches Hg. ICAO de - m) scribes altimeter setting by reference to millibars, QNH or QFE. (where QNH – above mean sea level and QFE – height above aerodrome) 12.3.2.2 U.S. will issue a clearance “direct” to a point on the previously issued route. PHRASEOLOGY INDICATION CLEARED DIRECT (fix). NOTE Clearances authorizing “direct” to a point on a previously is- OF ROUTE sued route do not require the phrase “rest of route unchanged.” However, it must be understood AND CLEAR- where the previously cleared route is resumed. When necessary, “rest of route unchanged” may be ANCE LIMIT used to clarify routing. 7110.65, paragraph 4 − 4 − 1. ROUTE USE & 4 − 2 − 5. ROUTE OR ALTI - TUDE AMENDMENTS 3.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.3.2.4 The U.S. does not have equivalent cruise climb between levels/altitudes.

Specification of However, in ICAO regions for supersonic flight 8- 8-3a(1), U.S. has adopted ICAO phraseology.

Cruise Levels, (c) Cruise climb between.

(levels) or above (level) 12.3.2.5 U.S. has no phraseology or instruction for emergency descent: 12.3.2.8, Separ- U.S. has no phraseology for “ADVISE IF ABLE.” U.S. does have phraseology “Advise if un - ation Instruc - able...” tions (b) ADVISE IF ABLE TO CROSS (signi - ficant point) AT (time or level) 12.3.4.7, Taxi U.S. has no phraseology using “BACKTRACK.” procedures, U.S. does use BACK-TAXI (7110.65) − A term used by air traffic controllers to taxi an aircraft on after landing the runway opposite to the traffic flow. The aircraft may be instructed to back-taxi to the beginning (n), (o), & (p) of the runway or at some point before reaching the runway end for the purpose of departure or to exit the runway.

12.3.4.11 U.S. uses CLEAR OF THE RUNWAY a. Taxiing aircraft, which is approaching a runway, is clear of the runway when all parts of the TAKE-OFF U.S. uses aircraft are held short of the applicable runway holding position marking.

CLEARANCE b. A pilot or controller may consider an aircraft, which is exiting or crossing a runway, to be clear when take-off of the runway when all parts of the aircraft are beyond the runway edge and there are no restric - clearance has tions to its continued movement beyond the applicable runway holding position marking.

not been com- c. Pilots and controllers shall exercise good judgment to ensure that adequate separation exists plied with between all aircraft on runways and taxiways at airports with inadequate runway edge lines or holding position markings.

c) Vacate 12.3.4.20 RUN - WAY VACAT - ING AND COMMUNIC - ATIONS AFTER LANDING b) 12.3.4.11 (e) U.S. uses different phraseology to cancel a take off.

HOLD POSI - TION, CAN - 3-9-10. CANCELLATION OF TAKEOFF CLEARANCE PHRASEOLOGY CEL TAKE − If circumstances require, cancel a previously issued take-off clearance and, when appropriate, in - OFF I SAY form the aircraft of the reason.

AGAIN CAN - CEL TAKE − PHRASEOLOGY OFF (reasons) ; CANCEL TAKEOFF CLEARANCE (reason) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 28 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.3.5.7 U.S. has no phraseology to expedite clearance.

a) EXPEDITE CLEARANCE (aircraft call sign) EXPEC - TED DEPARTURE FROM (place) AT (time) ; b) EXPEDITE CLEARANCE (aircraft call sign) [ESTIM - ATED] OVER (place) AT (time) RE - QUESTS (level or route, etc.) .

12.3.5.6 HAN - U.S. does not use radar handover. 7110.65, Para 5-4-3. METHODS PHRASEOLOGY HAN - DOVER DOFF/ POINT OUT/TRAFFIC (aircraft position) (aircraft ID),or (discrete beacon code point out only) (altitude, restrictions, and other appropriate information, if applicable). c. When receiving a handoff, point out, or traffic restrictions, respond to the transferring controller as follows: PHRAS - EOLOGY- (Aircraft ID) (restrictions, if applicable) RADAR CONTACT, or (aircraft ID or discrete beacon code) (restrictions, if applicable) POINT OUT APPROVED, or TRAFFIC OBSERVED, 12.4.1.1 U.S. controllers do not say “will shortly lose identification” or “identification lost.” 7110.65, Para IDENTIFICA - 5-3-7 TION OF AIR - 5-3-7. IDENTIFICATION STATUS CRAFT f) a. Inform an aircraft of radar contact when: 1. Initial radar identification in the ATC system is es - tablished.

2. Subsequent to loss of radar contact or terminating radar service, radar identification is re-estab - lished.

PHRASEOLOGY RADAR CONTACT (position if required).

b. Inform an aircraft when radar contact is lost.

PHRASEOLOGY RADAR CONTACT LOST (alternative instructions when required).

12.4.2.1 U.S. would use “airport or runway” rather than “field.” 7-4-2. VECTORS FOR VISUAL AP - VECTORING PROACH PHRASEOLOGY- (ACID) FLY HEADING OR TURN RIGHT/LEFT HEADING (de - FOR AP - grees) VECTOR FOR VISUAL APPROACH TO (airport name).

PROACH 7110.65, Para 5-11-2, VISUAL REFERENCE REPORT: (b) Aircraft may be requested to report the runway, approach/runway lights, or airport in sight. Heli - copters making a “point ‐ in ‐ space” approach may be requested to report when able to proceed to the landing area by visual reference to a prescribed surface route.

PHRASEOLOGY REPORT (runway, approach/runway lights or airport) IN SIGHT.

REPORT WHEN ABLE TO PROCEED VISUALLY TO AIRPORT/HELIPORT.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.4.2.4.2 a) The U.S uses only “begin descent” and does not speak to “Maintain a (number) Degree Glide COMMENCE Path.” DESCENT NOW [TO MAINTAIN A ( number ) DE - GREE GLIDE PATH] 12.4.2.5.1 U.S. controllers say “this will be a P-A-R/surveillance approach to runway (number) or airport/ PAR runway (number) or airport/heliport.” U.S. controllers do not say ”approach completed.” U.S. con- APPROACH trollers say “your missed approach procedure is (missed approach procedure)” and, if needed, ”ex - ecute missed approach.” For PAR approaches, U.S. controllers say “begin descent” and for surveil - lance approaches, U.S. controllers say “descend to your minimum descent altitude.” 7110.65, Para 5-12-8. APPROACH GUIDANCE TERMINATION lights in sight and requested to or advised that he/she will proceed visually, and has been instructed to proceed visually, all PAR approach proced - ures shall be discontinued. d. Continue to monitor final approach and frequency. Pilots shall re - main on final controller’s frequency until touchdown or otherwise instructed. 5-12-9. COMMU - NICATION TRANSFER PHRASEOLOGY CONTACT (terminal control function) (frequency, if required) AFTER LANDING 12.4.2.4.4 U.S. uses “CHECK WHEELS DOWN”. 7110.65, Par 2-1-24. WHEELS DOWN CHECK CHECKS; (a) PHRASEOLOGY 12.4.2.5.8 US ATC does not allow conditional clearances described.

MISSED APPROACH a) 12.4.3.12 and U.S., for aircraft above FL 180, U.S. controllers would say, “confirm using two niner niner two as 12.4.3.13 your altimeter setting, verify altitude” or “stop altitude squawk” “stop altitude squawk; altitude differs by (number) feet.” U.S. controllers would not say “stop squawk Charlie.” 7110.6, Para 5-2-22. BEACON TERMINATION Inform an aircraft when you want it to turn off its transponder.

12.3.4.13 - U.S. uses PHRASEOLOGY: ENTER LEFT/RIGHT BASE. STRAIGHT-IN. MAKE ENTERING STRAIGHT-IN. STRAIGHT-IN APPROVED. RIGHT TRAFFIC. MAKE RIGHT TRAFFIC.

AN AERO - RIGHT TRAFFIC APPROVED. CONTINUE. b. Runway in use. c. Surface wind. d. Altimeter DROME setting. REFERENCE FAA Order 7110.65, Current Settings, Para 2-7-1. e. Any supplementary TRAFFIC information. f. Clearance to land. g. Requests for additional position reports. Use prominent geo - CIRCUIT graphical fixes which can be easily recognized from the air, preferably those depicted on sectional b) charts. This does not preclude the use of the legs of the traffic pattern as reporting points.

12.4.3.14 U.S. controllers would say “verify at (altitude)” and/or “verify assigned altitude.” 7110.65 Para, 5-2-17. 1. Issue the correct altimeter setting and confirm the pilot has accurately reported the alti - tude. PHRASEOLOGY- (Location) ALTIMETER (appropriate altimeter), VERIFY ALTITUDE.

12.6.1 Alerting U.S. controllers would issue MEA/MVA/MOCA/MIA instead of QNH. 7110.65.

phraseologies CHAPTER 15 PROCEDURES RELATED TO EMERGENICES, COMMUNICATION FAILURE AND CONTINGENCIES 15.1.3 U.S. has difference updated. 5 − 2 − 13, Code Monitor Note 1. & 2. “10 − 2 − 6 HIJACKED AIR - CRAFT 10 − 2 − 6. HIJACKED AIRCRAFT Unlawful inter - Hijack attempts or actual events are a matter of national security and require special handling. Pol - ference and air - icy and procedures for hijack situations are detailed in FAA Order JO 7610.4, Special Operations.

craft bomb FAA Order JO 7610.4 describes reporting requirements, air crew procedures, air traffic procedures threat and escort or interceptor procedures for hijack situations.

REFERENCE: FAA Order JO 7610.4, Hijacked/Suspicious Aircraft Reporting and Procedures, Chapter 7.

FAA Order 7110.65, Code Monitor, paragraph 5 − 2 − 13.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 30 AIP GEN 1.7 − 30 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 15.3.3 b) 1, 2 7110.65 defers to the AIM for what to expect an aircraft to do when loss of two-way communica - tion has been encountered. The expectations in the AIM differ from what a pilot is expected to do in accordance with PANS-ATM 15.3.3 b) 1 and 2.

The U.S. does not specify a time that an aircraft would maintain its last assigned heading, speed, or altitude. PANS-ATM uses 20 min. in a non-radar environment and 7 min. in a radar environment.

15.3.10 When neither communications nor radar contact can be established for 30 minutes (or prior, if ap - propriate), U.S. controllers will consider an aircraft overdue and will initiate overdue aircraft pro - cedures including reporting to the ARTCC or FSS.

15.4.1 U.S. does not use the terms “strayed” or “unidentified” aircraft. 7110.65, paragraph 10-3-1.

OVERDUE AIRCRAFT 15.5.3.2 Separate known aircraft from the aircraft dumping fuel as follows: a. IFR aircraft by one of the following: 1. 1,000 feet above it; or in accordance with paragraph 4 − 5 − 1, Vertical Separation Minima, whichever is greater.

2. 2,000 feet below it.

3. 5 miles radar.

4. 5 miles laterally.

b. VFR radar-identified aircraft by 5 miles and in accordance with paragraph 5 − 6 − 1, Application.

15.7.1.1 The PANS-ATM states: “If, during an emergency situation, it is not possible to ensure that the ap - plicable horizontal separation can be maintained, emergency separation of half the applicable ver - tical separation minimum may be used” Pilots must be advised that emergency separation is being applied and traffic information must be given.

There is no equivalent emergency separation procedure in the U.S.

APPENDIX 1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR AIR-REPORTING BY VOICE COMMUNICATIONS AIREP Form of U.S. uses Pilot Reports (UAs), or Urgent Pilot Reports (UUAs).

Air-report APPENDIX 2 FLIGHT PLAN ITEM 9 ICAO aircraft wake turbulence categories (heavy, medium, light) and FAA weight classes (heavy, large, small) differ. Also, for landing aircraft, wake turbulence separation is defined differently.

The U.S. makes special provisions for any aircraft landing behind a B-757 (4 miles for a large air - craft behind or 5 miles for a small aircraft behind).

ITEM 15 U.S. ATS units do not accept cruising speeds nor filed altitudes/flight levels in metric terms. The U.S. accepts filed Mach Number expressed as M followed by 3 figures.

ITEM 18 The U.S. accepts the non-standard indicator IRMK/in filed flight plans.

APPENDIX 4 AIR TRAFFIC INCIDENT REPORT Appendix 4 U.S. has their accident/incident report in FAA Order JO 8020.16C.

APPENDIX 5 CONTROLLER − PILOT DATA LINK COMMUNICATIONS (CPDLC) MESSAGE SET 6. Air traffic PANS − ATM CPDLC message set includes the following: advisory mes - sage elements, ADVU − 1, Advisory providing the altimeter setting for the specified facility. (facility designation) ALTIMETER (altimeter setting).

Table A5 − 6 − 1.

Air traffic advi - FAA JO 7110.65, AIM, and AIP CPDLC message set includes the following: sory uplinks (ADVU) UM169, (free text) ”(facility designation)” LOCAL ALTIMETER (for Altimeter reporting Sta - tion).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 APPENDIX 6 ATS INTERFACILITY DATA COMMUNICATIONS (AIDC) MESSAGES 1. INTRODUC - 7110.65; 8-2-3. AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES TION INTERFACILITY DATA COMMUNICATIONS 1.1 General (AIDC) Where interfacility data communications capability has been implemented, its use for ATC co - ordination should be accomplished in accordance with regional Interface Control Documents, and supported by letters of agreement between the facilities concerned.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 32 AIP GEN 1.7 − 32 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 3 − METEOROLOGICAL SERVICE FOR INTERNATIONAL AIR NAVIGATION PART I (Core SARPs) Chapter 2 General Provisions 2.2 The U.S. has implemented a quality management system (QMS) for the majority of the meteorological information supplied to users. WAFC Washington and MWO Kansas City (a.k.a.

Aviation Weather Center) are ISO 9000. MWOs Anchorage and Honolulu and all 122 Weather Forecast Offices have a QMS that is governed under the following National Weather Service (NWS) directives: NWS Instruction 10 − 1601 (Verification), NWS Instruction 10 − 1602 (Service Evaluation), NWS Instruction 10 − 1606 (Service Assessment), NWS Instruction 10 − 1607 (Office Evaluation), and NWS Instruction 10 − 815 (Aviation Meteorologist Training and Competencies).

No QMS is in place for the augmentation of the surface observing program.

Chapter 3 World Area Forecast System and Meteorological Offices 3.2.1 SIGWX forecasts are not disseminated in IWXXM form (Appendix 2, 1.2.1.3).

Chapter 4 Meteorological Observations and Reports 4.5.1 For METAR and SPECI disseminated in accordance with Appendix 3, 2.1.2 PANS − MET Chapter 2, 2.1.1.2 (i.e., WMO’s METAR and SPECI code form), the U.S. provides atmospheric pressure in inches of mercury. METAR and SPECI in WMO’s METAR/SPECI code form contain an Altimeter Setting (A) instead of QNH, for example A3010, for 30.10 inches of mercury. The US does not provide QFE.

4.6.2.1 The U.S. reports visibility in statute miles.

4.6.3.3 RVR values in the METAR/SPECI code forms are reported in feet.

4.6.4.1 The U.S. automated surface observing systems (ASOS, AWOS) do not generate an automated report for the occurrence of drizzle or freezing drizzle. The ASOS does allow the manual augmentation of these elements to the observations.

4.6.8 The U.S. does not provide supplemental section for the METAR; the U.S. instead provides a Remarks Section (RMK) that contains similar information.

4.8 Volcanic eruptions, including known details, are contained in the “Remarks” section of manually reported METAR and SPECI.

4.9.2 The U.S. does not issue local routine reports or local special reports. This difference is applicable to subsequent paragraphs that relate to the provision of local routine and special reports in Annex 3 and the PANS − MET. The U.S. provides METAR to departing and arriving aircraft and provides wind and altimeter information in accordance with FAA Order JO 7110.65, Chapter 3, Section 9 (3 − 9 − 1) and Section 10 (3 − 10 − 1).

Chapter 5 Aircraft observations and reports 5.5 Urgent Pilot Reports (UUA) are used in lieu of Special Aircraft Observations, to include Hail, Low Level Wind Shear (within 2,000 ft of surface), severe icing, severe and extreme turbulence, tornado, funnel cloud or waterspout, and volcanic eruption and/or volcanic ash. In addition, Pilot Reports (UA) and UAA identify the location of the weather phenomenon by NAVAIDS.

Pilot Reports are used in lieu of Special Aircraft Observations, to include moderate turbulence and moderate icing. Braking action may be included in the remarks section of the UUA/UA, but is reported to air traffic control when worse than reported.

Chapter 6 Forecasts 6.2.3 Takeoff forecast information is provided through the TAF.

6.3.1 Landing forecasts are provided by the TAF.

6.3.3 The U.S. does not provide trend forecasts.

6.5 The U.S. provides an Area Forecast (FA) and Graphical Forecast for Aviation (GFA) in place of a GAMET. The FA is provided by MWOs Anchorage and Honolulu while the GFA is provided by WFO Kansas City. The format and content of the FA and GFA differs from the GAMET.

The FA and GFA are valid from the surface up to FL450. The GFA is a web − based interactive information service.

Chapter 7 SIGMET and AIRMET Information, Aerodrome Warnings and Wind Shear Warnings 7.1.3 The period of validity is 4-hour for volcanic ash SIGMETs issued by the MWO Kansas City over the contiguous U.S.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.1.4 Volcanic ash SIGMETs issued by the MWO Kansas City over the contiguous U.S. are coordinated with the VAAC but are not based solely on the advisory information due to the period of validity.

7.1.6 Volcanic ash SIGMETs issued by the MWO Kansas City over the contiguous U.S. are updated every 4 − hours.

7.2.1 The vertical domain of U.S. AIRMETs is from the surface up to FL450. The content, order, and format of U.S. AIRMETs are not in accordance with Table A6 − 1A due to national practices, which are described in National Weather Service Instruction 10 − 811. Traditional Alphanumeric Code AIRMETs are no longer in use over the contiguous U.S., but continue to be used over Alaska and Hawaii. The AIRMET sequence number is not restricted to FIRs. AIRMETs in the U.S. are issued on a routine schedule when moderate turbulence, non-convective low-level wind shear, strong surface winds greater than 30 knots, moderate icing, freezing level, mountain obscuration, or IFR conditions are occurring or are expected to occur. The US does not issue AIRMETs for thunderstorms. AIRMET information is not restricted to FL100 and below and can be provided up to FL450 depending on the phenomena. The U.S. does not use flight level (FL) when describing the altitudes in AIRMETs except for those above FL180. The U.S. uses VORs instead of latitude and longitude to describe the area within an AIRMET.

7.2.3 AIRMETs over the contiguous U.S. and Hawaii are valid for 6 hours and are issued every 6 hours on a scheduled basis. AIRMETs over Alaska are valid for 8 hours and are issued every 8 hours on a scheduled basis. The vertical domain of AIRMETs is from the surface up to FL450. The U.S.

also provides a graphical version of the AIRMET (G − AIRMET) that contains 3 − hourly time steps valid from 0 − hour to 12 − hours.

7.4.1 The U.S. does not provide wind shear warnings. The U.S. believes wind shear alerts are timelier to flight crews in landing and takeoff than wind shear warnings and thus provide a greater level of safety. In addition, the information is duplicative in nature in that wind shear warnings could be delayed while wind shear alerts are provided via automated systems that allow for immediate data link to flight crews through ATS systems.

7.6 The U.S. issues airport warning messages similar to the ICAO format (Appendix 7, Table A7 − 6, Template for aerodrome warnings) only at selected airports based on criteria per a bilateral agreement between the airport authority and the NWS Forecast Office.

Chapter 9 Service for operators and flight crew members 9.2.3 & 9.2.4 U.S. meteorological offices have no means to communicate directly to flight crews if there is a divergence in the forecast from what is provided in the flight document folder.

9.3.3 U.S. meteorological offices have no means to provide updates to flight document folders or to contact the operator.

Chapter 11 Use of communications to exchange meteorological information 11.6 The U.S. does not provide HF VOLMET service; MET information is instead supplied to aircraft in flight using ATOP and D − VOLMET through CPDLC.

PART II APPENDICES and ATTACHMENTS APPENDIX 2 Technical specifications related to global systems, supporting centers and meteorological offices 5.1.4 U.S. TCACs do not provide observed CB clouds in the tropical cyclone advisory (TCA) message.

The U.S. does not provide a graphical version of the TCA.

APPENDIX 3 Technical specifications related to meteorological observations and reports 3.1.4 Practice to disseminate SPECI for improving conditions as soon as possible after the observation.

4.4.2.3 GR refers to all hail. All reports of hail include hailstone size diameter in the Remarks (RMK) section of the METAR/SPECI in increments of 1/4 inch. If no hail size is reported it will be assumed to be small hail. Small hail will result in the issuance of a SPECI. GS is used only when snow pellets are observed. The U.S. automated surface observing systems (ASOS, AWOS, AWSS) do not generate an automated report for the occurrence of drizzle or freezing drizzle. The ASOS and AWSS do allow the manual augmentation of these elements to the observations.

APPENDIX 4 Technical specifications related to aircraft observations and reports 3.1.3 The U.S. MWOs do not disseminate special air observations and reports.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 34 United States of America 22 JAN 26 APPENDIX 6 Technical specifications related to SIGMET and AIRMET information, aerodrome warnings and wind shear warnings and alerts Table A6 − 1A, The US does not provide SIGMET and AIRMET information in accordance with Table A6 1A, Template for template for SIGMET and AIRMET messages.

SIGMET and AIRMET messages 4.2 The U.S. issues convective SIGMETs in lieu of SIGMETs for thunderstorms over the CONUS.

The US does not issue AIRMETs for thunderstorms. Convective SIGMETs are issued hourly for the East, Central, and Western U.S. and thus they do not indicate the FIR. Connective SIGMETs have an outlook section.

6.2.1 The U.S. does not provide wind shear warnings.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 PANS − MET AIR NAVIGATION SERVICES − METEOROLOGY (DOC 10157) Chapter 2 Aerodrome meteorological observational information 2.1.1.1 The U.S. does not issue local routine reports or local special reports.

2.1.1.2 U.S. METARs and SPECIs are not issued in accordance with Appendix 2, Table A2 − 2 due to national practices, which are described in FAA Order JO − 7900.5 and Federal Meteorological Handbook No. 1 (FMH*1). Ranges and resolution for numerical elements included in METAR and SPECI differ from Appendix 2, Table A2 − 4.

2.1.1.2 Note 2 This field is also used to denote a correction to the METAR/SPECI by “COR”.

d) 2.1.1.3 U.S. METAR and SPECI are produced in IWXXM but not disseminated.

2.1.1.4 The U.S. does not use the term CAVOK in meteorological reports.

2.1.2.1, The U.S. does not issue local routine reports or local special reports.

2.2.1.5.3, 2.2.2.4.2, 2.2.2.4.3, 2.2.3.6.4, 2.2.5.4.2, 2.2.5.4.5, 2.2.7.3.2 2.1.2.2 a), b), Practices require SPECI for wind shift when wind direction changes by 45 degrees or more in less c), d), e) than 15 minutes and the wind speed is 10 knots or more throughout the wind shift.

Practices do not require SPECI for increases of mean surface wind speed. Practices require SPECI for squall, where squall is defined as a strong wind characterized by a sudden onset in which the wind speed increases at least 16 knots and is sustained at least 22 knots or more for at least one minute. Practices do not require SPECI for wind direction changes based on local criteria. SPECI are not prepared for the equivalents in feet of 150, 350, or 600 meters. United States military stations may not report a SPECI based on RVR.

Practices do not require SPECI for the onset, cessation or change in intensity of: freezing fog; moderate or heavy rain (including showers thereof); low drifting dust, sand or snow; blowing dust, sand or snow (including snowstorm); dust storm; or sandstorm. SPECIs are made for the onset, cessation or change in intensity of snow, freezing precipitation, ice pellets, and the onset or cessation of hail, and thunderstorms.

Practice provides a SPECI when a layer of clouds or obscurations aloft is present below 1000 ft and no layer aloft was reported below 1000 ft in the preceding report. A SPECI is also reported when the ceiling (ceiling is defined in the US as the lowest broken or overcast layer) decreases or increases at these markers: 3000, 1500, 1000, 500 ft or lowest published instrument approach procedures.

2.1.2.2.2 b) U.S. practices require SPECI for visibility values of 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, and 3 statue miles, and the lowest instrument approach procedure minimum as published in the U.S. Terminal Procedures (if different from the aforelisted).

2.1.2.2.2 c) The U.S. does not issue SPECI for the equivalents in feet of 50, 175, 300, 550 or 600 meters.

RVR is measured in increments of 100 feet up to 1,000 feet, increments of 200 feet from 1,000 feet to 3,000 feet, and increments of 500 feet above 3,000 feet to 6,000 feet.

SPECI is made when the highest value from the designated RVR runway decreases to less than or if below, increases to equal or exceed 2,400 feet during the preceding 10 minutes.

2.1.2.2.2 d), e) The U.S. does not issue SPECI for duststorm, sandstorm, low drifting dust, low drifting sand, low drifting snow, blowing dust, blowing sand, blowing snow, unless it has been determined to be critical by the observer or designated by the responsible agency.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 36 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.1.1.2 The U.S. does not provide wind representatives for specific runways but does provide a wind representative for the aerodrome.

2.2.1.3.1 The U.S. provides a 2 − minute average wind observation for the METAR/SPECI.

2.2.1.3.2 ASOS provides a 2 − minute average wind that is updated every 5 − seconds 2.2.1.5.2 b), c), The wind direction may be considered variable if, during the 2 − min evaluation period, the wind d), e) speed is 6 KT or less. Also, the wind direction shall be considered variable if, during the 2 − min evaluation period, it varies by 60 deg or more when the wind speed is greater than 6 KT.

Practices define wind gusts as rapid fluctuations in wind speed with a variation of 10 knots or more between peaks and lulls. Wind speed data for the most recent 10 minutes is examined and a gust, the maximum instantaneous wind speed during that 10 − minute period, is reported if the definition above is met during that period.

Wind speeds and gusts 100 kt or higher are reported as such and not limited to 99 KT.

2.2.2.4.1 For METAR and SPECI disseminated in accordance with 2.1.2 (i.e., WMO’s METAR and SPECI code form), the U.S. reports visibility as follows: Automated observing stations: M 1/4 (“M” means less than), 1/4, 1/2, 3/4. 1, 1 1/4, 1 1/2, 1 3/4, 2, 2 1/2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 statute miles. Visibility of 1, 1/16 and 1/8 statute miles can be augmented at designated automated stations. Manual observing stations: 0, 1/16, 1/8, 3/16, 1/4, 5/16, 3/8, 1/2, 5/8, 3/4, 7/8, 1, 1 1/8, 1 1/4, 1 3/8, 1 1/2, 1 5/8, 1 3/4, 1 7/8, 2, 2 1/4, 2 1/2, 2 3/4, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 statute miles.

Further increments of 5 statute miles may be reported.

For METAR and SPECI disseminated in accordance with 2.1.3 (i.e., IWXXM form), the above values are reported in meters except that when the visibility is greater than 6 statute miles it is reported as exceeding 10000 meters.

2.2.3.4 b) and The U.S. does not report in METAR or SPECI marked discontinuity values when RVR passes Note through values of 800, 550, 300 and 175 meters.

2.2.3.6.1 and For METAR and SPECI disseminated in accordance with 2.1.2 (i.e., WMO’s METAR and SPECI Appendix 2, code form), the U.S. reports RVR in increments of 100 feet up to 1,000 feet, increments of 200 feet Table A2 − 2, from 1,000 feet to 3,000 feet, and increments of 500 feet above 3,000 feet to 6,000 feet.

METAR and SPECI For METAR and SPECI disseminated in IWXXM form) the above values are reported in meters.

2.2.3.6.2 The U.S. reports RVR in increments of 100 feet up to 1,000 feet, increments of 200 feet from 1,000 feet to 3,000 feet, and increments of 500 feet above 3,000 feet to 6,000 feet.

2.2.3.6.6 RVR tendency is not reported in U.S. METAR and SPECI.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.4.2.3 a), b), The following weather elements are augmented manually at designated automated stations c), d) observation sites: FC, TS, GR, GS, and VA. At selected airports, additional present weather elements may be provided. With the exception of volcanic ash, present weather is reported when prevailing visibility is less than 7 statute miles or considered operationally significant. Volcanic ash is always reported when observed.

GR refers to all hail.

All reports of hail include hailstone size diameter in the Remarks (RMK) section of the METAR/SPECI in increments of 1/4 inch. If no hail size is reported it will be assumed to be small hail. Small hail will result in the issuance of a SPECI.

GS is used only when snow pellets are observed.

The U.S. automated surface observing systems (ASOS, AWOS, AWSS) do not generate an automated report for the occurrence of drizzle or freezing drizzle. The ASOS and AWSS do allow the manual augmentation of these elements, as well as ice crystals (IC), to the observations.

Tornado and waterspout are coded as +FC.

Mist (BR) is reported when visibilities are at least 5/8 statute mile but less than 7 statute miles.

2.2.4.2.5 Thunderstorms in surface observations are reported via the Automated Lightning Detection and Reporting System (ALDARS).

2.2.4.2.8 The practice with respect to the proximity indicator VC is between 5 to 10 statute miles from point of observation.

The US does not define proximity by KM but rather uses English Units of statute miles.

2.2.4.2.10 The U.S. does not use “//” to denote the present weather is missing at an automated observing site.

The U.S. uses “PWINO” in the remarks section of the METAR and SPECI to denote the present weather is unavailable. Per FMH − 1, the U.S. only uses slashes (solidi) for missing precipitation totals in the METAR.

2.2.5.3 Practice does not provide adjustments for runway thresholds more than 50 feet lower than aerodrome elevation. Applies to KDEN runways 07, 08, 16L, 16R, 17L, 17R, 25, 26, 34L, 34R and 35R, KCLT runway 36C, KCVG runway 36C, KDFW runways 13L and 31R, KLAS runways 25L and 25R, KMEM runways 09 and 18C, KPIT runways 10R, 28L and 32, KSTL runways 06, 12R, 24 and 29, KIND runway 05L, KRDU runway 05L.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 38 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.5.4 The U.S. reports cloud bases at or below 5,000 ft in steps of 100 ft, between 5,000 ft and 10,000 ft in steps of 500 ft, and greater than 10,000 ft in steps of 1,000 ft.

The U.S. reports only up to 3 layers at automated sites and up to 6 layers at manual sites. Cloud layer amounts are a summation of layers at or below a given level, utilizing cumulative cloud amount. In addition, at automated sites, which are unstaffed, cloud layers above 12,000 ft are not reported. At staffed automated sites, clouds above 12,000 ft may be augmented. CAVOK and NSC are not used. In addition, the US does not use ”///” when cloud type cannot be observed; ”NCD” when no clouds are detected; or ”//////” for CB or TCU when not detected by automated observing systems. In the US, the symbol ”///”, when used in the cloud section of METAR, refers to a mountain station where the layer is below the station level.

The U.S. refers to a cloud Ceiling, with the abbreviation CIG, as the lowest layer reported as broken or overcast, or the vertical visibility into an indefinite ceiling.

The U.S. refers to a Variable Ceiling in the METAR and SPECI Remarks (RMK) when the ceiling layer is variable and below 3,000 feet. The range of variability (V) between the two values is included in the Remark, for example “CIG 005V010”.

The U.S. does not use “///” to denote missing vertical visibility. The U.S. uses “CHINO”, in the remarks section of the METAR, to denote that the Cloud Height Indicator system on the automated observation is unavailable.

Per FMH − 1, the U.S. only uses slashes (solidi) for missing precipitation totals in the METAR.

2.2.7.3.1 For METAR and SPECI disseminated in accordance with PANS − MET Chapter 2, 2.1.1.2 (i.e., WMO’s METAR and SPECI code form), the U.S. provides atmospheric pressure in inches of mercury. METAR and SPECI in WMO’s METAR/SPECI code form contains an Altimeter Setting (A) instead of QNH, for example A3010 for 30.10 inches of mercury. The US does not provide QFE.

2.2.7.3.3 For METAR and SPECI disseminated in accordance with PANS − MET Chapter 2, 2.1.1.2 (i.e., WMO’s METAR and SPECI code form), the U.S. provides atmospheric pressure in inches of mercury. METAR and SPECI in WMO’s METAR/SPECI code form contains an Altimeter Setting (A) instead of QNH, for example A3010 for 30.10 inches of mercury.

2.2.8 The U.S. does not provide supplemental section for the METAR rather the U.S provides a Remarks Section (RMK) that contains similar information.

U.S. METAR and SPECI contain Remarks that are intended for all operational decision − making.

FMH − 1 contains the complete description of Remarks.

Wind shear is not included in the METAR/SPECI code form in the U.S remarks.

Practice is to not use RE and to use beginning and ending times in the remarks section for only recent precipitation and thunderstorms.

Sea − surface temperature, the state of the sea and state of the runway are not provided in the METAR/SPECI code form in the U.S. remarks.

2.3 Volcanic eruptions, including known details, are contained in the “Remarks” section of manually reported METAR and SPECI.

Chapter 3 Aircraft meteorological observational information Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Entire Chapter As reported for Annex 3, Chapter 5, 5.5, Urgent Pilot Reports (UUA) are used in lieu of Special Aircraft observations, to include Hail (GR, GS), Low Level Wind Shear (within 2000ft of surface), severe icing, severe extreme turbulence, tornado, funnel cloud or water spout (FC), and volcanic eruption and/or volcanic ash. In addition, Route Pilot Reports (UA) and UUA identify the location of the weather phenomenon by NAVAIDS. Pilot Reports are used in lieu of Special Aircraft observations, to include moderate turbulence and moderate icing. Braking action may be included in the remarks section of the UUA/UA but is reported to air traffic control when worse than reported.

Chapter 4 Aerodrome meteorological forecast information 4.1.1.1 NWS TAFs are not issued in accordance with Appendix 4, Table A4*1 due to national practices, which are described in National Weather Service Instruction 10 − 813.

4.1.1.2 NWS TAFs are not issued in accordance with Appendix 4, Table A4*1 due to national practices, which are described in National Weather Service Instruction 10 − 813.

U.S. METAR and SPECI are produced in IWXXM but not disseminated.

4.1.2.1 U.S. practices define light winds as less than or equal to 6 knots for using VRB in TAF.

4.1.2.2 For TAFs disseminated in accordance Chapter 4, 4.1.1.1 (i.e., WMO’s TAF code form), forecast visibility increments used consist of 1/4 mile from 0 (zero) to 1 mile, 1/2 mile from 1 to 2 miles, and 1 mile above 2 miles. Note: miles are statute miles. For TAF disseminated in accordance with Chapter 4, 4.1.1.2 (i.e., IWXXM form), the visibility is given in meters.

4.1.2.3 Practices require forecast of non − convective low − level wind shear (LLWS) within 2,000 feet of the ground in the optional group. The forecast consists of WS (wind shear); heights of the wind shear in hundreds of feet; and wind speed and direction above the wind shear height.

4.1.2.4 The US does not use CAVOK and NSC in the TAF. US practices do not include TCU in the TAF.

4.1.3.1 US practices do not amend TAFs for moderate or heavy precipitation.

4.1.3.2 US practice requires TAF to be amended for a 30 degree change with an accompanying wind of 12 knots or greater; for a 10 knot wind increase only when the original was 12 knots or greater; and for a 10 knot wind gust, regardless of mean wind speed.

Change groups and amendment criteria below 1/2 statute mile (800 meters) are not used.

The 100 − foot (30 meter) change group and amendment criterion are not used.

4.1.3.4 The US practice does not use the change indicator “BECMG”.

4.1.3.5 The US practice is that the period of time covered by a TEMPO group is normally kept to a minimum but could be up to four (4) hours.

4.2 The U.S. does not issue landing forecasts in the form of a trend forecasts. Landing forecast information is provided through the TAF.

4.3 Takeoff forecast information is provided through the TAF.

Chapter 5 En − route meteorological forecast information 5.2 The U.S. provides an Area Forecast (FA) and Graphical Forecast for Aviation (GFA) in place of a GAMET. The format and content of the FA differs from the GAMET. The GFA are valid from the surface up to FL450. The GFA is a web − based interactive service.

Chapter 6 Meteorological information containing advisories, alerts, warnings and notices 6.1.2 One of two US VAACs are producing the advisory in IWXXM form, which is the Washington VAAC.

6.1.6 The VONA is not produced or disseminated in IWXXM form.

6.2.2 Tropical Cyclone Advisories issued by Miami and Honolulu TCACs differ from Table A7 − 3 in Appendix 7 of the PANS − MET as they contain forecasts valid at 3 − , 9 − , 15 − 21 − and 27 − hours instead of 6 − , 12 − , 18 − , and 24 − hours.

6.2.3 The tropical cyclone advisory is produced in IWXXM but not disseminated.

6.3.3 Space weather advisories are not issued for communication via satellite (SATCOM).

6.4.1 The content and format of U.S. SIGMETs are not in accordance with Appendix 7, Table A7 − 4 due to national practices, which are described in National Weather Service (NWS) Instruction 10 − 811.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 40 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.4.3 SIGMETs in the conterminous U.S. (CONUS), i.e. except Alaska and Hawaii, are often valid for more than one FIR. The SIGMET sequence numbers are not restricted to FIRs.

6.4.4 U.S. practices are to issue SIGMET for mountain wave only when accompanied by severe turbulence.

The U.S. does not issue a SIGMETs for the following: − radioactive clouds − severe icing due to freezing rain.

The U.S. issues SIGMETs for dust storm (WDSPR DS) and sandstorm (WDSPR SS) instead of heavy duststorm and heavy sandstorm. The U.S. criteria for the dust storm and sandstorm SIGMETs is dust or sand with visibility below 3 sm.

The U.S. issues Convective SIGMETs in lieu of SIGMETs for thunderstorms over the 48 contiguous States (i.e., except Alaska and Hawaii). Convective SIGMETs are issued hourly for the East, Central, and Western U.S. and thus they do not indicate the FIR. Connective SIGMETs have an outlook section.

Within the FIRs over the CONUS and coastal waters, Convective SIGMETs are issued in lieu of SIGMETS for Tropical Cyclones (TC).

Within the CONUS and coastal waters, Convective SIGMETs are issued in lieu of SIGMETS for thunderstorms.

6.4.6 U.S. SIGMETs are produced in IWXXM but not disseminated.

6.5.1 The content, order and format of U.S. AIRMETs are not in accordance with Appendix 7, Table A7 − 5 due to national practices, which are described in National Weather Service Instruction 10 − 811.

6.5.2 The AIRMET sequence number is not restricted to FIRs. AIRMETs in the U.S. are issued on a routine schedule.

6.5.4 AIRMET information is not restricted to FL100 and below and can be provided up to FL450 depending on the phenomena.

AIRMETs in the U.S. are issued on a routine schedule for the following criteria: 1. Ceiling less than 1,000 feet and/or visibility less than 3 SM (IFR).

2. Weather phenomena restricting visibility including, but not limited to, precipitation (PCPN), smoke (FU), haze (HZ), mist (BR), fog (FG), and blowing snow (BLSN).

3. Widespread mountain obscuration (MTNOBSC).

4. Weather phenomena causing the obscuration can include, and are limited to, clouds (CLDS), precipitation (PCPN), smoke (FU), haze (HZ), mist (BR), and fog (FG).

5. Moderate turbulence (MOD TURB).

6. Top and bottom of MOD TURB layer are included.

7. Sustained surface wind greater than 30 knots (STG SFC WND).

8. Moderate icing (MOD ICE).

9. Top and bottom of MOD ICE are included.

10. Multiple freezing level (FRZLVL) altitudes may be given; the lowest level is the declared FRZLVL.

11. Areas with multiple freezing levels are included.

12. Range of freezing levels over the area is included.

13. Lowest freezing levels above ground level (AGL) at intervals of 500 feet AMSL (or SFC as appropriate) are included.

14. Non − convective low − level wind shear potential below 2,000 feet AGL (LLWS POTENTIAL) The U.S. does not issue AIRMETs for the following: − Isolated and occasional thunderstorms − Cumulonimbus clouds − Towering cumulus clouds − Moderate mountain waves.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 41 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.5.6 U.S. AIRMETs are produced in IWXXM but not disseminated.

6.7.2.1 The U.S. does not provide wind shear warnings. The U.S. believes wind shear alerts are timelier to flight crews in landing and takeoff than wind shear warnings and thus provide a greater level of safety. In addition, the information is duplicative in nature in that wind shear warnings could be delayed while wind shear alerts are provided via automated systems that allow for immediate data link to flight crews through ATS systems.

6.7.2.2 The U.S. does not provide wind shear warnings. The U.S. believes wind shear alerts are timelier to flight crews in landing and takeoff than wind shear warnings and thus provide a greater level of safety. In addition, the information is duplicative in nature in that wind shear warnings could be delayed while wind shear alerts are provided via automated systems that allow for immediate data link to flight crews through ATS systems.

Chapter 10 Use of communications to exchange meteorological information 10.4 The U.S. does not provide HF VOLMET service, rather MET information is supplied to aircraft in flight using ATOP and D − VOLMET through CPDLC.

Appendix 2 Technical specifications related to aerodrome meteorological reports (local routine report, local special report, aerodrome routine meteorological report and aerodrome special meteorological report) Table A2 − 1 The U.S. does not issue local routine reports or local special reports.

Table A2 − 2 U.S. METARs and SPECIs are not issued in accordance with Appendix 2, Table A2 − 2 due to national practices, which are described in FAA Order JO − 7900.5 and Federal Meteorological Handbook No. 1 (FMH*1).

Table A2 − 4 The U.S. does not issue local routine reports or local special reports.

Table A2 − 5 Ranges and resolution for numerical elements included in METAR and SPECI differ from Appendix 2, Table A2 − 5.

Appendix 3 Technical specifications related to air − reports Table A3 − 1 The U.S. uses the formats of Urgent PIREPs (UUA) and Routine PIREPs (UA) to report airborne observations.

Table A3 − 2 The U.S. uses the formats of Urgent PIREPs (UUA) and Routine PIREPs (UA) to report airborne observations.

Table A3 − 3 The U.S. uses the formats of Urgent PIREPs (UUA) and Routine PIREPs (UA) to report airborne observations Appendix 4 Technical specifications related to aerodrome forecasts Table A4 − 1 NWS TAFs are not issued in accordance with Appendix 4, Table A4*1 due to national practices, which are described in National Weather Service Instruction 10 − 813.

Table A4 − 3 The US practice does not use the change indicator “BECMG”.

The US practice is that the period of time covered by a TEMPO group is normally kept to a minimum but could be up to four (4) hours.

Appendix 6 Technical specifications related to area forecasts for low − level flights in abbreviated plain language (GAMET) Table A6 − 1 The U.S. provides an Area Forecast (FA) and Graphical Forecast for Aviation (GFA) in place of a GAMET. The format and content of the FA differs from the GAMET.

Appendix 7 Technical specifications related to meteorological information containing advisories, alerts, warnings (SIGMET, AIRMET) and notices Table A7 − 3 U.S. TCACs do not provide observed CB clouds in the tropical cyclone advisory message.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 42 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Table A7 − 5 The content and format of U.S. SIGMETs and AIRMETs are not in accordance with Appendix 7, Table A7 − 5.

The U.S. does not use flight level (FL) when describing the altitudes in SIGMETs and AIRMETs except for those above FL180.

SIGMETs are issued by alphanumeric series, e.g., Kilo 1,2,3 etc.

The SIGMET and AIRMET sequence number are not restricted to FIRs.

Convective SIGMETs for the CONUS are issued with the non*standard WMO Header designator “WST” and use a lower criteria.

SIGMET messages in the CONUS use VORs in place of lat/long and do not reference FIRs.

The U.S. does not include a specific forecast position for the end of the SIGMET validity time, other than TC and the VA outside of the of the CONUS.

Table A7 − 6 The U.S. issues airport warning messages similar to the ICAO format only at selected airports based on criteria per a bilateral agreement between the airport authority and the NWS Forecast Office.

Table A7 − 7 The U.S. does not provide wind shear warnings. The U.S. provides wind shear alerts, which the U.S. believes are timelier to flight crews in landing and takeoff than wind shear warnings and thus provide a greater level of safety.

Appendix 8 Technical specifications for meteorological phenomena included in SIGMET and AIRMET information, special air − reports (uplink) and aerodrome warnings Appendix 8, 1 US practices allow for the use of term widespread (WDSPR) for more than 50 percent of the area.

Convective SIGMET criteria over the contiguous US are: a. A line of thunderstorms at least 60 miles long with thunderstorms affecting at least 40 percent of its length.

b. An area of active thunderstorms affecting judged to have a significant impact on the safety of aircraft operations covering at least 40 percent of the area concerned and exhibiting a very strong radar reflectivity intensity or a significant satellite or lightning signature.

c. Embedded or severe thunderstorm(s) expected to occur for more than 30 minutes during the valid period regardless of the size of the area.

Appendix 8, 9 The U.S. issues SIGMETs for dust storm (WDSPR DS) and sandstorm (WDSPR SS) instead of heavy duststorm and heavy sandstorm. The U.S. criteria for the dust storm and sandstorm SIGMETs is dust or sand with visibility below 3 sm.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 43 AIP GEN 1.7 − 43 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 4 − AERONAUTICAL CHARTS Chapter 1 Definitions Air taxiway The U.S. does not depict defined surfaces for air − taxiing of helicopters.

Final approach The U.S. does not depict final approach and take − off areas (FATOs).

and take − off area (FATO) Prohibited area The U.S. will employ the terms “prohibited area” and “restricted area” substantially in accordance Restricted area with the definitions established and, additionally, will use the following terms: “Alert area.” Airspace which may contain a high volume of pilot training activities or an unusual type of aerial activity, neither of which is hazardous to aircraft.

“Controlled firing area.” Airspace wherein activities are conducted under conditions so controlled as to eliminate the hazards to nonparticipating aircraft and to ensure the safety of persons and property on the ground.

“Warning area.” Airspace which may contain hazards to nonparticipating aircraft in international airspace.

“Maneuvering area.” This term is not used by the U.S.

“Military operations area (MOA).” An MOA is an airspace assignment of defined vertical and lateral dimensions established outside Class A airspace to separate/segregate certain military activities from IFR traffic and to identify for VFR traffic where these activities are conducted.

“Movement area.” Movement area is defined by the U.S. as the runways, taxiways, and other areas of an airport which are utilized for taxiing, take − off, and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramp and parking areas.

Touchdown and The U.S. does not use this term.

lift − off area (TLOF) Chapter 1.1 Definitions Aerodrome Airport Reference Point is the approximate geometric center of all usable runway surfaces.

reference point Area Off Route Obstruction Clearance Altitude (OROCA) used.

Minimum Altitude Air Transit Term “Helicopter Route” used.

Route Arrival Routes Arrival routes are also identified on Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR).

Danger Area The term “danger area” will not be used in reference to areas within the U.S. or in any of its possessions or territories.

Flight Level Flight level is related to a reference datum of 29.92 inches of mercury.

Glide Path Glideslope is used instead of glide path.

Helicopter Helipad is used vice helicopter stand.

Stand Heli port FAA definition: The geographic center of the heliport.

reference point (HRP) FAA definition: The lowest published altitude between radio fixes which assures acceptable Minimum navigational signal coverage and meets obstacle clearance requirements between those fixes.

en − route altitude (MEA) Minimum MOCA also assures acceptable navigational signal coverage within 22 NM of a VOR.

obstacle clearance altitude (MOCA) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 44 AIP GEN 1.7 − 44 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Minimum The FAA refers to Minimum Sector Altitudes as Minimum Safe Altitudes.

sector altitude (MSA) Missed Missed approach point based on acquiring the required visual reference.

approach point Movement Movement area also includes areas used by helicopters in taxiing. It does not include loading Area ramps or parking areas.

Obstacle Obstacles may include terrain and objects of natural growth.

Obstacle Decision Altitude and Decision Height used vice Obstacle Clearance Altitude and Obstacle clearance Clearance Height.

altitude (OCA) or Obstacle clearance height (OCH) Terminal Terminal Arrival Areas defined by the extension of the IAF legs and the intermediate segment arrival altitude course.

(TAA) Touchdown Touchdown zone is the first 3000 feet of the runway beginning at the threshold.

zone Visual Visual approach procedure is conducted on an IFR flight plan which authorizes the pilot to proceed approach visually and clear of clouds to the airport.

procedure Chapter 1.2 Applicability 1.2.2 Charts vary in their conformance to ICAO Standards.

1.2.2.1 Charts vary in their conformance to ICAO Recommended Practices.

Chapter 2 General Specifications 2.1.7 Charts are True North oriented except as indicated.

2.1.8 Sheet size of charts varies dependent on chart type.

2.13 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted.

2.2.1 The marginal note layouts, in some cases, differ from those set forth in Appendices 1, 5, and 6.

2.3.1 Marginal note layouts vary by chart type 2.4 Symbols do not universally conform to Appendix 2.

2.4.1 Symbols do not universally conform to Appendix 2.

2.4.4 Chart symbols may vary in their conformance to ICAO standards.

2.4.5 Chart symbols may vary in their conformance to ICAO standards.

2.5.4 Linear dimensions are expressed in feet.

2.5.7 Conversion scales are not universally used.

2.6.2 Some charts have no linear scale.

2.9.2 Abbreviations used are from FAA Order JO JO 7340.2, not ICAO Doc 8400.

2.11 Color schemes differ by chart series.

2.12.2 Hypsometric tints differ by chart series.

2.14.1 Airspace depiction differs by chart.

2.15.1 Depiction of magnetic variation differs by chart series and is not always shown.

2.15.4 Each aerodrome has its own magnetic variation assigned. IACC specifications require individually assigned magnetic variation values for each airport.

2.16 Chart typography may vary in conformance to ICAO Standards.

2.18.3.1 Julian Calendar is also used. Local times are used on select charts.

Chapter 3 Aerodrome Obstacle Chart − ICAO Type A (Operating Limitations) 3.1 This data is available digitally and is depicted on other individual flight products to which it is pertinent.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 45 AIP GEN 1.7 − 45 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.2.1 Availability of chart is not dependent on provision of other charts.

3.2.2 Notification is not made when chart is not required.

Chapter 4 Aerodrome Obstacle Chart − ICAO Type B 4.1 This data is available digitally and is depicted on other individual flight products to which it is pertinent.

4.2.1 Availability of chart is not dependent on provision of other charts.

Chapter 5 Aerodrome Obstacle Chart − ICAO Type C 5.1 This data is available digitally and is depicted on other individual flight products to which it is pertinent.

Chapter 6 Precision Approach Terrain Chart − ICAO 6.1 This data is available digitally and is depicted on other individual flight products to which it is pertinent.

Chapter 7 En Route Chart − ICAO 7.1 Simplified versions are not created.

7.6.1 Charts depict only oceanic shorelines and the major lake/river systems forming the U.S./Canadian border.

7.6.2 Off Route Obstruction Clearance Altitude (OROCA) is shown.

7.7 Isogonic date not charted. Isogonic data always reflects the most recent 5 year epoch date 7.9.2 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted.

7.9.3.1.1 Coordinates are shown in degrees, minutes and hundredths of minutes. SSV classification is now also shown for radio navigational aids. DME antenna elevation is not shown. Vertical limits of airspace are shown in tabulated data form. RNP values are not shown on routes.

Coordinates of significant points are not shown. Bearings are shown to the nearest degree and distances to the nearest mile.

Chapter 8 Area Chart − ICAO 8.1 Area charts produced only where the amount of detail required results in congestion of information on an IFR Enroute Low Altitude chart.

8.3.1 Departure and Arrival routes are not shown.

8.6.1 Charts depict only oceanic shorelines and the major lake/river systems forming the U.S./Canadian border.

8.6.2 Obstacles are not shown.

8.7 Magnetic Variation is not shown unless an isogonic line runs through the area.

8.8.1 Bearings and tracks are not provided as True values. IACC specifications do not accommodate nor require True values.

8.8.2 Bearings and tracks are not provided as true values.

8.9.1 Only airports shown are those with hard surface runways of 3000 feet or longer and/or with an Instrument Approach Procedure.

8.9.2 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted.

8.9.3 Off Route Obstruction Clearance Altitude (OROCA) is shown.

8.9.4.1.1 Coordinates are shown in degrees, minutes and hundredths of minutes. Standard Service Volume (SSV) classification is shown for radio navigational aids. DME antenna elevation is not shown.

Vertical limits of airspace are shown in tabulated data form. Terminal routings are not shown.

Coordinates of significant points are not shown. Bearings are shown to the nearest degree and distances to the nearest mile. Minimum vectoring altitudes are not shown.

Chapter 9 Standard Departure Chart − Instrument (SID) − ICAO 9.2 Charts are provided only when a procedure has been established.

9.3.2 Charts are not generally drawn to scale.

9.3.3 Scale bar is not shown.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 46 AIP GEN 1.7 − 46 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.4.2 Parallels and meridians are not shown.

9.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

9.5 Procedure route is identified in accordance with FAA Order 8260.46 9.6.1 Culture and topography are not shown.

9.6.2 Contour relief is not shown. Obstacles are listed textually.

9.7 Magnetic variation is not shown.

9.8.1 Bearings and tracks are not provided as True values. IACC specifications do not accommodate nor require True values.

9.8.2 Bearings and tracks are not provided as True values.

9.8.3 Bearings, tracks, and radials are not provided as True/Grid values.

9.9.1.2 Any requested secondary airport shown by symbol vs runway pattern.

9.9.2 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted when requested by procedure developer.

9.9.3 The FAA refers to Minimum Sector Altitudes as Minimum Safe Altitudes 9.9.3.2 Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

9.9.4.1.1 Coordinates for NAVAIDs and Significant Points are shown in degrees, minutes and hundredths of minutes. Bearings are shown to the nearest degree and distances to the nearest mile. DME antenna elevation is not shown. Obstacles are depicted textually with position and height, and without regard for penetration of OIS. Minimum vectoring altitudes are not shown.

Chapter 10 Standard Arrival Chart − Instrument (STAR) − ICAO 10.2 Charts are provided only when a procedure has been established.

10.3.2 Charts are not generally drawn to scale.

10.3.3 Scale bar is not shown.

10.4.2 Parallels and meridians are not shown.

10.4.3 Graduation marks are not shown.

10.5 Procedure route is identified in accordance with FAA Order JO 7100.9 10.6.1 Culture and topography are not shown.

10.6.2 Contour relief is not shown. Obstacles are listed textually.

10.7 Magnetic variation is not shown.

10.8.1 Bearings and tracks are not provided as True values.

10.8.2 10.8.3 Bearings, tracks, and radials are not provided as True/Grid values.

10.9.1.1 Airports are shown by symbol vice pattern.

10.9.1.2 Airports are shown by symbol vs runway pattern.

10.9.2 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted when requested by procedure developer.

10.9.3.1 Minimum Sector Altitude is not shown.

10.9.3.2 Area minimum altitudes are not shown.

10.9.4.1.1 Bearings are shown to the nearest degree and distances to the nearest mile. Coordinates for NAVAIDs and Significant Points are shown in degrees, minutes and hundredths of minutes. DME antenna elevation is not shown. Minimum vectoring altitudes are not shown.

Chapter 11 Instrument Approach Chart − ICAO 11.3.3 Scale is not shown.

11.3.3.1 Distance circle is not shown.

11.3.3.2 Distance between components and between last component and runway shown.

11.4 Sheet size is 8.25 inches by 5.375 inches 11.5.2 Graduation marks are not shown.

11.7.1 Culture information is not shown. Shaded hydrographic features are shown, but not labeled.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 47 AIP GEN 1.7 − 47 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 11.7.2 Smoothed contour lines and spot elevations are not shown.

11.7.3 Terrain is not charted if Std 11.7.2 is not met.

11.8.1 Magnetic variation is shown only in areas of compass instability and on charts North of 67 degrees of latitude.

11.9.1 Bearings, tracks, and radials are not shown as true values for RNAV segments.

11.9.2 Only magnetic north values are shown.

11.9.3 Bearings, tracks, and radials are not provided in true/grid values.

11.10.1.1 Only airports specifically requested for charting are shown.

11.10.1.2 Only airports specifically requested for charting are shown.

11.10.2.2 Obstacles that are the determining factor for an OCA/OCH are not necessarily shown.

11.10.2.4 Obstacle heights are only shown in MSL.

11.10.2.7 Absence of obstacle free zones are not shown.

11.10.3 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted when requested by procedure developer.

11.10.4.3 Geographic final approach fix coordinates are not shown.

11.10.5 Minimum Safe Altitudes vice Minimum Sector Altitudes. Terminal Arrival Areas vice Terminal Arrival Altitude.

11.10.6.1 Arrowed dotted line is used for MA track. Arrowed dashed line used for Visual track. Times required for the procedure are not shown.

11.10.6.2 Distance to airport from final approach NAVAID is not shown.

11.10.6.3 Missed approach segment is shown by arrowed, dotted line. Arrowed, dashed line is used for visual segments. Times required for the procedure are not shown. Distance between components is shown vice a distance scale.

11.10.6.4 Parentheses are not shown.

11.10.6.5 Ground profile and shaded altitude blocks are not shown.

11.10.7.1 Procedure landing minima are shown vice aerodrome operating minima.

11.10.7.2 Decision Altitude/Height (DA/H) and Minimum Descent Altitude/Height (MDA/H) are shown vice OCA/H.

11.10.8.2 Altitude/height table is not shown.

11.10.8.3 Altitude/height table is not shown.

11.10.8.4 Rate of descent table is not shown on individual plates, but a combined climb/descent table is available digitally or with printed procedure publication.

11.10.8.5 Descent gradient not shown, threshold crossing height shown in feet, vertical descent angle shown to hundredths of a degree.

11.10.8.6 Threshold crossing height shown in feet. Descent angle shown to the nearest hundredth of a degree.

11.10.8.8 Cautionary note is dependent on multiple criteria.

11.10.8.9 Simultaneous operations notes do not always contain references to runways or procedures.

Chapter 12 Visual Approach Chart − ICAO 12.2 Chart provided only when visual approach procedure has been established.

12.3.2 The scale can vary and also be not − to − scale.

12.3.3 Charts are shown at scale of 1:250,000, IAPs at 1:500,000 or smaller.

12.4 Sheet size is 8.25 inches by 5.375 inches.

12.5.2 Graduation marks are not shown 12.8 Magnetic variation is shown only in areas of compass instability and on charts North of 67 degrees of latitude.

12.9.2 Bearings, tracks, and radials are not shown as true/grid values.

12.9.3 Grid meridian is not shown.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 48 AIP GEN 1.7 − 48 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.10.1.1 Only airports specifically requested for charting are shown.

12.10.1.2 Airport elevation is not shown.

12.10.2.3 Height of obstacle above Mean Sea Level is shown.

12.10.2.3.1 Datum height not shown. Parentheses are not shown.

12.10.3 Vertical limits of areas are not shown. Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted when requested by procedure developer.

12.10.4 Control zones and Traffic zones are not shown.

12.10.5.3 VASI, MEHT, and angle of displacement are not shown.

Chapter 13 Aerodrome/Heliport Chart − ICAO 13.1 Helicopter movement is supported only with the location of helipads.

13.3.2 Latitude and longitude graticules are shown vice linear scale.

13.6.1 Latitude and longitude graticules are shown vice geographical coordinates. Airport elevations and runway end elevations are shown. Runway length and width are shown in feet. Clearways are not shown. Taxiways and identification only are shown. Standard taxi routes are not shown.

Boundaries of air traffic service are not shown. RVR observation sites are not shown. VOR checkpoint and frequency are not shown.

13.6.2 Locations accommodating folding wings tips are not shown.

13.6.3 Helicopter pads only are shown. Touchdown and liftoff areas are not shown. Final approach and takeoff areas are not shown. Safety areas are not shown. Clearways are not shown. Only highest obstacle within parameters of chart is shown. Visual aids are not shown. Declared distances are not shown.

Chapter 14 Aerodrome Ground Movement Chart − ICAO 14.1 Chart is not produced.

Chapter 15 15.1 Chart is not produced.

Chapter 16 World Aeronautical Chart – ICAO 1:1 000 000 16.2.1 1:1,000,000 Chart Series only produced and made available in areas NOT covered by 1:500,000 Chart Series. (Available in Caribbean area only.)

16.3.1 Linear scales are shown in the following order: nautical miles, statute miles, kilometers.

16.4.3 Charts are folded in eleven vertical panels and one horizontal fold.

16.5.1 Standard parallels are for each 8 degrees and are shown 1 degree and 20 minutes in from the Northern and Southern edges of the chart. Charts are not produced above 80 degrees latitude.

16.5.2 Distance between parallels is 1 degree. Above 56 degrees North, latitude graduation marks are shown only on every even degree of longitude. Distance between longitude meridians is 1 degree.

Above 64 degrees North, meridian graduation marks are shown every 5 minutes.

16.5.3.1 Lengths of interval marks are as follow: 1 minute − .045 inches; 5 minutes − .065 inches; 10 minutes − .10 inches on both sides.

16.6 Chart numbering is indicated on Title Panel chart index.

16.7.2.2 Tunnels, if possible, are shown wherever they exist.

16.7.3.2 Roads are not shown within outlined populated areas.

16.7.9.2 Coordinates shown to the nearest minute.

16.7.10.1 Notes will read ‘Relief data incomplete’ or ‘Limits of reliable relief information.’ 16.7.12.1 Wooded areas are not shown.

16.7.13 Date of topographic information is not shown.

16.8.2 Date of isogonic information is shown in the chart legend.

16.9.2.2 Other than hard surface runways are shown by symbol.

16.9.3.1 Obstacles greater than 500 feet are shown.

16.9.4 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 49 United States of America 22 JAN 26 16.9.7.1 Only aeronautical ground lights that operate continuously are shown.

16.9.7.2 Only marine lights that operate year round, with a range of at least 10 NM, and are omnidirectional are shown.

Chapter 17 Aeronautical Chart – ICAO 1:500 000 17.3.1 Linear scales are shown in the following order: nautical miles, statute miles, kilometers.

17.4.3 Charts are folded in eleven vertical panels and one horizontal fold.

17.4.4 Relationship of chart to WAC series is not shown.

17.5.4.1 The 10 minute interval mark is .10 inches on both sides of the graticule line.

17.6.1.1 Relationship of chart to WAC series is not shown.

17.7.2.2 Tunnels, if possible, are shown wherever they exist. Prominent tunnels are shown pictorially.

17.7.3.1 Roads are shown for radar and visual value and for distinct configurations that provide visual checkpoint value.

17.7.9.2 Coordinates are shown to the nearest minute.

17.7.10.1 Notes will read ‘Relief data incomplete’ or ‘Limits of reliable relief information.’ 17.7.12.1 Wooded areas are not shown.

17.7.13 Date of topographic information is not shown.

17.8.2 Date of isogonic information is shown in the chart legend.

17.9.2.2 Other than hard surface runways are shown by symbol.

17.9.3.1 Obstacles greater than 200 feet are shown, except in built up areas where only those greater than 300 feet are shown.

17.9.4 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Ar - eas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted.

17.9.7.1 Only aeronautical ground lights that operate continuously are shown.

17.9.7.2 Only marine lights that operate year round, with a range of at least 10 NM, and are omnidirectional are shown.

Chapter 18 Aeronautical Navigation Chart — ICAO Small Scale 18.1 Chart is not produced.

Chapter 19 Plotting Chart − ICAO 19.1 Chart is not produced.

Chapter 20 Electronic Aeronautical Chart Display — ICAO 20.1 Charts provided digitally to operators. Digital charts mimic paper products described above and may not be modified.

Chapter 21 ATC Surveillance Minimum Altitude Chart — ICAO 21.1 Minimum Vectoring Altitude charts are available in electronic format only.

21.9.2 Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Military Operations Areas, Warning Areas, Alert Areas, and National Security Areas exist and are charted.

Appendix 6 Aeronautical Data Quality Requirements Table 5. Bearing Whole degree resolution in charting of bearing used for formation of an en route and terminal fix.

used for the formation of an en route and of a terminal fix Table 5. Bearing Whole degree resolution in charting of bearing used for formation of an instrument approach used for the procedure fix.

formation of an instrument approach fix Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 50 AIP GEN 1.7 − 50 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Whole NM resolution in charting of distance used for formation of an en route fix.

Table 6.

(Length/ distance/ dimension Distance used for the formation of an en route fix Table 6. Whole NM resolution in charting of distance used for formation of an Arrival or Departure fix.

(Length/ distance/ dimension Distance used for formation of an terminal and instrument approach procedure fix Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 51 AIP GEN 1.7 − 51 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 DOC 10066, Procedures for Air Navigation Services Aeronautical Information Management PANS − AIM Chapter 1 Definitions ASHTAM The U.S. does not have a series of NOTAM called ASHTAM.

Danger Area The FAA does not have Danger Area airspace within the U.S.

SNOWTAM The U.S. does not use the SNOWTAM format.

Chapter 5 Aeronautical Information Products and Services 5.2.1.3.7 The FAA does not produce an AIP Supplement.

5.2.1.4 The FAA does not produce an AIP Supplement.

5.2.5 The U.S. Does not use SNOWTAM format.

5.2.5 The U.S. does not have a series of NOTAM called ASHTAM.

5.2.5 Currently, the U.S. does not utilize the ICAO format for Domestic NOTAMs. The U.S. NOTAMs that are distributed as International NOTAMs may be in ICAO format.

5.4.2 The FAA distribution system does not always match the ICAO standard for formatting, SNOWTAM, and ASHTAM.

Chapter 6 Aeronautical Information Updates 6.1.4 The FAA does not issue Trigger NOTAMs.

Appendix 2 Content of the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) PART 2 – EN (ENR) − ROUTE ENR 5.1 U.S. does not use the term Danger Areas. The U.S. describes navigation warnings for Prohibited and Restricted airspace, Warning Areas, Military Operations Areas, Alert Areas, Controlled Firing Areas, and National Security Areas.

PART 3 − AERODROMES (AD) AD 2. AERODROMES AD 2.3 The U.S. AIP AD 2.3 specifies only the hours that the airport is attended. All other pertinent information for AD 2.3 is listed in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.5 The U.S. AIP does not reference Passenger Facilities.

AD 2.6 The U.S. AIP 2.6 includes the Aerodrome Category for Firefighting and date of FAA certification.

For availability of crash, fire, rescue equipment refer to the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.7 The U.S. AIP does not list AD 2.7 information. For airports with seasonal availability, that information will be included in the Airport Remarks of the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.8 The U.S. AIP does not list AD 2.8. The pertinent information for AD 2.8 may be found in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 52 AIP GEN 1.7 − 52 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 AD 2.9 Types of runway lighting are shown with the runway or runway end they serve in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ In the U.S. uniformity in airport markings and signs from one airport to another enhances safety and improves efficiency. Refer to AIP Aerodromes, AD 1.1 Aerodrome Availability, paragraphs 12 through 17 for FAA uniform aerodrome lighting information, marking aids and signs.

AD 2.10 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.10, Aerodrome obstacles.

Obstructions are shown on U.S. airport diagrams and SIDs, STARs and Instrument Approach Procedures, available at FAA Terminal Procedures: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/search/ For FAA standards for obstruction lighting refer to AIP Aerodromes, AD 1.1, Aerodrome availability, paragraph 15.3, Obstruction Lights.

AD 2.11 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.11, Meteorological information provided.

Weather data sources will be listed in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, and will include assigned frequencies and/or telephone numbers and hours of operation. The Chart Supplement is available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.15 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.15, Other lighting and secondary power supply.

Rotating beacon position is indicated on airport diagram. Rotating beacon operates sunset to sunrise unless otherwise indicated in the Airport Remarks section of the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement.

If a landing direction indicator is present its location will be indicated on the Airport Diagram.

The airport’s taxiway lighting is described in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement.

The Chart Supplement is available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.16 The U.S. AIP does not list Helicopter landing areas.

Public heliports with an Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) or requested by the FAA or DoD are depicted on the IFR Enroute Low Altitude Charts.

If helicopter charts are available for an airport, this will be indicated in the Charts section of the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement.

The Chart Supplement is available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ Helicopter Instrument Approach Procedures, when available, can be found at Terminal Procedures – Basic Search (faa.gov) .

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 53 AIP GEN 1.7 − 53 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 AD 2.17 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.17, Air traffic services airspace.

Information concerning Class B, C, and part − time D and E surface area airspace is published with effective time in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement.

The chart Supplement also lists the appropriate ATC unit and frequencies to be used.

The Chart Supplement is available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.20 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.20, Local aerodrome regulations.

This information is listed in the Airport Remarks section of the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ .

AD 2.21 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.21, Noise abatement procedures.

Noise Restrictions and Noise Abatement procedures are listed in the NOISE section of the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.22 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.22, Flight procedures.

Radar and ADS − B procedures are described in the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ When an aerodrome has established low visibility procedures a detailed description can be found online at; https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/afx/afs/afs400/afs410/ca t_ils_info/media/App_SMGCS_Pub.xls AD 2.23 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.23, Additional Information.

Additional information at the aerodrome, such as an indication of bird concentrations to the extent practicable are described in the Airport Remarks section of the Airport/Facility Directory of the Chart Supplement, available on − line at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ AD 2.24 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.24, Charts related to an aerodrome.

U.S. charts equivalent to the recommended ICAO charts may be found online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productcatalog/ Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 54 AIP GEN 1.7 − 54 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 AD 2.25 The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 2.25, Visual segment surface (VSS) penetration.

This information is depicted on Instrument Approach Procedures.

If there are obstacles in the visual segment that could cause an aircraft to destabilize the approach between MDA and touchdown, the profile will not show a VDA (Vertical Descent Angle) and will instead show a note that states “Visual Segment − Obstacles”.

On RNAV approach charts, a small, shaded arrowhead shaped symbol from the end of the VDA to the runway indicates that the 34:1 Obstacle Clearance Surface (OCS) for the visual segment is clear of obstacles. The absence of the symbol indicates that the 34:1 OCS is not clear, or a Visual Segment − Obstacles note is indicated on the chart.

Instrument Approach Procedures are available at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/search/ AD 3 HELIPORTS The U.S. AIP does not contain AD 3. HELIPORTS.

All public and joint use heliports in the United States, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Pacific Territories are listed in the Digital Chart Supplements.

The Digital Chart Supplement pages are available for viewing, searching, downloading, and printing at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ Appendix 3 NOTAM Format Entire Currently, the U.S. does not utilize the ICAO format for Domestic NOTAMs. The U.S. NOTAMs Appendix that are distributed as International NOTAMs may be in ICAO format.

Appendix 4 SNOWTAM Format Entire The U.S. does not use the SNOWTAM format.

Appendix Appendix 5 ASHTAM Format Entire The U.S. does not have a series of NOTAM called ASHTAM.

Appendix Appendix 7 Predetermined Distribution System for NOTAM Entire The FAA distribution system does not always match the ICAO standard for formatting, Appendix SNOWTAM, and ASHTAM.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 55 AIP GEN 1.7 − 55 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 5 − UNITS OF MEASUREMENT TO BE USED IN AIR − GROUND COMMUNICATIONS Chapter 3 Standard application of units of measurement 3.2.2 Table 3 − 4 Ref 1.12, runway length and Ref 1.13 runway visual range, unit of measure is in feet.

Table 3 − 3 Table 3 − 4 Ref 1.16, visibility unit of measure is statute miles (SM).

Table 3 − 4 Table 3 − 4 Ref 3.2, altimeter setting, unit of measure is reported as inches of mercury.

Table 3 − 4, Ref 3.3, atmospheric pressure, unit of measure is in inches of mercury.

Attachment B Guidance on the application of System of Units (SI) 5.4.2 Specifications differ from Attachment B, Style and usage, Para 5.4 Numbers. Comma is not acceptable as a decimal marker. Comma is used to separate digits in groups of three.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 56 AIP GEN 1.7 − 56 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 6 − OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT Part I Chapter 3 General 3.3.1 The U.S. Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) program is a voluntary program.

Chapter 4 Flight Operations 4.2.1.1 US regulations allow acceptance of air operator certificates (AOC) issued by a regional safety oversight organization (RSOO) for a State of the Operator who is a member of that RSOO. The RSOO and State of the Operator legislation, as well as the methods and processes used to delegate the tasks and functions for AOC, must be reviewed and found acceptable to the FAA.

Chapter 4 Reference For multiengine aeroplanes, commuter and on − demand operators are required to maintain 4.3.2 copies of the load manifest for 30 days. Part 121 air carriers are required to keep copies of the load manifest for 90 days Chapter 4 Reference When determining the distance to a take − off alternate, the United States does not require 4.3.4.1.2 commuter and on demand operations to calculate engine inoperative configurations.

However, it is required that the alternate must be within one − hour flying time (at normal cruising speed, in still air) of the aerodrome of departure.

Chapter 4 Reference In the event of a loss of pressurization, the U.S. requires descent within four minutes to 4.3.9.2 14,000 ft, not the 13,000 ft as required by ICAO.

Chapter 4 Reference The United States allows turbo − jets that are certificated for single pilot operations.

4.9.2 Chapter 5 Aeroplane performance operating limitations Chapter 5 Reference The United States does not have specific regulations that require the loss of Runway length 5.2.8.1 be considered due to alignment of the airplane prior to takeoff. However, the United States does within its aircraft certification regulations require aircraft performance be determined by using the point on the runway where takeoff is started when computing takeoff distance.

This same criteria is used when computing runway available for accelerate/stop distance.

Accounting for runway loss due to alignment is done within each air carrier’s approved operations manual.

Chapter 5 Reference The U.S. does not require turbine engine reliability to have a power loss rate of less than 1 5.4.1 per 100,000 engine hours, a radio altimeter, two attitude indicators, airborne weather radar, a certified navigation system to identify aerodromes as forced landing areas, or an engine fire warning system.

Chapter 5 Reference The U.S. does not require an automatic trend monitoring system on aeroplanes certificated 5.4.2 after 1 January 2005.

Chapter 6 Aeroplane instruments, equipment and flight documents 6.3.2.3.2 Aircraft manufactured on or after May 16, 2025, and required to have a CVR installed must install a 25 − hour CVR when operating under 14 CFR parts 121, 135, or 129 with a passenger seating capacity of 30 or more or an all − cargo or combi derivative of such an aircraft.

Chapter 6 Reference The U.S. does not require a time piece.

6.4.1 Chapter 6 Reference The United States does not require aeroplanes on VFR flights, when operated as controlled 6.4.2 flights, to be equipped in accordance with the requirements for aeroplanes operated under instrument flight rules.

Chapter 6 Reference Seaplanes are not required to have equipment for making the sound signals prescribed in the 6.5.1 International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea. Seaplanes are not required to be equipped with one sea anchor (drogue).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 57 AIP GEN 1.7 − 57 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 Chapter 6 Reference The United States defines extended over water operations for aircraft other than helicopters 6.5.3.1 as an operation over water at a horizontal distance of more than 50 nautical miles from the nearest shoreline.

For 6.5.3.1.c − The United States does not require 8.8.kHz underwater locating devices to be installed on aircraft.

Chapter 6 Reference The United States does not require equipment to measure cosmic radiation.

6.12 6.15.1 The United States requires all Part 121 turbine aircraft to be equipped with terrain avoidance equipment. However, 14 CFR Part 135 only defines that turbine aircraft with 10 or more passenger seats be equipped and is silent on the 5700 KG weight/take off mass requirement.

Chapter 6 Reference The U.S. does not require ground proximity systems for piston powered airplanes.

6.15.5 6.17.2 The United States does not require an ELT for scheduled air carrier operations conducted by scheduled operators unless the scheduled operation is operated over water or remote areas.

The United States only requires one ELT on flights over water or remote area.

6.17.3 The United States does not require an ELT for scheduled air carrier operations conducted by scheduled operators unless the scheduled operation is operated over water or remote areas.

The United States only requires one ELT on flights over water or remote areas.

6.17.4 The United States does not require an ELT for scheduled air carrier operations conducted by scheduled operators unless the scheduled operation is operated over water or remote areas.

The United States only requires one ELT on flights over water or remote areas.

6.17.5 The United States does not require an ELT for scheduled air carrier operations conducted by scheduled operators unless the scheduled operation is operated over water or remote areas.

The United States only requires one ELT on flights over water or remote areas.

6.18.1 Existing regulations and surveillance capabilities deployed in the U.S. National Airspace System, including requirements for ADS − B Out equipment and use, provide precise, real − time position information to pilots and air traffic controllers. Additionally, FAA regulations require U.S. operators conducting international operations to comply with the rules there in force.

6.18.2 Existing regulations and surveillance capabilities deployed in the U.S. National Airspace System, including requirements for ADS − B Out equipment and use, provide precise, real − time position information to pilots and air traffic controllers. Additionally, FAA regulations require U.S. operators conducting international operations to comply with the rules there in force.

6.18.3 Existing regulations and surveillance capabilities deployed in the U.S. National Airspace System, including requirements for ADS − B Out equipment and use, provide precise, real − time position information to pilots and air traffic controllers. Additionally, FAA regulations require U.S. operators conducting international operations to comply with the rules there in force.

Chapter 6 Reference The U.S. does not require pressure altitude information with a resolution of 25 feet or better.

6.20.2 Chapter 6 Reference The U.S. does not require pressure altitude information with a resolution of 25 feet or better.

6.20.3 Chapter 6 Reference The United States requires the use of boom (or mask) microphones below 18,000 ft which 6.21 would be considered transition altitude.

However, if the flight is conducted below 18,000 ft and is in the cruise phase of the flight, boom microphones may be removed.

Certain 14 CFR part 135 operations that do not have cockpit voice recorder requirements are not required to wear boom microphones.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 58 AIP GEN 1.7 − 58 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Chapter 6 Reference When operations by a single pilot are authorized the U.S. requires an autopilot for IFR 6.23 passenger operations, but not for VFR or cargo operations. A) The U.S. does not require a boom microphone. B) The U.S. requires charts be available and used.

Chapter 8 Aeroplane Maintenance Chapter 8 Reference The United States requires that records of work be retained until the work is repeated, 8.4.2 superseded by other work or for one year after the work is performed, but does not require the records be retained after the unit has been permanently withdrawn from service.

Chapter 9 Aeroplane flight crew Chapter 9 Reference The cited regulation addresses recency and current requirements. Air operators have the 9.4.2.1 discretion as to the extent the operator may qualify and keep current a cruise relief pilot above the regulatory requirement. In lieu of a pilot qualified and current as only a cruise relief pilot, a fully qualified and current SIC may serve as a cruise relief pilot.

Chapter 9 Reference The U.S prescribes processes for variant cross training for flight crews related to variants.

9.4.2.2 Air operators have the discretion as to what extent the operator may qualify and keep current a cruise relief pilot above the regulatory requirement.

Chapter 9 Reference Operators are required to provide the information as outlined in this Standard and ensure the 9.4.3.2 pilot as adequate knowledge of, and the ability to use this information.

Chapter 9 Reference The U.S. does not restrict operators from using a pilot as a pilot − in − command on a route 9.4.3.5 where the pilot has not, within the preceding 12 months, made at least one trip between the terminal points of that route as a pilot member of the flight crew, as a check pilot, or as an observer on the flight deck, except for special areas and airports.

A list of U.S. Special airports may be found at the following link: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/DRSDOCID183887239820230707194018 .0001 .

Chapter 9 Reference The U.S. does not have an area/route 12 month currency requirement for pilots in command, 9.4.3.6 except for special areas and airports.

Chapter 9 Reference For PICs, the U.S. requires 1 proficiency checks per 12 months and either proficiency check 9.4.4.1 or an approved simulator training course, for SICs, the U.S. requires 1 proficiency check each 24 months and another proficiency check or an approved simulator training course every 12 months.

PART II Section II General Aviation Operations Chapter 2.4 Aeroplane instruments, equipment and flight documents.

2.4.8 Airplanes operated under visual flight rules at night are not required to be equipped with: c) to f) a) a turn and slip indicator; b) an attitude indicator (artificial horizon); c) a heading indicator (directional gyroscope); d) a means of indicating whether the supply of power to the gyroscopic instruments is adequate; e) a sensitive pressure altimeter; f) a means of indicating the outside air temperature; g) a timepiece with a sweep second hand; h) an airspeed indicating system with a means of preventing malfunctioning due to condensation or icing; i) a rate − of − climb and descent indicator; j) a landing light; k) illumination for flight instruments and equipment; l) lights in passenger compartments; and m) a flashlight (electric torch) for each crew member station.

Chapter 2.5 Aeroplane Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment 2.5.1.1 Except when operating under controlled flight, airplanes operated at night are not required to have radio communications equipment capable of conducting two-way communications.

United States requirements for radio communications equipment are based upon the type of airspace in which the operation occurs, and not on the time of the day.

2.5.1.2 When more than one radio communications equipment unit is required, the United States has no provision that each unit be independent of any other.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 59 AIP GEN 1.7 − 59 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 2.5.1.4 Except when operating under controlled flight, airplanes on extended flights over water or on flights over underdeveloped land are not required to have radio communications equipment capable of conducting two-way communications.

2.5.2.1 The United States has no provisions concerning required aircraft navigation instruments enabling a flight to proceed in accordance with a flight plan, prescribed RNP types, or the air traffic services provided. The United States does not specify a minimum distance between landmark references used by flights operating under visual flight rules.

Chapter 2.6 Aeroplane Maintenance 2.6.2.2. The FAA established Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations section 43.10, which speaks to the disposition of parts, removed from type-certificated products. After April 15, 2002, each person who removes a life-limited part from a type certificated product must ensure that the part is controlled using: a record keeping system; tag or record attached to part; non-permanent marking; permanent marking; or segregation.

Chapter 2.8 Manuals, logs and records 2.8.2.1 The FAA doesn’t require a journey logbook for General Aviation operations.

2.8.3 The FAA doesn’t require pilots for General Aviation operations to carry a list of emergency equipment. The list of required flying equipment and operating information is available in 14 CFR § 91.503.

Appendix 2.4 General aviation specific approvals 2. SPECIFIC The FAA monitors RVSM performance on a continual basis via ADS − B.

APROVAL TEMPLATE Section III Large and Turbojet Aeroplanes Chapter 3.1 Applicability 3.1.1 Large aircraft means aircraft of more than 12,500 pounds, maximum certificated takeoff weight. Additionally, 14 CFR part 91 requirements for non − commercial general aviation operations apply to large and turbojet airplanes with additional specific requirements established 14 CFR part 91 subparts F and G.

3.1.2 Large aircraft means aircraft of more than 12,500 pounds, maximum certificated takeoff weight. Additionally, 14 CFR part 91 requirements for non − commercial general aviation operations apply to large and turbojet airplanes with additional specific requirements established 14 CFR part 91 subparts F and G.

3.4 Flight operations 3.4.3.5.3 No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed— (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

No person may operate a civil aircraft in IFR conditions unless it carries enough fuel (considering weather reports and forecasts and weather conditions) to— (1) Complete the flight to the first airport of intended landing; (2) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, fly from that airport to the alternate airport; and (3) Fly after that for 45 minutes at normal cruising speed or, for helicopters, fly after that for 30 minutes at normal cruising speed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 60 AIP GEN 1.7 − 60 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.4.3.5.4 No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed— (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

3.4.3.6.1 For general aviation operations, the pilot is the operator as noted in the definition for operator in Annex 6, Part II and is not required to develop policies or procedures.

Chapter 3.11 Manuals, logs and records 3.11.2.3 The FAA considers the terms Maintenance Program and Inspection Program to be different.

In addition, the FAA recognizes there are significant differences between an air carrier main - tenance program and an inspection program used in non − air carrier operations. The FAA requires air carriers that operate certain types of aircraft to have a maintenance program (CAMP). In general, some non air − carrier aircraft, along with aircraft operated under 14 CFR part 91, are not required to have a maintenance program. However, FAA regulations and various Advisory Circulars allow the operator/registered owner to use a maintenance program if they decide to do so. 14 CFR § 91.409 identifies the inspection programs avail - able for selection by a registered owner. Advisory Circular 120 − 16 may be used as a guide to develop a maintenance program.

PART III Section I General Chapter 1 Definitions Section II International Commercial Air Transport 1.3.1 The U.S. Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) program is a voluntary program.

Chapter 2 Reference The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, 2.2.4.2 the operation of that aircraft.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 61 AIP GEN 1.7 − 61 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 2.2.8.3 Takeoff and landing under IFR.

(a) Instrument approaches to civil airports. Unless otherwise authorized by the FAA, when it is necessary to use an instrument approach to a civil airport, each person operating an aircraft must use a standard instrument approach procedure prescribed in part 97 of this chapter for that airport. This paragraph does not apply to United States military aircraft.

(b) Authorized DA/DH or MDA. For the purpose of this section, when the approach procedure being used provides for and requires the use of a DA/DH or MDA, the authorized DA/DH or MDA is the highest of the following: −− (1) The DA/DH or MDA prescribed by the approach procedure.

−− (2) The DA/DH or MDA prescribed for the pilot in command.

−− (3) The DA/DH or MDA appropriate for the aircraft equipment available and used during the approach.

(c) Operation below DA/DH or MDA. Except as provided in § 91.176 of this chapter, where a DA/DH or MDA is applicable, no pilot may operate an aircraft, except a military aircraft of the United States, below the authorized MDA or continue an approach below the authorized DA/DH unless – −− (1) The aircraft is continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the intended runway can be made at a normal rate of 11descent using normal maneuvers, and for operations conducted under part 121 or part 135 unless that descent rate will allow touchdown to occur within the touchdown zone of the runway of intended landing; −− (2) The flight visibility is not less than the visibility prescribed in the standard instrument approach being used; and −− (3) Except for a Category II or Category III approach where any necessary visual reference requirements are specified by the Administrator, at least one of the following visual references for the intended runway is distinctly visible and identifiable to the pilot: −−−− (i) The approach light system, except that the pilot may not descend below 100 feet above the touchdown zone elevation using the approach lights as a reference unless the red terminating bars or the red side row bars are also distinctly visible and identifiable.

−−−− (ii) The threshold.

The U.S. has not adopted the 2D and 3D instrument approach operation language.

2.3.3.2 The United States does not require that the operations manual describe the contents and use of the operational flight plan, but does require establishing procedures for locating each flight.

2.3.4.2.1 U.S. regulations allow for isolated aerodrome operations but do not require a point of no return (PNR) calculation.

2.3.4.2.3 U.S. regulations do not require two alternates in marginal weather conditions.

2.3.6.3 The fuel requirements for commuter and on demand operations are expressed in terms of flight time and do not include a specific altitude requirement.

Chapter 2 Reference The United States does not require IFR helicopter operations to maintain a specific altitude 2.3.6.3.1 above a destination.

Chapter 2 Reference Fuel reserves for IFR helicopter operations is 30 minutes at normal cruise speed beyond the 2.3.6.3.2 alternate heliport.

Chapter 2 Reference The United States has no provisions addressing when a suitable alternate is unavailable. If 2.3.6.3.3 the destination weather so requires, an alternate must be specified and 30 − minute fuel reserves must be carried.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 62 AIP GEN 1.7 − 62 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Chapter 2 Reference The operations manual does not include procedures for loss of pressurization and other 2.3.6.4 contingencies.

2.3.6.5 VFR: Fuel Supply No person may begin a flight operation in a helicopter under VFR unless, considering wind and forecast weather conditions, it has enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising fuel consumption, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

IFR: Alternate airport requirements Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft in IFR conditions unless it carries enough fuel (considering weather reports or forecasts or any combination of them) to— (1) Complete the flight to the first airport of intended landing; (2) Fly from that airport to the alternate airport; and (3) Fly after that for 45 minutes at normal cruising speed or, for helicopters, fly after that for 30 minutes at normal cruising speed.

(b) Paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not apply if part 97 of this chapter prescribes a standard instrument approach procedure for the first airport of intended landing and, for at least one hour before and after the estimated time of arrival, the appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate that— (1) The ceiling will be at least 1,500 feet above the lowest circling approach MDA; or (2) If a circling instrument approach is not authorized for the airport, the ceiling will be at least 1,500 feet above the lowest published minimum or 2,000 feet above the airport elevation, whichever is higher; and (3) Visibility for that airport is forecast to be at least three miles, or two miles more than the lowest applicable visibility minimums, whichever is the greater, for the instrument approach procedure to be used at the destination airport.

Chapter 2 Reference The operator’s manual must include: 2.3.7.1 Procedures for refueling aircraft, eliminating fuel contamination, protecting from fire (including electrostatic protection), and supervising and protecting passengers during refueling; Chapter 2 Reference The operator’s manual must include: 2.3.7.4 Procedures for refueling aircraft, eliminating fuel contamination, protecting from fire (including electrostatic protection), and supervising and protecting passengers during refueling; Procedures for ensuring compliance with emergency procedures, including a list of the functions assigned each category of required crewmembers in connection with an emergency and emergency evacuation duties under §135.123; AC 150/3230 requires compliance with National Fire Protection Association standards in NPA 407 which provides: Accessibility to aircraft by emergency fire equipment shall be considered in establishing aircraft fuel servicing positions.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 63 AIP GEN 1.7 − 63 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 Chapter 2 Reference The operator’s manual must include: 2.3.7.6 Procedures for refueling aircraft, eliminating fuel contamination, protecting from fire (including electrostatic protection), and supervising and protecting passengers during refueling; Chapter 2 Reference The United States requires oxygen at all times for passengers experiencing cabin pressure 2.3.8.1 altitudes above 15,000 ft, not 13,000 ft (620hPa) as per ICAO.

Chapter 2 Reference In the event of a loss of pressurization the U.S. requires descent within four minutes to 2.3.8.2 14,000 ft, not the 13,000 ft as required by ICAO.

Chapter 2 Reference The United States does not utilize a 1,000 ft minimum for non-precision approaches 2.4.1.3 Chapter 3 Reference US does not require the helicopter weight limitations found I n3.2.7 a), c), and d).

3.2.7 3.2.7.2.1 The rotorcraft must be able to maintain any required flight condition and make a smooth transition from any flight condition to any other flight condition without exceptional piloting skill, alertness, or strength, and without danger of exceeding the limit load factor under any operating condition probable for the type, including— (1) Sudden failure of one engine, for multiengine rotorcraft meeting Transport Category A engine isolation requirements; (2) Sudden, complete power failure, and (3) Sudden, complete control system failures.

Aircraft operational approval that does not require guaranteed engine out performance (Part 29 Category B or Part 27 Normal Category for single or multi − engine helicopters) shall be operated per the specific approved flight manual procedures that ensure a safe landing following an engine failure or all engine failure.

Chapter 4 Reference Precaution Kits and First aid equipment are not required on helicopters.

4.2.2 Chapter 4 Reference The US does not require marking of break-in points.

4.2.4.1 Chapter 4 Reference The U.S. does not require marking of break-in points.

4.2.4.2 Chapter 4 Reference The FAA does not specify a requirement for two landing lights.

4.4.2 Chapter 4 Reference B) and C) Life − saving rafts and pyrotechnic devices are only required for extended 4.5.2.1 over − water operations. That is in respect to helicopters in operations over water with a horizontal distance of more than 50 NM from the nearest shoreline and more than 50 NM from an offshore heliport structure.

Chapter 4 Reference Helicopters operated over land areas designated as areas in which search and rescue would 4.6 be especially difficult are not required to be equipped with signaling devices or life-saving equipment. The U.S. does not designate areas in which search and rescue would be especially difficult and therefore does not require additional equipment.

Chapter 5 Reference Except when operating under controlled flight, helicopters are not required to have radio 5.1.1 communications for night operations.

Chapter 5 Reference The United States does not require a helicopter to be provided with navigation equipment in 5.2.1 accordance with RNP types for navigation with the United States. However, the United States does provide information and operations specifications for IFR operating requirements when U.S. operators and aircraft conduct operations in the European Airspace Designated for Basic Area Navigation (RNP − 5 and 10).

Chapter 6 Reference The U.S. requires that records of work be retained until the work is repeated, superseded by 6.4.2 other work for one year after the work is performed, but does not require the records be retained after the until has been permanently withdrawn from service.

Chapter 6 Reference The U.S. requires that records of work must be retained until the work is repeated, 6.8.2 superseded by other work, or for one year after the work is performed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 64 AIP GEN 1.7 − 64 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Chapter 7 Reference US CAT helicopter pilots must demonstrate their proficiencies in the provisions of 7.4.2.2 7.4.2.2 through various means.

Chapter 9 Reference The U.S. does not require that an operator keep a list of the emergency and survival 9.5 equipment carried on board any of their helicopters engaged in international air navigation.

Chapter 11 Reference In the United States, certificate holders regulated under Part 135 of the CFR shall prepare 11.1 and keep current a manual setting forth the certificate holder’s procedures and policies.

Additionally, the Aircraft Operators Standard Security Program, (required by 49 CFR 1544, Subpart B) mandates crew members (both flight deck and attendants) be trained in the proper conduct of an aircraft cabin search, including likely areas of an aircraft that could conceal a weapon or improvised explosive devices and how to recognize weapons or devices.

Chapter 11 Reference Upon receipt of a specific and credible threat, the aircraft operator must immediately notify 11.3 the appropriate airport operator and the necessary ground and in − flight security operators.

Additionally, upon receiving information that an act or suspected act of air piracy has been committed, the aircraft operator must notify the U.S. Transportation Security Administration. If the aircraft is outside U.S. airspace, the aircraft operator must notify the appropriate authorities of the State in which the aircraft is located. Additionally, if different, the operator must also notify the appropriate authorities in which the aircraft is to land.

Section III International General Aviation 2.18 The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.

2.6.3.2 The United States allows the continuation of an approach regardless of the reported weather.

5.2.1 The U.S. has no provision that visual landmarks used in VFR be located at least every 60 NM (110km).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 65 AIP GEN 1.7 − 65 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 7 − AIRCRAFT NATIONALITY AND REGISTRATION MARKS 4.3.1 The marks are not required on wing structure; only tail or fuselage.

4.3.2 14 CFR § 45.25(b)(2) allows the marks to be placed on engine pods or appurtenances if they are located between the trailing edge of the wing and the leading edge of the horizontal stabilizer and are an integral part of the fuselage side surfaces. Annex 7, §4.3.2 does not mention the ability to place markings on the engine pod or appurtenances.

5.2.2 United States regulations use inches rather than centimeters. 14 CFR § 45.29 prescribes minimum heights of marks as 12 inches generally for fixed − wing aircraft, except marks may be 2 inches in some grandfathered cases, and 3 inches on a glider and for certain experimental certificates. Marks must be at least 3 inches high for airships, spherical balloons, nonspherical balloons, powered parachutes and weight − shift − control aircraft. Marks must be at least 12 inches high for rotorcraft except certain grandfathered rotorcraft.

The minimum height of marks on small (12,500 lb. or less), fixed − wing aircraft is 3 inches when none of the following exceeds 180 knots true airspeed: (1) design cruising speed; (2) maximum operating limit speed; (3) maximum structural cruising speed; and (4) if none of the foregoing speeds have been determined for the aircraft, the speed shown to be the maximum cruising speed of the aircraft.

10.1 The U.S. identification plate does not include the nationality or registration mark.

10.2 With respect to location of identification plate: for aircraft other than 14 CFR part 121, location must be either adjacent to and aft of the rear − most entrance door or on the fuselage near the tail surfaces.

a) There is no explicit U.S. registration requirement for unmanned free balloons and no requirement to carry an identification plate. A centralized registry of unmanned free balloons is not maintained. Operators are required to furnish the nearest ATC facility with a prelaunch notice containing information on the date, time, and location of release, and the type of balloon. This information is not maintained for any specified period of time.

b) With respect to RPA/small Unmanned Aircraft, in place of a “plate”, the FAA requires “markings” for the small UAS, which are not required to be fireproof. The FAA only allows markings on external surfaces.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 66 AIP GEN 1.7 − 66 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 8 − AIRWORTHINESS OF AIRCRAFT PART II Procedures for Certification and Continued Airworthiness Chapter 1 Type Certification 1.2.5 ICAO requires that the design of an aircraft under ICAO Annex 8, Parts IIIB, IVB, and V use alternative fire extinguishing agents to halon in the lavatories, engines, and auxiliary power units. The United States does not have a similar requirement.

PART III Large Aeroplanes Part IIIA Aeroplanes over 5 700 kg for which application for certification was submitted on or after 13 June 1960, but before 2 March 2004 Chapter 4 Design and Construction 4.1.6 (b), 4.1.6 (f), The FAA does not have similar requirements relative to paragraphs b) and f). The FAA 4.1.6 (g), 4.1.6 (h), published a notice to amend the U.S. regulations with the purpose of eventually meet - 4.1.6 (i) ing the intent of these provisions for new designs. However, the amendment will not be retroactive and will apply to airplanes for which application for certification is submit - ted after the effective dates of the future amendment. For b), the FAA does not have a specific requirement for physical separation of systems. However, physical separation is considered in the means of compliance to various regulations such as 25.1309, 25.901(c) and 25.903(d). The FAA also does not have a requirement for continued safe flight and landing after ANY event resulting in damage to the airplane structure or sys - tems.

For g), h) and i), the FAA does not have specific requirements to consider the effects of explosions or incendiary devices.

Chapter 8 Instruments and Equipment 8.4.1 ICAO requires that airplanes operating on the movement area of an airport shall have air - plane lights of such intensity, color, fields of coverage and other characteristics to furnish personnel on the ground with as much time as possible for interpretation and for subsequent maneuver necessary to avoid a collision. The FAA has no such requirement.

8.4.2 This provision addresses the lights’ effect on outside observers in reference to “harmful dazzle.” The U.S. regulations do not address the effect of aircraft lights on outside observ - ers. However, visibility to other pilots and the lights’ effect on the flight crew is addressed.

Chapter 9 Operating Limitations and Information 9.3.5 The United States does not have similar requirements. The FAA has begun work in an effort to amend the U.S. regulations with the purpose of eventually meeting the intent of these provisions.

Chapter 11 Security 11.2, 11.3, 11.4 With the exception of the door required by 11.3, the United States does not have similar re - quirements. The FAA has begun work in an effort to amend the U.S. regulations with the purpose of eventually meeting the intent of these provisions.

Part IIIB Aeroplanes over 5 700 kg for which application for certification was submitted on or after 2 March 2004 Chapter 3 Structure Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 67 AIP GEN 1.7 − 67 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.8.2 14 CFR 25.571 addresses structural durability. The damage − tolerance principles were intro - duced at amendment 25 − 45 of 14 CFR 25.571 (effective 12/1/1978), and therefore all appli - cable products/parts certified on or after 12/1/1978 are required to be damage − tolerant (ex - cept as provided by 14 CFR 21.101). It is noted that ”Likely structural repairs” is not a con - sideration under 14 CFR 25.571, and therefore Section 3.8.2 appears to be different in this regard. However, as a post − type certification requirement, 14 CFR part 26 requires TC hold - ers who develop published repair data to perform a damage tolerance evaluation of any re - pair that affects fatigue critical structure and incorporate any required damage tolerance − based inspections into the published repair data. In addition, the provisions for repairs reside in 14 CFR part 43, not part 21. All structural repairs are required to meet the certification basis of the airplane. 14 CFR 25.571 considers sonic fatigue whereas Section 3.8.1 of Annex 8 does not have a corresponding explicit requirement for sonic fatigue considerations. It is thus observed that 14 CFR 25.571 is more stringent in this regard. Lastly, amendment 25 − 132 of 14 CFR 25.571 (effective 1/14/2011) introduced the requirement for a Limit of Validity on the airframe of an airplane (on top of the requirement for considering WFD), and therefore 14 CFR is more stringent in this regard.

Chapter 4 Design and Construction 4.1.6 On November 28, 2008, the FAA adopted new regulations that meet the intent of these pro - visions. However, Part IIIB applies to airplanes with a date of application of March 2, 2004 or later, but the U.S. requirements apply to airplanes with a date of application of November 28, 2008 or later.

4.2 g)4) The United States has not modified regulations to require manufacturers to include the elements of the aeroplane design associated with cargo compartment fire protection and a summary of the demonstrated standards that were considered in the process of aeroplane certification, in the documentation made available to the operator for those aircraft certificated on or after 1 January 2025.

D.2 (g) Paragraph D.2.g.1 of the ICAO standard requires a fire suppression system for each cargo compartment accessible to a crewmember in a passenger − carrying airplane. U.S. require - ments permit manual fire fighting in an accessible cargo compartment by a crewmember or members for an all − passenger − carrying airplane or a passenger − cargo combination carrying airplane.

Additionally, the FAA does not have specific requirements to consider the effects of explo - sions or incendiary devices.

D.2 (h) The United States does have provisions to protect against possible instances of cabin depres - surization. However, the FAA does not have specific requirements to consider the effects of explosions or incendiary devices.

F.4.1 ICAO requires that airplanes operating on the movement area of an airport shall have air - plane lights of such intensity, color, fields of coverage and other characteristics to furnish personnel on the ground with as much time as possible for interpretation and for subsequent maneuver necessary to avoid a collision. The U.S. has no such requirement.

PART IV Helicopters Part IVA Helicopters for which application for certification was submitted on or after 22 March 1991 but before 13 December 2007 Chapter 2 Flight 2.2.3.1, These provisions address take − off performance data for all classes of helicopters and require 2.2.3.1.1 − 2.2.3.1.4 that this performance data include the take − off distance required. However, the United States has adopted the requirements only for Category A helicopters.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 68 AIP GEN 1.7 − 68 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Chapter 6 Rotor and Power Transmissions Systems and Powerplant Installation 6.7 This provision requires that there be a means for restarting a helicopter’s engine at altitudes up to a declared maximum altitude. In some cases the FAA does not require demonstration of engine restart capability. Since there is a different level of certitude for transport and nor - mal category helicopters in the United States, the engine restart capability is only required for Category A and B helicopters (14 CFR Part 29) and Category A normal helicopters (14 CFR Part 27).

Chapter 7 Instruments and Equipment 7.4.2 This provision addresses the need to switch off or reduce the intensity of the flashing lights.

The United States has minimum acceptable intensities that are prescribed for navigation lights and anti − collision lights. No reduction below these levels is possible.

7.4.2 (b) This provision addresses the lights’ effect on outside observers in reference to “harmful dazzle.” The U.S. regulations do not address the effect of aircraft lights on outside observ - ers. However, visibility to other pilots and the lights’ effect on the flight crew is addressed.

PART V Small Aeroplanes Part VA Aeroplanes over 750 kg but not exceeding 5 700 kg for which application for certification was submitted on or after 13 December 2007 but before 7 March 2021 Chapter 8 Crashworthiness and Cabin Safety 8.5 (e) The FAA provides requirements for emergency lighting systems in 14CFR 23.812. These requirements do not address the impact of the fuel spillage on emergency lighting systems.

Only commuter category airplanes are required to install emergency lighting systems.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 69 AIP GEN 1.7 − 69 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 9 − FACILITATION *The list of differences include Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The status of implementation of Annex 9 in Guam with respect to public health quarantine is not covered in the list of differences.

Chapter 2 Entry and Departure of Aircraft 2.3 Written crew baggage declaration is required in certain circumstances, and a special Embarkation/Disembarkation Card is required for most alien crew members.

2.4 A General Declaration for all inbound and for outbound flights with commercial cargo are required. However, the General Declaration outbound flights with commercial cargo shall not be required if the declaratory statement is made on the air cargo manifest. No declaration is required for outbound flights without commercial cargo if Customs clearance is obtained by telephone.

Remarks 19 CFR 122 2.4.1 Each crew member must be listed showing surname, given name, and middle initial.

2.4.4 The signing or stamping of the General Declaration protects the carrier by serving as proof of clearance.

2.5 The crew list is required by statute.

2.7 There is a statutory requirement for the Cargo Manifest.

2.8 In order to combat illicit drug smuggling, the U.S. requires the additional following information: the shipper’s and the consignee’s name and address, the type of air waybills, weight, and number of house air waybills. The manifest submitted in electronic form may become legally acceptable in the future. However, until the compliance rate for the automated manifest is acceptable, the U.S. must be able to require the written form of the manifest.

Remarks 19 CFR 122.48 2.9 Nature of goods information is required.

2.10 Stores list required in all cases but may be recorded on General Declaration in lieu of a separate list.

2.17 A cargo manifest is required except for merchandise, baggage and stores arriving from and departing for a foreign country on the same through flight. “All articles on board which must be licensed by the Secretary of State shall be listed on the cargo manifest.” “Company mail shall be listed on the cargo manifest.” 2.18 Traveling general declaration and manifest, crew purchases and stores list as well as a permit to proceed are required under various conditions when aircraft arrive in the U.S. from a foreign area with cargo shown on the manifest to be traveling to other airports in the U.S. or to foreign areas.

2.21 There is a statutory requirement that such changes can only be made prior to or at the time of formal entry of the aircraft.

2.25 The U.S. does not support the use of insecticides in aircraft with passengers present.

Pesticides registered for such use should not be inhaled. In effect, the passenger safety issue has precluded the use of such insecticides in the presence of passengers since 1979.

2.35 Advance notice is required of the number of citizens and aliens on board (non − scheduled flights only).

2.40 A copy of the contract for remuneration or hire is required to be a part of the application in the case of non − common carrier operations.

2.41 Single inspection is accorded certain aircraft not by size of aircraft but rather by type of operation. Loads (cargo) of an agricultural nature require inspection by a plant or animal quarantine inspector.

2.41c Fees are charged for services provided in connection with the arrival of private aircraft (nonscheduled aircraft).

Chapter 3 Entry and Departure of Persons and Their Baggage 3.3 Medical reports are required in some cases.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 70 AIP GEN 1.7 − 70 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Remarks 8 CFR 212.7 and INA 234 3.4 Documents such as visas with certain security devices serve as identity documents.

3.4.1 The U.S. has not standardized the personal identification data included in all national passports to conform with the recommendation in Doc 9303.

3.5.6 U.S. passport fees exceed the cost of the operation.

3.5.7 U.S. allows separate passports for minor dependents under the age of 16 entering the U.S.

with a parent or legal guardian.

3.7 The U.S. has a pilot program that allows nationals of certain countries which meet certain criteria to seek admission to the U.S. without a visa for up to 90 days as a visitor for pleasure or business.

Remarks 22 CFR 41.112(d) INA 212(d)(4), INA 238, 8 CFR 214.2(c) INA 217 The law permits visa waivers for aliens from contiguous countries and adjacent islands or in emergency cases. Visas are also waived for admissible aliens arriving on a carrier which is signatory to an agreement assuring immediate transit of its passengers provided they have a travel document or documents establishing identity, nationality, and ability to enter some country other than the U.S.

3.8 The U.S. charges a fee for visas.

3.8.3 Duration of stay is determined at port of entry.

Remarks INA 217 3.8.4 A visitor to the U.S. cannot enter without documentation.

Remarks INA 212(a) (26) 3.8.5 Under U.S. law, the duration of stay is determined by the Immigration Authorities at the port of entry and thus cannot be shown on the visa at the time of issuance.

3.10 Embarkation/Disembarkation Card does not conform to Appendix 4 in some particulars.

3.10.1 The operator is responsible for passengers’ presentation of completed embarkation/disembarkation cards.

Remarks 8 CFR 299.3 3.10.2 Embarkation/Disembarkation cards may be purchased from the U.S. Government, Superintendent of Documents.

Remarks 8 CFR 299.3 3.14.2 The U.S. fully supports the electronic Advance Passenger Information (API) systems.

However, the WCO/IATA Guideline is too restrictive and does not conform to the advancements in the PAXLIST EDIFACT international standard.

3.15 U.S. Federal Inspection Services’ officials see individuals more than once.

3.16 Written baggage declarations by crew members are required in some instances.

3.17.1 The U.S. uses a multiple channel system rather than the dual channel clearance system.

3.23, 3.23.1 Statute requires a valid visa and passport of all foreign crew members.

3.24, 3.24.1, 3.25, Crew members, except those eligible under Visa Waiver Pilot Program guidelines, are 3.25.1, 3.25.2, 3.25.3 required to have valid passports and valid visas to enter the U.S.

Remarks INA 212(a) (26), INA 252 and 253, 8 CFR 214.1(a), 8 CFR 252.1(c) 3.26, 3.27, 3.28, 3.29 Passports and visas are required for crew and non − U.S. nationals to enter the U.S.

3.33 Does not apply to landing card.

3.35 Law requires that the alien shall be returned to the place whence he/she came. Interpretation of this provision requires that he/she be returned to the place where he/she began his/her journey and not only to the point where he/she boarded the last − used carrier.

3.35.1 Law requires that certain aliens be deported from the U.S. at the expense of the transportation line which brought them to the U.S.

3.36 Statute provides for a fine if a passenger is not in possession of proper documents.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 71 AIP GEN 1.7 − 71 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.39.3 NOTE: The U.S. considers security for individuals in airline custody to be the carrier’s responsibility.

3.40.2 Annex 9 recommends that fines and penalties be mitigated if an alien with a document deficiency is eventually admitted to the country of destination.

3.43 Operator can be held responsible for some detention costs.

Chapter 4 Entry and Departure of Cargo and Other Articles 4.20 The Goods Declaration as defined by the Kyoto Convention serves as the fundamental Customs document rather than the commercial invoice.

4.40 Aircraft equipment and parts, certified for use in civil aircraft, may be entered duty − free by any nation entitled to most − favored nation tariff treatment. Security equipment and parts, unless certified for use in the aircraft, are not included.

4.41 Customs currently penalizes the exporting carrier for late filing of Shipper’s Export Declarations (SEDs) and inaccuracies on bills of lading with respect to the SEDs.

4.42 Regulations require entry of such items, most of which are dutiable by law.

4.44 Certain items in this category are dutiable by law.

4.48 Carriers are required to submit new documentation to explain the circumstances under which cargo manifest is not unladen. No penalty is imposed if the carrier properly reports this condition.

4.50 The procedures for adding, deleting, or correcting manifest items require filing a separate document.

4.55 The U.S. requires a transportation in − bond entry or a special manifest bonded movement for this type of movement.

Chapter 5 Traffic Passing Through the Territory of a Contracting State 5.1 Such traffic must be inspected at airports where passengers are required to disembark from the aircraft and no suitable sterile area is available.

5.2 Passports and visas are waived for admissible aliens arriving on a carrier which is signatory to an agreement assuring immediate transit of its passengers provided they have a travel document or documents establishing identity, nationality, and ability to enter some country other than the U.S.

5.3 Such traffic must be inspected at airports where no suitable sterile area is available.

5.4 Passports and visas are waived for admissible aliens arriving on a carrier which is signatory to an agreement assuring immediate transit of its passengers provided they have a travel document or documents establishing identity, nationality, and ability to enter some country other than the U.S.

5.4.1 Passengers will not be required to obtain and present visas if they will be departing from the U.S. within 8 hours of arrival or on the first flight thereafter departing for their destination.

5.8 Examination of transit traffic is required by law. Transit passengers without visas are allowed one stopover between the port of arrival and their foreign destination.

5.9 Passports and visas are required generally for transit passengers who are remaining in the U.S. beyond 8 hours or beyond the first available flight to their foreign destinations.

Chapter 6 International Airports − Facilities and Services for Traffic 6.3.1 Procedures involving scheduling committees raise a number of anti − trust problems under U.S. law.

6.33 Sterile physical facilities shall be provided, and in − transit passengers within those areas shall be subject to immigration inspection at any time.

Remarks OI 214.2(c) 6.34 The U.S. inspects crew and passengers in transit.

6.36 The U.S. inspects crew and passengers in transit.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 72 AIP GEN 1.7 − 72 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.56 Operators of aircraft are statutorily required to pay overtime charges for federal inspections conducted outside normal scheduled hours of operation. This requirement places aircraft operators in a less favorable position than operators of highway vehicles and ferries who are statutorily exempt from such charges.

Chapter 8 Other Facilitation Provisions 8.1 Separate bonds are required.

8.3.2 Visas are issued by the Department of State and are not issued at ports of entry.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 73 AIP GEN 1.7 − 73 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 10 − AERONAUTICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANNEX 10 − VOLUME I − RADIO NAVIGATION AIDS PART I Chapter 3 Specifications for Radio Navigation Aids 3.1.3.3.2 Per FAA Order 6050.32B, in the U.S., the ILS Localizer minimum signal strength requirement is − 120.5 − − 123 dBW which is equivalent to − 120.0 dBW/m2. ICAO requirement is − 114 dBW/m2.

However, FAA − E − 2970 states in paragraph 3.3.3.4, “The transmitter of any subsystem shall have sufficient power to meet the coverage requirements as defined in paragraph 3.3.2.1 3.1.4.1, The United States does not require such aircraft ILS equipment immunity. Interference from FM 3.1.4.2 broadcast signals will not adversely affect aircraft navigation and communications systems in the United States airspace.

3.3.4.2 The US minimum VOR signal strength is -120 dBW/m2. The ICAO requirement is - 107 dBW/m2.

3.3.8.1, The United States does not require such equipage for aircraft. Interference from FM broadcast 3.3.8.2 signals will not adversely affect aircraft navigation and communications systems in the United States airspace.

3.7.3.5.3.1 Currently, the service volume of GBAS in FAA Order 6050.32B is 23 NM up to 10,000 feet vs. 15 and 20 NM ICAO standard.

3.7.3.5.4.1 In the U.S., the LAAS operates on center frequencies from 112.050 to 117.950 MHz vs. ICAO’s 108.0 to117.975 MHz with the lowest assignable frequency of 112.05 MHz and the last upper assignable frequency of 117.150 MHz vs. ICAO’s 108.025 MHz and 117.900 MHz respectively.

3.7.3.5.3 Currently, the service volume of GBAS in FAA Order 6050.32B is 23 NM up to 10,000 feet.

Appendix B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM (GNSS) 3.6.7.2.3.5 A solution has been implemented in the US which does not require protection level bounding for rare anomalous ionospheric storms under extreme conditions. The solution requires denial of the approach service when anomalous ionosphere conditions could cause potentially large residual errors and allows operations when estimated residual errors would be below a threshold. The resulting errors under the threshold were found to be acceptable using specific safety assessments and criteria for this equipment.

3.6.8.2.2.5.3 In the U.S., the LAAS operates above the ILS LOC frequency band on center frequencies from 112.05 to 117.950 MHz; therefore, this standard does not apply.

3.6.8.2.2.6 Currently, the D/U standard for co − channel rejection is the same as the ICAO standard of 26 dB.

However, D/U standard for the second adjacent channel rejection is 46 dB, which is 3 dB less than the ICAO standard. In addition, no third adjacent channel rejection standard exists in Order 6050.32B.

3.6.8.2.2.6.1c In the U.S., the LAAS operates above the ILS LOC frequency band on center frequencies from 112.05 to 117.950 MHz; therefore, this standard does not apply.

3.6.8.2.2.6.2a In the U.S., the LAAS receiver protection from an undesired LAAS signal offset by +/ − 50 kHz is 46 dB vs. ICAOs 43 dB.

3.6.8.2.2.6.2c In the U.S., the LAAS operates above the ILS LOC frequency band on center frequencies from 112.05 to 117.950 MHz.

3.6.8.2.2.6.3 In the U.S., the LAAS receiver protection from an undesired LAAS, VOR, or ILS signal offset by +/ − 75 to +/ − 975 kHz is not considered during the frequency assignment process.

3.6.8.2.2.6.3c In the U.S., the LAAS operates above the ILS LOC frequency band on center frequencies from 112.05 to 117.950 MHz.

3.6.8.2.2.6.4 In the U.S., the LAAS receiver protection from an undesired LAAS, VOR, or ILS signal offset by +/ − 1 MHz or more is not considered during the frequency assignment process.

Attachment C INFORMATION AND MATERIAL FOR GUIDANCE IN THE APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES FOR ILS, VOR, PAR, 75 MHz MARKER BEACONS (EN − ROUTE), NDB AND DME Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 74 AIP GEN 1.7 − 74 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.6.2.1.1 and The US frequency protections for ILS localizers are 3 dB more stringent than the ICAO protections 2.6.2.1.2 (i.e. 23 dB vs. 20 dB for co − channel, − 4 dB vs. − 7 dB for interim 1st adjacent channels, − 31 dB vs. − 34 dB for final 1st adjacent channels, − 43 dB vs. − 46 dB for 2nd adjacent channels, and − 47 dB vs. − 50 dB for 3rd adjacent channels).

2.6.2.2.1 The US frequency protections for ILS localizers are 3 dB more stringent than the ICAO protections (i.e. 23 dB vs. 20 dB for co − channel, − 4 dB vs. − 7 dB for interim 1st adjacent channels, − 31 dB vs.

− 34 dB for final 1st adjacent channels, − 43 dB vs. − 46 dB for 2nd adjacent channels, and − 47 dB vs.

− 50 dB for 3rd adjacent channels).

3.4.6.1 a),b),c) The US frequency protections for co − channel, 1st and 2nd adjacent channels for VOR are 3 dB 3.4.6.2 a),b),c) more stringent than the ICAO protections (i.e. 23 dB vs. 20 dB for co − channel, − 4 dB vs. − 7 dB for interim 1st adjacent channels, − 31 dB vs. − 34 dB for final 1st adjacent channels, − 43 dB vs. − 46 dB for 2nd adjacent channels).

3.4.6.1 d) The US does not provide any VOR frequency protection for 3rd adjacent channels. The ICAO 3.4.6.2 d) protection provides − 50 dB for 3rd adjacent channels.

7.1.8.1 The US frequency protections for co − channel and 1st adjacent channels for DME are 3 dB more 7.1.8.2 stringent than the ICAO protections (i.e. 11 dB vs. 8 dB for co − channel, − 39 dB vs. − 42 dB for 1st Table C − 6 adjacent channels). The US frequency protection for 2nd adjacent channels for DME is 28 dB more stringent than the ICAO protection (i.e. − 47 dB vs. − 75 dB).

Attachment D INFORMATION AND MATERIAL FOR GUIDANCE IN THE APPLICATION OF THE GNSS STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED PRACTICES 7.2.1.5 and In the U.S., the LAAS/LAAS co − channel geographical separation is 159 nm at 10,000 and 20,000 Table D − 4 ft. ICAO separation is 195 nm at 10,000 ft.

The first adjacent channel in the U.S. is equivalent to the ICAO second adjacent channel or +/ − 50 kHz.

The ICAO separation requirement for GBAS/GBAS second adjacent channel separation is 24 NM.

In the U.S., geographical separations are not required between LAAS facilities, which differ in frequency by more than 25 kHz.

7.2.1.6 and Distances shown in ICAO Table D − 5 are different from the distances in FAA Order 6050.32B Table D − 5 figures 203 and 204 since in the U.S. the separation distances are calculated using the same method as for VOR described in FAA Order 6050.32B.

ANNEX 10 − VOLUME II − COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES INCLUDING THOSE WITH PANS STATUS Chapter 3 General Procedures for the International Aeronautical Telecommunication Service 3.2.2, US regulations do not have any specific procedures for closing down international aeronautical 3.2.3 stations. All international aeronautical stations in the U.S. operate continuously (24 hours a day and seven days a week) Chapter 5 Aeronautical Mobile Service − Voice Communications 5.1.5 US regulations do not require pilots to wait 10 seconds before making a second call. US regulations only require “a few seconds” instead of “10 seconds.” 5.2.1.4.1.1 The United States directs that, for air carriers and other civil aircraft having FAA authorized call signs, the call sign should be followed by the flight number in group form; and for air carriers of foreign registry, the flight number should be stated in group form, or using separate digits if that is the format used by the pilot.

5.2.1.4.1.1 The United States issues surface wind using the word “wind” followed by the separate digits of the indicated wind direction to the nearest 10 − degree multiple, the word “at” and the separate digits of the indicated velocity in knots, to include any gusts.

5.2.1.4.1.3 The United States issues the separate digits of a frequency, inserting the word “point” where the decimal point occurs.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 75 AIP GEN 1.7 − 75 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 5.2.2.7.1.2 US regulations do not specifically require pilots to send a message twice preceded with the phrase “TRANSMITTING BLIND”.

US regulations provides general procedures which allow pilots to make blind transmissions in case of emergency.

5.2.2.7.1.3.1 US regulations do not specifically require pilots to make a blind transmission preceded by “TRANSMITTING BLIND DUE TO RECEIVER FAILURE” with respect to the continuation of the flight of the aircraft.

US regulations provide general procedures which allow pilots to make appropriate blind transmissions.

5.2.2.7.3.1 US regulations do not specifically require pilots to make a blind transmission preceded by “TRANSMITTING BLIND DUE TO RECEIVER FAILURE”.

US regulations provide general procedures which allow pilots to make appropriate blind transmissions.

5.3.1.2 The initial communication, and if considered necessary, any subsequent transmissions by an aircraft in distress “should” begin with the signal MAYDAY … ANNEX 10 − VOLUME III − COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS PART I − DIGITAL DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Chapter 7 Aeronautical Mobile Airport Communications System (AeroMACS) 7.4.5.1 (d) In the U.S., the power spectral density of any frequency removed from the assigned frequency above 150% of the authorized frequency is 50 dB or 55 + log (P) dB, whichever is the lesser attenuation. ICAO requires 50 dB.

PART II − VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS Chapter 2 Aeronautical Mobile Service 2.2.1.2 ICAO recommends a signal − in − space field strength of 75 uv/m ( − 109dBW/m ), which translates to –82.5 dBm at the input of the receiver assuming 0 dB system losses. In the U.S., per RTCA DO − 186a MOPS, the input power to the aircraft receiver should be − 87 dBm.

The US does not require aircraft flying within the US airspace to meet the interference immunity 2.3.3.1 2.3.3.2 performance of paragraphs 2.3.3.1, 2.3.3.2, and 2.3.3.3 and the recommendation of paragraph 2.3.3.3 2.3.3.4 of Annex 10, Vol 3, Part 2, Chapter 2. The FAA, based on the recommendations of the.

2.3.3.4 Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, made a decision, in 1996, not to adopt the FM interference immunity performance standards in the U.S. The U.S. continues to use its own FM immunity standards to avoid FM interference in aircraft.

2.3.3.4 The U.S. does not require airborne VHF communications receiving systems to meet the FM broadcast immunity performance standards recommended by ICAO.

ANNEX 10 − VOLUME IV − SURVEILLANCE AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS Chapter 3 Surveillance Systems 3.1.1.7.13 SPI required to be transmitted for 18 +/ − 1 second.

Chapter 4 Airborne Collision Avoidance System 4.2.3.3.4 The TSO − C118 (RTCA DO − 197) implements this requirement. However, the requirement of limiting Mode S power to the level of Mode A/C (paragraph 4.2.3.4) is not implemented.

4.3.1.1.1 Specifies a nominal cycle of 1 second 4.3.2.1.2 The US specifies a false track probability of less than 1.2% for Mode A/C and less than 0.1% for Mode S.

4.3.5.3.1 Software versions 6.04A, version 7.0 and version 7.1 are all approved for operations in U.S.

airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP GEN 1.7 − 76 GEN 1.7 − 76 AIP GEN 1.7 − 76 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America United States of America 9 JUL 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.3.5.3.2 No changes planned to the current U.S. guidance. Per Advisory Circular (AC) 120 − 55C, Change 1, Section 11 (MAINTENANCE), para c., TCAS Software Updates: “when necessary, operators should ensure that appropriate TCAS software updates are incorporated. The latest version of software for TCAS II is version 7.1. To ensure compatibility with international standards, the FAA encourages the installation of this software as practical. Software version 6.04A, version 7.0 and version 7.1 are all approved for operations in U.S. airspace.” 4.3.5.3.3 No changes planned to the current U.S. guidance. Per Advisory Circular (AC) 120 − 55C, Change 1, Section 11 (MAINTENANCE), para c., TCAS Software Updates: “when necessary, operators should ensure that appropriate TCAS software updates are incorporated. The latest version of software for TCAS II is version 7.1. To ensure compatibility with international standards, the FAA encourages the installation of this software as practical. Software version 6.04A, version 7.0 and version 7.1 are all approved for operations in U.S. airspace.” ANNEX 10 − VOLUME V − AERONAUTICAL RADIO FREQUENCY SPECTRUM UTILIZATION Chapter 2 Distress frequencies 2.1.1 All emergency locator transmitters installed on or after 1 January 2002 and carried in compliance with Standards of Annex 6, Parts I, II and III may operate on both 406 MHz and 121.500 MHz or on 121.5 MHz.

Chapter 4 Utilization of frequencies above 30 MHz 4.1.2.4 FAA has not issued a mandatory carriage of VDL Mode 3 and VDL Mode 4. Participation in CPDLC (VDL Mode 2) “is at the discretion of the flight crew and/or operator” (NAS Data Communications Guide, version 11 dated May 26, 2021).

4.1.4.1 The US does not provide the 20 dB desired − to − undesired signal protection for VHF frequency assignments. The US provides 14 dB.

4.1.4.2 The US does not require aircraft flying within the US airspace to meet one of the characteristics dealing with the FM interference immunity performance. The U.S. Aviation Rulemaking Committee made a decision not to adopt the FM interference immunity performance standards in the U.S. The U.S. continues to use its own FM immunity standards to avoid FM interference in aircraft.

4.1.6.1.2 Assignable frequencies in 25 KHz steps in the US are 121.550 − 123.075 MHz instead of 121.550 – 123.050 MHz, and 123.125 – 136.975 MHz instead of 123.150 – 136.475 MHz.

4.2.3 The US does not follow the VOR assignment priority as defined in Section 4.2.3. Due to severe frequency congestion in the U.S., the ICAO frequency assignment priority order would result in inefficient use of the radio spectrum.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 77 AIP GEN 1.7 − 77 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 11 − AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES Chapter 1 Definitions Accepting Un - The term “receiving facility” is used.

it Advisory Advisory service is provided in terminal radar service areas and the outer area associated with Airspace class C airspace areas as well as Class E airspace.

Advisory Advisory service is provided in terminal radar service areas and the outer area associated with Route class C airspace areas as well as Class E airspace.

ACAS– Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) – An airborne collision avoidance system Airborne based on radar beacon signals which operates independent of ground − based equipment. 14 CFR Collision 1.1 further defines and breaks down TCAS into TCAS 1 – provides traffic advisories 2 – provides Avoidance traffic advisories and resolution advisories in the vertical plane and 3 – provides traffic advisories System and resolution advisories in the vertical and horizontal planes.

AIRMET FAA Pilot Controller Glossary defines (in part) AIRMET as “A concise description of an occur - rence or expected occurrence of specified en route weather phenomena that may affect the safety of aircraft operations, but at intensities lower than those that require the issuance of a SIGMET.” The ICAO definition of AIRMET narrows the purpose of the advisory to “low-level aircraft opera - tions”, where the FAA has a more broad definition to encompass “all aircraft and … aircraft having limited capability … ” Also, ICAO uses the term “forecast … for the flight information region” where the FAA uses “area forecast”. Difference in character (terminology) for area forecast. FAA uses AIRMETS for broader purpose.

Air taxiing The U.S. does not limit this definition to apply only to above the surface of an aerodrome.

Air traffic con - The U.S. uses “Air Traffic Control” with a definition of “A service operated by appropriate author - trol service ity to promote the safe, orderly and expeditious flow of air traffic.” Air traffic flow The U.S. does not define air traffic flow management.

management (ATFM) Air traffic con - The U.S. uses the term “air traffic control facility”. (i.e., En Route, Terminal, or Flight Service) trol unit Air traffic ser - FAA Pilot Control Glossary defines (in part) Flight Service Stations (FSS) as “air traffic facilities vices reporting which provide pilot briefing, en route communications and VFR search and rescue services, assist office lost aircraft in emergency situations, relay ATC clearances, originate Notices to Airmen, broadcast aviation weather and NAS information, receive and process IFR flight plans....” FSSs are available to receive any reports concerning air traffic services as well as accept and file flight plans.

Air traffic ser - The U.S. uses “Air Route Traffic Control Center”.

vices unit Airway A Class E airspace area established in the form of a corridor, the centerline of which is defined by radio navigational aids.

Alert Phase Alert – a notification to a position that there is an aircraft − to − aircraft or aircraft − to − airspace conflict as detected by automated problem detection.

Altitude Height above ground level (AGL), mean sea level (MSL) or indicate altitude.

Approach The U.S. not only includes arriving and departing controlled flights but also includes en route Control controlled flights. Additionally, as opposed to Annex 2 Amdt 47, the U.S. specifies the control Service facility that provides the service.

Approach The U.S. uses “Approach Control Facility” and also includes the possibility of providing ATS to Control Unit en route aircraft.

Appropriate The U.S. does not define “Appropriate ATS Authority.” The P/CG does contain a definition ATS Authority annotated as [ICAO] that adds “In the United States, the “appropriate ATS authority” is the Program Director for Air Traffic Planning and Procedures, ATP − 1.” Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 78 AIP GEN 1.7 − 78 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Apron The U.S. adds reference to seaplane operations to the definition.

Apron Ground control or ramp control provide the same service. There is no formal definition in the Pilot Management Controller Glossary.

Service Area Control The U.S. uses the terms “Traffic Control Center”, “Radar Approach Control Facility”, and Centre “Tower” to define a facility that provides air traffic control service to aircraft operating on IFR flight plans within controlled airspace and principally during the en route phase of flight. When equipment capabilities and controller workload permit, certain advisory/assistance services may be provided to VFR aircraft.

Area Control Air Traffic Control − A service operated by appropriate authority to promote the safe, orderly and Service expeditious flow of air traffic.

Controlled The US uses the term “IFR Clearance”.

flight Control Zone The US uses the term “Surface Area”. Surface area is airspace contained by the lateral boundary of the Class B, C, D, or E airspace designated for an airport that begins at the surface and extends upward.

Cruising Level Cruising Altitude – an altitude or flight level maintained during en route level flight. This is a constant altitude and should not be confused with a cruise clearance.

Data Quality The U.S. does not define data quality in its ATS operational documents.

Datum The U.S. does not define datum in its ATS operational documents.

Declared The U.S. does not define declared capacity in its ATS operational documents.

capacity DETRESFA The U.S. does not define DETRESFA, although the P/CG does contain DETRESFA [ICAO].

Distress phase The U.S. does not define distress phase, although the P/CG does contain the Annex 11 Amdt 52 verbiage in the definition of DETRESFA [ICAO].

Downstream Same as air traffic control clearance. Authorization for an aircraft to proceed under conditions Clearance specified by an air traffic control unit.

Duty While “duty” is frequently used in ATS documents and Title 14 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, the U.S. does not define duty in its ATS operational documents.

Duty period While “duty period” is used in ATS documents and Title 14 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, the U.S. does not define duty period in its ATS operational documents.

Emergency The U.S. defines ‘ emergency ’ but only uses some of the language from the Annex 11 Amdt 52 phase definition of “emergency phase”.

Final The U.S. defines the aspects of “Final Approach” separately.

Approach Flight In the US, flight information service and alerting service are often provided by flight service Information stations.

Centre Flight level The U.S. uses the measurement of a level of constant atmospheric pressure related to a reference datum of 29.92 inches of mercury instead of 1 013.2 hectopascals (hPa).

Geodetic The U.S. does not define Geodetic datum in aeronautical publications.

Datum Height The U.S defines Height as the height above ground level (or AGL) expressed in meters or feet.

INCERFA The U.S. does not define INCERFA.

Level The term “altitude” is used.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 79 AIP GEN 1.7 − 79 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 Maneuvering Any locality either on land, water, or structures, including airports/heliports and intermediate Area landing fields, which is used, or intended to be used, for the landing and takeoff of aircraft whether or not facilities are provided for the shelter, servicing, or for receiving or discharging passengers or cargo.

Meteorological No PCG definition. However FSSs perform this duty.

office Movement The runways, taxiways, and other areas of an airport/heliport which are utilized for taxiing/hover Area taxiing, air taxiing, takeoff, and landing of aircraft, exclusive of loading ramps and parking areas.

At those airports/heliports with a tower, specific approval for entry onto the movement area must be obtained from ATC.

Non − duty The U.S. uses the term “rest period.” period Obstacle The U.S. limits its definition of obstacle to an existing object, object of natural growth, or terrain at a fixed geographical location.

Pilot − in − The person who has final authority for the operation and safety of the flight has been designated as command pilot in command before or during the flight and hold the appropriate category, class and type rating for the flight.

Prohibited The U.S. allows flight into prohibited areas with proper permissions. Special use area.

area Radio The U.S. describes its radio navigation services in AIP GEN 3.4 but does not define it.

navigation service Radiotelepho - The U.S. does not explicitly define radiotelephony.

ny only Traffic US uses the term “Safety Alert” avoidance advice Traffic US uses the term “Traffic Advisory” information Transferring The U.S. uses the term “TRANSFERRING CONTROLLER.” unit Uncertainty The U.S. does not define uncertainty phase.

phase Waypoint A predetermined geographical position used for route/instrument approach definition, progress reports, published VFR routes, visual reporting points or points for transitioning and/or circumnavigating controlled and/or special use airspace, that is defined relative to a VORTAC station or in terms of latitude/longitude coordinates.

Chapter 2 General 2.3.2 Annex 11, paragraph 2.3.2 directs the flight information service to accomplish objective d) of para 2.2, “to provide advice and information for the safe and efficient conduct of flight.” Details on procedures to accomplish this objective are contained in FAA Order JO 7210.3, Part 4, Flight Service Stations. Specific procedures for accomplishing this objective are contained in FAA Order JO 7110.10, Flight Services. Also, the FAA Pilot Controller Glossary defines a Flight Service Station (FSS) as an air traffic facility which provides pilot briefings, flight plan processing, en route flight advisories, search and rescue services, and assistance to lost aircraft and aircraft in emergency situations. FSSs also relay ATC clearances, process Notices to Airmen, and broadcast aviation weather and aeronautical information. In Alaska, FSSs provide Airport Advisory Services.

2.5.2.2.1 FAA uses the generic term “controlled airspace” and “surface areas” 2.5.2.2.1.1 FAA also provides this service in Class E.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 80 AIP GEN 1.7 − 80 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.5.2.2.2 Annex 11, paragraph 2.3.2 directs the flight information service to accomplish objective d) of para 2.2, “to provide advice and information for the safe and efficient conduct of flight.” Details on procedures to accomplish this objective are contained in FAA Order 7210.3, Part 4, Flight Service Stations. Specific procedures for accomplishing this objective are contained in FAA Order 7110.10, Flight Services. Also, the FAA Pilot Controller Glossary defines Flight Service Stations as “air traffic facilities which provide pilot briefing, en route communications and VFR search and rescue services, assist lost aircraft and aircraft in emergency situations, relay ATC clearances, originate Notices to Airmen, broadcast aviation weather and NAS information, receive and process IFR flight plans, and monitor NAVAIDs. In addition, at selected locations, FSSs provide En Route Flight Advisory Service (Flight Watch), take weather observations, issue airport advisories, and advise Customs and Immigration of trans − border flights.” 2.6.1 The U.S. has chosen not to use Class F airspace.

2.11.3.2.2 Class E − 5 700/1200 − foot airspace areas are used for transitioning aircraft to/from the terminal or en route environment.

2.11.3.3 En Route Domestic Airspace Areas consist of Class E airspace that extends upward from a spe - cified altitude to provide controlled airspace in those areas where there is a requirement to provide IFR en route ATC services but the Federal airway structure is inadequate. En Route Domestic Airspace Areas may be designated to serve en route operations when there is a requirement to provide ATC service but the desired routing does not qualify for airway designation. Offshore/ Control Airspace Areas are locations designated in international airspace (between the U.S.

12 − mile territorial limit and the CTA/FIR boundary, and within areas of domestic radio navigation - al signal or ATC radar coverage) wherein domestic ATC procedures may be used for separation purposes.

2.11.5.1 A Class D airspace area shall be of sufficient size to: 1. Allow for safe and efficient handling of operations. 2. Contain IFR arrival operations while between the surface and 1,000 feet above the surface, and IFR departure operations while between the surface and the base of adjacent controlled airspace. Size and shape may vary to provide for 1 and 2. The emphasis is that a Class D area shall be sized to contain the intended operations.

2.11.5.3 Refer to Surface Areas. The U.S. uses the term “Surface Area”. Surface area is airspace contained by the lateral boundary of the Class B, C, D, or E airspace designated for an airport that begins at the surface and extends upward.

2.26.5 No time is issued prior to taxi for take − off. Time checks are given to the nearest quarter minute.

2.29 Process is described in the FAA Safety Management System Manual and the FAA Order 1100.161.

Chapter 3 Air Traffic Control Service 3.2 Air Route Traffic Control Facilities (ARTCC) are used instead of Area Control Service, and Terminal Control Facilities instead of Approach Control Service.

3.6.2.4 The U.S does not specify notification of 2 − way communication. The accepting unit shall not alter the clearance of an aircraft that has not yet reached the transfer of control point without the prior approval of the transferring unit.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 81 AIP GEN 1.7 − 81 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.7.3.1 Air crews are not required to read back clearances, only to acknowledge receipt of clearances.

Certain air traffic controller safety − related parts of ATC clearances and instructions which are transmitted by voice and which must be read back according to US requirements.

“Ensure pilots acknowledge all Air Traffic Clearances and ATC Instructions. When a pilot reads back an Air Traffic Clearance or ATC Instruction: Ensure that items read back are correct.

Ensure the read back of hold short instructions, whether a part of taxi instructions or a LAHSO clearance.

Ensure pilots use call signs and/or registration numbers in any read back acknowledging an Air Traffic Clearance or ATC Instruction.” 3.7.3.1.1 Air crews are not required to read back clearances, only to acknowledge receipt of clearances.

3.7.3.3 The U.S. only requires a read back for operations regarding hold short instructions. Controllers may request a read back whenever they feel a read back is necessary.

3.7.4.3 4 − 3 − 8. COORDINATION WITH RECEIVING FACILITY Coordinate with the receiving facility before the departure of an aircraft if the departure point is less than 15 minutes flying time from the transferring facility’s boundary unless an automatic transfer of data between automated systems will occur, in which case the flying time requirement may be reduced to 5 minutes or replaced with a mileage from the boundary parameter when mutually agreeable to both facilities.

3.7.4.4 4 − 4 − 5. CLASS G AIRSPACE Include routes through Class G airspace only when requested by the pilot. NOTE − 1. Flight plans filed for random RNAV routes through Class G airspace are considered a request by the pilot. 2. Flight plans containing MTR segments in/through Class G airspace are considered a request by the pilot. Air Traffic Control Clearance means an authorization by air traffic control within controlled airspace.

Chapter 4 Flight Information Service 4.2.2 No Class F airspace. Collision Hazard information is provided between known traffic to aircraft in Class G airspace.

Chapter 6 Air Traffic Services Requirements for Communications 6.1.1.4 The US uses a 45 day retention period.

6.2.2.3.8 6.2.3.6 The US has a 45 day or longer retention period, with some exceptions. US en route facilities using system analysis recording tapes as their radar retention media shall retain radar data for 15 days.

Facilities using a teletype emulator or console printout must be retained for 30 days unless they are related to an accident or incident. A facility using a console typewriter printout take − up device may retain the printout on the spool for 15 days after the last date on the spool. If a request is received to retain data information following an accident or incident, the printout of the relative data will suffice and the tape/disc may then be returned to service through the normal established rotational program.

6.3.1.3 The US has a 45 day or longer retention period except that those facilities utilizing an analog voice recorder system shall retain voice recordings for 15 days.

6.4.1.2 The US retains surveillance data recordings for 45 days or longer when they are pertinent to an accident or incident investigation, except that en route facilities using system analysis recording tapes as their radar retention media (regardless of the type of voice recorder system being used) shall retain voice recordings for 15 days and those facilities using an analog voice recorder system shall retain voice recordings for 15 days. FAA’s Air Traffic Control System Command Center shall retain voice recordings for 15 days.

Chapter 7 Air Traffic Services Requirements for Information 7.1.5 The term “communication station” is not used but the flight information is passed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 82 AIP GEN 1.7 − 82 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.6 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) are the mechanism that would be implemented in such cases.

Appendix 2 Principles Governing the Establishment and Identification of Significant Points 3.1 In U.S., per FAA Order 8260.19K, there are some non − pronounceable points allowed: Stepdown fixes between FAF and MAP, Missed Approach Points (MAP), Computer Navigation Fixes (CNFs), and VFR Waypoints.

Other exceptions include alphanumeric “Navigation Reference System” and the “Gulf of America Grid System” waypoints described in the United States AIP, ENR 4.4 and ENR 6.1, respectively.

Appendix 4 ATS Airspace Classifications Speed restrictions of 250 knots do not apply to aircraft operating beyond 12 NM from the coast line within the U.S. Flight Information Region, in offshore Class E airspace below 10,000 feet MSL.

Paragraph (a) of § 91.117 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) provides that “Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 knots.” Within domestic airspace, a pilot operating at or above 10,000 MSL on an assigned speed adjustment greater than 250 knots is expected to comply with § 91.117(a) when cleared below 10,000 feet MSL without notifying Air Traffic Control (ATC).

The Federal Aviation Administration has proceeded from an operational perspective that the speed restrictions of § 91.117(a) do not apply to U.S.-registered aircraft, via § 91.703(a)(3), when operating outside the United States (and not within another country’s territorial airspace).

Appendix 6 Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS) Requirements 1.2 f) Breaks (“relief periods”) required to be “of reasonable duration” (Section 2 − 5 − 4c) and “administered in an equitable manner” (2 − 6 − 6a)y. Minimum duration not defined except for a meal break (30 minutes).

1.2 Note Variation from prescriptive schedule rules must be entered into the Daily Record of Facility Operation at the time of the deviation.

3 b) FAA does not have specific processes for deviations or variations from prescriptive fatigue management regulations.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 83 AIP GEN 1.7 − 83 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 12 − SEARCH AND RESCUE There are no reportable differences between U.S. regulations and the Standards and Recommended Practices contained in this Annex.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 84 AIP GEN 1.7 − 84 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 13 − AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION Chapter 5 Investigation 5.1.2 The U.S. is unable to investigate all serious incidents. A decision on whether to investigate a serious incident will consider factors such as the potential consequences of the incident, an assessment of available staff and resources, and the potential benefit to future safety.

5.12 The laws of the United States require the determination and public reporting of the facts, circumstances, and cause(s) or probable cause(s) of every civil aircraft accident. These laws, including the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, do not confine the disclosure of such information to an accident investigation or report. Accordingly, factual information such as statements, records of communications between persons, and air traffic recordings and transcripts are generally made public. United States law prohibits the public disclosure of cockpit voice recordings and visual recordings and limits the public disclosure of cockpit voice recording transcripts or written depictions of visual information to that information which is deemed relevant by the investigative authority. However, U.S. Courts can order the disclosure of the foregoing information for other than accident investigation purposes.

Regarding issues related to the competent authority, the U.S. approach is consistent with Annex 13 and ICAO Document 10053 in recognizing limits in a State’s ability to protect investigation records that may be sought for other public purposes, including freedom of information laws. This approach is fully consistent with the balancing test that has been broadly applied in the U.S. in determining whether applicable laws and regulations require the public disclosure of these records or permit their withholding from the public.

5.12.2 The laws of the United States require the determination and public reporting of the facts, circumstances, and cause(s) or probable cause(s) of every civil aircraft accident. These laws, including the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, do not confine the disclosure of such information to an accident investigation or report. United States law prohibits the public disclosure of cockpit voice recordings and visual recordings and limits the public disclosure of cockpit voice recording transcripts or written depictions of visual information to that information which is deemed relevant by the investigative authority. However, U.S. Courts can order the disclosure of the foregoing information for other than accident investigation purposes.

5.12.3 The laws of the United States require the determination and public reporting of the facts, circumstances, and cause(s) or probable cause(s) of every civil aircraft accident. These laws, including the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, do not confine the disclosure of such information to an accident investigation or report.

United States law may afford protection of the names of persons involved in accidents or incidents in some cases, though not all cases. U.S. Courts can order the disclosure of the foregoing information. In addition, while it is U. S. practice not to identify names of such persons in accident and incident reports, those names may be revealed in background material made available to the public as required by U.S. law.

5.12.6 The United States supports the principle of not circulating, publishing, or providing access to a draft Report or any part thereof, or any documents obtained during the investigation, unless such a report or document has already been published or released by the State that conducted the investigation.

However, the laws of the United States facilitate the public disclosure of information held by government agencies and commercial businesses. The U.S. government may not be able to restrict public access to a draft Report or any part thereof on behalf of the State conducting the investigation. However, regarding “Foreign Investigations”, neither the Board, nor any agency receiving information from the Board, shall release records pertaining to an investigation until the State conducting the investigation issues its Final Report or 2 years following the date of the accident, whichever occurs first. The standard for determining public access to information requested from a U.S. government agency or a commercial business does not consider or require the express consent of the State conducting an investigation.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 85 AIP GEN 1.7 − 85 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 5.19 The United States may find it necessary to accept a limited number of advisors appointed to assist the accredited representative and will exercise discretion in determining whether the skills and expertise of the advisor(s) are appropriate for the conduct of the aircraft accident or incident investigation.

5.20 The United States may find it necessary to accept a limited number of advisors appointed to assist the accredited representative and will exercise discretion in determining whether the skills and expertise of the advisor(s) are appropriate for the conduct of the aircraft accident or incident investigation.

5.25 Concerning 5.25(h), investigative procedures observed by the United States allow full participation in all progress and investigation planning meetings; however, deliberations related to analysis, findings, probable causes, and safety recommendations are restricted to the investigative authority and its staff. However, contributions to these areas are permitted through timely written submissions, as specified in paragraph 5.25(i).

5.25 h) Investigative procedures observed by the U.S. allow full participation in all progress and investigation planning meetings; however, deliberations related to analysis, findings, probable causes, and safety recommendations are restricted to the investigative authority and its staff.

However, participation in these areas is extended through timely written submissions, as specified in paragraph 5.25 i).

5.26 Concerning 5.26(b): The United States supports, in principle, the privacy of the State conducting the investigation regarding the progress and the findings of that investigation. However, the laws of the United States facilitate the public disclosure of information held by U.S. government agencies and U.S. commercial businesses. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, regarding “Foreign Investigations”, neither the Board, nor any agency receiving information from the Board, shall release records pertaining to an investigation until the State conducting the investigation issues its Final Report or 2 years following the date of the accident, whichever occurs first. The standard for determining public access to information requested from a U.S. government agency or a commercial business does not consider or require the express consent of the State conducting the investigation.

5.26 b) The U.S. supports, in principle, the privacy of the State conducting the investigation regarding the progress and the findings of that investigation. However, the laws of the U.S. facilitate the public disclosure of information held by U.S. government agencies and U.S. commercial business. The standard for determining public access to information requested from a U.S. government agency or a commercial business does not consider or require the expressed consent of the State conducting the investigation.

Chapter 6 Reporting 6.2 The United States supports the principle of not circulating, publishing, or providing access to a draft Report or any part thereof, or any documents obtained during the investigation, unless such a report or document has already been published or released by the State that conducted the investigation.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 86 AIP GEN 1.7 − 86 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.3 The United States requires that comments on draft final reports be received within 30 days of transmittal unless an extension is provided.

6.13 The U.S. supports the principle of not circulating, publishing, or providing access to a draft report or any part thereof unless such a report or document has already been published or released by the State which conducted the investigation. However, the laws of the U.S. facilitate the public disclosure of information held by government agencies and commercial business. The U.S.

government may not be able to restrict public access to a draft report or any part thereof on behalf of the State conducting the investigation. The standard for determining public access to information requested from a U.S. government agency or a commercial business does not consider or require the expressed consent of the State conducting an investigation.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 87 AIP GEN 1.7 − 87 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 14 − AERODROMES VOLUME 1 − AERODROME DESIGN AND OPERATIONS Chapter 1 General 1.2.1 Airports in the U.S. are for the most part owned and operated by local governments and quasi − government organizations formed to operate transportation facilities. The Federal Government provides air traffic control, operates and maintains NAVAIDs, provides financial assistance for airport development, certificates major airports, and issues standards and guidance for airport planning, design, and operational safety.

There is general conformance with the Standards and Recommended Practices of Annex 14, Volume I. At airports with scheduled passenger service using aircraft having more than nine seats, compliance with standards is enforced through regulation and certification. At other airports, compliance is achieved through the agreements with individual airports under which Federal development funds were granted; or, through voluntary actions.

1.3.1 In the U.S., the Airport Reference Code is a two − component indicator relating the standards used in 1.3.2 the airport’s design to a combination of dimensional and operating characteristics of the largest 1.3.3 aircraft expected to use the airport. The first element, Aircraft Approach Category, corresponds to 1.3.4 the ICAO PANS − OPS approach speed groupings. The second, Airplane Design Group, corresponds to the wingspan groupings of code element 2 of the Annex 14, Aerodrome Reference Code. See below: TBL GEN 1.7 − 1 Airport Reference Code (ARC) Aircraft Approach Category Approximate Annex 14 Code Number A 1 B 2 C 3 D 4 E − Airplane Design Group Corresponding Annex 14 Code Letter I A II B III C IV D V E VI F (proposed) EXAMPLE: AIRPORT DESIGNED FOR B747 − 400 ARC D − V.

Chapter 2 Aerodrome Data 2.2.1 The airport reference point is recomputed when the ultimate planned development of the airport is changed.

2.9.6 Minimum friction values have not been established to indicate that runways are ‘‘slippery when 2.9.7 wet.’’ However, U.S. guidance recommends that pavements be maintained to the same levels indicated in the ICAO Airport Services Manual.

2.11.3 If inoperative fire fighting apparatus cannot be replaced immediately, a NOTAM must be issued. If the apparatus is not restored to service within 48 hours, operations shall be limited to those compatible with the lower index corresponding to operative apparatus.

2.12 e) Where the original VASI is still installed, the threshold crossing height is reported as the center of the on − course signal, not the top of the red signal from the downwind bar.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 88 AIP GEN 1.7 − 88 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Chapter 3 Physical Characteristics 3.1.2* The crosswind component is based on the ARC: 10.5 kt for AI and BI; 13 kt for AII and BII; 16 kt for AIII, BIII and CI through DIII; 20 kts for AIV through DVI.

3.1.9* Runway widths (in meters) used in design are shown in the table below: Width of Runway in Meters Aircraft Airplane Design Group Approach I II III IV V VI Category 1 1 A 18 23 −− −− 45 60 1 1 B 18 23 −− −− 45 60 C 30 30 30 45 45 60 D 30 30 30 45 45 60 1 3 The width of a precision (lower than / statute mile approach visibility minimums) runway is 23 meters for a runway which is to accommodate only small (less than 5,700 kg) airplanes and 30 meters for runways accommodating larger airplanes.

For airplanes with a maximum certificated take − off mass greater than 68,000 kg, the standard runway width is 45 meters.

3.1.12 FAA allows dual and triple simultaneous independent approaches when runway centerlines are at least 3100 feet apart.

3.1.14* Longitudinal runway slopes of up to 1.5 percent are permitted for aircraft approach categories C and D except for the first and last quarter of the runway where the maximum slope is 0.8 percent.

3.1.19* Minimum and maximum transverse runway slopes are based on aircraft approach categories as follows: For categories A and B: 1.0 − 2.0 percent C and D: 1.0 − 1.5 percent 3.2.2 The U.S. does not require that the minimum combined runway and shoulder widths equal 60 meters.

The widths of shoulders are determined independently.

3.2.3* The transverse slope on the innermost portion of the shoulder can be as high as 5 percent.

3.3.3 A strip width of 120 meters is used for code 3 and 4 runways for precision, nonprecision, and 3.3.4* non − instrumented operations. For code 1 and 2 precision runways, the width is 120 meters. For 3.3.5* non − precision/visual runways, widths vary from 37.5 meters up to 120 meters.

3.3.9* Airports used exclusively by small aircraft (U.S. Airplane Design Group I) may be graded to distances as little as 18 meters from the runway centerline.

3.3.14* The maximum transverse slope of the graded portion of the strip can be 3 percent for aircraft approach categories C and D and 5 percent for aircraft approach categories A and B.

3.3.15* The U.S. does not have standards for the maximum transverse grade on portions of the runway strip falling beyond the area that is normally graded.

3.3.17* Runways designed for use by smaller aircraft under non − instrument conditions may be graded to distances as little as 18 meters from the runway centerline (U.S. Airplane Design Groups I and II).

3.4.2* For certain code 1 runways, the runway end safety areas may be only 72 meters.

3.7.1* The U.S. does not provide Standards or Recommended Practices for radio altimeter operating areas.

3.7.2* 3.8.3* The U.S. specifies a 6 meter clearance for Design Group VI airplanes.

3.8.4* The taxiway width for Design Group VI airplanes is 30 meters.

3.8.5* The U.S. also permits designing taxiway turns and intersections using the judgmental oversteering method.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 89 AIP GEN 1.7 − 89 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.8.7* Minimum separations between runway and taxiway centerlines, and minimum separations between taxiways and taxilanes and between taxiway/taxilanes and fixed/moveable objects are shown in the tables that follow. Generally, U.S. separations are larger for non − instrumented runways, and smaller for instrumented runways, than the Annex. Values are also provided for aircraft with wingspans up to 80 meters.

Minimum Separations Between Runway Centerline and Parallel Taxiway/Taxilane Centerline Aircraft Airplane Design Group Operation Approach I I II III IV V VI Category Visual runways and runways with not lower than / statute 150 feet 45 225 feet 240 feet 300 feet 400 feet 4 − A and B −− −− mile (1,200 meters) approach meters 67.5 meters 72 meters 90 meters 120 meters visibility minimums Runways with lower than 200 feet 250 feet 300 feet 350 feet 400 feet / statute mile (1,200 meters) A and B −− −− 4 − 60 meters 75 meters 90 meters 105 meters 120 meters approach visibility minimums Visual runways and runways 3 2 with not lower than / statute 300 feet 300 feet 400 feet 400 feet 400 feet 600 feet 4 − C and D −− mile (1,200 meters) approach 90 meters 90 meters 120 meters 120 meters 120 meters 180 meters visibility minimums Runways with lower than 400 feet 400 feet 400 feet 400 feet 400 feet 600 feet / statute mile (1,200 meters) C and D −− 4 − 2 120 meters 120 meters 120 meters 120 meters 120 meters 180 meters approach visibility minimums These dimensional standards pertain to facilities for small airplanes exclusively.

Corrections are made for altitude: 120 meters separation for airports at or below 410 meters; 135 meters for altitudes between 410 meters and 2,000 meters; and, 150 meters for altitudes above 2,000 meters.

Minimum Taxiway and Taxilane Separations: Airplane Design Group I II III IV V VI Taxiway centerline to parallel taxiway/ 69 feet 105 feet 152 feet 215 feet 267 feet 324 feet taxilane centerline 21 meters 32 meters 46.5 meters 65.5 meters 81 meters 99 meters Fixed or movable object 44.5 feet 65.5 feet 93 feet 129.5 feet 160 feet 193 feet 13.5 meters 20 meters 28.5 meters 39.5 meters 48 meters 59 meters Taxilane centerline to parallel taxilane 64 feet 97 feet 140 feet 198 feet 245 feet 298 feet centerline 19.5 meters 29.5 meters 42.5 meters 60 meters 74.5 meters 91 meters Fixed or movable object 39.5 feet 57.5 feet 81 feet 112.5 feet 138 feet 167 feet 12 meters 17.5 meters 24.5 meters 34 meters 42 meters 51 meters 3.8.10* Line − of − sight standards for taxiways are not provided in U.S. practice, but there is a requirement that the sight distance along a runway from an intersecting taxiway must be sufficient to allow a taxiing aircraft to safely enter or cross the runway.

3.8.11* Transverse slopes of taxiways are based on aircraft approach categories. For categories C and D, slopes are 1.0 − 1.5 percent; for A and B, 1.0 − 2.0 percent.

3.11.5 The runway centerline to taxi − holding position separation for code 1 is 38 meters for non − precision operations and 53 meters for precision. Code 3 and 4 precision operations require a separation of 75 meters, except for “wide bodies,” which require 85 meters.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 90 AIP GEN 1.7 − 90 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Dimensions and Slopes for Protective Areas and Surfaces Precision Non − precision Instrument Approach Visual Runway Approach Runways other Utility Runways other Utility a All runways All runways b d than utility runways than utility runways c Width of inner edge 305 meters 305 meters 152 meters 152 meters 152 meters 76 meters Divergency 15 percent 15 percent 15 percent 15 percent 10 percent 10 percent (each side) c c c Final width 4,877 meters 1,219 meters 1,067 meters 610 meters 475 meters 381 meters c c c c c Length 15,240 meters 3,048 meters 3,048 meters 1,524 meters 1,524 meters 1,524 meters Slope: inner c c c c c 2 percent 2.94 percent 2.94 percent 5 percent 5 percent 5 percent 3,049 meters Slope: beyond c 2.5 percent 3,048 meters a b c With visibility minimum as low as 1.2 km; with visibility minimum greater than 1.2 km; criteria less demanding than d Annex 14 Table 4 − 1 dimensions and slopes. Utility runways are intended to serve propeller − driven aircraft having a maximum take − off mass of 5,570 kg.

Chapter 4 Obstacle Restriction and Removal 4.1 Obstacle limitation surfaces similar to those described in 4.1 − 4.20 are found in 14 CFR Part 77.

4.1.21 A balked landing surface is not used.

4.1.25 The U.S. does not establish take − off climb obstacle limitation areas and surface, per se , but does specify protective surfaces for each end of the runway based on the type of approach procedures available or planned. The dimensions and slopes for these surfaces and areas are listed in the table above.

4.2 The dimensions and slopes of U.S. approach areas and surfaces are set forth in the above table.

Aviation regulations do not prohibit construction of fixed objects above the surfaces described in these sections.

4.2.1 Primary surface is also used as a civil airport imaginary surface. Primary surface is a surface longitudinally centered on a runway.

U.S. uses the width of the primary surface of a runway as prescribed in 14 CFR Part 77.25 for the most precise approach existing or planned for either end of that runway.

4.2.8 The slope and dimensions of the approach surface applied to each end of a runway are determined by the most precise approach existing or planned for that runway end.

4.2.9 Approach surfaces are applied to each end of each runway based upon the type of approach available or planned for that runway end.

4.2.10, Any proposed construction of or alteration to an existing structure is normally considered to be 4.2.11 physically shielded by one or more existing permanent structure(s), natural terrain, or topographic feature(s) of equal or greater height if the structure under consideration is located within the lateral dimensions of any runway approach surface but would not exceed an overall height above the established airport elevation greater than that of the outer extremity of the approach surface, and located within, but would not penetrate, the shadow plane(s) of the shielding structure(s).

4.2.12 The basic principle in applying shielding guidelines is whether the location and height of the structures are such that aircraft, when operating with due regard for the shielding structure, would not collide with that structure.

4.2.16 The size of each imaginary surface is based on the category of each runway according to the type of approach available or planned for that runway. The slope and dimensions of the approach surface applied to each end of a runway are determined by the most precise approach existing or planned for that runway end.

4.2.17 Approach surfaces are applied to each end of each runway based upon the type of approach available or planned for that runway end.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 91 AIP GEN 1.7 − 91 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 Chapter 5 Visual Aids for Navigation 5.2.1.7* The U.S. does not require unpaved taxiways to be marked.

5.2.2.2* The U.S. does not require a runway designator marking for unpaved runways.

5.2.2.4 Zeros are not used to precede single − digit runway markings. An optional configuration of the numeral 1 is available to designate a runway 1 and to prevent confusion with the runway centerline.

5.2.4.2* Threshold markings are not required, but sometimes provided, for non − instrument runways that do 5.2.4.3* not serve international operations.

5.2.4.5 The current U.S. standard for threshold designation is eight stripes, except that more than eight stripes may be used on runways wider than 45 meters. After 1 January 2008, the U.S. standard will comply with Annex 14.

5.2.4.6 The width and spacing of threshold stripes will comply with Annex 14 after 1 January 2008.

5.2.4.10 When a threshold is temporarily displaced, there is no requirement that runway or taxiway edge markings, prior to the displaced threshold, be obscured. These markings are removed only if the area is unsuitable for the movement of aircraft.

5.2.5.2 Aiming point markings are required on precision instrument runways and code 3 and 4 runways 5.2.5.3* used by jet aircraft.

5.2.5.4 The aiming point marking commences 306 meters from the threshold at all runways.

5.2.6.3 The U.S. pattern for touchdown zone markings, when installed on both runway ends, is only applicable to runways longer than 4,990 feet. On shorter runways, the three pair of markings closest to the runway midpoint are eliminated.

5.2.6.4 The U.S. standard places the aiming point marking 306 meters from the threshold where it replaces one of the pair of three stripe threshold markings. The 306 meters location is used regardless of runway length.

5.2.6.5* Touchdown zone markings are not required at a non − precision approach runway, though they may be provided.

5.2.7.4* Runway side stripe markings on a non − instrument runway may have an over − all width of 0.3 meter.

5.2.8.3 Taxiway centerline markings are never installed longitudinally on a runway even if the runway is part of a standard taxi route.

5.2.9.5* The term ‘‘ILS’’ is used instead of CAT I, CAT II, CAT III.

5.2.11.4 Check − point markings are provided, but the circle is 3 meters in diameter, and the directional line 5.2.11.5* may be of varying width and length. The color is the yellow used for taxiway markings.

5.2.11.6* 5.2.12 Standards for aircraft stand markings are not provided.

5.2.13.1* Apron safety lines are not required although many airports have installed them.

5.2.14.1 The U.S. does not have standards for holding position markings on roadways that cross runways.

Local traffic control practices are used.

5.3.1.1 5.3.1.2* The U.S. does not have regulations to prevent the establishment of non − aviation ground lights that might interfere with airport operations.

5.3.1.3 New approach lighting installations will meet the frangibility requirements. Some existing 5.3.1.4 non − frangible systems may not be replaced before 1 January 2005.

5.3.2.1* There is no requirement for an airport to have emergency runway lighting available if it does not 5.3.2.2* have a secondary power source. Some airports do have these systems, and there is an FAA 5.3.2.3* specification for these lights.

5.3.3.1 Only airports served by aircraft having more than 30 seats are required to have a beacon, though 5.3.3.3 they are available at many others.

5.3.3.6 Although the present U.S. standard for beacons calls for 24 − 30 flashes per minute, some older beacons may have flash rates as low as 12 flashes per minute.

5.3.3.8 Coded identification beacons are not required and are not commonly installed. Typically, airport beacons conforming to 5.3.3.6 are installed at locations served by aircraft having more than 30 seats.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 92 AIP GEN 1.7 − 92 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.3.4.1 While the U.S. has installed an approach light system conforming to the specifications in 5.3.4.10 through 5.3.4.19, it also provides for a lower cost system consisting of medium intensity approach lighting and sequenced flashing lights (MALSF) at some locations.

5.3.4.2 In addition to the system described in 5.3.4.1, a system consisting of omnidirectional strobe lights (ODALS) located at 90 meters intervals extending out to 450 meters from the runway threshold is used at some locations.

5.3.4.10 The U.S. standard for a precision approach category I lighting system is a medium intensity through approach lighting system with runway alignment indicator lights (MALSR). This system consists of 5.3.4.19 3 meters barrettes at 60 meters intervals out to 420 meters from the threshold and sequenced flashing lights at 60 meters intervals from 480 meters to 900 meters. A crossbar 20 meters in length is provided 300 meters from the threshold. The total length of this system is dependent upon the ILS glide path angle. For angles 2.75 and higher, the length is 720 meters.

5.3.4.16 The capacitor discharge lights can be switched on or off when the steady − burning lights of the 5.3.4.31 approach lighting system are operating. However, they cannot be operated when the other lights are not in operation.

5.3.4.20 The U.S. standard for a precision approach category II and III lighting system has a total length dependent upon the ILS glide path angle. For angles 2.75 and higher, the length is 720 meters.

5.3.5.1 Visual approach slope indicator systems are not required for all runways used by turbojets except 5.3.5.3 runways involved with land and hold short operations that do not have an electronic glideslope 5.3.5.4 system.

5.3.5.2 In addition to PAPI and APAPI systems, VASI and AVASI type systems remain in service at U.S.

airports with commercial service. Smaller general aviation airports may have various other approach slope indicators including tri − color and pulsating visual approach slope indicators.

5.3.5.27 The U.S. standard for PAPI allows for the distance between the edge of the runway and the first light unit to be reduced to 9 meters for code 1 runways used by nonjet aircraft.

5.3.5.42 The PAPI obstacle protection surface used is as follows: The surface begins 90 meters in front of the PAPI system (toward the threshold) and proceeds outward into the approach zone at an angle 1 degree less than the aiming angle of the third light unit from the runway. The surface flares 10 degrees on either side of the extended runway centerline and extends 4 statute miles from its point of origin.

5.3.8.4 The U.S. permits the use of omnidirectional runway threshold identification lights.

5.3.13.2 The U.S. does not require the lateral spacing of touchdown zone lights to be equal to that of touchdown zone marking when runways are less that 45 meters wide.

The lateral distance between the markings is 22 meters when installed on runways with a width of 45 meters or greater. The distance is proportionately smaller for narrower runways. The lateral distance between touchdown zone lights is nominally 22 meters but may be reduced to 20 meters to avoid construction problems.

5.3.14 The U.S. has no provision for stopway lights.

5.3.15.1 Taxiway centerline lights are required only below 183 meters RVR on designated taxi routes.

5.3.15.2* However, they are generally recommended whenever a taxiing problem exists.

5.3.15.3 Taxiway centerline lights are not provided on runways forming part of a standard taxi route even for 8.2.3 low visibility operations. Under these conditions, the taxi path is coincident with the runway centerline, and the runway lights are illuminated.

5.3.15.5 Taxiway centerline lights on exit taxiways presently are green. However, the new U.S. standard which is scheduled to be published by 1 January 98 will comply with the alternating green/yellow standard of Annex 14.

5.3.15.7* The U.S. permits an offset of up to 60 cm.

5.3.16.2 Taxiway edge lights are not provided on runways forming part of a standard taxi route.

8.2.3 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 93 AIP GEN 1.7 − 93 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 5.3.17.1 Stop bars are required only for runway visual range conditions less than a value of 183 meters at 5.3.17.2* taxiway/runway intersections where the taxiway is lighted during low visibility operations. Once 5.3.17.3 installed, controlled stop bars are operated at RVR conditions less than a value of 350 meters.

5.3.17.4* 5.3.17.5* 5.3.17.6 Elevated stop bar lights are normally installed longitudinally in line with taxiway edge lights.

Where edge lights are not installed, the stop bar lights are installed not more than 3 meters from the taxiway edge.

5.3.17.9 The beamspread of elevated stop bar lights differs from the inpavement lights. The inner isocandela curve for the elevated lights is ± 7 horizontal and ± 4 vertical.

5.3.17.12 The U.S. standard for stop bars, which are switchable in groups, does not require the taxiway centerline lights beyond the stop bars to be extinguished when the stop bars are illuminated. The taxiway centerline lights which extend beyond selectively switchable stop bars are grouped into two segments of approximately 45 meters each. A sensor at the end of the first segment re − illuminates the stop bar and extinguishes the first segment of centerline lights. A sensor at the end of the second segment extinguishes that segment of centerline lights.

5.3.18.1* Taxiway intersection lights are also used at other hold locations on taxiways such as low visibility holding points.

5.3.18.2 Taxiway intersection lights are collocated with the taxiway intersection marking. The marking is located at the following distances from the centerline of the intersecting taxiway: Airplane Design Group Distance I 13.5 meters II 20 meters III 28.5 meters IV 39 meters V 48.5 meters VI 59 meters 5.3.19.1 Runway guard lights are required only for runway visual range conditions less than a value of 5.3.19.2* 350 meters.

5.3.19.4 Runway guard lights are placed at the same distance from the runway centerline as the aircraft 5.3.19.5 holding distance, or within a few feet of this location.

5.3.19.12 The new U.S. standard for in − pavement runway guard lights complies with Annex 14. However, there may be some existing systems that do not flash alternately.

5.3.20.4* The U.S. does not set aviation standards for flood lighting aprons.

5.3.21 The U.S. does not provide standards for visual docking guidance systems. U.S. manufacturers of these devices generally adhere to ICAO SARPS.

5.3.23.1 The U.S. does not have a requirement for providing roadholding position lights during RVR conditions less than a value of 350 meters.

5.4.1.2 Signs are often installed a few centimeters taller than specified in Annex 14, Volume 1, Table 5 − 4.

5.4.1.5 Sign inscriptions are slightly larger, and margins around the sign slightly smaller, than indicated in Annex 14, Volume 1, Appendix 4.

5.4.1.6 The sign luminance requirements are not as high as specified in Appendix 4. The U.S. does not specify a nighttime color requirement in terms of chromaticity.

5.4.2.2 All signs used to denote precision approach holding positions have the legend ‘‘ILS.’’ 5.4.2.4 5.4.2.9 5.4.2.14 5.4.2.16 5.4.2.6 U.S. practice uses the NO ENTRY sign to prohibit entry by aircraft only.

5.4.2.8 The second mandatory instruction sign is usually not installed unless added guidance is necessary.

5.4.2.10 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 94 AIP GEN 1.7 − 94 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.4.2.15 Signs for holding aircraft and vehicles from entering areas where they would infringe on obstacle limitation surfaces or interfere with NAVAIDs are inscribed with the designator of the approach , followed by the letters ‘‘ APCH ’’; for example, ‘‘15 − APCH.’’ 5.4.3.13 U.S. practice is to install signs about 3 to 5 meters closer to the taxiway/runway (See Annex 14, 5.4.3.15 Table 5 − 4).

5.4.3.16 The U.S. does not have standards for the location of runway exit signs.

5.4.3.24 A yellow border is used on all location signs, regardless of whether they are stand − alone or collocated with other signs.

5.4.3.26 U.S. practice is to use Pattern A on runway vacated signs, except that Pattern B is used to indicate that an ILS critical area has been cleared.

5.4.3.30* The U.S. does not have standards for signs used to indicate a series of taxi − holding positions on the same taxiway.

5.4.4.4* The inscription, ‘‘VOR Check Course,’’ is placed on the sign in addition to the VOR and DME data.

5.4.5.1* The U.S. does not have requirements for airport identification signs, though they are usually installed.

5.4.6.1* Standards are not provided for signs used to identify aircraft stands.

5.4.7.2 The distance from the edge of road to the road − holding position sign conforms to local highway practice.

5.5.2.2* Boundary markers may be used to denote the edges of an unpaved runway.

5.5.7.1* 5.5.3 There is no provision for stopway edge markers.

Chapter 6 Visual Aids for Denoting Obstacles 6.1 Recommended practices for marking and lighting obstacles are found in FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460 − 1J, Obstruction Marking and Lighting.

6.1.3 Any temporary or permanent structure, including all appurtenances, that exceeds an overall height of 200 feet (61m) above ground level or exceeds any obstruction standard contained in 14 CFR Part 77, should normally be marked and/or lighted.

6.2.1 This chapter provides recommended guidelines to make certain structures conspicuous to pilots during daylight hours. One way of achieving this conspicuity is by painting and/or marking these structures.

Recommendations on marking structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structures and overall layout of design.

6.2.3* The maximum dimension of the rectangles in a checkered pattern is 6 meters on a side.

6.2.7 Markers should be displayed in conspicuous positions on or adjacent to the structure so as to retain the general definition of the structure. They should be recognizable in clear air from a distance of at least 4,000 feet (1219m) and in all directions from which aircraft are likely to approach.

Markers should be distinctively shaped, i.e., spherical or cylindrical, so they are not mistaken for items that are used to convey other information. They should be replaced when faded or otherwise deteriorated.

6.2.11 Flag markers should be displayed around, on top, or along the highest edge of the obstruction.

When flags are used to mark extensive or closely grouped obstructions, they should be displayed approximately 50 feet (15m) apart. The flag stakes should be of such strength and height that they will support the flags above all surrounding ground, structures, and/or objects of natural growth.

6.2.12 Each side of the flag marker should be at least 2 feet (0.6m) in length.

Standard does not specifically address mobile objects.

6.2.14 Color patterns. Flags should be colored as follows: solid, orange and white, and checkerboard.

Standard does not specifically address mobile objects.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 95 AIP GEN 1.7 − 95 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 6.3.1 Obstruction lighting may be displayed on structures as follows: aviation red obstruction lights; medium intensity flashing white obstruction lights, high intensity flashing white obstruction lights, dual lighting, obstruction lights during construction, obstruction lights in urban areas, and temporary construction equipment lighting.

6.3.11 The height of the structure AGL determines the number of light levels.

6.3.13 When a structure lighted by a high intensity flashing light system is topped with an antenna or similar appurtenance exceeding 40 feet (12m) in height, a medium intensity flashing white light (L − 865) should be placed within 40 feet (12m) from the tip of the appurtenance. This light should operate 24 hours a day and flash simultaneously with the rest of the lighting system.

6.3.14 The number of light units recommended depends on the diameter of the structure at the top.

6.3.16 Lights should be installed on the highest point at each end. At intermediate levels, lights should be displayed for each 150 feet (46m) or fraction thereof. The vertical position of these lights should be equidistant between the top lights and the ground level as the shape and type of obstruction will permit. One such light should be displayed at each outside corner on each level with the remaining lights evenly spaced between the corner lights.

6.3.17 Lights should be installed on the highest point at each end. At intermediate levels, lights should be displayed for each 150 feet (46m) or fraction thereof. The vertical position of these lights should be equidistant between the top lights and the ground level as the shape and type of obstruction will permit. One such light should be displayed at each outside corner on each level with the remaining lights evenly spaced between the corner lights.

6.3.18 Lights should be installed on the highest point at each end. At intermediate levels, lights should be displayed for each 150 feet (46m) or fraction thereof. The vertical position of these lights should be equidistant between the top lights and the ground level as the shape and type of obstruction will permit. One such light should be displayed at each outside corner on each level with the remaining lights evenly spaced between the corner lights.

6.3.19, One or more light units is needed to obtain the desired horizontal coverage. The number of light 6.3.20 units recommended per level (except for the supporting structures of catenary wires and buildings) depends upon the average outside diameter of the specific structure, and the horizontal beam width of the light fixture. The light units should be installed in a manner to ensure an unobstructed view of the system by a pilot approaching from any direction. The number of lights recommended is the minimum.

The U.S. does not utilize Type A or Type B obstacle lights. Recommendations on marking structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of wind turbines, number of structures and overall layout of design.

6.3.21* The effective intensity, for daylight − luminance background, of Type A high − intensity obstacle 6.3.22* lights is 270,000 cd ± 25 percent.

The effective intensity, for daylight − luminance background, of Type B high − intensity obstacle lights is 140,000 cd ± 25 percent.

6.3.22 The height of the structure AGL determines the number of light levels. The light levels may be adjusted slightly, but not to exceed 10 feet (3m) when necessary to accommodate guy wires and personnel who replace or repair light fixtures. If an adjacent object shields any light, horizontal placement of the lights should be adjusted or additional lights should be mounted on that object to retain or contribute to the definition of the obstruction.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 96 AIP GEN 1.7 − 96 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.3.23, Red obstruction lights are used to increase conspicuity during nighttime. The red obstruction 6.3.24, lighting system is composed of flashing omnidirectional beacons (L − 864) and/or steady burning 6.3.27, (L − 810) lights. When one or more levels is comprised of flashing beacon lighting, the lights 6.3.29 should flash simultaneously.

The U.S. does not utilize Type A, B, C, or D obstacle lights. Recommendations on marking structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in 6.3.28 When objects within a group of obstructions are approximately the same overall height above the surface and are located a maximum of 150 feet (46m) apart, the group of obstructions may be considered an extensive obstruction. Install light units on the same horizontal plane at the highest portion or edge of prominent obstructions. Light units should be placed to ensure that the light is visible to a pilot approaching from any direction.

6.3.30, The medium intensity flashing white light system is normally composed of flashing omni − 6.3.31, directional lights. Medium intensity flashing white obstruction lights may be used during daytime 6.3.32 and twilight with automatically selected reduced intensity for nighttime operation.

The U.S. does not utilize Type A, B, or C obstacle lights. Medium intensity flashing white (L − 865) obstruction lights may provide conspicuity both day and night. Recommendations on marking structures can vary depending on terrain features, weather patterns, geographic location, and in the case of structures and overall layout of design.

6.3.35 Use high intensity flashing white obstruction lights during daytime with automatically selected reduced intensities for twilight and nighttime operations. When high intensity white lights are operated 24 hours a day, other methods of marking and lighting may be omitted.

The U.S. does not utilize Type A obstacle lights. Lighting with high intensity (L − 856) flashing white obstruction lights provides the highest degree of conspicuity both day and night.

Chapter 7 Visual Aids for Denoting Restricted Use Areas 7.1.2* A ‘‘closed’’ marking is not used with partially closed runways. See 5.2.4.10, above.

7.1.4 Crosses with shapes similar to figure 7.1, illustration b) are used to indicate closed runways and taxiways.

The cross for denoting a closed runway is yellow.

7.1.5 In the U.S. when a runway is permanently closed, only the threshold marking, runway designation marking, and touchdown zone marking need be obliterated. Permanently closed taxiways need not have the markings obliterated.

7.1.7 The U.S. does not require unserviceability lights across the entrance to a closed runway or taxiway when it is intersected by a night − use runway or taxiway.

7.4.4 Flashing yellow lights are used as unserviceability lights. The intensity is such as to be adequate to delineate a hazardous area.

Chapter 8 Equipment and Installations 8.1.5* A secondary power supply for non − precision instrument and non − instrument approach runways is 8.1.6* not required, nor is it required for all precision approach runways.

8.1.7 8.1.8 The U.S. does not provide secondary power specifically for take − off operations below 550 meters RVR.

8.2.1 There is no requirement in the U.S. to interleave lights as described in the Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 5.

8.2.3 See 5.3.15.3 and 5.3.16.2 8.7.2* Glide slope facilities and certain other installations located within the runway strip, or which 8.7.3 penetrate obstacle limitation surfaces, may not be frangibly mounted.

8.7.4* Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 97 AIP GEN 1.7 − 97 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 8.9.7* A surface movement surveillance system is recommended for operations from 350 meters RVR down to 183 meters. Below 183 meters RVR, a surface movement radar or alternative technology is generally required.

Chapter 9 Emergency and Other Services 9.1.1 Emergency plans such as those specified in this section are required only at airports serving scheduled air carriers using aircraft having more than 30 seats. These airports are certificated under 14 CFR Part 139. In practice, other airports also prepare emergency plans.

9.1.12 Full − scale airport emergency exercises are conducted at intervals, not to exceed three years, at airports with scheduled passenger service using aircraft with more than 30 seats.

9.2.1 Rescue and fire fighting equipment and services such as those specified in this section are required only at airports serving scheduled air carriers in aircraft having more than 30 seats. Such airports generally equate to ICAO categories 4 through 9.

Other airports have varying degrees of services and equipment.

9.2.3* There is no plan to eliminate, after 1 January 2005, the current practice of permitting a reduction of one category in the index when the largest aircraft has fewer than an average of five scheduled departures a day.

9.2.4 The level of protection at U.S. airports is derived from the length of the largest aircraft serving the 9.2.5 airport similar to the Annex’s procedure, except that maximum fuselage width is not used.

U.S. indices A − E are close equivalents of the Annex’s categories 5 − 9. The U.S. does not have an equivalent to category 10.

Fire Extinguishing Agents and Equipment Index Aircraft length Total minimum quantities of extinguishing agents More than Not more Dry chemical Water for Minimum trucks Discharge rate than protein foam A 27 meters 225 kg 0 1 See below B 27 meters 38 meters 225 kg 5,700 L 1 See below C 38 meters 48 meters 225 kg 5,700 L 2 See below D 48 meters 60 meters 225 kg 5,700 L 3 See below E 60 meters 225 kg 11,400 L 3 See below Truck size Discharge rate 1,900 L but less than 7,600 at least 1,900 L per minute but not more than 3,800 L per minute 7,600 L or greater at least 2,280 L per minute but not more than 4,560 L per minute 9.2.10 The required firefighting equipment and agents by index are shown in the table above.

The substitution equivalencies between complementary agents and foam meeting performance level A are also used for protein and fluoroprotein foam. Equivalencies for foam meeting performance level B are used only for aqueous film forming foams.

9.2.18* There is no specific requirement to provide rescue equipment as distinguished from firefighting equipment.

9.2.19* At least one apparatus must arrive and apply foam within 3 minutes with all other required vehicles arriving within 4 minutes.

Response time is measured from the alarm at the equipment’s customary assigned post to the commencement of the application of foam at the mid − point of the farthest runway.

9.2.29* For ICAO category 6 (U.S. index B), the U.S. allows one vehicle.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 98 AIP GEN 1.7 − 98 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.4.4 At the present time, there is no requirement to perform tests using a continuous friction measuring device with self − wetting features. Some U.S. airports own these devices, while others use less formal methods to monitor build − up of rubber deposits and the deterioration of friction characteristics.

9.4.15 The standard grade for temporary ramps is 15 feet longitudinal per 1 inch of height (0.56 percent slope) maximum, regardless of overlay depth.

9.4.19 There is no U.S. standard for declaring a light unserviceable if it is out of alignment or if its intensity is less than 50 percent of its specified value.

*Indicates ICAO Recommended Practice Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 99 AIP GEN 1.7 − 99 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 14 − AERODROMES VOLUME II − HELIPORTS Chapter 1 Definitions Declared The U.S. does not use declared distances (take − off distance available, rejected take − off distance distances available, or landing distance available) in designing heliports.

Final approach The U.S. ‘‘take − off and landing area’’ is comparable to the ICAO FATO, and the U.S. ‘‘FATO’’ is and take − off more comparable to the ICAO TLOF. The U.S. definition for the FATO stops with ‘‘the take − off area (FATO) manoeuvre is commenced.’’ This difference in definition reflects a variation in concept. The rejected take − off distance is an operational computation and is not required as part of the design.

Helicopter stand The U.S. does not use the term “helicopter stand.” Instead, the U.S. considers paved or unpaved aprons, helipads, and helidecks, all as helicopter parking areas; i.e., helicopter stands.

Safety area The U.S. considers the safety area to be part of the take − off and landing area which surrounds the FATO and does not call for or define a separate safety area.

Touchdown and The U.S. differs in the definition by considering helipads and helidecks to be FATO. The U.S. does lift − off area not define the load bearing area on which the helicopter may touch down or lift − off as a TLOF.

(TLOF) Chapter 2 Heliport Data 2.1 d) The U.S. does not measure or report a safety area as a separate feature of a heliport.

2.2 The U.S. does not ‘‘declare’’ distances for heliports.

Chapter 3 Physical Characteristics 3.1.2 The U.S. does not distinguish between single − engine and multi − engine helicopters for the purposes of heliport design standards. Neither does the U.S. design or classify heliports on the basis of helicopter performance. The U.S. FATO dimensions are at least equal to the rotor diameter of the design single rotor helicopter and the area must be capable of providing ground effect. The U.S.

does not have alternative design standards for water FATOs, elevated heliports, or helidecks.

3.1.3 The U.S. has a single gradient standard; i.e., 5 percent, except in fueling areas where the limit is 2 percent, which is applicable for all portions of heliports.

3.1.6 The U.S. does not require or provide criteria for clearways in its design standards. It does encourage 3.1.7* ownership and clearing of the land underlying the innermost portion of the approach out to where 3.1.8* the approach surface is 10.5 meters above the level of the take − off surface.

3.1.14 to 3.1.21 Safety areas are considered part of the take − off and landing area (or primary surface) in U.S.

heliport design. The take − off and landing area of the U.S. design criteria, based on 2 rotor diameters, provides for the ICAO safety area; however, the surface does not have to be continuous with the FATO or be load bearing.

3.1.22 Taxiway widths are twice the undercarriage width of the design helicopter.

3.1.23 The U.S. requires 1.25 rotor diameters plus 2 meters of separation between helicopter ground taxiways.

3.1.24 The U.S. gradient standard for taxiways is a maximum of 5 percent.

3.1.32* The U.S. sets no gradient standards for air taxiways.

3.1.33 The U.S. requires 1.5 rotor diameters of separation between hover or air taxiways.

3.1.34 The U.S. standards for air taxiways and air transit routes are combined as the standards for hover taxiways noted in paragraphs 3.1.23, 3.1.24 and 3.1.33.

3.1.35 The U.S. sets no maximum turning angle or minimum radius of turn on hover taxiways.

3.1.36 The U.S. gradient standard for aprons is a maximum of 5 percent except in fueling areas where it is 2 percent.

3.1.37 The U.S. criterion for object clearances is 1/3 rotor diameter or 3 meters, whichever is greater.

3.1.38 The U.S. standard for helipads (comparable to helicopter stands) is 1.5 times the undercarriage length or width, whichever is greater.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 100 AIP GEN 1.7 − 100 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.39 The U.S. standard for separation between FATO center and the centerline of the runway is 120 meters.

3.2.2 The U.S. does not apply either a performance related or an alternative design standard for elevated heliport facilities.

3.2.5 to 3.2.10 The U.S. does not use safety areas in its heliport design.

3.3 In the U.S., shipboard and relocatable off − shore helicopter ‘‘helideck’’ facilities are under the 3.4 purview of the U.S. Coast Guard and utilize the International Maritime Organization (IMO) code.

Fixed off − shore helideck facilities are under the purview of the Department of Interior based on their document 351DM2. Coastal water helideck facilities are under the purview of the individual affected States.

Chapter 4 Obstacle Restriction and Removal 4.1.1 The U.S. approach surface starts at the edge of the take − off and landing area.

4.1.2 a) The U.S. approach surface width adjacent to the heliport take − off and landing area is a minimum of 2 rotor diameters.

4.1.2 b) 2) The U.S. precision instrument approach surface flares from a width of 2 rotor diameters to a width of 1,800 meters at the 7,500 meters outer end. The U.S. does not use a note similar to the one that follows 4.1.4, as it does not differentiate between helicopter requirements on the basis of operational performance.

4.1.5 The outer limit of the U.S. transitional surfaces adjacent to the take − off and landing area is 76 meters from the centerline of the VFR approach/departure surfaces. The transitional surface width decreases to zero at a point 1,220 meters from the take − off and landing area. It does not terminate at an inner horizontal surface or at a predetermined height.

4.1.6 The U.S. transitional surfaces have a fixed width, 76 meters less the width of the take − off and landing area, from the approach centerline for visual operations and an outwardly flaring width to 450 meters for precision instrument operations. The U.S. does not use an inner horizontal surface nor terminate the transitional surfaces at a fixed/predetermined height.

4.1.7 b) Since the U.S. includes the safety area in the take − off and landing area, the comparable elevation is at the elevation of the FATO.

4.1.9 through The U.S. does not use the inner horizontal surface, the conical surface, or take − off climb surface 4.1.20 described in these paragraphs or the note following paragraph 4.1.20 for heliport design.

4.1.21 through The U.S. does not have alternative criteria for floating or fixed − in − place helidecks.

4.1.25 4.2 The U.S. has no requirement for a note similar to the one following the heading ‘‘Obstacle limitation requirements.’’ 4.2.1 The U.S. criteria does not require a take − off climb surface or a conical obstacle limitation surface to establish a precision instrument approach procedure.

4.2.2 The U.S. criteria does not require a take − off climb surface or a conical obstacle limitation surface to establish a non − precision instrument approach procedure.

4.2.3 The U.S. criteria does not require a take − off climb obstacle limitation surface to establish a non − instrument approach procedure.

4.2.4* The U.S. has no requirement for protective surfaces such as an inner horizontal surface or a conical surface.

4.2.5 The U.S. does not have tables for heliport design comparable to the ICAO Tables 4 − 1 to 4 − 4.

4.2.6 The U.S. subscribes to the intent of this paragraph to limit object heights in the heliport protective surfaces but uses fewer surfaces with different dimensions for those surfaces.

4.2.7* The U.S. subscribes to the intent of this paragraph but uses different dimensional surfaces.

4.2.8 The U.S. criterion requires that a heliport have at least one approach and departure route and encourages multiple approaches separated by arcs of 90 to 180 degrees.

4.2.9* The U.S. has no requirement that a heliport’s approach surfaces provide 95 percent usability.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 101 AIP GEN 1.7 − 101 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 4.2.10 Since the U.S. does not differentiate between surface level and elevated heliports, the comments to paragraphs 4.2.1 through 4.2.5 above apply.

4.2.11 The U.S. has no requirement for a take − off climb surface. It does require at least one approach/departure surface and encourages that there be as many approaches as is practical separated by arcs of 90 to 180 degrees.

4.2.12 through Since the U.S. does not have alternative design criteria for helidecks or shipboard heliports, there 4.2.22 are no comparable U.S. protective surface requirements.

Tables 4 − 1, 4 − 2, The U.S. does not have tables comparable to the ICAO Tables 4 − 1 to 4 − 4.

4 − 3, 4 − 4 Chapter 5 Visual Aids 5.2.1 The U.S. does not have criteria for markings to be used in defining winching areas.

5.2.3.3 The U.S. maximum mass markings are specified in 1,000 pound units rather than tonnes or kilograms.

5.2.4.3 The U.S. criterion requires FATO markers but is not specific on the number or spacing between markers.

5.2.4.4 The U.S. criteria for FATO markers is not dimensionally specific.

5.2.6 The U.S. does not require, or have criteria for, marking an aiming point.

5.2.7.1 The U.S. does not require specific criteria for marking floating or off − shore fixed − in − place helicopter or helideck facilities.

5.2.8 The U.S. does not require marking the touchdown area.

5.2.9 The U.S. does not have criteria for heliport name markings.

5.2.10 The U.S. does not have a requirement to mark helideck obstacle − free sectors.

5.2.12.2 The U.S. criterion places the air taxiway markers along the edges of the routes rather than on the centerline.

5.2.12.3 The U.S. criterion for air taxiway markers does not specify the viewing area or height to width ratio.

5.3.2.3 The U.S. heliport beacon flashes white − green − yellow colors rather than a series of timed flashes.

5.3.2.5* The U.S. criteria is not specific on the light intensity of the flash.

5.3.3.3 The U.S. criterion specifies a 300 meters approach light system configuration. The light bars are spaced at 30 meters intervals. The first two bars of the configuration are single lights, the next two bars are two lights, then two bars with three lights, then two bars with four lights, and finally two bars with five lights.

5.3.3.4 The U.S. approach light system uses aimed PAR − 56 lights.

5.3.3.6 The U.S. heliport approach light system does not contain flashing lights.

5.3.5.2 a) The U.S. requires an odd number of lights, but not less than three lights per side.

5.3.5.2 b) The U.S. requires a minimum of eight lights for a circular FATO and does not specify the distance between lights.

5.3.5.4* The U.S. criteria does not specify light distribution.

5.3.6 The U.S. does not have specific criteria for aiming point lights.

5.3.8 The U.S. does not have standards for winching area lighting.

Chapter 6 Heliport Services 6.1* The U.S. requirements for rescue and fire fighting services at certificated heliports are found in 14 CFR Part 139. Criteria for other heliports are established by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) pamphlets 403 or 418, or in regulations of local fire departments.

*Indicates ICAO Recommended Practice Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 102 AIP GEN 1.7 − 102 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 15 − AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES Chapter 1 General ASHTAM The U.S. doesn’t have a series of NOTAM called ASHTAM.

Danger area Danger Areas do not exist in the U.S. Equivalent/similar areas are defined, designated & charted as Prohibited, Warning, Alert, and Restricted Areas.” Pre − flight The US does not use the term PIB.

Information Bulletin (PIB) Prohibited Additional terminology used by the US.

Area Restricted Additional terminology used by the US.

Area SNOWTAM The US presents the information via a NOTAM.

1.1.20 The US does not use the term ASHTAM.

1.2.2.2 The U.S. utilizes Geoid − 03 which is a component of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88).

Chapter 5 Aeronautical Information Products and Services 5.2.1 Currently, the U.S. does not utilize the ICAO format for domestic NOTAMs. The US NOTAMs that are distributed as International NOTAMs are in ICAO format (excluding the L/L).

5.2.5.1. f) The US does not produce an Aircraft Parking / Docking Chart.

5.2.6 The U.S. does not use the term SNOWTAM and ASHTAM.

5.3.3.4.1 The United States does not publish the horizontal extent of obstacles.

Chapter 6 Aeronautical Information Updates 6.3.2.1 The U.S. does not routinely publish “trigger” NOTAMs when an AIP amendment is issued.

6.3.2.3 The U.S. does not provide a NOTAM for accidental release of radioactive material, toxic chemicals, pyrotechnic demonstrations, sky lanterns, rocket debris, or volcanic ash deposition.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 103 AIP GEN 1.7 − 103 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 16 − ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION VOLUME I − AIRCRAFT NOISE Reference: Part 36 of Title 14 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations Chapter 1 1.7 Each person who applies for a type certificate for an airplane covered by 14 CFR Part 36, irrespective of the date of application for the type certificate, must show compliance with Part 36.

Chapter 2 2.1.1 For type design change applications made after 14 August 1989, if an airplane is a Stage 3 airplane prior to a change in type design, it must remain a Stage 3 airplane after the change in type design regardless of whether Stage 3 compliance was required before the change in type design.

2.3.1 a) Sideline noise is measured along a line 450 meters from and parallel to the extended runway centerline for two − and three − engine aircraft; for four − engine aircraft, the sideline distance is 0.35 NM.

2.4.2 Noise level limits for Stage 2 derivative aircraft depend upon whether the engine by − pass ratio is less than two. If it is, the Stage 2 limits apply. Otherwise, the limits are the Stage 3 limits plus 3 dB or the Stage 2 value, whichever is lower.

2.4.2.2 b) Take − off noise limits for three − engine, Stage 2 derivative airplanes with a by − pass ratio equal to or greater than 2 are 107 EPNdB for maximum weights of 385,000 kg (850,000 lb) or more, reduced by 4 dB per halving of the weight down to 92 EPNdB for maximum weights of 28,700 kg (63,177 lb) or less. Aircraft with a by − pass ratio less than 2 only need meet the Stage 2 limits.

2.5.1 Trade − off sum of excesses not greater than 3 EPNdB and no excess greater than 2 EPNdB.

2.6.1.1 For airplanes that do not have turbo − jet engines with a by − pass ratio of 2 or more, the following apply: a) four − engine airplanes − 214 meters (700 feet); b) all other airplanes − 305 meters (1,000 feet).

For all airplanes that have turbo − jet engines with a by − pass ratio of 2 or more, the following apply: a) four − engine airplanes − 210 meters (689 feet); b) three − engine airplanes − 260 meters (853 feet); c) airplanes with fewer than three engines − 305 meters (1,000 feet).

The power may not be reduced below that which will provide level flight for an engine inoperative or that will maintain a climb gradient of at least 4 percent, whichever is greater.

Chapter 3 3.1.1 For type design change applications made after 14 August 1989, if an airplane is a Stage 3 airplane prior to a change in type design, it must remain a Stage 3 airplane after the change in type design regardless of whether Stage 3 compliance was required before the change in type design.

3.3.1 a) 2) The U.S. has no equivalent provision in 14 CFR Part 36.

3.3.2.2 A minimum of two microphones symmetrically positioned about the test flight track must be used to define the maximum sideline noise. This maximum noise may be assumed to occur where the aircraft reaches 305 meters (1,000 feet).

14 CFR Part 36 does not require symmetrical measurements to be made at each and every point for propeller − driven airplane sideline noise determination.

3.6.2.1 c) Under 14 CFR Part 36, during each test take − off, simultaneous measurements should be made at the sideline noise measuring stations on each side of the runway and also at the take − off noise measuring station. If test site conditions make it impractical to simultaneously measure take − off and sideline noise, and if each of the other sideline measurement requirements is met, independent measurements may be made of the sideline noise under simulated flight path techniques. If the reference flight path includes a power cutback before the maximum possible sideline noise level is developed, the reduced sideline noise level, which is the maximum value developed by the simulated flight path technique, must be the certificated sideline noise value.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 104 AIP GEN 1.7 − 104 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.6.2.1 d) 14 CFR Part 36 specifies the day speeds and the acoustic reference speed to be the minimum approved value of V +10 kt, or the all − engines operating speed at 35 feet (for turbine − engine powered airplanes) or 50 feet (for reciprocating − engine powered airplanes), whichever speed is greater as determined under the regulations constituting the type certification basis of the airplane.

The test must be conducted at the test day speeds ± 3 kt.

3.7.4 If a take − off test series is conducted at weights other than the maximum take − off weight for which noise certification is requested: a) at least one take − off test must be at or above that maximum weight; b) each take − off test weight must be within +5 or − 10 percent of the maximum weight.

If an approach test series is conducted at weights other than the maximum landing weight for which certification is requested: a) at least one approach test must be conducted at or above that maximum weight; b) each test weight must exceed 90 percent of the maximum landing weight.

Total EPNL adjustment for variations in approach flight path from the reference flight path and for any difference between test engine thrust or power and reference engine thrust or power must not exceed 2 EPNdB.

Chapter 5 5.1.1 Applies to all large transport category aircraft (as they do to all subsonic turbo − jet aircraft regardless of category). Commuter category aircraft, propeller − driven airplanes below 8,640 kg (19,000 lb) are subject to 14 CFR Part 36, Appendix F or to Appendix G, depending upon the date of completion of the noise certification tests.

Chapter 6 6.1.1 Applies to new, all propeller − driven airplane types below 19,000 lb (8,640 kg.) in the normal, commuter, utility, acrobatic, transport, or restricted categories for which the noise certification tests are completed before 22 December 1988.

Chapter 8 General 14 CFR Part 36 (Section 36.1 (h)) defines Stage 1 and Stage 2 noise levels and Stage 1 and Stage 2 helicopters. These definitions parallel those used in 14 CFR Part 36 for turbo − jets and are used primarily to simplify the acoustical change provisions in Section 36.11.

14 CFR Part 36 (Section 36.805(c)) provides for certain derived versions of helicopters for which there are no civil prototypes to be certificated above the noise level limits.

8.1.1 a) Applicable to new helicopter types for which application for an original type certificate was made on or after 6 March 1988.

8.1.1 b) Applicable only to “acoustical changes’’ for which application for an amended or supplemental type certificate was made on or after 6 March 1988.

8.4 14 CFR Part 36 Appendix H specifies a slightly different rate of allowable maximum noise levels as a function of helicopter mass. The difference can lead to a difference in the calculated maximum noise limits of 0.1 EPNdB under certain roundoff condition.

8.6.3.1 b) Does not include the V speeds.

NE 8.7 14 CFR Part 36 Appendix H does not permit certain negative corrections. Annex 16 has no equivalent provision.

8.7.4 EPNL correction must be less than 2.0 EPNdB for any combination of lateral deviation, height, approach angle and, in the case of flyover, thrust or power.

Corrections to the measured data are required if the tests were conducted below the reference weight.

Corrections to the measured data are required if the tests were conducted at other than reference engine power.

8.7.5 The rotor speed must be maintained within one percent of the normal operating RPM during the take − off procedure.

8.7.8 The helicopter shall fly within ± 10 from the zenith for approach and take − off, but within ± 5 from the zenith for horizontal flyover.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 105 AIP GEN 1.7 − 105 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 Chapter 10 General Exception from acoustical change rule given for aircraft with flight time prior to 1 January 1955 and land configured aircraft reconfigured with floats or skis.

10.1.1 Applies to new, amended, or supplemental type certificates for propeller − driven airplanes not exceeding 8,640 kg (19,000 lb) for which noise certification tests have not been completed before 22 December 1988.

10.4 The maximum noise level is a constant 73 dBA up to 600 kg (1,320 lb). Above that weight, the limit increases at the rate of 1 dBA/75kg (1 dBA/165 lb) up to 85 dBA at 1,500 kg (3,300 lb) after which it is constant up to and including 8,640 kg (19,000 lb).

10.5.2, second For variable − pitch propellers, the definition of engine power is different in the second segment of phase, d) the reference path. Maximum continuous installed power instead of maximum power is used.

Chapter 11 11.1 14 CFR Part 36 Appendix J was effective 11 September 1992 and applies to those helicopters for which application for a type certificate was made on or after 6 March 1986.

11.4 14 CFR Part 36 Appendix J specifies a slightly different rate of allowable maximum noise levels as a function of helicopter mass. The difference can lead to a difference in the calculated maximum noise limits of 0.1 EPNdB under certain roundoff condition.

11.6 14 CFR Part 36 Appendix J prescribes a ± 15 meter limitation on the allowed vertical deviation about the reference flight path. Annex 16 has no equivalent provision.

PART V General No comparable provision exists in U.S. Federal Regulations. Any local airport proprietor may propose noise abatement operating procedures to the FAA which reviews them for safety and appropriateness.

Appendix 1 General Sections 3, 8, and 9 of Appendix 1 which contain the technical specifications for equipment, measurement and analysis and data correction for Chapter 2 aircraft and their derivatives differ in many important aspects from the corresponding requirements in Appendix 2 which has been updated several times. 14 CFR Part 36 updates have generally paralleled those of Appendix 2 of Annex 16. These updated requirements are applicable in the U.S. to both Stage 2 and Stage 3 aircraft and their derivatives.

2.2.1 A minimum of two microphones symmetrically positioned about the test flight track must be used to define the maximum sideline noise. This maximum noise may be assumed to occur where the aircraft reaches 305 meters (1,000 feet), except for four − engine, Stage 2 aircraft for which 439 meters (1,440 feet) may be used.

2.2.2 No obstructions in the cone defined by the axis normal to the ground and the half − angle 80 from the axis.

2.2.3 c) Relative humidity and ambient temperature over the sound path between the aircraft and 10 meters above the ground at the noise measuring site is such that the sound attenuation in the 8 kHz one − third octave band is not greater than 12 dB/100 meters and the relative humidity is between 20 and 95 percent. However, if the dew point and dry bulb temperature used for obtaining relative humidity are measured with a device which is accurate to within one − half a degree Celsius, the sound attenuation rate shall not exceed 14 dB/100 meters in the 8 kHz one − third octave band.

2.2.3 d) Test site average wind not above 12 kt and average cross − wind component not above 7 kt.

2.3.4 The aircraft position along the flight path is related to the recorded noise 10 dB downpoints.

2.3.5 At least one take − off test must be a maximum take − off weight and the test weight must be within +5 or − 10 percent of maximum certificated take − off weight.

Appendix 2 2.2.1 A minimum of two symmetrically placed microphones must be used to define the maximum sideline noise at the point where the aircraft reaches 305 meters.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 106 AIP GEN 1.7 − 106 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.2 When a multiple layering calculation is required, the atmosphere between the airplane and the ground shall be divided into layers. These layers are not required to be of equal depth, and the maximum layer depth must be 100 meters.

2.2.2 b) 14 CFR Part 36 specifies that the lower limit of the temperature test window is 36 degrees Fahrenheit (2.2 degrees Celsius). Annex 16 provides 10 degrees Celsius as the lower limit for the temperature test window.

14 CFR Part 36 does not specify that the airport facility used to obtain meteorological condition measurements be within 2,000 meters of the measurement site.

2.2.2 c) 14 CFR Part 36 imposes a limit of 14 dB/100 meters in the 8 kHz one − third octave band when the temperature and dew point are measured with a device which is accurate to within one − half a degree Celsius.

2.2.3 14 CFR Part 36 requires that the limitations on the temperature and relative humidity test window must apply over the whole noise propagation path between a point 10 meters above the ground and the helicopter. Annex 16 specifies that the limitations on the temperature and relative humidity test window apply only at a point 10 meters above the ground.

14 CFR Part 36 requires that corrections for sound attenuation must be based on the average of temperature and relative humidity readings at 10 meters and the helicopter. Annex 16 implies that the corrections for sound absorption are based on the temperature and relative humidity measured at 10 meters only.

3.2.6 No equivalent requirement.

3.4.5 For each detector/integrator the response to a sudden onset or interruption of a constant sinusoidal signal at the respective one − third octave band center frequency must be measured at sampling times 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 seconds after the onset or interruption. The rising responses must be the following amounts before the steady − state level: 0.5 seconds: 4.0 ± 1.0 dB 1.0 seconds: 1.75 ± 0.75 dB 1.5 seconds: 1.0 ± 0.5 dB 2.0 seconds: 0.6 ± 0.5 dB 3.4.5 (Note 1) No equivalent provision in 14 CFR Part 36.

3.5.2 No equivalent requirement.

5.4 14 CFR Part 36 requires that the difference between airspeed and groundspeed shall not exceed 10 kt between the 10 dB down time period.

8.4.2 14 CFR Part 36 specifies a value of − 10 in the adjustment for duration correction. Annex 16 specifies a value of − 7.5.

9.1.2, 9.1.3 14 CFR Part 36 always requires use of the integrated procedure if the corrected take − off or approach noise level is within 1.0 dB of the applicable noise limit.

Appendix 6 4.4.1 The microphone performance, not its dimensions, is specified. The microphone must be mounted 1.2 meters (4 feet) above ground level. A windscreen must be employed when the wind speed is in excess of 9 km/h (5 kt).

5.2.2 a) Reference conditions are different. Noise data outside the applicable range must be corrected to 77 degrees F and 70 percent humidity.

5.2.2 c) There is no equivalent provision in 14 CFR Part 36. Fixed − pitch propeller − driven airplanes have a special provision. If the propeller is fixed − pitch and the test power is not within 5 percent of reference power, a helical tip Mach number correction is required.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 107 AIP GEN 1.7 − 107 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 16 − ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION VOLUME II − AIRCRAFT ENGINE EMISSIONS Chapter 1 The U.S. currently has regulations prohibiting intentional fuel venting from turbojet, turbofan and turboprop aircraft, but we do not now have a regulation preventing the intentional fuel venting from helicopter engines.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 108 AIP GEN 1.7 − 108 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 17 − SECURITY − SAFEGUARDING INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION AGAINST ACTS OF UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE There are no reportable differences between U.S. regulations and the Standards and Recommended Practices contained in this Annex.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 109 AIP GEN 1.7 − 109 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ANNEX 18 − THE SAFE TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS BY AIR There are no reportable differences between U.S. regulations and the Standards and Recommended Practices contained in this Annex.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 110 AIP GEN 1.7 − 110 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ANNEX 19 − SAFETY MANAGEMENT Chapter 3 State Safety Management Responsibilities 3.3.2.1 U.S. does not currently require the implementation of SMS for: − approved training organizations that are exposed to safety risks related to aircraft operations during the provision of their services; − approved maintenance organizations providing services to operators of aeroplanes or helicopters engaged in international commercial air transport.

U.S. does require the implementation of SMS for: − organizations responsible for type design that hold a production certificate for the same product; − operators of certain aerodromes that do not satisfy criteria in 14 CFR § 139.401.

3.3.2.3 The U.S. has not established criteria for international general aviation operators of large or turbojet aeroplanes to implement an SMS.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 111 AIP GEN 1.7 − 111 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 PANS − OPS − 8168/611 VOLUME I − Flight Procedures PART III Table III − 1 − 1 Max speeds for visual maneuvering (Circling)” must not be applied to circling procedures in the U.S.

and Comply with the airspeeds and circling restrictions in ENR 1.5, paragraphs 11.1 and 11.6, in order to Table III − 1 − 2 remain within obstacle protection areas.

PART IV 1.2.1 The airspeeds contained in ENR 1.5 shall be used in U.S. CONTROLLED AIRSPACE .

VOLUME II − Construction of Visual and Instrument Flight Procedures In toto The United States does not construct Visual nor Instrument Flight Procedures per Volume II. The U.S.

constructs Visual and Instrument Flight Procedures following the cited FAA Orders 8260.3, 8260.19, 8260.46, 8260.58, and 8260.61.

In toto See ENR 1.5 − 6 Approach Clearance.

Feeder routes may connect an instrument approach to the en route structure.

PART I Section 2 − General Principles Chapter 1 1.1.4d See ENR 1.5 − 3.1 Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) Procedures and 1.5 − 35 Departure Control.

The United States has En Route Transitions promulgated on SIDs and STARs that facilitate transitions between en route and instrument flight procedures.

Section 4 − Arrival and Approach Procedures Chapter 5 5.4.1.5 See ENR 1.5 − 11 Approach and Landing Minimums.

The United States publishes landing minima on instrument approach charts.

5.4.6.1 See ENR 1.5 − 12.9.

Obstacles may penetrate the visual segment surface.

Chapter 7 7.3 See ENR 1.5 − 11 Approach and Landing Minimums.

The United States uses a minimum obstacle clearance of 300’ instead of 394’ for CAT C and D circling minima.

Appendix (to See ENR 1.5 − 26 Charted Visual Flight Procedures (CVFPs).

Chapter 7) The United States publishes CVFPs instead of Visual Maneuvering using Prescribed Track and provides no minimum obstacle clearance assurance.

Chapter 10 10.1.1 See ENR 1.5 − 10 Side − step Maneuver.

The United States may authorize a side − step maneuver to transition from the final approach course aligned to one runway to land on a parallel runway.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 1.7 − 112 AIP GEN 1.7 − 112 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Part III Section 5 − Publication Chapter 1 1.4.2.3 See ENR 1.5 − 9.2 for RNP AR APCH, 12.13 for RNP APCH.

The United States naming convention for RNP APCH approaches is ”RNAV (GPS) RWY ##”. The naming convention for RNP AR APCH approaches is ”RNAV (RNP) RWY ##”.

Part IV In toto See ENR 1.5 − 12.8 Visual Descent Point (VDP).

The United States may publish a VDP on a nonprecision approach where a pilot can make a stabilized descent from the MDA. Volume II, Part IV does not contain an equivalent provision.

VOLUME III − Aircraft Operating Procedures Section 3 − Simultaneous operations on parallel or near − parallel instrument runways 1.5c3 The United States does not require the final vector to final to enable the aircraft to be established on the final approach course track, in level flight for at least 3.7 km (2.0NM) prior to intercepting the glide path or vertical path for the selected instrument approach procedure. FAA Order JO 7110.65 requires that when conducting dual or triple simultaneous independent approaches the aircraft is cleared to descend to the appropriate glideslope/glidepath intercept altitude soon enough to provide a period of level flight to dissipate excess speed. Also, the aircraft must be provided at least 1 mile of straight flight prior to the final approach course intercept.

Section 10 − Flight Tracking 1.2.1 The United States has notified differences to the distress tracking standards in Annex 6, Part I, 6.18.

Consistent with those differences, the United States does not require U.S. operators to establish training programs and procedures specific to autonomous distress tracking and will not perform surveillance of implementation by U.S. operators.

1.2.2 FAA Order JO 7210.632, Air Traffic Organization Occurrence Reporting, establishes mandatory occurrence reporting (MOR) requirements and format for FAA employees, including reports sourced from operators and missed position reporting. The MOR Report form includes most, but not all, of the template in the Appendix to Ch. 1.

1.2.3 The United States has notified differences to the distress tracking standards in Annex 6, Part I, 6.18.

Consistent with those differences, the United States does not require U.S. operators to maintain contact details in the ICAO OPS CTRL.annex 6 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 1.7 − 113 AIP GEN 1.7 − 113 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 PAN − ABC − DOC 8400 Differences between abbreviations used in U.S. AIP, International NOTAMs Class I and Class II, and Notices to Airmen Publication and ICAO PANS − ABC are listed in GEN 2.2 . For other U.S. listings of abbreviations (contractions) for general use, air traffic control, and National Weather Service (NWS), which differ in some respects, see U.S. publication Contractions Handbook (FAA Order JO 7340.2). In addition, various U.S. publications contain abbreviations of terms used therein, particularly those unique to that publication.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.1 − 1 AIP GEN 2.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

GEN 2. TABLES AND CODES

GEN 2.1 Measuring System, Aircraft Markings, and

Holidays

1. Units of Measurement 1.1 The following table identifies the units of measurement that have been selected for use in messages transmitted by all U.S. aeronautical stations, in the U.S. AIP, NOTAM dissemination, and other publications.

2. Time System 2.1 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) is used in the Air Traffic and Communication services provided and in most documents published by the Aeronautical Information Services.

2.2 When local mean time is used, it will be so indicated as local standard time (LST). See FIG GEN 2.1 − 1 for a depiction of the standard time zones within the continental U.S.

3. Geodetic Reference Datum 3.1 All published geographic coordinates indicating latitude and longitude are expressed in terms of the World Geodetic System − 1984 (WGS − 84) geodetic reference datum.

4. Vertical Reference System 4.1 The U.S. utilizes Geoid − 03, which is a component of the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88).

5. Aircraft Nationality and Registration Marks 5.1 The nationality mark for the aircraft registered in the U.S. is the letter N, followed by a series of numbers or a series of numbers and letters.

6. Public Holidays 6.1 A list of US public holidays can be found at www.usa.gov/holidays . Aviation services remain available during holidays.

TBL GEN 2.1 − 1 For Measurements of: Units used: Distance used in navigation, position reporting, etc. − generally in Nautical miles and tenths excess of 2 to 3 nautical miles Relatively short distances such as those relating to aerodrome (e.g., Feet runway lengths) Altitudes, elevations and heights Feet Horizontal speed, including wind speed Knots Vertical speed Feet per minute Wind direction for landing and taking off Degrees magnetic Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.1 − 2 AIP GEN 2.1 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Wind direction except for landing and taking off Degrees true Visibility, including runway visual Statute miles or feet Altimeter Setting Inches of mercury Temperature Degrees Fahrenheit Weight Pounds Time Hours and minutes, the day of 24 hours beginning at midnight Coordinated Universal Time Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 2.1 − 3 AIP GEN 2.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 FIG GEN 2.1 − 1 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: Blank Page →

Blank Page

AIP GEN 2.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 2.2 Abbreviations Used in AIS Publications

NOTE − An “s” may be added for plural. ICAO indicates ICAO usage.

A ARTCC air route traffic control center ASDE airport surface detection equipment / and A/C approach control ASPH asphalt ASSC Airport Surface Surveillance Capability AAM Advanced Air Mobility ATCT air traffic control tower AAS airport advisory service ATD along − track distance ICAO: AAP − approach control; AC − altocumulus ASR airport surveillance radar ACFT aircraft ATIS automatic terminal information service ACR air carrier AVBL available ADF automatic direction finder AWY airway AER approach end runway B AFIS Automatic Flight Information Service BC back course AFT after BCN beacon AGL above ground level BCST broadcast AHRS Attitude Heading Reference System BLDG building AIM Aeronautical Information Manual BRG bearing AIS Aeronautical Information Services BTN between ALS approach light system BVLOS Beyond Visual Line of Sight ALSF − 1 standard 2400’ high − intensity approach BYD beyond lighting system with sequenced flashers C (Category I configuration) CAT category ALSF − 2 standard 2400’ high − intensity approach lighting system with sequenced flashers ICAO: CAT − clear air turbulence (Category II configuration) CBO Community − Based Organization ALSTG altimeter setting CFR Code of Federal Regulations ALT altitude CFR crash fire rescue ALTM altimeter CLNC clearance ALTN alternate ICAO: CLR − clear/cleared to/clearance AMDT amendment CLSD close or closed or closing ICAO: AMD − amendment CMSND commissioned APCH approach CNTR center APCHG approaching CNTRLN centerline APRX approximate CL − centerline ICAO: APV approve or approved or approval COA Certificate of Waiver or Authorization ARAC Army Radar Approach Control facility COMLO compass locator (US Army) CONST construction ARPT airport CPTY capacity ATO Air Traffic Organization CRS course ICAO: AD − aerodrome CTC contact ARR arrive or arrival ICAO: CTR − control zone ARSR air route surveillance radar Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.2 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 D FDC flight data center Fl/P flight information (permanent) ICAO: D − danger area Fl/T flight information (temporary) ICAO: D − downward (tendency in RVR during previous 10 minutes) FL flight level DALGT daylight FM fan marker DCMSND decommissioned FM from DDT runway weight bearing capacity for ICAO: FM − from; FM − from (followed by aircraft with double dual − tandem type time weather change is forecast to landing gear begin) DEGS degrees FREQ frequency ICAO: C − degrees Celsius (Centigrade) FRIA FAA − Recognized Identification Area F − degrees Fahrenheit FRQ frequent DEP depart; departure FSS Flight Service Station ICAO: DEP − depart/departure/departure FT feet message G DF direction finder GOVT government ICAO: DF − I am connecting you to the station GP glide path you request ICAO: GP − glide path DH decision height GS glide slope DME UHF standard (TACAN compatible dis - tance measuring equipment) ICAO: GS − ground speed; GS − small hail and/or snow pellets ICAO: DME − distance meaning equipment GWT gross weight DSPLCD displaced H DSTC distance HAA height above airport ICAO: DIST − distance HAT height above touchdown DT runway weight bearing capacity for aircraft with dual − tandem type landing HAZMAT Hazardous Material gear ICAO: HGT − height/height above DURG during HIRL High intensity runway lights ICAO: DRG − during HOL holiday DVFR defense visual flight rule HWY highway DW runway weight bearing capacity for I aircraft with dual − wheel type landing IAF initial approach fix gear IAP instrument approach procedure E ICAO: INA − initial approach E east IDENT identification ICAO: E − east/east longitude ICAO: ID − identifier/identification/identify EQUIP equipment IF intermediate fix ICAO: EQPT − equipment ICAO: IF − intermediate approach fix ETA estimated time of arrival IFR instrument flight rules ETE estimated time en route IFSS international flight service station EXCP except ILS instrument landing system ICAO: EXC − except INFO information EXTD extend or extended INOP inoperative F INS Inertial Navigation System FAF final approach fix INT intersection FAR Federal Aviation Regulation Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 2.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 INTL international MIN minimum or minute INTST intensity MIRL medium intensity runway edge lights IRU Inertial Reference Unit MM middle marker ILS J MOCA minimum obstruction clearance altitude J − bar jet runway barrier MRA minimum reception altitude K MSA minimum safe altitude KHZ kilohertz MSL mean sea level L MUNI municipal L left (used only to designate rwys; N e.g., rwy 12L) N north ICAO: L − left/runway identification/locator NA not authorized LAANC Low Altitude Authorization and NATL national Notification Capability NAVAID navigational aid LAT latitude NDB nondirectional radio beacon LB pounds (weight) NM nautical mile(s) LCTD located NOPT no procedure turn required LDA localizer type directional aid NR number ICAO: LDA − landing distance available LLZ − localizer O LGTD lighted OBSTN obstruction LMM compass locator at ILS middle marker OCA Oceanic Control Area LNDG landing ODALS omnidirectional approach lighting system ICAO: LDG − landing OM outer marker ILS LOC localizer OOP Operations Over People ICAO: LOC − localizer or locally or location or located OPER operate LOM compass locator at ILS outer marker OPN operation LONG longitude ICAO: OPR − operator/operate/operative/ operating/operational LRCO limited remote communications outlet ORIG original M OTS out of service MAA maximum authorized altitude OVRN overrun MAG magnetic P MAINT maintain, maintenance PAO Public Aircraft Operation ICAO: MNTN − maintain; MAINT − maintenance PAR precision approach radar MALS medium intensity approach light system PAT pattern MALSR medium intensity approach light system PBCS Performance − Based Communication with runway alignment indicator lights and Surveillance MAP missed approach point PCN pavement classification number ICAO: MAP − aeronautical maps and charts PERMLY permanently MAX maximum PIC Pilot − in − Command MCA minimum crossing altitude POB persons on board MDA minimum descent altitude PPR prior permission required MEA minimum en route IFR altitude PROC procedure MGOW Maximum Gross Operating Weight MHZ megahertz Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.2 − 4 AIP GEN 2.2 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Q SEC second SFC surface QUAD quadrant SFL sequenced flashing lights R SGI Special Government Interest R right (used only to designate rwys; e.g., rwy 19R) SI straight − in approach ICAO: R − received (acknowledgement of ICAO: STA − straight − in approach receipt)/red/restricted area (followed by SM statute mile(s) identification)/right (runway SR sunrise identification) SS sunset RADAR radio detection and ranging ICAO: SS − sandstorm RAPCON Radar Approach Control facility (USAF, USN and USMC) SSALF simplified short approach lighting system with sequenced flashers RATCF Radar Air Traffic Control Facility (USN and USMC) SSALR simplified short approach lighting system with runway alignment indicator RC Radio − Controlled lights RCAG remote center air/ground SSALS simplified short approach lighting RCLS runway centerline lights system system ICAO: RCL − runway centerline STOL short take − off and landing runway RCO remote communications outlet ICAO: STOL − short takeoff and landing RCV receive sUAS Small UAS RCVG receiving SVC service REIL runway end identifier lights ICAO: SVC − service message REQ request T RID Remote Identification T true (after a bearing) RNAV area navigation ICAO: T − temperature RPIC Remote Pilot − in − Command TAC terminal area chart RRP runway reference point TACAN UHF navigational facility − REL runway entrance lights omnidirectioal course and distance information RLLS Runway Lead − in Light System ICAO: TACAN − VHF tactical navigational RSTRD restricted aid RTS returned to service TAS true air speed RVR runway visual range TCH threshold crossing height RVRM runway visual range midpoint ICAO: TEMPO − Temporary/temporarily RVRR runway visual range rollout TFC traffic RVRT runway visual range touchdown THL takeoff hold lights RWSL runway status light THR threshold RWY runway THRU through ICAO: RWY − runway ICAO: THRU − through/I am connecting you S to another switchboard S runway weight bearing capacity for TKOF take − off aircraft with single − wheel type landing TEMPRLY temporarily gear ICAO: TMA − TERMINAL CONTROL S south AREA ICAO: S − south/south latitude TMPRY temporary/temporarily SAA Sense and Avoid TPA traffic pattern altitude SDF simplified directional facility Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 2.2 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TRACON terminal radar approach control VFR visual flight rules TRML terminal VHF very high frequency TRSA terminal radar service area VOR VHF omni − directional radio range TRUST The Recreational UAS Safety Test VLOS Visual Line of Sight TSNT transient VO Visual Observer TWR tower VORTAC Combined VOR and TACAN system (collocated) TWY taxiway VOT a VOR Receiver testing facility U VSBY visibility ICAO: U/S − unserviceable ICAO: VIS − visibility UAM Urban Air Mobility W UAS Unmanned Aircraft System W west UASFM UAS Facility Map WEA weather UAVBL unavailable ICAO: WX − weather UHF ultra high frequency WKDAY weekday UNLGTD unlighted WKEND weekend UNMON unmonitored WPT waypoint UNSKED unscheduled WS Weather Service UNUSBL unusable WT weight UTM UAS Traffic Management Z V Z Coordinated Universal Time VASI visual approach slope indicator ICAO: UTC − Coordinated Universal Time VCNTY vicinity VDP visual descent point Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: Blank Page →

Blank Page

AIP GEN 2.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 2.3 Chart Symbols

Aeronautical chart symbols are published in the Aeronautical Chart User’s Guide published by Aeronautical Information Services (AIS). The guide is available in PDF format for print, download, or viewing at: http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/aero_guide / Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 2.4 Location Indicators

Location identifiers authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration, Department of the Navy, and Transport Canada and U.S. airspace fixes and procedure codes are accessible through FAA Order JO 7350.9, Location Identifiers.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

A listing of navigation aids is not available. See individual aeronautical charts for specific information.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 2.6 Conversion Tables

TBL GEN 2.6 − 1 ft/M ft 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 0.30 0.61 0.91 1.22 1.52 1.83 2.13 2.44 2.74 10 3.05 3.35 3.66 3.96 4.27 4.57 4.88 5.18 5.49 5.79 20 6.10 6.40 6.71 7.01 7.32 7.62 7.92 8.23 8.53 8.84 30 9.14 9.45 9.75 10.06 10.36 10.67 10.97 11.28 11.58 11.89 40 12.19 12.50 12.80 13.11 13.41 13.72 14.02 14.33 14.73 14.94 50 15.24 15.54 15.85 16.15 16.46 16.76 17.07 17.37 17.68 17.98 60 18.29 18.59 18.90 19.20 19.51 19.81 20.12 20.42 20.73 21.03 70 21.34 21.64 21.95 22.25 22.56 22.86 23.16 23.47 23.77 24.08 80 24.38 24.69 24.99 25.30 25.60 25.91 26.21 26.52 26.82 27.13 90 27.43 27.74 28.04 28.35 28.65 28.96 29.26 29.57 29.87 30.18 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 30.48 33.53 36.58 39.62 42.67 45.72 48.77 51.82 54.86 57.91 200 60.96 64.01 67.06 70.10 73.15 76.20 79.25 82.30 85.34 88.39 300 91.44 94.49 97.54 100.53 103.63 106.68 109.73 112.78 115.82 118.87 400 121.92 124.97 128.02 131.06 134.11 137.16 140.21 143.26 146.30 149.35 500 152.40 155.45 158.50 161.54 164.59 167.64 170.69 173.74 176.78 179.83 600 182.88 185.93 188.98 192.02 195.07 198.12 201.17 204.22 207.26 210.31 700 213.36 216.41 219.46 222.50 225.55 228.60 231.65 234.70 237.74 240.79 800 243.84 246.89 249.94 252.98 256.03 259.09 262.13 265.18 268.22 271.27 900 274.32 277.37 280.42 283.42 268.51 289.56 292.61 295.66 298.70 301.75 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 304.80 335.28 365.76 396.24 426.72 457.20 487.68 518.16 548.64 579.12 2000 609.60 640.08 670.56 701.04 731.52 762.00 792.48 822.96 853.44 883.92 3000 914.40 944.88 975.36 1005.8 1036.3 1066.8 1097.3 1127.8 1158.2 1188.7 4000 1219.2 1249.7 1280.2 1310.6 1341.6 1371.6 1402.1 1432.6 1463.0 1493.5 5000 1524.0 1554.5 1585.0 1615.4 1645.9 1676.4 1706.9 1737.4 1767.8 1798.3 6000 1828.8 1859.3 1889.8 1920.2 1950.7 1981.2 2011.7 2042.2 2072.6 2103.1 7000 2133.6 2164.1 2194.6 2225.0 2255.5 2286.0 2316.5 2347.0 2377.4 2407.9 8000 2438.4 2468.9 2499.4 2529.8 2560.3 2590.8 2621.3 2651.8 2682.2 2712.7 9000 2743.2 2773.7 2804.2 2834.6 2865.1 2895.6 2926.1 2956.6 2987.0 3017.5 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 3048.0 3352.8 3657.6 3962.4 4267.2 4572.0 4876.8 5181.6 5486.4 5791.2 20000 6096.0 6400.8 6705.6 7010.4 7315.2 7620.0 7924.8 8229.6 8534.4 8839.2 30000 9144.0 9448.8 9753.6 10058 10363 10668 10937 11278 11582 11887 40000 12192 12497 12802 13106 13411 13716 14021 14326 14630 14935 50000 15240 15545 15850 16154 16459 16764 17069 17374 17678 17983 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.6 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 2.6 − 2 M/ft M 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 3.28 6.56 9.84 13.12 16.40 19.68 22.97 26.25 29.53 10 32.81 36.09 39.37 42.65 45.93 49.21 52.49 55.77 59.05 62.34 20 65.62 68.90 72.18 75.46 78.74 82.02 85.30 88.58 91.86 95.14 30 98.42 101.70 104.99 108.27 111.55 114.83 118.11 121.39 124.67 127.95 40 131.23 134.51 137.79 141.07 144.36 147.64 150.92 154.20 157.48 160.76 50 164.04 167.32 170.60 173.88 177.16 180.44 183.72 187.01 190.29 193.57 60 196.85 200.13 203.14 206.69 209.97 213.25 216.53 219.81 223.09 226.38 70 229.66 232.94 236.22 239.50 242.78 246.06 249.34 252.62 255.90 259.18 80 262.46 265.74 269.03 272.31 275.59 278.87 282.15 285.43 288.71 291.99 90 295.27 298.55 301.83 305.11 308.40 311.68 314.96 318.24 321.52 324.80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 328.08 360.89 393.70 426.50 459.31 492.12 524.93 557.74 590.54 623.35 200 656.16 688.97 721.78 754.58 787.39 820.20 853.01 885.82 918.62 951.43 300 984.24 1017.0 109.9 1082.7 1115.5 1148.3 1181.1 1213.9 1246.7 1279.5 400 1312.3 1345.1 1377.9 1410.7 1443.6 1476.4 1509.2 1542.0 1574.8 1607.6 500 1640.4 1673.2 1706.0 1738.8 1771.6 1804.4 1837.2 1870.1 1902.9 1935.7 600 1968.5 2001.3 2034.1 2066.9 2099.7 2132.5 2165.3 2198.1 2230.9 2263.8 700 2296.6 2329.4 2362.2 2395.0 2427.8 2460.6 2493.4 2562.2 2559.0 2591.8 800 2624.6 2657.4 2690.3 2723.1 2755.9 2788.7 2821.5 2854.3 2887.1 2919.9 900 2952.7 2985.5 3018.3 3051.1 3084.0 3116.8 3149.6 3182.4 3215.2 3248.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 3280.8 3608.0 3937.0 4265.0 4593.1 4921.2 5249.3 5577.4 5905.4 6233.5 2000 6561.6 6889.7 7217.8 7545.8 7873.9 8202.0 8530.1 8858.2 9186.2 9514.3 3000 9842.4 10170 10499 10827 11155 11483 11811 12139 12467 12795 4000 13123 13451 13779 14107 14436 14764 15092 15420 15748 16076 5000 16404 16732 17060 17388 17716 18044 18372 18701 19029 19357 6000 19685 20013 20341 20669 20997 21325 21653 21981 22309 22638 7000 22966 23294 23622 23950 24278 24606 24934 25262 25590 25918 8000 26246 26574 26903 27231 27559 27887 28215 28543 28871 29199 9000 29527 29855 30183 30511 30840 31168 31496 31824 32152 32480 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 2.6 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 2.6 − 3 INTERNATIONAL NAUTICAL MILES TO STATUTE MILES 1 nautical mile = 6,076.10 feet or 1,852 meters 1 statute mile = 5,280 feet or 1,609.35 meters NM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0.000 1.151 2.302 3.452 4.603 5.754 6.905 8.055 9.206 10.357 10 11.508 12.659 13.809 14.960 16.111 17.262 18.412 19.563 20.714 21.865 20 23.016 24.166 25.317 26.468 27.619 28.769 29.920 31.071 32.222 33.373 30 34.523 35.674 36.825 37.976 39.126 40.277 41.428 42.579 43.730 44.880 40 46.031 47.182 48.333 49.483 50.634 51.785 52.936 54.087 55.237 56.388 50 57.539 58.690 59.840 60.991 62.142 63.293 64.444 65.594 66.745 67.896 60 69.047 70.197 71.348 72.499 73.650 74.801 75.951 77.102 78.253 79.404 70 80.554 81.705 82.856 84.007 85.158 86.308 87.459 88.610 89.761 90.911 80 92.062 93.213 94.364 95.515 96.665 97.816 98.967 100.118 101.268 102.419 90 103.570 104.721 105.871 107.022 108.173 109.324 110.475 111.625 112.776 113.927 TBL GEN 2.6 − 4 STATUTE MILES TO INTERNATIONAL NAUTICAL MILES SM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0.000 0.869 1.738 2.607 3.476 4.345 5.214 6.083 6.952 7.821 10 8.690 9.559 10.428 11.297 12.166 13.035 13.904 14.773 15.642 16.511 20 17.380 18.249 19.118 19.986 20.855 21.724 22.593 23.462 24.331 25.200 30 26.069 26.938 27.807 28.676 29.545 30.414 31.283 32.152 33.021 33.890 40 34.759 35.628 36.497 37.366 38.235 39.104 39.973 40.482 41.711 42.580 50 43.449 44.318 45.187 46.056 46.925 47.794 48.663 49.532 50.401 51.270 60 52.139 53.008 53.877 54.746 55.615 56.484 57.353 58.222 59.091 59.959 70 60.828 61.697 62.566 63.435 64.304 65.173 66.042 66.911 67.780 68.649 80 69.518 70.387 71.256 72.125 72.994 73.863 74.732 75.601 76.470 77.339 90 78.208 79.077 79.946 80.815 81.684 82.553 83.422 84.291 85.160 86.029 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.6 − 4 AIP GEN 2.6 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 2.6 − 5 CONVERSION TABLE NM .0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 0 0 608 1215 1823 2430 3038 3646 4253 4861 5469 1 6076 6684 7291 7899 8507 9114 9722 10329 10937 11545 2 12152 12760 13367 13975 14583 15190 15798 16406 17013 17621 3 18228 18836 19444 20051 20659 21266 21874 22482 23089 23697 4 24304 24912 25520 26127 26735 27343 27950 28558 29165 29773 5 30381 30988 31596 32203 32811 33419 34026 34634 35241 35849 6 36457 37064 37672 38280 38887 39495 40102 40710 41318 41925 7 42533 43140 43748 44356 44963 45571 46178 46786 47394 48001 8 48609 49217 49824 50432 51039 51647 52255 52862 53470 54077 9 54685 55293 55900 56508 57115 57723 58331 58938 59546 60154 TBL GEN 2.6 − 6 CONVERSION TABLE − ft/NM ft 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 0.016 0.033 0.049 0.066 0.082 0.099 0.115 0.132 0.148 1000 0.165 0.181 0.197 0.214 0.230 0.247 0.263 0.280 0.296 0.313 2000 0.329 0.346 0.362 0.379 0.395 0.411 0.428 0.444 0.461 0.477 3000 0.494 0.510 0.527 0.543 0.560 0.576 0.593 0.609 0.625 0.642 4000 0.658 0.675 0.691 0.708 0.724 0.741 0.757 0.774 0.790 0.806 5000 0.823 0.839 0.856 0.872 0.889 0.905 0.922 0.938 0.955 0.971 6000 0.988 1.004 1.020 1.037 1.053 1.070 1.086 1.103 1.119 1.136 7000 1.152 1.169 1.185 1.202 1.218 1.234 1.251 1.267 1.284 1.300 8000 1.317 1.333 1.350 1.366 1.383 1.399 1.416 1.432 1.448 1.465 9000 1.481 1.498 1.514 1.531 1.547 1.564 1.580 1.597 1.613 1.629 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 1.646 1.811 1.975 2.140 2.304 2.469 2.634 2.798 2.963 3.127 20000 3.292 3.457 3.621 3.786 3.950 4.115 4.280 4.444 4.609 4.773 30000 4.938 5.103 5.267 5.432 5.596 5.761 5.926 6.090 6.255 6.419 40000 6.584 6.749 6.913 7.078 7.242 7.407 7.572 7.736 7.901 8.065 50000 8.230 8.395 8.559 8.724 8.888 9.053 9.218 9.382 9.547 9.711 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 2.6 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 2.6 − 7 MB/INS ° C/ ° F MB INS MB INS MB INS ° C ° F ° C ° F ° C ° F 30 948 27.99 982 29.00 1016 30.00 − 60 − 76.0 − 15 15 86.0 949 28.02 983 29.03 1017 30.03 − 59 − 74.2 − 14 6.8 31 87.8 950 28.05 984 29.06 1018 30.06 − 58 − 72.4 − 13 8.6 32 89.6 951 28.08 985 29.09 1019 30.09 − 57 − 70.6 − 12 10.4 33 91.4 952 28.11 986 29.12 1020 30.12 − 56 − 68.8 − 11 12.2 34 93.2 953 28.14 987 29.15 1021 30.15 − 55 − 67.0 − 10 14.0 35 95.0 954 28.17 988 29.18 1022 30.18 − 54 − 65.2 − 9 15.8 36 96.8 955 28.20 989 29.21 1023 30.21 − 53 − 63.4 − 8 17.6 37 98.6 956 28.23 990 29.23 1024 30.24 − 52 − 61.6 − 7 19.4 38 100.4 957 28.26 991 29.26 1025 30.27 − 51 − 59.8 − 6 21.2 39 102.2 40 958 28.29 992 29.29 1026 30.30 − 50 − 58.0 − 5 23.0 104.0 959 28.32 993 29.32 1027 30.33 − 49 − 56.2 − 4 24.8 42 105.8 960 28.35 994 29.35 1028 30.36 − 48 − 54.4 − 3 26.6 42 107.6 961 28.38 995 29.38 1029 30.39 − 47 − 52.6 − 2 28.4 43 109.4 962 28.41 996 29.41 1030 30.42 − 46 − 50.8 − 1 30.2 44 111.2 963 28.44 997 29.44 1031 30.45 − 45 − 49.0 0 32.0 45 113.0 964 28.47 998 29.47 1032 30.47 − 44 − 47.2 1 33.8 46 114.8 965 28.50 999 29.50 1033 30.50 − 43 − 45.4 2 35.6 47 116.6 966 28.53 1000 29.53 1034 30.53 − 42 − 43.6 3 37.4 48 118.4 967 28.56 1001 29.56 1035 30.56 − 41 − 41.8 4 39.2 49 120.2 50 968 28.59 1002 29.59 1036 30.59 − 40 − 40.0 5 41.0 122.0 969 28.61 1003 29.62 1037 30.62 − 39 − 38.2 6 42.8 51 123.8 970 28.64 1004 29.65 1038 30.65 − 38 − 36.4 7 44.6 52 125.6 971 28.67 1005 29.68 1039 30.68 − 37 − 34.6 8 46.4 53 127.4 972 28.70 1006 29.71 1040 30.71 − 36 − 32.8 9 48.2 54 129.2 973 28.73 1007 29.74 1041 30.74 − 35 − 31.0 10 50.0 55 131.0 974 28.76 1008 29.77 1042 30.77 − 34 − 29.2 11 51.8 56 132.8 975 28.79 1009 29.80 1043 30.80 − 33 − 27.4 12 53.6 57 134.6 976 28.82 1010 29.83 1044 30.83 − 32 − 25.6 13 55.4 58 136.4 977 28.85 1011 29.86 1045 30.86 − 31 − 23.8 14 57.2 59 138.2 60 978 28.88 1012 29.88 1046 30.89 − 30 − 22.0 15 59.0 140.0 979 28.91 1013 29.91 1047 30.92 − 29 − 20.2 16 60.8 61 141.8 980 28.94 1014 29.94 1048 30.95 − 28 − 18.4 17 62.6 62 143.6 981 28.97 1015 29.97 1049 30.98 − 27 − 16.6 18 64.4 63 145.4 1050 31.01 − 26 − 14.8 19 66.2 64 147.2 − 24 − 11.2 21 69.8 66 150.8 − 23 − 9.4 22 71.6 67 152.6 − 22 − 7.6 23 73.4 68 154.4 − 21 − 5.8 24 75.2 69 156.2 70 − 20 − 4.0 25 77.0 158.0 − 19 − 2.2 26 78.7 − 18 − 0.4 27 80.6 − 17 1.4 28 82.4 − 16 3.2 29 84.2 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 2.6 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 2.6 − 8 litres/imperial gallons litres/U.S. gallons L IMP L IMP L IMP L U.S. L U.S. L U.S.

1 .22 41 9.02 81 17.82 1 .26 41 10.83 81 21.40 3 .66 43 9.46 83 18.26 3 .79 43 11.36 83 21.93 4 .88 44 9.68 84 18.48 4 1.06 44 11.63 84 22.19 5 1.10 45 9.90 85 18.70 5 1.32 45 11.89 85 22.46 6 1.32 46 10.12 86 18.92 6 1.59 46 12.15 86 22.72 7 1.54 47 10.34 87 19.14 7 1.85 47 12.42 87 22.99 8 1.76 48 10.56 88 19.36 8 2.11 48 12.68 88 22.35 9 1.98 49 10.78 89 19.58 9 2.38 49 12.95 89 23.51 10 2.20 50 11.00 90 19.80 10 2.64 50 13.21 90 23.78 11 2.42 51 11.22 91 20.02 11 2.91 51 13.47 91 24.04 12 2.64 52 11.44 92 20.24 12 3.17 52 13.74 92 24.31 13 2.86 53 11.66 93 20.46 13 3.44 53 14.00 93 24.57 14 3.08 54 11.88 94 20.68 14 3.70 54 14.27 94 24.84 15 3.30 55 12.10 95 20.90 15 3.96 55 14.53 95 25.10 16 3.52 56 12.32 96 21.12 16 4.23 56 14.80 96 25.36 17 3.74 57 12.54 97 21.34 17 4.49 57 15.06 97 25.63 18 3.86 58 12.76 98 21.56 18 4.76 58 15.32 98 25.89 19 4.18 59 12.98 99 21.78 19 5.02 59 15.59 99 26.16 20 4.40 60 13.20 100 22.00 20 5.28 60 15.85 100 26.42 21 4.62 61 13.42 200 44.00 21 5.55 61 16.12 200 52.84 22 4.84 62 13.64 300 66.00 22 5.81 62 16.38 300 79.26 23 5.06 63 13.86 400 88.00 23 6.08 63 16.65 400 105.68 24 5.28 64 14.08 500 110.00 24 6.34 64 16.91 500 132.10 25 5.50 65 14.30 600 132.00 25 6.61 65 17.17 600 158.52 26 5.72 66 14.52 700 154.00 26 6.87 66 17.44 700 184.94 27 5.94 67 14.74 800 176.00 27 7.13 67 17.70 800 211.36 28 6.16 68 14.96 900 198.00 28 7.40 68 17.97 900 237.78 29 6.38 69 15.18 1000 220.00 29 7.66 69 18.23 1000 264.2 30 6.60 70 15.40 2000 440.00 30 7.93 70 18.49 2000 528.4 31 6.82 71 15.62 3000 660.00 31 8.19 71 18.76 3000 792.6 32 7.04 72 15.84 4000 880.00 32 8.45 72 19.02 4000 1056.8 33 7.26 73 16.06 5000 1100.00 33 8.72 73 19.29 5000 1321.0 34 7.48 74 16.28 6000 1320.00 34 8.98 74 19.55 6000 1585.2 35 7.70 75 16.50 7000 1540.00 35 9.25 75 19.82 7000 1849.4 36 7.92 76 16.72 8000 1760.00 36 9.51 76 20.08 8000 2113.6 37 8.14 77 16.94 9000 1980.00 37 9.78 77 20.34 9000 2377.8 38 8.36 78 17.16 10000 2200.00 38 10.04 78 29.61 10000 2642.0 39 8.58 79 17.38 39 10.30 79 20.87 40 8.80 80 17.60 40 10.57 80 21.14 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 2.6 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 2.6 − 9 Kg/lb kg lb kg lb kg lb kg lb kg lb kg lb 1 2.20 28 61.73 52 114.64 76 167.55 100 220.5 16000 35273.6 2 4.41 29 63.93 53 116.84 77 169.75 200 440.9 17000 37478.2 3 6.61 30 6.14 54 119.05 78 171.96 300 661.4 18000 39682.2 4 8.82 31 68.34 55 121.25 79 174.16 400 881.8 19000 41887.4 5 11.02 32 70.55 56 123.46 80 176.37 500 1102.3 20000 44092.0 6 13.23 33 72.75 57 125.66 81 178.57 600 1322.8 21000 46296.6 7 15.43 34 74.96 58 127.87 82 180.78 700 1543.2 22000 48501.2 8 17.64 35 77.16 59 130.07 83 182.98 800 1763.7 23000 50705.8 9 19.84 36 79.37 60 132.28 84 185.19 900 1984.1 24000 52910.4 10 22.05 37 81.57 61 134.48 85 187.39 1000 2204.6 25000 55115.0 11 24.25 38 83.78 62 136.69 86 189.60 2000 4409.2 26000 57319.6 12 26.46 39 85.98 63 138.98 87 191.80 3000 6613.8 27000 59524.2 13 28.66 40 88.18 64 141.09 88 194.01 4000 8818.4 28000 61728.8 14 30.86 41 90.39 65 143.30 89 196.21 5000 11023.0 29000 63933.5 15 33.07 42 92.59 66 145.50 90 198.41 6000 13227.6 30000 66138.0 16 35.27 43 94.80 67 147.71 91 200.62 7000 15432.2 35000 77161.0 17 37.48 44 97.00 68 149.91 92 202.82 8000 17636.8 40000 88184.0 18 39.68 45 99.21 69 152.12 93 205.03 9000 19841.4 45000 99207.0 19 41.89 46 101.41 70 154.32 94 207.23 10000 22046.0 50000 110230.0 20 44.09 47 103.62 71 156.53 95 209.44 11000 24250.6 60000 132276.0 21 46.30 48 105.82 72 158.73 96 211.64 12000 26455.2 70000 154322.0 22 48.50 49 108.03 73 160.94 97 213.85 13000 28659.8 80000 176368.0 23 50.71 50 110.23 74 163.14 98 216.05 14000 30864.4 90000 198414.0 24 52.91 51 112.44 75 165.35 99 218.26 15000 33069.0 100000 220460.0 25 55.12 26 57.32 27 59.52 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: Blank Page →

Blank Page

AIP GEN 2.7 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 2.7 Sunrise/Sunset Tables

The U.S. does not publish sunrise/sunset tables, but sunrise/sunset information can be found online at https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/usa Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: Blank Page →

Blank Page

AIP GEN 3.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3. SERVICES

GEN 3.1 Aeronautical Information Services

1. Aeronautical Information Service 1.1 The U.S. Aeronautical Information Services is a part of the Air Traffic Organization of the Federal Aviation Administration .

Postal Address: Federal Aviation Administration Aeronautical Information Services 1305 East − West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 800 − 638 − 8972 Telex: 892 − 562 Commercial Telegraphic Address: FAA WASH AFTN Address: KRWAYAYX 1.2 The U.S. NOTAM office is located at the following address: Postal Address: Federal Aviation Administration U.S. NOTAM Office Air Traffic Control System Command Center 3701 Macintosh Drive Warrenton, VA 20187 Telephone: 540 − 422 − 4260 Toll Free: 1 − 888 − 876 − 6826 Facsimile : 540 − 422 − 4298 Telex: None AFTN Address (Administrative) : KDCAYNYX AFTN (NOTAM): KDZZNAXX 2. Area of Responsibility of AIS 2.1 Aeronautical Information Services is responsible for the collection, validation, and dissemination of aeronautical information for the U.S. and areas under its jurisdiction for air traffic control purposes.

3. Aeronautical Publications 3.1 United States AIP 3.1.1 The AIP, issued in one volume, is the basic aeronautical information document published for international use. It contains information of a lasting character, with interim updates published in various other publications.

The AIP is available in English only and is maintained on a current basis by a 6 − month amendment service.

3.2 Aeronautical Information Circulars 3.2.1 These circulars, called Advisory Circulars, contain information of general or technical interest relating to administrative or aviation matters which are inappropriate to either the AIP or the NOTAM. Advisory Circulars are available in English only. A checklist of outstanding circulars is issued annually.

3.3 En Route Aeronautical Charts, En Route Supplements, Approach Procedure Charts, Chart Supplements Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.3.1 These publications, available in English only, contain specific information on airspace, airports, navigational aids, and flight procedures applicable to the regional areas of the U.S. and the territories and airspace under its jurisdiction. These publications are available on the AIS website at: http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav .

4. Distribution of Publications 4.1 This order is available on the FAA’s Air Traffic Plans and Publications website at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications . All foreign aeronautical authorities are responsible for viewing, downloading, and subscribing to receive electronic mail notifications when changes occur to this publication.

Subscriptions to air traffic directives can be made through the Air Traffic Plans and Publications website at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ or directly via the following link: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USAFAA/subscriber/new?topic_id=USAFAA_39 . See information in paragraph 1.2 for published NOTAMs.

4.2 Advisory Circulars are available, upon request, from the: U.S. Department of Transportation Subsequent Distribution Office Ardmore East Business Center 3341 Q 75th Avenue Landover, MD 20785 4.3 Public sales of charts and publications are available through FAA approved print providers. A listing of products, dates of latest editions, and print providers is available on the AIS website at: http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav.

4.4 For the latest information regarding publication availability of world − wide products see the National Geospatial − Intelligence Agency (NGA) website: https://www.nga.mil/ProductsServices/Pages/PublicProduct - s.aspx.

5. NOTAM Service 5.1 NOTAM Class I (Telecommunication Distribution) 5.1.1 NOTAM Class I distribution is used mainly for the notification of temporary information of timely significance such as unforeseen changes in services, facilities, airspace utilization, or any other emergency.

Distribution is via telecommunications through International NOTAM Office of the Aeronautical Information Services, in accordance with the following classifications: 5.1.1.1 International NOTAM. NOTAM containing full information on all airports, facilities and flight procedures available for use by international civil aviation. NOTAMs are given selected distribution to adjacent or appropriate International NOTAM Offices which require their exchange.

5.1.1.2 International Airspace NOTAM. NOTAM containing short term information pertaining to potentially hazardous international and domestic airspace utilization which is of concern to international flights. NOTAMs are given selected distribution to adjacent or appropriate International NOTAM Offices which require their exchange.

5.1.1.3 International Airspace NOTAM. NOTAM containing permanent changes − en route airway structure/aeronautical service and information of a general nature. NOTAMs are given selected distribution to adjacent or appropriate International NOTAM Offices which require their exchange.

5.1.1.4 Domestic NOTAM. NOTAM containing information of concern to aircraft other than those engaged in international civil aviation. Distribution is to local or national users only. (See ENR 1.10.)

5.1.2 Each NOTAM is assigned a four digit serial number which is followed by the location indicator for which the series is applicable. The serial numbers start with number 0001 at 0000 UTC on 1 July of each year. Each serial number is preceded by a letter: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.1.2.1 “ A ” for NOTAM classification “1.” NOTE − NOTAM number one for the year 1984 for the New York, John F. Kennedy International Airport would read A0001/84 KJFK.

All NOTAMs issued will be preceded by an ‘‘A.’’ 5.1.2.2 “ B ” for NOTAM classification “2.” (Airspace): the identifier of the affected air traffic control center/FIR will be used.

NOTE − NOTAM number one for the year 1984 for the Oakland ARTCC/FIR (Pacific Ocean Area) would read A0001/84 KZOA.

5.1.2.3 “ C ” for NOTAM classification “3” (Permanent Airspace): The KFDC identifier will be used for data of permanent airway/aeronautical services and of a general nature that are transmitted as NOTAMs and are given selected distribution to adjacent or appropriate International NOTAM Offices which require their exchange.

NOTE − NOTAM number one for the year 1984 for KFDC is A0001/84 KFDC.

5.1.2.4 “ E ” for NOTAM classification “5” (domestic): No application (see ENR 1.10.)

5.2 Each NOTAM is provided with an identification letter adjoining the end of the word NOTAM meaning: 5.2.1 NOTAMN: NOTAM containing new information.

5.2.2 NOTAMC: NOTAM cancelling a previous NOTAM indicated.

5.2.3 NOTAMR: NOTAM replacing a previous NOTAM indicated.

5.3 A checklist of NOTAMs currently in force for each international NOTAM classification is issued each month over the Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunications Network (AFTN) to each International NOTAM office which exchanges International NOTAMs with the U.S. International NOTAM Office.

5.4 NOTAM Class I information is exchanged between the U.S. International NOTAM Office and the following International NOTAM Offices.

TBL GEN 3.1 − 1 COUNTRY CITY CAPE VERDE AMILCAR CABRAL ISLANDS AFGHANISTAN KABUL CHILE SANTIAGO ALBANIA ROME CHINA BEIJING ALGERIA ALGIERS CHINA TAIPEI ANGOLA LUANDA (FORMOSA) ARGENTINA BUENOS AIRES COLOMBIA BOGOTA AUSTRALIA SIDNEY CONGO BRAZZAVILLE AUSTRIA VIENNA CROATIA ZAGREB AZORES SANTO MARIA CUBA HAVANA BAHAMAS NASSAU CYPRUS NICOSIA BAHRAIN BAHRAIN CZECH REPUBLIC PRAGUE BANGLADESH DHAKA (DACCA) DENMARK COPENHAGEN BELGIUM BRUSSELS DOMINICAN SANTO DOMINGO BERMUDA BERMUDA REPUBLIC BOLIVIA LA PAZ ECUADOR GUAYAQUIL BOSNIA ZAGREB ENGLAND LONDON BRAZIL RIO DE JANEIRO ESTONIA TALLINN BULGARIA SOFIA ETHIOPIA ADDIS ABABA CAMBODIA PHNOM − PEHN EYGPT CAIRO CANADA OTTAWA Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.1 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIJI NANDI NETHERLANDS CURACAO ANTILLES FINLAND HELSINKI NEW GUINEA PORT MOSEBY FRANCE PARIS NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND FRENCH GUIANA MARTINIQUE NIGERIA LAGOS FRENCH TAHITI POLYNESIA NORWAY OSLO OMAN MUSCAT GERMANY (WEST) FRANKFURT PAKISTAN KARACHI GHANA ACCRA PANAMA TOCUMEN GREECE ATHENS PARAGUAY ASUNCION GREENLAND SONDRE STROMFJORD PERU LIMA GUYANA GEORGETOWN PHILLIPINES MANILLA HAITI PORT − AU − PRINCE POLAND WARSAW HONDURAS TEQUCIGALPA PORTUGAL LISBON HONG KONG HONG KONG ROMANIA BUCHAREST HUNGARY BUDAPEST RUSSIA MOSCOW ICELAND REYKJAVIK SAMOA FALEOLA INDIA BOMBAY SAUDI ARABIA JEDDAH INDIA CALCUTTA SENEGAL DAKAR INDIA DELHI SEYCHELLES MAHE INDIA MADRAS SINGAPORE SINGAPORE INDONESIA JAKARTA SLOVAKIA BRATISLAVA IRAN TEHRAN (NOT AVBL) SOLOMON HONIARA IRELAND SHANNON ISLANDS ISRAEL TEL AVIV SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG ITALY ROME SPAIN MADRID JAMAICA KINGSTON SRI LANKA COLOMBO JAPAN TOKYO SUDAN KHARTOUM JORDAN AMMAN SURINAME PARAMARIBO KENYA NAIROBI SWEDEN STOCKHOLM KOREA (SOUTH) SEOUL SWITZERLAND ZURICH KUWAIT KUWAIT SYRIA DAMASCUS LATVIA MOSCOW TANZANIA DAR − ES − SALAAM LEBANON BEIRUT THAILAND BANKOK LIBERIA ROBERTS TRINIDAD PORT OF SPAIN LIBYA TRIPOLI TUNISIA TUNIS MALAYSIA KUALA LUMPUR TURKEY ANKARA MALTA LUQA URUGUAY MONTEVIDEO MAURITIUS PLAISANCE VIET NAM HO CHI MINH CITY MAYNMAR RANGOON VENEZUELA CARACAS MEXICO MEXICO CITY YEMEN ADEN MOROCCO CASABLANCA YUGOSLAVIA BELGRADE MOZAMBIQUE MAPUTO ZAIRE KINSHASA NAMIBIA JOHANNESBURG ZAMBIA LUSAKA NAURU ISLAND NAURU ZIMBABWE HARARE NETHERLANDS AMSTERDAM Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6. Pre − Flight Information Service at Aerodromes Available to International Flights 6.1 Pre − Flight Information Units in the U.S. are Flight Service Stations (FSS) operated by either FAA (in Alaska) or by federal contract facilities (elsewhere in the U.S.).

6.2 FSSs are air traffic facilities that provide pilot briefings, flight plan processing, en route flight advisories, search and rescue services, and assistance to lost aircraft and aircraft in emergency situations. FSSs also relay ATC clearances, process Notices to Airmen, and broadcast aviation weather and aeronautical information.

In Alaska, designated FSSs also take weather observations, and provide Airport Advisory Services (AAS).

6.3 FSS locations, services, and telephone information are available in the Chart Supplement U.S., Chart Supplement Alaska, and Chart Supplement Pacific.

6.4 Flight Service Stations have telecommunications access to all of the weather and NOTAM information available for a preflight briefing to international locations with which the U.S. International NOTAM office exchanges information.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3.2 Aeronautical Charts

1. General 1.1 Civil aeronautical charts for the U.S. and its territories, and possessions are produced by Aeronautical Information Services (AIS), https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/safety_alerts/ , which is part of FAA’s Air Traffic Organization, Mission Support Services.

2. Obtaining Aeronautical Charts 2.1 Public sales of charts and publications are available through a network of FAA approved print providers.

A listing of products, dates of latest editions, and print providers is available on the AIS website at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/safety_alerts/ .

3. Safety Alerts, Charting Notices and Data Product Notices 3.1 Safety Alerts (SAs) are published to notify users of an error that was reported or discovered in one of our digital products. The specific product and effective date(s) are provided.

3.2 Charting Notices (CNs) are published to notify users of a planned chart/publication enhancement and the effective date on which the enhancement will be implemented.

3.3 Data Product Notices (DPNs) are published to notify users of a system outage. DPNs may also be used to notify users of a developmental upgrade to one of our digital products and the effective date on which the upgrade will be implemented.

3.4 A listing of SAs/CNs/DPNs may be found on the AIS website at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/safety_alerts / .

4. Selected Charts and Products Available VFR Navigation Charts IFR Navigation Charts Planning Charts Supplementary Charts and Publications Digital Products 5. General Description of Each Chart Series 5.1 VFR Navigation Charts 5.1.1 Sectional Aeronautical Charts. Sectional Charts are designed for visual navigation of slow to medium speed aircraft. The topographic information consists of contour lines, shaded relief, drainage patterns, and an extensive selection of visual checkpoints and landmarks used for flight under VFR. Cultural features include cities and towns, roads, railroads, and other distinct landmarks. The aeronautical information includes visual and radio aids to navigation, airports, controlled airspace, special − use airspace, obstructions, and related data. Scale 1 inch = 6.86nm/1:500,000. 60 x 20 inches folded to 5 x 10 inches. Revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 1 and FIG GEN 3.2 − 2 .)

5.1.2 VFR Terminal Area Charts (TAC). TACs depict the airspace designated as Class B airspace. While similar to sectional charts, TACs have more detail because the scale is larger. The TAC should be used by pilots intending to operate to or from airfields within or near Class B or Class C airspace. Areas with TAC coverage are indicated by a • on the Sectional Chart indexes. VFR Transition Routes may also be depicted and/or described on this chart. Scale 1 inch = 3.43nm/1:250,000. Revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 1 and FIG GEN 3.2 − 2 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.1.3 U.S. Gulf Coast VFR Aeronautical Chart. The Gulf Coast Chart is designed primarily for helicopter operation in the Gulf of America area. Information depicted includes offshore mineral leasing areas and blocks, oil drilling platforms, and high density helicopter activity areas. Scale 1 inch = 13.7nm/1:1,000,000. 55 x 27 inches folded to 5 x 10 inches. Revised every 56 days.

5.1.4 Grand Canyon VFR Aeronautical Chart. Covers the Grand Canyon National Park area and is designed to promote aviation safety, flight free zones, and facilitate VFR navigation in this popular area. The chart contains aeronautical information for general aviation VFR pilots on one side and commercial VFR air tour operators on the other side. Revised every 56 days.

FIG GEN 3.2 − 1 Sectional and VFR Terminal Area Charts for the Conterminous U.S., Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 2 Sectional and VFR Terminal Area Charts for Alaska 5.1.5 Caribbean VFR Aeronautical Charts. Caribbean 1 and 2 (CAC − 1 and CAC − 2) are designed for visual navigation to assist familiarization of foreign aeronautical and topographic information. The aeronautical information includes visual and radio aids to navigation, airports, controlled airspace, special − use airspace, obstructions, and related data. The topographic information consists of contour lines, shaded relief, drainage patterns, and a selection of landmarks used for flight under VFR. Cultural features include cities and towns, roads, railroads, and other distinct landmarks. Scale 1 inch = 13.7nm/1:1,000,000. CAC − 1 consists of two sides measuring 30” x 60” each. CAC − 2 consists of two sides measuring 20” x 60” each. Revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 3 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 3 Caribbean VFR Aeronautical Charts 5.1.6 Helicopter Route Charts. A three − color chart series which shows current aeronautical information useful to helicopter pilots navigating in areas with high concentrations of helicopter activity. Information depicted includes helicopter routes, four classes of heliports with associated frequency and lighting capabilities, NAVAIDs, and obstructions. In addition, pictorial symbols, roads, and easily identified geographical features are portrayed. Scale 1 inch = 1.71nm/1:125,000. 34 x 30 inches folded to 5 x 10 inches. Revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 4 ) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 4 Helicopter Route Charts 5.2 IFR Navigation Charts 5.2.1 IFR En Route Low Altitude Charts (Conterminous U.S. and Alaska). En route low altitude charts provide aeronautical information for navigation under IFR conditions below 18,000 feet MSL. This four − color chart series includes airways; limits of controlled airspace; VHF NAVAIDs with frequency, identification, channel, geographic coordinates; airports with terminal air/ground communications; minimum en route and obstruction clearance altitudes; airway distances; reporting points; special use airspace; and military training routes. Scales vary from 1 inch = 5nm to 1 inch = 20nm. 50 x 20 inches folded to 5 x 10 inches. Charts revised every 56 days. Area charts show congested terminal areas at a large scale. They are included with subscriptions to any conterminous U.S. Set Low (Full set, East or West sets). (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 5 and FIG GEN 3.2 − 6 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 5 En Route Low Altitude Instrument Charts for the Conterminous U.S. (Includes Area Charts) FIG GEN 3.2 − 6 Alaska En Route Low Altitude Chart Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.2.2 IFR En Route High Altitude Charts (Conterminous U.S. and Alaska). En route high altitude charts are designed for navigation at or above 18,000 feet MSL. This four − color chart series includes the jet route structure; VHF NAVAIDs with frequency, identification, channel, geographic coordinates; selected airports; reporting points. Scales vary from 1 inch = 45nm to 1 inch = 18nm. 55 x 20 inches folded to 5 x 10 inches. Revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 7 and FIG GEN 3.2 − 8 .)

FIG GEN 3.2 − 7 En Route High Altitude Charts for the Conterminous U.S.

FIG GEN 3.2 − 8 Alaskan En Route High Altitude Chart Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.2.3 U.S. Terminal Procedures Publication (TPP). TPPs are published in 24 loose − leaf or perfect bound volumes covering the conterminous U.S., Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. A Change Notice is published at the midpoint between revisions in bound volume format and is available on the internet for free download at the AIS website. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 15 .) The TPPs include: 5.2.3.1 Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts. IAP charts portray the aeronautical data that is required to execute instrument approaches to airports. Each chart depicts the IAP, all related navigation data, communications information, and an airport sketch. Each procedure is designated for use with a specific electronic navigational aid, such as ILS, VOR, NDB, RNAV, etc.

5.2.3.2 Instrument Departure Procedure (DP) Charts. DP charts are designed to expedite clearance delivery and to facilitate transition between takeoff and en route operations. They furnish pilots’ departure routing clearance information in graphic and textual form.

5.2.3.3 Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) Charts. STAR charts are designed to expedite ATC arrival procedures and to facilitate transition between en route and instrument approach operations. They depict preplanned IFR ATC arrival procedures in graphic and textual form. Each STAR procedure is presented as a separate chart and may serve either a single airport or more than one airport in a given geographic area.

5.2.3.4 Airport Diagrams. Full page airport diagrams are designed to assist in the movement of ground traffic at locations with complex runway/taxiway configurations and provide information for updating geodetic position navigational systems aboard aircraft. Airport diagrams are available for free download at the AIS website.

5.2.4 Alaska Terminal Procedures Publication. This publication contains all terminal flight procedures for civil and military aviation in Alaska. Included are IAP charts, DP charts, STAR charts, airport diagrams, radar minimums, and supplementary support data such as IFR alternate minimums, take − off minimums, rate of descent tables, rate of climb tables and inoperative components tables. Volume is 5 − 3/8 x 8 − 1/4 inch top bound.

Publication revised every 56 days with provisions for a Terminal Change Notice, as required.

5.3 Planning Charts 5.3.1 U.S. IFR/VFR Low Altitude Planning Chart. This chart is designed for prefight and en route flight planning for IFR/VFR flights. Depiction includes low altitude airways and mileage, NAVAIDs, airports, special use airspace, cities, times zones, major drainage, a directory of airports with their airspace classification, and a mileage table showing great circle distances between major airports. Scale 1 inch = 47nm/ 1:3,400,000. Chart revised annually, and is available either folded or unfolded for wall mounting. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 10 .)

5.3.2 Gulf of America and Caribbean Planning Chart. This is a VFR planning chart on the reverse side of the Puerto Rico − Virgin Islands VFR Terminal Area Chart. Information shown includes mileage between airports of entry, a selection of special use airspace and a directory of airports with their available services. Scale 1 inch = 85nm/1:6,192,178. 60 x 20 inches folded to 5 x 10 inches. Revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 10 .)

5.3.3 Alaska VFR Wall Planning Chart. This chart is designed for VFR preflight planning and chart selection.

It includes aeronautical and topographic information of the state of Alaska. The aeronautical information includes public and military airports; radio aids to navigation; and Class B, Class C, TRSA and special − use airspace. The topographic information includes city tint, populated places, principal roads, and shaded relief.

Scale 1 inch = 27.4nm/1:2,000,000. The one sided chart is 58.5 x 40.75 inches and is designed for wall mounting.

Revised annually. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 9 .)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 9 Alaska VFR Wall Planning Chart FIG GEN 3.2 − 10 Planning Charts 5.3.4 U.S. VFR Wall Planning Chart. This chart is designed for VFR preflight planning and chart selection.

It includes aeronautical and topographic information of the conterminous U.S. The aeronautical information includes airports, radio aids to navigation, Class B airspace and special use airspace. The topographic information includes city tint, populated places, principal roads, drainage patterns, and shaded relief. Scale 1 inch = 43 nm/ 1:3,100,000. The one − sided chart is 59 x 36 inches and ships unfolded for wall mounting. Revised annually. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 11 ) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 11 U.S. VFR Wall Planning Chart 5.3.5 VFR Flyway Planning Charts. This chart is printed on the reverse side of selected TAC charts. The coverage is the same as the associated TAC. Flyway planning charts depict flight paths and altitudes recommended for use to bypass high traffic areas. Ground references are provided as a guide for visual orientation. Flyway planning charts are designed for use in conjunction with TACs and sectional charts and are not to be used for navigation. VFR Transition Routes may also be depicted and/or described on this chart. Chart scale 1 inch = 3.43nm/1:250,000.

5.4 Supplementary Charts and Publications 5.4.1 Chart Supplement refers to a series of civil/military flight information publications issued by the FAA every 56 days consisting of the Chart Supplement U.S., Chart Supplement Alaska, and Chart Supplement Pacific.

5.4.2 Chart Supplement U.S. This is a civil/military flight information publication. This 7-volume book series is designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts and contains data including, but not limited to, airports, NAVAIDs, communications data, weather data sources, special notices, non-regulatory operational procedures, and airport diagrams. Coverage includes the conterminous U.S., Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. The Chart Supplement U.S. shows data that cannot be readily depicted in graphic form; for example, airport hours of operations, types of fuel available, runway widths, lighting codes, etc. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 12 .)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 12 Chart Supplement U.S. Geographic Areas 5.4.3 Chart Supplement Alaska. This is a civil/military flight information publication. This single-volume book is designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts. The Chart Supplement Alaska contains data including, but not limited to, airports, NAVAIDs, communications data, weather data sources, special notices, non-regulatory operational procedures, and airport diagrams. The publication also includes uniquely geographical operational requirements such as area notices and emergency procedures.

5.4.4 Chart Supplement Pacific. This is a civil/military flight information publication. This single volume book is designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts. The Chart Supplement Pacific contains data including, but not limited to, airports, NAVAIDs, communications data, weather data sources, special notices, non − regulatory operational procedures, and airport diagrams. The publication also includes airspace, navigational facilities, non − regulatory Pacific area procedures, Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP), Departure Procedures (DP), Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) charts, radar minimums, supporting data for the Hawaiian and Pacific Islands, and uniquely geographical operational requirements such as area notices and emergency procedures.

5.4.5 North Atlantic Route Chart. Designed for FAA controllers to monitor transatlantic flights, this 5 − color chart shows oceanic control areas, coastal navigation aids, oceanic reporting points, and NAVAID geographic coordinates. Full Size Chart: scale 1 inch = 113.1nm/1:8,250,000. Chart is shipped flat only. Half Size Chart: scale 1 inch = 150.8nm/1:11,000,000. Chart is 29 − 3/4 x 20 − 1/2 inches, shipped folded to 5 x 10 inches only. Chart are revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 13 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 13 North Atlantic Route Charts 5.4.6 North Pacific Route Charts. These charts are designed for FAA controllers to monitor transoceanic flights. They show established intercontinental air routes, including reporting points with geographic positions.

Composite Chart: scale 1 inch = 164NM/1:12,000,000. 48 x 41 − 1/2 inches. Area Charts: scale 1 inch = 95.9nm/1:7,000,000. 52 x 40 − 1/2 inches. All charts are shipped unfolded. Charts are revised every 56 days. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 14 .)

FIG GEN 3.2 − 14 North Pacific Oceanic Route Charts 5.4.7 Airport Obstruction Charts (OC). The OC is a 1:12,000 scale graphic depicting 14 CFR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace surfaces, a representation of objects that penetrate these surfaces, aircraft movement and apron areas, navigational aids, prominent airport buildings, and a selection of roads and other planimetric detail in the airport vicinity. Also included are tabulations of runway and other operational data.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.4.8 FAA Aeronautical Chart User’s Guide. A booklet designed to be used as a teaching aid and reference document. It describes the substantial amount of information provided on FAA’s aeronautical charts and publications. It includes explanations and illustrations of chart terms and symbols organized by chart type. The users guide is available for free download at the AIS website.

5.5 Digital Products 5.5.1 The Digital Aeronautical Information CD (DAICD). The DAICD is a combination of the NAVAID Digital Data File, the Digital Chart Supplement, and the Digital Obstacle File on one Compact Disk. These three digital products are no longer sold separately. The files are updated every 56 days and are available by subscription only.

5.5.1.1 The NAVAID Digital Data File. This file contains a current listing of NAVAIDs that are compatible with the National Airspace System. This file contains all NAVAIDs including ILS and its components, in the U.S., Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands plus bordering facilities in Canada, Mexico, and the Atlantic and Pacific areas.

5.5.1.2 The Digital Obstacle File. This file describes all known obstacles of interest to aviation users in the U.S., with limited coverage of the Pacific, Caribbean, Canada, and Mexico. The obstacles are assigned unique numerical identifiers, accuracy codes, and listed in order of ascending latitude within each state or area.

5.5.2 The Coded Instrument Flight Procedures (CIFP) (ARINC 424 [Ver 13 & 15]). The CIFP is a basic digital dataset, modeled to an international standard, which can be used as a basis to support GPS navigation.

Initial data elements included are: Airport and Helicopter Records, VHF and NDB Navigation aids, en route waypoints and airways. Additional data elements will be added in subsequent releases to include: departure procedures, standard terminal arrivals, and GPS/RNAV instrument approach procedures. The database is updated every 28 days. The data is available for free download at the AIS website.

5.5.3 digital − Visual Charts (d − VC). These digital VFR charts are geo − referenced images of FAA Sectional Aeronautical, TAC, and Helicopter Route charts. Additional digital data may easily be overlaid on the raster image using commonly available Geographic Information System software. Data such as weather, temporary flight restrictions, obstacles, or other geospatial data can be combined with d − VC data to support a variety of needs. The file resolution is 300 dots per inch and the data is 8 − bit color. The data is provided as a GeoTIFF and distributed for free on the AIS website. The root mean square error of the transformation will not exceed two pixels.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.2 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.2 − 15 U.S. Terminal Publication Volumes 6. National Geospatial − Intelligence Agency (NGA) Products 6.1 National Geospatial − Intelligence Agency (NGA) Products. For the latest information regarding publication availability, visit the NGA website: https://www.nga.mil/ProductsServices/Aeronautical/Pages/default.aspx .

6.1.1 Flight Information Publication (FLIP) Planning Documents General Planning (GP) Area Planning Area Planning − Special Use Airspace − Planning Charts 6.1.2 FLIP En Route Charts and Chart Supplements Pacific, Australasia, and Antarctica United States − IFR and VFR Supplements Flight Information Handbook Caribbean and South America − Low Altitude Caribbean and South America − High Altitude Europe, North Africa, and Middle East − Low Altitude Europe, North Africa, and Middle East − High Altitude Africa Eastern Europe and Asia Area Arrival Charts Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.2 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.1.3 FLIP Instrument Approach Procedures (IAPs) Africa Canada and North Atlantic Caribbean and South America Eastern Europe and Asia Europe, North Africa, and Middle East Pacific, Australasia, and Antarctica VFR Arrival/Departure Routes − Europe and Korea United States 6.1.4 Miscellaneous DOD Charts and Products Aeronautical Chart Updating Manual (CHUM) DOD Weather Plotting Charts (WPC) Tactical Pilotage Charts (TPC) Operational Navigation Charts (ONC) Global Navigation and Planning Charts (GNC) Jet Navigation Charts (JNC) and Universal Jet Navigation Charts (JNU) Jet Navigation Charts (JNCA) Aerospace Planning Charts (ASC) Oceanic Planning Charts (OPC) Joint Operations Graphics − Air (JOG − A) Standard Index Charts (SIC) Universal Plotting Sheet (VP − OS) Sight Reduction Tables for Air Navigation (PUB249) Plotting Sheets (VP − 30) Dial − Up Electronic CHUM Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3.3 Air Traffic Services

1. Responsible Authority 1.1 The authority responsible for the overall administration of air traffic services provided for civil aviation in the U.S. and its territories, possessions and international airspace under its jurisdiction is the Chief Operating Officer of the Air Traffic Organization, acting under the authority of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

2. Area of Responsibility 2.1 Air traffic services as indicated in the following paragraphs are provided for the entire territory of the conterminous U.S., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, as well as the international airspace in oceanic areas under the jurisdiction of the U.S. which lies within the ICAO Caribbean (CAR), North Atlantic (NAT), North American (NAM), and Pacific (PAC) regions.

3. Air Traffic Services 3.1 With the exception of terminal control services at certain civil aerodromes and military aerodromes, air traffic service in the U.S. is provided by the Air Traffic Organization, FAA, Department of Transportation (DOT), U.S. Government.

3.2 Air Traffic control is exercised within the area of responsibility of the U.S.: 3.2.1 On all airways.

3.2.2 In Class B, C, D, and E Airspace; and 3.2.3 Within the Class A airspace whose vertical extent is from 18,000 feet to and including FL 600 throughout most of the conterminous U.S. and, in Alaska, from 18,000 feet to and including FL 600 but not including the airspace less than 1,500 feet above the surface of the earth and the Alaskan Peninsula west of longitude 160 ° 00 West. (A complete description of Class A airspace is contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 14, Part 71.)

3.3 Air traffic control and alerting services are provided by various air traffic control (ATC) units and are described in ENR 1.1.

3.4 Radar service is an integral part of the air traffic system. A description of radar services and procedures is provided in ENR 1.1.

3.5 The description of airspace designated for air traffic services is found in ENR 1.4.

3.6 Procedural data and descriptions are found in ENR 1.5.

3.7 Numerous restricted and prohibited areas are established within U.S. territory. These areas, none of which interfere with normal air traffic, are explained in ENR 1.5. Activation of areas subject to intermittent activity is notified in advance by a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM), giving reference to the area by its identification.

3.8 In general, the air traffic rules and procedures in force and the organization of the air traffic services are in conformity with ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures. Differences between the national and international rules and procedures are given in GEN 1.7. The regional supplementary procedures and altimeter setting procedures are reproduced in full with an indication wherein there is a difference.

3.9 Coordination between the operator and air traffic services is effected in accordance with 2.11 of Annex II, and 2.1.1.4 and 2.1.2.5 of Part VIII of the PANS − ATM (Doc 4444).

3.10 Minimum flight altitudes on the ATS routes as listed in ENR 1.4 have been determined so as to ensure at least 1,000 feet vertical clearance above the highest obstacle within 4 nautical miles (NM) on each side of the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 centerline of the route. However, where the regular divergence (4.5 degrees) of the navigational aid signal in combination with the distance between the navigational aids could result in the aircraft being more than 4 NM on either side of the centerline, the 4 NM protection limit is increased by the extent to which the divergence is more than 4 NM from the centerline.

3.11 Pilot Visits to Air Traffic Facilities. Pilots are encouraged to participate in local pilot/air traffic control outreach activities. However, due to security and workload concerns, requests for air traffic facility visits may not always be approved. Therefore, visit requests should be submitted through the air traffic facility as early as possible. Pilots should contact the facility and advise them of the number of persons in the group, the time and date of the proposed visit, and the primary interest of the group. The air traffic facility will provide further instructions if a request can be approved.

3.12 Operation Rain Check. Operation Rain Check is a program designed and managed by local air traffic control facility management. Its purpose is to familiarize pilots and aspiring pilots with the ATC system, its functions, responsibilities and benefits.

4. En Route Procedures 4.1 Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) An ARTCC is a facility established to provide air traffic control service to aircraft operating on instrument flight rule (IFR) flight plans within CONTROLLED AIRSPACE and principally during the en route phase of flight.

When equipment capabilities and controller workload permit, certain advisory/assistance services may be provided to visual flight rule (VFR) aircraft.

4.2 ARTCC Communications 4.2.1 Direct Communications, Controllers and Pilots 4.2.1.1 ARTCCs are capable of direct communications with IFR air traffic on certain frequencies. Maximum communications coverage is possible through the use of Remote Center Air/Ground (RCAG) sites comprised of very high frequency (VHF) and ultra high frequency (UHF) transmitters and receivers. These sites are located throughout the U.S. Although they may be several hundred miles away from the ARTCC, they are remoted to the various centers by land lines or microwave links. As IFR operations are expedited through the use of direct communications, pilots are requested to use these frequencies strictly for communications pertinent to the control of IFR aircraft. Flight plan filing, en route weather, weather forecasts, and similar data should be requested through Flight Service Stations, company radio, or appropriate military facilities capable of performing these services.

4.2.1.2 An ARTCC is divided into sectors. Each sector is handled by one or a team of controllers and has its own sector discrete frequency. As a flight progresses from one sector to another, the pilot is requested to change to the appropriate sector discrete frequency.

4.2.1.3 Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) is a system that supplements air/ground voice communications. The CPDLC’s principal operating criteria are: a) Voice remains the primary and controlling air/ground communications means.

b) Participating aircraft will need to have the appropriate CPDLC avionics equipment in order to receive uplink or transmit downlink messages.

c) En Route CPDLC offers many services including the following: Altimeter Setting (AS); Transfer of Communications (TOC); Initial Contact (IC); route assignments including airborne reroutes (ABRR); altitude assignments; speed assignments; crossing constraints; holding; and advisory and emergency messages.

1) Altimeter settings will be uplinked automatically when appropriate after a Monitor TOC. Altimeter settings will also be uplinked automatically when an aircraft receives an uplinked altitude assignment below FL 180. A controller may also manually send an altimeter setting message.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − When conducting instrument approach procedures, pilots are responsible to obtain and use the appropriate altimeter setting in accordance with 14 CFR Section 97.20. CPDLC issued altimeter settings are excluded for this purpose.

2) Initial contact is a safety validation transaction that compares a pilot’s initiated altitude downlink message with an aircraft’s stored altitude in the ATC automation system. When an IC mismatch or Confirm Assigned Altitude (CAA) downlink time − out indicator is displayed in the Full Data Block (FDB) and Aircraft List (ACL), the controller who has track control of the aircraft must use voice communication to verify the assigned altitude of the aircraft, and acknowledge the IC mismatch/time − out indicator.

3) Transfer of communications automatically establishes data link contact with a succeeding sector.

4) Menu text transmissions are scripted nontrajectory altering uplink messages.

5) The CPDLC Message Elements available for use in domestic enroute operations are contained in TBL TBL GEN 3.3-1 through TBL GEN 3.3−22, Message Elements, below.

NOTE − The FAA is not implementing ATN B1; the ATN B1 column in the tables is there for informational purposes only.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 1 Response Attribute of CPDLC Message Element Description Response Attribute For Uplink Message W/U Response required.

Valid responses. WILCO, UNABLE, STANDBY, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AUTHORITY, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required), ERROR Note – WILCO, UNABLE, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AUTHORITY and ERROR will close the uplink message.

FANS 1/A.– WILCO, UNABLE, STANDBY, ERROR, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY.

A/N Response required.

Valid responses. AFFIRM, NEGATIVE, STANDBY, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AUTHORITY, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required), ERROR Note – AFFIRM, NEGATIVE, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AUTHORITY and ERROR will close the uplink message.

FANS 1/A.– AFFIRM, NEGATIVE, STANDBY, ERROR, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 R Response required.

Valid responses. ROGER, UNABLE, STANDBY, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AUTHORITY, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required), ERROR Note – ROGER, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AU - THORITY and ERROR will close the uplink message.

FANS 1/A.– ROGER, STANDBY, ERROR, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY. FANS 1/A aircraft do not have the capability to send UNABLE in response to an uplink message con - taining message elements with an “R” response attribute. For these aircraft, the flight crew may use alternative means to UNABLE the message. These alternative means will need to be taken into consideration to ensure proper technical and operational closure of the communication transaction.

Y Response required.

Valid responses: Any CPDLC downlink message, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required).

N No response required unless logical acknowledgement is required.

Valid Responses (only if LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT is required). LOGICAL AC - KNOWLEDGEMENT, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY, NOT AUTHORIZED NEXT DATA AUTHORITY, ERROR FANS 1/A.– “N” is defined as “no response is required,” but not used. Under some circum - stances, an ERROR message will also close an uplink message.

NE [Not defined in Doc 4444] FANS 1/A.– The WILCO, UNABLE, AFFIRM, NEGATIVE, ROGER, and STANDBY re - sponses are not enabled (NE) for flight crew selection. An uplink message with a response at - tribute NE is considered to be closed even though a response may be required operationally.

Under some circumstances, a downlink error message may be linked to an uplink message with a NE attribute.

For Downlink Message Y Response required. Yes Valid responses. Any CPDLC uplink message, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required).

N Response required. No, unless logical acknowledgement required.

Valid responses (only if LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT is required). LOGICAL AC - KNOWLEDGEMENT, SERVICE UNAVAILABLE, FLIGHT PLAN NOT HELD, ERROR FANS 1/A.– Aircraft do not have the capability to receive technical responses to downlink message elements with an “N” response attribute (other than LACK or ERROR for ATN B1 aircraft). In some cases, the response attribute is different between FANS 1/A aircraft and Doc 4444. As an example, most emergency messages have an “N” response attribute for FANS 1/A whereas Doc 4444 defines a “Y” response attribute for them. As a consequence, for FANS 1/A aircraft, ATC will need to use alternative means to acknowledge to the flight crew that an emergency message has been received.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 2 Route Uplink Message Elements (RTEU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM74 PROCEED UM74 PROCEED W/U RTEU − 2 Instruction to pro - PROCEED DIRECT TO DIRECT TO ceed directly to the DIRECT TO ( position ) ( position ) specified position. ( position ) UM75 WHEN N/A W/U RTEU − 2 Instruction to pro - PROCEED ABLE PROCEED ceed directly to the DIRECT TO DIRECT TO ( posi - specified position. ( position ) tion ) Note – This mes - sage element is equivalent to SUPU − 5 plus RTEU − 2 in Doc 4444.

UM77 AT ( posi- N/A W/U RTEU − 4 Instruction to pro- AT (position) PRO - tion ) PROCEED ceed, at the speci- CEED DIRECT TO DIRECT TO ( posi - fied at position, di - (position) tion ) rectly to the next specified position.

UM78 AT ( altitude ) N/A W/U RTEU − 5 Instruction to pro- AT (level) PRO - PROCEED DI - ceed, upon reaching CEED DIRECT TO RECT TO ( posi- the specified level, (position) tion ) directly to the spec - ified position.

UM79 CLEARED UM79 CLEARED W/U RTEU − 6 Instruction to pro- CLEARED TO TO ( position ) via TO ( position ) via ceed to the speci - (position) VIA ( route clearance ) ( route clearance ) fied position via the (departure data[O]) specified route. (en − route data) UM80 CLEARED UM80 CLEARED W/U RTEU − 7 Instruction to CLEARED (route clearance) (route clearance) proceed via the (departure data[O]) specified route. (en − route data) (arrival approach data) UM83 AT (posi- N/A W/U RTEU − 9 Instruction to pro- AT (position) tion) CLEARED ceed from the speci- CLEARED (route clearance) fied position via the (en − route data) specified route. (arrival approach data) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM91 HOLD AT N/A W/U RTEU − 11 Instruction to enter AT (position) (position) MAIN - a holding pattern at HOLD INBOUND the specified posi - TRACK (de - TAIN (altitude) IN - BOUND TRACK tion in accordance grees)(direction) (degrees) (direc - with the specified TURNS (leg type) tion) TURN LEG instructions. LEGS TIME (leg type) Note – RTEU − 13 EXPECT FUR - THER CLEAR - ANCE AT TIME (time) is appended to this message when an extended hold is anticipated.

UM92 HOLD AT UM92 HOLD AT W/U RTEU − 12 Instruction to enter AT (position) (position) AS PUB - (position) AS PUB - a holding pattern at HOLD AS PUB - LISHED MAIN - LISHED MAIN - the specified posi - LISHED TAIN (altitude) TAIN (level) tion in accordance with the published holding instruc - tions.

Note – RTEU − 13 EXPECT FUR - THER CLEAR - ANCE AT TIME (time) is appended to this message when an extended hold is anticipated.

UM93 EXPECT N/A R RTEU − 13 Notification that an EXPECT FUR - FURTHER onwards clearance THER CLEAR - CLEARANCE AT may be issued at the ANCE AT (time) specified time (time) UM137 CONFIRM N/A Y RTEU − 15 Request to confirm CONFIRM AS - ASSIGNED the assigned route. SIGNED ROUTE ROUTE Note – NE response attribute.

NOTE − In domestic airspace, the FAA provides automated free text messages (UM169 )concatenated with route uplinks to reinforce pilot understanding of the ROUTE CLEARANCE. (UM79, UM80, and UM83).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 3 Route Downlink Message Elements (RTED) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM22 REQUEST DM22 REQUEST Y RTED − 1 Request for a direct REQUEST DIRECT TO DIRECT TO clearance to the DIRECT TO ( position ) ( position ) specified position. ( position ) DM23 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 2 Request for the REQUEST (named (procedure name) specified procedure instruction or clearance name.

DM24 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 3 Request for the REQUEST (route clearance) specified route. CLEARANCE (de - parture data[O]) (en − route data)(ar - rival approach da - ta[O]) DM40 ASSIGNED N/A N RTED − 9 Confirmation that ASSIGNED ROUTE (route the assigned route is ROUTE (departure clearance) the specified route. data[O]) (en − route data) (arrival ap - proach data[O]) TBL GEN 3.3 − 4 Lateral Uplink Message Elements (LATU ) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM82 CLEARED UM82 CLEARED W/U LATU − 10 Instruction allow - CLEARED TO TO DEVIATE UP TO DEVIATE UP ing deviation up to DEVIATE UP TO TO (distance offset) the specified dis - (lateral deviation) TO (specified dis (direction) OF tance(s) from the OF ROUTE tance) (direction) ROUTE cleared route in the OF ROUTE specified direc - tion ( s ) .

UM127 REPORT N/A W/U LATU − 18 Instruction to re - REPORT BACK BACK ON ROUTE port when the air - ON ROUTE Note – R response at - craft is back on the tribute. cleared route.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 5 Lateral Downlink Message Elements (LATD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM27 REQUEST N/A Y LATD − 2 Request for a REQUEST WEATHER DEVIA - weather deviation WEATHER DEVI - TION UP TO (speci - up to the specified ATION UP TO fied distance) (direc - distance off track in (specified distance) tion) OF ROUTE the specified direc - (direction) OF tion. ROUTE DM41 BACK ON N/A Y LATD − 4 The aircraft has re - BACK ON ROUTE gained the cleared ROUTE route.

DM59 DIVERTING N/A Y LATD − 5 Report indicating DIVERTING TO TO (position) VIA diverting to the (position) VIA (en − (route clearance) specified position route data) (arrival Note 1. − H alert at - via the specified approach data[O]) tribute route, which may Note 2. − N be sent without any response attribute previous coordina - tion done with ATC.

DM60 N/A Y LATD − 6 Report indicating OFFSETTING OFFSETTING that the aircraft is (specified distance) (distance offset) offsetting to a par - (direction) (direction) OF allel track at the OF ROUTE ROUTE specified distance Note 1. − H alert at - in the specified di - tribute rection off from the Note 2. − N cleared route.

response attribute DM80 DEVIATING N/A Y LATD − 7 Report indicating DEVIATING (deviation offset) (di - deviating specified (specifiedDevia - distance or degrees tion) (direction) OF rection) OF ROUTE in the specified di - ROUTE Note 1. − H alert at - rection from the tribute cleared route.

Note 2. − N response attribute Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 6 Level Uplink Message Elements (LVLU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM19 MAINTAIN UM19 W/U LVLU − 5 Instruction to MAINTAIN (level) (altitude) MAINTAIN (level) maintain the speci- Note − Used for a sin - fied level or verti - gle level cal range.

UM20 CLIMB TO UM20 CLIMB TO W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that a CLIMB TO ( level ) AND MAINTAIN ( level ) climb to the speci - (altitude) fied level or verti- Note − Used for a sin- cal range is to gle level commence and once reached is to be maintained.

UM23 DESCEND TO UM23 DESCEND W/U LVLU − 9 DESCEND TO Instruction that a AND MAINTAIN TO ( level ) ( level ) descent to the (altitude) specified level or Note − Used for a sin- vertical range is gle level to commence and once reached is to be maintained.

UM30 MAINTAIN UM19 MAIN - W/U LVLU − 5 Instruction to MAINTAIN ( level ) BLOCK (altitude) TO TAIN (level) maintain the speci - (altitude) fied level or verti- Note – Used for a ver - cal range.

tical range.

UM31 CLIMB TO UM20 CLIMB TO W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that a CLIMB TO ( level ) AND MAINTAIN (level) climb to the speci- BLOCK (altitude) TO fied level or verti - (altitude) cal range is to Note – Used for a ver - commence and tical range once reached is to be maintained.

UM32 DESCEND TO UM23 DESCEND W/U LVLU − 9 Instruction that a DECEND ( level ) AND MAINTAIN TO (level) descent to the BLOCK (altitude) TO specified level or (altitude) vertical range is to Note – Used for a ver - commence and tical range. once reached is to be maintained.

UM36 EXPEDITE N/A W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that a CLIMB TO ( level ) CLIMB TO (altitude) climb to the speci- Note − This message fied level or verti - element is equivalent cal range is to to SUPU − 3 plus commence and LVLU − 6 in Doc 4444. once reached is to be maintained.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM37 EXPEDITE N/A W/U LVLU − 9 DESCEND TO Instruction that a DESCEND TO ( level ) descent to the (altitude) specified level or vertical range is to commence and once reached is to be maintained.

UM38 IMMEDIATE - N/A W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that a CLIMB TO ( level ) LY CLIMB TO climb to the speci - (altitude) fied level or verti - Note − This message cal range is to element is equivalent commence and to EMGU − 2 plus once reached is to LVLU − 6 in Doc 4444. be maintained.

UM39 IMMEDIATE - N/A W/U LVLU − 9 DESCEND TO Instruction that a LY DESCEND TO ( level ) descent to the (altitude) specified level or Note − This message vertical range is element is equivalent to commence and to EMGU − 2 plus once reached is LVLU − 9 in Doc 4444.

to be maintained.

N/A Y LVLU − 27 Request to confirm CONFIRM AS - UM135 CONFIRM ASSIGNED ALTI - the assigned level. SIGNED LEVEL TUDE Note − NE response attribute UM177 AT PILOTS N/A NE See Note Request to confirm DISCRETION the assigned level.

NOTE − ICAO Document 10037, Global Operational Data Link (GOLD) Manual does not include this in its tables.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 7 Level Downlink Message Elements (LVLD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM6 REQUEST (alti - DM6 REQUEST Y LVLD − 1 Request to fly at REQUEST (level) tude) ( level ) the specified level Note − Used for a sin - or vertical range.

gle level DM7 REQUEST DM6 REQUEST Y LVLD − 1 Request to fly at REQUEST (level) BLOCK (altitude) TO ( level ) the specified level (altitude) or vertical range.

Note – Used for a ver - tical range.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 DM8 REQUEST N/A Y N/A Request to cruise N/A CRUISE CLIMB TO climb to the speci - (altitude) fied level. Due to different interpre - tations between the various ATS units, this element should be avoided.

DM9 REQUEST DM9 REQUEST Y LVLD − 2 Request for a REQUEST CLIMB TO CLIMB TO ( level ) climb to the speci- CLIMB TO ( level ) (altitude) fied level or verti - cal range.

DM10 REQUEST DM10 REQUEST Y LVLD − 3 Request for a de- REQUEST DE - DESCENT TO DESCENT TO scent to the speci- SCENT TO ( level ) (altitude) ( level ) fied level or verti - cal range.

DM38 ASSIGNED DM38 AS - N LVLD − 11 Confirmation that ASSIGNED LEV - LEVEL (altitude) SIGNED LEVEL the assigned level EL ( level ) Note − Used for a sin - ( level ) or vertical range is gle level the specified level or vertical range.

DM61 DESCEND - N/A N LVLD − 14 Report indicating DESCENDING ING TO (altitude) descending to the TO ( level single ) Note − urgent alert at- specified level.

tribute DM77 ASSIGNED DM38 AS - N LVLD − 11 Confirmation that ASSIGNED LEV - BLOCK (altitude) TO SIGNED LEVEL the assigned level EL ( level ) (altitude) (level) or vertical range is Note – Used for a ver - the specified level tical range. or vertical range.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 8 Crossing Constraint Message Elements (CSTU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM46 CROSS (posi - UM46 CROSS W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT (altitude) (position) AT (lev - specified position AT (level) Note – Used for a sin - el) is to be crossed at gle level. the specified level or within the speci - fied vertical range.

UM49 CROSS ( posi - N/A W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion ) AT AND MAIN - specified position AT (level) TAIN ( altitude ) is to be crossed at Note 1. − A vertical the specified level range cannot be pro - or within the speci - vided. fied vertical range.

Note 2. − This mes - sage element is equiv - alent to CSTU − 1 plus LVLU − 5 in Doc 4444.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM50 CROSS (posi - UM46 CROSS W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) BETWEEN (al - (position) AT (lev - specified position AT (level) titude) AND (altitude) el) is to be crossed at Note – Used for a ver - the specified level tical range. or within the speci - fied vertical range.

UM51 CROSS (posi - UM51 CROSS W/U CSTU − 4 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT (time) (position) AT specified position AT TIME (level) (time) is to be crossed at the specified time.

UM52 CROSS (posi - UM52 CROSS W/U CSTU − 5 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT OR BE - (position) AT OR specified position BEFORE TIME FORE (time) BEFORE (time) is to be crossed at (time) the specified time.

UM53 CROSS (posi - UM53 CROSS W/U CSTU − 6 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT OR AFTER (position) AT OR specified position AFTER TIME (time) AFTER (time) is to be crossed at (time) the specified time.

UM54 CROSS (posi - UM54 CROSS W/U CSTU − 7 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) BETWEEN (position) BE- specified position BETWEEN TIME (time) AND (time) TWEEN (time) is to be crossed at (time) AND TIME AND (time) the specified time. (time) UM55 CROSS (posi - UM55 CROSS W/U CSTU − 8 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT (speed) (position) AT specified position AT (speed) (speed) is to be crossed at the specified time.

UM56 CROSS (posi - UM56 CROSS W/U CSTU − 9 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT OR LESS (position) AT OR specified position AT (speed) OR THAN (speed) LESS THAN is to be crossed at LESS (speed ) or less than the specified speed.

UM57 CROSS (posi - N/A W/U CSTU − 9 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT OR specified position AT (speed) OR GREATER THAN is to be crossed at LESS (speed) or less than the specified speed.

UM50 CROSS (posi - UM46 CROSS W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) BETWEEN (alti - (position) AT (lev - specified position AT (level) tude) AND (altitude) el). is to be crossed at Note − Used for a ver - the specified level tical range.

UM61 CROSS (posi - UM61 CROSS W/U CSTU − 14 Instruction that the CROSS (position) tion) AT AND MAIN - (position) AT AND specified position AT (level) AT TAIN (altitude) AT MAINTAIN (level) is to be crossed at (speed) (speed) AT (speed) the specified time.

Note 1. − A vertical range cannot be pro - vided.

Note 2. − This mes - sage element is equiv - alent to CSTU − 14 plus LVLU − 5 in Doc 4444.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 9 Speed Uplink Message Elements (SPDU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM106 MAINTAIN UM106 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 4 Instruction to MAINTAIN (speed) TAIN (speed) maintain the speci - (speed) fied speed.

UM107 MAINTAIN UM107 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 5 Instruction to MAINTAIN PRESENT SPEED TAIN PRESENT maintain the speci - PRESENT SPEED SPEED fied speed.

UM108 MAINTAIN UM108 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 6 Instruction to MAINTAIN (speed) OR TAIN (speed) OR maintain the speci - (speed) OR GREATER GREATER fied speed or GREATER greater.

UM109 MAINTAIN UM109 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 7 Instruction to MAINTAIN (speed) OR LESS TAIN (speed) OR maintain the speci - (speed) OR LESS LESS fied speed or less.

UM116 RESUME UM116 RESUME W/U SPDU − 13 Instruction to re- RESUME NOR - NORMAL SPEED NORMAL SPEED sume a normal MAL SPEED speed. The aircraft no longer needs to comply with a pre - viously issued speed restriction.

UM134 CONFIRM N/A Y SPDU − 15 Request to report REPORT (speed SPEED the speed defined types) SPEED Note – NE response by the speed attribute. type(s).

TBL GEN 3.3 − 10 Speed Downlink Message Elements (SPDD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM34 PRESENT N/A N SPDD − 3 Report indicating (speed types) SPEED (speed) the speed defined SPEED (speed) by the specified speed types is the specified speed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 11 Air Traffic Advisory Uplink Message Elements (ADVU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM154 RADAR N/A R ADVU − 2 Advisory that the SURVEILLANCE SERVICES TERMI - ATS surveillance SERVICE TERMI - NATED service is terminat - NATED ed.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 12 Voice Communications Uplink Message Elements (COMU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM117 CONTACT UM117 CON - W/U COMU − 1 Instruction to es - CONTACT (ICAO unit name) TACT (unit name) tablish voice con - (unit name) (frequency) (frequency) tact with the speci - (frequency) fied ATS unit on the specified fre - quency.

UM120 MONITOR UM120 MONI - W/U COMU − 5 Instruction to mon - MONITOR (ICAO unit name) TOR ( unit name) itor the specified (unit name) (frequency) (frequency) ATS unit on the (frequency) specified frequen - cy. The flight crew is not required to establish voice contact on the fre - quency.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 13 Voice Communications Downlink Message Elements (COMD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM20 REQUEST N/A Y COMD − 1 Request for voice REQUEST VOICE CONTACT contact on the spec - VOICE Note − Used when a ified frequency. CONTACT frequency is not re - (frequency) quired.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 14 Emergency/Urgency Downlink Message Elements (EMGD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM55 PAN PAN PAN N/A Y EMGD − 1 Indication of an ur - PAN PAN PAN Note − N response at - gent situation.

tribute DM56 MAYDAY N/A Y EMGD − 2 Indication of an MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY emergency situa - MAYDAY Note − N response at - tion. MAYDAY tribute DM57 ( remaining fu - N/A Y EMGD − 3 Report indicating (remaining fuel) el ) OF FUEL RE - fuel remaining ENDURANCE MAINING AND (time) and number AND (persons on ( remaining souls ) of persons on board. board) PERSONS SOULS ON BOARD ON BOARD Note − N response at - tribute DM58 CANCEL N/A Y EMGD − 4 Indication that the CANCEL EMERGENCY emergency situation EMERGENCY Note − N response at - is canceled.

tribute TBL GEN 3.3 − 15 Standard Response Uplink Message Elements (RSPU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM0 UNABLE UM0 UNABLE N RSPU − 1 Indication that the UNABLE message cannot be complied with.

UM1 STANDBY UM1 STANDBY N RSPU − 2 Indication that the STANDBY message will be re - sponded to shortly.

UM2 REQUEST DE - N/A N RSPU − 3 Indication that a REQUEST DE - FERRED long − term delay in FERRED response can be ex - pected.

UM3 ROGER UM3 ROGER N RSPU − 4 Indication that the ROGER message is re - ceived.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 16 Standard Response Downlink Message Elements (RSPD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display DM0 WILCO DM0 WILCO N RSPD − 1 Indication that the WILCO instruction is under - stood and will be complied with.

DM1 UNABLE DM1 UNABLE N RSPD − 2 Indication that the UNABLE message cannot be complied with.

DM2 STANDBY DM2 STANDBY N RSPD − 3 Indication that the STANDBY message will be re - sponded to shortly.

DM3 ROGER N RSPD − 4 Indication that the ROGER DM3 ROGER Note − ROGER is the message is re - only correct response ceived.

to an uplink free text message.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 17 Supplemental Uplink Message Elements (SUPU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM166 DUE TO N/A NE SUPS − 2 Indication that the DUE TO TRAFFIC associated message (specified reason is issued due to the uplink) specified reason.

UM167 DUE TO N/A NE SUPU − 2 Indication that the DUE TO AIRSPACE RE - associated message (specified reason STRICTION is issued due to the uplink) specified reason.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 18 Supplemental Downlink Message Elements (SUPD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM165 DUE TO DM65 DUE TO N SUPU − 1 Indication that the DUE TO AIRSPACE RE - WEATHER associated message (specified reason STRICTION is issued due to the uplink) specified reason.

UM166 DUE TO DM66 DUE TO N SUPU − 1 Indication that the DUE TO AIRSPACE RE - WEATHER associated message (specified reason STRICTION is issued due to the downlink) specified reason.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 19 Free Text Uplink Message Elements (TXTU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Ele - Intended Use Identifier ment Display UM169 ( free text ) UM203 ( free text ) R TXTU − 1 A message or part ( free text ) of a message that Note − M alert does not conform to attribute.

any standard mes - sage element in the PANSATM (Doc 4444).

UM169 ( free text ) N/A R N/A See Note N/A CPDLC NOT IN USE UNTIL FURTHER NOTIFICATION UM169 ( free text ) N/A R N/A See Note N/A “[facility designation]” LOCAL ALTIMETER (for Altimeter Report - ing Station) UM169 ( free text ) N/A R N/A See Note N/A “[facility designation] LOCAL ALTIMETER MORE THAN ONE HOUR” OLD UM169 ( free text ) N/A R N/A See Note N/A DUE TO WEATHER UM169 ( free text ) N/A R N/A See Note N/A REST OF ROUTE UN - CHANGED UM169 ( free text ) N/A R N/A See Note N/A TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT REROUTE UM169 ( free text ) DUE N/A R N/A See Note N/A TO SPACING UM169 ( free text ) ATC N/A R N/A See Note N/A HAS YOUR RE - QUEST UM169 ( free text ) ATC N/A R N/A See Note N/A ADVISORY NOTE − 1. These are FAA scripted free text messages with no GOLD equivalent.

2. In domestic airspace, the FAA provides automated free text messages concatenated with route uplinks to reinforce pilot understanding of the ROUTE CLEARANCE. (UM79, UM80, and UM83).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 20 Free Text Downlink Message Elements (TXTD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Ele - Intended Use Identifier ment Display DM68 (free text) N/A Y N/A N/A ( free text ) Note 1. – Urgency or Medium Note − M alert (M) alert attribute. attribute.

Note 2. – Selecting any of the emergency message elements will result in this message ele - ment being enabled for the flight crew to include in the emergency message at their discretion.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 21 System Management Uplink Message Elements (SYSU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Ele - Intended Use Identifier ment Display UM159 ERROR (error UM159 ERROR N SYSU − 1 System − generated ERROR (error in - information) (error informa - notification of an formation) tion) error.

UM160 NEXT DATA UM160 NEXT N SYSU − 2 System − generated NEXT DATA AUTHORITY (ICAO DATA AUTHOR - notification of the AUTHORITY facility designation) ITY (facility) next data authority (facility designa - Note − The facility des - Note − Facility or the cancellation tion [O]) ignation is required. parameter can thereof.

specify a facility designation or no facility.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 22 System Management Downlink Message Elements (SYSD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Ele - Intended Use Identifier ment Display DM62 ERROR (error DM62 ERROR N SYSD − 1 System − generated ERROR (error in - information) (error informa - notification of an formation) tion) error.

DM63 NOT CUR - DM63 NOT N SYSD − 3 System − generated NOT CURRENT RENT DATA AU - CURRENT rejection of any DATA AU - THORITY DATA AUTHOR - CPDLC message THORITY ITY sent from a ground facility that is not the current data au - thority.

N/A DM64 (ICAO facility N/A N N/A System − generated designation) notification that the Note − Use by FANS ground system is 1/A aircraft in B1 envi - not designated as ronments. the next data au - thority (NDA), indi - cating the identity of the current data authority (CDA).

Identity of the NDA, if any, is also reported.

4.2.2 ATC Frequency Change Procedures 4.2.2.1 The following phraseology will be used by controllers to effect a frequency change: EXAMPLE − (Aircraft identification) CONTACT (facility name or location name and terminal function) (frequency) AT (time, fix, or altitude).

NOTE − Pilots are expected to maintain a listening watch on the transferring controller’s frequency until the time, fix, or altitude specified. ATC will omit frequency change restrictions whenever pilot compliance is expected upon receipt.

4.2.2.2 The following phraseology should be utilized by pilots for establishing contact with the designated facility: a) When operating in a radar environment: 1) On initial contact, the pilot should inform the controller of the aircraft’s assigned altitude preceded by the words “level,” or “climbing to,” or “descending to,” as appropriate; and the aircraft’s present vacating altitude, if applicable.

EXAMPLE − 1. (Name) CENTER, (aircraft identification), LEVEL (altitude or flight level).

2. (Name) CENTER, (aircraft identification), LEAVING (exact altitude or flight level), CLIMBING TO OR DESCENDING TO (altitude or flight level).

NOTE − Exact altitude or flight level means to the nearest 100 foot increment. exact altitude or flight level reports on initial contact provide ATC with information required prior to using Mode C altitude information for separation purposes.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) When operating in a nonradar environment: 1) On initial contact, the pilot should inform the controller of the aircraft’s present position, altitude and time estimate for the next reporting point.

EXAMPLE − ( Name) CENTER, (aircraft identification), (POSITION), (altitude), ESTIMATING (reporting point) at (time) .

2) After initial contact, when a position report will be made, the pilot should give the controller a complete position report.

EXAMPLE − ( Name) CENTER, (aircraft identification), (position), (time), (altitude), (type of flight plan), (ETA and name of next reporting point), (the name of the next succeeding reporting point), AND (remarks) .

REFERENCE − AIP, Position Reporting, Paragraph 6.

4.2.2.3 At times controllers will ask pilots to verify the fact that they are at a particular altitude. The phraseology used will be: “VERIFY AT (altitude).” In climbing/descending situations, controllers may ask pilots to “VERIFY ASSIGNED ALTITUDE AS (altitude).” Pilots should confirm that they are at the altitude stated by the controller or that the assigned altitude is correct as stated. If this is not the case, they should inform the controller of the actual altitude being maintained or the different assigned altitude.

CAUTION − Pilots should not take action to change their actual altitude or different assigned altitude to that stated in the controller’s verification request unless the controller specifically authorizes a change.

4.2.3 ARTCC Radio Frequency Outage. ARTCC’s normally have at least one back − up radio receiver and transmitter system for each frequency which can usually be pressed into service quickly with little or no disruption of ATC service. Occasionally, technical problems may cause a delay but switchover seldom takes more than 60 seconds. When it appears that the outage will not be quickly remedied, the ARTCC will usually request a nearby aircraft, if there is one, to switch to the affected frequency to broadcast communications instructions. It is important, therefore, that the pilot wait at least one minute before deciding that the ARTCC has actually experienced a radio frequency failure. When such an outage does occur, the pilot should, if workload and equipment capability permit, maintain a listening watch on the affected frequency while attempting to comply with the recommended communications procedures which follow.

4.2.3.1 If two − way communications cannot be established with the ARTCC after changing frequencies, a pilot should attempt to recontact the transferring controller for the assignment of an alternative frequency or other instructions.

4.2.3.2 When an ARTCC radio frequency failure occurs after two − way communications have been established, the pilot should attempt to reestablish contact with the center on any other known ARTCC frequency, preferably that of the next responsible sector when practicable, and ask for instructions. However, when the next normal frequency change along the route is known to involve another ATC facility, the pilot should contact that facility, if feasible, for instructions. If communications cannot be reestablished by either method, the pilot is expected to request communications instructions from the FSS appropriate to the route of flight.

NOTE − The exchange of information between an aircraft and an ARTCC through an FSS is quicker than relay via company radio because the FSS has direct interphone lines to the responsible ARTCC sector. Accordingly, when circumstances dictate a choice between the two, during an ARTCC frequency outage, relay via FSS radio is recommended.

5. Radio Communications Failure 5.1 Pilots of IFR flights experiencing two − way radio failure are expected to adhere to the procedures prescribed in GEN 3.4 , paragraph 12.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 91.185 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6. Position Reporting 6.1 The safety and effectiveness of traffic control depends to a large extent on accurate position reporting. In order to provide the proper separation and expedite aircraft movements, ATC must be able to make accurate estimates of the progress of every aircraft operating on an IFR flight plan.

6.2 Position Identification 6.2.1 When a position report is to be made passing a VOR radio facility, the time reported should be the time at which the first complete reversal of the “to/from” indicator is accomplished.

6.2.2 When a position report is made passing a facility by means of an airborne automatic direction finder (ADF), the time reported should be the time at which the indicator makes a complete reversal.

6.2.3 When an aural or light − panel indication is used to determine the time passing a reporting point, such as a fan marker, Z marker, cone of silence or intersection of range courses, the time should be noted when the signal is first received and again when it ceases. The mean of these two times should then be taken as the actual time over the fix.

6.2.4 If a position is given with respect to distance and direction from a reporting point, the distance and direction should be computed as accurately as possible.

6.2.5 Except for terminal transition purposes, position reports or navigation with reference to aids not established for use in the structure in which flight is being conducted will not normally be required by ATC.

6.3 Position Reporting Points 6.3.1 Federal Aviation Regulations require pilots to maintain a listening watch on the appropriate frequency and, unless operating under the provisions of subparagraph 6.4 , to furnish position reports passing certain reporting points. Reporting points are indicated by symbols on en route charts. The designated compulsory reporting point symbol is the solid triangle ; the “on request” reporting point symbol is the open triangle . Reports passing an “on request” reporting point are only necessary when requested by ATC.

6.4 Position Reporting Requirements 6.4.1 Flights Along Airways or Routes. A position report is required by all flights regardless of altitude, including those operating in accordance with an ATC clearance specifying “VFR − on − top,” over each designated compulsory reporting point along the route being flown.

6.4.2 Flight Along a Direct Route. Regardless of the altitude or flight level being flown, including flights operating in accordance with an ATC clearance specifying “VFR − on − top,” pilots must report over each reporting point used in the flight plan to define the route of flight.

6.4.3 Flights in a Radar Environment. When informed by ATC that their aircraft are in “RADAR CONTACT,” PILOTS SHOULD DISCONTINUE POSITION REPORTS OVER DESIGNATED REPORT - ING POINTS. They should resume normal position reporting when ATC advises “RADAR CONTACT LOST” or “RADAR SERVICE TERMINATED.” NOTE − ATC will inform pilots that they are in “radar contact” (a) When their aircraft is initially identified in the ATC system; and (b) When radar identification is reestablished after radar service has been terminated or radar contact has been lost.

Subsequent to being advised that the controller has established radar contact, this fact will not be repeated to the pilot when handed off to another controller. At times, the aircraft identity will be confirmed by the receiving controller; however, this should not be construed to mean that radar contact has been lost. The identity of transponder − equipped aircraft will be confirmed by asking the pilot to “ident, squawk standby,” or to change codes. Aircraft without transponders will be advised of their position to confirm identity. In this case, the pilot is expected to advise the controller if in disagreement with the position given. If the pilot cannot confirm the accuracy of the position given because of not being tuned to the NAVAID referenced by the controller, the pilot should ask for another radar position relative to the tuned in NAVAID.

6.4.4 Flights in an Oceanic (Nonradar) Environment. Pilots must report over each point used in the flight plan to define the route of flight, even if the point is depicted on aeronautical charts as an “on request” Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 (non-compulsory) reporting point. For aircraft providing automatic position reporting via an Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Contract (ADS-C) logon, pilots should discontinue voice position reports.

6.5 Position Report Items 6.5.1 Position reports should include the following items: 6.5.1.1 Identification.

6.5.1.2 Position.

6.5.1.3 Time.

6.5.1.4 Altitude or flight level (Include actual altitude or flight level when operating on a clearance specifying “VFR − on − top.”).

6.5.1.5 Type of flight plan (not required in IFR position reports made directly to ARTCCs or approach control).

6.5.1.6 ETA and name of next reporting point.

6.5.1.7 The name only of the next succeeding reporting point along the route of flight.

6.5.1.8 Pertinent remarks.

7. Additional Reports 7.1 The following reports should be made to ATC or FSS facilities without a specific request: 7.1.1 At all times, report: 7.1.1.1 When vacating any previously assigned altitude/flight level for a newly assigned altitude/flight level.

7.1.1.2 When an altitude change will be made if operating on a clearance specifying “VFR − on − top.” 7.1.1.3 When unable to climb/descend at a rate of at least 500 feet per minute.

7.1.1.4 When approach has been missed. (Request clearance for specific action; i.e., to alternative airport, another approach, etc.).

7.1.1.5 Change in the average true airspeed (at cruising altitude) when it varies by 5 percent or 10 knots (whichever is greater) from that filed in the flight plan.

7.1.1.6 The time and altitude/flight level reaching a holding fix or point to which cleared.

7.1.1.7 When leaving any assigned holding fix or point.

NOTE − The reports in subparagraphs 7.1.1.6 and 7.1.1.7 may be omitted by pilots of aircraft involved in instrument training at military area facilities when radar service is being provided.

7.1.1.8 Any loss, in controlled airspace, of VOR, TACAN, ADF, low frequency navigation receiver capability, GPS anomalies while using installed IFR − certified GPS/GNSS receivers, complete or partial loss of ILS receiver capability or impairment of air/ground communications capability. Reports should include aircraft identification, equipment affected, degree to which the capability to operate under IFR in the ATC system is impaired, and the nature and extent of assistance desired from ATC.

NOTE − When reporting GPS anomalies, include the location and altitude of the anomaly. Be specific when describing the location and include duration of the anomaly if necessary.

7.1.1.9 Any information relating to the safety of flight.

NOTE − Other equipment installed in an aircraft may effectively impair safety and/or the ability to operate under IFR. If such equipment; e.g., airborne weather radar, malfunctions and in the pilot’s judgment either safety or IFR capabilities are affected, reports should be made as above.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.2 When not in radar contact, report: 7.2.1 When leaving the final approach fix inbound on final approach (nonprecision approach) or when leaving the outer marker or fix used in lieu of the outer marker inbound on final approach (precision approach); or 7.2.2 A corrected estimate at anytime it becomes apparent that an estimate as previously submitted is in error in excess of 2 minutes. For flights in the North Atlantic (NAT), a revised estimate is required if the error is 3 minutes or more.

7.3 Pilots encountering weather conditions which have not been forecast, or hazardous conditions which have been forecast, are expected to forward a report of such weather to ATC.

8. Quota Flow Control 8.1 Quota Flow Control is designed to balance the ATC system demand with system capacity.

8.2 ARTCCs will hold the optimum number of aircraft that their primary and secondary holding fixes will safely accommodate without imposing undue limitations on the control of other traffic operating within the ARTCC’s airspace. This is based on the user’s requirement to continue operating to a terminal regardless of the arrival rate at that terminal. When staffing, equipment, or severe weather will inhibit the number of aircraft the arrival ARTCC may safely hold, a reduction may be necessary.

8.3 When an ARTCC is holding the optimum number of aircraft, the adjacent ARTCCs will be issued quotas concerning aircraft which can be cleared into the impacted ARTCC’s airspace. When the adjacent center’s demand exceeds the quota, aircraft will be held in the adjacent ARTCC’s airspace until they can be permitted to proceed.

8.4 The size of the hourly quota will be based initially on the projected arrival rate and thereafter on the actual landing and diversion totals. Once quotas have been imposed, departures in the arrival and adjacent ARTCC’s area to the affected airport may be assigned ground delay, if necessary, to limit airborne holding to ATC capacity.

However, when a forecast of improved arrival rate appears reliable, in the opinion of the arrival ARTCC, additional above − quota flights may be approved based on the expectation that by the time these additional above − quota flights become an operational factor in the affected area, the system will be able to absorb them without undue difficulty.

8.5 Long distance flights, which originate beyond the adjacent ARTCC area, will normally be permitted to proceed to a point just short of the arrival ARTCC boundary where a delay, at least equal to the delays (ground/airborne) being encountered, will be assigned.

8.6 ARTCCs imposing ground delays make efforts to advise the users when lengthy delays are a prospect to preclude unnecessary boarding and subsequent unloading prior to actual takeoff due to lengthy unanticipated ground delays. Users should advise the ARTCC through FSS or operation offices when there is any significant change in the proposed departure time so as to permit more efficient flow control planning. Airborne aircraft holding in the adjacent ARTCC airspace generally receive more benefit than ground delayed aircraft when increases unexpectedly develop in the quota number because the reaction time is less. For this reason, whenever operationally feasible, adjacent ARTCCs may offer airborne delay within their areas instead of ground delay.

8.7 Flights originating beyond the adjacent ARTCC areas may not have sufficient fuel to absorb the total anticipated delay while airborne. Accordingly, the concerned adjacent ARTCC may permit these flights to land in its area while retaining previously accumulated delay for the purpose of quota priority. When the amount of air traffic backlogging in an adjacent ARTCC area is approaching the saturation point, additional en route traffic will be subject to prior approval.

8.8 Generally, movement of arrival aircraft into the impacted airport terminal area will be made on the basis that those flights with the most accumulated delay, either ground, airborne, or a combination of both, normally receive priority over other traffic. This applies only to delays encountered because of the situation at the airport of intended landing.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 8.9 Pilots/operators are advised to check for flow control advisories which are transmitted to FSSs, to selected airline dispatch offices, and to ARTCCs.

9. Advisory and Air Traffic Information Services 9.1 Approach Control Service for VFR Arriving Aircraft 9.1.1 Numerous approach control facilities have established programs for arriving VFR aircraft to contact approach control for landing information. This information includes: wind, runway, and altimeter setting at the airport of intended landing. This information may be omitted if contained in the ATIS broadcast and the pilot states the appropriate ATIS code.

NOTE − Pilot use of “have numbers” does not indicate receipt of the ATIS broadcast. In addition, the controller will provide traffic advisories on a workload permitting basis.

9.1.2 Such information will be furnished upon initial contact with the concerned approach control facility. The pilot will be requested to change to the tower frequency at a predetermined time or point, to receive further landing information.

9.1.3 Where available, use of this procedure will not hinder the operation of VFR flights by requiring excessive spacing between aircraft or devious routing. Radio contact points will be based on time or distance rather than on landmarks.

9.1.4 Compliance with this procedure is not mandatory, but pilot participation is encouraged. (See ENR 1.1, paragraph 40, Terminal Radar Services for VFR Aircraft.)

NOTE − Approach control services for VFR aircraft are normally dependent on air traffic control radar. These services are not available during periods of a radar outage.

9.2 Traffic Advisory Practices at Airports Without Operating Control Towers 9.2.1 Airport Operations Without an Operating Control Tower 9.2.1.1 There is no substitute for alertness while in the vicinity of an airport. It is essential that pilots be alert and look for other traffic and exchange traffic information when approaching or departing an airport without an operating control tower. This is of particular importance since other aircraft may not have communication capability or, in some cases, pilots may not communicate their presence or intentions when operating into or out of such airports. To achieve the greatest degree of safety, it is essential that: a) All radio − equipped aircraft transmit/receive on a common frequency identified for the purpose of airport advisories; and b) Pilots use the correct airport name, as identified in appropriate aeronautical publications, to reduce the risk of confusion when communicating their position, intentions, and/or exchanging traffic information.

9.2.1.2 An airport may have a full or part − time tower or FSS located on the airport, a full or part − time UNICOM station or no aeronautical station at all. There are three ways for pilots to communicate their intention and obtain airport/traffic information when operating at an airport that does not have an operating tower: by communicating with an FSS, a UNICOM operator, or by making a self − announce broadcast.

NOTE − FSS airport advisories are available only in Alaska.

9.2.1.3 Many airports are now providing completely automated weather, radio check capability and airport advisory information on an automated UNICOM system. These systems offer a variety of features, typically selectable by microphone clicks, on the UNICOM frequency. Availability of the automated UNICOM will be published in the Chart Supplement and approach charts.

9.2.2 Communicating on a Common Frequency Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.2.2.1 The key to communicating at an airport without an operating control tower is selection of the correct common frequency. The acronym, CTAF, which stands for common traffic advisory frequency, is synonymous with this program. A CTAF is a frequency designated for the purpose of carrying out airport advisory practices while operating to or from an airport without an operating control tower. The CTAF may be a UNICOM, MULTICOM, FSS, or tower frequency and is identified in appropriate aeronautical publications.

NOTE − FSS frequencies are available only in Alaska.

9.2.2.2 CTAF (Alaska Only) . In Alaska, a CTAF may also be designated for the purpose of carrying out advisory practices while operating in designated areas with a high volume of VFR traffic.

9.2.2.3 The CTAF frequency for a particular airport or area is contained in the Chart Supplement, Alaska Terminal Publication, Instrument Approach Procedure Charts, and Instrument Departure Procedure (DP) Charts. Also, the CTAF frequency can be obtained by contacting any FSS. Use of the appropriate CTAF, combined with a visual alertness and application of the following recommended good operating practices, will enhance safety of flight into and out of all uncontrolled airports.

9.2.3 Recommended Traffic Advisory Practices 9.2.3.1 Pilots of inbound aircraft should monitor and communicate on the designated CTAF from 10 miles to landing. Pilots of departing aircraft should monitor/communicate on the appropriate frequency from start − up, during taxi, and until 10 miles from the airport unless the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) or local procedures require otherwise.

9.2.3.2 Pilots of aircraft conducting other than arriving or departing operations at altitudes normally used by arriving and departing aircraft should monitor/communicate on the appropriate frequency while within 10 miles of the airport unless required to do otherwise by the CFR or local procedures. Such operations include parachute jumping/dropping (see ENR 5.1, Paragraph 2.3, Parachute Jump Aircraft Operations), en route, practicing maneuvers, etc.

9.2.3.3 In Alaska, pilots of aircraft conducting other than arriving or departing operations in designated CTAF areas should monitor/communicate on the appropriate frequency while within the designated area, unless required to do otherwise by CFRs or local procedures. Such operations include parachute jumping/dropping, en route, practicing maneuvers, etc.

9.2.4 Airport Advisory/Information Services Provided by a FSS 9.2.4.1 There are two advisory type services provided at selected airports.

a) Local Airport Advisory (LAA) is available only in Alaska and provided at airports that have a FSS physically located on the airport, which does not have a control tower or where the tower is operated on a part − time basis. The CTAF for LAA airports is disseminated in the appropriate aeronautical publications.

b) Remote Airport Information Service (RAIS) is provided in support of special events at nontowered airports by request from the airport authority and must be published as a NOTAM D.

9.2.4.2 In communicating with a CTAF FSS, check the airport’s automated weather and establish two − way communications before transmitting outbound/inbound intentions or information. An inbound aircraft should initiate contact approximately 10 miles from the airport, reporting aircraft identification and type, altitude, location relative to the airport, intentions (landing or over flight), possession of the automated weather, and request airport advisory or airport information service. A departing aircraft should initiate contact before taxiing, reporting aircraft identification and type, VFR or IFR, location on the airport, intentions, direction of take − off, possession of the automated weather, and request airport advisory or information service, as applicable. Also, report intentions before taxiing onto the active runway for departure. If you must change frequencies for other service after initial report to FSS, return to FSS frequency for traffic update.

a) Inbound EXAMPLE − Vero Beach radio, Centurion Six Niner Delta Delta is ten miles south, two thousand, landing Vero Beach. I have the automated weather, request airport advisory.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) Outbound EXAMPLE − Vero Beach radio, Centurion Six Niner Delta Delta, ready to taxi to runway 22, VFR, departing to the southwest. I have the automated weather, request airport advisory.

9.2.4.3 Airport advisory service includes wind direction and velocity, favored or designated runway, altimeter setting, known airborne and ground traffic, NOTAMs, airport taxi routes, airport traffic pattern information, and instrument approach procedures. These elements are varied so as to best serve the current traffic situation. Some airport managers have specified that under certain wind or other conditions designated runways be used. Pilots should advise the FSS of the runway they intend to use.

9.2.4.4 Automatic Flight Information Service (AFIS) − Alaska FSSs Only a) AFIS is the continuous broadcast of recorded non − control information at airports in Alaska where an FSS provides local airport advisory service. Its purpose is to improve FSS specialist efficiency by reducing frequency congestion on the local airport advisory frequency.

1) The AFIS broadcast will automate the repetitive transmission of essential but routine information (for example, weather, favored runway, braking action, airport NOTAMs, etc.). The information is continuously broadcast over a discrete VHF radio frequency (usually the ASOS frequency).

2) Use of AFIS is not mandatory, but pilots who choose to utilize two − way radio communications with the FSS are urged to listen to AFIS, as it relieves frequency congestion on the local airport advisory frequency. AFIS broadcasts are updated upon receipt of any official hourly and special weather, and changes in other pertinent data.

3) When a pilot acknowledges receipt of the AFIS broadcast, FSS specialists may omit those items contained in the broadcast if they are current. When rapidly changing conditions exist, the latest ceiling, visibility, altimeter, wind or other conditions may be omitted from the AFIS and will be issued by the FSS specialist on the appropriate radio frequency.

EXAMPLE − “Kotzebue information ALPHA. One six five five zulu. Wind, two one zero at five; visibility two, fog; ceiling one hundred overcast; temperature minus one two, dew point minus one four; altimeter three one zero five. Altimeter in excess of three one zero zero, high pressure altimeter setting procedures are in effect. Favored runway two six. Weather in Kotzebue surface area is below V − F − R minima − an ATC clearance is required. Contact Kotzebue Radio on 123.6 for traffic advisories and advise intentions. Notice to Airmen, Hotham NDB out of service. Transcribed Weather Broadcast out of service. Advise on initial contact you have ALPHA.” NOTE − The absence of a sky condition or ceiling and/or visibility on Alaska FSS AFIS indicates a sky condition or ceiling of 5,000 feet or above and visibility of 5 miles or more. A remark may be made on the broadcast, “the weather is better than 5000 and 5.” b) Pilots should listen to Alaska FSSs AFIS broadcasts whenever Alaska FSSs AFIS is in operation.

NOTE − Some Alaska FSSs are open part time and/or seasonally.

c) Pilots should notify controllers on initial contact that they have received the Alaska FSSs AFIS broadcast by repeating the phonetic alphabetic letter appended to the broadcast.

EXAMPLE − “Information Alpha received.” d) While it is a good operating practice for pilots to make use of the Alaska FSS AFIS broadcast where it is available, some pilots use the phrase “have numbers” in communications with the FSS. Use of this phrase means that the pilot has received wind, runway, and altimeter information ONLY and the Alaska FSS does not have to repeat this information. It does not indicate receipt of the AFIS broadcast and should never be used for this purpose.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 CAUTION − All aircraft in the vicinity of an airport may not be in communication with the FSS.

9.2.5 Information Provided by Aeronautical Advisory Stations (UNICOM) 9.2.5.1 UNICOM is a nongovernment air/ground radio communication station which may provide airport information at public use airports where there is no tower or FSS.

9.2.5.2 On pilot request, UNICOM stations may provide pilots with weather information, wind direction, the recommended runway, or other necessary information. If the UNICOM frequency is designated as the CTAF, it will be identified in appropriate aeronautical publications.

9.2.5.3 Unavailability of Information from FSS or UNICOM. Should LAA by an FSS or Aeronautical Advisory Station UNICOM be unavailable, wind and weather information may be obtainable from nearby controlled airports via Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) or Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) frequency.

9.2.6 Self − Announce Position and/or Intentions 9.2.6.1 General. Self-announce is a procedure whereby pilots broadcast their position or intended flight activity or ground operation on the designated CTAF. This procedure is used primarily at airports which do not have an FSS on the airport. The self-announce procedure should also be used if a pilot is unable to communicate with the FSS on the designated CTAF. Pilots stating, “Traffic in the area, please advise” is not a recognized Self − Announce Position and/or Intention phrase and should not be used under any condition.

9.2.6.2 If an airport has a tower which is temporarily closed or operated on a part − time basis, and there is no FSS on the airport or the FSS is closed, use the CTAF to self − announce your position or intentions.

9.2.6.3 Where there is no tower, FSS, or UNICOM station on the airport, use MULTICOM frequency 122.9 for self − announce procedures. Such airports will be identified in appropriate aeronautical information publications.

9.2.6.4 Straight-in Landings. The FAA discourages VFR straight-in approaches to landings due to the increased risk of a mid-air collision. However, if a pilot chooses to execute a straight-in approach for landing without entering the airport traffic pattern, the pilot should self − announce their position on the designated CTAF approximately 8 to 10 miles from the airport and coordinate their straight − in approach and landing with other airport traffic. Pilots executing a straight − in approach (IFR or VFR) do not have priority over other aircraft in the traffic pattern, and must comply with the provisions of 14 CFR 91.113 (g), Right-of-way rules.

9.2.6.5 Traffic Pattern Operations. All traffic within a 10-mile radius of a non-towered airport or a part-time-towered airport when the control tower is not operating, should monitor and communicate on the designated CTAF when entering the traffic pattern. Pilots operating in the traffic pattern or on a straight-in approach must be alert at all times to other aircraft in the pattern, or conducting straight-in approaches, and communicate their position to avoid a possible traffic conflict. In the airport traffic pattern and while on straight-in approaches to a runway, effective communication and a pilot’s responsibility to see-and-avoid are essential mitigations to avoid a possible midair collision. In addition, following established traffic pattern procedures eliminates excessive maneuvering at low altitudes, reducing the risk of loss of aircraft control.

REFERENCE − FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 90 − 66, Non − Towered Airport Flight Operations.

9.2.6.6 Practice Approaches. Pilots conducting practice instrument approaches should be particularly alert for other aircraft that may be departing in the opposite direction. When conducting any practice approach, regardless of its direction relative to other airport operations, pilots should make announcements on the CTAF as follows: a) Departing the final approach fix, inbound (nonprecision approach) or departing the outer marker or fix used in lieu of the outer marker, inbound (precision approach).

b) Established on the final approach segment or immediately upon being released by ATC.

c) Upon completion or termination of the approach; and Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 28 United States of America 22 JAN 26 d) Upon executing the missed approach procedure.

9.2.6.7 Departing aircraft should always be alert for arrival aircraft coming from the opposite direction.

9.2.6.8 Recommended Self − Announce broadcasts. It should be noted that aircraft operating to or from another nearby airport may be making self-announce broadcasts on the same UNICOM or MULTICOM frequency. To help identify one airport from another, the airport name should be spoken at the beginning and end of each self-announce transmission. When referring to a specific runway, pilots should use the runway number and not use the phrase “Active Runway.” a) Inbound EXAMPLE − Strawn traffic, Apache Two Two Five Zulu, (position), (altitude), (descending) or entering downwind/base/ final (as appropriate) runway one seven full stop/touch − and − go, Strawn.

Strawn traffic Apache Two Two Five Zulu clear of runway one seven Strawn.

b) Outbound EXAMPLE − Strawn traffic, Queen Air Seven One Five Five Bravo (location on airport) taxiing to runway two six Strawn.

Strawn traffic, Queen Air Seven One Five Five Bravo departing runway two six. “Departing the pattern to the (direction), climbing to (altitude) Strawn.” c) Practice Instrument Approach EXAMPLE − Strawn traffic, Cessna Two One Four Three Quebec (position from airport) inbound descending through (altitude) practice (name of approach) approach runway three five Strawn.

Strawn traffic, Cessna Two One Four Three Quebec practice (type) approach completed or terminated runway three five Strawn.

9.2.7 UNICOM Communication Procedures 9.2.7.1 In communicating with a UNICOM station, the following practices will help reduce frequency congestion, facilitate a better understanding of pilot intentions, help identify the location of aircraft in the traffic pattern, and enhance safety of flight: a) Select the correct UNICOM frequency.

b) State the identification of the UNICOM station you are calling in each transmission.

c) Speak slowly and distinctly.

d) Report approximately 10 miles from the airport, reporting altitude, and state your aircraft type, aircraft identification, location relative to the airport, state whether landing or overflight, and request wind information and runway in use.

e) Report on downwind, base and final approach.

f) Report leaving the runway.

9.2.7.2 Recommended UNICOM Phraseologies: a) Inbound.

PHRASEOLOGY − FREDERICK UNICOM CESSNA EIGHT ZERO ONE TANGO FOXTROT 10 MILES SOUTHEAST DESCENDING THROUGH (altitude) LANDING FREDERICK, REQUEST WIND AND RUNWAY INFORMATION FREDERICK.

FREDERICK TRAFFIC CESSNA EIGHT ZERO ONE TANGO FOXTROT ENTERING DOWNWIND/BASE/ FINAL (as appropriate) FOR RUNWAY ONE NINER FULL STOP/TOUCH − AND − GO FREDERICK.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FREDERICK TRAFFIC CESSNA EIGHT ZERO ONE TANGO FOXTROT CLEAR OF RUNWAY ONE NINER FREDERICK.

b) Outbound PHRASEOLOGY − FREDERICK UNICOM CESSNA EIGHT ZERO ONE TANGO FOXTROT (location on airport) TAXIING TO RUNWAY ONE NINE, REQUEST WIND AND TRAFFIC INFORMATION FREDERICK.

FREDERICK TRAFFIC CESSNA EIGHT ZERO ONE TANGO FOXTROT DEPARTING RUNWAY ONE NINE.

“REMAINING IN THE PATTERN” OR “DEPARTING THE PATTERN TO THE (direction) (as appropriate)” FREDERICK.

9.3 IFR Approaches/Ground Vehicle Operations 9.3.1 IFR Approaches. When operating in accordance with an IFR clearance and ATC approves a change to the advisory frequency, make an expeditious change to the CTAF and employ the recommended traffic advisory procedures.

9.3.2 Ground Vehicle Operation. Airport ground vehicles equipped with radios should monitor the CTAF frequency when operating on the airport movement area and remain clear of runways/taxiways being used by aircraft. Radio transmissions from ground vehicles should be confined to safety − related matters.

9.3.3 Radio Control of Airport Lighting Systems. Whenever possible, the CTAF will be used to control airport lighting systems at airports without operating control towers. This eliminates the need for pilots to change frequencies to turn the lights on and allows a continuous listening watch on a single frequency. The CTAF is published on the instrument approach chart and in other appropriate aeronautical information publications.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 30 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 23 Summary of Recommended Communication Procedures COMMUNICATION/BROADCAST PROCEDURES Practice Facility at Frequency Use Outbound Inbound Instrument Airport Approach 1.

UNICOM (No Communicate with UNICOM Before taxiing and 10 miles out; Tower or FSS) station on published CTAF before taxiing entering frequency (122.7; 122.8; onto the runway downwind, base, 122.725; 122.975; or 123.0). for departure. and final; leaving If unable to contact UNICOM the runway.

station, use self-announce procedures on CTAF.

No Tower, FSS, or Self-announce on Before taxiing and 10 miles out; Departing final UNICOM MULTICOM frequency before taxiing entering approach fix 122.9. onto the runway downwind, base, (name) or on final for departure. and final; leaving approach segment the runway. inbound.

No Tower in Communicate with FSS on Before taxiing and 10 miles out; Approach operation, FSS open CTAF frequency. before taxiing entering completed/ (Alaska only) onto the runway downwind, base, terminated.

for departure. and final; leaving the runway.

FSS closed Self-announce on CTAF. Before taxiing and 10 miles out; (No Tower) before taxiing entering downwind, base, onto the runway for departure. and final; leaving the runway.

Tower or FSS not in Self-announce on CTAF. Before taxiing and 10 miles out; operation before taxiing entering onto the runway downwind, base, for departure. and final; leaving the runway.

6. Designated CTAF Self-announce on CTAF Before taxiing and When entering Area (Alaska Only) designated on chart or Chart before taxiing on designated CTAF Supplement Alaska. the runway for area.

departure until leaving designated area.

9.4 Designated UNICOM/MULTICOM Frequencies 9.4.1 Frequency Use 9.4.1.1 TBL GEN 3.3 − 24 depicts UNICOM and MULTICOM frequency uses as designated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

NOTE − 1. In some areas of the country, frequency interference may be encountered from nearby airports using the same UNICOM frequency. Where there is a problem, UNICOM operators are encouraged to develop a “least interference” frequency assignment plan for airports concerned using the frequencies designated for airports without operating control towers.

UNICOM licensees are encouraged to apply for UNICOM 25 KHz spaced channel frequencies. Due to the extremely limited number of frequencies with 50 KHz channel spacing, 25 KHz channel spacing should be implemented. UNICOM licensees may then request FCC to assign frequencies in accordance with the plan, which FCC will review and consider for approval.

2. Wind direction and runway information may not be available on UNICOM frequency 122.950.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.4.1.2 TBL GEN 3.3 − 25 depicts other frequency uses as designated by the FCC.

9.5 Use of UNICOM for ATC purposes 9.5.1 UNICOM service may be used for air traffic control purposes, only under the following circumstances: 9.5.1.1 Revision to proposed departure time.

9.5.1.2 Takeoff, arrival, or flight plan cancellation time.

9.5.1.3 ATC clearance, provided arrangements are made between the ATC facility and the UNICOM licensee to handle such messages.

TBL GEN 3.3 − 24 UNICOM/MULTICOM Frequency Usage Use Frequency Airports without an 122.700 operating control tower. 122.725 122.800 122.975 123.000 123.050 123.075 122.900 (MULTICOM FREQUENCY) Activities of a temporary, seasonal, emergency nature or search and rescue, as well as, airports with no tower, FSS, or UNICOM.

(MULTICOM 122.925 FREQUENCY) Forestry management and fire suppression, fish and game management and protection, and environmental monitoring and protection.

Airports with a control 122.950 tower or FSS on airport.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 32 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.3 − 25 Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use Frequency Air-to-air communication 122.750 (private fixed wing aircraft).

Helicopter air − to − air 123.025 communications; Air traffic control operations.

Aviation instruction, 123.300 Glider, Hot Air Balloon 123.500 (not to be used for advisory service) .

Assignment to flight test 123.400 land and aircraft stations 123.450 (not for air − to − air communication except for those aircraft operating in an oceanic FIR).

This frequency is available only to itinerant stations that have a requirement to be periodically transferred to various locations.

Mobile station operations on these frequencies are limited to an area within 320 km (200 mi) of an associated flight test land station.

9.6 Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) 9.6.1 ATIS is the continuous broadcast of recorded noncontrol information in selected high activity terminal areas. Its purpose is to improve controller effectiveness and to relieve frequency congestion by automating the repetitive transmission of essential but routine information. The information is continuously broadcast over a discrete VHF radio frequency or the voice portion of a local NAVAID. ATIS transmissions on a discrete VHF radio frequency are engineered to be receivable to a maximum of 60 NM from the ATIS site and a maximum altitude of 25,000 feet AGL. At most locations, ATIS signals may be received on the surface of the airport, but local conditions may limit the maximum ATIS reception distance and/or altitude. Pilots are urged to cooperate in the ATIS program as it relieves frequency congestion on approach control, ground control, and local control frequencies. The Chart Supplement indicates airports for which ATIS is provided.

9.6.2 ATIS information includes: 9.6.2.1 Airport/facility name 9.6.2.2 Phonetic letter code 9.6.2.3 Time of the latest weather sequence (UTC) 9.6.2.4 Weather information consisting of: a) Wind direction and velocity b) Visibility c) Obstructions to vision d) Present weather consisting of: sky condition, temperature, dew point, altimeter, a density altitude advisory when appropriate, and other pertinent remarks included in the official weather observation 9.6.2.5 Instrument approach and runway in use.

The ceiling/sky condition, visibility, and obstructions to vision may be omitted from the ATIS broadcast if the ceiling is above 5,000 feet and the visibility is more than 5 miles. The departure runway will only be given if Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 different from the landing runway except at locations having a separate ATIS for departure. The broadcast may include the appropriate frequency and instructions for VFR arrivals to make initial contact with approach control.

Pilots of aircraft arriving or departing the terminal area can receive the continuous ATIS broadcast at times when cockpit duties are least pressing and listen to as many repeats as desired. ATIS broadcast must be updated upon the receipt of any official hourly and special weather. A new recording will also be made when there is a change in other pertinent data such as runway change, instrument approach in use, etc.

SAMPLE BROADCAST − DULLES INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION SIERRA. ONE FOUR ZERO ZERO ZULU. WIND THREE FIVE ZERO AT EIGHT. VISIBILITY ONE ZERO. CEILING FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED BROKEN. TEMPERATURE THREE FOUR. DEW POINT TWO EIGHT. ALTIMETER THREE ZERO ONE ZERO. ILS RUNWAY ONE RIGHT APPROACH IN USE. DEPARTING RUNWAY THREE ZERO. ADVISE ON INITIAL CONTACT YOU HAVE INFORMATION SIERRA.

9.6.3 Pilots should listen to ATIS broadcasts whenever ATIS is in operation.

9.6.4 Pilots should notify controllers on initial contact that they have received the ATIS broadcast by repeating the alphabetical code word appended to the broadcast.

EXAMPLE − “Information Sierra received.” 9.6.5 When the pilot acknowledges receipt of the ATIS broadcast, controllers may omit those items contained on the broadcast if they are current. Rapidly changing conditions will be issued by ATC and the ATIS will contain words as follows: EXAMPLE − “Latest ceiling/visibility/altimeter/wind/(other conditions) will be issued by approach control/tower.” NOTE − The absence of a sky condition/ceiling and/or visibility on ATIS indicates a sky condition/ceiling of 5,000 feet or above and visibility of 5 miles or more. A remark may be made on the broadcast, “the weather is better than 5,000 and 5,” or the existing weather may be broadcast.

9.6.6 Controllers will issue pertinent information to pilots who do not acknowledge receipt of a broadcast or who acknowledge receipt of a broadcast which is not current.

9.6.7 To serve frequency − limited aircraft, FSSs are equipped to transmit on the omnirange frequency at most en route VORs used as ATIS voice outlets. Such communication interrupts the ATIS broadcast. Pilots of aircraft equipped to receive on other FSS frequencies are encouraged to do so in order that these override transmissions may be kept to an absolute minimum.

9.6.8 While it is a good operating practice for pilots to make use of the ATIS broadcast where it is available, some pilots use the phrase “Have Numbers” in communications with the control tower. Use of this phrase means that the pilot has received wind, runway and altimeter information ONLY and the tower does not have to repeat this information. It does not indicate receipt of the ATIS broadcast and should never be used for this purpose.

9.7 Airport Reservation Operations and Special Traffic Management Programs 9.7.1 This section describes procedures for obtaining required airport reservations at airports designated by the FAA and for airports operating under Special Traffic Management Programs.

9.7.2 Slot Controlled Airports.

9.7.2.1 The FAA may adopt rules to require advance reservations for unscheduled operations at certain airports.

In addition to the information in the rules adopted by the FAA, a listing of the airports and relevant information will be maintained on the FAA website www.fly.faa.gov/ecvrs .

9.7.2.2 The FAA has established an Airport Reservation Office (ARO) to receive and process reservations for unscheduled flights at the slot controlled airports. The ARO uses the Enhanced Computer Voice Reservation System (e-CVRS) to allocate reservations. Reservations will be available beginning 72 hours in advance of the operation at the slot controlled airport. Standby lists are not maintained. Flights with declared emergencies do Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.3 − 34 United States of America 22 JAN 26 not require reservations. Refer to the website for the current listing of slot controlled airports, limitations, and reservation procedures.

9.7.2.3 For more detailed information on operations and reservation procedures at a slot controlled airport, please see 14 CFR Part 93, Subpart K – High Density Traffic Airports.

9.7.3 Special Traffic Management Programs (STMP) 9.7.3.1 Special programs may be established when a location requires special traffic handling to accommodate above normal traffic demand (for example, NFL Super Bowl, EAA AirVenture Oshkosh, SUN ’n FUN Aerospace Expo) or reduced airport capacity (for example, significant airport runway closures for airport construction). The special programs may remain in effect until the problem has been resolved or until local traffic management procedures can handle the volume and a need for special handling no longer exists.

9.7.3.2 If an STMP is used to accommodate a special event, a domestic notice will be issued relaying the website address: www.fly.faa.gov/estmp. Domestic notice information includes: what airports are included in the STMP, the dates and times reservations are required, the time limits for reservation requests, the point of contact for reservations, and any other instructions.

9.7.4 Making Reservations. Detailed information and User Instruction Guides for using the Web interface to the reservation systems are available on the websites for the slot controlled airports (e-CVRS), www.fly.faa.gov/ecvrs ; and STMPs (e-STMP), www.fly.faa.gov/estmp .

NOTE − Users may contact the ARO at (540) 422 − 4246 if they have a problem with their reservation.

9.7.5 Prior Permission Required (PPR) 9.7.5.1 A PPR may be required at locations where air traffic demand does not require an STMP, but operations may be impacted by on − airport activity or by a nearby event.

9.7.5.2 Events that may require a PPR include, but are not limited to: a) Construction on or near an active runway requiring time to remove personnel and equipment.

b) Limited ramp space for parking aircraft.

c) Snow removal at airports without an operating control tower.

d) General aviation operations into military airports.

9.7.5.3 Pilots are responsible for coordinating operations related to the PPR. Controllers may be aware of the PPR, but they do not enforce or otherwise oversee compliance. Operations contrary to a PPR could result in a safety hazard to persons or property on the ground.

9.7.5.4 PPRs are disseminated via NOTAM or published in the airport remarks section of the Chart Supplement and typically includes a phone number or frequency to coordinate operations. An identification number may be issued that is to be included in the Remarks section of the flight plan. Major airports with PPRs are listed on the FAA’s National Airspace System Status website ( https://nasstatus.faa.gov ).

9.8 Operations at Uncontrolled Airports with Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS)/Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) 9.8.1 Many airports throughout the National Airspace System are equipped with either ASOS or AWOS. At most airports with an operating control tower or human observer, the weather will be available to you in a METAR hourly or special observation format on the Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) or directly transmitted from the controller/observer.

9.8.2 At uncontrolled airports that are equipped with ASOS/AWOS with ground − to − air broadcast capability, the one − minute updated airport weather should be available to you within approximately 25 NM of the airport below 10,000 feet. The frequency for the weather broadcast will be published on sectional charts and in the Chart Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.3 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Supplement. Some part − time towered airports may also broadcast the automated weather on their ATIS frequency during the hours that the tower is closed.

9.8.3 Controllers issue SVFR or IFR clearances based on pilot request, known traffic and reported weather; i.e., METAR/SPECI observations, when they are available. Pilots have access to more current weather at uncontrolled ASOS/AWOS airports than do the controllers who may be located several miles away. Controllers will rely on the pilot to determine the current airport weather from the ASOS/AWOS. All aircraft arriving or departing an ASOS/AWOS equipped uncontrolled airport should monitor the airport weather frequency to ascertain the status of the airspace. Pilots in Class E airspace must be alert for changing weather conditions which may affect the status of the airspace from IFR/VFR. If ATC service is required for IFR/SVFR approach/departure or requested for VFR service, the pilot should advise the controller that he/she has received the one − minute weather and state his/her intentions.

EXAMPLE − “I have the ( airport ) one − minute weather, request an ILS runway 14 approach.” REFERENCE − Section GEN 3.5, Paragraph 7, Weather Observing Programs.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: Blank Page →

Blank Page

AIP GEN 3.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3.4 Communication Service

1. Responsible Authority 1.1 The authority responsible for the administration of communications services in the U.S. is the Federal Aviation Administration, Communications, Information and Network Programs Group, AJM − 31.

Postal Address: Federal Aviation Administration Communications, Information and Network Programs Group, AJM − 31 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, D.C. 20591 AFTN Address: KRWAYAYX Commercial Telegraphic Address: FAA WASH 2. Area of Responsibility 2.1 Communications services are available on a continuous basis without charge to the user. The Air Traffic Services Division is responsible for the establishment of the operational requirements of the U.S.

communications system. Responsibility for the day to day operation of these services resides with the local air traffic facility. Enquiries or complaints regarding any communications services or facilities should be referred to the relevant air traffic facility or to the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Operations Services, as appropriate.

3. Types of Services 3.1 Radio Navigation Service 3.1.1 Various types of air navigation aids are in use today, each serving a special purpose. These aids have varied owners and operators, namely: the Federal Aviation Administration, the military services, private organizations; and individual states and foreign governments. The Federal Aviation Administration has the statutory authority to establish, operate, and maintain air navigation facilities and to prescribe standards for the operation of any of these aids which are used by both civil and military aircraft for instrument flight in federally controlled airspace.

These aids are tabulated in the Chart Supplement by State.

3.1.2 Pilots should be aware of the possibility of momentary erroneous indications on cockpit displays when the primary signal generator for a ground − based navigational transmitter (for example, a glideslope, VOR, or nondirectional beacon) is inoperative. Pilots should disregard any navigation indication, regardless of its apparent validity, if the particular transmitter was identified by NOTAM or otherwise as unusable or inoperative.

3.1.3 The following types of radio navigation aids are provided in the U.S.: 3.1.3.1 VHF Direction − Finding (VHF − DF).

3.1.3.2 LF Non − Directional Beacon (NDB).

3.1.3.3 VHF Omni − Directional Radio Range (VOR).

3.1.3.4 Distance Measuring Equipment (DME).

3.1.3.5 Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN).

3.1.3.6 Instrument Landing System (ILS).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.3.7 Final Approach Simplified Directional Facility (SDF).

3.1.3.8 Precision Approach Radar (PAR) at certain military aerodromes.

3.1.3.9 Global Positioning System (GPS).

3.1.4 NAVAID Service Volumes 3.1.4.1 The FAA publishes Standard Service Volumes (SSVs) for most NAVAIDs. The SSV is a three − dimensional volume within which the FAA ensures that a signal can be received with adequate signal strength and course quality, and is free from interference from other NAVAIDs on similar frequencies (e.g., co − channel or adjacent − channel interference). However, the SSV signal protection does not include potential blockage from terrain or obstructions. The SSV is principally intended for off − route navigation, such as proceeding direct to or from a VOR when not on a published instrument procedure or route. Navigation on published instrument procedures (e.g., approaches or departures) or routes (e.g., Victor routes) may use NAVAIDs outside of the SSV, when Extended Service Volume (ESV) is approved, since adequate signal strength, course quality, and freedom from interference are verified by the FAA prior to the publishing of the instrument procedure or route.

NOTE − A conical area directly above the NAVAID is generally not usable for navigation.

3.1.4.2 A NAVAID will have service volume restrictions if it does not conform to signal strength and course quality standards throughout the published SSV. Service volume restrictions are first published in Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) and then with the alphabetical listing of the NAVAIDs in the Chart Supplement. Service volume restrictions do not generally apply to published instrument procedures or routes unless published in NOTAMs for the affected instrument procedure or route.

3.1.4.3 VOR/DME/TACAN Standard Service Volumes (SSV).

a) The three original SSVs are shown in FIG GEN 3.4 − 1 and are designated with three classes of NAVAIDs: Terminal (T), Low (L), and High (H). The usable distance of the NAVAID depends on the altitude Above the Transmitter Height (ATH) for each class. The lower edge of the usable distance when below 1,000 feet ATH is shown in FIG GEN 3.4 − 2 for Terminal NAVAIDs and in FIG GEN 3.4 − 3 for Low and High NAVAIDs.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.4 − 1 Original Standard Service Volumes FIG GEN 3.4 − 2 Lower Edge of the Terminal Service Volume (in altitude ATH) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.4 − 3 Lower Edge of Low and High Service Volumes (in altitude ATH) b) With the progression of navigation capabilities to Performance Based Navigation (PBN), additional capabilities for off − route navigation are necessary. For example, the VOR MON (See ENR 4.1, paragraph 2.6) requires the use of VORs at 5,000 feet AGL, which is beyond the original SSV ranges. Additionally, PBN procedures using DME require extended ranges. As a result, the FAA created four additional SSVs. Two of the new SSVs are associated with VORs: VOR Low (VL) and VOR High (VH), as shown in FIG GEN 3.4 − 4 . The other two new SSVs are associated with DME: DME Low (DL) and DME High (DH), as shown in FIG GEN 3.4 − 5 . The SSV at altitudes below 1,000 feet for the VL and VH are the same as FIG GEN 3.4 − 3 . The SSVs at altitudes below 12,900 feet for the DL and DH SSVs correspond to a conservative estimate of the DME radio line of sight (RLOS) coverage at each altitude (not including possible terrain blockage).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.4 − 4 New VOR Service Volumes FIG GEN 3.4 − 5 New DME Service Volumes NOTE − 1. In the past, NAVAIDs at one location typically all had the same SSV. For example, a VORTAC typically had a High (H) SSV for the VOR, the TACAN azimuth, and the TACAN DME, or a Low (L) or Terminal (T) SSV for all three. A VOR/DME Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 typically had a High (H), Low (L), or Terminal (T) for both the VOR and the DME. A common SSV may no longer be the case at all locations. A VOR/DME, for example, could have an SSV of VL for the VOR and DH for the DME, or other combinations.

2. The TACAN azimuth will only be classified as T, L, or H.

c) TBL GEN 3.4 − 1 is a tabular summary of the VOR, DME, and TACAN NAVAID SSVs, not including altitudes below 1,000 feet ATH for VOR and TACAN Azimuth, and not including ranges for altitudes below 12,900 feet for TACAN and DME.

TBL GEN 3.4 − 1 VOR/DME/TACAN Standard Service Volumes SSV Designator Altitude and Range Boundaries T (Terminal) From 1,000 feet ATH up to and including 12,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 25 NM.

L (Low Altitude) From 1,000 feet ATH up to and including 18,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 40 NM.

H (High Altitude) From 1,000 feet ATH up to and including 14,500 feet ATH at radial distances out to 40 NM. From 14,500 ATH up to and including 60,000 feet at radial distances out to 100 NM. From 18,000 feet ATH up to and including 45,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 130 NM.

VL (VOR Low) From 1,000 feet ATH up to but not including 5,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 40 NM. From 5,000 feet ATH up to but not including 18,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 70 NM.

VH (VOR High) From 1,000 feet ATH up to but not including 5,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 40 NM. From 5,000 feet ATH up to but not including 14,500 feet ATH at radial distances out to 70 NM. From 14,500 ATH up to and including 60,000 feet at radial distances out to 100 NM. From 18,000 feet ATH up to and including 45,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 130 NM.

DL (DME Low) For altitudes up to 12,900 feet ATH at a radial distance corresponding to the LOS to the NAVAID. From 12,900 feet ATH up to but not including 18,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 130 NM DH (DME High) For altitudes up to 12,900 feet ATH at a radial distance corresponding to the LOS to the NAVAID. From 12,900 ATH up to and including 60,000 feet at radial distances out to 100 NM. From 12,900 feet ATH up to and including 45,000 feet ATH at radial distances out to 130 NM.

3.1.4.4 Nondirectional Radio Beacon (NDB) SSVs. NDBs are classified according to their intended use. The ranges of NDB service volumes are shown in TBL GEN 3.4 − 2 . The distance (radius) is the same at all altitudes for each class.

TBL GEN 3.4 − 2 NDB Service Volumes Class Distance (Radius) (NM) Compass Locator 15 MH 25 H 50* HH 75 *Service ranges of individual facilities may be less than 50 nautical miles (NM).

Restrictions to service volumes are first published as a Notice to Airmen and then with the alphabetical listing of the NAVAID in the Chart Supplement.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.5 NAVAIDs with Voice 3.1.5.1 Voice equipped en route radio navigational aids are under the operational control of either a Flight Service Station (FSS) or an approach control facility. Facilities with two − way voice communication available are indicated in the Chart Supplement and aeronautical charts.

3.1.5.2 Unless otherwise noted on the chart, all radio navigation aids operate continuously except during shutdowns for maintenance. Hours of operation of facilities not operating continuously are annotated on charts and in the Chart Supplement.

3.2 Mobile Service 3.2.1 The aeronautical stations (Airport Traffic Control Towers, Air Route Traffic Control Centers, and Flight Service Stations) maintain a continuous watch on their assigned frequencies during the published hours of service unless otherwise notified. An aircraft should normally communicate with the air − ground control radio station which exercises control in the area in which it is flying. Aircraft should maintain continuous watch on the appropriate frequency of the control station and should not abandon watch, except in an emergency, without informing the control radio station.

3.2.2 Flight Service Stations (FSSs) are allocated frequencies for different functions. For Airport Advisory Service, the pilot should contact the FSS on 123.6 MHz. Individually assigned FSS frequencies are listed in the Chart Supplement under the FSS entry. If you are in doubt as to what frequency to use to contact an FSS, transmit on 122.1 MHz and advise the FSS of the frequency on which you are receiving.

3.3 Fixed Service 3.3.1 Messages to be transmitted over the Aeronautical Fixed Service are accepted only if they satisfy the requirements of: 3.3.1.1 ICAO Annex 10, Vol. II, Chapter 3, paragraph 3.3.

3.3.1.2 Are prepared in the form specified in Annex 10.

3.3.1.3 The text of an individual message does not exceed 200 groups.

3.3.2 General aircraft operating messages, Class B traffic, including reservation messages pertaining to flights scheduled to depart within 72 hours, must not be acceptable for transmission over U.S. government operated telecommunications circuits except in those cases where it has been determined by the U.S. that adequate non − government facilities are not available.

3.4 Broadcast Service 3.4.1 The following meteorological broadcasts are available for the use of aircraft in flight: 3.4.1.1 Sub − Area Meteorological Broadcast (Volmet).

3.4.1.2 VHF RTF Meteorological Broadcasts.

3.4.2 Full details of broadcast service are given in GEN 3.5 , Meteorological Services.

3.4.3 All broadcast services to aircraft are provided in the English language only.

4. Aeronautical Fixed Services 4.1 General 4.1.1 All U.S. ATC facilities have the ability to communicate with all other ATS facilities via either telephone or other domestic telecommunications systems. Circuit diagrams depicting these connections are not available for this publication due to the number of ATS facilities available in the U.S.

4.2 The Domestic Telecommunications Network 4.2.1 The U.S. Domestic telecommunications network is an automated system operating through the National Airspace Data Interchange Network (NADIN) in Atlanta, GA, and Salt Lake City, UT. All Flight Service Stations Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 (FSS) and Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCC) connect through the NATCOM. All FSS and ARTCC facilities have both transmit and receive capabilities.

4.2.2 Airport Air Traffic Control Towers (ATCT) and Approach Control (A/C) Facilities do not connect with this system. Messages originating from or destined to these facilities are relayed through the associated FSS.

Associated FSSs for these facilities are listed in the Chart Supplement U.S.

4.2.3 Airport administrative offices, airport managers or airport administrative officials do not normally connect with the domestic telecommunications network. Urgent messages destined to these facilities must be forwarded to the associated FSS for relay or the message must be sent through commercial telegraphic systems.

4.3 The International Message Network (Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunications Network − AFTN) 4.3.1 AFTN messages originating from outside the U.S. domestic telecommunications system must be prepared in accordance with ICAO procedures. All incoming messages are received by NADIN and relayed to the addressed facility through automated procedures. The automated system will interpret the international address group and automatically forward the message via the domestic system to the addressee. For example, a message addressed KIKKYFYX will be accepted by AFTN and relayed to IKK (Kankakee FSS). The Kankakee FSS will manually relay this message to the intended recipient when necessary. Intended recipients are to be addressed in the first line of the message text.

4.3.2 All international flight plans entering the U.S. system must adhere to ICAO format. These flight plans are to be forwarded, via AFTN, to each affected, U.S. controlled, Flight Information Region (FIR) or Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) outside the continental U.S. (e.g., Miami FIR, San Juan, P.R. ARTCC) or the first FIR/ARTCC for flights entering the continental U.S. (e.g., New York FIR/ARTCC). If the flight plan content is acceptable, it is entered into the ARTCC system and is forwarded, automatically, via ARTCC computer, to all subsequently affected domestic ARTCCs. Flight plans which cannot be processed are rejected at the point of entry into the U.S. system and the originator is queried. Format adherence, once the flight plan is in the ARTCC system, is assured since each of the ARTCCs are automated facilities. Each subsequent ARTCC computer, however, will process incoming flight plans according to the requested routing. Flight plans can be rejected by any ARTCC due to errors in routing. Rejected flight plans, regardless of reason or point of rejection, are held in suspense until the needed clarification is received by the ARTCC facility.

4.4 Radio Communications Phraseology and Techniques 4.4.1 General 4.4.1.1 Radio communications are a critical link in the ATC system. The link can be a strong bond between pilot and controller − or it can be broken with surprising speed and disastrous results. Discussion herein provides basic procedures for new pilots and also highlights safe operating concepts for all pilots.

4.4.1.2 The single, most important thought in pilot − controller communications is understanding. It is essential, therefore, that pilots acknowledge each radio communication with ATC by using the appropriate aircraft call sign. Brevity is important, and contacts should be kept as brief as possible, but the controller must know what you want to do before he/she can properly carry out his/her control duties. And you, the pilot, must know exactly what he/she wants you to do. Since concise phraseology may not always be adequate, use whatever words are necessary to get your message across. Pilots are to maintain vigilance in monitoring air traffic control radio communications frequencies for potential traffic conflicts with their aircraft especially when operating on an active runway and/or when conducting a final approach to landing.

4.4.1.3 All pilots will find the Pilot/Controller Glossary very helpful in learning what certain words or phrases mean. Good phraseology enhances safety and is the mark of a professional pilot. Jargon, chatter and “CB” slang have no place in ATC communications. The Pilot/Controller Glossary is the same glossary used in the ATC controller’s handbook. We recommend that it be studied and reviewed from time to time to sharpen your communication skills.

4.4.2 Radio Technique Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.4.2.1 Listen before you transmit. Many times you can get the information you want through ATIS or by monitoring the frequency. Except for a few situations where some frequency overlap occurs, if you hear someone else talking, the keying of your transmitter will be futile and you will probably jam their receivers causing them to repeat their call. If you have just changed frequency, pause for your receiver to tune, listen, and make sure the frequency is clear.

4.4.2.2 Think before keying your transmitter. Know what you want to say and if it is lengthy; e.g., a flight plan or IFR position report, jot it down. (But do not lock your head in the cockpit.)

4.4.2.3 The microphone should be very close to your lips and after pressing the mike button, a slight pause may be necessary to be sure the first word is transmitted. Speak in a normal conversational tone.

4.4.2.4 When you release the button, wait a few seconds before calling again. The controller or FSS specialist may be jotting down your number, looking for your flight plan, transmitting on a different frequency, or selecting his/her transmitter to your frequency.

4.4.2.5 Be alert to the sounds or lack of sounds in your receiver. Check your volume, recheck your frequency, and make sure that your microphone is not stuck in the transmit position. Frequency blockage can, and has, occurred for extended periods of time due to unintentional transmitter operation. This type of interference is commonly referred to as a “stuck mike,’’ and controllers may refer to it in this manner when attempting to assign an alternate frequency. If the assigned frequency is completely blocked by this type of interference, use the procedures described in paragraph 12. , Two − Way Radio Communications Failure.

4.4.2.6 Be sure that you are within the performance range of your radio equipment and the ground station equipment. Remote radio sites do not always transmit and receive on all of a facilities’ available frequencies, particularly with regard to VOR sites where you can hear but not reach a ground station’s receiver. Remember that higher altitude increases the range of VHF “line of sight” communications.

4.4.3 Aircraft Call Signs 4.4.3.1 Improper use of call signs can result in pilots executing a clearance intended for another aircraft. Call signs should never be abbreviated on an initial contact or at any time when other aircraft call signs have similar numbers/sounds or identical letters/numbers, (e.g., Cessna 6132F, Cessna 1622F, Baron 123F, Cherokee 7732F, etc.).

EXAMPLE − As an example, assume that a controller issues an approach clearance to an aircraft at the bottom of a holding stack and an aircraft with a similar call sign (at the top of the stack) acknowledges the clearance with the last two or three numbers of his/her call sign. If the aircraft at the bottom of the stack did not hear the clearance and intervene, flight safety would be affected, and there would be no reason for either the controller or pilot to suspect that anything is wrong. This kind of “human factors” error can strike swiftly and is extremely difficult to rectify.

4.4.3.2 Pilots, therefore, must be certain that aircraft identification is complete and clearly identified before taking action on an ATC clearance. ATC specialists will not abbreviate call signs of air carrier or other civil aircraft having authorized call signs. ATC specialists may initiate abbreviated call signs of other aircraft by using the prefix and the last three digits/letters of the aircraft identification after communications are established. The pilot may use the abbreviated call sign in subsequent contacts with the ATC specialist. When aware of similar/identical call signs, ATC specialists will take action to minimize errors by emphasizing certain numbers/letters, by repeating the entire call sign, repeating the prefix, or by asking pilots to use a different call sign temporarily. Pilots should use the phrase “Verify clearance for (your complete call sign)” if doubt exists concerning proper identity.

4.4.3.3 Civil aircraft pilots should state the aircraft type, model or manufacturer’s name followed by the digits/letters of the registration number. When the aircraft manufacturer’s name or model is stated, the prefix “N” is dropped.

EXAMPLE − “Bonanza Six Five Five Golf,” “Douglas One One Zero,” “Breezy Six One Three Romeo Experimental” (Omit “Experimental” after initial contact).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.4.3.4 Air taxi or other commercial operators not having FAA authorized call signs should prefix their normal identification with the phonetic word “Tango.” EXAMPLE − “Tango Aztec Two Four Six Four Alpha.” 4.4.3.5 Air carriers and commuter air carriers having FAA authorized call signs should identify themselves by stating the complete call sign (using group form for the numbers) and the word “super” or “heavy” if appropriate.

EXAMPLE − “United Twenty − five, Midwest Commuter Seven Eleven.” 4.4.3.6 Military aircraft use a variety of systems including serial numbers, word call signs and combinations of letters/numbers.

EXAMPLE − “Army Copter 48931” “Air Force 61782” “REACH 31792” “Pat 157” “AirEvac 17652” “Navy Golf Alpha Kilo 21” “Marine 4 Charlie 36” 4.4.3.7 Air Ambulance Flights. Because of the priority afforded air ambulance flights in the ATC system, extreme discretion is necessary when using the term “MEDEVAC.” It is only intended for those missions of an urgent medical nature and to be utilized only for that portion of the flight requiring priority handling. It is important for ATC to be aware of a flight’s MEDEVAC status, and it is the pilot’s responsibility to ensure that this information is provided to ATC.

a) To receive priority handling from ATC, the pilot must verbally identify the flight in radio transmissions by stating “MEDEVAC” followed by the FAA authorized call sign (ICAO 3LD, US Special, or local) or the aircraft civil “N” registration numbers/letters.

EXAMPLE − If the aircraft identification of the flight indicates DAL51, the pilot states “MEDEVAC Delta Fifty One”.

If the aircraft identification of the flight indicates MDSTR1, the pilot states “MEDEVAC Medstar One”.

If the aircraft identification of the flight indicates N123G or LN123G, the pilot states “MEDEVAC One Two Three Golf”.

b) If requested by the pilot, ATC will provide additional assistance (e.g., landline notifications) to expedite ground handling of patients, vital organs, or urgently needed medical materials. When possible make these requests to ATC via methods other than through ATC radio frequencies.

c) MEDEVAC flights may include: 1) Civilian air ambulance flights responding to medical emergencies (e.g., first call to an accident scene, carrying patients, organ donors, organs, or other urgently needed lifesaving medical material).

2) Air carrier and air taxi flights responding to medical emergencies. The nature of these medical emergency flights usually concerns the transportation of urgently needed lifesaving medical materials or vital organs, but can include inflight medical emergencies. It is imperative that the company/pilot determine, by the nature/urgency of the specific medical cargo, if priority ATC assistance is required.

d) When filing a flight plan, pilots may include “L” for “MEDEVAC” with the aircraft registration letters/digits and/or include “MEDEVAC” in Item 11 (Remarks) of the flight plan or Item 18 (Other Information) of an international flight plan. However, ATC will only use these flight plan entries for informational purposes or as a visual indicator. ATC will only provide priority handling when the pilot verbally identifies the “MEDEVAC” status of the flight as described above (in subparagraph 4.4.3.7a ).

NOTE − Civilian air ambulance aircraft operating VFR and without a filed flight plan are eligible for priority handling in accordance with subparagraph c.1 above.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.10, Flight Planning (Restriction, Limitation or Advisory Information) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 e) ATC will also provide priority handling requested. These aircraft may file “HOSP” or “AIR EVAC” in either Item 11 (Remarks) of the flight plan or Item 18 of an international flight plan. For aircraft identification in radio transmissions, civilian pilots will use normal call signs when filing ”HOSP” and military pilots will use the ”EVAC” call sign.

4.4.3.8 Student Pilots Radio Identification. The FAA desires to help the student pilot in acquiring sufficient practical experience in the environment in which he/she will be required to operate. To receive additional assistance while operating in areas of concentrated air traffic, a student pilot need only identify himself/herself as a student pilot during his/her initial call to an FAA radio facility. For instance, “Dayton Tower, Fleetwing One Two Three Four, Student Pilot.” This special identification will alert FAA air traffic control personnel and enable them to provide the student pilot with such extra assistance and consideration as he/she may need. It is recommended that student pilots identify themselves as such, on initial contact with each clearance delivery prior to taxiing, ground control, tower, approach and departure control frequency, or FSS contact.

4.4.4 Description of Interchange or Leased Aircraft 4.4.4.1 Controllers issue traffic information based on familiarity with airline equipment and color/markings.

When an air carrier dispatches a flight using another company’s equipment and the pilot does not advise the terminal ATC facility, the possible confusion in aircraft identification can compromise safety.

4.4.4.2 Pilots flying an “interchange” or “leased” aircraft not bearing the colors/markings of the company operating the aircraft should inform the terminal ATC facility on first contact the name of the operating company and trip number, followed by the company name as displayed on the aircraft, and aircraft type.

EXAMPLE − AIR CAL 311, United (Interchange/Lease), Boeing 727.

4.4.5 Ground Station Call Signs 4.4.5.1 Pilots, when calling a ground station, should begin with the name of the facility being called followed by the type of the facility being called, as indicated in the following examples.

TBL GEN 3.4 − 3 Calling a Ground Station Facility Call Sign Airport UNICOM “Shannon UNICOM” FAA Flight Service “Chicago Radio” Station Airport Traffic Control “Augusta Tower” Tower Clearance Delivery “Dallas Clearance Position (IFR) Delivery” Ground Control Position “Miami Ground” in Tower Radar or Nonradar “Oklahoma City Approach Control Approach” Position Radar Departure Control “St. Louis Departure” Position FAA Air Route Traffic “Washington Center” Control Center 4.5 Radio Communications Phraseology 4.5.1 Phonetic Alphabet 4.5.1.1 The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) phonetic alphabet is used by FAA personnel when communications conditions are such that the information cannot be readily received without their use. Air traffic Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 control facilities may also request pilots to use phonetic letter equivalents when aircraft with similar sounding identifications are receiving communications on the same frequency. Pilots should use the phonetic alphabet when identifying their aircraft during initial contact with air traffic control facilities. Additionally, use the phonetic equivalents for single letters and to spell out groups of letters or difficult words during adverse communications conditions.

TBL GEN 3.4 − 4 Phonic Phonic Character Morse Code Telephony Character Morse Code Telephony (Pronunciation) (Pronunciation) R ● — ● Romeo (ROW − ME − OH) A ● — Alfa (AL − FAH) S ● ● ● Sierra (SEE − AIR − RAH) B — ● ● ● Bravo (BRAH − VOH) T — Tango (TANG − GO) — ● — ● Charlie (CHAR − LEE) or C (SHAR − LEE) ● ● — Uniform (YOU − NEE − FORM) U or — ● ● Delta (DELL − TAH) D (OO − NEE − FORM) ● Echo (ECK − OH) E V ● ● ● — Victor (VIK − TAH) ● ● — ● Foxtrot (FOKS − TROT) W ● — — Whiskey (WISS − KEY) F X — ● ● — Xray (ECKS − RAY) — — ● Golf (GOLF) G Y — ● — — Yankee (YANG − KEY) ● ● ● ● Hotel (HOH − TEL) H Z — — ● ● Zulu (ZOO − LOO) ● ● India (IN − DEE − AH) 1 ● — — — — One (WUN) I 2 ● ● — — — Two (TOO) ● — — — Juliett (JEW − LEE − ETT) J 3 ● ● ● — — Three (TREE) — ● — Kilo (KEY − LOH) K 4 ● ● ● ● — Four (FOW − ER) ● — ● ● Lima (LEE − MAH) 5 ● ● ● ● ● Five (FIFE) L 6 — ● ● ● ● Six (SIX) — — Mike (MIKE) M 7 — — ● ● ● Seven (SEV − EN) — ● November (NO − VEM − BER) N 8 — — — ● ● Eight (AIT) — — — Oscar (OSS − CAH) O 9 — — — — ● Nine (NIN − ER) 0 — — — — — Zero (ZEE − RO) ● — — ● Papa (PAH − PAH) P Q — — ● — Quebec (KEH − BECK) 4.5.2 Figures 4.5.2.1 Figures indicating hundreds and thousands in round numbers, as for ceiling heights, and upper wind levels up to 9,900, must be spoken in accordance with the following: EXAMPLE − 1. 500 . . . . . . . . five hundred 2. 4,500 . . . . . . four thousand five hundred 4.5.2.2 Numbers above 9,900 must be spoken by separating the digits preceding the word “thousand.” EXAMPLE − 1. 10,000 . . . . . one zero thousand 2. 13,500 . . . . . one three thousand five hundred 4.5.2.3 Transmit airway or jet route numbers as follows: EXAMPLE − 1. V12 . . . . . . . Victor Twelve 2. J533 . . . . . . . J Five Thirty − Three 4.5.2.4 All other numbers must be transmitted by pronouncing each digit.

EXAMPLE − 10 . . . . . . . . . . . one zero Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.5.2.5 When a radio frequency contains a decimal point, the decimal point is spoken as “Point.” EXAMPLE − 122.1 . . . . . . . . . one two two point one NOTE − ICAO procedures require the decimal point be spoken as “decimal.” The FAA will honor such usage by military aircraft and all other aircraft required to use ICAO procedures.

4.5.3 Altitudes and Flight Levels 4.5.3.1 Up to but not including 18,000 feet MSL, by stating the separate digits of the thousands, plus the hundreds.

EXAMPLE − 1. 12,000 . . . . . one two thousand 2. 12,500 . . . . . one two thousand five hundred 4.5.3.2 At and above 18,000’ MSL (FL 180) by stating the words “flight level” followed by the separated digits of the flight level.

EXAMPLE − 1. 190 . . . . . . . . Flight Level One Niner Zero 2. 275 . . . . . . . . Flight Level Two Seven Five 4.5.4 Directions 4.5.4.1 The three digits of a magnetic course, bearing, heading or wind direction, should always be magnetic.

The word “true” must be added when it applies.

EXAMPLE − 1. (Magnetic course) 005 . . . . . . zero zero five 2. (True course) 050 . . . . . . . . . . zero five zero true 3. (Magnetic bearing) 360 . . . . . three six zero 4. (Magnetic heading) 100 . . . . . heading one zero zero 5. (Wind direction) 220 . . . . . . . . wind two two zero 4.5.5 Speeds 4.5.5.1 The separate digits of the speed are to be followed by the word “KNOTS” except that controllers may omit the word “KNOTS” when using speed adjustment procedures (e.g., “REDUCE/INCREASE SPEED TO TWO FIVE ZERO”).

EXAMPLE − 1. (Speed) 250 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . two five zero knots 2. (Speed) 190 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . one niner zero knots 4.5.5.2 The separate digits of the Mach number are to be preceded by the word “Mach.” EXAMPLE − 1. (Mach number) 1.5 . . . . . . . . . Mach one point five 2. (Mach number) 0.64 . . . . . . . . Mach point six four 3. (Mach number) 0.7 . . . . . . . . . Mach point seven 4.5.6 Time 4.5.6.1 FAA uses Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) for all operations. The word “local” or the time zone equivalent must be used to denote local when local time is given during radio and telephone communications.

The term “ZULU” may be used to denote UTC.

EXAMPLE − 0920 UTC . . . . . . . zero niner two zero, zero one two zero pacific or local, or one twenty AM Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.5.6.2 To convert from Standard Time to UTC: TBL GEN 3.4 − 5 Standard Time to Coordinated Universal Time Eastern Standard Time Add 5 hours Central Standard Time Add 6 hours Mountain Standard Time Add 7 hours Pacific Standard Time Add 8 hours Alaska Standard Time Add 9 hours Hawaii Standard Time Add 10 hours NOTE − For daylight time, subtract 1 hour.

4.5.6.3 A reference may be made to local daylight or standard time utilizing the 24 − hour clock system. The hour is indicated by the first two figures and the minutes by the last two figures.

EXAMPLE − 1. 0000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . zero zero zero zero 2. 0920 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . zero niner two zero 4.5.6.4 Time may be stated in minutes only (two figures) in radio telephone communications when no misunderstanding is likely to occur.

4.5.6.5 Current time in use at a station is stated in the nearest quarter minute in order that pilots may use this information for time checks. Fractions of a quarter minute or more, but less than eight seconds more, are stated as the preceding quarter minute; fractions of a quarter minute of eight seconds or more are stated as the succeeding quarter minute.

EXAMPLE − 1. 0929:05 . . . . time, zero niner two niner 2. 0929:10 . . . . time, zero niner two niner and one − quarter 4.5.7 Communications with Tower when Aircraft Transmitter/Receiver or Both are Inoperative 4.5.7.1 Arriving Aircraft a) Receiver Inoperative. If you have reason to believe your receiver is inoperative, remain outside or above Class D airspace until the direction and flow of traffic has been determined; then, advise the tower of your type aircraft, position, altitude, intention to land, and request that you be controlled with light signals. When you are approximately 3 to 5 miles from the airport, advise the tower of your position and join the airport traffic pattern.

From this point on, watch the tower for light signals. Thereafter, if a complete pattern is made, transmit your position when downwind and/or turning base leg.

b) Transmitter Inoperative. Remain outside or above Class D airspace until the direction and flow of traffic has been determined, then join the airport traffic pattern. Monitor the primary local control frequency as depicted on sectional charts for landing or traffic information, and look for a light signal which may be addressed to your aircraft. During hours of daylight, acknowledge tower transmissions or light signals by rocking your wings. At night, acknowledge by blinking the landing or navigational lights.

NOTE − To acknowledge tower transmissions during daylight hours, hovering helicopters will turn in the direction of the controlling facility and flash the landing light. While in flight, helicopters should show their acknowledgment of receiving a transmission by making shallow banks in opposite directions. At night, helicopters will acknowledge receipt of transmissions by flashing either the landing or the search light.

c) Transmitter and Receiver Inoperative. Remain outside or above Class D airspace until the direction and flow of traffic has been determined, then join the airport traffic pattern and maintain visual contact with tower to receive light signals.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.5.7.2 Departing Aircraft. If you experience radio failure prior to leaving the parking area, make every effort to have the equipment repaired. If you are unable to have the malfunction repaired, call the tower by telephone and request authorization to depart without two − way radio communications. If tower authorization is granted, you will be given departure information and requested to monitor the tower frequency or watch for light signals, as appropriate. During daylight hours, acknowledge tower transmissions or light signals by moving the ailerons or rudder. At night, acknowledge by blinking the landing or navigation lights. If radio malfunction occurs after departing the parking area, watch the tower for light signals or monitor tower frequency.

4.5.8 Contact Procedures 4.5.8.1 Initial Contact a) The terms “initial contact” or “initial call up” mean the first radio call you make to a given facility, or the first call to a different controller/FSS specialist within a facility. Use the following format: 1) Name of facility being called.

2) Your full aircraft identification as filed in the flight plan or as discussed under aircraft call signs.

3) When operating on an airport surface, state your position.

4) The type of message to follow or your request if it is short; and 5) The word “Over,” if required.

EXAMPLE − 1. “New York Radio, Mooney Three One One Echo.” 2. “Columbia Ground, Cessna Three One Six Zero Foxtrot, south ramp, I − F − R Memphis.” 3. “Miami Center, Baron Five Six Three Hotel, request VFR traffic advisories.” b) Many FSSs are equipped with remote communications outlets and can transmit on the same frequency at more than one location. The frequencies available at specific locations are indicated on charts above FSS communications boxes. To enable the specialist to utilize the correct transmitter, advise the location and frequency on which you expect a reply.

EXAMPLE − St. Louis FSS can transmit on frequency 122.3 at either Farmington, MO, or Decatur, IL. If you are in the vicinity of Decatur, your callup should be “Saint Louis radio, Piper Six Niner Six Yankee, receiving Decatur One Two Two Point Three.” c) If radio reception is reasonably assured, inclusion of your request, your position or altitude, the phrase “Have numbers” or “Information Charlie received” (for ATIS) in the initial contact helps decrease radio frequency congestion. Use discretion and do not overload the controller with information he/she does not need.

When you do not get a response from the ground station, recheck your radios or use another transmitter and keep the next contact short.

EXAMPLE − “Atlanta Center, Duke Four One Romeo, request VFR traffic advisories, Twenty Northwest Rome, Seven Thousand Five Hundred, over.” 4.5.9 Initial Contact when your Transmitting and Receiving Frequencies are Different 4.5.9.1 If you are attempting to establish contact with a ground station and you are receiving on a different frequency than that transmitted, indicate the VOR name or the frequency on which you expect a reply. Most FSSs and control facilities can transmit on several VOR stations in the area. Use the appropriate FSS call sign as indicated on charts.

EXAMPLE − New York FSS transmits on the Kennedy, Deer Park and Calverton VORTACs. If you are in the Calverton area, your callup should be “New York Radio, Cessna Three One Six Zero Foxtrot, receiving Riverhead VOR, over.” 4.5.9.2 If the chart indicates FSS frequencies above the VORTAC or in FSS communications boxes, transmit or receive on those frequencies nearest your location.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.5.9.3 When unable to establish contact and you wish to call any ground station, use the phrase “any radio (tower) (station), give Cessna Three One Six Zero Foxtrot a call on (frequency) or (VOR).” If an emergency exists or you need assistance, so state.

4.5.10 Subsequent Contacts and Responses to Call Up from a Ground Facility. Use the same format as used for initial contact except you should state your message or request with the call up in one transmission. The ground station name and the word “Over” may be omitted if the message requires an obvious reply and there is no possibility for misunderstandings. You should acknowledge all callups or clearances unless the controller of FSS specialist advises otherwise. There are some occasions when the controller must issue time − critical instructions to other aircraft and he/she may be in a position to observe your response, either visually or on radar.

If the situation demands your response, take appropriate action or immediately advise the facility of any problem.

Acknowledge with your aircraft identification, either at the beginning or at the end of your transmission, and one of the words “Wilco, Roger, Affirmative, Negative” or other appropriate remarks; e.g., “Piper Two One Four Lima, Roger.” If you have been receiving services such as VFR traffic advisories and you are leaving the area or changing frequencies, advise the ATC facility and terminate contact.

4.6 Acknowledgement of Frequency Changes 4.6.1 When advised by ATC to change frequencies, acknowledge the instruction. If you select the new frequency without an acknowledgement, the controller’s workload is increased because he/she has no way of knowing whether you received the instruction or have had radio communications failure.

4.6.2 At times, a controller/specialist may be working a sector with multiple frequency assignments. In order to eliminate unnecessary verbiage and to free the controller/specialist for higher priority transmissions, the controller/specialist may request the pilot “(Identification), change to my frequency 134.5.” This phrase should alert the pilot that he/she is only changing frequencies, not controller/specialist, and that initial call − up phraseology may be abbreviated.

EXAMPLE − “United Two Twenty − two on One Three Four Point Five” or “One Three Four Point Five, United Two Twenty − two.” 4.6.3 Compliance with Frequency Changes. When instructed by ATC to change frequencies, select the new frequency as soon as possible unless instructed to make the change at a specific time, fix, or altitude. A delay in making the change could result in an untimely receipt of important information. If you are instructed to make the frequency change at a specific time, fix, or altitude, monitor the frequency you are on until reaching the specified time, fix, or altitudes unless instructed otherwise by ATC.

5. Communications for VFR Flights 5.1 FSSs and Supplemental Weather Service Locations (SWSLs) are allocated frequencies for different functions; for example, in Alaska, certain FSSs provide Local Airport Advisory on 123.6 MHz or other frequencies which can be found in the Chart Supplement U.S. If you are in doubt as to what frequency to use, 122.2 MHz is assigned to the majority of FSSs as a common en route simplex frequency.

NOTE − In order to expedite communications, state the frequency being used and the aircraft location during initial call − up.

EXAMPLE − Dayton radio, November One Two Three Four Five on one two two point two, over Springfield V − O − R, over.

5.2 Certain VOR voice channels are being utilized for recorded broadcasts; for example, ATIS. These services and appropriate frequencies are listed in the Chart Supplement U.S. On VFR flights, pilots are urged to monitor these frequencies. When in contact with a control facility, notify the controller if you plan to leave the frequency to monitor these broadcasts.

6. Over − water Flights Radio Procedure 6.1 Pilots should remember that there is a need to continuously guard the VHF emergency frequency 121.5 MHz when on long over − water flights, except when communications on other VHF channels, equipment limitations, Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 or cockpit duties prevent simultaneous guarding of two channels. Guarding of 121.5 MHz is particularly critical when operating in proximity to flight information region (FIR) boundaries; for example, operations on Route R220 between Anchorage and Tokyo, since it serves to facilitate communications with regard to aircraft which may experience in − flight emergencies, communications, or navigational difficulties. (Reference ICAO Annex 10, Vol II Paras. 5.2.2.1.1.1 and 5.2.2.1.1.2.)

7. Radio Communications and Navigation Facilities 7.1 A complete listing of air traffic radio communications facilities and frequencies and radio navigation facilities and frequencies is contained in the Chart Supplement U.S. Similar information for the Pacific and Alaskan areas is contained in the Pacific and Alaskan Supplements (See GEN 3.2 , Aeronautical Charts).

8. U.S. Aeronautical Telecommunications Services 8.1 The following services are available for aircraft engaged in international or overseas flight.

8.2 The aeronautical voice communication stations listed are available to and utilized by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Control Centers for air traffic control purposes.

8.3 The frequencies in use will depend upon the time of day or night and conditions which affect radio wave propagation. Voice communications handled on a single channel simplex basis (i.e., with the aircraft and the ground station using the same frequency for transmission and reception) unless otherwise noted in remarks.

8.4 The stations will remain on continuous watch for aircraft within their communications areas and, when practicable, will transfer this watch to another station when the aircraft reaches the limit of the communications area.

8.5 Stations listed below which are designated “FAA” are operated by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.

Stations designated “Radio” are operated by Collins Aerospace, Incorporated, (formerly ARINC). Contact the Aviation Voice Services Support Section at IMS − Voice − Svcs@Collins.com . (See TBL GEN 3.4 − 6 .)

8.6 All users of the North Atlantic HF MWARA services should consult International NOTAMS and ICAO Regional Supplementary Procedures, Document 7030, for current procedures concerning the operational use of the North Atlantic HF families. At present, procedures for the distribution of HF communications traffic in the North Atlantic are: 8.6.1 All aircraft registered in the hemisphere west of 30W should use family alpha on the southern routes and family bravo on the central and northern routes. (Southern routes are those which enter the New York, San Juan and Santa Maria FIRs. The central and northern routes comprise all others).

8.6.2 All aircraft registered in the hemisphere east of 30W should use family alpha on the southern routes and family charlie on the central and northern routes.

8.6.3 All aircraft should use family alpha on the southern route and family delta on the central and northern routes while outside the organized track system (OTS).

8.6.4 Aircraft registered in Australia will use families designated to aircraft registered east of 30W.

8.7 Aircraft operating in the Anchorage Arctic CTA/FIR beyond line of sight range of remote control VHF air/ground facilities operated from the Anchorage ACC, must maintain communications with Cambridge Bay radio and a listening or SELCAL watch on HF frequencies of the North Atlantic D (NAT D) network (2971 kHz, 4675 kHz, 8891 kHz and 11279 kHz). Additionally, Cambridge Bay radio can provide Anchorage and Fairbanks surface observations and terminal forecasts to flight crews on request.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.4 − 6 Station and Transmitting Radio Call Remarks Operating Agency Frequencies HONOLULU Honolulu 122.6 122.2 #121.5 #Emergency. Frequency 122.1 also available for receiving (FAA) Radio MHz only.

126.7 118.4 126.9 Miami MIAMI (FAA) 122.2 122.4 122.75 Local and Short Range.

Radio 123.65 127.9 MHz #121.5 MHz #Emergency.

New York NEW YORK 3485* 6604 10051 *3485 Volmet broadcasts from 1 hour after sunset to Radio (FAA) 13270* kHz 1 hour before sunrise.

(Volmet) *13270 Volmet broadcasts from 1 hour before sunrise to 1 hour after sunset.

Broadcasts at H+00 − 05; Aerodrome Forecasts, Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland. Hourly Reports, Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, Niagara Falls, Milwaukee, Indianapolis.

Broadcasts at H+05 − 10; SIGMET, (Oceanic − New York).

Aerodrome Forecasts, Bangor, Pittsburgh, Charlotte.

Hourly Reports, Bangor, Pittsburgh, Windsor Locks, St.

Louis, Charlotte, Minneapolis.

Broadcasts at H+10 − 15; Aerodrome Forecasts, New York, Newark, Boston. Hourly reports, New York, Newark, Boston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington.

Broadcasts at H+15 − 20; SIGMET (Oceanic − Miami/San Juan). Aerodrome Forecasts, Bermuda, Miami, Atlanta.

Hourly Reports, Bermuda, Miami, Nassau, Freeport, Tampa, West Palm Beach, Atlanta.

Broadcasts at H+30 − 35; Aerodrome Forecasts, Niagara Falls, Milwaukee, Indianapolis. Hourly Reports Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, Niagara Falls, Milwaukee, Indianapolis.

Broadcasts at H+35 − 40; SIGMET (Oceanic − New York).

Aerodrome Forecasts, Windsor Locks, St. Louis. Hourly Reports, Bangor, Pittsburgh, Windsor Locks, St. Louis, Charlotte, Minneapolis.

Broadcasts at H+40 − 45; Aerodrome Forecasts, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington. Hourly Reports, New York, Newark, Boston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Washington.

Broadcasts at H+45 − 50; SIGMET (Oceanic − Miami/San Juan). Aerodrome Forecasts, Nassau, Freeport. Hourly Reports, Bermuda, Miami, Nassau, Freeport, Tampa, West Palm Beach, Atlanta.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Station and Transmitting Radio Call Remarks Operating Agency Frequencies 3016 5598 8906 NEW YORK New York 13306 17946 North Atlantic Family A Network.

(RADIO) 21964 kHz 2962 6628 8825 11309 13354 North Atlantic Family E Network.

17952 kHz 2887 3455 5550 6577 8846 11396 Caribbean Family A Network.

kHz 5520 6586 8918 11330 13297 Caribbean Family B Network.

17907 kHz Long Distance Operations Control (LDOC) Service (phone − patch). Communications are limited to operational control matters only. Public correspondence 3494 6640 8933 (personal messages) to/from crew or passengers cannot be accepted.

11342 13330 17925 kHz Note: New York RADIO can also provide HF communications over South America on these LDOC frequencies through their remote site located in Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

Extended range VHF. Coverage area includes Canadian Maritime Provinces, and oceanic routes to the Caribbean, 129.90 MHz from Boston, New York and Washington areas to approximately 250 nautical miles from the east coast.

Extended range VHF. Full period service is provided within most of the Gulf of America. Also on routes between Miami and San Juan to a distance of approximately 250 nautical miles from the Florida coast 130.7 MHz and within approximately 250 nautical miles of San Juan.

Note: New York RADIO also provides VHF communications over the Northern two − thirds of Mexico on 130.7 MHz for 14 CFR Section 121.99 compliance.

436623 Aircraft operating within the New York Oceanic FIR.

3413 3452 5574 SAN San 5667 6673 8843 FRANCISCO Central East Pacific One Network.

Francisco 10057 11330 13354 (RADIO) kHz 2869 5547 11282 Central East Pacific Two Network.

13288 21964 kHz 2998 4666 6532 8903 11384 13300 Central West Pacific Network.

17904 21985 kHz 3467 5643 8867 South Pacific Network.

13261 17904 kHz 2932 5628 6655 8915 8951 10048 11330 North Pacific Network 13273 13339 17946 21925 kHz Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Station and Transmitting Operating Radio Call Remarks Frequencies Agency Long Distance Operations Control (LDOC) Service (phone − patch). Communications are limited to operational control matters only. Public correspondence (personal messages) to/from crew or passengers cannot be 3494 6640 8903 accepted.

11342 13348 17925 Note: San Francisco RADIO can also provide HF 21964 kHz communications along the polar routes on these LDOC frequencies through their remote site located at Barrow, Alaska.

Extended range VHF. Coverage area includes area surrounding the Hawaiian Islands and Guam. Coverage 131.95 MHz extends out approximately 250 NM from Hawaii and from the West coast.

For en route communications for aircraft operating on 129.40 MHz Seattle/Anchorage/Routes.

Aircraft operating within the Oakland and Anchorage 436625 Oceanic FIRs.

OAKLAND Oakland 122.5 122.2 #121.5 #Emergency.

(FAA) Radio MHz 122.2 122.3 122.6 For frequencies 108.2 and 110.6, MHz use 122.1 MHz, SAN JUAN P.R. San Juan 108.2 108.6 110.6 for transmissions to San Juan Radio. For frequency 108.6 (FAA) Radio MHz use 123.6 MHz.

9. Selective Calling System (SELCAL) Facilities Available 9.1 The SELCAL is a communication system which permits the selective calling of individual aircraft over radio − telephone channels from the ground station to properly equipped aircraft, so as to eliminate the need for the flight crew to constantly monitor the frequency in use.

TBL GEN 3.4 − 7 Location Operator HF VHF New York RADIO X X San Francisco RADIO X X 10. Special North Atlantic, Caribbean, and Pacific Area Communications 10.1 VHF air − to − air frequencies enable aircraft engaged on flights over remote and oceanic areas out of range of VHF ground stations to exchange necessary operational information and to facilitate the resolution of operational problems.

10.2 Frequencies have been designated as follows: TBL GEN 3.4 − 8 Area Frequency North Atlantic 123.45 MHz Caribbean 123.45 MHz Pacific 123.45 MHz 11. Distress and Urgency Communications 11.1 A pilot who encounters a distress or urgency condition can obtain assistance simply by contacting the air traffic facility or other agency in whose area of responsibility the aircraft is operating, stating the nature of the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 difficulty, pilot’s intentions, and assistance desired. Distress and urgency communications procedures are prescribed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), however, and have decided advantages over the informal procedure described above.

11.2 Distress and urgency communications procedures discussed in the following paragraphs relate to the use of air ground voice communications.

11.3 The initial communication, and if considered necessary, any subsequent transmissions by an aircraft in distress should begin with the signal MAYDAY, preferably repeated three times. The signal PAN − PAN should be used in the same manner for an urgency condition.

11.4 Distress communications have absolute priority over all other communications, and the word MAYDAY commands radio silence on the frequency in use. Urgency communications have priority over all other communications except distress, and the word PAN − PAN warns other stations not to interfere with urgency transmissions.

11.5 Normally, the station addressed will be the air traffic facility or other agency providing air traffic services, on the frequency in use at the time. If the pilot is not communicating and receiving services, the station to be called will normally be the air traffic facility or other agency in whose area of responsibility the aircraft is operating, on the appropriate assigned frequency. If the station addressed does not respond, or if time or the situation dictates, the distress or urgency message may be broadcast, or a collect call may be used, addressing “Any Station (Tower) (Radio) (Radar).” 11.6 The station addressed should immediately acknowledge a distress or urgency message, provide assistance, coordinate and direct the activities of assisting facilities, and alert the appropriate Search and Rescue coordinator if warranted. Responsibility will be transferred to another station only if better handling will result.

11.7 All other stations, aircraft and ground, will continue to listen until it is evident that assistance is being provided. If any station becomes aware that the station being called either has not received a distress or urgency message, or cannot communicate with the aircraft in difficulty, it will attempt to contact the aircraft and provide assistance.

11.8 Although the frequency in use or other frequencies assigned by ATC are preferable, the following emergency frequencies can be used for distress or urgency communications, if necessary or desirable: 11.8.1 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz. Both have a range generally limited to line of sight. 121.5 MHz is guarded by direction finding stations and some military and civil aircraft. 243.0 MHz is guarded by military aircraft. Both 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz are guarded by military towers, most civil towers, flight service stations, and radar facilities. Normally ARTCC emergency frequency capability does not extend to radar coverage limits. If an ARTCC does not respond when called on 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz, call the nearest tower or flight service station.

11.8.2 2182 kHz. The range is generally less than 300 miles for the average aircraft installation. It can be used to request assistance from stations in the maritime service. 2182 kHz is guarded by major radio stations serving Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Centers and Coast Guard units along the sea coasts of the U.S. and shores of the Great Lakes. The call “Coast Guard” will alert all Coast Guard Radio Stations within range. 2182 kHz is also guarded by most commercial coast stations and some ships and boats.

12. Two − Way Radio Communications Failure 12.1 It is virtually impossible to provide regulations and procedures applicable to all possible situations associated with two − way radio communications failure. During two − way radio communications failure when confronted by a situation not covered in the regulation, pilots are expected to exercise good judgment in whatever action they elect to take. Should the situation so dictate, they should not be reluctant to use the emergency action contained in 14 CFR Section 91.3(b).

12.2 Whether two − way communications failure constitutes an emergency depends on the circumstances, and in any event is a determination made by the pilot. 14 CFR Section 91.3 authorizes a pilot to deviate from any rule to the extent required to meet an emergency.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.4 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.3 In the event of two − way radio communications failure, ATC service will be provided on the basis that the pilot is operating in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.185. A pilot experiencing two − way communications failure should (unless emergency authority is exercised) comply with 14 CFR Section 91.185 as indicated below.

12.4 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each pilot who has two − way radio communications failure when operating under IFR must comply with the following conditions: 12.4.1 If the failure occurs in VFR conditions, or if VFR conditions are encountered after the failure, each pilot must continue the flight under VFR and land as soon as practicable.

NOTE − This procedure also applies when two-way radio failure occurs while operating in Class A airspace. The primary objective of this provision in 14 CFR Section 91.185 is to preclude extended IFR operation by these aircraft within the ATC system.

Pilots should recognize that operation under these conditions may unnecessarily as well as adversely affect other users of the airspace, since ATC may be required to reroute or delay other users in order to protect the failure aircraft. However, it is not intended that the requirement to “land as soon as practicable” be construed to mean “as soon as possible.” Pilots retain the prerogative of exercising their best judgment and are not required to land at an unauthorized airport, at an airport unsuitable for the type of aircraft flown, or to land only minutes short of their intended destination.

12.4.2 If the failure occurs in IFR conditions, or if VFR conditions cannot be complied with, each pilot must continue the flight according to the following requirements.

12.5 Route requirements: 12.5.1 By the route assigned in the last ATC clearance received.

12.5.2 If being radar vectored, by the direct route from the point of radio failure to the fix, route, or airway specified in the vector clearance.

12.5.3 In the absence of an assigned route, by the route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance.

12.5.4 In the absence of an assigned route or a route that ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance, by the route filed in the flight plan.

12.6 Altitude requirements. At the HIGHEST of the following altitudes or flight levels FOR THE ROUTE SEGMENT BEING FLOWN: 12.6.1 The altitude or flight level assigned in the last ATC clearance received.

12.6.2 The minimum altitude (converted, if appropriate, to minimum flight level as prescribed in 14 CFR Section 91.121(c)) for IFR operations.

12.6.3 The altitude or flight level ATC has advised may be expected in a further clearance.

NOTE − The intent of the rule is that a pilot who has experienced two − way radio failure should select the appropriate altitude for the particular route segment being flown and make the necessary altitude adjustments for subsequent route segments. If the pilot received an “expect further clearance” containing a higher altitude to expect at a specified time or fix, he/she should maintain the highest of the following altitudes until that time/fix: (1) his/her last assigned altitude, or (2) the minimum altitude/flight level for IFR operations.

Upon reaching the time/fix specified, the pilot should commence his/her climb to the altitude he/she was advised to expect.

If the radio failure occurs after the time/fix specified, the altitude to be expected is not applicable and the pilot should maintain an altitude consistent with 1 or 2 above.

If the pilot receives an “expect further clearance” containing a lower altitude, the pilot should maintain the highest of 1 or 2 above until that time/fix specified in paragraph 12.7 , Leave Clearance Limit.

EXAMPLE − 1. A pilot experiencing two − way radio failure at an assigned altitude of 7,000 feet is cleared along a direct route which will require a climb to a minimum IFR altitude of 9,000 feet, should climb to reach 9,000 feet at the time or place where it becomes Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.4 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 necessary (see 14 CFR Section 91.177(b)). Later while proceeding along an airway with an MEA of 5,000 feet, the pilot would descend to 7,000 feet (the last assigned altitude), because that altitude is higher than the MEA.

2. A pilot experiencing two − way radio failure while being progressively descended to lower altitudes to begin an approach is assigned 2,700 feet until crossing the VOR and then cleared for the approach. The MOCA along the airway is 2,700 feet and MEA is 4,000 feet. The aircraft is within 22 NM of the VOR. The pilot should remain at 2,700 feet until crossing the VOR because that altitude is the minimum IFR altitude for the route segment being flown.

3. The MEA between a and b − 5,000 feet. The MEA between b and c − 5,000 feet. The MEA between c and d − 11,000 feet.

The MEA between d and e − 7,000 feet. A pilot had been cleared via a, b, c, d, to e. While flying between a and b the assigned altitude was 6,000 feet and the pilot was told to expect a clearance to 8,000 feet at b. Prior to receiving the higher altitude assignment, the pilot experienced two − way failure. The pilot would maintain 6,000 to b, then climb to 8,000 feet (the altitude the pilot was advised to expect.) The pilot would maintain 8,000 feet, then climb to 11,000 at c, or prior to c if necessary to comply with an MCA at c. (14 CFR Section 91.177(b).) Upon reaching d, the pilot would descend to 8,000 feet (even though the MEA was 7,000 feet), as 8,000 was the highest of the altitude situations stated in the rule 14 CFR Section 91.185.

12.7 Leave Clearance Limit 12.7.1 When the clearance limit is a fix from which an approach begins, commence descent or descent and approach as close as possible to the expect further clearance time if one has been received, or if one has not been received, as close as possible to the estimated time of arrival as calculated from the filed or amended (with ATC) estimated time en route.

12.7.2 If the clearance limit is not a fix from which an approach begins, leave the clearance limit at the expect further clearance time if one has been received, or if none has been received, upon arrival over the clearance limit, and proceed to a fix from which an approach begins and commence descent or descent and approach as close as possible to the estimated time of arrival as calculated from the filed or amended (with ATC) estimated time en route.

13. Transponder Operation During Two − Way Communications Failure 13.1 If an aircraft with a coded radar beacon transponder experiences a loss of two − way radio capability, the pilot should adjust the transponder to reply on Mode 3/A, Code 7600.

13.2 The pilot should understand that the aircraft may not be in an area of radar coverage.

14. Reestablishing Radio Contact 14.1 In addition to monitoring the NAVAID voice feature, the pilot should attempt to reestablish communications by attempting contact: 14.1.1 On the previously assigned frequency.

14.1.2 With an FSS, New York Radio, or San Francisco Radio.

14.2 If communications are established with an FSS, New York Radio or San Francisco Radio, the pilot should advise the aircraft’s position, altitude, and last assigned frequency; then request further clearance from the controlling facility. The preceding does not preclude the use of 121.5 MHz. There is no priority on which action should be attempted first. If the capability exists, do all at the same time.

NOTE − New York Radio and San Francisco Radio are operated by Collins Aerospace, Incorporated (formerly ARINC) under contract with the FAA for communications services. These Radio facilities have the capability of relaying information to/from ATC facilities throughout the country.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: Blank Page →

Blank Page

AIP GEN 3.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3.5 Meteorological Services

1. Meteorological Authority 1.1 The meteorological authority for the United States is the Federal Aviation Administration Assistant Administrator for the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen).

Postal Address: Assistant Administrator, NextGen Federal Aviation Administration Orville Wright Building (FOB − 10A) FAA National Headquarters 800 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington DC 20591 Telephone: 202 − 267 − 7111 Fax: 202 − 267 − 5456 1.2 Meteorological Information Service Provider 1.2.1 The meteorological services for civil aviation are prepared by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Postal Address: National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Commerce 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 Telephone: 301 − 713 − 1726 Fax: 301 − 713 − 1598 1.3 Meteorological Offices 1.3.1 FAA Flight Service Stations 1.3.1.1 A complete listing of FAA Flight Service Stations and their telephone numbers is contained in the Chart Supplement U.S. Additionally, communications data and en route services provided by FAA Flight Service Stations are contained in the same publication. Similar information for the Pacific and Alaskan areas is contained in the Chart Supplements Pacific and Alaska. (See GEN 3.2 , Aeronautical Charts.)

1.4 Climatological Summaries 1.4.1 Requests for copies of climatological summaries are made available through the: Postal Address: National Climatic Data Center Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Environmental Data Services Branch Federal Building Asheville, North Carolina 28801 2. Area of Responsibility 2.1 The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for providing meteorological services for the 50 states of the U.S., its external territories, and possessions.

2.2 International Flight Documentation Sites. Airports listed below are designated as international flight documentation sites.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.5 − 1 Location Airport Name Indicator Anchorage, AK Anchorage International PANC William B. Hartsfield Atlanta, GA KATL International Baltimore − Washington Baltimore, MD KBWI International General Edward Lawrence Logan Boston, MA KBOS International Charlotte, NC Charlotte/Douglas International KCLT Chicago, IL O’Hare International KORD Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Cincinnati, OH KCVG International Dallas − Ft. Worth, Dallas − Ft. Worth International KDFW TX Detroit Metropolitan Wayne Detroit, MI KDTW County Fairbanks, AK Fairbanks International PAFA NOCD Guam Guam/Agana Naval Air Station AGANA Hartford, CT Bradley International KBDL George Bush Houston, TX KIAH Intercontinental/Houston Kahului, HI Kahului PHOG Las Vegas, NV Harry Reid International KLAS Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles International KLAX Miami, FL Miami International KMIA Minneapolis − St. Paul International Minneapolis, MN KMSP (Wold − Chamberlain) New Orleans International New Orleans, LA KMSY (Moisant Field) New York, NY John F. Kennedy International KJFK Newark, NJ Newark International KEWR Orlando, FL Orlando International KMCO Pago Pago, Pago Pago International NSTU American Samoa Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia International KPHL Pittsburgh, PA Pittsburgh International KPIT Portland, OR Portland International KPDX Raleigh − Durham, Raleigh − Durham International KRDU NC San Francisco, CA San Francisco International KSFO San Juan, PR Luis Munoz Marin International TJSJ Seattle, WA Seattle − Tacoma International KSEA Tampa, FL Tampa International KTPA Washington, DC Washington Dulles International KIAD 2.2.1 Climatological information, basically in the form of climatological summaries, is available at all designated international airports in the U.S.

2.2.2 Flight documentation is provided in the form of copies of facsimile charts, copies of teletype − writer forecasts, and airport forecast decode sheets. Flight documentation materials are available at all destination Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 regular airport meteorological stations. English is the language used for all U.S. flight documentation. Briefings can be provided either in person or received by telephone at all airport meteorological offices.

2.2.3 All airport forecasts (TAF) prepared for U.S. international airports cover the following validity periods: 00 − 24 UTC, 06 − 06 UTC, 12 − 12 UTC, and 18 − 18 UTC. At the present time, specific landing forecasts are not made for any U.S. airport. The portion of the airport’s TAF valid closest to the time of landing is used in lieu of a landing forecast.

2.2.4 Supplementary information available at U.S. meteorological airport offices includes extended weather and severe weather outlooks, pilot reports, runway braking action reports (during the winter), relative humidity, times of sunrise and sunset, surface and upper air analyses, radar echo charts, and forecasts of maximum and minimum surface temperatures.

2.2.5 All meteorological offices shown as taking routine aviation observations also take unscheduled special aviation observations when meteorological conditions warrant.

3. Types of Service Provided 3.1 Area Forecast Charts (Facsimile Form) 3.1.1 The U.S. has one Area Forecast Center, the National Center for Environmental Predictions (NCEP), located in Suitland, Maryland. The NCEP prepares current weather, significant weather, forecast weather, constant pressure, and tropopause − vertical wind shear charts for the U.S., the Caribbean and Northern South America, the North Atlantic, and the North Pacific areas. The NCEP also prepares a constant pressure and tropopause − vertical wind shear chart for Canada.

3.2 Local and Regional Aviation Forecasts (Printed Form) 3.2.1 Numerous forecasts and weather advisories are prepared which serve local and regional areas of the U.S.

These forecasts are generally prepared by the NWS on a scheduled basis or, as in the case of severe weather advisories, as needed. These forecasts are Area Forecast (FA), Airport Forecast (TAF), Severe Weather Forecast (WW), Hurricane Advisories (WT), Winds and Temperature Aloft Forecast (FD), Simplified Surface Analyses (AS), 12 − and 24 − Hour Prognoses (FS), and flight advisory notices, such as SIGMETs (WS), AIRMETs (text bulletins − [WA] and graphics [G − AIRMET]), Center Weather Advisories (CWA), and Radar Weather Reports (SD).

3.3 Preflight Briefing Services 3.3.1 Preflight briefing services and flight documentation are provided through FAA Flight Service Stations (FSS).

3.4 National Weather Service Aviation Weather Service Program 3.4.1 Weather service to aviation is a joint effort of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Weather Service (NWS), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Defense, and various private sector aviation weather service providers. Requirements for all aviation weather products originate from the FAA, which is the Meteorological Authority for the U.S.

3.4.2 NWS meteorologists are assigned to all air route traffic control centers (ARTCC) as part of the Center Weather Service Units (CWSU) as well as the Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC). These meteorologists provide specialized briefings as well as tailored forecasts to support the needs of the FAA and other users of the NAS.

3.4.3 Aviation Products 3.4.3.1 The NWS maintains an extensive surface, upper air, and radar weather observing program; and a nationwide aviation weather forecasting service.

3.4.3.2 Airport observations (METAR and SPECI) supported by the NWS are provided by automated observing systems.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.4.3.3 Terminal Aerodrome Forecasts (TAF) are prepared by 123 NWS Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs) for over 700 airports. These forecasts are valid for 24 or 30 hours and amended as required.

3.4.3.4 Inflight aviation advisories (for example, Significant Meteorological Information (SIGMETs) and Airmen’s Meteorological Information (AIRMETs)) are issued by three NWS Meteorological Watch Offices (MWOs); the Aviation Weather Center (AWC) in Kansas City, MO, the Alaska Aviation Weather Unit (AAWU) in Anchorage, AK, and the Weather Service Forecast Office (WFO) in Honolulu, HI. The AWC, the AAWU, and WSFO Honolulu issue area forecasts for selected areas. In addition, NWS meteorologists assigned to most ARTCCs as part of the Center Weather Service Unit (CWSU) provide Center Weather Advisories (CWAs) and gather weather information to support the needs of the FAA and other users of the system.

3.4.3.5 Several NWS National Centers for Environmental Production (NCEP) provide aviation specific weather forecasts, or select public forecasts which are of interest to pilots and operators.

a) The Aviation Weather Center (AWC) displays a variety of domestic and international aviation forecast products over the Internet at aviationweather.gov.

b) The NCEP Central Operations (NCO) is responsible for the operation of many numerical weather prediction models, including those which produce the many wind and temperature aloft forecasts.

c) The Storm Prediction Center (SPC) issues tornado and severe weather watches along with other guidance forecasts.

d) The National Hurricane Center (NHC) issues forecasts on tropical weather systems (for example, hurricanes).

e) The Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC) provides alerts, watches, warnings and forecasts for space weather events (for example, solar storms) affecting or expected to affect Earth’s environment.

f) The Weather Prediction Center (WPC) provides analysis and forecast products on a national scale including surface pressure and frontal analyses.

3.4.3.6 NOAA operates two Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAAC) which issue forecasts of ash clouds following a volcanic eruption in their area of responsibility.

3.4.3.7 Details on the products provided by the above listed offices and centers is available in FAA − H − 8083 − 28, Aviation Weather Handbook.

3.4.4 Weather element values may be expressed by using different measurement systems depending on several factors, such as whether the weather products will be used by the general public, aviation interests, international services, or a combination of these users. FIG GEN 3.5 − 1 provides conversion tables for the most used weather elements that will be encountered by pilots.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 1 Weather Elements Conversion Tables 3.5 FAA Weather Services 3.5.1 The FAA provides the Flight Service program, which serves the weather needs of pilots through its flight service stations (FSS). Pilots may access weather information through www.1800wxbrief.com . To contact Flight Service in the CONUS, Hawaii, and U.S. territories, call 1 − 800 − WX − BRIEF (1 − 800 − 992 − 7433); in Alaska call 1 − 833 − AK − BRIEF (1 − 833 − 252 − 7433).

3.5.2 The FAA maintains an extensive surface weather observing program. Airport observations (METAR and SPECI) in the U.S. are provided by automated observing systems. Various levels of human oversight of the METAR and SPECI reports and augmentation may be provided at select larger airports by either government or contract personnel qualified to report specified weather elements that cannot be detected by the automated observing system. The requirements to issue SPECI reports are detailed in TBL GEN 3.5 − 2 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.5 − 2 SPECI Issuance Table Wind direction changes by 45 ° or more, in less than 15 minutes, and the wind speed is 1 Wind Shift 10 kt or more throughout the wind shift.

The surface visibility (as reported in the body of the report): Decreases to less than 3 sm, 2 sm, 1 sm, ½ sm, ¼ sm or the lowest standard instrument approach procedure (IAP) minimum.

2 Visibility Increases to equal to or exceed 3 sm, 2 sm, 1 sm, ½ sm, ¼ sm or the lowest standard IAP minimum.

As published in the U.S. Terminal Procedures. If none published, use ½ sm.

The highest value from the designated RVR runway decreases to less than 2,400 ft during the preceding 10 minutes; or, if the RVR is below 2,400 ft, increases to equal to or exceed 3 RVR 2,400 ft during the preceding 10 minutes. U.S. military stations may not report a SPECI based on RVR.

Tornado, Funnel Is observed.

4 Cloud, or Disappears from sight or ends.

Waterspout Begins (a SPECI is not required to report the beginning of a new thunderstorm if one 5 Thunderstorm is currently reported).

Ends.

Hail begins or ends.

Freezing precipitation begins, ends, or changes intensity.

6 Precipitation Ice pellets begin, end, or change intensity.

Snow begins, ends, or changes intensity.

When a squall occurs. (Wind speed suddenly increases by at least 16 knots and is 7 Squalls sustained at 22 knots or more for at least one minute.)

through: The ceiling changes 3,000 ft.

1,500 ft.

1,000 ft.

500 ft.

8 Ceiling The lowest standard IAP minimum.

“Ceiling change” means that it forms, dissipates below, decreases to less than, or, if below, increases to equal or exceed the values listed.

As published in the U.S. Terminal Procedures. If none published, use 200 ft.

A layer of clouds or obscurations aloft is present below 1,000 ft and no layer aloft was 9 Sky Condition reported below 1,000 ft in the preceding METAR or SPECI.

Volcanic Erup - 10 When an eruption is first noted.

tion Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Upon notification of an aircraft mishap, unless there has been an intervening observation.

11 Aircraft Mishap “Aircraft mishap” is an inclusive term to denote the occurrence of an aircraft accident or incident.

Any other meteorological situation designated by the responsible agency of which, in 12 Miscellaneous the opinion of the observer, is critical.

3.5.3 Other Sources of Weather Information 3.5.3.1 Weather and aeronautical information are available from numerous private industry sources on an individual or contract pay basis. Prior to every flight, pilots should gather all information vital to the nature of the flight. Pilots can receive a regulatory compliant briefing without contacting Flight Service. Pilots are encouraged to use automated resources and review AC 91 − 92, Pilot’s Guide to a Preflight Briefing, for more information.

3.5.3.2 Pilots can access Leidos Flight Services via the Internet at http://www.1800wxbrief.com . Pilots can receive preflight weather data and file VFR and IFR flight plans.

3.6 Use of Aviation Weather Products 3.6.1 Air carriers and operators certificated under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 119 are required to use the aeronautical weather information systems defined in the Operations Specifications issued to that certificate holder by the FAA. These systems may utilize basic FAA/National Weather Service (NWS) weather services, contractor − or operator − proprietary weather services and/or Enhanced Weather Information System (EWINS) when approved in the Operations Specifications. As an integral part of this system approval, the procedures for collecting, producing and disseminating aeronautical weather information, as well as the crew member and dispatcher training to support the use of system weather products, must be accepted or approved.

3.6.2 Operators not certificated under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 119 are encouraged to use FAA/NWS products through Flight Service Stations, Leidos Flight Service, and/or Flight Information Services − Broadcast (FIS − B).

3.6.3 The suite of available aviation weather product types is expanding, with the development of new sensor systems, algorithms and forecast models. The FAA and NWS, supported by various weather research laboratories and corporations under contract to the Government, develop and implement new aviation weather product types. The FAA’s NextGen Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP) facilitates collaboration between the NWS, the FAA, and various industry and research representatives. This collaboration ensures that user needs and technical readiness requirements are met before experimental products mature to operational application.

3.6.4 The AWRP manages the transfer of aviation weather R&D to operational use through technical review panels and conducting safety assessments to ensure that newly developed aviation weather products meet regulatory requirements and enhance safety.

3.6.5 The AWRP review and decision − making process applies criteria to weather products at various stages .

The stages are composed of the following: 3.6.5.1 Sponsorship of user needs.

3.6.5.2 R & D and controlled testing.

3.6.5.3 Experimental application.

3.6.5.4 Operational application.

3.6.6 Pilots and operators should be aware that weather services provided by entities other than FAA, NWS, or their contractors may not meet FAA/NWS quality control standards. Hence, operators and pilots contemplating Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 using such services should request and/or review an appropriate description of services and provider disclosure.

This should include, but is not limited to, the type of weather product (for example, current weather or forecast weather), the currency of the product (that is, product issue and valid times), and the relevance of the product.

Pilots and operators should be cautious when using unfamiliar products, or products not supported by FAA/NWS technical specifications.

NOTE − When in doubt, consult with a FAA Flight Service Station Specialist.

3.6.7 In addition, pilots and operators should be aware there are weather services and products available from government organizations beyond the scope of the AWRP process mentioned earlier in this section. For example, governmental agencies such as the NWS and the Aviation Weather Center (AWC), or research organizations such as the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) display weather “model data” and “experimental” products which require training and/or expertise to properly interpret and use. These products are developmental prototypes that are subject to ongoing research and can change without notice. Therefore, some data on display by government organizations, or government data on display by independent organizations may be unsuitable for flight planning purposes. Operators and pilots contemplating using such services should request and/or review an appropriate description of services and provider disclosure. This should include, but is not limited to, the type of weather product (for example, current weather or forecast weather), the currency of the product (i.e., product issue and valid times), and the relevance of the product. Pilots and operators should be cautious when using unfamiliar weather products.

NOTE − When in doubt, consult with a FAA Flight Service Station Specialist.

3.6.8 With increased access to weather products via the public Internet, the aviation community has access to an overwhelming amount of weather information and data that support self − briefing. The FAA Aviation Weather Handbook , FAA − H − 8083 − 28 (current edition), describes the weather products distributed by the NWS. Pilots and operators using the public Internet to access weather from a third party vendor should request and/or review an appropriate description of services and provider disclosure. This should include, but is not limited to, the type of weather product (for example, current weather or forecast weather), the currency of the product (i.e., product issue and valid times), and the relevance of the product. Pilots and operators should be cautious when using unfamiliar weather products and when in doubt, consult with a Flight Service Specialist.

3.6.9 The development of new weather products, coupled with the termination of some legacy textual and graphical products may create confusion between regulatory requirements and the new products. All flight − related, aviation weather decisions must be based on all available pertinent weather products. As every flight is unique and the weather conditions for that flight vary hour by hour, day to day, multiple weather products may be necessary to meet aviation weather regulatory requirements. Many new weather products now have a Precautionary Use Statement that details the proper use or application of the specific product.

3.6.10 The FAA has identified three distinct types of weather information available to pilots and operators.

3.6.10.1 Observations . Raw weather data collected by some type of sensor suite including surface and airborne observations, radar, lightning, satellite imagery, and profilers.

3.6.10.2 Analysis . Enhanced depiction and/or interpretation of observed weather data.

3.6.10.3 Forecasts . Predictions of the development and/or movement of weather phenomena based on meteorological observations and various mathematical models.

3.6.11 Not all sources of aviation weather information are able to provide all three types of weather information.

The FAA has determined that operators and pilots may utilize the following approved sources of aviation weather information: 3.6.11.1 Federal Government. The FAA and NWS collect raw weather data, analyze the observations, and produce forecasts. The FAA and NWS disseminate meteorological observations, analyses, and forecasts through a variety of systems. In addition, the Federal Government is the only approval authority for sources of weather Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 observations; for example, contract towers and airport operators may be approved by the Federal Government to provide weather observations.

3.6.11.2 Enhanced Weather Information System (EWINS). An EWINS is an FAA authorized, proprietary system for tracking, evaluating, reporting, and forecasting the presence or lack of adverse weather phenomena.

The FAA authorizes a certificate holder to use an EWINS to produce flight movement forecasts, adverse weather phenomena forecasts, and other meteorological advisories. For more detailed information regarding EWINS, see the FAA − H − 8083 − 28, Aviation Weather Handbook, and the Flight Standards Information Management System 8900.1.

3.6.11.3 Commercial Weather Information Providers. In general, commercial providers produce proprietary weather products based on NWS/FAA products with formatting and layout modifications but no material changes to the weather information itself. This is also referred to as “repackaging.” In addition, commercial providers may produce analyses, forecasts, and other proprietary weather products that substantially alter the information contained in government − produced products. However, those proprietary weather products that substantially alter government − produced weather products or information, may only be approved for use by 14 CFR Part 121 and Part 135 certificate holders if the commercial provider is EWINS qualified.

NOTE − Commercial weather information providers contracted by FAA to provide weather observations, analyses, and forecasts (e.g., contract towers) are included in the Federal Government category of approved sources by virtue of maintaining required technical and quality assurance standards under Federal Government oversight.

3.7 Graphical Forecasts for Aviation (GFA) 3.7.1 The GFA website is intended to provide the necessary aviation weather information to give users a complete picture of the weather that may affect flight in the continental United States (CONUS). The website includes observational data, forecasts, and warnings that can be viewed from 14 hours in the past to 15 hours in the future, including thunderstorms, clouds, flight category, precipitation, icing, turbulence, and wind. Hourly model data and forecasts, including information on clouds, flight category, precipitation, icing, turbulence, wind, and graphical output from the National Weather Service’s (NWS) National Digital Forecast Data (NDFD) are available. Wind, icing, and turbulence forecasts are available in 3,000 ft increments from the surface up to 30,000 ft MSL, and in 6,000 ft increments from 30,000 ft MSL to 48,000 ft MSL. Turbulence forecasts are also broken into low (below 18,000 ft MSL) and high (at or above 18,000 ft MSL) graphics. A maximum icing graphic and maximum wind velocity graphic (regardless of altitude) are also available. Built with modern geospatial information tools, users can pan and zoom to focus on areas of greatest interest. Target users are commercial and general aviation pilots, operators, briefers, and dispatchers.

3.7.2 Weather Products.

3.7.2.1 The Aviation Forecasts include gridded displays of various weather parameters as well as NWS textual weather observations, forecasts, and warnings. Icing, turbulence, and wind gridded products are three − dimensional. Other gridded products are two − dimensional and may represent a “composite” of a three − dimensional weather phenomenon or a surface weather variable, such as horizontal visibility. The following are examples of aviation forecasts depicted on the GFA: a) Terminal Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) b) Ceiling & Visibility (CIG/VIS) c) Clouds d) Precipitation / Weather (PCPN/WX) e) Thunderstorm (TS) f) Winds g) Turbulence Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 h) Ice 3.7.2.2 Observations & Warnings (Obs/Warn). The Obs/Warn option provides an option to display weather data for the current time and the previous 14 hours (rounded to the nearest hour). Users may advance through time using the arrow buttons or by clicking on the desired hour. Provided below are the Obs/Warn product tabs available on the GFA website: a) METAR b) Precipitation/Weather (PCPN/WX) c) Ceiling & Visibility (CIG/VIS) d) Pilot Weather Report (PIREP) e) Radar & Satellite (RAD/SAT) 3.7.2.3 The GFA will be continuously updated and available online at http://aviationweather.gov/gfa . Upon clicking the link above, select INFO on the top right corner of the map display. The next screen presents the option of selecting Overview, Products, and Tutorial. Simply select the tab of interest to explore the enhanced digital and graphical weather products designed to replace the legacy FA. Users should also refer to the Aviation Weather Handbook , FAA − H − 8083 − 28, Graphical Forecasts for Aviation (GFA) Tool, for more detailed information on the GFA.

3.7.2.4 GFA Static Images . Some users with limited internet connectivity may access static images via the Aviation Weather Center (AWC) Decision Support Imagery at: https://aviationweather.gov/graphics/ . There are two static graphical images available, titled Aviation Cloud Forecast and Aviation Surface Forecast. The Aviation Cloud Forecast provides cloud coverage, bases, layers, and tops with AIRMETs for mountain obscuration and AIRMETs for icing overlaid. The Aviation Surface Forecast provides visibility, weather phenomena, and winds (including wind gusts) with AIRMETs for instrument flight rules conditions and AIRMETs for sustained surface winds of 30 knots or more overlaid. These images are presented on ten separate maps providing forecast views for the entire contiguous United States (U.S.) on one and nine regional views which provide more detail for the user. They are updated every 3 hours and provide forecast snapshots for 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 hours into the future. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 2 and FIG GEN 3.5 − 2 .)

NOTE − The contiguous United States (U.S.) refers to the 48 adjoining U.S. states on the continent of North America that are south of Canada and north of Mexico, plus the District of Columbia. The term excludes the states of Alaska, Hawaii, and all off − shore U.S. territories and possessions, such as Puerto Rico.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 2 Aviation Surface Forecast Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 3 Aviation Cloud Forecast 3.8 Preflight Briefing 3.8.1 Flight Service is one of the primary sources for obtaining preflight briefings and to file flight plans by phone or the Internet. Flight Service Specialists are qualified and certificated as Pilot Weather Briefers by the FAA. They are not authorized to make original forecasts, but are authorized to translate and interpret available forecasts and reports directly into terms describing the weather conditions which you can expect along your flight route and at your destination. Prior to every flight, pilots should gather all information vital to the nature of the flight. Pilots can receive a regulatory compliant briefing without contacting Flight Service. Pilots are encouraged to use automated resources and review AC 91 − 92, Pilot’s Guide to a Preflight Briefing, for more information.

Pilots who prefer to contact Flight Service are encouraged to conduct a self − brief prior to calling. Conducting a self − brief before contacting Flight Service provides familiarity of meteorological and aeronautical conditions applicable to the route of flight and promotes a better understanding of weather information.

Three basic types of preflight briefings (Standard, Abbreviated, and Outlook) are available to serve the pilot’s specific needs. Pilots should specify to the briefer the type of briefing they want, along with their appropriate background information. This will enable the briefer to tailor the information to the pilot’s intended flight. The following paragraphs describe the types of briefings available and the information provided in each briefing .

3.8.2 Standard Briefing. You should request a Standard Briefing any time you are planning a flight and you have not received a previous briefing or have not received preliminary information through online resources.

International data may be inaccurate or incomplete. If you are planning a flight outside of U.S. controlled airspace, the briefer will advise you to check data as soon as practical after entering foreign airspace, unless you Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 advise that you have the international cautionary advisory. The briefer will automatically provide the following information in the sequence listed, except as noted, when it is applicable to your proposed flight.

3.8.2.1 Adverse Conditions. Significant meteorological and/or aeronautical information that might influence the pilot to alter or cancel the proposed flight; for example, hazardous weather conditions, airport closures, air traffic delays, etc. Pilots should be especially alert for current or forecast weather that could reduce flight minimums below VFR or IFR conditions. Pilots should also be alert for any reported or forecast icing if the aircraft is not certified for operating in icing conditions. Flying into areas of icing or weather below minimums could have disastrous results.

3.8.2.2 VFR Flight Not Recommended. When VFR flight is proposed and sky conditions or visibilities are present or forecast, surface or aloft, that, in the briefer’s judgment, would make flight under VFR doubtful, the briefer will describe the conditions, describe the affected locations, and use the phrase “VFR flight not recommended.” This recommendation is advisory in nature. The final decision as to whether the flight can be conducted safely rests solely with the pilot. Upon receiving a “ VFR flight not recommended ” statement, the non − IFR rated pilot will need to make a “go or no go” decision. This decision should be based on weighing the current and forecast weather conditions against the pilot’s experience and ratings. The aircraft’s equipment, capabilities and limitations should also be considered.

NOTE − Pilots flying into areas of minimal VFR weather could encounter unforecasted lowering conditions that place the aircraft outside the pilot’s ratings and experience level. This could result in spatial disorientation and/or loss of control of the aircraft.

3.8.2.3 Synopsis. A brief statement describing the type, location, and movement of weather systems and/or air masses which might affect the proposed flight.

NOTE − The first 3 elements of a standard briefing may be combined in any order when the briefer believes it will help to describe conditions more clearly.

3.8.2.4 Current Conditions. Reported weather conditions applicable to the flight will be summarized from all available sources; e.g., METARs, PIREPs, RAREPs. This element may be omitted if the proposed time of departure is beyond two hours, unless the information is specifically requested by the pilot. For more detailed information on PIREPS, users can refer to the current version of AC 00 − 45, Aviation Weather Services.

3.8.2.5 En Route Forecast. En route conditions forecast for the proposed route are summarized in logical order; i.e., departure − climbout, en route, and descent.

3.8.2.6 Destination Forecast. The destination forecast (TAF) for the planned estimated time of arrival (ETA).

Any significant changes within 1 hour before and after the planned arrival are included.

3.8.2.7 Winds Aloft. Forecast winds aloft for the proposed route will be provided in knots and degrees, referenced to true north. The briefer will interpolate wind directions and speeds between levels and stations as necessary to provide expected conditions at planned altitudes.

3.8.2.8 Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) a) Available NOTAM (D) information pertinent to the proposed flight, including special use airspace (SUA) NOTAMs for restricted areas, aerial refueling, and night vision goggles (NVG).

NOTE − Other SUA NOTAMs (D), such as military operations area (MOA), military training route (MTR), and warning area NOTAMs, are considered “upon request” briefing items as indicated in paragraph 3.8.2.10 .

b) Prohibited Areas P − 40, P − 49, P − 56, and the special flight rules area (SFRA) for Washington, DC.

NOTE − For information on SFRAs, see ENR 5, Navigation Warnings, paragraph 2.4.2.

c) FSS briefers do not provide FDC NOTAM information for special instrument approach procedures unless specifically asked. Pilots authorized by the FAA to use special instrument approach procedures must specifically request FDC NOTAM information for these procedures.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − 1. NOTAM information may be combined with current conditions when the briefer believes it is logical to do so.

2. Airway NOTAMs, procedural NOTAMs, and NOTAMs that are general in nature and not tied to a specific airport/facility (for example, flight advisories and restrictions, open duration special security instructions, and special flight rules areas) are briefed solely by pilot request. NOTAMs, graphic notices, and other information published in the Domestic Notices and International Notices are not included in pilot briefings unless the pilot specifically requests a review of these notices. For complete flight information, pilots are urged to review the Domestic Notices and International Notices found in the External Links section of the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search or Air Traffic Plans and Publications website and the Chart Supplement in addition to obtaining a briefing.

3.8.2.9 Air Traffic Control (ATC) Delays. Any known ATC delays and flow control advisories which might affect the proposed flight.

3.8.2.10 Pilots may obtain the following from flight service station briefers upon request: a) Information on Special Use Airspace (SUA) and SUA related airspace, except those listed in paragraph 3.8.2.8 .

NOTE − 1. For the purpose of this paragraph, SUA and related airspace includes the following types of airspace: alert area, military operations area (MOA), warning area, and air traffic control assigned airspace (ATCAA). MTR data includes the following types of airspace: IFR training routes (IR), VFR training routes (VR), and slow training routes (SR).

2. Pilots are encouraged to request updated information from ATC facilities while in flight.

b) A review of airway NOTAMs, procedural NOTAMs, and NOTAMs that are general in nature and not tied to a specific airport/facility (for example, flight advisories and restrictions, open duration special security instructions, and special flight rules areas), Domestic Notices and International Notices. Domestic Notices and International Notices are found in the External Links section of the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search System.

c) Approximate density altitude data.

d) Information regarding such items as air traffic services and rules, customs/immigration procedures, ADIZ rules, and search and rescue.

e) NOTAMs, available military NOTAMs, runway friction measurement value NOTAMs.

f) GPS RAIM availability for 1 hour before to 1 hour after ETA, or a time specified by the pilot.

g) Other assistance as required.

3.8.3 Abbreviated Briefing. Request an Abbreviated Briefing when you need information to supplement mass disseminated data, to update a previous briefing, or when you need only one or two specific items. Provide the briefer with appropriate background information, the time you received the previous information, and/or the specific items needed. You should indicate the source of the information already received so that the briefer can limit the briefing to the information that you have not received, and/or appreciable changes in meteorological/aeronautical conditions since your previous briefing. To the extent possible, the briefer will provide the information in the sequence shown for a Standard Briefing. If you request only one or two specific items, the briefer will advise you if adverse conditions are present or forecast. Adverse conditions contain both meteorological and aeronautical information. Details on these conditions will be provided at your request.

3.8.4 Outlook Briefing. You should request an Outlook Briefing whenever your proposed time of departure is 6 or more hours from the time of the briefing. The briefer will provide available forecast data applicable to the proposed flight. This type of briefing is provided for planning purposes only. You should obtain a Standard or Abbreviated Briefing prior to departure in order to obtain such items as adverse conditions, current conditions, updated forecasts, winds aloft, and NOTAMs.

3.8.5 Inflight Briefing . You are encouraged to conduct a self − briefing using online resources or obtain your preflight briefing by telephone or in person before departure (Alaska only). In those cases where you need to Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 obtain a preflight briefing or an update to a previous briefing by radio, you should contact the nearest FSS to obtain this information. After communications have been established, advise the specialist of the type briefing you require and provide appropriate background information. You will be provided information as specified in the above paragraphs, depending on the type of briefing requested. En Route advisories tailored to the phase of flight that begins after climb − out and ends with descent to land are provided upon pilot request. Besides flight service, there are other resources available to the pilot inflight, including: Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B). Free traffic, weather, and flight information are available on ADS − B In receivers that can receive data over 978 MHz (UAT) broadcasts. These services are available across the nation to aircraft owners who equip with ADS − B In, with further advances coming from airborne and runway traffic awareness. Even search − and − rescue operations benefit from accurate ADS − B tracking.

Flight Information Services − Broadcast (FIS − B). FIS − B is a free service; but is only available to aircraft who can receive data over 978 MHz (UAT). FIS − B automatically transmits a wide range of weather products with national and regional focus to all equipped aircraft. Having current weather and aeronautical information in the cockpit helps pilots plan more safe and efficient flight paths, as well as make strategic decisions during flight to avoid potentially hazardous weather.

Pilots are encouraged to provide a continuous exchange of information on weather, winds, turbulence, flight visibility, icing, etc., between pilots and inflight specialists. Pilots should report good weather as well as bad, and confirm expected conditions as well as unexpected. Remember that weather conditions can change rapidly and that a “go or no go” decision, as mentioned in paragraph 3.8.2.2 , should be assessed at all phases of flight.

3.8.6 Following any briefing, feel free to ask for any information that you or the briefer may have missed. It helps to save your questions until the briefing has been completed. This way the briefer is able to present the information in a logical sequence and lessens the chance of important items being overlooked.

3.9 Inflight Aviation Weather Advisories 3.9.1 Inflight Aviation Weather Advisories are forecasts to advise en route aircraft of development of potentially hazardous weather. Inflight aviation weather advisories in the conterminous U.S. are issued by the Aviation Weather Center (AWC) in Kansas City, MO, as well as 20 Center Weather Service Units (CWSU) associated with ARTCCs. AWC also issues advisories for portions of the Gulf of America, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, which are under the control of ARTCCs with Oceanic flight information regions (FIRs). The Weather Forecast Office (WFO) in Honolulu issues advisories for the Hawaiian Islands and a large portion of the Pacific Ocean. In Alaska, the Alaska Aviation Weather Unit (AAWU) issues inflight aviation weather advisories along with the Anchorage CWSU. All heights are referenced MSL, except in the case of ceilings (CIG) which indicate AGL.

3.9.2 There are four types of inflight aviation weather advisories: the SIGMET, the Convective SIGMET, the AIRMET, and the Center Weather Advisory (CWA). All of these advisories use VORs, airports, or well − known geographic areas to describe the hazardous weather areas.

3.9.3 The Severe Weather Watch Bulletins (WWs), (with associated Alert Messages) (AWW) supplements these Inflight Aviation Weather Advisories.

3.9.4 SIGMET. A SIGMET is a concise description of the occurrence or expected occurrence of specified en route weather phenomena which is expected to affect the safety of aircraft operations.

3.9.4.1 SIGMETs: a) Are intended for dissemination to all pilots in flight to enhance safety.

b) Are issued by the responsible MWO as soon as it is practical to alert operators and aircrews of hazardous en route conditions.

c) Are unscheduled products that are valid for 4 hours; except SIGMETs associated with tropical cyclones and volcanic ash clouds are valid for 6 hours. Unscheduled updates and corrections are issued as necessary.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 d) Use geographical points to describe the hazardous weather areas. These points can reference either VORs, airports, or latitude − longitude depending on SIGMET location. If the total area to be affected during the forecast period is very large, it could be that in actuality only a small portion of this total area would be affected at any one time.

EXAMPLE − Example of a SIGMET: BOSR WS 050600 SIGMET ROMEO 2 VALID UNTIL 051000 ME NH VT FROM CAR TO YSJ TO CON TO MPV TO CAR OCNL SEV TURB BLW 080 EXP DUE TO STG NWLY FLOW. CONDS CONTG BYD 1000Z.

3.9.4.2 SIGMETs over the contiguous U.S.: a) Are issued corresponding to the areas described in FIG GEN 3.5 − 5 and are only for non − convective weather. The U.S. issues a special category of SIGMETs for convective weather called Convective SIGMETs.

b) Are identified by an alphabetic designator, from November through Yankee, excluding Sierra and Tango.

Issuance for the same phenomenon will be sequentially numbered using the original designator until the phenomenon ends. For example, the first issuance in the Chicago (CHI) area (reference FIG GEN 3.5 − 5 ) for phenomenon moving from the Salt Lake City (SLC) area will be SIGMET Papa 3, if the previous two issuances, Papa 1 and Papa 2, had been in the SLC area. Note that no two different phenomena across the country can have the same alphabetic designator at the same time.

c) Use location identifiers (either VORs or airports) to describe the hazardous weather areas.

d) Are issued when the following phenomena occur or are expected to occur: 1) Severe icing not associated with thunderstorms.

2) Severe or extreme turbulence or clear air turbulence (CAT) not associated with thunderstorms.

3) Widespread dust storms or sandstorms lowering surface visibilities to below 3 miles.

4) Volcanic ash.

3.9.4.3 SIGMETs over Alaska: a) Are issued for the Anchorage FIR including Alaska and nearby coastal waters corresponding to the areas described in FIG GEN 3.5 − 4 and are only for non − convective weather. The U.S. issues a special category of SIGMETs for convective weather called Convective SIGMETs.

b) Use location identifiers (either VORs or airports) to describe the hazardous weather areas.

c) Use points of latitude and longitude over the ocean areas of the Alaska FIR.

d) Are identified by an alphabetic designator from India through Mike.

e) In addition to the phenomenon applicable to SIGMETs over the contiguous U.S., SIGMETs over Alaska are also issued for: 1) Tornadoes.

2) Lines of thunderstorms.

3) Embedded thunderstorms.

4) Hail greater than or equal to ¾ inch in diameter.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 4 Alaska SIGMET and Area Forecast Zones 3.9.4.4 SIGMETs over oceanic regions (New York Oceanic FIR, Oakland Oceanic FIR including Hawaii, Houston Oceanic FIR, Miami Oceanic FIR, San Juan FIR), points of latitude and longitude are used to describe the hazard area.

a) SIGMETs over the Oakland Oceanic FIR west of 140 west and south of 30 north (including the Hawaiian Islands), are identified by an alphabetic designator from November through Zulu.

b) SIGMETs over the Oakland Oceanic FIR east of 140 west and north of 30 north are identified by an alphabetic designator from Alpha through Mike.

c) SIGMETs over the New York Oceanic FIR, Houston Oceanic FIR, Miami Oceanic FIR, and San Juan FIR are identified by an alphabetic designator from Alpha through Mike.

d) In addition to SIGMETs issued for the phenomenon for the contiguous U.S., SIGMETs in the oceanic regions are also issued for: 1) Tornadoes.

2) Lines of thunderstorms.

3) Embedded thunderstorms.

4) Hail greater than or equal to ¾ inch in diameter.

3.9.5 Convective SIGMET 3.9.5.1 Convective SIGMETs are issued in the conterminous U.S. for any of the following: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 18 AIP GEN 3.5 − 18 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 a) Severe thunderstorm due to: 1) Surface winds greater than or equal to 50 knots.

2) Hail at the surface greater than or equal to / inches in diameter.

3) Tornadoes.

b) Embedded thunderstorms.

c) A line of thunderstorms.

d) Thunderstorms producing precipitation greater than or equal to heavy precipitation affecting 40 percent or more of an area at least 3,000 square miles.

3.9.5.2 Any convective SIGMET implies severe or greater turbulence, severe icing, and low − level wind shear.

A convective SIGMET may be issued for any convective situation that the forecaster feels is hazardous to all categories of aircraft.

3.9.5.3 Convective SIGMET bulletins are issued for the western (W), central (C), and eastern (E) United States.

(Convective SIGMETs are not issued for Alaska or Hawaii.) The areas are separated at 87 and 107 degrees west longitude with sufficient overlap to cover most cases when the phenomenon crosses the boundaries. Bulletins are issued hourly at H+55. Special bulletins are issued at any time as required and updated at H+55. If no criteria meeting convective SIGMET requirements are observed or forecasted, the message “CONVECTIVE SIGMET... NONE” will be issued for each area at H+55. Individual convective SIGMETs for each area (W, C, E) are numbered sequentially from number one each day, beginning at 00Z. A convective SIGMET for a continuing phenomenon will be reissued every hour at H+55 with a new number. The text of the bulletin consists of either an observation and a forecast or just a forecast. The forecast is valid for up to 1 hour.

EXAMPLE − CONVECTIVE SIGMET 44C VALID UNTIL 1455Z AR TX OK FROM 40NE ADM-40ESE MLC-10W TXK-50WNW LFK-40ENE SJT-40NE ADM AREA TS MOV FROM 26025KT. TOPS ABV FL450.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 5 SIGMET Locations – Contiguous U.S.

FIG GEN 3.5 − 6 Hawaii Area Forecast Locations 3.9.6 AIRMET. An AIRMET is a concise description of the occurrence or expected occurrence of specified en route weather phenomena that may affect the safety of aircraft operations, but at intensities lower than those which require the issuance of a SIGMET.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.9.6.1 AIRMETS contain details about Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) conditions, extensive mountain obscuration, turbulence, strong surface winds, icing, and freezing levels. Unscheduled updates and corrections are issued as necessary.

3.9.6.2 AIRMETs: a) Are intended to inform all pilots, but especially Visual Flight Rules pilots and operators of sensitive aircraft, of potentially hazardous weather phenomena.

b) Are issued on a scheduled basis every 6 hours, except every 8 hours in Alaska. Unscheduled updates and corrections are issued as necessary.

c) Are intended for dissemination to all pilots in the preflight and en route phase of flight to enhance safety.

En route, AIRMETs are available over Flight Service frequencies. Over the contiguous U.S., AIRMETs are also available on equipment intended to display weather and other non − air traffic control − related flight information to pilots using the Flight Information Service − Broadcast (FIS − B). In Alaska and Hawaii, AIRMETs are broadcast on air traffic frequencies.

d) Are issued for the contiguous U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii. No AIRMETs are issued for U.S. Oceanic FIRs in the Gulf of America, Caribbean, Western Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 3 U.S. AIRMET Issuance Time and Frequency Product Type Issuance Time Issuance Frequency AIRMETs over the Contiguous U.S. 0245, 0845, 1445, 2045 UTC Every 6 hours 0515, 1315, 2115 UTC (standard time) AIRMETs over Alaska Every 8 hours 0415, 1215, 2015 UTC (Daylight savings time) AIRMETs over Hawaii 0400, 1000, 1600, 2200 UTC Every 6 hours 3.9.6.3 AIRMETs over the Contiguous U.S.: a) Are displayed graphically on websites, such as aviationweather.gov and 1800wxbrief.com, and equipment receiving FIS − B information.

b) Provide a higher forecast resolution than AIRMETs issued in text format.

c) Are valid at discrete times no more than 3 hours apart for a period of up to 12 hours into the future (for example; 00, 03, 06, 09, and 12 hours). Additional forecasts may be inserted during the first 6 hours (for example; 01, 02, 04, and 05). 00 − hour represents the initial conditions, and the subsequent graphics depict the area affected by the particular hazard at that valid time. Forecasts valid at 00 through 06 hours correspond to the text AIRMET bulletin.

d) Depict the following en route aviation weather hazards: 1) Instrument flight rule conditions (ceiling < 1000’ and/or surface visibility <3 miles).

2) Widespread mountain obscuration.

3) Moderate icing.

4) Freezing levels.

5) Moderate turbulence.

6) Non − convective low − level wind shear potential below 2,000 feet AGL.

7) Sustained surface winds greater than 30 knots.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.9.6.4 Interpolation of time periods between AIRMETs over the contiguous U.S. valid times: Users must keep in mind when using the AIRMET over the contiguous U.S. that if a 00 − hour forecast shows no significant weather and a 03 − hour forecast shows hazardous weather, they must assume a change is occurring during the period between the two forecasts. It should be taken into consideration that the hazardous weather starts immediately after the 00 − hour forecast unless there is a defined initiation or ending time for the hazardous weather. The same would apply after the 03 − hour forecast. The user should assume the hazardous weather condition is occurring between the snapshots unless informed otherwise. For example, if a 00 − hour forecast shows no hazard, a 03 − hour forecast shows the presence of hazardous weather, and a 06 − hour forecast shows no hazard, the user should assume the hazard exists from the 0001 hour to the 0559 hour time period.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 7 AIRMETs over the Contiguous U.S.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.9.6.5 AIRMETs over Alaska and Hawaii: a) AIRMETs over Alaska and Hawaii are in text format. The hazard areas are described using well − known geographical areas. AIRMETs over Alaska are issued for three Alaskan regions corresponding to Alaska area forecasts (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 4 ).

b) AIRMETs over Alaska are valid up to eight hours. AIRMETs over Hawaii are valid up to six hours.

Unscheduled issuances contain an update number for easier identification.

c) AIRMET Zulu describes moderate icing and provides freezing level heights.

EXAMPLE − Example of AIRMET Sierra issued for the Southeast Alaska area: WAAK47 PAWU 241324 WA7O JNUS WA 241315 AIRMET SIERRA FOR IFR AND MT OBSC VALID UNTIL 242115 LYNN CANAL AND GLACIER BAY JB MTS OBSC BY CLDS/ISOL PCPN. NC.

CNTRL SE AK JC MTS OCNL OBSC IN CLDS. NC.

SRN SE AK JD PAWG − PAKT LN W OCNL CIGS BLW 010/VIS BLW 3SM BR. IMPR.

ERN GLF CST JE OCNL CIGS BLW 010/VIS BLW 3SM BR/ − RA BR. DTRT.

=JNUT WA 241315 AIRMET TANGO FOR TURB/STG SFC WINDS VALID UNTIL 242115 ERN GLF CST JE OFSHR ICY BAY W SUSTAINED SFC WND 30 KTS OR GTR. SPRDG E. INTSF.

=JNUZ WA 241315 AIRMET ZULU FOR ICING VALID UNTIL 242115 ERN GLF CST JE 16Z TO 19Z ALG CST W ICY BAY OCNL MOD ICEIC 080 − 160.

FZLVL 045 EXC 015 INLAND. WKN.

EXAMPLE − Example of AIRMET Tango issued for Hawaii FA area: WAHW31 PHFO 241529 WA0HI HNLS WA 241600 AIRMET SIERRA UPDATE 2 FOR IFR VALID UNTIL 242200 NO SIGNIFICANT IFR EXP.

=HNLT WA 241600 AIRMET TANGO UPDATE 3 FOR TURB VALID UNTIL 242200 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 AIRMET TURB...HI OVER AMD IMT S THRU W OF MTN.

TEMPO MOD TURB BLW 070.

COND CONT BEYOND 2200Z.

=HNLZ WA 241600 AIRMET ZULU UPDATE 2 FOR ICE AND FZLVL VALID UNTIL 242200 NO SIGNIFICANT ICE EXP 3.9.7 Watch Notification Messages The Storm Prediction Center (SPC) in Norman, OK, issues Watch Notification Messages to provide an area threat alert for forecast organized severe thunderstorms that may produce tornadoes, large hail, and/or convective damaging winds within the CONUS. SPC issues three types of watch notification messages: Aviation Watch Notification Messages, Public Severe Thunderstorm Watch Notification Messages, and Public Tornado Watch Notification Messages.

It is important to note the difference between a Severe Thunderstorm (or Tornado) Watch and a Severe Thunderstorm (or Tornado) Warning. A watch means severe weather is possible during the next few hours, while a warning means that severe weather has been observed, or is expected within the hour. Only the SPC issues Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Watches, while only NWS Weather Forecasts Offices issue Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Warnings.

3.9.7.1 The Aviation Watch Notification Message. The Aviation Watch Notification Message product is an approximation of the area of the Public Severe Thunderstorm Watch or Public Tornado Watch. The area may be defined as a rectangle or parallelogram using VOR navigational aides as coordinates.

The Aviation Watch Notification Message was formerly known as the Alert Severe Weather Watch Bulletin (AWW). The NWS no longer uses that title or acronym for this product. The NWS uses the acronym SAW for the Aviation Watch Notification Message, but retains AWW in the product header for processing by weather data systems.

EXAMPLE − Example of an Aviation Watch Notification Message: WWUS30 KWNS 271559 SAW2 SPC AWW 271559 WW 568 TORNADO AR LA MS 271605Z - 280000Z AXIS..65 STATUTE MILES EAST AND WEST OF LINE..

45ESE HEZ/NATCHEZ MS/ - 50N TUP/TUPELO MS/ ..AVIATION COORDS.. 55NM E/W /18WNW MCB - 60E MEM/ HAIL SURFACE AND ALOFT..3 INCHES. WIND GUSTS..70 KNOTS. MAX TOPS TO 550. MEAN STORM MOTION VECTOR 26030.

LAT...LON 31369169 34998991 34998762 31368948 THIS IS AN APPROXIMATION TO THE WATCH AREA. FOR A COMPLETE DEPICTION OF THE WATCH SEE WOUS64 KWNS FOR WOU2.

3.9.7.2 Public Severe Thunderstorm Watch Notification Messages describe areas of expected severe thunderstorms. (Severe thunderstorm criteria are 1-inch hail or larger and/or wind gusts of 50 knots [58 mph] or greater). A Public Severe Thunderstorm Watch Notification Message contains the area description and axis, the watch expiration time, a description of hail size and thunderstorm wind gusts expected, the definition of the watch, a call to action statement, a list of other valid watches, a brief discussion of meteorological reasoning and technical information for the aviation community.

3.9.7.3 Public Tornado Watch Notification Messages describe areas where the threat of tornadoes exists. A Public Tornado Watch Notification Message contains the area description and axis, watch expiration time, the term “damaging tornadoes,” a description of the largest hail size and strongest thunderstorm wind gusts expected, the definition of the watch, a call to action statement, a list of other valid watches, a brief discussion of Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 meteorological reasoning and technical information for the aviation community. SPC may enhance a Public Tornado Watch Notification Message by using the words “THIS IS A PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS SITUATION” when there is a likelihood of multiple strong (damage of EF2 or EF3) or violent (damage of EF4 or EF5) tornadoes.

3.9.7.4 Public severe thunderstorm and tornado watch notification messages were formerly known as the Severe Weather Watch Bulletins (WW). The NWS no longer uses that title or acronym for this product but retains WW in the product header for processing by weather data systems.

EXAMPLE − Example of a Public Tornado Watch Notification Message: WWUS20 KWNS 050550 SEL2 SPC WW 051750 URGENT - IMMEDIATE BROADCAST REQUESTED TORNADO WATCH NUMBER 243 NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK 1250 AM CDT MON MAY 5 2011 THE NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER HAS ISSUED A *TORNADO WATCH FOR PORTIONS OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL ARKANSAS SOUTHERN MISSOURI FAR EASTERN OKLAHOMA *EFFECTIVE THIS MONDAY MORNING FROM 1250 AM UNTIL 600 AM CDT.

...THIS IS A PARTICULARLY DANGEROUS SITUATION...

*PRIMARY THREATS INCLUDE NUMEROUS INTENSE TORNADOES LIKELY NUMEROUS SIGNIFICANT DAMAGING WIND GUSTS TO 80 MPH LIKELY NUMEROUS VERY LARGE HAIL TO 4 INCHES IN DIAMETER LIKELY THE TORNADO WATCH AREA IS APPROXIMATELY ALONG AND 100 STATUTE MILES EAST AND WEST OF A LINE FROM 15 MILES WEST NORTHWEST OF FORT LEONARD WOOD MISSOURI TO 45 MILES SOUTHWEST OF HOT SPRINGS ARKANSAS. FOR A COMPLETE DEPICTION OF THE WATCH SEE THE ASSOCIATED WATCH OUTLINE UPDATE (WOUS64 KWNS WOU2).

REMEMBER...A TORNADO WATCH MEANS CONDITIONS ARE FAVORABLE FOR TORNADOES AND SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS IN AND CLOSE TO THE WATCH AREA. PERSONS IN THESE AREAS SHOULD BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR THREATENING WEATHER CONDITIONS AND LISTEN FOR LATER STATEMENTS AND POSSIBLE WARNINGS.

OTHER WATCH INFORMATION...THIS TORNADO WATCH REPLACES TORNADO WATCH NUMBER 237. WATCH NUMBER 237 WILL NOT BE IN EFFECT AFTER 1250 AM CDT. CONTINUE...WW 239...WW 240...WW 241...WW 242...

DISCUSSION...SRN MO SQUALL LINE EXPECTED TO CONTINUE EWD...WHERE LONG/HOOKED HODOGRAPHS SUGGEST THREAT FOR EMBEDDED SUPERCELLS/POSSIBLE TORNADOES. FARTHER S...MORE WIDELY SCATTERED SUPERCELLS WITH A THREAT FOR TORNADOES WILL PERSIST IN VERY STRONGLY DEEP SHEARED/LCL ENVIRONMENT IN AR.

AVIATION...TORNADOES AND A FEW SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS WITH HAIL SURFACE AND ALOFT TO 4 INCHES. EXTREME TURBULENCE AND SURFACE WIND GUSTS TO 70 KNOTS. A FEW CUMULONIMBI WITH MAXIMUM TOPS TO 500. MEAN STORM MOTION VECTOR 26045.

3.9.7.5 Status reports are issued as needed to show progress of storms and to delineate areas no longer under the threat of severe storm activity. Cancellation bulletins are issued when it becomes evident that no severe weather will develop or that storms have subsided and are no longer severe.

3.9.8 Center Weather Advisories (CWA) 3.9.8.1 CWAs are unscheduled inflight, flow control, air traffic, and air crew advisory. By nature of its short lead time, the CWA is not a flight planning product. It is generally a nowcast for conditions beginning within the next two hours. CWAs will be issued: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 a) As a supplement to an existing SIGMET, Convective SIGMET or AIRMET.

b) When an Inflight Advisory has not been issued but observed or expected weather conditions meet SIGMET/AIRMET criteria based on current pilot reports and reinforced by other sources of information about existing meteorological conditions.

c) When observed or developing weather conditions do not meet SIGMET, Convective SIGMET, or AIRMET criteria; e.g., in terms of intensity or area coverage, but current pilot reports or other weather information sources indicate that existing or anticipated meteorological phenomena will adversely affect the safe flow of air traffic within the ARTCC area of responsibility.

3.9.8.2 The following example is a CWA issued from the Kansas City, Missouri, ARTCC. The “3” after ZKC in the first line denotes this CWA has been issued for the third weather phenomena to occur for the day. The “301” in the second line denotes the phenomena number again (3) and the issuance number (01) for this phenomena.

The CWA was issued at 2140Z and is valid until 2340Z.

EXAMPLE − ZKC3 CWA 032140 ZKC CWA 301 VALID UNTIL 032340 ISOLD SVR TSTM over KCOU MOVG SWWD 10 KTS ETC.

4. Categorical Ceiling and Visibility Conditions 4.1 Categorical terms, describing either reported or forecast general ceiling and visibility conditions, are defined as follows: 4.1.1 LIFR (Low IFR). Ceiling less than 500 feet and/or visibility less than 1 mile.

4.1.2 IFR. Ceiling 500 to less than 1,000 feet and/or visibility 1 to less than 3 miles.

4.1.3 MVFR (Marginal VFR). Ceiling 1,000 or 3,000 feet and/or visibility 3 to 5 miles inclusive.

4.1.4 VFR. Ceiling greater than 3,000 feet and visibility greater than 5 miles; includes sky clear.

4.2 The cause of LIFR, IFR, or MVFR is indicated by either ceiling or visibility restrictions or both. The contraction “CIG” and/or weather and obstruction to vision symbols are used. If winds or gusts of 25 knots or greater are forecast for the outlook period, the word “WIND” is also included for all categories, including VFR.

EXAMPLE − 1. LIFR CIG − low IFR due to low ceiling.

2. IFR FG − IFR due to visibility restricted by fog.

3. MVFR CIG HZ FU − marginal VFR due both to ceiling and to visibility restricted by haze and smoke.

4. IFR CIG RA WIND − IFR due both to low ceiling and to visibility restricted by rain; wind expected to be 25 knots or greater.

5. Inflight Weather Advisory Broadcasts ARTCCs broadcast a Convective SIGMET, SIGMET, AIRMET (except in the contiguous U.S.), Urgent Pilot Report, or CWA alert once on all frequencies, except emergency frequencies, when any part of the area described is within 150 miles of the airspace under their jurisdiction. These broadcasts advise pilots of the availability of hazardous weather advisories and to contact the nearest flight service facility for additional details.

EXAMPLE − 1. Attention all aircraft, SIGMET Delta Three, from Myton to Tuba City to Milford, severe turbulence and severe clear icing below one zero thousand feet. Expected to continue beyond zero three zero zero zulu.

2. Attention all aircraft, Convective SIGMET Two Seven Eastern. From the vicinity of Elmira to Phillipsburg. Scattered embedded thunderstorms moving east at one zero knots. A few intense level five cells, maximum tops four five zero.

3. Attention all aircraft, Kansas City Center weather advisory one zero three. Numerous reports of moderate to severe icing from eight to niner thousand feet in a three zero mile radius of St. Louis. Light or negative icing reported from four thousand to one two thousand feet remainder of Kansas City Center area.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − Terminal control facilities have the option to limit hazardous weather information broadcast as follows: Tower cab and approach control positions may opt to broadcast hazardous weather information alerts only when any part of the area described is within 50 miles of the airspace under their jurisdiction.

REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 2 − 6 − 6, Hazardous Inflight Weather Advisory.

6. Flight Information Services (FIS) 6.1 FIS . FIS is a method of disseminating meteorological (MET) and aeronautical information (AI) to displays in the cockpit in order to enhance pilot situational awareness, provide decision support tools, and improve safety.

FIS augments traditional pilot voice communication with Flight Service Stations (FSSs), ATC facilities, or Airline Operations Control Centers (AOCCs). FIS is not intended to replace traditional pilot and controller/flight service specialist/aircraft dispatcher preflight briefings or inflight voice communications. FIS, however, can provide textual and graphical information that can help abbreviate and improve the usefulness of such communications. FIS enhances pilot situational awareness and improves safety.

6.1.1 Data link Service Providers (DSPs). DSPs deploy and maintain airborne, ground − based, and, in some cases, space − based infrastructure that supports the transmission of AI/MET information over one or more physical links. A DSP may provide a free of charge or a for − fee service that permits end users to uplink and downlink AI/MET and other information. The following are examples of DSPs: 6.1.1.1 FAA FIS-B. A ground-based broadcast service provided through the ADS-B Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) network. The service provides users with a 978 MHz data link capability when operating within range and line-of-sight of a transmitting ground station. FIS-B enables users of properly equipped aircraft to receive and display a suite of broadcast weather and aeronautical information products.

6.1.1.2 Non-FAA FIS Systems. Several commercial vendors provide customers with FIS data over both the aeronautical spectrum and on other frequencies using a variety of data link protocols. Services available from these providers vary greatly and may include tier based subscriptions. Advancements in bandwidth technology permits preflight as well as inflight access to the same MET and AI information available on the ground. Pilots and operators using non-FAA FIS for MET and AI information should be knowledgeable regarding the weather services being provided as some commercial vendors may be repackaging NWS sourced weather, while other commercial vendors may alter the weather information to produce vendor − tailored or vendor − specific weather reports and forecasts.

6.1.2 Three Data Link Modes. There are three data link modes that may be used for transmitting AI and MET information to aircraft. The intended use of the AI and/or MET information will determine the most appropriate data link service.

6.1.2.1 Broadcast Mode: A one-way interaction in which AI and/or MET updates or changes applicable to a designated geographic area are continuously transmitted (or transmitted at repeated periodic intervals) to all aircraft capable of receiving the broadcast within the service volume defined by the system network architecture.

6.1.2.2 Contract/Demand Mode: A two-way interaction in which AI and/or MET information is transmitted to an aircraft in response to a specific request.

6.1.2.3 Contract/Update Mode: A two-way interaction that is an extension of the Demand Mode. Initial AI and/or MET report(s) are sent to an aircraft and subsequent updates or changes to the AI and/or MET information that meet the contract criteria are automatically or manually sent to an aircraft.

6.1.3 To ensure airman compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations, manufacturer’s operating manuals should remind airmen to contact ATC controllers, FSS specialists, operator dispatchers, or airline operations control centers for general and mission critical aviation weather information and/or NAS status conditions (such as NOTAMs, Special Use Airspace status, and other government flight information). If FIS products are systemically modified (for example, are displayed as abbreviated plain text and/or graphical depictions), the modification process and limitations of the resultant product should be clearly described in the vendor’s user guidance.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 28 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.1.4 Operational Use of FIS. Regardless of the type of FIS system being used, several factors must be considered when using FIS: 6.1.4.1 Before using FIS for inflight operations, pilots and other flight crewmembers should become familiar with the operation of the FIS system to be used, the airborne equipment to be used, including its system architecture, airborne system components, coverage service volume and other limitations of the particular system, modes of operation and indications of various system failures. Users should also be familiar with the specific content and format of the services available from the FIS provider(s). Sources of information that may provide this specific guidance include manufacturer’s manuals, training programs, and reference guides.

6.1.4.2 FIS should not serve as the sole source of aviation weather and other operational information. ATC, FSSs, and, if applicable, AOCC VHF/HF voice remain as a redundant method of communicating aviation weather, NOTAMs, and other operational information to aircraft in flight. FIS augments these traditional ATC/FSS/AOCC services and, for some products, offers the advantage of being displayed as graphical information. By using FIS for orientation, the usefulness of information received from conventional means may be enhanced. For example, FIS may alert the pilot to specific areas of concern that will more accurately focus requests made to FSS or AOCC for inflight updates or similar queries made to ATC.

6.1.4.3 The airspace and aeronautical environment is constantly changing. These changes occur quickly and without warning. Critical operational decisions should be based on use of the most current and appropriate data available. When differences exist between FIS and information obtained by voice communication with ATC, FSS, and/or AOCC (if applicable), pilots are cautioned to use the most recent data from the most authoritative source.

6.1.4.4 FIS aviation weather products (for example, graphical ground − based radar precipitation depictions) are not appropriate for tactical (typical timeframe of less than 3 minutes) avoidance of severe weather such as negotiating a path through a weather hazard area. FIS supports strategic (typical timeframe of 20 minutes or more) weather decision − making such as route selection to avoid a weather hazard area in its entirety. The misuse of information beyond its applicability may place the pilot and aircraft in jeopardy. In addition, FIS should never be used in lieu of an individual preflight weather and flight planning briefing.

6.1.4.5 DSPs offer numerous MET and AI products with information that can be layered on top of each other.

Pilots need to be aware that too much information can have a negative effect on their cognitive work load. Pilots need to manage the amount of information to a level that offers the most pertinent information to that specific flight without creating a cockpit distraction. Pilots may need to adjust the amount of information based on numerous factors including, but not limited to, the phase of flight, single pilot operation, autopilot availability, class of airspace, and the weather conditions encountered.

6.1.4.6 FIS NOTAM products, including Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) information, are advisory − use information and are intended for situational awareness purposes only. Cockpit displays of this information are not appropriate for tactical navigation − pilots should stay clear of any geographic area displayed as a TFR NOTAM. Pilots should contact FSSs and/or ATC while en route to obtain updated information and to verify the cockpit display of NOTAM information.

6.1.4.7 FIS supports better pilot decision − making by increasing situational awareness. Better decision − making is based on using information from a variety of sources. In addition to FIS, pilots should take advantage of other weather/NAS status sources, including, briefings from Flight Service Stations, data from other air traffic control facilities, airline operation control centers, pilot reports, as well as their own observations.

6.1.4.8 FAA’s Flight Information Service − Broadcast (FIS − B).

a) FIS − B is a ground − based broadcast service provided through the FAA’s Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS − B) Services Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) network. The service provides users with a 978 MHz data link capability when operating within range and line − of − sight of a transmitting ground station. FIS − B enables users of properly − equipped aircraft to receive and display a suite of broadcast weather and aeronautical information products.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) TBL GEN 3.5 − 4 lists the text and graphical products available through FIS − B and provided free − of − charge. Detailed information concerning FIS − B meteorological products can be found in FAA − H − 8083 − 28, Aviation Weather Handbook and AC 00 − 63, Use of Cockpit Displays of Digital Weather and Aeronautical Information. Information on Special Use Airspace (SUA), Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR), and Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) products can be found in Chapters ENR 1 and ENR 5 of this manual.

c) Users of FIS − B should familiarize themselves with the operational characteristics and limitations of the system, including: system architecture; service environment; product lifecycles; modes of operation; and indications of system failure.

d) FIS − B products are updated and transmitted at specific intervals based primarily on product issuance criteria. Update intervals are defined as the rate at which the product data is available from the source for transmission. Transmission intervals are defined as the amount of time within which a new or updated product transmission must be completed and/or the rate or repetition interval at which the product is rebroadcast. Update and transmission intervals for each product are provided in TBL GEN 3.5 − 4 .

NOTE − The NOTAM − D and NOTAM − FDC products broadcast via FIS − B are limited to those issued or effective within the past 30 days. Except for TFRs, NOTAMs older than 30 days are not provided. The pilot in command is responsible for reviewing all necessary information prior to flight.

e) Where applicable, FIS − B products include a look − ahead range expressed in nautical miles (NM) for three service domains: Airport Surface; Terminal Airspace; and Enroute/Gulf − of − America. TBL GEN 3.5 − 5 provides service domain availability and look − ahead ranging for each FIS − B product.

f) Prior to using this capability, users should familiarize themselves with the operation of FIS − B avionics by referencing the applicable User’s Guides. Guidance concerning the interpretation of information displayed should be obtained from the appropriate avionics manufacturer.

g) FIS − B malfunctions not attributed to aircraft system failures or covered by active NOTAM should be reported by radio or telephone to the nearest FSS facility, or by sending an email to the ADS − B help desk at adsb@faa.gov. Reports should include: 1) Condition observed; 2) Date and time of observation; 3) Altitude and location of observation; 4) Type and call sign of the aircraft; and 5) Type and software version of avionics system.

6.2 Non − FAA FIS Systems. Several commercial vendors also provide customers with FIS data over both the aeronautical spectrum and on other frequencies using a variety of data link protocols. In some cases, the vendors provide only the communications system that carries customer messages, such as the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) used by many air carrier and other operators.

6.2.1 Operators using non − FAA FIS data for inflight weather and other operational information should ensure that the products used conform to FAA/NWS standards. Specifically, aviation weather and NAS status information should meet the following criteria: 6.2.1.1 The products should be either FAA/NWS “accepted” aviation weather reports or products, or based on FAA/NWS accepted aviation weather reports or products. If products are used which do not meet this criteria, they should be so identified. The operator must determine the applicability of such products to their particular flight operations.

6.2.1.2 In the case of a weather product which is the result of the application of a process which alters the form, function or content of the base FAA/NWS accepted weather product(s), that process, and any limitations to the application of the resultant product, should be described in the vendor’s user guidance material. An example Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 30 United States of America 22 JAN 26 would be a NEXRAD radar composite/mosaic map, which has been modified by changing the scaling resolution.

The methodology of assigning reflectivity values to the resultant image components should be described in the vendor’s guidance material to ensure that the user can accurately interpret the displayed data.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 4 FIS − B Over UAT Product Update and Transmission Intervals Transmission Basic Product Update Interval Interval (95%) Product AIRMET As Available 5 minutes Yes As Available, then at 15 minute AWW/WW 5 minutes No intervals for 1 hour Ceiling As Available 10 minutes No As Available, then at 15 minute 5 minutes Yes Convective SIGMET intervals for 1 hour D − ATIS As Available 1 minute No Echo Top 5 minutes 5 minutes No 1 minute (where available), As METAR/SPECI 5 minutes Yes Available otherwise MRMS NEXRAD (CONUS) 2 minutes 15 minutes Yes MRMS NEXRAD (Regional) 2 minutes 2.5 minutes Yes NOTAMs − D/FDC As Available 10 minutes Yes NOTAMs − TFR As Available 10 minutes Yes PIREP As Available 10 minutes Yes As Available, then at 15 minute SIGMET 5 minutes Yes intervals for 1 hour SUA Status As Available 10 minutes Yes TAF/AMEND 6 Hours ( ± 15 minutes) 10 minutes Yes Temperature Aloft 12 Hours ( ± 15 minutes) 10 minutes Yes TWIP As Available 1 minute No Winds aloft 12 Hours ( ± 15 minutes) 10 minutes Yes Lightning strikes 5 minutes 5 minutes Yes Turbulence 1 minute 15 minutes Yes 60 minutes 15 minutes Yes Icing, Forecast Potential (FIP) Cloud tops 30 minutes 15 minutes Yes 1 Minute AWOS 1 minute 10 minutes No Graphical − AIRMET As Available 5 minutes Yes Center Weather Advisory (CWA) As Available 10 minutes Yes Temporary Restricted Areas (TRA) As Available 10 minutes Yes Temporary Military Operations Areas As Available 10 minutes Yes (TMOA) The Update Interval is the rate at which the product data is available from the source.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 The Transmission Interval is the amount of time within which a new or updated product transmission must be completed (95%) and the rate or repetition interval at which the product is rebroadcast (95%).

The transmission and update intervals for the expanded set of basic meteorological products may be adjusted based on FAA and vendor agreement on the final product formats and performance requirements.

NOTE − 1. Details concerning the content, format, and symbols of the various data link products provided should be obtained from the specific avionics manufacturer.

2. NOTAM − D and NOTAM − FDC products broadcast via FIS − B are limited to those issued or effective within the past 30 days.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 5 Product Parameters for Low/Medium/High Altitude Tier Radios Product Surface Radios Low Altitude Tier Medium Altitude High Altitude Tier Tier CONUS NEXRAD N/A CONUS NEXRAD CONUS NEXRAD CONUS NEXRAD not provided imagery imagery Winds & Temps 500 NM look − ahead 500 NM look − ahead 750 NM look − ahead 1,000 NM look − Aloft range range range ahead range METAR 100 NM look − ahead 250 NM look − ahead 375 NM look − ahead CONUS: CONUS range range range Class B & C airport METARs and 500 NM look − ahead range Outside of CONUS: 500 NM look-ahead range TAF 100 NM look − ahead 250 NM look − ahead 375 NM look − ahead CONUS: CONUS range range range Class B & C airport TAFs and 500 NM look − ahead range Outside of CONUS: 500 NM look-ahead range AIRMET, SIGMET, 100 NM look − ahead 250 NM look − ahead 375 NM look − ahead 500 NM look − ahead PIREP, and SUA/ range. PIREP/SUA/ range range range SAA SAA is N/A.

Regional NEXRAD 150 NM look − ahead 150 NM look − ahead 200 NM look − ahead 250 NM look − ahead range range range range NOTAMs D, FDC, 100 NM look − ahead 100 NM look − ahead 100 NM look − ahead 100 NM look − ahead and TFR range range range range 7. Weather Observing Programs 7.1 Manual Observations. Aviation Routine Weather Reports (METAR) are taken at more than 600 locations in the U.S. With only a few exceptions, these stations are located at airport sites and most are staffed by FAA personnel who manually observe, perform calculations, and enter the observation into the distribution system.

The format and coding of these observations are contained in FIG GEN 3.5 − 26 and FIG GEN 3.5 − 27 .

7.2 Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 32 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.2.1 Automated weather reporting systems are increasingly being installed at airports. These systems consist of various sensors, a processor, a computer − generated voice subsystem, and a transmitter to broadcast local, minute − by − minute weather data directly to the pilot.

NOTE − When the barometric pressure exceeds 31.00 inches Hg., see subparagraph ENR 1.7 − 3, Altimeter Setting Procedures.

7.2.2 The AWOS observations will include the prefix “AUTO” to indicate that the data are derived from an automated system. Some AWOS locations will be augmented by certified observers who will provide weather and obstruction to vision information in the remarks of the report when the reported visibility is less than 3 miles.

These sites, along with the hours of augmentation, are published in the Chart Supplement. Augmentation is identified in the observation as “OBSERVER WEATHER.” The AWOS wind speed, direction and gusts, temperature, dew point, and altimeter setting are exactly the same as for manual observations. The AWOS will also report density altitude when it exceeds the field elevation by more than 1,000 feet. The reported visibility is derived from a sensor near the touchdown of the primary instrument runway. The visibility sensor output is converted to a visibility value using a 10 − minute harmonic average. The reported sky condition/ceiling is derived from the ceilometer located next to the visibility sensor. The AWOS algorithm integrates the last 30 minutes of ceilometer data to derive cloud layers and heights. This output may also differ from the observer sky condition in that the AWOS is totally dependent upon the cloud advection over the sensor site.

7.2.3 Referred to as AWOS, these real − time systems are operationally classified into nine basic levels: 7.2.3.1 AWOS − A only reports altimeter setting.

NOTE − Any other information is advisory only.

7.2.3.2 AWOS − AV reports altimeter and visibility; NOTE − Any other information is advisory only.

7.2.3.3 AWOS − l usually reports altimeter setting, wind data, temperature, dew point, and density altitude.

7.2.3.4 AWOS − 2 provides the information provided by AWOS − l, plus visibility.

7.2.3.5 AWOS − 3 provides the information provided by AWOS − 2, plus cloud/ceiling data.

7.2.3.6 AWOS − 3P provides reports the same as the AWOS 3 system, plus a precipitation identification sensor.

7.2.3.7 AWOS − 3PT reports the same as the AWOS 3P System, plus thunderstorm/lightning reporting capability.

7.2.3.8 AWOS − 3T reports the same as AWOS 3 system and includes a thunderstorm/lightning reporting capability.

7.2.3.9 AWOS − 4 reports the same as the AWOS 3 system, plus precipitation occurrence, type and accumulation, freezing rain, thunderstorm, and runway surface sensors.

7.2.4 The information is transmitted over a discrete VHF radio frequency or the voice portion of a local NAVAID. AWOS transmissions on a discrete VHF radio frequency are engineered to be receivable to a maximum of 25 NM from the AWOS site and a maximum altitude of 10,000 feet AGL. At many locations, AWOS signals may be received on the surface of the airport, but local conditions may limit the maximum AWOS reception distance and/or altitude. The system transmits a 20 − to 30 − second weather message updated each minute. Pilots should monitor the designated frequency for the automated weather broadcast. A description of the broadcast is contained in Paragraph 7.3, Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) Broadcasts. There is no two − way communication capability. Most AWOS sites also have a dial − up capability so that the minute − by − minute weather messages can be accessed via telephone.

7.2.5 AWOS information (system level, frequency, phone number) concerning specific locations is published, as the systems become operational, in the Chart Supplement and, where applicable, on published Instrument Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Approach Procedure (IAP) charts. Selected individual systems may be incorporated into nationwide data collection and dissemination networks in the future.

7.3 AWOS Broadcasts. Computer − generated voice is used in AWOS to automate the broadcast of the minute − by − minute weather observations. In addition, some systems are configured to permit the addition of an operator − generated voice message; e.g., weather remarks, following the automated parameters. The phraseology used generally follows that used for other weather broadcasts. Following are explanations and examples of the exceptions.

7.3.1 Location and Time. The location/name and the phrase “AUTOMATED WEATHER OBSERVATION” followed by the time are announced.

7.3.1.1 If the airport’s specific location is included in the airport’s name, the airport’s name is announced.

EXAMPLE − “Bremerton National Airport automated weather observation one four five six zulu.” “Ravenswood Jackson County Airport automated weather observation one four five six zulu.” 7.3.1.2 If the airport’s specific location is not included in the airport’s name, the location is announced followed by the airport’s name.

EXAMPLE − “Sault Ste. Marie, Chippewa County International Airport automated weather observation.” “Sandusky, Cowley Field automated weather observation.” 7.3.1.3 The word “TEST” is added following “OBSERVATION” when the system is not in commissioned status.

EXAMPLE − “Bremerton National Airport automated weather observation test one four five six zulu.” 7.3.1.4 The phrase “TEMPORARILY INOPERATIVE” is added when the system is inoperative.

EXAMPLE − “Bremerton National Airport automated weather observing system temporarily inoperative.” 7.3.2 Ceiling and Sky Cover 7.3.2.1 Ceiling is announced as either “CEILING” or “INDEFINITE CEILING.” The phrases “MEASURED CEILING” and “ESTIMATED CEILING” are not used. With the exception of indefinite ceilings, all automated ceiling heights are measured.

EXAMPLE − “Bremerton National Airport automated weather observation one four five six zulu, ceiling two thousand overcast.” “Bremerton National Airport automated weather observation one four five six zulu, indefinite ceiling two hundred.” 7.3.2.2 The word “CLEAR” is not used in AWOS due to limitations in the height ranges of the sensors. No clouds detected is announced as, “No clouds below XXX” or, in newer systems as, “Clear below XXX” (where XXX is the range limit of the sensor).

EXAMPLE − “No clouds below one two thousand.” “Clear below one two thousand.” 7.3.2.3 A sensor for determining ceiling and sky cover is not included in some AWOS. In these systems, ceiling and sky cover are not announced. “SKY CONDITION MISSING” is announced only if the system is configured with a ceilometer, and the ceiling and sky cover information is not available.

7.3.3 Visibility Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 34 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.3.3.1 The lowest reportable visibility value in AWOS is “less than / .” It is announced as “VISIBILITY LESS THAN ONE QUARTER.” 7.3.3.2 A sensor for determining visibility is not included in some AWOSs. In these systems, visibility is not announced. “VISIBILITY MISSING” is announced only if the system is configured with a visibility sensor and visibility information is not available.

7.3.4 Weather. In the future, some AWOSs are to be configured to determine the occurrence of precipitation.

However, the type and intensity may not always be determined. In these systems, the word “PRECIPITATION” will be announced if precipitation is occurring, but the type and intensity are not determined.

7.3.5 Remarks. If remarks are included in the observation, the word “REMARKS” is announced following the altimeter setting. Remarks are announced in the following order of priority: 7.3.5.1 Automated “remarks.” a) Variable visibility.

b) Density altitude.

7.3.5.2 Manual input remarks. Manual input remarks are prefaced with the phrase “OBSERVER WEATHER.” As a general rule the manual remarks are limited to: a) Type and intensity of precipitation.

b) Thunderstorms, intensity (if applicable), and direction.

c) Obstructions to vision when the visibility is less than 7 miles.

EXAMPLE − “Remarks … density altitude, two thousand five hundred … visibility variable between one and two … wind direction variable between two four zero and three one zero … observed weather … thunderstorm moderate rain showers and mist … thunderstorm overhead.” 7.3.5.3 If an automated parameter is “missing” and no manual input for that parameter is available, the parameter is announced as “MISSING.” For example, a report with the dew point “missing,” and no manual input available, would be announced as follows: EXAMPLE − “Ceiling one thousand overcast, visibility three, precipitation, temperature three zero, dew point missing, wind calm, altimeter three zero zero one.” 7.3.5.4 “REMARKS” are announced in the following order of priority: a) Automated “REMARKS”: 1) Variable visibility.

2) Density altitude.

b) Manual Input “REMARKS.” As a general rule, the remarks are announced in the same order as the parameters appear in the basic text of the observation.

EXAMPLE − “Remarks, density altitude, two thousand five hundred, visibility variable between one and two, wind direction variable between two four zero and three one zero, observer ceiling estimated two thousand broken, observer temperature two, dew point minus five.” 7.4 Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS)/Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) 7.4.1 The ASOS/AWOS is the primary surface weather observing system of the U.S. The program to install and operate these systems throughout the U.S. is a joint effort of the NWS, the FAA and the Department of Defense.

ASOS/AWOS is designed to support aviation operations and weather forecast activities. The ASOS/AWOS will provide continuous minute-by-minute observations and perform the basic observing functions necessary to Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 generate an aviation routine weather report (METAR) and other aviation weather information. The information may be transmitted over a discrete VHF radio frequency or the voice portion of a local NAVAID. ASOS/AWOS transmissions on a discrete VHF radio frequency are engineered to be receivable to a maximum of 25 NM from the ASOS/AWOS site and a maximum altitude of 10,000 feet AGL. At many locations, ASOS/AWOS signals may be received on the surface of the airport, but local conditions may limit the maximum reception distance and/or altitude. While the automated system and the human may differ in their methods of data collection and interpretation, both produce an observation quite similar in form and content. For the “objective” elements such as pressure, ambient temperature, dew point temperature, wind, and precipitation accumulation, both the automated system and the observer use a fixed location and time-averaging technique. The quantitative differences between the observer and the automated observation of these elements are negligible. For the “subjective” elements, however, observers use a fixed time, spatial averaging technique to describe the visual elements (sky condition, visibility and present weather), while the automated systems use a fixed location, time averaging technique. Although this is a fundamental change, the manual and automated techniques yield remarkably similar results within the limits of their respective capabilities. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 26 and FIG GEN 3.5 − 27 , Key to Decode an ASOS/AWOS (METAR) Observation.

7.4.2 System Description 7.4.2.1 The ASOS/AWOS at each airport location consists of these main components: a) Individual weather sensors.

b) Data collection and processing units.

c) Peripherals and displays.

7.4.2.2 The ASOS/AWOS sensors perform the basic function of data acquisition. They continuously sample and measure the ambient environment, derive raw sensor data and make them available to the collection and processing units.

7.4.3 Every ASOS/AWOS will contain the following basic set of sensors.

7.4.3.1 Cloud height indicator (one or possibly three).

7.4.3.2 Visibility sensor (one or possibly three).

7.4.3.3 Precipitation identification sensor.

7.4.3.4 Freezing rain sensor.

7.4.3.5 Pressure sensors (two sensors at small airports; three sensors at large airports).

7.4.3.6 Ambient temperature/dew point temperature sensor.

7.4.3.7 Anemometer (wind direction and speed sensor).

7.4.3.8 Rainfall accumulation sensor.

7.4.3.9 Automated Lightning Detection and Reporting System (ALDARS) (excluding Alaska and Pacific Island sites).

7.4.4 The ASOS/AWOS data outlets include: 7.4.4.1 Those necessary for on − site airport users.

7.4.4.2 National communications networks.

7.4.4.3 Computer − generated voice (available through FAA radio broadcast to pilots and dial-in telephone line).

NOTE − Wind direction is reported relative to magnetic north in ATIS as well as ASOS and AWOS radio (voice) broadcasts.

7.5 A comparison of weather observing programs and the elements observed by each are in TBL GEN 3.5 − 6 , Weather Observing Programs.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 36 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.6 Service Standards. During 1995, a government/industry team worked to comprehensively reassess the requirements for surface observations at the nation’s airports. That work resulted in agreement on a set of service standards and the FAA and NWS ASOS sites to which the standards would apply. The term “Service Standards” refers to the level of detail in the weather observation. The service standards consist of four different levels of service (A, B, C, and D) as described below. Specific observational elements included in each service level are listed in TBL GEN 3.5 − 7 , Weather Observation Service Standards.

7.6.1 Service Level D defines the minimum acceptable level of service. It is a completely automated service in which the ASOS/AWOS observation will constitute the entire observation; i.e., no additional weather information is added by a human observer. This service is referred to as a stand alone D site.

7.6.2 Service Level C is a service in which the human observer, usually an air traffic controller, augments or adds information to the automated observation. Service Level C also includes backup of ASOS/AWOS elements in the event of an ASOS/AWOS malfunction or an unrepresentative ASOS/AWOS report.

7.6.3 In backup, the human observer inserts the correct or missing value for the automated ASOS/AWOS elements. This service is provided by air traffic controllers under the Limited Aviation Weather Reporting Station (LAWRS) process, FSS and NWS observers, and, at selected sites, Non − Federal Observation Program observers.

Two categories of airports require detail beyond Service Level C in order to enhance air traffic control efficiency and increase system capacity. Services at these airports are typically provided by contract weather observers, NWS observers, and, at some locations, FSS observers.

7.6.4 Service Level B is a service in which weather observations consist of all elements provided under Service Level C, plus augmentation of additional data beyond the capability of the ASOS/AWOS. This category of airports includes smaller hubs or airports special in other ways that have worse than average bad weather operations for thunderstorms and/or freezing/frozen precipitation, and/or that are remote airports.

7.6.5 Service Level A , the highest and most demanding category, includes all the data reported in Service Standard B, plus additional requirements as specified. Service Level A covers major aviation hubs and/or high volume traffic airports with average or worse weather.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 6 Weather Observing Programs Rainfall Density Condition Occurrence Lightning Remarks Precipitation Identification Runway Surface Element Reported Wind Visibility Altimeter Precipitation Occurrence Freezing Rain Temperature Dew Point Altimeter Cloud/Ceiling Accumulation Thunderstorm/ Type ASOS X X X X X X X X X X AWOS − A X AWOS − A/V X X AWOS − 1 X X X X AWOS − 2 X X X X X AWOS − 3 X X X X X X AWOS − 3P X X X X X X X AWOS − 3T X X X X X X X AWOS − 3P/T X X X X X X X X AWOS − 4 X X X X X X X X X X X X Manual X X X X X X X REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7900.5, Surface Weather Observing, for element reporting.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.5 − 7 Weather Observation Service Standards SERVICE LEVEL A Service Level A consists of all the elements of 10 minute longline RVR at precedented sites or Service Levels B, C and D plus the elements additional visibility increments of 1/8, 1/16 and 0 listed to the right, if observed. Sector visibility Variable sky condition Cloud layers above 12,000 feet and cloud types Widespread dust, sand and other obscurations Volcanic eruptions SERVICE LEVEL B Service Level B consists of all the elements of Longline RVR at precedented sites Service Levels C and D plus the elements listed to (may be instantaneous readout) the right, if observed. Freezing drizzle versus freezing rain Ice pellets Snow depth & snow increasing rapidly remarks Thunderstorm and lightning location remarks Observed significant weather not at the station remarks SERVICE LEVEL C Service Level C consists of all the elements of Service Thunderstorms Level D plus augmentation and backup by a human Tornadoes observer or an air traffic control specialist on location Hail nearby. Backup consists of inserting the correct value if Virga the system malfunctions or is unrepresentative. Volcanic ash Augmentation consists of adding the elements listed to Tower visibility the right, if observed. During hours that the observing Operationally significant remarks as deemed facility is closed, the site reverts to Service Level D. appropriate by the observer SERVICE LEVEL D This level of service consists of an ASOS or AWOS Wind continually measuring the atmosphere at a point near the Visibility runway. The ASOS or AWOS senses and measures the Precipitation/Obstruction to vision weather parameters listed to the right. Cloud height Sky cover Temperature Dew point Altimeter 8. Weather Radar Services 8.1 The National Weather Service operates a network of radar sites for detecting coverage, intensity, and movement of precipitation. The network is supplemented by FAA and DoD radar sites in the western sections of the country. Local warning radars augment the network by operating on an as needed basis to support warning and forecast programs.

8.2 Scheduled radar observations are taken hourly and transmitted in alpha − numeric format on weather telecommunications circuits for flight planning purposes. Under certain conditions special radar reports are issued in addition to the hourly transmittals. Data contained in the reports is also collected by the National Meteorological Center and used to prepare hourly national radar summary charts for dissemination on facsimile circuits.

8.3 All En route Flight Advisory Service facilities and many Automated Flight Service Stations have equipment to directly access the radar displays from the individual weather radar sites. Specialists at these locations are trained to interpret the display for pilot briefing and inflight advisory services. The Center Weather Service Units Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 38 United States of America 22 JAN 26 located in the ARTCCs also have access to weather radar displays and provide support to all air traffic facilities within their center’s area.

8.4 A clear radar display (no echoes) does not mean that there is no significant weather within the coverage of the radar site. Clouds and fog are not detected by the radar. However, when echoes are present, turbulence can be implied by the intensity of the precipitation, and icing is implied by the presence of the precipitation at temperatures at or below zero degrees Celsius. Used in conjunction with other weather products, radar provides invaluable information for weather avoidance and flight planning.

8.5 Additional information on weather radar products and services can be found in the Aviation Weather Handbook , FAA − H − 8083 − 28.

REFERENCE − Pilot/Controller Glossary Term − Precipitation Radar Weather Descriptions.

AIP, GEN 3.5 , Para 26. , Thunderstorms.

Chart Supplement, Charts, NWS Upper Air Observing Stations and Weather Network for the location of specific radar sites.

9. ATC Inflight Weather Avoidance Assistance 9.1 ATC Radar Weather Display 9.1.1 ATC radars are able to display areas of precipitation by sending out a beam of radio energy that is reflected back to the radar antenna when it strikes an object or moisture which may be in the form of rain drops, hail, or snow. The larger the object is, or the more dense its reflective surface, the stronger the return will be presented.

Radar weather processors indicate the intensity of reflective returns in terms of decibels (dBZ). ATC systems cannot detect the presence or absence of clouds. The ATC systems can often determine the intensity of a precipitation area, but the specific character of that area (snow, rain, hail, VIRGA, etc.) cannot be determined.

For this reason, ATC refers to all weather areas displayed on ATC radar scopes as “precipitation.” 9.1.2 All ATC facilities using radar weather processors with the ability to determine precipitation intensity, will describe the intensity to pilots as: 9.1.2.1 “LIGHT” (< 26 dBZ) 9.1.2.2 “MODERATE” (26 to 40 dBZ) 9.1.2.3 “HEAVY” (> 40 to 50 dBZ) 9.1.2.4 “EXTREME” (> 50 dBZ) NOTE − En Route ATC radar’s Weather and Radar Processor (WARP) does not display light precipitation intensity.

9.1.3 ATC facilities that, due to equipment limitations, cannot display the intensity levels of precipitation, will describe the location of the precipitation area by geographic position, or position relative to the aircraft. Since the intensity level is not available, the controller will state “INTENSITY UNKNOWN.” 9.1.4 ARTCC facilities normally use a Weather and Radar Processor (WARP) to display a mosaic of data obtained from multiple NEXRAD sites. There is a time delay between actual conditions and those displayed to the controller. For example, the precipitation data on the ARTCC controller’s display could be up to 6 minutes old. When the WARP is not available, a second system, the narrowband Air Route Surveillance Radar (ARSR) can display two distinct levels of precipitation intensity that will be described to pilots as “MODERATE” (26 to 40 dBZ) and “HEAVY TO EXTREME” ( > 40 dBZ ). The WARP processor is only used in ARTCC facilities.

9.1.5 ATC radar is not able to detect turbulence. Generally, turbulence can be expected to occur as the rate of rainfall or intensity of precipitation increases. Turbulence associated with greater rates of rainfall/precipitation will normally be more severe than any associated with lesser rates of rainfall/precipitation. Turbulence should be expected to occur near convective activity, even in clear air. Thunderstorms are a form of convective activity that imply severe or greater turbulence. Operation within 20 miles of thunderstorms should be approached with great caution, as the severity of turbulence can be markedly greater than the precipitation intensity might indicate.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.2 Weather Avoidance Assistance 9.2.1 To the extent possible, controllers will issue pertinent information of weather or chaff areas and assist pilots in avoiding such areas if requested. Pilots should respond to a weather advisory by either acknowledging the advisory or by acknowledging the advisory and requesting an alternative course of action as follows: 9.2.1.1 Request to deviate off course by stating a heading or degrees, direction of deviation, and approximate number of miles. In this case, when the requested deviation is approved, navigation is at the pilot’s prerogative, but must maintain the altitude assigned, and remain within the lateral restrictions issued by ATC.

9.2.1.2 An approval for lateral deviation authorizes the pilot to maneuver left or right within the lateral limits specified in the clearance.

NOTE − 1. It is often necessary for ATC to restrict the amount of lateral deviation (“twenty degrees right,” “up to fifteen degrees left,” “up to ten degrees left or right of course”).

2. The term “when able, proceed direct,” in an ATC weather deviation clearance, refers to the pilot’s ability to remain clear of the weather when returning to course/route.

9.2.1.3 Request a new route to avoid the affected area.

9.2.1.4 Request a change of altitude.

9.2.1.5 Request radar vectors around the affected areas.

9.2.2 For obvious reasons of safety, an IFR pilot must not deviate from the course or altitude/flight level without a proper ATC clearance. When weather conditions encountered are so severe that an immediate deviation is determined to be necessary and time will not permit approval by ATC, the pilot’s emergency authority may be exercised.

9.2.3 When the pilot requests clearance for a route deviation or for an ATC radar vector, the controller must evaluate the air traffic picture in the affected area and coordinate with other controllers (if ATC jurisdictional boundaries may be crossed) before replying to the request.

9.2.4 It should be remembered that the controller’s primary function is to provide safe separation between aircraft. Any additional service, such as weather avoidance assistance, can only be provided to the extent that it does not derogate the primary function. It is also worth noting that the separation workload is generally greater than normal when weather disrupts the usual flow of traffic. ATC radar limitations and frequency congestion may also be factors in limiting the controller’s capability to provide additional service.

9.2.5 It is very important that the request for deviation or radar vector be forwarded to ATC as far in advance as possible. Delay in submitting it may delay or even preclude ATC approval or require that additional restrictions be placed on the clearance. Insofar as possible, the following information should be furnished to ATC when requesting clearance to detour around weather activity: 9.2.5.1 Proposed point where detour will commence.

9.2.5.2 Proposed route and extent of detour (direction and distance).

9.2.5.3 Point where original route will be resumed.

9.2.5.4 Flight conditions (IFR or VFR).

9.2.5.5 Any further deviation that may become necessary as the flight progresses.

9.2.5.6 Advise if the aircraft is equipped with functioning airborne radar.

9.2.6 To a large degree, the assistance that might be rendered by ATC will depend upon the weather information available to controllers. Due to the extremely transitory nature of severe weather situations, the controller’s weather information may be of only limited value if based on weather observed on radar only. Frequent updates by pilots giving specific information as to the area affected, altitudes, intensity, and nature of the severe weather can be of considerable value. Such reports are relayed by radio or phone to other pilots and controllers, and they also receive widespread teletypewriter dissemination.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 40 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.2.7 Obtaining IFR clearance or an ATC radar vector to circumnavigate severe weather can often be accommodated more readily in the en route areas away from terminals because there is usually less congestion and, therefore, greater freedom of action. In terminal areas, the problem is more acute because of traffic density, ATC coordination requirements, complex departure and arrival routes, and adjacent airports. As a consequence, controllers are less likely to be able to accommodate all requests for weather detours in a terminal area or be in a position to volunteer such routes to the pilot. Nevertheless, pilots should not hesitate to advise controllers of any observed severe weather and should specifically advise controllers if they desire circumnavigation of observed weather.

9.3 ATC Severe Weather Avoidance Plans 9.3.1 Air Route Traffic Control Centers and some Terminal Radar Control facilities utilize plans for severe weather avoidance within their control areas. Aviation − oriented meteorologists provide weather information.

Preplanned alternate route packages developed by the facilities are used in conjunction with flow restrictions to ensure a more orderly flow of traffic during periods of severe or adverse weather conditions.

9.3.2 During these periods, pilots may expect to receive alternative route clearances. These routes are predicated upon the forecasts of the meteorologist and coordination between the Air Traffic Control System Command Center and the other centers. The routes are utilized as necessary in order to allow as many aircraft as possible to operate in any given area, and frequently they will deviate from the normal preferred routes. With user cooperation, this plan may significantly reduce delays.

9.4 Procedures for Weather Deviations and Other Contingencies in Oceanic Controlled Airspace 9.4.1 See ENR 7.3, paragraph 4, Weather Deviation Procedures.

10. Notifications Required From Operators 10.1 Preflight briefing and flight documentation services provided by FSSs do not require prior notification.

10.2 Preflight briefing and flight documentation services provided by a National Weather Service Office (or contract office) are available upon request for long − range international flights for which meteorological data packages are prepared for the pilot − in − command. Briefing times should be coordinated between the local representative and the local meteorological office.

10.3 Flight Service Stations do not normally have the capability to prepare meteorological data packages for a preflight briefing.

11. Weather Observing Systems and Operating Procedures For surface wind readings, most meteorological reporting stations have a direct reading, 3 − cup anemometer wind system for which a 1 − minute mean wind speed and direction (based on true north) is taken. Some stations also have a continuous wind speed recorder which is used in determining the gustiness of the wind.

12. Runway Visual Range (RVR) There are currently two configurations of the RVR, commonly identified as Taskers and New Generation RVR.

The Taskers use transmissometer technology. The New Generation RVRs use forward scatter technology and are currently being deployed to replace the existing Taskers.

12.1 RVR values are measured by transmissometers mounted on 14 − foot towers along the runway. A full RVR system consists of: 12.1.1 A transmissometer projector and related items.

12.1.2 A transmissometer receiver (detector) and related items.

12.1.3 An analog recorder.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 41 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.1.4 A signal data converter and related items.

12.1.5 A remote digital or remote display programmer.

12.2 The transmissometer projector and receiver are mounted on towers 250 feet apart. A known intensity of light is emitted from the projector and is measured by the receiver. Any obscuring matter, such as rain, snow, dust, fog, haze, or smoke, reduces the light intensity arriving at the receiver. The resultant intensity measurement is then converted to an RVR value by the signal data converter. These values are displayed by readout equipment in the associated air traffic facility and updated approximately once every minute for controller issuance to pilots.

12.3 The signal data converter receives information on the high − intensity runway edge light setting in use (step 3, 4, or 5), transmission values from the transmissometer, and the sensing of day or night conditions. From the three data sources, the system will compute appropriate RVR values.

12.4 An RVR transmissometer established on a 250 − foot baseline provides digital readouts to a minimum of 600 feet, which are displayed in 200 − foot increments to 3,000 feet, and in 500 − foot increments from 3,000 feet to a maximum value of 6,000 feet.

12.5 RVR values for Category IIIa operations extend down to 700 − foot RVR; however, only 600 and 800 feet are reportable RVR increments. The 800 RVR reportable value covers a range of 701 feet to 900 feet and is therefore a valid minimum indication of Category IIIa operations.

12.6 Approach categories with the corresponding minimum RVR values are listed in TBL GEN 3.5 − 8 .

TBL GEN 3.5 − 8 Category Visibility (RVR) Nonprecision 2,400 feet Category I 1,800 feet* Category II 1,000 feet Category IIIa 700 feet Category IIIb 150 feet Category IIIc 0 feet * 1,400 feet with special equipment and authorization 12.7 Ten − minute maximum and minimum RVR values for the designated RVR runway are reported in the body of the aviation weather report when the prevailing visibility is less than 1 mile and/or the RVR is 6,000 feet or less. ATCTs report RVR when the prevailing visibility is 1 mile or less and/or the RVR is 6,000 feet or less.

12.8 Details on the requirements for the operational use of RVR are contained in FAA Advisory Circular 97 − 1, “Runway Visual Range (RVR).” Pilots are responsible for compliance with minimums prescribed for their class of operations in appropriate Federal Aviation Regulations and/or operations specifications.

12.8.1 RVR values are also measured by forward scatter meters mounted on 14 − foot frangible fiberglass poles.

A full RVR system consists of: 12.8.1.1 Forward scatter meter with a transmitter, receiver and associated items.

12.8.1.2 A runway light intensity monitor (RLIM).

12.8.1.3 An ambient light sensor (ALS).

12.8.1.4 A data processor unit (DPU).

12.8.1.5 A controller display (CD).

12.8.2 The forward scatter meter is mounted on a 14 − foot frangible pole. Infrared light is emitted from the transmitter and received by the receiver. Any obscuring matter such as rain, snow, dust, fog, haze, or smoke increases the amount of scattered light reaching the receiver. The resulting measurement along with inputs from Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 42 United States of America 22 JAN 26 the runway light intensity monitor and the ambient light sensor are forwarded to the DPU which calculates the proper RVR value. The RVR values are displayed locally and remotely on controller displays.

12.8.3 The runway light intensity monitors both the runway edge and centerline light step settings (steps 1 through 5). Centerline light step settings are used for CAT IIIb operations. Edge light step settings are used for CAT I, II, and IIIa operations.

12.8.4 New Generation RVRs can measure and display RVR values down to the lowest limits of Category IIIb operations (150 foot RVR). RVR values are displayed in 100 − foot increments and are reported as follows: 12.8.4.1 100 − foot increments for products below 800 feet.

12.8.4.2 200 − foot increments for products between 800 feet and 3,000 feet.

12.8.4.3 500 − foot increments for products between 3,000 feet and 6,500 feet.

12.8.4.4 25 − meter increments for products below 150 meters.

12.8.4.5 50 − meter increments for products between 150 meters and 800 meters.

12.8.4.6 100 − meter increments for products between 800 meters and 1,200 meters.

12.8.4.7 200 − meter increments for products between 1,200 meters and 2,000 meters.

13. Reporting of Cloud Heights 13.1 Ceiling, by definition in Federal Aviation Regulations, and as used in Aviation Weather Reports and Forecasts, is the height above ground (or water) level of the lowest layer of clouds or obscuring phenomenon that is reported as “broken,” “overcast,” or “the vertical visibility into an obscuration.” For example, an aerodrome forecast which reads “BKN030” refers to heights above ground level (AGL). An area forecast which reads “BKN030” states that the height is above mean sea level (MSL). See FIG GEN 3.5 − 24 for the Key to Routine Aviation Weather Reports and Forecasts for the definition of “broken,” “overcast,” and “obscuration.” 13.2 Information on cloud base height is obtained by use of ceilometers (rotating or fixed beam), ceiling lights, ceiling balloons, pilot reports, and observer estimations. The systems in use by most reporting stations are either the observer estimation or the rotating beam ceilometer.

13.3 Pilots usually report height values above mean sea level, since they determine heights by the altimeter. This is taken into account when disseminating and otherwise applying information received from pilots. (“Ceiling” heights are always above ground level.) In reports disseminated as pilot reports, height references are given the same as received from pilots; that is, above mean sea level.

13.4 In area forecasts or inflight Advisories, ceilings are denoted by the contraction “CIG” when used with sky cover symbols as in “LWRG TO CIG OVC005,” or the contraction “AGL” after the forecast cloud height value.

When the cloud base is given in height above mean sea level, it is so indicated by the contraction “MSL” or “ASL” following the height value. The heights of cloud tops, freezing level, icing, and turbulence are always given in heights above mean sea level (ASL or MSL).

14. Reporting Prevailing Visibility 14.1 Surface (horizontal) visibility is reported in METAR reports in terms of statute miles and increments 3/ 5/ 3/ 1/ 5/ 1 1 1 3 7 1 thereof; e.g., / , / , , / , , , , , / , / , 1, 1 / , etc. (Visibility reported by an unaugmented 16 8 16 4 16 8 2 8 4 8 8 1 1/ 1 1/ 3 1 automated site is reported differently than in a manual report; i.e., ASOS/AWOS: 0, / , , / , , / , 1, 1 / 16 8 4 2 4 4, 1/ 3/ 1/ 1 1 1/ 3 1 1/ 3/ 1/ 1 1 2, 2 3, 4, 5, etc., AWOS: M / , / , , / , 1, 1 / , 1 1 2, 2 3, 4, 5, etc.) Visibility is 2, 4, 2, 4 4 2 4 4 2, 4, 2, determined through the ability to see and identify preselected and prominent objects at a known distance from the usual point of observation. Visibilities which are determined to be less than 7 miles, identify the obscuring atmospheric condition; e.g., fog, haze, smoke, etc., or combinations thereof.

14.2 Prevailing visibility is the greatest visibility equaled or exceeded throughout at least one − half the horizon circle, not necessarily contiguous. Segments of the horizon circle which may have a significantly different Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 43 United States of America 22 JAN 26 visibility may be reported in the remarks section of the weather report; i.e., the southeastern quadrant of the horizon circle may be determined to be 2 miles in mist while the remaining quadrants are determined to be 3 miles in mist.

14.3 When the prevailing visibility at the usual point of observation, or at the tower level, is less than 4 miles, certificated tower personnel will take visibility observations in addition to those taken at the usual point of observation. The lower of these two values will be used as the prevailing visibility for aircraft operations.

15. Estimating Intensity of Rain and Ice Pellets 15.1 Rain 15.1.1 Light. From scattered drops that, regardless of duration, do not completely wet an exposed surface up to a condition where individual drops are easily seen.

15.1.2 Moderate. Individual drops are not clearly identifiable; spray is observable just above pavements and other hard surfaces.

15.1.3 Heavy. Rain seemingly falls in sheets; individual drops are not identifiable; heavy spray to a height of several inches is observed over hard surfaces.

15.2 Ice Pellets 15.2.1 Light. Scattered pellets that do not completely cover an exposed surface regardless of duration.

Visibility is not affected.

15.2.2 Moderate. Slow accumulation on the ground. Visibility is reduced by ice pellets to less than 7 statute miles.

15.2.3 Heavy. Rapid accumulation on the ground. Visibility is reduced by ice pellets to less than 3 statute miles.

16. Estimating the Intensity of Snow or Drizzle (Based on Visibility) / statute mile.

16.1 Light. Visibility more than 1 1 16.2 Moderate. Visibility from more than / statute mile to / statute mile.

4 2 16.3 Heavy. Visibility / statute mile or less.

17. Pilot Weather Reports (PIREPs) 17.1 FAA air traffic facilities are required to solicit PIREPs when the following conditions are reported or forecast: ceilings at or below 5,000 feet, visibility at or below 5 miles (surface or aloft), thunderstorms and related phenomena, icing of a light degree or greater, turbulence of a moderate degree or greater, wind shear, and reported or forecast volcanic ash clouds, including the presence of sulphur gases (SO or H S). SO is identifiable 2 2 2 as the sharp, acrid odor of a freshly struck match. H S, also known as sewer gas, has the odor of rotten eggs.

Electrical smoke and fire and SO are two odors described as somewhat similar.

NOTE − After determining there are no secondary indications that would result from and indicate an electrical fire, the flight crew must establish whether the sulphur odor is transient or not. This is best achieved by flight crew donning oxygen mask(s) and breathing 100 percent oxygen for the period of time that results in a complete change of air within the cockpit and also allows the sense of smell to be regained. After the appropriate time period, the flight crew should remove the oxygen mask and determine if the odor is still present. The detection of sulphur gases are to be reported as SO to conform to ICAO practices.

17.2 Pilots are urged to cooperate and promptly volunteer reports of these conditions and other atmospheric data, such as cloud bases, tops and layers, flight visibility, precipitation, visibility restrictions (haze, smoke, and dust), wind at altitude, and temperature aloft.

17.3 PIREPs should be given to the ground facility with which communications are established; i.e., FSS, ARTCC, or terminal ATC. One of the primary duties of the Inflight position is to serve as a collection point for the exchange of PIREPs with en route aircraft.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 44 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17.4 If pilots do not make PIREPs by radio, it is helpful if, upon landing, they report to the nearest FSS or Weather Forecast Office the inflight conditions which they encountered. Some of the uses made of the reports are: 17.4.1 The ATCT uses the reports to expedite the flow of air traffic in the vicinity of the field and for hazardous weather avoidance procedures.

17.4.2 The FSS uses the reports to brief other pilots, to provide inflight advisories and weather avoidance information to en route aircraft.

17.4.3 The ARTCC uses the reports to expedite the flow of en route traffic, to determine most favorable altitudes, and to issue hazardous weather information within the center’s area.

17.4.4 The NWS uses the reports to verify or amend conditions contained in aviation forecasts and advisories; (In some cases, pilot reports of hazardous conditions are the triggering mechanism for the issuance of advisories.)

17.4.5 The NWS, other government organizations, the military, and private industry groups use PIREPs for research activities in the study of meteorological phenomena.

17.4.6 All air traffic facilities and the NWS forward the reports received from pilots into the weather distribution system to assure the information is made available to all pilots and other interested parties.

17.5 The FAA, NWS, and other organizations that enter PIREPs into the weather reporting system use the format listed in TBL GEN 3.5 − 9, PIREP Element Code Chart . Items 1 through 6 are included in all transmitted PIREPs along with one or more of items 7 through 13. Although the PIREP should be as complete and concise as possible, pilots should not be overly concerned with strict format or phraseology. The important thing is that the information is relayed so other pilots may benefit from your observation. If a portion of the report needs clarification, the ground station will request the information.

17.6 Completed PIREPs will be transmitted to weather circuits as in the following examples: EXAMPLE − KCMH UA/OV APE 230010/TM 1516/FL085/TP BE20/SK BKN065/WX FV03SM HZ FU/TA 20/TB LGT.

Translation: one zero miles southwest of Appleton VOR; time 1516 UTC; altitude eight thousand five hundred; aircraft type BE20; base of the broken cloud layer is six thousand five hundred; flight visibility 3 miles with haze and smoke; air temperature 20 degrees Celsius; light turbulence.

EXAMPLE − KCRW UA/OV KBKW 360015 − KCRW/TM 1815/ FL120/TP BE99/SK IMC/WX RA − /TA M08/WV 290030/TB LGT − MDT/IC LGT RIME/RM MDT MXD ICG DURC KROA NWBND FL080 − 100 1750Z.

Translation: from 15 miles north of Beckley VOR to Charleston VOR; time 1815 UTC; altitude 12,000 feet; type aircraft, BE − 99; in clouds; rain; temperature minus 8 Celsius; wind 290 degrees magnetic at 30 knots; light to moderate turbulence; light rime icing during climb northwestbound from Roanoke, VA, between 8,000 and 10,000 feet at 1750 UTC.

17.7 For more detailed information on PIREPs, users can refer to the current version of the Aviation Weather Handbook , FAA − H − 8083 − 28.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 45 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.5 − 9 PIREP Element Code Chart PIREP ELEMENT PIREP CODE CONTENTS 1. 3 − letter station identifier XXX Nearest weather reporting location to the reported phenomenon 2. Report type UA or UUA Routine or urgent PIREP 3. Location /OV In relation to a VOR 4. Time /TM Coordinated Universal Time 5. Altitude /FL Essential for turbulence and icing reports 6. Type aircraft /TP Essential for turbulence and icing reports 7. Sky cover /SK Cloud height and coverage (sky clear, few, scattered, broken, or overcast) 8. Weather /WX Flight visibility, precipitation, restrictions to visibility, etc.

9. Temperature /TA Degrees Celsius 10. Wind /WV Direction in degrees magnetic north and speed in knots 11. Turbulence /TB See paragraph 21.

12. Icing /IC See paragraph 19.

13. Remarks /RM For reporting elements not included or to clarify previously reported items 18. Mandatory MET Points 18.1 Within the ICAO CAR/SAM Regions and within the U.S. area of responsibility, several mandatory MET reporting points have been established. These points are located within the Houston, Miami, and San Juan Flight Information Regions (FIR). These points have been established for flights between the South American and Caribbean Regions and Europe, Canada and the U.S.

18.2 Mandatory MET Reporting Points Within the Houston FIR Point For Flights Between ABBOT Acapulco and Montreal, New York, Toronto, Mexico City and New Orleans.

ALARD New Orleans and Belize, Guatemala, San Pedro Sula, Mexico City and Miami, Tampa.

ARGUS Toronto and Guadalajara, Mexico City, New Orleans and Mexico City.

SWORD Dallas − Fort Worth, New Orleans, Chicago and Cancun, Cozumel, and Central America.

18.3 Mandatory MET Reporting Points Within the Miami FIR Point For Flights Between Grand New York and Aruba, Curacao, Kingston, Miami and Belem, St. Thomas, Rio de Janeiro, San Paulo, Turk St. Croix, Kingston and Bermuda.

GRATX Madrid and Miami, Havana.

MAPYL New York and Guayaquil, Montego Bay, Panama, Lima, Atlanta and San Juan.

RESIN New Orleans and San Juan.

SLAPP New York and Aruba, Curacao, Kingston, Port − au − Prince. Bermuda and Freeport, Nassau. New York and Barranquilla, Bogota, Santo Domingo, Washington and Santo Domingo, Atlanta and San Juan.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 46 United States of America 22 JAN 26 18.4 Mandatory MET Reporting Points Within the San Juan FIR Point For Flights Between GRANN Toronto and Barbados, New York and Fort de France. At intersection of routes A321, A523, G432.

KRAFT San Juan and Buenos Aires, Caracas, St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. Maarten, San Juan, Kingston and Bermuda.

PISAX New York and Barbados, Fort de France, Bermuda and Antigua, Barbados.

19. PIREPs Relating to Airframe Icing 19.1 The effects of ice accretion on aircraft are: cumulative − thrust is reduced, drag increases, lift lessens, weight increases. The results are an increase in stall speed and a deterioration of aircraft performance. In extreme cases, 2 to 3 inches of ice can form on the leading edge of the airfoil in less than 5 minutes. It takes but / inch of ice to reduce the lifting power of some aircraft by 50 percent and to increase the frictional drag by an equal percentage.

19.2 A pilot can expect icing when flying in visible precipitation, such as rain or cloud droplets, and the temperature is between +02 and − 10 degrees Celsius. When icing is detected, a pilot should do one of two things (particularly if the aircraft is not equipped with deicing equipment). The pilot should get out of the area of precipitation or go to an altitude where the temperature is above freezing. This “warmer” altitude may not always be a lower altitude. Proper preflight action includes obtaining information on the freezing level and the above − freezing levels in precipitation areas. Report the icing to an ATC or FSS facility, and if operating IFR, request new routing or altitude if icing will be a hazard. Be sure to give the type of aircraft to ATC when reporting icing. TBL GEN 3.5 − 10 describes how to report icing conditions.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 10 Intensity Ice Accumulation Trace Ice becomes noticeable. The rate of accumulation is slightly greater than the rate of sublimation. A representative accretion rate for reference purposes is less than ¼ inch (6 mm) per hour on the outer wing. The pilot should consider exiting the icing conditions before they become worse.

Light The rate of ice accumulation requires occasional cycling of manual deicing systems to minimize ice accretions on the airframe. A representative accretion rate for reference purposes is ¼ inch to 1 inch (0.6 to 2.5 cm) per hour on the unprotected part of the outer wing. The pilot should consider exiting the icing condition.

Moderate The rate of ice accumulation requires frequent cycling of manual deicing systems to minimize ice accretions on the airframe. A representative accretion rate for reference purposes is 1 to 3 inches (2.5 to 7.5 cm) per hour on the unprotected part of the outer wing. The pilot should consider exiting the icing condition as soon as possible.

Severe The rate of ice accumulation is such that ice protection systems fail to remove the accumulation of ice and ice accumulates in locations not normally prone to icing, such as areas aft of protected surfaces and any other areas identified by the manufacturer. A representative accretion rate for reference purposes is more than 3 inches (7.5 cm) per hour on the unprotected part of the outer wing. By regulation, immediate exit is required.

Pilot Report: Aircraft Identification, Location, Time (UTC), Intensity of Type , Altitude/FL, Aircraft Type, Indicated Air Speed (IAS), and Outside Air Temperature (OAT) .

Rime or Clear Ice: Rime ice is a rough, milky, opaque ice formed by the instantaneous freezing of small supercooled water droplets. Clear ice is a glossy, clear, or translucent ice formed by the relatively slow freezing of large supercooled water droplets.

The Outside Air Temperature (OAT) should be requested by the FSS or ATC if not included in the PIREP.

NOTE − Severe icing is aircraft dependent, as are the other categories of icing intensity. Severe icing may occur at any ice accumulation rate when the icing rate or ice accumulations exceed the tolerance of the aircraft.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 47 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20. Definitions of Inflight Icing Terms See TBL GEN 3.5 − 11 , Icing Types, and TBL GEN 3.5 − 12 , Icing Conditions.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 11 Icing Types Clear Ice See Glaze Ice.

Glaze Ice Ice, sometimes clear and smooth, but usually containing some air pockets, which results in a lumpy translucent appearance. Glaze ice results from supercooled drops/droplets striking a surface but not freezing rapidly on contact. Glaze ice is denser, harder, and sometimes more transparent than rime ice. Factors, which favor glaze formation, are those that favor slow dissipation of the heat of fusion (i.e., slight supercooling and rapid accretion). With larger accretions, the ice shape typically includes “horns” protruding from unprotected leading edge surfaces. It is the ice shape, rather than the clarity or color of the ice, which is most likely to be accurately assessed from the cockpit. The terms “clear” and “glaze” have been used for essentially the same type of ice accretion, although some reserve “clear” for thinner accretions which lack horns and conform to the airfoil.

Intercycle Ice Ice which accumulates on a protected surface between actuation cycles of a deicing system.

Known or Observed or Actual ice observed visually to be on the aircraft by the flight crew or identified by on − board Detected Ice Accretion sensors.

Mixed Ice Simultaneous appearance or a combination of rime and glaze ice characteristics. Since the clarity, color, and shape of the ice will be a mixture of rime and glaze characteristics, accurate identification of mixed ice from the cockpit may be difficult.

Residual Ice Ice which remains on a protected surface immediately after the actuation of a deicing system.

Rime Ice A rough, milky, opaque ice formed by the rapid freezing of supercooled drops/droplets after they strike the aircraft. The rapid freezing results in air being trapped, giving the ice its opaque appearance and making it porous and brittle. Rime ice typically accretes along the stagnation line of an airfoil and is more regular in shape and conformal to the airfoil than glaze ice. It is the ice shape, rather than the clarity or color of the ice, which is most likely to be accurately assessed from the cockpit.

Runback Ice Ice which forms from the freezing or refreezing of water leaving protected surfaces and running back to unprotected surfaces.

Note − Ice types are difficult for the pilot to discern and have uncertain effects on an airplane in flight. Ice type definitions will be included in the AIP for use in the “Remarks” section of the PIREP and for use in forecasting.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 48 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL GEN 3.5 − 12 Icing Conditions Appendix C Icing Conditions Appendix C (14 CFR, Part 25 and 29) is the certification icing condition standard for approving ice protection provisions on aircraft. The conditions are specified in terms of altitude, temperature, liquid water content (LWC), representative droplet size (mean effective drop diameter [MED]), and cloud horizontal extent.

Forecast Icing Conditions Environmental conditions expected by a National Weather Service or an FAA − approved weather provider to be conducive to the formation of inflight icing on aircraft.

Freezing Drizzle (FZDZ) Drizzle is precipitation at ground level or aloft in the form of liquid water drops which have diameters less than 0.5 mm and greater than 0.05 mm. Freezing drizzle is drizzle that exists at air temperatures less than 0 C (supercooled), remains in liquid form, and freezes upon contact with objects on the surface or airborne.

Freezing Precipitation Freezing precipitation is freezing rain or freezing drizzle falling through or outside of visible cloud.

Freezing Rain (FZRA) Rain is precipitation at ground level or aloft in the form of liquid water drops which have diameters greater than 0.5 mm. Freezing rain is rain that exists at air temperatures less than 0 C (supercooled), remains in liquid form, and freezes upon contact with objects on the ground or in the air.

Icing in Cloud Icing occurring within visible cloud. Cloud droplets (diameter < 0.05 mm) will be present; freezing drizzle and/or freezing rain may or may not be present.

Icing in Precipitation Icing occurring from an encounter with freezing precipitation, that is, supercooled drops with diameters exceeding 0.05 mm, within or outside of visible cloud.

Known Icing Conditions Atmospheric conditions in which the formation of ice is observed or detected in flight.

Note − Because of the variability in space and time of atmospheric conditions, the existence of a report of observed icing does not assure the presence or intensity of icing conditions at a later time, nor can a report of no icing assure the absence of icing conditions at a later time.

Potential Icing Conditions Atmospheric icing conditions that are typically defined by airframe manufacturers relative to temperature and visible moisture that may result in aircraft ice accretion on the ground or in flight. The potential icing conditions are typically defined in the Airplane Flight Manual or in the Airplane Operation Manual.

Supercooled Drizzle Drops Synonymous with freezing drizzle aloft.

(SCDD) Supercooled Drops or /Droplets Water drops/droplets which remain unfrozen at temperatures below 0 C.

Supercooled drops are found in clouds, freezing drizzle, and freezing rain in the atmosphere. These drops may impinge and freeze after contact on aircraft surfaces.

Supercooled Large Drops (SLD) Liquid droplets with diameters greater than 0.05 mm at temperatures less than 0 C, i.e., freezing rain or freezing drizzle.

21. PIREPs Relating to Turbulence 21.1 When encountering turbulence, pilots are urgently requested to report such conditions to ATC as soon as practicable. PIREPs relating to turbulence should state: 21.1.1 Aircraft location.

21.1.2 Time of occurrence in UTC.

21.1.3 Turbulence intensity.

21.1.4 Whether the turbulence occurred in or near clouds.

21.1.5 Aircraft altitude, or flight level.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 49 United States of America 22 JAN 26 21.1.6 Type of aircraft.

21.1.7 Duration of turbulence.

EXAMPLE − 1. Over Omaha, 1232Z, moderate turbulence in clouds at Flight Level three one zero, Boeing 707.

2. From five zero miles south of Albuquerque to three zero miles north of Phoenix, 1250Z, occasional moderate chop at Flight Level three three zero, DC8.

21.2 Duration and classification of intensity should be made using TBL GEN 3.5 − 13 , Turbulence Reporting Criteria Table.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 13 Turbulence Reporting Criteria Table Intensity Aircraft Reaction Reaction inside Aircraft Reporting Term − Definition Light Turbulence that momentarily causes Occupants may feel a slight strain Occasional − Less than / of the time.

slight, erratic changes in altitude against seat belts or shoulder straps.

1 2 and/or attitude (pitch, roll, yaw). Unsecured objects may be displaced Intermittent − / to / 3 3.

Report as Light Turbulence; slightly. Food service may be or conducted, and little or no difficulty is Continuous − More than / 3.

Turbulence that causes slight, rapid encountered in walking.

and somewhat rhythmic bumpiness without appreciable changes in altitude or attitude. Report as Light Chop.

NOTE Moderate Turbulence that is similar to Light Occupants feel definite strains against 1. Pilots should report location(s), time Turbulence but of greater intensity. seat belts or shoulder straps.

(UTC), intensity, whether in or near Changes in altitude and/or attitude Unsecured objects are dislodged. Food clouds, altitude, type of aircraft and, occur, but the aircraft remains in service and walking are difficult.

when applicable, duration of positive control at all times. It usually turbulence.

causes variations in indicated airspeed.

Report as Moderate Turbulence; 2. Duration may be based on time or between two locations or over a single Turbulence that is similar to Light location. All locations should be Chop but of greater intensity. It causes readily identifiable.

rapid bumps or jolts without appreciable changes in aircraft altitude or attitude. Report as Moderate Chop.

Severe Turbulence that causes large, abrupt Occupants are forced violently against EXAMPLES: changes in altitude and/or attitude. It seat belts or shoulder straps.

a. Over Omaha. 1232Z, Moderate usually causes large variations in Unsecured objects are tossed about.

Turbulence, in cloud, Flight Level 310, indicated airspeed. Aircraft may be Food service and walking are B707.

momentarily out of control. Report as impossible.

Severe Turbulence.

b. From 50 miles south of Albuquerque Extreme Turbulence in which the aircraft is to 30 miles north of Phoenix, 1210Z to violently tossed about and is 1250Z, occasional Moderate Chop, practically impossible to control. It Flight Level 330, DC8. may cause structural damage. Report as Extreme Turbulence.

High level turbulence (normally above 15,000 feet ASL) not associated with cumuliform cloudiness, including thunderstorms, should be reported as clear air turbulence (CAT) preceded by the appropriate intensity, or light or moderate chop.

22. Wind Shear PIREPs 22.1 Because unexpected changes in wind speed and direction can be hazardous to aircraft operations at low altitudes on approach to and departing from airports, pilots are urged to promptly volunteer reports to controllers of wind shear conditions they encounter. An advance warning of this information will assist other pilots in avoiding or coping with a wind shear on approach or departure.

22.2 When describing conditions, the use of the terms “negative” or “positive” wind shear should be avoided.

PIREPs of negative wind shear on final, intended to describe loss of airspeed and lift, have been interpreted to Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 50 United States of America 22 JAN 26 mean that no wind shear was encountered. The recommended method for wind shear reporting is to state the loss/gain of airspeed and the altitude(s) at which it was encountered.

EXAMPLE − 1. Denver Tower, Cessna 1234 encountered wind shear, loss of 20 knots at 400.

2. Tulsa Tower, American 721 encountered wind shear on final, gained 25 knots between 600 and 400 feet followed by loss of 40 knots between 400 feet and surface.

Pilots using Inertial Navigation Systems should report the wind and altitude both above and below the shear layer.

EXAMPLE − Miami Tower, Gulfstream 403 Charlie encountered an abrupt wind shear at 800 feet on final, max thrust required.

Pilots who are not able to report wind shear in these specific terms are encouraged to make reports in terms of the effect upon their aircraft.

22.3 Wind Shear Escape 22.3.1 Pilots should report to ATC when they are performing a wind shear escape maneuver. This report should be made as soon as practicable, but not until aircraft safety and control is assured, which may not be satisfied until the aircraft is clear of the wind shear or microburst. ATC should provide safety alerts and traffic advisories, as appropriate.

EXAMPLE − “Denver Tower, United 1154, wind shear escape. ” 22.3.2 Once the pilot initiates a wind shear escape maneuver, ATC is not responsible for providing approved separation between the aircraft and any other aircraft, airspace, terrain, or obstacle until the pilot reports that the escape procedure is complete and approved separation has been re − established. Pilots should advise ATC that they are resuming the previously assigned clearance or should request an alternate clearance.

EXAMPLE − “Denver Tower, United ll54, wind shear escape complete, resuming last assigned heading/(name) DP/clearance. ” or “Denver Tower, United ll54, wind shear escape complete, request further instructions. ” 23. Clear Air Turbulence (CAT) PIREPs 23.1 Clear air turbulence (CAT) has become a very serious operational factor to flight operations at all levels and especially to jet traffic flying in excess of 15,000 feet. The best available information on this phenomenon must come from pilots via the PIREP procedures. All pilots encountering CAT conditions are urgently requested to report time, location, and intensity (light, moderate, severe, or extreme) of the element to the FAA facility with which they are maintaining radio contact. If time and conditions permit, elements should be reported according to the standards for other PIREPs and position reports. See TBL GEN 3.5 − 13 , Turbulence Reporting Criteria Table.

24. Microbursts 24.1 Relatively recent meteorological studies have confirmed the existence of microburst phenomena.

Microbursts are small − scale intense downdrafts which, on reaching the surface, spread outward in all directions from the downdraft center. This causes the presence of both vertical and horizontal wind shears that can be extremely hazardous to all types and categories of aircraft, especially at low altitudes. Due to their small size, short life − span, and the fact that they can occur over areas without surface precipitation, microbursts are not easily detectable using conventional weather radar or wind shear alert systems.

24.2 Parent clouds producing microburst activity can be any of the low or middle layer convective cloud types.

Note however, that microbursts commonly occur within the heavy rain portion of thunderstorms, and in much weaker, benign − appearing convective cells that have little or no precipitation reaching the ground.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 51 United States of America 22 JAN 26 24.3 The life cycle of a microburst as it descends in a convective rain shaft is seen in FIG GEN 3.5 − 8 , Evolution of a Microburst. An important consideration for pilots is the fact that the microburst intensifies for about 5 minutes after it strikes the ground.

24.4 Characteristics of microbursts include: 24.4.1 Size. The microburst downdraft is typically less than 1 mile in diameter as it descends from the cloud base to about 1,000 − 3,000 feet above the ground. In the transition zone near the ground, the downdraft changes to a horizontal outflow that can extend to approximately 2 / miles in diameter.

24.4.2 Intensity. The downdrafts can be as strong as 6,000 feet per minute. Horizontal winds near the surface can be as strong as 45 knots resulting in a 90 − knot shear (headwind to tailwind change for a traversing aircraft) across the microburst. These strong horizontal winds occur within a few hundred feet of the ground.

24.4.3 Visual Signs. Microbursts can be found almost anywhere that there is convective activity. They may be embedded in heavy rain associated with a thunderstorm or in light rain in benign − appearing virga. When there is little or no precipitation at the surface accompanying the microburst, a ring of blowing dust may be the only visual clue of its existence.

FIG GEN 3.5 − 8 Evolution of a Microburst WIND SPEED WIND SPEED 10-20 knots 10-20 knots > 20 knots > 20 knots T T-5 Min T-2 Min T T + 5 Min T + 10 Min T-5 Min T-2 Min T + 5 Min T + 10 Min 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 HEIGHT (feet) HEIGHT (feet) 0 0 2 3 SCALE (miles) SCALE (miles) Vertical cross section of the evolution of a microburst wind field. T is the time of initial divergence at the surface. The shading refers to the vector wind speeds. Figure adapted from Wilson et al., 1984, Microburst Wind Structure and Evaluation of Doppler Radar for Wind Shear Detection, DOT/FAA Report No. DOT/FAA/PM-84/29, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 37 pp.

24.4.4 Duration. An individual microburst will seldom last longer than 15 minutes from the time it strikes the ground until dissipation. The horizontal winds continue to increase during the first 5 minutes with the maximum intensity winds lasting approximately 2 − 4 minutes. Sometimes microbursts are concentrated into a line structure and, under these conditions, activity may continue for as long as 1 hour. Once microburst activity starts, multiple microbursts in the same general area are not uncommon and should be expected.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 52 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 9 Microburst Encounter During Takeoff NOTE − A microburst encounter during takeoff. The airplane first encounters a headwind and experiences increasing performance (1), this is followed in short succession by a decreasing headwind component (2), a downdraft (3), and finally a strong tailwind (4), where 2 through 5 all result in decreasing performance of the airplane. Position (5) represents an extreme situation just prior to impact. Figure courtesy of Walter Frost, FWG Associates, Inc., Tullahoma, Tennessee.

24.5 Microburst wind shear may create a severe hazard for aircraft within 1,000 feet of the ground, particularly during the approach to landing and landing and take − off phases. The impact of a microburst on aircraft which have the unfortunate experience of penetrating one is characterized in FIG GEN 3.5 − 9 . The aircraft may encounter a headwind (performance increasing), followed by a downdraft and a tailwind (both performance decreasing), possibly resulting in terrain impact.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 53 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 10 NAS Wind Shear Product Systems 24.6 Detection of Microbursts, Wind Shear, and Gust Fronts 24.6.1 FAA’s Integrated Wind Shear Detection Plan 24.6.1.1 The FAA currently employs an integrated plan for wind shear detection that will significantly improve both the safety and capacity of the majority of the airports currently served by the air carriers. This plan integrates several programs, such as the Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS), Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR), Weather System Processor (WSP), and Low Level Wind Shear Alert Systems (LLWAS) into a single strategic concept that significantly improves the aviation weather information in the terminal area. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 10 .)

24.6.1.2 The wind shear/microburst information and warnings are displayed on the ribbon display terminal (RBDT) located in the tower cabs. They are identical (and standardized) to those in the LLWAS, TDWR and WSP systems, and designed so that the controller does not need to interpret the data, but simply read the displayed information to the pilot. The RBDTs are constantly monitored by the controller to ensure the rapid and timely dissemination of any hazardous event(s) to the pilot.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 54 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 11 LLWAS Siting Criteria 24.6.1.3 The early detection of a wind shear/microburst event, and the subsequent warning(s) issued to an aircraft on approach or departure, will alert the pilot/crew to the potential of, and to be prepared for, a situation that could become very dangerous! Without these warnings, the aircraft may NOT be able to climb out of or safely transition the event, resulting in a catastrophe. The air carriers, working with the FAA, have developed specialized training programs using their simulators to train and prepare their pilots on the demanding aircraft procedures required to escape these very dangerous wind shear and/or microburst encounters.

24.6.1.4 Low Level Wind Shear Alert System (LLWAS) a) The LLWAS provides wind data and software processes to detect the presence of hazardous wind shear and microbursts in the vicinity of an airport. Wind sensors, mounted on poles sometimes as high as 150 feet, are (ideally) located 2,000 − 3,500 feet, but not more than 5,000 feet, from the centerline of the runway. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 11 .)

b) The LLWAS was fielded in 1988 at 110 airports across the nation. Many of these systems have been replaced by new Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) and Weather Systems Processor (WSP) technology.

While all legacy LLWAS systems will eventually be phased out, 39 airports will be upgraded to LLWAS − NE (Network Expansion) system. The new LLWAS − NE systems not only provide the controller with wind shear warnings and alerts, including wind shear/microburst detection at the airport wind sensor location, but also provide the location of the hazards relative to the airport runway(s). It also has the flexibility and capability to grow with the airport as new runways are built. As many as 32 sensors, strategically located around the airport and in relationship to its runway configuration, can be accommodated by the LLWAS − NE network.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 55 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 12 Warning Boxes 24.6.1.5 Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) a) TDWRs have been deployed at 45 locations across the U.S. Optimum locations for TDWRs are 8 to 12 miles from the airport proper, and designed to look at the airspace around and over the airport to detect microbursts, gust fronts, wind shifts, and precipitation intensities. TDWR products advise the controller of wind shear and microburst events impacting all runways and the areas / mile on either side of the extended centerline of the runways and to a distance of 3 miles on final approach and 2 miles on departure. FIG GEN 3.5 − 12 is a theoretical view of the runway and the warning boxes that the software uses to determine the location(s) of wind shear or microbursts. These warnings are displayed (as depicted in the examples in subparagraph e) on the ribbon display terminal located in the tower cabs.

b) It is very important to understand what TDWR DOES NOT DO: 1) It DOES NOT warn of wind shear outside of the alert boxes (on the arrival and departure ends of the runways).

2) It DOES NOT detect wind shear that is NOT a microburst or a gust front.

3) It DOES NOT detect gusty or cross wind conditions.

4) It DOES NOT detect turbulence.

However, research and development is continuing on these systems. Future improvements may include such areas as storm motion (movement), improved gust front detection, storm growth and decay, microburst prediction, and turbulence detection.

c) TDWR also provides a geographical situation display (GSD) for supervisors and traffic management specialists for planning purposes. The GSD displays (in color) 6 levels of weather (precipitation), gust fronts and predicted storm movement(s). This data is used by the tower supervisor(s), traffic management specialists, and controllers to plan for runway changes and arrival/departure route changes in order to reduce aircraft delays and increase airport capacity.

24.6.1.6 Weather Systems Processor (WSP) a) The WSP provides the controller, supervisor, traffic management specialist, and ultimately the pilot, with the same products as the terminal doppler weather radar at a fraction of the cost. This is accomplished by utilizing Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 56 United States of America 22 JAN 26 new technologies to access the weather channel capabilities of the existing ASR − 9 radar located on or near the airport, thus eliminating the requirements for a separate radar location, land acquisition, support facilities, and the associated communication landlines and expenses.

b) The WSP utilizes the same RBDT display as the TDWR and LLWAS, and, like the TDWR, has a GSD for planning purposes by supervisors, traffic management specialists, and controllers. The WSP GSD emulates the TDWR display; i.e., it also depicts 6 levels of precipitation, gust fronts and predicted storm movement, and like the TDWR, GSD is used to plan for runway changes and arrival/departure route changes in order to reduce aircraft delays and to increase airport capacity.

c) This system is installed at 34 airports across the nation, substantially increasing the safety of flying.

24.6.1.7 Operational Aspects of LLWAS, TDWR, and WSP To demonstrate how this data is used by both the controller and the pilot, 3 ribbon display examples and their explanations are presented: a) MICROBURST ALERTS EXAMPLE − This is what the controller sees on his/her ribbon display in the tower cab.

27A MBA 35K − 2MF 250 20 NOTE − (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 13 to see how the TDWR/WSP determines the microburst location).

This is what the controller will say when issuing the alert.

PHRASEOLOGY − RUNWAY 27 ARRIVAL, MICROBURST ALERT, 35 KT LOSS 2 MILE FINAL, THRESHOLD WINDS 250 AT 20.

In plain language, the controller is telling the pilot that on approach to runway 27, there is a microburst alert on the approach lane to the runway, and to anticipate or expect a 35 − knot loss of airspeed at approximately 2 miles out on final approach (where the aircraft will first encounter the phenomena). With that information, the aircrew is forewarned, and should be prepared to apply wind shear/microburst escape procedures should they decide to continue the approach. Additionally, the surface winds at the airport for landing runway 27 are reported as 250 degrees at 20 knots.

NOTE − Threshold wind is at pilot’s request or as deemed appropriate by the controller.

b) WIND SHEAR ALERTS EXAMPLE − This is what the controller sees on his/her ribbon display in the tower cab.

27A WSA 20K − 3MF 200 15 NOTE − (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 14 to see how the TDWR/WSP determines the wind shear location).

This is what the controller will say when issuing the alert.

PHRASEOLOGY − RUNWAY 27 ARRIVAL, WIND SHEAR ALERT, 20 KT LOSS 3 MILE FINAL, THRESHOLD WINDS 200 AT 15.

In plain language, the controller is advising the aircraft arriving on runway 27 that at 3 miles out the pilot should expect to encounter a wind shear condition that will decrease airspeed by 20 knots and possibly the aircraft will encounter turbulence. Additionally, the airport surface winds for landing runway 27 are reported as 200 degrees at 15 knots.

NOTE − Threshold wind is at pilot’s request or as deemed appropriate by the controller.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 57 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 13 Microburst Alert Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 58 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 14 Weak Microburst Alert Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 59 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 15 Gust Front Alert c) MULTIPLE WIND SHEAR ALERTS EXAMPLE − This is what the controller sees on his/her ribbon display in the tower cab.

27A WSA 20K+ RWY 250 20 27D WSA 20K+ RWY 250 20 NOTE − (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 15 to see how the TDWR/WSP determines the gust front/wind shear location).

This is what the controller will say when issuing the alert.

PHRASEOLOGY − MULTIPLE WIND SHEAR ALERTS.

RUNWAY 27 ARRIVAL, WIND SHEAR ALERT, 20 KT GAIN ON RUNWAY; RUNWAY 27 DEPARTURE, WIND SHEAR ALERT, 20 KT GAIN ON RUNWAY, WINDS 250 AT 20.

EXAMPLE − In this example, the controller is advising arriving and departing aircraft that they could encounter a wind shear condition right on the runway due to a gust front (significant change of wind direction) with the possibility of a 20 knot gain in airspeed associated with the gust front. Additionally, the airport surface winds (for the runway in use) are reported as 250 degrees at 20 knots.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 60 United States of America 22 JAN 26 24.6.1.8 The Terminal Weather Information for Pilots System (TWIP) a) With the increase in the quantity and quality of terminal weather information available through TDWR, the next step is to provide this information directly to pilots rather than relying on voice communications from ATC.

The National Airspace System (NAS) has long been in need of a means of delivering terminal weather information to the cockpit more efficiently in terms of both speed and accuracy to enhance pilot awareness of weather hazards and reduce air traffic controller workload. With the TWIP capability, terminal weather information, both alphanumerically and graphically, is now available directly to the cockpit for 46 airports in the U.S. NAS. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 16 .)

FIG GEN 3.5 − 16 TWIP Image of Convective Weather at MCO International b) TWIP products are generated using weather data from the TDWR or the Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS). These products can then be accessed by pilots using the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) data link services. Airline dispatchers can also access this database and send messages to specific aircraft whenever wind shear activity begins or ends at an airport.

c) TWIP products include descriptions and character graphics of microburst alerts, wind shear alerts, significant precipitation, convective activity within 30 NM surrounding the terminal area, and expected weather that will impact airport operations. During inclement weather; i.e., whenever a predetermined level of precipitation or wind shear is detected within 15 miles of the terminal area, TWIP products are updated once each minute for text messages and once every 5 minutes for character graphic messages. During good weather (below the predetermined precipitation or wind shear parameters) each message is updated every 10 minutes. These products are intended to improve the situational awareness of the pilot/flight crew, and to aid in flight planning prior to arriving or departing the terminal area. It is important to understand that, in the context of TWIP, the predetermined levels for inclement versus good weather has nothing to do with the criteria for VFR/MVFR/IFR/LIFR; it only deals with precipitation, wind shears, and microbursts.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 61 AIP GEN 3.5 − 61 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL GEN 3.5 − 14 TWIP − Equipped Airports Airport Identifier Airport Identifier Andrews AFB, MD KADW Harry Reid Intl Airport KLAS Hartsfield − Jackson Atlanta Intl Airport KATL LaGuardia Airport KLGA Nashville Intl Airport KBNA Kansas City Intl Airport KMCI Logan Intl Airport KBOS Orlando Intl Airport KMCO Baltimore/Washington Intl Airport KBWI Midway Intl Airport KMDW Hopkins Intl Airport KCLE Memphis Intl Airport KMEM Charlotte/Douglas Intl Airport KCLT Miami Intl Airport KMIA Port Columbus Intl Airport KCMH General Mitchell Intl Airport KMKE Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Intl Airport KCVG Minneapolis St. Paul Intl Airport KMSP Dallas Love Field Airport KDAL Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl KMSY Airport James M. Cox Intl Airport KDAY Will Rogers World Airport KOKC Ronald Reagan Washington National KDCA Airport O’Hare Intl Airport KORD Denver Intl Airport KDEN President Donald J. Trump Intl KDJT Dallas − Fort Worth Intl Airport KDFW Philadelphia Intl Airport KPHL Detroit Metro Wayne County Airport KDTW Phoenix Sky Harbor Intl Airport KPHX Newark Liberty Intl Airport KEWR Pittsburgh Intl Airport KPIT Fort Lauderdale − Hollywood Intl Airport KFLL Raleigh − Durham Intl Airport KRDU William P. Hobby Airport KHOU Louisville Intl Airport KSDF Washington Dulles Intl Airport KIAD Salt Lake City Intl Airport KSLC George Bush Intercontinental Airport KIAH Lambert − St. Louis Intl Airport KSTL Wichita Mid − Continent Airport KICT Tampa Intl Airport KTPA Indianapolis Intl Airport KIND Tulsa Intl Airport KTUL John F. Kennedy Intl Airport KJFK Luis Munoz Marin Intl Airport TJSJ 25. PIREPs Relating to Volcanic Ash Activity 25.1 Volcanic eruptions which send ash into the upper atmosphere occur somewhere around the world several times each year. Flying into a volcanic ash cloud can be exceedingly dangerous. At least two B747s have lost all power in all four engines after such an encounter. Regardless of the type aircraft, some damage is almost certain to ensue after an encounter with a volcanic ash cloud. Additionally, studies have shown that volcanic eruptions are the only significant source of large quantities of sulphur dioxide (SO ) gas at jet-cruising altitudes.

Therefore, the detection and subsequent reporting of SO is of significant importance. Although SO is colorless, 2 2 its presence in the atmosphere should be suspected when a sulphur-like or rotten egg odor is present throughout the cabin.

25.2 While some volcanoes in the U.S. are monitored, many in remote areas are not. These unmonitored volcanoes may erupt without prior warning to the aviation community. A pilot observing a volcanic eruption who has not had previous notification of it may be the only witness to the eruption. Pilots are strongly encouraged to transmit a PIREP regarding volcanic eruptions and any observed volcanic ash clouds or detection of sulphur dioxide (SO ) gas associated with volcanic activity.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 62 United States of America 22 JAN 26 25.3 Pilots should submit PIREPs regarding volcanic activity using the Volcanic Activity Reporting form (VAR) as illustrated in FIG GEN 3.5 − 31 . (If a VAR form is not immediately available, relay enough information to identify the position and type of volcanic activity.)

25.4 Pilots should verbally transmit the data required in items 1 through 8 of the VAR as soon as possible. The data required in items 9 through 16 of the VAR should be relayed after landing, if possible.

26. Thunderstorms 26.1 Turbulence, hail, rain, snow, lightning, sustained updrafts and downdrafts, and icing conditions are all present in thunderstorms. While there is some evidence that maximum turbulence exists at the middle level of a thunderstorm, recent studies show little variation of turbulence intensity with altitude.

26.2 There is no useful correlation between the external visual appearance of thunderstorms and the severity or amount of turbulence or hail within them. Also, the visible thunderstorm cloud is only a portion of a turbulent system whose updrafts and downdrafts often extend far beyond the visible storm cloud. Severe turbulence can be expected up to 20 miles from severe thunderstorms. This distance decreases to about 10 miles in less severe storms. These turbulent areas may appear as a well − defined echo on weather radar.

26.3 Weather radar, airborne or ground − based, will normally reflect the areas of moderate to heavy precipitation. (Radar does not detect turbulence.) The frequency and severity of turbulence generally increases with the areas of highest liquid water content of the storm. NO FLIGHT PATH THROUGH AN AREA OF STRONG OR VERY STRONG RADAR ECHOES SEPARATED BY 20 − 30 MILES OR LESS MAY BE CONSIDERED FREE OF SEVERE TURBULENCE.

26.4 Turbulence beneath a thunderstorm should not be minimized. This is especially true when the relative humidity is low in any layer between the surface and 15,000 feet. Then the lower altitudes may be characterized by strong out − flowing winds and severe turbulence.

26.5 The probability of lightning strikes occurring to aircraft is greatest when operating at altitudes where temperatures are between − 5 C and +5 C. Lightning can strike aircraft flying in the clear in the vicinity of a thunderstorm.

26.6 Current weather radar systems are able to objectively determine precipitation intensity. These precipitation intensity areas are described as “light,” “moderate,” “heavy,” and “extreme.” REFERENCE − Pilot/Controller Glossary Term − Precipitation Radar Weather Descriptions.

EXAMPLE − Alert provided by an ATC facility to an aircraft: (aircraft identification) EXTREME precipitation between ten o’clock and two o’clock, one five miles. Precipitation area is two five miles in diameter.

EXAMPLE − Alert provided by an FSS: (aircraft identification) EXTREME precipitation two zero miles west of Atlanta V − O − R, two five miles wide, moving east at two zero knots, tops flight level three niner zero.

27. Thunderstorm Flying 27.1 Thunderstorm Avoidance. Never regard any thunderstorm lightly, even when radar echoes are of light intensity. Avoiding thunderstorms is the best policy. Following are some Do’s and Don’ts of thunderstorm avoidance: 27.1.1 Don’t land or takeoff in the face of an approaching thunderstorm. A sudden gust front of low − level turbulence could cause loss of control.

27.1.2 Don’t attempt to fly under a thunderstorm even if you can see through to the other side. Turbulence and wind shear under the storm could be disastrous.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 63 United States of America 22 JAN 26 27.1.3 Don’t attempt to fly under the anvil of a thunderstorm. There is a potential for severe and extreme clear air turbulence.

27.1.4 Don’t fly without airborne radar into a cloud mass containing scattered embedded thunderstorms.

Scattered thunderstorms not embedded usually can be visually circumnavigated.

27.1.5 Don’t trust the visual appearance to be a reliable indicator of the turbulence inside a thunderstorm.

27.1.6 Don’t assume that ATC will offer radar navigation guidance or deviations around thunderstorms.

27.1.7 Don’t use data-linked weather next generation weather radar (NEXRAD) mosaic imagery as the sole means for negotiating a path through a thunderstorm area (tactical maneuvering).

27.1.8 Do remember that the data-linked NEXRAD mosaic imagery shows where the weather was, not where the weather is. The weather conditions may be 15 to 20 minutes older than the age indicated on the display.

27.1.9 Do listen to chatter on the ATC frequency for Pilot Weather Reports (PIREP) and other aircraft requesting to deviate or divert.

27.1.10 Do ask ATC for radar navigation guidance or to approve deviations around thunderstorms, if needed.

27.1.11 Do use data-linked weather NEXRAD mosaic imagery (for example, Flight Information Service-Broadcast (FIS-B)) for route selection to avoid thunderstorms entirely (strategic maneuvering).

27.1.12 Do advise ATC, when switched to another controller, that you are deviating for thunderstorms before accepting to rejoin the original route.

27.1.13 Do ensure that after an authorized weather deviation, before accepting to rejoin the original route, that the route of flight is clear of thunderstorms.

27.1.14 Do avoid by at least 20 miles any thunderstorm identified as severe or giving an intense radar echo. This is especially true under the anvil of a large cumulonimbus.

27.1.15 Do circumnavigate the entire area if the area has 6/10 thunderstorm coverage.

27.1.16 Do remember that vivid and frequent lightning indicates the probability of a severe thunderstorm.

27.1.17 Do regard as extremely hazardous any thunderstorm with tops 35,000 feet or higher whether the top is visually sighted or determined by radar.

27.1.18 Do give a PIREP for the flight conditions.

27.1.19 Do divert and wait out the thunderstorms on the ground if unable to navigate around an area of thunderstorms.

27.1.20 Do contact Flight Service for assistance in avoiding thunderstorms. Flight Service specialists have NEXRAD mosaic radar imagery and NEXRAD single site radar with unique features such as base and composite reflectivity, echo tops, and VAD wind profiles.

27.2 If you cannot avoid penetrating a thunderstorm, following are some Do’s before entering the storm: 27.2.1 Tighten your safety belt, put on your shoulder harness (if installed), if and secure all loose objects.

27.2.2 Plan and hold the course to take the aircraft through the storm in a minimum time.

27.2.3 To avoid the most critical icing, establish a penetration altitude below the freezing level or above the level of − 15 C.

27.2.4 Verify that pitot heat is on and turn on carburetor heat or jet engine anti − ice. Icing can be rapid at any altitude and cause almost instantaneous power failure and/or loss of airspeed indication.

27.2.5 Establish power settings for turbulence penetration airspeed recommended in your aircraft manual.

27.2.6 Turn up cockpit lights to highest intensity to lessen danger of temporary blindness from lightning.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 64 United States of America 22 JAN 26 27.2.7 If using automatic pilot, disengage Altitude Hold Mode and Speed Hold Mode. The automatic altitude and speed controls will increase maneuvers of the aircraft thus increasing structural stress.

27.2.8 If using airborne radar, tilt the antenna up and down occasionally. This will permit the detection of other thunderstorm activity at altitudes other than the one being flown.

27.3 Following are some Do’s and Don’ts during the thunderstorm penetration: 27.3.1 Do keep your eyes on your instruments. Looking outside the cockpit can increase danger of temporary blindness from lightning.

27.3.2 Don’t change power settings; maintain settings for the recommended turbulence penetration airspeed.

27.3.3 Do maintain constant attitude. Allow the altitude and airspeed to fluctuate.

27.3.4 Don’t turn back once you are in the thunderstorm. A straight course through the storm most likely will get the aircraft out of the hazards most quickly. In addition, turning maneuvers increase stress on the aircraft.

28. Wake Turbulence 28.1 General 28.1.1 Every aircraft generates wake turbulence while in flight. Wake turbulence is a function of an aircraft producing lift, resulting in the formation of two counter − rotating vortices trailing behind the aircraft.

28.1.2 Wake turbulence from the generating aircraft can affect encountering aircraft due to the strength, duration, and direction of the vortices. Wake turbulence can impose rolling moments exceeding the roll − control authority of encountering aircraft, causing possible injury to occupants and damage to aircraft. Pilots should always be aware of the possibility of a wake turbulence encounter when flying through the wake of another aircraft, and adjust the flight path accordingly.

28.2 Vortex Generation 28.2.1 The creation of a pressure differential over the wing surface generates lift. The lowest pressure occurs over the upper wing surface and the highest pressure under the wing. This pressure differential triggers the roll up of the airflow at the rear of the wing resulting in swirling air masses trailing downstream of the wing tips. After the roll up is completed, the wake consists of two counter − rotating cylindrical vortices. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 17 .)

The wake vortex is formed with most of the energy concentrated within a few feet of the vortex core.

28.2.2 More aircraft are being manufactured or retrofitted with winglets. There are several types of winglets, but their primary function is to increase fuel efficiency by improving the lift − to − drag ratio. Studies have shown that winglets have a negligible effect on wake turbulence generation, particularly with the slower speeds involved during departures and arrivals.

28.3 Vortex Strength 28.3.1 Weight, speed, wingspan, and shape of the generating aircraft’s wing all govern the strength of the vortex.

The vortex characteristics of any given aircraft can also be changed by extension of flaps or other wing configuring devices. However, the vortex strength from an aircraft increases proportionately to an increase in operating weight or a decrease in aircraft speed. Since the turbulence from a “dirty” aircraft configuration hastens wake decay, the greatest vortex strength occurs when the generating aircraft is HEAVY, CLEAN, and SLOW.

28.3.2 Induced Roll 28.3.2.1 In rare instances, a wake encounter could cause catastrophic inflight structural damage to an aircraft.

However, the usual hazard is associated with induced rolling moments that can exceed the roll − control authority of the encountering aircraft. During inflight testing, aircraft intentionally flew directly up trailing vortex cores of larger aircraft. These tests demonstrated that the ability of aircraft to counteract the roll imposed by wake vortex depends primarily on the wingspan and counter − control responsiveness of the encountering aircraft.

These tests also demonstrated the difficulty of an aircraft to remain within a wake vortex. The natural tendency is for the circulation to eject aircraft from the vortex.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 65 United States of America 22 JAN 26 28.3.2.2 Counter − control is usually effective and induced roll minimal in cases where the wing span and ailerons of the encountering aircraft extend beyond the rotational flow field of the vortex. It is more difficult for aircraft with short wing span (relative to the generating aircraft) to counter the imposed roll induced by vortex flow. Pilots of short − span aircraft, even of the high − performance type, must be especially alert to vortex encounters. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 18 .)

28.4 Vortex Behavior 28.4.1 Trailing vortices have certain behavioral characteristics which can help a pilot visualize the wake location and thereby take avoidance precautions.

28.4.1.1 An aircraft generates vortices from the moment it rotates on takeoff to touchdown, since trailing vortices are a by − product of wing lift. Prior to takeoff or touchdown pilots should note the rotation or touchdown point of the preceding aircraft. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 19 .)

28.4.1.2 The vortex circulation is outward, upward and around the wing tips when viewed from either ahead or behind the aircraft. Tests with larger aircraft have shown that the vortices remain spaced a bit less than a wingspan apart, drifting with the wind, at altitudes greater than a wingspan from the ground. In view of this, if persistent vortex turbulence is encountered, a slight change of altitude (upward) and lateral position (upwind) should provide a flight path clear of the turbulence.

28.4.1.3 Flight tests have shown that the vortices from larger aircraft sink at a rate of several hundred feet per minute, slowing their descent and diminishing in strength with time and distance behind the generating aircraft.

Pilots should fly at or above the preceding aircraft’s flight path, altering course as necessary to avoid the area directly behind and below the generating aircraft. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 20 .) Pilots, in all phases of flight, must remain vigilant of possible wake effects created by other aircraft. Studies have shown that atmospheric turbulence hastens wake breakup, while other atmospheric conditions can transport wake horizontally and vertically.

FIG GEN 3.5 − 17 Wake Vortex Generation Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 66 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 18 Wake Encounter Counter Control COUNTER CONTROL FIG GEN 3.5 − 19 Wake Ends/Wake Begins Touchdown Rotation Wake Begins Wake Ends FIG GEN 3.5 − 20 Vortex Flow Field AVOID AVOID Nominally 500-1000 Ft. Nominally 500-1000 Ft.

Sink Rate Sink Rate Several Hundred Ft.,/Min. Several Hundred Ft.,/Min.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 67 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 21 Vortex Movement Near Ground − No Wind

3K 3K 3K 3K

No Wind No Wind

28.4.1.4 When the vortices of larger aircraft sink close to the ground (within 100 to 200 feet), they tend to move laterally over the ground at a speed of 2 or 3 knots. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 21 .)

28.4.1.5 Pilots should be alert at all times for possible wake vortex encounters when conducting approach and landing operations. The pilot is ultimately responsible for maintaining an appropriate interval, and should consider all available information in positioning the aircraft in the terminal area, to avoid the wake turbulence created by a preceding aircraft. Test data show that vortices can rise with the air mass in which they are embedded.

The effects of wind shear can cause vortex flow field “tilting.” In addition, ambient thermal lifting and orographic effects (rising terrain or tree lines) can cause a vortex flow field to rise and possibly bounce.

FIG GEN 3.5 − 22 Vortex Movement Near Ground − with Cross Winds

3K Wind 3K Wind

6K 6K

0 (3K - 3K) 0 (3K - 3K)

(3K + 3K) (3K + 3K) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 68 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 23 Vortex Movement in Ground Effect − Tailwind Tail Wind Tail Wind Light Quartering Light Quartering Tailwind Tailwind Touchdown Point Touchdown Point

x

28.4.2 A crosswind will decrease the lateral movement of the upwind vortex and increase the movement of the downwind vortex. Thus, a light wind with a cross − runway component of 1 to 5 knots could result in the upwind vortex remaining in the touchdown zone for a period of time and hasten the drift of the downwind vortex toward another runway. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 22.) Similarly, a tailwind condition can move the vortices of the preceding aircraft forward into the touchdown zone. THE LIGHT QUARTERING TAILWIND REQUIRES MAXIMUM CAUTION. Pilots should be alert to large aircraft upwind from their approach and takeoff flight paths. (See FIG GEN 3.5 − 23 .)

28.5 Operations Problem Areas 28.5.1 A wake turbulence encounter can range from negligible to catastrophic. The impact of the encounter depends on the weight, wingspan, size of the generating aircraft, distance from the generating aircraft, and point of vortex encounter. The probability of induced roll increases when the encountering aircraft’s heading is generally aligned with the flight path of the generating aircraft.

28.5.2 AVOID THE AREA BELOW AND BEHIND THE WAKE GENERATING AIRCRAFT, ESPECIALLY AT LOW ALTITUDE WHERE EVEN A MOMENTARY WAKE ENCOUNTER COULD BE CATASTROPHIC.

NOTE − A common scenario for a wake encounter is in terminal airspace after accepting clearance for a visual approach behind landing traffic. Pilots must be cognizant of their position relative to the traffic and use all means of vertical guidance to ensure they do not fly below the flight path of the wake generating aircraft.

28.5.3 Pilots should be particularly alert in calm wind conditions and situations where the vortices could: 28.5.3.1 Remain in the touchdown area.

28.5.3.2 Drift from aircraft operating on a nearby runway.

28.5.3.3 Sink into the takeoff or landing path from a crossing runway.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 69 United States of America 22 JAN 26 28.5.3.4 Sink into the traffic pattern from other airport operations.

28.5.3.5 Sink into the flight path of VFR aircraft operating on the hemispheric altitude 500 feet below.

28.5.4 Pilots should attempt to visualize the vortex trail of aircraft whose projected flight path they may encounter. When possible, pilots of larger aircraft should adjust their flight paths to minimize vortex exposure to other aircraft.

28.6 Vortex Avoidance Procedures 28.6.1 Under certain conditions, airport traffic controllers apply procedures for separating IFR aircraft. If a pilot accepts a clearance to visually follow a preceding aircraft, the pilot accepts responsibility for separation and wake turbulence avoidance. The controllers will also provide to VFR aircraft, with whom they are in communication and which in the tower’s opinion may be adversely affected by wake turbulence from a larger aircraft, the position, altitude and direction of flight of larger aircraft followed by the phrase “CAUTION − WAKE TURBULENCE.” After issuing the caution for wake turbulence, the airport traffic controllers generally do not provide additional information to the following aircraft unless the airport traffic controllers know the following aircraft is overtaking the preceding aircraft. WHETHER OR NOT A WARNING OR INFORMATION HAS BEEN GIVEN, HOWEVER, THE PILOT IS EXPECTED TO ADJUST AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS AND FLIGHT PATH AS NECESSARY TO PRECLUDE SERIOUS WAKE ENCOUNTERS. When any doubt exists about maintaining safe separation distances between aircraft during approaches, pilots should ask the control tower for updates on separation distance and aircraft groundspeed.

28.6.2 The following vortex avoidance procedures are recommended for the various situations: 28.6.2.1 Landing Behind a Larger Aircraft − Same Runway. Stay at or above the larger aircraft’s final approach flight path − note its touchdown point − land beyond it.

28.6.2.2 Landing Behind a Larger Aircraft − When a Parallel Runway is Closer Than 2,500 Feet. Consid - er possible drift to your runway. Stay at or above the larger aircraft’s final approach flight path − note its touchdown point.

28.6.2.3 Landing Behind a Larger Aircraft − Crossing Runway. Cross above the larger aircraft’s flight path.

28.6.2.4 Landing Behind a Departing Larger Aircraft − Same Runway. Note the larger aircraft’s rotation point − land well prior to rotation point.

28.6.2.5 Landing Behind a Departing Larger Aircraft − Crossing Runway. Note the larger aircraft’s rotation point − if past the intersection − continue the approach − land prior to the intersection. If larger aircraft rotates prior to the intersection, avoid flight below the larger aircraft’s flight path. Abandon the approach unless a landing is ensured well before reaching the intersection.

28.6.2.6 Departing Behind a Larger Aircraft. Note the larger aircraft’s rotation point − rotate prior to larger aircraft’s rotation point − continue climb above the larger aircraft’s climb path until turning clear of the larger aircraft’s wake. Avoid subsequent headings which will cross below and behind a larger aircraft. Be alert for any critical takeoff situation which could lead to a vortex encounter.

28.6.2.7 Intersection Takeoffs − Same Runway. Be alert to adjacent larger aircraft operations, particularly upwind of your runway. If intersection takeoff clearance is received, avoid subsequent headings which will cross below a larger aircraft’s path.

28.6.2.8 Departing or Landing After a Larger Aircraft Executing a Low Approach, Missed Approach, Or Touch − and − go Landing. Because vortices settle and move laterally near the ground, the vortex hazard may exist along the runway and in your flight path after a larger aircraft has executed a low approach, missed approach, or a touch − and − go landing, particular in light quartering wind conditions. You should ensure that an interval of at least 2 minutes has elapsed before your takeoff or landing.

28.6.2.9 En Route VFR (Thousand − foot Altitude Plus 500 Feet). Avoid flight below and behind a large aircraft’s path. If a larger aircraft is observed above on the same track (meeting or overtaking) adjust your position laterally, preferably upwind.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 70 United States of America 22 JAN 26 28.7 Helicopters 28.7.1 In a slow hover − taxi or stationary hover near the surface, helicopter main rotor(s) generate downwash producing high velocity outwash vortices to a distance approximately three times the diameter of the rotor. When rotor downwash hits the surface, the resulting outwash vortices have behavioral characteristics similar to wing tip vortices produced by fixed − wing aircraft. However, the vortex circulation is outward, upward, around, and away from the main rotor(s) in all directions. Pilots of small aircraft should avoid operating within three rotor diameters of any helicopter in a slow hover − taxi or stationary hover. In forward flight, departing or landing helicopters produce a pair of strong, high − speed trailing vortices similar to wing tip vortices of larger fixed − wing aircraft. Pilots of small aircraft should use caution when operating behind or crossing behind landing and departing helicopters.

28.8 Pilot Responsibility 28.8.1 Research and testing have been conducted, in addition to ongoing wake initiatives, in an attempt to mitigate the effects of wake turbulence. Pilots must exercise vigilance in situations where they are responsible for avoiding wake turbulence.

28.8.2 Pilots are reminded that in operations conducted behind all aircraft, acceptance of instructions from ATC in the following situations is an acknowledgment that the pilot will ensure safe takeoff and landing intervals and accepts the responsibility of providing his/her own wake turbulence separation: 28.8.2.1 Traffic information.

28.8.2.2 Instructions to follow an aircraft.

28.8.2.3 The acceptance of a visual approach clearance.

28.8.3 For operations conducted behind super or heavy aircraft, ATC will specify the word “ super ” or “ heavy ” as appropriate, when this information is known. Pilots of super or heavy aircraft should always use the word “ super ” or “ heavy ” in radio communications.

28.8.4 Super, heavy and large jet aircraft operators should use the following procedures during an approach to landing. These procedures establish a dependable baseline from which pilots of in − trail, lighter aircraft may reasonably expect to make effective flight path adjustments to avoid serious wake vortex turbulence.

28.8.4.1 Pilots of aircraft that produce strong wake vortices should make every attempt to fly on the established glidepath, not above it; or, if glidepath guidance is not available, to fly as closely as possible to a “3 − 1” glidepath, not above it.

EXAMPLE − Fly 3,000 feet at 10 miles from touchdown, 1,500 feet at 5 miles, 1,200 feet at 4 miles, and so on to touchdown.

28.8.4.2 Pilots of aircraft that produce strong wake vortices should fly as closely as possible to the approach course centerline or to the extended centerline of the runway of intended landing as appropriate to conditions.

28.8.5 Pilots operating lighter aircraft on visual approaches in − trail to aircraft producing strong wake vortices should use the following procedures to assist in avoiding wake turbulence. These procedures apply only to those aircraft that are on visual approaches.

28.8.5.1 Pilots of lighter aircraft should fly on or above the glidepath. Glidepath reference may be furnished by an ILS, by a visual approach slope system, by other ground − based approach slope guidance systems, or by other means. In the absence of visible glidepath guidance, pilots may very nearly duplicate a 3 − degree glideslope by adhering to the “3 to 1” glidepath principle.

EXAMPLE − Fly 3,000 feet at 10 miles from touchdown, 1,500 feet at 5 miles, 1,200 feet at 4 miles, and so on to touchdown.

28.8.5.2 If the pilot of the lighter following aircraft has visual contact with the preceding heavier aircraft and also with the runway, the pilot may further adjust for possible wake vortex turbulence by the following practices: a) Pick a point of landing no less than 1,000 feet from the arrival end of the runway.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 71 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) Establish a line − of − sight to that landing point that is above and in front of the heavier preceding aircraft.

c) When possible, note the point of landing of the heavier preceding aircraft and adjust point of intended landing as necessary.

EXAMPLE − A puff of smoke may appear at the 1,000 − foot markings of the runway, showing that touchdown was at that point; therefore, adjust point of intended landing to the 1,500 − foot markings.

d) Maintain the line − of − sight to the point of intended landing above and ahead of the heavier preceding aircraft; maintain it to touchdown.

e) Land beyond the point of landing of the preceding heavier aircraft. Ensure you have adequate runway remaining, if conducting a touch − and − go landing, or adequate stopping distance available for a full stop landing.

28.8.6 During visual approaches pilots may ask ATC for updates on separation and groundspeed with respect to heavier preceding aircraft, especially when there is any question of safe separation from wake turbulence.

28.8.7 Pilots should notify ATC when a wake event is encountered. Be as descriptive as possible (i.e., bank angle, altitude deviations, intensity and duration of event, etc.) when reporting the event. ATC will record the event through their reporting system. You are also encouraged to use the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) to report wake events.

28.9 Air Traffic Wake Turbulence Separations 28.9.1 Because of the possible effects of wake turbulence, controllers are required to apply no less than minimum required separation to all aircraft operating behind a Super or Heavy, and to Small aircraft operating behind a B757, when aircraft are IFR; VFR and receiving Class B, Class C, or TRSA airspace services; or VFR and being radar sequenced.

28.9.1.1 Typical separation applied to aircraft operating directly behind a super or heavy at the same altitude or less than 1,000 feet below, and to small aircraft operating directly behind a B757 at the same altitude or less than 500 feet below: a) Heavy behind super − 5 miles.

b) Large behind super − 7 miles.

c) Small behind super − 8 miles.

d) Heavy behind heavy − 3 miles.

e) Small/large behind heavy − 5 miles.

f) Small behind B757 − 4 miles.

28.9.1.2 Also, separation, measured at the time the preceding aircraft is over the landing threshold, is provided to small aircraft: a) Small landing behind heavy − 6 miles.

b) Small landing behind large, non − B757 − 4 miles.

REFERENCE − Pilot/Controller Glossary Term − Aircraft Classes.

28.9.2 Additionally, appropriate time or distance intervals are provided to departing aircraft when the departure will be from the same threshold, a parallel runway separated by less than 2,500 feet with less than 500 feet threshold stagger, or on a crossing runway and projected flight paths will cross: 28.9.2.1 Three minutes or the appropriate radar separation when takeoff will be behind a super aircraft; 28.9.2.2 Two minutes or the appropriate radar separation when takeoff will be behind a heavy aircraft.

28.9.2.3 Two minutes or the appropriate radar separation when a small aircraft will takeoff behind a B757.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 72 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − Controllers may not reduce or waive these intervals.

28.9.3 A 3 − minute interval will be provided for a small aircraft taking off: 28.9.3.1 From an intersection on the same runway (same or opposite direction) behind a departing large aircraft (except B757), or 28.9.3.2 In the opposite direction on the same runway behind a large aircraft (except B757) takeoff or low/missed approach.

NOTE − This 3 − minute interval may be waived upon specific pilot request.

28.9.4 A 3 − minute interval will be provided when a small aircraft will takeoff: 28.9.4.1 From an intersection on the same runway (same or opposite direction) behind a departing B757, or 28.9.4.2 In the opposite direction on the same runway behind a B757 takeoff or low/missed approach.

NOTE − This 3 − minute interval may not be waived.

28.9.5 A 4 − minute interval will be provided for all aircraft taking off behind a super aircraft, and a 3 − minute interval will be provided for all aircraft taking off behind a heavy aircraft when the operations are as described in subparagraphs 28.9.4.1 and 28.9.4.2 above, and are conducted on either the same runway or parallel runways separated by less than 2,500 feet. Controllers may not reduce or waive this interval.

28.9.6 Pilots may request additional separation (i.e., 2 minutes instead of 4 or 5 miles) for wake turbulence avoidance. This request should be made as soon as practical on ground control and at least before taxiing onto the runway.

NOTE − Federal Aviation Administration Regulations state: “The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft.” 28.9.7 Controllers may anticipate separation and need not withhold a takeoff clearance for an aircraft departing behind a large, heavy, or super aircraft if there is reasonable assurance the required separation will exist when the departing aircraft starts takeoff roll.

29. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Weather Formats 29.1 The U.S. uses the ICAO world standard for aviation weather reporting and forecasting. The World Meteorological Organization’s (WMO) publication No. 782 “Aerodrome Reports and Forecasts” contains the base METAR and TAF code as adopted by the WMO member countries.

29.2 Although the METAR code is adopted worldwide, each country is allowed to make modifications or exceptions to the code for use in their particular country, e.g., the U.S. will continue to use statute miles for visibility, feet for RVR values, knots for wind speed, and inches of mercury for altimetry. However, temperature and dew point will be reported in degrees Celsius. The U.S reports prevailing visibility rather than lowest sector visibility. The elements in the body of a METAR report are separated with a space. The only exceptions are RVR, temperature, and dew point which are separated with a solidus (/). When an element does not occur, or cannot be observed, the preceding space and that element are omitted from that particular report. A METAR report contains the following sequence of elements in the following order: 29.2.1 Type of report.

29.2.2 ICAO station identifier.

29.2.3 Date and time of report.

29.2.4 Modifier (as required).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 73 United States of America 22 JAN 26 29.2.5 Wind.

29.2.6 Visibility.

29.2.7 Runway Visual Range (RVR).

29.2.8 Weather phenomena.

29.2.9 Sky conditions.

29.2.10 Temperature/Dew point group.

29.2.11 Altimeter.

29.2.12 Remarks (RMK).

29.3 The following paragraphs describe the elements in a METAR report.

29.3.1 Type of Report. There are two types of reports: 29.3.1.1 The METAR, an aviation routine weather report.

29.3.1.2 The SPECI, a nonroutine (special) aviation weather report.

The type of report (METAR or SPECI) will always appear as the lead element of the report.

29.3.2 ICAO Station Identifier. The METAR code uses ICAO 4 − letter station identifiers. In the contiguous 48 states, the 3 − letter domestic station identifier is prefixed with a “K”; i.e., the domestic identifier for Seattle is SEA while the ICAO identifier is KSEA. For Alaska, all station identifiers start with “PA”; for Hawaii, all station identifiers start with “PH.” The identifier for the eastern Caribbean is “T” followed by the individual country’s letter; i.e., Puerto Rico is “TJ.” For a complete worldwide listing see ICAO Document 7910, “Location Indicators.” 29.3.3 Date and Time of Report. The date and time the observation is taken are transmitted as a six − digit date/time group appended with Z to denote Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). The first two digits are the date followed with two digits for hour and two digits for minutes.

EXAMPLE − 172345Z (the 17th day of the month at 2345Z) 29.3.4 Modifier (As Required). “AUTO” identifies a METAR/SPECI report as an automated weather report with no human intervention. If “AUTO” is shown in the body of the report, the type of sensor equipment used at the station will be encoded in the remarks section of the report. The absence of “AUTO” indicates that a report was made manually by an observer or that an automated report had human augmentation/backup. The modifier “COR” indicates a corrected report that is sent out to replace an earlier report with an error.

NOTE − There are two types of automated stations, AO1 for automated weather reporting stations without a precipitation discriminator, and AO2 for automated stations with a precipitation discriminator. (A precipitation discriminator can determine the difference between liquid and frozen/freezing precipitation). This information appears in the remarks section of an automated report.

29.3.5 Wind. The wind is reported as a five digit group (six digits if speed is over 99 knots). The first three digits are the direction from which the wind is blowing, in tens of degrees referenced to true north, or “VRB” if the direction is variable. The next two digits is the wind speed in knots, or if over 99 knots, the next three digits. If the wind is gusty, it is reported as a “G” after the speed followed by the highest gust reported. The abbreviation “KT” is appended to denote the use of knots for wind speed.

EXAMPLE − 13008KT − wind from 130 degrees at 8 knots 08032G45KT − wind from 080 degrees at 32 knots with gusts to 45 knots Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 74 United States of America 22 JAN 26 VRB04KT − wind variable in direction at 4 knots 00000KT − wind calm 210103G130KT − wind from 210 degrees at 103 knots with gusts to 130 knots If the wind direction is variable by 60 degrees or more and the speed is greater than 6 knots, a variable group consisting of the extremes of the wind direction separated by a “V” will follow the prevailing wind group.

32012G22KT 280V350 29.3.5.1 Peak Wind. Whenever the peak wind exceeds 25 knots, “PK WND” will be included in Remarks; e.g., PK WND 280045/1955 “Peak wind two eight zero at four five occurred at one niner five five.” If the hour can be inferred from the report time, only the minutes will be appended; e.g., PK WND 34050/38 “Peak wind three four zero at five zero occurred at three eight past the hour.” 29.3.5.2 Wind Shift. Whenever a wind shift occurs, “WSHFT” will be included in remarks followed by the time the wind shift began; e.g., WSHFT 30 FROPA “Wind shift at three zero due to frontal passage.” 29.3.6 Visibility. Prevailing visibility is reported in statute miles with “SM” appended to it.

EXAMPLE − 7SM . . . . . . . . . seven statute miles 15SM . . . . . . . . fifteen statute miles / SM . . . . . . . . one − half statute mile 29.3.6.1 Tower/Surface Visibility. If either tower or surface visibility is below 4 statute miles, the lesser of the 2 will be reported in the body of the report; the greater will be reported in remarks.

29.3.6.2 Automated Visibility. ASOS/AWOS visibility stations will show visibility 10 or greater than 10 miles 1 1 as “10SM.” AWOS visibility stations will show visibility less than / statute mile as “M / SM” and visibility 4 4 10 or greater than 10 miles as “10SM.” NOTE − Automated sites that are augmented by human observer to meet service level requirements can report 0, 1/16 SM, and 1/8 SM visibility increments.

29.3.6.3 Variable Visibility. Variable visibility is shown in remarks when rapid increase or decrease by / statute mile or more and the average prevailing visibility is less than 3 statute miles; e.g., VIS 1V2 means “visibility variable between 1 and 2 statute miles.” 29.3.6.4 Sector Visibility. Sector visibility is shown in remarks when it differs from the prevailing visibility, and either the prevailing or sector visibility is less than 3 statute miles.

EXAMPLE − VIS N2 . . . . . . . visibility north two 29.3.7 Runway Visual Range (when reported). “R” identifies the group followed by the runway heading (and parallel runway designator, if needed) “/” and the visual range in feet (meters in other countries) followed with “FT.” (“Feet” is not spoken.)

29.3.7.1 Variability Values. When RVR varies by more than on reportable value, the lowest and highest values are shown with “V” between them.

29.3.7.2 Maximum/Minimum Range. “P” indicates an observed RVR is above the maximum value for this system (spoken as “more than”). “M” indicates an observed RVR is below the minimum value which can be determined by the system (spoken as “less than”).

EXAMPLE − R32L/1200FT − Runway Three Two Left R − V − R one thousand two hundred R27R/M1000V4000FT − Runway Two Seven Right R − V − R variable from less than one thousand to four thousand.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 75 United States of America 22 JAN 26 29.3.8 Weather Phenomena. In METAR, weather is reported in the format: Intensity / Proximity / Descriptor / Precipitation / Obstruction to Visibility / Other NOTE − The “/” above and in the following descriptions (except as the separator between the temperature and dew point) are for separation purposes in this publication and do not appear in the actual METARs.

29.3.8.1 Intensity applies only to the first type of precipitation reported. A “ − ” denotes light, no symbol denotes moderate, and a “+” denotes heavy.

29.3.8.2 Proximity applies to and is reported only for weather occurring in the vicinity of the airport (between 5 and 10 miles of the point(s) of observation). It is denoted by the letters “VC.” (Intensity and “VC” will not appear together in the weather group.)

29.3.8.3 Descriptor. These eight descriptors apply to the precipitation or obstructions to visibility: TS thunderstorm DR low drifting SH showers MI shallow FZ freezing BC patches BL blowing PR partial NOTE − Although “TS” and “SH” are used with precipitation and may be preceded with an intensity symbol, the intensity still applies to the precipitation not the descriptor.

29.3.8.4 Precipitation. There are nine types of precipitation in the METAR code: RA rain DZ drizzle SN snow GR hail ( / or greater) GS small hail/snow pellets PL ice pellets SG snow grains IC ice crystals UP unknown precipitation (automated stations only) 29.3.8.5 Obstructions to Visibility. Obscurations are any phenomena in the atmosphere, other than precipitation, that reduce horizontal visibility. There are eight types of obscuration phenomena in the METAR code: FG fog (visibility less than / mile) HZ haze FU smoke PY spray BR mist (visibility / − 6 miles) SA sand DU dust VA volcanic ash Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 76 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − Fog (FG) is observed or forecast only when the visibility is less than / mile. Otherwise, mist (BR) is observed or forecast.

29.3.8.6 Other. There are five categories of other weather phenomena which are reported when they occur: SQ squall SS sandstorm DS duststorm PO dust/sand whirls FC funnel cloud +FC tornado/waterspout EXAMPLES − TSRA thunderstorm with moderate rain +SN heavy snow − RA FG light rain and fog BRHZ mist and haze (visibility / mile or greater) FZDZ freezing drizzle VCSH rain shower in the vicinity +SHRASNPL heavy rain showers, snow, ice pellets (Intensity indicator refers to the predominant rain.)

29.3.9 Sky Condition. In METAR, sky condition is reported in the format: Amount / Height / (Type) or Indefinite Ceiling / Height 29.3.9.1 Amount. The amount of sky cover is reported in eighths of sky cover, using contractions: SKC clear (no clouds) 0 2 FEW > / to / cloud cover 8 8 3 4 SCT scattered ( / to / cloud cover) 8 8 5 7 BKN broken ( / to / cloud cover) 8 8 OVC overcast ( / cloud cover) CB cumulonimbus when present TCU towering cumulus when present NOTE − 1. “SKC” will be reported at manual stations. “CLR” will be used at automated stations when no clouds below 12,000 feet are reported.

2. A ceiling layer is not designated in the METAR code. For aviation purposes, the ceiling is the lowest broken or overcast layer, or vertical visibility into obscuration. Also, there is no provision for reporting thin layers in the METAR code. When clouds are thin, that layer must be reported as if it were opaque.

29.3.9.2 Height. Cloud bases are reported with three digits in hundreds of feet above ground level (AGL).

(Clouds above 12,000 feet cannot be reported by an automated station).

29.3.9.3 Type. If towering cumulus clouds (TCU) or cumulonimbus clouds (CB) are present, they are reported after the height which represents their base.

EXAMPLE − SCT025TCU BKN080 BKN250 − “two thousand five hundred scattered towering cumulus, ceiling eight thousand broken, two five thousand broken.” SCT008 OVC012CB − “eight hundred scattered ceiling one thousand two hundred overcast cumulonimbus clouds.” 29.3.9.4 Vertical Visibility (indefinite ceiling height). The height into an indefinite ceiling is preceded by “VV” and followed by three digits indicating the vertical visibility in hundreds of feet. This layer indicates total obscuration.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 77 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − / SM FG VV006 − visibility one eighth, fog, indefinite ceiling six hundred.

29.3.9.5 Obscurations are reported when the sky is partially obscured by a ground − based phenomena by indicating the amount of obscuration as FEW, SCT, BKN followed by three zeros (000). In remarks, the obscuring phenomenon precedes the amount of obscuration and three zeros.

EXAMPLE − BKN000 (IN BODY) − “sky partially obscured.” FU BKN000 (IN REMARKS) − “smoke obscuring five − to seven − eighths of the sky.” 29.3.9.6 When sky conditions include a layer aloft other than clouds, such as smoke or haze, the type of phenomena, sky cover, and height are shown in remarks.

EXAMPLE − BKN020 (IN BODY) − “ceiling two thousand broken.” RMK FU BKN020 − “broken layer of smoke aloft, based at two thousand.” 29.3.9.7 Variable Ceiling. When a ceiling is below three thousand and is variable, the remark “CIG” will be shown followed with the lowest and highest ceiling heights separated by a “V.” EXAMPLE − CIG 005V010 − “ceiling variable between five hundred and one thousand.” 29.3.9.8 Second Site Sensor. When an automated station uses meteorological discontinuity sensors, remarks will be shown to identify site specific sky conditions which differ and are lower than conditions reported in the body.

EXAMPLE − CIG 020 RY11 − “ceiling two thousand at Runway One One.” 29.3.9.9 Variable Cloud Layer. When a layer is varying in sky cover, remarks will show the variability range.

If there is more than one cloud layer, the variable layer will be identified by including the layer height.

EXAMPLE − SCT V BKN − “scattered layer variable to broken.” BKN025 V OVC − “broken layer at two thousand five hundred variable to overcast.” 29.3.9.10 Significant Clouds. When significant clouds are observed, they are shown in remarks, along with the specified information as shown below: a) Cumulonimbus (CB), or Cumulonimbus Mammatus (CBMAM), distance (if known), direction from the station, and direction of movement, if known. If the clouds are beyond 10 miles from the airport, DSNT will indicate distance.

EXAMPLE − CB W MOV E − “cumulonimbus west moving east.” CBMAM DSNT S − “cumulonimbus mammatus distant south.” b) Towering Cumulus (TCU), location, (if known), or direction from the station.

EXAMPLE − TCU OHD − “towering cumulus overhead.” TCU W − “towering cumulus west.” c) Altocumulus Castellanus (ACC), Stratocumulus Standing Lenticular (SCSL), Altocumulus Standing Lenticular (ACSL), Cirrocumulus Standing Lenticular (CCSL) or rotor clouds, describing the clouds (if needed), and the direction from the station.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 78 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ACC W “altocumulus castellanus west” ACSL SW − S “standing lenticular altocumulus southwest through south” APRNT ROTOR CLD S “apparent rotor cloud south” CCSL OVR MT E “standing lenticular cirrocumulus over the mountains east” 29.3.10 Temperature/Dew Point. Temperature and dew point are reported in two, two − digit groups in degrees Celsius, separated by a solidus (/). Temperatures below zero are prefixed with an “M.” If the temperature is available but the dew point is missing, the temperature is shown followed by a solidus. If the temperature is missing, the group is omitted from the report.

EXAMPLE − 15/08 . . . . . . . . “temperature one five, dew point 8” 00/M02 . . . . . . . “temperature zero, dew point minus 2” M05/ . . . . . . . . . “temperature minus five, dew point missing” 29.3.11 Altimeter. Altimeter settings are reported in a four − digit format in inches of mercury prefixed with an “A” to denote the units of pressure.

EXAMPLE − A2995 . . . . . . . . “altimeter two niner niner five” 29.3.12 Remarks. Remarks will be included in all observations, when appropriate. The contraction “RMK” denotes the start of the remarks section of a METAR report.

Except for precipitation, phenomena located within 5 statute miles of the point of observation will be reported as at the station. Phenomena between 5 and 10 statute miles will be reported in the vicinity, “VC.” Precipitation not occurring at the point of observation but within 10 statute miles is also reported as in the vicinity, “VC.” Phenomena beyond 10 statute miles will be shown as distant, “DSNT.” Distances are in statute miles except for automated lightning remarks which are in nautical miles. Movement of clouds or weather will be indicated by the direction toward which the phenomena is moving.

There are two categories of remarks: Automated, Manual, and Plain Language; and Additive and Automated Maintenance Data.

29.3.12.1 Automated, Manual, and Plain Language Remarks. This group of remarks may be generated from either manual or automated weather reporting stations and generally elaborates on parameters reported in the body of the report. Plain language remarks are only provided by manual stations.

1) Volcanic Eruptions 11) Lightning. When lightning is observed at a manual location, the frequency and location is 2) Tornado, Funnel Cloud, Waterspout reported.

3) Type of Automated Station (AO1 or AO2) When cloud − to − ground lightning is detected by an 4) Peak Wind automated lightning detection system, such as ALDARS: 5) Wind Shift [a] Within 5 nautical miles (NM) of the Airport 6) Tower or Surface Visibility Reference Point (ARP), it will be reported as “TS” 7) Variable Prevailing Visibility in the body of the report with no remark; 8) Sector Visibility 9) Visibility at Second Location 10) Dispatch Visual Range Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 79 United States of America 22 JAN 26 [b] Between 5 and 10 NM of the ARP, it will 17) Variable Ceiling be reported as “VCTS” in the body of the report 18) Obscurations with no remark; 19) Variable Sky Condition [c] Beyond 10 but less than 30 NM of the 20) Significant Cloud Types ARP, it will be reported in remarks as “DSNT” 21) Ceiling Height at Second Location followed by the direction from the ARP.

22) Pressure Rising or Falling Rapidly EXAMPLE − LTG DSNT W or LTG DSNT ALQDS 23) Sea − Level Pressure 12) Beginning/Ending Time of Precipitation 24) Aircraft Mishap (not transmitted) 13) Beginning/Ending Time of Thunderstorms 25) No SPECI Reports Taken 14) Thunderstorm Location; Movement Direction 26) Snow Increasing Rapidly 15) Hailstone Size 27) Other Significant Information 16) Virga 29.3.12.2 Additive and Automated Maintenance Data Remarks.

1) Hourly Precipitation 11) 24 − Hour Maximum/Minimum Temperatures 2) Precipitation Amount 12) Pressure Tendency 3) 24 − Hour Precipitation 13) Sensor Status: 4) Snow Depth on Ground WINO 5) Water Equivalent of Snow on Ground ZRANO 6) Cloud Types SNO 7) Duration of Sunshine VRNO 8) Hourly Temperature and Dew Point (Tenths) PNO 9) 6 − Hour Maximum Temperature VISNO 10) 6 − Hour Minimum Temperature EXAMPLE − METAR report and explanation: METAR KSFO 041453Z AUTO VRB02KT 3SM BR CLR 15/12 A3012 RMK AO2 METAR Type of report (aviation routine weather report) KSFO Station identifier (San Francisco, CA) 041453Z Date/Time (4th day of month; time 1453 UTC) AUTO Fully automated; no human intervention VRB02KT Wind (wind variable at two) 3SM Visibility (visibility three statute miles) BR Visibility obscured by mist CLR No clouds below one two thousand 15/12 Temperature one five; dew point one two A3012 Altimeter three zero one two RMK Remarks AO2 This automated station has a weather discriminator (for precipitation).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 80 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − METAR report and explanation: METAR KBNA 281250Z 33018KT 290V360 1/2SM R31/2700FT SN BLSN FG VV008 00/M03 A2991 RMK RAE42SNB42 METAR Aviation routine weather report KBNA Nashville, TN 281250Z 28th day of month; time 1250 UTC (no modifier) This is a manually generated report, due to the absence of “AUTO” and “AO1 or AO2” in remarks.

33018KT Wind three three zero at one eight 290V360 Wind variable between two nine zero and three six zero / SM Visibility one half statute mile R31/2700FT Runway three one RVR two thousand seven hundred feet SN Moderate snow BLSN FG Visibility obscured by blowing snow and fog VV008 Indefinite ceiling eight hundred 00/M03 Temperature zero; dew point minus three A2991 Altimeter two niner niner one RMK Remarks RAE36 Rain ended at three six SNB42 Snow began at four two EXAMPLE − SPECI report and explanation: SPECI KCVG 152224Z 28024G36KT 3/4SM +TSRA BKN008 OVC020CB 28/23 A3000 RMK TSRAB24 TS W MOV E.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 81 United States of America 22 JAN 26 SPECI Nonroutine aviation special weather report KCVG Cincinnati, OH 152224Z 15th day of month; time 2224 UTC (no modifier) This is a manually generated report due to the absence of “AUTO” and “AO1 or AO2” in remarks.

28024G36KT Wind two eight zero at two four gusts three six 3/4SM Visibility three fourths statute mile +TSRA Thunderstorms, heavy rain BKN008 Ceiling eight hundred broken OVC020CB Two thousand overcast cumulonim - bus clouds 28/23 Temperature two eight; dew point two three A3000 Altimeter three zero zero zero RMK Remarks TSRAB24 Thunderstorm and rain began at two four TS W MOV E Thunderstorm west moving east 29.4 Aerodrome Forecast (TAF). A concise statement of the expected meteorological conditions at an airport during a specified period. At most locations, TAFs have a 24 hour forecast period. However, TAFs for some locations have a 30 hour forecast period. These forecast periods may be shorter in the case of an amended TAF.

TAFs use the same codes as METAR weather reports. They are scheduled four times daily for 24 − hour periods beginning at 0000Z, 0600Z, 1200Z, and 1800Z.

Forecast times in the TAF are depicted in two ways. The first is a 6 − digit number to indicate a specific point in time, consisting of a two − digit date, two − digit hour, and two − digit minute (such as issuance time or FM). The second is a pair of four − digit numbers separated by a “/” to indicate a beginning and end for a period of time.

In this case, each four − digit pair consists of a two − digit date and a two − digit hour.

TAFs are issued in the following format: TYPE OF REPORT/ICAO STATION IDENTIFIER/DATE AND TIME OF ORIGIN/VALID PERIOD DATE AND TIME/FORECAST METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS NOTE − The “/” above and in the following descriptions are for separation purposes in this publication and do not appear in the actual TAFs.

TAF KORD 051130Z 0512/0618 14008KT 5SM BR BKN030 TEMPO 0513/0516 1 1/2SM BR FM051600 16010KT P6SM SKC FM052300 20013G20KT 4SM SHRA OVC020 PROB40 0600/0606 2SM TSRA OVC008CB BECMG 0606/0608 21015KT P6SM NSW SCT040 TAF format observed in the above example: TAF = type of report KORD = ICAO station identifier 051130Z = date and time of origin (issuance time) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 82 United States of America 22 JAN 26 0512/0618 = valid period date and times 14008KT 5SM BR BKN030 = forecast meteorological conditions 29.4.1 Explanation of TAF elements 29.4.1.1 Type of Report. There are two types of TAF issuances, a routine forecast issuance (TAF) and an amended forecast (TAF AMD). An amended TAF is issued when the current TAF no longer adequately describes the on − going weather or the forecaster feels the TAF is not representative of the current or expected weather.

Corrected (COR) or delayed (RTD) TAFs are identified only in the communications header which precedes the actual forecasts.

29.4.1.2 ICAO Station Identifier. The TAF code uses ICAO 4 − letter location identifiers as described in the METAR section.

29.4.1.3 Date and Time of Origin. This element is the date and time the forecast is actually prepared. The format is a two − digit date and four − digit time followed, without a space, by the letter “Z.” 29.4.1.4 Valid Period Date and Time. he UTC valid period of the forecast consists of two four − digit sets, separated by a “/”. The first four − digit set is a two − digit date followed by the two − digit beginning hour, and the second four − digit set is a two − digit date followed by the two − digit ending hour. Although most airports have a 24 − hour TAF, a select number of airports have a 30 − hour TAF. In the case of an amended forecast, or a forecast which is corrected or delayed, the valid period may be for less than 24 hours. Where an airport or terminal operates on a part − time basis (less than 24 hours/day), the TAFs issued for those locations will have the abbreviated statement “AMD NOT SKED” added to the end of the forecasts. The time observations are scheduled to end and/or resume will be indicated by expanding the AMD NOT SKED statement. Expanded statements will include: a) Observation ending time (AFT DDHHmm; for example, AFT 120200) b) Scheduled observations resumption time (TIL DDHHmm; for example, TIL 171200Z) or c) Period of observation unavailability (DDHH/DDHH); for example, 2502/2512).

29.4.1.5 Forecast Meteorological Conditions. This is the body of the TAF. The basic format is: Wind / Visibility / Weather / Sky Condition / Optional Data (Wind Shear) The wind, visibility, and sky condition elements are always included in the initial time group of the forecast.

Weather is included only if significant to aviation. If a significant, lasting change in any of the elements is expected during the valid period, a new time period with the changes is included. It should be noted that with the exception of an “FM” group, the new time period will include only those elements which are expected to change; i.e., if a lowering of the visibility is expected but the wind is expected to remain the same, the new time period reflecting the lower visibility would not include a forecast wind. The forecast wind would remain the same as in the previous time period.

Any temporary conditions expected during a specific time period are included with that time period. The following describes the elements in the above format.

a) Wind. This five (or six) digit group includes the expected wind direction (first 3 digits) and speed (last 2 digits or 3 digits if 100 knots or greater). The contraction “KT” follows to denote the units of wind speed. Wind gusts are noted by the letter “G” appended to the wind speed followed by the highest expected gust.

NOTE − A variable wind direction is noted by “VRB” where the three digit direction usually appears. A calm wind (3 knots or less) is forecast as “00000KT.” EXAMPLE − 18010KT − wind one eight zero at one zero (wind is blowing from 180 at 10 knots).

35012G20KT − wind three five zero at one two gust two zero Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 83 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) Visibility. The expected prevailing visibility up to and including 6 miles is forecast in statute miles, including fractions of miles, followed by “SM” to note the units of measure. Expected visibilities greater than 6 miles are forecast as P6SM (Plus six statute miles).

EXAMPLE − 1/2SM . . . . . . . . visibility one − half 4SM . . . . . . . . . visibility four P6SM . . . . . . . . visibility more than six c) Weather Phenomena. The expected weather phenomena is coded in TAF reports using the same format, qualifiers, and phenomena contractions as METAR reports (except UP).

Obscurations to vision will be forecast whenever the prevailing visibility is forecast to be 6 statute miles or less.

If no significant weather is expected to occur during a specific time period in the forecast, the weather group is omitted for that time period. If, after a time period in which significant weather has been forecast, a change to a forecast of no significant weather occurs, the contraction NSW (no significant weather) will appear as the weather group in the new time period. (NSW is included only in temporary (TEMPO) groups.)

NOTE − It is very important that pilots understand that NSW only refers to weather phenomena, i.e., rain, snow, drizzle, etc. Omitted conditions, such as sky conditions, visibility, winds, etc., are carried over from the previous time group.

d) Sky Condition. TAF sky condition forecasts use the METAR format described in the METAR section.

Cumulonimbus clouds (CB) are the only cloud type forecast in TAFs. When clear skies are forecast, the contraction “SKC” will always be used. The contraction “CLR” is never used in the aerodrome forecast (TAF).

When the sky is obscured due to a surface − based phenomenon, vertical visibility (VV) into the obscuration is forecast. The format for vertical visibility is “VV” followed by a three − digit height in hundreds of feet.

NOTE − As in METAR, ceiling layers are not designated in the TAF code. For aviation purposes, the ceiling is the lowest broken or overcast layer or vertical visibility into a complete obscuration.

SKC “sky clear” SCT005 BKN025CB “five hundred scattered, ceiling two thousand five hundred broken cumulonimbus clouds” VV008 “indefinite ceiling eight hundred” e) Optional Data (Wind Shear). Wind Shear is the forecast of non − convective, low − level winds (up to 2,000 feet). The forecast includes the letters “WS” followed by the height of the wind shear, the wind direction and wind speed at the indicated height and the ending letters “KT” (knots). Height is given in hundreds of feet (AGL) up to and including 2,000 feet. Wind shear is encoded with the contraction “WS” followed by a three − digit height, slant character “/” and winds at the height indicated in the same format as surface winds. The wind shear element is omitted if not expected to occur.

WS010/18040KT “low level wind shear at one thousand, wind one eight zero at four zero” 29.5 Probability Forecast. The probability or chance of thunderstorms or other precipitation events occurring, along with associated weather conditions (wind, visibility, and sky conditions). The PROB30 group is used when the occurrence of thunderstorms or precipitation is 30 − 39% and the PROB40 group is used when the occurrence of thunderstorms or precipitation is 40 − 49%. This is followed by two four − digit groups separated by a “/”, giving the beginning date and hour, and the ending date and hour of the time period during which the thunderstorms or precipitation are expected.

NOTE − NWS does not use PROB 40 in the TAF. However U.S. Military generated TAFS may include PROB40. PROB30 will not be shown during the first nine hours of a NWS forecast.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 84 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − PROB40 2221/2302 / SM +TSRA “chance between 2100Z and 0200Z of visibility one − half statute mile in thunderstorms and heavy rain.” PROB30 3010/3014 1SM RASN . “chance between 1000Z and 1400Z of visibility one statute mile in mixed rain and .

snow.” 29.6 Forecast Change Indicators. The following change indicators are used when either a rapid, gradual, or temporary change is expected in some or all of the forecast meteorological conditions. Each change indicator marks a time group within the TAF report.

29.6.1 From (FM) Group. The FM group is used when a rapid change, usually occurring in less than one hour, in prevailing conditions is expected. Typically, a rapid change of prevailing conditions to more or less a completely new set of prevailing conditions is associated with a synoptic feature passing through the terminal area (cold or warm frontal passage). Appended to the “FM” indicator is the six − digit date, hour, and minute the change is expected to begin and continues until the next change group or until the end of the current forecast.

A “FM” group will mark the beginning of a new line in a TAF report (indented 5 spaces). Each “FM” group contains all the required elements − wind, visibility, weather, and sky condition. Weather will be omitted in “FM” groups when it is not significant to aviation. FM groups will not include the contraction NSW.

EXAMPLE − FM210100 14010KT P6SM SKC − “after 0100Z on the 21st, wind one four zero at one zero, visibility more than six, sky clear.” 29.6.2 Becoming (BECMG) Group. The BECMG group is used when a gradual change in conditions is expected over a longer time period, usually two hours. The time period when the change is expected is two four − digit groups separated by a “/”, with the beginning date and hour, and ending date and hour of the change period which follows the BECMG indicator. The gradual change will occur at an unspecified time within this time period. Only the changing forecast meteorological conditions are included in BECMG groups. The omitted conditions are carried over from the previous time group.

NOTE − The NWS does not use BECMG in the TAF.

EXAMPLE − OVC012 BECMG 0114/0116 BKN020 − “ceiling one thousand two hundred overcast. Then a gradual change to ceiling two thousand broken between 1400Z on the 1st and 1600Z on the 1st.” 29.6.3 Temporary (TEMPO) Group. The TEMPO group is used for any conditions in wind, visibility, weather, or sky condition which are expected to last for generally less than an hour at a time (occasional), and are expected to occur during less than half the time period. The TEMPO indicator is followed by two four − digit groups separated by a “/”. The first four digit group gives the beginning date and hour, and the second four digit group gives the ending date and hour of the time period during which the temporary conditions are expected. Only the changing forecast meteorological conditions are included in TEMPO groups. The omitted conditions are carried over from the previous time group.

EXAMPLE − 1. SCT030 TEMPO 0519/0523 BKN030 − “three thousand scattered with occasional ceilings three thousand broken between 1900Z on the 5th and 2300Z on the 5th.” 2. 4SM HZ TEMPO 1900/1906 2SM BR HZ − “visibility four in haze with occasional visibility two in mist and haze between 0000Z on the 19th and 0600Z on the 19th.” Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 85 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 24

Key to Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Aviation

Routine Weather Report (METAR) (Front)

TAF KPIT 091730Z 0918/1024 15005KT 5SM HZ FEW020 WS010/31022KT FM091930 30015G25KT 3SM SHRA OVC015 TEMPO 0920/0922 1/2SM +TSRA OVC008CB FM100100 27008KT 5SM SHRA BKN020 OVC040 PROB30 1004/1007 1SM RA BR FM101015 18005KT 6SM SHRA OVC020 BECMG 1013/1015 P6SM NSW SKC NOTE : Users are cautioned to confirm DATE and TIME of the TAF. For example FM 10 0000 is 0000Z on the 10th . Do not confuse with 1000Z!

METAR KPIT 091955Z COR 22015G25KT 3/4SM R28L/2600FT TSRA OVC010CB 18/16 A2992 RMK SLP045 T01820159 Forecast Explanation Report TAF Message type: TAFroutine or TAF AMDamended forecast, METAR METARhourly, SPECIspecial or TESTM noncommissioned ASOS report KPIT ICAO location indicator KPIT 091730Z Issuance time: ALL times in UTC “Z”, 2digit date, 4digit time 091955Z 0918/1024 Valid period, either 24 hours or 30 hours. The first two digits of EACH four digit number indicate the date of the valid period, the final two di th th gits indicate the time (valid from 18Z on the 9 to 24Z on the 10 ).

In U.S. METAR: CORrected ob; or AUTOmated ob for automated re COR port with no human intervention; omitted when observer logs on.

15005KT Wind: 3 digit truenorth direction , nearest 10 degrees (or V aRiaBle); 22015G25KT next 23 digits for speed and unit, KT (KMH or MPS); as needed, G ust and maximum speed; 00000KT for calm; for METAR, if direction varies 60 degrees or more, Variability appended, e.g., 180V260 5SM Prevailing visibility; in U.S., Statute Miles & fractions; above 6 miles in ¾SM TAF Plus6SM. (Or, 4digit minimum visibility in meters and as re quired, lowest value with direction) Runway Visual Range: R; 2digit runway designator Left, Center, or R28L/2600FT Right as needed; “/”, Minus or Plus in U.S., 4digit value, F eeT in U.S., (usually meters elsewhere); 4digit value Variability 4digit value (and tendency Down, Up or No change) HZ Significant present, forecast and recent weather: see table (on back) TSRA FEW020 Cloud amount, height and type: Sky Clear 0/8, FEW >0/82/8, ScaTtered OVC 010CB 3/84/8, BroKeN 5/87/8, OverC ast 8/8; 3digit height in hundreds of ft; Towering Cumulus or CumulonimBus in METAR ; in TAF , only CB.

Vertical Visibility for obscured sky and height “VV004”. More than 1 layer may be reported or forecast. In automated METAR reports only, CleaR for “clear below 12,000 feet” Temperature: degrees Celsius; first 2 digits, temperature “/” last 2 digits, 18/16 dewpoint temperature; Minus for below zero, e.g., M06 Altimeter setting: indicator and 4 digits; in U.S., Ainches and hun A2992 dredths; (QhectoPascals, e.g., Q1013) WS010/31022KT In U.S. TAF , nonconvective lowlevel (≤2,000 ft) Wind Shear; 3digit height (hundreds of ft); “/”; 3digit wind direction and 23 digit wind speed above the indicated height, and unit, KT Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 86 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 25

Key to Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Aviation

Routine Weather Report (METAR) (Back)

In METAR , ReMarK indicator & remarks. For example: Sea Level RMK SLP045 Pressure in hectoPascals & tenths, as shown: 1004.5 hPa; Temp/ T01820159 dewpoint in tenths ° C, as shown: temp. 18.2 ° C, dewpoint 15.9 ° C FM091930 FroM: changes are expected at: 2digit date, 2digit hour, and 2digit minute beginning time: indicates significant change. Each FM starts on a new line, indented 5 spaces TEMPO TEMPOrary: changes expected for <1 hour and in total, < half of the 0920/0922 period between the 2digit date and 2digit hour beginning, and 2digit date and 2digit hour ending time PROB30 PROBability and 2digit percent (30 or 40): probable condition in the 1004/1007 period between the 2digit date & 2digit hour beginning time, and the 2digit date and 2digit hour ending time BECMG BECoMinG: change expected in the period between the 2digit date and 1013/1015 2digit hour beginning time, and the 2digit date and 2digit hour ending time Table of Significant Present, Forecast and Recent Weather Grouped in categories and used in the order listed below; or as needed in TAF, No Significant Weather.

Qualifiers Intensity or Proximity “” = Light No sign = Moderate “+” = Heavy “VC” = Vicinity, but not at aerodrome. In the US METAR, 5 to 10 SM from the point of observation. In the US TAF, 5 to 10 SM from the center of the runway complex. Elsewhere, within 8000m.

Descriptor BC – Patches BL – Blowing DR – Drifting FZ – Freezing MI – Shallow PR – Partial SH – Showers TS – Thunderstorm Weather Phenomena Precipitation DZ – Drizzle GR – Hail GS – Small Hail/Snow Pellets IC – Ice Crystals PL – Ice Pellets RA – Rain SG – Snow Grains SN – Snow UP – Unknown Precipitation in automated observations Obscuration BR – Mist (≥5/8SM) DU – Widespread Dust FG – Fog (<5/8SM) FU – Smoke HZ – Haze PY – Spray SA – Sand VA – Volcanic Ash Other DS – Dust Storm FC – Funnel Cloud +FC – Tornado or Waterspout PO – Well developed dust or sand whirls SQ – Squall SS – Sandstorm Explanations in parentheses “()” indicate different worldwide practices.

Ceiling is not specified; defined as the lowest broken or overcast layer, or the vertical visibility.

NWS TAFs exclude BECMG groups and temperature forecasts, NWS TAFS do not use PROB in the first 9 hours of a TAF; NWS METARs exclude trend forecasts. US Military TAFs include Turbulence and Icing groups.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 87 United States of America 22 JAN 26 30. Meteorological Broadcasts (ATIS, VHF and LF) 30.1 Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) Broadcasts 30.1.1 These broadcasts are made continuously and include as weather information only the ceiling, visibility, wind, and altimeter setting of the aerodrome at which they are located.

30.2 Navigational Aids Providing Broadcast Services 30.2.1 A compilation of navigational aids over which weather broadcasts are transmitted is not available for this publication. Complete information concerning all navigational aids providing this service is contained in the Chart Supplement U.S. Similar information for the Pacific and Alaskan areas is contained in the Chart Supplements Pacific and Alaska.

TBL GEN 3.5 − 15 Meteorological Broadcasts (VOLMET) Name Call Sign Frequency Broadcast Form Contents Emission Remarks New York New York 3485, 6604, H00 − 05 Aerodrome KDTW Detroit Voice Plain language Radio 10051, 13270 Forecasts KCLE Cleveland English kHz KCVG Cincinnati Hourly Reports KDTW Detroit KCLE Cleveland KCVG Cincinnati KIND Indianapolis KPIT Pittsburgh H05 − 10 SIGMET Oceanic − New York FIR Aerodrome KBGR Bangor Forecasts KBDL Windsor Locks KCLT Charlotte Hourly Reports KBGR Bangor KBDL Windsor Locks KORF Norfolk KCLT Charlotte H10 − 15 Aerodrome KJFK New York Forecasts KEWR Newark KBOS Boston Hourly Reports KJFK New York KEWR Newark KBOS Boston KBAL Baltimore KIAD Washington H15 − 20 SIGMET Oceanic − Miami FIR/San Juan FIR Aerodrome MXKF Bermuda Forecasts KMIA Miami KATL Atlanta Hourly Reports MXKF Bermuda KMIA Miami MYNN Nassau KMCO Orlando KATL Atlanta H30 − 35 Aerodrome KORD Chicago Forecasts KMKE Milwaukee KMSP Minneapolis Hourly Reports KORD Chicago KMKE Milwaukee KMSP Minneapolis KDTW Detroit KBOS Boston E35 − 40 SIGMET Oceanic − New York FIR Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 88 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Name Call Sign Frequency Broadcast Form Contents Emission Remarks Aerodrome KIND Indianapolis Forecasts KSTL St. Louis KPIT Pittsburgh Hourly Reports KIND Indianapolis KSTL St. Louis KPIT Pittsburgh KACY Atlantic City E40 − 45 Aerodrome KBAL Baltimore Forecasts KPHL Philadelphia KIAD Washington Hourly Reports KBAL Baltimore KPHL Philadelphia KIAD Washington KJFK New York KEWR Newark E45 − 50 SIGMET Oceanic − Miami FIR/San Juan FIR Aerodrome MYNN Nassau Forecasts KMCO Orlando Hourly Reports MXKF Bermuda KMIA Miami MYNN Nassau KMCO Orlando KATL Atlanta KTPA Tampa KPBI West Palm Beach All stations operate on A3 emission H24.

All broadcasts are made 24 hours daily, seven days a week.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 89 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 26 Key to Decode an ASOS/AWOS (METAR) Observation (Front) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 90 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 27 Key to Decode an ASOS/AWOS (METAR) Observation (Back) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 91 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 28 NEXRAD Coverage Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 92 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 29 NEXRAD Coverage Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.5 − 93 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 30 NEXRAD Coverage Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.5 − 94 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.5 − 31 Volcanic Activity Reporting Form (VAR) Air − reports are critically important in assessing the hazards which volcanic ash cloud presents to aircraft operations.

OPERATOR: A/C IDENTIFICATION: (as indicated on flight plan) PILOT-IN-COMMAND: DEP FROM: DATE: TIME; UTC: ARR AT: DATE: TIME; UTC: ADDRESSEE AIREP SPECIAL Items 1–8 are to be reported immediately to the ATS unit that you are in contact with.

1) AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION 2) POSITION 3) TIME 4) FLIGHT LEVEL OR ALTITUDE 5) VOLCANIC ACTIVITY OBSERVED AT (position or bearing, estimated level of ash cloud and distance from aircraft) 6) AIR TEMPERATURE 7) SPOT WIND Other 8) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION No SO 2 detected Yes No (Brief description of activity especially vertical and lateral extent of ash cloud and, Ash encountered Yes where possible, horizontal movement, rate of growth, etc.)

After landing complete items 9–16 then fax form to: (Fax number to be provided by the meteorological authority based on local arrangements between the meteorological authority and the operator concerned.)

9) DENSITY OF ASH CLOUD (a) Wispy (b) Moderate dense (c) Very dense (a) White 10) COLOUR OF ASH CLOUD (b) Light grey (c) Dark grey (e) Other (d) Black 11) ERUPTION (a) Continuous (b) Intermittent (c) Not visible 12) POSITION OF ACTIVITY (a) Summit (b) Side (c) Single (d) Multiple (e) Not observed 13) OTHER OBSERVED (a) Lightning (b) Glow (c) Large rocks FEATURES OF ERUPTION (d) Ash fallout (e) Mushroom cloud (f) All 14) EFFECT ON AIRCRAFT (a) Communication (b) Navigation systems (c) Engines (d) Pitot static (e) Windscreen (f) Windows 15) OTHER EFFECTS (a) Turbulence (b) St. Elmo’s Fire (c) Other fumes 16) OTHER INFORMATION (Any information considered useful.)

Date: 07/19/2010 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3.6 Search and Rescue

1. Responsible Authority 1.1 The Search and Rescue (SAR) service in the U.S. and its area of jurisdiction is organized in accordance with the Standards and Recommended Practices of ICAO Annex 12 by the Federal Aviation Administration with the collaboration of the U.S. Coast Guard and the U.S. Air Force. The Coast Guard and the Air Force are the responsible SAR authorities and have the responsibility for making the necessary facilities available. Postal and telegraphic addresses for the Federal Aviation Administration are given in. The appropriate addresses for Coast Guard and Air Force offices are: Air Force Coast Guard Postal Address: Postal Address: Inland SAR Coordinator United States Coast Guard Commander ARRS Search and Rescue Division (GOSR/73) USAF RCC 400 7th Street, S.W.

Tyndall AFB, FL Washington, D.C. 20590 Telegraphic Address: None. Telegraphic Address: None.

Telex: None. Telex: 89 2427 Telephone: 1 − 800 − 851 − 3051, Commercial: 850 − 283 − 5955, or Defense Switching Network: 523 − 5955.

2. Types of Service 2.1 Details of the Rescue Coordination Centers (RCCs) and related rescue units are given in this section. In addition, various elements of state and local police organizations are available for search and rescue missions when required. The aeronautical, maritime and public telecommunication services are available to the search and rescue organizations.

2.2 Aircraft, both land and amphibious based, are used, as well as land and seagoing vessels, when required, and carry survival equipment. Airborne survival equipment, capable of being dropped, consists of inflatable rubber dinghies equipped with medical supplies, emergency rations and survival radio equipment. Aircraft and marine craft are equipped to communicate on 121.5, 123.1, 243.0, 500 kHz, 2182 kHz, and 8364 kHz. Ground rescue teams are equipped to communicate on 121.5 MHz, 500 kHz, and 8364 kHz. SAR aircraft and marine craft are equipped with direction finding equipment and radar.

3. SAR Agreements 3.1 Bilateral agreements exist between the U.S. and the following neighboring States of the NAM region: Canada and Mexico.

3.1.1 There are two agreements with Canada. One provides for public aircraft of either country which are engaged in air search and rescue operations to enter or leave either country without being subjected to immigration or customs formalities normally required. The other permits vessels and wrecking appliances of either country to render aid and assistance on specified border waters and on the shores and in the waters of the other country along the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts within a distance of 30 miles from the international boundary on those coasts. A post operations report is required.

3.1.2 The agreement with Mexico applies to territorial waters and shores of each country within 200 miles of the border on the Gulf Coast and within 270 miles of the border on the Pacific Coast. It permits the vessels and aircraft of either country to proceed to the assistance of a distressed vessel or aircraft of their own registry upon notification of entry and of departure of the applicable waters and shores.

3.2 In situations not falling under the above agreements, requests from States to participate in a SAR operation within the U.S. for aircraft of their own registry may be addressed to the nearest RCC. The RCC would reply, and issue appropriate instructions.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4. General Conditions of Availability 4.1 The SAR service and facilities in the U.S. are available to the neighboring States within the NAM, NAT, CAR, PAC Regions upon request to the appropriate RCC at all times when they are not engaged in search and rescue activity in their home territory. All facilities are specialized in SAR techniques and functions.

5. Applicable ICAO Documents Annex 12 . . . . . . . . . Search and Rescue Annex 13 . . . . . . . . . Aircraft Accident Inquiry Doc 7030 . . . . . . . . . Regional Supplementary Procedures for Alerting and Search and Rescue Services applicable to the NAM, NAT, CAR, PAC Regions.

6. Differences from ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures 6.1 Differences from ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures are listed in GEN 1.7 .

7. Emergency Locator Transmitters 7.1 General 7.1.1 ELTs are required for most General Aviation airplanes.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR SECTION 91.207.

7.1.2 ELTs of various types were developed as a means of locating downed aircraft. These electronic, battery operated transmitters operate on one of three frequencies. These operating frequencies are 121.5 MHz, 243.0 MHz, and the newer 406 MHz. ELTs operating on 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz are analog devices. The newer 406 MHz ELT is a digital transmitter that can be encoded with the owner’s contact information or aircraft data.

The latest 406 MHz ELT models can also be encoded with the aircraft’s position data which can help SAR forces locate the aircraft much more quickly after a crash. The 406 MHz ELTs also transmits a stronger signal when activated than the older 121.5 MHz ELTs.

7.1.2.1 The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requires 406 MHz ELTs be registered with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as outlined in the ELTs documentation. The FAA’s 406 MHz ELT Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO − C126 also requires that each 406 MHz ELT be registered with NOAA. The reason is NOAA maintains the owner registration database for U.S. registered 406 MHz alerting devices, which includes ELTs. NOAA also operates the United States’ portion of the Cospas − Sarsat satellite distress alerting system designed to detect activated 406 MHz ELTs and other distress alerting devices .

7.1.2.2 As of 2009, the Cospas − Sarsat system terminated monitoring and reception of the 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz frequencies. What this means for pilots is that those aircraft with only 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz ELTs onboard will have to depend upon either a nearby air traffic control facility receiving the alert signal or an overflying aircraft monitoring 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz detecting the alert and advising ATC.

7.1.2.3 In the event that a properly registered 406 MHz ELT activates, the Cospas − Sarsat satellite system can decode the owner’s information and provide that data to the appropriate search and rescue (SAR) center. In the United States, NOAA provides the alert data to the appropriate U.S. Air Force Rescue Coordination Center (RCC) or U.S. Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Center. That RCC can then telephone or contact the owner to verify the status of the aircraft. If the aircraft is safely secured in a hangar, a costly ground or airborne search is avoided. In the case of an inadvertent 406 MHz ELT activation, the owner can deactivate the 406 MHz ELT. If the 406 MHz ELT equipped aircraft is being flown, the RCC can quickly activate a search. 406 MHz ELTs permit the Cospas − Sarsat satellite system to narrow the search area to a more confined area compared to that of a 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz ELT. 406 MHz ELTs also include a low − power 121.5 MHz homing transmitter to aid searchers in finding the aircraft in the terminal search phase.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.1.2.4 Each analog ELT emits a distinctive downward swept audio tone on 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz.

7.1.2.5 If “armed” and when subject to crash − generated forces, ELTs are designed to automatically activate and continuously emit their respective signals, analog or digital. The transmitters will operate continuously for at least 48 hours over a wide temperature range. A properly installed, maintained, and functioning ELT can expedite search and rescue operations and save lives if it survives the crash and is activated.

7.1.2.6 Pilots and their passengers should know how to activate the aircraft’s ELT if manual activation is required. They should also be able to verify the aircraft’s ELT is functioning and transmitting an alert after a crash or manual activation.

7.1.2.7 Because of the large number of 121.5 MHz ELT false alerts and the lack of a quick means of verifying the actual status of an activated 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz analog ELT through an owner registration database, U.S. SAR forces do not respond as quickly to initial 121.5/243.0 MHz ELT alerts as the SAR forces do to 406 MHz ELT alerts. Compared to the almost instantaneous detection of a 406 MHz ELT, SAR forces’ normal practice is to wait for confirmation of an overdue aircraft or similar notification. In some cases, this confirmation process can take hours. SAR forces can initiate a response to 406 MHz alerts in minutes compared to the potential delay of hours for a 121.5/243.0 MHz ELT. Therefore, due to the obvious advantages of 406 MHz beacons and the significant disadvantages to the older 121.5/243.0 MHz beacons, and considering that the International Cospas − Sarsat Program stopped the monitoring of 121.5/243.0 MHz by satellites on February 1, 2009, all aircraft owners/operators are highly encouraged by both NOAA and the FAA to consider making the switch to a digital 406 MHz ELT beacon. Further, for non − aircraft owner pilots, check the ELT installed in the aircraft you are flying, and as appropriate, obtain a personal locator beacon transmitting on 406 MHz.

7.2 ELT Testing 7.2.1 ELTs should be tested in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, preferably in a shielded or screened room or specially designed test container to prevent the broadcast of signals which could trigger a false alert.

7.2.2 When this cannot be done, aircraft operational testing is authorized as follows: 7.2.2.1 Analog 121.5/243 MHz ELTs should only be tested during the first 5 minutes after any hour. If operational tests must be made outside of this period, they should be coordinated with the nearest FAA Control Tower. Tests should be no longer than three audible sweeps. If the antenna is removable, a dummy load should be substituted during test procedures.

7.2.2.2 Digital 406 MHz ELTs should only be tested in accordance with the unit’s manufacturer’s instructions.

7.2.2.3 Airborne tests are not authorized.

7.3 False Alarms 7.3.1 Caution should be exercised to prevent the inadvertent activation of ELTs in the air or while they are being handled on the ground. Accidental or unauthorized activation will generate an emergency signal that cannot be distinguished from the real thing, leading to expensive and frustrating searches. A false ELT signal could also interfere with genuine emergency transmissions and hinder or prevent the timely location of crash sites. Frequent false alarms could also result in complacency and decrease the vigorous reaction that must be attached to all ELT signals.

7.3.2 Numerous cases of inadvertent activation have occurred as a result of aerobatics, hard landings, movement by ground crews and aircraft maintenance. These false alarms can be minimized by monitoring 121.5 MHz and/or 243.0 MHz as follows: 7.3.2.1 In flight when a receiver is available.

7.3.2.2 Before engine shut down at the end of each flight.

7.3.2.3 When the ELT is handled during installation or maintenance.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.3.2.4 When maintenance is being performed near the ELT.

7.3.2.5 When a ground crew moves the aircraft.

7.3.2.6 If an ELT signal is heard, turn off the aircraft’s ELT to determine if it is transmitting. If it has been activated, maintenance might be required before the unit is returned to the “ARMED” position. You should contact the nearest Air Traffic facility and notify it of the inadvertent activation.

7.4 Inflight Monitoring and Reporting 7.4.1 Pilots are encouraged to monitor 121.5 MHz and/or 243.0 MHz while in flight to assist in identifying possible emergency ELT transmissions. On receiving a signal, report the following information to the nearest air traffic facility: 7.4.1.1 Your position at the time the signal was first heard.

7.4.1.2 Your position at the time the signal was last heard.

7.4.1.3 Your position at maximum signal strength.

7.4.1.4 Your flight altitudes and frequency on which the emergency signal was heard: 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz.

If possible, positions should be given relative to a navigation aid. If the aircraft has homing equipment, provide the bearing to the emergency signal with each reported position.

8. National Search and Rescue Plan 8.1 By federal interagency agreement, the National Search and Rescue Plan provides for the effective use of all available facilities in all types of SAR missions. These facilities include aircraft, vessels, pararescue and ground rescue teams, and emergency radio fixing. Under the Plan, the U.S. Coast Guard is responsible for the coordination of SAR in the Maritime Region, and the U.S. Air Force is responsible in the Inland Region. To carry out these responsibilities, the Coast Guard and the Air Force have established RCCs to direct SAR activities within their regions. For aircraft emergencies, distress and urgency information normally will be passed to the appropriate RCC through an air route traffic control center (ARTCC) or flight service station (FSS).

8.2 Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Centers TBL GEN 3.6 − 1 Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Centers Alameda, CA Miami, FL 510 − 437 − 3701 305 − 415 − 6800 Boston, MA New Orleans, LA 617 − 223 − 8555 504 − 589 − 6225 Cleveland, OH Portsmouth, VA 216 − 902 − 6117 757 − 398 − 6390 Honolulu, HI Seattle, WA 808 − 541 − 2500 206 − 220 − 7001 Juneau, AK San Juan, PR 907 − 463 − 2000 787 − 289 − 2042 8.3 Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Centers are served by major radio stations which guard 2182 kHz (VOICE). In addition, Coast Guard units along the seacoasts of the U.S. and shores of the Great Lakes guard 2182 kHz. The call “COAST GUARD” will alert all Coast Guard Radio Stations within range. 2182 kHz is also guarded by most commercial coast stations and some ships and boats.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 8.4 Air Force Rescue Coordination Centers TBL GEN 3.6 − 2 Air Force Rescue Coordination Center Tyndall AFB, Florida Phone Commercial 850 − 283 − 5955 WATS 800 − 851 − 3051 DSN 523 − 5955 TBL GEN 3.6 − 3 Air Command Rescue Coordination Center Alaska Alaskan Air Command Rescue Coordination Center Elemendorf AFB, Alaska Phone Commercial 907 − 428 − 7230 or 800 − 420 − 7230 (outside Anchorage) DSN 317 − 551 − 7230 8.5 Joint Rescue Coordination Center Hawaii TBL GEN 3.6 − 4 Honolulu Joint Rescue Coordination Center HQ 14th CG District Phone Honolulu Commercial 808 − 541 − 2500 DSN 448 − 0301 9. Procedures and Signals for Aircraft in Emergency 9.1 Search and Rescue 9.1.1 Search and Rescue is a life − saving service provided through the combined efforts of the federal agencies signatory to the National SAR Plan, and the agencies responsible for SAR within each State. Operational resources are provided by the U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Defense components, the Civil Air Patrol, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, county and local law enforcement and other public safety agencies, and private volunteer organizations. Services include search for missing aircraft, survival aid, rescue, and emergency medical help for the occupants after an accident site is located.

9.2 Emergency and Overdue Aircraft 9.2.1 ARTCCs and FSSs will alert the SAR system when information is received from any source that an aircraft is in difficulty, overdue, or missing.

9.2.2 Radar facilities providing radar flight following or advisories consider the loss of radar and radios, without service termination notice, to be a possible emergency. Pilots receiving VFR services from radar facilities should be aware that SAR may be initiated under these circumstances.

9.2.3 A filed flight plan is the most timely and effective indicator that an aircraft is overdue. Flight plan information is invaluable to SAR forces for search planning and executing search efforts. Prior to departure on every flight, local or otherwise, someone at the departure point should be advised of your destination and the route of flight if other than direct. Search efforts are often wasted and rescue is often delayed because of pilots who thoughtlessly take off without telling anyone where they are going. File a flight plan for your safety.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.2.4 According to the National Search and Rescue Plan, “The life expectancy of an injured survivor decreases as much as 80 percent during the first 24 hours, while the chances of survival of uninjured survivors rapidly diminishes after the first 3 days.” 9.2.5 An Air Force Review of 325 SAR missions conducted during a 23 − month period revealed that “Time works against people who experience a distress but are not on a flight plan, since 36 hours normally pass before family concern initiates an (alert).” 9.3 VFR Search and Rescue Protection 9.3.1 To receive this valuable protection, file a VFR or DVFR Flight Plan with an FAA FSS. For maximum protection, file only to the point of first intended landing, and refile for each leg to final destination. When a lengthy flight plan is filed, with several stops en route and an ETE to final destination, a mishap could occur on any leg, and unless other information is received, it is probable that no one would start looking for you until 30 minutes after your ETA at your final destination.

9.3.2 If you land at a location other than the intended destination, report the landing to the nearest FAA FSS and advise them of your original destination.

9.3.3 If you land en route and are delayed more than 30 minutes, report this information to the nearest FSS and give them your original destination.

9.3.4 If your ETE changes by 30 minutes or more, report a new ETA to the nearest FSS and give them your original destination. Remember that if you fail to respond within one − half hour after your ETA at final destination, a search will be started to locate you.

9.3.5 It is important that you CLOSE YOUR FLIGHT PLAN IMMEDIATELY AFTER ARRIVAL AT YOUR FINAL DESTINATION WITH THE FSS DESIGNATED WHEN YOUR FLIGHT PLAN WAS FILED. The pilot is responsible for closure of a VFR or DVFR flight plan; they are not closed automatically. This will prevent needless search efforts.

9.3.6 The rapidity of rescue on land or water will depend on how accurately your position may be determined.

If a flight plan has been followed and your position is on course, rescue will be expedited.

9.4 Survival Equipment 9.4.1 For flight over uninhabited land areas, it is wise to take suitable survival equipment depending on type of climate and terrain.

9.4.2 If forced landing occurs at sea, chances for survival are governed by degree of crew proficiency in emergency procedures and by effectiveness of water survival equipment.

9.5 Body Signal Illustrations 9.5.1 If you are forced down and are able to attract the attention of the pilot of a rescue airplane, the body signals illustrated on the following pages can be used to transmit messages to the pilot circling over your location.

9.5.2 Stand in the open when you make the signals.

9.5.3 Be sure the background, as seen from the air, is not confusing.

9.5.4 Go through the motions slowly and repeat each signal until you are positive that the pilot understands you.

9.6 Observance of a Downed Aircraft 9.6.1 Determine if the crash is marked with yellow cross; if so, the crash has already been reported and identified.

9.6.2 Determine, if possible, the type and number of the aircraft and whether there is evidence of survivors.

9.6.3 Fix, as accurately as possible, the exact location of the crash.

9.6.4 If circumstances permit, orbit the scene to guide in other assisting units or until relieved by another aircraft.

9.6.5 Transmit information to the nearest FAA or other appropriate radio facility.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.6.6 Immediately after landing, make a complete report to nearest FAA, Air Force, or Coast Guard installation.

The report may be made by long distance collect telephone.

FIG GEN 3.6 − 1 Ground − Air Visual Code for Use by Survivors NO. NO. MESSAGE MESSAGE CODE SYMBOL CODE SYMBOL

1 Require assistance Require assistance V

2 Require medical assistance Require medical assistance X

3 No or Negative No or Negative N

4 Yes or Affirmative Yes or Affirmative Y

5 Proceeding in this direction Proceeding in this direction IF IN DOUBT, USE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL IF IN DOUBT, USE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL

S O S

INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS 1. Lay out symbols by using strips of fabric or parachutes, pieces of wood, stones, or any available material.

2. Provide as much color contrast as possible between material used for symbols and background against which symbols are exposed.

3. Symbols should be at least 10 feet high or larger. Care should be taken to lay out symbols exactly as shown.

4. In addition to using symbols, every effort is to be made to attract attention by means of radio, flares, smoke, or other available means.

5. On snow covered ground, signals can be made by dragging, shoveling or tramping. Depressed areas forming symbols will appear black from the air.

6. Pilot should acknowledge message by rocking wings from side to side.

FIG GEN 3.6 − 2 Ground − Air Visual Code for use by Ground Search Parties CODE SYMBOL CODE SYMBOL NO. NO. MESSAGE MESSAGE Operation completed. Operation completed. L L L 2 L L We have found all personnel. We have found all personnel.

We have found only some personnel. We have found only some personnel.

We are not able to continue. We are not able to continue.

X X Returning to base. Returning to base.

Have divided into two groups. Have divided into two groups.

Each proceeding in direction indicated. Each proceeding in direction indicated.

Information received that aircraft is in this direction. Information received that aircraft is in this direction.

Nothing found. Will continue search. Nothing found. Will continue search.

N N Note: These visual signals have been accepted for international use and appear in Annex 12 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 3 Urgent Medical Assistance NEED MEDICAL NEED MEDICAL ASSISTANCE-URGENT ASSISTANCE-URGENT Used only when life is at stake Used only when life is at stake FIG GEN 3.6 − 4 All OK ALL OK-DO NOT WAIT ALL OK-DO NOT WAIT Wave one arm overhead Wave one arm overhead Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 5 Short Delay CAN PROCEED SHORTLY CAN PROCEED SHORTLY WAIT IF PRACTICABLE WAIT IF PRACTICABLE One arm horizontal One arm horizontal FIG GEN 3.6 − 6 Long Delay NEED MECHANICAL HELP NEED MECHANICAL HELP OR PARTS - LONG DELAY OR PARTS - LONG DELAY Both arms horizontal Both arms horizontal Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 7 Drop Message Make throwing motion FIG GEN 3.6 − 8 Receiver Operates OUR RECEIVER IS OUR RECEIVER IS OPERATING OPERATING Cup hands over ears Cup hands over ears Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 9 Do Not Land Here DO NOT ATTEMPT DO NOT ATTEMPT TO LAND HERE TO LAND HERE Both arms waved across face Both arms waved across face FIG GEN 3.6 − 10 Land Here LAND HERE LAND HERE Both arms forward horizontally, Both arms forward horizontally, squatting and point in direction squatting and point in direction of landing - Repeat of landing - Repeat Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 11 Negative (Ground) NEGATIVE (NO) NEGATIVE (NO) White cloth waved horizontally White cloth waved horizontally FIG GEN 3.6 − 12 Affirmative (Ground) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 13 Pick Us Up PICK US UP- PICK US UP- PLANE ABANDONED PLANE ABANDONED Both arms vertical Both arms vertical FIG GEN 3.6 − 14 Affirmative (Aircraft) Affirmative reply from aircraft: AFFIRMATIVE (YES) Dip nose of plane several times Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 15 Negative (Aircraft) Negative reply from aircraft: Negative reply from aircraft: NEGATIVE (NO) NEGATIVE (NO) Fishtail plane Fishtail plane FIG GEN 3.6 − 16 Message received and understood (Aircraft) Message received and understood by aircraft: Message received and understood by aircraft: Day or moonlight - Rocking wings Day or moonlight - Rocking wings Night - Green flashed from signal lamp Night - Green flashed from signal lamp Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 17 Message received and NOT understood (Aircraft) Message received and NOT understood by aircraft: Message received and NOT understood by aircraft: Day or moonlight - Making a complete right-hand circle Day or moonlight - Making a complete right-hand circle Night-Red flashes from signal lamp. Night-Red flashes from signal lamp.

10. Pilot Responsibility and Authority 10.1 The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft. In an emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot in command may deviate from any rule in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 91, Subpart A, General, and Subpart B, Flight Rules, to the extent required to meet that emergency (14 CFR Section 91.3(b)).

NOTE − In the event of a pilot incapacitation, an Emergency Autoland system or an emergency descent system may assume operation of the aircraft and deviate to meet that emergency.

10.2 If the emergency authority of 14 CFR Section 91.3(b) is used to deviate from the provisions of an air traffic control clearance, the pilot in command must notify ATC as soon as possible and obtain an amended clearance (14 CFR Section 91.123(c)).

10.3 Unless deviation is necessary under the emergency authority of 14 CFR Section 91.3, pilots of IFR flights experiencing two − way radio communications failure are expected to adhere to the procedures prescribed under “IFR operations; two − way radio communications failure.” (14 CFR Section 91.185) 11. Distress and Urgency Communications 11.1 A pilot who encounters a distress or urgency condition can obtain assistance simply by contacting the air traffic facility or other agency in whose area of responsibility the aircraft is operating, stating the nature of the difficulty, pilot’s intentions, and assistance desired. Distress and urgency communications procedures prescribed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), however, have decided advantages over the informal procedure described above.

11.2 Distress and urgency communications procedures discussed in the following paragraphs relate to the use of air − ground voice communications.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 11.4 Distress communications have absolute priority over all other communications, and the word MAYDAY commands radio silence on the frequency in use. Urgency communications have priority over all other communications except distress, and the word PAN − PAN warns other stations not to interfere with urgency transmissions.

11.5 Normally, the station addressed will be the air traffic facility or other agency providing air traffic services on the frequency in use at the time. If the pilot is not communicating and receiving services, the station to be called will normally be the air traffic facility or other agency in whose area of responsibility the aircraft is operating on the appropriate assigned frequency. If the station addressed does not respond, or if time or the situation dictates, the distress or urgency message may be broadcast, or a collect call may be used, addressing “Any Station (Tower) (Radio) (Radar).” 11.6 The station addressed should immediately acknowledge a distress or urgency message, provide assistance, coordinate and direct the activities of assisting facilities, and alert the appropriate search and rescue coordinator if warranted. Responsibility will be transferred to another station only if better handling will result.

11.8 Although the frequency in use or other frequencies assigned by ATC are preferable, the following emergency frequencies can be used for distress or urgency communications, if necessary or desirable: 11.8.1 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz − Both have a range generally limited to line of sight. 121.5 MHz is guarded by direction finding stations and some military and civil aircraft. 243.0 MHz is guarded by military aircraft. Both 121.5 MHz and 243.0 MHz are guarded by military towers, most civil towers, and radar facilities. Normally ARTCC emergency frequency capability does not extend to radar coverage limits. If an ARTCC does not respond when called on 121.5 MHz or 243.0 MHz, call the nearest tower.

12. Emergency Condition − Request Assistance Immediately 12.1 Pilots do not hesitate to declare an emergency when they are faced with distress conditions such as fire, mechanical failure, or structural damage. However, some are reluctant to report an urgency condition when they encounter situations which may not be immediately perilous, but are potentially catastrophic. An aircraft is in at least an urgency condition the moment the pilot becomes doubtful about position, fuel endurance, weather, or any other condition that could adversely affect flight safety. This is the time to ask for help, not after the situation has developed into a distress condition.

12.2 Pilots who become apprehensive for their safety for any reason should request assistance immediately.

Ready and willing help is available in the form of radio, radar, direction finding stations and other aircraft. Delay has caused accidents and cost lives. Safety is not a luxury. Take action.

13. Obtaining Emergency Assistance 13.1 A pilot in any distress or urgency condition should immediately take the following action, not necessarily in the order listed, to obtain assistance: 13.1.1 Climb, if possible, for improved communications and better radar and direction finding detection.

However, it must be understood that unauthorized climb or descent under IFR conditions within CONTROLLED AIRSPACE is prohibited, except as permitted by 14 CFR Section 91.3(b).

13.1.2 If equipped with a radar beacon transponder (civil) or IFF/SIF (military): 13.1.2.1 Continue squawking assigned Mode A/3 discrete code/VFR code and Mode C altitude encoding when in radio contact with an air traffic facility or other agency providing air traffic services, unless instructed to do otherwise.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 13.1.2.2 If unable to immediately establish communications with an air traffic facility/agency, squawk Mode A/3, Code 7700/Emergency and Mode C.

13.1.2.3 Transmit a distress or urgency message consisting of as many as necessary of the following elements, preferably in the order listed: a) If distress, MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAYDAY; if urgency, PAN − PAN, PAN − PAN, PAN − PAN.

b) Name of station addressed.

c) Aircraft identification and type.

d) Nature of distress or urgency.

e) Weather.

f) Pilots intentions and request.

g) Present position, and heading; or if lost, last known position, time, and heading since that position.

h) Altitude or flight level.

i) Fuel remaining in minutes.

j) Number of people on board.

k) Any other useful information.

13.1.3 After establishing radio contact, comply with advice and instructions received. Cooperate. Do not hesitate to ask questions or clarify instructions when you do not understand or if you cannot comply with clearances. Assist the ground station to control communications on the frequency in use. Silence interfering radio stations. Do not change frequency or change to another ground station unless absolutely necessary. If you do, advise the ground station of the new frequency and station name prior to the change, transmitting in the blind if necessary. If two − way communications cannot be established on the frequency, return immediately to the frequency or station where two − way communications last existed.

13.1.4 When in a distress condition with bailout, crash landing, or ditching imminent, take the following additional actions to assist search and rescue units: 13.1.4.1 Time and circumstances permitting, transmit as many as necessary of the message elements in subparagraph 13.1.2.3 and any of the following you think might be helpful: a) ELT status.

b) Visible landmarks.

c) Aircraft color.

d) Number of persons on board.

e) Emergency equipment on board.

13.1.4.2 Actuate your ELT if the installation permits.

13.1.4.3 For bailout, and for crash landing or ditching if risk of fire is not a consideration, set your radio for continuous transmission.

13.1.4.4 If it becomes necessary to ditch, make every effort to ditch near a surface vessel. If time permits, an FAA facility should be able to get the position of the nearest commercial or Coast Guard vessel from a Coast Guard Rescue Coordination Center.

13.2 After a crash landing unless you have good reason to believe that you will not be located by search aircraft or ground teams, it is best to remain with your aircraft and prepare means for signalling search aircraft.

14. Radar Service for VFR Aircraft in Difficulty 14.1 Radar equipped air traffic control facilities can provide radar assistance and navigation service (vectors) to VFR aircraft in difficulty when the pilot can talk with the controller, and the aircraft is within radar coverage.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Pilots should clearly understand that authorization to proceed in accordance with such radar navigational assistance does not constitute authorization for the pilot to violate Federal Aviation Regulations. In effect, assistance is provided on the basis that navigational guidance information is advisory in nature, and the responsibility for flying the aircraft safely remains with the pilot.

14.2 Experience has shown that many pilots who are not qualified for instrument flight cannot maintain control of their aircraft when they encounter clouds or other reduced visibility conditions. In many cases, the controller will not know whether flight into instrument conditions will result from his/her instructions. To avoid possible hazards resulting from being vectored into IFR conditions, a pilot in difficulty should keep the controller advised of the weather conditions in which he/she is operating and the weather along the course ahead, and observe the following: 14.2.1 If a course of action is available which will permit flight and a safe landing in VFR weather conditions, noninstrument rated pilots should choose the VFR condition rather than requesting a vector or approach that will take them into IFR weather conditions; or 14.2.2 If continued flight in VFR conditions is not possible, the noninstrument rated pilot should so advise the controller and indicating the lack of an instrument rating, declare a distress condition.

14.2.3 If the pilot is instrument rated and current, and the aircraft is instrument equipped, the pilot should so indicate by requesting an IFR flight clearance. Assistance will then be provided on the basis that the aircraft can operate safely in IFR weather conditions.

15. Intercept and Escort 15.1 The concept of airborne intercept and escort is based on the SAR aircraft establishing visual and/or electronic contact with an aircraft in difficulty, providing inflight assistance, and escorting it to a safe landing.

If bailout, crash landing or ditching becomes necessary, SAR operations can be conducted without delay. For most incidents, particularly those occurring at night and/or during instrument flight conditions, the availability of intercept and escort services will depend on the proximity of SAR units with suitable aircraft on alert for immediate dispatch. In limited circumstances, other aircraft flying in the vicinity of an aircraft in difficulty can provide these services.

15.2 If specifically requested by a pilot in difficulty or if a distress condition is declared, SAR coordinators will take steps to intercept and escort an aircraft. Steps may be initiated for intercept and escort if an urgency condition is declared and unusual circumstances make such action advisable.

15.3 It is the pilot’s prerogative to refuse intercept and escort services. Escort services will normally be provided to the nearest adequate airport. Should the pilot receiving escort services continue on to another location after reaching a safe airport, or decide not to divert to the nearest safe airport, the escort aircraft is not obligated to continue and further escort is discretionary. The decision will depend on the circumstances of the individual incident.

16. Visual Emergency Signals NOTE − See FIG GEN 3.6 − 1 through FIG GEN 3.6 − 17.

17. Ditching Procedures 17.1 In order to select a proper ditching course for an aircraft, a basic knowledge of sea evaluation and other factors involved is required. Selection of the ditching heading may well determine the difference between survival and disaster.

(See FIG GEN 3.6 − 18 , FIG GEN 3.6 − 19 , FIG GEN 3.6 − 20 , and FIG GEN 3.6 − 21 ).

17.2 Common Oceanographic Terminology: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17.2.1 Sea. The condition of the surface that is the result of both waves and swells.

17.2.2 Wave (or Chop). The condition of the surface caused by local winds.

17.2.3 Swell. The condition of the surface which has been caused by a distant disturbance.

17.2.4 Swell Face. The side of the swell toward the observer. The backside is the side away from the observer.

These definitions apply regardless of the direction of swell movement.

17.2.5 Primary Swell. The swell system having the greatest height from trough to crest.

17.2.6 Secondary Swells. Those swell systems of less height than the primary swell.

17.2.7 Fetch. The distance the waves have been driven by a wind blowing in a constant direction, without obstruction.

17.2.8 Swell Period. The time interval between the passage of two successive crests at the same spot in the water, measured in seconds.

17.2.9 Swell Velocity. The velocity with which the swell advances with relation to a fixed reference point, measured in knots. There is little movement of water in the horizontal direction. Swells move primarily in a vertical motion, similar to the motion observed when shaking out a carpet.

17.2.10 Swell Direction. The direction from which a swell is moving. This direction is not necessarily the result of the wind present at the scene. The swell encountered may be moving into or across the local wind. Swells, once set in motion, tend to maintain their original direction for as long as they continue in deep water, regardless of changes in wind direction.

17.2.11 Swell Height. The height between crest and trough, measured in feet. The vast majority of ocean swells are lower than 12 to 15 feet, and swells over 25 feet are not common at any spot on the oceans. Successive swells may differ considerably in height.

17.3 Swells 17.3.1 It is extremely dangerous to land into the wind without regard to sea conditions. The swell system, or systems, must be taken into consideration.

FIG GEN 3.6 − 18 Single Swell (15 knot wind) SWELL SWELL DITCHING HEADING WIND Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 19 Double Swell (15 knot wind) WIND PRIMARY PRIMARY SWELL SWELL DITCHING HEADING SECONDARY SECONDARY SWELL SWELL FIG GEN 3.6 − 20 Double Swell (30 knot wind) PRIMARY PRIMARY SWELL SWELL SECONDARY SECONDARY SWELL SWELL DITCHING HEADING WIND Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.6 − 21 (50 knot wind) SWELL SWELL WIND WIND Aircraft with low landing speeds - land into the wind.

Aircraft with high landing speeds - choose compromise heading between wind and swell.

Both - land on back side of swell.

FIG GEN 3.6 − 22 Wind − Swell − Ditch Heading DIRECTION OF SWELL MOVEMENT BEST BEST GOOD FAIR GOOD Landing parallel to the major swell GOOD !!

POOR!!!

FACE BACK SIDE Landing on the face and back of swell 17.3.2 In ditching parallel to the swell, it makes little difference whether touchdown is on top of the crest or in the trough. It is preferable, if possible, to land on the top or back side of the swell. After determining which heading (and its reciprocal) will parallel the swell, select the heading with the most into the wind component.

17.3.3 If only one swell system exists, the problem is relatively simple − even with a high, fast system.

Unfortunately, most cases involve two or more systems running in different directions. With many systems present, the sea presents a confused appearance. One of the most difficult situations occurs when two swell Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 systems are at right angles. For example, if one system is 8 feet high, and the other 3 feet, a landing parallel to the primary system, and down swell on the secondary system is indicated. If both systems are of equal height, a compromise may be advisable − selecting an intermediate heading at 45 degrees down swell to both systems.

When landing down a secondary swell, attempt to touch down on the back side, not on the face of the swell.

Remember one axiom − AVOID THE FACE OF A SWELL.

17.3.4 If the swell system is formidable, it is considered advisable, in landplanes, to accept more crosswind in order to avoid landing directly into the swell.

17.3.5 The secondary swell system is often from the same direction as the wind. Here, the landing may be made parallel to the primary system, with the wind and secondary system at an angle. There is a choice of two headings paralleling the primary system. One heading is downwind and down the secondary swell; and the other is into the wind and into the secondary swell. The choice of heading will depend on the velocity of the wind versus the velocity and height of the secondary swell.

17.4 Wind 17.4.1 The simplest method of estimating the wind direction and velocity is to examine the wind streaks on the water. These appear as long streaks up and down wind. Some persons may have difficulty determining wind direction after seeing the streaks in the water. Whitecaps fall forward with the wind but are overrun by the waves thus producing the illusion that the foam is sliding backward. Knowing this, and by observing the direction of the streaks, the wind direction is easily determined. Wind velocity can be accurately estimated by noting the appearance of the whitecaps, foam and wind streaks.

17.5 Preditching Preparation 17.5.1 A successful aircraft ditching is dependent on three primary factors. In order of importance they are: 17.5.1.1 Sea conditions and wind.

17.5.1.2 Type of aircraft.

17.5.1.3 Skill and technique of pilot.

17.5.2 The behavior of the aircraft on making contact with the water will vary within wide limits according to the state of the sea. If landed parallel to a single swell system, the behavior of the aircraft may approximate that to be expected on a smooth sea. If landed into a heavy swell or into a confused sea, the deceleration forces may be extremely great − resulting in breaking up of the aircraft. Within certain limits, the pilot is able to minimize these forces by proper sea evaluation and selection of ditching heading.

17.5.3 When on final approach the pilot should look ahead and observe the surface of the sea. There may be shadows and whitecaps − signs of large seas. Shadows and whitecaps close together indicate that the seas are short and rough. Touchdown in these areas is to be avoided. Select and touchdown in any area (only about 500 feet is needed) where the shadows and whitecaps are not so numerous.

17.5.4 Touchdown should be at the lowest speed and rate of descent which permit safe handling and optimum nose up attitude on impact. Once first impact has been made there is often little the pilot can do to control a landplane.

17.6 Ditching 17.6.1 Once preditching preparations are completed, the pilot should turn to the ditching heading and commence letdown. The aircraft should be flown low over the water, and slowed down until ten knots or so above stall. At this point, additional power should be used to overcome the increased drag caused by the noseup attitude. When a smooth stretch of water appears ahead, cut power, and touchdown at the best recommended speed as fully stalled as possible. By cutting power when approaching a relatively smooth area, the pilot will prevent over shooting and will touchdown with less chance of planing off into a second uncontrolled landing. Most experienced seaplane pilots prefer to make contact with the water in a semi − stalled attitude, cutting power as the tail makes contact. This technique eliminates the chance of misjudging altitude with a resultant heavy drop in Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.6 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 a fully stalled condition. Care must be taken not to drop in a fully stalled condition. Care must be taken not to drop the aircraft from too high altitude, or to balloon due to excessive speed. The altitude above water depends on the aircraft. Over glassy smooth water, or at night without sufficient light, it is very easy for even the most experienced pilots to misjudge altitude by 50 feet or more. Under such conditions, carry enough power to maintain 9 to 12 noseup attitude, and 10 to 20 over stalling speed until contact is made with the water. The proper use of power on the approach is of great importance. If power is available on one side only, a little power should be used to flatten the approach; however, the engine should not be used to such an extent that the aircraft cannot be turned against the good engines right down to the stall with a margin of rudder movement available.

When near the stall, sudden application of excessive unbalanced power may result in loss of directional control.

If power is available on one side only, a slightly higher than normal glide approach speed should be used. This will insure good control and some margin of speed after leveling off without excessive use of power. The use of power in ditching is so important that when it is certain that the coast cannot be reached, the pilot should, if possible, ditch before fuel is exhausted. The use of power in a night or instrument ditching is far more essential than under daylight contact conditions.

17.6.2 If no power is available, a greater than normal approach speed should be used down to the flare − out. This speed margin will allow the glide to be broken early and more gradually, thereby giving the pilot time and distance to feel for the surface − decreasing the possibility of stalling high or flying into the water. When landing parallel to a swell system, little difference is noted between landing on top of a crest or in the trough. If the wings of the aircraft are trimmed to the surface of the sea rather than the horizon, there is little need to worry about a wing hitting a swell crest. The actual slope of a swell is very gradual. If forced to land into a swell, touchdown should be made just after passage of the crest. If contact is made on the face of the swell, the aircraft may be swamped or thrown violently into the air, dropping heavily into the next swell. If control surfaces remain intact, the pilot should attempt to maintain the proper nose attitude by rapid and positive use of the controls.

17.7 After Touchdown 17.7.1 In most cases drift caused by crosswind can be ignored; the forces acting on the aircraft after touchdown are of such magnitude that drift will be only a secondary consideration. If the aircraft is under good control, the “crab” may be kicked out with rudder just prior to touchdown. This is more important with high wing aircraft, for they are laterally unstable on the water in a crosswind, and may roll to the side in ditching.

NOTE − This information has been extracted from the publication “Aircraft Emergency Procedures Over Water.” 18. Fuel Dumping 18.1 Should it become necessary to dump fuel, the pilot should immediately advise ATC. Upon receipt of advice that an aircraft will dump fuel, ATC will broadcast or cause to be broadcast immediately and every 3 minutes thereafter on appropriate ATC, FSS, and airline company radio frequencies the following: EXAMPLE − ATTENTION ALL AIRCRAFT − FUEL DUMPING IN PROGRESS − OVER (location) AT (altitude) BY (type aircraft) (flight direction).

18.2 Upon receipt of such a broadcast, pilots of aircraft affected, which are not on IFR flight plans or special VFR clearances, should clear the area specified in the advisory. Aircraft on IFR flight plans or special VFR clearances will be provided specific separation by ATC. At the termination of the fuel dumping operation, pilots should advise ATC. Upon receipt of such information, ATC will issue, on appropriate frequencies, the following: EXAMPLE − ATTENTION ALL AIRCRAFT − FUEL DUMPING BY − (type aircraft) TERMINATED.

19. FAA K − 9 Explosives Detection Team Program 19.1 The FAA’s Office of Civil Aviation Security Operations manages the FAA K − 9 Explosives Detection Team Program, which was established in 1972. Through a unique agreement with law enforcement agencies and airport Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.6 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 authorities, the FAA has strategically placed FAA − certified K − 9 teams (a team is one handler and one dog) at airports throughout the country. If a bomb threat is received while an aircraft is in flight, the aircraft can be directed to an airport with this capability.

19.2 The FAA provides initial and refresher training for all handlers, provides single purpose explosive detector dogs, and requires that each team is annually evaluated in five areas for FAA certification: aircraft (wide body and narrow body), vehicles, terminal, freight, (cargo), and luggage. If you desire this service, notify your company or an FAA air traffic control facility.

19.3 FAA Sponsored Explosives Detection Dog/Handler Team Locations TBL GEN 3.6 − 5 Airport Symbol Location ATL Atlanta, Georgia BHM Birmingham, Alabama BOS Boston, Massachusetts BUF Buffalo, New York CLT Charlotte, North Carolina ORD Chicago, Illinois CVG Cincinnati, Ohio DFW Dallas, Texas DEN Denver, Colorado DTW Detroit, Michigan IAH Houston, Texas JAX Jacksonville, Florida MCI Kansas City, Missouri LAX Los Angeles, California MEM Memphis, Tennessee MIA Miami, Florida MKE Milwaukee, Wisconsin MSY New Orleans, Louisiana MCO Orlando, Florida PHX Phoenix, Arizona PIT Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania PDX Portland, Oregon SLC Salt Lake City, Utah SFO San Francisco, California SJU San Juan, Puerto Rico SEA Seattle, Washington STL St. Louis, Missouri TUS Tucson, Arizona TUL Tulsa, Oklahoma 19.4 If due to weather or other considerations an aircraft with a suspected hidden explosive problem were to land or intended to land at an airport other than those listed above, it is recommended they call the FAA’s Washington Operations Center (telephone 202 − 267 − 3333, if appropriate) or have an air traffic facility with which you can communicate contact the above center requesting assistance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 3.7 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 3.7 Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting

Communications

1. Discrete Emergency Frequency 1.1 Direct contact between an emergency aircraft flight crew, Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Incident Commander (ARFF IC), and the Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) is possible on an aeronautical radio frequency (Discrete Emergency Frequency [DEF]) designated by Air Traffic Control (ATC) from the operational frequencies assigned to that facility.

1.2 Emergency aircraft at airports without an ATCT (or when the ATCT is closed) may contact the ARFF IC (if ARFF service is provided) on the Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF) published for the airport or the civil emergency frequency 121.5 MHz.

2. Radio Call Signs Preferred radio call sign for the ARFF IC is “(location/facility) Command” when communicating with the flight crew and the FAA ATCT.

EXAMPLE − LAX Command.

Washington Command.

3. ARFF Emergency Hand Signals In the event that electronic communications cannot be maintained between the ARFF IC and the flight crew, standard emergency hand signals as depicted in FIG GEN 3.7 − 1 through FIG GEN 3.7 − 3 should be used. These hand signals should be known and understood by all cockpit and cabin aircrew, and all ARFF firefighters.

FIG GEN 3.7 − 1 FIG GEN 3.7 − 2 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 3.7 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG GEN 3.7 − 3 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 4.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

GEN 4. CHARGES FOR AERODROMES/HELIPORTS

GEN 4.1 Fees and Charges

1. General 1.1 Charges for services and facilities vary from aerodrome to aerodrome, and information concerning such charges may be obtained at the aerodromes. Unless alternative arrangements have been made, all charges for the use of the aerodrome, such as landing fees, passenger service charges, cargo charges, storage charges, and the like, are payable on demand or before the aircraft departs the aerodrome. All such charges are established by and payable to the various administrative authorities of the various aerodromes.

1.2 A private aircraft will be charged a processing fee of $25 once every calendar year. This will be charged the first time the aircraft arrives from a foreign place in the calender year or may be paid in advance. This fee is charged to the aircraft, not the pilot, and the receipt should be kept with the aircraft.

1.3 Commercial aircraft operators will be charged a processing fee of $5 per paying passenger for each arrival from foreign to the U.S. This fee will not be charged for passengers arriving from Canada, Mexico, and certain nearby Caribbean countries.

2. Charges for Inspection Services 2.1 Generally speaking, free service is provided at airports during regular business hours (usually 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.), Monday through Saturday, and from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Sundays and national holidays. However, tours of duty at airports are based on the need for services and are altered at some ports to coincide with schedule changes and peak workloads.

2.2 Overtime charges may be imposed, in certain cases, for Immigration and Naturalization Services and Public Health Service quarantine inspection of aircraft whose operations are not covered by published schedules.

Information concerning such charges may be obtained from the Immigration and Naturalization Office and the Public Health Service Medical Officer in Charge at, or nearest, the intended place of landing.

3. Penalties for Violations 3.1 Since the law provides for substantial penalties for violations of the Customs regulations, aircraft operators and pilots should make every effort to comply with them.

3.2 A $5,000 penalty will be assessed for common violations such as: 3.2.1 Failure to report arrival.

3.2.2 Failure to obtain landing rights.

3.2.3 Failure to provide advance notice of arrival.

3.2.4 Failure to provide penetration report on southern border.

3.2.5 Departing without permission or discharging passengers or cargo without permission.

REFERENCE − 19 CFR 122.161.

NOTE − 1. Importation of contraband, including agricultural materials, or undeclared merchandise can result in penalty action and seizure of aircraft, which varies according to the nature of the violation and pertinent provision of law.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP GEN 4.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2. The above penalties are double to $10,000 for a second offense. Seizure of aircraft may occur at any time depending upon the circumstances behind the violation.

3. If a penalty is incurred, application may be made to the customs officer in charge for a reduction in amount or cancellation, giving the grounds upon which relief is believed to be justified. If the operator or pilot desires to petition further for relief of the penalty, he/she may appeal to the appropriate district Director of Customs. If still further review of the penalty is desired, written appeal may be made to the proper regional Commissioner of Customs and, in some cases, to Customs Headquarters.

3.3 Any person violating any provision of the Public Health Service regulations shall be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or to imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both, as provided in section 368 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 271).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP GEN 4.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

The Federal Aviation Administration does not charge for the use of Federal air navigation facilities or telecommunications services.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: PART II. EN ROUTE →

PART II. EN ROUTE

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PART 2 EN ROUTE (ENR)

AIP ENR 0.1 − 1 AIP ENR 0.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

ENR 0.1 Table of Contents to Part 2

ENR 1 . GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES ENR 1.1 General Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.1 − 1 ENR 1.2 Visual Flight Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.2 − 1 ENR 1.3 Instrument Flight Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.3 − 1 ENR 1.4 ATS Airspace Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.4 − 1 ENR 1.5 Holding, Approach, and Departure Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.5 − 1 ENR 1.6 ATS Surveillance Services and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.6 − 1 ENR 1.7 Barometric Altimeter Errors and Setting Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.7 − 1 ENR 1.8 Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors, Setting procedures, and Cold Temperature Airports (CTA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.8 − 1 ENR 1.9 Air Traffic Flow Management and Airspace Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.9 − 1 ENR 1.10 Flight Planning (Restriction, Limitation or Advisory Information) . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.10 − 1 ENR 1.11 Addressing of Flight Plans for Domestic or International Flight Planning . . . . . . ENR 1.11 − 1 ENR 1.12 National Security and Interception Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.12 − 1 ENR 1.13 Unlawful Interference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.13 − 1 ENR 1.14 Air Traffic Incidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.14 − 1 ENR 1.15 Medical Facts for Pilots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.15 − 1 ENR 1.16 Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) and Area Navigation (RNAV) . . . . . . . . . ENR 1.16 − 1 ENR 2 . AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES AIRSPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 2 − 1 ENR 3 . ATS ROUTES ENR 3.1 Lower ATS Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 3.1 − 1 ENR 3.2 Upper ATS Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 3.2 − 1 ENR 3.3 Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 3.3 − 1 ENR 3.4 Helicopter Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 3.4 − 1 ENR 3.5 Other Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 3.5 − 1 ENR 3.6 En Route Holding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 3.6 − 1 ENR 4 . NAVIGATION AIDS/SYSTEMS ENR 4.1 Navigation Aids − En Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 4.1 − 1 ENR 4.2 Special Navigation Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 4.2 − 1 ENR 4.3 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 4.3 − 1 ENR 4.4 Name − Code Designators for Significant Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 4.4 − 1 ENR 4.5 Aeronautical Ground Lights − En − Route . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 4.5 − 1 ENR 5 . NAVIGATION WARNINGS ENR 5.1 Prohibited, Restricted, and Other Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 5.1 − 1 ENR 5.2 Military Exercise and Training Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 5.2 − 1 ENR 5.3 Other Activities of a Dangerous Nature and Other Potential Hazards . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 5.3 − 1 ENR 5.4 Air Navigation Obstacles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 5.4 − 1 ENR 5.5 Aerial Sporting and Recreational Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 5.5 − 1 ENR 5.6 Bird Migration and Areas with Sensitive Fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 5.6 − 1 ENR 6. HELICOPTER OPERATIONS ENR 6.1 Helicopter IFR Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 6.1 − 1 ENR 6.2 Special Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 6.2 − 1 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 0.1 − 2 AIP ENR 0.1 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ENR 7. OCEANIC OPERATIONS ENR 7.1 General Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.1 − 1 ENR 7.2 Data Link Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.2 − 1 ENR 7.3 Special Procedures for In − Flight Contingencies in Oceanic Airspace . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.3 − 1 ENR 7.4 Operational Policy 50 NM Lateral Separation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.4 − 1 ENR 7.5 Operational Policy Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) and Performance − Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.5 − 1 ENR 7.6 North Atlantic (NAT) Route Clearance Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.6 − 1 ENR 7.7 North Atlantic (NAT) Timekeeping Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.7 − 1 ENR 7.8 North Atlantic (NAT) Safety Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.8 − 1 ENR 7.9 Y − Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.9 − 1 ENR 7.10 Atlantic High Offshore Airspace Offshore Routes Supporting Florida Airspace Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.10 − 1 ENR 7.11 Reduced Separation Climb/Descent Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.11 − 1 ENR 7.12 New York Oceanic Control Area (OCA) West Flight Level Allocation . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.12 − 1 ENR 7.13 Gulf of America RNAV Routes Q100, Q102, and Q105 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 7.13 − 1 ENR 8. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) ENR 8.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.1 − 1 ENR 8.2 Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.2 − 1 ENR 8.3 Large UAS (MCGOW 55 Pounds or More) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.3 − 1 ENR 8.4 Airspace Access for UAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.4 − 1 ENR 8.5 UAS Pilot Testing, Certification and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.5 − 1 ENR 8.6 Advanced Air Mobility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.6 − 1 ENR 8.7 UAS Operations on Airports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.7 − 1 ENR 8.8 Other Information and Best Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENR 8.8 − 1 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES

ENR 1.1 General Rules

1. Differences between National and International Rules and Procedures 1.1 The air traffic rules and procedures applicable to air traffic in U.S. Class A, B, C, D and E airspace conform with Annexes 2 and 11 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation and to those portions applicable to aircraft in the Procedures for Air Navigation Services − Rules of the Air and Air Traffic Services (Doc 4444 − RAC/501/10) and to the Regional Supplementary Procedures (DOC 7030) applicable to the NAM, NAT, CAR and PAC Regions, except as noted in the cases below. All differences have been registered with the International Civil Aviation Organization.

1.1.1 Annex 2 − Rules of the Air NOTE − See GEN 1.7.

1.1.2 Annex 11 − Air Traffic Services NOTE − See GEN 1.7.

1.1.3 Procedures for Air Navigation Services − Rules of the Air (DOC 4444) and Air Traffic Services (RAC/501/10) NOTE − See GEN 1.7.

1.1.4 Regional Supplementary Procedures (Doc 7030) NOTE − See GEN 1.7.

2. Airport Operations 2.1 General 2.1.1 Increased traffic congestion, aircraft in climb and descent attitudes, and pilots preoccupation with cockpit duties are some factors that increase the hazardous accident potential near the airport. The situation is further compounded when the weather is marginal; that is, just meeting VFR requirements. Pilots must be particularly alert when operating in the vicinity of an airport. This section defines some rules, practices, and procedures that pilots should be familiar with, and adhere to, for safe airport operations.

2.1.2 Each airport operator regularly serving scheduled air carriers has put into use security measures designed to prevent or deter unauthorized persons from having access to “Air Operations Area.” The “Air Operations Area” means any area of the airport used or intended to be used for landing, takeoff, or surface maneuvering of aircraft. Pilots are encouraged to obtain airport security instructions by posted signs or radio communication.

3. Airports With an Operating Control Tower 3.1 Towers have been established to provide for a safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of traffic on and in the vicinity of an airport. When the responsibility has been so delegated, towers also provide for the separation of IFR aircraft in the terminal areas (Approach Control).

3.2 When operating at an airport where traffic control is being exercised by a control tower, pilots are required to maintain two − way radio contact with the tower while operating within the Class B, Class C, and Class D Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.1 − 2 AIP ENR 1.1 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 surface area unless the tower authorizes otherwise. Initial callup should be made about 15 miles from the airport.

Unless there is a good reason to leave the tower frequency before exiting the Class B, Class C, and Class D surface area, it is a good operating practice to remain on the tower frequency for the purpose of receiving traffic information. In the interest of reducing tower frequency congestion, pilots are reminded that it is not necessary to request permission to leave the tower frequency once outside of Class B, Class C, and Class D surface area.

Not all airports with an operating control tower will have Class D airspace. These airports do not have weather reporting which is a requirement for surface − based controlled airspace, previously known as a control zone. The controlled airspace over these airports will normally begin at 700 feet or 1,200 feet above ground level and can be determined from the visual aeronautical charts. Pilots are expected to use good operating practices and communicate with the control tower as described in this section.

3.3 When necessary, the tower controller will issue clearances or other information for aircraft to generally follow the desired flight path (traffic pattern) when flying in the Class D airspace, and the proper taxi routes when operating on the ground. If not otherwise authorized or directed by the tower, pilots approach to land in an airplane must circle the airport to the left, and pilots approaching to land in a helicopter must avoid the flow of fixed − wing traffic. However, an appropriate clearance must be received from the tower before landing.

3.4 The following terminology for the various components of a traffic pattern has been adopted as standard for use by control towers and pilots: 3.4.1 Upwind leg. A flight path that begins after departure and continues straight ahead along the extended runway centerline. Upwind leg is an extension of departure and is used when issuing control instructions for separation, spacing, or sequencing.

3.4.2 Crosswind leg. A flight path at right angles to the landing runway off its takeoff end.

3.4.3 Downwind leg. A flight path parallel to the landing runway in the opposite direction of landing.

3.4.4 Base leg. A flight path at right angles to the landing runway off its approach end and extending from the downwind leg to the intersection of the extended runway centerline.

3.4.5 Final approach. A flight path in the direction of landing along the extended runway centerline from the base leg to the runway.

FIG ENR 1.1 − 1 Components of a Traffic Pattern Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 3 AIP ENR 1.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 NOTE − FIG ENR 1.1 − 1 is intended only to illustrate terminology used in identifying various components of a traffic pattern. It should not be used as a reference or guide on how to enter a traffic pattern.

3.5 Many towers are equipped with a tower radar display. The radar uses are intended to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the local control, or tower, position. They are not intended to provide radar services or benefits to pilots except as they may accrue through a more efficient tower operation. The four basic uses are: 3.5.1 To determine an aircraft’s exact location. This is accomplished by radar identifying the VFR aircraft through any of the techniques available to a radar position; such as, having the aircraft ident. Once identified, the aircraft’s position and spatial relationship to other aircraft can be quickly determined, and standard instructions regarding VFR operation in the aircraft traffic area will be issued. Once initial radar identification of a VFR aircraft has been established and the appropriate instructions have been issued, radar monitoring may be discontinued; the reason being that the local controller’s primary means of surveillance in VFR conditions is usually scanning the airport and local area.

3.5.2 To provide radar traffic advisories. Radar traffic advisories may be provided to the extent that the local controller is able to monitor the radar display. Local control has primary control responsibilities to the aircraft operating on the runways which will normally supersede radar monitoring duties.

3.5.3 To provide a direction or suggested heading. The local controller may provide pilots flying VFR with generalized instructions which will facilitate operations; e.g., “PROCEED SOUTHWEST BOUND, ENTER A RIGHT DOWNWIND RUNWAY THREE ZERO;” or provide a suggested heading to establish radar identification or as an advisory aid to navigation; e.g., “SUGGESTED HEADING TWO TWO ZERO, FOR RADAR IDENTIFICATION.” In both cases, the instructions are advisory aids to the pilot flying VFR and are not radar vectors. PILOTS HAVE COMPLETE DISCRETION REGARDING ACCEPTANCE OF THE SUGGESTED HEADING OR DIRECTION AND HAVE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SEEING AND AVOIDING OTHER AIRCRAFT.

3.5.4 To provide information and instructions to aircraft operating within Class D airspace. In an example of this situation, the local controller would use the radar to advise a pilot on an extended downwind when to turn base leg.

NOTE − The above tower radar applications are intended to augment the standard functions of the local control position. There is no controller requirement to maintain constant radar identification and, in fact, such a requirement could compromise the local controller’s ability to visually scan the airport and local area to meet FAA responsibilities to the aircraft operating on the runways and within Class D airspace. Normally, pilots will not be advised of being in radar contact since that continued status cannot be guaranteed and since the purpose of the radar identification is not to establish a link for the provision of radar services.

3.6 A few of the radar − equipped towers are authorized to use the radar to ensure separation between aircraft in specific situations, while still others may function as limited radar approach controls. The various radar uses are strictly a function of FAA operational need. The facilities may be indistinguishable to pilots since they are all referred to as tower and no publication lists the degree of radar use. THEREFORE, WHEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH A TOWER CONTROLLER WHO MAY HAVE RADAR AVAILABLE, DO NOT ASSUME THAT CONSTANT RADAR MONITORING AND COMPLETE ATC RADAR SERVICES ARE BEING PROVIDED.

4. Traffic Patterns 4.1 It is recommended that aircraft enter the airport traffic pattern at one of the following altitudes listed below.

These altitudes should be maintained unless another traffic pattern altitude is published in the Chart Supplement or unless otherwise required by the applicable distance from cloud criteria (14 CFR Section 91.155). (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 2 and FIG ENR 1.1 − 3 .): Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.1 − 4 AIP ENR 1.1 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.1.1 Propeller − driven aircraft enter the traffic pattern at 1,000 feet above ground level (AGL).

4.1.2 Large and turbine − powered aircraft enter the traffic pattern at an altitude of not less than 1,500 feet AGL or 500 feet above the established pattern altitude.

4.1.3 Helicopters operating in the traffic pattern may fly a pattern similar to the fixed − wing aircraft pattern, but at a lower altitude (500 AGL) and closer to the runway. This pattern may be on the opposite side of the runway from fixed − wing traffic when airspeed requires or for practice power − off landings (autorotation) and if local policy permits. Landings not to the runway must avoid the flow of fixed wing traffic.

4.2 A pilot may vary the size of the traffic pattern depending on the aircraft’s performance characteristics. Pilots of en route aircraft should be constantly alert for aircraft in traffic patterns and avoid these areas whenever possible.

4.3 Unless otherwise indicated, all turns in the traffic pattern must be made to the left, except for helicopters, as applicable.

4.4 On Sectional, Aeronautical, and VFR Terminal Area Charts, right traffic patterns are indicated at public − use and joint − use airports with the abbreviation “RP” (for Right Pattern), followed by the appropriate runway number(s) at the bottom of the airport data block.

EXAMPLE − RP 9, 18, 22R NOTE − 1. Pilots are encouraged to use the standard traffic pattern. However, those pilots who choose to execute a straight − in approach, maneuvering for and execution of the approach should not disrupt the flow of arriving and departing traffic.

Likewise, pilots operating in the traffic pattern should be alert at all times for aircraft executing straight − in approaches.

REFERENCE − AC 90 − 66, Non − Towered Airport Flight Operations 2. *RP indicates special conditions exist and refers pilots to the Chart Supplement.

3. Right traffic patterns are not shown at airports with full − time control towers.

4.5 Wind conditions affect all airplanes in varying degrees. FIG ENR 1.1 − 4 is an example of a chart used to determine the headwind, crosswind, and tailwind components based on wind direction and velocity relative to the runway. Pilots should refer to similar information provided by the aircraft manufacturer when determining these wind components.

4.6 Unexpected Maneuvers in the Airport Traffic Pattern 4.6.1 There have been several incidents in the vicinity of controlled airports that were caused primarily by aircraft executing unexpected maneuvers. ATC service is based upon observed or known traffic and airport conditions. Controllers establish the sequence of arriving and departing aircraft by requiring them to adjust flight as necessary to achieve proper spacing. These adjustments can only be based on observed traffic, accurate pilot reports, and anticipated aircraft maneuvers. Pilots are expected to cooperate so as to preclude disruption of traffic flow or creation of conflicting patterns. The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft.

4.6.2 On occasion it may be necessary for pilots to maneuver their aircraft to maintain spacing with the traffic they have been sequenced to follow. The controller can anticipate minor maneuvering such as shallow “S” turns.

The controller cannot, however, anticipate a major maneuver such as a 360 − degree turn. If a pilot makes a 360 − degree turn after obtaining a landing sequence, the result is usually a gap in the landing interval and more importantly it causes a chain reaction which may result in a conflict with following traffic and interruption of the sequence established by the tower or approach controller. Should a pilot decide to make maneuvering turns to maintain spacing behind a preceding aircraft, the pilot should always advise the controller if at all possible.

Except when requested by the controller or in emergency situations, a 360 − degree turn should never be executed in the traffic pattern or when receiving radar service without first advising the controller.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 2 Traffic Pattern Operations Single Runway EXAMPLE − KEY TO TRAFFIC PATTERN OPERATIONS 1. Enter pattern in level flight, abeam the midpoint of the runway, at pattern altitude.

2. Maintain pattern altitude until abeam approach end of the landing runway on downwind leg.

3. Complete turn to final at least / mile from the runway.

4. Continue straight ahead until beyond departure end of runway.

5. If remaining in the traffic pattern, commence turn to crosswind leg beyond the departure end of the runway within 300 feet of pattern altitude.

6. If departing the traffic pattern, continue straight out, or exit with a 45 degree turn (to the left when in a left − hand traffic pattern; to the right when in a right − hand traffic pattern) beyond the departure end of the runway, after reaching pattern altitude.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 3 Traffic Pattern Operations Parallel Runways EXAMPLE − KEY TO TRAFFIC PATTERN OPERATIONS 1. Enter pattern in level flight, abeam the midpoint of the runway, at pattern altitude.

2. Maintain pattern altitude until abeam approach end of the landing runway on downwind leg.

3. Complete turn to final at least / mile from the runway.

4. Continue straight ahead until beyond departure end of runway.

5. If remaining in the traffic pattern, commence turn to crosswind leg beyond the departure end of the runway within 300 feet of pattern altitude.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7. Do not overshoot final or continue on a track which will penetrate the final approach of the parallel runway.

8. Do not continue on a track which will penetrate the departure path of the parallel runway.

FIG ENR 1.1 − 4 Headwind/Tailwind/Crosswind Component Calculator 5. Visual Indicators at Airports Without an Operating Control Tower 5.1 At those airports without an operating control tower, a segmented circle visual indicator system, if installed, is designed to provide traffic pattern information. The segmented circle system consists of the following components: 5.1.1 The Segmented Circle. Located in a position affording maximum visibility to pilots in the air and on the ground and providing a centralized location for other elements of the system.

5.1.2 The Wind Direction Indicator. A wind cone, wind sock, or wind tee installed near the operational runway to indicate wind direction. The large end of the wind cone/wind sock points into the wind as does the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 large end (cross bar) of the wind tee. In lieu of a tetrahedron and where a wind sock or wind cone is collocated with a wind tee, the wind tee may be manually aligned with the runway in use to indicate landing direction. These signaling devices may be located in the center of the segmented circle and may be lighted for night use. Pilots are cautioned against using a tetrahedron to indicate wind direction.

5.1.3 The Landing Direction Indicator. A tetrahedron is installed when conditions at the airport warrant its use. It may be used to indicate the direction of landings and takeoffs. A tetrahedron may be located at the center of a segmented circle and may be lighted for night operations. The small end of the tetrahedron points in the direction of landing. Pilots are cautioned against using a tetrahedron for any purpose other than as an indicator of landing direction. Further, pilots should use extreme caution when making runway selection by use of a tetrahedron in very light or calm wind conditions as the tetrahedron may not be aligned with the designated calm − wind runway. At airports with control towers, the tetrahedron should only be referenced when the control tower is not in operation. Tower instructions supersede tetrahedron indications.

5.1.4 Landing Strip Indicators. Installed in pairs as shown in the segmented circle diagram, and used to show the alignment of landing strips.

5.1.5 Traffic Pattern Indicators. Arranged in pairs in conjunction with landing strip indicators and used to indicate the direction of turns when there is a variation from the normal left traffic pattern. If there is no segmented circle installed at the airport, traffic pattern indicators may be installed on or near the end of the runway.

5.2 Preparatory to landing at an airport without a control tower, or when the control tower is not in operation, the pilot should concern himself with the indicator for the approach end of the runway to be used. When approaching for landing, all turns must be made to the left unless a traffic pattern indicator indicates that turns should be made to the right. If the pilot will mentally enlarge the indicator for the runway to be used, the base and final approach legs of the traffic pattern to be flown immediately become apparent. Similar treatment of the indicator at the departure end of the runway will clearly indicate the direction of turn after takeoff.

5.3 When two or more aircraft are approaching an airport for the purpose of landing, the pilot of the aircraft at the lower altitude has the right − of − way over the pilot of the aircraft at the higher altitude. However, the pilot operating at the lower altitude should not take advantage of another aircraft, which is on final approach to land, by cutting in front of, or overtaking that aircraft.

6. Ground Control Frequencies 6.1 Pilots of departing aircraft should communicate with the control tower on the appropriate ground control/clearance delivery frequency prior to starting engines to receive engine start time, taxi and/or clearance information. Unless otherwise advised by the tower, remain on that frequency during taxiing and runup, then change to local control frequency when ready to request takeoff clearance.

NOTE − Pilots are encouraged to monitor the local tower frequency as soon as practical consistent with other ATC requirements.

6.2 The tower controller will consider that pilots of turbine − powered aircraft are ready for takeoff when they reach the runway or warm − up block unless advised otherwise.

6.3 The majority of ground control frequencies are in the 121.6 − 121.9 MHz bandwidth. Ground control frequencies are provided to eliminate frequency congestion on the tower (local control) frequency and are limited to communications between the tower and aircraft on the ground and between the tower and utility vehicles on the airport, provide a clear VHF channel for arriving and departing aircraft. They are used for issuance of taxi information, clearances, and other necessary contacts between the tower and aircraft or other vehicles operated on the airport. A pilot who has just landed should not change from the tower frequency to the ground control frequency until directed to do so by the controller. Normally, only one ground control frequency is assigned at an airport; however, at locations where the amount of traffic so warrants, a second ground control frequency and/or another frequency designated as a clearance delivery frequency, may be assigned.

6.4 A controller may omit the ground or local control frequency if the controller believes the pilot knows which frequency is in use. If the ground control frequency is in the 121 MHz bandwidth the controller may omit the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 numbers preceding the decimal point; e.g., 121.7, “CONTACT GROUND POINT SEVEN.” However, if any doubt exists as to what frequency is in use, the pilot should promptly request the controller to provide that information.

6.5 Controllers will normally avoid issuing a radio frequency change to helicopters, known to be single-piloted, which are hovering, air taxiing, or flying near the ground. At times, it may be necessary for pilots to alert ATC regarding single pilot operations to minimize delay of essential ATC communications. Whenever possible, ATC instructions will be relayed through the frequency being monitored until a frequency change can be accomplished. Pilots must promptly advise ATC if they are unable to comply with a frequency change. Also, pilots should advise ATC if they must land to accomplish the frequency change unless it is clear the landing; e.g., on a taxiway or in a helicopter operating area, will have no impact on other air traffic.

7. Traffic Control Light Signals 7.1 The following procedures are used by airport traffic control towers in the control of aircraft, ground vehicles, equipment, and personnel not equipped with radio. These same procedures will be used to control aircraft, ground vehicles, equipment, and personnel equipped with radio if radio contact cannot be established. Airport traffic control personnel use a directive traffic control signal which emits an intense narrow beam of a selected color (either red, white, or green) when controlling traffic by light signals.

7.2 Although the traffic signal light offers the advantage that some control may be exercised over nonradio − equipped aircraft, pilots should be cognizant of the disadvantages which are: 7.2.1 The pilot may not be looking at the control tower at the time a signal is directed toward him/her; and 7.2.2 The directions transmitted by a light signal are very limited since only approval of a pilot’s anticipated actions may be transmitted. No supplement or explanatory information may be transmitted except by the use of the “General Warning Signal” which advises the pilot to be on the alert.

7.3 Between sunset and sunrise, a pilot wishing to attract the attention of the control tower should turn on a landing light and taxi the aircraft into a position, clear of the active runway, so that light is visible to the tower.

The landing light should remain on until appropriate signals are received from the tower.

TBL ENR 1.1 − 1 Airport Traffic Control Tower Light Gun Signals Meaning Color and Type of Signal Movement of Vehicles, Aircraft on the Ground Aircraft in Flight Equipment and Personnel Steady green Cleared to cross, proceed or go Cleared for takeoff Cleared to land Flashing green Not applicable Cleared for taxi Return for landing (to be followed by steady green at the proper time) Steady red STOP STOP Give way to other aircraft and continue circling Flashing red Clear the taxiway/runway Taxi clear of the runway in use Airport unsafe, do not land Flashing white Return to starting point on Return to starting point on Not applicable airport airport Alternating red and green Exercise extreme caution Exercise extreme caution Exercise extreme caution 8. Use of Runways/Declared Distances 8.1 Runways are identified by numbers that indicate the nearest 10 − degree increment of the azimuth of the runway centerline. For example, where the magnetic azimuth is 183 degrees, the runway designation would be 18; for a magnetic azimuth of 87 degrees, the runway designation would be 9. For a magnetic azimuth ending in the number 5, such as 185, the runway designation could be either 18 or 19. Wind direction issued by the tower is also magnetic and wind velocity is in knots.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − 1. At airports with multiple parallel runways whose magnetic azimuths are identical, each runway number will be supplemented by a letter and shown from left to right when viewed from the direction of approach.

2. When multiple parallel runways at the same airport are separated by a large distance, such as by a central terminal or several terminals, the runways may be designated as non − parallel runways to avoid pilot confusion.

REFERENCE − AC 150/5340 − 1, Standards for Airport Markings, Para 2.3.5, Characteristics.

8.2 Airport proprietors are responsible for taking the lead in local aviation noise control. Accordingly, they may propose specific noise abatement plans to the FAA. If approved, these plans are applied in the form of Formal or Informal Runway Use Programs for noise abatement purposes.

8.2.1 ATC will assign the runway/s most nearly aligned with the wind when 5 knots or more, or the “calm wind” runway when less than 5 knots unless: 8.2.1.1 Use of another runway is operationally advantageous, or 8.2.1.2 A Runway Use Program is in effect.

NOTE − Tailwind and crosswind considerations take precedence over delay/capacity considerations, and noise abatement operations/procedures.

REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 3 − 5 − 1, Selection.

8.3 If a pilot prefers to use a runway different from that specified, the pilot is expected to advise ATC. ATC may honor such requests as soon as is operationally practicable. ATC will advise pilots when the requested runway is noise sensitive. When use of a runway other than the one assigned is requested, pilot cooperation is encouraged to preclude disruption of traffic flows or the creation of conflicting patterns.

REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 3 − 5 − 1, Selection.

8.4 Declared Distances.

8.4.1 Declared distances for a runway represent the maximum distances available and suitable for meeting takeoff and landing distance performance requirements. These distances are determined in accordance with FAA runway design standards by adding to the physical length of paved runway any clearway or stopway and subtracting from that sum any lengths necessary to obtain the standard runway safety areas, runway object free areas, or runway protection zones. As a result of these additions and subtractions, the declared distances for a runway may be more or less than the physical length of the runway as depicted on aeronautical charts and related publications, or available in electronic navigation databases provided by either the U.S. Government or commercial companies.

8.4.2 All 14 CFR Part 139 airports report declared distances for each runway. Other airports may also report declared distances for a runway if necessary to meet runway design standards or to indicate the presence of a clearway or stopway. Where reported, declared distances for each runway end are published in the Chart Supplement. For runways without published declared distances, the declared distances may be assumed to be equal to the physical length of the runway unless there is a displaced landing threshold, in which case the Landing Distance Available (LDA) is shortened by the amount of the threshold displacement.

NOTE − A symbol is shown on U.S. Government charts to indicate that runway declared distance information is available (See appropriate Chart Supplement).

8.4.2.1 The FAA uses the following definitions for runway declared distances (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 5 ).

REFERENCE − Pilot/Controller Glossary Terms: “Accelerate − Stop Distance Available,” “Landing Distance Available,” “Takeoff Distance Available,” “Takeoff Run Available,” ” Stopway,” and “Clearway.” a) Takeoff Run Available (TORA) – The runway length declared available and suitable for the ground run of an airplane taking off.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 The TORA is typically the physical length of the runway, but it may be shorter than the runway length if necessary to satisfy runway design standards. For example, the TORA may be shorter than the runway length if a portion of the runway must be used to satisfy runway protection zone requirements.

b) Takeoff Distance Available (TODA) – The takeoff run available plus the length of any remaining runway or clearway beyond the far end of the takeoff run available.

The TODA is the distance declared available for satisfying takeoff distance requirements for airplanes where the certification and operating rules and available performance data allow for the consideration of a clearway in takeoff performance computations.

NOTE − The length of any available clearway will be included in the TODA published in the entry for the Chart Supplement for that runway end.

c) Accelerate − Stop Distance Available (ASDA) – The runway plus stopway length declared available and suitable for the acceleration and deceleration of an airplane aborting a takeoff.

The ASDA may be longer than the physical length of the runway when a stopway has been designated available by the airport operator, or it may be shorter than the physical length of the runway if necessary to use a portion of the runway to satisfy runway design standards; for example, where the airport operator uses a portion of the runway to achieve the runway safety area requirement. ASDA is the distance used to satisfy the airplane accelerate − stop distance performance requirements where the certification and operating rules require accelerate − stop distance computations.

NOTE − The length of any available stopway will be included in the ASDA published in the entry for the Chart Supplement for that runway end.

d) Landing Distance Available (LDA) − The runway length declared available and suitable for a landing airplane.

The LDA may be less than the physical length of the runway or the length of the runway remaining beyond a displaced threshold if necessary to satisfy runway design standards;for example, where the airport operator uses a portion of the runway to achieve the runway safety area requirement.

Although some runway elements (such as stopway length and clearway length) may be available information, pilots must use the declared distances determined by the airport operator and not attempt to independently calculate declared distances by adding those elements to the reported physical length of the runway.

8.4.2.2 The airplane operating rules and/or the airplane operating limitations establish minimum distance requirements for takeoff and landing and are based on performance data supplied in the Airplane Flight Manual or Pilot’s Operating Handbook. The minimum distances required for takeoff and landing obtained either in planning prior to takeoff or in performance assessments conducted at the time of landing must fall within the applicable declared distances before the pilot can accept that runway for takeoff or landing.

8.4.2.3 Runway design standards may impose restrictions on the amount of runway available for use in takeoff and landing that are not apparent from the reported physical length of the runway or from runway markings and lighting. The runway elements of Runway Safety Area (RSA), Runway Object Free Area (ROFA), and Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) may reduce a runway’s declared distances to less than the physical length of the runway at geographically constrained airports (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 6 ). When considering the amount of runway available for use in takeoff or landing performance calculations, the declared distances published for a runway must always be used in lieu of the runway’s physical length.

REFERENCE − AC 150/5300 − 13, Airport Design.

8.4.2.4 While some runway elements associated with declared distances may be identifiable through runway markings or lighting (for example, a displaced threshold or a stopway), the individual declared distance limits are not marked or otherwise identified on the runway. An aircraft is not prohibited from operating beyond a Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 declared distance limit during the takeoff, landing, or taxi operation provided the runway surface is appropriately marked as usable runway (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 6 ). The following examples clarify the intent of this paragraph.

REFERENCE − AIM, Runway Markings, Paragraph 2 − 3 − 3.

AC 150/5340 − 1, Standards for Airport Markings.

EXAMPLE − 1. The declared LDA for runway 9 must be used when showing compliance with the landing distance requirements of the applicable airplane operating rules and/or airplane operating limitations or when making a before landing performance assessment. The LDA is less than the physical runway length, not only because of the displaced threshold, but also because of the subtractions necessary to meet the RSA beyond the far end of the runway. However, during the actual landing operation, it is permissible for the airplane to roll beyond the unmarked end of the LDA.

2. The declared ASDA for runway 9 must be used when showing compliance with the accelerate − stop distance requirements of the applicable airplane operating rules and/or airplane operating limitations. The ASDA is less than the physical length of the runway due to subtractions necessary to achieve the full RSA requirement. However, in the event of an aborted takeoff, it is permissible for the airplane to roll beyond the unmarked end of the ASDA as it is brought to a full − stop on the remaining usable runway.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 5 Declared Distances with Full − Standard Runway Safety Areas, Runway Object Free Areas, and Runway Protection Zones Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 6 Effects of a Geographical Constraint on a Runway’s Declared Distances NOTE − A runway’s RSA begins a set distance prior to the threshold and will extend a set distance beyond the end of the runway depending on the runway’s design criteria. If these required lengths cannot be achieved, the ASDA and/or LDA will be reduced as necessary to obtain the required lengths to the extent practicable.

9. Low Level Wind Shear/Microburst Detection Systems 9.1 Low Level Wind Shear Alert System (LLWAS), Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR), Weather System Processor (WSP), and Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS) display information on hazardous wind shear and microburst activity in the vicinity of an airport to air traffic controllers who relay this information to pilots.

9.1.1 LLWAS provides wind shear alert and gust front information but does not provide microburst alerts. The LLWAS is designed to detect low level wind shear conditions around the periphery of an airport. It does not detect wind shear beyond that limitation. Controllers will provide this information to pilots by giving the pilot the airport wind followed by the boundary wind.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − Wind shear alert, airport wind 230 at 8, south boundary wind 170 at 20.

9.1.2 LLWAS “network expansion,” (LLWAS NE) and LLWAS Relocation/Sustainment (LLWAS − RS) are systems integrated with TDWR. These systems provide the capability of detecting microburst alerts and wind shear alerts. Controllers will issue the appropriate wind shear alerts or microburst alerts. In some of these systems controllers also have the ability to issue wind information oriented to the threshold or departure end of the runway.

EXAMPLE − Runway 17 arrival microburst alert, 40 knot loss 3 mile final.

NOTE − Reference GEN 3.5, Paragraph 25, Microbursts.

9.1.3 More advanced systems are in the field or being developed such as ITWS. ITWS provides alerts for microbursts, wind shear, and significant thunderstorm activity. ITWS displays wind information oriented to the threshold or departure end of the runway.

9.1.4 The WSP provides weather processor enhancements to selected Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR) − 9 facilities. The WSP provides Air Traffic with detection and alerting of hazardous weather such as wind shear, microbursts, and significant thunderstorm activity. The WSP displays terminal area 6 level weather, storm cell locations and movement, as well as the location and predicted future position and intensity of wind shifts that may affect airport operations. Controllers will receive and issue alerts based on Areas Noted for Attention (ARENA). An ARENA extends on the runway center line from a 3 mile final to the runway to a 2 mile departure.

9.1.5 An airport equipped with the LLWAS, ITWS, or WSP is so indicated in the Chart Supplement under Weather Data Sources for that particular airport.

10. Braking Action Reports and Advisories 10.1 When available, ATC furnishes pilots the quality of braking action received from pilots. The quality of braking action is described by the terms “good,” “good to medium,” “medium,” “medium to poor,” “poor,” and “nil.” When pilots report the quality of braking action by using the terms noted above, they should use descriptive terms that are easily understood, such as, “braking action poor the first/last half of the runway,” together with the particular type of aircraft.

10.2 FICON NOTAMs will provide contaminant measurements for paved runways; however, a FICON NOTAM for braking action will only be used for non − paved runway surfaces, taxiways, and aprons. These NOTAMs are classified according to the most critical term (“good to medium,” “medium,” “medium to poor,” and “poor”).

10.2.1 FICON NOTAM reporting of a braking condition for paved runway surfaces is not permissible by Federally Obligated Airports or those airports certificated under 14 CFR Part 139.

10.2.2 A “NIL” braking condition at these airports must be mitigated by closure of the affected surface. Do not include the type of vehicle in the FICON NOTAM.

10.3 When tower controllers receive runway braking action reports which include the terms medium, poor, or nil, or whenever weather conditions are conducive to deteriorating or rapidly changing runway braking conditions, the tower will include on the ATIS broadcast the statement, “BRAKING ACTION ADVISORIES ARE IN EFFECT.” 10.4 During the time that braking action advisories are in effect, ATC will issue the most recent braking action report for the runway in use to each arriving and departing aircraft. Pilots should be prepared for deteriorating braking conditions and should request current runway condition information if not issued by controllers. Pilots should also be prepared to provide a descriptive runway condition report to controllers after landing.

11. Runway Condition Reports 11.1 Aircraft braking coefficient is dependent upon the surface friction between the tires on the aircraft wheels and the pavement surface. Less friction means less aircraft braking coefficient and less aircraft braking response.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 11.2 Runway condition code (RwyCC) values range from 1 (poor) to 6 (dry). For frozen contaminants on runway surfaces, a runway condition code reading of 4 indicates the level when braking deceleration or directional control is between good and medium.

NOTE − A RwyCC of “0” is used to delineate a braking action report of NIL and is prohibited from being reported in a FICON NOTAM.

11.3 Airport management should conduct runway condition assessments on wet runways or runways covered with compacted snow and/or ice.

11.3.1 Numerical readings may be obtained by using the Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM). The RCAM provides the airport operator with data to complete the report that includes the following: 11.3.1.1 Runway(s) in use 11.3.1.2 Time of the assessment 11.3.1.3 Runway condition codes for each zone (touchdown, mid − point, roll − out) 11.3.1.4 Pilot − reported braking action report (if available) 11.3.1.5 The contaminant (for example, wet snow, dry snow, slush, ice, etc.)

11.3.2 Assessments for each zone (see 11.3.1.3) will be issued in the direction of takeoff and landing on the runway, ranging from “1” to “6” to describe contaminated surfaces.

NOTE − A RwyCC of “0” is used to delineate a braking action report of NIL and is prohibited from being reported in a FICON NOTAM.

11.3.3 When any 1 or more runway condition codes are reported as less than 6, airport management must notify ATC for dissemination to pilots.

11.3.4 Controllers will not issue runway condition codes when all 3 segments of a runway are reporting values of 6.

11.4 When runway condition code reports are provided by airport management, the ATC facility providing approach control or local airport advisory must provide the report to all pilots.

11.5 Pilots should use runway condition code information with other knowledge including aircraft performance characteristics, type, and weight, previous experience, wind conditions, and aircraft tire type (such as bias ply vs. radial constructed) to determine runway suitability.

11.6 The Runway Condition Assessment Matrix identifies the descriptive terms “good,” “good to medium,” “medium,” “medium to poor,” “poor,” and “nil” used in braking action reports.

REFERENCE − Advisory Circular AC 91 − 79A (Revision 1), Mitigating the Risks of a Runway Overrun Upon Landing, Appendix 1.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 7 Runway Condition Assessment Matrix (RCAM) 12. Communications Prior to Departure 12.1 Nontower Controlled Airports 12.1.1 At airports not served by a FSS located on the airport, the pilot in command should broadcast his/her intentions on the prescribed frequency prior to aircraft movement and departure.

12.1.2 At airports served by a FSS located on the airport, the pilot in command should obtain airport advisory service prior to aircraft movement and departure.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.1.3 Aircraft departing on an IFR clearance must obtain the clearance prior to departure via telephone, the appropriate FSS, or via direct communications with the ATC facility issuing the clearance as appropriate. An IFR clearance does not relieve the pilot from the communication stated above prior to aircraft movement and departure.

12.2 Tower Controlled Airports 12.2.1 Pilots of departing aircraft should communicate with the control tower on the appropriate ground control/clearance delivery frequency prior to starting engines to receive engine start time, taxi, and/or clearance information. Unless otherwise advised by the tower, remain on the frequency during taxiing and run up, then change to local control frequency when ready to request takeoff clearance.

NOTE − Refer to Automatic Terminal Information Service (ATIS) for continuous broadcast of terminal information.

13. Gate Holding Due to Departure Delays 13.1 Pilots should contact ground control/clearance delivery prior to starting engines as gate hold procedures will be in effect whenever departure delays exceed or are anticipated to exceed 15 minutes. The sequence for departure will be maintained in accordance with initial call up unless modified by flow control restrictions. Pilots should monitor the ground control/clearance delivery frequency for engine startup advisories or new proposed start time if the delay changes.

13.2 The tower controller will consider that pilots of turbine − powered aircraft are ready for takeoff when they reach the runway/warm − up block unless advised otherwise.

14. Taxiing 14.1 General. Approval must be obtained prior to moving an aircraft or vehicle onto the movement area during the hours an airport traffic control tower is in operation.

14.1.1 Always state your position on the airport when calling the tower for taxi instructions.

14.1.2 The movement area is normally described in local bulletins issued by the airport manager or control tower. These bulletins may be found in FSSs, fixed base operators offices, air carrier offices, and operations offices.

14.1.3 The control tower also issues bulletins describing areas where they cannot provide airport traffic control service due to nonvisibility or other reasons.

14.1.4 A clearance must be obtained prior to taxiing on a runway, taking off, or landing during the hours an airport traffic control tower is in operation.

14.1.5 A clearance must be obtained prior to crossing any runway. ATC will issue an explicit clearance for all runway crossings.

14.1.6 When assigned a takeoff runway, ATC will first specify the runway, issue taxi instructions, and state any hold short instructions or runway crossing clearances if the taxi route will cross a runway. This does not authorize the aircraft to “enter” or “cross” the assigned departure runway at any point. In order to preclude misunderstandings in radio communications, ATC will not use the word “cleared” in conjunction with authorization for aircraft to taxi. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A READBACK FROM THE PILOT OF ALL RUNWAY HOLD SHORT INSTRUCTIONS.

14.1.7 When issuing taxi instructions to any point other than an assigned takeoff runway, ATC will specify the point to taxi to, issue taxi instructions, and state any hold short instructions or runway crossing clearances if the taxi route will cross a runway.

14.1.8 If a pilot is expected to hold short of a runway approach/departure ( Runway XX APPCH/ Runway XX DEP) hold area or ILS holding position (see FIG AD 1.1 − 24, Taxiways Located in Runway Approach Area, in Section AD 1.1, Aerodrome Availability), ATC will issue instructions.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 14.1.9 When taxi instructions are received from the controller, pilots should always read back: 14.1.9.1 The runway assignment.

14.1.9.2 Any clearance to enter a specific runway.

14.1.9.3 Any instruction to hold short of a specific runway or line up and wait.

14.1.10 Controllers are required to request a readback of runway hold short assignment when it is not received from the pilot/vehicle.

14.2 ATC clearances or instructions pertaining to taxiing are predicated on known traffic and known physical airport conditions. Therefore, it is important that pilots clearly understand the clearance or instruction. Although an ATC clearance is issued for taxiing purposes, when operating in accordance with the Federal Regulations, it is the responsibility of the pilot to avoid collision with other aircraft. Since “the pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft” the pilot should obtain clarification of any clearance or instruction which is not understood.

14.2.1 Good operating practice dictates that pilots acknowledge all runway crossing, hold short, or takeoff clearances unless there is some misunderstanding, at which time the pilot should query the controller until the clearance is understood. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN FROM THE PILOT A READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLD SHORT INSTRUCTIONS. Pilots operating a single pilot aircraft should monitor only assigned ATC communications after being cleared onto the active runway for departure.

Single pilot aircraft should not monitor other than ATC communications until flight from Class D airspace is completed. This same procedure should be practiced from after receipt of the clearance for landing until the landing and taxi activities are complete. Proper effective scanning for other aircraft, surface vehicles, or other objects should be continuously exercised in all cases.

14.2.2 If the pilot is unfamiliar with the airport or for any reason confusion exists as to the correct taxi routing, a request may be made for progressive taxi instructions which include step − by − step routing directions.

Progressive instructions may also be issued if the controller deems it necessary due to traffic or field conditions (for example, construction or closed taxiways).

14.3 At those airports where the United States Government operates the control tower and ATC has authorized noncompliance with the requirement for two − way radio communications while operating within Class D airspace, or at those airports where the United States Government does not operate the control tower and radio communications cannot be established, pilots must obtain a clearance by visual light signal prior to taxiing on a runway and prior to takeoff and landing.

14.4 The following phraseologies and procedures are used in radio − telephone communications with aeronautical ground stations.

14.4.1 Request for taxi instructions prior to departure. State your aircraft identification, location, type of operation planned (VFR or IFR), and the point of first intended landing.

EXAMPLE − Aircraft: “Washington ground, Beechcraft One Three One Five Niner at hangar eight, ready to taxi, I − F − R to Chicago.” Tower: “Beechcraft One Three One Five Niner, Washington ground, runway two seven, taxi via taxiways Charlie and Delta, hold short of runway three three left.” Aircraft: “Beechcraft One Three One Five Niner, runway two seven, hold short of runway three three left.” 14.4.2 Receipt of Air Traffic Control Clearance. Air route traffic control clearances are relayed to pilots by airport traffic controllers in the following manner: EXAMPLE − Tower: “Beechcraft One Three One Five Niner, cleared to the Chicago Midway Airport via Victor Eight, maintain eight thousand.” Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Aircraft: “Beechcraft One Three One Five Niner, cleared to the Chicago Midway Airport via Victor Eight, maintain eight thousand.” NOTE − Normally, an ATC IFR clearance is relayed to a pilot by the ground controller. At busy locations, however, pilots may be instructed by the ground controller to “contact clearance delivery” on a frequency designated for this purpose. No surveillance or control over the movement of traffic is exercised by this position of operation. (See paragraph 28., ATC Clearances and Aircraft Separation.)

14.4.3 Request for Taxi Instructions After Landing. State your aircraft identification, location, and that you request taxi instructions.

EXAMPLE − Aircraft: “Dulles ground, Beechcraft One Four Two Six One clearing runway one right on taxiway echo three, request clearance to Page.” Tower: “Beechcraft One Four Two Six One, Dulles ground, taxi to Page via taxiways echo three, echo one, and echo niner.” or Aircraft: “Orlando ground, Beechcraft One Four Two Six One clearing runway one eight left at taxiway bravo three, request clearance to Page.” Tower: “Beechcraft One Four Two Six One, Orlando ground, hold short of runway one eight right.” Aircraft: “Beechcraft One Four Two Six One, hold short of runway one eight right.” 14.5 During ground operations, jet blast, prop wash, and rotor wash can cause damage and upsets if encountered at close range. Pilots should consider the effects of jet blast, prop wash, and rotor wash on aircraft, vehicles, and maintenance equipment during ground operations.

15. Taxi During Low Visibility 15.1 Pilots and aircraft operators should be constantly aware that during certain low visibility conditions the movement of aircraft and vehicles on airports may not be visible to the tower controller. This may prevent visual confirmation of an aircraft’s adherence to taxi instructions.

15.2 Of vital importance is the need for pilots to notify the controller when difficulties are encountered or at the first indication of becoming disoriented. Pilots should proceed with extreme caution when taxiing toward the sun. When vision difficulties are encountered, pilots should immediately inform the controller.

15.3 Advisory Circular 120 − 57, Low Visibility Operations Surface Movement Guidance and Control System, commonly known as LVOSMGCS (pronounced “LVO SMIGS”) describes an adequate example of a low visibility taxi plan for any airport which has takeoff or landing operations in less than 1,200 feet runway visual range (RVR) visibility conditions. These plans, which affect aircrew and vehicle operators, may incorporate additional lighting, markings, and procedures to control airport surface traffic. They will be addressed at two levels; operations less than 1,200 feet RVR to 500 feet RVR and operations less than 500 feet RVR.

NOTE − Specific lighting systems and surface markings may be found in Paragraph 14, Taxiway Lights, and Paragraph 18, Taxiway Markings, in Section AD 1.1, Aerodrome Availability.

15.4 When low visibility conditions exist, pilots should focus their entire attention on the safe operation of the aircraft while it is moving. Checklists and nonessential communication should be withheld until the aircraft is stopped and the brakes set.

16. Standard Taxi Routes 16.1 Standard Taxi Routes (STRs) provide a standard, predictable taxi route from an origination point to a termination point on the airport movement area. The use of STRs helps reduce frequency congestion and Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 streamline taxi procedures. STRs may be available at certain airports. Absent an STR Letter of Agreement (LOA), issuance of an STR will be at the request of the pilot and discretion of ATC. STRs used under an LOA are issued by ATC and are not required to be requested by the pilot.

16.2 STRs are available via two methods, (LOA) or publicly − available via the Domestic Notices website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/domesticnotices/ .

16.3 An LOA for STRs will be revised for updates and changes, including cancellation on an as-needed basis with the operator. It is the responsibility of the operator to distribute changes to their flight crews.

16.4 An STR may be requested by a pilot or assigned at the discretion of ATC to the pilot of an operator with an LOA STR. It is the responsibility of the pilot to request a full taxi clearance if not fully familiar with the STR.

16.5 A Letter to Airman (LTA) will be issued by airport traffic control towers to announce availability, updates, cancellation, or changes of publicly available STRs with appropriate updates to the Domestic Notices website.

An LTA may include an airport diagram. The airport diagram will be labeled “not for navigation” and is not an acceptable substitute for the most up − to − date airport diagrams. LTAs are available via the FAA NOTAM Search website: https://notams.aim.faa.gov/notamSearch/nsapp.html#/ .

16.6 Pilots request publicly − available STRs by stating the desired STR name (e.g., ATC Facility, flight or aircraft identification, location, request STR name). By requesting an STR, a pilot acknowledges full familiarity with the STR. The issuance of a pilot − requested STRs is at the discretion of ATC.

16.7 STRs contain the same characteristics and responsibilities: 16.7.1 Pilots should not request, and ATC may not issue STR instructions during low visibility Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (SMGCS) operations.

16.7.2 It is the pilot’s responsibility to maintain familiarity and awareness of the most current versions of STRs, as well as airport diagrams and charts prior to accepting an STR assignment.

16.7.3 If a pilot is unsure about the assigned STR procedure, the pilot is encouraged to either seek clarification from ATC or decline the STR assignment.

16.7.4 Pilots who become disoriented during taxi should advise ATC immediately and request detailed taxi instructions or other assistance.

16.7.5 An STR instruction does not constitute nor imply a clearance to cross a runway.

16.7.6 Unless otherwise stated by ATC, the issuance of an STR does not give an aircraft the right of way over another taxiing aircraft.

16.7.7 Unless otherwise instructed by ATC, originating from, and terminating to a non-movement area as part of an STR is at the discretion of the pilot in coordination with ramp control, if required.

16.7.8 If ATC instructs the pilot to deviate from an STR, ATC must issue detailed taxi instructions for the remainder of the taxi.

16.7.9 Pilots are urged to exercise caution when accepting STR assignments, especially when STRs are used or available at more than one airport in the same terminal area.

16.8 ATC may cancel, amend, or revise an STR as necessary. Any updates to publicly-available STRs will be communicated via LTA with appropriate updates to the Domestic Notices website.

17. Intersection Takeoffs 17.1 In order to enhance airport capacities, reduce taxiing distances, minimize departure delays, and provide for more efficient movement of air traffic, controllers may initiate intersection takeoffs as well as approve them when the pilot requests. If for ANY reason a pilot prefers to use a different intersection or the full length of the runway or desires to obtain the distance between the intersection and the runway end, THE PILOT IS EXPECTED TO INFORM ATC ACCORDINGLY.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17.2 An aircraft is expected to taxi to (but not onto) the end of the assigned runway unless prior approval for an intersection departure is received from ground control.

17.3 Pilots should state their position on the airport when calling the tower for takeoff from a runway intersection.

EXAMPLE − Cleveland Tower, Apache Three Seven Two Two Papa, at the intersection of taxiway oscar and runway two three right, ready for departure.

17.4 Controllers are required to separate small aircraft that are departing from an intersection on the same runway (same or opposite direction) behind a large nonheavy aircraft (except B757), by ensuring that at least a 3 − minute interval exists between the time the preceding large aircraft has taken off and the succeeding small aircraft begins takeoff roll. The 3 − minute separation requirement will also be applied to small aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of 12,500 pounds or less departing behind a small aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff weight of more than 12,500 pounds. To inform the pilot of the required 3 − minute hold, the controller will state, “Hold for wake turbulence.” If after considering wake turbulence hazards, the pilot feels that a lesser time interval is appropriate, the pilot may request a waiver to the 3 − minute interval. To initiate such a request, simply say “Request waiver to 3 − minute interval” or a similar statement. Controllers may then issue a takeoff clearance if other traffic permits, since the pilot has accepted the responsibility for wake turbulence separation.

17.5 The 3 − minute interval is not required when the intersection is 500 feet or less from the departure point of the preceding aircraft and both aircraft are taking off in the same direction. Controllers may permit the small aircraft to alter course after takeoff to avoid the flight path of the preceding departure.

17.6 A 4 − minute interval is mandatory for small, large, and heavy aircraft behind a super aircraft. The 3 − minute interval is mandatory behind a heavy aircraft in all cases, and for small aircraft behind a B757.

18. VFR Flights in Terminal Areas 18.1 Use reasonable restraint in exercising the prerogative of VFR flight, especially in terminal areas. The weather minimums and distances from clouds are minimums. Giving yourself a greater margin in specific instances is just good judgment.

18.1.1 Approach Area. Conducting a VFR operation in Class D and E Airspace when the official visibility is 3 or 4 miles is not prohibited, but good judgment would dictate that you keep out of the approach area.

18.1.2 Reduced Visibility. It has always been recognized that precipitation reduces forward visibility.

Consequently, although again it may be perfectly legal to cancel your IFR flight plan at any time you can proceed VFR, it is good practice, when precipitation is occurring, to continue IFR operation into a terminal area until you are reasonably close to your destination.

18.1.3 Simulated Instrument Flights. In conducting simulated instrument flights, be sure that the weather is good enough to compensate for the restricted visibility of the safety pilot and your greater concentration on your flight instruments. Give yourself a greater margin when your flight plan lies in or near a busy airway or close to an airport.

19. Low Approach 19.1 A low approach (sometimes referred to as a low pass) is the go − around maneuver following approach.

Instead of landing or making a touch − and − go, a pilot may wish to go around (low approach) in order to expedite a particular operation − a series of practice instrument approaches is an example of such an operation. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, the low approach should be made straight ahead with no turns or climb made until the pilot has made a thorough visual check for other aircraft in the area.

19.2 When operating within Class D airspace, a pilot intending to make a low approach should contact the tower for approval. This request should be made prior to starting the final approach.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 19.3 When operating to an airport within Class E airspace, a pilot intending to make a low approach should, prior to leaving the final approach fix inbound (nonprecision approach) or the outer marker or fix used in lieu of the outer marker inbound (precision approach), so advise the FSS, UNICOM, or make a broadcast as appropriate.

20. Practice Instrument Approaches 20.1 Various air traffic incidents required adoption of measures to achieve more organized and controlled operations where practice instrument approaches are conducted. Practice instrument approaches are considered to be instrument approaches made by either a VFR aircraft not on an IFR flight plan or an aircraft on an IFR flight plan. To achieve this and thereby enhance air safety, it is Air Traffic Operations policy to provide for separation of such operations at locations where approach control facilities are located and, as resources permit, at certain other locations served by ARTCCs or approach control facilities. Pilot requests to practice instrument approaches may be approved by ATC subject to traffic and workload conditions. Pilots should anticipate that in some instances the controller may find it necessary to deny approval or withdraw previous approval when traffic conditions warrant. It must be clearly understood, however, that even though the controller may be providing separation, pilots on VFR flight plans are required to comply with basic visual flight rules (14 CFR Section 91.155). Application of ATC procedures or any action taken by the controller to avoid traffic conflictions does not relieve IFR and VFR pilots of their responsibility to see and avoid other traffic while operating in VFR conditions (14 CFR Section 91.113). In addition to the normal IFR separation minimums (which includes visual separation) during VFR conditions, 500 feet vertical separation may be applied between VFR aircraft and between a VFR aircraft and an IFR aircraft. Pilots not on IFR flight plans desiring practice instrument approaches should always state “practice” when making requests to ATC. Controllers will instruct VFR aircraft requesting an instrument approach to maintain VFR. This is to preclude misunderstandings between the pilot and controller as to the status of the aircraft. If the pilot wishes to proceed in accordance with instrument flight rules, he/she must specifically request and obtain an IFR clearance.

20.2 Before practicing an instrument approach, pilots should inform the approach control facility or the tower of the type of practice approach they desire to make and how they intend to terminate it; i.e., full − stop landing, touch − and − go, or missed/low approach maneuver. This information may be furnished progressively when conducting a series of approaches. Pilots on an IFR flight plan, who have made a series of instrument approaches to full stop landings, should inform ATC when they make their final landing. The controller will control flights practicing instrument approaches so as to ensure that they do not disrupt the flow of arriving and departing itinerant IFR or VFR aircraft. The priority afforded itinerant aircraft over practice instrument approaches is not intended to be so rigidly applied that it causes a grossly inefficient application of services. A minimum delay to itinerant traffic may be appropriate to allow an aircraft practicing an approach to complete that approach.

NOTE − A clearance to land means that appropriate separation on the landing runway will be ensured. A landing clearance does not relieve the pilot from compliance with any previously issued restriction.

20.3 At airports without a tower, pilots wishing to make practice instrument approaches should notify the facility having control jurisdiction of the desired approach as indicated on the approach chart. All approach control facilities and ARTCCs are required to publish a Letter to Airmen depicting those airports where they provide standard separation to both VFR and IFR aircraft conducting practice instrument approaches.

20.4 The controller will provide approved separation between both VFR and IFR aircraft when authorization is granted to make practice approaches to airports where an approach control facility is located and to certain other airports served by approach control or an ARTCC. Controller responsibility for separation of VFR aircraft begins at the point where the approach clearance becomes effective or when the aircraft enters Class B or TRSA airspace whichever comes first.

20.5 VFR aircraft practicing instrument approaches are not automatically authorized to execute the missed approach procedure. This authorization must be specifically requested by the pilot and approved by the controller. Where ATC procedures require application of IFR separation to VFR aircraft practicing instrument approaches, separation will be provided throughout the procedure including the missed approach. Where no Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 separation services are provided during the practice approach, no separation services will be provided during the missed approach.

20.6 Except in an emergency, aircraft cleared to practice instrument approaches must not deviate from the approved procedure until cleared to do so by the controller.

20.7 At radar approach control locations when a full approach procedure (procedure turn, etc.) cannot be approved, pilots should expect to be vectored to a final approach course for a practice instrument approach which is compatible with the general direction of traffic at that airport.

20.8 When granting approval for a practice instrument approach, the controller will usually ask the pilot to report to the tower prior to or over the final approach fix inbound (nonprecision approaches) or over the outer marker or fix used in lieu of the outer marker inbound (precision approaches).

20.9 When authorization is granted to conduct practice instrument approaches to an airport with a tower but where approved standard separation is not provided to aircraft conducting practice instrument approaches, the tower will approve the practice approach, instruct the aircraft to maintain VFR, and issue traffic information, as required.

20.10 When a pilot notifies an FSS providing Airport Advisory Service of intent to conduct a practice instrument approach and if separation will be provided, he/she will be instructed to contact the appropriate facility on a specified frequency prior to initiating the approach. At airports where separation is not provided, the FSS will acknowledge the message and issue known traffic information but will neither approve or disapprove the approach.

20.11 Pilots conducting practice instrument approaches should be particularly alert for other aircraft operating in the local traffic pattern or in proximity to the airport.

21. Option Approach 21.1 The “Cleared for the Option” procedure will permit an instructor, flight examiner or pilot the option to make a touch − and − go, low approach, missed approach, stop − and − go, or full stop landing. This procedure can be very beneficial in a training situation in that neither the student pilot nor examinee would know what maneuver would be accomplished. The pilot should make a request for this procedure passing the final approach fix inbound on an instrument approach or entering downwind for a VFR traffic pattern. After ATC approval of the option, the pilot should inform ATC as soon as possible of any delay on the runway during their stop-and-go or full stop landing. The advantages of this procedure as a training aid are that it enables an instructor or examiner to obtain the reaction of a trainee or examinee under changing conditions, the pilot would not have to discontinue an approach in the middle of the procedure due to student error or pilot proficiency requirements, and finally it allows more flexibility and economy in training programs. This procedure will only be used at those locations with an operational control tower and will be subject to ATC approval.

22. Communications Release of IFR Aircraft Landing at an Airport Without an Operating Control Tower 22.1 Aircraft operating on an IFR flight plan, landing at an airport without an operating control tower will be advised to change to the airport advisory frequency when direct communication with ATC is no longer required.

23. Pilot Responsibilities When Conducting Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO) 23.1 LAHSO is an acronym for “Land And Hold Short Operations.” These operations include landing and holding short of an intersecting runway, an intersecting taxiway, or some other designated point on a runway other than an intersecting runway or taxiway. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 8 , FIG ENR 1.1 − 9 , FIG ENR 1.1 − 10 .)

23.2 Pilot Responsibilities and Basic Procedures 23.2.1 LAHSO is an air traffic control procedure that requires pilot participation to balance the needs for increased airport capacity and system efficiency, consistent with safety. This procedure can be done safely Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 provided pilots and controllers are knowledgeable and understand their responsibilities. The following paragraphs outline specific pilot/operator responsibilities when conducting LAHSO.

23.2.2 At controlled airports, air traffic may clear a pilot to land and hold short. Pilots may accept such a clearance provided that the pilot − in − command determines that the aircraft can safely land and stop within the Available Landing Distance (ALD). ALD data are published in the special notices section of the Chart Supplement and in the U.S. Terminal Procedures Publications. Controllers will also provide ALD data upon request. Student pilots or pilots not familiar with LAHSO should not participate in the program.

FIG ENR 1.1 − 8 Land and Hold Short of an Intersecting Runway FIG ENR 1.1 − 9 Land and Hold Short of an Intersecting Taxiway EXAMPLE − FIG ENR 1.1 − 10 − Holding short at a designated point may be required to avoid conflicts with the runway safety area/flight path of a nearby runway.

NOTE − Each figure shows the approximate location of LAHSO markings, signage, and in − pavement lighting when installed.

REFERENCE − AIP, Part 3 − Aerodromes.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 10 Land and Hold Short of a Designated Point on a Runway Other Than an Intersecting Runway or Taxiway 23.2.3 The pilot − in − command has the final authority to accept or decline any land and hold short clearance. The safety and operation of the aircraft remain the responsibility of the pilot. Pilots are expected to decline a LAHSO clearance if they determine it will compromise safety.

23.2.4 To conduct LAHSO, pilots should become familiar with all available information concerning LAHSO at their destination airport. Pilots should have, readily available, the published ALD and runway slope information for all LAHSO runway combinations at each airport of intended landing. Additionally, knowledge about landing performance data permits the pilot to readily determine that the ALD for the assigned runway is sufficient for safe LAHSO. As part of a pilot’s preflight planning process, pilots should determine if their destination airport has LAHSO. If so, their preflight planning process should include an assessment of which LAHSO combinations would work for them given their aircraft’s required landing distance. Good pilot decision − making is knowing in advance whether one can accept a LAHSO clearance if offered.

23.2.5 For those airplanes flown with two crewmembers, effective intra − cockpit communication between cockpit crewmembers is also critical. There have been several instances where the pilot working the radios accepted a LAHSO clearance but then simply forgot to tell the pilot flying the aircraft.

23.2.6 If, for any reason, such as difficulty in discerning the location of a LAHSO intersection, wind conditions, aircraft condition, etc., the pilot elects to request to land on the full length of the runway, to land on another runway, or to decline LAHSO, a pilot is expected to promptly inform ATC, ideally even before the clearance is issued. A LAHSO clearance, once accepted, must be adhered to, just as any other ATC clearance, unless an amended clearance is obtained or an emergency occurs. A LAHSO clearance does not preclude a rejected landing.

23.2.7 A pilot who accepts a LAHSO clearance should land and exit the runway at the first convenient taxiway (unless directed otherwise) before reaching the hold short point. Otherwise, the pilot must stop and hold at the hold short point. If a rejected landing becomes necessary after accepting a LAHSO clearance, the pilot should maintain safe separation from other aircraft or vehicles, and should promptly notify the controller.

23.2.8 Controllers need a full read back of all LAHSO clearances. Pilots should read back their LAHSO clearance and include the words, “HOLD SHORT OF (RUNWAY/TAXIWAY/OR POINT)” in their acknowledgment of all LAHSO clearances. In order to reduce frequency congestion, pilots are encouraged to read back the LAHSO clearance without prompting. Don’t make the controller have to ask for a read back!

23.3 LAHSO Situational Awareness Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 23.3.1 Situational awareness is vital to the success of LAHSO. Situational awareness starts with having current airport information in the cockpit, readily accessible to the pilot. (An airport diagram assists pilots in identifying their location on the airport, thus reducing requests for “progressive taxi instructions” from controllers.)

23.3.2 Situational awareness includes effective pilot − controller radio communication. ATC expects pilots to specifically acknowledge and read back all LAHSO clearances as follows: EXAMPLE − ATC: “(Aircraft ID) cleared to land runway six right, hold short of taxiway bravo for crossing traffic (type aircraft).” Aircraft: “(Aircraft ID), wilco, cleared to land runway six right to hold short of taxiway bravo.” ATC: “(Aircraft ID) cross runway six right at taxiway bravo, landing aircraft will hold short.” Aircraft: “(Aircraft ID), wilco, cross runway six right at bravo, landing traffic (type aircraft) to hold.” 23.3.3 Situational awareness also includes a thorough understanding of the airport markings, signage, and lighting associated with LAHSO. These visual aids consist of a three − part system of yellow hold − short markings, red and white signage and, in certain cases, in − pavement lighting. Visual aids assist the pilot in determining where to hold short. FIG ENR 1.1 − 8 , FIG ENR 1.1 − 9 , FIG ENR 1.1 − 10 depict how these markings, signage, and lighting combinations will appear once installed. Pilots are cautioned that not all airports conducting LAHSO have installed any or all of the above markings, signage, or lighting.

23.3.4 Pilots should only receive a LAHSO clearance when there is a minimum ceiling of 1,000 feet and 3 statute miles visibility. The intent of having “basic” VFR weather conditions is to allow pilots to maintain visual contact with other aircraft and ground vehicle operations. Pilots should consider the effects of prevailing inflight visibility (such as landing into the sun) and how it may affect overall situational awareness. Additionally, surface vehicles and aircraft being taxied by maintenance personnel may also be participating in LAHSO, especially in those operations that involve crossing an active runway.

24. Exiting the Runway after Landing 24.1 The following procedures must be followed after landing and reaching taxi speed.

24.1.1 Exit the runway without delay at the first available taxiway or on a taxiway as instructed by ATC. Pilots must not exit the landing runway onto another runway unless authorized by ATC. At airports with an operating control tower, pilots should not stop or reverse course on the runway without first obtaining ATC approval.

24.1.2 Taxi clear of the runway unless otherwise directed by ATC. An aircraft is considered clear of the runway when all parts of the aircraft are past the runway edge and there are no restrictions to its continued movement beyond the runway holding position markings. In the absence of ATC instructions, the pilot is expected to taxi clear of the landing runway by taxiing beyond the runway holding position markings associated with the landing runway, even if that requires the aircraft to protrude into or cross another taxiway or ramp area. Once all parts of the aircraft have crossed the runway holding position markings, the pilot must hold unless further instructions have been issued by ATC.

NOTE − 1. The tower will issue the pilot instructions which will permit the aircraft to enter another taxiway, runway, or ramp area when required.

2. Guidance contained in subparagraphs 24.1.1 and 24.1.2 above is considered an integral part of the landing clearance and satisfies the requirement of 14 CFR Section 91.129.

24.1.3 Immediately change to ground control frequency when advised by the tower and obtain a taxi clearance.

NOTE − 1. The tower will issue instructions required to resolve any potential conflictions with other ground traffic prior to advising the pilot to contact ground control.

2. Ground control will issue taxi clearance to parking. That clearance does not authorize the aircraft to “enter” or “cross” any runways. Pilots not familiar with the taxi route should request specific taxi instructions from ATC.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 28 United States of America 22 JAN 26 25. Hand Signals FIG ENR 1.1 − 11 Signalman Directs Towing SIGNALMAN SIGNALMAN FIG ENR 1.1 − 12 Signalman’s Position SIGNALMAN SIGNALMAN Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 13 All Clear (O.K.)

FIG ENR 1.1 − 14 Start Engine POINT TO ENGINE TO BE STARTED Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 30 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 15 Pull Chocks FIG ENR 1.1 − 16 Proceed Straight Ahead Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 17 Left Turn FIG ENR 1.1 − 18 Right Turn Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 32 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 19 Slow Down FIG ENR 1.1 − 20 Flagman Directs Pilot Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 21 Insert Chocks FIG ENR 1.1 − 22 Cut Engines Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 34 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 23 Night Operation Use same hand movements as day operation FIG ENR 1.1 − 24 Stop 26. Use of Aircraft Lights 26.1 Aircraft position lights are required to be lighted on aircraft operated on the surface and in flight from sunset to sunrise. In addition, aircraft equipped with an anti − collision light system are required to operate that light system during all types of operations (day and night). However, during any adverse meteorological conditions, the pilot − in − command may determine that the anti − collision lights should be turned off when their light output would constitute a hazard to safety (14 CFR Section 91.209). Supplementary strobe lights should be turned off on the ground when they adversely affect ground personnel or other pilots, and in flight when there are adverse reflection from clouds.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 26.2 An aircraft anti − collision light system can use one or more rotating beacons and/or strobe lights, be colored either red or white, and have different (higher than minimum) intensities when compared to other aircraft. Many aircraft have both a rotating beacon and a strobe light system.

26.3 The FAA has a voluntary pilot safety program, Operation Lights On , to enhance the see − and − avoid concept. Pilots are encouraged to turn on their landing lights during takeoff; i.e., either after takeoff clearance has been received or when beginning takeoff roll. Pilots are further encouraged to turn on their landing lights when operating below 10,000 feet, day or night, especially when operating within 10 miles of any airport or in conditions of reduced visibility and in areas where flocks of birds may be expected; i.e., coastal areas, lake areas, around refuse dumps, etc. Although turning on aircraft lights does enhance the see − and − avoid concept, pilots should not become complacent about keeping a sharp lookout for other aircraft. Not all aircraft are equipped with lights, and some pilots may not have their lights turned on. Aircraft manufacturers’ recommendations for operation of landing lights and electrical systems should be observed.

26.4 Prop and jet blast forces generated by large aircraft have overturned or damaged several smaller aircraft taxiing behind them. To avoid similar results and in the interest of preventing upsets and injuries to ground personnel from such forces, the FAA recommends that air carriers and commercial operators turn on their rotating beacons anytime their aircraft engines are in operation. General aviation pilots using rotating beacon − equipped aircraft are also encouraged to participate in this program which is designed to alert others to the potential hazard. Since this is a voluntary program, exercise caution and do not rely solely on the rotating beacon as an indication that aircraft engines are in operation.

26.5 Prior to commencing taxi, it is recommended to turn on navigation, position, anti-collision, and logo lights (if equipped). To signal intent to other pilots, consider turning on the taxi light when the aircraft is moving or intending to move on the ground, and turning it off when stopped or yielding to other ground traffic. Strobe lights should not be illuminated during taxi if they will adversely affect the vision of other pilots or ground personnel.

26.6 At the discretion of the pilot-in-command, all exterior lights should be illuminated when taxiing on or across any runway. This increases the conspicuity of the aircraft to controllers and other pilots approaching to land, taxiing, or crossing the runway. Pilots should comply with any equipment operating limitations and consider the effects of landing and strobe lights on other aircraft in their vicinity.

26.7 When entering the departure runway for takeoff or to “line up and wait,” all lights, except for landing lights, should be illuminated to make the aircraft conspicuous to ATC and other aircraft on approach. Landing lights should be turned on when takeoff clearance is received or when commencing takeoff roll at an airport without an operating control tower.

27. Flight Inspection/“Flight Check” Aircraft in Terminal Areas 27.1 “Flight Check” is a call sign used to alert pilots and air traffic controllers when an FAA aircraft is engaged in flight inspection/certification of NAVAIDs and flight procedures. Flight check aircraft fly preplanned high/low altitude flight patterns such as grids, orbits, DME arcs, and tracks, including low passes along the full length of the runway to verify NAVAID performance.

27.2 Pilots should be especially watchful and avoid the flight paths of any aircraft using the call sign “Flight Check.” These flights will normally receive special handling from ATC. Pilot patience and cooperation in allowing uninterrupted recordings can significantly help expedite flight inspections, minimize costly, repetitive runs, and reduce the burden on the U.S. taxpayer.

28. ATC Clearances and Aircraft Separation 28.1 Clearance 28.1.1 A clearance issued by ATC is predicated on known traffic and known physical airport conditions. An ATC clearance means an authorization by ATC, for the purpose of preventing collision between known aircraft, for an aircraft to proceed under specified conditions within Classes A, B, C, D, and E airspace. IT IS NOT Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 36 United States of America 22 JAN 26 AUTHORIZATION FOR A PILOT TO DEVIATE FROM ANY RULE, REGULATION OR MINIMUM ALTITUDE NOR TO CONDUCT UNSAFE OPERATION OF THE AIRCRAFT.

28.1.2 14 CFR Section 91.3(a) states: “The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.” If ATC issues a clearance that would cause a pilot to deviate from a rule or regulation, or in the pilot’s opinion, would place the aircraft in jeopardy, IT IS THE PILOT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO REQUEST AN AMENDED CLEARANCE. Similarly, if a pilot prefers to follow a different course of action, such as make a 360 − degree turn for spacing to follow traffic when established in a landing or approach sequence, land on a different runway, takeoff from a different intersection, takeoff from the threshold instead of an intersection, or delay operation, THE PILOT IS EXPECTED TO INFORM ATC ACCORDINGLY. When the pilot requests a different course of action, however, the pilot is expected to cooperate so as to preclude the disruption of the traffic flow or the creation of conflicting patterns. The pilot is also expected to use the appropriate aircraft call sign to acknowledge all ATC clearances, frequency changes, or advisory information.

28.1.3 Each pilot who deviates from an ATC clearance in response to a traffic alert and collision avoidance system resolution advisory must notify ATC of that deviation as soon as possible.

28.1.4 When weather conditions permit, during the time an IFR flight is operating, it is the direct responsibility of the pilot to avoid other aircraft since VFR flights may be operating in the same area without the knowledge of ATC, and traffic clearances provide standard separation only between IFR flights.

28.2 Clearance Prefix A clearance, information, or request for information originated by an ATC facility and relayed to the pilot through an air/ground communication station will be prefixed by “ATC CLEARS,” “ATC ADVISES,” or “ATC REQUESTS.” 28.3 Clearance Items 28.3.1 An ATC clearance normally contains the following: 28.3.1.1 Clearance Limit. The traffic clearance issued prior to departure will normally authorize flight to the airport of intended landing. Many airports and associated NAVAIDs are collocated with the same name and/or identifier, so care should be exercised to ensure a clear understanding of the clearance limit. When the clearance limit is the airport of intended landing, the clearance should contain the airport name followed by the word “airport.” Under certain conditions, a clearance limit may be a NAVAID or other fix. When the clearance limit is a NAVAID, intersection, or waypoint and the type is known, the clearance should contain type. Under certain conditions at some locations, a short − range clearance procedure is utilized whereby a clearance is issued to a fix within or just outside the terminal area, and pilots are advised of the frequency on which they will receive the long − range clearance direct from the center controller.

28.3.1.2 Departure Procedure. Headings to fly and altitude restrictions may be issued to separate a departure from other air traffic in the terminal area. Where the volume of traffic warrants, instrument departure procedures (DPs) have been developed. (See ENR 1.5 .)

28.3.1.3 Route of Flight a) Clearances are normally issued for the altitude/flight level and route filed by the pilot. However, due to traffic conditions, it is frequently necessary for ATC to specify an altitude/flight level or route different from that requested by the pilot. In addition, flow patterns have been established in certain congested areas, or between congested areas, whereby traffic capacity is increased by routing all traffic on preferred routes. Information on these flow patterns is available in offices where preflight briefing is furnished or where flight plans are accepted.

b) When required, air traffic clearances include data to assist pilots in identifying radio reporting points. It is the responsibility of a pilot to notify ATC immediately if the radio equipment cannot receive the type of signals the pilot must utilize to comply with the clearance.

28.3.1.4 Altitude Data Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 a) The altitude/flight level instructions in an ATC clearance normally require that a pilot “MAINTAIN” the altitude/flight level to which the flight will operate when in Classes A, B, C, D, and E airspace. Altitude/flight level changes while en route should be requested prior to the time the change is desired.

b) When possible, if the altitude assigned is different than that requested by the pilot, ATC will inform an aircraft when to expect climb or descent clearance or to request altitude change from another facility. If this has not been received prior to crossing the boundary of the ATC facility’s area and assignment at a different flight level is still desired, the pilot should reinitiate the request with the next facility.

c) The term “CRUISE” may be used instead of “MAINTAIN” to assign a block of airspace, to a pilot, from the minimum IFR altitude up to and including the altitude specified in the cruise clearance. The pilot may level off at any intermediate altitude within this block of airspace. Climb/descent within the block is to be made at the discretion of the pilot. However, once the pilot starts descent and verbally reports leaving an altitude in the block, the pilot may not return to that altitude without additional ATC clearance.

28.4 Amended Clearances 28.4.1 Amendments to the initial clearance will be issued at any time an air traffic controller deems such action necessary to avoid possible confliction between aircraft. Clearances will require that a flight “hold” or change altitude prior to reaching the point where standard separation from other IFR traffic would no longer exist.

NOTE − Some pilots have questioned this action and requested “traffic information” and were at a loss when the reply indicated “no traffic reported.” In such cases the controller has taken action to prevent a traffic confliction which would have occurred at a distant point.

28.4.2 A pilot may wish an explanation of the handling of the flight at the time of occurrence; however, controllers are not able to take time from their immediate control duties, nor can they afford to overload the ATC communications channels to furnish explanations. Pilots may obtain an explanation by directing a letter or telephone call to the chief controller of the facility involved.

28.4.3 Pilots have the privilege of requesting a different clearance from that which has been issued by ATC if they feel that they have information which would make another course of action more practicable or if aircraft equipment limitations or company procedures forbid compliance with the clearance issued.

28.4.4 Pilots should pay particular attention to the clearance and not assume that the route and altitude/flight level are the same as requested in the flight plan. It is suggested that pilots make a written report of clearances at the time they are received, and verify, by a repeat back, any portions that are complex or about which a doubt exists. It will be the responsibility of each pilot to accept or refuse the clearance issued.

28.5 Special VFR Clearance 28.5.1 An ATC clearance must be obtained prior to operating within a Class B, Class C, Class D, and Class E surface area when the weather is less than that required for VFR flight. A VFR pilot may request and be given a clearance to enter, leave or operate within most Class D and Class E surface areas and some Class B and Class C surface areas in special VFR conditions, traffic permitting, and providing such flight will not delay IFR operations. All special VFR flights must remain clear of clouds. The visibility requirements for Special VFR aircraft (other than helicopters) are: 28.5.1.1 At least one statute mile flight visibility for operations within Classes B, C, D, and E surface areas.

28.5.1.2 At least one statute mile ground visibility if taking off or landing. If ground visibility is not reported at that airport, the flight visibility must be at least one statute mile.

28.5.1.3 The restrictions in subparagraphs 28.5.1.1 and 28.5.1.2 do not apply to helicopters. Helicopters must remain clear of clouds and may operate in Classes B, C, D, and E surface areas with less than one statute mile visibility.

28.5.2 When a control tower is located within a Class B, Class C, and Class D surface area, requests for clearances should be to the tower. If no tower is located within the surface area, a clearance may be obtained from the nearest tower, FSS or ARTCC.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 38 United States of America 22 JAN 26 28.5.3 It is not necessary to file a complete flight plan with the request for clearance, but pilots should state their intentions in sufficient detail to permit ATC to fit their flight into the traffic flow. The clearance will not contain a specific altitude as the pilot must remain clear of clouds. The controller may require the pilot to fly at or below a certain altitude due to other traffic, but the altitude specified will permit flight at or above the minimum safe altitude. In addition, at radar locations, flight may be vectored if necessary for control purposes or on pilot request.

NOTE − The pilot is responsible for obstacle or terrain clearance (reference 14 CFR Section 91.119).

28.5.4 Special VFR clearances are effective within Classes B, C, D, and E surface areas only. ATC does not provide separation after an aircraft leaves Class D surface area on a special VFR clearance.

28.5.5 Special VFR operations by fixed − wing aircraft are prohibited in some Classes B and C surface areas due to the volume of IFR traffic. A list of these Classes B and C surface areas is contained in 14 CFR Part 91, Appendix D, Section 3 and also depicted on Sectional Aeronautical Charts.

28.5.6 ATC provides separation between special VFR flights and between them and other IFR flights.

28.5.7 Special VFR operations by fixed − wing aircraft are prohibited between sunset and sunrise unless the pilot is instrument rated and the aircraft is equipped for IFR flight.

28.5.8 Pilots arriving or departing an uncontrolled airport that has automated weather broadcast capability (ASOS/AWOS) should monitor the broadcast frequency, advise the controller that they have the “one − minute weather,” and state intentions prior to operating within the Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E surface areas.

NOTE − One − minute weather is the most recent one minute updated weather broadcast received by a pilot from an uncontrolled airport ASOS/AWOS.

29. Pilot Responsibilities Upon Clearance Issuance 29.1 Record ATC Clearance. When conducting an IFR operation, make a written record of your ATC clearance. The specified conditions which are a part of your air traffic clearance may be somewhat different from those included in your flight plan. Additionally, ATC may find it necessary to ADD conditions, such as a particular departure route. The very fact that ATC specifies different or additional conditions means that other aircraft are involved in the traffic situation.

29.2 ATC Clearance/Instruction Readback. Pilots of airborne aircraft should read back those parts of ATC clearances and instructions containing altitude assignments, vectors, or runway assignments as a means of mutual verification. The read back of the “numbers” serves as a double check between pilots and controllers and reduces the kinds of communications errors that occur when a number is either “misheard” or is incorrect.

29.2.1 Include the aircraft identification in all readbacks and acknowledgments. This aids controllers in determining that the correct aircraft received the clearance or instruction. The requirement to include aircraft identification in all readbacks and acknowledgments becomes more important as frequency congestion increases and when aircraft with similar call signs are on the same frequency.

EXAMPLE − “Climbing to Flight Level three three zero, United Twelve” or “November Five Charlie Tango, roger, cleared to land runway nine left.” 29.2.2 Read back altitudes, altitude restrictions, and vectors in the same sequence as they are given in the clearance/instruction.

29.2.3 Altitudes contained in charted procedures such as DPs, instrument approaches, etc., should not be read back unless they are specifically stated by the controller.

29.2.4 Initial read back of a taxi, departure or landing clearance should include the runway assignment, including left, right, center, etc. if applicable.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 29.3 It is the responsibility of the pilot to accept or refuse the clearance issued.

30. IFR Clearance VFR − On − Top 30.1 A pilot on an IFR flight plan operating in VFR weather conditions, may request VFR − on − top in lieu of an assigned altitude. This would permit pilots to select an altitude or flight level of their choice (subject to any ATC restrictions).

30.2 Pilots desiring to climb through a cloud, haze, smoke, or other meteorological formation and then either cancel their IFR flight plan or operate VFR − on − top may request a climb to VFR − on − top. The ATC authorization must contain either a top report or a statement that no top report is available, and a request to report reaching VFR − on − top. Additionally, the ATC authorization may contain a clearance limit, routing and an alternative clearance if VFR − on − top is not reached by a specified altitude.

30.3 A pilot on an IFR flight plan operating in VFR conditions may request to climb/descend in VFR conditions.

30.4 ATC may not authorize VFR − on − top/VFR conditions operations unless the pilot requests the VFR operation or a clearance to operate in VFR conditions will result in noise abatement benefits where part of the IFR departure route does not conform to an FAA approved noise abatement route or altitude.

30.5 When operating in VFR conditions with an ATC authorization to “maintain VFR − on − top” or “maintain VFR conditions,” pilots on IFR flight plans must: 30.5.1 Fly at the appropriate VFR altitude as prescribed in 14 CFR Section 91.159.

30.5.2 Comply with the VFR visibility and distance from cloud criteria in 14 CFR Section 91.155 (Basic VFR Weather Minimums).

NOTE − See AIP, GEN 1.7, Annex 2, Rules of the Air, for a table showing basic VFR weather minimums.

30.5.3 Comply with instrument flight rules that are applicable to this flight; i.e., minimum IFR altitude, position reporting, radio communications, course to be flown, adherence to ATC clearance, etc. Pilots should advise ATC prior to any altitude change to ensure the exchange of accurate traffic information.

30.6 ATC authorization to “maintain VFR − on − top” is not intended to restrict pilots so that they must operate only above an obscuring meteorological formation (layer). Instead, it permits operation above, below, between layers or in areas where there is no meteorological obscuration. It is imperative that clearance to operate “VFR − on − top/VFR conditions” does not imply cancellation of the IFR flight plan.

30.7 Pilots operating VFR − on − top/VFR conditions may receive traffic information from ATC on other pertinent IFR or VFR aircraft. However, aircraft operating in Class B or Class C airspace and TRSAs must be separated as required by FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control.

NOTE − When operating in VFR weather conditions, it is the pilot’s responsibility to be vigilant so as to see and avoid other aircraft.

31. VFR/IFR Flights 31.1 A pilot departing VFR, either intending to or needing to obtain an IFR clearance en route, must be aware of the position of the aircraft and the relative terrain/obstructions. When accepting a clearance below the minimum en route altitude (MEA)/minimum IFR altitude (MIA)/minimum vector altitude (MVA)/off route obstruction clearance altitude (OROCA), pilots are responsible for their own terrain/obstruction clearance until reaching the MEA/MIA/MVA/OROCA. If the pilots are unable to maintain terrain/obstruction clearance, the controller should be advised and pilots should state their intentions. Pilots are reminded that on composite VFR to IFR flight plan, or on an IFR clearance, while flying unpublished departures via RNAV into uncontrolled airspace, the PIC is responsible for terrain and obstruction clearance until reaching the MEA/MIA/MVA/ORO - CA.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 40 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − OROCA is a published altitude which provides 1,000 feet of terrain and obstruction clearance in the US (2,000 feet of clearance in designated mountainous areas). These altitudes are not assessed for NAVAID signal coverage, air traffic control surveillance, or communications coverage, and are published for general situational awareness, flight planning and in − flight contingency use.

32. Adherence to Clearance 32.1 When air traffic clearance has been obtained under either the Visual or Instrument Flight Rules, the pilot in command of the aircraft must not deviate from the provisions thereof unless an amended clearance is obtained.

When ATC issues a clearance or instruction, pilots are expected to execute its provisions upon receipt. ATC, in certain situations, will include the word “IMMEDIATELY” in a clearance or instruction to impress urgency of an imminent situation, and expeditious compliance by the pilot is expected and necessary for safety. The addition of a VFR or other restriction; i.e., climb or descent point or time, crossing altitude, etc., does not authorize a pilot to deviate from the route of flight or any other provision of the ATC clearance.

32.2 When a heading is assigned or a turn is requested by ATC, pilots are expected to promptly initiate the turn, to complete the turn, and to maintain the new heading unless issued additional instructions.

32.3 The term “at pilot’s discretion” included in the altitude information of an ATC clearance means that ATC has offered the pilot the option to start climb or descent when the pilot wishes, is authorized to conduct the climb or descent at any rate, and to temporarily level off at any intermediate altitude as desired. However, once the aircraft has vacated an altitude, it may not return to that altitude.

32.4 When ATC has not used the term “AT PILOT’S DISCRETION” nor imposed any climb or descent restrictions, pilots should initiate climb or descent promptly on acknowledgement of the clearance. Descend or climb at an optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft to 1,000 feet above or below the assigned altitude, and then attempt to descend or climb at a rate of between 500 and 1,500 fpm until the assigned altitude is reached. If at anytime the pilot is unable to climb or descend at a rate of at least 500 feet a minute, advise ATC. If it is necessary to level off at an intermediate altitude during climb or descent, advise ATC, except when leveling off at 10,000 feet MSL on descent, or 2,500 feet above airport elevation (prior to entering a Class C or Class D surface area), when required for speed reduction (14 CFR Section 91.117).

NOTE − Leveling off at 10,000 feet MSL on descent or 2,500 feet above airport elevation (prior to entering a Class C or Class D surface area) to comply with 14 CFR Section 91.117 airspeed restrictions is commonplace. Controllers anticipate this action and plan accordingly. Leveling off at any other time on climb or descent may seriously affect air traffic handling by ATC.

Consequently, it is imperative that pilots make every effort to fulfill the above expected actions to aid ATC in safely handling and expediting traffic.

32.5 If the altitude information of an ATC DESCENT clearance includes a provision to “CROSS (fix) AT” or “AT OR ABOVE/BELOW (altitude),” the manner in which the descent is executed to comply with the crossing altitude is at the pilot’s discretion. This authorization to descend at pilot’s discretion is only applicable to that portion of the flight to which the crossing altitude restriction applies, and the pilot is expected to comply with the crossing altitude as a provision of the clearance. Any other clearance in which pilot execution is optional will so state: “AT PILOT’S DISCRETION.” EXAMPLE − 1. “United Four Seventeen, descend and maintain six thousand.” NOTE − 1. The pilot is expected to commence descent upon receipt of the clearance and to descend at the suggested rates until reaching the assigned altitude of 6,000 feet.

EXAMPLE − 2. “United Four Seventeen, descend at pilot’s discretion, maintain six thousand.” NOTE − 2. The pilot is authorized to conduct descent within the context of the term at pilot’s discretion as described above.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 41 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − 3. “United Four Seventeen, cross Lakeview V − O − R at or above Flight Level two zero zero, descend and maintain six thousand.” NOTE − 3. The pilot is authorized to conduct descent at pilot’s discretion until reaching Lakeview VOR and must comply with the clearance provision to cross the Lakeview VOR at or above FL 200. After passing Lakeview VOR, the pilot is expected to descend at the suggested rates until reaching the assigned altitude of 6,000 feet.

EXAMPLE − 4. “United Four Seventeen, cross Lakeview V − O − R at six thousand, maintain six thousand.” NOTE − 4. The pilot is authorized to conduct descent at pilot’s discretion, however, must comply with the clearance provision to cross the Lakeview VOR at 6,000 feet.

EXAMPLE − 5. “United Four Seventeen, descend now to Flight Level two seven zero, cross Lakeview V − O − R at or below one zero thousand, descend and maintain six thousand.” NOTE − 5. The pilot is expected to promptly execute and complete descent to FL 270 upon receipt of the clearance. After reaching FL 270 the pilot is authorized to descend “at pilot’s discretion” until reaching Lakeview VOR. The pilot must comply with the clearance provision to cross Lakeview VOR at or below 10,000 feet. After Lakeview VOR the pilot is expected to descend at the suggested rates until reaching 6,000 feet.

EXAMPLE − 6. “United Three Ten, descend now and maintain Flight Level two four zero, pilot’s discretion after reaching Flight Level two eight zero.” NOTE − 6. The pilot is expected to commence descent upon receipt of the clearance and to descend at the suggested rates until reaching FL 280. At that point, the pilot is authorized to continue descent to FL 240 within the context of the term “at pilot’s discretion” as described above.

32.6 In case emergency authority is used to deviate from the provisions of an ATC clearance, the pilot in command must notify ATC as soon as possible and obtain an amended clearance. In an emergency situation which results in no deviation from the rules prescribed in 14 CFR Part 91 but which requires ATC to give priority to an aircraft, the pilot of such aircraft must, when requested by ATC, make a report within 48 hours of such emergency situation to the manager of that ATC facility.

32.7 The guiding principle is that the last ATC clearance has precedence over the previous ATC clearance. When the route or altitude in a previously issued clearance is amended, the controller will restate applicable altitude restrictions. If altitude to maintain is changed or restated, whether prior to departure or while airborne, and previously issued altitude restrictions are omitted, those altitude restrictions are canceled, including Departure Procedures and Standard Terminal Arrival Route (STAR) altitude restrictions.

EXAMPLE − 1. A departure flight receives a clearance to destination airport to maintain FL 290. The clearance incorporates a DP which has certain altitude crossing restrictions. Shortly after takeoff, the flight receives a new clearance changing the maintaining FL from 290 to 250. If the altitude restrictions are still applicable, the controller restates them.

2. A departing aircraft is cleared to cross Fluky Intersection at or above 3,000 feet, Gordonville VOR at or above 12,000 feet, maintain FL 200. Shortly after departure, the altitude to be maintained is changed to FL 240. If the altitude restrictions are still applicable, the controller issues an amended clearance as follows: “cross Fluky Intersection at or above three thousand, cross Gordonville V − O − R at or above one two thousand, maintain Flight Level two four zero.” 3. An arriving aircraft is cleared to the destination airport via V45 Delta VOR direct; the aircraft is cleared to cross Delta VOR at 10,000 feet, and then to maintain 6,000 feet. Prior to Delta VOR, the controller issues an amended clearance as follows: “turn right heading one eight zero for vector to runway three six I − L − S approach, maintain six thousand.” NOTE − Because the altitude restriction “cross Delta V − O − R at 10,000 feet” was omitted from the amended clearance, it is no longer in effect.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 42 United States of America 22 JAN 26 32.8 Pilots of turbojet aircraft equipped with afterburner engines should advise ATC prior to takeoff if they intend to use afterburning during their climb to the en route altitude. Often, the controller may be able to plan traffic to accommodate a high performance climb and allow the aircraft to climb to the planned altitude without restriction.

32.9 If an “expedite” climb or descent clearance is issued by ATC, and the altitude to maintain is subsequently changed or restated without an expedite instruction, the expedite instruction is canceled. Expedite climb/descent normally indicates to the pilot that the approximate best rate of climb/descent should be used without requiring an exceptional change in aircraft handling characteristics. Normally controllers will inform pilots of the reason for an instruction to expedite.

33. IFR Separation Standards 33.1 ATC effects separation of aircraft vertically by assigning different altitudes; longitudinally by providing an interval expressed in time or distance between aircraft on the same, converging, or crossing courses; and laterally by assigning different flight paths.

33.2 Separation will be provided between all aircraft operating on IFR flight plans except during that part of the flight (outside Class B airspace or a TRSA) being conducted on a VFR − on − top/VFR conditions clearance. Under these conditions, ATC may issue traffic advisories, but it is the sole responsibility of the pilot to be vigilant so as to see and avoid other aircraft.

33.3 When radar is employed in the separation of aircraft at the same altitude, a minimum of 3 miles separation is provided between aircraft operating within 40 miles of the radar antenna site, and 5 miles between aircraft operating beyond 40 miles from the antenna site. These minimums may be increased or decreased in certain specific situations.

34. Speed Adjustments 34.1 ATC will issue speed adjustments to pilots of radar − controlled aircraft to achieve or maintain appropriate spacing. If necessary, ATC will assign a speed when approving deviations or radar vectoring off procedures that include published speed restrictions or a chart note used to transition from Mach to IAS. If no speed is assigned, speed becomes pilot’s discretion. However, when the aircraft reaches the end of the STAR, the last published speed on the STAR must be maintained until ATC deletes it, assigns a new speed, issues a vector, assigns a direct route, or issues an approach clearance.

NOTE − A chart note identifying a speed to maintain after transitioning from Mach to IAS may be published in lieu of or in addition to other published speed restrictions on a STAR.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.5, Para 3, Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) Procedures 34.2 ATC will express all speed adjustments in terms of knots based on indicated airspeed (IAS) in 5 or 10 knot increments except that at or above FL 240 speeds may be expressed in terms of Mach numbers in 0.01 increments. The use of Mach numbers is restricted to aircraft with Mach meters.

34.3 Pilots of aircraft in U.S. domestic Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace complying with speed adjustments (published or assigned) should maintain a speed within plus or minus 10 knots or 0.02 Mach number, whichever is less, of the assigned speed.

34.4 Pilots of aircraft in offshore controlled airspace or oceanic controlled airspace must adhere to the ATC assigned airspeed and must request ATC approval before making any change thereto. If it is essential to make an immediate temporary change in the Mach number (e.g., due to turbulence), ATC must be notified as soon as possible. If it is not feasible to maintain the last assigned Mach number during an en route climb or descent due to aircraft performance, advise ATC at the time of the request.

34.5 When ATC assigns speed adjustments, it will be in accordance with the following recommended minimums: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 43 United States of America 22 JAN 26 34.5.1 To aircraft operating between FL 280 and 10,000 feet, a speed not less than 250 knots or the equivalent Mach number.

NOTE − 1. On a standard day the Mach numbers equivalent to 250 knots CAS (subject to minor variations) are: FL 240 − 0.6 FL 250 − 0.61 FL 260 − 0.62 FL 270 − 0.64 FL 280 − 0.65 FL 290 − 0.66 .

2. When an operational advantage will be realized, speeds lower than the recommended minima may be applied.

34.5.2 To arriving turbojet aircraft operating below 10,000 feet, a speed not less than 210 knots, except within 20 flying miles of the airport of intended landing, a speed not less than 170 knots.

34.5.3 To arriving reciprocating engine or turboprop aircraft within 20 flying miles of the runway threshold of the airport of intended landing, a speed not less than 150 knots.

34.5.4 Departures, for turbojet aircraft, a speed not less than 230 knots; for reciprocating engine aircraft, a speed not less than 150 knots.

34.6 When ATC combines a speed adjustment with a descent clearance, the sequence of delivery with the word “then” between, indicates the expected order of execution; i.e., “DESCEND AND MAINTAIN (altitude); THEN, REDUCE SPEED TO (speed),” or “REDUCE SPEED TO (speed); THEN, DESCEND AND MAINTAIN (altitude).” NOTE − The maximum speeds below 10,000 feet as established in 14 CFR S ection 91.117 still apply. If there is any doubt concerning the manner in which such a clearance is to be executed, request clarification from ATC.

34.7 If ATC determines (before an approach clearance is issued) that it is no longer necessary to apply speed adjustment procedures, they will: 34.7.1 Advise the pilot to “resume normal speed.” Normal speed is used to terminate ATC assigned speed adjustments on segments where no published speed restrictions apply. It does not cancel published restrictions on upcoming procedures. This does not relieve the pilot of those speed restrictions which are applicable to 14 CFR Section 91.117.

EXAMPLE − (An aircraft is flying a SID with no published speed restrictions. ATC issues a speed adjustment and instructs the aircraft where the adjustment ends): “Maintain two two zero knots until BALTR then resume normal speed.” NOTE − The ATC assigned speed assignment of two two zero knots would apply until BALTR. The aircraft would then resume a normal operating speed while remaining in compliance with 14 CFR Section 91.117.

34.7.2 Instruct pilots to “comply with speed restrictions” when the aircraft is joining or resuming a charted procedure or route with published speed restrictions.

EXAMPLE − (ATC vectors an aircraft off of a SID to rejoin the procedure at a subsequent waypoint. When instructing the aircraft to resume the procedure, ATC also wants the aircraft to comply with the published procedure speed restrictions): “Resume the SALTY ONE departure. Comply with speed restrictions.” CAUTION − The phraseology “Descend via/Climb via SID” requires compliance with all altitude and/or speed restrictions depicted on the procedure.

34.7.3 Instruct the pilot to “resume published speed.” Resume published speed is issued to terminate a speed adjustment where speed restrictions are published on a charted procedure.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 44 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − When instructed to “comply with speed restrictions” or to “resume published speed,” ATC anticipates pilots will begin adjusting speed the minimum distance necessary prior to a published speed restriction so as to cross the waypoint/fix at the published speed. Once at the published speed, ATC expects pilots will maintain the published speed until additional adjustment is required to comply with further published or ATC assigned speed restrictions or as required to ensure compliance with 14 CFR Section 91.117.

EXAMPLE − (An aircraft is flying a SID/STAR with published speed restrictions. ATC issues a speed adjustment and instructs the aircraft where the adjustment ends): “Maintain two two zero knots until BALTR then resume published speed.” NOTE − The ATC assigned speed assignment of two two zero knots would apply until BALTR. The aircraft would then comply with the published speed restrictions.

34.7.4 Advise the pilot to “delete speed restrictions” when either ATC assigned or published speed restrictions on a charted procedure are no longer required.

EXAMPLE − (An aircraft is flying a SID with published speed restrictions designed to prevent aircraft overtake on departure. ATC determines there is no conflicting traffic and deletes the speed restriction): “Delete speed restrictions.” NOTE − When deleting published restrictions, ATC must ensure obstacle clearance until aircraft are established on a route where no published restrictions apply. This does not relieve the pilot of those speed restrictions which are applicable to 14 CFR Section 91.117.

34.7.5 Instruct the pilot to “climb via” or “descend via.” A climb via or descend via clearance cancels any previously issued speed restrictions and, once established on the depicted departure or arrival, to climb or descend, and to meet all published or assigned altitude and/or speed restrictions.

EXAMPLE − 1. (An aircraft is flying a SID with published speed restrictions. ATC has issued a speed restriction of 250 knots for spacing.

ATC determines that spacing between aircraft is adequate and desires the aircraft to comply with published restrictions): “United 436, Climb via SID.” 2. (An aircraft is established on a STAR. ATC must slow an aircraft for the purposes of spacing and assigns it a speed of 280 knots. When spacing is adequate, ATC deletes the speed restriction and desires that the aircraft comply with all published restrictions on the STAR): “Gulfstream two three papa echo, descend via the TYLER One arrival.” NOTE − 1. In example 1, when ATC issues a “Climb via SID” clearance, it deletes any previously issued speed and/or altitude restrictions. The pilot should then vertically navigate to comply with all speed and/or altitude restrictions published on the SID.

2. In example 2, when ATC issues a “Descend via <STAR name> arrival,” ATC has canceled any previously issued speed and/or altitude restrictions. The pilot should vertically navigate to comply with all speed and/or altitude restrictions published on the STAR.

CAUTION − When descending on a STAR, pilots should not speed up excessively beyond the previously issued speed. Otherwise, adequate spacing between aircraft descending on the STAR that was established by ATC with the previous restriction may be lost.

34.8 Approach clearances supersede any prior speed adjustment assignments, and pilots are expected to make their own speed adjustments as necessary to complete the approach. However, under certain circumstances, it may be necessary for ATC to issue further speed adjustments after approach clearance is issued to maintain separation between successive arrivals. Under such circumstances, previously issued speed adjustments will be restated if that speed is to be maintained or additional speed adjustments are requested. Speed adjustments should not be assigned inside the final approach fix on final or a point 5 miles from the runway, whichever is closer to the runway.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 45 United States of America 22 JAN 26 34.9 The pilots retain the prerogative of rejecting the application of speed adjustment by ATC if the minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater than the speed adjustment. IN SUCH CASES, PILOTS ARE EXPECTED TO ADVISE ATC OF THE SPEED THAT WILL BE USED.

34.10 Pilots are reminded that they are responsible for rejecting the application of speed adjustment by ATC if, in their opinion, it will cause them to exceed the maximum indicated airspeed prescribed by 14 CFR Section 91.117(a), (c) and (d). IN SUCH CASES, THE PILOT IS EXPECTED TO SO INFORM ATC. Pilots operating at or above 10,000 feet MSL who are issued speed adjustments which exceed 250 knots IAS and are subsequently cleared below 10,000 feet MSL are expected to comply with 14 CFR Section 91.117(a).

34.11 Speed restrictions of 250 knots do not apply to U.S. registered aircraft operating beyond 12 nautical miles from the coastline within the U.S. Flight Information Region, in Class E airspace below 10,000 feet MSL.

However, in airspace underlying a Class B airspace area designated for an airport, or in a VFR corridor designated through such as a Class B airspace area, pilots are expected to comply with the 200 knot speed limit specified in 14 CFR Section 91.117(c).

34.12 For operations in a Class C and Class D surface area, ATC is authorized to request or approve a speed greater than the maximum indicated airspeeds prescribed for operation within that airspace (14 CFR Section 91.117(b)).

NOTE − Pilots are expected to comply with the maximum speed of 200 knots when operating beneath Class B airspace or in a Class B VFR corridor (14 CFR Section 91.117(c) and (d)).

34.13 When in communication with the ARTCC or approach control facility, pilots should, as a good operating practice, state any ATC assigned speed restriction on initial radio contact associated with an ATC communications frequency change.

35. Runway Separation 35.1 Tower controllers establish the sequence of arriving and departing aircraft by requiring them to adjust flight or ground operation as necessary to achieve proper spacing. They may “HOLD” an aircraft short of the runway to achieve spacing between it and another arriving aircraft; the controller may instruct a pilot to “EXTEND DOWNWIND” in order to establish spacing from another arriving or departing aircraft. At times a clearance may include the word “IMMEDIATE.” For example: “CLEARED FOR IMMEDIATE TAKEOFF.” In such cases “IMMEDIATE” is used for purposes of air traffic separation. It is up to the pilot to refuse the clearance if, in the pilot’s opinion, compliance would adversely affect the operation.

36. Visual Separation 36.1 Visual separation is a means employed by ATC to separate aircraft in terminal areas and en route airspace.

There are two methods employed to effect this separation: 36.1.1 The tower controller sees the aircraft involved and issues instructions, as necessary, to ensure that the aircraft avoid each other.

36.1.2 A pilot sees the other aircraft involved and upon instructions from the controller provides separation by maneuvering the aircraft to avoid it. When pilots accept responsibility to maintain visual separation, they must maintain constant visual surveillance and not pass the other aircraft until it is no longer a factor.

NOTE − Traffic is no longer a factor when during approach phase the other aircraft is in the landing phase of flight or executes a missed approach; and during departure or en route, when the other aircraft turns away or is on a diverging course.

36.2 A pilot’s acceptance of instructions to follow another aircraft or provide visual separation from it is an acknowledgment that the pilot will maneuver the aircraft as necessary to avoid the other aircraft or to maintain in − trail separation. In operations conducted behind heavy aircraft, or a small aircraft behind a B757 or other large aircraft, it is also an acknowledgment that the pilot accepts the responsibility for wake turbulence separation.

Visual separation is prohibited behind super aircraft.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 46 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − When a pilot has been told to follow another aircraft or to provide visual separation from it, the pilot should promptly notify the controller if visual contact with the other aircraft is lost or cannot be maintained or if the pilot cannot accept the responsibility for the separation for any reason.

36.3 Scanning the sky for other aircraft is a key factor in collision avoidance. Pilots and copilots (or the right seat passenger) should continuously scan to cover all areas of the sky visible from the cockpit. Pilots must develop an effective scanning technique which maximizes one’s visual capabilities. Spotting a potential collision threat increases directly as more time is spent looking outside the aircraft. One must use timesharing techniques to effectively scan the surrounding airspace while monitoring instruments as well.

36.4 Since the eye can focus only on a narrow viewing area, effective scanning is accomplished with a series of short, regularly spaced eye movements that bring successive areas of the sky into the central visual field. Each movement should not exceed ten degrees, and each area should be observed for at least one second to enable collision detection. Although many pilots seem to prefer the method of horizontal back − and − forth scanning every pilot should develop a scanning pattern that is not only comfortable but assures optimum effectiveness.

Pilots should remember, however, that they have a regulatory responsibility (14 CFR Section 91.113) to see and avoid other aircraft when weather conditions permit.

37. Use of Visual Clearing Procedures and Scanning Techniques 37.1 Before Takeoff. Prior to taxiing onto a runway or landing area in preparation for takeoff, pilots should scan the approach areas for possible landing traffic, executing appropriate clearing maneuvers to provide them a clear view of the approach areas.

37.2 Climbs and Descents. During climbs and descents in flight conditions which permit visual detection of other traffic, pilots should execute gentle banks, left and right at a frequency which permits continuous visual scanning of the airspace about them.

37.3 Straight and Level. Sustained periods of straight and level flight in conditions which permit visual detection of other traffic should be broken at intervals with appropriate clearing procedures to provide effective visual scanning.

37.4 Traffic Patterns. Entries into traffic patterns while descending create specific collision hazards and should be avoided.

37.5 Traffic at VOR Sites. All operators should emphasize the need for sustained vigilance in the vicinity of VORs and airway intersections due to the convergence of traffic.

37.6 Training Operations. Operators of pilot training programs are urged to adopt the following practices: 37.6.1 Pilots undergoing flight instruction at all levels should be requested to verbalize clearing procedures (call out, “Clear” left, right, above, or below) to instill and sustain the habit of vigilance during maneuvering.

37.6.2 High − wing Airplane. Momentarily raise the wing in the direction of the intended turn and look.

37.6.3 Low − wing Airplane. Momentarily lower the wing in the direction of the intended turn and look.

37.6.4 Appropriate clearing procedures should precede the execution of all turns including chandelles, lazy eights, stalls, slow flight, climbs, straight and level, spins, and other combination maneuvers.

37.7 Scanning Techniques for Traffic Avoidance.

37.7.1 Pilots must be aware of the limitations inherent in the visual scanning process. These limitations may include: 37.7.1.1 Reduced scan frequency due to concentration on flight instruments or tablets and distraction with passengers.

37.7.1.2 Blind spots related to high-wing and low-wing aircraft in addition to windshield posts and sun visors.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 47 United States of America 22 JAN 26 37.7.1.3 Prevailing weather conditions including reduced visibility and the position of the sun.

37.7.1.4 The attitude of the aircraft will create additional blind spots.

37.7.1.5 The physical limitations of the human eye, including the time required to (re)focus on near and far objects, from the instruments to the horizon for example; empty field myopia, narrow field of vision and atmospheric lighting all affect our ability to detect another aircraft.

37.7.2 Best practices to see and avoid: 37.7.2.1 ADS-B In is an effective system to help pilots see and avoid other aircraft. If your aircraft is equipped with ADS-B In, it is important to understand its features and how to use it properly. Many units provide visual and/or audio alerts to supplement the system’s traffic display. Pilots should incorporate the traffic display in their normal traffic scan to provide awareness of nearby aircraft. Prior to taxiing onto an airport movement area, ADS-B In can provide advance indication of arriving aircraft and aircraft in the traffic pattern. Systems that incorporate a traffic − alerting feature can help minimize the pilot’s inclination to fixate on the display. Refer to ENR 1.1 − 46.5 , ADS-B Limitations.

37.7.2.2 Understand the limitations of ADS-B In. In certain airspace, not all aircraft will be equipped with ADS-B Out or transponders and will not be visible on your ADS-B In display.

37.7.2.3 Limit the amount of time that you focus on flight instruments or tablets.

37.7.2.4 Develop a strategic approach to scanning for traffic. Scan the entire sky and try not to focus straight ahead.

38. Surveillance Systems 38.1 Radar 38.1.1 Capabilities 38.1.1.1 Radar is a method whereby radio waves are transmitted into the air and are then received when they have been reflected by an object in the path of the beam. Range is determined by measuring the time it takes (at the speed of light) for the radio wave to go out to the object and then return to the receiving antenna. The direction of a detected object from a radar site is determined by the position of the rotating antenna when the reflected portion of the radio wave is received.

38.1.1.2 More reliable maintenance and improved equipment have reduced radar system failures to a negligible factor. Most facilities actually have some components duplicated − one operating and another which immediately takes over when a malfunction occurs to the primary component.

38.1.2 Limitations 38.1.2.1 It is very important for the aviation community to recognize the fact that there are limitations to radar service and that ATC controllers may not always be able to issue traffic advisories concerning aircraft which are not under ATC control and cannot be seen on radar. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 25 ).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 48 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 25 Limitations to Radar Service Precipitation Attenuation AREA BLACKED OUT BY ATTENUATION NOT OBSERVED OBSERVED ECHO The nearby target absorbs and scatters so much of the out-going and returning energy that the radar does not detect the distant target.

a) The characteristics of radio waves are such that they normally travel in a continuous straight line unless they are: 1) “Bent” by abnormal atmospheric phenomena such as temperature inversions.

2) Reflected or attenuated by dense objects such as heavy clouds, precipitation, ground obstacles, mountains, etc.

3) Screened by high terrain features.

b) The bending of radar pulses, often called anomalous propagation or ducting, may cause many extraneous blips to appear on the radar operator’s display if the beam has been bent toward the ground, or may decrease the detection range if the wave is bent upward. It is difficult to solve the effects of anomalous propagation, but using beacon radar and electronically eliminating stationary and slow moving targets by a method called moving target indicator (MTI) usually negate the problem.

c) Radar energy that strikes dense objects will be reflected and displayed on the operator’s scope, thereby blocking out aircraft at the same range and greatly weakening or completely eliminating the display of targets at a greater range. Again, radar beacon and MTI are effectively used to combat ground clutter and weather phenomena, and a method of circularly polarizing the radar beam will eliminate some weather returns. A negative characteristic of MTI is that an aircraft flying a speed that coincides with the canceling signal of the MTI (tangential or “blind” speed) may not be displayed to the radar controller.

d) Relatively low altitude aircraft will not be seen if they are screened by mountains or are below the radar beam due to earth curvature. The historical solution to screening has been the installation of strategically placed multiple radars, which has been done in some areas, but ADS − B now provides ATC surveillance in some areas with challenging terrain where multiple radar installations would be impractical.

e) There are several other factors which affect radar control. The amount of reflective surface of an aircraft will determine the size of the radar return. Therefore, a small light airplane or a sleek jet fighter will be more difficult to see on primary radar than a large commercial jet or military bomber. Here again, the use of transponder or ADS − B equipment is invaluable. In addition, all FAA ATC facilities display automatically reported altitude information to the controller from appropriately equipped aircraft.

f) At some locations within the ATC en route environment, secondary − radar − only (no primary radar) gap filler radar systems are used to give lower altitude radar coverage between two larger radar systems, each of which provides both primary and secondary radar coverage. ADS − B serves this same role, supplementing both primary and secondary radar. In those geographical areas served by secondary radar only or ADS − B, aircraft without either transponders or ADS − B equipment cannot be provided with radar service. Additionally, transponder or Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 49 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ADS − B equipped aircraft cannot be provided with radar advisories concerning primary targets and ATC radar − derived weather.

g) With regard to air traffic radar reception, wind turbines generally do not affect the quality of air traffic surveillance radar returns for transponder and ADS − B Out equipped aircraft. Air traffic interference issues apply to the search radar and Non − Transponder/Non − ADS − B Out − equipped aircraft.

NOTE − Generally, one or two wind turbines don’t present a significant radar reception loss. A rule of thumb is three (3) or more turbines constitute a wind turbine farm and thus negatively affect the search radar product.

1) Detection loss in the area of a wind turbine farm is substantial. In extreme circumstances, this can extend for more than 1.0 nautical mile (NM) horizontally around the nearest turbine and at all altitudes above the wind turbine farm. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 26 .)

FIG ENR 1.1 − 26 Wind Turbine Farm Area of Potential Interference NOTE − All aircraft should comply with 14 CFR §91.119(c) “ … aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.” 2) To avoid interference, Non − Transponder/Non − ADS − B Out equipped aircraft should avoid flight within 1.0 NM horizontally, at all altitudes, from the wind turbine farms.

3) Because detection loss near and above wind turbine farms for search − only targets causes dropped tracks, erroneous tracks, and can result in loss of separation, it is imperative that Non − Transponder/Non − ADS − B Out equipped aircraft operate at the proper VFR altitudes per the hemispheric rule and utilize see − and − avoid techniques.

4) Pilots should be aware that air traffic controllers cannot provide separation from Non − Transponder/Non − ADS − B Out equipped aircraft in the vicinity of wind turbine farms. See − and − avoid is the pilot’s responsibility, as these non − equipped aircraft may not appear on radar and will not appear on Traffic Information Service − Broadcast (TIS − B).

h) The controller’s ability to advise a pilot flying on instruments or in visual conditions of the aircraft’s proximity to another aircraft will be limited if the unknown aircraft is not observed on radar, if no flight plan information is available, or if the volume of traffic and workload prevent issuing traffic information. First priority is given to establishing vertical, lateral, or longitudinal separation between aircraft flying IFR under the control of ATC.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 50 United States of America 22 JAN 26 38.2 Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) 38.2.1 The ATCRBS, sometimes referred to as a secondary surveillance radar, consists of three main components: 38.2.1.1 Interrogator. Primary radar relies on a signal being transmitted from the radar antenna site and for this signal to be reflected or “bounced back” from an object (such as an aircraft). This reflected signal is then displayed as a “target” on the controller’s radar scope. In the ATCRBS, the Interrogator, a ground − based radar beacon transmitter − receiver, scans in synchronism with the primary radar and transmits discrete radio signals which repetitiously requests all transponders, on the mode being used, to reply. The replies received are then mixed with the primary returns and both are displayed on the same radar scope.

38.2.1.2 Transponder. This airborne radar beacon transmitter − receiver automatically receives the signals from the interrogator and selectively replies with a specific pulse group (code) only to those interrogations being received on the mode to which it is set. These replies are independent of, and much stronger than a primary radar return.

38.2.1.3 Radar scope. The radar scope used by the controller displays returns from both the primary radar system and the ATCRBS. These returns, called targets, are what the controller refers to in the control and separation of traffic.

38.2.2 The job of identifying and maintaining identification of primary radar targets is a long and tedious task for the controller. Some of the advantages of ATCRBS over primary radar are: 38.2.2.1 Reinforcement of radar targets.

38.2.2.2 Rapid target identification.

38.2.2.3 Unique display of selected codes.

38.2.3 A part of the ATCRBS ground equipment is the decoder. This equipment enables the controller to assign discrete transponder codes to each aircraft under his/her control. Normally only one code will be assigned for the entire flight. Assignments are made by the ARTCC computer on the basis of the National Beacon Code Allocation Plan. The equipment is also designed to receive Mode C altitude information from the aircraft.

38.3 Surveillance Radar 38.3.1 Surveillance radars are divided into two general categories: Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR) and Air Route Surveillance Radar (ARSR).

38.3.1.1 ASR is designed to provide relatively short range coverage in the general vicinity of an airport and to serve as an expeditious means of handling terminal area traffic through observation of precise aircraft locations on a radar scope. The ASR can also be used as an instrument approach aid.

38.3.1.2 ARSR is a long − range radar system designed primarily to provide a display of aircraft locations over large areas.

38.3.2 Surveillance radars scan through 360 degrees of azimuth and present target information on a radar display located in a tower or center. This information is used independently or in conjunction with other navigational aids in the control of air traffic.

38.4 Precision Approach Radar (PAR) 38.4.1 PAR is designed for use as a landing aid rather than an aid for sequencing and spacing aircraft. PAR equipment may be used as a primary landing aid (See ENR 1.5 for additional information), or it may be used to monitor other types of approaches. It is designed to display range, azimuth, and elevation information.

38.4.2 Two antennas are used in the PAR array, one scanning a vertical plane, and the other scanning horizontally. Since the range is limited to 10 miles, azimuth to 20 degrees, and elevation to 7 degrees, only the final approach area is covered. Each scope is divided into two parts. The upper half presents altitude and distance information, and the lower half presents azimuth and distance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 51 United States of America 22 JAN 26 38.5 Airport Surface Detection Equipment (ASDE − X)/Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) 38.5.1 ASDE − X/ASSC is a multi − sensor surface surveillance system the FAA has acquired for airports in the United States. This system provides high resolution, short − range, clutter free surveillance information about aircraft and vehicles, both moving and fixed, located on or near the surface of the airport’s runways and taxiways under all weather and visibility conditions. The system consists of: 38.5.1.1 A Primary Radar System. ASDE − X/ASSC system coverage includes the airport surface and the airspace 5 miles from the arrival and departure ends of the runway and up to 200 feet above the surface. Typically located on the control tower or other strategic location on the airport, the Primary Radar antenna is able to detect and display aircraft that are not equipped with or have malfunctioning transponders or ADS − B.

38.5.1.2 Interfaces. ASDE − X/ASSC contains an automation interface for flight identification via all automation platforms and interfaces with the terminal radar for position information.

38.5.1.3 ASDE − X/ASSC Automation. A Multi − sensor Data Processor (MSDP) combines all sensor reports into a single target which is displayed to the air traffic controller.

38.5.1.4 Air Traffic Control Tower Display. A high resolution, color monitor in the control tower cab provides controllers with a seamless picture of airport operations on the airport surface.

38.5.2 The combination of data collected from the multiple sensors ensures that the most accurate information about aircraft location is received in the tower, thereby increasing surface safety and efficiency.

38.5.3 The following facilities are operational with ASDE − X: TBL ENR 1.1 − 2 BWI Baltimore Washington International LAS Las Vegas Harry Reid International BOS Boston Logan International LAX Los Angeles International BDL Bradley International SDF Louisville International MDW Chicago Midway MEM Memphis International ORD Chicago O’Hare International MIA Miami International CLT Charlotte Douglas International MSP Minneapolis St. Paul International DFW Dallas/Fort Worth International EWR Newark International DEN Denver International MCO Orlando International DTW Detroit Metro Wayne County PHL Philadelphia International FLL Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood Intl PHX Phoenix Sky Harbor International MKE General Mitchell International DCA Ronald Reagan Washington National IAH George Bush International SAN San Diego International ATL Hartsfield − Jackson Atlanta Intl SLC Salt Lake City International HNL Honolulu International SEA Seattle − Tacoma International JFK John F. Kennedy International PVD Theodore Francis Green State SNA John Wayne − Orange County IAD Washington Dulles International LGA LaGuardia HOU William P. Hobby International STL Lambert St. Louis International 38.5.4 The following facilities have been projected to receive ASSC: TBL ENR 1.1 − 3 SFO San Francisco International MCI Kansas City International CLE Cleveland − Hopkins International Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 52 United States of America 22 JAN 26 CVG Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Intl PIT Pittsburgh International PDX Portland International ANC Ted Stevens Anchorage International MSY Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl ADW Joint Base Andrews AFB 38.6 Radar Availability 38.6.1 FAA radar units operate continuously at the locations shown in the Chart Supplement, and their services are available to all pilots, both civil and military. Contact the associated FAA control tower or ARTCC on any frequency guarded for initial instructions, or in an emergency, any FAA facility for information on the nearest radar service.

38.7 Transponder and ADS − B Out Operation 38.7.1 General 38.7.1.1 Pilots should be aware that proper application of transponder and ADS-B operating procedures will provide both VFR and IFR aircraft with a higher degree of safety while operating on the ground and airborne.

Transponder/ADS-B panel designs differ; therefore, a pilot should be thoroughly familiar with the operation of their particular equipment to maximize its full potential. ADS-B Out, and transponders with altitude reporting mode turned ON (Mode C or S), substantially increase the capability of surveillance systems to see an aircraft.

This provides air traffic controllers, as well as pilots of suitably equipped aircraft (TCAS and ADS-B In), increased situational awareness and the ability to identify potential traffic conflicts. Even VFR pilots who are not in contact with ATC will be afforded greater protection from IFR aircraft and VFR aircraft that are receiving traffic advisories. Nevertheless, pilots should never relax their visual scanning for other aircraft, and should include the ADS-B In display (if equipped) in their normal traffic scan.

38.7.1.2 ATCRBS is similar to and compatible with military coded radar beacon equipment. Civil Mode A is identical to military Mode 3.

38.7.1.3 Transponder and ADS-B operations on the ground . Civil and military aircraft should operate with the transponder in the altitude reporting mode (consult the aircraft’s flight manual to determine the specific transponder position to enable altitude reporting) and ADS-B Out transmissions enabled at all airports, any time the aircraft is positioned on any portion of the airport movement area. This includes all defined taxiways and runways. Pilots must pay particular attention to ATIS and airport diagram notations, General Notes (included on airport charts), and comply with directions pertaining to transponder and ADS-B usage. Generally, these directions are: a) Departures. Select the transponder mode which allows altitude reporting and enable ADS-B during pushback or taxi-out from parking spot. Select TA or TA/RA (if equipped with TCAS) when taking the active runway.

b) Arrivals. If TCAS equipped, deselect TA or TA/RA upon leaving the active runway, but continue transponder and ADS − B transmissions in the altitude reporting mode. Select STBY or OFF for transponder and ADS − B upon arriving at the aircraft’s parking spot or gate.

38.7.1.4 Transponder and ADS-B Operations While Airborne.

a) Unless otherwise requested by ATC, aircraft equipped with an ATC transponder maintained in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.413 MUST operate with this equipment on the appropriate Mode 3/A code, or other code as assigned by ATC, and with altitude reporting enabled whenever in controlled airspace. If practicable, aircraft SHOULD operate with the transponder enabled in uncontrolled airspace.

b) Aircraft equipped with ADS − B Out MUST operate with this equipment in the transmit mode at all times, unless otherwise requested by ATC.

38.7.1.5 Transponder and ADS − B Operation Under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) a) Unless otherwise instructed by an ATC facility, adjust transponder/ADS − B to reply on Mode 3/A Code 1200 regardless of altitude.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 53 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) When required to operate their transponder/ADS − B, pilots must always operate that equipment with altitude reporting enabled unless otherwise instructed by ATC or unless the installed equipment has not been tested and calibrated as required by 14 CFR Section 91.217. If deactivation is required, turn off altitude reporting.

c) When participating in a VFR standard formation flight that is not receiving ATC services, only the lead aircraft should operate its transponder and ADS − B Out and squawk code 1203. Once established in formation, all other aircraft should squawk standby and disable ADS − B transmissions.

NOTE − 1. If the formation flight is receiving ATC services, pilots can expect ATC to direct all non-lead aircraft to STOP Squawk, and should not do so until instructed.

2. Firefighting aircraft not in contact with ATC may squawk 1255 in lieu of 1200 while en route to, from , or within the designated firefighting area(s).

3. VFR aircraft flying authorized SAR missions for the USAF or USCG may be advised to squawk 1277 in lieu of 1200 while en route to, from, or within the designated search area.

4. VFR gliders should squawk 1202 in lieu of 1200.

REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7110.66, National Beacon Code Allocation Plan (NBCAP).

38.7.1.6 A pilot on an IFR flight who elects to cancel the IFR flight plan prior to reaching their destination, should adjust the transponder/ADS − B according to VFR operations.

38.7.1.7 If entering a U.S. OFFSHORE AIRSPACE AREA from outside the U.S., the pilot should advise on first radio contact with a U.S. radar ATC facility that such equipment is available by adding “transponder” or “ADS − B” (if equipped) to the aircraft identification.

38.7.1.8 It should be noted by all users of ATC transponders and ADS − B Out systems that the surveillance coverage they can expect is limited to “line of sight” with ground radar and ADS − B radio sites. Low altitude or aircraft antenna shielding by the aircraft itself may result in reduced range or loss of aircraft contact. Though ADS − B often provides superior reception at low altitudes, poor coverage from any surveillance system can be improved by climbing to a higher altitude.

NOTE − Pilots should refer to AIP, ENR 1.1, paragraph 46. , Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast Services (ADS − B) Services, for a complete description of operating limitations and procedures.

38.7.2 Transponder/ADS − B Code Designation 38.7.2.1 For ATC to utilize one of the 4096 discrete codes, a four − digit code designation will be used; for example, code 2102 will be expressed as “TWO ONE ZERO TWO.” NOTE − Circumstances may occasionally require ATC to assign a non − discrete code; i.e., a code ending in “00.” REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7110.66, National Beacon Code Allocation Plan (NBCAP).

38.7.3 Automatic Altitude Reporting 38.7.3.1 Most transponders (Modes C and S) and all ADS − B Out systems are capable of automatic altitude reporting. This system converts aircraft altitude in 100 − foot increments to coded digital information that is transmitted to the appropriate surveillance facility as well as to ADS − B In and TCAS systems.

38.7.3.2 Adjust the transponder/ADS − B to reply on the Mode 3/A code specified by ATC and with altitude reporting enabled, unless otherwise directed by ATC or unless the altitude reporting equipment has not been tested and calibrated as required by 14 CFR Section 91.217. If deactivation is required by ATC, turn off the altitude reporting feature of your transponder/ADS − B. An instruction by ATC to “STOP ALTITUDE SQUAWK, ALTITUDE DIFFERS BY (number of feet) FEET,” may be an indication that the transmitted altitude information is incorrect, or that the aircraft’s altimeter setting is incorrect. While an incorrect altimeter setting has no effect on the transmitted altitude information, it will cause the aircraft to fly at a true altitude different from Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 54 United States of America 22 JAN 26 the assigned altitude. When a controller indicates that an altitude readout is invalid, the pilot should verify that the aircraft altimeter is set correctly.

NOTE − Altitude encoders are preset at standard atmospheric pressure. Local altimeter correction is applied by the surveillance facility before the altitude information is presented to ATC.

38.7.3.3 Pilots should report exact altitude or flight level to the nearest hundred foot increment when establishing initial contact with an ATC facility. Exact altitude or flight level reports on initial contact provide ATC with information that is required prior to using automatically reported altitude information for separation purposes. This will significantly reduce altitude verification requests.

38.7.4 IDENT Feature 38.7.4.1 Transponder/ADS − B Out equipment must be operated only as specified by ATC. Activate the “IDENT” feature only when requested by ATC.

38.7.5 Code Changes 38.7.5.1 When making routine code changes, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of Codes 7500, 7600, or 7700 thereby causing momentary false alarms at automated ground facilities. For example when switching from Code 2700 to Code 7200, switch first to 2200 then 7200, NOT to 7700 and then 7200. This procedure applies to nondiscrete Code 7500 and all discrete codes in the 7600 and 7700 series (i.e., 7600 − 7677, 7700 − 7777) which will trigger special indicators in automated facilities. Only nondiscrete Code 7500 will be decoded as the hijack code.

38.7.5.2 Under no circumstances should a pilot of a civil aircraft operate the transponder on Code 7777. This code is reserved for military interceptor operations.

38.7.5.3 Military pilots operating VFR or IFR within restricted/warning areas should adjust their transponders to Code 4000, unless another code has been assigned by ATC.

38.7.6 Mode C Transponder and ADS − B Out Requirements 38.7.6.1 Specific details concerning requirements to carry and operate Mode C transponders and ADS − B Out, as well as exceptions and ATC authorized deviations from those requirements, are found in 14 CFR Sections 91.215, 91.225, and 99.13.

38.7.6.2 In general, the CFRs require aircraft to be equipped with an operable Mode C transponder and ADS − B Out when operating: a) In Class A, Class B, or Class C airspace areas; b) Above the ceiling and within the lateral boundaries of Class B or Class C airspace up to 10,000 feet MSL; c) Class E airspace at and above 10,000 feet MSL within the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia, excluding the airspace at and below 2,500 feet AGL; d) Within 30 miles of a Class B airspace primary airport, below 10,000 feet MSL (commonly referred to as the “Mode C Veil”); e) For ADS − B Out: Class E airspace at and above 3,000 feet MSL over the Gulf of America from the coastline of the United States out to 12 nautical miles.

NOTE − The airspace described in (e) above is specified in 14 CFR § 91.225 for ADS − B Out requirements. However, 14 CFR § 91.215 does not include this airspace for ATC transponder requirements.

f) Transponder and ADS − B Out requirements do not apply to any aircraft that was not originally certificated with an electrical system, or that has not subsequently been certified with such a system installed, including balloons and gliders. These aircraft may conduct operations without a transponder or ADS − B Out when operating: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 55 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1) Outside any Class B or Class C airspace area; and 2) Below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an airport, or 10,000 feet MSL, whichever is lower.

38.7.6.3 14 CFR Section 99.13 requires all aircraft flying into, within, or across the contiguous U.S. ADIZ be equipped with a Mode C or Mode S transponder. Balloons, gliders, and aircraft not equipped with an engine − driven electrical system are excepted from this requirement.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.12 , National Security and Interception Procedures.

38.7.6.4 Pilots must ensure that their aircraft transponder/ADS − B is operating on an appropriate ATC − assigned VFR/IFR code with altitude reporting enabled when operating in such airspace. If in doubt about the operational status of either feature of your transponder while airborne, contact the nearest ATC facility or FSS and they will advise you what facility you should contact for determining the status of your equipment.

38.7.6.5 In − flight requests for “immediate” deviation from the transponder requirements may be approved by controllers only for failed equipment, and only when the flight will continue IFR or when weather conditions prevent VFR descent and continued VFR flight in airspace not affected by the CFRs. All other requests for deviation should be made at least 1 hour before the proposed operation by contacting the nearest Flight Service or Air Traffic facility in person or by telephone. The nearest ARTCC will normally be the controlling agency and is responsible for coordinating requests involving deviations in other ARTCC areas.

38.7.6.6 In − flight requests for “immediate” deviation from the ADS − B Out requirements may be approved by ATC only for failed equipment, and may be accommodated based on workload, alternate surveillance availability, or other factors. All other requests for deviation must be made at least 1 hour before the proposed operation, following the procedures contained in Advisory Circular (AC) 90 − 114, Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast Operations.

38.7.7 Cooperative Surveillance Phraseology. Air traffic controllers, both civil and military, will use the following phraseology when referring to operation of cooperative ATC surveillance equipment. Except as noted, the following ATC instructions do not apply to military transponders operating in other than Mode 3/A/C/S.

38.7.7.1 SQUAWK (number). Operate radar beacon transponder/ADS − B on designated code with altitude reporting enabled.

38.7.7.2 IDENT. Engage the “IDENT” feature (military I/P) of the transponder/ADS − B.

38.7.7.3 SQUAWK (number) AND IDENT. Operate transponder/ADS − B on specified code with altitude reporting enabled, and engage the “IDENT” (military I/P) feature.

38.7.7.4 SQUAWK STANDBY. Switch transponder/ADS − B to standby position.

38.7.7.5 SQUAWK NORMAL. Resume normal transponder/ADS − B operation on previously assigned code.

(Used after “SQUAWK STANDBY,” or by military after specific transponder tests).

38.7.7.6 SQUAWK ALTITUDE. Activate Mode C with automatic altitude reporting.

38.7.7.7 STOP ALTITUDE SQUAWK. Turn off automatic altitude reporting.

38.7.7.8 STOP SQUAWK (Mode in use). Stop transponder and ADS − B Out transmissions, or switch off only specified mode of the aircraft transponder (military).

38.7.7.9 SQUAWK MAYDAY. Operate transponder/ADS − B in the emergency position (Mode A Code 7700 for civil transponder. Mode 3 Code 7700 and emergency feature for military transponder.)

38.7.7.10 SQUAWK VFR. Operate radar beacon transponder/ADS − B on Code 1200 in the Mode A/3, or other appropriate VFR code, with altitude reporting enabled.

38.8 Emergency Operation 38.8.1 When an emergency occurs, the pilot of an aircraft equipped with a coded radar beacon transponder who desires to alert a ground radar facility to an emergency condition and who cannot establish communications without delay with an ATC facility may adjust the transponder to reply on Mode A/3, Code 7700.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 56 United States of America 22 JAN 26 38.8.2 Pilots should understand that they may not be within a radar coverage area and that, even if they are, certain radar facilities are not yet equipped to automatically recognize Code 7700 as an emergency signal.

Therefore, they should establish radio communications with an ATC facility as soon as possible.

38.9 Radio Failure Operation 38.9.1 Should the pilot of an aircraft equipped with a coded radar beacon transponder experience a loss of two − way radio capability the pilot should: 38.9.1.1 Adjust the transponder to reply on MODE A/3, Code 7600.

38.9.1.2 Understand that the aircraft may not be in an area of radar coverage.

38.9.2 Pilots should understand that they may not be in an area of radar coverage. Also, many radar facilities are not presently equipped to automatically display Code 7600 and will interrogate 7600 only when the aircraft is under direct radar control at the time of radio failure. However, replying on Code 7700 first, increases the probability of early detection of a radio failure condition.

38.10 Radar Services 38.10.1 Safety Alert 38.10.1.1 A safety alert will be issued to pilots of aircraft being controlled by ATC if the controller is aware the aircraft is at an altitude which, in the controller’s judgment, places the aircraft in unsafe proximity to terrain, obstructions, or other aircraft. The provision of this service is contingent upon the capability of the controller to have an awareness of situations involving unsafe proximity to terrain, obstructions, and uncontrolled aircraft.

The issuance of a safety alert cannot be mandated, but it can be expected on a reasonable, though intermittent, basis. Once the alert is issued, it is solely the pilot’s prerogative to determine what course of action, if any, will be taken. This procedure is intended for use in time critical situations where aircraft safety is in question.

Noncritical situations should be handled via the normal traffic alert procedures.

38.10.2 Terrain/Obstruction Alert 38.10.2.1 Controllers will immediately issue an alert to the pilots of aircraft under their control when they recognize that the aircraft is at an altitude which, in their judgment, may be in unsafe proximity to terrain/obstructions. The primary method of detecting unsafe proximity is through Mode C automatic altitude reports.

EXAMPLE − Low altitude alert Cessna Three Four Juliett, check your altitude immediately. And if the aircraft is not yet on final approach, the MVA (MEA/MIA/MOCA) in your area is six thousand.

38.10.2.2 Most En Route and Terminal radar facilities have an automated function which, if operating, alerts controllers when a tracked Mode C equipped aircraft under their control is below or is predicted to be below a predetermined minimum safe altitude. This function, called Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW), is designed solely as a controller aid in detecting potentially unsafe aircraft proximity to terrain/obstructions. The radar facility will, when MSAW is operating, provide MSAW monitoring for all aircraft with an operating Mode C altitude encoding transponder that are tracked by the system and are: a) Operating on a IFR flight plan.

b) Operating VFR and have requested MSAW monitoring.

NOTE − Pilots operating VFR may request MSAW or monitoring if their aircraft are equipped with Mode C transponders.

EXAMPLE − Apache Three Three Papa requests MSAW monitoring.

38.10.2.3 Due to the lack of terrain and obstacle clearance data, accurate automation databases may not be available for providing MSAW information to aircraft overflying Mexico and Canada. Air traffic facilities along the United States/Mexico/Canada borders may have MSAW computer processing inhibited where accurate terrain data is not available.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 57 United States of America 22 JAN 26 38.10.3 Aircraft Conflict Alert 38.10.3.1 Controllers will immediately issue an alert to the pilots of aircraft under their control if they are aware of an aircraft that is not under their control at an altitude which, in the controller’s judgment, places both aircraft in unsafe proximity to each other. With the alert, when feasible, the controller will offer the pilot the position of the traffic if time permits and an alternate course(s) of action. Any alternate course of action the controller may recommend to the pilot will be predicated only on other traffic in the controller’s jurisdiction.

EXAMPLE − American Three, traffic alert, (position of traffic, if time permits), advise you turn right/left heading (degrees) and/or climb/descend to (altitude) immediately.

38.10.4 Radar Traffic Information Service (RTIS) 38.10.4.1 This is a service provided by radar ATC facilities. Pilots receiving this service are advised of any radar target observed on the radar display which may be in such proximity to the position of their aircraft or its intended route of flight that it warrants their attention. This service is not intended to relieve the pilot of the responsibility for continual vigilance to see and avoid other aircraft.

a) Purpose of this Service 1) The issuance of traffic information as observed on a radar display is based on the principle of assisting and advising a pilot that a particular radar target’s position and track indicates it may intersect or pass in such proximity to the intended flight path that it warrants the pilot’s attention. This is to alert the pilot to the traffic, to be on the lookout for it, and thereby be in a better position to take appropriate action should the need arise.

2) Pilots are reminded that the surveillance radar used by ATC does not provide altitude information unless the aircraft is equipped with Mode C and the radar facility is capable of displaying altitude information.

b) Provisions of the Service 1) Many factors, such as limitations of the radar, volume of traffic, controller workload, and communications frequency congestion could prevent the controller from providing this service. Controllers possess complete discretion for determining whether they are able to provide or continue to provide this service in a specific case. The controller’s reason against providing or continuing to provide the service in a particular case is not subject to question nor need it be communicated to the pilot. In other words, the provision of this service is entirely dependent upon whether controllers believe they are in a position to provide it. Traffic information is routinely provided to all aircraft operating on IFR flight plans except when the pilot declines the service, or the pilot is operating within Class A airspace. Traffic information may be provided to flights not operating on IFR Flight Plans when requested by pilots of such flights.

NOTE − Radar ATC facilities normally display and monitor both primary and secondary radar as well as ADS − B, except that secondary radar or ADS − B may be used as the sole display source in Class A airspace, and under some circumstances outside of Class A airspace (beyond primary coverage and in en route areas where only secondary and/or ADS − B is available). Secondary radar and/or ADS − B may also be used outside Class A airspace as the sole display source when the primary radar is temporarily unusable or out of service. Pilots in contact with the affected ATC facility are normally advised when a temporary outage occurs; i.e., “primary radar out of service; traffic advisories available on transponder or ADS − B aircraft only.” This means simply that only aircraft that have transponders and ADS − B installed and in use will be depicted on ATC displays when the primary and/or secondary radar is temporarily out of service.

2) When receiving VFR radar advisory service, pilots should monitor the assigned frequency at all times.

This is to preclude controllers’ concern for radio failure of emergency assistance to aircraft under the controller’s jurisdiction. VFR radar advisory service does not include vectors away from conflicting traffic unless requested by the pilot. When advisory service is no longer desired, advise the controller before changing frequencies, then change your transponder code to 1200 if applicable. THE, as appropriate, MEA/MVA/MOCA IN YOUR AREA IS (altitude) or if past the final approach fix, THE, as appropriate, MDA/DH (if known) is (altitude). Except in programs where radar service is automatically terminated, the controller will advise the aircraft when radar is terminated.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 58 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − Participation by VFR pilots in formal programs implemented at certain terminal locations constitutes pilot request. This also applies to participating pilots at those locations where arriving VFR flights are encouraged to make their first contact with the tower on the approach control frequency.

c) Issuance of Traffic Information. Traffic information will include the following concerning a target which may constitute traffic for an aircraft that is: 1) Radar identified.

(a) Azimuth from the aircraft in terms of the twelve hour clock.

(b) When rapidly maneuvering civil test or military aircraft prevent accurate issuance of traffic as in a) above, specify the direction from an aircraft’s position in terms of the eight cardinal compass points (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW). This method must be terminated at the pilot’s request.

(d) Direction in which the target is proceeding.

(e) Type of aircraft and altitude if known.

EXAMPLE − Traffic 10 o’clock, 3 miles, west-bound (type aircraft and altitude, if known, of the observed traffic). The altitude may be known, by means of Mode C, but not verified with the pilot for accuracy. (To be valid for separation purposes by ATC, the accuracy of Mode C readouts must be verified. This is usually accomplished upon initial entry into the radar system by a comparison of the readout to pilot stated altitude, or the field elevation in the case of continuous readout being received from an aircraft on the airport.) When necessary to issue traffic advisories containing unverified altitude information, the controller will issue the indicated altitude of the aircraft. The pilot may upon receipt of traffic information, request a vector (heading) to avoid such traffic. The vector will be provided to the extent possible as determined by the controller provided the aircraft to be vectored is within the airspace under the jurisdiction of the controller.

2) Not radar identified (a) Distance and direction with respect to a fix.

(b) Direction in which the target is proceeding.

EXAMPLE − T raffic 8 miles south of the airport northeastbound, (type aircraft and altitude if known).

(d) The examples depicted in FIG ENR 1.1 − 27 and FIG ENR 1.1 − 28 point out the possible error in the position of this traffic when it is necessary for a pilot to apply drift correction to maintain this track. This error could also occur in the event a change in course is made at the time radar traffic information is issued.

FIG ENR 1.1 − 27 Induced Error in Position of Traffic WIND TRACK TRACK (A) (B) EXAMPLE − In FIG ENR 1.1 − 27 , traffic information would be issued to the pilot of aircraft “A” as 12 o’clock. The actual position of the traffic as seen by the pilot of aircraft “A” would be one o’clock. Traffic information issued to aircraft “B” would also be given as 12 o’clock, but in this case, the pilot of “B” would see the traffic at 11 o’clock.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 59 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 28 Induced Error in Position of Traffic TRACK WIND (D) (C) TRACK EXAMPLE − In FIG ENR 1.1 − 28 , traffic information would be issued to the pilot of aircraft “C” as two o’clock. The actual position of the traffic as seen by the pilot of aircraft “C” would be three o’clock. Traffic information issued to aircraft “D” would be at an 11 o’clock position. Since it is not necessary for the pilot of aircraft “D” to apply wind correction (CRAB) to remain on track, the actual position of the traffic issued would be correct. Since the radar controller can only observe aircraft track (course) on the radar display, traffic advisories are issued accordingly, and pilots should give due consideration to this fact when looking for reported traffic.

38.11 Radar Assistance to VFR Aircraft 38.11.1 Radar equipped FAA ATC facilities provide radar assistance and navigation service (vectors) to VFR aircraft provided the aircraft can communicate with the facility, are within radar coverage, and can be radar identified.

38.11.2 Pilots should clearly understand that authorization to proceed in accordance with such radar navigational assistance does not constitute authorization for the pilot to violate Federal Aviation Regulations.

In effect, assistance provided is on the basis that navigational guidance information issued is advisory in nature and the job of flying the aircraft safely remains with the pilot.

38.11.3 In many cases, controllers will be unable to determine if flight into instrument conditions will result from their instructions. To avoid possible hazards resulting from being vectored into IFR conditions, pilots should keep controllers advised of the weather conditions in which they are operating and along the course ahead.

38.11.4 Radar navigation assistance (vectors) may be initiated by the controller when one of the following conditions exist: 38.11.4.1 The controller suggests the vector and the pilot concurs.

38.11.4.2 A special program has been established and vectoring service has been advertised.

38.11.4.3 In the controller’s judgment the vector is necessary for air safety.

38.11.5 Radar navigation assistance (vectors) and other radar derived information may be provided in response to pilot requests. Many factors, such as limitations of radar, volume of traffic, communications frequency, congestion, and controller workload could prevent the controller from providing it. Controllers have complete discretion for determining if they are able to provide the service in a particular case. Their decision not to provide the service in a particular case is not subject to question.

39. Operational Policy/Procedures for Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) in the Domestic U.S., Alaska, Offshore Airspace and the San Juan FIR 39.1 Applicability and RVSM Mandate (Date/Time and Area) 39.1.1 Applicability. The policies, guidance and direction in this section are consistent with the policies and procedures used in Domestic U.S. RVSM Airspace, as specified in the Aeronautical Information Manual, Chapter 4, Section 6. For any oceanic area specific items, see Part II, ENR 7 , Oceanic Procedures.

39.1.2 Requirement. The FAA implemented RVSM between flight level (FL) 290 − 410 (inclusive) in the following airspace: the airspace of the lower 48 states of the United States, Alaska, Atlantic and Gulf of America Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 60 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Offshore Airspace and the San Juan FIR. RVSM has been implemented worldwide and may be applied in all ICAO Flight Information Regions (FIR).

39.1.3 In accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.706, with only limited exceptions, prior to operating in RVSM airspace, operators must comply with the standards of Part 91, Appendix G, and be authorized by the Administrator.

If the operator has not been authorized for RVSM operations, or the aircraft is not RVSM compliant, the aircraft will be referred to as “non − RVSM” aircraft. Paragraph 39.10 discusses ATC policies for accommodation of non − RVSM aircraft flown by the Department of Defense, Air Ambulance (MEDEVAC) operators, foreign State governments and aircraft flown for certification and development. Paragraph 39.11 , Non − RVSM Aircraft Requesting Climb to and Descent from Flight Levels Above RVSM Airspace Without Intermediate Level Off, contains policies for non − RVSM aircraft climbing and descending through RVSM airspace to/from flight levels above RVSM airspace.

39.1.4 Benefits. RVSM enhances ATC flexibility, mitigates conflict points, enhances sector throughput, reduces controller workload and enables crossing traffic. Operators gain fuel savings and operating efficiency benefits by flying at more fuel efficient flight levels and on more user preferred routings.

39.2 Flight Level Orientation Scheme Altitude assignments for direction of flight follow a scheme of odd altitude assignment for magnetic courses 000 − 179 degrees and even altitudes for magnetic courses 180 − 359 degrees for flights up to and including FL 410, as indicated in FIG ENR 1.1 − 29 .

FIG ENR 1.1 − 29 Flight Level Orientation Scheme NOTE − Odd Flight Levels: Magnetic Course 000 − 179 Degrees Even Flight Levels: Magnetic Course 180 − 359 Degrees.

39.3 Aircraft and Operator Approval Policy/Procedures, RVSM Monitoring and Databases for Aircraft and Operator Approval 39.3.1 RVSM Authority. 14 CFR Section 91.180 applies to RVSM operations within the U.S. 14 CFR Section 91.706 applies to RVSM operations outside the U.S. Both sections require that the operator obtain authorization prior to operating in RVSM airspace.

39.3.2 Sources of Information. Advisory Circular (AC) 91 − 85, Authorization of Aircraft and Operators for Flight in Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Airspace, and the FAA RVSM Website.

39.3.3 TCAS Equipage. TCAS equipage requirements are contained in 14 CFR Sections 121.356, 125.224, 129.18 and 135.189. Part 91 Appendix G does not contain TCAS equipage requirements specific to RVSM, however, Appendix G does require that aircraft equipped with TCAS II and flown in RVSM airspace be modified to incorporate TCAS II Version 7.0 or a later version.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 61 United States of America 22 JAN 26 39.3.4 Aircraft Monitoring. Operators are required to participate in the RVSM altitude − keeping performance monitoring program that is appropriate for the type of operation being conducted. The monitoring programs are described in FAA AC 91 − 85, Authorization of Aircraft and Operators for Flight in Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum Airspace. Monitoring is a quality control program that enables the FAA and other civil aviation authorities to assess the in − service altitude − keeping performance of aircraft and operators.

39.3.5 RVSM Approvals Databases for U.S. operators can be found on the RVSM Documentation Webpage in the “RVSM Approvals” section.

39.4 Flight Planning into RVSM Airspace 39.4.1 Operators that do not file the correct aircraft equipment suffix on the FAA or ICAO Flight Plan may be denied clearance into RVSM airspace. Policies for the FAA Flight Plan are detailed in subparagraph 39.4.3 below. Policies for the ICAO Flight Plan are detailed in subparagraph 39.4.4.

39.4.2 The operator will annotate the equipment block of the FAA or ICAO Flight Plan with an aircraft equipment suffix indicating RVSM capability only after the responsible civil aviation authority has determined that both the operator and its aircraft are RVSM − compliant and has issued RVSM authorization to the operator.

39.4.3 General Policies for FAA Flight Plan Equipment Suffix. Appendix 1, TBL 1 − 2, allows operators to indicate that the aircraft has both RVSM and Advanced Area Navigation (RNAV) capabilities or has only RVSM capability.

39.4.3.1 The operator will annotate the equipment block of the FAA Flight Plan with the appropriate aircraft equipment suffix from Appendix 1, TBL 1 − 2 and/or TBL 1 − 3.

39.4.3.2 Operators can only file one equipment suffix in block 3 of the FAA Flight Plan. Only this equipment suffix is displayed directly to the controller.

39.4.3.3 Aircraft with RNAV Capability. For flight in RVSM airspace, aircraft with RNAV capability, but not Advanced RNAV capability, will file “/W”. Filing “/W” will not preclude such aircraft from filing and flying direct routes in en route airspace.

39.4.4 Policy for ICAO Flight Plan Equipment Suffixes.

39.4.4.1 Operators/aircraft that are RVSM − compliant and that file ICAO flight plans will file “/W” in block 10 (Equipment) to indicate RVSM authorization and will also file the appropriate ICAO Flight Plan suffixes to indicate navigation and communication capabilities.

39.4.4.2 Operators/aircraft that file ICAO flight plans that include flight in Domestic U.S. RVSM airspace must file “/W” in block 10 to indicate RVSM authorization.

39.4.5 Importance of Flight Plan Equipment Suffixes. Military users, and civilians who file stereo route flight plans, must file the appropriate equipment suffix in the equipment block of the FAA Form 7233 − 1, Flight Plan, or DD Form 175, Military Flight Plan, or FAA Form 7233 − 4, International Flight Plan, or DD Form 1801, DOD International Flight Plan. All other users must file the appropriate equipment suffix in the equipment block of FAA Form 7233 − 4, International Flight Plan. The equipment suffix informs ATC: 39.4.5.1 Whether or not the operator and aircraft are authorized to fly in RVSM airspace.

39.4.5.2 The navigation and/or transponder capability of the aircraft (e.g., advanced RNAV, Transponder with Mode C).

39.4.6 Significant ATC uses of the flight plan equipment suffix information are: 39.4.6.1 To issue or deny clearance into RVSM airspace.

39.4.6.2 To apply a 2,000 foot vertical separation minimum in RVSM airspace to aircraft that are not authorized for RVSM, but are in one of the limited categories that the FAA has agreed to accommodate. (See paragraphs 39.10 , Procedures for Accommodation of Non − RVSM Aircraft, and 39.11, Non − RVSM Aircraft Requesting Climb to and Descent from Flight Levels Above RVSM Airspace Without Intermediate Level Off, for policy on limited operation of unapproved aircraft in RVSM airspace).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 62 United States of America 22 JAN 26 39.4.7 Improperly changing an aircraft equipment suffix and/or adding “NON-RVSM” in the NOTES or REMARKS section (Field 18) while not removing the “W” from Field 10, will not provide air traffic control with the proper visual indicator necessary to detect Non-RVSM aircraft. To ensure information processes correctly for Non-RVSM aircraft, the “W” in Field 10 must be removed. Entry of information in the NOTES or REMARKS section (Field 18) will not affect the determination of RVSM capability and must not be used to indicate a flight is Non-RVSM.

39.5 Pilot RVSM Operating Practices and Procedures 39.5.1 RVSM Requirement. If either the operator is not authorized for RVSM operations, or the aircraft is not RVSM compliant, the pilot will neither request nor accept a clearance into RVSM airspace unless: 39.5.1.1 The flight is conducted by a non − RVSM DOD, MEDEVAC, certification/development or foreign State (government) aircraft in accordance with Paragraph 39.10, Procedures for Accommodation of Non − RVSM Aircraft.

39.5.1.2 The pilot intends to climb to or descend from FL 430 or above in accordance with Paragraph 39.11, Non − RVSM Aircraft Requesting Climb to and Descent from Flight Levels Above RVSM Airspace Without Intermediate Level Off.

39.5.1.3 An emergency situation exists.

39.5.2 Basic RVSM Operating Practices and Procedures. FAA AC 91 − 85 contains pilot practices and procedures for RVSM. Operators must incorporate RVSM practices and procedures, as supplemented by the applicable paragraphs of this section, into operator training or pilot knowledge programs and operator documents containing RVSM operational policies.

39.5.3 FAA AC 91 − 85 contains practices and procedures for flight planning, preflight procedures at the aircraft, procedures prior to RVSM airspace entry, inflight (en route) procedures, contingency procedures and post flight.

39.5.4 The following paragraphs either clarify or supplement FAA AC 91 − 85 practices and procedures.

39.6 Guidance on Severe Turbulence and Mountain Wave Activity (MWA) 39.6.1 Introduction/Explanation 39.6.1.1 The information and practices in this paragraph are provided to emphasize to pilots and controllers the importance of taking appropriate action in RVSM airspace when aircraft experience severe turbulence and/or MWA that is of sufficient magnitude to significantly affect altitude − keeping.

39.6.1.2 Severe Turbulence. Severe turbulence causes large, abrupt changes in altitude and/or attitude usually accompanied by large variations in indicated airspeed. Aircraft may be momentarily out of control. Encounters with severe turbulence must be remedied immediately in any phase of flight. Severe turbulence may be associated with MWA.

39.6.1.3 Mountain Wave Activity (MWA) a) Significant MWA occurs both below and above the floor of RVSM airspace, FL 290. MWA often occurs in western states in the vicinity of mountain ranges. It may occur when strong winds blow perpendicular to mountain ranges resulting in up and down or wave motions in the atmosphere. Wave action can produce altitude excursions and airspeed fluctuations accompanied by only light turbulence. With sufficient amplitude, however, wave action can induce altitude and airspeed fluctuations accompanied by severe turbulence. MWA is difficult to forecast and can be highly localized and short lived.

b) Wave activity is not necessarily limited to the vicinity of mountain ranges. Pilots experiencing wave activity anywhere that significantly affects altitude − keeping can follow the guidance provided below.

c) Inflight MWA Indicators (Including Turbulence). Indicators that the aircraft is being subjected to MWA are: 1) Altitude excursions and/or airspeed fluctuations with or without associated turbulence.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 63 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2) Pitch and trim changes required to maintain altitude with accompanying airspeed fluctuations.

3) Light to severe turbulence depending on the magnitude of the MWA.

39.6.1.4 Priority for Controller Application of Merging Target Procedures a) Explanation of Merging Target Procedures. As described in subparagraph 39.6.3.3 below, ATC will use “merging target procedures” to mitigate the effects of both severe turbulence and MWA. The procedures in subparagraph 39.6.3.3 have been adapted from existing procedures published in FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, paragraph 5 − 1 − 4, Merging Target Procedures. paragraph 5 − 1 − 4 calls for en route controllers to advise pilots of potential traffic that they perceive may fly directly above or below his/her aircraft at minimum vertical separation. In response, pilots are given the option of requesting a radar vector to ensure their radar target will not merge or overlap with the traffic’s radar target.

b) The provision of “merging target procedures” to mitigate the effects of severe turbulence and/or MWA is not optional for the controller, but rather is a priority responsibility. Pilot requests for vectors for traffic avoidance when encountering MWA or pilot reports of “Unable RVSM due turbulence or MWA” are considered first priority aircraft separation and sequencing responsibilities. (FAA Order JO 7110.65, paragraph 2 − 1 − 2, Duty Priority, states that the controller’s first priority is to separate aircraft and issue safety alerts).

c) Explanation of the term “traffic permitting.” The contingency actions for MWA and severe turbulence detailed in paragraph 39.9, Contingency Actions: Weather Encounters and Aircraft System Failures that Occur After Entry into RVSM Airspace, state that the controller will “vector aircraft to avoid merging targets with traffic at adjacent flight levels, traffic permitting.” The term “traffic permitting” is not intended to imply that merging target procedures are not a priority duty. The term is intended to recognize that, as stated in FAA Order JO 7110.65, paragraph 2 − 1 − 2, Duty Priority, there are circumstances when the controller is required to perform more than one action and must “exercise their best judgment based on the facts and circumstances known to them” to prioritize their actions. Further direction given is: “That action which is most critical from a safety standpoint is performed first.” 39.6.1.5 TCAS Sensitivity. For both MWA and severe turbulence encounters in RVSM airspace, an additional concern is the sensitivity of collision avoidance systems when one or both aircraft operating in close proximity receive TCAS advisories in response to disruptions in altitude hold capability.

39.6.2 Pre − flight tools. Sources of observed and forecast information that can help the pilot ascertain the possibility of MWA or severe turbulence are: Forecast Winds and Temperatures Aloft (FD), Area Forecast (FA), Graphical Turbulence Guidance (GTG), SIGMETs and PIREPs.

39.6.3 Pilot Actions When Encountering Weather (for example, Severe Turbulence or MWA) 39.6.3.1 Weather Encounters Inducing Altitude Deviations of Approximately 200 feet. When the pilot experiences weather induced altitude deviations of approximately 200 feet, the pilot will contact ATC and state “Unable RVSM Due (state reason)” (e.g., turbulence, mountain wave). See contingency actions in paragraph 39.9.

39.6.3.2 Severe Turbulence (including that associated with MWA). When pilots encounter severe turbulence, they should contact ATC and report the situation. Until the pilot reports clear of severe turbulence, the controller will apply merging target vectors to one or both passing aircraft to prevent their targets from merging: EXAMPLE − “Yankee 123, FL 310, unable RVSM due severe turbulence.” “Yankee 123, fly heading 290; traffic twelve o’clock, 10 miles, opposite direction; eastbound MD − 80 at FL 320” (or the controller may issue a vector to the MD − 80 traffic to avoid Yankee 123).

39.6.3.3 MWA. When pilots encounter MWA, they should contact ATC and report the magnitude and location of the wave activity. When a controller makes a merging targets traffic call, the pilot may request a vector to avoid flying directly over or under the traffic. In situations where the pilot is experiencing altitude deviations of 200 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 64 United States of America 22 JAN 26 feet or greater, the pilot will request a vector to avoid traffic. Until the pilot reports clear of MWA, the controller will apply merging target vectors to one or both passing aircraft to prevent their targets from merging: EXAMPLE − “Yankee 123, FL 310, unable RVSM due mountain wave.” “Yankee 123, fly heading 290; traffic twelve o’clock, 10 miles, opposite direction; eastbound MD − 80 at FL 320” (or the controller may issue a vector to the MD − 80 traffic to avoid Yankee 123).

39.6.3.4 FL Change or Re − route. To leave airspace where MWA or severe turbulence is being encountered, the pilot may request a FL change and/or re − route, if necessary.

39.7 Guidance on Wake Turbulence 39.7.1 Pilots should be aware of the potential for wake turbulence encounters in RVSM airspace. Experience gained since 1997 has shown that such encounters in RVSM airspace are generally moderate or less in magnitude.

39.7.2 Prior to DRVSM implementation, the FAA established provisions for pilots to report wake turbulence events in RVSM airspace using the NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS). A “Safety Reporting” section established on the FAA RVSM Documentation webpage provides contacts, forms, and reporting procedures.

39.7.3 To date, wake turbulence has not been reported as a significant factor in DRVSM operations. European authorities also found that reports of wake turbulence encounters did not increase significantly after RVSM implementation (eight versus seven reports in a ten − month period). In addition, they found that reported wake turbulence was generally similar to moderate clear air turbulence.

39.7.4 Pilot Action to Mitigate Wake Turbulence Encounters 39.7.4.1 Pilots should be alert for wake turbulence when operating: a) In the vicinity of aircraft climbing or descending through their altitude.

b) Approximately 10 − 30 miles after passing 1,000 feet below opposite − direction traffic.

c) Approximately 10 − 30 miles behind and 1,000 feet below same − direction traffic.

39.7.4.2 Pilots encountering or anticipating wake turbulence in DRVSM airspace have the option of requesting a vector, FL change, or if capable, a lateral offset.

NOTE − 1. Offsets of approximately a wing span upwind generally can move the aircraft out of the immediate vicinity of another aircraft’s wake vortex.

2. In domestic U.S. airspace, pilots must request clearance to fly a lateral offset. Strategic lateral offsets flown in oceanic airspace do not apply.

39.8 Pilot/Controller Phraseology TBL ENR 1.1 − 4 shows standard phraseology that pilots and controllers will use to communicate in DRVSM operations.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 65 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.1 − 4 Pilot/Controller Phraseology Message Phraseology For a controller to ascertain the RVSM approval status of (call sign) confirm RVSM approved an aircraft: Pilot indication that flight is RVSM approved Affirm RVSM Pilot report of lack of RVSM approval (non − RVSM status). Negative RVSM, (supplementary information, Pilot will report non − RVSM status, as follows: e.g., “Certification flight”).

a. On the initial call on any frequency in the RVSM airspace and . . .

b. In all requests for flight level changes pertaining to flight levels within the RVSM airspace and . . .

c. In all read backs to flight level clearances pertaining to flight levels within the RVSM airspace and . . .

d. In read back of flight level clearances involving climb and descent through RVSM airspace (FL 290 − 410) Pilot report of one of the following after entry into RVSM Unable RVSM Due Equipment airspace: all primary altimeters, automatic altitude control systems or altitude alerters have failed.

(See Paragraph 39.9, Contingency Actions: Weather Encounters and Aircraft System Failures that Occur After Entry into RVSM Airspace).

NOTE − This phrase is to be used to convey both the initial indication of RVSM aircraft system failure and on initial contact on all frequencies in RVSM airspace until the problem ceases to exist or the aircraft has exited RVSM airspace.

ATC denial of clearance into RVSM airspace Unable issue clearance into RVSM airspace, maintain FL *Pilot reporting inability to maintain cleared flight level *Unable RVSM due (state reason) (e.g., turbulence, due to weather encounter. (See Paragraph 39.9, mountain wave) Contingency Actions: Weather Encounters and Aircraft System Failures that Occur after Entry into RVSM Airspace).

ATC requesting pilot to confirm that an aircraft has Confirm able to resume RVSM regained RVSM − approved status or a pilot is ready to resume RVSM Pilot ready to resume RVSM after aircraft system or Ready to resume RVSM weather contingency 39.9 Contingency Actions: Weather Encounters and Aircraft System Failures that Occur After Entry into RVSM Airspace TBL ENR 1.1 − 5 provides pilot guidance on actions to take under certain conditions of aircraft system failure that occur after entry into RVSM airspace and weather encounters. It also describes the expected ATC controller actions in these situations. It is recognized that the pilot and controller will use judgment to determine the action most appropriate to any given situation.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 66 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.1 − 5 Contingency Actions: Weather Encounters and Aircraft System Failures that Occur After Entry into RVSM Airspace Initial Pilot Actions in Contingency Situations Initial pilot actions when unable to maintain flight level (FL) or unsure of aircraft altitude − keeping capability: Notify ATC and request assistance as detailed below.

Maintain cleared flight level, to the extent possible, while evaluating the situation.

Watch for conflicting traffic both visually and by reference to TCAS, if equipped .

Alert nearby aircraft by illuminating exterior lights (commensurate with aircraft limitations).

Severe Turbulence and/or Mountain Wave Activity (MWA) Induced Altitude Deviations of Approximately 200 feet Pilot will: Controller will: When experiencing severe turbulence and/or Vector aircraft to avoid merging target with MWA induced altitude deviations of traffic at adjacent flight levels, traffic permitting approximately 200 feet or greater, pilot will contact ATC and state “Unable RVSM Due (state Advise pilot of conflicting traffic reason)” (e.g., turbulence, mountain wave) Issue FL change or re − route, traffic permitting If not issued by the controller, request vector clear of traffic at adjacent FLs Issue PIREP to other aircraft If desired, request FL change or re − route Report location and magnitude of turbulence or MWA to ATC See Paragraph 39.6, Guidance on Severe Turbulence Paragraph 39.6 explains “traffic permitting.” and Mountain Wave Activity (MWA), for detailed guidance.

Mountain Wave Activity (MWA) Encounters − General Pilot actions: Controller actions: Contact ATC and report experiencing MWA Advise pilot of conflicting traffic at adjacent FL If so desired, pilot may request a FL change or If pilot requests, vector aircraft to avoid merging re − route target with traffic at adjacent RVSM flight levels, traffic permitting Report location and magnitude of MWA to ATC Issue FL change or re − route, traffic permitting Issue PIREP to other aircraft See paragraph 39.6 for guidance on MWA. Paragraph 39.6 explains “traffic permitting.” NOTE − MWA encounters do not necessarily result in altitude deviations on the order of 200 feet. The guidance below is intended to address less significant MWA encounters.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 67 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Wake Turbulence Encounters Pilot should: Controller should: Contact ATC and request vector, FL change or, Issue vector, FL change or lateral offset clear- if capable, a lateral offset ance, traffic permitting See Paragraph 39.7, Guidance on Wake Turbulence. Paragraph 39.6 explains “traffic permitting.” “Unable RVSM Due Equipment” Failure of Automatic Altitude Control System, Altitude Alerter or All Primary Altimeters Pilot will: Controller will: Contact ATC and state “Unable RVSM Due Provide 2,000 feet vertical separation or Equipment” appropriate horizontal separation Request clearance out of RVSM airspace unless Clear aircraft out of RVSM airspace unless operational situation dictates otherwise operational situation dictates otherwise One Primary Altimeter Remains Operational Pilot will: Controller will: Cross check stand − by altimeter Acknowledge operation with single primary altimeter Notify ATC of operation with single primary altimeter If unable to confirm primary altimeter accuracy, follow actions for failure of all primary altimeters Transponder Failure Pilot will: Controller will: Contact ATC and request authority to continue Consider request to continue to operate at to operate at cleared flight level cleared flight level Comply with revised ATC clearance, if issued Issue revised clearance, if necessary NOTE − 14 CFR Section 91.215 (ATC transponder and altitude reporting equipment and use) regulates operation with the transponder inoperative.

39.10 Procedures for Accommodation of Non − RVSM Aircraft 39.10.1 General Policies for Accommodation of Non − RVSM Aircraft 39.10.1.1 The RVSM mandate calls for only RVSM authorized aircraft/operators to fly in designated RVSM airspace with limited exceptions. The policies detailed below are intended exclusively for use by aircraft that the FAA has agreed to accommodate. They are not intended to provide other operators a means to circumvent the normal RVSM approval process.

39.10.1.2 If either the operator is not authorized or the aircraft is not RVSM − compliant, the aircraft will be referred to as a “non − RVSM” aircraft. 14 CFR Section 91.180 and Part 91 Appendix G enable the FAA to authorize a deviation to operate a non − RVSM aircraft in RVSM airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 68 United States of America 22 JAN 26 39.10.1.3 Non − RVSM aircraft flights will be handled on a workload permitting basis. The vertical separation standard applied between aircraft not approved for RVSM and all other aircraft must be 2,000 feet.

39.10.1.4 Required Pilot Calls. The pilot of non − RVSM aircraft will inform the controller of the lack of RVSM approval in accordance with the direction provided in Paragraph 39.8 , Pilot/Controller Phraseology.

39.10.2 Categories of Non − RVSM Aircraft that may be Accommodated Subject to FAA approval and clearance, the following categories of non − RVSM aircraft may operate in domestic U.S. RVSM airspace provided they have an operational transponder.

39.10.2.1 Department of Defense (DOD) aircraft.

39.10.2.2 Flights conducted for aircraft certification and development purposes.

39.10.2.3 Active air ambulance flights utilizing a “MEDEVAC” call sign.

39.10.2.4 Aircraft climbing/descending through RVSM flight levels (without intermediate level off) to/from FLs above RVSM airspace (Policies for these flights are detailed in paragraph 39.11 , Non − RVSM Aircraft Requesting Climb to and Descent from Flight Levels Above RVSM Airspace Without Intermediate Level Off.

39.10.2.5 Foreign State (government) aircraft.

39.10.3 Methods for operators of non − RVSM aircraft to request access to RVSM Airspace. Operators may: 39.10.3.1 LOA/MOU. Enter into a Letter of Agreement (LOA)/Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the RVSM facility (the Air Traffic facility that provides air traffic services in RVSM airspace). Operators must comply with LOA/MOU.

39.10.3.2 File − and − Fly. File a flight plan to notify the FAA of their intention to request access to RVSM airspace.

NOTE − Priority for access to RVSM airspace will be afforded to RVSM compliant aircraft, then File − and − Fly flights.

39.11 Non − RVSM Aircraft Requesting Climb to and Descent from Flight Levels Above RVSM Airspace Without Intermediate Level Off 39.11.1 File − and − Fly. Operators of Non − RVSM aircraft climbing to and descending from RVSM flight levels should just file a flight plan.

39.11.2 Non − RVSM aircraft climbing to and descending from flight levels above RVSM airspace will be handled on a workload permitting basis. The vertical separation standard applied in RVSM airspace between non − RVSM aircraft and all other aircraft must be 2,000 feet.

39.11.3 Non − RVSM aircraft climbing to/descending from RVSM airspace can only be considered for accommodation provided: 39.11.3.1 Aircraft is capable of a continuous climb/descent and does not need to level off at an intermediate altitude for any operational considerations and 39.11.3.2 Aircraft is capable of climb/descent at the normal rate for the aircraft.

39.11.4 Required Pilot Calls. The pilot of non − RVSM aircraft will inform the controller of the lack of RVSM approval in accordance with the direction provided in paragraph 39.8 , Pilot/Controller Phraseology.

40. Terminal Radar Services for VFR Aircraft 40.1 Basic Radar Service 40.1.1 In addition to the use of radar for the control of IFR aircraft, all commissioned radar facilities provide the following basic radar services for VFR aircraft: 40.1.1.1 Safety alerts.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 69 United States of America 22 JAN 26 40.1.1.2 Traffic advisories.

40.1.1.3 Limited radar vectoring (on a workload permitting basis).

40.1.1.4 Sequencing at locations where procedures have been established for this purpose and/or when covered by a letter of agreement.

NOTE − When the stage services were developed, two basic radar services (traffic advisories and limited vectoring) were identified as “Stage I.” This definition became unnecessary and the term “Stage I” was eliminated from use. The term “Stage II” has been eliminated in conjunction with the airspace reclassification, and sequencing services to locations with local procedures and/or letters of agreement to provide this service have been included in basic services to VFR aircraft. These basic services will still be provided by all terminal radar facilities whether they include Class B, C, D, or E airspace. “Stage III” services have been replaced with “Class B” and “Terminal Radar Service Area” service where applicable.

40.1.2 Vectoring service may be provided when requested by the pilot or with pilot concurrence when suggested by ATC.

40.1.3 Pilots of arriving aircraft should contact approach control on the publicized frequency and give their position, altitude, aircraft call sign, type aircraft, radar beacon code (if transponder equipped), destination, and should request traffic information.

40.1.4 Approach control will issue wind and runway, except when the pilot states “have numbers” or this information is contained in the ATIS broadcast and the pilot states that the current ATIS information has been received. Traffic information is provided on a workload permitting basis. Approach control will specify the time or place at which the pilot is to contact the tower on local control frequency for further landing information. Radar service is automatically terminated and the aircraft need not be advised of termination when an arriving VFR aircraft receiving radar services to a tower − controlled airport where basic radar service is provided has landed, or to all other airports, is instructed to change to tower or advisory frequency.

40.1.5 Sequencing for VFR aircraft is available at certain terminal locations (see locations listed in the Chart Supplement). The purpose of the service is to adjust the flow of arriving VFR and IFR aircraft into the traffic pattern in a safe and orderly manner and to provide radar traffic information to departing VFR aircraft. Pilot participation is urged but is not mandatory. Traffic information is provided on a workload permitting basis.

Standard radar separation between VFR or between VFR and IFR aircraft is not provided.

40.1.5.1 Pilots of arriving VFR aircraft should initiate radio contact on the publicized frequency with approach control when approximately 25 miles from the airport at which sequencing services are being provided. On initial contact by VFR aircraft, approach control will assume that sequencing service is requested. After radar contact is established, the pilot may use pilot navigation to enter the traffic pattern or, depending on traffic conditions, approach control may provide the pilot with routings or vectors necessary for proper sequencing with other participating VFR and IFR traffic en route to the airport. When a flight is positioned behind a preceding aircraft and the pilot reports having that aircraft in sight, the pilot will be instructed to follow the preceding aircraft. THE ATC INSTRUCTION TO FOLLOW THE PRECEDING AIRCRAFT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE PILOT TO COMPLY WITH ANY ATC CLEARANCE OR INSTRUCTION ISSUED TO THE PRECEDING AIRCRAFT. If other “nonparticipating” or “local” aircraft are in the traffic pattern, the tower will issue a landing sequence. If an arriving aircraft does not want radar service, the pilot should state “NEGATIVE RADAR SERVICE” or make a similar comment, on initial contact with approach control.

40.1.5.2 Pilots of departing VFR aircraft are encouraged to request radar traffic information by notifying ground control, or where applicable, clearance delivery, on initial contact with their request and proposed direction of flight.

EXAMPLE − Xray ground control, November One Eight Six, Cessna One Seventy Two, ready to taxi, VFR southbound at 2,500, have information bravo and request radar traffic information.

NOTE − Following takeoff, the tower will advise when to contact departure control.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 70 United States of America 22 JAN 26 40.1.5.3 Pilots of aircraft transiting the area and in radar contact/communication with approach control will receive traffic information on a controller workload permitting basis. Pilots of such aircraft should give their position, altitude, aircraft call sign, aircraft type, radar beacon code (if transponder equipped), destination, and/or route of flight.

40.2 Terminal Radar Service Area (TRSA) Service (Radar Sequencing and Separation Service for VFR Aircraft in a TRSA).

40.2.1 This service has been implemented at certain terminal locations. The service is advertised in the Chart Supplement. The purpose of this service is to provide separation between all participating VFR aircraft and all IFR aircraft operating within the airspace defined as the TRSA. Pilot participation is urged but is not mandatory.

40.2.2 If any aircraft does not want the service, the pilot should state “NEGATIVE TRSA SERVICE” or make a similar comment, on initial contact with approach control or ground control, as appropriate.

40.2.3 TRSAs are depicted on sectional aeronautical charts and listed in the Chart Supplement.

40.2.4 While operating within a TRSA, pilots are provided TRSA service and separation as prescribed in this paragraph. In the event of a radar outage, separation and sequencing of VFR aircraft will be suspended as this service is dependent on radar. The pilot will be advised that the service is not available and will be issued wind, runway information, and the time or place to contact the tower. Traffic information will be provided on a workload permitting basis.

40.2.5 Visual separation is used when prevailing conditions permit and it will be applied as follows: 40.2.5.1 When a VFR flight is positioned behind a preceding aircraft and the pilot reports having that aircraft in sight, the pilot will be instructed by ATC to follow the preceding aircraft. THE ATC INSTRUCTION TO FOLLOW THE PRECEDING AIRCRAFT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE PILOT TO COMPLY WITH ANY ATC CLEARANCE OR INSTRUCTION ISSUED TO THE PRECEDING AIRCRAFT.

Radar service will be continued to the runway.

40.2.5.2 If other “nonparticipating” or “local” aircraft are in the traffic pattern, the tower will issue a landing sequence.

40.2.5.3 Departing VFR aircraft may be asked if they can visually follow a preceding departure out of the TRSA.

The pilot will be instructed to follow the other aircraft provided that the pilot can maintain visual contact with that aircraft.

40.2.6 Participating VFR aircraft will be separated from IFR and other participating VFR aircraft by one of the following: 40.2.6.1 500 feet vertical separation.

40.2.6.2 Visual separation.

40.2.6.3 Target resolution (a process to ensure that correlated radar targets do not touch).

40.2.7 Participating pilots operating VFR in a TRSA: 40.2.7.1 Must maintain an altitude when assigned by ATC unless the altitude assignment is to maintain at or below a specified altitude. ATC may assign altitudes for separation that do not conform to 14 CFR Section 91.159. When the altitude assignment is no longer needed for separation or when leaving the TRSA, the instruction will be broadcast, “RESUME APPROPRIATE VFR ALTITUDES.” Pilots must then return to an altitude that conforms to 14 CFR Section 91.159 as soon as practicable.

40.2.7.2 When not assigned an altitude, the pilot should coordinate with ATC prior to any altitude change.

40.2.8 Within the TRSA, traffic information on observed but unidentified targets will, to the extent possible, be provided to all IFR and participating VFR aircraft. The pilot will be vectored upon request to avoid the observed traffic, provided the aircraft to be vectored is within the airspace under the jurisdiction of the controller.

40.2.9 Departing aircraft should inform ATC of their intended destination and/or route of flight and proposed cruising altitude.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 71 United States of America 22 JAN 26 40.2.10 ATC will normally advise participating VFR aircraft when leaving the geographical limits of the TRSA.

Radar service is not automatically terminated with this advisory unless specifically stated by the controller.

40.3 Class C Service. This service provides, in addition to basic radar service, approved separation between IFR and VFR aircraft, and sequencing of VFR arrivals to the primary airport.

40.4 Class B Service. This service provides, in addition to basic radar service, approved separation of aircraft based on IFR, VFR, and/or weight, and sequencing of VFR arrivals to the primary airport(s).

40.5 PILOT RESPONSIBILITY. THESE SERVICES ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS RELIEVING PILOTS OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO SEE AND AVOID OTHER TRAFFIC OPERATING IN BASIC VFR WEATHER CONDITIONS, TO ADJUST THEIR OPERATIONS AND FLIGHT PATH AS NECESSARY TO PRECLUDE SERIOUS WAKE ENCOUNTERS, TO MAINTAIN APPROPRIATE TERRAIN AND OBSTRUCTION CLEARANCE, OR TO REMAIN IN WEATHER CONDITIONS EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE MINIMUMS REQUIRED BY 14 CFR SECTION 91.155. WHENEVER COMPLIANCE WITH AN ASSIGNED ROUTE, HEADING AND/OR ALTITUDE IS LIKELY TO COMPROMISE PILOT RESPONSIBILITY RESPECTING TERRAIN AND OBSTRUCTION CLEAR - ANCE, VORTEX EXPOSURE, AND WEATHER MINIMUMS, APPROACH CONTROL SHOULD BE SO ADVISED AND A REVISED CLEARANCE OR INSTRUCTION OBTAINED.

40.6 ATC services for VFR aircraft participating in terminal radar services are dependent on ATC radar. Services for VFR aircraft are not available during periods of radar outages. The pilot will be advised when VFR services are limited or not available.

NOTE − Class B and Class C airspace are areas of regulated airspace. The absence of ATC radar does not negate the requirement of an ATC clearance to enter Class B airspace or two − way radio contact with ATC to enter Class C airspace.

41. Tower En Route Control (TEC) 41.1 TEC is an ATC program to provide a service to aircraft proceeding to and from metropolitan areas. It links designated approach control areas by a network of identified routes made up of the existing airway structure of the National Airspace System. The FAA has initiated an expanded TEC program to include as many facilities as possible. The program’s intent is to provide an overflow resource in the low altitude system which would enhance ATC services. A few facilities have historically allowed turbojets to proceed between certain city pairs, such as Milwaukee and Chicago, via tower en route and these locations may continue this service. However, the expanded TEC program will be applied, generally, for nonturbojet aircraft operating at and below 10,000 feet.

The program is entirely within the approach control airspace of multiple terminal facilities. Essentially, it is for relatively short flights. Participating pilots are encouraged to use TEC for flights of 2 hours duration or less. If longer flights are planned, extensive coordination may be required with the multiple complex which could result in unanticipated delays.

41.2 There are no unique requirements upon pilots to use the TEC program. Normal flight plan filing procedures will ensure proper flight plan processing. Pilots should include the acronym “TEC” in the remarks selection of the flight plan when requesting tower en route.

41.3 All approach controls in the system may not operate up to the maximum TEC altitude of 10,000 feet. IFR flight may be planned to any satellite airport in proximity to the major primary airport via the same routing.

42. Services in Offshore Controlled Airspace 42.1 Pilots requesting TEC are subject to the same delay factor at the destination airport as other aircraft in the ATC system. In addition, departure and en route delays may occur depending upon individual facility workload.

When a major metropolitan airport is incurring significant delays, pilots in the TEC program may want to consider an alternative airport experiencing no delay.

42.2 Flights which operate between the U.S. 3 − mile territorial limit and the adjoining oceanic controlled airspace/flight information region (CTA/FIR) boundaries generally operate in airspace designated by federal regulation as “controlled airspace,” or “offshore controlled airspace.” Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 72 United States of America 22 JAN 26 42.3 Within the designated areas ATC radar surveillance, ground based navigational signal coverage, and air/ground communications are capable of supporting air traffic services comparable to those provided over U.S.

domestic controlled airspace.

42.4 Pilots should be aware that domestic procedures will be applied in offshore controlled airspace to both VFR and IFR aircraft using ATC services.

43. Pilot/Controller Roles/Responsibilities 43.1 General 43.1.1 The roles and responsibilities of the pilot and controller for effective participation in the ATC system are contained in several documents. Pilot responsibilities are in the Federal Aviation Regulations (Title 14 of the U.S.

Code of Federal Regulations) and the air traffic controller’s are in FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, and supplemental FAA directives. Additional and supplemental information for pilots can be found in the current Aeronautical Information Manual, Notices to Airmen, advisory circulars, and aeronautical charts. Since there are many other excellent publications produced by nongovernment organizations as well as other Government organizations with various updating cycles, questions concerning the latest or most current material can be resolved by cross − checking with the above mentioned documents.

43.1.2 The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the safe operation of that aircraft. In an emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot in command may deviate from any rule in the General, Subpart A, and Flight Rules, Subpart B, in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.3.

43.1.3 The air traffic controller is responsible to give first priority to the separation of aircraft and to the issuance of radar safety alerts; second priority to other services that are required, but do not involve separation of aircraft; and third priority to additional services to the extent possible.

43.1.4 In order to maintain a safe and efficient air traffic system, it is necessary that every party fulfill their responsibilities to the fullest.

43.1.5 The responsibilities of the pilot and the controller intentionally overlap in many areas providing a degree of redundancy. Should one or the other fail in any manner, this overlapping responsibility is expected to compensate, in many cases, for failures that may affect safety.

43.1.6 The following, while not intended to be all inclusive, is a brief listing of pilot and controller responsibilities for some commonly used procedures or phases of flight. More detailed explanations are contained in the appropriate Federal Aviation Regulations, Advisory Circulars, and similar publications. The information provided here is an overview of the principles involved and is not meant as an interpretation of the rules nor is it intended to extend or diminish responsibilities.

43.2 Air Traffic Clearance 43.2.1 Pilot 43.2.1.1 Acknowledges receipt and understanding of an ATC clearance.

43.2.1.2 Reads back any hold short of runway instructions issued by ATC.

43.2.1.3 Requests clarification or amendment, as appropriate, any time a clearance is not fully understood, or considered unacceptable from a safety standpoint.

43.2.1.4 Promptly complies with an air traffic clearance upon receipt, except as necessary to cope with an emergency. Advises ATC as soon as possible and obtains an amended clearance if deviation is necessary.

43.2.2 Controller 43.2.2.1 Issues appropriate clearances for the operation being, or to be, conducted in accordance with established criteria.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 73 United States of America 22 JAN 26 43.2.2.2 Assigns altitudes in IFR clearances that are at or above the minimum IFR altitudes in Classes A, B, C, D, and E airspace.

43.2.2.3 Ensures acknowledgements by the pilot for issued information, clearance, or instructions.

43.2.2.4 Ensures that readbacks by the pilot of altitude, heading, or other items are correct. If incorrect, distorted, or incomplete, makes corrections as appropriate.

43.3 Contact Approach 43.3.1 Pilot 43.3.1.1 This approach must be requested by the pilot and is made in lieu of a standard or special instrument approach.

43.3.1.2 By requesting the contact approach, the pilot indicates that the flight is operating clear of clouds, has at least 1 mile flight visibility, and can reasonably expect to continue to the destination airport in those conditions.

43.3.1.3 Be aware that while conducting a contact approach, the pilot assumes responsibility for obstruction clearance.

43.3.1.4 Advises ATC immediately if you are unable to continue the contact approach or if you encounter less than 1 mile flight visibility.

43.3.1.5 Be aware that, if radar service is being received, it may automatically terminate when the pilot is told to contact the tower. “Radar service terminated” is used by ATC to inform a pilot that he/she will no longer be provided any of the services that could be received while in radar contact.

REFERENCE − The Pilot/Controller Glossary is published in the Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM) and FAA Orders JO 7110.10, Flight Services, and JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control.

43.3.2 Controller 43.3.2.1 Issues clearance for contact approach only when requested by the pilot. Does not solicit the use of this procedure.

43.3.2.2 Before issuing clearance, ascertains that reported ground visibility at destination airport is at least 1 mile.

43.3.2.3 Provides approved separation between aircraft cleared for contact approach and other IFR or special VFR aircraft. When using vertical separation, does not assign a fixed altitude but clears the aircraft at or below an altitude which is at least 1,000 feet below any IFR traffic but not below minimum safe altitudes prescribed in 14 CFR Section 91.119.

43.3.2.4 Issues alternative instructions if, in the controller’s judgment, weather conditions may make completion of the approach impractical.

43.4 Instrument Approach 43.4.1 Pilot 43.4.1.1 Be aware that the controller issues clearance for approach based only on known traffic.

43.4.1.2 Follows the procedures as shown on the instrument approach chart including all restrictive notations, such as: a) Procedure not authorized at night.

b) Approach not authorized when local area altimeter not available.

c) Procedure not authorized when control tower not in operation.

d) Procedure not authorized when glide slope not used.

e) Straight − in minimums not authorized at night.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.1 − 74 AIP ENR 1.1 − 74 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 f) Radar required.

g) The circling minimums published on the instrument approach chart provide adequate obstruction clearance. The pilot should not descend below the circling altitude until the aircraft is in a position to make final descent for landing. Sound judgment and knowledge of the pilot’s and the aircraft’s capabilities are the criteria for a pilot to determine the exact maneuver in each instance since airport design and the aircraft position, altitude, and airspeed must all be considered. (See ENR 1.5 , paragraph 11.6 , Circling Minimums.)

43.4.1.3 Upon receipt of an approach clearance while on an unpublished route or being radar vectored: a) Complies with the minimum altitude for IFR.

b) Maintains last assigned altitude until established on a segment of a published route or Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP), at which time published altitudes apply.

43.4.1.4 There are currently two temperature limitations that may be published in the notes box of the middle briefing strip on an instrument approach procedure (IAP). The two published temperature limitations are: a) A temperature range limitation associated with the use of Baro − VNAV that may be published on an United States PBN IAP titled RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP); and/or b) A Cold Temperature Airport (CTA) limitation designated by a snowflake ICON and temperature in Celsius (C) that is published on every IAP for the airfield.

43.4.1.5 Any planned altitude correction for the intermediate and/or missed approach holding segments must be coordinated with ATC. Pilots do not have to advise ATC of a correction in the final segment.

REFERENCE − AIP, Section ENR 1.8 , Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors, Setting Procedures, and Cold Temperature Airports (CTA).

43.4.2 Controller 43.4.2.1 Issues an approach clearance based on known traffic.

43.4.2.2 Issues an IFR approach clearance only after aircraft is established on a segment of published route or IAP; or assigns an appropriate altitude for the aircraft to maintain until so established.

43.5 Missed Approach 43.5.1 Pilot 43.5.1.1 Executes a missed approach when one of the following conditions exist: a) Arrival at the missed approach point (MAP) or the decision height (DH) and visual reference to the runway environment is insufficient to complete the landing.

b) Determines that a safe approach or landing is not possible (see ENR 1.5 , paragraph 27.8 ).

c) Instructed to do so by ATC.

43.5.1.2 Advises ATC that a missed approach will be made. Include the reason for the missed approach unless initiated by ATC.

43.5.1.3 Complies with the missed approach instructions for the IAP being executed from the MAP, unless other missed approach instructions are specified by ATC.

43.5.1.4 If executing a missed approach prior to reaching the MAP, fly the lateral navigation path of the instrument procedure to the MAP. Climb to the altitude specified in the missed approach procedure, except when a maximum altitude is specified between the final approach fix (FAF) and the MAP. In that case, comply with the maximum altitude restriction. Note, this may require a continued descent on the final approach.

43.5.1.5 When applicable, apply cold temperature correction to the published missed approach segment. Advise ATC when intending to apply cold temperature correction and of the amount of correction required on initial contact (or as soon as possible). This information is required for ATC to provide aircraft appropriate vertical Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 75 AIP ENR 1.1 − 75 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 separation between known traffic. The pilot must not apply an altitude correction to an assigned altitude when provided an initial heading to fly or radar vector in lieu of published missed approach procedures, unless approved by ATC.

REFERENCE − AIP, Section ENR 1.8 , Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors, Setting Procedures, and Cold Temperature Airports (CTA).

43.5.1.6 Following a missed approach, requests clearance for specific action; i.e., another approach, hold for improved conditions, proceed to an alternate airport, etc.

43.5.2 Controller 43.5.2.1 Issues an approved alternate missed approach procedure if it is desired that the pilot execute a procedure other than as depicted on the instrument approach chart.

43.5.2.2 May vector a radar identified aircraft executing a missed approach when operationally advantageous to the pilot or the controller.

43.5.2.3 In response to the pilot’s stated intentions, issues a clearance to an alternate airport, to a holding fix, or for reentry into the approach sequence, as traffic conditions permit.

43.6 Vectors 43.6.1 Pilot 43.6.1.1 Promptly complies with headings and altitudes assigned to you by the controller.

43.6.1.2 Questions any assigned heading or altitude believed to be incorrect.

43.6.1.3 If operating VFR and compliance with any radar vector or altitude would cause a violation of any Federal Aviation Regulation, advises ATC and obtain a revised clearance or instruction.

43.6.2 Controller 43.6.2.1 Vectors aircraft in Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace: a) For separation.

b) For noise abatement.

c) To obtain an operational advantage for the pilot or the controller.

43.6.2.2 Vectors aircraft in Class A, B, C, D, E, and G airspace when requested by the pilot.

43.6.2.3 Except where authorized for radar approaches, radar departures, special VFR, or when operating in accordance with vectors below minimum altitude procedures, vector IFR aircraft at or above minimum vectoring altitudes.

43.6.2.4 May vector aircraft off assigned procedures. When published altitude or speed restrictions are included, controllers must assign an altitude, or if necessary, a speed.

43.6.2.5 May vector VFR aircraft, not at an ATC assigned altitude, at any altitude. In these cases, terrain separation is the pilot’s responsibility.

43.7 Speed Adjustments 43.7.1 Pilot (In U.S. Domestic Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace) 43.7.2 Except as stated in paragraphs 43.7.5 and 43.7.6, advises ATC anytime the true airspeed at cruising level varies or is expected to vary by plus or minus 10 knots or 0.02 Mach number, whichever is less, of the filed true airspeed.

43.7.3 Complies with speed adjustments from ATC unless: 43.7.3.1 Except as stated in paragraphs 43.7.5 and 43.7.6, advises ATC anytime the true airspeed at cruising level varies or is expected to vary by plus or minus 10 knots or 0.02 Mach number, whichever is less, of the filed true airspeed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 76 United States of America 22 JAN 26 43.7.3.2 Complies with speed adjustments from ATC unless: a) The minimum or maximum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater or less than the requested airspeed. In such cases, advises ATC.

b) Operating at or above 10,000 feet MSL on an ATC assigned SPEED ADJUSTMENT of more than 250 knots IAS and subsequent clearance is received for descent below 10,000 feet MSL. In such cases, pilots are expected to comply with 14 CFR Section 97.117(a).

43.7.4 Controller (In U.S. Domestic Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspaces) 43.7.4.1 Assigns aircraft to speed adjustments when necessary, but not as a substitute for good vectoring technique.

43.7.4.2 Adheres to the restrictions of FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, as to when speed adjustment procedures may be applied.

43.7.4.3 Avoids speed adjustments requiring alternate decreases and increases.

43.7.4.4 Assigns speed adjustments to a specified IAS knots/Mach number or to increase or decrease speed utilizing increments of 5 knots or multiples thereof.

43.7.4.5 Terminates ATC-assigned speed adjustments when no longer required by issuing further instructions to pilots in the following manner: a) Advises pilots to “resume normal speed” when the aircraft is on a heading, random routing, charted procedure, or route without published speed restrictions.

b) Instructs pilots to “comply with speed restrictions” when the aircraft is joining or resuming a charted procedure or route with published speed restrictions.

CAUTION − The phraseology “Climb via SID” requires compliance with all altitude and/or speed restrictions depicted on the procedure.

c) Instructs pilots to “resume published speed” when aircraft are cleared via a charted instrument flight procedure that contains published speed restrictions.

d) Advises aircraft to “delete speed restrictions” when ATC assigned or published speed restrictions on a charted procedure are no longer required.

e) Clears pilots for approach without restating previously issued speed adjustments.

43.7.4.6 Gives due consideration to aircraft capabilities to reduce speed while descending.

43.7.5 Pilot (In Oceanic Class A and E Airspace) 43.7.5.1 If ATC has not assigned an airspeed, advises ATC anytime the true airspeed at cruising level varies or is expected to vary by ± 10 knots or 0.02 Mach number, whichever is less, of the filed true airspeed.

43.7.5.2 If ATC has assigned an airspeed, aircraft must adhere to the ATC assigned airspeed and must request ATC approval before making any change thereto. If it is essential to make an immediate temporary change in the Mach number (e.g., due to turbulence), ATC must be notified as soon as possible. If it is not feasible, due to aircraft performance, to maintain the last assigned Mach number during an en route climb or descent, advises ATC at the time of the request.

43.7.6 Controller (In Oceanic Class A and E Airspace) 43.7.6.1 Assigns airspeed when necessary for separation of aircraft to comply with 14 CFR, ICAO regulations and procedures, or letters of agreement.

43.8 Traffic Advisories (Traffic Information) 43.8.1 Pilot Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 77 United States of America 22 JAN 26 43.8.1.1 Acknowledges receipt of traffic advisories.

43.8.1.2 Informs controller if traffic is in sight.

43.8.1.3 Advises ATC if a vector to avoid traffic is desired.

43.8.1.4 Does not expect to receive radar traffic advisories on all traffic. Some aircraft may not appear on the radar display. Be aware that the controller may be occupied with high priority duties and unable to issue traffic information for a variety of reasons.

43.8.1.5 Advises controller if service is not desired.

43.8.2 Controller 43.8.2.1 Issues radar traffic to the maximum extent consistent with higher priority duties except in Class A airspace.

43.8.2.2 Provides vectors to assist aircraft to avoid observed traffic when requested by the pilot.

43.8.2.3 Issues traffic information to aircraft in Class D airspace for sequencing purposes.

43.8.2.4 Controllers are required to issue traffic advisories to each aircraft operating on intersecting or nonintersecting converging runways where projected flight paths will cross.

43.9 Safety Alert 43.9.1 Pilot 43.9.1.1 Initiates appropriate action if a safety alert is received from ATC.

43.9.1.2 Be aware that this service is not always available and that many factors affect the ability of the controller to be aware of a situation in which unsafe proximity to terrain, obstructions, or another aircraft may be developing.

43.9.2 Controller 43.9.2.1 Issues a safety alert if aware an aircraft under their control is at an altitude which, in the controller’s judgment, places the aircraft in unsafe proximity to terrain, obstructions, or another aircraft. Types of safety alerts are: a) Terrain/Obstruction Alerts. Immediately issued to an aircraft under their control if aware the aircraft is at an altitude believed to place the aircraft in unsafe proximity to terrain/obstruction.

b) Aircraft Conflict Alerts. Immediately issued to an aircraft under their control if aware of an aircraft not under their control at an altitude believed to place the aircraft in unsafe proximity to each other. With the alert, they offer the pilot an alternative if feasible.

43.9.2.2 Discontinues further alerts if informed by the pilot action is being taken to correct the situation or that the other aircraft is in sight.

43.10 See and Avoid 43.10.1 Pilot 43.10.1.1 When meteorological conditions permit, regardless of type of flight plan or whether or not under control of a radar facility, the pilot is responsible to see and avoid other traffic, terrain, or obstacles.

43.10.2 Controller 43.10.2.1 Provides radar traffic information to radar identified aircraft operating outside positive control airspace on a workload permitting basis.

43.10.2.2 Issues a safety advisory to an aircraft under their control if aware the aircraft is at an altitude believed to place the aircraft in unsafe proximity to terrain, obstructions or other aircraft.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 78 United States of America 22 JAN 26 43.11 Visual Approach 43.11.1 Pilot 43.11.1.1 If a visual approach is not desired, advises ATC.

43.11.1.2 Complies with controller’s instructions for vectors toward the airport of intended landing or to a visual position behind a preceding aircraft.

43.11.1.3 The pilot must, at all times, have either the airport or the preceding aircraft in sight. After being cleared for a visual approach, proceed to the airport in a normal manner or follow the preceding aircraft. Remain clear of clouds while conducting a visual approach.

43.11.1.4 If the pilot accepts a visual approach clearance to visually follow a preceding aircraft, you are required to establish a safe landing interval behind the aircraft you were instructed to follow. You are responsible for wake turbulence separation.

43.11.1.5 Advise ATC immediately if the pilot is unable to continue following the preceding aircraft, cannot remain clear of clouds, needs to climb, or loses sight of the airport.

43.11.1.6 In the event of a go − around, the pilot is responsible to maintain terrain and obstruction avoidance until reaching an ATC assigned altitude if issued.

43.11.1.7 Be aware that radar service is automatically terminated, without being advised by ATC, when the pilot is instructed to change to advisory frequency.

43.11.1.8 Be aware that there may be other traffic in the traffic pattern and the landing sequence may differ from the traffic sequence assigned by the approach control or ARTCC.

43.11.2 Controller 43.11.2.1 Does not clear an aircraft for a visual approach unless reported weather at the airport is ceiling at or above 1,000 feet and visibility is 3 miles or greater. When weather is not available for the destination airport, informs the pilot and does not initiate a visual approach to that airport unless there is reasonable assurance that descent and flight to the airport can be made visually.

43.11.2.2 Issues visual approach clearance when the pilot reports sighting either the airport or a preceding aircraft which is to be followed.

43.11.2.3 Provides separation except when visual separation is being applied by the pilot.

43.11.2.4 Continues flight following and traffic information until the aircraft has landed or has been instructed to change to advisory frequency.

43.11.2.5 For all aircraft, inform the pilot when the preceding aircraft is a heavy. Inform the pilot of a small aircraft when the preceding aircraft is a B757. Visual separation is prohibited behind super aircraft.

43.11.2.6 When weather is available for the destination airport, does not initiate a vector for a visual approach unless the reported ceiling at the airport is 500 feet or more above the MVA and visibility is 3 miles or more. If vectoring weather minima are not available but weather at the airport is ceiling at or above 1,000 feet and visibility of 3 miles or greater, visual approaches may still be conducted.

43.11.2.7 Informs the pilot conducting the visual approach of the aircraft class when pertinent traffic is known to be a heavy aircraft.

43.12 Visual Separation 43.12.1 Pilot 43.12.1.1 Acceptance of instructions to follow another aircraft or to provide visual separation from it is an acknowledgment that the pilot will maneuver the aircraft as necessary to avoid the other aircraft or to maintain in − trail separation. Pilots are responsible to maintain visual separation until flight paths (altitudes and/or courses) diverge.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 79 United States of America 22 JAN 26 43.12.1.2 If instructed by ATC to follow another aircraft or to provide visual separation from it, promptly notify the controller if you lose sight of that aircraft, are unable to maintain continued visual contact with it, or cannot accept the responsibility for your own separation for any reason.

43.12.1.3 The pilot also accepts responsibility for wake turbulence separation under these conditions.

43.12.2 Controller Applies Visual Separation Only: 43.12.2.1 Within the terminal area when a controller has both aircraft in sight or by instructing a pilot who sees the other aircraft to maintain visual separation from it.

43.12.2.2 Pilots are responsible to maintain visual separation until flight paths (altitudes and/or courses) diverge.

43.12.2.3 Within en route airspace when aircraft are on opposite courses and one pilot reports having seen the other aircraft and that the aircraft have passed each other.

43.13 VFR − on − top 43.13.1 Pilot 43.13.1.1 This clearance must be requested by the pilot on an IFR flight plan, and if approved, allows the pilot the choice to select (subject to any ATC restrictions) an altitude or flight level in lieu of an assigned altitude.

NOTE − 1. VFR − on − top is not permitted in certain airspace areas, such as Class A airspace, certain restricted areas, etc.

Consequently, IFR flights operating VFR − on − top will avoid such airspace.

2. See paragraph 33. of this section, IFR Separation Standards; GEN 3.3, paragraph 6, Position Reporting; and GEN 3.3, paragraph 7, Additional Reports.

43.13.1.2 By requesting a VFR − on − top clearance, the pilot assumes the sole responsibility to be vigilant so as to see and avoid other aircraft and to: a) Fly at the appropriate VFR altitude as prescribed in 14 CFR Section 91.159.

b) Comply with the VFR visibility and distance from clouds criteria in 14 CFR Section 91.155 (Basic VFR Weather Minimums).

c) Comply with instrument flight rules that are applicable to this flight; i.e., minimum IFR altitudes, position reporting, radio communications, course to be flown, adherence to ATC clearance, etc.

d) Advise ATC prior to any altitude change to ensure the exchange of accurate traffic information.

43.13.2 Controller 43.13.2.1 May clear an aircraft to maintain VFR − on − top if the pilot of an aircraft on an IFR flight plan requests the clearance.

43.13.2.2 Informs the pilot of an aircraft cleared to climb to VFR − on − top the reported height of the tops or that no top report is available; issues an alternate clearance if necessary; and once the aircraft reports reaching VFR − on − top, reclears the aircraft to maintain VFR − on − top.

43.13.2.3 Before issuing clearance, ascertains that the aircraft is not in or will not enter Class A airspace.

43.14 Instrument Departures 43.14.1 Pilot 43.14.1.1 Prior to departure, considers the type of terrain and other obstructions on or in the vicinity of the departure airport.

43.14.1.2 Determines if obstruction avoidance can be maintained visually or that the departure procedure should be followed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 80 United States of America 22 JAN 26 43.14.1.3 Determines whether an obstacle departure procedure (ODP) and/or DP is available for obstruction avoidance. One option may be a Visual Climb Over Airport (VCOA). Pilots must advise ATC as early as possible of the intent to fly the VCOA prior to departure.

43.14.1.4 At airports where instrument approach procedures have not been published, hence no published departure procedure, determines what action will be necessary and takes such action that will assure a safe departure.

43.14.2 Controller 43.14.2.1 At locations with airport traffic control service, when necessary, specifies direction of takeoff, turn, or initial heading to be flown after takeoff, consistent with published departure procedures (DP) or diverse vector areas (DVA), where applicable.

43.14.2.2 At locations without airport traffic control service but within Class E surface area, when necessary to specify direction of takeoff/turn or initial heading to be flown, obtains pilot’s concurrence that the procedure will allow him/her to comply with local traffic patterns, terrain, and obstruction avoidance.

43.14.2.3 When the initial heading will take the aircraft off an assigned procedure (for example, an RNAV SID with a published lateral path to a waypoint and crossing restrictions from the departure end of runway), the controller will assign an altitude to maintain with the initial heading.

43.14.2.4 Includes established departure procedures as part of the air traffic control clearance when pilot compliance is necessary to ensure separation.

43.14.2.5 At locations with both SIDs and DVAs, ATC will provide an amended departure clearance to cancel a previously assigned SID and subsequently utilize a DVA or vice versa. The amended clearance will be provided to the pilot in a timely manner so that the pilot may confirm adequate climb performance exists to determine if the amended clearance is acceptable, and brief the changes in advance of entering the runway.

43.14.2.6 At locations with a DVA, ATC is not permitted to utilize a SID and DVA concurrently.

43.15 Minimum Fuel Advisory 43.15.1 Pilot 43.15.1.1 Advises ATC of your “minimum fuel” status when your fuel supply has reached a state where, upon reaching destination, you cannot accept any undue delay.

43.15.1.2 Be aware that this is not an emergency situation but merely an advisory that indicates an emergency situation is possible should any undue delay occur.

43.15.1.3 On initial contact the term “minimum fuel” should be used after stating call sign.

EXAMPLE − Salt Lake Approach, United 621, “minimum fuel.” 43.15.1.4 Be aware a minimum fuel advisory does not imply a need for traffic priority.

43.15.1.5 If the remaining usable fuel supply suggests the need for traffic priority to ensure a safe landing, you should declare an emergency due to low fuel, and report the fuel remaining in minutes.

43.15.2 Controller 43.15.2.1 When an aircraft declares a state of “minimum fuel,” relay this information to the facility to whom control jurisdiction is transferred.

43.15.2.2 Be alert for any occurrence which might delay the aircraft.

44. Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS I & II) 44.1 TCAS I provides proximity warning only, to assist the pilot in the visual acquisition of intruder aircraft.

No recommended avoidance maneuvers are provided nor authorized as a direct result of a TCAS I warning. It is intended for use by smaller commuter aircraft holding 10 to 30 passenger seats, and general aviation aircraft.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 81 United States of America 22 JAN 26 44.2 TCAS II provides traffic advisories (TA) and resolution advisories (RA). Resolution advisories provide recommended maneuvers in a vertical direction (climb or descend only) to avoid conflicting traffic. Transport category aircraft, and larger commuter and business aircraft holding 31 passenger seats or more, are required to be TCAS II equipped.

44.2.1 When a TA occurs, attempt to establish visual contact with the traffic but do not deviate from an assigned clearance based only on TA information.

44.2.2 When an RA occurs, pilots should respond immediately to the RA displays and maneuver as indicated unless doing so would jeopardize the safe operation of the flight, or the flight crew can ensure separation with the help of definitive visual acquisition of the aircraft causing the RA.

44.2.3 Each pilot who deviates from an ATC clearance in response to an RA must notify ATC of that deviation as soon as practicable, and notify ATC when clear of conflict and returning to their previously assigned clearance.

44.3 Deviations from rules, policies, or clearances should be kept to the minimum necessary to satisfy an RA.

Most RA maneuvering requires minimum excursion from assigned altitude.

44.4 The serving IFR air traffic facility is not responsible to provide approved standard IFR separation to an IFR aircraft, from other aircraft, terrain, or obstructions after an RA maneuver until one of the following conditions exists: 44.4.1 The aircraft has returned to its assigned altitude and course.

44.4.2 Alternate ATC instructions have been issued.

44.4.3 A crew member informs ATC that the TCAS maneuver has been completed.

NOTE − TCAS does not alter or diminish the pilot’s basic authority and responsibility to ensure safe flight. Since TCAS does not respond to aircraft which are not transponder equipped or aircraft with a transponder failure, TCAS alone does not ensure safe separation in every case. At this time, no air traffic service nor handling is predicated on the availability of TCAS equipment in the aircraft.

45. Traffic Information Service (TIS) 45.1 Introduction The Traffic Information Service (TIS) provides information to the cockpit via data link, that is similar to VFR radar traffic advisories normally received over voice radio. Among the first FAA − provided data services, TIS is intended to improve the safety and efficiency of “see and avoid” flight through an automatic display that informs the pilot of nearby traffic and potential conflict situations. This traffic display is intended to assist the pilot in visual acquisition of these aircraft. TIS employs an enhanced capability of the terminal Mode S radar system, which contains the surveillance data, as well as the data link required to “uplink” this information to suitably − equipped aircraft (known as a TIS “client”). TIS provides estimated position, altitude, altitude trend, and ground track information for up to 8 intruder aircraft within 7 NM horizontally, +3,500 and − 3,000 feet vertically of the client aircraft (see FIG ENR 1.1 − 30 , TIS Proximity Coverage Volume). The range of a target reported at a distance greater than 7 NM only indicates that this target will be a threat within 34 seconds and does not display a precise distance. TIS will alert the pilot to aircraft (under surveillance of the Mode S radar) that are estimated to be within 34 seconds of potential collision, regardless of distance or altitude. TIS surveillance data is derived from the same radar used by ATC; this data is uplinked to the client aircraft on each radar scan (nominally every 5 seconds).

45.2 Requirements 45.2.1 In order to use TIS, the client and any intruder aircraft must be equipped with the appropriate cockpit equipment and fly within the radar coverage of a Mode S radar capable of providing TIS. Typically, this will be within 55 NM of the sites depicted in FIG ENR 1.1 − 31 , Terminal Mode S Radar Sites. ATC communication is not a requirement to receive TIS, although it may be required by the particular airspace or flight operations in which TIS is being used.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 82 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 30 TIS Proximity Coverage Volume FIG ENR 1.1 − 31 Terminal Mode S Radar Sites Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 83 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 32 Traffic Information Service (TIS) Avionics Block Diagram Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 84 United States of America 22 JAN 26 45.2.2 The cockpit equipment functionality required by a TIS client aircraft to receive the service consists of the following (refer to FIG ENR 1.1 − 32 ): 45.2.2.1 Mode S data link transponder with altitude encoder.

45.2.2.2 Data link applications processor with TIS software installed.

45.2.2.3 Control − display unit.

45.2.2.4 Optional equipment includes a digital heading source to correct display errors caused by “crab angle” and turning maneuvers.

NOTE − Some of the above functions will likely be combined into single pieces of avionics, such as subparagraphs 45.2.2.1 and 45.2.2.2.

45.2.3 To be visible to the TIS client, the intruder aircraft must, at a minimum, have an operating transponder (Mode A, C or S). All altitude information provided by TIS from intruder aircraft is derived from Mode C reports, if appropriately equipped.

45.2.4 TIS will initially be provided by the terminal Mode S systems that are paired with ASR − 9 digital primary radars. These systems are in locations with the greatest traffic densities, thus will provide the greatest initial benefit. The remaining terminal Mode S sensors, which are paired with ASR − 7 or ASR − 8 analog primary radars, will provide TIS pending modification or relocation of these sites. See FIG ENR 1.1 − 31 , Terminal Mode S Radar Sites, for site locations. There is no mechanism in place, such as NOTAMs, to provide status update on individual radar sites since TIS is a nonessential, supplemental information service.

The FAA also operates en route Mode S radars (not illustrated) that rotate once every 12 seconds. These sites will require additional development of TIS before any possible implementation. There are no plans to implement TIS in the en route Mode S radars at the present time.

45.3 Capabilities 45.3.1 TIS provides ground − based surveillance information over the Mode S data link to properly equipped client aircraft to aid in visual acquisition of proximate air traffic. The actual avionics capability of each installation will vary and the supplemental handbook material must be consulted prior to using TIS. A maximum of eight (8) intruder aircraft may be displayed; if more than eight aircraft match intruder parameters, the eight “most significant” intruders are uplinked. These “most significant” intruders are usually the ones in closest proximity and/or the greatest threat to the TIS client.

45.3.2 TIS, through the Mode S ground sensor, provides the following data on each intruder aircraft: 45.3.2.1 Relative bearing information in 6 − degree increments.

45.3.2.2 Relative range information in 1/8 NM to 1 NM increments (depending on range).

45.3.2.3 Relative altitude in 100 − foot increments (within 1,000 feet) or 500 − foot increments (from 1,000 − 3,500 feet) if the intruder aircraft has operating altitude reporting capability.

45.3.2.4 Estimated intruder ground track in 45 − degree increments.

45.3.2.5 Altitude trend data (level within 500 fpm or climbing/descending >500 fpm) if the intruder aircraft has operating altitude reporting capability.

45.3.2.6 Intruder priority as either a “traffic advisory” or “proximate” intruder.

45.3.3 When flying from surveillance coverage of one Mode S sensor to another, the transfer of TIS is an automatic function of the avionics system and requires no action from the pilot.

45.3.4 There are a variety of status messages that are provided by either the airborne system or ground equipment to alert the pilot of high priority intruders and data link system status. These messages include the following: 45.3.4.1 Alert. Identifies a potential collision hazard within 34 seconds. This alert may be visual and/or audible, such as a flashing display symbol or a headset tone. A target is a threat if the time to the closest approach Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 85 United States of America 22 JAN 26 in vertical and horizontal coordinates is less than 30 seconds and the closest approach is expected to be within 500 feet vertically and 0.5 nautical miles laterally.

45.3.4.2 TIS Traffic. TIS traffic data is displayed.

45.3.4.3 Coasting. The TIS display is more than 6 seconds old. This indicates a missing uplink from the ground system. When the TIS display information is more than 12 seconds old, the “No Traffic” status will be indicated.

45.3.4.4 No Traffic. No intruders meet proximate or alert criteria. This condition may exist when the TIS system is fully functional or may indicate “coasting” between 12 and 59 seconds old (see paragraph 45.3.4.3 above).

45.3.4.5 TIS Unavailable. The pilot has requested TIS, but no ground system is available. This condition will also be displayed when TIS uplinks are missing for 60 seconds or more.

45.3.4.6 TIS Disabled. The pilot has not requested TIS or has disconnected from TIS.

45.3.4.7 Good − bye. The client aircraft has flown outside of TIS coverage.

NOTE − Depending on the avionics manufacturer implementation, it is possible that some of these messages will not be directly available to the pilot.

45.3.5 Depending on avionics system design, TIS may be presented to the pilot in a variety of different displays, including text and/or graphics. Voice annunciation may also be used, either alone or in combination with a visual display. FIG ENR 1.1 − 32 , Traffic Information Service (TIS), Avionics Block Diagram, shows an example of a TIS display using symbology similar to the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) installed on most passenger air carrier/commuter aircraft in the U.S. The small symbol in the center represents the client aircraft and the display is oriented “track up,” with the 12 o’clock position at the top. The range rings indicate 2 and 5 NM. Each intruder is depicted by a symbol positioned at the approximate relative bearing and range from the client aircraft. The circular symbol near the center indicates an “alert” intruder and the diamond symbols indicate “proximate” intruders.

45.3.6 The inset in the lower right corner of FIG ENR 1.1 − 32 , Traffic Information Service (TIS), Avionics Block Diagram, shows a possible TIS data block display. The following information is contained in this data block: 45.3.6.1 The intruder, located approximately four o’clock, three miles, is a “proximate” aircraft and currently not a collision threat to the client aircraft. This is indicated by the diamond symbol used in this example.

45.3.6.2 The intruder ground track diverges to the right of the client aircraft, indicated by the small arrow.

45.3.6.3 The intruder altitude is 700 feet less than or below the client aircraft, indicated by the “ − 07” located under the symbol.

45.3.6.4 The intruder is descending >500 fpm, indicated by the downward arrow next to the “ − 07” relative altitude information. The absence of this arrow when an altitude tag is present indicates level flight or a climb/descent rate less than 500 fpm.

NOTE − If the intruder did not have an operating altitude encoder (Mode C), the altitude and altitude trend “tags” would have been omitted.

45.4 Limitations 45.4.1 TIS is NOT intended to be used as a collision avoidance system and does not relieve the pilot’s responsibility to “see and avoid” other aircraft (see paragraph 43.10, See and Avoid). TIS must not be used for avoidance maneuvers during IMC or other times when there is no visual contact with the intruder aircraft. TIS provides proximity warning only, to assist the pilot in the visual acquisition of intruder aircraft. It is intended for use by aircraft in which TCAS is not required. Avoidance maneuvers are neither provided nor authorized, as a direct result of a TIS intruder display or TIS alert.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 86 United States of America 22 JAN 26 45.4.2 TIS does not alter or diminish the pilot’s basic authority and responsibility to ensure safe flight. Since TIS does not respond to aircraft which are not transponder equipped, aircraft with a transponder failure, or aircraft out of radar coverage, TIS alone does not ensure safe separation in every case.

45.4.3 At this time, no air traffic service nor handling is predicated on the availability of TIS equipment in the aircraft.

45.4.4 While TIS is a useful aid to visual traffic avoidance, it has some system limitations that must be fully understood to ensure proper use. Many of these limitations are inherent in secondary radar surveillance. In other words, the information provided by TIS will be no better than that provided to ATC. Other limitations and anomalies are associated with the TIS predictive algorithm.

45.4.4.1 Intruder Display Limitations. TIS will only display aircraft with operating transponders installed.

TIS relies on surveillance of the Mode S radar, which is a “secondary surveillance” radar similar to the ATCRBS described in paragraph 38.2, Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS).

45.4.4.2 TIS Client Altitude Reporting Requirement. Altitude reporting is required by the TIS client aircraft in order to receive TIS. If the altitude encoder is inoperative or disabled, TIS will be unavailable, as TIS requests will not be honored by the ground system. As such, TIS requires altitude reporting to determine the Proximity Coverage Volume as indicated in FIG ENR 1.1 − 30. TIS users must be alert to altitude encoder malfunctions, as TIS has no mechanism to determine if client altitude reporting is correct. A failure of this nature will cause erroneous and possibly unpredictable TIS operation. If this malfunction is suspected, confirmation of altitude reporting with ATC is suggested.

45.4.4.3 Intruder Altitude Reporting. Intruders without altitude reporting capability will be displayed without the accompanying altitude tag. Additionally, nonaltitude reporting intruders are assumed to be at the same altitude as the TIS client for alert computations. This helps to ensure that the pilot will be alerted to all traffic under radar coverage, but the actual altitude difference may be substantial. Therefore, visual acquisition may be difficult in this instance.

45.4.4.4 Coverage Limitations. Since TIS is provided by ground − based, secondary surveillance radar, it is subject to all limitations of that radar. If an aircraft is not detected by the radar, it cannot be displayed on TIS.

Examples of these limitations are as follows: a) TIS will typically be provided within 55 NM of the radars depicted in FIG ENR 1.1 − 31 , Terminal Mode S Radar Sites. This maximum range can vary by radar site and is always subject to “line of sight” limitations; the radar and data link signals will be blocked by obstructions, terrain, and curvature of the earth.

b) TIS will be unavailable at low altitudes in many areas of the country, particularly in mountainous regions.

Also, when flying near the “floor” of radar coverage in a particular area, intruders below the client aircraft may not be detected by TIS.

c) TIS will be temporarily disrupted when flying directly over the radar site providing coverage if no adjacent site assumes the service. A ground − based radar, similar to a VOR or NDB, has a zenith cone, sometimes referred to as the cone of confusion or cone of silence. This is the area of ambiguity directly above the station where bearing information is unreliable. The zenith cone setting for TIS is 34 degrees: any aircraft above that angle with respect to the radar horizon will lose TIS coverage from that radar until it is below this 34 degree angle. The aircraft may not actually lose service in areas of multiple radar coverage since an adjacent radar will provide TIS.

If no other TIS − capable radar is available, the “Good − bye” message will be received and TIS terminated until coverage is resumed.

45.4.4.5 Intermittent Operations. TIS operation may be intermittent during turns or other maneuvering, particularly if the transponder system does not include antenna diversity (antenna mounted on the top and bottom of the aircraft). As in subparagraph 45.4.4.4 above, TIS is dependent on two − way, “line of sight” communications between the aircraft and the Mode S radar. Whenever the structure of the client aircraft comes between the transponder antenna (usually located on the underside of the aircraft) and the ground − based radar antenna, the signal may be temporarily interrupted.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 87 United States of America 22 JAN 26 45.4.4.6 TIS Predictive Algorithm. TIS information is collected one radar scan prior to the scan during which the uplink occurs. Therefore, the surveillance information is approximately 5 seconds old. In order to present the intruders in a “real time” position, TIS uses a “predictive algorithm” in its tracking software. This algorithm uses track history data to extrapolate intruders to their expected positions consistent with the time of display in the cockpit. Occasionally, aircraft maneuvering will cause this algorithm to induce errors in the TIS display.

These errors primarily affect relative bearing information; intruder distance and altitude will remain relatively accurate and may be used to assist in “see and avoid.” Some of the more common examples of these errors are as follows: a) When client or intruder aircraft maneuver excessively or abruptly, the tracking algorithm will report incorrect horizontal position until the maneuvering aircraft stabilizes.

b) When a rapidly closing intruder is on a course that crosses the client at a shallow angle (either overtaking or head on) and either aircraft abruptly changes course within ¼ NM, TIS will display the intruder on the opposite side of the client than it actually is.

These are relatively rare occurrences and will be corrected in a few radar scans once the course has stabilized.

45.4.4.7 Heading/Course Reference. Not all TIS aircraft installations will have onboard heading reference information. In these installations, aircraft course reference to the TIS display is provided by the Mode S radar.

The radar only determines ground track information and has no indication of the client aircraft heading. In these installations, all intruder bearing information is referenced to ground track and does not account for wind correction. Additionally, since ground − based radar will require several scans to determine aircraft course following a course change, a lag in TIS display orientation (intruder aircraft bearing) will occur. As in subparagraph 45.4.4.6 above, intruder distance and altitude are still usable.

45.4.4.8 Closely − Spaced Intruder Errors. When operating more than 30 NM from the Mode S sensor, TIS forces any intruder within 3/8 NM of the TIS client to appear at the same horizontal position as the client aircraft.

Without this feature, TIS could display intruders in a manner confusing to the pilot in critical situations (for example, a closely − spaced intruder that is actually to the right of the client may appear on the TIS display to the left). At longer distances from the radar, TIS cannot accurately determine relative bearing/distance information on intruder aircraft that are in close proximity to the client.

Because TIS uses a ground − based, rotating radar for surveillance information, the accuracy of TIS data is dependent on the distance from the sensor (radar) providing the service. This is much the same phenomenon as experienced with ground − based navigational aids, such as a VOR. As distance from the radar increases, the accuracy of surveillance decreases. Since TIS does not inform the pilot of distance from the Mode S radar, the pilot must assume that any intruder appearing at the same position as the client aircraft may actually be up to 3/8 NM away in any direction. Consistent with the operation of TIS, an alert on the display (regardless of distance from the radar) should stimulate an outside visual scan, intruder acquisition, and traffic avoidance based on outside reference.

45.5 Reports of TIS Malfunctions 45.5.1 Users of TIS can render valuable assistance in the early correction of malfunctions by reporting their observations of undesirable performance. Reporters should identify the time of observation, location, type and identity of aircraft, and describe the condition observed; the type of transponder processor, and software in use can also be useful information. Since TIS performance is monitored by maintenance personnel rather than ATC, it is suggested that malfunctions be reported by radio or telephone to the nearest Flight Service Station (FSS) facility.

NOTE − TIS operates at only those terminal Mode S radar sites depicted in FIG ENR 1.1 − 31 . Though similar in some ways, TIS is not related to TIS − B (Traffic Information Service − Broadcast).

46. Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) Services 46.1 Introduction Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 88 United States of America 22 JAN 26 46.1.1 Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) is a surveillance technology deployed throughout the NAS (see FIG ENR 1.1 − 33 ). The ADS − B system is composed of aircraft avionics and a ground infrastructure. Onboard avionics determine the position of the aircraft by using the GNSS and transmit its position along with additional information about the aircraft to ground stations for use by ATC and other ADS − B services. This information is transmitted at a rate of approximately once per second. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 34 and FIG ENR 1.1 − 35 .)

46.1.2 In the United States, ADS − B equipped aircraft exchange information on one of two frequencies: 978 or 1090 MHz. The 1090 MHz frequency is also associated with Mode A, C, and S transponder operations. 1090 MHz transponders with integrated ADS − B functionality extend the transponder message sets with additional ADS − B information. This additional information is known as an “extended squitter” message and is referred to as 1090ES. ADS − B equipment operating on 978 MHz is known as the Universal Access Transceiver (UAT).

46.1.3 ADS − B avionics can have the ability to both transmit and receive information. The transmission of ADS − B information from an aircraft is known as ADS − B Out. The receipt of ADS − B information by an aircraft is known as ADS − B In. All aircraft operating within the airspace defined in 14 CFR § 91.225 are required to transmit the information defined in § 91.227 using ADS − B Out avionics.

46.1.4 In general, operators flying at 18,000 feet and above (Class A airspace) are required to have 1090ES equipment. Those that do not fly above 18,000 may use either UAT or 1090ES equipment. (Refer to 14 CFR §§ 91.225 and 91.227.) While the regulations do not require it, operators equipped with ADS − B In will realize additional benefits from ADS − B broadcast services: Traffic Information Service – Broadcast (TIS − B) (paragraph 47.) and Flight Information Service − Broadcast (FIS − B) (paragraph 48. ).

FIG ENR 1.1 − 33 ADS − B, TIS − B, and FIS − B: Broadcast Services Architecture Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 89 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.1 − 34 En Route − ADS − B/ADS − R/TIS − B/FIS − B Service Ceilings/Floors FIG ENR 1.1 − 35 Terminal − ADS − B/ADS − R/TIS − B/FIS − B Service Ceilings/Floors 46.2 ADS − B Certification and Performance Requirements ADS − B equipment may be certified as a surveillance source for air traffic separation services using ADS − B Out.

ADS − B equipment may also be certified for use with ADS − B In advisory services that enable appropriately equipped aircraft to display traffic and flight information. Refer to the aircraft’s flight manual supplement or Pilot Operating Handbook for the capabilities of a specific aircraft installation.

46.3 ADS − B Capabilities and Procedures 46.3.1 ADS − B enables improved surveillance services, both air − to − air and air − to − ground, especially in areas where radar is ineffective due to terrain or where it is impractical or cost prohibitive. Initial NAS applications Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 90 United States of America 22 JAN 26 of air − to − air ADS − B are for “advisory” use only, enhancing a pilot’s visual acquisition of other nearby equipped aircraft either when airborne or on the airport surface. Additionally, ADS − B will enable ATC and fleet operators to monitor aircraft throughout the available ground station coverage area.

46.3.2 One of the data elements transmitted by ADS − B is the aircraft’s Flight Identification (FLT ID). The FLT ID is comprised of a maximum of seven alphanumeric characters and must correspond to the aircraft identification filed in the flight plan. For airline and commuter aircraft, the FLT ID is usually the company name and flight number (for example, AAL3432), and is typically entered into the avionics by the flight crew during preflight. For general aviation (GA), if aircraft avionics allow dynamic modification of the FLT ID, the pilot can enter it prior to flight. However, some ADS − B avionics require the FLT ID to be set to the aircraft registration number (for example, N1234Q) by the installer and cannot be changed by the pilot from the cockpit. In both cases, the FLT ID must correspond to the aircraft identification filed in its flight plan.

ATC automation systems use the transmitted ADS − B FLT ID to uniquely identify each aircraft within a given airspace, and to correlate it to its filed flight plan for the purpose of providing surveillance and separation services. If the FLT ID and the filed aircraft identification are not identical, a Call Sign Mis − Match (CSMM) is generated and ATC automation systems may not associate the aircraft with its filed flight plan. In this case, air traffic services may be delayed or unavailable until the CSMM is corrected. Consequently, it is imperative that flight crews and GA pilots ensure the FLT ID entry correctly matches the aircraft identification filed in their flight plan.

46.3.3 Each ADS − B aircraft is assigned a unique ICAO address (also known as a 24 − bit address) that is broadcast by the ADS − B transmitter. This ICAO address is programmed at installation. Should multiple aircraft broadcast the same ICAO address while transiting the same ADS − B Only Service Volume, the ADS − B network may be unable to track the targets correctly. If radar reinforcement is available, tracking will continue. If radar is unavailable, the controller may lose target tracking entirely on one or both targets. Consequently, it is imperative that the ICAO address entry is correct.

46.3.4 Aircraft that are equipped with ADS − B avionics on the UAT datalink have a feature that allows them to broadcast an anonymous 24 − bit ICAO address. In this mode, the UAT system creates a randomized address that does not match the actual ICAO address assigned to the aircraft. The UAT anonymous 24 − bit address feature may only be used when the operator has not filed an IFR flight plan and is not requesting ATC services. In the anonymity mode, the aircraft’s beacon code must be set to 1200 and, depending on the manufacturer’s implementation, the aircraft FLT ID might not be transmitted. Pilots should be aware that while in UAT anonymity mode, they will not be eligible to receive ATC separation and flight following services, and may not benefit from enhanced ADS − B search and rescue capabilities.

46.3.5 ADS − B systems integrated with the transponder will automatically set the applicable emergency status when 7500, 7600, or 7700 are entered into the transponder. ADS − B systems not integrated with the transponder, or systems with optional emergency codes, will require that the appropriate emergency code is entered through a pilot interface. ADS − B is intended for inflight and airport surface use. Unless otherwise directed by ATC, transponder/ADS − B systems should be turned “on” and remain “on” whenever operating in the air or on the airport surface movement area.

46.4 ATC Surveillance Services using ADS − B − Procedures and Recommended Phraseology Radar procedures, with the exceptions found in this paragraph, are identical to those procedures prescribed for radar in the AIP.

46.4.1 Preflight: If ATC services are anticipated when either a VFR or IFR flight plan is filed, the aircraft identification (as entered in the flight plan) must be entered as the FLT ID in the ADS − B avionics as described in paragraph 46.3.2 .

46.4.2 Inflight: When requesting surveillance services while airborne, pilots must disable the anonymous feature, if so equipped, prior to contacting ATC. Pilots must also ensure that their transmitted ADS − B FLT ID matches the aircraft identification as entered in their flight plan.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 91 United States of America 22 JAN 26 46.4.3 Aircraft with an Inoperative/Malfunctioning ADS − B Transmitter: 46.4.3.1 ATC will inform the flight crew when the aircraft’s ADS − B transmitter appears to be inoperative or malfunctioning: PHRASEOLOGY − YOUR ADS − B TRANSMITTER APPEARS TO BE INOPERATIVE/MALFUNCTIONING. STOP ADS − B TRANSMISSIONS.

46.4.3.2 ATC will inform the flight crew if it becomes necessary to turn off the aircraft’s ADS − B transmitter.

PHRASEOLOGY − STOP ADS − B TRANSMISSIONS.

46.4.3.3 Other malfunctions and considerations: Loss of automatic altitude reporting capabilities (encoder failure) will result in loss of ATC altitude advisory services.

46.4.4 Procedures for Accommodation of Non − ADS − B Equipped Aircraft: 46.4.4.1 Pilots of aircraft not equipped with ADS − B may only operate outside airspace designated as ADS − B airspace in 14 CFR §91.225. Pilots of unequipped aircraft wishing to fly any portion of a flight in ADS − B airspace may seek a deviation from the regulation to conduct operations without the required equipment.

Direction for obtaining this deviation are available in Advisory Circular 90 − 114.

46.4.4.2 While air traffic controllers can identify which aircraft are ADS − B equipped and which are not, there is no indication if a non − equipped pilot has obtained a preflight authorization to enter ADS − B airspace.

Situations may occur when the pilot of a non − equipped aircraft, without an authorization to operate in ADS − B airspace receives an ATC − initiated in − flight clearance to fly a heading, route, or altitude that would penetrate ADS − B airspace. Such clearances may be for traffic, weather, or simply to shorten the aircraft’s route of flight.

When this occurs, the pilot should acknowledge and execute the clearance, but must advise the controller that they are not ADS − B equipped and have not received prior authorization to operate in ADS − B airspace. The controller, at their discretion, will either acknowledge and proceed with the new clearance, or modify the clearance to avoid ADS − B airspace. In either case, the FAA will normally not take enforcement action for non − equipage in these circumstances.

NOTE − Pilots operating without ADS − B equipment must not request route or altitude changes that will result in an incursion into ADS − B airspace except for safety of flight; for example, weather avoidance. Unequipped aircraft that have not received a pre − flight deviation authorization will only be considered in compliance with regulation if the amendment to flight is initiated by ATC.

EXAMPLE − 1. ATC: “November Two Three Quebec, turn fifteen degrees left, proceed direct Bradford when able, rest of route unchanged.” Aircraft: “November Two Three Quebec, turning fifteen degrees left, direct Bradford when able, rest of route unchanged.

Be advised, we are negative ADS − B equipment and have not received authorization to operate in ADS − B airspace.” ATC : “November Two Three Quebec, roger” or “November Two Three Quebec, roger, turn twenty degrees right, rejoin Victor Ten, rest of route unchanged.” 2. ATC: “November Four Alpha Tango, climb and maintain one zero thousand for traffic.” Aircraft: “November Four Alpha Tango, leaving eight thousand for one zero thousand. Be advised, we are negative ADS − B equipment and have not received authorization to operate in ADS − B airspace.” ATC: “November Four Alpha Tango, roger” or “November Four Alpha Tango, roger, cancel climb clearance, maintain eight thousand.” REFERENCE − Federal Register Notice, Volume 84, Number 62, dated April 1, 2019 46.5 ADS − B Limitations 46.5.1 The ADS − B cockpit display of traffic is NOT intended to be used as a collision avoidance system and does not relieve the pilot’s responsibility to “see and avoid” other aircraft. (See paragraph 43.10, See and Avoid).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 92 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ADS − B provides proximity warning only to assist the pilot in the visual acquisition of other aircraft. ADS − B must not be used for avoidance maneuvers during IMC or other times when there is no visual contact with the intruder aircraft. No avoidance maneuvers are provided or authorized, as a direct result of an ADS − B display or an ADS − B alert.

46.5.2 ADS − B does not alter or diminish the pilot’s basic authority and responsibility to ensure safe flight.

ADS − B only displays aircraft that are ADS − B equipped; therefore, aircraft that are not ADS − B equipped or aircraft that are experiencing an ADS − B failure will not be displayed. ADS − B alone does not ensure safe separation.

46.5.3 Presently, no air traffic services or handling is predicated on the availability of an ADS − B cockpit display.

A “traffic − in − sight” reply to ATC must be based on seeing an aircraft out − the − window, NOT on the cockpit display.

46.6 Reports of ADS − B Malfunctions Users of ADS − B can provide valuable assistance in the correction of malfunctions by reporting instances of undesirable system performance. Since ADS − B performance is monitored by maintenance personnel rather than ATC, report malfunctions to the nearest Flight Service Station (FSS) facility by radio or telephone, or by sending an email to the ADS − B help desk at adsb@faa.gov. Reports should include: 46.6.1 Condition observed; 46.6.2 Date and time of observation; 46.6.3 Altitude and location of observation; 46.6.4 Type and call sign of the aircraft; and 46.6.5 Type and software version of avionics system.

47. Traffic Information Service − Broadcast (TIS − B) 47.1 Introduction TIS − B is the broadcast of ATC derived traffic information to ADS − B equipped (1090ES or UAT) aircraft from ground radio stations. The source of this traffic information is derived from ground − based air traffic surveillance sensors. TIS − B service will be available throughout the NAS where there are both adequate surveillance coverage from ground sensors and adequate broadcast coverage from ADS − B ground radio stations. The quality level of traffic information provided by TIS − B is dependent upon the number and type of ground sensors available as TIS − B sources and the timeliness of the reported data. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 34 and FIG ENR 1.1 − 35.)

47.2 TIS − B Requirements In order to receive TIS − B service, the following conditions must exist: 47.2.1 Aircraft must be equipped with an ADS − B transmitter/receiver or transceiver, and a cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI).

47.2.2 Aircraft must fly within the coverage volume of a compatible ground radio station that is configured for TIS − B uplinks. (Not all ground radio stations provide TIS − B due to a lack of radar coverage or because a radar feed is not available).

47.2.3 Aircraft must be within the coverage of and detected by at least one ATC radar serving the ground radio station in use.

47.3 TIS − B Capabilities 47.3.1 TIS − B is intended to provide ADS − B equipped aircraft with a more complete traffic picture in situations where not all nearby aircraft are equipped with ADS − B Out. This advisory − only application is intended to enhance a pilot’s visual acquisition of other traffic.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 93 United States of America 22 JAN 26 47.3.2 Only transponder − equipped targets (i.e., Mode A/C or Mode S transponders) are transmitted through the ATC ground system architecture. Current radar siting may result in limited radar surveillance coverage at lower altitudes near some airports, with subsequently limited TIS − B service volume coverage. If there is no radar coverage in a given area, then there will be no TIS − B coverage in that area.

47.4 TIS − B Limitations 47.4.1 TIS − B is NOT intended to be used as a collision avoidance system and does not relieve the pilot’s responsibility to “see and avoid” other aircraft, in accordance with 14 CFR §91.113b. TIS − B must not be used for avoidance maneuvers during times when there is no visual contact with the intruder aircraft. TIS − B is intended only to assist in the visual acquisition of other aircraft.

NOTE − No aircraft avoidance maneuvers are authorized as a direct result of a TIS − B target being displayed in the cockpit.

47.4.2 While TIS − B is a useful aid to visual traffic avoidance, its inherent system limitations must be understood to ensure proper use.

47.4.2.1 A pilot may receive an intermittent TIS − B target of themselves, typically when maneuvering (e.g., climbing turns) due to the radar not tracking the aircraft as quickly as ADS − B.

47.4.2.2 The ADS − B − to − radar association process within the ground system may at times have difficulty correlating an ADS − B report with corresponding radar returns from the same aircraft. When this happens the pilot may see duplicate traffic symbols (i.e., “TIS − B shadows”) on the cockpit display.

47.4.2.3 Updates of TIS − B traffic reports will occur less often than ADS − B traffic updates. TIS − B position updates will occur approximately once every 3 − 13 seconds depending on the type of radar system in use within the coverage area. In comparison, the update rate for ADS − B is nominally once per second.

47.4.2.4 The TIS − B system only uplinks data pertaining to transponder − equipped aircraft. Aircraft without a transponder will not be displayed as TIS − B traffic.

47.4.2.5 There is no indication provided when any aircraft is operating inside or outside the TIS − B service volume, therefore it is difficult to know if one is receiving uplinked TIS − B traffic information.

47.4.3 Pilots and operators are reminded that the airborne equipment that displays TIS − B targets is for pilot situational awareness only and is not approved as a collision avoidance tool. Unless there is an imminent emergency requiring immediate action, any deviation from an air traffic control clearance in response to perceived converging traffic appearing on a TIS − B display must be approved by the controlling ATC facility before commencing the maneuver, except as permitted under certain conditions in 14CFR §91.123.

Uncoordinated deviations may place an aircraft in close proximity to other aircraft under ATC control not seen on the airborne equipment and may result in a pilot deviation or other incident.

47.5 Reports of TIS − B Malfunctions Users of TIS − B can provide valuable assistance in the correction of malfunctions by reporting instances of undesirable system performance. Since TIS − B performance is monitored by maintenance personnel rather than ATC, report malfunctions to the nearest Flight Service Station (FSS) facility by radio or telephone, or by sending an email to the ADS − B help desk at adsb@faa.gov. Reports should include: 47.5.1 Condition observed; 47.5.2 Date and time of observation; 47.5.3 Altitude and location of observation; 47.5.4 Type and call sign of the aircraft; and 47.5.5 Type and software version of avionics system.

48. Flight Information Service − Broadcast (FIS − B) 48.1 Introduction.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 94 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIS − B is a ground broadcast service provided through the ADS − B Services network over the 978 MHz UAT data link. The FAA FIS − B system provides pilots and flight crews of properly equipped aircraft with a cockpit display of certain aviation weather and aeronautical information. FIS − B reception is line − of − sight within the service volume of the ground infrastructure. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 34 and FIG ENR 1.1 − 35 .)

48.2 Weather Products Provided by FIS − B.

FIS-B does not replace a preflight weather briefing from a source listed in GEN 3.5, paragraph 3.5, FAA Weather Services, or inflight updates from an FSS or ATC. FIS-B information may be used by the pilot for the safe conduct of flight and aircraft movement; however, the information should not be the only source of weather or aeronautical information. A pilot should be particularly alert and understand the limitations and quality assurance issues associated with individual products. This includes graphical representation of next generation weather radar (NEXRAD) imagery and Notices to Airmen (NOTAM)/temporary flight restrictions (TFR).

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 3.5, Para 7, Flight Information Services (FIS).

Advisory Circular AC 00 − 63, Use of Cockpit Displays of Digital Weather and Aeronautical Information.

48.3 Reports of FIS − B Malfunctions.

Users of FIS − B can provide valuable assistance in the correction of malfunctions by reporting instances of undesirable system performance. Since FIS − B performance is monitored by maintenance personnel rather than ATC, report malfunctions to the nearest Flight Service Station (FSS) facility by radio or telephone, or by sending an email to the ADS − B help desk at adsb@faa.gov. Reports should include: 48.3.1 Condition observed; 48.3.2 Date and time of observation; 48.3.3 Altitude and location of observation; 48.3.4 Type and call sign of the aircraft; and 48.3.5 Type and software version of avionics system.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.1 − 95 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.1 − 6 FIS − B Over UAT Product Update and Transmission Intervals Transmission Basic Product Update Interval Interval (95%) Product AIRMET As Available 5 minutes Yes As Available, then at 15 minute AWW/WW 5 minutes No intervals for 1 hour Ceiling As Available 10 minutes No As Available, then at 15 minute 5 minutes Yes Convective SIGMET intervals for 1 hour D − ATIS As Available 1 minute No Echo Top 5 minutes 5 minutes No 1 minute (where available), As METAR/SPECI 5 minutes Yes Available otherwise MRMS NEXRAD (CONUS) 2 minutes 15 minutes Yes MRMS NEXRAD (Regional) 2 minutes 2.5 minutes Yes As Available NOTAMs − D/FDC 10 minutes Yes NOTAMs − TFR As Available 10 minutes Yes PIREP As Available 10 minutes Yes As Available, then at 15 minute SIGMET 5 minutes Yes intervals for 1 hour As Available SUA Status 10 minutes Yes TAF/AMEND 6 Hours ( ± 15 minutes) 10 minutes Yes Temperature Aloft 12 Hours ( ± 15 minutes) 10 minutes Yes TWIP As Available 1 minute No Winds aloft 12 Hours ( ± 15 minutes) 10 minutes Yes Lightning strikes 5 minutes 5 minutes Yes Turbulence 1 minute 15 minutes Yes 60 minutes 15 minutes Yes Icing, Forecast Potential (FIP) Cloud tops 30 minutes 15 minutes Yes 1 Minute AWOS 1 minute 10 minutes No Graphical − AIRMET As Available 5 minutes Yes Center Weather Advisory (CWA) As Available 10 minutes Yes Temporary Restricted Areas (TRA) As Available 10 minutes Yes Temporary Military Operations Areas As Available 10 minutes Yes (TMOA) The Update Interval is the rate at which the product data is available from the source.

The Transmission Interval is the amount of time within which a new or updated product transmission must be completed (95%) and the rate or repetition interval at which the product is rebroadcast (95%).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.1 − 96 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − 1. Details concerning the content, format, and symbols of the various data link products provided should be obtained from the specific avionics manufacturer.

2. NOTAM − D and NOTAM − FDC products broadcast via FIS − B are limited to those issued or effective within the past 30 days.

49. Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Rebroadcast (ADS − R) 49.1 Introduction.

ADS − R is a datalink translation function of the ADS − B ground system required to accommodate the two separate operating frequencies (978 MHz and 1090 ES). The ADS − B system receives the ADS − B messages transmitted on one frequency and ADS − R translates and reformats the information for rebroadcast and use on the other frequency. This allows ADS − B In equipped aircraft to see nearby ADS − B Out traffic regardless of the operating link of the other aircraft. Aircraft operating on the same ADS − B frequency exchange information directly and do not require the ADS − R translation function. (See FIG ENR 1.1 − 34 and FIG ENR 1.1 − 35 .)

49.2 Reports of ADS − R Malfunctions.

Users of ADS–R can provide valuable assistance in the correction of malfunctions by reporting instances of undesirable system performance. Since ADS–R performance is monitored by maintenance personnel rather than ATC, report malfunctions to the nearest Flight Service Station (FSS) facility by radio or telephone, or by sending an email to the ADS − B help desk at adsb@faa.gov. Reports should include: 49.2.1 Condition observed; 49.2.2 Date and time of observation; 49.2.3 Altitude and location of observation; 49.2.4 Type and call sign of the aircraft; and 49.2.5 Type and software version of avionics system.

50. Heavy Traffic Around Military Fields 50.1 Pilots are advised to exercise vigilance when in close proximity to most military airports. These airports may have jet aircraft traffic patterns extending up to 2,500 feet above the surface. In addition, they may have an unusually heavy concentration of jet aircraft operating within a 25 − nautical mile radius and from the surface to all altitudes. The precautionary note also applies to the larger civil airports.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.2 Visual Flight Rules

See ENR 1.1 , ENR 1.4 , and ENR 1.10 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.3 Instrument Flight Rules

See ENR 1.1 , ENR 1.4 , and ENR 1.10 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.4 ATS Airspace Classification

1. General 1.1 There are two categories of airspace or airspace areas: 1.1.1 Regulatory (Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, restricted and prohibited areas).

1.1.2 Nonregulatory (military operations areas [MOA], warning areas, alert areas, controlled firing areas [CFA], and national security areas [NSA]).

NOTE − Additional information on special use airspace (prohibited areas, restricted areas [permanent or temporary], warning areas, MOAs [permanent or temporary], alert areas, CFAs, and NSAs) may be found in Section ENR 5.1, Prohibited, Restricted and Other Areas, paragraph 1 and Section ENR 5.2, Military Exercise and Training Areas, paragraphs 1. through 3.

1.2 Within these two categories, there are four types: 1.2.1 Controlled.

1.2.2 Uncontrolled.

1.2.3 Special use.

1.2.4 Other airspace.

1.3 The categories and types of airspace are dictated by: 1.3.1 The complexity or density of aircraft movements.

1.3.2 The nature of the operations conducted within the airspace.

1.3.3 The level of safety required.

1.3.4 The national and public interest.

1.4 It is important that pilots be familiar with the operational requirements for each of the various types or classes of airspace. Subsequent sections will cover each class in sufficient detail to facilitate understanding.

1.5 General Dimensions of Airspace Segments 1.5.1 Refer to Title 14 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) for specific dimensions, exceptions, geographical areas covered, exclusions, specific transponder/ADS − B or other equipment requirements, and flight operations.

REFERENCE − See GEN 1.7, Annex 2, for U.S. Differences From ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures.

1.6 Hierarchy of Overlapping Airspace Designations 1.6.1 When overlapping airspace designations apply to the same airspace, the operating rules associated with the more restrictive airspace designation apply.

1.6.2 For the purpose of clarification: 1.6.2.1 Class A airspace is more restrictive than Class B, Class C, Class D, Class E, or Class G airspace.

1.6.2.2 Class B airspace is more restrictive than Class C, Class D, Class E, or Class G airspace.

1.6.2.3 Class C airspace is more restrictive than Class D, Class E, or Class G airspace.

1.6.2.4 Class D airspace is more restrictive than Class E or Class G airspace.

1.6.2.5 Class E is more restrictive than Class G airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.7 Basic VFR Weather Minimums 1.7.1 No person may operate an aircraft under basic VFR when the flight visibility is less, or at a distance from clouds that is less, than that prescribed for the corresponding altitude and class of airspace. (See TBL ENR 1.4 − 1 .)

NOTE − Student pilots must comply with 14 CFR Section 61.89(A) (6) and (7).

1.7.2 Except as provided in 14 CFR Section 91.157, Special VFR Minimums, no person may operate an aircraft beneath the ceiling under VFR within the lateral boundaries of controlled airspace designated to the surface for an airport when the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet. (See 14 CFR Section 91.155(c).)

1.8 VFR Cruising Altitudes and Flight Levels (See TBL ENR 1.4 − 2 .)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.4 − 1 Basic VFR Weather Minimums Airspace Flight Visibility Distance from Clouds Class A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not Applicable Not Applicable Class B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles Clear of Clouds Class C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal Class D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal Class E Less than 10,000 feet MSL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal At or above 10,000 feet MSL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 statute miles 1,000 feet below 1,000 feet above 1 statute mile horizontal Class G 1,200 feet or less above the surface (regardless of MSL altitude).

For aircraft other than helicopters: 1 statute mile Clear of clouds Day, except as provided in 14 CFR § 91.155(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Night, except as provided in 14 CFR § 91.155(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal For helicopters: Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ½ statute mile Clear of clouds 1 statute mile Clear of clouds Night, except as provided in § 91.155(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

More than 1,200 feet above the surface but less than 10,000 feet MSL.

Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 statute mile 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal Night . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 statute miles 500 feet below 1,000 feet above 2,000 feet horizontal More than 1,200 feet above the surface and at or above 10,000 5 statute miles 1,000 feet below feet MSL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,000 feet above 1 statute mile horizontal TBL ENR 1.4 − 2 VFR Cruising Altitudes and Flight Levels If your magnetic course And you are more than 3,000 feet above the And you are above 18,000 feet MSL (ground track) is: surface but below 18,000 feet MSL, fly: to FL 290, fly: 0 to 179 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Odd thousands MSL, plus 500 feet (3,500; Odd Flight Levels plus 500 feet 5,500; 7,500, etc.) (FL 195; FL 215; FL 235, etc.)

180 to 359 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Even thousands MSL, plus 500 feet Even Flight Levels plus 500 feet (4,500; 6,500; 8,500, etc.) (FL 185; FL 205; FL 225, etc.)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2. Controlled Airspace 2.1 General 2.1.1 Controlled Airspace. A generic term that covers the different classification of airspace (Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, and Class E airspace) and defined dimensions within which air traffic control service is provided to IFR flights and to VFR flights in accordance with the airspace classification. (See FIG ENR 1.4 − 1 for Airspace Classes). Airspace classes are pronounced in the ICAO phonetics for clarification. The term “class” may be dropped when referring to airspace in pilot/controller communications.

2.1.2 IFR Requirements. IFR operations in any class of controlled airspace requires that a pilot must file an IFR flight plan and receive an appropriate ATC clearance.

2.1.3 IFR Separation. Standard IFR separation is provided to all aircraft operating under IFR in controlled airspace.

2.1.4 VFR Requirements. It is the responsibility of the pilot to insure that ATC clearance or radio communication requirements are met prior to entry into Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace. The pilot retains this responsibility when receiving ATC radar advisories. (See 14 CFR Part 91.)

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 91.

2.1.5 Traffic Advisories. Traffic advisories will be provided to all aircraft as the controller’s work situation permits.

2.1.6 Safety Alerts. Safety Alerts are mandatory services and are provided to ALL aircraft. There are two types of Safety Alerts, Terrain/Obstruction Alert and Aircraft Conflict/Mode Intruder Alert.

2.1.6.1 Terrain/Obstruction Alert. A Terrain/Obstruction Alert is issued when, in the controller’s judgment, an aircraft’s altitude places it in unsafe proximity to terrain and/or obstructions.

FIG ENR 1.4 − 1 Airspace Classes 2.1.6.2 Aircraft Conflict/Mode C Intruder Alert. An Aircraft Conflict/Mode C Intruder Alert is issued if the controller observes another aircraft which places it in an unsafe proximity. When feasible, the controller will offer the pilot an alternative course of action.

2.1.7 Ultralight Vehicles. No person may operate an ultralight vehicle within Class A, Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport unless that person has prior authorization from the ATC facility having jurisdiction over that airspace. (See 14 CFR Part 103.)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.1.8 Unmanned Free Balloons. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, no person may operate an unmanned free balloon below 2,000 feet above the surface within the lateral boundaries of Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace designated for an airport. (See 14 CFR Part 101.)

2.1.9 Parachute Jumps. No person may make a parachute jump, and no pilot in command may allow a parachute jump to be made from that aircraft, in or into Class A, Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace without, or in violation of, the terms of an ATC authorization issued by the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the airspace. (See 14 CFR Part 105.)

2.2 Class A Airspace 2.2.1 Definition. Generally, that airspace from 18,000 feet MSL up to and including FL 600, including the airspace overlying the waters within 12 nautical miles off the coast of the 48 contiguous States and Alaska; and designated international airspace beyond 12 nautical miles off the coast of the 48 contiguous States and Alaska within areas of domestic radio navigational signal or ATC radar coverage, and within which domestic procedures are applied.

2.2.2 Operating Rules and Pilot/Equipment Requirements. Unless otherwise authorized, all persons must operate their aircraft under IFR.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 71.33, Sections 91.167 through 91.193, Sections 91.215 through 91.217, and Sections 91.225 through 91.227.

2.2.3 Charts. Class A airspace is not specifically charted.

2.3 Class B Airspace 2.3.1 Definition. Generally, that airspace from the surface to 10,000 feet MSL surrounding the nation’s busiest airports in terms of IFR operations or passenger enplanements. The configuration of each Class B airspace area is individually tailored and consists of a surface area and two or more layers (some Class B airspace areas resemble upside − down wedding cakes), and is designed to contain all published instrument procedures once an aircraft enters the airspace. An ATC clearance is required for all aircraft to operate in the area, and all aircraft that are so cleared receive separation services within the airspace. The cloud clearance requirement for VFR operations is “clear of clouds.” 2.3.2 Operating Rules and Pilot/Equipment Requirements. Regardless of weather conditions, an ATC clearance is required prior to operating within Class B airspace. Pilots should not request a clearance to operate within Class B airspace unless the requirements of 14 CFR Sections 91.131, 91.215, and 91.225 are met.

Included among these requirements are: 2.3.2.1 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, aircraft must be equipped with an operable two − way radio capable of communicating with ATC on appropriate frequencies for that Class B airspace.

2.3.2.2 No person may take off or land a civil aircraft at the following primary airports within Class B airspace unless the pilot in command holds at least a private pilot certificate: a) Andrews Air Force Base, MD.

b) Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, GA.

c) Boston Logan Airport, MA.

d) Chicago O’Hare Intl. Airport, IL.

e) Dallas/Fort Worth Intl. Airport, TX.

f) Los Angeles Intl. Airport, CA.

g) Miami Intl. Airport, FL.

h) Newark Intl. Airport, NJ.

i) New York Kennedy Airport, NY.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 j) New York La Guardia Airport, NY.

k) Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, DC.

l) San Francisco Intl. Airport, CA.

2.3.2.3 No person may take off or land a civil aircraft at an airport within Class B airspace or operate a civil aircraft within Class B airspace unless: a) The pilot in command holds at least a private pilot certificate; or b) The pilot − in − command holds a recreational pilot certificate and has met the requirements of 14 CFR Section 61.101; or c) The pilot − in − command holds a sport pilot certificate and has met the requirements of 14 CFR Section 61.325; or d) The aircraft is operated by a student pilot: 1) Who seeks a private pilot certificate and has met the requirements of 14 CFR Section 61.95.

2) Who seeks a recreational pilot or sport pilot certificate and has met the requirements of 14 CFR Section 61.94.

2.3.2.4 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each person operating a large turbine engine − powered airplane to or from a primary airport must operate at or above the designated floors while within the lateral limits of Class B airspace.

2.3.2.5 Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each aircraft must be equipped as follows: a) For IFR operations, an operable VOR or TACAN receiver or an operable and suitable RNAV system; and b) For all operations, a two − way radio capable of communications with ATC on appropriate frequencies for that area.

c) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, an operable radar beacon transponder with automatic altitude reporting capability and operable ADS − B Out equipment.

NOTE − ATC may, upon notification, immediately authorize a deviation from the altitude reporting equipment requirement; however, a request for a deviation from the 4096 transponder equipment requirement must be submitted to the controlling ATC facility at least one hour before the proposed operation. A request for a deviation from the ADS − B equipage requirement must be submitted using the FAA’s automated web authorization tool at least one hour but not more than 24 hours before the proposed operation. (See ENR 1.1, paragraph 38.7, Transponder Operation).

2.3.2.6 Mode C Veil a) The airspace within 30 nautical miles of an airport listed in Appendix D, Section 1 of 14 CFR Part 91 (generally primary airports within Class B airspace areas), from the surface upward to 10,000 feet mean seal level (MSL). Unless otherwise authorized by air traffic control, aircraft operating within this airspace must be equipped with operable radar beacon transponder with automatic altitude reporting capability and operable ADS − B Out equipment.

b) However, aircraft that were not originally certificated with an engine − driven electrical system or that have not subsequently been certified with a system installed may conduct operations within a Mode C veil provided the aircraft remains outside Class A, B or C airspace; and below the altitude of the ceiling of a Class B or Class C airspace area designated for an airport or 10,000 feet MSL, whichever is lower.

2.3.3 Charts. Class B airspace is charted on Sectional Charts, IFR En Route Low Altitude Charts, and Terminal Area Charts.

2.3.4 Flight Procedures 2.3.4.1 Flights. Aircraft within Class B airspace are required to operate in accordance with current IFR procedures. A clearance for a visual approach to a primary airport is not authorization for turbine powered airplanes to operate below the designated floors of the Class B airspace.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.3.4.2 VFR Flights a) Arriving aircraft must obtain an ATC clearance prior to entering Class B airspace and must contact ATC on the appropriate frequency, and in relation to geographical fixes shown on local charts. Although a pilot may be operating beneath the floor of the Class B airspace on initial contact, communications with ATC should be established in relation to the points indicated for spacing and sequencing purposes.

b) Departing aircraft require a clearance to depart Class B airspace and should advise the clearance delivery position of their intended altitude and route of flight. ATC will normally advise VFR aircraft when leaving the geographical limits of the Class B airspace. Radar service is not automatically terminated with this advisory unless specifically stated by the controller.

c) Aircraft not landing or departing the primary airport may obtain an ATC clearance to transit the Class B airspace when traffic conditions permit and provided the requirements of 14 CFR Section 91.131 are met. Such VFR aircraft are encouraged, to the extent possible, to operate at altitudes above or below the Class B airspace or transit through established VFR corridors. Pilots operating in VFR corridors are urged to use frequency 122.750 MHz for the exchange of aircraft position information.

2.3.5 ATC Clearances and Separation. An ATC clearance is required to enter and operate within Class B airspace. VFR pilots are provided sequencing and separation from other aircraft while operating within Class B airspace. (See ENR 1.1 , paragraph 40. , Terminal Radar Service for VFR Aircraft.)

NOTE − Separation and sequencing of VFR will be suspended in the event of a power outage as this service is dependent on radar.

The pilot will be advised that the service is not available and issued wind, runway information, and the time or place to contact the tower.

2.3.5.1 VFR aircraft are separated from all VFR/IFR aircraft which weigh 19,000 pounds or less by a minimum of: a) Target resolution; or b) 500 feet vertical separation; or c) Visual separation.

2.3.5.2 VFR aircraft are separated from all VFR/IFR aircraft which weigh more than 19,000 and turbojets by no less than: a) 1 / miles lateral separation; or b) 500 feet vertical separation; or c) Visual separation.

2.3.5.3 This program is not to be interpreted as relieving pilots of their responsibilities to see and avoid other traffic operating in basic VFR weather conditions, to adjust their operations and flight path as necessary to preclude serious wake encounters, to maintain appropriate terrain and obstruction clearance, or to remain in weather conditions equal to or better than the minimums required by 14 CFR Section 91.155. Approach control should be advised and a revised clearance or instruction obtained when compliance with an assigned route, heading, and/or altitude is likely to compromise pilot responsibility with respect to terrain and obstruction clearance, vortex exposure, and weather minimums.

2.3.5.4 ATC may assign altitudes to VFR aircraft that do not conform to 14 CFR Section 91.159. “RESUME APPROPRIATE VFR ALTITUDES” will be broadcast when the altitude assignment is no longer needed for separation or when leaving Class B airspace. Pilots must return to an altitude that conforms to 14 CFR Section 91.159.

2.3.5.5 Proximity Operations. VFR aircraft operating in proximity to Class B airspace are cautioned against operating too closely to the boundaries, especially where the floor of the Class B airspace is 3,000 feet or less above the surface or where VFR cruise altitudes are at or near the floor of higher levels. Observance of this Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 precaution will reduce the potential for encountering an aircraft operating at the altitudes of Class B floors.

Additionally, VFR aircraft are encouraged to utilize the VFR Planning Chart as a tool for planning flight in proximity to Class B airspace. Charted VFR Flyway Planning charts are published on the back of the existing VFR Terminal Area Charts.

2.4 Class C Airspace 2.4.1 Definition. Generally, that airspace from the surface to 4,000 feet above the airport elevation (charted in MSL) surrounding those airports that have an operational control tower, are serviced by a radar approach control, and that have a certain number of IFR operations or passenger enplanements. Although the configuration of each Class C airspace area is individually tailored, the airspace usually consists of a surface area with a 5 NM radius, and an outer area with a 10 NM radius that extends no lower than 1,200 feet up to 4,000 feet above the airport elevation.

2.4.2 Outer Area. Class C airspace areas have a procedural (nonregulatory) Outer Area. Normally this area is 20 NM from the primary Class C airspace airport. Its vertical limit extends from the lower limits of radio/radar coverage up to the ceiling of the approach control’s delegated airspace, excluding the Class C airspace itself, and other airspace as appropriate. (This outer area is not charted.)

2.4.3 Charts. Class C airspace is charted on Sectional Charts, IFR En Route Low Altitude, and Terminal Area Charts where appropriate.

2.4.4 Operating Rules and Pilot Equipment Requirements 2.4.4.1 Pilot Certification. No specific certification required.

2.4.4.2 Equipment a) Two-way radio.

b) Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, an operable radar beacon transponder with automatic altitude reporting capability and operable ADS − B Out equipment.

1) Within the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia at and above 10,000 feet MSL, excluding the airspace at and below 2,500 feet above the surface, and 2) At and above 3,000 feet MSL over the Gulf of America from the coastline of the United States out to 12 nautical miles.

NOTE − See Section ENR 1.1, paragraph 38.7, Transponder/ADS − B Operation, subparagraph 38.7.6 for Mode C Transponder Requirements and ENR 1.1, paragraph 46., for ADS − B requirements for operating above Class C airspace.

c) Arrival or Through Flight Entry Requirements. Two − way radio communication must be established with the ATC facility providing ATC services prior to entry and thereafter maintain those communications while in Class C airspace. Pilots of arriving aircraft should contact the Class C airspace ATC facility on the publicized frequency and give their position, altitude, radar beacon code, destination, and request Class C service. Radio contact should be initiated far enough from the Class C airspace boundary to preclude entering Class C airspace before two − way radio communications are established.

NOTE − 1. If the controller responds to a radio call with, “(aircraft callsign) standby,” radio communications have been established and the pilot can enter the Class C airspace.

2. If workload or traffic conditions prevent immediate provision of Class C services, the controller will inform the pilot to remain outside the Class C airspace until conditions permit the services to be provided.

3. It is important to understand that if the controller responds to the initial radio call without using the aircraft identification, radio communications have not been established and the pilot may not enter the Class C airspace.

4. Class C airspace areas have a procedural Outer Area. Normally this area is 20 NM from the primary Class C airspace airport. Its vertical limit extends from the lower limits of radio/radar coverage up to the ceiling of the approach control’s delegated airspace, excluding the Class C airspace itself, and other airspace as appropriate. (This outer area is not charted.)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5. Pilots approaching an airport with Class C service should be aware that if they descend below the base altitude of the 5 to 10 mile shelf during an instrument or visual approach, they may encounter non − transponder/non − ADS − B VFR aircraft.

EXAMPLE − 1. [Aircraft callsign] “remain outside the Class Charlie airspace and standby.” 2. “Aircraft calling Dulles approach control, standby.” d) Departures from: 1) A primary or satellite airport with an operating control tower. Two − way radio communications must be established and maintained with the control tower, and thereafter as instructed by ATC while operating in Class C airspace.

2) A satellite airport without an operating control tower. Two − way radio communications must be established as soon as practicable after departing with the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class C airspace.

e) Aircraft Speed. Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

2.4.5 Air Traffic Services. When two − way radio communications and radar contact are established, all VFR aircraft are: 2.4.5.1 Sequenced to the primary airport.

2.4.5.2 Provided Class C services within the Class C airspace and the Outer Area.

2.4.5.3 Provided basic radar services beyond the outer area on a workload permitting basis. This can be terminated by the controller if workload dictates.

2.4.6 Aircraft Separation. Separation is provided within the Class C airspace and the Outer Area after two − way radio communications and radar contact are established. VFR aircraft are separated from IFR aircraft within the Class C airspace by any of the following: 2.4.6.1 Visual separation.

2.4.6.2 500 feet vertical separation.

2.4.6.3 Target resolution.

2.4.6.4 Wake turbulence separation will be provided to all aircraft operating: a) Behind and less than 1,000 feet below super or heavy aircraft, b) To small aircraft operating behind and less than 500 feet below B757 aircraft, and c) To small aircraft following a large aircraft on final approach.

NOTE − 1. Separation and sequencing of VFR aircraft will be suspended in the event of a radar outage as this service is dependent on radar. The pilot will be advised that the service is not available and issued wind, runway information, and the time or place to contact the tower.

2. Pilot participation is voluntary within the outer area and can be discontinued within the outer area at the pilots request.

Class C services will be provided in the outer area unless the pilot requests termination of the service.

3. Some facilities provide Class C services only during published hours. At other times, terminal IFR radar service will be provided. It is important to note that the communications and transponder/ADS − B requirements are dependent on the class of airspace established outside of the published hours.

2.4.7 Secondary Airports 2.4.7.1 In some locations, Class C airspace may overlie the Class D surface area of a secondary airport. In order to allow that control tower to provide service to aircraft, portions of the overlapping Class C airspace may be Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 procedurally excluded when the secondary airport tower is in operation. Aircraft operating in these procedurally excluded areas will only be provided airport traffic control services when in communication with the secondary airport tower.

2.4.7.2 Aircraft proceeding inbound to a satellite airport will be terminated at a sufficient distance to allow time to change to the appropriate tower or advisory frequency. Class C services to these aircraft will be discontinued when the aircraft is instructed to contact the tower or change to advisory frequency.

2.4.7.3 Aircraft departing secondary controlled airports will not receive Class C services until they have been radar identified and two − way communications have been established with the Class C airspace facility.

2.4.7.4 This program is not to be interpreted as relieving pilots of their responsibilities to see and avoid other traffic operating in basic VFR weather conditions, to adjust their operations and flight path as necessary to preclude serious wake encounters, to maintain appropriate terrain and obstruction clearance, or to remain in weather conditions equal to or better than the minimums required by 14 CFR Section 91.155. Approach control should be advised and a revised clearance or instruction obtained when compliance with an assigned route, heading, and/or altitude is likely to compromise pilot responsibility with respect to terrain and obstruction clearance, vortex exposure, and weather minimums.

2.4.8 Class C Airspace Areas By State These states currently have designated Class C airspace areas that are depicted on sectional charts. Pilots should consult current sectional charts and NOTAMs for the latest information on services available. Pilots should be aware that some Class C airspace underlies or is adjacent to Class B airspace. (See TBL ENR 1.4 − 3 .)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 11 AIP ENR 1.4 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 1.4 − 3 Class C Airspace Areas by State State/City Airport State/City Airport Moline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quad City International ALABAMA Peoria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greater Peoria Regional Birmingham . . . . . . . . . Birmingham − Shuttlesworth International Springfield . . . . . . . . . . Abraham Lincoln Capital Huntsville . . . . . . . . . . . International − Carl T Jones Fld INDIANA Mobile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regional Evansville . . . . . . . . . . . Regional ALASKA Fort Wayne . . . . . . . . . . International Anchorage . . . . . . . . . . . Ted Stevens International Indianapolis . . . . . . . . . . International ARIZONA South Bend . . . . . . . . . . Regional Davis − Monthan . . . . . . . AFB IOWA Tucson . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Cedar Rapids . . . . . . . . . The Eastern Iowa ARKANSAS Des Moines . . . . . . . . . . International Fayetteville (Springdale) Northwest Arkansas Regional KANSAS Little Rock . . . . . . . . . . Adams Field Wichita . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mid − Continent CALIFORNIA KENTUCKY Beale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Lexington . . . . . . . . . . . Blue Grass Burbank . . . . . . . . . . . . Bob Hope Louisville . . . . . . . . . . . International − Standiford Field Fresno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yosemite International LOUISIANA Monterey . . . . . . . . . . . . Peninsula Baton Rouge . . . . . . . . . Metropolitan, Ryan Field Oakland . . . . . . . . . . . . . Metropolitan Oakland Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . Regional International Shreveport . . . . . . . . . . . Barksdale AFB Ontario . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Shreveport . . . . . . . . . . . Regional Riverside . . . . . . . . . . . . March AFB MAINE Sacramento . . . . . . . . . . International Bangor . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Norman Y. Mineta International San Jose . . . . . . . . . . . .

Portland . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Jetport Santa Ana . . . . . . . . . . . John Wayne/Orange County MICHIGAN Santa Barbara . . . . . . . . Municipal Flint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bishop International COLORADO Grand Rapids . . . . . . . . Gerald R. Ford International Colorado Springs . . . . . Municipal Lansing . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital City CONNECTICUT MISSISSIPPI Windsor Locks . . . . . . . Bradley International Columbus . . . . . . . . . . . AFB FLORIDA Jackson . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jackson − Evers International Daytona Beach . . . . . . . International MISSOURI Fort Lauderdale . . . . . . . Hollywood International Springfield . . . . . . . . . . Springfield − Branson National Fort Myers . . . . . . . . . . SW Florida Regional MONTANA Jacksonville . . . . . . . . . . International Billings . . . . . . . . . . . . . Logan International Orlando . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sanford International NEBRASKA Palm Beach . . . . . . . . . . President Donald J. Trump Inter - Lincoln . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lincoln national Omaha . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eppley Airfield Pensacola . . . . . . . . . . . NAS Offutt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Pensacola . . . . . . . . . . . International NEVADA Bradenton International Sarasota . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reno . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reno/Tahoe International Tallahassee . . . . . . . . . . Regional NEW HAMPSHIRE Whiting . . . . . . . . . . . . . NAS Manchester . . . . . . . . . . Manchester GEORGIA NEW JERSEY Savannah . . . . . . . . . . . . Hilton Head International Atlantic City . . . . . . . . . International HAWAII NEW MEXICO Kahului . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kahului Albuquerque . . . . . . . . . International Sunport IDAHO NEW YORK Boise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Air Terminal Albany . . . . . . . . . . . . . International ILLINOIS Buffalo . . . . . . . . . . . . . Niagara International Champaign . . . . . . . . . . Urbana U of Illinois − Willard Islip . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long Island MacArthur Chicago . . . . . . . . . . . . . Midway International Rochester . . . . . . . . . . . Greater Rochester International Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.4 − 12 AIP ENR 1.4 − 12 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 State/City Airport State/City Airport Syracuse . . . . . . . . . . . . Hancock International Nashville . . . . . . . . . . . . International TEXAS NORTH CAROLINA Abilene . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regional Asheville . . . . . . . . . . . . Regional Amarillo . . . . . . . . . . . . Rick Husband International Fayetteville . . . . . . . . . . Regional/Grannis Field Austin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Austin − Bergstrom International Greensboro . . . . . . . . . . Piedmont Triad International Corpus Christi . . . . . . . . International Pope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Dyess . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Raleigh . . . . . . . . . . . . . Raleigh − Durham International El Paso . . . . . . . . . . . . . International OHIO Harlingen . . . . . . . . . . . Valley International Akron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Akron − Canton Regional Laughlin . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Columbus . . . . . . . . . . . Port Columbus International Lubbock . . . . . . . . . . . . Preston Smith International Dayton . . . . . . . . . . . . . James M. Cox International Midland . . . . . . . . . . . . . International Toledo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Express San Antonio . . . . . . . . . International OKLAHOMA Oklahoma City . . . . . . . Will Rogers World VERMONT Tinker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Burlington . . . . . . . . . . . International Tulsa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International VIRGIN ISLANDS OREGON St. Thomas . . . . . . . . . . Charlotte Amalie Cyril E. King Portland . . . . . . . . . . . . . International PENNSYLVANIA VIRGINIA Allentown . . . . . . . . . . . Lehigh Valley International Richmond . . . . . . . . . . . International PUERTO RICO Norfolk . . . . . . . . . . . . . International San Juan . . . . . . . . . . . . Luis Munoz Marin International Roanoke . . . . . . . . . . . . Regional/Woodrum Field RHODE ISLAND WASHINGTON Providence . . . . . . . . . . Theodore Francis Green State Point Roberts . . . . . . . . Vancouver International SOUTH CAROLINA Spokane . . . . . . . . . . . . Fairchild AFB Charleston . . . . . . . . . . . AFB/International Spokane . . . . . . . . . . . . International Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . Metropolitan Whidbey Island . . . . . . . NAS, Ault Field Greer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greenville − Spartanburg WEST VIRGINIA International Charleston . . . . . . . . . . . Yeager Myrtle Beach . . . . . . . . Myrtle Beach International WISCONSIN Shaw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AFB Green Bay . . . . . . . . . . . Austin Straubel International TENNESSEE Madison . . . . . . . . . . . . Dane County Regional − Traux Chattanooga . . . . . . . . . Lovell Field Field Knoxville . . . . . . . . . . . McGhee Tyson Milwaukee . . . . . . . . . . General Mitchell International 2.5 Class D Airspace 2.5.1 Definition. Generally, Class D airspace extends upward from the surface to 2,500 feet above the airport elevation (charted in MSL) surrounding those airports that have an operational control tower. The configuration of each Class D airspace area is individually tailored and when instrument procedures are published, the airspace will normally be designed to contain the procedures.

2.5.1.1 Class D surface areas may be designated as full-time or part-time. Part-time Class D effective times are published in the Chart Supplement.

2.5.1.2 Part − time Class D surface areas may default to either a Class E surface area or Class G airspace. When a part–time Class D surface area defaults to Class G, the surface area airspace becomes Class G up to, but not including, the overlying controlled airspace. Normally, the overlying controlled airspace is the Class E transition area airspace that begins at either 700 feet or 1200 feet AGL. This may be determined by consulting the applicable VFR Sectional or Terminal Area Charts.

2.5.2 Operating Rules and Pilot Equipment Requirements 2.5.2.1 Pilot Certification. No specific certification required.

2.5.2.2 Equipment. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, an operable two − way radio is required.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.5.2.3 Arrival or Through Flight Entry Requirements. Two − way radio communication must be established with the ATC facility providing ATC services prior to entry and thereafter maintain those communications while in the Class D airspace. Pilots of arriving aircraft should contact the control tower on the publicized frequency and give their position, altitude, destination, and any request(s). Radio contact should be initiated far enough from the Class D airspace boundary to preclude entering the Class D airspace before two − way radio communications are established.

NOTE − 1. If the controller responds to a radio call with, “(aircraft callsign) standby,” radio communications have been established, and the pilot can enter the Class D airspace.

2. If workload or traffic conditions prevent immediate entry into Class D airspace, the controller will inform the pilot to remain outside the Class D airspace until conditions permit entry.

EXAMPLE − 1. “[Aircraft callsign] remain outside the Class Delta airspace and standby.” It is important to understand that if the controller responds to the initial radio call without using the aircraft callsign, radio communications have not been established, and the pilot may not enter the Class D airspace.

2. “Aircraft calling Manassas tower standby.” At those airports where the control tower does not operate 24 hours a day, the operating hours of the tower will be listed on the appropriate charts and in the Chart Supplement. During the hours the tower is not in operation, the Class E surface area rules or a combination of Class E rules to 700 feet above ground level and Class G rules to the surface will become applicable. Check the Chart Supplement for specifics.

2.5.2.4 Departures from: a) A primary or satellite airport with an operating control tower. Two − way radio communications must be established and maintained with the control tower, and thereafter as instructed by ATC while operating in the Class D airspace.

b) A satellite airport without an operating control tower. Two − way radio communications must be established with the ATC facility having jurisdiction over the Class D airspace as soon as practicable after departing.

2.5.2.5 Aircraft Speed. Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class D airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

2.5.3 Class D airspace areas are depicted on Sectional and Terminal charts with blue segmented lines, and on IFR En Route Low Altitude charts with a boxed [D].

2.5.4 Arrival extensions.

2.5.4.1 Class D airspace arrival extensions for instrument approach procedures may be Class D or Class E airspace. As a general rule, if all extensions are 2 miles or less, they remain part of the Class D surface area.

However, if any one extension is greater than 2 miles, then all extensions become Class E.

2.5.4.2 Surface area arrival extensions are effective concurrent with the published times of the Class D surface area. For example, if a part–time Class D surface area changes to Class E airspace, the arrival extensions will remain in effect as Class E airspace. If a part–time Class D surface area changes to Class G airspace, the associated arrival extensions will become Class G at the same time.

2.5.5 Separation for VFR Aircraft. No separation services are provided to VFR aircraft.

2.6 Class E Airspace 2.6.1 Definition. Class E airspace is a type of controlled airspace that is designated to serve a variety of terminal or en route purposes as described below.

2.6.2 Operating Rules and Pilot/Equipment Requirements.

2.6.2.1 Pilot Certification. No specific certification required.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.6.2.2 Equipment. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC: a) An operable radar beacon transponder with automatic altitude reporting capability and operable ADS − B Out equipment are required at and above 10,000 feet MSL within the 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia, excluding the airspace at and below 2,500 feet above the surface, and b) Operable ADS − B Out equipment at and above 3,000 feet MSL over the Gulf of America from the coastline of the United States out to 12 nautical miles.

NOTE − The airspace described in (b) is specified in 14 CFR § 91.225 for ADS − B Out requirements. However, 14 CFR § 91.215 does not include this airspace for transponder requirements.

2.6.2.3 Arrival or Through Flight Entry Requirements. No specific requirements.

2.6.3 Charts. Class E airspace below 14,500 feet MSL is charted on Sectional, Terminal, and IFR Enroute Low Altitude charts.

2.6.4 Vertical limits. Except where designated at a lower altitude, Class E airspace in the United States consists of the airspace extending upward from 14,500 feet MSL to, but not including, 18,000 feet MSL overlying: the 48 contiguous states, including the waters within 12 miles from the coast of the 48 contiguous states; the District of Columbia; Alaska, including the waters within 12 miles from the coast of Alaska, and that airspace above FL 600; excluding: 2.6.4.1 The Alaska peninsula west of longitude 160 00 ' 00 '' W.; and 2.6.4.2 The airspace below 1,500 feet above the surface of the earth unless specifically designated lower.

NOTE − Class E airspace above FL 600 has no upper limit.

2.6.5 Types of Class E Airspace 2.6.5.1 Surface area designated for an airport. Class E designated as a surface area for an airport where a control tower is not in operation. The airspace will be configured to contain all instrument procedures. Class E surface areas normally extend from the surface up to but not including the overlying controlled airspace.

2.6.5.2 Extension to a surface area: a) Class E airspace areas may be designated as extensions to Class B, Class C, and Class D surface areas. Such extensions provide controlled airspace to contain standard instrument approach procedures without imposing a communications requirement on pilots operating under VFR. Surface area arrival extensions for instrument approach procedures become part of the primary core surface area and are effective concurrent with the times of the primary core surface area.

b) When a part–time Class C or Class D surface area defaults to Class E, the arrival extensions will remain in effect as Class E airspace. When a part–time Class C, Class D, or Class E surface area defaults to Class G, the associated arrival extensions will default to Class G at the same time.

2.6.5.3 Airspace used for transition: a) Class E airspace areas extending upward from either 700 feet AGL (shown as magenta vignette on sectional charts) or 1,200 feet AGL (blue vignette) are designated in conjunction with an airport with an approved instrument procedure. These areas are used for transitioning aircraft to/from the terminal or en route environment.

b) Unless otherwise specified, 700/1200 − foot AGL Class E airspace areas remain in effect continuously, regardless of airport operating hours or surface area status. The 700/1200 − foot transition areas should not be confused with surface areas or arrival extensions.

2.6.5.4 En Route Domestic Areas. There are Class E airspace areas that extend upward from a specified altitude and are en route domestic airspace areas that provide controlled airspace in those areas where there is a requirement to provide IFR en route ATC services, but the Federal airway system is inadequate.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.6.5.5 Federal Airways and Low − altitude RNAV Routes. Federal airways and low − altitude RNAV routes are Class E airspace areas and, unless otherwise specified, they extend upward from 1,200 feet AGL to, but not including,18,000 feet MSL. Federal airways consist of L/MF airways (colored Federal airways) and VOR Federal airways. L/MF airways are green, red, amber, and blue. VOR Federal airways are classified as Domestic, Alaskan, and Hawaiian. Low − altitude RNAV routes include T − routes and helicopter RNAV routes (TK − routes).

2.6.5.6 Offshore Airspace Areas. There are Class E airspace areas that extend upward from a specified altitude to, but not including, 18,000 feet MSL and are designated as offshore airspace areas. These areas provide controlled airspace beyond 12 nautical miles from the coast of the U.S. in those areas where there is a requirement to provide IFR en route ATC services and within which the U.S. is applying domestic procedures.

2.6.6 Separation for VFR Aircraft. No separation services are provided to VFR aircraft.

3. Class G Airspace 3.1 General Class G airspace (uncontrolled) is that portion of airspace that has not been designated as Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, or Class E airspace.

3.2 VFR Requirements Rules governing VFR flight have been adopted to assist the pilot in meeting his/her responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft. Minimum flight visibility and distance from clouds required for VFR flight are contained in 14 CFR Section 91.155. (See TBL ENR 1.4 − 1 for a tabular presentation of these rules).

3.3 IFR Requirements 3.3.1 Title 14 CFR specifies the pilot and aircraft equipment requirements for IFR flight. Pilots are reminded that in addition to altitude or flight level requirements, 14 CFR Section 91.177 includes a requirement to remain at least 1,000 feet (2,000 feet in designated mountainous terrain) above the highest obstacle within a horizontal distance of 4 nautical miles from the course to be flown.

3.3.2 IFR Altitudes. (See TBL ENR 1.4 − 4 .)

4. Other Airspace Areas 4.1 Airport Advisory/Information Services 4.1.1 There are two advisory type services available at selected airports. Airports offering these services are listed in the Chart Supplement and the published service hours may be changed by NOTAM D.

4.1.1.1 Local Airport Advisory (LAA) service is available only in Alaska and is operated within 10 statute miles of an airport where a control tower is not operating but where a FSS is located on the airport. At such locations, the FSS provides a complete local airport advisory service to arriving and departing aircraft. During periods of fast changing weather the FSS will automatically provide Final Guard as part of the service from the time the aircraft reports “on − final” or “taking − the − active − runway” until the aircraft reports “on − the − ground” or “airborne.” NOTE − Current FAA policy, when requesting remote ATC services, requires that a pilot monitor the automated weather broadcast at the landing airport prior to requesting ATC services. The FSS automatically provides Final Guard, when appropriate, during LAA operations. Final Guard is a value added wind/altimeter monitoring service, which provides an automatic wind and altimeter check during active weather situations when the pilot reports on − final or taking the active runway. During the landing or take − off operation when the winds or altimeter are actively changing the FSS will blind broadcast significant changes when the specialist believes the change might affect the operation. Pilots should acknowledge the first wind/altimeter check but due to cockpit activity no acknowledgement is expected for the blind broadcasts. It is prudent for a pilot to report on − the − ground or airborne to end the service.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.4 − 4 IFR Altitudes Class G Airspace If your magnetic course And you are below (ground track) is: 18,000 feet MSL, fly: 0 to 179 Odd thousands MSL, (3,000; 5,000; 7,000, etc.)

180 to 359 Even thousands MSL, (2,000; 4,000; 6,000, etc.)

4.1.1.2 Remote Airport Information Service (RAIS) is provided in support of short term special events like small to medium fly − ins. The service is advertised by NOTAM D only. The FSS will not have access to a continuous readout of the current winds and altimeter; therefore, RAIS does not include weather and/or Final Guard service.

However, known traffic, special event instructions, and all other services are provided.

NOTE − The airport authority and/or manager should request RAIS support on official letterhead directly with the manager of the FSS that will provide the service at least 60 days in advance. Approval authority rests with the FSS manager and is based on workload and resource availability.

REFERENCE − See GEN 3.3, Air Traffic Services, Paragraph 9.2, Traffic Advisory Practices at Airports Without Operating Control Towers.

4.1.1.3 It is not mandatory that pilots participate in the Airport Advisory programs. Participation enhances safety for everyone operating around busy GA airports; therefore, everyone is encouraged to participate and provide feedback that will help improve the program.

4.2 Published VFR Routes. Published VFR routes for transitioning around, under, and through complex airspace such as Class B airspace were developed through a number of FAA and industry initiatives. All of the following terms; i.e., “VFR Flyway,” “VFR Corridor,” and “VFR Transition Route” have been used when referring to the same or different types of routes or airspace. The following paragraphs identify and clarify the functionality of each type of route and specify where and when an ATC clearance is required.

4.2.1 VFR Flyways 4.2.1.1 A VFR Flyway is defined as a general flight path not defined as a specific course, for use by pilots in planning flights into, out of, through, or near complex terminal airspace to avoid Class B airspace. An ATC clearance is NOT required to fly these routes.

4.2.1.2 VFR Flyways are depicted on the reverse side of some of the VFR Terminal Area Charts (TACs). These charts identify VFR flyways designed to help VFR pilots avoid major controlled traffic flows. They may further depict multiple VFR routings throughout the area which may be used as an alternative to flight within Class B airspace. The ground references provide a guide for improved visual navigation. These routes are not intended to discourage requests for VFR operations within Class B airspace but are designed solely to assist pilots in planning for flights under and around busy Class B airspace without entering Class B airspace.

4.2.1.3 It is very important to remember that these suggested routes are not sterile of other traffic. The entire Class B airspace, and the airspace underneath it, may be heavily congested with many different types of aircraft.

Pilot adherence to VFR rules must be exercised at all times. Communications must be established and maintained between your aircraft and any control tower while transiting Class C or Class D surface areas of airports under Class B airspace.

4.2.2 VFR Corridors 4.2.2.1 The design of a few of the first Class B airspace areas provided a corridor for the passage of uncontrolled traffic. A VFR corridor is defined as airspace through Class B airspace, with defined vertical and lateral boundaries, in which aircraft may operate without an ATC clearance or communication with air traffic control.

4.2.2.2 These corridors are, in effect, a “hole” through Class B airspace. (See FIG ENR 1.4 − 2 .) A classic example would be the corridor through the Los Angeles Class B airspace, which has been subsequently changed Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 to Special Flight Rules airspace (SFR). A corridor is surrounded on all sides by Class B airspace and does not extend down to the surface like a VFR Flyway. Because of their finite lateral and vertical limits, and the volume of VFR traffic using a corridor, extreme caution and vigilance must be exercised.

FIG ENR 1.4 − 2 Class B Airspace 4.2.2.3 Because of the heavy traffic volume and the procedures necessary to efficiently manage the flow of traffic, it has not been possible to incorporate VFR corridors in the development or modifications of Class B airspace in recent years.

4.2.3 VFR Transition Routes 4.2.3.1 To accommodate VFR traffic through terminal airspace, VFR Transition Routes were developed. A VFR Transition Route is defined as a specific flight course depicted and described on a TAC and/or VFR Flyway Planning Chart. Communication with ATC where the route transitions Class B, Class C, and/or Class D airspace is required. In addition to communication requirements, a clearance is required to operate in Class B airspace.

VFR Transition Routes may include published altitudes or ATC-assigned altitudes. Per 14 CFR section 91.123, pilot compliance is expected for all route and altitude restrictions as published or assigned by ATC. VFR Transition Route and altitude assignments do not relieve pilots from their duty to comply with 14 CFR section 91.119. Pilots are expected to request an alternate clearance if necessary for compliance.

4.2.3.2 These routes, as depicted in FIG ENR 1.4 − 2 , are designed to show the pilot where to position the aircraft where an ATC assignment or clearance for the route can normally be expected with minimal or no delay. Until ATC authorization is received, pilots must remain clear of Class B airspace. On initial contact, pilots should advise ATC of their position, altitude, route name desired, and direction of flight.

4.2.3.3 For secondary airports underlying or in close proximity to Class B or Class C airspace, VFR Transition Routes may be developed and depicted for arrivals/departures. These arrivals/departures may be requested from or assigned by ATC.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.4 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.4 − 3 VFR Transition Route 4.2.4 Helicopter Routes 4.2.4.1 Helicopter Routes are depicted on a specialized VFR chart established for select high traffic density areas to enhance helicopter access and ease of operation. The Helicopter Route Chart depicts prominent geographical features, roads and obstructions. A Helicopter Route is a specific VFR flight course and is depicted on the Helicopter Route Chart. These routes contain specific altitudes and instructions for navigating over visual reference points as published, or as instructed by ATC.

4.2.4.2 Helicopter Route Charts, as depicted in FIG ENR 1.4 − 4 , incorporate expanded ground reference and unique symbology to improve visual navigation. The charts contain additional information such as frequencies to self − announce on and other route information. On initial contact, pilots should advise ATC of their position, altitude, and route name desired. Helicopter Routes may include published altitudes or ATC-assigned altitudes.

Per 14 CFR section 91.123, pilot compliance is expected for all route and altitude restrictions as published or assigned by ATC. Helicopter Route and altitude assignments do not relieve pilots from their duty to comply with 14 CFR section 91.119 and 132.203(b). Pilots are expected to request an alternate clearance if necessary for compliance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.4 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.4 − 4 Helicopter Route Chart 4.3 Terminal Radar Service Area (TRSA) 4.3.1 Background. The terminal radar service areas (TRSA) were originally established as part of the Terminal Radar Program at selected airports. TRSAs were never controlled airspace from a regulatory standpoint because the establishment of TRSAs were never subject to the rulemaking process; consequently, TRSAs are not contained in 14 CFR Part 71 nor are there any TRSA operating rules in Part 91. Part of the Airport Radar Service Area (ARSA) program was to eventually replace all TRSAs. However, the ARSA requirements became relatively stringent, and it was subsequently decided that TRSAs would have to meet ARSA criteria before they would be converted. TRSAs do not fit into any of the U.S. Airspace Classes; therefore, they will continue to be non − Part 71 airspace areas where participating pilots can receive additional radar services which have been redefined as TRSA Service.

4.3.2 TRSA Areas. The primary airport(s) within the TRSA become(s) Class D airspace. The remaining portion of the TRSA overlies other controlled airspace which is normally Class E airspace beginning at 700 or 1,200 feet and established to transition to/from the en route/terminal environment.

4.3.3 Participation. Pilots operating under VFR are encouraged to contact the radar approach control and avail themselves of the TRSA Services. However, participation is voluntary on the part of the pilot. See ENR 1.1, paragraph 40.2 , for details and procedures.

4.3.4 Charts. TRSAs are depicted on VFR sectional and terminal area charts with a solid black line and altitudes for each segment. The Class D portion is charted with a blue segmented line.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.5 Holding, Approach, and Departure Procedures

1. Holding Procedures 1.1 Whenever an aircraft is cleared to a fix other than the destination airport and delay is expected, it is the responsibility of ATC to issue complete holding instructions (unless the pattern is charted), an EFC time and best estimate of any additional en route/terminal delay.

NOTE − Only those holding patterns depicted on U.S. government or commercially produced (meeting FAA requirements) low/high altitude en route, and area or STAR charts should be used.

1.2 If the holding pattern is charted and the controller doesn’t issue complete holding instructions, the pilot is expected to hold as depicted on the appropriate chart. When the pattern is charted on the assigned procedure or route being flown, ATC may omit all holding instructions except the charted holding direction and the statement AS PUBLISHED; for example, HOLD EAST AS PUBLISHED. ATC must always issue complete holding instructions when pilots request them.

1.3 If no holding pattern is charted and holding instructions have not been issued, the pilot should ask ATC for holding instructions prior to reaching the fix. This procedure will eliminate the possibility of an aircraft entering a holding pattern other than that desired by ATC. If unable to obtain holding instructions prior to reaching the fix (due to frequency congestion, stuck microphone, etc.), then enter a standard pattern on the course on which the aircraft approached the fix and request further clearance as soon as possible. In this event, the altitude/flight level of the aircraft at the clearance limit will be protected so that separation will be provided as required.

1.4 When an aircraft is 3 minutes or less from a clearance limit and a clearance beyond the fix has not been received, the pilot is expected to start a speed reduction so that the aircraft will cross the fix, initially, at or below the maximum holding airspeed.

1.5 When no delay is expected, the controller should issue a clearance beyond the fix as soon as possible and, whenever possible, at least 5 minutes before the aircraft reaches the clearance limit.

1.6 Pilots should report to ATC the time and altitude/flight level at which the aircraft reaches the clearance limit and report leaving the clearance limit.

NOTE − In the event of two-way communications failure, pilots are required to comply with 14 CFR Section 91.185.

1.7 Patterns at the most generally used holding fixes are depicted (charted) on U.S. Government or commercially produced (meeting FAA requirements) Low or High Altitude En Route, Area, Departure Procedure, and STAR Charts. Pilots are expected to hold in the pattern depicted unless specifically advised otherwise by ATC. (See ENR 1.1, paragraph 28. , ATC Clearances and Aircraft Separations.)

NOTE − Holding patterns that protect for a maximum holding airspeed other than the standard may be depicted by an icon, unless otherwise depicted. The icon is a standard holding pattern symbol (racetrack) with the airspeed restriction shown in the center. In other cases, the airspeed restriction will be depicted next to the standard holding pattern symbol.

1.8 An ATC clearance requiring an aircraft to hold at a fix where the pattern is not charted will include the following information: 1.8.1 Direction of holding from the fix in terms of the eight cardinal compass points; i.e., N, NE, E, SE, etc.

1.8.2 Holding fix. (The fix may be omitted if it is included at the beginning of the transmission as the clearance limit.)

1.8.3 Radial, course, bearing, airway, or route on which the aircraft is to hold.

1.8.4 Leg length in miles if DME or RNAV is to be used. (Leg length will be specified in minutes on pilot request or if the controller considers it necessary.)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.8.5 Direction of turn if left turns are to be made, the pilot requests, or the controller considers it necessary.

1.8.6 Time to expect further clearance, and any pertinent additional delay information.

1.9 Typical Holding Pattern Example 1.9.1 When holding at a VOR station, pilots should begin the turn to the outbound leg at the time of the first complete reversal of the “to − from” indicator. See GEN 3.4, Paragraph 12, Two − Way Radio Communications Failure, for holding at the approach fix when radio failure occurs.

1.9.2 Holding Pattern Airspace Protection Holding pattern airspace protection is based on the following procedures.

NOTE − Holding pattern airspace protection design criteria is contained in FAA Order 8260.3, United States Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS.)

1.9.2.1 Airspeeds a) All aircraft may hold at the following altitudes and maximum holding airspeeds: TBL ENR 1.5 − 1 Altitude (MSL) Airspeed (KIAS) MHA − 6,000’ 200 6,001’ − 14,000’ 230 14,001’ and above 265 NOTE − These are the maximum indicated air speeds applicable to all holding.

b) The following are exceptions to the maximum holding airspeeds: 1) Holding patterns from 6,001’ to 14,000’ may be restricted to a maximum airspeed of 210 KIAS. This nonstandard pattern will be depicted by an icon.

2) Holding patterns may be restricted to a maximum speed. The speed restriction is depicted in parenthesis inside the holding pattern on the chart: for example, (175). The aircraft should be at or below the maximum speed prior to initially crossing the holding fix to avoid exiting the protected airspace. Pilots unable to comply with the maximum airspeed restriction should notify ATC.

3) Holding patterns at USAF airfields only − 310 KIAS maximum, unless otherwise depicted.

4) Holding patterns at Navy fields only − 230 KIAS maximum, unless otherwise depicted.

5) All helicopter/power lift aircraft holding on a “COPTER” instrument procedure is predicated on a minimum airspeed of 90 KIAS unless charted otherwise.

6) When a climb − in hold is specified by a published procedure (for example, “Climb − in holding pattern to depart XYZ VORTAC at or above 10,000.” or “All aircraft climb − in TRUCK holding pattern to cross TRUCK Int at or above 11,500 before proceeding on course.”), additional obstacle protection area has been provided to allow for greater airspeeds in the climb for those aircraft requiring them. A maximum airspeed of 310 KIAS is permitted in Climb − in − holding, unless a maximum holding airspeed is published, in which case that maximum airspeed is applicable. The airspeed limitations in 14 CFR Section 91.117, Aircraft Speed, still apply.

c) The following phraseology may be used by an ATC specialist to advise a pilot of the maximum holding airspeed for a holding pattern airspace area.

PHRASEOLOGY − (AIRCRAFT IDENTIFICATION) (holding instructions, when needed) MAXIMUM HOLDING AIRSPEED IS (speed in knots).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 1 Holding Pattern Descriptive Terms ABEAM ABEAM HOLDING SIDE HOLDING SIDE OUTBOUND OUTBOUND OUTBOUND OUTBOUND END END FIX END FIX END INBOUND INBOUND RECIPROCAL RECIPROCAL FIX FIX NONHOLDING SIDE NONHOLDING SIDE HOLDING HOLDING COURSE COURSE Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 2 Holding Patterns

EXAMPLES OF HOLDING EXAMPLES OF HOLDING

OM OM

L

M M M M

RUNWAY RUNWAY

TYPICAL PROCEDURE ON AN ILS OUTER MARKER TYPICAL PROCEDURE ON AN ILS OUTER MARKER

VOR VOR

TYPICAL PROCEDURE AT INTERSECTION TYPICAL PROCEDURE AT INTERSECTION

OF VOR RADIALS OF VOR RADIALS

HOLDING COURSE HOLDING COURSE

TOWARD NAVAID TOWARD NAVAID

AWAY FROM NAVAID AWAY FROM NAVAID

VORTAC VORTAC

15 NM DME FIX 10 NM DME FIX 15 NM DME FIX 10 NM DME FIX

TYPICAL PROCEDURE AT DME FIX TYPICAL PROCEDURE AT DME FIX

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 3 Holding Pattern Entry Procedures 1.9.2.2 Entry Procedures. Holding protected airspace is designed based in part on pilot compliance with the three recommended holding pattern entry procedures discussed below. Deviations from these recommendations, coupled with excessive airspeed crossing the holding fix, may in some cases result in the aircraft exceeding holding protected airspace.(See FIG ENR 1.5 − 3 .)

a) Parallel Procedure. When approaching the holding fix from anywhere in sector (a), the parallel entry procedure would be to turn to a heading to parallel the holding course outbound on the nonholding side for one minute, turn in the direction of the holding pattern through more than 180 degrees, and return to the holding fix or intercept the holding course inbound.

b) Teardrop Procedure. When approaching the holding fix from anywhere in sector (b), the teardrop entry procedure would be to fly to the fix, turn outbound to a heading for a 30 degree teardrop entry within the pattern (on the holding side) for a period of one minute, then turn in the direction of the holding pattern to intercept the inbound holding course.

c) Direct Entry Procedure. When approaching the holding fix from anywhere in sector (c), the direct entry procedure would be to fly directly to the fix and turn to follow the holding pattern.

d) While other entry procedures may enable the aircraft to enter the holding pattern and remain within protected airspace, the parallel, teardrop and direct entries are the procedures for entry and holding recommended by the FAA, and were derived as part of the development of the size and shape of the obstacle protection areas for holding.

e) Nonstandard Holding Pattern. Fix end and outbound end turns are made to the left. Entry procedures to a nonstandard pattern are oriented in relation to the 70 degree line on the holding side just as in the standard pattern.

1.9.2.3 Timing a) Inbound Leg 1) At or below 14,000 feet MSL: 1 minute.

2) Above 14,000 feet MSL: 1 / minutes.

NOTE − The initial outbound leg should be flown for 1 minute or 1 / minutes (appropriate to altitude). Timing for subsequent outbound legs should be adjusted, as necessary, to achieve proper inbound leg time. Pilots may use any navigational means available; i.e. DME, RNAV, etc., to insure the appropriate inbound leg times.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) Outbound Leg timing begins over/abeam the fix, whichever occurs later. If the abeam position cannot be determined, start timing when turn to outbound is completed.

1.9.2.4 Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)/ GPS Along − Track Distance (ATD). DME/GPS holding is subject to the same entry and holding procedures except that distances (nautical miles) are used in lieu of time values. The outbound course of the DME/GPS holding pattern is called the outbound leg of the pattern. The controller or the instrument approach procedure chart will specify the length of the outbound leg. The end of the outbound leg is determined by the DME or ATD readout. The holding fix on conventional procedures, or controller defined holding based on a conventional navigation aid with DME, is a specified course or radial and distances are from the DME station for both the inbound and outbound ends of the holding pattern. When flying published GPS overlay or stand alone procedures with distance specified, the holding fix will be a waypoint in the database and the end of the outbound leg will be determined by the ATD. Some GPS overlay and early stand alone procedures may have timing specified. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 4 , FIG ENR 1.5 − 5 and FIG ENR 1.5 − 6 .) See ENR 4.1, Paragraph 16. Global Positioning System (GPS), for requirements and restriction on using GPS for IFR operations.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 4 Inbound Toward NAVAID NOTE − When the inbound course is toward the NAVAID, the fix distance is 10 NM, and the leg length is 5 NM, then the end of the outbound leg will be reached when the DME reads 15 NM.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 5 Inbound Leg Away from NAVAID NOTE − When the inbound course is away from the NAVAID and the fix distance is 28 NM, and the leg length is 8 NM, then the end of the outbound leg will be reached when the DME reads 20 NM.

1.9.2.5 Use of RNAV Distance in lieu of DME Distance. Substitution of RNAV computed distance to or from a NAVAID in place of DME distance is permitted when holding. However, the actual holding location and pattern flown will be further from the NAVAID than designed due to the lack of slant range in the position solution (see FIG ENR 1.5 − 6 ). This may result in a slight difference between RNAV distance readout in reference to the NAVAID and the DME readout, especially at higher altitudes. When used solely for DME substitution, the difference between RNAV distance to/from a fix and DME slant range distance can be considered negligible and no pilot action is required.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 REFERENCE − AIP ENR 1.16 , Paragraph 3. Use of Suitable Area Navigation (RNAV) Systems on Conventional Procedures and Routes.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 6 Difference Between DME Distance From NAVAID & RNAV Computed Distance From NAVAID 1.9.2.6 Use of RNAV Guidance and Holding. RNAV systems, including multi − sensor Flight Management Systems (FMS) and stand − alone GPS receivers, may be used to furnish lateral guidance when executing a hold.

The manner in which holding is implemented in an RNAV system varies widely between aircraft and RNAV system manufacturers. Holding pattern data may be extracted from the RNAV database for published holds or may be manually entered for ad − hoc ATC − assigned holds. Pilots are expected to be familiar with the capabilities and limitations of the specific RNAV system used for holding.

a) All holding, including holding defined on an RNAV or RNP procedure, is based on the conventional NAVAID holding design criteria, including the holding protected airspace construction. There are differences between the holding entry and flight track assumed in conventional holding pattern design and the entry and track that may be flown when RNAV guidance is used to execute holding. Individually, these differences may not affect the ability of the aircraft to remain within holding pattern protected airspace. However, cumulatively, they can result in deviations sufficient to result in excursions up to limits of the holding pattern protected airspace, and in some circumstances beyond protected airspace. The following difference and considerations apply when an RNAV system furnishes the lateral guidance used to fly a holding pattern: 1) Many systems use ground track angle instead of heading to select the entry method. While the holding pattern design allows a 5 degree tolerance, this may result in an unexpected entry when the winds induce a large drift angle.

2) The holding protected airspace is based on the assumption that the aircraft will fly − over the holding fix upon initial entry. RNAV systems may execute a “fly − by” turn when approaching the holding fix prior to entry.

A “fly − by” turn during a direct entry from the holding pattern side of holding course may result in excursions beyond protected airspace, especially as the intercept angle and ground speed increase.

3) During holding, RNAV systems furnish lateral steering guidance using either a constant bank or constant radius to achieve the desired inbound and outbound turns. An aircraft’s flight guidance system may use reduced bank angles for all turns including turns in holding, especially at higher altitudes, that may result in exceeding holding protected airspace. Use of a shallower bank angle will expand both the width and length of the aircraft track, especially as wind speed increases. If the flight guidance system’s bank angle limit feature is pilot − selectable, a minimum 25 degree bank angle should be selected regardless of altitude unless aircraft operating limitations specify otherwise and the pilot advises ATC.

4) Where a holding distance is published, the turn from the outbound leg begins at the published distance from the holding fix, thus establishing the design turn point required to remain within protected airspace. RNAV systems apply a database coded or pilot − entered leg distance as a maximum length of the inbound leg to the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 holding fix. The RNAV system then calculates a turn point from the outbound leg required to achieve this inbound leg length. This often results in an RNAV − calculated turn point on the outbound leg beyond the design turn point.

(See FIG ENR 1.5 − 7 ). With a strong headwind against the outbound leg, RNAV systems may fly up to and possibly beyond the limits of protected airspace before turning inbound. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 8 .) This is especially true at higher altitudes where wind speeds are greater and ground speed results in a wider holding pattern.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 7 RNAV Lateral Guidance and Holding – No Wind FIG ENR 1.5 − 8 RNAV Lateral Guidance and Holding – Effect of Wind 5) Some RNAV systems compute the holding pattern based on the aircraft’s altitude and speed at a point prior to entering the hold. If the indicated airspeed is not reduced to comply with the maximum holding speed before this point, the computed pattern may exceed the protected airspace. Loading or executing a holding pattern may result in the speed and time limits applicable to the aircraft’s current altitude being used to define the holding pattern for RNAV lateral guidance. This may result in an incorrect hold being flown by the RNAV system. For example, entering or executing the holding pattern above 14,000 feet when intending to hold below 14,000 feet may result in applying 1 ½ minute timing below 14,000 feet.

NOTE − Some systems permit the pilot to modify leg time of holding patterns defined in the navigation database; for example, a hold − in − lieu of procedure turn. In most RNAV systems, the holding pattern time remains at the pilot − modified time and will not revert back to the coded time if the aircraft descends to a lower altitude where a shorter time interval applies.

b) RNAV systems are not able to alert the pilot for excursions outside of holding pattern protected airspace since the dimensions of this airspace are not included in the navigation database. In addition, the dimensions of holding pattern protected airspace vary with altitude for a charted holding pattern, even when the hold is used Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 for the same application. Close adherence to the pilot actions described in this section reduce the likelihood of exceeding the boundary of holding pattern protected airspace when using RNAV lateral guidance to conduct holding.

c) Holding patterns may be stored in the RNAV system’s navigation database and include coding with parameters defining how the RNAV system will conduct the hold. For example, coding will determine whether holding is conducted to manual termination (HM), continued holding until the aircraft reaches a specified altitude (HA), or holding is conducted until the holding fix is crossed the first time after entry (HF). Some systems do not store all holding patterns, and may only store patterns associated with missed approaches and hold − in − lieu of procedure turn (HILPT). Some store all holding as standard patterns and require pilot action to conduct non − standard holding (left turns).

1) Pilots are cautioned that multiple holding patterns may be established at the same fix. These holding patterns may differ in respect to turn directions and leg lengths depending on their application as an en route holding pattern, a holding pattern charted on a SID or STAR, or when used on an instrument approach procedure.

Many RNAV systems limit the database coding at a particular fix to a single holding pattern definition. Pilots extracting the holding pattern from the navigation database are responsible for confirming that the holding pattern conforms to the assigned charted holding pattern in terms of turn direction, speed limit, timing, and distance.

2) If ATC assigns holding that is not charted, then the pilot is responsible for programming the RNAV system with the assigned holding course, turn direction, speed limit, leg length, or leg time.

3) Changes made after the initial execution may not apply until the next circuit of the holding pattern if the aircraft is in close proximity to the holding fix.

1.9.2.7 Pilot Action. The following actions are recommended to ensure that the aircraft remains within holding protected airspace when holding is performed using either conventional NAVAID guidance or when using RNAV lateral guidance.

a) Speed. When ATC furnishes advance notice of holding, start speed reduction to be at or below the maximum holding speed allowed at least 3 minutes prior to crossing the holding fix. If advance notice by ATC is not provided, begin speed reduction as expeditiously as practical. It is acceptable to allow RNAV systems to determine an appropriate deceleration point prior to the holding fix and to manage the speed reduction to the RNAV computed holding speed. If the pilot does not permit the RNAV system to manage the deceleration from the computed point, the actual hold pattern size at holding entry may differ from the holding pattern size computed by the RNAV system.

1) Aircraft are expected to enter holding at or below the maximum holding speed established in paragraph 1.9.2.1 a or the charted maximum holding speed.

(a) All fixed wing aircraft conducting holding should fly at speeds at or above 90 KIAS to minimize the influence of wind drift.

(b) When RNAV lateral guidance is used in fixed wing airplanes, it is desirable to enter and conduct holding at the lowest practical airspeed consistent with the airplane’s recommended holding speed to address the cumulative errors associated with RNAV holding and increase the probability of remaining within protected airspace. It is acceptable to allow RNAV systems to determine a recommended holding speed that is at or below the maximum holding speed.

2) Advise ATC immediately if unable to comply with the maximum holding airspeed and request an alternate clearance.

NOTE − Speeds above the maximum or published holding speed may be necessary due to turbulence, icing, etc. Exceeding maximum holding airspeed may result in aircraft excursions beyond the holding pattern protected airspace. In a nonradar environment, the pilot should advise ATC that they cannot accept the assigned hold.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3) Ensure the RNAV system applies the proper time and speed restrictions to a holding pattern. This is especially critical when climbing or descending to a holding pattern altitude where time and speed restrictions are different than at the present aircraft altitude.

b) Bank Angle. For holding not involving the use of RNAV lateral guidance, make all turns during entry and while holding at: 1) 3 degrees per second, or 2) 30 degree bank angle, or 3) 25 degree bank angle, provided a flight director system is used.

NOTE − Use whichever requires the least bank angle.

4) When using RNAV lateral guidance to conduct holding, it is acceptable to permit the RNAV system to calculate the appropriate bank angle for the outbound and inbound turns. Do not use flight guidance system bank angle limiting functions of less than 25 degrees unless the feature is not pilot − selectable, required by the aircraft limitations, or its use is necessary to comply with the aircraft’s minimum maneuvering speed margins. If the bank angle must be limited to less than 25 degrees, advise ATC that additional area for holding is required.

c) Compensate for wind effect primarily by drift correction on the inbound and outbound legs. When outbound, triple the inbound drift correction to avoid major turning adjustments; for example, if correcting left by 8 degrees when inbound, correct right by 24 degrees when outbound.

d) Determine entry turn from aircraft heading upon arrival at the holding fix; + / − 5 degrees in heading is considered to be within allowable good operating limits for determining entry. When using RNAV lateral guidance for holding, it is permissible to allow the system to compute the holding entry.

e) RNAV lateral guidance may execute a fly − by turn beginning at an excessively large distance from the holding fix. Reducing speed to the maximum holding speed at least 3 minutes prior to reaching the holding fix and using the recommended 25 degree bank angle will reduce potential excursions beyond protected airspace.

f) When RNAV guidance is used for holding, pilots should be prepared to intervene if the turn from outbound leg to the inbound leg does not begin within a reasonable distance of the charted leg length, especially when holding is used as a course reversal HILPT. Pilot intervention is not required when holding in an ATC − assigned holding pattern that is not charted. However, notify ATC when the outbound leg length becomes excessive when RNAV guidance is used for holding.

g) When holding at a fix and instructions are received specifying the time of departure from the fix, the pilot should adjust the aircraft’s flight path within the limits of the established holding pattern in order to leave the fix at the exact time specified. After departing the holding fix, normal speed is to be resumed with respect to other governing speed requirements such as terminal area speed limits, specific ATC requests, etc. Where the fix is associated with an instrument approach, and timed approaches are in effect, a procedure turn must not be executed unless the pilot advises ATC, since aircraft holding are expected to proceed inbound on final approach directly from the holding pattern when approach clearance is received.

1.10 Radar Surveillance of Holding Pattern Airspace Areas 1.10.1 Whenever aircraft are holding, ATC will usually provide radar surveillance of the holding airspace on the controller’s radar display.

1.10.2 The controller will attempt to detect any holding aircraft that stray outside the holding airspace and will assist any detected aircraft to return to the assigned airspace.

1.10.3 Many factors could prevent ATC from providing this additional service, such as workload, number of targets, precipitation, ground clutter, and radar system capability. These circumstances may make it unfeasible to maintain radar identification of aircraft or to detect aircraft straying from the holding pattern. The provision of this service depends entirely upon whether the controller is in a position to provide it and does not relieve a pilot of the responsibility to adhere to an accepted ATC clearance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.10.4 ATC is responsible for traffic and obstruction separation when they have assigned holding that is not associated with a published (charted) holding pattern. Altitudes assigned will be at or above the minimum vectoring or minimum IFR altitude.

2. Approach Procedures 2.1 Approach Control 2.1.1 Approach control is responsible for controlling all instrument flight operating within its area of responsibility. Approach control may serve one or more airfields, and control is exercised primarily by direct pilot/controller communications. Prior to arriving at the destination radio facility, instructions will be received from ARTCC to contact approach control on a specified frequency.

2.2 Radar Approach Control 2.2.1 Where radar is approved for approach control service, it is used not only for radar approaches (Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR) and Precision Approach Radar (PAR)) but is also used to provide vectors in conjunction with published nonradar approaches based on radio NAVAIDs (ILS, VOR, NDB, TACAN). Radar vectors can provide course guidance and expedite traffic to the final approach course of any established instrument approach procedure or to the traffic pattern for a visual approach. Approach control facilities that provide this radar service will operate in the following manner: 2.2.1.1 Arriving aircraft are either cleared to an outer fix most appropriate to the route being flown with vertical separation and, if required, given holding information or, when radar handoffs are effected between the ARTCC and approach control, or between two approach control facilities, aircraft are cleared to the airport or to a fix so located that the handoff will be completed prior to the time the aircraft reaches the fix. When radar handoffs are utilized, successive arriving flights may be handed off to approach control with radar separation in lieu of vertical separation.

2.2.1.2 After release to approach control, aircraft are vectored to the appropriate final approach course (ILS, RNAV, GLS, VOR, ADF, etc.). Radar vectors and altitude or flight levels will be issued as required for spacing and separating aircraft. Therefore, pilots must not deviate from the headings issued by approach control. Aircraft will normally be informed when it is necessary to vector across the final approach course for spacing or other reasons. If approach course crossing is imminent and the pilot has not been informed that the aircraft will be vectored across the final approach course, the pilot should query the controller.

2.2.1.3 The pilot is not expected to turn inbound on the final approach course unless an approach clearance has been issued. This clearance will normally be issued with the final vector for interception of the final approach course, and the vector will be such as to enable the pilot to establish the aircraft on the final approach course prior to reaching the final approach fix.

2.2.1.4 In the case of aircraft already inbound on the final approach course, approach clearance will be issued prior to the aircraft reaching the final approach fix. When established inbound on the final approach course, radar separation will be maintained, and the pilot will be expected to complete the approach utilizing the approach aid designated in the clearance (ILS, RNAV, GLS, VOR, radio beacons, etc.) as the primary means of navigation.

Therefore, once established on the final approach course, pilots must not deviate from it unless a clearance to do so is received from ATC.

2.2.1.5 After passing the final approach fix on final approach, aircraft are expected to continue inbound on the final approach course and complete the approach or effect the missed approach procedure published for that airport.

2.2.2 ARTCCs are approved for and may provide approach control services to specific airports. The radar systems used by these centers do not provide the same precision as an ASR/PAR used by approach control facilities and towers, and the update rate is not as fast. Therefore, pilots may be requested to report established on the final approach course.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.3 Whether aircraft are vectored to the appropriate final approach course or provide their own navigation on published routes to it, radar service is automatically terminated when the landing is completed or when instructed to change to advisory frequency at uncontrolled airports, whichever occurs first.

3. Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) Procedures 3.1 STAR procedures may have mandatory speeds and/or crossing altitudes published. Other STARs may have planning information depicted to inform pilots what clearances or restrictions to “expect.” “Expect” altitudes/speeds are not considered STAR procedures crossing restrictions unless verbally issued by ATC.

Published speed restrictions are independent of altitude restrictions and are mandatory unless modified by ATC.

Pilots should plan to cross waypoints with a published speed restriction, at the published speed, and should not exceed this speed past the associated waypoint unless authorized by ATC or a published note to do so. A chart note used to transition from Mach to IAS may also be published. Pilots should maintain their cruise Mach number during the descent until reaching the published transition speed in knots, then continue the descent at that speed until the next published speed restriction on the STAR, or until it is necessary to comply with the speed limits published in 14 CFR §91.117.

3.1.1 STAR procedures may have mandatory speeds and/or crossing altitudes published. Other STARs may have planning information depicted to inform pilots what clearances or restrictions to “ expect .” “ Expect ” altitudes/speeds are not considered STAR procedures crossing restrictions unless verbally issued by ATC.

Published speed restrictions are independent of altitude restrictions and are mandatory unless modified by ATC.

NOTE − The “ expect ” altitudes/speeds are published so that pilots may have the information for planning purposes. These altitudes/speeds must not be used in the event of lost communications unless ATC has specifically advised the pilot to expect these altitudes/speeds as part of a further clearance.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 91.185c(2)(iii).

3.1.2 When an IFR cleared route includes a STAR, pilots must maintain the last assigned altitude until receiving authorization to descend so as to comply with all published/issued altitude restrictions. This authorization may contain the phraseology “DESCEND VIA.” If vectored or cleared to deviate off a STAR, pilots must consider the STAR canceled. If the STAR contains published altitude restrictions, speed restrictions, or a chart note used to transition from Mach to IAS, those restrictions are also canceled and pilots will receive an altitude to maintain and, if necessary, a speed. If ATC intends to clear the aircraft back onto the STAR, controllers will advise pilots where to expect to resume the procedure. Pilots should then be prepared to rejoin the STAR at the subsequent fix or procedure leg.

3.1.2.1 Clearance to “descend via” authorizes pilots to: a) Descend at pilot’s discretion to meet published restrictions and laterally navigate on a STAR.

b) When cleared to a waypoint depicted on a STAR, to descend from a previously assigned altitude at pilot’s discretion to the altitude depicted at that waypoint.

c) Once established on the depicted arrival, to descend and to meet all published or assigned altitude and/or speed restrictions.

NOTE − 1. When otherwise cleared along a route or procedure that contains published speed restrictions, the pilot must comply with those speed restrictions independent of any descend via clearance.

2. ATC anticipates pilots will begin adjusting speed the minimum distance necessary prior to a published speed restriction so as to cross the waypoint/fix at the published speed. Once at the published speed, ATC expects pilots will maintain the published speed until additional adjustment is required to comply with further published or ATC assigned speed restrictions or as required to ensure compliance with 14 CFR Section 91.117.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3. The “descend via” is used in conjunction with STARs to reduce phraseology by not requiring the controller to restate the altitude at the next waypoint/fix to which the pilot has been cleared.

4. Air traffic will assign an altitude to cross the waypoint/ fix, if no altitude is depicted at the waypoint/fix, for aircraft on a direct routing to a STAR. Air traffic must ensure obstacle clearance when issuing a “descend via” instruction to the pilot.

5. Minimum en route altitudes (MEA) are not considered restrictions; however, pilots must remain above all MEAs, unless receiving an ATC instruction to descend below the MEA.

EXAMPLE − 1. Lateral/routing clearance only.

“Cleared Tyler One arrival.” NOTE − In Example 1, pilots are cleared to fly the lateral path of the procedure. Compliance with any published speed restrictions is required. No descent is authorized.

2. Routing with assigned altitude: “Cleared Tyler One arrival, descend and maintain flight level two four zero.” “Cleared Tyler One arrival, descend at pilot’s discretion, maintain flight level two four zero.” NOTE − In Example 2, the first clearance requires the pilot to descend to FL 240 as directed, comply with any published speed restrictions, and maintain FL 240 until cleared for further vertical navigation with a newly assigned altitude or a“descend via” clearance.

The second clearance authorizes the pilot to descend to FL 240 at his discretion, to comply with any published speed restrictions, and then maintain FL 240 until issued further instructions.

3. Lateral/routing and vertical navigation clearance.

“Descend via the Eagul Five arrival.” “Descend via the Eagul Five arrival, except, cross Vnnom at or above one two thousand.” NOTE − In Example 3, the first clearance authorized the aircraft to descend at pilot’s discretion on the Eagul Five arrival; the pilot must descend so as to comply with all published altitude and speed restrictions.

The second clearance authorizes the same, but requires the pilot to descend so as to cross at Vnnom at or above 12,000.

4. Lateral/routing and vertical navigation clearance when assigning altitude not published on procedure.

“Descend via the Eagul Five arrival, except after Geeno, maintain one zero thousand.” “Descend via the Eagul Five arrival, except cross Geeno at one one thousand then maintain seven thousand.” NOTE − I n Example 4, the first clearance authorized the aircraft to track laterally on the Eagul Five Arrival and to descend at pilot’s discretion so as to comply with all altitude and speed restrictions until reaching Geeno and then maintain 10,000. Upon reaching 10,000, aircraft should maintain 10,000 until cleared by ATC to continue to descend.

The second clearance requires the same, except the aircraft must cross Geeno at 11,000 and is then authorized to continue descent to and maintain 7,000.

5. Direct routing to intercept a STAR and vertical navigation clearance.

“Proceed direct Leoni, descend via the Leoni One arrival.” “Proceed direct Denis, cross Denis at or above flight level two zero zero, then descend via the Mmell One arrival.” NOTE − In Example 5, in the first clearance an altitude is published at Leoni; the aircraft proceeds to Leoni, crosses Leoni at the published altitude and then descends via the arrival. If a speed restrictions is published at Leoni, the aircraft will slow to comply with the published speed.

In the second clearance, there is no altitude published at Denis; the aircraft must cross Denis at or above FL200, and then descends via the arrival.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.2.2 Pilots cleared for vertical navigation using the phraseology “descend via” must inform ATC upon initial contact with a new frequency, of the altitude leaving, “descending via (procedure name),” the runway transition or landing direction if assigned, and any assigned restrictions not published on the procedure.

EXAMPLE − 1. Delta 121 is cleared to descend via the Eagul Five arrival, runway 26 transition: “Delta One Twenty One leaving flight level one niner zero, descending via the Eagul Five arrival runway two-six transition.” 2. Delta 121 is cleared to descend via the Eagul Five arrival, but ATC has changed the bottom altitude to 12,000: “Delta One Twenty One leaving flight level one niner zero for one two thousand, descending via the Eagul Five arrival, runway two-six transition.” 3. (JetBlue 602 is cleared to descend via the Ivane Two arrival, landing south): “JetBlue six zero two leaving flight level two one zero descending via the Ivane Two arrival landing south.” NOTE − In reference to published altitude restrictions on a STAR or STAR runway transition, the “bottom altitude” is the lowest altitude authorized.

3.1.2.3 Pilots of IFR aircraft destined to locations for which STARs have been published may be issued a clearance containing a STAR whenever ATC deems it appropriate.

3.2 Use of STARs requires pilot possession of at least the approved chart. RNAV STARs must be retrievable by the procedure name from the aircraft database and conform to charted procedure. As with any ATC clearance or portion thereof, it is the responsibility of each pilot to accept or refuse an issued STAR. Pilots should notify ATC if they do not wish to use a STAR by placing “NO STAR” in the remarks section of the flight plan or by the less desirable method of verbally stating the same to ATC.

3.3 STAR charts are published in the Terminal Procedures Publications (TPP) and are available from FAA’s Aeronautical Information Services (AIS).

3.4 PBN STAR.

3.4.1 Public PBN STARs are normally designed using RNAV 1, RNP 1, or A − RNP NavSpecs. These procedures require system performance currently met by GPS or DME/DME/IRU PBN systems that satisfy the criteria discussed in the current publication of AC 90 − 100, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations. These procedures, using RNAV 1 and RNP 1 NavSpecs, must maintain a total system error of not more than 1 NM for 95% of the total flight time. Minimum values for A − RNP procedures will be charted in the PBN box (for example, 1.00 or 0.30).

3.4.2 In the U.S., a specific procedure’s PBN requirements will be prominently displayed in separate, standardized notes boxes. For procedures with PBN elements, the “PBN box” will contain the procedure’s NavSpec(s); and, if required: specific sensors or infrastructure needed for the navigation solution, any additional or advanced functional requirements, the minimum RNP value, and any amplifying remarks. Items listed in this PBN box are REQUIRED for the procedure’s PBN elements.

3.4.3 For procedures requiring GPS, if the navigation system does not automatically alert the flight crew of a loss of GPS, the operator must develop procedures to verify correct GPS operation.

REFERENCE − ENR 4.1 Paragraph 16.2.5.10, Impact of Magnetic Variation on PBN Systems 4. Local Flow Traffic Management Program 4.1 This program is a continuing effort by the FAA to enhance safety, minimize the impact of aircraft noise, and conserve aviation fuel. The enhancement of safety and reduction of noise are achieved in this program by minimizing low altitude maneuvering of arriving turbojet and turboprop aircraft weighing more that 12,500 pounds and, by permitting departure aircraft to climb to high altitudes sooner, as arrivals are operating at higher altitudes at the points where their flight paths cross. The application of these procedures also reduces exposure time between controlled aircraft and uncontrolled aircraft at the lower altitudes in and around the terminal environment. Fuel conservation is accomplished by absorbing any necessary arrival delays for aircraft included in this program operating at the higher and more fuel efficient altitudes.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.2 A fuel efficient descent is basically an uninterrupted descent (except where level flight is required for speed adjustment) from cruising altitude to the point when level flight is necessary for the pilot to stabilize the aircraft on final approach. The procedure for a fuel efficient descent is based on an altitude loss which is most efficient for the majority of aircraft being served. This will generally result in a descent gradient window of 250 − 350 feet per nautical mile.

4.3 When crossing altitudes and speed restrictions are issued verbally or are depicted on a chart, ATC will expect the pilot to descend first to the crossing altitude and then reduce speed. Verbal clearances for descent will normally permit an uninterrupted descent in accordance with the procedure as described in paragraph 4.2 above.

Acceptance of a charted fuel efficient descent (Runway Profile Descent) clearance requires the pilot to adhere to the altitudes, speeds, and headings depicted on the charts unless otherwise instructed by ATC. PILOTS RECEIVING A CLEARANCE FOR A FUEL EFFICIENT DESCENT ARE EXPECTED TO ADVISE ATC IF THEY DO NOT HAVE RUNWAY PROFILE DESCENT CHARTS PUBLISHED FOR THAT AIRPORT OR ARE UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH THE CLEARANCE.

5. Advance Information on Instrument Approaches 5.1 When landing at airports with approach control services and where two or more instrument approach procedures are published, pilots will be provided in advance of their arrival with the type of approach to expect or that they may be vectored for a visual approach. This information will be broadcast either by a controller or on ATIS. It will not be furnished when the visibility is three miles or better and the ceiling is at or above the highest initial approach altitude established for any low altitude instrument approach procedure for the airport.

5.2 The purpose of this information is to aid the pilot in planning arrival actions; however, it is not an ATC clearance or commitment and is subject to change. Pilots should bear in mind that fluctuating weather, shifting winds, blocked runway, etc., are conditions which may result in changes to approach information previously received. It is important that pilots advise ATC immediately if they are unable to execute the approach ATC advised will be used, or if they prefer another type of approach.

5.3 Aircraft destined to uncontrolled airports which have automated weather data with broadcast capability should monitor the ASOS/AWOS frequency to ascertain the current weather for the airport. The pilot must advise ATC when he/she has received the broadcast weather and state his/her intentions.

NOTE − 1. ASOS/AWOS should be set to provide one − minute broadcast weather updates at uncontrolled airports that are without weather broadcast capability by a human observer.

2. Controllers will consider the long line disseminated weather from an automated weather system at an uncontrolled airport as trend and planning information only and will rely on the pilot for current weather information for the airport. If the pilot is unable to receive the current broadcast weather, the last long − line disseminated weather will be issued to the pilot.

When receiving IFR services, the pilot/aircraft operator is responsible for determining if weather/visibility is adequate for approach/landing.

5.4 When making an IFR approach to an airport not served by a tower or FSS, after the ATC controller advises “CHANGE TO ADVISORY FREQUENCY APPROVED,” you should broadcast your intentions, including the type of approach being executed, your position, and when over the final approach fix inbound (nonprecision approach) or when over the outer marker or the fix used in lieu of the outer marker inbound (precision approach).

Continue to monitor the appropriate frequency (UNICOM, etc.) for reports from other pilots.

6. Approach Clearance 6.1 An aircraft which has been cleared to a holding fix and subsequently “cleared . . . approach” has not received new routing. Even though clearance for the approach may have been issued prior to the aircraft reaching the holding fix, ATC would expect the pilot to proceed via the holding fix (the last assigned route), and the feeder route associated with that fix (if a feeder route is published on the approach chart) to the initial approach fix (IAF) to commence the approach. WHEN CLEARED FOR THE APPROACH, THE PUBLISHED OFF AIRWAY (FEEDER) ROUTES THAT LEAD FROM THE EN ROUTE STRUCTURE TO THE IAF ARE PART OF THE APPROACH CLEARANCE.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.2 If a feeder route to an IAF begins at a fix located along the route of flight prior to reaching the holding fix, and clearance for an approach is issued, a pilot should commence the approach via the published feeder route; i.e., the aircraft would not be expected to overfly the feeder route and return to it. The pilot is expected to commence the approach in a similar manner at the IAF, if the IAF for the procedure is located along the route of flight to the holding fix.

6.3 If a route of flight directly to the initial approach fix is desired, it should be so stated by the controller with phraseology to include the words “direct . . . ,” “proceed direct” or a similar phrase which the pilot can interpret without question. If a pilot is uncertain of the clearance, immediately query ATC as to what route of flight is desired.

6.4 The name of an instrument approach, as published, is used to identify the approach, even though a component of the approach aid, such as the glideslope on an Instrument Landing System, is inoperative or unreliable. The controller will use the name of the approach as published, but must advise the aircraft at the time an approach clearance is issued that the inoperative or unreliable approach aid component is unusable, except when the title of the published approach procedures otherwise allows, for example, ILS or LOC.

6.5 At times ATC may not specify a particular approach procedure in the clearance, but will state “CLEARED APPROACH.” 6.5.1 This clearance indicates the pilot may execute any one of the authorized IAPs for that airport.

6.5.2 The clearance may be issued in conjunction with the route to or over an IAF or feeder fix.

6.5.3 This clearance does not constitute approval for the pilot to execute a contact approach or a visual approach to the airport or runway.

6.6 Except when being vectored to the final approach course, pilots cleared for an IAP are expected to execute the entire procedure commencing at an IAF or an associated feeder route as described on the IAP chart. Pilots are not required to execute the entire procedure if: 6.6.1 An appropriate new or revised ATC clearance is received, or 6.6.2 The IFR flight plan is canceled.

6.7 STAR to Approach Connectivity. A STAR may terminate at a fix that is also the IAF or IF for an approach.

When the arrival route instructions as published on the STAR state the pilot can expect the instrument approach from the STAR terminus fix or approach IAF or IF, pilots are expected to ensure that the RNAV system is loaded with the approach beginning at that IAF or IF so that the STAR and approach are connected. ATC will clear the aircraft for the instrument approach by stating the IAF fix/waypoint by name with the approach clearance. This procedure also applies to aircraft arriving to an airport via other air traffic services (ATS) routes.

EXAMPLE − “At RDFSH, Cleared ILS Runway 27 Approach” NOTE − The fix “RDFSH” is the STAR terminus fix and an IAF for the ILS runway 27 approach at KIAH. Pilots are expected to ensure that the ILS Runway 27 approach is loaded in the RNAV system with the RDFSH IAF selected. Pilots are not to select vectors or vectors to final option when loading the ILS runway 27 approach.

6.8 The following applies to aircraft on radar vectors and/or cleared “direct to” in conjunction with an approach clearance: 6.8.1 Maintain the last altitude assigned by ATC until the aircraft is established on a published segment of a transition route, or approach procedure segment, or other published route, for which a lower altitude is published on the chart. If already on an established route, or approach or arrival segment, you may descend to whatever minimum altitude is listed for that route or segment 6.8.2 Continue on the vector heading until intercepting the next published ground track applicable to the approach clearance.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.8.3 Once reaching the final approach fix via the published segments, the pilot may continue on approach to a landing.

6.8.4 If proceeding to an IAF with a published course reversal (procedure turn or hold-in-lieu of PT pattern), except when cleared for a straight in approach by ATC, the pilot must execute the procedure turn/hold-in-lieu of PT, and complete the approach.

6.8.5 If cleared to an IAF/IF via a NoPT route, or no procedure turn/hold-in-lieu of PT is published, continue with the published approach.

6.8.6 In addition to the above, RNAV aircraft may be issued a clearance direct to the IAF/IF at intercept angles not greater than 90 degrees for both conventional and RNAV instrument approaches. Controllers may issue a heading or a course direct to a fix between the IF and FAF at intercept angles not greater than 30 degrees for both conventional and RNAV instrument approaches. In all cases, controllers will assign altitudes that ensure obstacle clearance and will permit a normal descent to the FAF. When clearing aircraft direct to the IF, ATC will radar monitor the aircraft until the IF and will advise the pilot to expect clearance direct to the IF at least 5 miles from the fix. ATC must issue a straight-in approach clearance when clearing an aircraft direct to an IAF/IF with a procedure turn or hold − in − lieu of a procedure turn, and ATC does not want the aircraft to execute the course reversal.

NOTE − Refer to 14 CFR 91.175 (i).

6.9 RNAV aircraft may be issued a clearance direct to the FAF that is also charted as an IAF, in which case the pilot is expected to execute the depicted procedure turn or hold-in-lieu of procedure turn. ATC will not issue a straight-in approach clearance. If the pilot desires a straight-in approach, they must request vectors to the final approach course outside of the FAF or fly a published “NoPT” route. When visual approaches are in use, ATC may clear an aircraft direct to the FAF.

NOTE − 1. In anticipation of a clearance by ATC to any fix published on an instrument approach procedure, pilots of RNAV aircraft are advised to select an appropriate IAF or feeder fix when loading an instrument approach procedure into the RNAV system.

2. Selection of “Vectors-to-Final” or “Vectors” option for an instrument approach may prevent approach fixes located outside of the FAF from being loaded into an RNAV system. Therefore, the selection of these options is discouraged due to increased workload for pilots to reprogram the navigation system.

6.10 Arrival Holding. Some approach charts have an arrival holding pattern depicted at an IAF or at a feeder fix located along an airway. The arrival hold is depicted using a “thin line” since it is not always a mandatory part of the instrument procedure.

6.10.1 Arrival holding is charted where holding is frequently required prior to starting the approach procedure so that detailed holding instructions are not required. The arrival holding pattern is not authorized unless assigned by ATC. Holding at the same fix may also be depicted on the en route chart.

6.10.2 Arrival holding is also charted where it is necessary to use a holding pattern to align the aircraft for procedure entry from an airway due to turn angle limitations imposed by procedure design standards. When the turn angle from an airway into the approach procedure exceeds the permissible limits, an arrival holding pattern may be published along with a note on the procedure specifying the fix, the airway, and arrival direction where use of the arrival hold is required for procedure entry. Unlike a hold − in − lieu of procedure turn, use of the arrival holding pattern is not authorized until assigned by ATC. If ATC does not assign the arrival hold before reaching the holding fix, the pilot should request the hold for procedure entry. Once established on the inbound holding course and an approach clearance has been received, the published procedure can commence. Alternatively, if using the holding pattern for procedure entry is not desired, the pilot may ask ATC for maneuvering airspace to align the aircraft with the feeder course.

EXAMPLE − Planview Chart Note: “Proc NA via V343 northeast bound without holding at JOXIT. ATC CLNC REQD.” 6.11 An RF leg is defined as a constant radius circular path around a defined turn center that starts and terminates at a fix. An RF leg may be published as part of a procedure. Since not all aircraft have the capability to fly these Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 leg types, pilots are responsible for knowing if they can conduct an RNAV approach with an RF leg.

Requirements for RF legs will be indicated on the approach chart in the notes section or at the applicable initial approach fix. Controllers will clear RNAV-equipped aircraft for instrument approach procedures containing RF legs: 6.11.1 Via published transitions, or 6.11.2 In accordance with paragraph 6.8.6 above, and 6.11.3 ATC will not clear aircraft direct to any waypoint beginning or within an RF leg, and will not assign fix/waypoint crossing speeds in excess of charted speed restrictions.

EXAMPLE − 1. Controllers will not clear aircraft direct to THIRD because that waypoint begins the RF leg, and aircraft cannot be vectored or cleared to TURNN or vectored to intercept the approach segment at any point between THIRD and FORTH because this is the RF leg. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 9 .)

6.12 When necessary to cancel a previously issued approach clearance, the controller will advise the pilot “Cancel Approach Clearance” followed by any additional instructions when applicable.

7. Landing Priority 7.1 A clearance for a specific type of approach (ILS, RNAV, GLS, ADF, VOR, or visual approach) to an aircraft operating on an IFR flight plan does not mean that landing priority will be given over other traffic. Traffic control towers handle all aircraft, regardless of the type of flight plan, on a “first − come, first − served” basis. Therefore, because of local traffic or runway in use, it may be necessary for the controller, in the interest of safety, to provide a different landing sequence. In any case, a landing sequence will be issued to each aircraft as soon as possible to enable the pilot to properly adjust the aircraft’s flight path.

8. Procedure Turn and Hold − in − lieu of Procedure Turn 8.1 A procedure turn is the maneuver prescribed when it is necessary to reverse direction to establish the aircraft inbound on an intermediate or final approach course. The procedure turn or hold − in − lieu − of − PT is a required maneuver when it is depicted on the approach chart, unless cleared by ATC for a straight − in approach.

Additionally, the procedure turn or hold − in − lieu − of − PT is not permitted when the symbol “No PT” is depicted on the initial segment being used, when a RADAR VECTOR to the final approach course is provided, or when conducting a timed approach from a holding fix. The altitude prescribed for the procedure turn is a minimum altitude until the aircraft is established on the inbound course. The maneuver must be completed within the distance specified in the profile view. For a hold − in − lieu − of − PT, the holding pattern should be flown as depicted and the specified leg length/timing must not be exceeded.

NOTE − The pilot may elect to use the procedure turn or hold − in − lieu − of − PT when it is not required by the procedure, but must first receive an amended clearance from ATC. If the pilot is uncertain whether the ATC clearance intends for a procedure turn to be conducted or to allow for a straight − in approach, the pilot must immediately request clarification from ATC (14 CFR Section 91.123).

8.1.1 On U.S. Government charts, a barbed arrow indicates the maneuvering side of the outbound course on which the procedure turn is made. Headings are provided for course reversal using the 45 degree type procedure turn. However, the point at which the turn may be commenced and the type and rate of turn is left to the discretion of the pilot (limited by the charted remain within xx NM distance). Some of the options are the 45 degree procedure turn, the racetrack pattern, the teardrop procedure turn, or the 80 degree 260 degree course reversal.

Racetrack entries should be conducted on the maneuvering side where the majority of protected airspace resides.

If an entry places the pilot on the non − maneuvering side of the PT, correction to intercept the outbound course ensures remaining within protected airspace. Some procedure turns are specified by procedural track. These turns must be flown exactly as depicted.

8.1.2 Descent to the procedure turn (PT) completion altitude from the PT fix altitude (when one has been published or assigned by ATC) must not begin until crossing over the PT fix or abeam and proceeding outbound.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Some procedures contain a note in the chart profile view that says “Maintain (altitude) or above until established outbound for procedure turn” (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 10 ). Newer procedures will simply depict an “at or above” altitude at the PT fix without a chart note (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 11 ). Both are there to ensure required obstacle clearance is provided in the procedure turn entry zone (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 12 ). Absence of a chart note or specified minimum altitude adjacent to the PT fix is an indication that descent to the procedure turn altitude can commence immediately upon crossing over the PT fix, regardless of the direction of flight. This is because the minimum altitudes in the PT entry zone and the PT maneuvering zone are the same.

8.1.3 When the approach procedure involves a procedure turn, a maximum speed of not greater than 200 knots (IAS) should be observed from first overheading the course reversal IAF through the procedure turn maneuver to ensure containment within the obstruction clearance area. Pilots should begin the outbound turn immediately after passing the procedure turn fix. The procedure turn maneuver must be executed within the distance specified in the profile view. The normal procedure turn distance is 10 miles. This may be reduced to a minimum of 5 miles where only Category A or helicopter aircraft are to be operated or increased to as much as 15 miles to accommodate high performance aircraft.

8.1.4 A teardrop procedure or penetration turn may be specified in some procedures for a required course reversal. The teardrop procedure consists of departure from an initial approach fix on an outbound course followed by a turn toward and intercepting the inbound course at or prior to the intermediate fix or point. Its purpose is to permit an aircraft to reverse direction and lose considerable altitude within reasonably limited airspace. Where no fix is available to mark the beginning of the intermediate segment, it must be assumed to commence at a point 10 miles prior to the final approach fix. When the facility is located on the airport, an aircraft is considered to be on final approach upon completion of the penetration turn. However, the final approach segment begins on the final approach course 10 miles from the facility.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 9 Example of an RNAV Approach with RF Leg Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 10 FIG ENR 1.5 − 11 8.1.5 A holding pattern in lieu of procedure turn may be specified for course reversal in some procedures. In such cases, the holding pattern is established over an intermediate fix or a final approach fix. The holding pattern distance or time specified in the profile view must be observed. For a hold − in − lieu − of − PT, the holding pattern direction must be flown as depicted and the specified leg length/timing must not be exceeded. Maximum holding airspeed limitations as set forth for all holding patterns apply. The holding pattern maneuver is completed when the aircraft is established on the inbound course after executing the appropriate entry. If cleared for the approach prior to returning to the holding fix, and the aircraft is at the prescribed altitude, additional circuits of the holding pattern are not necessary nor expected by ATC. If pilots elect to make additional circuits to lose excessive altitude or to become better established on course, it is their responsibility to so advise ATC upon receipt of their approach clearance.

8.1.6 A procedure turn is not required when an approach can be made directly from a specified intermediate fix to the final approach fix. In such cases, the term “NoPT” is used with the appropriate course and altitude to denote that the procedure turn is not required. If a procedure turn is desired, and when cleared to do so by ATC, descent below the procedure turn altitude should not be made until the aircraft is established on the inbound course, since some NoPT altitudes may be lower than the procedure turn altitudes.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 12 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 8.2 Limitations on Procedure Turns 8.2.1 In the case of a radar initial approach to a final approach fix or position, or a timed approach from a holding fix, or where the procedure specifies NoPT, no pilot may make a procedure turn unless, when final approach clearance is received, the pilot so advises ATC and a clearance is received to executive a procedure turn.

8.2.2 When a teardrop procedure turn is depicted and a course reversal is required, this type turn must be executed.

8.2.3 When a holding pattern replaces a procedure turn, the holding pattern must be followed, except when RADAR VECTORING is provided or when NoPT is shown on the approach course. The recommended entry procedures will ensure the aircraft remains within the holding pattern’s protected airspace. As in the procedure turn, the descent from the minimum holding pattern altitude to the final approach fix altitude (when lower) may not commence until the aircraft is established on the inbound course. Where a holding pattern is established in − lieu − of a procedure turn, the maximum holding pattern airspeeds apply.

NOTE − See paragraph 1.9.2.1 , Airspeeds.

8.2.4 The absence of the procedure turn barb in the plan view indicates that a procedure turn is not authorized for that procedure.

9. RNP AR (Authorization Required) Instrument Procedures 9.1 RNP AR procedures require authorization analogous to the special authorization required for Category II or III ILS procedures. All operators require specific authorization from the FAA to fly any RNP AR approach or departure procedure. The FAA issues RNP AR authorization via operations specification (OpSpec), management specification (Mspec), or letter of authorization (LOA). There are no exceptions. Operators can find comprehensive information on RNP AR aircraft eligibility, operating procedures, and training requirements in AC 90 − 101, Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR.

9.2 Unique characteristics of RNP AR Operations Approach title. The FAA titles all RNP AR instrument approach procedures (IAP) as “RNAV (RNP) RWY XX.” All RNP AR procedures will clearly state “Authorization Required” on the procedure chart.

9.3 RNP value. RNP AR procedures are characterized by use of a lateral Obstacle Evaluation Area (OEA) equal to two times the RNP value (2 x RNP) in nautical miles. No secondary lateral OEA or additional buffers are used.

RNP AR procedures require a minimum lateral accuracy value of RNP 0.30. Each published line of minima in an RNP AR procedure has an associated RNP value that defines the procedure’s lateral performance requirement in the Final Approach Segment. Each approved RNP AR operator’s FAA − issued authorization will identify a minimum authorized RNP approach value This value may vary depending on aircraft configuration or operational procedures (e.g., use of flight director or autopilot).

9.4 Radius − to − fix (RF) legs. Many RNP AR IFPs contain RF legs. Aircraft eligibility for RF legs is required in any authorization for RNP AR operations.

9.5 Missed Approach RNP value less than 1.00 NM. Some RNP AR IFPs require an RNP lateral accuracy value of less than 1.00 NM in the missed approach segment. The operator’s FAA − issued RNP AR authorization will specify whether the operator may fly a missed approach procedure requiring a lateral accuracy value less than 1.00 NM. AC 90 − 101 identifies specific operating procedures and training requirements applicable to this aspect of RNP AR procedures.

9.6 Non − standard speeds or climb gradients. RNP AR approaches may require non − standard approach speeds and/or missed approach climb gradients. RNP AR approach charts will reflect any non − standard requirements and pilots must confirm they can meet those requirements before commencing the approach.

9.7 RNP AR Departure Procedures (RNP AR DP). RNP AR approach authorization is a mandatory prerequisite for an operator to be eligible to perform RNP AR DPs. RNP AR DPs can utilize a minimum RNP value of RNP Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 0.30, may include higher than standard climb gradients, and may include RF turns. Close in RF turns associated with RNP AR DPs may begin as soon as the departure end of the runway (DER). For specific eligibility guidance, operators should refer to AC 90 − 101.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 13 Example of an RNP AR DP 10. Side − step Maneuver 10.1 ATC may authorize a standard instrument approach procedure which serves either one of parallel runways that are separated by 1,200 feet or less followed by a straight-in landing on the adjacent runway.

10.2 Aircraft that will execute a side-step maneuver will be cleared for a specified approach procedure and landing on the adjacent parallel runway. Example, “cleared ILS runway 7 left approach, side-step to runway 7 right.” Pilots are expected to commence the side-step maneuver as soon as possible after the runway or runway environment is in sight. Compliance with minimum altitudes associated with stepdown fixes is expected even after the side − step maneuver is initiated.

NOTE − Side − step minima are flown to a Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) regardless of the approach authorized.

10.3 Landing minimums to the adjacent runway will be based on nonprecision criteria and therefore higher than the precision minimums to the primary runway, but will normally be lower than the published circling minimums.

11. Approach and Landing Minimums 11.1 Landing Minimums. The rules applicable to landing minimums are contained in 14 CFR Section 91.175.

TBL ENR 1.5 − 2 may be used to convert RVR to ground or flight visibility. For converting RVR values that fall between listed values, use the next higher RVR value; do not interpolate. For example, when converting 1800 RVR, use 2400 RVR with the resultant visibility of / mile.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.5 − 2 RVR Value Conversions RVR Visibility (statute miles) 1600 / 2400 / 3200 / 4000 / 4500 / 5000 1 6000 1 / 11.1.1 Aircraft approach category means a grouping of aircraft based on a speed of V at the maximum REF certified landing weight, if specified, or if V is not specified, 1.3 at the maximum certified landing weight.

REF VSO V , V , and the maximum certified landing weight are those values as established for the aircraft by the REF SO certification authority of the country of registry. A pilot must maneuver the aircraft within the circling approach protected area (see FIG ENR 1.5 − 14 ) to achieve the obstacle and terrain clearances provided by procedure design criteria.

11.1.2 In addition to pilot techniques for maneuvering, one acceptable method to reduce the risk of flying out of the circling approach protected area is to use either the minima corresponding to the category determined during certification or minima associated with a higher category. Helicopters may use Category A minima. If it is necessary to operate at a speed in excess of the upper limit of the speed range for an aircraft’s category, the minimums for the higher category should be used. This may occur with certain aircraft types operating in heavy/gusty wind, icing, or non − normal conditions. For example, an airplane which fits into Category B, but is circling to land at a speed of 145 knots, should use the approach Category D minimums. As an additional example, a Category A airplane (or helicopter) which is operating at 130 knots on a straight − in approach should use the approach Category C minimums.

11.1.3 A pilot who chooses an alternative method when it is necessary to maneuver at a speed that exceeds the category speed limit (for example, where higher category minimums are not published) should consider the following factors that can significantly affect the actual ground track flown: 11.1.3.1 Bank angle. For example, at 165 knots groundspeed, the radius of turn increases from 4,194 feet using 30 degrees of bank to 6,654 feet when using 20 degrees of bank. When using a shallower bank angle, it may be necessary to modify the flightpath or indicated airspeed to remain within the circling approach protected area.

Pilots should be aware that excessive bank angle can lead to a loss of aircraft control.

11.1.3.2 Indicated airspeed. Procedure design criteria typically utilize the highest speed for a particular category.

If a pilot chooses to operate at a higher speed, other factors should be modified to ensure that the aircraft remains within the circling approach protected area.

11.1.3.3 Wind speed and direction. For example, it is not uncommon to maneuver the aircraft to a downwind leg where the groundspeed will be considerably higher than the indicated airspeed. Pilots must carefully plan the initiation of all turns to ensure that the aircraft remains within the circling approach protected area.

11.1.3.4 Pilot technique. Pilots frequently have many options with regard to flightpath when conducting circling approaches. Sound planning and judgment are vital to proper execution. The lateral and vertical path to be flown should be carefully considered using current weather and terrain information to ensure that the aircraft remains within the circling approach protected area.

11.1.4 It is important to remember that 14 CFR Section 91.175(c) requires that “where a DA/DH or MDA is applicable, no pilot may operate an aircraft below the authorized MDA or continue an approach below the authorized DA/DH unless the aircraft is continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 intended runway can be made at a normal rate of descent using normal maneuvers, and for operations conducted under Part 121 or Part 135 unless that descent rate will allow touchdown to occur within the touchdown zone of the runway of intended landing.” 11.1.5 See the following category limits: 11.1.5.1 Category A: Speed less than 91 knots.

11.1.5.2 Category B: Speed 91 knots or more but less than 121 knots.

11.1.5.3 Category C: Speed 121 knots or more but less than 141 knots.

11.1.5.4 Category D: Speed 141 knots or more but less than 166 knots.

11.1.5.5 Category E: Speed 166 knots or more.

NOTE − V in the above definition refers to the speed used in establishing the approved landing distance under the airworthiness REF regulations constituting the type certification basis of the airplane, regardless of whether that speed for a particular airplane is 1.3 V 1.23 V or some higher speed required for airplane controllability. This speed, at the maximum certificated SO, SR, landing weight, determines the lowest applicable approach category for all approaches regardless of actual landing weight.

11.2 Published Approach Minimums. Approach minimums are published for different aircraft categories and consist of a minimum altitude (DA, DH, MDA) and required visibility. These minimums are determined by applying the appropriate TERPS criteria. When a fix is incorporated in a nonprecision final segment, two sets of minimums may be published; one for the pilot that is able to identify the fix, and a second for the pilot that cannot. Two sets of minimums may also be published when a second altimeter source is used in the procedure.

When a nonprecision procedure incorporates both a stepdown fix in the final segment and a second altimeter source, two sets of minimums are published to account for the stepdown fix and a note addresses minimums for the second altimeter source.

11.3 Obstacle Clearance. Final approach obstacle clearance is provided from the start of the final segment to the runway or missed approach point, whichever occurs last. Side-step obstacle protection is provided by increasing the width of the final approach obstacle clearance area.

11.3.1 Circling approach protected areas are defined by the tangential connection of arcs drawn from each runway end (see FIG ENR 1.5 − 14 ). Circling approach protected areas developed prior to late 2012 used fixed radius distances, dependent on aircraft approach category, as shown in the table on page B2 of the U.S. TPP. The approaches using standard circling approach areas can be identified by the absence of the “negative C” symbol on the circling line of minima. Circling approach protected areas developed after late 2012 use the radius distance shown in the table on page B2 of the U.S. TPP, dependent on aircraft approach category, and the altitude of the circling MDA, which accounts for true airspeed increase with altitude. The approaches using expanded circling approach areas can be identified by the presence of the “negative C” symbol on the circling line of minima (see FIG ENR 1.5 − 15 ). Because of obstacles near the airport, a portion of the circling area may be restricted by a procedural note; for example, “Circling NA E of RWY 17 − 35.” Obstacle clearance is provided at the published minimums (MDA) for the pilot who makes a straight − in approach, side − steps, or circles. Once below the MDA the pilot must see and avoid obstacles. Executing the missed approach after starting to maneuver usually places the aircraft beyond the MAP. The aircraft is clear of obstacles when at or above the MDA while inside the circling area, but simply joining the missed approach ground track from the circling maneuver may not provide vertical obstacle clearance once the aircraft exits the circling area. Additional climb inside the circling area may be required before joining the missed approach track. See ENR 1.5 − 27. , Missed Approach, for additional considerations when starting a missed approach at other than the MAP.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 14 Final Approach Obstacle Clearance NOTE − Circling approach area radii vary according to approach category and MSL circling altitude due to TAS changes − see FIG ENR 1.5 − 15 .

FIG ENR 1.5 − 15 Standard and Expanded Circling Approach Radii in the U.S. TPP Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 16 Precision Obstacle Free Zone (POFZ) 11.3.2 Precision Obstacle Free Zone (POFZ) . A volume of airspace above an area beginning at the runway threshold, at the threshold elevation, and centered on the extended runway centerline. The POFZ is 200 feet (60m) long and 800 feet (240m) wide. The POFZ must be clear when an aircraft on a vertically guided final approach is within 2 nautical miles of the runway threshold and the official weather observation is a ceiling below 250 feet or visibility less than / statute mile (SM) (or runway visual range below 4,000 feet). If the POFZ is not clear, the MINIMUM authorized height above touchdown (HAT) and visibility is 250 feet and / SM. The POFZ is considered clear even if the wing of the aircraft holding on a taxiway waiting for runway clearance penetrates the POFZ; however, neither the fuselage nor the tail may infringe on the POFZ. The POFZ is applicable at all runway ends including displaced thresholds. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 16 .)

11.4 Straight − In Minimums are shown on the IAP when the final approach course is within 30 degrees of the runway alignment and a normal descent can be made from the IFR altitude shown on the IAP to the runway surface. When either the normal rate of descent or the runway alignment factor of 30 degrees is exceeded, a straight − in minimum is not published and a circling minimum applies. The fact that a straight − in minimum is not published does not preclude pilots from landing straight − in if they have the active runway in sight and have sufficient time to make a normal approach for landing. Under such conditions and when ATC has cleared them for landing on that runway, pilots are not expected to circle even though only circling minimums are published.

If they desire to circle, they should advise ATC.

11.5 Side − Step Maneuver Minimums. Landing minimums for a side − step maneuver to the adjacent runway will normally be higher than the minimums to the primary runway.

11.6 Circling Minimums. In some busy terminal areas, ATC may not allow circling and circling minimums will not be published. Published circling minimums provide obstacle clearance when pilots remain within the appropriate area of protection. Pilots should remain at or above the circling altitude until the aircraft is continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the intended runway can be made at a normal Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.5 − 28 AIP ENR 1.5 − 28 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 rate of descent using normal maneuvers. Circling may require maneuvers at low altitude, at low airspeed, and in marginal weather conditions. Pilots must use sound judgment, have an in − depth knowledge of their capabilities, and fully understand the aircraft performance to determine the exact circling maneuver since weather, unique airport design, and the aircraft position, altitude, and airspeed must all be considered. The following basic guidance applies to the circling maneuver: 11.6.1 A portion of the circling area may be restricted. The restriction will be described by a chart note with reference to a direction relative to a runway or runways, and no circling maneuvers may be made in that restricted area. The restrictions may be applicable only to certain aircraft approach categories, and circling restrictions may differ between day and night. Pilots must carefully review and comply with circling restrictions during all circling operations.

11.6.2 At towered airports, follow specific instruction from the controller during the circling maneuver; however, an ATC clearance does not negate published circling area restrictions.

11.6.3 At non − towered airports, pilots must utilize the turn direction specified by 14 CFR § 91.126(b) unless a published circling area restriction requires the pilot to make turns in the opposite direction. It may be desirable to fly over the airport to observe wind and turn indicators and other traffic that may be on the runway or flying in the vicinity of the airport.

11.6.4 Remain vigilant for other traffic and remain within the circling approach maneuvering airspace radius distance as shown in the table on page B2 of the U.S. TPP. Maneuver to a base or downwind leg, as appropriate, considering existing weather conditions, VFR traffic flow, altitude to be lost while using normal descent rates/maneuvers, and any circling restrictions.

REFERENCE − AC 90 − 66, Non − Towered Airport Flight Operations.

11.6.5 The missed approach point (MAP) varies depending upon the approach flown. For vertically guided approaches, the MAP is at the decision altitude/decision height. Non − vertically guided and circling procedures share the same MAP, and the pilot determines this MAP by timing from the final approach fix, by a fix, a NAVAID, or a waypoint. Circling from a GLS, an ILS without a localizer line of minima, or an RNAV (GPS) approach without an LNAV line of minima is prohibited.

11.7 Instrument Approaches at a Military Field. When instrument approaches are conducted by civil aircraft at military airports, they must be conducted in accordance with the procedures and minimums approved by the military agency having jurisdiction over the airport.

12. Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts 12.1 14 CFR Section 91.175(a), Instrument approaches to civil airports, requires the use of SIAPs prescribed for the airport in 14 CFR Part 97 unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator (including ATC). If there are military procedures published at a civil airport, aircraft operating under 14 CFR Part 91 must use the civil procedure(s). Civil procedures are defined with “FAA” in parenthesis; e.g., (FAA), at the top, center of the procedure chart. DOD procedures are defined using the abbreviation of the applicable military service in parenthesis; for example, (USAF), (USN), (USA). 14 CFR Section 91.175(g), Military airports, requires civil pilots flying into or out of military airports to comply with the IAP’s and takeoff and landing minimums prescribed by the authority having jurisdiction at those airports. Unless an emergency exists, civil aircraft operating at military airports normally require advance authorization, commonly referred to as “Prior Permission Required” or “PPR.” Additionally, some civil airports may require PPR for the use of runways, taxiways, aprons, or other airport facilities and services. PPRs are typically published in the Chart Supplement entry for the airport.

Temporary or short − notice PPRs may be disseminated via NOTAM.

NOTE − Civil aircraft may conduct practice VFR approaches using DOD instrument approach procedures when approved by the air traffic controller.

12.1.1 IAPs (standard and special, civil and military) are based on joint civil and military criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for TERPS. The design of IAPs based on criteria contained in TERPS, takes into account the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 interrelationship between airports, facilities, and the surrounding environment, terrain, obstacles, noise sensitivity, etc. Appropriate altitudes, courses, headings, distances, and other limitations are specified and, once approved, the procedures are published and distributed by government and commercial cartographers as instrument approach charts.

12.1.2 Not all IAPs are published in chart form. Radar IAPs are established where requirements and facilities exist but they are printed in tabular form in appropriate U.S. Government Flight Information Publications.

12.1.3 The navigation equipment required to join and fly an instrument approach procedure is indicated by the title of the procedure and notes on the chart.

12.1.3.1 Straight − in IAPs are identified by the navigational system providing the final approach guidance and the runway to which the approach is aligned (e.g., VOR RWY 13). Circling only approaches are identified by the navigational system providing final approach guidance and a letter (e.g., VOR A). More than one navigational system separated by a slash indicates that more than one type of equipment must be used to execute the final approach (e.g., VOR/DME RWY 31). More than one navigational system separated by the word “or” indicates either type of equipment may be used to execute the final approach (for example, VOR or GPS RWY 15).

NOTE − This procedure identification method has changed and these procedures will be revised in the course of the normal procedure amendment process. The slash and equipment (e.g., /DME) information will be removed with future amendments. Pilots should review the procedure’s notes, planview annotations,and PBN/equipment requirements boxes to determine the capability needed to accomplish the procedure.

12.1.3.2 In some cases, other types of navigation systems including radar may be required to execute other portions of the approach or to navigate to the IAF (e.g., an NDB procedure turn to an ILS, an NDB in the missed approach, or radar required to join the procedure or identify a fix). When radar or other equipment is required for procedure entry from the en route environment, a note will be charted in the planview of the approach procedure chart (for example, RADAR REQUIRED or ADF REQUIRED). When radar or other equipment is required on portions of the procedure outside the final approach segment, including the missed approach, a note will be charted in the notes box of the pilot briefing portion of the approach chart (for example, RADAR REQUIRED or DME REQUIRED). Notes are not charted when VOR is required outside the final approach segment. Pilots should ensure that the aircraft is equipped with the required NAVAID(s) in order to execute the approach, including the missed approach.

NOTE − Some military (i.e., U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy) IAPs have these “additional equipment required” notes charted only in the planview of the approach procedure and do not conform to the same application standards used by the FAA.

12.1.3.3 The FAA has initiated a program to provide a new notation for LOC approaches when charted on an ILS approach requiring other navigational aids to fly the final approach course. The LOC minimums will be annotated with the NAVAID required (for example, “DME Required” or “RADAR Required”). During the transition period, ILS approaches will still exist without the annotation.

12.1.3.4 Many ILS approaches having minima based on RVR are eligible for a landing minimum of RVR 1800.

Some of these approaches are to runways that have touchdown zone and centerline lights. For many runways that do not have touchdown and centerline lights, it is still possible to allow a landing minimum of RVR 1800.

For these runways, the normal ILS minimum of RVR 2400 can be annotated with a single or double asterisk or the dagger symbol “ † ”; for example “** 696/24 200 (200/1/2).” A note is included on the chart stating “**RVR 1800 authorized with use of FD or AP or HUD to DA.” The pilot must use the flight director, or autopilot with an approved approach coupler, or head up display to decision altitude or to the initiation of a missed approach.

In the interest of safety, single pilot operators should not fly approaches to 1800 RVR minimums on runways without touchdown and centerline lights using only a flight director, unless accompanied by the use of an autopilot with an approach coupler.

12.1.3.5 The naming of multiple approaches of the same type to the same runway is also changing. Multiple approaches with the same guidance will be annotated with an alphabetical suffix beginning at the end of the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 30 United States of America 22 JAN 26 alphabet and working backwards for subsequent procedures (e.g., ILS Z RWY 28, ILS Y RWY 28, etc.). The existing annotations such as ILS 2 RWY 28 or Silver ILS RWY 28 will be phased out and replaced with the new designation. The Cat II and Cat III designations are used to differentiate between multiple ILSs to the same runway unless there are multiples of the same type.

12.1.3.6 RNAV (GPS) approaches to LNAV, LP, LNAV/VNAV and LPV lines of minima using WAAS and RNAV (GPS) approaches to LNAV and LNAV/VNAV lines of minima using GPS are charted as RNAV (GPS) RWY (Number) (e.g., RNAV (GPS) RWY 21).

12.1.3.7 Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) Box. As charts are updated, a procedure’s PBN requirements and conventional equipment requirements will be prominently displayed in separate, standardized notes boxes.

For procedures with PBN elements, the PBN box will contain the procedure’s navigation specification(s); and, if required: specific sensors or infrastructure needed for the navigation solution, any additional or advanced functional requirements, the minimum Required Navigation Performance (RNP) value, and any amplifying remarks. Items listed in this PBN box are REQUIRED for the procedure’s PBN elements. For example, an ILS with an RNAV missed approach would require a specific capability to fly the missed approach portion of the procedure. That required capability will be listed in the PBN box. The separate Equipment Requirements box will list ground − based equipment requirements. On procedures with both PBN elements and equipment requirements, the PBN requirements box will be listed first. The publication of these notes will continue incrementally until all charts have been amended to comply with the new standard.

12.1.4 Approach minimums are based on the local altimeter setting for that airport, unless annotated otherwise; e.g., Oklahoma City/Will Rogers World approaches are based on having a Will Rogers World altimeter setting.

When a different altimeter source is required, or more than one source is authorized, it will be annotated on the approach chart; e.g., use Sidney altimeter setting, if not received, use Scottsbluff altimeter setting. Approach minimums may be raised when a nonlocal altimeter source is authorized. When more than one altimeter source is authorized, and the minima are different, they will be shown by separate lines in the approach minima box or a note; e.g., use MHK altimeter setting; when not available use SLN altimeter setting and increase all MDA s 40 feet. The altimeter source location may be referenced by city name, city and state, airport name, or the FAA location identifier. When using the location identifier, an airport outside the contiguous U.S. will use both the FAA and ICAO identifiers. New approach procedures and future amendments of existing procedures will use airport identifiers as the standard reference. When the altimeter must be obtained from a source other than air traffic a note will indicate the source; e.g., Obtain local altimeter setting on CTAF. When the altimeter setting(s) on which the approach is based is not available, the approach is not authorized. Baro − VNAV must be flown using the local altimeter setting only. Where no local altimeter is available, the LNAV/VNAV line will still be published for use by WAAS receivers with a note that Baro − VNAV is not authorized. When a local and at least one other altimeter setting source is authorized and the local altimeter is not available Baro − VNAV is not authorized; however, the LNAV/VNAV minima can still be used by WAAS receivers using the alternate altimeter setting source.

NOTE − Barometric Vertical Navigation (baro − VNAV). An RNAV system function which uses barometric altitude information from the aircraft’s altimeter to compute and present a vertical guidance path to the pilot. The specified vertical path is computed as a geometric path, typically computed between two waypoints or an angle based computation from a single waypoint.

Further guidance may be found in Advisory Circular 90 − 105.

12.1.5 A pilot adhering to the altitudes, flight paths, and weather minimums depicted on the IAP chart or vectors and altitudes issued by the radar controller, is assured of terrain and obstruction clearance and runway or airport alignment during approach for landing.

12.1.6 IAPs are designed to provide an IFR descent from the en route environment to a point where a safe landing can be made. They are prescribed and approved by appropriate civil or military authority to ensure a safe descent during instrument flight conditions at a specific airport. It is important that pilots understand these procedures and their use prior to attempting to fly instrument approaches.

12.1.7 TERPS criteria are provided for the following types of instrument approach procedures: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.1.7.1 Precision Approach (PA). An instrument approach based on a navigation system that provides course and glidepath deviation information meeting the precision standards of ICAO Annex 10. For example, PAR, ILS,and GLS are precision approaches.

12.1.7.2 Approach with Vertical Guidance (APV). An instrument approach based on a navigation system that is not required to meet the precision approach standards of ICAO Annex 10 but provides course and glidepath deviation information. For example, Baro − VNAV, LDA with glidepath, LNAV/VNAV and LPV are APV approaches.

12.1.7.3 Nonprecision Approach (NPA). An instrument approach based on a navigation system which provides course deviation information, but no glidepath deviation information. For example, VOR, NDB and LNAV. As noted in subparagraph 12.10, Vertical Descent Angle (VDA) on Nonprecision Approaches, some approach procedures may provide a Vertical Descent Angle as an aid in flying a stabilized approach, without requiring its use in order to fly the procedure. This does not make the approach an APV procedure, since it must still be flown to an MDA and has not been evaluated with a glidepath.

12.2 The method used to depict prescribed altitudes on instrument approach charts differs according to techniques employed by different chart publishers. Prescribed altitudes may be depicted in four different configurations: minimum, maximum, mandatory, and recommended. The U.S. Government distributes charts produced by National Geospatial − Intelligence Agency (NGA) and FAA. Altitudes are depicted on these charts in the profile view with underscore, overscore, both or none to identify them as minimum, maximum, mandatory or recommended.

12.2.1 Minimum altitude will be depicted with the altitude value underscored. Aircraft are required to maintain altitude at or above the depicted value, for example, 3000 .

12.2.2 Maximum altitude will be depicted with the altitude value overscored. Aircraft are required to maintain altitude at or below the depicted value, for example, 4000 .

12.2.3 Mandatory altitude will be depicted with the altitude value both underscored and overscored. Aircraft are required to maintain altitude at the depicted value, for example, 5000 .

12.2.4 Recommended altitude will be depicted with no overscore or underscore. These altitudes are depicted for descent planning, for example, 6000.

NOTE − 1. Pilots are cautioned to adhere to altitudes as prescribed because, in certain instances, they may be used as the basis for vertical separation of aircraft by ATC. When a depicted altitude is specified in the ATC clearance, that altitude becomes mandatory as defined above.

2. The ILS glide slope is intended to be intercepted at the published glide slope intercept altitude. This point marks the PFAF and is depicted by the ”lightning bolt” symbol on U.S. Government charts. Intercepting the glide slope at this altitude marks the beginning of the final approach segment and ensures required obstacle clearance during descent from the glide slope intercept altitude to the lowest published decision altitude for the approach. Interception and tracking of the glide slope prior to the published glide slope interception altitude does not necessarily ensure that minimum, maximum, and/or mandatory altitudes published for any preceding fixes will be complied with during the descent. If the pilot chooses to track the glide slope prior to the glide slope interception altitude, they remain responsible for complying with published altitudes for any preceding stepdown fixes encountered during the subsequent descent.

3. Approaches used for simultaneous (parallel) independent and simultaneous close parallel operations procedurally require descending on the glideslope from the altitude at which the approach clearance is issued (refer to ENR 1.5 − 19. and ENR 1.5 − 20. ). For simultaneous close parallel (PRM) approaches, the Attention All Users Page (AAUP) may publish a note which indicates that descending on the glideslope/glidepath meets all crossing restrictions. However, if no such note is published, and for simultaneous independent approaches (4300 and greater runway separation) where an AAUP is not published, pilots are cautioned to monitor their descent on the glideslope/path outside of the PFAF to ensure compliance with published crossing restrictions during simultaneous operations.

4. When parallel approach courses are less than 2500 feet apart and reduced in-trail spacing is authorized for simultaneous dependent operations, a chart note will indicate that simultaneous operations require use of vertical guidance and that the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 32 United States of America 22 JAN 26 pilot should maintain last assigned altitude until established on glide slope. These approaches procedurally require utilization of the ILS glide slope for wake turbulence mitigation. Pilots should not confuse these simultaneous dependent operations with (SOIA) simultaneous close parallel PRM approaches, where PRM appears in the approach title.

12.2.5 Altitude restrictions depicted at stepdown fixes within the final approach segment are applicable only when flying a Non − Precision Approach to a straight − in or circling line of minima identified as an MDA. These altitude restrictions may be annotated with a note “LOC only” or “LNAV only.” Stepdown fix altitude restrictions within the final approach segment do not apply to pilots using Precision Approach (ILS) or Approach with Vertical Guidance (LPV, LNAV/VNAV) lines of minima identified as a DA, since obstacle clearance on these approaches is based on the aircraft following the applicable vertical guidance. Pilots are responsible for adherence to stepdown fix altitude restrictions when outside the final approach segment (i.e., initial or intermediate segment), regardless of which type of procedure the pilot is flying. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 17 ).

FIG ENR 1.5 − 17 Instrument Approach Procedure Stepdown Fixes 12.3 The Minimum Safe Altitudes (MSA) is published for emergency use on IAP or departure procedure (DP) graphic charts. MSAs provide 1,000 feet of clearance over all obstacles, but do not necessarily assure acceptable navigation signal coverage. The MSA depiction on the plan view of an approach chart or on a DP graphic chart contains the identifier of the center point of the MSA, the applicable radius of the MSA, a depiction of the sector(s), and the minimum altitudes above mean sea level which provide obstacle clearance. For conventional navigation systems, the MSA is normally based on the primary omnidirectional facility on which the IAP or DP graphic chart is predicated, but may be based on the airport reference point (ARP) if no suitable facility is available. For RNAV approaches or DP graphic charts, the MSA is based on an RNAV waypoint. MSAs normally have a 25 NM radius; however, for conventional navigation systems, this radius may be expanded to 30 NM if Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 necessary to encompass the airport landing surfaces. A single sector altitude is normally established, however when the MSA is based on a facility and it is necessary to obtain relief from obstacles, an MSA with up to four sectors may be established.

12.4 Terminal Arrival Area (TAA) 12.4.1 The TAA provides a transition from the en route structure to the terminal environment with little required pilot/air traffic control interface for aircraft equipped with Area Navigation (RNAV) systems. A TAA provides minimum altitudes with standard obstacle clearance when operating within the TAA boundaries. TAAs are primarily used on RNAV approaches but may be used on an ILS approach when RNAV is the sole means for navigation to the IF; however, they are not normally used in areas of heavy concentration of air traffic.

12.4.2 The basic design of the RNAV procedure underlying the TAA is normally the “T” design (also called the “Basic T”). The “T” design incorporates two IAFs plus a dual purpose IF/IAF that functions as both an intermediate fix and an initial approach fix. The T configuration continues from the IF/IAF to the final approach fix (FAF) and then to the missed approach point (MAP). The two base leg IAFs are typically aligned in a straight-line perpendicular to the intermediate course connecting at the IF/IAF. A Hold-in-Lieu-of Procedure Turn (HILPT) is anchored at the IF/IAF and depicted on U.S. Government publications using the “hold − in − lieu − of − PT” holding pattern symbol. When the HILPT is necessary for course alignment and/or descent, the dual purpose IF/IAF serves as an IAF during the entry into the pattern. Following entry into the HILPT pattern and when flying a route or sector labeled “NoPT,” the dual-purpose fix serves as an IF, marking the beginning of the Intermediate Segment. See FIG ENR 1.5 − 18 and FIG ENR 1.5 − 19 for the Basic “T” TAA configuration.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 18 Basic “T” Design Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 34 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 19 Basic “T” Design 12.4.3 The standard TAA based on the “T” design consists of three areas defined by the Initial Approach Fix (IAF) legs and the intermediate segment course beginning at the IF/IAF. These areas are called the straight − in, left − base, and right − base areas. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 20 ). TAA area lateral boundaries are identified by magnetic courses TO the IF/IAF. The straight − in area can be further divided into pie − shaped sectors with the boundaries identified by magnetic courses TO the (IF/ IAF), and may contain stepdown sections defined by arcs based on RNAV distances from the IF/IAF. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 21 ). The right/left − base areas can only be subdivided using arcs based on RNAV distances from the IAFs for those areas.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 20 TAA Area 12.4.4 Entry from the terminal area onto the procedure is normally accomplished via a no procedure turn (NoPT) routing or via a course reversal maneuver. The published procedure will be annotated “NoPT” to indicate when the course reversal is not authorized when flying within a particular TAA sector. Otherwise, the pilot is expected to execute the course reversal under the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.175. The pilot may elect to use the course reversal pattern when it is not required by the procedure, but must receive clearance from air traffic control before beginning the procedure.

12.4.4.1 ATC should not clear an aircraft to the left base leg or right base leg IAF within a TAA at an intercept angle exceeding 90 degrees. Pilots must not execute the HILPT course reversal when the sector or procedure segment is labeled “NoPT.” 12.4.4.2 ATC may clear aircraft direct to the fix labeled IF/IAF if the course to the IF/IAF is within the straight-in sector labeled “NoPT” and the intercept angle does not exceed 90 degrees. Pilots are expected to proceed direct to the IF/IAF and accomplish a straight-in approach. Do not execute HILPT course reversal. Pilots are also expected to fly the straight − in approach when ATC provides radar vectors and monitoring to the IF/IAF and issues a “straight-in” approach clearance; otherwise, the pilot is expected to execute the HILPT course reversal.

12.4.4.3 On rare occasions, ATC may clear the aircraft for an approach at the airport without specifying the approach procedure by name or by a specific approach (for example, “cleared RNAV Runway 34 approach”) without specifying a particular IAF. In either case, the pilot should proceed direct to the IAF or to the IF/IAF associated with the sector that the aircraft will enter the TAA and join the approach course from that point and if required by that sector (i.e., sector is not labeled “NoPT), complete the HILPT course reversal.

NOTE − If approaching with a TO bearing that is on a sector boundary, the pilot is expected to proceed in accordance with a “NoPT” routing unless otherwise instructed by ATC.

12.4.5 Altitudes published within the TAA replace the MSA altitude. However, unlike MSA altitudes the TAA altitudes are operationally usable altitudes. These altitudes provide at least 1,000 feet of obstacle clearance, more in mountainous areas. It is important that the pilot knows which area of the TAA the aircraft will enter in order to comply with the minimum altitude requirements. The pilot can determine which area of the TAA the aircraft Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 36 United States of America 22 JAN 26 will enter by determining the magnetic bearing of the aircraft TO the fix labeled IF/IAF. The bearing should then be compared to the published lateral boundary bearings that define the TAA areas. Do not use magnetic bearing to the right-base or left-base IAFs to determine position.

12.4.5.1 An ATC clearance direct to an IAF or to the IF/IAF without an approach clearance does not authorize a pilot to descend to a lower TAA altitude. If a pilot desires a lower altitude without an approach clearance, request the lower TAA altitude from ATC. Pilots not sure of the clearance should confirm their clearance with ATC or request a specific clearance. Pilots entering the TAA with two − way radio communications failure (14 CFR Section 91.185, IFR Operations: Two − way Radio Communications Failure), must maintain the highest altitude prescribed by Section 91.185(c)(2) until arriving at the appropriate IAF.

12.4.5.2 Once cleared for the approach, pilots may descend in the TAA sector to the minimum altitude depicted within the defined area/subdivision, unless instructed otherwise by air traffic control. Pilots should plan their descent within the TAA to permit a normal descent from the IF/IAF to the FAF. In FIG ENR 1.5 − 21 , pilots within the left or right − base areas are expected to maintain a minimum altitude of 6,000 feet until within 17 NM of the associated IAF. After crossing the 17 NM arc, descent is authorized to the lower charted altitudes. Pilots approaching from the northwest are expected to maintain a minimum altitude of 6,000 feet, and when within 22 NM of the IF/IAF, descend to a minimum altitude of 2,000 feet MSL until crossing the IF/IAF.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 21 Sectored TAA Areas 12.4.6 U.S. Government charts depict TAAs using icons located in the plan view outside the depiction of the actual approach procedure. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 22 ). Use of icons is necessary to avoid obscuring any portion of the “T” procedure (altitudes, courses, minimum altitudes, etc.). The icon for each TAA area will be located and oriented on the plan view with respect to the direction of arrival to the approach procedure, and will show all TAA minimum altitudes and sector/radius subdivisions. The IAF for each area of the TAA is included on the icon where it appears on the approach to help the pilot orient the icon to the approach procedure. The IAF name and the distance of the TAA area boundary from the IAF are included on the outside arc of the TAA area icon.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 22 RNAV (GPS) Approach Chart SW − 1, 27 JAN 2022 to 24 FEB 2022 1, 27 JAN 2022 to 24 FEB 2022 − SW Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 38 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.4.7 TAAs may be modified from the standard size and shape to accommodate operational or ATC requirements. Some areas may be eliminated, while the other areas are expanded. The “T” design may be modified by the procedure designers where required by terrain or ATC considerations. For instance, the “T” design may appear more like a regularly or irregularly shaped “Y,” upside down “L,” or an “I.” 12.4.7.1 FIG ENR 1.5 − 23 depicts a TAA without a left base leg and right base leg. In this generalized example, pilots approaching on a bearing TO the IF/IAF from 271 clockwise to 089 are expected to execute a course reversal because the amount of turn required at the IF/IAF exceeds 90 degrees. The term “NoPT” will be annotated on the boundary of the TAA icon for the other portion of the TAA.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 23 TAA with Left and Right Base Areas Eliminated 12.4.7.2 FIG ENR 1.5 − 24 depicts another TAA modification that pilots may encounter. In this generalized example, the left base area and part of the straight-in area have been eliminated. Pilots operating within the TAA between 210 clockwise to 360 bearing TO the IF/IAF are expected to proceed direct to the IF/IAF and then execute the course reversal in order to properly align the aircraft for entry onto the intermediate segment or to avoid an excessive descent rate. Aircraft operating in areas from 001 clockwise to 090 bearing TO the IF/IAF are expected to proceed direct to the right base IAF and not execute course reversal maneuver. Aircraft cleared direct the IF/IAF by ATC in this sector will be expected to accomplish HILTP. Aircraft operating in areas 091 clockwise to 209 bearing TO the IF/IAF are expected to proceed direct to the IF/IAF and not execute the course reversal. These two areas are annotated “NoPT” at the TAA boundary of the icon in these areas when displayed on the approach chart’s plan view.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 24 TAA with Left Base and Part of Straight − In Area Eliminated 12.4.7.3 FIG ENR 1.5 − 25 depicts a TAA with right base leg and part of the straight-in area eliminated.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 25 TAA with Right Base Eliminated Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 40 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.4.8 When an airway does not cross the lateral TAA boundaries, a feeder route will be established from an airway fix or NAVAID to the TAA boundary to provide a transition from the en route structure to the appropriate IAF. Each feeder route will terminate at the TAA boundary and will be aligned along a path pointing to the associated IAF. Pilots should descend to the TAA altitude after crossing the TAA boundary and cleared for the approach by ATC. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 26 .)

FIG ENR 1.5 − 26 Examples of a TAA with Feeders from an Airway 12.4.9 Each waypoint on the “T” is assigned a pronounceable 5 − letter name, except the missed approach waypoint. These names are used for ATC communications, RNAV databases, and aeronautical navigation products. The missed approach waypoint is assigned a pronounceable name when it is not located at the runway threshold.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 41 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 27 Minimum Vectoring Altitude Charts N 30 160 12.5 Minimum Vectoring Altitudes (MVAs) are established for use by ATC when radar ATC is exercised.

MVA charts are prepared by air traffic facilities at locations where there are numerous different minimum IFR altitudes. Each MVA chart has sectors large enough to accommodate vectoring of aircraft within the sector at the MVA. Each sector boundary is at least 3 miles from the obstruction determining the MVA. To avoid a large sector with an excessively high MVA due to an isolated prominent obstruction, the obstruction may be enclosed in a buffer area whose boundaries are at least 3 miles from the obstruction. This is done to facilitate vectoring around the obstruction. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 27 .)

12.5.1 The minimum vectoring altitude in each sector provides 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle in nonmountainous areas and 2,000 feet above the highest obstacle in designated mountainous areas. Where lower MVAs are required in designated mountainous areas to achieve compatibility with terminal routes or to permit vectoring to an IAP, 1,000 feet of obstacle clearance may be authorized with the use of ATC Surveillance. The minimum vectoring altitude will provide at least 300 feet above the floor of controlled airspace.

NOTE − OROCA is a published altitude which provides 1,000 feet of terrain and obstruction clearance in the US (2,000 feet of clearance in designated mountainous areas). These altitudes are not assessed for NAVAID signal coverage, air traffic control surveillance, or communications coverage, and are published for general situational awareness, flight planning and in − flight contingency use.

12.5.2 Because of differences in the areas considered for MVA, and those applied to other minimum altitudes, and the ability to isolate specific obstacles, some MVAs may be lower than the nonradar Minimum En Route Altitudes (MEAs), Minimum Obstruction Clearance Altitudes (MOCAs) or other minimum altitudes depicted on charts for a given location. While being radar vectored, IFR altitude assignments by ATC will be at or above MVA.

12.5.3 The MVA/MIA may be lower than the TAA minimum altitude. If ATC has assigned an altitude to an aircraft that is below the TAA minimum altitude, the aircraft will either be assigned an altitude to maintain until established on a segment of a published route or instrument approach procedure, or climbed to the TAA altitude.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 42 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.6 Circling. Circling minimums charted on an RNAV (GPS) approach chart may be lower than the LNAV/VNAV line of minima, but never lower than the LNAV line of minima (straight-in approach). Pilots may safely perform the circling maneuver at the circling published line of minima if the approach and circling maneuver is properly performed according to aircraft category and operational limitations.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 28 Example of LNAV and Circling Minima Lower Than LNAV/VNAV DA.

Harrisburg International RNAV (GPS) RWY 13 CATEGORY A B C D LPV DA 558/24 250 (300 − ½ ) LNAV/ 1572 − 5 1264 (1300 − 5) VNAV DA 1180 / 24 1180 / 40 1180 / 2 1180 / 2 ¼ LNAV MDA 872 (900 − ½ ) 872 (900 − ¾ ) 872 (900 − 2) 872 (900 − 2 ¼ ) 1180 − 1 1180 − 1 ¼ 1180 − 2 ½ 1180 − 2 ¾ CIRCLING 870 (900 − 1) 870 (900 − 1 ¼ ) 870 (900 − 2 ½ ) 870 (900 − 2 ¾ ) FIG ENR 1.5 − 29 Explanation of LNAV and/or Circling Minima Lower than LNAV/VNAV DA 12.7 FIG ENR 1.5 − 29 provides a visual representation of an obstacle evaluation and calculation of LNAV MDA, Circling MDA, LNAV/VNAV DA.

12.7.1 No vertical guidance (LNAV). A line is drawn horizontal at obstacle height and 250 feet added for Required Obstacle Clearance (ROC). The controlling obstacle used to determine LNAV MDA can be different than the controlling obstacle used in determining ROC for circling MDA. Other factors may force a number larger than 250 ft to be added to the LNAV OCS. The number is rounded up to the next higher 20 foot increment.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 43 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.7.2 Circling MDA. The circling MDA will provide 300 foot obstacle clearance within the area considered for obstacle clearance and may be lower than the LNAV/VNAV DA, but never lower than the straight in LNAV MDA. This may occur when different controlling obstacles are used or when other controlling factors force the LNAV MDA to be higher than 250 feet above the LNAV OCS. In FIG ENR 1.5 − 28 , the required obstacle clearance for both the LNAV and Circle resulted in the same MDA, but lower than the LNAV/VNAV DA.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 29 provides an illustration of this type of situation.

12.7.3 Vertical guidance (LNAV/VNAV). A line is drawn horizontal at obstacle height until reaching the obstacle clearance surface (OCS). At the OCS, a vertical line is drawn until reaching the glide path. This is the DA for the approach. This method places the offending obstacle in front of the LNAV/VNAV DA so it can be seen and avoided. In some situations, this may result in the LNAV/VNAV DA being higher than the LNAV and/or Circling MDA.

12.8 The Visual Descent Point (VDP) identified by the symbol (V), is a defined point on the final approach course of a nonprecision straight − in approach procedure from which a stabilized visual descent from the MDA to the runway touchdown point may be commenced. The pilot should not descend below the MDA prior to reaching the VDP. The VDP will be identified by DME or RNAV along − track distance to the MAP. The VDP distance is based on the lowest MDA published on the IAP and harmonized with the angle of the visual glide slope indicator (VGSI) (if installed) or the procedure VDA (if no VGSI is installed). A VDP may not be published under certain circumstances which may result in a destabilized descent between the MDA and the runway touchdown point. Such circumstances include an obstacle penetrating the visual surface between the MDA and runway threshold, lack of distance measuring capability, or the procedure design prevents a VDP to be identified.

12.8.1 VGSI systems may be used as a visual aid to the pilot to determine if the aircraft is in a position to make a stabilized descent from the MDA. When the visibility is close to minimums, the VGSI may not be visible at the VDP due to its location beyond the MAP.

12.8.2 Pilots not equipped to receive the VDP should fly the approach procedure as though no VDP had been provided.

12.8.3 On a straight-in nonprecision IAP, descent below the MDA between the VDP and the MAP may be inadvisable or impossible. Aircraft speed, height above the runway, descent rate, amount of turn, and runway length are some of the factors which must be considered by the pilot to determine if a safe descent and landing can be accomplished.

12.9 A visual segment obstruction evaluation is accomplished during procedure design on all IAPs. Obstacles (both lighted and unlighted) are allowed to penetrate the visual segment obstacle identification surfaces.

Identified obstacle penetrations may cause restrictions to instrument approach operations which may include an increased approach visibility requirement, not publishing a VDP, and/or prohibiting night instrument operations to the runway. There is no implicit obstacle protection from the MDA/DA to the touchdown point. Accordingly, it is the responsibility of the pilot to visually acquire and avoid obstacles below the MDA/DA during transition to landing.

12.9.1 Unlighted obstacle penetrations may result in prohibiting night instrument operations to the runway. A chart note will be published in the pilot briefing strip “Procedure NA at Night.” 12.9.2 Use of a VGSI may be approved in lieu of obstruction lighting to restore night instrument operations to the runway. A chart note will be published in the pilot briefing strip “ Straight-in Rwy XX at Night, operational VGSI required, remain on or above VGSI glidepath until threshold.” 12.10 The highest obstacle (man-made, terrain, or vegetation) will be charted on the planview of an IAP. Other obstacles may be charted in either the planview or the airport sketch based on distance from the runway and available chart space. The elevation of the charted obstacle will be shown to the nearest foot above mean sea level.

Obstacles without a verified accuracy are indicated by a ± symbol following the elevation value.

12.11 Vertical Descent Angle (VDA). FAA policy is to publish a VDA/TCH on all nonprecision approaches except those published in conjunction with vertically guided minimums (i.e., ILS or LOC RWY XX) or no-FAF Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 44 United States of America 22 JAN 26 procedures without a step-down fix (i.e., on − airport VOR or NDB). A VDA does not guarantee obstacle protection below the MDA in the visual segment. The presence of a VDA does not change any nonprecision approach requirements.

12.11.1 Obstacles may penetrate the obstacle identification surface below the MDA in the visual segment of an IAP that has a published VDA/TCH. When the VDA/TCH is not authorized due to an obstacle penetration that would require a pilot to deviate from the VDA between MDA and touchdown, the VDA/TCH will be replaced with the note “Visual Segment- Obstacles” in the profile view of the IAP (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 30 ). Accordingly, pilots are advised to carefully review approach procedures to identify where the optimum stabilized descent to landing can be initiated. Pilots that follow the previously published descent angle, provided by the RNAV system, below the MDA on procedures with this note may encounter obstacles in the visual segment. Pilots must visually avoid any obstacles below the MDA.

12.11.1.1 VDA/TCH data is furnished by FAA on the official source document for publication on IAP charts and for coding in the navigation database unless, as noted previously, replaced by the note “Visual Segment – Obstacles.” 12.11.1.2 Commercial chart providers and navigation systems may publish or calculate a VDA/TCH even when the FAA does not provide such data. Pilots are cautioned that they are responsible for obstacle avoidance in the visual segment regardless of the presence or absence of a VDA/TCH and associated navigation system advisory vertical guidance.

12.11.2 The threshold crossing height (TCH) used to compute the descent angle is published with the VDA. The VDA and TCH information are charted on the profile view of the IAP following the fix (FAF/stepdown) used to compute the VDA. If no PA/APV IAP is established to the same runway, the VDA will be equal to or higher than the glide path angle of the VGSI installed on the same runway provided it is within instrument procedure criteria. A chart note will indicate if the VGSI is not coincident with the VDA. Pilots must be aware that the published VDA is for advisory information only and not to be considered instrument procedure derived vertical guidance. The VDA solely offers an aid to help pilots establish a continuous, stabilized descent during final approach.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 30 Example of a Chart Note 12.11.3 Pilots may use the published angle and estimated/actual groundspeed to find a target rate of descent from the rate of descent table published in the back of the U.S. Terminal Procedures Publication. This rate of descent can be flown with the Vertical Velocity Indicator (VVI) in order to use the VDA as an aid to flying a stabilized descent. No special equipment is required.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 45 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.11.4 A straight − in aligned procedure may be restricted to circling only minimums when an excessive descent gradient necessitates. The descent angle between the FAF/stepdown fix and the Circling MDA must not exceed the maximum descent angle allowed by TERPS criteria. A published VDA on these procedures does not imply that landing straight ahead is recommended or even possible. The descent rate based on the VDA may exceed the capabilities of the aircraft and the pilot must determine how to best maneuver the aircraft within the circling area in order to land safely.

12.12 In isolated cases, an IAP may contain a published visual flight path. These procedures are annotated “Fly Visual to Airport” or “Fly Visual.” A dashed arrow indicating the visual flight path will be included in the profile and plan views with a defined flightpath or approximate heading and distance to the end of the runway.

12.12.1 The depicted ground track or flightpath associated with the “Fly Visual to Airport” segment should be flown with flight instrumentation (when advisory lateral and vertical guidance is provided) and/or pilotage or dead reckoning navigation techniques. When executing the “Fly Visual to Airport” segment, the flight visibility must not be less than that prescribed in the IAP; the pilot must remain clear of clouds and proceed to the airport maintaining visual contact with the ground. Altitude on the visual flight path is at the discretion of the pilot, and recommended altitudes may be shown, but it is the responsibility of the pilot to visually acquire and avoid obstacles in the “Fly Visual to Airport” segment.

12.12.2 Missed approach obstacle clearance is assured only if the missed approach is commenced at or above the MDA/DA and flown from the published MAP. Before initiating an IAP that contains a “Fly Visual to Airport” segment, the pilot should have preplanned climb out options based on aircraft performance and terrain features.

Obstacle clearance is the responsibility of the pilot when the missed approach maneuver is initiated below the MDA/DA or when the approach is continued beyond the MAP.

NOTE − The FAA Administrator retains the authority to approve instrument approach procedures where the pilot, on arrival at the MDA/DA on the prescribed flightpath, may not necessarily have one of the visual references specified in 14 CFR § 91.175 and related rules. While it is not a function of procedure design to ensure compliance with § 91.175, the pilot is always required to assess prevailing flight visibility against the published minima. When published on the procedure, the annotation “Fly Visual to Airport” provides specific relief only from §91.175 (c)(3)(i) through (x) requirements that the pilot have distinctly visible and identifiable visual references prior to descent below MDA/DA.

12.13 Area Navigation (RNAV) Instrument Approach Charts. Reliance on RNAV systems for instrument operations is becoming more commonplace as new systems such as GPS and augmented GPS such as the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) are developed and deployed. In order to support full integration of RNAV procedures into the National Airspace System (NAS), the FAA developed a new charting format for IAPs (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 22 ). This format avoids unnecessary duplication and proliferation of instrument approach charts.

The original stand alone GPS charts, titled simply “GPS,” are being converted to the newer format as the procedures are revised. One reason for the revision is the addition of WAAS based minima to the approach chart.

The reformatted approach chart is titled “RNAV (GPS) RWY XX.” Up to four lines of minima are included on these charts. GLS (Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) Landing System) was a placeholder for future WAAS and LAAS minima, and the minima was always listed as N/A. The GLS minima line has now been replaced by the WAAS LPV (Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance) minima on most RNAV (GPS) charts. LNAV/VNAV (lateral navigation/vertical navigation) was added to support both WAAS electronic vertical guidance and Barometric VNAV. LPV and LNAV/VNAV are both APV procedures as described in paragraph 12.1.7 . The original GPS minima, titled “S − XX,” for straight in runway XX, is retitled LNAV (lateral navigation). Circling minima may also be published. A new type of nonprecision WAAS minima will also be published on this chart and titled LP (localizer performance). LP will be published in locations where vertically guided minima cannot be provided due to terrain and obstacles and therefore, no LPV or LNAV/VNAV minima will be published. GBAS procedures are published on a separate chart and the GLS minima line is to be used only for GBAS. ATC clearance for the RNAV procedure authorizes a properly certified pilot to utilize any minimums for which the aircraft is certified (for example, a WAAS equipped aircraft utilizes the LPV or LP minima but a GPS only aircraft may not). The RNAV chart includes information formatted for quick reference by the pilot or flight crew at the top of the chart. This portion of the chart, developed based on a study by the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 46 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation System Center, is commonly referred to as the pilot briefing.

12.13.1 The minima lines are: 12.13.1.1 GLS. “GLS” is the acronym for GBAS Landing System. The U.S. version of GBAS has traditionally been referred to as LAAS. The worldwide community has adopted GBAS as the official term for this type of navigation system. To coincide with international terminology, the FAA is also adopting the term GBAS to be consistent with the international community. This line was originally published as a placeholder for both WAAS and LAAS minima and marked as N/A since no minima was published. As the concepts for GBAS and WAAS procedure publication have evolved, GLS will now be used only for GBAS minima, which will be on a separate approach chart. Most RNAV(GPS) approach charts have had the GLS minima line replaced by a WAAS LPV line of minima.

12.13.1.2 LPV. “LPV” is the acronym for localizer performance with vertical guidance. RNAV (GPS) approaches to LPV lines of minima take advantage of the improved accuracy of WAAS lateral and vertical guidance to provide an approach that is very similar to a Category I Instrument Landing System (ILS). The approach to LPV line of minima is designed for angular guidance with increasing sensitivity as the aircraft gets closer to the runway. The sensitivities are nearly identical to those of the ILS at similar distances. This was done intentionally to allow the skills required to proficiently fly an ILS to readily transfer to flying RNAV (GPS) approaches to the LPV line of minima. Just as with an ILS, the LPV has vertical guidance and is flown to a DA.

Aircraft can fly this minima line with a statement in the Aircraft Flight Manual that the installed equipment supports LPV approaches. This includes Class 3 and 4 TSO − C146 GPS/WAAS equipment.

12.13.1.3 LNAV/VNAV. LNAV/VNAV identifies APV minimums developed to accommodate an RNAV IAP with vertical guidance, usually provided by approach certified Baro − VNAV, but with lateral and vertical integrity limits larger than a precision approach or LPV. LNAV stands for Lateral Navigation; VNAV stands for Vertical Navigation. This minima line can be flown by aircraft with a statement in the Aircraft Flight Manual that the installed equipment supports GPS approaches and has an approach − approved barometric VNAV, or if the aircraft has been demonstrated to support LNAV/VNAV approaches. This includes Class 2, 3 and 4 TSO − C146 GPS/WAAS equipment. Aircraft using LNAV/VNAV minimums will descend to landing via an internally generated descent path based on satellite or other approach approved VNAV systems. Since electronic vertical guidance is provided, the minima will be published as a DA. Other navigation systems may be specifically authorized to use this line of minima. (See Section A, Terms/Landing Minima Data, of the U.S. Terminal Procedures books.)

12.13.1.4 LP. “LP” is the acronym for localizer performance. Approaches to LP lines of minima take advantage of the improved accuracy of WAAS to provide approaches, with lateral guidance and angular guidance. Angular guidance does not refer to a glideslope angle but rather to the increased lateral sensitivity as the aircraft gets closer to the runway, similar to localizer approaches. However, the LP line of minima is a Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) rather than a DA (H). Procedures with LP lines of minima will not be published with another approach that contains approved vertical guidance (LNAV/VNAV or LPV). It is possible to have LP and LNAV published on the same approach chart but LP will only be published if it provides lower minima than an LNAV line of minima. LP is not a fail − down mode for LPV. LP will only be published if terrain, obstructions, or some other reason prevent publishing a vertically guided procedure. WAAS avionics may provide GNSS − based advisory vertical guidance during an approach to an LP line of minima. Barometric altimeter information remains the primary altitude reference for complying with any altitude restrictions. WAAS equipment may not support LP, even if it supports LPV, if it was approved before TSO − C145b and TSO − C146b. Receivers approved under previous TSOs may require an upgrade by the manufacturer in order to be used to fly to LP minima. Receivers approved for LP must have a statement in the approved Flight Manual or Supplemental Flight Manual including LP as one of the approved approach types.

12.13.1.5 LNAV. This minima is for lateral navigation only, and the approach minimum altitude will be published as a minimum descent altitude (MDA). LNAV provides the same level of service as the present GPS stand alone approaches. LNAV minimums support the following navigation systems: WAAS, when the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 47 United States of America 22 JAN 26 navigation solution will not support vertical navigation; and, GPS navigation systems which are presently authorized to conduct GPS approaches.

NOTE − GPS receivers approved for approach operations in accordance with: AC 20 − 138, Airworthiness Approval of Positioning and Navigation Systems, qualify for this minima. WAAS navigation equipment must be approved in accordance with the requirements specified in TSO − C145() or TSO − C146() and installed in accordance with Advisory Circular AC 20 − 138.

12.13.2 Other systems may be authorized to utilize these approaches. See the description in Section A of the U.S.

Terminal Procedures books for details. Operational approval must also be obtained for Baro − VNAV systems to operate to the LNAV/VNAV minimums. Baro − VNAV may not be authorized on some approaches due to other factors, such as no local altimeter source being available. Baro − VNAV is not authorized on LPV procedures.

Pilots are directed to their local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) for additional information.

NOTE − RNAV and Baro − VNAV systems must have a manufacturer supplied electronic database which must include the waypoints, altitudes, and vertical data for the procedure to be flown. The system must be able to retrieve the procedure by name from the aircraft navigation database, not just as a manually entered series of waypoints.

12.13.3 ILS or RNAV (GPS) Charts.

12.13.3.1 Some RNAV (GPS) charts will also contain an ILS line of minima to make use of the ILS precision final in conjunction with the RNAV GPS capabilities for the portions of the procedure prior to the final approach segment and for the missed approach. Obstacle clearance for the portions of the procedure other than the final approach segment is still based on GPS criteria.

NOTE − Some GPS receiver installations inhibit GPS navigation whenever ANY ILS frequency is tuned. Pilots flying aircraft with receivers installed in this manner must wait until they are on the intermediate segment of the procedure prior to the PFAF (PFAF is the active waypoint) to tune the ILS frequency and must tune the ILS back to a VOR frequency in order to fly the GPS based missed approach.

12.13.3.2 Charting . There are charting differences between ILS, RNAV (GPS), and GLS approaches.

a) The LAAS procedure is titled “GLS RWY XX” on the approach chart.

b) The VDB provides information to the airborne receiver where the guidance is synthesized.

c) The LAAS procedure is identified by a four alpha − numeric character field referred to as the RPI or approach ID and is similar to the IDENT feature of the ILS.

d) The RPI is charted.

e) Most RNAV(GPS) approach charts have had the GLS (NA) minima line replaced by an LPV line of minima.

f) Since the concepts for LAAS and WAAS procedure publication have evolved, GLS will now be used only for LAAS minima, which will be on a separate approach chart.

12.13.4 Required Navigation Performance (RNP) 12.13.4.1 Pilots are advised to refer to the “TERMS/LANDING MINIMUMS DATA” (Section A) of the U.S.

Government Terminal Procedures books for aircraft approach eligibility requirements by specific RNP level requirements.

12.13.4.2 Some aircraft have RNP approval in their AFM without a GPS sensor. The lowest level of sensors that the FAA will support for RNP service is DME/DME. However, necessary DME signal may not be available at the airport of intended operations. For those locations having an RNAV chart published with LNAV/VNAV minimums, a procedure note may be provided such as “DME/DME RNP − 0.3 NA.” This means that RNP aircraft dependent on DME/DME to achieve RNP − 0.3 are not authorized to conduct this approach. Where DME facility availability is a factor, the note may read “DME/DME RNP − 0.3 Authorized; ABC and XYZ Required.” This means that ABC and XYZ facilities have been determined by flight inspection to be required in the navigation solution to assure RNP − 0.3. VOR/DME updating must not be used for approach procedures.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 48 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.13.5 Chart Terminology 12.13.5.1 Decision Altitude (DA) replaces the familiar term Decision Height (DH). DA conforms to the international convention where altitudes relate to MSL and heights relate to AGL. DA will eventually be published for other types of instrument approach procedures with vertical guidance, as well. DA indicates to the pilot that the published descent profile is flown to the DA (MSL), where a missed approach will be initiated if visual references for landing are not established. Obstacle clearance is provided to allow a momentary descent below DA while transitioning from the final approach to the missed approach. The aircraft is expected to follow the missed instructions while continuing along the published final approach course to at least the published runway threshold waypoint or MAP (if not at the threshold) before executing any turns.

12.13.5.2 Minimum Descent Altitude (MDA) has been in use for many years, and will continue to be used for the LNAV only and circling procedures.

12.13.5.3 Threshold Crossing Height (TCH) has been traditionally used in “precision” approaches as the height of the glide slope above threshold. With publication of LNAV/VNAV minimums and RNAV descent angles, including graphically depicted descent profiles, TCH also applies to the height of the “descent angle,” or glidepath, at the threshold. Unless otherwise required for larger type aircraft which may be using the IAP, the typical TCH is 30 to 50 feet.

12.13.6 The MINIMA FORMAT will also change slightly.

12.13.6.1 Each line of minima on the RNAV IAP is titled to reflect the level of service available; e.g., GLS, LPV, LNAV/VNAV, LP, and LNAV. CIRCLING minima will also be provided.

12.13.6.2 The minima title box indicates the nature of the minimum altitude for the IAP. For example: a) DA will be published next to the minima line title for minimums supporting vertical guidance such as for GLS, LPV or LNAV/VNAV.

b) MDA will be published as the minima line on approaches with lateral guidance only, LNAV, or LP. Descent below the MDA must meet the conditions stated in 14 CFR Section 91.175.

c) Where two or more systems, such as LPV and LNAV/VNAV, share the same minima, each line of minima will be displayed separately.

12.13.7 Chart Symbology changed slightly to include: 12.13.7.1 Descent Profile. The published descent profile and a graphical depiction of the vertical path to the runway will be shown. Graphical depiction of the RNAV vertical guidance will differ from the traditional depiction of an ILS glide slope (feather) through the use of a shorter vertical track beginning at the decision altitude.

a) It is FAA policy to design IAPs with minimum altitudes established at fixes/waypoints to achieve optimum stabilized (constant rate) descents within each procedure segment. This design can enhance the safety of the operations and contribute toward reduction in the occurrence of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents.

Additionally, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recently emphasized that pilots could benefit from publication of the appropriate IAP descent angle for a stabilized descent on final approach. The RNAV IAP format includes the descent angle to the hundredth of a degree; e.g., 3.00 degrees. The angle will be provided in the graphically depicted descent profile.

b) The stabilized approach may be performed by reference to vertical navigation information provided by WAAS or LNAV/VNAV systems; or for LNAV − only systems, by the pilot determining the appropriate aircraft attitude/groundspeed combination to attain a constant rate descent which best emulates the published angle. To aid the pilot, U.S. Government Terminal Procedures Publication charts publish an expanded Rate of Descent Table on the inside of the back hard cover for use in planning and executing precision descents under known or approximate groundspeed conditions.

12.13.7.2 Visual Descent Point (VDP). A VDP will be published on most RNAV IAPs. VDPs apply only to aircraft utilizing LP or LNAV minima, not LPV or LNAV/VNAV minimums.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 49 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.13.7.3 Missed Approach Symbology. In order to make missed approach guidance more readily understood, a method has been developed to display missed approach guidance in the profile view through the use of quick reference icons. Due to limited space in the profile area, only four or fewer icons can be shown.

However, the icons may not provide representation of the entire missed approach procedure. The entire set of textual missed approach instructions are provided at the top of the approach chart in the pilot briefing. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 22 .)

12.13.7.4 Waypoints. All RNAV or GPS stand − alone IAPs are flown using data pertaining to the particular IAP obtained from an onboard database, including the sequence of all WPs used for the approach and missed approach, except that step down waypoints may not be included in some TSO − C − 129 receiver databases.

Included in the database, in most receivers, is coding that informs the navigation system of which WPs are fly − over (FO) or fly − by (FB). The navigation system may provide guidance appropriately − including leading the turn prior to a fly − by WP; or causing overflight of a fly − over WP. Where the navigation system does not provide such guidance, the pilot must accomplish the turn lead or waypoint overflight manually. Chart symbology for the FB WP provides pilot awareness of expected actions. Refer to the legend of the U.S. Terminal Procedures books.

12.13.7.5 TAAs are described in subparagraph 12.4, Terminal Arrival Area (TAA). When published, the RNAV chart depicts the TAA areas through the use of “icons” representing each TAA area associated with the RNAV procedure (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 22 ). These icons are depicted in the plan view of the approach chart, generally arranged on the chart in accordance with their position relative to the aircrafts arrival from the en route structure.

The WP, to which navigation is appropriate and expected within each specific TAA area, will be named and depicted on the associated TAA icon. Each depicted named WP is the IAF for arrivals from within that area. TAAs may not be used on all RNAV procedures because of airspace congestion or other reasons.

12.13.7.6 Published Temperature Limitations. There are currently two temperature limitations that may be published in the notes box of the middle briefing strip on an instrument approach procedure (IAP). The two published temperature limitations are: a) A temperature range limitation associated with the use of Baro − VNAV that may be published on an United States PBN IAP titled RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP); and/or b) A Cold Temperature Airport (CTA) limitation designated by a snowflake ICON and temperature in Celsius (C) that is published on every IAP for the airfield.

REFERENCE − AIP, Section ENR 1.8 , Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors, Setting Procedures, and Cold Temperature Airports (CTA).

12.13.7.7 WAAS Channel Number/Approach ID. The WAAS Channel Number is an optional equipment capability that allows the use of a 5 − digit number to select a specific final approach segment without using the menu method. The Approach ID is an airport unique 4 − character combination for verifying the selection and extraction of the correct final approach segment information from the aircraft database. It is similar to the ILS ident, but displayed visually rather than aurally. The Approach ID consists of the letter W for WAAS, the runway number, and a letter other than L, C or R, which could be confused with Left, Center and Right, e.g., W35A.

Approach IDs are assigned in the order that WAAS approaches are built to that runway number at that airport.

The WAAS Channel Number and Approach ID are displayed in the upper left corner of the approach procedure pilot briefing.

12.13.7.8 At locations where outages of WAAS vertical guidance may occur daily due to initial system limitations, a negative W symbol ( ) will be placed on RNAV (GPS) approach charts. Many of these outages will be very short in duration, but may result in the disruption of the vertical portion of the approach. The symbol indicates that NOTAMs or Air Traffic advisories are not provided for outages which occur in the WAAS LNAV/VNAV or LPV vertical service. Use LNAV or circling minima for flight planning at these locations, whether as a destination or alternate. For flight operations at these locations, when the WAAS avionics indicate that LNAV/VNAV or LPV service is available, then vertical guidance may be used to complete the approach using the displayed level of service. Should an outage occur during the procedure, reversion to LNAV minima may be required. As the WAAS coverage is expanded, the will be removed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.5 − 50 AIP ENR 1.5 − 50 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − Properly trained and approved, as required, TSO-C145() and TSO-C146() equipped users (WAAS users) with and using approved baro-VNAV equipment may plan for LNAV/VNAV DA at an alternate airport. Specifically authorized WAAS users with and using approved baro-VNAV equipment may also plan for RNP 0.3 DA at the alternate airport as long as the pilot has verified RNP availability through an approved prediction program.

13. Special Instrument Approach Procedures 13.1 Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) charts reflect the criteria associated with the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument [Approach] Procedures (TERPs), which prescribes standardized methods for use in developing IAPs. Standard IAPs are published in the Federal Register (FR) in accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, and are available for use by appropriately qualified pilots operating properly equipped and airworthy aircraft in accordance with operating rules and procedures acceptable to the FAA. Special IAPs are also developed using TERPS but are not given public notice in the FR. The FAA authorizes only certain individual pilots and/or pilots in individual organizations to use special IAPs, and may require additional crew training and/or aircraft equipment or performance, and may also require the use of landing aids, communications, or weather services not available for public use. Additionally, IAPs that service private use airports or heliports are generally special IAPs. FDC NOTAMs for Specials, FDC T-NOTAMs, may also be used to promulgate safety-of-flight information relating to Specials provided the location has a valid landing area identifier and is serviced by the United States NOTAM system. Pilots may access NOTAMs online or through an FAA Flight Service Station (FSS). FSS specialists will not automatically provide NOTAM information to pilots for special IAPs during telephone pre − flight briefings. Pilots who are authorized by the FAA to use special IAPs must specifically request FDC NOTAM information for the particular special IAP they plan to use.

14. Radar Approaches 14.1 The only airborne radio equipment required for radar approaches is a functioning radio transmitter and receiver. The radar controller vectors the aircraft to align it with the runway centerline. The controller continues the vectors to keep the aircraft on course until the pilot can complete the approach and landing by visual reference to the surface. There are two types of radar approaches, “Precision” (PAR) and “Surveillance” (ASR).

14.2 A radar approach may be given to any aircraft upon request and may be offered to pilots of aircraft in distress or to expedite traffic; however, a surveillance approach might not be approved unless there is an ATC operational requirement, or in an unusual or emergency situation. Acceptance of a precision or surveillance approach by a pilot does not waive the prescribed weather minimums for the airport or for the particular aircraft operator concerned. The decision to make a radar approach when the reported weather is below the established minimums rests with the pilot.

14.3 Precision and surveillance approach minimums are published on separate pages in the Federal Aviation Administration Instrument Approach Procedure charts.

14.3.1 A Precision Approach (PAR) is one in which a controller provides highly accurate navigational guidance in azimuth and elevation to a pilot. Pilots are given headings to fly to direct them to and keep their aircraft aligned with the extended centerline of the landing runway. They are told to anticipate glidepath interception approximately 10 to 30 seconds before it occurs and when to start descent. The published decision altitude (DA) will be given only if the pilot requests it. If the aircraft is observed to deviate above or below the glidepath, the pilot is given the relative amount of deviation by use of terms “slightly” or “well” and is expected to adjust the aircraft’s rate of descent to return to the glidepath. Trend information is also issued with respect to the elevation of the aircraft and may be modified by the terms “rapidly” and “slowly”; e.g., “well above glidepath, coming down rapidly.” Range from touchdown is given at least once each mile. If an aircraft is observed by the controller to proceed outside of specified safety zone limits in azimuth and/or elevation and continues to operate outside these prescribed limits, the pilot will be directed to execute a missed approach or to fly a specified course unless the pilot has the runway environment (runway, approach lights, etc.) in sight. Navigational guidance in Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 51 AIP ENR 1.5 − 51 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 azimuth and elevation is provided to the pilot until the aircraft reaches the published DA. Advisory course and glidepath information is furnished by the controller until the aircraft passes over the landing threshold, at which point the pilot is advised of any deviation from the runway centerline. Radar service is automatically terminated upon completion of the approach.

14.3.2 A Surveillance Approach (ASR) is one in which a controller provides navigational guidance in azimuth only. The pilot is furnished headings to fly to align the aircraft with the extended centerline of the landing runway.

Since the radar information used for a surveillance approach is considerably less precise than that used for a precision approach, the accuracy of the approach will not be as great, and higher minimums will apply. Guidance in elevation is not possible but the pilot will be advised when to commence descent to the minimum descent altitude (MDA) or, if appropriate, to an intermediate “step down fix” minimum crossing altitude and subsequently to the prescribed MDA. In addition, the pilot will be advised of the location of the missed approach point (MAP) prescribed for the procedure and the aircraft’s position each mile on final from the runway, airport/heliport, or MAP, as appropriate. If requested by the pilot, recommended altitudes will be issued at each mile, based on the descent gradient established for the procedure, down to the last mile that is at or above the MDA. Normally, navigational guidance will be provided until the aircraft reaches the MAP. Controllers will terminate guidance and instruct the pilot to execute a missed approach unless at the MAP the pilot has the runway, airport/heliport in sight or, for a helicopter point − in − space approach, the prescribed visual reference with the surface is established. Also, if at any time during the approach the controller considers that safe guidance for the remainder of the approach cannot be provided, the controller will terminate guidance and instruct the pilot to execute a missed approach. Similarly, guidance termination and missed approach will be effected upon pilot request, and for civil aircraft only, controllers may terminate guidance when the pilot reports the runway, airport/heliport, or visual surface route (point − in − space approach) in sight or otherwise indicates that continued guidance is not required. Radar service is automatically terminated at the completion of a radar approach.

NOTE − The published MDA for straight − in approaches will be issued to the pilot before beginning descent. When a surveillance approach will terminate in a circle − to − land maneuver, the pilot must furnish the aircraft approach category to the controller.

The controller will then provide the pilot with the appropriate MDA.

14.3.3 A No − Gyro Approach is available to a pilot under radar control who experiences circumstances wherein the directional gyro or other stabilized compass is inoperative or inaccurate. When this occurs, the pilot should so advise ATC and request a No − Gyro vector or approach. Pilots of aircraft not equipped with a directional gyro or other stabilized compass who desire radar handling may also request a No − Gyro vector or approach. The pilot should make all turns at standard rate and should execute the turn immediately upon receipt of instructions. For example, “TURN RIGHT,” “STOP TURN.” When a surveillance or precision approach is made, the pilot will be advised after the aircraft has been turned onto final approach to make turns at half standard rate.

15. Radar Monitoring of Instrument Approaches 15.1 PAR facilities operated by the FAA and the military services at some joint − use (civil/military) and military installations monitor aircraft on instrument approaches and issue radar advisories to the pilot when weather is below VFR minimum (1,000 and 3), at night, or when requested by a pilot. This service is provided only when the PAR final approach course coincides with the final approach of the navigational aid and only during the operational hours of the PAR. The radar advisories serve only as a secondary aid since the pilot has selected the navigational aid as the primary aid for the approach.

15.2 Prior to starting final approach, the pilot will be advised of the frequency on which the advisories will be transmitted. If, for any reason, radar advisories cannot be furnished, the pilot will be so advised.

15.3 Advisory information, derived from radar observations, includes information on: 15.3.1 Passing the final approach fix inbound (nonprecision approach) or passing the outer marker or the fix used in lieu of the outer marker inbound (precision approach).

15.3.2 Trend advisories with respect to elevation and/or azimuth radar position and movement will be provided.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 52 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − At this point, the pilot may be requested to report sighting the approach lights or the runway.

NOTE − Whenever the aircraft nears the PAR safety limit, the pilot will be advised that the aircraft is well above or below the glidepath or well left or right of course. Glidepath information is given only to those aircraft executing a precision approach, such as ILS. Altitude information is not transmitted to aircraft executing other than precision approaches because the descent portions of these approaches generally do not coincide with the depicted PAR glidepath.

15.3.3 If, after repeated advisories, the aircraft proceeds outside the PAR safety limit or if a radical deviation is observed, the pilot will be advised to execute a missed approach if not visual.

15.4 Radar service is automatically terminated upon completion of the approach.

16. ILS Approach 16.1 Communications should be established with the appropriate FAA control tower or with the FAA FSS where there is no control tower, prior to starting an ILS approach. This is in order to receive advisory information as to the operation of the facility. It is also recommended that the aural signal of the ILS be monitored during an approach as to assure continued reception and receipt of advisory information, when available.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 53 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17. Simultaneous Approaches to Parallel Runways FIG ENR 1.5 − 31 Simultaneous Approaches (Approach Courses Parallel and Offset between 2.5 and 3.0 degrees) 17.1 ATC procedures permit ILS/RNAV/GLS instrument approach operations to dual or triple parallel runway configurations. ILS/RNAV/GLS approaches to parallel runways are grouped into three classes: Simultaneous Dependent Approaches; Simultaneous Independent Approaches; and Simultaneous Close Parallel PRM Approaches. RNAV approach procedures that are approved for simultaneous operations require GPS as the sensor for position updating. VOR/DME, DME/DME and IRU RNAV updating is not authorized. The classification of a parallel runway approach procedure is dependent on adjacent parallel runway centerline separation, ATC procedures, and airport ATC final approach radar monitoring and communications capabilities.

At some airports, one or more approach courses may be offset up to 3 degrees. ILS approaches with offset localizer configurations result in loss of Category II/III capabilities and an increase in decision altitude/height (50’).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 54 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17.2 Depending on weather conditions, traffic volume, and the specific combination of runways being utilized for arrival operations, a runway may be used for different types of simultaneous operations, including closely spaced dependent or independent approaches. Pilots should ensure that they understand the type of operation that is being conducted, and ask ATC for clarification if necessary.

17.3 Parallel approach operations demand heightened pilot situational awareness. Once cleared for an approach procedure, each pilot must maintain the lateral and vertical path of the procedure unless otherwise instructed by ATC. Instrument approach procedures using a curved or straight path to transition to the final segment may be used in conjunction with simultaneous operations. Pilots may notice nearby aircraft on adjacent approaches. As each aircraft nears the final approach fix, it may appear to the pilots involved that these aircraft are on converging or intercepting flight tracks. The procedures provide safe separation between aircraft. Each pilot should maintain close adherence to the approach procedure. Each pilot should be prepared to take appropriate action should adjacent aircraft deviate in a manner that creates a collision hazard to their aircraft and notify ATC. Pilots are informed by ATC or through the ATIS that simultaneous approaches are in use.

17.4 The close proximity of adjacent aircraft conducting simultaneous independent approaches, especially simultaneous close parallel PRM approaches mandates strict pilot compliance with all ATC clearances. ATC assigned airspeeds, altitudes, and headings must be complied with in a timely manner. Autopilot coupled approaches require pilot knowledge of procedures necessary to comply with ATC instructions. Simultaneous independent approaches, particularly simultaneous close parallel PRM approaches necessitate precise approach course tracking to minimize final monitor controller intervention, and unwanted No Transgression Zone (NTZ) penetration. In the unlikely event of a breakout, ATC will not assign altitudes lower than the minimum vectoring altitude. Pilots should notify ATC immediately if there is a degradation of aircraft or navigation systems.

17.5 Strict radio discipline is mandatory during simultaneous independent and simultaneous close parallel PRM approach operations. This includes an alert listening watch and the avoidance of lengthy, unnecessary radio transmissions. Attention must be given to proper call sign usage to prevent the inadvertent execution of clearances intended for another aircraft. Use of abbreviated call signs must be avoided to preclude confusion of aircraft with similar sounding call signs. Pilots must be alert to unusually long periods of silence or any unusual background sounds in their radio receiver. A stuck microphone may block the issuance of ATC instructions on the tower frequency by the final monitor controller during simultaneous independent and simultaneous close parallel PRM approaches. In the case of PRM approaches, the use of a second frequency by the monitor controller mitigates the “stuck mike” or other blockage on the tower frequency.

REFERENCE − AIP GEN 3.4, Paragraph 4.4, Radio Communications Phraseology and Techniques, gives additional communications information.

17.6 Use of Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems (TCAS) provides an additional element of safety to parallel approach operations. Pilots should follow recommended TCAS operating procedures presented in approved flight manuals, original equipment manufacturer recommendations, professional newsletters, and FAA publications.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 55 United States of America 22 JAN 26 18. Simultaneous Dependent Approaches FIG ENR 1.5 − 32 Simultaneous Approaches (Parallel Runways and Approach Courses) 18.1 Simultaneous dependent approaches are an ATC procedure permitting approaches to airports having parallel runway centerlines separated by at least 2,500 feet up to 9,000 feet. Integral parts of a total system are ILS or other system providing approach navigation, radar, communications, ATC procedures, and required airborne equipment. RNAV equipment in the aircraft or GLS equipment on the ground and in the aircraft may replace the required airborne and ground based ILS equipment. Although non − precision minimums may be published, pilots must only use those procedures specifically authorized by chart note. For example, the chart note “LNAV NA during simultaneous operations,” requires vertical guidance. When given a choice, pilots should always fly a precision approach whenever possible.

18.2 A simultaneous dependent approach differs from a simultaneous independent approach in that, the minimum distance between parallel runway centerlines may be reduced; there is no requirement for radar monitoring or advisories; and a staggered separation of aircraft on the adjacent final course is required.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 56 United States of America 22 JAN 26 18.3 A minimum of 1.0 NM radar separation (diagonal) is required between successive aircraft on the adjacent final approach course when runway centerlines are at least 2,500 feet but no more than 3,600 feet apart. A minimum of 1.5 NM radar separation (diagonal) is required between successive aircraft on the adjacent final approach course when runway centerlines are more than 3,600 feet but no more than 8,300 feet apart. When runway centerlines are more than 8,300 feet but no more than 9,000 feet apart a minimum of 2 NM diagonal radar separation is provided. Aircraft on the same final approach course within 10 NM of the runway end are provided a minimum of 3 NM radar separation, reduced to 2.5 NM in certain circumstances. In addition, a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical or a minimum of three miles radar separation is provided between aircraft during turn on to the parallel final approach course.

18.4 Whenever parallel approaches are in use, pilots are informed by ATC or via the ATIS that approaches to both runways are in use. The charted IAP also notes which runways may be used simultaneously. In addition, the radar controller will have the interphone capability of communicating with the tower controller where separation responsibility has not been delegated to the tower.

NOTE − ATC will not specifically identify these operations as being dependent when advertised on the ATIS.

EXAMPLE − Simultaneous ILS Runway 19 right and ILS Runway 19 left in use.

18.5 At certain airports, simultaneous dependent approaches are permitted to runways spaced less than 2,500 feet apart. In this case, ATC will provide no less than the minimum authorized diagonal separation with the leader always arriving on the same runway. The trailing aircraft is permitted reduced diagonal separation, instead of the single runway separation normally utilized for runways spaced less than 2,500 feet apart. For wake turbulence mitigation reasons: 18.5.1 Reduced diagonal spacing is only permitted when certain aircraft wake category pairings exist; typically when the leader is either in the large or small wake turbulence category, and 18.5.2 All aircraft must descend on the glideslope from the altitude at which they were cleared for the approach during these operations.

When reduced separation is authorized, the IAP briefing strip indicates that simultaneous operations require the use of vertical guidance and that the pilot should maintain last assigned altitude until intercepting the glideslope.

No special pilot training is required to participate in these operations.

REFERENCE − ENR 1.5, Para 20. Simultaneous Close Parallel PRM Approaches and Simultaneous Offset Instrument Approaches (SOIA) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 57 United States of America 22 JAN 26 19. Simultaneous Independent ILS/RNAV/GLS Approaches FIG ENR 1.5 − 33 Simultaneous Independent ILS/RNAV/GLS Approaches 19.1 System. An approach system permitting simultaneous approaches to parallel runways with centerlines separated by at least 4,300 feet. Separation between 4,300 and 9,000 feet (9,200’ for airports above 5,000’) utilizing NTZ final monitor controllers. Simultaneous independent approaches require NTZ radar monitoring to ensure separation between aircraft on the adjacent parallel approach course. Aircraft position is tracked by final monitor controllers who will issue instructions to aircraft observed deviating from the assigned final approach course. Staggered radar separation procedures are not utilized. Integral parts of a total system are radar, communications, ATC procedures, and ILS or other required airborne equipment. A chart note identifies that the approach is authorized for simultaneous use.

When simultaneous operations are in use, it will be advertised on the ATIS. When advised that simultaneous approaches are in use, pilots must advise approach control immediately of malfunctioning or inoperative receivers, or if a simultaneous approach is not desired. Although non − precision minimums may be published, pilots must only use those procedures specifically authorized by chart note. For example, the chart note “LNAV NA during simultaneous operations,” requires vertical guidance. When given a choice, pilots should always fly a precision approach whenever possible.

NOTE − ATC does not use the word independent or parallel when advertising these operations on the ATIS.

EXAMPLE − Simultaneous ILS Runway 24 left and ILS Runway 24 right approaches in use.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 58 United States of America 22 JAN 26 19.2 Radar Services. These services are is provided for each simultaneous independent approach.

19.2.1 During turn on to parallel final approach, aircraft are normally provided 3 miles radar separation or a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical separation. The assigned altitude must be maintained until intercepting the glidepath, unless cleared otherwise by ATC. Aircraft will not be vectored to intercept the final approach course at an angle greater than thirty degrees.

NOTE − Some simultaneous operations permit the aircraft to track an RNAV course beginning on downwind and continuing in a turn to intercept the final approach course. In this case, separation with the aircraft on the adjacent final approach course is provided by the monitor controller with reference to an NTZ.

19.2.2 The final monitor controller will have the capability of overriding the tower controller on the tower frequency.

19.2.3 Pilots will be instructed to contact the tower frequency prior to the point where NTZ monitoring begins.

19.2.4 Aircraft observed to overshoot the turn − on or to continue on a track which will penetrate the NTZ will be instructed to return to the correct final approach course immediately. The final monitor controller may cancel the approach clearance, and issue missed approach or other instructions to the deviating aircraft.

PHRASEOLOGY − “(Aircraft call sign) YOU HAVE CROSSED THE FINAL APPROACH COURSE. TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY AND RETURN TO THE FINAL APPROACH COURSE,” or “(aircraft call sign) TURN (left/right) AND RETURN TO THE FINAL APPROACH COURSE.” 19.2.5 If a deviating aircraft fails to respond to such instructions or is observed penetrating the NTZ, the aircraft on the adjacent final approach course (if threatened), will be issued a breakout instruction.

PHRASEOLOGY − “TRAFFIC ALERT (aircraft call sign) TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY HEADING (degrees), (climb/descend) AND MAINTAIN (altitude).” 19.2.6 Radar monitoring will automatically be terminated when visual separation is applied, the aircraft reports the approach lights or runway in sight, or the aircraft is 1 NM or less from the runway threshold. Final monitor controllers will not advise pilots when radar monitoring is terminated.

NOTE − Simultaneous independent approaches conducted to runways spaced greater than 9,000 feet (or 9,200’ at airports above 5,000’) do not require an NTZ. However, from a pilot’s perspective, the same alerts relative to deviating aircraft will be provided by ATC as are provided when an NTZ is being monitored. Pilots may not be aware as to whether or not an NTZ is being monitored.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 59 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20. Simultaneous Close Parallel PRM Approaches and Simultaneous Offset Instrument Approaches (SOIA) FIG ENR 1.5 − 34 PRM Approaches Simultaneous Close Parallel 20.1 System 20.1.1 PRM is an acronym for the high update rate Precision Runway Monitor surveillance system which is required to monitor the No Transgression Zone (NTZ) for specific parallel runway separations used to conduct simultaneous close parallel approaches. PRM is also published in the title as part of the approach name for IAPs used to conduct Simultaneous Close Parallel approaches. “PRM” alerts pilots that specific airborne equipment, training, and procedures are applicable.

Because Simultaneous Close Parallel PRM approaches are independent, the NTZ and normal operating zone (NOZ) airspace between the final approach courses is monitored by two monitor controllers, one for each approach course. The NTZ monitoring system (final monitor aid) consists of a high resolution ATC radar display with automated tracking software which provides monitor controllers with aircraft identification, position, speed, and a ten − second projected position, as well as visual and aural NTZ penetration alerts. A PRM high update rate surveillance sensor is a component of this system only for specific runway spacing. Additional procedures for simultaneous independent approaches are described in ENR 1.5, paragraph 19. Simultaneous Independent ILS/RNAV/GLS Approaches.

20.1.2 Simultaneous Close Parallel PRM approaches, whether conducted utilizing a high update rate PRM surveillance sensor or not, must meet all of the following requirements: pilot training,PRM in the approach Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 60 United States of America 22 JAN 26 title,NTZ monitoring utilizing a final monitor aid, radar display, publication of an AAUP, and use of a secondary PRM communications frequency. PRM approaches are depicted on a separate IAP titled (Procedure type) PRM Rwy XXX (Simultaneous Close Parallel or Close Parallel).

NOTE − ATC does not use the word “independent” when advertising these operations on the ATIS.

EXAMPLE − Simultaneous ILS PRM Runway 33 left and ILS PRM Runway 33 right approaches in use.

20.1.2.1 The pilot may request to conduct a different type of PRM approach to the same runway other than the one that is presently being used; for example, RNAV instead of ILS. However, pilots must always obtain ATC approval to conduct a different type of approach. Also, in the event of the loss of ground − based NAVAIDS, the ATIS may advertise other types of PRM approaches to the affected runway or runways.

20.1.2.2 The Attention All Users Page (AAUP) will address procedures for conducting PRM approaches.

20.2 Requirements and Procedures. Besides system requirements and pilot procedures as identified in subparagraph 20.1.1 above, all pilots must have completed special training before accepting a clearance to conduct a PRM approach.

20.2.1 Pilot Training Requirement. Pilots must complete special pilot training, as outlined below, before accepting a clearance for a simultaneous close parallel PRM approach.

20.2.1.1 For operations under 14 CFR Parts 121, 129, and 135, pilots must comply with FAA − approved company training as identified in their Operations Specifications. Training includes the requirement for pilots to view the FAA training slide presentation, “Precision Runway Monitor (PRM) Pilot Procedures.” Refer to https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training/prm / or search key words “FAA PRM” for additional information and to view or download the slide presentation.

20.2.1.2 For operations under Part 91: a) Pilots operating transport category aircraft must be familiar with PRM operations as contained in this section of the AIM. In addition, pilots operating transport category aircraft must view the slide presentation, “Precision Runway Monitor (PRM) Pilot Procedures.” Refer to https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training/ prm/ or search key words “FAA PRM” for additional information and to view or download the slide presentation.

b) Pilots not operating transport category aircraft must be familiar with PRM and SOIA operations as contained in this section of the AIM. The FAA strongly recommends that pilots not involved in transport category aircraft operations view the FAA training slide presentation, “Precision Runway Monitor (PRM) Pilot Procedures.” Refer to https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/training/prm/ or search key words “FAA PRM” for additional information and to view or download the slide presentation.

NOTE − Depending on weather conditions, traffic volume, and the specific combination of runways being utilized for arrival operations, a runway may be used for different types of simultaneous operations, including closely spaced dependent or independent approaches. Use PRM procedures only when the ATIS advertises their use. For other types of simultaneous approaches, see ENR 1.5 paragraphs 17.and 18.

20.3 ATC Directed Breakout. An ATC directed “breakout” is defined as a vector off the final approach course of a threatened aircraft in response to another aircraft penetrating the NTZ.

20.4 Dual Communications. The aircraft flying the PRM approach must have the capability of enabling the pilot/s to listen to two communications frequencies simultaneously. To avoid blocked transmissions, each runway will have two frequencies, a primary and a PRM monitor frequency. The tower controller will transmit on both frequencies. The monitor controller’s transmissions, if needed, will override both frequencies. Pilots will ONLY transmit on the tower controller’s frequency, but will listen to both frequencies. Select the PRM monitor frequency audio only when instructed by ATC to contact the tower. The volume levels should be set about the same on both radios so that the pilots will be able to hear transmissions on the PRM frequency if the tower is blocked. Site − specific procedures take precedence over the general information presented in this paragraph.

Refer to the AAUP for applicable procedures at specific airports.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 61 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20.5 Radar Services 20.5.1 During turn on to parallel final approach, aircraft will be provided 3 miles radar separation or a minimum of 1,000 feet vertical separation. The assigned altitude must be maintained until intercepting the glideslope/glidepath, unless cleared otherwise by ATC. Aircraft will not be vectored to intercept the final approach course at an angle greater than thirty degrees.

20.5.2 The final monitor controller will have the capability of overriding the tower controller on the tower frequency as well as transmitting on the PRM frequency.

20.5.3 Pilots will be instructed to contact the tower frequency prior to the point where NTZ monitoring begins.

Pilots will begin monitoring the secondary PRM frequency at that time (see Dual VHF Communications Required below).

20.5.4 To ensure separation is maintained, and in order to avoid an imminent situation during PRM approaches, pilots must immediately comply with monitor controller instructions.

20.5.5 Aircraft observed to overshoot the turn or to continue on a track which will penetrate the NTZ will be instructed to return to the correct final approach course immediately. The final monitor controller may cancel the approach clearance, and issue missed approach or other instructions to the deviating aircraft.

PHRASEOLOGY − “(Aircraft call sign) YOU HAVE CROSSED THE FINAL APPROACH COURSE. TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY AND RETURN TO THE FINAL APPROACH COURSE,” or “(Aircraft call sign) TURN (left/right) AND RETURN TO THE FINAL APPROACH COURSE.” 20.5.6 If a deviating aircraft fails to respond to such instructions or is observed penetrating the NTZ, the aircraft on the adjacent final approach course (if threatened) will be issued a breakout instruction.

PHRASEOLOGY − “TRAFFIC ALERT (aircraft call sign) TURN (left/right) IMMEDIATELY HEADING (degrees), (climb/descend) AND MAINTAIN (altitude).” 20.5.7 Radar monitoring will automatically be terminated when visual separation is applied, or the aircraft reports the approach lights or runway in sight or within 1 NM of the runway threshold. Final monitor controllers will not advise pilots when radar monitoring is terminated.

20.6 Attention All Users Page (AAUP). At airports that conduct PRM operations, the AAUP informs pilots under the “General” section of information relative to all the PRM approaches published at a specific airport, and this section must be briefed in its entirety. Under the “Runway Specific” section, only items relative to the runway to be used for landing need be briefed. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 35 .) A single AAUP is utilized for multiple PRM approach charts at the same airport, which are listed on the AAUP. The requirement for informing ATC if the pilot is unable to accept a PRM clearance is also presented. The “General” section of AAUP addresses the following: 20.6.1 Review of the procedure for executing a climbing or descending breakout; 20.6.2 Breakout phraseology beginning with the words, “Traffic Alert;” 20.6.3 Descending on the glideslope/glidepath meets all crossing restrictions; 20.6.4 Briefing the PRM approach also satisfies the non − PRM approach briefing of the same type of approach to the same runway; and 20.6.5 Description of the dual communications procedure.

The “Runway Specific” section of the AAUP addresses those issues which only apply to certain runway ends that utilize PRM approaches. There may be no Runway Specific procedures, a single item applicable to only one runway end, or multiple items for a single or multiple runway end/s. Examples of SOIA runway specific procedures are as follows: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 62 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 35 PRM Attention All Users Page (AAUP) 20.7 Simultaneous Offset Instrument Approach (SOIA).

20.7.1 SOIA is a procedure used to conduct simultaneous approaches to runways spaced less than 3,000 feet, but at least 750 feet apart. The SOIA procedure utilizes a straight − in PRM approach to one runway, and a PRM offset approach with glideslope/glidepath to the adjacent runway. In SOIA operations, aircraft are paired, with the aircraft conducting the straight − in PRM approach always positioned slightly ahead of the aircraft conducting the offset PRM approach.

20.7.2 The straight − in PRM approach plates used in SOIA operations are identical to other straight − in PRM approach plates, with an additional note, which provides the separation between the two runways used for Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 63 United States of America 22 JAN 26 simultaneous SOIA approaches. The offset PRM approach plate displays the required notations for closely spaced approaches as well as depicts the visual segment of the approach.

20.7.3 Controllers monitor the SOIA PRM approaches in exactly the same manner as is done for other PRM approaches. The procedures and system requirements for SOIA PRM approaches are identical with those used for simultaneous close parallel PRM approaches until near the offset PRM approach missed approach point (MAP), where visual acquisition of the straight − in aircraft by the aircraft conducting the offset PRM approach occurs. Since SOIA PRM approaches are identical to other PRM approaches (except for the visual segment in the offset approach), an understanding of the procedures for conducting PRM approaches is essential before conducting a SOIA PRM operation.

20.7.4 In SOIA, the approach course separation (instead of the runway separation) meets established close parallel approach criteria. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 36 for the generic SOIA approach geometry.) A visual segment of the offset PRM approach is established between the offset MAP and the runway threshold. Aircraft transition in visual conditions from the offset course, beginning at the offset MAP, to align with the runway and can be stabilized by 500 feet above ground level (AGL) on the extended runway centerline. A cloud ceiling for the approach is established so that the aircraft conducting the offset approach has nominally at least 30 seconds or more to acquire the leading straight − in aircraft prior to reaching the offset MAP. If visual acquisition is not accomplished prior to crossing the offset MAP, a missed approach must be executed.

20.7.5 Flight Management System (FMS) coding of the offset RNAV PRM and GLS PRM approaches in a SOIA operation is different than other RNAV and GLS approach coding in that it does not match the initial missed approach procedure published on the charted IAP. In the SOIA design of the offset approach, lateral course guidance terminates at the fictitious threshold point (FTP), which is an extension of the final approach course beyond the offset MAP to a point near the runway threshold. The FTP is designated in the approach coding as the MAP so that vertical guidance is available to the pilot to the runway threshold, just as vertical guidance is provided by the offset LDA glideslope. No matter what type of offset approach is being conducted, reliance on lateral guidance is discontinued at the charted MAP and replaced by visual maneuvering to accomplish runway alignment.

20.7.5.1 As a result of this approach coding, when executing a missed approach at and after passing the charted offset MAP, a heading must initially be flown (either hand − flown or using autopilot “heading mode”) before engaging LNAV. If the pilot engages LNAV immediately, the aircraft may continue to track toward the FTP instead of commencing a turn toward the missed approach holding fix. Notes on the charted IAP and in the AAUP make specific reference to this procedure.

20.7.5.2 Some FMSs do not code waypoints inside of the FAF as part of the approach. Therefore, the depicted MAP on the charted IAP may not be included in the offset approach coding. Pilots utilizing those FMSs may identify the location of the waypoint by noting its distance from the FTP as published on the charted IAP. In those same FMSs, the straight − in SOIA approach will not display a waypoint inside the PFAF. The same procedures may be utilized to identify an uncoded waypoint. In this case, the location is determined by noting its distance from the runway waypoint or using an authorized distance as published on the charted IAP.

20.7.5.3 Because the FTP is coded as the MAP, the FMS map display will depict the initial missed approach course as beginning at the FTP. This depiction does not match the charted initial missed approach procedure on the IAP. Pilots are reminded that charted IAP guidance is to be followed, not the map display. Once the aircraft completes the initial turn when commencing a missed approach, the remainder of the procedure coding is standard and can be utilized as with any other IAP.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 64 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 36 SOIA Approach Geometry NOTE − SAP The stabilized approach point is a design point along the extended centerline of the intended landing run - way on the glide slope/glide path at 500 feet above the runway threshold elevation. It is used to verify a suffi - cient distance is provided for the visual maneuver after the offset course approach DA to permit the pilots to conform to approved, stabilized approach criteria. The SAP is not published on the IAP.

Offset The point along the LDA, or other offset course, where the course separation with the adjacent ILS, or other Course DA straight-in course, reaches the minimum distance permitted to conduct closely spaced approaches. Typic - ally that minimum distance will be 3,000 feet without the use of high update radar; with high update radar, course separation of less than 3,000 ft may be used when validated by a safety study. The altitude of the glide slope/glide path at that point determines the offset course approach decision altitude and is where the NTZ terminates. Maneuvering inside the DA is done in visual conditions.

Visual Angle, as determined by the SOIA design tool, formed by the extension of the straight segment of the calcu- Segment lated flight track (between the offset course MAP/DA and the SAP) and the extended runway centerline.

Angle The size of the angle is dependent on the aircraft approach categories (Category D or only selected categor - ies/speeds) that are authorized to use the offset course approach and the spacing between the runways.

Visibility Distance from the offset course approach DA to runway threshold in statute mile .

Procedure The aircraft on the offset course approach must see the runway-landing environment and, if ATC has ad - vised that traffic on the straight-in approach is a factor, the offset course approach aircraft must visually acquire the straight-in approach aircraft and report it in sight to ATC prior to reaching the DA for the offset course approach.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 65 United States of America 22 JAN 26 CC The Clear of Clouds point is the position on the offset final approach course where aircraft first operate in visual meteorological conditions below the ceiling, when the actual weather conditions are at, or near, the minimum ceiling for SOIA operations. Ceiling is defined by the Aeronautical Information Manual.

20.7.6 SOIA PRM approaches utilize the same dual communications procedures as do other PRM approaches.

20.7.6.1 SOIA utilizes the same AAUP format as do other PRM approaches. The minimum weather conditions that are required are listed. Because of the more complex nature of instructions for conducting SOIA approaches, the “Runway Specific” items are more numerous and lengthy.

20.7.6.2 Examples of SOIA offset runway specific notes: a) Aircraft must remain on the offset course until passing the offset MAP prior to maneuvering to align with the centerline of the offset approach runway.

b) Pilots are authorized to continue past the offset MAP to align with runway centerline when: 1) the straight − in approach traffic is in sight and is expected to remain in sight, 2) ATC has been advised that “traffic is in sight.” (ATC is not required to acknowledge this transmission), 3) the runway environment is in sight. Otherwise, a missed approach must be executed. Between the offset MAP and the runway threshold, pilots conducting the offset PRM approach must not pass the straight − in aircraft and are responsible for separating themselves visually from traffic conducting the straight − in PRM approach to the adjacent runway, which means maneuvering the aircraft as necessary to avoid that traffic until landing, and providing wake turbulence avoidance, if applicable. Pilots maintaining visual separation should advise ATC, as soon as practical, if visual contact with the aircraft conducting the straight − in PRM approach is lost and execute a missed approach unless otherwise instructed by ATC.

20.7.6.3 Examples of SOIA straight − in runway specific notes: a) To facilitate the offset aircraft in providing wake mitigation, pilots should descend on, not above, the glideslope/glidepath.

b) Conducting the straight − in approach, pilots should be aware that the aircraft conducting the offset approach will be approaching from the right/left rear and will be operating in close proximity to the straight − in aircraft.

20.7.7 Recap.

The following are differences between widely spaced simultaneous approaches (at least 4,300 feet between the runway centerlines) and Simultaneous PRM close parallel approaches which are of importance to the pilot: 20.7.7.1 Runway Spacing. Prior to PRM simultaneous close parallel approaches, most ATC − directed breakouts were the result of two aircraft in − trail on the same final approach course getting too close together.

Two aircraft going in the same direction did not mandate quick reaction times. With PRM closely spaced approaches, two aircraft could be alongside each other, navigating on courses that are separated by less than 4,300 feet and as close as 3,000 feet. In the unlikely event that an aircraft “blunders” off its course and makes a worst case turn of 30 degrees toward the adjacent final approach course, closing speeds of 135 feet per second could occur that constitute the need for quick reaction. A blunder has to be recognized by the monitor controller, and breakout instructions issued to the endangered aircraft. The pilot will not have any warning that a breakout is imminent because the blundering aircraft will be on another frequency. It is important that, when a pilot receives breakout instructions, the assumption is made that a blundering aircraft is about to (or has penetrated the NTZ) and is heading toward his/her approach course. The pilot must initiate a breakout as soon as safety allows. While conducting PRM approaches, pilots must maintain an increased sense of awareness in order to immediately react to an ATC (breakout) instruction and maneuver (as instructed by ATC) away from a blundering aircraft.

20.7.7.2 Communications. Dual VHF communications procedures should be carefully followed. One of the assumptions made that permits the safe conduct of PRM approaches is that there will be no blocked communications.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 66 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20.7.7.3 Hand − flown Breakouts. The use of the autopilot is encouraged while flying a PRM approach, but the autopilot must be disengaged in the rare event that a breakout is issued. Simulation studies of breakouts have shown that a hand − flown breakout can be initiated consistently faster than a breakout performed using the autopilot.

20.7.7.4 TCAS. The ATC breakout instruction is the primary means of conflict resolution. TCAS, if installed, provides another form of conflict resolution in the unlikely event other separation standards would fail. TCAS is not required to conduct a closely spaced approach.

The TCAS provides only vertical resolution of aircraft conflicts, while the ATC breakout instruction provides both vertical and horizontal guidance for conflict resolutions. Pilots should always immediately follow the TCAS Resolution Advisory (RA), whenever it is received. Should a TCAS RA be received before, during, or after an ATC breakout instruction is issued, the pilot should follow the RA, even if it conflicts with the climb/descent portion of the breakout maneuver. If following an RA requires deviating from an ATC clearance, the pilot must advise ATC as soon as practical. While following an RA, it is extremely important that the pilot also comply with the turn portion of the ATC breakout instruction unless the pilot determines safety to be factor. Adhering to these procedures assures the pilot that acceptable “breakout” separation margins will always be provided, even in the face of a normal procedural or system failure.

21. Simultaneous Converging Instrument Approaches 21.1 ATC may conduct instrument approaches simultaneously to converging runways; i.e., runways having an included angle from 15 to 100 degrees, at airports where a program has been specifically approved to do so.

21.2 The basic concept requires that dedicated, separate standard instrument approach procedures be developed for each converging runway included. These approaches can be identified by the letter “V” in the title; for example, “ILS V Rwy 17 (CONVERGING)”.Missed approach points must be at least 3 miles apart and missed approach procedures ensure that missed approach protected airspace does not overlap.

21.3 Other requirements are: radar availability, nonintersecting final approach courses, precision approach capability for each runway and, if runways intersect, controllers must be able to apply visual separation as well as intersecting runway separation criteria. Intersecting runways also require minimums of at least 700 foot ceilings and 2 miles visibility. Straight in approaches and landings must be made.

21.4 Whenever simultaneous converging approaches are in use, aircraft will be informed by the controller as soon as feasible after initial contact or via ATIS. Additionally, the radar controller will have direct communications capability with the tower controller where separation responsibility has not been delegated to the tower.

22. Timed Approaches From a Holding Fix 22.1 Timed approaches may be conducted when the following conditions are met: 22.1.1 A control tower is in operation at the airport where the approaches are conducted.

22.1.2 Direct communications are maintained between the pilot and the center/approach controller until the pilot is instructed to contact the tower.

22.1.3 If more than one missed approach procedure is available, none requires a course reversal.

22.1.4 If only one missed approach procedure is available, the following conditions are met.

22.1.4.1 Course reversal is not required.

22.1.4.2 Reported ceiling and visibility are equal to or greater than the highest prescribed circling minimums for the instrument approach procedure.

22.1.5 When cleared for the approach, pilots must not execute a procedure turn. (See 14 CFR Section 91.175j.)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 67 United States of America 22 JAN 26 22.2 Although the controller will not specifically state that “timed approaches are in use,” the assigning a time to depart the final approach fix inbound (nonprecision approach) or the outer marker or the fix used in lieu of the outer marker inbound (precision approach) is indicative that timed approach procedures are being utilized, or in lieu of holding, the controller may use radar vectors to the final approach course to establish a mileage interval between aircraft that will insure the appropriate time sequence between the final approach fix/outer marker or the fix used in lieu of the outer marker and the airport.

22.3 Each pilot in an approach sequence will be given advance notice as to the time he/she should leave the holding point on approach to the airport. When a time to leave the holding point has been received, the pilot should adjust his/her flight path to leave the fix as closely as possible to the designated time. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 37 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 68 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 37 Timed Approaches from a Holding Fix LMM LOM 1000 FT.

REPORT LEAVING PREVIOUS ALTITUDE FOR NEW ASSIGNED ALTITUDE 1000 FT.

1000 FT.

ONE MINUTE APPROXIMATELY 5 MILES AIRPORT FLYING TIME 12:03 CLEARANCE RECEIVED :04 INITIAL TIME OVER FIX :06 1/2 30 SEC.

:07 REPORT :05 :05 1/2 LEAVING FINAL APPROACH TIME EXAMPLE − At 12:03 local time, in the example shown, a pilot holding, receives instructions to leave the fix inbound at 12:07. These instructions are received just as the pilot has completed turn at the outbound end of the holding pattern and is proceeding inbound toward the fix. Arriving back over the fix, the pilot notes that the time is 12:04 and that there are 3 minutes to lose in order to leave the fix at the assigned time. Since the time remaining is more than two minutes, the pilot plans to fly a race track pattern rather than a 360 degree turn, which would use up 2 minutes. The turns at the ends of the race track pattern will consume approximately 2 minutes. Three minutes to go, minus 2 minutes required for the turns, leaves 1 minute for level flight. Since two portions of level flight will be required to get back to the fix inbound, the pilot halves the 1 minute remaining Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 69 United States of America 22 JAN 26 and plans to fly level for 30 seconds outbound before starting the turn back to the fix on final approach. If the winds were negligible at flight altitude, this procedure would bring the pilot inbound across the fix precisely at the specified time of 12:07. However, if expecting headwind on final approach, the pilot should shorten the 30 second outbound course somewhat, knowing that the wind will carry the aircraft away from the fix faster while outbound and decrease the ground speed while returning to the fix. On the other hand, compensating for a tailwind on final approach, the pilot should lengthen the calculated 30 second outbound heading somewhat, knowing that the wind would tend to hold the aircraft closer to the fix while outbound and increase the ground speed while returning to the fix.

23. Contact Approach 23.1 Pilots operating in accordance with an IFR flight plan, provided they are clear of clouds and have at least 1 mile flight visibility and can reasonably expect to continue to the destination airport in those conditions, may request ATC authorization for a “contact approach.” 23.2 Controllers may authorize a “contact approach” provided: 23.2.1 The contact approach is specifically requested by the pilot. ATC cannot initiate this approach.

EXAMPLE − Request contact approach.

23.2.2 The reported ground visibility at the destination airport is at least 1 statute mile.

23.2.3 The contact approach will be made to an airport having a standard or special instrument approach procedure.

23.2.4 Approved separation is applied between aircraft so cleared and between these aircraft and other IFR or special VFR aircraft.

EXAMPLE − Cleared contact approach (and if required) at or below (altitude) (routing) if not possible (alternative procedures) and advise.

23.3 A contact approach is an approach procedure that may be used by a pilot (with prior authorization from ATC) in lieu of conducting a standard or special instrument approach procedure (IAP) to an airport. It is not intended for use by a pilot on an IFR flight clearance to operate to an airport not having a published and functioning IAP. Nor is it intended for an aircraft to conduct an instrument approach to one airport and then, when “in the clear,” discontinue that approach and proceed to another airport. In the execution of a contact approach, the pilot assumes the responsibility for obstruction clearance. If radar service is being received, it will automatically terminate when the pilot is instructed to change to advisory frequency.

24. Use of Enhanced Flight Vision Systems (EFVS) on Instrument Approaches 24.1 Introduction. During an instrument approach, an EFVS can enable a pilot to see the approach lights, visual references associated with the runway environment, and other objects or features that might not be visible using natural vision alone. An EFVS uses a head − up display (HUD), or an equivalent display that is a head − up presentation, to combine flight information, flight symbology, navigation guidance, and a real − time image of the external scene to the pilot. Combining the flight information, navigation guidance, and sensor imagery on a HUD (or equivalent display) allows the pilot to continue looking forward along the flightpath throughout the entire approach, landing, and rollout.

An EFVS operation is an operation in which visibility conditions require an EFVS to be used in lieu of natural vision to perform an approach or landing, determine enhanced flight visibility, identify required visual references, or conduct a rollout. There are two types of EFVS operations: 24.1.1 EFVS operations to touchdown and rollout.

24.1.2 EFVS operations to 100 feet above the touchdown zone elevation (TDZE).

24.2 EFVS Operations to Touchdown and Rollout. An EFVS operation to touchdown and rollout is an operation in which the pilot uses the enhanced vision imagery provided by an EFVS in lieu of natural vision to Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 70 United States of America 22 JAN 26 descend below DA or DH to touchdown and rollout. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 38 .) These operations may be conducted only on Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) or special IAPs that have a DA or DH (for example, precision or APV approach). An EFVS operation to touchdown and rollout may not be conducted on an approach that has circling minimums. The regulations for EFVS operations to touchdown and rollout can be found in 14 CFR § 91.176(a).

FIG ENR 1.5 − 38 EFVS Operation to Touchdown and Rollout 24.3 EFVS Operations to 100 Feet Above the TDZE. An EFVS operation to 100 feet above the TDZE is an operation in which the pilot uses the enhanced vision imagery provided by an EFVS in lieu of natural vision to descend below DA/DH or MDA down to 100 feet above the TDZE. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 39 .) To continue the approach below 100 feet above the TDZE, a pilot must have sufficient flight visibility to identify the required visual references using natural vision and must continue to use the EFVS to ensure the enhanced flight visibility meets the visibility requirements of the IAP being flown. These operations may be conducted on SIAPs or special IAPs that have a DA/DH or MDA. An EFVS operation to 100 feet above the TDZE may not be conducted on an approach that has circling minimums. The regulations for EFVS operations to 100 feet above the TDZE can be found in 14 CFR § 91.176(b).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 71 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 39 EFVS Operation to 100 ft Above the TDZE 24.4 EFVS Equipment Requirements. An EFVS that is installed on a U.S. − registered aircraft and is used to conduct EFVS operations must conform to an FAA − type design approval (i.e., a type certificate (TC), amended TC, or supplemental type certificate (STC)). A foreign − registered aircraft used to conduct EFVS operations that does not have an FAA − type design approval must be equipped with an EFVS that has been approved by either the State of the Operator or the State of Registry to meet the requirements of ICAO Annex 6. Equipment requirements for an EFVS operation to touchdown and rollout can be found in 14 CFR § 91.176(a)(1), and the equipment requirements for an EFVS operation to 100 feet above the TDZE can be found in 14 CFR § 91.176(b)(1). An operator can determine the eligibility of their aircraft to conduct EFVS operations by referring to the Airplane Flight Manual, Airplane Flight Manual Supplement, Rotorcraft Flight Manual, or Rotorcraft Flight Manual Supplement as applicable.

24.5 Operating Requirements. Any operator who conducts EFVS operations to touchdown and rollout (14 CFR § 91.176(a)) must have an OpSpec, MSpec, or LOA that specifically authorizes those operations. Parts 91K, 121, 125, 129, and 135 operators who conduct EFVS operations to 100 feet above the TDZE (14 CFR § 91.176(b))must have an OpSpec, MSpec, or LOA that specifically authorizes the operation. Part 91 operators (other than 91K operators) are not required to have an LOA to conduct EFVS operations to 100 feet above the TDZE in the United States. However, an optional LOA is available to facilitate operational approval from foreign Civil Aviation Authorities (CAA). To conduct an EFVS operation to touchdown and rollout during an authorized Category II or III operation, the operator must have: 24.5.1 An OpSpec, MSpec, or LOA authorizing EFVS operations to touchdown and rollout (14 CFR § 91.176(a)); and 24.5.2 An OpSpec, MSpec, or LOA authorizing Category II or Category III operations.

24.6 EFVS Operations in Rotorcraft. Currently, EFVS operations in rotorcraft can only be conducted on IAPs that are flown to a runway. Instrument approach criteria, procedures, and appropriate visual references have not Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 72 United States of America 22 JAN 26 yet been developed for straight − in landing operations below DA/DH or MDA under IFR to heliports or platforms. An EFVS cannot be used in lieu of natural vision to descend below published minimums on copter approaches to a point in space (PinS) followed by a “proceed visual flight rules (VFR)” visual segment, or on approaches designed to a specific landing site using a “proceed visually” visual segment.

24.7 EFVS Pilot Requirements. A pilot who conducts EFVS operations must receive ground and flight training specific to the EFVS operation to be conducted. The training must be obtained from an authorized training provider under a training program approved by the FAA. Additionally, recent flight experience and proficiency or competency check requirements apply to EFVS operations. These requirements are addressed in 14 CFR §§ 61.66, 91.1065, 121.441, Appendix F to Part 121, 125.287, and 135.293.

24.8 Enhanced Flight Visibility and Visual Reference Requirements. To descend below DA/DH or MDA during EFVS operations under 14 CFR § 91.176(a) or (b), a pilot must make a determination that the enhanced flight visibility observed by using an EFVS is not less than what is prescribed by the IAP being flown. In addition, the visual references required in 14 CFR § 91.176(a) or (b) must be distinctly visible and identifiable to the pilot using the EFVS. The determination of enhanced flight visibility is a separate action from that of identifying required visual references, and is different from ground − reported visibility. Even though the reported visibility or the visibility observed using natural vision may be less, as long as the EFVS provides the required enhanced flight visibility and a pilot meets all of the other requirements, the pilot can continue descending below DA/DH or MDA using the EFVS. Suitable enhanced flight visibility is necessary to ensure the aircraft is in a position to continue the approach and land. It is important to understand that using an EFVS does not result in obtaining lower minima with respect to the visibility or the DA/DH or MDA specified in the IAP. An EFVS simply provides another means of operating in the visual segment of an IAP. The DA/DH or MDA and the visibility value specified in the IAP to be flown do not change.

24.9 Flight Planning and Beginning or Continuing an Approach Under IFR. A Part 121, 125, or 135 operator’s OpSpec or LOA for EFVS operations may authorize an EFVS operational credit dispatching or releasing a flight and for beginning or continuing an instrument approach procedure. When a pilot reaches DA/DH or MDA, the pilot conducts the EFVS operation in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.176(a) or (b) and their authorization to conduct EFVS operations.

24.10 Missed Approach Considerations. In order to conduct an EFVS operation, the EFVS must be operable.

In the event of a failure of any required component of an EFVS at any point in the approach to touchdown, a missed approach is required. However, this provision does not preclude a pilot’s authority to continue an approach if continuation of an approach is considered by the pilot to be a safer course of action.

24.11 Light Emitting Diode (LED) Airport Lighting Impact on EFVS Operations. Incandescent lamps are being replaced with LEDs at some airports in threshold lights, taxiway edge lights, taxiway centerline lights, low intensity runway edge lights, wind cone lights, beacons, and some obstruction lighting. Additionally, there are plans to replace incandescent lamps with LEDs in approach lighting systems. Pilots should be aware that LED lights cannot be sensed by infrared − based EFVSs. Airports with LED approach lights will be identified in the Airport Remarks paragraph of the Charting Supplement with the remarks: “Pilots conducting EFVS ops; be aware LED ALS in use.” More information may be found at the FAA Flight Standards EFVS webpage at https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/afx/afs/afs400/afs410/efvs .

24.12 Other Vision Systems. Unlike an EFVS that meets the equipment requirements of 14 CFR § 91.176, a Synthetic Vision System (SVS) or Synthetic Vision Guidance System (SVGS) does not provide a real − time sensor image of the outside scene and also does not meet the equipment requirements for EFVS operations. A pilot cannot use a synthetic vision image on a head − up or a head − down display in lieu of natural vision to descend below DA/DH or MDA. An EFVS can, however, be integrated with an SVS, also known as a Combined Vision System (CVS). A CVS can be used to conduct EFVS operations if all of the requirements for an EFVS are satisfied and the SVS image does not interfere with the pilot’s ability to see the external scene, to identify the required visual references, or to see the sensor image.

24.13 Additional Information. Operational criteria for EFVS can be found in Advisory Circular (AC) 90 − 106, Enhanced Flight Vision System Operations, and airworthiness criteria for EFVS can be found in AC 20 − 167, Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 73 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Airworthiness Approval of Enhanced Vision System, Synthetic Vision System, Combined Vision System, and Enhanced Flight Vision System Equipment.

25. Visual Approach 25.1 A visual approach is conducted on an IFR flight plan and authorizes a pilot to proceed visually and clear of clouds to the airport. The pilot must have either the airport or the preceding identified aircraft in sight. This approach must be authorized and controlled by the appropriate air traffic control facility. Reported weather at the airport must have a ceiling at or above 1,000 feet and visibility 3 miles or greater. ATC may authorize this type of approach when it will be operationally beneficial. Visual approaches are an IFR procedure conducted under Instrument Flight Rules in visual meteorological conditions. Cloud clearance requirements of 14 CFR Section 91.155 are not applicable, unless required by operation specifications. When conducting visual approaches, pilots are encouraged to use other available navigational aids to assist in positive lateral and vertical alignment with the runway.

25.2 Operating to an Airport Without Weather Reporting Service. ATC will advise the pilot when weather is not available at the destination airport. ATC may initiate a visual approach provided there is a reasonable assurance that weather at the airport is a ceiling at or above 1,000 feet and visibility 3 miles or greater (e.g., area weather reports, PIREPs, etc.).

25.3 Operating to an Airport With an Operating Control Tower. Aircraft may be authorized to conduct a visual approach to one runway while other aircraft are conducting IFR or VFR approaches to another parallel, intersecting, or converging runway. ATC may authorize a visual approach after advising all aircraft involved that other aircraft are conducting operations to the other runway. This may be accomplished through use of the ATIS.

25.3.1 When operating to parallel runways separated by less than 2,500 feet, ATC will ensure approved separation is provided unless the succeeding aircraft reports sighting the preceding aircraft to the adjacent parallel and visual separation is applied.

25.3.2 When operating to parallel runways separated by at least 2,500 feet but less than 4,300 feet, ATC will ensure approved separation is provided until the aircraft are issued an approach clearance and one pilot has acknowledged receipt of a visual approach clearance, and the other pilot has acknowledged receipt of a visual or instrument approach clearance, and aircraft are established on a heading or established on a direct course to a fix or cleared on an RNAV/instrument approach procedure which will intercept the extended centerline of the runway at an angle not greater than 30 degrees.

25.3.3 When operating to parallel runways separated by 4,300 feet or more, ATC will ensure approved separation is provided until one of the aircraft has been issued and the pilot has acknowledged receipt of the visual approach clearance, and each aircraft is assigned a heading, or established on a direct course to a fix, or cleared on an RNAV/instrument approach procedure which will allow the aircraft to intercept the extended centerline of the runway at an angle not greater than 30 degrees.

NOTE − The intent of the 30 degree intercept angle is to reduce the potential for overshoots of the final and to preclude side − by − side operations with one or both aircraft in a belly − up configuration during the turn − on.

25.4 Clearance for Visual Approach. At locations with an operating control tower, ATC will issue approach clearances that will include an assigned runway. At locations without an operating control tower or where a part − time tower is closed, ATC will issue a visual approach clearance to the airport only.

25.5 Separation Responsibilities. If the pilot has the airport in sight but cannot see the aircraft to be followed, ATC may clear the aircraft for a visual approach; however, ATC retains both separation and wake vortex separation responsibility. When visually following a preceding aircraft, acceptance of the visual approach clearance constitutes acceptance of pilot responsibility for maintaining a safe approach interval and adequate wake turbulence separation.

25.6 A visual approach is not an IAP and therefore has no missed approach segment. If a go − around is necessary for any reason, aircraft operating at controlled airports will be issued an appropriate clearance or instruction by Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 74 United States of America 22 JAN 26 the tower to enter the traffic pattern for landing or proceed as otherwise instructed. In either case, the pilot is responsible to maintain terrain and obstruction avoidance until reaching an ATC assigned altitude if issued, and ATC will provide approved separation or visual separation from other IFR aircraft. At uncontrolled airports, aircraft are expected to remain clear of clouds and complete a landing as soon as possible. If a landing cannot be accomplished, the aircraft is expected to remain clear of clouds and contact ATC as soon as possible for further clearance. Separation from other IFR aircraft will be maintained under these circumstances.

25.7 Visual approaches reduce pilot/controller workload and expedite traffic by shortening flight paths to the airport. It is the pilot’s responsibility to advise ATC as soon as possible if a visual approach is not desired.

25.8 Authorization to conduct a visual approach is an IFR authorization and does not alter IFR flight plan cancellation responsibility. See ENR 1.10 , Paragraph 11.2, Canceling IFR Flight Plan.

25.9 Radar service is automatically terminated, without advising the pilot, when the aircraft is instructed to change to advisory frequency.

26. Charted Visual Flight Procedures (CVFPs) 26.1 CVFPs are charted visual approaches established for environmental/noise considerations, and/or when necessary for the safety and efficiency of air traffic operations. The approach charts depict prominent landmarks, courses, and recommended altitudes to specific runways. CVFPs are designed to be used primarily for turbojet aircraft.

26.2 These procedures will be used only at airports with an operating control tower.

26.3 Most approach charts will depict some NAVAID information which is for supplemental navigational guidance only.

26.4 Unless indicating a Class B airspace floor, all depicted altitudes are for noise abatement purposes and are recommended only. Pilots are not prohibited from flying other than recommended altitudes if operational requirements dictate.

26.5 When landmarks used for navigation are not visible at night, the approach will be annotated “PROCEDURE NOT AUTHORIZED AT NIGHT.” 26.6 CVFPs usually begin within 20 flying miles from the airport.

26.7 Published weather minimums for CVFPs are based on minimum vectoring altitudes rather than the recommended altitudes depicted on charts.

26.8 CVFPs are not instrument approaches and do not have missed approach segments.

26.9 ATC will not issue clearances for CVFPs when the weather is less than the published minimum.

26.10 ATC will clear aircraft for a CVFP after the pilot reports siting a charted landmark or a preceding aircraft.

If instructed to follow a preceding aircraft, pilots are responsible for maintaining a safe approach interval and wake turbulence separation.

26.11 Pilots should advise ATC if at any point they are unable to continue an approach or lose sight of a preceding aircraft. Missed approaches will be handled as a go − around.

26.12 When conducting visual approaches, pilots are encouraged to use other available navigational aids to assist in positive lateral and vertical alignment with the assigned runway.

27. Missed Approach 27.1 When a landing cannot be accomplished, advise ATC and, upon reaching the missed approach point defined on the approach procedure chart, the pilot must comply with the missed approach instructions for the procedure being used or with an alternate missed approach procedure specified by ATC.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 75 United States of America 22 JAN 26 27.2 Obstacle protection for missed approach is predicated on the missed approach being initiated at the decision altitude/decision height (DA/DH) or at the missed approach point and not lower than minimum descent altitude (MDA). A climb gradient of at least 200 feet per nautical mile is required, (except for Copter approaches, where a climb of at least 400 feet per nautical mile is required), unless a higher climb gradient is published in the notes section of the approach procedure chart. When higher than standard climb gradients are specified, the end point of the non − standard climb will be specified at either an altitude or a fix. Pilots must preplan to ensure that the aircraft can meet the climb gradient (expressed in feet per nautical mile) required by the procedure in the event of a missed approach, and be aware that flying at a higher than anticipated ground speed increases the climb rate requirement (feet per minute). Tables for the conversion of climb gradients (feet per nautical mile) to climb rate (feet per minute), based on ground speed, are included on page D1 of the U.S. Terminal Procedures booklets.

Reasonable buffers are provided for normal maneuvers. However, no consideration is given to an abnormally early turn. Therefore, when an early missed approach is executed, pilots should, unless otherwise cleared by ATC, fly the IAP as specified on the approach plate to the missed approach point at or above the MDA or DH before executing a turning maneuver.

27.3 If visual reference is lost while circling to land from an instrument approach, the missed approach specified for that particular procedure must be followed (unless an alternate missed approach procedure is specified by ATC). To become established on the prescribed missed approach course, the pilot should make an initial climbing turn toward the landing runway and continue the turn until established on the missed approach course. Inasmuch as the circling maneuver may be accomplished in more than one direction, different patterns will be required to become established on the prescribed missed approach course depending on the aircraft position at the time visual reference is lost. Adherence to the procedure will help assure that an aircraft will remain laterally within the circling and missed approach obstruction clearance areas. Refer to paragraph 27.8 concerning vertical obstruction clearance when starting a missed approach at other than the MAP. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 40 .)

FIG ENR 1.5 − 40 Circling and Missed Approach Obstruction Clearance Areas DECISION TO MISS HERE CLIMBING TURN X CLIMBING TURN X DECISION CIRCLING TO MISS HERE MANEUVER VOR (WHEN CLEARED IN VOR RIGHT HAND TRAFFIC PATTERN) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 76 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.5 − 41 Missed Approach 090° 056° CHANUTE 109.2 CNU 011° R236 191° Portion of a Published Procedure VOR Remain within MISSED APPROACH 10 NM Climbing right turn to 236° 2600 direct to VOR 056° x 5.7 NM FIG ENR 1.5 − 42 Overhead Maneuver INITIAL APPROACH INITIAL APPROACH 3 - 5 NM 180° TURN BREAK POINT BREAK POINT X X ROLL OUT ROLL OUT INITIAL POINT INITIAL POINT X 180° TURN 27.4 At locations where ATC radar service is provided, the pilot should conform to radar vectors when provided by ATC in lieu of the published missed approach procedure.

27.5 Some locations may have a preplanned alternate missed approach procedure for use in the event the primary NAVAID used for the missed approach procedure is unavailable. To avoid confusion, the alternate missed approach instructions are not published on the chart. However, the alternate missed approach holding pattern will be depicted on the instrument approach chart for pilot situational awareness and to assist ATC by not having to issue detailed holding instructions. The alternate missed approach may be based on NAVAIDs not used in the approach procedure or the primary missed approach. When the alternate missed approach procedure is implemented by NOTAM, it becomes a mandatory part of the procedure. The NOTAM will specify both the textual instructions and any additional equipment requirements necessary to complete the procedure. Air traffic may also issue instructions for the alternate missed approach when necessary, such as when the primary missed approach NAVAID fails during the approach. Pilots may reject an ATC clearance for an alternate missed approach that requires equipment not necessary for the published approach procedure when the alternate missed Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 77 United States of America 22 JAN 26 approach is issued after beginning the approach. However, when the alternate missed approach is issued prior to beginning the approach the pilot must either accept the entire procedure (including the alternate missed approach), request a different approach procedure, or coordinate with ATC for alternative action to be taken, i.e., proceed to an alternate airport, etc.

27.6 When the approach has been missed, request a clearance for specific action; i.e., to alternative airport, another approach, etc.

27.7 Pilots must ensure that they have climbed to a safe altitude prior to proceeding off the published missed approach, especially in nonradar environments. Abandoning the missed approach prior to reaching the published altitude may not provide adequate terrain clearance. Additional climb may be required after reaching the holding pattern before proceeding back to the IAF or to an alternate.

27.8 A clearance for an instrument approach procedure includes a clearance to fly the published missed approach procedure, unless otherwise instructed by ATC. The published missed approach procedure provides obstacle clearance only when the missed approach is conducted on the missed approach segment from or above the missed approach point, and assumes a climb rate of 200 feet/NM or higher, as published. If the aircraft initiates a missed approach at a point other than the missed approach point (see paragraph 12.2 ), from below MDA or DA (H), or on a circling approach, obstacle clearance is not necessarily provided by following the published missed approach procedure, nor is separation assured from other air traffic in the vicinity.

In the event a balked (rejected) landing occurs at a position other than the published missed approach point, the pilot should contact ATC as soon as possible to obtain an amended clearance. If unable to contact ATC for any reason, the pilot should attempt to re − intercept a published segment of the missed approach and comply with route and altitude instructions. If unable to contact ATC, and in the pilot’s judgment it is no longer appropriate to fly the published missed approach procedure, then consider either maintaining visual conditions if practicable and reattempt a landing, or a circle − climb over the airport. Should a missed approach become necessary when operating to an airport that is not served by an operating control tower, continuous contact with an air traffic facility may not be possible. In this case, the pilot should execute the appropriate go − around/missed approach procedure without delay and contact ATC when able to do so.

Prior to initiating an instrument approach procedure, the pilot should assess the actions to be taken in the event of a balked (rejected) landing beyond the missed approach point or below the MDA or DA (H) considering the anticipated weather conditions and available aircraft performance. 14 CFR 91.175(e) authorizes the pilot to fly an appropriate missed approach procedure that ensures obstruction clearance, but it does not necessarily consider separation from other air traffic. The pilot must consider other factors such as the aircraft’s geographical location with respect to the prescribed missed approach point, direction of flight, and/or minimum turning altitudes in the prescribed missed approach procedure. The pilot must also consider aircraft performance, visual climb restrictions, charted obstacles, published obstacle departure procedure, takeoff visual climb requirements as expressed by nonstandard takeoff minima, other traffic expected to be in the vicinity, or other factors not specifically expressed by the approach procedures.

28. Overhead Approach Maneuver 28.1 Pilots operating in accordance with an IFR flight plan in Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC) may request ATC authorization for an overhead maneuver. An overhead maneuver is not an instrument approach procedure. Overhead maneuver patterns are developed at airports where aircraft have an operational need to conduct the maneuver. An aircraft conducting an overhead maneuver is considered to be VFR and the IFR flight plan is canceled when the aircraft reaches the initial point on the initial approach portion of the maneuver. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 42 .) The existence of a standard overhead maneuver pattern does not eliminate the possible requirement for an aircraft to conform to conventional rectangular patterns if an overhead maneuver cannot be approved. Aircraft operating to an airport without a functioning control tower must initiate cancellation of an IFR flight plan prior to executing the overhead maneuver. Cancellation of the IFR flight plan must be accomplished after crossing the landing threshold on the initial portion of the maneuver or after landing.

Controllers may authorize an overhead maneuver and issue the following to arriving aircraft: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 78 United States of America 22 JAN 26 28.1.1 Pattern altitude and direction of traffic. This information may be omitted if either is standard.

PHRASEOLOGY − PATTERN ALTITUDE (altitude). RIGHT TURNS.

28.1.2 Request for a report on initial approach.

PHRASEOLOGY − REPORT INITIAL.

28.1.3 “Break” information and a request for the pilot to report. The “Break Point” will be specified if nonstandard. Pilots may be requested to report “break” if required for traffic or other reasons.

PHRASEOLOGY − BREAK AT (specified point).

REPORT BREAK.

29. Departure Procedures 29.1 Pre − Taxi Clearance Procedures 29.1.1 Locations where these procedures are in effect are indicated in the Chart Supplement.

29.1.2 Certain airports have established programs whereby pilots of departing IFR aircraft may elect to receive their IFR clearances before they start taxiing for takeoff. The following provisions are included in such procedures: 29.1.2.1 Pilot participation is not mandatory.

29.1.2.2 Participating pilots call clearance delivery/ground control not more than 10 minutes before proposed taxi time.

29.1.2.3 IFR clearance (or delay information, if clearance cannot be obtained) is issued at the time of this initial call − up.

29.1.2.4 When the IFR clearance is received on clearance delivery frequency, pilots call ground control when ready to taxi.

29.1.2.5 Normally, pilots need not inform ground control that they have received IFR clearance on clearance delivery frequency. Certain locations may, however, require that the pilot inform ground control of a portion of the routing or that the IFR clearance has been received.

29.1.2.6 If a pilot cannot establish contact on clearance delivery frequency or has not received an IFR clearance before ready to taxi, the pilot should contact ground control and inform the controller accordingly.

30. Automated Pre − Departure Clearance Procedures 30.1 Many airports in the National Airspace System are equipped with the Terminal Data Link System (TDLS) that includes the Pre − Departure Clearance (PDC) and Controller Pilot Data Link Communication–Departure Clearance (CPDLC-DCL) functions. Both the PDC and CPDLC-DCL functions automate the Clearance Delivery operations in the ATCT for participating users. Both functions display IFR clearances from the ARTCC to the ATCT. The Clearance Delivery controller in the ATCT can append local departure information and transmit the clearance via data link to participating airline/service provider computers for PDC. The airline/service provider will then deliver the clearance via the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) or a similar data link system, or for non-data link equipped aircraft, via a printer located at the departure gate. For CPDLC-DCL, the departure clearance is uplinked from the ATCT via the Future Air Navigation System (FANS) to the aircraft avionics and requires a response from the flight crew. Both PDC and CPDLC-DCL reduce frequency congestion, controller workload, and are intended to mitigate delivery/read back errors.

30.2 Both services are available only to participating aircraft that have subscribed to the service through an approved service provider.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 79 United States of America 22 JAN 26 30.3 In all situations, the pilot is encouraged to contact clearance delivery if a question or concern exists regarding an automated clearance. Due to technical reasons, the following limitations/differences exist between the two services: 30.3.1 PDC 30.3.1.1 Aircraft filing multiple flight plans are limited to one PDC clearance per departure airport within a 24 − hour period. Additional clearances will be delivered verbally.

30.3.1.2 If the clearance is revised or modified prior to delivery, it will be rejected from PDC and the clearance will need to be delivered verbally.

30.3.1.3 No acknowledgment of receipt or read back is required for a PDC.

30.3.2 CPDLC − DCL 30.3.2.1 No limitation to the number of clearances received.

30.3.2.2 Allows delivery of revised flight data, including revised departure clearances.

30.3.2.3 A response from the flight crew is required.

30.3.2.4 Requires a logon to the FAA National Single Data Authority − KUSA − utilizing the ATC FANS application.

30.3.2.5 To be eligible, operators must have received CPDLC/FANS authorization from the responsible civil aviation authority, and file appropriate equipment information in ICAO field 10a and in the ICAO field 18 DAT (Other Data Applications) of the flight plan.

31. IFR Clearances Off Uncontrolled Airports 31.1 Pilots departing on an IFR flight plan should consult the Chart Supplement to determine the frequency or telephone number to use to contact clearance delivery. On initial contact, pilots should advise that the flight is IFR and state the departure and destination airports.

31.2 Air traffic facilities providing clearance delivery services via telephone will have their telephone number published in the Chart Supplement of that airport’s entry. This same section may also contain a telephone number to use for cancellation of an IFR flight plan after landing.

31.3 Except in Alaska, pilots of MEDEVAC flights may obtain a clearance by calling 1 − 877 − 543 − 4733.

32. Taxi Clearance 32.1 Pilots on IFR flight plans should communicate with the control tower on the appropriate ground control/clearance delivery frequency prior to starting engines to receive engine start time, taxi, and/or clearance information.

33. Line Up and Wait (LUAW) 33.1 Line up and wait is an air traffic control (ATC) procedure designed to position an aircraft onto the runway for an imminent departure. The ATC instruction “LINE UP AND WAIT” is used to instruct a pilot to taxi onto the assigned departure runway, align the aircraft with the correct departure direction and await for further ATC instructions. LUAW is not an authorization to takeoff.

EXAMPLE − Tower: “N234AR Runway 24L, line up and wait.” NOTE − Previous reviews of air traffic events, involving LUAW instructions, revealed that a significant number of pilots read back LUAW instructions correctly and departed without a takeoff clearance. Do not confuse LUAW instructions with a departure clearance; the outcome could be catastrophic, especially during intersecting runway operations.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 80 United States of America 22 JAN 26 33.2 In instances where the pilot has been instructed to LUAW and has been advised of a reason/condition (wake turbulence, traffic on an intersecting runway, etc.) or the reason/condition is clearly visible (another aircraft that has landed on or is taking off on the same runway), and the reason/condition is satisfied, the pilot should expect an imminent takeoff clearance, unless advised of a delay. If you are uncertain about any ATC instruction or clearance, contact ATC immediately.

33.3 If a takeoff clearance is not received within a reasonable amount of time after instructed to LUAW, ATC should be contacted.

EXAMPLE − Aircraft: Cessna 234AR holding in position Runway 24L.

Aircraft: Cessna 234AR holding in position Runway 24L at Bravo.

NOTE − FAA analysis of accidents and incidents involving aircraft holding in position indicate that two minutes or more elapsed between the time the instruction was issued to “line up and wait” and the resulting event (for example, landover or go − around). Pilots should consider the length of time that they have been holding in position whenever they HAVE NOT been advised of any expected delay to determine when it is appropriate to query the controller.

REFERENCE − Advisory Circulars 91 − 73A, Part 91 and Part 135 Single − Pilot Procedures during Taxi Operations, and 120 − 74A, Parts 91, 121, 125, and 135 Flightcrew Procedures during Taxi Operations.

33.4 Situational awareness during line up and wait operations is enhanced by monitoring ATC instructions/clearances issued to other aircraft. Pilots should listen carefully if another aircraft is on frequency that has a similar call sign and pay close attention to communications between ATC and other aircraft. If you are uncertain of an ATC instruction or clearance, query ATC immediately. Care should be taken to not inadvertently execute a clearance/instruction for another aircraft.

33.5 Pilots should be especially vigilant when conducting LUAW operations at night, when intersecting runway operations are being conducted, or during reduced visibility conditions. Pilots should scan the full length of the runway and look for aircraft crossing the runway, on final approach, or landing roll (including intersecting runways) prior to and while taxiing onto the runway. ATC should be contacted anytime there is a concern about a potential conflict or clarity is needed with assigned instructions.

NOTE − Pilots are reminded of the importance of maintaining situational awareness during LUAW operations with intersecting/crossing runways. Ensure a takeoff clearance has been received before beginning a takeoff roll.

33.6 When two or more runways are active, aircraft may be instructed to “LINE UP AND WAIT” on two or more runways. When multiple runway operations are being conducted, it is important to listen closely for your call sign and runway. Be alert for similar sounding call signs and acknowledge all instructions with your call sign.

When you are holding in position and are not sure if the takeoff clearance was for you, ask ATC before you begin takeoff roll. ATC prefers that you confirm a takeoff clearance rather than mistake another aircraft’s clearance for your own.

33.7 When ATC issues intersection “line up and wait” and takeoff clearances, the intersection designator will be used. If ATC omits the intersection designator, call ATC for clarification.

EXAMPLE − Aircraft: “Cherokee 234AR, Runway 24L at November 4, line up and wait.” 33.8 If landing traffic is a factor during line up and wait operations, ATC will inform the aircraft in position of the closest traffic within 6 flying miles requesting a full − stop, touch − and − go, stop − and − go, or an unrestricted low approach to the same runway. Pilots should take care to note the position of landing traffic. ATC will also advise the landing traffic when an aircraft is authorized to “line up and wait” on the same runway.

EXAMPLE − Tower: “Cessna 234AR, Runway 24L, line up and wait. Traffic a Boeing 737, six mile final.” Tower: “Delta 1011, continue, traffic a Cessna 210 holding in position Runway 24L.” Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 81 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − ATC will normally withhold landing clearance to arrival aircraft when another aircraft is in position and holding on the runway.

33.9 Never land on a runway that is occupied by another aircraft, even if a landing clearance was issued. Do not hesitate to ask the controller about the traffic on the runway and be prepared to execute a go − around.

NOTE − Always clarify any misunderstanding or confusion concerning ATC instructions or clearances. ATC should be advised immediately if there is any uncertainty about the ability to comply with any of their instructions.

34. Departure Restrictions, Clearance Void Times, Hold for Release, and Release Times 34.1 ATC may assign departure restrictions, clearance void times, hold for release, and release times, when necessary, to separate departures from other traffic or to restrict or regulate the departure flow. Departures from an airport without an operating control tower must be issued either a departure release (along with a release time and/or void time if applicable), or a hold for release.

REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 4 − 3 − 4, Departure Release, Hold for Release, Release Times, Departure Restrictions, and Clearance Void Times.

34.1.1 Clearance Void Times. A pilot may receive a clearance, when operating from an airport without a control tower, which contains a provision for the clearance to be void if not airborne by a specific time. A pilot who does not depart prior to the clearance void time must advise ATC as soon as possible of his or her intentions.

ATC will normally advise the pilot of the time allotted to notify ATC that the aircraft did not depart prior to the clearance void time. This time cannot exceed 30 minutes. Failure of an aircraft to contact ATC within 30 minutes after the clearance void time will result in the aircraft being considered overdue and search and rescue procedures initiated.

NOTE − 1. Other IFR traffic for the airport where the clearance is issued is suspended until the aircraft has contacted ATC or until 30 minutes after the clearance void time or 30 minutes after the clearance release time if no clearance void time is issued.

2. If the clearance void time expires, it does not cancel the departure clearance or IFR flight plan. It withdraws the pilot’s authority to depart IFR until a new departure release/release time has been issued by ATC and is acknowledged by the pilot.

3. Pilots who depart at or after their clearance void time are not afforded IFR separation, and may be in violation of 14 CFR Section 91.173, which requires that pilots receive an appropriate ATC clearance before operating IFR in controlled airspace.

4. Pilots who choose to depart VFR after their clearance void time has expired should not depart using the previously assigned IFR transponder code.

EXAMPLE − Clearance void if not off by (clearance void time) and, if required, if not off by (clearance void time) advise (facility) not later than (time) of intentions.

34.1.2 Hold for Release. ATC may issue “hold for release” instructions in a clearance to delay an aircraft’s departure for traffic management reasons (i.e., weather, traffic volume, etc.). When ATC states in the clearance, “hold for release,” the pilot may not depart utilizing that IFR clearance until a release time or additional instructions are issued by ATC. In addition, ATC will include departure delay information in conjunction with “hold for release” instructions. The ATC instruction, “hold for release,” applies to the IFR clearance and does not prevent the pilot from departing under VFR. However, prior to takeoff the pilot should cancel the IFR flight plan and operate the transponder/ADS − B on the appropriate VFR code. An IFR clearance may not be available after departure.

EXAMPLE − (Aircraft identification) cleared to (destination) airport as filed, maintain (altitude), and, if required (additional instructions or information), hold for release, expect (time in hours and/or minutes) departure delay.

34.1.3 Release Times. A “release time” is a departure restriction issued to a pilot by ATC, specifying the earliest time an aircraft may depart. ATC will use “release times” in conjunction with traffic management procedures and/or to separate a departing aircraft from other traffic.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 82 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − (Aircraft identification) released for departure at (time in hours and/or minutes).

34.1.4 Expect Departure Clearance Time (EDCT). The EDCT is the runway release time assigned to an aircraft included in traffic management programs. Aircraft are expected to depart no earlier than 5 minutes before, and no later than 5 minutes after the EDCT.

34.2 If practical, pilots departing uncontrolled airports should obtain IFR clearances prior to becoming airborne when two − way communication with the controlling ATC facility is available.

35. Departure Control 35.1 Departure Control is an approach control function responsible for ensuring separation between departures.

So as to expedite the handling of departures, Departure Control may suggest a takeoff direction other than that which may normally have been used under VFR handling. Many times it is preferred to offer the pilot a runway that will require the fewest turns after takeoff to place the pilot on course or selected departure route as quickly as possible. At many locations particular attention is paid to the use of preferential runways for local noise abatement programs, and route departures away from congested areas.

35.2 Departure Control utilizing radar will normally clear aircraft out of the terminal area using vectors, a diverse vector area (DVA), or published DPs.

35.2.1 When a departure is to be vectored immediately following takeoff using vectors, a DVA, or published DPs that begins with an ATC assigned heading off the ground, the pilot will be advised prior to takeoff of the initial heading to be flown but may not be advised of the purpose of the heading. When ATC assigns an initial heading with the takeoff clearance that will take the aircraft off an assigned procedure (for example, an RNAV SID with a published lateral path to a waypoint and crossing restrictions from the departure end of runway), the controller will assign an altitude to maintain with the initial heading and, if necessary, a speed to maintain.

35.2.2 At some airports when a departure will fly an RNAV SID that begins at the runway, ATC may advise aircraft of the initial fix/waypoint on the RNAV route. The purpose of the advisory is to remind pilots to verify the correct procedure is programmed in the FMS before takeoff. Pilots must immediately advise ATC if a different RNAV SID is entered in the aircraft’s FMC. When this advisory is absent, pilots are still required to fly the assigned SID as published.

EXAMPLE − Delta 345 RNAV to MPASS, Runway 26L, cleared for takeoff.

NOTE − 1. The SID transition is not restated as it is contained in the ATC clearance.

2. Aircraft cleared via RNAV SIDs designed to begin with a vector to the initial waypoint are assigned a heading before departure.

35.2.3 Pilots operating in a radar environment are expected to associate departure headings or an RNAV departure advisory with vectors or the flight path to their planned route or flight. When given a vector taking the aircraft off a previously assigned nonradar route, the pilot will be advised briefly what the vector is to achieve.

Thereafter, radar service will be provided until the aircraft has been reestablished “on-course” using an appropriate navigation aid and the pilot has been advised of the aircraft’s position or a handoff is made to another radar controller with further surveillance capabilities.

35.3 Controllers will inform pilots of the departure control frequencies and, if appropriate, the transponder code before takeoff. Pilots must ensure their transponder/ADS − B is adjusted to the “on” or normal operating position as soon as practical and remain on during all operations unless otherwise requested to change to “standby” by ATC. Pilots should not change to the departure control frequency until requested. Controllers may omit the departure control frequency if a DP has or will be assigned and the departure control frequency is published on the DP.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 83 United States of America 22 JAN 26 36. Abbreviated IFR Departure Clearance (Cleared . . . as Filed) Procedures 36.1 ATC facilities will issue an abbreviated IFR departure clearance based on the ROUTE of flight filed in the IFR flight plan, provided the filed route can be approved with little or no revision. These abbreviated clearance procedures are based on the following conditions: 36.1.1 The aircraft is on the ground or it has departed VFR and the pilot is requesting IFR clearance while airborne.

36.1.2 That a pilot will not accept an abbreviated clearance if the route or destination of a flight plan filed with ATC has been changed by him/her or the company or the operations officer before departure.

36.1.3 That it is the responsibility of the company or operations office to inform the pilot when they make a change to the filed flight plan.

36.1.4 That it is the responsibility of the pilot to inform ATC in the initial call − up (for clearance) when the filed flight plan has been either: 36.1.4.1 Amended.

36.1.4.2 Canceled and replaced with a new filed flight plan.

NOTE − The facility issuing a clearance may not have received the revised route or the revised flight plan by the time a pilot requests clearance.

36.2 Controllers will issue a detailed clearance when they know that the original filed flight plan has been changed or when the pilot requests a full route clearance.

36.3 The clearance as issued will include the destination airport filed in the flight plan.

36.4 ATC procedures now require the controller to state the DP name, the current number and the DP Transition name after the phrase “Cleared to (destination) airport,” and prior to the phrase, “then as filed,” for ALL departure clearances when the DP or DP Transition is to be flown. The procedure applies whether or not the DP is filed in the flight plan.

36.5 Standard Terminal Arrivals (STARs), when filed in a flight plan, are considered a part of the filed route of flight and will not normally be stated in an initial departure clearance. If the ARTCC’s jurisdictional airspace includes both the departure airport and the fix where a STAR or STAR Transition begins, the STAR name, the current number, and the STAR Transition name MAY be stated in the initial clearance.

36.6 “Cleared to (destination) airport as filed” does NOT include the en route altitude filed in a flight plan. An en route altitude will be stated in the clearance or the pilot will be advised to expect an assigned/filed altitude within a given time frame or at a certain point after departure. This may be done verbally in the departure instructions or stated in the DP.

36.7 In a radar and a nonradar environment, the controller will state “Cleared to (destination) airport as filed” or: 36.7.1 If a DP or DP Transition is to be flown, specify the DP name, the current DP number, the DP Transition name, the assigned altitude/flight level, and any additional instructions (departure control frequency, beacon code assignment, etc.) necessary to clear a departing aircraft via the DP/DP Transition and the route filed.

EXAMPLE − National Seven Twenty cleared to Miami Airport Intercontinental one departure, Lake Charles transition then as filed, maintain Flight Level two seven zero.

36.7.2 When there is no DP or when the pilot cannot accept a DP, specify the assigned altitude/flight level, and any additional instructions necessary to clear a departing aircraft via an appropriate departure routing and the route filed.

NOTE − A detailed departure route description or a radar vector may be used to achieve the desired departure routing.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 84 United States of America 22 JAN 26 36.7.3 If necessary to make a minor revision to the filed route, specify the assigned DP/DP Transition (or departure routing), the revision to the filed route, the assigned altitude/flight level, and any additional instructions necessary to clear a departing aircraft.

EXAMPLE − Jet Star One Four Two Four cleared to Atlanta Airport, South Boston two departure then as filed except change route to read South Boston Victor 20 Greensboro, maintain one seven thousand.

36.7.4 Additionally, in a nonradar environment, specify one or more fixes as necessary to identify the initial route of flight.

EXAMPLE − Cessna Three One Six Zero Foxtrot cleared to Charlotte Airport as filed via Brooke, maintain seven thousand.

36.8 To ensure success of the program, pilots should: 36.8.1 Avoid making changes to a filed flight plan just prior to departure.

36.8.2 State the following information in the initial call − up to the facility when no change has been made to the filed flight plan: Aircraft call sign, location, type operation (IFR), and the name of the airport (or fix) to which you expect clearance.

EXAMPLE − “Washington clearance delivery (or ground control if appropriate) American Seventy Six at gate one, IFR Los Angeles.” 36.8.3 If the flight plan has been changed, state the change and request a full route clearance.

EXAMPLE − “Washington clearance delivery, American Seventy Six at gate one. IFR San Francisco. My flight plan route has been amended (or destination changed). Request full route clearance.” 36.8.4 Request verification or clarification from ATC if ANY portion of the clearance is not clearly understood.

36.8.5 When requesting clearance for the IFR portion of a VFR − IFR flight, request such clearance prior to the fix where IFR operation is proposed to commence in sufficient time to avoid delay. Use the following phraseology: EXAMPLE − “Los Angeles center, Apache Six One Papa, VFR estimating Paso Robles VOR at three two, one thousand five hundred, request IFR to Bakersfield.” 37. Instrument Departure Procedures (DP) − Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODP), Standard Instrument Departures (SID), and Diverse Vector Areas (DVA) 37.1 Instrument departure procedures are preplanned instrument flight rule (IFR) procedures which provide obstruction clearance from the terminal area to the appropriate en route structure. There are two types of DPs, Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODP), printed either textually or graphically, and Standard Instrument Departures (SID), always printed graphically. All DPs, either textual or graphic may be designed using either conventional or RNAV criteria. RNAV procedures will have RNAV printed in the title; for example, SHEAD TWO DEPARTURE (RNAV). ODPs provide obstruction clearance via the least onerous route from the terminal area to the appropriate en route structure. ODPs are recommended for obstruction clearance and may be flown without ATC clearance unless an alternate departure procedure (SID or radar vector) has been specifically assigned by ATC. Graphic ODPs will have (OBSTACLE) printed in the procedure title; for example, GEYSR THREE DEPARTURE (OBSTACLE), or, CROWN ONE DEPARTURE (RNAV) (OBSTACLE). Standard Instrument Departures are air traffic control (ATC) procedures printed for pilot/controller use in graphic form to provide obstruction clearance and a transition from the terminal area to the appropriate en route structure. SIDs are primarily designed for system enhancement and to reduce pilot/controller workload. ATC clearance must be received prior to flying a SID. All DPs provide the pilot with a way to depart the airport and transition to the en route structure safely.

37.2 A Diverse Vector Area (DVA) is an area in which ATC may provide random radar vectors during an uninterrupted climb from the departure runway until above the MVA/MIA, established in accordance with the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 85 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TERPS criteria for diverse departures. The DVA provides obstacle and terrain avoidance in lieu of taking off from the runway under IFR using an ODP or SID.

37.3 Pilots operating under 14 CFR Part 91 are strongly encouraged to file and fly a DP at night, during marginal Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC) and Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), when one is available. The following paragraphs will provide an overview of the DP program, why DPs are developed, what criteria are used, where to find them, how they are to be flown, and finally pilot and ATC responsibilities.

37.4 Why are DPs necessary? The primary reason is to provide obstacle clearance protection information to pilots. A secondary reason, at busier airports, is to increase efficiency and reduce communications and departure delays through the use of SIDs. When an instrument approach is initially developed for an airport, the need for DPs is assessed. The procedure designer conducts an obstacle analysis to support departure operations. If an aircraft may turn in any direction from a runway within the limits of the assessment area (see paragraph 37.5.3) and remain clear of obstacles, that runway passes what is called a diverse departure assessment and no ODP will be published. A SID may be published if needed for air traffic control purposes. However, if an obstacle penetrates what is called the 40:1 obstacle identification surface, then the procedure designer chooses whether to: 37.4.1 Establish a steeper than normal climb gradient; or 37.4.2 Establish a steeper than normal climb gradient with an alternative that increases takeoff minima to allow the pilot to visually remain clear of the obstacle(s); or 37.4.3 Design and publish a specific departure route; or 37.4.4 A combination or all of the above.

37.5 What criteria is used to provide obstruction clearance during departure?

37.5.1 Unless specified otherwise, required obstacle clearance for all departures, including diverse, is based on the pilot crossing the departure end of the runway at least 35 feet above the departure end of runway elevation, climbing to 400 feet above the departure end of runway elevation before making the initial turn, and maintaining a minimum climb gradient of 200 feet per nautical mile (FPNM), unless required to level off by a crossing restriction, until the minimum IFR altitude. A greater climb gradient may be specified in the DP to clear obstacles or to achieve an ATC crossing restriction. If an initial turn higher than 400 feet above the departure end of runway elevation is specified in the DP, the turn should be commenced at the higher altitude. If a turn is specified at a fix, the turn must be made at that fix. Fixes may have minimum and/or maximum crossing altitudes that must be adhered to prior to passing the fix. In rare instances, obstacles that exist on the extended runway centerline may make an “early turn” more desirable than proceeding straight ahead. In these cases, the published departure instructions will include the language “turn left(right) as soon as practicable.” These departures will also include a ceiling and visibility minimum of at least 300 and 1. Pilots encountering one of these DPs should preplan the climb out to gain altitude and begin the turn as quickly as possible within the bounds of safe operating practices and operating limitations. This type of departure procedure is being phased out.

NOTE − “Practical” or “feasible” may exist in some existing departure text instead of “practicable.” 37.5.2 ODPs, SIDs, and DVAs assume normal aircraft performance, and that all engines are operating.

Development of contingency procedures, required to cover the case of an engine failure or other emergency in flight that may occur after liftoff, is the responsibility of the operator. (More detailed information on this subject is available in Advisory Circular AC 120 − 91, Airport Obstacle Analysis, and in the “Departure Procedures” section of chapter 2 in the Instrument Procedures Handbook, FAA − H − 8083 − 16.)

37.5.3 The 40:1 obstacle identification surface (OIS) begins at the departure end of runway (DER) and slopes upward at 152 FPNM until reaching the minimum IFR altitude or entering the en route structure. This assessment area is limited to 25 NM from the airport in nonmountainous areas and 46 NM in designated mountainous areas.

Beyond this distance, the pilot is responsible for obstacle clearance if not operating on a published route, if below (having not reached) the MEA or MOCA of a published route, or an ATC assigned altitude. See FIG ENR 1.5 − 43 .

(Ref 14 CFR 91.177 for further information on en route altitudes.)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 86 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − ODPs are normally designed to terminate within these distance limitations, however, some ODPs will contain routes that may exceed 25/46 NM; these routes will insure obstacle protection until reaching the end of the ODP.

FIG ENR 1.5 − 43 Diverse Departure Obstacle Assessment to 25/46 NM 37.5.4 Takeoff Obstacles. Takeoff Obstacles Notes in the “Takeoff Minimums and (OBSTACLE) Departure Procedures” section of the Terminal Procedures Publication (TPP) identifies obstacle(s) that penetrate the 40:1 OCS. The obstacle notes alert the pilot to the height and location of the obstacles relative to the DER so they can be avoided. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways: the pilot may be able to see and avoid the obstruction; early liftoff/climb performance may allow the aircraft to cross well above the obstacle(s); or if the obstacle(s) cannot be visually acquired during departure, the takeoff should be delayed or another runway selected for the IFR departure.

37.5.4.1 Takeoff obstacles will be published as low, close − in and/or takeoff minimums obstacle notes.

a) Low, close − in obstacles require a higher than standard climb gradient (within 1 NM or less from DER) to an altitude of 200 feet or less above DER elevation and do not require increased takeoff minimums.

b) Takeoff minimums obstacles require a higher than standard climb gradient (within 2.6 NM from DER) to an altitude greater than 200 feet above the DER elevation and require increased takeoff minimums. These obstacles are published with higher than standard ceiling and visibility takeoff minimums and are published in the same obstacle listing.

37.5.4.2 Obstacle notes are not required to be charted on SIDs. When a pilot is assigned a SID for departure refer to the airport entry in the TPP or the graphic ODP to obtain information on the takeoff obstacles.

37.5.4.3 The FAA redefined the initial climb area criteria that are used to evaluate and identify the obstacles that penetrate the 40:1 OCS. The takeoff obstacle notes are published in a different manner, and an additional minimums option is added for the departure. To ensure the pilot knows which evaluation was accomplished, the charting will be different by bolding certain headers and runway information. Until the FAA can amend all departures the legacy obstacle notes will still be published.

a) For textual departures, the headers Takeoff Minimums, Departure Procedures, and Takeoff Obstacle Notes will be bolded and underlined. The specific runway entries under each header will continue to be bolded.

b) For graphic departure procedures, the headers Takeoff Minimums and Takeoff Obstacle Notes will be bolded and continue to be underlined. The specific runway entries for these headers will be bolded. In the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 87 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Departure Route Description section of the graphic departure, the heading will be bolded and underlined, and the runway information will just be bolded.

c) Legacy takeoff obstacle notes combine low, close − in and takeoff obstacles for each runway.

d) New takeoff obstacle notes separate low, close − in and takeoff minimums obstacle notes. There is also a DER crossing altitude included in the notes section, providing the pilot with a DER crossing height that clears all obstacles that penetrate the 40:1 OCS.

e) The obstacles are described with an inner limit from the DER, using the word “beginning,” expressed in 1/4 SM increments rounded down and an outer limit, using the words “extending to” expressed in 1/4 SM increments rounded up. They will also be described in relation to the extended runway centerline as “left, right, or crossing.” Crossing means they are within 100ft of the centerline. Left or right means they are greater than 100 ft from centerline. Both an MSL altitude and height above DER elevation will be provided for the obstacle that penetrates the 40:1 OCS the most. This allows the pilot to determine when the reported weather conditions are adequate to see and avoid the low, close − in obstacle(s), if aircraft performance does not permit the aircraft to climb over them. It also allows the pilot to correlate the position of the obstacles and the MSL elevation and height above DER for the controlling obstacle for the published higher than standard takeoff minimums.

f) A DER crossing height using standard ceiling/visibility is provided as a new takeoff minimums option for pilots in addition to the current options (higher than standard ceiling/visibility or standard ceiling/visibility with a higher than standard climb gradient, or a reduced takeoff runway length with a standard climb gradient and standard ceiling/visibility).

EXAMPLE − Legacy takeoff minimums and obstacle notes TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: Rwy12 L/R , 400-2 1/2 or std. w/min. climb of 261’ per NM to 500.

TAKEOFF OBSTACLE NOTES: Rwy 14 , trees 2011’ from DER, 29’ left of centerline, 100’ AGL/3829’ MSL.

Rwy 32 , trees 1009’ from DER, 697’ left of centerline, 100’ AGL/3839’ MSL. Tower 4448’ from DER, 1036’ left of centerline, 165’ AGL/3886’ MSL.

EXAMPLE − New takeoff minimums and obstacle notes TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: Rwy12 L/R: 400 − 2 1/2 or std. w/min. climb of 261’ per NM to 500 or standard and crossing DER 66’ above DER Elev clears takeoff minimums obstacles.

TAKEOFF OBSTACLE NOTES: Rwy 12L LOW, CLOSE − IN OBSTACLES: trees beginning 600’ from DER, extending to 1/2 SM, crossing centerline, up to 156’ MSL, 86’ above DER, crossing DER 49’ above DER Elev clears low, close − in obstacles.

Rwy 12L TAKEOFF MINIMUMS OBSTACLES: buildings, crane, tower beginning 1 1/2 SM from DER, extending to 1 3/4 SM, left, right, and crossing centerline, up to 373’ MSL, 284’ above DER, crossing DER at 66’ above DER Elev clears takeoff minimums obstacles.

Rwy 12R LOW, CLOSE − IN OBSTACLES: obstacles 35’ and below.

Rwy 12R TAKEOFF MINIMUMS OBSTACLES: buildings, crane, tower beginning 1 1/2 SM from DER, extending to 1 3/4 SM, left, right, and crossing centerline, up to 373’ MSL, 284’ above DER, crossing DER at 66’ above DER Elev clears take − off minimums obstacles.

Rwy 30L/R LOW, CLOSE − IN OBSTACLES: obstacles 35’ and below.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 88 United States of America 22 JAN 26 37.5.4.4 Compliance with 14 CFR part 121 or 135 one − engine − inoperative (OEI) departure performance requirements, or similar ICAO/State rules, cannot be assured by the sole use of takeoff obstacle note data as published in the TPP. Operators conducting these operations should refer to precise data sources (i.e., GIS database, etc.) specifically intended for OEI departure planning (see AC 120 − 91).

37.5.5 Climb gradients greater than 200 FPNM are specified when required to support procedure design constraints, obstacle clearance, and/or airspace restrictions. Compliance with a climb gradient for these purposes is mandatory when the procedure is part of the ATC clearance, unless increased takeoff minimums are provided and weather conditions allow compliance with these minimums.

NOTE − Climb gradients for ATC purposes are being phased out on SIDs.

EXAMPLE − “Cross ALPHA intersection at or below 4000; maintain 6000.” The pilot climbs at least 200 FPNM to 6000. If 4000 is reached before ALPHA, the pilot levels off at 4000 until passing ALPHA; then immediately resumes at least 200 FPNM climb.

EXAMPLE − “TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: RWY 27, Standard with a minimum climb of 280’ per NM to 2500.” A climb of at least 280 FPNM is required to 2500 and is mandatory when the departure procedure is included in the ATC clearance.

NOTE − Some SIDs still retain labeled “ATC” climb gradients published or have climb gradients that are established to meet a published altitude restriction that is not required for obstacle clearance or procedure design criteria. These procedures will be revised in the course of the normal procedure amendment process.

37.5.6 Climb gradients may be specified only to an altitude/fix, above which the normal gradient applies.

An ATC − required altitude restriction published at a fix, will not have an associated climb gradient published with that restriction. Pilots are expected to determine if crossing altitudes can be met, based on the performance capability of the aircraft they are operating.

EXAMPLE − “Minimum climb 340 FPNM to ALPHA.” The pilot climbs at least 340 FPNM to ALPHA, then at least 200 FPNM to MIA.

37.5.7 A Visual Climb Over Airport (VCOA) procedure is a departure option for an IFR aircraft, operating in visual meteorological conditions equal to or greater than the specified visibility and ceiling, to visually conduct climbing turns over the airport to the published “at or above” altitude. At this point, the pilot may proceed in instrument meteorological conditions to the first en route fix using a diverse departure, or to proceed via a published routing to a fix from where the aircraft may join the IFR en route structure, while maintaining a climb gradient of at least 200 feet per nautical mile. VCOA procedures are developed to avoid obstacles greater than 3 statute miles from the departure end of the runway as an alternative to complying with climb gradients greater than 200 feet per nautical mile. Pilots are responsible to advise ATC as early as possible of the intent to fly the VCOA option prior to departure. Pilots are expected to remain within the distance prescribed by the published visibility minimums during the climb over the airport until reaching the “at or above” altitude for the VCOA procedure. If no additional routing is published, then the pilot may proceed in accordance with their IFR clearance. If additional routing is published after the “at − or − above” altitude, the pilot must comply with the route to a fix that may include a climb − in − holding pattern to reach the MEA/MIA for the en route portion of their IFR flight. These textual procedures are published in the Take − Off Minimums and (Obstacle) Departure Procedures section of the Terminal Procedures Publications and/or appear as an option on a Graphic ODP.

EXAMPLE − TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 32, standard with minimum climb of 410’ per NM to 3000’ or 1100 − 3 for VCOA.

VCOA: Rwy 32, when executing VCOA, notify ATC prior to departure. Climb in visual conditions to cross Broken Bow Muni/Keith Glaze Field at or above 3500’ before proceeding on course.

37.6 Obstacle Clearance Responsibilities. DPs are designed so that the pilot’s adherence to the procedure’s lateral path and vertical climb requirements will ensure obstacle protection.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 89 United States of America 22 JAN 26 37.6.1 Obstacle clearance responsibility rests with the pilot when he/she chooses to depart IFR under 14 CFR part 91 and has not filed or been cleared for an ODP or an ATC − assigned SID or assigned headings for a DVA from the departure runway. Standard takeoff minimums are one statute mile for aircraft having two engines or less and one − half statute mile for aircraft having more than two engines. Higher than standard ceiling and visibility minimums will allow visual avoidance of the obstacles during the initial climb at the standard climb gradient.

37.6.2 When cleared to depart IFR using the ODP, SID, VCOA, or assigned headings for DVA, pilots must reference the published takeoff minimums and takeoff obstacle notes.

37.6.2.1 Since the presence of low, close − in obstacles do not require publishing increased takeoff minimums the pilot should consider, if necessary to see and avoid these obstacles, the weather at time of takeoff. Based on the position of low, close − in obstacles, weather no less than 300 ft and 1 NM may be necessary to visually avoid obstacles.

37.6.2.2 Takeoff minimums obstacles are especially critical to aircraft that do not lift off until close to the departure end of the runway or which climb at the minimum rate. When departing IFR using the higher than standard takeoff minimums option, pilots are responsible for visually avoiding takeoff minimums obstacles.

Pilots should also consider drift following lift − off to ensure sufficient clearance from these obstacles. The segment of the procedure that requires the pilot to see and avoid obstacles ends when the aircraft is beyond or above the ceiling and visibility published to avoid these obstacles.

37.6.3 When departing using the VCOA, obstacle avoidance is not guaranteed if the pilot maneuvers farther from the airport than the published visibility minimum for the VCOA prior to reaching the published VCOA altitude. Pilots are responsible for maintaining clearance from low, close − in obstacles.

37.6.4 When departing using a DVA, pilots are responsible for maintaining clearance from low, close − in obstacles. DVAs may also require a higher than standard climb gradient. Standard takeoff minimums apply when departing a runway under IFR when using the DVA. The existence of a DVA will be noted in the Takeoff .

Minimums and (Obstacle) Departure Procedure section of the TPP EXAMPLE − DIVERSE VECTOR AREA (RADAR VECTORS) AMDT 1 14289 (FAA) Rwy 6R , headings as assigned by ATC; requires minimum climb of 290’ per NM to 400.

Rwys 6L , 7L, 7R, 24R, 25R, headings as assigned by ATC.

37.6.5 In all cases, continued obstacle clearance is based on having climbed a minimum of 200 feet per nautical mile to the specified point and then continuing to climb at least 200 feet per nautical mile during the departure until reaching the minimum en route altitude, unless higher than standard climb gradient is published. When a higher than standard climb gradient is published and used, that climb gradient is maintained, until reaching the climb gradient termination altitude, after which the standard 200 feet per nautical mile is maintained until reaching the minimum en route altitude.

NOTE − As is always the case, when used by the controller during departure, the term “radar contact” should not be interpreted as relieving pilots of their responsibility to maintain appropriate terrain and obstruction clearance, which may include flying the obstacle DP.

37.7 Where are DPs located? DPs and DVAs will be listed by airport in the IFR Takeoff Minimums and (Obstacle) Departure Procedures Section, Section L, of the TPP. If the DP is textual, it will be described in TPP Section L . SIDs and complex ODPs will be published graphically and named. The name will be listed by airport name and runway in Section L. Graphic ODPs will also have the term “(OBSTACLE)” printed in the charted procedure title, differentiating them from SIDs.

37.7.1 An ODP that has been developed solely for obstacle avoidance will be indicated with the symbol “T” on appropriate Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) charts and DP charts for that airport. The “T” symbol will Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 90 United States of America 22 JAN 26 continue to refer users to TPP Section C. In the case of a graphic ODP, the TPP Section C will only contain the name of the ODP. Since there may be both a textual and a graphic DP, Section C should still be checked for additional information. The nonstandard minimums and minimum climb gradients found in TPP Section C also apply to charted DPs and radar vector departures unless different minimums are specified on the charted DP.

Takeoff minimums and departure procedures apply to all runways unless otherwise specified. New graphic DPs will have all the information printed on the graphic depiction. As a general rule, ATC will only assign an ODP from a nontowered airport when compliance with the ODP is necessary for aircraft to aircraft separation. Pilots may use the ODP to help ensure separation from terrain and obstacles.

37.8 Responsibilities 37.8.1 Each pilot, prior to departing an airport on an IFR flight should: 37.8.1.1 Consider the type of terrain and other obstacles on or in the vicinity of the departure airport; 37.8.1.2 Determine whether an ODP is available; 37.8.1.3 Determine if obstacle avoidance can be maintained visually or if the ODP should be flown; and 37.8.1.4 Consider the effect of degraded climb performance and the actions to take in the event of an engine loss during the departure. Pilots should notify ATC as soon as possible of reduced climb capability in that circumstance.

NOTE − Guidance concerning contingency procedures that address an engine failure on takeoff after V speed on a large or turbine − powered transport category airplane may be found in AC 120 − 91, Airport Obstacle Analysis.

37.8.1.5 Determine if a DVA is published and whether the aircraft is capable of meeting the published climb gradient. Advise ATC when requesting the IFR clearance, or as soon as possible, if unable to meet the DVA climb gradient.

37.8.1.6 Check for Takeoff Obstacle Notes published in the TPP for the takeoff runway.

37.8.2 Pilots should not exceed a published speed restriction associated with a SID waypoint until passing that waypoint.

37.8.3 After an aircraft is established on a SID and subsequently vectored or cleared to deviate off of the SID or SID transition, pilots must consider the SID canceled, unless the controller adds “expect to resume SID;” pilots should then be prepared to rejoin the SID at a subsequent fix or procedure leg. If the SID contains published altitude and/or speed restrictions, those restrictions are canceled and pilots will receive an altitude to maintain and, if necessary, a speed. ATC may also interrupt the vertical navigation of a SID and provide alternate altitude instructions while the aircraft remains established on the published lateral path. Aircraft may be vectored off of an ODP, or issued an altitude lower than a published altitude on an ODP, at which time the ODP is canceled. In these cases, ATC assumes responsibility for terrain and obstacle clearance. In all cases, the minimum 200 FPNM climb gradient is assumed.

37.8.4 Aircraft instructed to resume a SID procedure such as a DP or SID which contains speed and/or altitude restrictions, must be: 37.8.4.1 Issued/reissued all applicable restrictions, or 37.8.4.2 Advised to “Climb via SID” or resume published speed.

EXAMPLE − “Resume the Solar One departure, Climb via SID.” “Proceed direct CIROS, resume the Solar One departure, Climb via SID.” 37.8.5 A clearance for a SID which does not contain published crossing restrictions, and/or is a SID with a Radar Vector segment or a Radar Vector SID, will be issued using the phraseology “Maintain ( altitude).” 37.8.6 A clearance for a SID which contains published altitude restrictions may be issued using the phraseology “climb via.” Climb via is an abbreviated clearance that requires compliance with the procedure lateral path, Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 91 United States of America 22 JAN 26 associated speed and altitude restrictions along the cleared route or procedure. Clearance to “climb via” authorizes the pilot to: 37.8.6.1 When used in the IFR departure clearance, in a PDC, DCL or when cleared to a waypoint depicted on a SID, to join the procedure after departure or to resume the procedure.

37.8.6.2 When vertical navigation is interrupted and an altitude is assigned to maintain which is not contained on the published procedure, to climb from that previously-assigned altitude at pilot’s discretion to the altitude depicted for the next waypoint.

37.8.6.3 Once established on the depicted departure, to navigate laterally and climb to meet all published or assigned altitude and speed restrictions.

NOTE − 1. When otherwise cleared along a route or procedure that contains published speed restrictions, the pilot must comply with those speed restrictions independent of a climb via clearance.

2. ATC anticipates pilots will begin adjusting speed the minimum distance necessary prior to a published speed restriction so as to cross the waypoint/fix at the published speed. Once at the published speed ATC expects pilots will maintain the published speed until additional adjustment is required to comply with further published or ATC assigned speed restrictions or as required to ensure compliance with 14 CFR Section 91.117.

3. If ATC interrupts lateral/vertical navigation while an aircraft is flying a SID, ATC must ensure obstacle clearance. When issuing a “climb via” clearance to join or resume a procedure ATC must ensure obstacle clearance until the aircraft is established on the lateral and vertical path of the SID.

4. ATC will assign an altitude to cross if no altitude is depicted at a waypoint/fix or when otherwise necessary/ required, for an aircraft on a direct route to a waypoint/fix where the SID will be joined or resumed.

5. SIDs will have a “top altitude;” the “top altitude” is the charted “maintain” altitude contained in the procedure description or assigned by ATC.

EXAMPLE − 1. Lateral route clearance: “Cleared Loop Six departure.” NOTE − The aircraft must comply with the SID lateral path, and any published speed restrictions.

2. Routing with assigned altitude: “Cleared Loop Six departure, climb and maintain four thousand.” NOTE − The aircraft must comply with the SID lateral path, and any published speed restriction while climbing unrestricted to four thousand.

3. (A pilot filed a flight plan to the Johnston Airport using the Scott One departure, Jonez transition, then Q-145. The pilot filed for FL350. The Scott One includes altitude restrictions, a top altitude and instructions to expect the filed altitude ten minutes after departure). Before departure ATC uses PDC, DCL or clearance delivery to issue the clearance: “Cleared to Johnston Airport, Scott One departure, Jonez transition, Q-OneForty-five. Climb via SID.” NOTE − In Example 3, the aircraft must comply with the Scott One departure lateral path and any published speed and altitude restrictions while climbing to the SID top altitude.

4. (Using the Example 3 flight plan, ATC determines the top altitude must be changed to FL180). The clearance will read: “Cleared to Johnston Airport, Scott One departure, Jonez transition, Q-One Forty-five, Climb via SID except maintain flight level one eight zero.” NOTE − In Example 4, the aircraft must comply with the Scott One departure lateral path and any published speed and altitude restrictions while climbing to FL180. The aircraft must stop climb at FL180 until issued further clearance by ATC.

5. (An aircraft was issued the Suzan Two departure, “climb via SID” in the IFR departure clearance. After departure ATC must change a waypoint crossing restriction). The clearance will be: “Climb via SID except cross Mkala at or above seven thousand.” Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.5 − 92 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − In Example 5, the aircraft will comply with the Suzan Two departure lateral path and any published speed and altitude restrictions and climb so as to cross Mkala at or above 7,000; remainder of the departure must be flown as published.

6. (An aircraft was issued the Teddd One departure, “climb via SID” in the IFR departure clearance. An interim altitude of 10,000 was issued instead of the published top altitude of FL 230). After departure ATC is able to issue the published top altitude. The clearance will be: “Climb via SID.” NOTE − In Example 6, the aircraft will track laterally and vertically on the Teddd One departure and initially climb to 10,000; Once re-issued the “climb via” clearance the interim altitude is canceled aircraft will continue climb to FL230 while complying with published restrictions.

7. (An aircraft was issued the Bbear Two departure, “climb via SID” in the IFR departure clearance. An interim altitude of 16,000 was issued instead of the published top altitude of FL 190). After departure, ATC is able to issue a top altitude of FL300 and still requires compliance with the published SID restrictions. The clearance will be: “Climb via SID except maintain flight level three zero zero.” NOTE − In Example 7, the aircraft will track laterally and vertically on the Bbear Two departure and initially climb to 16,000; Once re-issued the “climb via” clearance the interim altitude is canceled and the aircraft will continue climb to FL300 while complying with published restrictions.

8. (An aircraft was issued the Bizee Two departure, “climb via SID.” After departure, ATC vectors the aircraft off of the SID, and then issues a direct routing to rejoin the SID at Rockr waypoint which does not have a published altitude restriction.

ATC wants the aircraft to cross at or above 10,000). The clearance will read: “Proceed direct Rockr, cross Rockr at or above one-zero thousand, climb via the Bizee Two departure.” NOTE − In Example 8, the aircraft will join the Bizee Two SID at Rockr at or above 10,000 and then comply with the published lateral path and any published speed or altitude restrictions while climbing to the SID top altitude.

9. (An aircraft was issued the Suzan Two departure, “climb via SID” in the IFR departure clearance. After departure ATC vectors the aircraft off of the SID, and then clears the aircraft to rejoin the SID at Dvine waypoint, which has a published crossing restriction). The clearance will read: “Proceed direct Dvine, Climb via the Suzan Two departure.” NOTE − In Example 9, the aircraft will join the Suzan Two departure at Dvine, at the published altitude, and then comply with the published lateral path and any published speed or altitude restrictions.

37.8.7 Pilots cleared for vertical navigation using the phraseology “climb via” must inform ATC, upon initial contact, of the altitude leaving and any assigned restrictions not published on the procedure.

EXAMPLE − 1. (Cactus 711 is cleared to climb via the Laura Two departure. The Laura Two has a top altitude of FL190): “Cactus Seven Eleven leaving two thousand, climbing via the Laura Two departure.” 2. (Cactus 711 is cleared to climb via the Laura Two departure, but ATC changed the top altitude to16,000): “Cactus Seven Eleven leaving two thousand for one-six thousand, climbing via the Laura Two departure.” 37.8.8 If prior to or after takeoff an altitude restriction is issued by ATC, all previously issued “ATC” altitude restrictions are canceled including those published on a SID. Pilots must still comply with all speed restrictions and lateral path requirements published on the SID unless canceled by ATC.

EXAMPLE − Prior to takeoff or after departure ATC issues an altitude change clearance to an aircraft cleared to climb via a SID but ATC no longer requires compliance with published altitude restrictions: “Climb and maintain flight level two four zero.” NOTE − The published SID altitude restrictions are canceled; The aircraft should comply with the SID lateral path and begin an unrestricted climb to FL240. Compliance with published speed restrictions is still required unless specifically deleted by ATC.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.5 − 93 United States of America 22 JAN 26 37.8.9 Altitude restrictions published on an ODP are necessary for obstacle clearance and/or design constraints.

Crossing altitudes and speed restrictions on ODPs cannot be canceled or amended by ATC.

37.9 PBN Departure Procedures 37.9.1 All public PBN SIDs and graphic ODPs are normally designed using RNAV 1, RNP 1, or A − RNP NavSpecs. These procedures generally start with an initial track or heading leg near the departure end of runway (DER). In addition, these procedures require system performance currently met by GPS or DME/DME/IRU PBN systems that satisfy the criteria discussed in the latest AC 90 − 100, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations. RNAV 1 and RNP 1 procedures must maintain a total system error of not more than 1 NM for 95 percent of the total flight time. Minimum values for A − RNP procedures will be charted in the PBN box (for example, 1.00 or 0.30).

37.9.2 In the U.S., a specific procedure’s PBN requirements will be prominently displayed in separate, standardized notes boxes. For procedures with PBN elements, the “PBN box” will contain the procedure’s NavSpec(s); and, if required: specific sensors or infrastructure needed for the navigation solution, any additional or advanced functional requirements, the minimum RNP value, and any amplifying remarks. Items listed in this PBN box are REQUIRED for the procedure’s PBN elements.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.6 ATS Surveillance Services and Procedures

1. General 1.1 The FAA maintains a Keyhole Markup Language (KML) file with information on estimated ATS surveillance coverage on the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb .

1.2 The full URL to download the file is located at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/re - search/airspace#interactiveMap . The file contains selectable data on the Continental United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Guam.

1.3 Geospatial software (such as Google Earth) can be used to open the KML file and view graphical portrayals of ADS − B rule airspace and estimated ADS − B and secondary surveillance radar (SSR) surveillance coverage at selectable altitudes of 500 feet; 1,500 feet; 3,000feet; 5,000 feet; and 10,000 feet AGL.

1.4 Additionally, for Alaska, selectable altitudes of 20,000 feet and 33,000 feet MSL are available.

2. Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR) 2.1 The following graphics are static portrayals of SSR coverage at various locations and altitudes.

FIG ENR 1.6 − 1 CONUS with SSR Coverage at 1,500’ AGL Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.6 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 2 CONUS with SSR Coverage at 5,000’ AGL Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.6 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 3 Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam with SSR Coverage at 1,500’ AGL Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.6 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 4 Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam with SSR Coverage at 5,000’ AGL Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.6 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 5 Alaska with SSR Coverage at 1,500’ AGL FIG ENR 1.6 − 6 Alaska with SSR Coverage at 5,000’ AGL Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.6 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 7 Alaska with SSR Coverage at 20,000’ MSL 3. Automatic Dependent Surveillance — Broadcast (ADS − B) 3.1 The following graphics are static portrayals of SSR coverage at various locations and altitudes. See ENR 1.6 paragraph 1.1 for details on an interactive version of the portrayals below.

FIG ENR 1.6 − 8 CONUS with ADS − B Coverage at 1,500’ AGL Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.6 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 9 CONUS with ADS − B Coverage at 5,000’ AGL Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.6 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 10 Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam with ADS − B Coverage at 1,500’ AGL Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.6 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 11 Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Guam with ADS − B Coverage at 5,000’ AGL Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.6 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 12 Alaska with ADS − B Coverage at 1,500’ AGL FIG ENR 1.6 − 13 Alaska with ADS − B Coverage at 5,000’ AGL Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.6 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.6 − 14 Alaska with ADS − B Coverage at 20,000’ MSL Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.7 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.7 Barometric Altimeter Errors and Setting

Procedures

1. General 1.1 Aircraft altimeters are subject to the following errors and weather factors: 1.1.1 Instrument error.

1.1.2 Position error from aircraft static pressure systems.

1.1.3 Nonstandard atmospheric pressure.

1.1.4 Nonstandard temperatures.

1.2 The standard altimeter 29.92 inches Mercury (“Hg.) setting at the higher altitudes eliminates station barometer errors, some altimeter instrument errors, and errors caused by altimeter settings derived from different geographical sources.

2. Barometric Pressure Altimeter Errors 2.1 High Barometric Pressure: Cold, dry air masses may produce barometric pressures in excess of 31.00 “Hg.

Many aircraft altimeters cannot be adjusted above 31.00 “Hg. When an aircraft’s altimeter cannot be set to a pressure setting above 31.00 “Hg, the aircraft’s true altitude will be higher than the indicated altitude on the barometric altimeter.

2.2 Low Barometric Pressure: An abnormal low − pressure condition exists when the barometric pressure is less than 28.00 “Hg. Flight operations are not recommended when an aircraft’s altimeter is unable to be set below 28.00 “Hg. In this situation, the aircraft’s true altitude is lower than the indicated altitude. This situation may be exacerbated when operating in extremely cold temperatures, which may result in the aircraft’s true altitude being significantly lower than the indicated altitude.

NOTE − EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE EXERCISED WHEN FLYING IN PROXIMITY TO OBSTRUCTIONS OR TERRAIN IN LOW PRESSURES AND/OR LOW TEMPERATURES.

3. Altimeter Setting Procedures 3.1 Manufacturing and installation specifications, along with 14 CFR Part 43, Appendix E requirement for periodic tests and inspections, helps reduce mechanical, elastic, temperature, and installation errors. (See Instrument Flying Handbook.) Scale error may be observed while performing a ground altimeter check using the following procedure: 3.1.1 Set the current reported airfield altimeter setting on the altimeter setting scale.

3.1.2 Read the altitude on the altimeter. The altitude should read the known field elevation if you are located on the same reference level used to establish the altimeter setting.

3.1.3 If the difference from the known field elevation and the altitude read from the altimeter is plus or minus 75 feet or greater, the accuracy of the altimeter is questionable and the problem should be referred to an appropriately rated repair station for evaluation and possible correction.

3.2 It is important to set the current altimeter settings for the area of operation when flying at an enroute altitude that does not require a standard altimeter setting of 29.92 “Hg. If the altimeter is not set to the current altimeter setting when flying from an area of high pressure into an area of low pressure, the aircraft will be closer to the surface than the altimeter indicates. An inch Hg error in the altimeter setting equals 1,000 feet of altitude. For Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.7 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 example, setting 29.90 “Hg. instead of 30.90 “Hg. To quote an old saying: “GOING FROM A HIGH TO A LOW, LOOK OUT BELOW.” 3.3 The aircraft cruising altitude or flight level is maintained by referencing the barometric altimeter. Procedures for setting altimeters during high and low barometric pressure events must be set using the following procedures: 3.3.1 Below 18,000 feet mean sea level (MSL).

3.3.1.1 Barometric pressure is 31.00 “Hg. or less.

a) Set the altimeter to a current reported altimeter setting from a station along the route and within 100 NM of the aircraft, or; b) If there is no station within this area, use the current reported altimeter setting of the nearest available station, or; NOTE − Air traffic controllers will furnish this information at least once when en route or on an instrument flight plan within their controlled airspace: c) If the aircraft is not equipped with a radio, set the altimeter to the elevation of the departure airport or use an available appropriate altimeter setting prior to departure.

3.3.1.2 When the barometric pressure exceeds 31.00 “Hg., a NOTAM will be published to define the affected geographic area. The NOTAM will also institute the following procedures: a) All aircraft: All aircraft will set 31.00 “Hg. for en route operations below 18,000 feet MSL. Maintain this setting until out of the affected area or until reaching the beginning of the final approach segment on an instrument approach. Set the current altimeter setting (above 31.00 “Hg.) approaching the final segment, if possible. If no current altimeter setting is available, or if a setting above 31.00 “Hg. cannot be made on the aircraft’s altimeter, leave 31.00 “Hg. set in the altimeter and continue the approach.

b) Set 31.00 “Hg. in the altimeter prior to reaching the lowest of any mandatory/ crossing altitudes or 1,500 feet above ground level (AGL) when on a departure or missed approach.

NOTE − Air traffic control will issue actual altimeter settings and advise pilots to set 31.00 “Hg. in their altimeters for en route operations below 18,000 feet MSL in affected areas.

c) No additional restrictions apply for aircraft operating into an airport that are able to set and measure altimeter settings above 31.00 “Hg.

d) Flight operations are restricted to VFR weather conditions to and from an airport that is unable to accurately measure barometric pressures above 31.00 “Hg. These airports will report the barometric pressure as “missing” or “in excess of 31.00 “Hg.”.

e) VFR aircraft: VFR operating aircraft have no additional restrictions. Pilots must use caution when flight planning and operating in these conditions.

f) IFR aircraft: IFR aircraft unable to set an altimeter setting above 31.00 “Hg. should apply the following: 1) The suitability of departure alternate airports, destination airports, and destination alternate airports will be determined by increasing the published ceiling and visibility requirements when unable to set the aircraft altimeter above 31.00 “Hg. Any reported or forecast altimeter setting over 31.00 “Hg. will be rounded up to the next tenth to calculate the required increases. The ceiling will be increased by 100 feet and the visibility by 1/4 statute mile for each 1/10 “Hg. over 31.00 “Hg. Use these adjusted values in accordance with operating regulations and operations specifications.

EXAMPLE − Destination airport altimeter is 31.21 “Hg. The planned approach is an instrument landing system (ILS) with a decision altitude (DA) 200 feet and visibility 1/2 mile (200 − 1/2). Subtract 31.00 “Hg. from 31.21 “Hg. to get .21 “Hg. .21 “Hg. rounds up to .30 “Hg. Calculate the increased requirement: 100 feet per 1/10 equates to a 300 feet increase for .30 “Hg. 1/4 statute Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.7 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 mile per 1/10 equates to a 3/4 statute mile increase for .30 “Hg. The destination weather requirement is determined by adding the 300 − 3/4 increase to 200 − 1/2. The destination weather requirement is now 500 − 1 1/4.

2) 31.00 “Hg. will remain set during the complete instrument approach. The aircraft has arrived at the DA or minimum descent altitude (MDA) when the published DA or MDA is displayed on the barometric altimeter.

NOTE − The aircraft will be approximately 300 feet higher than the indicated barometric altitude using this method.

3) These restrictions do not apply to authorized Category II/III ILS operations and certificate holders using approved atmospheric pressure at aerodrome elevation (QFE) altimetry systems.

g) Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Service Center Directors, in their area of jurisdiction, may authorize temporary waivers to a high barometric pressure procedures in effect NOTAM to permit emergency supply, transport, or medical services, 14 CFR § 91.144(b). ATO Service Center contact information can be found at: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/mission_support/sc 3.3.2 At or above 18,000 feet MSL. All operators will set 29.92 “Hg. (standard setting) in the barometric altimeter. The lowest usable flight level is determined by the atmospheric pressure in the area of operation as shown in TBL ENR 1.7 − 1 . Air Traffic Control (ATC) will assign this flight level.

TBL ENR 1.7 − 1 Lowest Usable Flight Level Altimeter Setting Lowest Usable Flight (Current Reported) Level 29.92 or higher 180 29.91 to 28.92 190 28.91 to 27.92 200 3.3.3 When the minimum altitude per 14 CFR Section 91.159 and 14 CFR Section 91.177 is above 18,000 feet MSL, the lowest usable flight level must be the flight level equivalent of the minimum altitude plus the number of feet specified in TBL ENR 1.7 − 2 . ATC will accomplish this calculation.

TBL ENR 1.7 − 2 Lowest Flight Level Correction Factor Altimeter Setting Correction Factor 29.92 or higher None 29.91 to 29.42 500 feet 29.41 to 28.92 1000 feet 28.91 to 28.42 1500 feet 28.41 to 27.92 2000 feet 27.91 to 27.42 2500 feet EXAMPLE − The minimum safe altitude of a route is 19,000 feet MSL and the altimeter setting is reported between 29.92 and 29.43 “Hg, the lowest usable flight level will be 195, which is the flight level equivalent of 19,500 feet MSL (minimum altitude ( TBL ENR 1.7 − 1 ) plus 500 feet).

3.3.4 Aircraft operating in an offshore CONTROL AREA should use altimeter − setting procedures as described above, unless directed otherwise by ATC.

NOTE − Aircraft exiting the oceanic CTA/FIR destined for the U.S. or transitioning through U.S. offshore control areas should use the current reported altimeter of a station nearest to the route being flown. When entering an oceanic CTA/FIR from U.S.

offshore control areas, pilots should change to the standard altimeter setting 29.92 “Hg.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.8 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ENR 1.8 Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors,

Setting Procedures, and Cold Temperature Airports

(CTA)

1. Effect of Cold Temperature on Barometric Altimeters 1.1 Temperature has an effect on the accuracy of barometric altimeters, indicated altitude, and true altitude. The standard temperature at sea level is 15 degrees Celsius (59 degrees Fahrenheit). The temperature gradient from sea level is minus 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) per 1,000 feet. For example, at 5000 feet above sea level, the ambient temperature on a standard day would be 5 degrees Celsius. When the ambient (at altitude) temperature is colder than standard, the aircraft’s true altitude is lower than the indicated barometric altitude.

When the ambient temperature is warmer than the standard day, the aircraft’s true altitude is higher than the indicated barometric altitude.

1.2 TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 indicates how much error may exist when operating in non − standard cold temperatures.

To use the table, find the reported temperature in the left column, read across the top row to locate the height above the airport (subtract airport elevation from the flight altitude). Find the intersection of the temperature row and height above the airport column. This number represents how far the aircraft may be below the indicated altitude due to possible cold temperature induced error.

TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 ICAO Cold Temperature Error Table 2. Pre − Flight Planning for Cold Temperature Altimeter Errors Flight planning into a CTA may be accomplished prior to flight. Use the predicted coldest temperature for plus or minus 1 hour of the estimated time of arrival and compare against the CTA published temperature. If the predicted temperature is at or below CTA temperature, calculate an altitude correction using TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 .

This correction may be used at the CTA if the actual arrival temperature is the same as the temperature used to calculate the altitude correction during preflight planning.

3. Effects of Cold Temperature on Baro − vertical Navigation (VNAV) Vertical Guidance Non − standard temperatures can result in a change to effective vertical paths and actual descent rates when using aircraft baro − VNAV equipment for vertical guidance on final approach segments. A lower than standard temperature will result in a shallower descent angle and reduced descent rate. Conversely, a higher than standard temperature will result in a steeper angle and increased descent rate. Pilots should consider potential consequences of these effects on approach minima, power settings, sight picture, visual cues, etc., especially for high − altitude or terrain − challenged locations and during low − visibility conditions.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.8 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 REFERENCE − AIM Paragraph 5 − 4 − 5. Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts 3.1 Uncompensated Baro − VNAV note on 14 CFR Part 97 IAPs. The area navigation (RNAV) global positioning system (GPS) and RNAV required navigation performance (RNP) notes, “For uncompensated Baro − VNAV systems, lateral navigation (LNAV)/VNAV NA below –XX ° C ( − XX ° F) or above XX ° C (XXX ° F)” and “For uncompensated Baro − VNAV systems, procedure NA below –XX ° C ( − XX ° F) or above XX ° C (XXX ° F)” apply to baro − VNAV equipped aircraft. These temperatures and how they are used are independent of the temperature and procedures applied for a Cold Temperature Airport.

3.1.1 The uncompensated baro − VNAV chart note and temperature range on an RNAV (GPS) approach is applicable to the LNAV/VNAV line of minima. Baro − VNAV equipped aircraft without a temperature compensating system may not use the RNAV (GPS) approach LNAV/VNAV line of minima when the actual temperature is above or below the charted temperature range.

3.1.2 The uncompensated baro − VNAV chart note and temperature range on an RNAV (RNP) approach applies to the entire procedure. For aircraft without a baro − VNAV and temperature compensating system, the RNAV (RNP) approach is not authorized when the actual temperature is above or below the charted uncompensated baro − VNAV temperature range.

3.2 Baro − VNAV temperature range versus CTA temperature: The baro − VNAV and CTA temperatures are independent and do not follow the same correction or reporting procedures. However, there are times when both procedures, each according to its associated temperature, should be accomplished on the approach.

3.3 Operating and ATC reporting procedures.

3.3.1 Do not use the CTA operating or reporting procedure found in this section, 4.1 thru 5.5, when complying with the baro − VNAV temperature note on an RNAV (GPS) approach. Correction is not required nor expected to be applied to procedure altitudes or VNAV paths outside of the final approach segment.

3.3.2 Operators must advise ATC when making temperature corrections on RNP authorization required (AR) approaches while adhering to baro − VNAV temperature note.

3.3.3 Reporting altitude corrections is required when complying with CTAs in conjunction with the baro − VNAV temperature note. The CTA altitude corrections will be reported in this situation. No altitude correction reporting is required in the final segment.

NOTE − When executing an approach with vertical guidance at a CTA (i.e., ILS, localizer performance with vertical guidance (LPV), LNAV/VNAV), pilots are reminded to intersect the glideslope/glidepath at the corrected intermediate altitude (if applicable) and follow the published glideslope/glidepath to the corrected minima. The ILS glideslope and WAAS generated glidepath are unaffected by cold temperatures and provide vertical guidance to the corrected DA. Begin descent on the ILS glideslope or WAAS generated glidepath when directed by aircraft instrumentation. Temperature affects the precise final approach fix (PFAF) true altitude where a baro − VNAV generated glidepath begins. The PFAF altitude must be corrected when below the CTA temperature restriction for the intermediate segment or outside of the baro − VNAV temperature restriction when using the LNAV/VNAV line of minima to the corrected DA.

4. Cold Temperature Airports (CTA) 4.1 General: The FAA has determined that operating in cold temperatures has placed some 14 CFR Part 97 instrument approach procedures in the United States National Airspace System at risk for loss of required obstacle clearance (ROC). An airport that is determined to be at risk will have an ICON and temperature published on the instrument approach procedure (IAP) in the terminal procedures publication (TPP).

4.2 CTA identification in TPP: A CTA is identified by a “snowflake” icon ( ) and temperature limit, in Celsius, on U.S. Government approach charts.

4.3 A current list of CTAs is located at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/ dtpp/search/. Airports are listed by ICAO code, Airport Name, Temperature in Celsius, and affected segment(s).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.8 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.4 Airport Criteria. The CTA risk analysis is performed on airports that have at least one runway of 2500 ft.

Pilots operating into an airport with a runway length less than 2500 ft. may make a cold temperature altitude correction in cold temperature conditions, if desired. Comply with operating and reporting procedures for CTAs.

4.5 ATC Reporting Requirements. Pilots must advise ATC with the corrected altitude when applying an altitude correction on any approach segment with the exception of the final segment.

4.6 Methods to apply correction: The FAA recommends operators/pilots use either the All Segments Method or the Individual Segments Method when making corrections at CTAs.

5. Cold Temperature Airport Procedures 5.1 PILOTS MUST NOT MAKE AN ALTIMETER CHANGE to accomplish an altitude correction. Pilots must ensure that the altimeter is set to the current altimeter setting provided by ATC in accordance with 14 CFR §91.121.

5.2 Actions on when and where to make corrections: Pilots will make an altitude correction to the published, “at”, “at or above”, and “at or below” altitudes on all designated segment(s) to all runways for all published instrument approach procedures when the reported airport temperature is at or below the published CTA temperature on the approach plate. A pilot may request an altitude correction (if desired) on any approach at any United States airport when extreme cold temperature is encountered. Pilots making a correction must comply with ATC reporting requirements.

5.3 Correctable altitudes: ATC does not apply a cold temperature correction to their Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA) or Minimum IFR Altitude (MIA) charts. Pilots must request approval from ATC to apply a cold temperature correction to any ATC assigned altitude. Pilots must not correct altitudes published on Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs), Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODPs), and Standard Terminal Arrivals (STARs).

5.4 Use of corrected MDA/DA: Pilots will use the corrected MDA or DA as the minimum altitude for an approach. Pilots must meet the requirements in 14 CFR Part 91.175 in order to operate below the corrected MDA or DA. Pilots must see and avoid obstacles when descending below the minimum altitude on the approach.

NOTE − The corrected DA or MDA does not affect the visibility minima published for the approach. With the application of a cold temperature correction to the DA or MDA, the airplane should be in a position on the glideslope/glidepath or at the published missed approach point to identify the runway environment.

5.5 Acceptable use of table for manual CTA altitude correction (see TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 ): Pilots may calculate a correction with a visual interpolation of the chart when using reported temperature and height above airport. This calculated altitude correction may then be rounded to the nearest whole hundred or rounded up. For example, a correction of 130 ft from the chart may be rounded to 100 ft or 200 ft. A correction of 280 ft will be rounded up to 300 ft. This rounded correction will be added to the appropriate altitudes for the “Individual” or “All” segment method. The correction calculated from the table for the MDA or DA may be used as is or rounded up, but never rounded down. This number will be added to the MDA, DA, and all step-down fix altitudes inside of the FAF/PFAF.

5.5.1 No extrapolation above the 5000 ft column is required. Pilots may use the 5000 ft “height above airport in feet” column for calculating corrections when the calculated altitude is greater than 5000 ft above reporting station elevation. Pilots must add the correction(s) from the table to the affected segment altitude(s) and fly at the new corrected altitude. Do not round down when using the 5000 ft column for calculated height above airport values greater than 5000 ft. Pilots may extrapolate above the 5000 ft column to apply a correction if desired.

5.5.2 These techniques have been adopted to minimize pilot distraction by limiting the number of entries into the table when making corrections. Although not all altitudes on the approach will be corrected back to standard day values, a safe distance above the terrain/obstacle will be maintained on the corrected approach segment(s).

Pilots may calculate a correction for each fix based on the fix altitude if desired.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.8 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − Pilots may use Real Time Mesoscale Analysis (RTMA): Alternate Report of Surface Temperature, for computing altitude corrections, when airport temperatures are not available via normal reporting.

5.6 How to apply Cold Temperature Altitude Corrections on an Approach.

5.6.1 All Segments Method: Pilots may correct all segment altitudes from the IAF altitude to the MA final holding altitude. Pilots familiar with the information in this section and the procedures for accomplishing the all segments method, only need to use the published “snowflake” icon, /CTA temperature limit on the approach chart for making corrections. Pilots are not required to reference the CTA list. The altitude correction is calculated as follows: 5.6.1.1 Manual correction: Pilots will make a manual correction when the aircraft is not equipped with a temperature compensating system or when a compensating system is not used to make the correction. Use TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 , ICAO Cold Temperature Error Table to calculate the correction needed for the approach segment(s).

a) Correct all altitudes from the FAF/PFAF up to and including the IAF altitude: Calculate the correction by taking the FAF/PFAF altitude and subtracting the airport elevation. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Round this number as applicable and then add to all altitudes from the FAF altitude through the IAF altitude.

b) Correct all altitudes in the final segment: Calculate the correction by taking the MDA or DA for the approach being flown and subtract the airport elevation. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Use this number or round up to next nearest 100 ft. Add this number to MDA or DA, and any step − down fix altitudes in the final segment.

c) Correct final holding altitude in the MA Segment: Calculate the correction by taking the MA holding altitude and subtract the airport elevation. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Round this number as applicable and then add to the final MA altitude only.

5.6.1.2 Aircraft with temperature compensating systems: If flying an aircraft equipped with a system capable of temperature compensation, follow the instructions for applying temperature compensation provided in the airplane flight manual (AFM), AFM supplement, or system operating manual. Ensure that temperature compensation system is on and active prior to the IAF and remains active throughout the entire approach and missed approach.

a) Pilots that have a system that is able to calculate a temperature-corrected DA or MDA may use the system for this purpose.

b) Pilots that have a system unable to calculate a temperature corrected DA or MDA will manually calculate an altitude correction for the MDA or DA.

NOTE − Some systems apply temperature compensation only to those altitudes associated with an instrument approach procedure loaded into the active flight plan, while other systems apply temperature compensation to all procedure altitudes or user entered altitudes in the active flight plan, including altitudes associated with a Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR). For those systems that apply temperature compensation to all altitudes in the active flight plan, delay activating temperature compensation until the aircraft has passed the last altitude constraint associated with the active STAR.

5.6.2 Individual Segment(s) Method: Pilots are allowed to correct only the marked segment(s) indicated in the CTA list ( https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/search/ ). Pilots using the Individual Segment(s) Method will reference the CTA list to determine which segment(s) need a correction. (See FIG ENR 1.8 − 1 .)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.8 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.8 − 1 Example Cold Temperature Restricted Airport List − Required Segments Identifier Airport name Temperature Initial Intermediate Final Missed Montana KBTM Bert Mooney − 25C X X X KBZN Bozeman Yellowstone Intl − 31C X KEKS Ennis Big Sky − 25C X KGPI Glacier Park Intl − 15C X KHLN Helena Rgnl − 17C X X X 5.6.2.1 Manual Correction: Pilots will make a manual correction when the aircraft is not equipped with a temperature compensating system or when a compensating system is not used to make the correction. Use TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 , ICAO Cold Temperature Error Table, to calculate the correction needed for the approach segment(s).

a) Initial Segment: All altitudes from the intermediate fix (IF) altitude up to and including the IAF altitude.

The correction may be accomplished by using the IF altitude or by using the All Segments Method (a) Manual correction (1). To correct the initial segment by using the IF altitude, subtract the airport elevation from the IF altitude. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Round this number as applicable and then add to the IF, IAF, and any step-down fix altitudes.

b) Intermediate Segment: All altitudes from the FAF/PFAF up to but not including the IF altitude. Calculate the correction by taking FAF/PFAF altitude and subtracting the airport elevation. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Round this number as applicable and then add to FAF altitude and all step-down fix altitudes within the intermediate segment (inside of the waypoint labeled “IF”).

c) Final segment: Calculate the correction by taking the MDA or DA for the approach flown and subtract the airport elevation. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Use this number or round up to next nearest 100 ft. Add this number to MDA or DA and any applicable step-down fix altitudes in the final segment.

d) Missed Approach Segment: Calculate the correction by taking the final MA holding altitude and subtract the airport elevation. Use this number to enter the height above airport column in TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 until reaching the reported temperature from the “Reported Temperature” row. Round this number as applicable and then add to the final MA altitude only.

5.6.2.2 Aircraft with temperature compensating system: If flying an aircraft equipped with a system capable of temperature compensation, follow the instructions for applying temperature compensation provided in the AFM, AFM supplement, or system operating manual. Ensure the temperature compensation system is on and active prior to the segment(s) being corrected. Manually calculate an altimetry correction for the MDA or DA.

Determine an altimetry correction from the ICAO table based on the reported airport temperature and the height difference between the MDA or DA, as applicable, and the airport elevation, or use the compensating system to calculate a temperature corrected altitude for the published MDA or DA if able.

5.7 Communication: Pilots must request approval from ATC whenever applying a cold temperature altitude correction. Pilots do not need to inform ATC of the final approach segment correction (i.e., new MDA or DA).

This request should be made on initial radio contact with the ATC facility issuing the approach clearance. ATC requires this information in order to ensure appropriate vertical separation between known traffic. Pilots should query ATC when vectored altitudes to a segment are lower than the requested corrected altitude. Pilots are encouraged to self − announce corrected altitude when flying into a non − towered airfield.

5.7.1 The following are examples of appropriate pilot − to − ATC communication when applying cold − temperature altitude corrections: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.8 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.7.1.1 On initial check − in with ATC providing approach clearance: Missoula, MT (example below).

a) Vectors to final approach course: Outside of IAFs: “ Request 9700 ft. for cold temperature operations.” b) Vectors to final approach course: Inside of ODIRE: “Request 7300 ft. for cold temperature operations. ” c) Missed Approach segment: “ Require final holding altitude, 12500 ft. on missed approach for cold temperature operations. ” 5.7.1.2 Pilots cleared by ATC for an instrument approach procedure; “Cleared the RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 12 approach (from any IAF)”. Missoula, MT (example below).

a) IAF: “ Request 9700 ft. for cold temperature operations at LANNY, CHARL, or ODIRE. ” 6. Example for Calculating Altitude Corrections on CTAs All 14 CFR Part 97 IAPs must be corrected at an airport. The following example provides the steps for correcting the different segments of an approach and will be applied to all 14 CFR Part 97 IAPs.

6.1 Missoula Intl (KMSO). Reported Temperature − 12 ° C: RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 12.

6.1.1 All Segments Method: All segments corrected from IAF through MA holding altitude.

6.1.1.1 Manual calculation: a) Cold Temperature Airport Temperature Limit: − 12 ° C.

b) Altitude at the Final Approach Fix (FAF) (SUPPY) = 6200 ft.

c) Airport elevation = 3206 ft.

d) Difference: 6200 ft. – 3206 ft. = 2994 ft.

e) Use TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 , ICAO Cold Temperature Error Table, height above airport of 2994 ft. and − 12 ° C.

Visual interpolation is approximately 300 ft. Actual interpolation is 300 ft.

f) Add 300 ft. to the FAF and all procedure altitudes outside of the FAF up to and including IAF altitude(s): 1) LANNY (IAF), CHARL (IAF), and ODIRE (IAF Holding − in − Lieu): 9400 + 300 = 9700 ft.

2) CALIP (stepdown fix): 7000 + 300 = 7300 ft 3) SUPPY (FAF): 6200 + 300 = 6500 ft.

g) Correct altitudes within the final segment altitude based on the minima used. LNAV MDA = 4520 ft.

h) Difference: 4520 ft. – 3206 ft. = 1314 ft i) TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 : 1314 ft. at − 12 ° C is approximately 150 ft. Use 150 ft. or round up to 200 ft.

j) Add corrections to altitudes up to but not including the FAF: 1) BEGPE (stepdown fix): 4840 + 150 = 4990 ft.

2) LNAV MDA: 4520 + 150 = 4670 ft.

k) Correct JENKI/Missed Approach Holding Altitude: MA altitude is 12000 ft.

1) JENKI: 12000 − 3206 = 8794 ft.

l) TBL ENR 1.8 − 1 : 8794 ft. at − 12 ° C. Enter table at − 12 ° C and intersect the 5000 ft. height above airport column. The approximate value is 500 ft.

m) Add correction to holding fix final altitude: 1) JENKI: 12000 + 500 = 12500 ft.

6.1.1.2 Temperature Compensating System: Operators using a temperature compensating RNAV system to make altitude corrections will be set to the current airport temperature ( − 12 ° C) and activated prior to passing the IAF. A manual calculation of the cold temperature altitude correction is required for the MDA/DA.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.8 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.1.2 Individual Segments Method: Missoula requires correction in the intermediate and final segments.

However, in this example, the missed approach is also shown.

6.1.2.1 Manual Calculation: Use the appropriate steps in the All Segments Method above to apply a correction to the required segment.

a) Intermediate. Use steps 6.1.1.1 a) thru e). Do not correct the IAF or IF when using individual segments method.

b) Final. Use steps 6.1.1.1 f) thru i).

c) Missed Approach. Use steps 6.1.1.1 j) thru l).

6.1.2.2 Temperature Compensating System: Operators using a temperature compensating RNAV system to make altitude corrections will be set to the current airport temperature ( − 12 ° C) and activated at a point needed to correct the altitude for the segment. A manual calculation of the cold temperature altitude correction is required for the MDA/DA.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.8 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.8 − 2 Missoula Intl RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 12 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.9 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.9 Air Traffic Flow Management and Airspace

Management

1. General 1.1 The Traffic Management System mission is to balance air traffic demand with system capacity, ensuring the maximum efficient utilization of the National Airspace System (NAS). A safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of traffic while minimizing delays is fostered through continued analysis, coordination, and dynamic utilization of traffic management initiatives and programs.

1.2 While this list is not all inclusive, below are just a few of the most common initiatives and programs: 1.2.1 Trajectory − based operations (TBO) is an air traffic management (ATM) method for strategically planning and managing flights throughout the operation by using time − based management (TBM), information exchanged between air and ground systems, and the aircraft’s ability to fly trajectories in time and space. Aircraft trajectory is defined in four dimensions—latitude, longitude, altitude, and time. TBO will increase airspace and airport throughput, flight efficiency, flexibility and predictability through TBM, Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) procedures, and increased collaboration with NAS users regarding preferred trajectories and priorities.

TBM operations include, but are not limited to, arrival metering, surface metering, terminal metering, and departure scheduling.

1.2.2 Time − Based Management is a methodology for managing the flow of air traffic through the assignment of crossing times at specific points along an aircraft’s trajectory. TBM applies time to mitigate demand/capacity imbalances while enhancing efficiency and predictability of the NAS. TBM techniques/tools will be used even during periods when demand does not exceed capacity. This sustains operational predictability and regional/national strategic plan. TBM utilizes capabilities within TFMS, TBFM, and TFDM designed to achieve a specified interval between aircraft.

1.2.3 Traffic Management Initiatives (TMI) are techniques used to manage demand with capacity in the NAS.

1.2.3.1 Properly coordinated and implemented TMIs are an important tool in the air traffic system. These initiatives contribute to the safe and orderly movement of air traffic.

1.2.3.2 Any TMI creates an impact on customers. It is imperative to consider this impact and implement only those initiatives necessary to maintain system integrity.

1.2.4 A Ground Delay Program (GDP) is a traffic management process administered by the ATCSCC when aircraft are held on the ground in order to manage capacity and demand at a specific location, by assigning arrival slots. The purpose of the program is to support the TM mission and limit airborne holding. It is a flexible program and may be implemented in various forms depending upon the needs of the air traffic system. The Expect Departure Clearance Time (EDCT) is calculated based on the estimated time en route and the arrival slot. It is important for aircraft to depart as close as possible to the EDCT to ensure accurate delivery of aircraft to the impacted location. GDPs provide for equitable assignment of delays to all system users. GDPs must be applied to all aircraft departing airports in the contiguous U.S., as well as, from select Canadian airports. Aircraft that have been assigned an EDCT in a GDP should not be subject to additional delay. Exceptions to this policy are miles − in − trail and departure/en route spacing initiatives that have been approved by the ATCSCC. GDP procedures do not apply to facilities in Alaska.

1.2.5 Airspace Flow Programs (AFP) were developed to provide a dynamic method of implementing and managing ground delay programs. The creation and publication of Flow Evaluation Areas (FEA) and Flow Constrained Areas (FCA) serve to identify areas of limited capacity to system customers that require a reduction in demand through rerouting flights (voluntary or mandatory). An alternative to managing airspace congestion is to merge these two technologies and create AFPs. An AFP is a traffic management tool that assigns specific arrival slots and corresponding EDCTs to manage capacity and demand for a specific area identified by the FCA.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.9 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 It is important for aircraft to depart as close as possible to the EDCT to ensure accurate delivery of aircraft to the impacted area. AFPs may be applied to all aircraft departing airports in the contiguous United States and from select Canadian airports. Aircraft that have been assigned an EDCT in an AFP should not be subject to additional delay. Exceptions to this policy are miles − in − trail and departure/en route spacing initiatives that have been approved by the ATCSCC. AFP procedures do not apply to facilities in Alaska.

1.2.6 Ground Stop(s) (GS) override all other traffic management initiatives. Aircraft must not be released from a GS without the approval of the originator of the GS. The GS is a process that requires aircraft, that meet a specific criteria, to remain on the ground. The criteria may be airport specific, airspace specific, or equipment specific; for example, all departures to San Francisco, or all departures entering Yorktown sector, or all Category I and II aircraft going to Charlotte. GSs normally occur with little or no warning. Since GSs are one of the most restrictive methods of traffic management, alternative initiatives must be explored and implemented if appropriate.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.10 Flight Planning (Restriction, Limitation or

Advisory Information)

1. Preflight Preparation 1.1 Prior to every flight, pilots should gather all information vital to the nature of the flight, assess whether the flight would be safe, and then file a flight plan. Pilots can receive a regulatory compliant briefing without contacting Flight Service. Pilots are encouraged to use automated resources and review Advisory Circular AC 91 − 92, Pilot’s Guide to a Preflight Briefing, for more information. Pilots who prefer to contact Flight Service are encouraged to conduct a self − brief prior to calling. Conducting a self − brief before contacting Flight Service provides familiarity of meteorological and aeronautical conditions applicable to the route of flight and promotes a better understanding of weather information. Pilots may access Flight Service through www.1800wxbrief.com or by calling 1 − 800 − WX − BRIEF (1 − 800 − 992 − 7433) in the CONUS, Hawaii, and U.S. territories; or 1–833–AK–BRIEF (1 − 833 − 252 − 7433) in Alaska. Flight planning applications are also available for conducting a self − briefing and filing flight plans.

NOTE − Alaska only: Pilots filing flight plans via “fast file” who desire to have their briefing recorded, should include a statement at the end of the recording as to the source of their weather briefing.

1.2 The information required by the FAA to process flight plans is obtained from FAA Form 7233 − 4, International Flight Plan. Only DOD users, and civilians who file stereo route flight plans, may use FAA Form 7233 − 1, Flight Plan.

NOTE − FAA and DOD Flight Plan Forms are equivalent. Where the FAA specifies Form 7233 − 1, Domestic Flight Plan, and FAA Form 7233 − 4, International Flight Plan, the DOD may substitute their Form DD 175, Military Flight Plan and Form DD − 1801, DOD International Flight Plan as necessary. NAS automation systems process and convert data in the same manner, although for computer acceptance, input fields may be adjusted to follow FAA format.

1.3 FSSs are required to advise of pertinent NOTAMs if a standard briefing is requested, but if they are overlooked, do not hesitate to remind the specialist that you have not received NOTAM information.

Additionally, FSS briefers do not provide FDC NOTAM information for special instrument approach procedures unless specifically asked. Pilots authorized by the FAA to use special instrument approach procedures must specifically request FDC NOTAM information for these procedures. Pilots who receive the information electronically will receive NOTAMs for special IAPs automatically.

NOTE − Domestic Notices and International Notices are not provided during a briefing unless specifically requested by the pilot since the FSS specialist has no way of knowing whether the pilot has already checked the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search External links or Air Traffic Plans and Publications website prior to calling. Airway NOTAMs, procedural NOTAMs, and NOTAMs that are general in nature and not tied to a specific airport/facility (for example, flight advisories and restrictions, open duration special security instructions, and special flight rules areas) are briefed solely by pilot request.

Remember to ask for these notices if you have not already reviewed this information, and to request all pertinent NOTAMs specific to your flight.

1.4 Pilots are urged to use only the latest issue of aeronautical charts in planning and conducting flight operations. Aeronautical charts are revised and reissued on a periodic basis to ensure that depicted data are current and reliable. In the conterminous U.S., sectional charts are updated every 56 days, IFR en route charts each 56 days, and amendments to civil IFR approach charts are accomplished on a 56 − day cycle with a change notice volume issued on the 28 − day mid − cycle. Charts that have been superseded by those of a more recent date may contain obsolete or incomplete flight information.

REFERENCE − AIP, GEN 3.2, Aeronautical Charts.

AIP, ENR 1.5, Para 12, Instrument Procedure (IAP) Charts.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 2 AIP ENR 1.10 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.5 When requesting a preflight briefing, identify yourself as a pilot and provide the following: 1.5.1 Type of flight planned; e.g., VFR or IFR.

1.5.2 Aircraft number or pilot’s name.

1.5.3 Aircraft type.

1.5.4 Departure airport.

1.5.5 Route of flight.

1.5.6 Destination.

1.5.7 Flight altitude(s).

1.5.8 ETD and ETE.

1.6 Prior to conducting a briefing, briefers are required to have the background information listed above so that they may tailor the briefing to the needs of the proposed flight. The objective is to communicate a “picture” of meteorological and aeronautical information necessary for the conduct of a safe and efficient flight. Briefers use all available weather and aeronautical information to summarize data applicable to the proposed flight. Pilots who have briefed themselves before calling Flight Service should advise the briefer what information has been obtained from other sources.

REFERENCE − See AIP, GEN 3.5 for meteorological services.

1.7 The Federal Aviation Administration has designated High Density Traffic Airports (HDTA) and has prescribed air traffic rules and requirements for operating aircraft (excluding helicopter operations) to and from these airports.

REFERENCE − AIP, GEN 3.3, Paragraph 9.7, Airport Reservations Operations and Procedures.

1.8 In addition to the filing of a flight plan, if the flight will traverse or land in one or more foreign countries, it is particularly important that pilots leave a complete itinerary with someone directly concerned and keep that person advised of the flight’s progress. If serious doubt arises as to the safety of the flight, that person should first contact the FSS.

1.9 Pilots operating under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 135 without an FAA assigned 3 − letter designator, must prefix the normal registration (N) number with the letter “T” on flight plan filing.

EXAMPLE − TN 1234B.

1.10 Cold Temperature Operations 1.10.1 Pilots should begin planning for cold temperature operations during the preflight planning phase. Cold temperatures produce barometric altimetry errors, which affect instrument flight procedures. There are currently two temperature limitations that may be published in the notes box of the middle briefing strip on an instrument approach procedure (IAP). The two published temperature limitations are: 1.10.1.1 A temperature range limitation associated with the use of baro − VNAV that may be published on a United States PBN IAP titled RNAV (GPS) or RNAV (RNP); and/or 1.10.1.2 A Cold Temperature Airport (CTA) limitation designated by a snowflake ICON and temperature in Celsius (C) that is published on every IAP for the airfield.

1.10.2 Pilots should request the lowest forecast temperature +/ − 1 hour for arrival and departure operations. If the temperature is forecast to be outside of the baro − VNAV or at or below the CTA temperature limitation, consider the following: 1.10.2.1 When using baro − VNAV with an aircraft that does not have an automated temperature compensating function, pilots should plan to use the appropriate minima and/or IAP.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 3 AIP ENR 1.10 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 1.10.2.2 The RNAV (RNP) procedure may not be accomplished without an approved automated temperature compensating function if the temperature is outside of the baro − VNAV temperature range limitation.

1.10.3 If the temperature is forecast to be at or below the published CTA temperature, pilots should calculate a correction for the appropriate segment/s or a correction for all the segments if using the “All Segments Method.” Pilots should review the operating procedures for the aircraft’s temperature compensating system when planning to use the system for any cold temperature corrections. Any planned altitude correction for the intermediate and/or missed approach holding segments must be coordinated with ATC. Pilots do not have to advise ATC of a correction in the final segment.

NOTE − The charted baro − VNAV temperature range limitation does not apply to pilots operating aircraft with an airworthiness approval to conduct an RNAV (GPS) approach to LNAV/VNAV minimums with the use of SBAS vertical guidance.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.8 , Cold Temperature Barometric Altimeter Errors, Setting Procedures and Cold Temperature Airports (CTA).

2. Follow IFR Procedures Even When Operating VFR 2.1 To maintain IFR proficiency, pilots are urged to practice IFR procedures whenever possible, even when operating VFR. Some suggested practices include: 2.1.1 Obtain a complete preflight briefing and check NOTAMs. Prior to every flight, pilots should gather all information vital to the nature of the flight. Pilots can receive a regulatory compliant briefing without contacting Flight Service. Pilots are encouraged to use automated resources and review AC 91 − 92, Pilot’s Guide to a Preflight Briefing, for more information. NOTAMs are available online from the Federal NOTAM system (FNS) search website ( https://notams.aim.faa.gov/notamSearch/ ), private vendors, or on request from Flight Service.

2.1.2 File a flight plan. This is an excellent low − cost insurance policy. The cost is the time it takes to fill it out.

The insurance includes the knowledge that someone will be looking for you if you become overdue at your destination. Pilots can file flight plans either by using a website or by calling Flight Service. Flight planning applications are also available to file, activate, and close VFR flight plans.

2.1.3 Use current charts.

2.1.4 To enhance situational awareness and minimize distractions during critical phases of flight, pre − load all intended waypoints into a suitable RNAV system while the aircraft is on the ground.

2.1.5 Use the navigation aids. Practice maintaining a good course; keep the course deviation indicator centered.

2.1.6 Maintain a constant altitude that is appropriate for the direction of flight.

2.1.7 Estimate en route position times.

2.1.8 Make accurate and frequent position reports to the FSSs along your route of flight.

2.2 Simulated IFR flight is recommended (under the hood); however, pilots are cautioned to review and adhere to the requirements specified in 14 CFR Section 91.109 before and during such flight.

2.3 When flying VFR at night, in addition to the altitude appropriate for the direction of flight, pilots should maintain an altitude which is at or above the minimum en route altitude as shown on charts. This is especially true in mountainous terrain, where there is usually very little ground reference. Do not depend on your eyes alone to avoid rising unlighted terrain, or even lighted obstructions such as TV towers.

3. Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) System 3.1 The NOTAM System provides pilots with time critical aeronautical information that is temporary, or information to be published on aeronautical charts at a later date, or information from another operational Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 4 AIP ENR 1.10 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 publication. The NOTAM is cancelled when the information in the NOTAM is published on the chart or when the temporary condition is returned to normal status. NOTAMs may be disseminated up to 7 days before the start of activity. Pilots can access NOTAM information online via NOTAM Search at: https://notams.aim.faa.gov/notamSearch / or from an FSS.

3.1.1 14 CFR § 91.103, Preflight Action directs pilots to become familiar with all available information concerning a planned flight prior to departure, including NOTAMs. Pilots may change their flight plan based on available information. Current NOTAM information may affect: 3.1.1.1 Aerodromes.

3.1.1.2 Runways, taxiways, and ramp restrictions.

3.1.1.3 Obstructions.

3.1.1.4 Communications.

3.1.1.5 Airspace.

3.1.1.6 Status of navigational aids or radar service availability.

3.1.1.7 Other information essential to planned en route, terminal, or landing operations.

3.1.2 Pilots should also review NOTAMs for the ARTCC area (for example, Washington Center (ZDC), Cleveland Center (ZOB), etc.) in which the flight will be operating. You can find the 3 letter code for each ARTCC on the FAA’s NOTAM web page. These NOTAMs may affect the planned flight. Some of the operations include Central Altitude Reservation Function (CARF), Special Use Airspace (SUA), Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFR), Global Positioning System (GPS), Flight Data Center (FDC) changes to routes, wind turbine, and Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS).

NOTE − NOTAM information is transmitted using ICAO contractions to reduce transmission time. See TBL ENR 1.10 − 2 for a listing of the most commonly used contractions, or go online to the following URL: https://www.notams.faa.gov/downloads/contractions.pdf . For a complete listing of approved NOTAM Contractions, see FAA JO Order 7340.2, Contractions.

3.1.3 Pilots should also contact ATC or FSS while en route to obtain updated airfield information for their destination. This is particularly important when flying to the airports without an operating control tower. Pilots should also ensure NOTAMs are updated for locations without an operating control tower. Snow removal, fire and rescue activities, construction, and wildlife encroachment, could provide hazards to pilots. This information may not be available to pilots prior to arrival/departure.

3.1.4 Pilots should check NOTAMs to ensure NAVAIDs required for the flight are in service. A NOTAM is published when a NAVAID is out of service or Unserviceable (U/S). Although a NAVAID is deemed U/S and planned for removal from service, it may be a long time before that NAVAID is officially decommissioned and removed from charts. A NOTAM is the primary method of alerting pilots to its unavailability. Pilots using VFR charts can also review the Aeronautical Information Services’ (AIS) website concerning Safety Alerts, Charting Notices, and Digital Product Notices at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/safety_alerts/ for additional chart information.

3.2 The FAA issues information on the status of GPS through the NOTAM system. Operators may find information on GPS satellite outages, GPS testing, and GPS anomalies by specifically searching for GPS NOTAMS prior to flight.

3.2.1 The NOTAM system uses the terms UNRELIABLE (UNREL), MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE (AVBL), and NOT AVAILABLE (AVBL) when describing the status of GPS. UNREL indicates the expected level of service of the GPS and/or WAAS may not be available. Pilots must then determine the adequacy of the signal for desired use. Aircraft should have additional navigation equipment for their intended route.

NOTE − Unless associated with a known testing NOTAM, pilots should report GPS anomalies, including degraded operation and/or loss of service, as soon as possible via radio or telephone, and via the GPS Anomaly Reporting Form. (See ENR 4.1 − 22. ) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 5 AIP ENR 1.10 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.2.2 GPS operations may also be NOTAMed for testing. This is indicated in the NOTAM language with the name of the test in parenthesis. When GPS testing NOTAMS are published and testing is actually occurring, ATC will advise pilots requesting or cleared for a GPS or RNAV (GPS) approach that GPS may not be available and request intentions. TBL ENR 1.10 − 1 lists an example of a GPS testing NOTAM.

3.3 NOTAM information is classified as Domestic NOTAMs (NOTAM D), Flight Data Center (FDC) NOTAMs, International NOTAMs, or Military NOTAMs.

3.3.1 NOTAM (D) information is disseminated for all navigational facilities that are part of the National Airspace System (NAS), all public use aerodromes, seaplane bases, and heliports listed in the Chart Supplement.

NOTAM (D) information includes taxiway closures, personnel and equipment near or crossing runways, and airport lighting aids that do not affect instrument approach criteria (i.e., VGSI). All NOTAM Ds must have one of the keywords listed in TBL ENR 1.10 − 1 , as the first part of the text after the location identifier. These keywords categorize NOTAM Ds by subject, for example, APRON (ramp), RWY (runway), SVC (Services), etc. There are several types of NOTAM Ds: 3.3.1.1 Aerodrome activity and conditions, to include field conditions.

3.3.1.2 Airspace to include CARF, SUA, and general airspace activity like UAS or pyrotechnics.

3.3.1.3 Visual and radio navigational aids.

3.3.1.4 Communication and services.

3.3.1.5 Pointer NOTAMs. NOTAMs issued to point to additional aeronautical information. When pointing to another NOTAM, the keyword in the pointer NOTAM must match the keyword in the original NOTAM. Pointer NOTAMs should be issued for, but are not limited to, TFRs, Airshows, Temporary SUA, major NAS system interruptions, etc.

3.3.1.6 NOTAM Ds that crossover into International NOTAMs . These NOTAMs contain the same data as NOTAM Ds, only they are referenced differently. They are categorized, stored, and issued with a series letter preceding them and are distributed via Service A to countries requesting NOTAMs for that airport. The FAA currently uses the Series A (and may use Series K) for this type of NOTAM.

3.3.2 FDC NOTAMs are issued when it is necessary to disseminate regulatory information. FDC NOTAMs include: 3.3.2.1 Amendments to published IAPs and other current aeronautical charts.

3.3.2.2 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) restrict entrance to a certain airspace at a certain time, however, some TFRs provide relief if ATC permission is given to enter the area when requested. Online preflight resources for TFRs provide graphics and plain language interpretations.

3.3.2.3 High barometric pressure warning.

3.3.2.4 Laser light activity.

3.3.2.5 ADS − B, TIS − B, and FIS − B service availability.

3.3.2.6 Satellite − based systems such as WAAS or GPS.

3.3.2.7 Special Notices.

3.3.3 International NOTAMs.

3.3.3.1 International NOTAMs are published in ICAO format per Annex 15 and distributed to multiple countries. International NOTAMs issued by the U.S. NOTAM Office use Series A followed by 4 sequential numbers, a slant “/” and a 2 − digit number representing the year the NOTAM was issued. International NOTAMs basically duplicate data found in a U.S. Domestic NOTAM.

3.3.3.2 Not every topic of a U.S. Domestic NOTAM is issued as an International NOTAM by the U.S. The U.S.

International NOTAM will be linked to the appropriate U.S. Domestic NOTAM when possible.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 6 AIP ENR 1.10 − 6 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.3.3.3 International NOTAMs received by the FAA from other countries are stored in the U.S. NOTAM System.

3.3.3.4 The International NOTAM format includes a “Q” Line that can be easily read/parsed by a computer and allows the NOTAM to be displayed digitally.

a) Field A: ICAO location identifier or FIR affected by the NOTAM.

b) Field B: Start of Validity.

c) Field C: End of Validity (both in [Year][Month][Day][Hour][Minute] format).

d) Field D: (when present) Schedule.

e) Field E: Full NOTAM description.

f) Field F: (when present) Lowest altitude, or “SFC.” g) Field G: (when present) Highest altitude, or “UNL.” 3.3.3.5 For more on International format, please see Annex 15.

3.3.4 Military NOTAMs. NOTAMs originated by the U.S. Air Force, Army, Marine, or Navy, and pertaining to military or joint − use navigational aids/airports that are part of the NAS. Military NOTAMs are published in the International NOTAM format and should be reviewed by users of a military or joint − use facility.

3.4 Security NOTAMS. U.S. Domestic Security NOTAMS are FDC NOTAMS that inform pilots of curtain U.S. security activities or requirements, such as Special Security Instructions for aircraft operations to, from, within, or transitioning U.S. territorial airspace. These NOTAMS are found on the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search website under the location designator KZZZ.

3.4.1 United States International Flight Prohibitions, Potential Hostile Situations, and Foreign Notices are issued by the FAA and are found on the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search website under the location designator KICZ.

TBL ENR 1.10 − 1 NOTAM Keywords Keyword Definition RWY . . . . . . . Runway Example !BNA BNA RWY 18/36 CLSD YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM TWY . . . . . . . Taxiway Example !BTV BTV TWY C EDGE LGT OBSC YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM APRON . . . . . Apron/Ramp Example !BNA BNA APRON NORTH APN E 100FT CLSD YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM AD . . . . . . . . . Aerodrome Example !BET BET AD AP ELK NEAR MOVEMENT AREAS YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM OBST . . . . . . . Obstruction Example !SJT SJT OBST MOORED BALLOON WI AN AREA DEFINED AS 1NM RADIUS OF SJT 2430FT (510FT AGL) FLAGGED YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM NAV . . . . . . . . Navigation Aids Example !SHV SHV NAV ILS RWY 32 110.3 COMMISSIONED YYMMDDHHMM − PERM COM . . . . . . . Communications Example !INW INW COM REMOTE COM OUTLET 122.6 U/S YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM EST (Note* EST will auto cancel) SVC . . . . . . . . Services Example !ROA ROA SVC TWR COMMISSIONED YYMMDDHHMM − PERM AIRSPACE . . Airspace Example !MHV MHV AIRSPACE AEROBATIC ACFT WI AN AREA DEFINED AS 4.3NM RADIUS OF MHV 5500FT − 10500FT AVOIDANCE ADZ CTC JOSHUA APP DLY YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 7 AIP ENR 1.10 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 ODP . . . . . . . . Obstacle Departure Procedure Example !FDC 2/9700 DIK ODP DICKINSON − THEODORE ROOSEVELT RGNL, DICKINSON, ND. TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES AMDT 1... DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: RWY 25, CLIMB HEADING 250 TO 3500 BEFORE TURNING LEFT. ALL OTHER DATA REMAINS AS PUBLISHED. THIS IS TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES, AMDT 1A. YYMMDDHHMM − PERM SID . . . . . . . . . Standard Instrument Departure Example !FDC x/xxxx DFW SID DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTL, DALLAS, TX. PODDE THREE DEPARTURE...

CHANGE NOTES TO READ: RWYS 17C/R, 18L/R: DO NOT EXCEED 240KT UNTIL LARRN. RWYS 35L/C, 36L/R: DO NOT EXCEED 240KT UNTIL KMART YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM Keyword Definition STAR . . . . . . . Standard Terminal Arrival Example !FDC x/xxxx DCA STAR RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL,WASHINGTON, DC. WZRRD TWO ARRIVAL... SHAAR TRANSITION: ROUTE FROM DRUZZ INT TO WZRRD INT NOT AUTHO - RIZED. AFTER DRUZZ INT EXPECT RADAR VECTORS TO AML VORTAC YYMMDDHHMM − YYM - MDDHHMM CHART . . . . . Chart Example !FDC 2/9997 DAL IAP DALLAS LOVE FIELD, DALLAS, TX. ILS OR LOC RWY 31R, AMDT 5... CHART NOTE: SIMULTANEOUS APPROACH AUTHORIZED WITH RWY 31L. MISSED APPROACH: CLIMB TO 1000 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN TO 5000 ON HEADING 330 AND CVE R − 046 TO FINGR INT/ CVE 36.4 DME AND HOLD. CHART LOC RWY 31L. THIS IS ILS OR LOC RWY 31R, AMDT 5A. YYM - MDDHHMM − PERM DATA . . . . . . . Data Example !FDC 2/9700 DIK ODP DICKINSON − THEODORE ROOSEVELT RGNL, DICKINSON, ND. TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES AMDT 1... DEPARTURE PROCEDURE: RWY 25, CLIMB HEADING 250 TO 3500 BEFORE TURNING LEFT. ALL OTHER DATA REMAINS AS PUBLISHED. THIS IS TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND (OBSTACLE) DEPARTURE PROCEDURES, AMDT 1A. YYMMDDHHMM − PERM IAP . . . . . . . . . Instrument Approach Procedure Example !FDC 2/9997 DAL IAP DALLAS LOVE FIELD, DALLAS, TX. ILS OR LOC RWY 31R, AMDT 5... CHART NOTE: SIMULTANEOUS APPROACH AUTHORIZED WITH RWY 31L. MISSED APPROACH: CLIMB TO 1000 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN TO 5000 ON HEADING 330 AND CVE R − 046 TO FINGR INT/ CVE 36.4 DME AND HOLD. CHART LOC RWY 31L. THIS IS ILS OR LOC RWY 31R, AMDT 5A. YYM - MDDHHMM − PERM VFP . . . . . . . . Visual Flight Procedures Example !FDC X/XXXX JFK VFP JOHN F KENNEDY INTL, NEW YORK, NY. PARKWAY VISUAL RWY 13L/R, ORIG...WEATHER MINIMUMS 3000 FOOT CEILING AND 3 MILES VISIBILITY. YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM ROUTE . . . . . Route Example !FDC x/xxxx ZFW ROUTE ZFW ZKC. V140 SAYRE (SYO) VORTAC, OK TO TULSA (TUL) VORTAC, OK MEA 4300. YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM EST SPECIAL . . . Special Example !FDC x/xxxx JNU SPECIAL JUNEAU INTERNATIONAL, JUNEAU, AK. LDA − 2 RWY 8 AMDT 9 PROCE - DURE TURN NA. YYMMDDHHMM − YYMMDDHHMM SECURITY . . Security Example !FDC x/xxxx FDC ...SPECIAL NOTICE... THIS IS A RESTATEMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ADVI - SORY NOTICE. IN THE INTEREST OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, PILOTS ARE STRONGLY ADVISED TO AVOID THE AIRSPACE ABOVE, OR IN PROXIMITY TO SUCH SITES AS POWER PLANTS (NUCLEAR, HYDRO − ELECTRIC, OR COAL), DAMS, REFINERIES, IN - DUSTRIAL COMPLEXES, MILITARY FACILITIES AND OTHER SIMILAR FACILITIES. PILOTS SHOULD NOT CIRCLE AS TO LOITER IN THE VICINITY OVER THESE TYPES OF FACILITIES.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 8 AIP ENR 1.10 − 8 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 GPS Global Positioning System Testing TESTING . . . !GPS 01/028 ZAB NAV GPS (YPG_AZ GPS 21 − 06)(INCLUDING WAAS, GBAS, AND ADS − B) MAYNOT Example BE AVBL WI A276NM RADIUS CENTERED AT 332347N1142221W (BLH108023) FL400 − UNL, 232NM RADIUS AT FL250, 164NM RADIUS AT 100000FT 160NM RADIUS AT 4000FT AGL 126NM RADIUS AT 50FT AGL DLY 1830 − 2230 2101281830 − 2101292230 PRN (GPS) . . Pseudo − random noise code used differentiate GPS satellites. This code allows any receiver to identify exactly Example which satellite(s) it is receiving.

!GPS GPS NAV PRN 16 U/S 2109231600 − 2109242300EST Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 9 AIP ENR 1.10 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 1.10 − 2 Contractions Commonly Found in NOTAMs A E ABN . . . . . . . . . . Aerodrome Beacon E . . . . . . . . . . . . . East or eastern longititude ACFT . . . . . . . . . Aircraft EB . . . . . . . . . . . Eastbound ACT . . . . . . . . . . Active EMERG . . . . . . . Emergency ADJ . . . . . . . . . . Adjacent ENE . . . . . . . . . . East − northeast AGL . . . . . . . . . . Above Ground Level EQPT . . . . . . . . . Equipment ALS . . . . . . . . . . Approach Light System ESE . . . . . . . . . . East − southeast AP . . . . . . . . . . . Airport EST . . . . . . . . . . Estimate or estimated or estimation APN . . . . . . . . . . Apron (message type designator) APP . . . . . . . . . . Approach control office or approach EXC . . . . . . . . . . Except control or approach control service F ARST . . . . . . . . . Arresting (specify (part of) aircraft FL . . . . . . . . . . . . Flight level arresting equipment) FREQ . . . . . . . . . Frequency ASDA . . . . . . . . . Accelerate Stop Distance Available FRI . . . . . . . . . . . Friday ASPH . . . . . . . . . Asphalt FSS . . . . . . . . . . . Flight Service Station AUTH . . . . . . . . Authorized or authorization FST . . . . . . . . . . . First AVBL . . . . . . . . . Available or availability FT . . . . . . . . . . . . Feet (dimensional unit) AVGAS . . . . . . . Aviation gasoline G AWOS . . . . . . . . Automatic Weather Observing System G . . . . . . . . . . . . . Green AZM . . . . . . . . . . Azimuth GA . . . . . . . . . . . General aviation B GLD . . . . . . . . . . Glider BA . . . . . . . . . . . Braking action GND . . . . . . . . . . Ground BCN . . . . . . . . . . Beacon (aeronautical ground light) GP . . . . . . . . . . . Glide Path BCST . . . . . . . . . Broadcast GRVL . . . . . . . . . Gravel BDRY . . . . . . . . . Boundary H BLDG . . . . . . . . . Building HEL . . . . . . . . . . Helicopter BLW . . . . . . . . . . Below HGT . . . . . . . . . . Height or height above BTN . . . . . . . . . . Between HLDG . . . . . . . . Holding C HLP . . . . . . . . . . Heliport C . . . . . . . . . . . . . Center (preceded by runway designator HVY . . . . . . . . . . Heavy number to identify a parallel runway) I CD . . . . . . . . . . . Clearance delivery IFR . . . . . . . . . . . Instrument Flight Rules CIV . . . . . . . . . . . Civil ILS . . . . . . . . . . . Instrument Landing System CL . . . . . . . . . . . Centerline IM . . . . . . . . . . . . Inner Marker CLSD . . . . . . . . . Close or closed or closing INOP . . . . . . . . . Inoperative COM . . . . . . . . . Communication INT . . . . . . . . . . . Intersection CONC . . . . . . . . Concrete K COND . . . . . . . . Condition CONS . . . . . . . . . Continuous KT . . . . . . . . . . . Knots CONST . . . . . . . Construction or constructed L CPDLC . . . . . . . . Controller Pilot Data Link L . . . . . . . . . . . . . Left (preceded by runway designator Communications number to identify a parallel runway) CTC . . . . . . . . . . Contact LAT . . . . . . . . . . Latitude CUST . . . . . . . . . Customs LDA . . . . . . . . . . Landing Distance Available D LDG . . . . . . . . . . Landing DA . . . . . . . . . . . Decision altitude LEN . . . . . . . . . . Length DEG . . . . . . . . . . Degrees LGT . . . . . . . . . . Light or lighting DEP . . . . . . . . . . Depart or Departure LGTD . . . . . . . . . Lighted DER . . . . . . . . . . Departure end of the runway LOC . . . . . . . . . . Localizer DH . . . . . . . . . . . Decision Height LONG . . . . . . . . Longitude DIST . . . . . . . . . . Distance M DLY . . . . . . . . . . Daily MAINT . . . . . . . Maintenance DP . . . . . . . . . . . Dew Point Temperature MBST . . . . . . . . . Microburst DPT . . . . . . . . . . Depth MIL . . . . . . . . . . Military DTHR . . . . . . . . . Displaced Runway Threshold Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 10 AIP ENR 1.10 − 10 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 MIN . . . . . . . . . . Minutes SAT . . . . . . . . . . Saturday MNT . . . . . . . . . . Monitor or monitoring or monitored SB . . . . . . . . . . . . Southbound MON . . . . . . . . . Monday SE . . . . . . . . . . . . Southeast MOV . . . . . . . . . Move or moving or movement SEC . . . . . . . . . . Seconds N SFC . . . . . . . . . . Surface SN . . . . . . . . . . . Snow N . . . . . . . . . . . . . North SR . . . . . . . . . . . . Sunrise NAVAID . . . . . . . Navigational aid SS . . . . . . . . . . . . Sunset NB . . . . . . . . . . . Northbound SSR . . . . . . . . . . Secondary surveillance radar NDB . . . . . . . . . . Nondirectional Radio Beacon SSW . . . . . . . . . . South − southwest NE . . . . . . . . . . . Northeast STD . . . . . . . . . . Standard NEB . . . . . . . . . . Northeast bound SUN . . . . . . . . . . Sunday NM . . . . . . . . . . . Nautical Mile/s SW . . . . . . . . . . . Southwest NNE . . . . . . . . . . North − northeast SWB . . . . . . . . . . Southwest bound NNW . . . . . . . . . North − northwest T NOV . . . . . . . . . . November NW . . . . . . . . . . . Northwest TAR . . . . . . . . . . Terminal area surveillance radar NWB . . . . . . . . . Northwest bound TAX . . . . . . . . . . Taxing or taxiing TDZ . . . . . . . . . . Touchdown Zone O TEMPO . . . . . . . Temporary or temporarily OBSC . . . . . . . . . Obscure or obscured or obscuring TFC . . . . . . . . . . Traffic OBST . . . . . . . . . Obstacle THR . . . . . . . . . . Threshold OPN . . . . . . . . . . Open or opening or opened THU . . . . . . . . . . Thursday OPS . . . . . . . . . . Operations TKOF . . . . . . . . . Takeoff P TODA . . . . . . . . . Take − off Distance Available PAPI . . . . . . . . . . Precision Approach Path Indicator TORA . . . . . . . . . Take − off Run Available PARL . . . . . . . . . Parallel TRG . . . . . . . . . . Training PAX . . . . . . . . . . Passenger/s TUE . . . . . . . . . . Tuesday PCL . . . . . . . . . . Pilot Controlled Lighting TWR . . . . . . . . . . Aerodrome Control Tower PCT . . . . . . . . . . Percent TWY . . . . . . . . . Taxiway PERM . . . . . . . . . Permanent TX . . . . . . . . . . . Taxilane PJE . . . . . . . . . . . Parachute Jumping Activities U PLA . . . . . . . . . . Practice Low Approach U/S . . . . . . . . . . . Unserviceable PPR . . . . . . . . . . Prior Permission Required UAS . . . . . . . . . . Unmanned Aircraft System PRN . . . . . . . . . . Pseudo − random Navigation UNL . . . . . . . . . . Unlimited PT . . . . . . . . . . . . Procedure Turn UNREL . . . . . . . Unreliable R V R . . . . . . . . . . . . . Red VIS . . . . . . . . . . . Visibility R . . . . . . . . . . . . . Right (preceded by runway designator VOR . . . . . . . . . . VHF Omni-Directional Radio Range number to identify a parallel runway) VORTAC . . . . . . VOR and TACAN (collocated) RAI . . . . . . . . . . . Runway Alignment Indicator VOT . . . . . . . . . . VOR Test Facility RCL . . . . . . . . . . Runway Centerline W RCLL . . . . . . . . . Runway Centerline Light W . . . . . . . . . . . . West or western longitude REDL . . . . . . . . . Runway Edge Light WB . . . . . . . . . . . Westbound RLLS . . . . . . . . . Runway Lead − in Light System WDI . . . . . . . . . . Wind Direction Indicator RMK . . . . . . . . . Remark WED . . . . . . . . . Wednesday RTS . . . . . . . . . . Return to Service WI . . . . . . . . . . . Within RTZL . . . . . . . . . Runway Touchdown Zone Light(s) WID . . . . . . . . . . Width or wide RVR . . . . . . . . . . Runway Visual Range WIP . . . . . . . . . . Work in progress RWY . . . . . . . . . Runway WNW . . . . . . . . . West − northwest RX . . . . . . . . . . . Receive/Receiver WS . . . . . . . . . . . Wind shear S WSW . . . . . . . . . West − southwest S . . . . . . . . . . . . . South or southern latitude SA . . . . . . . . . . . Sand Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 11 AIP ENR 1.10 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 4. Operational Information System (OIS) 4.1 The FAA’s Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC) maintains a website with near real − time National Airspace System (NAS) status information. NAS operators are encouraged to access the website at www.fly.faa.gov prior to filing their flight plan.

4.1.1 The website consolidates information from advisories. An advisory is a message that is disseminated electronically by the ATCSCC that contains information pertinent to the NAS.

4.1.1.1 Advisories are normally issued for the following items: a) Ground Stops.

b) Ground Delay Programs.

c) Route Information.

d) Plan of Operations.

e) Facility Outages and Scheduled Facility Outages.

f) Volcanic Ash Activity Bulletins.

g) Special Traffic Management Programs.

4.1.1.2 This list is not all − inclusive. Any time there is information that may be beneficial to a large number of people, an advisory may be sent. Additionally, there may be times when an advisory is not sent due to workload or the short length of time of the activity.

4.1.1.3 Route information is available on the website and in specific advisories. Some route information, subject to the 56 − day publishing cycle, is located on the “OIS” under “Products,” Route Management Tool (RMT), and “What’s New” Playbook. The RMT and Playbook contain routings for use by Air Traffic and NAS operators when they are coordinated “real − time” and are then published in an ATCSCC advisory.

4.1.1.4 Route advisories are identified by the word “Route” in the header; the associated action is required (RQD), recommended (RMD), planned (PLN), or for your information (FYI). Operators are expected to file flight plans consistent with the Route RQD advisories.

4.1.1.5 Electronic System Impact Reports are on the intranet at http://www.atcscc.faa.gov/ois / under “System Impact Reports.” This page lists scheduled outages/events/projects that significantly impact the NAS; for example, runway closures, air shows, and construction projects. Information includes anticipated delays and traffic management initiatives (TMI) that may be implemented.

5. Flight Plan − VFR Flights (See Appendix 1, FAA Form 7233 − 4 – International Flight Plan) 5.1 The requirements for the filing and activation of VFR flight plans can vary depending in which airspace the flight is operating. Pilots are responsible for activating flight plans with a Flight Service Station. Control tower personnel do not automatically activate VFR flight plans.

5.1.1 Within the continental U.S., a VFR flight plan is not normally required.

5.1.2 VFR flights (except for DOD and law enforcement flights) into an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) are required to file DVFR flight plans.

NOTE − Detailed ADIZ procedures are found in Section 6, National Security and Interception Procedures, of this chapter. (See 14 CFR Part 99).

5.1.3 Flights within the Washington, DC Special Flight Rules Area have additional requirements that must be met. Visit http://www.faa.safety.gov for the required Special Awareness Training that must be completed before flight within this area.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 12 AIP ENR 1.10 − 12 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.1.4 VFR flight to an international destination requires a filed and activated flight plan.

NOTE − ICAO flight plan guidance is published in ICAO Document 4444 PANS − ATM Appendix 2.

5.2 It is strongly recommended that a VFR flight plan be filed with a Flight Service Station or equivalent flight plan filing service. When filing, pilots must use FAA Form 7233 − 4, International Flight Plan or DD Form 1801.

Only DOD users, and civilians who file stereo route flight plans, may use FAA Form 7233 − 1, Flight Plan. Pilots may take advantage of advances in technology by filing their flight plans using any available electronic means.

Activating the flight plan will ensure that you receive VFR Search and Rescue services.

5.3 When a stopover flight is anticipated, it is recommended that a separate flight plan be filed for each leg of the flight.

5.4 Pilots are encouraged to activate their VFR flight plans with Flight Service by the most expeditious means possible. This may be via radio or other electronic means. VFR flight plan proposals are normally retained for two hours following the proposed time of departure.

5.5 Pilots may also activate a VFR flight plan by using an assumed departure time. This assumed departure time will cause the flight plan to become active at the designated time. This may negate the need for communication with a flight service station or flight plan filing service upon departure. It is the pilot’s responsibility to revise his actual departure time, time en route, or ETA with flight service.

NOTE − Pilots are strongly advised to remain mindful when using an assumed departure time. If not updated, search and rescue activities will be based on the assumed departure time.

5.6 U.S. air traffic control towers do not routinely activate VFR flight plans. Foreign pilots especially must be mindful of the need to communicate directly with a flight service station, or use an assumed departure time procedure clearly communicated with the flight plan filing service.

5.7 Although position reports are not required for VFR flight plans, periodic reports to FSSs along the route are good practice. Such contacts permit significant information to be passed to the transiting aircraft and also serve to check the progress of the flight should it be necessary for any reason to locate the aircraft.

5.8 Pilots flying VFR should fly an appropriate cruising altitude for their direction of flight.

5.9 When filing a VFR Flight plan, indicate the appropriate aircraft equipment capability as prescribed for an IFR flight plan.

5.10 ATC radar history data can be useful in finding a downed or missing aircraft; therefore, surveillance equipment should be listed in Item 18. Pilots using commercial GPS tracking services are encouraged to note the specific service in Item 19 N/ (survival equip remarks) of FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801.

6. Flight Plan − IFR Flights (See Appendix 1, FAA Form 7233 − 4 – International Flight Plan) 6.1 General 6.1.1 Use of FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801 is mandatory for: 6.1.1.1 Assignment of RNAV SIDs and STARs or other PBN routing, 6.1.1.2 All IFR flights that will depart U.S. domestic airspace, and 6.1.1.3 Domestic IFR flights except military/DOD and civilians who file stereo route flight plans.

6.1.1.4 All military/DOD IFR flights that will depart U.S. controlled airspace.

6.1.2 Military/DOD flights using FAA Form 7233 − 1 or DD Form 175, may not be eligible for assignment of RNAV SIDs or STARs. Military flights desiring assignment of these procedures should file using FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD 1801, as described in this section.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 13 AIP ENR 1.10 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 6.1.3 When filing an IFR flight plan using FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801, it is recommended that filers include all operable navigation, communication, and surveillance equipment capabilities by adding appropriate equipment qualifiers as shown in Appendix 1, FAA Form 7233 − 4, International Flight Plan.

6.1.4 ATC issues clearances based on aircraft capabilities filed in Items 10 and 18 of FAA Form 7233 − 4.

Operators should file all capabilities for which the aircraft and crew is certified, capable, and authorized. PBN/ capability must be filed in Item 18, Other Information. When filing a capability, ATC expects filers to use that capability for example; answer a SATVOICE call from ATC if code M1or M3 is filed in Item 10.

6.1.5 Prior to departure from within, or prior to entering controlled airspace, a pilot must submit a complete flight plan and receive an air traffic clearance, if weather conditions are below VFR minimums. IFR flight plans may be submitted to an FSS or flight plan filing service.

6.1.6 Pilots should file IFR flight plans at least 30 minutes prior to estimated time of departure to preclude possible delay in receiving a departure clearance from ATC.

6.1.7 In order to provide FAA traffic management units strategic route planning capabilities, nonscheduled operators conducting IFR operations above FL 230 are requested to voluntarily file IFR flight plans at least 4 hours prior to estimated time of departure (ETD).

6.1.8 To minimize your delay in entering Class B, Class C, Class D, and Class E surface areas at destination when IFR weather conditions exist or are forecast at that airport, an IFR flight plan should be filed before departure.

Otherwise, a 30 minute delay is not unusual in receiving an ATC clearance because of time spent in processing flight plan data.

6.1.9 Traffic saturation frequently prevents control personnel from accepting flight plans by radio. In such cases, the pilot is advised to contact a flight plan filing service for the purpose of filing the flight plan.

6.1.10 When requesting an IFR clearance, it is highly recommended that the departure airport be identified by stating the city name and state and/or the airport location identifier in order to clarify to ATC the exact location of the intended airport of departure.

6.1.11 Multiple versions of flight plans for the same flight may lead to unsafe conditions and errors within the air traffic system. Pilots must not file more than one flight plan for the same flight without ensuring that the previous flight plan has been successfully removed.

6.1.12 When a pilot is aware that the possibility for multiple flight plans on the same aircraft may exist, ensuring receipt of a full route clearance will help mitigate chances of error.

6.2 Airways and Jet Routes Depiction on Flight Plan 6.2.1 It is vitally important that the route of flight be accurately and completely described in the flight plan. To simplify definition of the proposed route, and to facilitate ATC, pilots are requested to file via airways or jet routes established for use at the altitude or flight level planned.

6.2.2 If flight is to be conducted via designated airways or jet routes, describe the route by indicating the type and number designators of the airway(s) or jet route(s) requested. If more than one airway or jet route is to be used, clearly indicate points of transition. If the transition is made at an unnamed intersection, show the next succeeding NAVAID or named intersection on the intended route and the complete route from that point.

Reporting points may be identified by using authorized name/code as depicted on appropriate aeronautical charts. The following two examples illustrate the need to specify the transition point when two routes share more than one transition fix.

EXAMPLE − 1. ALB J37 BUMPY J14 BHM Spelled out: from Albany, New York, via Jet Route 37 transitioning to Jet Route 14 at BUMPY intersection, thence via Jet Route 14 to Birmingham, Alabama.

2. ALB J37 ENO J14 BHM Spelled out: from Albany, New York, via Jet Route 37 transitioning to Jet Route 14 at Smyrna VORTAC (ENO) thence via Jet Route 14 to Birmingham, Alabama.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 14 AIP ENR 1.10 − 14 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.2.3 The route of flight may also be described by naming the reporting points or NAVAIDs over which the flight will pass, provided the points named are established for use at the altitude or flight level planned.

EXAMPLE − BWI V44 SWANN V433 DQO Spelled out: from Baltimore − Washington International, via Victor 44 to Swann intersection, transitioning to Victor 433 at Swann, thence via Victor 433 to Dupont.

6.2.4 When the route of flight is defined by named reporting points, whether alone or in combination with airways or jet routes, and the navigational aids (VOR, VORTAC, TACAN, NDB) to be used for the flight are a combination of different types of aids, enough information should be included to clearly indicate the route requested.

EXAMPLE − LAX J5 LKV J3 GEG YXC FL 330 J500 VLR J515 YWG Spelled out: from Los Angeles International via Jet Route 5 Lakeview, Jet Route 3 Spokane, direct Cranbrook, British Columbia VOR/DME, Flight Level 330 Jet Route 500 to Langruth, Manitoba VORTAC, Jet Route 515 to Winnipeg, Manitoba.

6.2.5 When filing IFR, it is to the pilot’s advantage to file a preferred route.

REFERENCE − Preferred IFR Routes are described and tabulated in the Chart Supplement U.S.

Additionally available at U.S.

http://www.fly.faa.gov/Products/Coded_Departure_Routes/NFDC_Preferred_Routes_Database/nfdc_preferred_routes_database.html .

6.2.6 ATC may issue a SID or a STAR, as appropriate.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.5 , Para 3, Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) Procedures.

AIP, ENR 1.5, Para 37, Instrument Departure Procedures (DP) − Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODP), Standard Instrument Departures (SID), and Diverse Vector Areas (DVA).

NOTE − Pilots not desiring an RNAV SID or RNAV STAR should enter in Item #18, PBN code: NAV/RNV A0 and/or D0.

6.3 Direct Flights 6.3.1 All or any portions of the route which will not be flown on the radials or courses of established airways or routes, such as direct route flights, must be defined by indicating the radio fixes over which the flight will pass.

Fixes selected to define the route must be those over which the position of the aircraft can be accurately determined. Such fixes automatically become compulsory reporting points for the flight, unless advised otherwise by ATC. Only those navigational aids established for use in a particular structure; i.e., in the low or high structures, may be used to define the en route phase of a direct flight within that altitude structure.

6.3.2 The azimuth feature of VOR aids and the azimuth and distance (DME) features of VORTAC and TACAN aids are assigned certain frequency protected areas of airspace which are intended for application to established airway and route use, and to provide guidance for planning flights outside of established airways or routes. These areas of airspace are expressed in terms of cylindrical service volumes of specified dimensions called “class limits” or “categories.” REFERENCE − AIP, GEN 3.4, Para 3.1.4, NAVAID Service Volumes.

6.3.3 An operational service volume has been established for each class in which adequate signal coverage and frequency protection can be assured. To facilitate use of VOR, VORTAC, or TACAN aids, consistent with their operational service volume limits, pilot use of such aids for defining a direct route of flight in controlled airspace should not exceed the following: 6.3.3.1 Operations above FL 450 − Use aids not more than 200 NM apart. These aids are depicted on en route high altitude charts.

6.3.3.2 Operation off established routes from 18,000 feet MSL to FL 450 − Use aids not more than 260 NM apart.

These aids are depicted on en route high altitude charts.

6.3.3.3 Operation off established airways below 18,000 feet MSL − Use aids not more than 80 NM apart. These aids are depicted on en route low altitude charts.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 15 AIP ENR 1.10 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 6.3.3.4 Operation off established airways between 14,500 feet MSL and 17,999 feet MSL in the conterminous U.S. − (H) facilities not more than 200 NM apart may be used.

6.3.4 Increasing use of self − contained airborne navigational systems which do not rely on the VOR/VORTAC/TACAN system has resulted in pilot requests for direct routes which exceed NAVAID service volume limits.

6.3.5 At times, ATC will initiate a direct route in a surveillance environment which exceeds NAVAID service volume limits. Pilots must adhere to the altitude specified in the clearance.

6.3.6 Appropriate airway or jet route numbers may also be included to describe portions of the route to be flown.

EXAMPLE − MDW V262 BDF V10 BRL STJ SLN GCK Spelled out: from Chicago Midway Airport via Victor 262 to Bradford, Victor 10 to Burlington, Iowa, direct St. Joseph, Missouri, direct Salina, Kansas, direct Garden City, Kansas.

NOTE − When route of flight is described by radio fixes, the pilot will be expected to fly a direct course between the points named.

6.3.7 Pilots are reminded that they are responsible for adhering to obstruction clearance requirements on those segments of direct routes that are outside of controlled airspace and ATC surveillance capability. The MEAs and other altitudes shown on IFR en route charts pertain to those route segments within controlled airspace, and those altitudes may not meet obstruction clearance criteria when operating off those routes.

NOTE − Refer to 14 CFR 91.177 for pilot responsibility when flying random point to point routes.

6.4 Area Navigation (RNAV)/Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) 6.4.1 When not being radar monitored, GNSS − equipped RNAV aircraft on random RNAV routes must be cleared via or reported to be established on a point − to − point route.

6.4.1.1 The points must be published NAVAIDs, waypoints, fixes or airports recallable from the aircraft’s navigation database. The points must be displayed on controller video maps or depicted on the controller chart displayed at the control position. When applying nonradar separation the maximum distance between points must not exceed 500 miles.

6.4.1.2 ATC will protect 4 miles either side of the route centerline.

6.4.1.3 Assigned altitudes must be at or above the highest MIA along the projected route segment being flown, including the protected airspace of that route segment.

6.4.2 Pilots of aircraft equipped with approved area navigational equipment may file for RNAV routes throughout the National Airspace System in accordance with the following procedures: 6.4.2.1 File airport − to − airport flight plans.

6.4.2.2 File the appropriate indication of RNAV and/or RNP capability in the flight plan.

6.4.2.3 Plan the random route portion of the flight plan to begin and end over appropriate arrival and departure transition fixes or appropriate navigation aids for the altitude stratum within which the flight will be conducted.

The use of normal preferred departure and arrival routes (DP/STAR), where established, is recommended.

6.4.2.4 File route structure transitions to and from the random route portion of the flight.

6.4.2.5 Define the random route by waypoints. File route description waypoints by using degree distance fixes based on navigational aids which are appropriate for the altitude stratum.

6.4.2.6 File a minimum of one route description waypoint for each ARTCC through whose area the random route will be flown. These waypoints must be located within 200 NM of the preceding center’s boundary.

6.4.2.7 File an additional route description waypoint for each turn point in the route.

6.4.2.8 Plan additional route description waypoints as required to ensure accurate navigation via the filed route of flight. Navigation is the pilot’s responsibility unless ATC assistance is requested.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 16 AIP ENR 1.10 − 16 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.4.2.9 Plan the route of flight so as to avoid prohibited and restricted airspace by 3 NM unless permission has been obtained to operate in that airspace and the appropriate ATC facilities are advised.

NOTE − To be approved for use in the National Airspace System, RNAV equipment must meet system availability, accuracy, and airworthiness standards. For additional information and guidance on RNAV equipment requirements see Advisory Circular (AC) 20 − 138, Airworthiness Approval of Positioning and Navigation Systems, and AC 90 − 100, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations.

6.4.3 Pilots of aircraft equipped with latitude/ longitude coordinate navigation capability, independent of VOR/TACAN references, may file for random RNAV using the following procedures: 6.4.3.1 File airport − to − airport flight plans prior to departure.

6.4.3.2 File the appropriate RNAV capability certification suffix in the flight plan.

6.4.3.3 Plan the random route portion of the flight to begin and end over published departure/arrival transition fixes or appropriate navigation aids for airports without published transition procedures. The use of preferred departure and arrival routes, such as DP and STAR where established, is recommended.

6.4.3.4 Plan the route of flight so as to avoid prohibited and restricted airspace by 3 NM unless permission has been obtained to operate in that airspace and the appropriate ATC facility is advised.

6.4.3.5 Define the route of flight after the departure fix, including each intermediate fix (turnpoint) and the arrival fix for the destination airport in terms of latitude/longitude coordinates plotted to the nearest minute or in terms of Navigation Reference System (NRS) waypoints. For latitude/ longitude filing the arrival fix must be identified by both the latitude/longitude coordinates and a fix identifier.

EXAMPLE − 1 2 3 4 5 MIA SRQ 3407/10615 3407/11546 TNP LAX Departure airport.

Departure fix.

Intermediate fix (turning point).

Arrival fix.

Destination airport.

or 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ORD IOW KP49G KD34U KL16O OAL MOD2 SFO Departure airport.

Transition fix.

Minneapolis ARTCC waypoint.

Denver ARTCC Waypoint.

Los Angeles ARTCC waypoint.

Transition fix.

Arrival.

Destination airport.

6.4.3.6 Record latitude/longitude coordinates by two or four figures describing latitude in degrees followed by a N or S, followed by 3 or 5 digits longitude followed by an E or W. Separate latitude and longitude with a solidus “/”. Use leading zeros if necessary.

6.4.3.7 File at FL 390 or above for the random RNAV portion of the flight.

6.4.3.8 Fly all routes/route segments on Great Circle tracks.

6.4.3.9 Make any inflight requests for random RNAV clearances or route amendments to an en route ATC facility.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 17 AIP ENR 1.10 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 7. Flight Plan – Defense VFR (DVFR) Flights VFR flights (except for DOD and law enforcement flights) into an ADIZ are required to file DVFR flight plans for security purposes. Detailed ADIZ procedures are found in section ENR 1.12 , National Security and Interception Procedures.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 99, Security Control of Air Traffic.

7.1 DVFR flight plans must be filed using FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801.

7.2 Enter the letter “D” in Item 8b of FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801.

7.3 DVFR flights where pilots decline search and rescue coverage must clearly indicate “NORIV” in Item 18 following the indicator “RMK/”. This flight plan must still be activated in order to properly notify NORAD, however no flight plan cancellation will be expected.

EXAMPLE − RMK/NORIV 8. Single Flights Conducted With Both VFR and IFR Flight Plans 8.1 Flight plans which combine VFR operation on an active VFR flight plan for one portion of a flight, and IFR for another portion, sometimes known as a composite flight plan, cannot be accepted or processed by current en route automation systems.

8.2 Pilots are free to operate VFR in VFR conditions prior to accepting an IFR clearance from the appropriate control facility, or may cancel an IFR clearance and proceed VFR as desired. However, if a pilot desires to be on an active VFR flight plan, with search and rescue provisions, for the portion of flight not conducted under an IFR clearance, a separate VFR flight plan must be filed, activated, and closed.

8.3 If a pilot desires to be on an active VFR flight plan prior to or following the IFR portion of the flight, that flight plan must be filed and processed as a distinct and separate flight plan. The VFR flight plan must be opened and closed with either a Flight Service Station or other service provider having the capability to open and close VFR flight plans. Air Traffic Control does not have the ability to determine if an aircraft is operating on an active VFR flight plan and cannot process the activation or cancellation of a VFR flight plan.

8.4 Pilots may propose to commence the IFR portion of flight at a defined airborne point. This airborne point, or fix, is entered as the departure point in Item 13 of FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801.

8.5 Pilots may indicate in the IFR flight plan the intention to terminate the IFR portion of flight at any defined airborne point. The airborne point, or fix, is entered as the destination point in Item 16 of FAA Form 7233 − 4 or DD Form 1801.

8.6 Prior to beginning the IFR portion of flight, a pilot must receive an IFR clearance from the appropriate control facility.

8.7 If the pilot does not desire further clearance after reaching the clearance limit, he or she must advise ATC to cancel the IFR clearance.

9. Change in Proposed Departure Time 9.1 To prevent computer saturation in the en route environment, parameters have been established to delete proposed departure flight plans which have not been activated. Most centers have this parameter set so as to delete these flight plans a minimum of 2 hours after the proposed departure time or Expect Departure Clearance Time (EDCT). To ensure that a flight plan remains active, pilots whose actual departure time will be delayed 2 hours or more beyond their filed departure time, are requested to notify ATC of their new proposed departure time.

9.2 Due to traffic saturation, ATC personnel frequently will be unable to accept these revisions via radio. It is recommended that you forward these revisions to a flight plan service provider or FSS.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 18 AIP ENR 1.10 − 18 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 10. Other Changes 10.1 In addition to altitude/flight level, destination, and/or route changes, increasing or decreasing the speed of an aircraft constitutes a change in a flight plan. Therefore, at any time the average true airspeed at cruising altitude between reporting points varies or is expected to vary from that given in the flight plan by plus or minus 5 percent, or 10 knots, whichever is greater, air traffic control should be advised.

11. Canceling Flight Plans 11.1 Closing VFR and DVFR Flight Plans 11.1.1 A pilot is responsible for ensuring that his/her VFR or DVFR flight plan is canceled. You should close your flight plan with the nearest FSS, or if one is not available, you may request any ATC facility to relay your cancellation to the FSS. Control towers do not automatically close VFR or DVFR flight plans as they may not be aware that a particular VFR aircraft is on a flight plan. If you fail to report or cancel your flight plan within / hour after your ETA, search and rescue procedures are started.

11.2 Canceling IFR Flight Plan 11.2.1 14 CFR Section 91.153 includes the statement “When a flight plan has been activated, the pilot in command, upon canceling or completing the flight under the flight plan, must notify an FAA Flight Service Station or ATC facility.” 11.2.2 An IFR flight plan may be canceled at any time the flight is operating in VFR conditions outside Class A airspace by the pilot stating “CANCEL MY IFR FLIGHT PLAN” to the controller or air/ground station with which he/she is communicating. Immediately after canceling an IFR flight plan, a pilot should take necessary action to change to the appropriate air/ground frequency, VFR radar beacon code, and VFR altitude or flight level.

11.2.3 ATC separation and information services will be discontinued, including radar services (where applicable). Consequently, if the canceling flight desires VFR radar advisory service, the pilot must specifically request it.

NOTE − Pilots must be aware that other procedures may be applicable to a flight that cancels an IFR flight plan within an area where a special program, such as a designated terminal radar service area, Class C airspace or Class B airspace, has been established.

11.2.4 If a DVFR flight plan requirement exists, the pilot is responsible for filing this flight plan to replace the canceled IFR flight plan. If a subsequent IFR operation becomes necessary, a new IFR flight plan must be filed and an ATC clearance obtained before operating in IFR conditions.

11.2.5 If operating on an IFR flight plan to an airport with a functioning control tower, the flight plan is automatically closed upon landing.

11.2.6 If operating on an IFR flight plan to an airport where there is no functioning control tower, the pilot must initiate cancellation of the IFR flight plan. This can be done after landing if there is a functioning FSS or other means of direct communications with ATC. In the event there is no FSS and air/ground communications with ATC is not possible below a certain altitude, the pilot would, weather conditions permitting, cancel his/her IFR flight plan while still airborne and able to communicate with ATC by radio. This will not only save the time and expense of canceling the flight plan by telephone but will quickly release the airspace for use by other aircraft.

11.3 RNAV and RNP Operations 11.3.1 During the pre − flight planning phase the availability of the navigation infrastructure required for the intended operation, including any non − RNAV contingencies must be confirmed for the period of intended operation. Availability of the onboard navigation equipment necessary for the route to be flown must be confirmed. Pilots are reminded that on composite VFR to IFR flight plan, or on an IFR clearance, while flying unpublished departures via RNAV into uncontrolled airspace, the PIC is responsible for terrain and obstruction clearance until reaching the MEA/MIA/MVA/OROCA.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.10 − 19 AIP ENR 1.10 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 NOTE − OROCA is a published altitude which provides 1,000 feet of terrain and obstruction clearance in the US (2,000 feet of clearance in designated mountainous areas). These altitudes are not assessed for NAVAID signal coverage, air traffic control surveillance, or communications coverage, and are published for general situational awareness, flight planning and in − flight contingency use.

11.3.2 If a pilot determines a specified RNP level cannot be achieved, revise the route or delay the operation until appropriate RNP level can be ensured.

11.3.3 The onboard navigation database must be current and appropriate for the region of intended operation and must include the navigation aids, waypoints, and coded terminal airspace procedures for the departure, arrival and alternate airfields.

11.3.4 During system initialization, pilots of aircraft equipped with a Flight Management System or other RNAV − certified system, must confirm that the navigation database is current, and verify that the aircraft position has been entered correctly. Flight crews should crosscheck the cleared flight plan against charts or other applicable resources, as well as the navigation system textual display and the aircraft map display. This process includes confirmation of the waypoints sequence, reasonableness of track angles and distances, any altitude or speed constraints, and identification of fly − by or fly − over waypoints. A procedure must not be used if validity of the navigation database is in doubt.

11.3.5 Prior to commencing takeoff, the flight crew must verify that the RNAV system is operating correctly and the correct airport and runway data have been loaded.

11.3.6 During the pre − flight planning phase RAIM prediction must be performed if TSO − C129() equipment is used to solely satisfy the RNAV and RNP requirement. GPS RAIM availability must be confirmed for the intended route of flight (route and time) using current GPS satellite information. In the event of a predicted, continuous loss of RAIM of more than five (5) minutes for any part of the intended flight, the flight should be delayed, canceled, or re − routed where RAIM requirements can be met. Operators may satisfy the predictive RAIM requirement through any one of the following methods: 11.3.6.1 Operators may monitor the status of each satellite in its plane/slot position, by accounting for the latest GPS constellation status (e.g., NOTAMs or NANUs), and compute RAIM availability using model − specific RAIM prediction software; 11.3.6.2 Operators may use the Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) on the FAA en route and terminal RAIM prediction website; 11.3.6.3 Operators may contact a Flight Service Station to obtain non − precision approach RAIM; 11.3.6.4 Operators may use a third party interface, incorporating FAA/VOLPE RAIM prediction data without altering performance values, to predict RAIM outages for the aircraft’s predicted flight path and times; 11.3.6.5 Operators may use the receiver’s installed RAIM prediction capability (for TSO − C129a/Class A1/B1/C1 equipment) to provide non − precision approach RAIM, accounting for the latest GPS constellation status (e.g., NOTAMs or NANUs). Receiver non − precision approach RAIM should be checked at airports spaced at intervals not to exceed 60 NM along the RNAV 1 procedure’s flight track. “Terminal” or “Approach” RAIM must be available at the ETA over each airport checked; or 11.3.6.6 Operators not using model − specific software or FAA/VOLPE RAIM data will need FAA operational approval.

NOTE − If TSO − C145/C146 equipment is used to satisfy the RNAV and RNP requirement, the pilot/operator need not perform the prediction if WAAS coverage is confirmed to be available along the entire route of flight. Outside the U.S. or in areas where WAAS coverage is not available, operators using TSO − C145/C146 receivers are required to check GPS RAIM availability.

12. IFR Operations To High Altitude Destinations 12.1 Pilots planning IFR flights to airports located in mountainous terrain are cautioned to consider the necessity for an alternate airport even when the forecast weather conditions would technically relieve them from the requirement to file one.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 1.10 − 20 AIP ENR 1.10 − 20 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12.2 The FAA has identified three possible situations where the failure to plan for an alternate airport when flying IFR to such destination airport could result in a critical situation if the weather is less than forecast and sufficient fuel is not available to proceed to a suitable airport.

12.2.1 An IFR flight to an airport where the Minimum Descent Altitudes (MDAs) or landing visibility minimums for all instrument approaches are higher than the forecast weather minimums specified in 14 CFR Section 91.167(b). For example, there are 3 high altitude airports in the U.S. with approved instrument approach procedures where all of the MDAs are greater than 2,000 feet and/or the landing visibility minimums are greater than 3 miles (Bishop, California; South Lake Tahoe, California; and Aspen − Pitkin Co/Sardy Field, Colorado).

In the case of these airports, it is possible for a pilot to elect, on the basis of forecasts, not to carry sufficient fuel to get to an alternate when the ceiling and/or visibility is actually lower than that necessary to complete the approach.

12.2.2 A small number of other airports in mountainous terrain have MDAs which are slightly (100 to 300 feet) below 2,000 feet AGL. In situations where there is an option as to whether to plan for an alternate, pilots should bear in mind that just a slight worsening of the weather conditions from those forecast could place the airport below the published IFR landing minimums.

12.2.3 An IFR flight to an airport which requires special equipment; i.e., DME, glide slope, etc., in order to make the available approaches to the lowest minimums. Pilots should be aware that all other minimums on the approach charts may require weather conditions better than those specified in 14 CFR Section 91.167(b). An inflight equipment malfunction could result in the inability to comply with the published approach procedures or, again, in the position of having the airport below the published IFR landing minimums for all remaining instrument approach alternatives.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.11 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.11 Addressing of Flight Plans for Domestic or

International Flight Planning

1. General Information 1.1 In order to safely and efficiently exercise their responsibilities, controllers must receive the most current and accurate flight plan information available. For departing aircraft, this information is normally received in the form of an ICAO Filed Flight Plan (FPL). For aircraft inbound from an adjacent facility, flight plan information may also be received in the form of an FPL, however, if available, the most current information is received via inter − facility automated interface in the form of a Current Flight Plan (CPL). Although the FPL and CPL are similar, they differ in that the FPL contains the requested route/altitude, while the CPL contains the route/altitude actually assigned to the aircraft.

1.2 Within domestic U.S. (contiguous 48 states) airspace, only the first en route facility needs to receive flight plan data, whether from the filer or an adjacent facility. This is due to the fact that U.S. en route computer systems automatically forward current flight plan data and revisions from facility to facility. The inappropriate addressing of an FPL by the filer may create processing and/or controller workload issues, resulting in delays.

1.3 Please refer to guidance in the scenarios below to ensure that FPLs are addressed correctly.

2. Addressing Guidance NOTE − In this section, U.S. Domestic Airspace includes the 48 contiguous states and Puerto Rico.

Please use the following criteria when selecting addresses for transmission of the ICAO FPL to U.S. Air Traffic Control (ATC): 2.1 Address the FPL to the departure ARTCC only. Do not address subsequent U.S. domestic facilities.

NOTE − If a flight leaves U.S. domestic airspace and later re − enters U.S. domestic airspace, the return portion of the flight should be addressed per guidance in Scenarios 2.3 or 2.4 below, as applicable.

2.2 U.S. Domestic to International Destinations Address the FPL to the departure ARTCC.

Do not address subsequent U.S. domestic facilities.

Address the FPL to New York, Oakland, and/or Anchorage Oceanic, as appropriate.

Address any non − U.S. FIRs in accordance with ICAO Doc 4444, Procedures for Air Navigation Services — Air Traffic Management, and other published procedures.

2.3 From Canada to or through U.S. Domestic Airspace Address non − U.S. FIRs in accordance with ICAO Doc 4444 and other published procedures.

Do not address the FPL to any U.S. domestic ARTCC.

Address the FPL to New York, Oakland and/or Anchorage Oceanic, as appropriate.

Address any non − U.S. FIRs in accordance with ICAO Doc 4444 and other published procedures.

2.4 International (non − Canada) to or through U.S. Domestic Airspace Address FPLs to non − U.S. FIRs in accordance with ICAO Doc 4444 and other published procedures.

Address the FPL to the first domestic U.S. ARTCC.

Do not address subsequent U.S. domestic facilities.

Address the FPL to New York, Oakland and/or Anchorage Oceanic, as appropriate Address any non − U.S. FIRs in accordance with ICAO Doc 4444 and other published procedures.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.11 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3. Addresses to the Air Route Traffic Control Centers and to Flight Data NOTE − Messages addressed using an ARTCC flight data address (i.e., ZRZX) are not processed by the computer. Response and/or interpretation of these messages are dependent on flight data personnel action. Note: ZTZX (ATC Tower) is not used in the United States.

3.1 ARTCC NADIN/AFTN Addresses The addressing convention used for U.S. domestic FIR/ARTCCs is as follows: 3.1.1 KZxxZRZX addresses the message only to the facility Flight Data Unit via Aeronautical Information System Replacement (AISR).

EXAMPLE − KZLCZRZX 3.1.2 KZxxZQZX addresses the message to both Flight Data and the En Route Computer.

EXAMPLE − KZLCZQZX NOTE − New York ARTCC and Oakland ARTCC require additional addresses for flights entering the Oceanic FIR. For international flight plan addressing, see ENR 7, Oceanic Operations, ENR 7.1 General Procedures, 2. Flight Plan Filing Requirements.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.12 National Security and Interception Procedures

1. National Security 1.1 National security in the control of air traffic is governed by 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 99, Security Control of Air Traffic .

1.2 National Security Requirements 1.2.1 Pursuant to 14 CFR 99.7, Special Security Instructions, each person operating an aircraft in an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) or Defense Area must, in addition to the applicable rules of Part 99, comply with special security instructions issued by the FAA Administrator in the interest of national security, pursuant to agreement between the FAA and the Department of Defense (DOD), or between the FAA and a U.S. Federal security or intelligence agency.

1.2.2 In addition to the requirements prescribed in this section, national security requirements for aircraft operations to or from, within, or transiting U.S. territorial airspace are in effect pursuant to 14 CFR 99.7; 49 United States Code (USC) 40103, Sovereignty and Use of Airspace; and 49 USC 41703, Navigation of Foreign Civil Aircraft. Aircraft operations to or from, within, or transiting U.S. territorial airspace must also comply with all other applicable regulations published in 14 CFR.

1.2.3 Due to increased security measures in place at many areas and in accordance with 14 CFR 91.103, Preflight Action , prior to departure, pilots must become familiar with all available information concerning that flight.

Pilots are responsible to comply with 14 CFR 91.137 (Temporary flight restrictions in the vicinity of disaster/hazard areas), 91.138 (Temporary flight restrictions in national disaster areas in the State of Hawaii), 91.141 (Flight restrictions in the proximity of the Presidential and other parties), and 91.143 (Flight limitation in the proximity of space flight operations) when conducting flight in an area where a temporary flight restrictions area is in effect, and should check appropriate NOTAMs during flight planning. In addition, NOTAMs may be issued for National Security Areas (NSA) that temporarily prohibit flight operations under the provisions of 14 CFR 99.7.

REFERENCE − AIP ENR 5.1 , Paragraph 2.1 , National Security Areas.

AIP ENR 5.1, Paragraph 2.2, Temporary Flight Restrictions.

1.2.4 Noncompliance with the national security requirements for aircraft operations contained in this section may result in denial of flight entry into U.S. territorial airspace or ground stop of the flight at a U.S. airport.

1.2.5 Pilots of aircraft that do not adhere to the procedures in the national security requirements for aircraft operations contained in this section may be intercepted, and/or detained and interviewed by federal, state, or local law enforcement or other government personnel.

1.3 Definitions 1.3.1 Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) means an area of airspace over land or water, in which the ready identification, location, and control of all aircraft (except Department of Defense and law enforcement aircraft) is required in the interest of national security.

1.3.2 Defense Area means any airspace of the contiguous U.S. that is not an ADIZ in which the control of aircraft is required for reasons of national security.

1.3.3 U.S. territorial airspace, for the purposes of this section, means the airspace over the U.S., its territories, and possessions, and the airspace over the territorial sea of the U.S., which extends 12 nautical miles from the baselines of the U.S., determined in accordance with international law.

1.3.4 To U.S. territorial airspace means any flight that enters U.S. territorial airspace after departure from a location outside of the U.S., its territories or possessions, for landing at a destination in the U.S., its territories or possessions.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.3.5 From U.S. territorial airspace means any flight that exits U.S. territorial airspace after departure from a location in the U.S., its territories or possessions, and lands at a destination outside the U.S., its territories or possessions.

1.3.6 Within U.S. territorial airspace means any flight departing from a location inside of the U.S., its territories or possessions, which operates en route to a location inside the U.S., its territories or possessions.

1.3.7 Transit or transiting U.S. territorial airspace means any flight departing from a location outside of the U.S., its territories or possessions, which operates in U.S. territorial airspace en route to a location outside the U.S., its territories or possessions without landing at a destination in the U.S., its territories or possessions.

1.3.8 Aeronautical facility , for the purposes of this section, means a communications facility where flight plans or position reports are normally filed during flight operations.

1.4 ADIZ Requirements 1.4.1 To facilitate early identification of all aircraft in the vicinity of U.S. airspace boundaries, Air Defense Identification Zones (ADIZ) have been established. All aircraft must meet certain requirements to facilitate early identification when operating into, within, and across an ADIZ, as described in 14 CFR 99. (See FIG ENR 1.12 − 1 .)

1.4.2 Requirements for aircraft operations are as follows: 1.4.2.1 Transponder Requirements. Unless otherwise authorized by ATC, each aircraft conducting operations into, within, or across the contiguous U.S. ADIZ must be equipped with an operable radar beacon transponder.

The transponder must be turned on and squawking a discrete beacon code assigned by ATC or issued by FSS and displaying the aircraft altitude. Use of beacon code 1200 is not authorized. Use of the Universal Access Transceiver (UAT) anonymity mode is not authorized.

a) For air defense purposes, aircraft equipped with an operable 1090es (DO − 260b) ADS − B system operating outbound across the contiguous U.S. ADIZ may also be identified by the ICAO aircraft address (otherwise known as the aircraft Mode S code). Therefore, use of a privacy ICAO aircraft address by outbound aircraft is not authorized.

b) Pilots of outbound VFR aircraft must squawk a discrete beacon code assigned by ATC or issued by FSS.

c) Nothing in this section changes the ADS − B OUT requirements of 14 CFR 91.225.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR 99.13, Transponder − On Requirements.

14 CFR 91.225, Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) Out equipment and use.

1.4.2.2 Two − way Radio. In accordance with 14 CFR 99.9, Radio Requirements , any person operating in an ADIZ must maintain two − way radio communication with an appropriate aeronautical facility. For two − way radio communications failure, follow instructions contained in 14 CFR 99.9.

1.4.2.3 Flight Plan. In accordance with 14 CFR 99.11, Flight Plan Requirements, and 14 CFR 99.9, except as specified in subparagraph 1.4.5, no person may operate an aircraft into, within, or from a departure point within an ADIZ, unless the person files, activates, and closes a flight plan with an appropriate aeronautical facility, or is otherwise authorized by air traffic control as follows: a) Pilots must file an Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flight plan or file a Defense Visual Flight Rules (DVFR) flight plan containing the time and point of ADIZ penetration; b) The pilot must activate the DVFR flight plan with U.S. Flight Service and set the aircraft transponder to the assigned discrete beacon code prior to entering the ADIZ; c) The IFR or DVFR aircraft must depart within 5 minutes of the estimated departure time contained in the flight plan, except for (d) below; d) If the airport of departure within the Alaskan ADIZ has no facility for filing a flight plan, the flight plan must be filed immediately after takeoff or when within range of an appropriate aeronautical facility; Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 e) State aircraft (U.S. or foreign) planning to operate through an ADIZ should enter ICAO Code M in Item 8 of the flight plan to assist in identification of the aircraft as a state aircraft.

1.4.3 Position Reporting Before Penetration of ADIZ.

In accordance with 14 CFR 99.15, Position Reports , before entering the ADIZ, the pilot must report to an appropriate aeronautical facility as follows: 1.4.3.1 IFR flights in controlled airspace. The pilot must maintain a continuous watch on the appropriate frequency and report the time and altitude of passing each designated reporting point or those reporting points specified or requested by ATC, except that while the aircraft is under radar control, only the passing of those reporting points specifically requested by ATC need be reported. (See 14 CFR 91.183(a), IFR Communications.)

1.4.3.2 DVFR flights and IFR flights in uncontrolled airspace: a) The time, position, and altitude at which the aircraft passed the last reporting point before penetration and the estimated time of arrival over the next appropriate reporting point along the flight route; b) If there is no appropriate reporting point along the flight route, the pilot reports at least 15 minutes before penetration: the estimated time, position, and altitude at which the pilot will penetrate; or c) If the departure airport is within an ADIZ or so close to the ADIZ boundary that it prevents the pilot from complying with (a) or (b) above, the pilot must report immediately after departure: the time of departure, the altitude, and the estimated time of arrival over the first reporting point along the flight route.

1.4.3.3 Foreign civil aircraft. If the pilot of a foreign civil aircraft that intends to enter the U.S. through an ADIZ cannot comply with the reporting requirements in subparagraphs 1.4.3.1 or 1.4.3.2 above, as applicable, the pilot must report the position of the aircraft to the appropriate aeronautical facility not less than 1 hour and not more than 2 hours average direct cruising distance from the U.S.

1.4.4 Land − Based ADIZ. Land − Based ADIZ are activated and deactivated over U.S. metropolitan areas as needed, with dimensions, activation dates and other relevant information disseminated via NOTAM. Pilots unable to comply with all NOTAM requirements must remain clear of Land − Based ADIZ. Pilots entering a Land − Based ADIZ without authorization or who fail to follow all requirements risk interception by military fighter aircraft.

1.4.5 Exceptions to ADIZ requirements.

1.4.5.1 Except for the national security requirements in paragraph 1.2, transponder requirements in subparagraph 1.4.2.1, and position reporting in subparagraph 1.4.3, the ADIZ requirements in 14 CFR Part 99 described in this section do not apply to the following aircraft operations pursuant to Section 99.1(b), Applicability: a) Within the 48 contiguous States or within the State of Alaska, on a flight which remains within 10 NM of the point of departure; b) Operating at true airspeed of less than 180 knots in the Hawaii ADIZ or over any island, or within 12 NM of the coastline of any island, in the Hawaii ADIZ; c) Operating at true airspeed of less than 180 knots in the Alaska ADIZ while the pilot maintains a continuous listening watch on the appropriate frequency; or d) Operating at true airspeed of less than 180 knots in the Guam ADIZ.

1.4.5.2 An FAA air route traffic control center (ARTCC) may exempt certain aircraft operations on a local basis in concurrence with the DOD or pursuant to an agreement with a U.S. Federal security or intelligence agency.

(See 14 CFR 99.1 for additional information.)

1.4.6 A VFR flight plan filed inflight makes an aircraft subject to interception for positive identification when entering an ADIZ. Pilots are therefore urged to file the required DVFR flight plan either in person or by telephone prior to departure when able.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.5 Civil Aircraft Operations To or From U.S. Territorial Airspace 1.5.1 Civil aircraft, except as described in subparagraph 1.5.2 below, are authorized to operate to or from U.S.

territorial airspace if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.5.1.1 File and are on an active flight plan (IFR, VFR, or DVFR); 1.5.1.2 Are equipped with an operational transponder with altitude reporting capability, and continuously squawk an ATC assigned transponder code; 1.5.1.3 Maintain two − way radio communications with ATC; 1.5.1.4 Comply with all other applicable ADIZ requirements described in paragraph 1.4 and any other national security requirements in paragraph 1.2 ; 1.5.1.5 Comply with all applicable U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) requirements, including Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) requirements (see subparagraph 1.5.3 below for CBP APIS information), in accordance with 19 CFR Part 122, Air Commerce Regulations; and 1.5.1.6 Are in receipt of, and are operating in accordance with, an FAA routing authorization if the aircraft is registered in a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country or is operating with the ICAO three letter designator (3LD) of a company in a country listed as a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country, unless the operator holds valid FAA Part 129 operations specifications. VFR and DVFR flight operations are prohibited for any aircraft requiring an FAA routing authorization. (See paragraph 1.11 for FAA routing authorization information).

1.5.2 Civil aircraft registered in the U.S., Canada, or Mexico with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight of 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) or less that are operating without an operational transponder, and/or the ability to maintain two − way radio communications with ATC, are authorized to operate to or from U.S. territorial airspace over Alaska if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.5.2.1 Depart and land at an airport within the U.S. or Canada; 1.5.2.2 Enter or exit U.S. territorial airspace over Alaska north of the fifty − fourth parallel; 1.5.2.3 File and are on an active flight plan; 1.5.2.4 Comply with all other applicable ADIZ requirements described in paragraph 1.4 and any other national security requirements in paragraph 1.2 ; 1.5.2.5 Squawk 1200 if VFR and equipped with a transponder; and 1.5.2.6 Comply with all applicable U.S. CBP requirements, including APIS requirements (see paragraph 1.5.3 below for CBP APIS information), in accordance with 19 CFR Part 122, Air Commerce Regulations.

1.5.3 CBP APIS Information. Information about U.S. CBP APIS requirements is available at http://www.cbp.gov.

1.6 Civil Aircraft Operations Within U.S. Territorial Airspace 1.6.1 Civil aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight less than or equal to 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) are authorized to operate within U.S. territorial airspace in accordance with all applicable regulations and VFR in airport traffic pattern areas of U.S. airports near the U.S. border, except for those described in subparagraph 1.6.2 below.

1.6.2 Civil aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight less than or equal to 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) and registered in a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country or operating with the ICAO 3LD of a company in a country listed as a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country, unless the operator holds valid FAA Part 129 operations specifications, must operate within U.S. territorial airspace in accordance with the same requirements as civil aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight greater than 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs), as described in subparagraph 1.6.3 below.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.6.3 Civil aircraft with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight greater than 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) are authorized to operate within U.S. territorial airspace if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.6.3.1 File and are on an active flight plan (IFR or VFR); 1.6.3.2 Equipped with an operational transponder with altitude reporting capability, and continuously squawk an ATC assigned transponder code; 1.6.3.3 Equipped with an operational ADS − B Out when operating in airspace specified in 14 CFR 91.225; 1.6.3.4 Maintain two − way radio communications with ATC; 1.6.3.5 Aircraft not registered in the U.S. must operate under an approved Transportation Security Administration (TSA) aviation security program (see paragraph 1.10 for TSA aviation security program information) or in accordance with an FAA/TSA airspace waiver (see paragraph 1.9 for FAA/TSA airspace waiver information), except as authorized in 1.6.3.7 below; 1.6.3.6 Are in receipt of, and are operating in accordance with an FAA routing authorization and an FAA/TSA airspace waiver if the aircraft is registered in a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country or is operating with the ICAO 3LD of a company in a country listed as a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country, unless the operator holds valid FAA Part 129 operations specifications. VFR and DVFR flight operations are prohibited for any aircraft requiring an FAA routing authorization. (See paragraph 1.11 for FAA routing authorization information.); and 1.6.3.7 Aircraft not registered in the U.S., when conducting post − maintenance, manufacturer, production, or acceptance flight test operations, are exempt from the requirements in 1.6.3.5 above if all of the following requirements are met: a) A U.S. company must have operational control of the aircraft; b) An FAA − certificated pilot must serve as pilot in command; c) Only crewmembers are permitted onboard the aircraft; and d) “Maintenance Flight” is included in the remarks section of the flight plan.

1.7 Civil Aircraft Operations Transiting U.S. Territorial Airspace 1.7.1 Civil aircraft (except those operating in accordance with subparagraphs 1.7.2, 1.7.3, 1.7.4, or 1.7.5) are authorized to transit U.S. territorial airspace if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.7.1.1 File and are on an active flight plan (IFR, VFR, or DVFR); 1.7.1.2 Equipped with an operational transponder with altitude reporting capability and continuously squawk an ATC assigned transponder code; 1.7.1.3 Equipped with an operational ADS − B Out when operating in airspace specified in 14 CFR 91.225; 1.7.1.4 Maintain two − way radio communications with ATC; 1.7.1.5 Comply with all other applicable ADIZ requirements described in paragraph 1.4 and any other national security requirements in paragraph 1.2 ; 1.7.1.6 Are operating under an approved TSA aviation security program (see paragraph 1.10 for TSA aviation security program information) or are operating with and in accordance with an FAA/TSA airspace waiver (see paragraph 1.9 for FAA/TSA airspace waiver information), if: a) The aircraft is not registered in the U.S.; or b) The aircraft is registered in the U.S. and its maximum takeoff gross weight is greater than 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs); 1.7.1.7 Are in receipt of, and are operating in accordance with, an FAA routing authorization if the aircraft is registered in a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country or is operating with the ICAO 3LD of Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 a company in a country listed as a U.S. State Department − designated special interest country, unless the operator holds valid FAA Part 129 operations specifications. VFR and DVFR flight operations are prohibited for any aircraft requiring an FAA routing authorization. (See paragraph 1.11 for FAA routing authorization information.)

1.7.2 Civil aircraft registered in Canada or Mexico, and engaged in operations for the purposes of air ambulance, firefighting, law enforcement, search and rescue, or emergency evacuation are authorized to transit U.S.

territorial airspace within 50 NM of their respective borders with the U.S., with or without an active flight plan, provided they have received and continuously transmit an ATC − assigned transponder code.

1.7.3 Civil aircraft registered in Canada, Mexico, Bahamas, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, or the British Virgin Islands with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight of 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) or less are authorized to transit U.S. territorial airspace if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.7.3.1 File and are on an active flight plan (IFR, VFR, or DVFR) that enters U.S. territorial airspace directly from any of the countries listed in this subparagraph 1.7.3. Flights that include a stop in a non − listed country prior to entering U.S. territorial airspace must comply with the requirements prescribed by subparagraph 1.7.1 above, including operating under an approved TSA aviation security program (see paragraph 1.10 for TSA aviation program information) or operating with, and in accordance with, an FAA/TSA airspace waiver (see paragraph 1.9 for FAA/TSA airspace waiver information); 1.7.3.2 Equipped with an operational transponder with altitude reporting capability and continuously squawk an ATC assigned transponder code; 1.7.3.3 Equipped with an operational ADS − B Out when operating in airspace specified in 14 CFR 91.225; 1.7.3.4 Maintain two − way radio communications with ATC; and 1.7.3.5 Comply with all other applicable ADIZ requirements described in paragraph 1.4 and any other national security requirements in paragraph 1.2 .

1.7.4 Civil aircraft registered in Canada, Mexico, Bahamas, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, or the British Virgin Islands with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight greater than 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) must comply with the requirements in subparagraph 1.7.1 , including operating under an approved TSA aviation security program (see paragraph 1.10 for TSA aviation program information) or operating with, and in accordance with, an FAA/TSA airspace waiver (see paragraph 1.9 for FAA/TSA airspace waiver information).

1.7.5 Civil aircraft registered in the U.S., Canada, or Mexico with a maximum certificated takeoff gross weight of 100,309 pounds (45,500 kgs) or less that are operating without an operational transponder and/or the ability to maintain two − way radio communications with ATC, are authorized to transit U.S. territorial airspace over Alaska if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.7.5.1 Enter and exit U.S. territorial airspace over Alaska north of the fifty − fourth parallel; 1.7.5.2 File and are on an active flight plan; 1.7.5.3 Squawk 1200 if VFR and equipped with a transponder; and 1.7.5.4 Comply with all other applicable ADIZ requirements described in paragraph 1.4 and any other national security requirements in paragraph 1.2 .

1.8 Foreign State Aircraft Operations 1.8.1 Foreign state aircraft are authorized to operate in U.S. territorial airspace if in compliance with all of the following conditions: 1.8.1.1 File and are on an active IFR flight plan; 1.8.1.2 Equipped with an operational transponder with altitude reporting capability and continuously squawk an ATC assigned transponder code; 1.8.1.3 Equipped with an operational ADS − B Out when operating in airspace specified in 14 CFR 91.225; Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.8.1.4 Maintain two − way radio communications with ATC; 1.8.1.5 Comply with all other applicable ADIZ requirements described in paragraph 1.4 and any other national security requirements in paragraph 1.2 .

1.8.2 Diplomatic Clearances. Foreign state aircraft may operate to or from, within, or in transit of U.S.

territorial airspace only when authorized by the U.S. State Department by means of a diplomatic clearance, except as described in subparagraph 1.8.9 below.

1.8.2.1 Information about diplomatic clearances is available on the U.S. State Department website at https://www.state.gov/diplomatic-aircraft-clearance-procedures-for-foreign-state-aircraft-to-operate-in-united -states-national-airspace/ .

1.8.2.2 A diplomatic clearance may be initiated by contacting the U.S. State Department via email at DCAS@state.gov or via phone at (202) 453 − 8390.

NOTE − A diplomatic clearance is not required for foreign state aircraft operations that transit U.S. controlled oceanic airspace but do not enter U.S. territorial airspace. (See subparagraph 1.8.4 for flight plan information.)

1.8.3 An FAA routing authorization for state aircraft operations of special interest countries listed in subparagraph 1.11.2 is required before the U.S. State Department will issue a diplomatic clearance for such operations. (See paragraph 1.11 for FAA routing authorizations information).

1.8.4 Foreign state aircraft operating with a diplomatic clearance must navigate U.S. territorial airspace on an active IFR flight plan, unless specifically approved for VFR flight operations by the U.S. State Department in the diplomatic clearance.

NOTE − Foreign state aircraft operations to or from, within, or transiting U.S. territorial airspace; or transiting any U.S. controlled oceanic airspace, should enter ICAO code M in Item 8 of the flight plan to assist in identification of the aircraft as a state aircraft.

1.8.5 A foreign aircraft that operates to or from, within, or in transit of U.S. territorial airspace while conducting a state aircraft operation is not authorized to change its status as a state aircraft during any portion of the approved, diplomatically cleared itinerary.

1.8.6 A foreign aircraft described in subparagraph 1.8.5 above may operate from or within U.S. territorial airspace as a civil aircraft operation, once it has completed its approved, diplomatically cleared itinerary, if the aircraft operator is: 1.8.6.1 A foreign air carrier that holds valid FAA Part 129 operations specifications; and 1.8.6.2 Is in compliance with all other requirements applied to foreign civil aircraft operations from or within U.S. territorial airspace. (See paragraphs 1.5 and 1.6.)

1.8.7 Foreign state aircraft operations are not authorized to or from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (KDCA).

1.8.8 Foreign state aircraft operating with a U.S. Department of State issued Diplomatic Clearance Number in the performance of official missions are authorized to deviate from the Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) Out requirements contained in 14 CFR §§ 91.225 and 91.227. All foreign state aircraft and/or operators associated with Department of Defense missions should contact their respective offices for further information on handling. Foreign state aircraft not associated with Department of Defense should coordinate with Department of State through the normal diplomatic clearance process.

1.8.9 Diplomatic Clearance Exceptions. State aircraft operations on behalf of the governments of Canada and Mexico conducted for the purposes of air ambulance, firefighting, law enforcement, search and rescue, or emergency evacuation are authorized to transit U.S. territorial airspace within 50 NM of their respective borders with the U.S., with or without an active flight plan, provided they have received and continuously transmit an ATC assigned transponder code. State aircraft operations on behalf of the governments of Canada and Mexico Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 conducted under this subparagraph 1.8.9 are not required to obtain a diplomatic clearance from the U.S. State Department.

1.9 FAA/TSA Airspace Waivers 1.9.1 Operators may submit requests for FAA/TSA airspace waivers at https://waivers.faa.gov by selecting “international” as the waiver type.

1.9.2 Information regarding FAA/TSA airspace waivers can be found at: http://www.tsa.gov/for − industry/general − aviation or can be obtained by contacting TSA at (571) 227 − 2071.

1.9.3 All existing FAA/TSA waivers issued under previous FDC NOTAMS remain valid until the expiration date specified in the waiver, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

1.10 TSA Aviation Security Programs 1.10.1 Applicants for U.S. air operator certificates will be provided contact information for TSA aviation security programs by the U.S. Department of Transportation during the certification process.

1.10.2 For information about applicable TSA security programs: 1.10.2.1 U.S. air carriers and commercial operators must contact their TSA Principal Security Specialist (PSS); and 1.10.2.2 Foreign air carriers must contact their International Industry Representative (IIR).

1.11 FAA Flight Routing Authorizations 1.11.1 Information about FAA routing authorizations for U.S. State Department − designated special interest country flight operations to or from, within, or transiting U.S. territorial airspace is available by country at: 1.11.1.1 FAA website: http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/us_restrictions/ ; or 1.11.1.2 Phone by contacting the FAA System Operations Support Center (SOSC) at (202) 267 − 8115.

1.11.2 Special Interest Countries. The U.S. State Department − designated special interest countries are Cuba, Iran, The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea), The People’s Republic of China, The Russian Federation, Sudan, and Syria.

NOTE − FAA flight routing authorizations are not required for aircraft registered in Hong Kong, Taiwan, or Macau.

1.11.3 Aircraft operating with the ICAO 3LD assigned to a company or entity from a country listed as a State Department − designated special interest country and holding valid FAA Part 129 operations specifications do not require FAA flight routing authorization.

1.11.4 FAA routing authorizations will only be granted for IFR operations. VFR and DVFR flight operations are prohibited for any aircraft requiring an FAA routing authorization.

1.12 Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT) 1.12.1 During defense emergency or air defense emergency conditions, additional special security instructions may be issued in accordance with 32 CFR Part 245, Plan for the Emergency Security Control of Air Traffic (ESCAT).

1.12.2 Under the provisions of 32 CFR Part 245, the military will direct the action to be taken in regard to landing, grounding, diversion, or dispersal of aircraft in the defense of the U.S. during emergency conditions.

1.12.3 At the time a portion or all of ESCAT is implemented, ATC facilities will broadcast appropriate instructions received from the Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC) over available ATC frequencies. Depending on instructions received from the ATCSCC, VFR flights may be directed to land at the nearest available airport, and IFR flights will be expected to proceed as directed by ATC.

1.12.4 Pilots on the ground may be required to file a flight plan and obtain an approval (through FAA) prior to conducting flight operation.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2. Interception Procedures 2.1 General 2.1.1 In conjunction with the FAA, Air Defense Sectors monitor air traffic and could order an intercept in the interest of national security or defense. Intercepts during peacetime operations are vastly different from those conducted under increased states of readiness. The interceptors may be fighters or rotary wing aircraft. The reasons for aircraft intercept include, but are not limited to: 2.1.1.1 Identify an aircraft.

2.1.1.2 Track an aircraft.

2.1.1.3 Inspect an aircraft.

2.1.1.4 Divert an aircraft.

2.1.1.5 Establish communications with an aircraft.

2.1.2 All aircraft operating in US national airspace are highly encouraged to maintain a listening watch on VHF/UHF guard frequencies (121.5 or 243.0 MHz). If subjected to a military intercept, it is incumbent on civilian aviators to understand their responsibilities and to comply with ICAO standard signals relayed from the intercepting aircraft. Specifically, aviators are expected to contact air traffic control without delay (if able) on the local operating frequency or on VHF/UHF guard. Noncompliance may result in the use of force.

2.1.3 When specific information is required (i.e., markings, serial numbers, etc.) the interceptor pilot(s) will respond only if, in their judgment, the request can be conducted in a safe manner. Intercept procedures are described in some detail in the paragraphs below. In all situations, the interceptor pilot will consider safety of flight for all concerned throughout the intercept procedure. The interceptor pilot(s) will use caution to avoid startling the intercepted crew or passengers and understand that maneuvers considered normal for interceptor aircraft may be considered hazardous to other aircraft.

2.2 Fighter Intercept Phases (See FIG ENR 1.12 − 2 ) 2.2.1 Approach Phase 2.2.1.1 As standard procedure, intercepted aircraft are approached from behind. Typically, interceptor aircraft will be employed in pairs; however, it is not uncommon for a single aircraft to perform the intercept operation.

Safe separation between interceptors and intercepted aircraft is the responsibility of the intercepting aircraft and will be maintained at all times.

2.2.2 Identification Phase 2.2.2.1 Interceptor aircraft will initiate a controlled closure toward the aircraft of interest, holding at a distance no closer than deemed necessary to establish positive identification and to gather the necessary information. The interceptor may also fly past the intercepted aircraft while gathering data at a distance considered safe based on aircraft performance characteristics.

2.2.3 Post Intercept Phase 2.2.3.1 An interceptor may attempt to establish communications via standard ICAO signals. In time-critical situations where the interceptor is seeking an immediate response from the intercepted aircraft or if the intercepted aircraft remains non-compliant to instruction, the interceptor pilot may initiate a divert maneuver.

In this maneuver, the interceptor flies across the intercepted aircraft’s flight path (minimum 500 feet separation and commencing from slightly below the intercepted aircraft altitude) in the general direction the intercepted aircraft is expected to turn. The interceptor will rock its wings (daytime) or flash external lights/select afterburners (night) while crossing the intercepted aircraft’s flight path. The interceptor will roll out in the direction the intercepted aircraft is expected to turn before returning to verify the aircraft of interest is complying.

The intercepted aircraft is expected to execute an immediate turn to the direction of the intercepting aircraft. If the aircraft of interest does not comply, the interceptor may conduct a second climbing turn across the intercepted Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 aircraft’s flight path (minimum 500 feet separation and commencing from slightly below the intercepted aircraft altitude) while expending flares as a warning signal to the intercepted aircraft to comply immediately and to turn in the direction indicated and to leave the area. The interceptor is responsible to maintain safe separation during these and all intercept maneuvers. Flight safety is paramount.

NOTE − 1. NORAD interceptors will take every precaution to preclude the possibility of the intercepted aircraft experiencing jet wash/wake turbulence; however, there is a potential that this condition could be encountered.

2. During night/IMC, the intercept will be from below flight path.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.12 − 1 Air Defense Identification Zone Boundaries Designated Mountainous Areas � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.12 − 2 Intercept Procedures 2.3 Helicopter Intercept Phases (See FIG ENR 1.12 − 3 ) 2.3.1 Approach Phase 2.3.1.1 Aircraft intercepted by helicopter may be approached from any direction, although the helicopter should close for identification and signaling from behind. Generally, the helicopter will approach off the left side of the intercepted aircraft. Safe separation between the helicopter and the unidentified aircraft will be maintained at all times.

2.3.2 Identification Phase 2.3.2.1 The helicopter will initiate a controlled closure toward the aircraft of interest, holding at a distance no closer than deemed necessary to establish positive identification and gather the necessary information. The intercepted pilot should expect the interceptor helicopter to take a position off his left wing slightly forward of abeam.

2.3.3 Post Intercept Phase 2.3.3.1 Visual signaling devices may be used in an attempt to communicate with the intercepted aircraft. Visual signaling devices may include, but are not limited to, LED scrolling signboards or blue flashing lights. If compliance is not obtained through the use of radios or signaling devices, standard ICAO intercept signals ( TBL ENR 1.12 − 1 ) may be employed. In order to maintain safe aircraft separation, it is incumbent upon the pilot of the intercepted aircraft not to fall into a trail position (directly behind the helicopter) if instructed to follow the helicopter. This is because the helicopter pilot may lose visual contact with the intercepted aircraft.

NOTE − Intercepted aircraft must not follow directly behind the helicopter thereby allowing the helicopter pilot to maintain visual contact with the intercepted aircraft and ensuring safe separation is maintained.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.12 − 3 Helicopter Intercept Procedures 2.3.4 Summary of Intercepted Aircraft Actions 2.3.4.1 An intercepted aircraft must, without delay: a) Adhere to instructions relayed through the use of visual devices, visual signals, and radio communications from the intercepting aircraft.

b) Attempt to establish radio communications with the intercepting aircraft or with the appropriate air traffic control facility by making a general call on guard frequencies (121.5 or 243.0 MHz), giving the identity, position, and nature of the flight.

c) If transponder equipped, select Mode 3/A Code 7700 unless otherwise instructed by air traffic control.

NOTE − If instruction received from any agency conflicts with that given by the intercepting aircraft through visual or radio communications, the intercepted aircraft must seek immediate clarification.

d) Continue to comply with interceptor aircraft signals and instructions until positively released.

2.4 Interception Signals (See TBL ENR 1.12 − 1 and TBL ENR 1.12 − 2 ) 2.5 Visual Warning System (VWS) 2.5.1 The VWS signal consists of highly-focused red and green colored laser lights designed to illuminate in an alternating red and green signal pattern. These lasers may be directed at specific aircraft suspected of making unauthorized entry into the Washington, DC Special Flight Rules Area (DC SFRA) proceeding on a heading or flight path that may be interpreted as a threat or that operate contrary to the operating rules for the DC SFRA.

The beam is neither hazardous to the eyes of pilots/aircrew or passengers, regardless of altitude or distance from the source nor will the beam affect aircraft systems.

2.5.1.1 If you are communicating with ATC, and this signal is directed at your aircraft, you are required to contact ATC and advise that you are being illuminated by a visual warning system.

2.5.1.2 If this signal is directed at you, and you are not communicating with ATC, you are advised to turn to the most direct heading away from the center of the DC SFRA as soon as possible. Immediately contact ATC on an appropriate frequency, VHF Guard 121.5 or UHF Guard 243.0, and provide your aircraft identification, position, and nature of the flight. Failure to follow these procedures may result in interception by military aircraft. Further noncompliance with interceptor aircraft or ATC may result in the use of force.

2.5.1.3 Pilots planning to operate aircraft in or near the DC SFRA are to familiarize themselves with aircraft intercept procedures. This information applies to all aircraft operating within the DC SFRA including DOD, Law Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.12 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Enforcement, and aircraft engaged in aeromedical operations and does not change procedures established for reporting unauthorized laser illumination as published in FAA Advisory Circulars and Notices.

REFERENCE − CFR 91.161 2.5.1.4 More details including a video demonstration of the VWS are available from the following FAA website: www.faasafety.gov/VisualWarningSystem/VisualWarning.htm .

TBL ENR 1.12 − 1 Intercepting Signals INTERCEPTING SIGNALS Signals initiated by intercepting aircraft and responses by intercepted aircraft (as set forth in ICAO Annex 2-Appendix 1, 2.1) Series INTERCEPTING Aircraft Signals Meaning INTERCEPTED Aircraft Responds Meaning DAY − Rocking wings from a position You have AEROPLANES: Understood, slightly above and ahead of, and normally been DAY − Rocking wings and following. will comply.

to the left of, the intercepted aircraft and, intercepted.

after acknowledgement, a slow level turn, Follow me.

normally to the left, on to the desired heading.

NIGHT − Same and, in addition, flashing NIGHT-Same and, in addition, flashing navigational lights at irregular intervals.

navigational lights at irregular intervals.

NOTE 1 − Meteorological conditions or terrain may require the intercepting aircraft to take up a position slightly above and ahead of, and to the right of, the intercepted aircraft and to make the HELICOPTERS: subsequent turn to the right. DAY or NIGHT − Rocking aircraft, flashing navigational lights at irregular intervals and NOTE 2 − If the intercepted aircraft is not following.

able to keep pace with the intercepting aircraft, the latter is expected to fly a series of race − track patterns and to rock its wings each time it passes the intercepted aircraft.

DAY or NIGHT − An abrupt break − away You may AEROPLANES: Understood, maneuver from the intercepted aircraft proceed. DAY or NIGHT-Rocking wings. will comply.

consisting of a climbing turn of 90 degrees or more without crossing the line of flight HELICOPTERS: of the intercepted aircraft. DAY or NIGHT − Rocking aircraft.

3 DAY − Circling aerodrome, lowering Land at this AEROPLANES: Understood, landing gear and overflying runway in aerodrome. DAY − Lowering landing gear, following will comply.

direction of landing or, if the intercepted the intercepting aircraft and, if after aircraft is a helicopter, overflying the overflying the runway landing is consid - helicopter landing area. ered safe, proceeding to land.

NIGHT − Same and, in addition, showing NIGHT − Same and, in addition, showing steady landing lights (if carried).

steady landing lights.

HELICOPTERS: DAY or NIGHT-Following the intercepting aircraft and proceeding to land, showing a steady landing light (if carried).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.12 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 1.12 − 2 Intercepting Signals INTERCEPTING SIGNALS Signals and Responses During Aircraft Intercept Signals initiated by intercepted aircraft and responses by intercepting aircraft (as set forth in ICAO Annex 2-Appendix 1, 2.2) Series INTERCEPTED Aircraft Signals Meaning INTERCEPTING Aircraft Responds Meaning AEROPLANES: Aerodrome DAY or NIGHT − If it is desired that the Understood, DAY − Raising landing gear while passing you have intercepted aircraft follow the intercepting follow me.

over landing runway at a height exceeding designated is aircraft to an alternate aerodrome, the 300m (1,000 ft) but not exceeding 600m inadequate. intercepting aircraft raises its landing gear (2,000 ft) above the aerodrome level, and and uses the Series 1 signals prescribed for continuing to circle the intercepting aircraft.

aerodrome.

NIGHT − Flashing landing lights while If it is decided to release the intercepted Understood, passing over landing runway at a height aircraft, the intercepting aircraft uses the you may exceeding 300m (1,000 ft) but not Series 2 signals prescribed for intercepting proceed.

exceeding 600m (2,000 ft) above the aircraft.

aerodrome level, and continuing to circle the aerodrome. If unable to flash landing lights, flash any other lights available.

AEROPLANES: Cannot DAY or NIGHT-Use Series 2 signals Understood.

DAY or NIGHT − Regular switching on and comply. prescribed for intercepting aircraft.

off of all available lights but in such a manner as to be distinct from flashing lights.

AEROPLANES: In distress. DAY or NIGHT-Use Series 2 signals Understood.

DAY or NIGHT − Irregular flashing of all prescribed for intercepting aircraft.

available lights.

HELICOPTERS: DAY or NIGHT − Irregular flashing of all available lights.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.13 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.13 Unlawful Interference

1. Special Emergency (Air Piracy) 1.1 A special emergency is a condition of air piracy, or other hostile act by a person(s) aboard an aircraft, which threatens the safety of the aircraft or its passengers.

1.2 The pilot of an aircraft reporting a special emergency condition should: 1.2.1 If circumstances permit, apply distress or urgency radio − telephony procedures. Include the details of the special emergency.

1.2.2 If circumstances do not permit the use of prescribed distress or urgency procedures, transmit: 1.2.2.1 On the air − ground frequency in use at the time.

1.2.2.2 As many as possible of the following elements spoken distinctly and in the following order.

a) Name of the station addressed (time and circumstances permitting).

b) The identification of the aircraft and present position.

c) The nature of the special emergency condition and pilot intentions (circumstances permitting).

d) If unable to provide this information, use code words and/or transponder setting for indicated meanings as follows: Spoken Words TRANSPONDER SEVEN FIVE ZERO ZERO Meaning Am being hijacked/forced to a new destination Transponder Setting Mode 3/A, Code 7500 NOTE − Code 7500 will never be assigned by ATC without prior notification from the pilot that the aircraft is being subjected to unlawful interference. The pilot should refuse the assignment of this code in any other situation and inform the controller accordingly. Code 7500 will trigger the special emergency indicator in all radar ATC facilities.

1.3 Air traffic controllers will acknowledge and confirm receipt of transponder Code 7500 by asking the pilot to verify it. If the aircraft is not being subjected to unlawful interference, the pilot should respond to the query by broadcasting in the clear that the aircraft is not being subjected to unlawful interference. Upon receipt of this information, the controller will request the pilot to verify the code selection depicted in the code selector windows in the transponder control panel and change the code to the appropriate setting. If the pilot replies in the affirmative or does not reply, the controller will not ask further questions but will flight follow, respond to pilot requests, and notify appropriate authorities.

1.4 If it is possible to do so without jeopardizing the safety of the flight, the pilot of a hijacked U.S. passenger aircraft, after departing from the cleared routing over which the aircraft was operating, will attempt to do one or more of the following things insofar as circumstances may permit: 1.4.1 Maintain a true airspeed of no more than 400 knots and, preferably, an altitude of between 10,000 and 25,000 feet.

1.4.2 Fly a course toward the destination which the hijacker has announced.

1.5 If these procedures result in either radio contact or air intercept, the pilot will attempt to comply with any instructions received which may direct the aircraft to an appropriate landing field or alter the aircraft’s flight path off its current course, away from protected airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.14 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.14 Air Traffic Incidents

1. Aviation Safety Reporting Program 1.1 The FAA has established a voluntary program designed to stimulate the free and unrestricted flow of information concerning deficiencies and discrepancies in the aviation system. This is a positive program intended to ensure the safest possible system by identifying and correcting unsafe conditions before they lead to accidents. The primary objective of the program is to obtain information to evaluate and enhance the safety and efficiency of the present system.

1.2 This cooperative safety reporting program invites pilots, controllers, flight attendants, maintenance personnel and other users of the airspace system, or any other person, to file written reports of actual or potential discrepancies and deficiencies involving the safety of aviation operations. The operations covered by the program include departure, en route, approach, and landing operations and procedures, air traffic control procedures and equipment, crew and air traffic control communications, aircraft cabin operations, aircraft movement on the airport, near midair collisions, aircraft maintenance and record keeping, and airport conditions or services.

1.3 The report should give the date, time, location, persons and aircraft involved (if applicable), nature of the event, and all pertinent details.

1.4 To ensure receipt of this information, the program provides for the waiver of certain disciplinary actions against persons, including pilots and air traffic controllers, who file timely written reports concerning potentially unsafe incidents. To be considered timely, reports must be delivered or postmarked within 10 days of the incident unless that period is extended for good cause. Reports should be submitted on NASA ARC Forms 277, which are available free of charge, postage prepaid, at FAA Flight Standards District Offices and Flight Service Stations, and from NASA, ASRS, P.O. Box 189, Moffet Field, CA 94035.

1.5 The FAA utilizes NASA to act as an independent third party to receive and analyze reports submitted under the program. This program is described in Advisory Circular 00 − 46.

2. Aircraft Accident and Incident Reporting 2.1 Occurrences Requiring Notification 2.1.1 The operator of an aircraft must immediately, and by the most expeditious means available, notify the nearest National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Field Office when: 2.1.1.1 An aircraft accident or any of the following listed incidents occur: a) Flight control system malfunction or failure.

b) Inability of any required flight crewmember to perform normal flight duties as a result of injury or illness.

c) Failure of structural components of a turbine engine excluding compressor and turbine blades and vanes.

d) Inflight fire.

e) Aircraft collide in flight.

f) Damage to property, other than the aircraft, estimated to exceed $25,000 for repair (including materials and labor) or fair market value in the event of total loss, whichever is less.

g) For large multi − engine aircraft (more than 12,500 pounds maximum certificated takeoff weight): 1) Inflight failure of electrical systems which requires the sustained use of an emergency bus powered by a backup source such as a battery, auxiliary power unit, or air − driven generator to retain flight control or essential instruments.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.14 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2) Inflight failure of hydraulic systems that results in sustained reliance on the sole remaining hydraulic or mechanical system for movement of flight control surfaces.

3) Sustained loss of the power or thrust produced by two or more engines.

4) An evacuation of aircraft in which an emergency egress system is utilized.

2.1.1.2 An aircraft is overdue and is believed to have been involved in an accident.

2.2 Manner of Notification 2.2.1 The most expeditious method of notification to the NTSB by the operator will be determined by the circumstances existing at the time. The NTSB has advised that any of the following would be considered examples of the type of notification that would be acceptable: 2.2.1.1 Direct telephone notification.

2.2.1.2 Telegraphic notification.

2.2.1.3 Notification to the FAA who would in turn notify the NTSB by direct communication; i.e., dispatch or telephone.

2.3 Items to be Reported 2.3.1 The notification required above must contain the following information, if available: 2.3.1.1 Type, nationality, and registration marks of the aircraft.

2.3.1.2 Name of owner and operator of the aircraft.

2.3.1.3 Name of the pilot − in − command.

2.3.1.4 Date and time of the accident.

2.3.1.5 Last point of departure and point of intended landing of the aircraft.

2.3.1.6 Position of the aircraft with reference to some easily defined geographical point.

2.3.1.7 Number of persons aboard, number killed, and number seriously injured.

2.3.1.8 Nature of the accident or incident, the weather, and the extent of damage to the aircraft, so far as is known.

2.3.1.9 A description of any explosives, radioactive materials, or other dangerous articles carried.

2.4 Follow − up Reports 2.4.1 The operator must file a report on NTSB Form 6120.1 or 6120.2, available from the NTSB Field Offices, or the NTSB, Washington, D.C. 20594: 2.4.1.1 Within ten days after an accident.

2.4.1.2 When, after seven days, an overdue aircraft is still missing.

2.4.1.3 A report on an incident for which notification is required as described in paragraph 2.1 must be filed only as requested by an authorized representative of the NTSB.

2.4.2 Each crewmember, if physically able at the time the report is submitted, must attach a statement setting forth the facts, conditions and circumstances relating to the accident or occurrence as they appeared. If the crewmember is incapacitated, the statement must be submitted as soon as physically possible.

2.5 Where to File the Reports 2.5.1 The operator of an aircraft must file with the field office of the NTSB nearest the accident or incident any report required by this section.

2.5.2 The NTSB field offices are listed under U.S. Government in the telephone directories in the following cities: Anchorage, Alaska; Atlanta, Georgia; Chicago, Illinois; Denver, Colorado; Fort Worth, Texas; Los Angeles, California; Miami, Florida; Parsippany, New Jersey; and Seattle, Washington.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.14 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3. Near Midair Collision Reporting 3.1 Purpose and Data Uses. The primary purpose of the Near Midair Collision (NMAC) Reporting Program is to provide information for use in enhancing the safety and efficiency of the National Airspace System. Data obtained from NMAC reports are used by the FAA to improve the quality of FAA services to users and to develop programs, policies, and procedures aimed at the reduction of NMAC occurrences. All NMAC reports are thoroughly investigated by Flight Standards Facilities in coordination with Air Traffic Facilities. Data from these investigations are transmitted to FAA Headquarters in Washington, D.C., where they are compiled and analyzed, and where safety programs and recommendations are developed.

3.2 Definition. A near midair collision is defined as an incident associated with the operation of an aircraft in which a possibility of collision occurs as a result of proximity of less than 500 feet to another aircraft, or a report is received from a pilot or a flight crewmember stating that a collision hazard existed between two or more aircraft.

3.3 Reporting Responsibility. It is the responsibility of the pilot and/or flight crew to determine whether a near midair collision did actually occur and, if so, to initiate a NMAC report. Be specific, as ATC will not interpret a casual remark to mean that a NMAC is being reported. The pilot should state “I wish to report a near midair collision.” 3.4 Where to File Reports. Pilots and/or flight crew members involved in NMAC occurrences are urged to report each incident immediately: 3.4.1 By radio or telephone to the nearest FAA ATC facility or FSS.

3.4.2 In writing, in lieu of the above, to the nearest Flight Standards District Office (FSDO).

3.5 Items to be Reported 3.5.1 Date and time (UTC) of incident.

3.5.2 Location of incident and altitude.

3.5.3 Identification and type of reporting aircraft, aircrew destination, name and home base of pilot.

3.5.4 Identification and type of other aircraft, aircrew destination, name and home base of pilot.

3.5.5 Type of flight plans; station altimeter setting used.

3.5.6 Detailed weather conditions at altitude or flight level.

3.5.7 Approximate courses of both aircraft: indicate if one or both aircraft were climbing or descending.

3.5.8 Reported separation in distance at first sighting, proximity at closest point horizontally and vertically, length of time in sight prior to evasive action.

3.5.9 Degree of evasive action taken, if any (from both aircraft, if possible).

3.5.10 Injuries, if any.

3.6 Investigation. The FSDO in whose area the incident occurred is responsible for the investigation and reporting of NMACs.

3.7 Existing radar, communication, and weather data will be examined in the conduct of the investigation. When possible, all cockpit crew members will be interviewed regarding factors involving the NMAC incident. Air traffic controllers will be interviewed in cases where one or more of the involved aircraft was provided ATC service. Both flight and ATC procedures will be evaluated. When the investigation reveals a violation of an FAA regulation, enforcement action will be pursued.

4. Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Reports 4.1 Persons wanting to report UAP/unexplained phenomena activity should visit the All − Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) website at https://www.aaro.mil/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.14 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.2 If concern is expressed that life or property might be endangered by unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) activity, report the activity to the local law enforcement department.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.15 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 1.15 Medical Facts for Pilots

1. Fitness for Flight 1.1 Medical Certification 1.1.1 All pilots except those flying gliders and free air balloons must possess valid medical certificates in order to exercise the privileges of their airman certificates. The periodic medical examinations required for medical certification are conducted by designated Aviation Medical Examiners, who are physicians with a special interest in aviation safety and training in aviation medicine.

1.1.2 The standards for medical certification are contained the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 67).

Pilots who have a history of certain medical conditions described in these standards are mandatorily disqualified from flying. These medical conditions include a personality disorder manifested by overt acts, a psychosis, alcoholism, drug dependence, epilepsy, an unexplained disturbance of consciousness, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and diabetes requiring medication for its control. Other medical conditions may be temporarily disqualifying, such as acute infections, anemia, and peptic ulcer. Pilots who do not meet medical standards may still be qualified under special issuance provisions or the exemption process. This may require that either additional medical information be provided or practical flight tests be conducted.

1.1.3 Student pilots should visit an aviation medical examiner as soon as possible in their flight training in order to avoid unnecessary training expenses should they not meet the medical standards. For the same reason, the student pilot who plans to enter commercial aviation should apply for the highest class of medical certificate that might be necessary in the pilot’s career.

CAUTION − The Federal Aviation Regulations prohibit a pilot who possesses a current medical certificate from performing crewmember duties while the pilot has a known medical condition or increase of a known medical condition that would make the pilot unable to meet the standards for the medical certificate.

1.2 Illness 1.2.1 Even a minor illness suffered in day − to − day living can seriously degrade performance of many piloting tasks vital to safe fight. Illness can produce fever and distracting symptoms that can impair judgment, memory, alertness, and the ability to make calculations. Although symptoms from an illness may be under adequate control with a medication, the medication itself may decrease pilot performance.

1.2.2 The safest rule is not to fly while suffering from any illness. If this rule is considered too stringent for a particular illness, the pilot should contact an aviation medical examiner for advice.

1.3 Medication 1.3.1 Pilot performance can be seriously degraded by both prescribed and over − the − counter medications, as well as by the medical conditions for which they are taken. Many medications, such as tranquilizers, sedatives, strong pain relievers, and cough − suppressant preparations, have primary effects that may impair judgment, memory, alertness, coordination, vision, and the ability to make calculations. Others, such as antihistamines, blood pressure drugs, muscle relaxants, and agents to control diarrhea and motion sickness, have side effects that may impair the same critical functions. Any medication that depresses the nervous system, such as a sedative, tranquilizer, or antihistamine, can make a pilot much susceptible to hypoxia (see below).

1.3.2 The Federal Aviation Regulations prohibit pilots from performing crewmember duties while using any medication that affects the faculties in any way contrary to safety. The safest rule is not to fly as a crewmember while taking any medication, unless approved to do so by the FAA.

1.4 Alcohol 1.4.1 Extensive research has provided a number of facts about the hazards of alcohol consumption and flying.

As little as one ounce of liquor, one bottle of beer, or four ounces of wine can impair flying skills, with the alcohol Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.15 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 consumed in these drinks being detectable in the breath and blood at least three hours. Even after the body completely destroys a moderate amount of alcohol, a pilot can still be severely impaired for many hours by hangover. There is simply no way of increasing the destruction of alcohol or alleviating a hangover. Alcohol also renders a pilot much more susceptible to disorientation and hypoxia (see below).

1.4.2 A consistently high alcohol − related, fatal aircraft accident rate serves to emphasize that alcohol and flying are a potentially lethal combination. The Federal Aviation Regulations prohibit pilots from performing crewmember duties within eight hours after drinking any alcoholic beverage or while under the influence of alcohol. However, due to the slow destruction of alcohol, a pilot may still be under the influence eight hours after drinking a moderate amount of alcohol. Therefore, an excellent rule is to allow at least 12 to 24 hours between “bottle and throttle” depending on the amount of alcoholic beverage consumed.

1.5 Fatigue 1.5.1 Fatigue continues to be one of the most treacherous hazards to flight safety, as it may not be apparent to a pilot until serious errors are made. Fatigue is best described as either acute (short − term) or chronic (long − term).

1.5.2 A normal occurrence of everyday living, acute fatigue is the tiredness felt after long periods of physical and mental strain, including strenuous muscular effort, immobility, heavy mental workload, strong emotional pressure, monotony, and lack of sleep. Consequently, coordination and alertness, so vital to safe pilot performance, can be reduced. Acute fatigue is prevented by adequate rest and sleep, as well as regular exercise and proper nutrition.

1.5.3 Chronic fatigue occurs when there is not enough time for full recovery between episodes of acute fatigue.

Performance continues to fall off, and judgment becomes impaired so that unwarranted risks may be taken.

Recovery from chronic fatigue requires a prolonged period of rest.

1.5.4 OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (OSA). OSA is now recognized as an important preventable factor identified in transportation accidents. OSA interrupts the normal restorative sleep necessary for normal functioning and is associated with chronic illnesses such as hypertension, heart attack, stroke, obesity, and diabetes. Symptoms include snoring, excessive daytime sleepiness, intermittent prolonged breathing pauses while sleeping, memory impairment and lack of concentration. There are many available treatments which can reverse the day time symptoms and reduce the chance of an accident. OSA can be easily treated. Most treatments are acceptable for medical certification upon demonstrating effective treatment. If you have any symptoms described above, or neck size over 17 inches in men or 16 inches in women, or a body mass index greater than 30 you should be evaluated for sleep apnea by a sleep medicine specialist.

( https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/english_bmi_calculator/bmi_calculator.html ) With treatment you can avoid or delay the onset of these chronic illnesses and prolong a quality life.

1.6 Stress 1.6.1 Stress from the pressures of everyday living can impair pilot performance, often in very subtle ways.

Difficulties, particularly at work, can occupy thought processes enough to markedly decrease alertness.

Distraction can so interfere with judgment that unwarranted risks are taken, such as flying into deteriorating weather conditions to keep on schedule. Stress and fatigue (see above) can be an extremely hazardous combination.

1.6.2 Most pilots do leave stress “on the ground.” Therefore when more than usual difficulties are being experienced, a pilot should consider delaying flight until these difficulties are satisfactorily resolved.

1.7 Emotion 1.7.1 Certain emotionally upsetting events, including a serious argument, death of a family member, separation or divorce, loss of job, and financial catastrophe, can render a pilot unable to fly an aircraft safely. The emotions of anger, depression, and anxiety from such events not only decrease alertness but also may lead to taking risks that border on self − destruction. Any pilot who experiences an emotionally upsetting event should not fly until satisfactorily recovered from it.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.15 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.8 Personal Checklist 1.8.1 Aircraft accident statistics show that pilots should be conducting preflight checklists on themselves as well as their aircraft, for pilot impairment contributes to many more accidents than failure of aircraft systems. A personal checklist that can be easily committed to memory, which includes all of the categories of pilot impairment discussed in this section, is distributed by the FAA in form of a wallet − sized card.

1.9 PERSONAL CHECKLIST. I’m physically and mentally safe to fly; not being impaired by:

I llness

M edication

S tress

A lcohol

F atigue

E motion

2. Effects of Altitude 2.1 Hypoxia 2.1.1 Hypoxia is a state of oxygen deficiency in the body sufficient to impair functions of the brain and other organs. Hypoxia from exposure to altitude is due only to the reduced barometric pressures encountered at altitude, for the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere remains about 21 percent from the ground out to space.

2.1.2 Although a deterioration in night vision occurs at a cabin pressure altitude as low as 5,000 feet, other significant effects of altitude hypoxia usually do not occur in the normal healthy pilot below 12,000 feet. From 12,000 to 15,000 feet of altitude, judgment, memory, alertness, coordination and ability to make calculations are impaired. Headache, drowsiness, dizziness and either a sense of well − being (euphoria) or belligerence occur. The effects appear following increasingly shorter periods of exposure to increasing altitude. In fact, pilot performance can seriously deteriorate within 15 minutes at 15,000 feet.

2.1.3 At cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet, the periphery of the visual field grays out to a point where only central vision remains (tunnel vision). A blue coloration (cyanosis) of the fingernails and lips develops. The ability to take corrective and protective action is lost in 20 to 30 minutes at 18,000 feet and 5 to 12 minutes at 20,000 feet, followed soon thereafter by unconsciousness.

2.1.4 The altitude at which significant effects of hypoxia occur can be lowered by a number of factors. Carbon monoxide inhaled in smoking or from exhaust fumes (see below), lowered hemoglobin (anemia), and certain medications can reduce the oxygen − carrying capacity of the blood to the degree that the amount of oxygen provided to body tissues will already be equivalent to the oxygen provided to the tissues when exposed to cabin pressure altitude of several thousand feet. Small amounts of alcohol and low doses of certain drugs, such as antihistamines, tranquilizers, sedatives, and analgesics can, through their depressant actions, render the brain much more susceptible to hypoxia. Extreme heat and cold, fever, and anxiety increase the body’s demand for oxygen, and hence its susceptibility to hypoxia.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.15 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.1.5 The effects of hypoxia are usually quite difficult to recognize, especially when they occur gradually. Since symptoms of hypoxia do not vary in an individual, the ability to recognize hypoxia can be greatly improved by experiencing and witnessing the effects of hypoxia during an altitude chamber “flight.” The FAA provides this opportunity through aviation physiology training, which is conducted at the FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute and at many military facilities across the U.S. To attend the Physiological Training Program at the Civil Aeromedical Institute, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, contact by telephone (405) 954 − 6212, or by writing Aerospace Medical Education Division, AAM − 400, CAMI, Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125.

NOTE − To attend the physiological training program at one of the military installations having the training capability, an application form and a fee must be submitted. Full particulars about location, fees, scheduling procedures, course content, individual requirements, etc., are contained in the physiological training application, Form Number AC − 3150 − 7, which is obtained by contacting the Accident Prevention Specialist or the Office Forms Manager in the nearest FAA office.

2.1.6 Hypoxia is prevented by heeding factors that reduce tolerance to altitude, by enriching the inspired air with oxygen from an appropriate oxygen system and by maintaining a comfortable, safe cabin pressure altitude. For optimum protection, pilots are encouraged to use supplemental oxygen above 10,000 feet during the day, and above 5,000 feet at night. The Federal Aviation Regulations require that the minimum flight crew be provided with and use supplemental oxygen after 30 minutes of exposure to cabin pressure altitudes between 12,500 and 14,000 feet, and immediately on exposure to cabin pressure altitudes above 14,000. Every occupant of the aircraft must be provided with supplemental oxygen at cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet.

2.2 Ear Block 2.2.1 As the aircraft cabin pressure decreases during ascent, the expanding air in the middle ear pushes the eustachian tube open and, by escaping down it to the nasal passages, equalizes in pressure with the cabin pressure.

But during descent, the pilot must periodically open the eustachian tube to equalize pressure. This can be accomplished by swallowing, yawning, tensing muscles in the throat or, if these do not work, by the combination of closing the mouth, pinching the nose closed and attempting to blow through the nostrils (Valsalva maneuver).

2.2.2 Either an upper respiratory infection, such as a cold or sore throat, or a nasal allergic condition can produce enough congestion around the eustachian tube to make equalization difficult. Consequently, the difference in pressure between the middle ear and aircraft cabin can build up to a level that will hold the eustachian tube closed, making equalization difficult if not impossible. This problem is commonly referred to as an “ear block.” 2.2.3 An ear block produces severe ear pain and loss of hearing that can last from several hours to several days.

Rupture of the ear drum can occur in flight or after landing. Fluid can accumulate in the middle ear and become infected.

2.2.4 An ear block is prevented by not flying with an upper respiratory infection or nasal allergic condition.

Adequate protection is usually not provided by decongestant sprays or drops to reduce congestion around the eustachian tubes. Oral decongestants have side effects that can significantly impair pilot performance.

2.2.5 If an ear block does not clear shortly after landing, a physician should be consulted.

2.3 Sinus Block 2.3.1 During ascent and descent, air pressure in the sinuses equalizes with the aircraft cabin pressure through small openings that connect the sinuses to the nasal passages. Either an upper respiratory infection, such as a cold or sinusitis, or a nasal allergic condition can produce enough congestion around an opening to slow equalization and, as the difference in pressure between the sinus and cabin mounts, eventually plug the opening. This “sinus block” occurs most frequently during descent.

2.3.2 A sinus block can occur in the frontal sinuses, located above each eyebrow, or in the maxillary sinuses, located in each upper cheek. It will usually produce excruciating pain over the sinus area. A maxillary sinus block can also make the upper teeth ache. Bloody mucus may discharge from the nasal passages.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.15 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.3.3 A sinus block is prevented by not flying with an upper respiratory infection or nasal allergic condition.

Adequate protection is usually not provided by decongestant sprays or drops to reduce congestion around the sinus openings. Oral decongestants have side effects that can impair pilot performance.

2.3.4 If a sinus block does not clear shortly after landing, a physician should be consulted.

2.4 Decompression Sickness After Scuba Diving 2.4.1 A pilot or passenger who intends to fly after scuba diving should allow the body sufficient time to rid itself of excess nitrogen absorbed during diving. If not, altitude decompression sickness due to evolved nitrogen gas can occur during exposure to reduced barometric pressure (i.e., low cabin pressure) associated with increased altitude and may lead to a serious inflight emergency.

2.4.2 The recommended wait time before going to flight altitudes up to 8,000 feet is at least 12 hours after diving that did not require a controlled ascent (i.e., non − decompression stop diving), and at least 24 hours after diving that required a controlled ascent (i.e., decompression stop diving). The recommended wait time before going to flight altitudes above 8,000 feet is at least 24 hours after any SCUBA dive. These altitudes are actual flight altitudes above mean sea level (AMSL) and not pressurized cabin altitudes. This takes into consideration the risk of aircraft decompression during flight.

3. Hyperventilation in Flight 3.1 Hyperventilation, or an abnormal increase in the volume of air breathed in and out of the lungs, can occur subconsciously when a stressed situation is encountered in flight. As hyperventilation “blows off” excessive carbon dioxide from the body, a pilot can experience symptoms of lightheadedness, suffocation, drowsiness, tingling in the extremities, and coolness − and react to them with even greater hyperventilation. Incapacitation can eventually result from incoordination, disorientation, and painful muscle spasms. Finally, unconsciousness can occur.

3.2 The symptoms of hyperventilation subside within a few minutes after the rate and depth of breathing are consciously brought back under control. The buildup of carbon dioxide in the body can be hastened by controlled breathing in and out of a paper bag held over the nose and mouth.

3.3 Early symptoms of hyperventilation and hypoxia are similar. Moreover, hyperventilation and hypoxia can occur at the same time. Therefore, if a pilot is using an oxygen system when symptoms are experienced, the oxygen regulator should immediately be set to deliver 100 percent oxygen, and then the system checked to assure that it has been functioning effectively before giving attention to rate and depth of breathing.

4. Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Flight 4.1 Carbon monoxide is a colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas contained in exhaust fumes. When breathed even in minute quantities over a period of time, it can significantly reduce the ability of the blood to carry oxygen.

Consequently, effects of hypoxia occur (see subparagraph 2.1 ).

4.2 Most heaters in light aircraft work by air flowing over the manifold. Use of these heaters while exhaust fumes are escaping through manifold cracks and seals is responsible every year for several nonfatal and fatal aircraft accidents from carbon monoxide poisoning.

4.3 A pilot who detects the odor of exhaust or experiences symptoms of headache, drowsiness, or dizziness while using the heater should suspect carbon monoxide poisoning, and immediately shut off the heater and open air vents. If symptoms are severe, or continue after landing, medical treatment should be sought.

5. Illusions in Flight 5.1 Introduction. Many different illusions can be experienced in flight. Some can lead to spatial disorientation.

Others can lead to landing errors. Illusions rank among the most common factors cited as contributing to fatal aircraft accidents.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.15 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.2 Illusions Leading to Spatial Disorientation 5.2.1 Various complex motions and forces and certain visual scenes encountered in flight can create illusions of motion and position. Spatial disorientation from these illusions can be prevented only by visual reference to reliable, fixed points on the ground or to flight instruments.

5.2.2 The Leans. An abrupt correction of a banked attitude, which has been entered too slowly to stimulate the motion sensing system in the inner ear, can create the illusion of banking in the opposite direction. The disoriented pilot will roll the aircraft back into its original dangerous attitude or, if level flight is maintained, will feel compelled to lean in the perceived vertical plane until this illusion subsides.

5.2.3 Coriolis Illusion. An abrupt head movement in a prolonged constant − rate turn that has ceased stimulating the motion sensing system can create the illusion of rotation or movement in an entirely different axis. The disoriented pilot will maneuver the aircraft into a dangerous attitude in an attempt to stop rotation. This most overwhelming of all illusions in flight may be prevented by not making sudden, extreme head movements, particularly while making prolonged constant − rate turns under IFR conditions.

5.2.4 Graveyard Spin. A proper recovery from a spin that has ceased stimulating the motion sensing system can create the illusion of spinning in the opposite direction. The disoriented pilot will return the aircraft to its original spin.

5.2.5 Graveyard Spiral. An observed loss of altitude during a coordinated constant − rate turn that has ceased stimulating the motion sensing system can create the illusion of being in a descent with the wings level. The disoriented pilot will pull back on the controls, tightening the spiral and increasing the loss of altitude.

5.2.6 Somatogravic Illusion. A rapid acceleration during takeoff can create the illusion of being in a nose − up attitude. The disoriented pilot will push the aircraft into a nose − low, or dive attitude. A rapid deceleration by a quick reduction of the throttles can have the opposite effect, with the disoriented pilot pulling the aircraft into a nose − up, or stall attitude.

5.2.7 Inversion Illusion. An abrupt change from climb to straight and level flight can create the illusion of tumbling backwards. The disoriented pilot will push the aircraft abruptly into a nose − low attitude, possibly intensifying this illusion.

5.2.8 Elevator Illusion. An abrupt upward vertical acceleration, usually by an updraft, can create the illusion of being in a climb. The disoriented pilot will push the aircraft into a nose − low attitude. An abrupt downward vertical acceleration, usually by a downdraft, has the opposite effect, with the disoriented pilot pulling the aircraft into a nose − up attitude.

5.2.9 False Horizon. Sloping cloud formations, an obscured horizon, a dark scene spread with ground lights and stars, and certain geometric patterns of ground lights can create illusions of not being aligned correctly with the actual horizon. The disoriented pilot will place the aircraft in a dangerous attitude.

5.2.10 Autokinesis. In the dark, a static light will appear to move about when stared at for many seconds. The disoriented pilot will lose control of the aircraft in attempting to align it with the light.

5.3 Illusions Leading to Landing Errors 5.3.1 Various surface features and atmospheric conditions encountered in landing can create illusions of incorrect height above and distance from the runway threshold. Landing errors from these illusions can be prevented by anticipating them during approaches, aerial visual inspection of unfamiliar airports before landing, using electronic glide slope or VASI systems when available, and maintaining optimum proficiency in landing procedures.

5.3.2 Runway Width Illusion. A narrower − than − usual runway can create the illusion that the aircraft is at a higher altitude than it actually is. The pilot who does not recognize this illusion will fly a lower approach, with the risk of striking objects along the approach path or landing short. A wider − than − usual runway can have the opposite effect, with the risk of leveling out high and landing hard or overshooting the runway.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.15 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.3.3 Runway and Terrain Slopes Illusion. An upsloping runway, upsloping terrain, or both, can create the illusion that the aircraft is at a higher altitude than it actually is. The pilot who does not recognize this illusion will fly a lower approach. A downsloping runway, downsloping approach terrain, or both, can have the opposite effect.

5.3.4 Featureless Terrain Illusion. An absence of ground features, as when landing over water, darkened areas, and terrain made featureless by snow, can create the illusion that the aircraft is at a higher altitude than it actually is. The pilot who does not recognize this illusion will fly a lower approach.

5.3.5 Atmospheric Illusions. Rain on the windscreen can create the illusion of greater height, and atmospheric haze can create the illusion of being at greater distance from the runway. The pilot who does not recognize these illusions will fly a lower approach. Penetration of fog can create the illusion of pitching up. The pilot who does not recognize this illusion will steepen the approach, often quite abruptly.

5.3.6 Ground Lighting Illusions. Lights along a straight path, such as a road, and even lights on moving trains can be mistaken for runway and approach lights. Bright runway and approach lighting systems, especially where few lights illuminate the surrounding terrain, may create the illusion of less distance to the runway. The pilot who does not recognize this illusion will fly a higher approach. Conversely, the pilot overflying terrain which has few lights to provide height cues may make lower than normal approach.

6. Vision in Flight 6.1 Introduction. Of the body senses, vision is the most important for safe flight. Major factors that determine how effectively vision can be used are the level of illumination and the technique of scanning the sky for other aircraft.

6.2 Vision Under Dim and Bright Illumination 6.2.1 Under conditions of dim illumination, small print and colors on aeronautical charts and aircraft instruments become unreadable unless adequate cockpit lighting is available. Moreover, another aircraft must be much closer to be seen unless its navigation lights are on.

6.2.2 In darkness, vision becomes more sensitive to light, a process called dark adaptation. Although exposure to total darkness for at least 30 minutes is required for complete dark adaptation, the pilot can achieve a moderate degree of dark adaptation within 20 minutes under dim red cockpit lighting. Since red light severely distorts colors, especially on aeronautical charts, and can cause serious difficulty in focusing the eyes on objects inside the aircraft, its use is advisable only where optimum outside night vision capability is necessary. Even so, white cockpit lighting must be available when needed for map and instrument reading, especially under IFR conditions.

Dark adaptation is impaired by exposure to cabin pressure altitude above 5,000 feet, carbon monoxide inhaled in smoking and from exhaust fumes, deficiency of Vitamin A in the diet, and by prolonged exposure to bright sunlight. Since any degree of dark adaptation is lost within a few seconds of viewing a bright light, the pilot should close one eye when using a light to preserve some degree of night vision.

6.2.3 Excessive illumination, especially from light reflected off the canopy, surfaces inside the aircraft, clouds, water, snow, and desert terrain, can produce glare, with uncomfortable squinting, watering of the eyes, and even temporary blindness. Sunglasses for protection from glare should absorb at least 85 percent of visible light (15 percent transmittance) and all colors equally (neutral transmittance), with negligible image distortion from refractive and prismatic errors.

6.3 Scanning for Other Aircraft 6.3.1 Scanning the sky for other aircraft is a key factor in collision avoidance. It should be used continuously by the pilot and copilot (or right seat passenger) to cover all areas of the sky visible from the cockpit. Although pilots must meet specific visual acuity requirements, the ability to read an eye chart does not ensure that one will be able to efficiently spot other aircraft. Pilots must develop an effective scanning technique which maximizes one’s visual capabilities. The probability of spotting a potential collision threat obviously increases with the time spent looking outside the cockpit. Thus, one must use timesharing techniques to efficiently scan the surrounding airspace while monitoring instruments as well.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.15 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.3.2 While the eyes can observe an approximate 200 degree arc of the horizon at one glance, only a very small center area called the fovea, in the rear of the eye, has the ability to send clear, sharply focused messages to the brain. All other visual information that is not processed directly through the fovea will be of less detail. An aircraft at a distance of 7 miles which appears in sharp focus within the foveal center of vision would have to be as close as 7/10 of a mile in order to be recognized if it were outside of foveal vision. Because the eyes can focus only on this narrow viewing area, effective scanning is accomplished with a series of short, regularly spaced eye movements that bring successive areas of the sky into the central visual field. Each movement should not exceed 10 degrees, and each area should be observed for at least one second to enable detection. Although horizontal back − and − forth eye movements seem preferred by most pilots, each pilot should develop a scanning pattern that is most comfortable and then adhere to it to assure optimum scanning.

6.3.3 Studies show that the time a pilot spends on visual tasks inside the cabin should represent no more than 1 1 / to / of the scan time outside, or no more than 4 to 5 seconds on the instrument panel for every 16 seconds 4 3 outside. Since the brain is already trained to process sight information that is presented from left to right, one may find it easier to start scanning over the left shoulder and proceed across the windshield to the right.

6.3.4 Pilots should realize that their eyes may require several seconds to refocus when switching views between items in the cockpit and distant objects. The eyes will also tire more quickly when forced to adjust to distances immediately after close − up focus, as required for scanning the instrument panel. Eye fatigue can be reduced by looking from the instrument panel to the left wing past the wing tip to the center of the first scan quadrant when beginning the exterior scan. After having scanned from left to right, allow the eyes to return to the cabin along the right wing from its tip inward. Once back inside, one should automatically commence the panel scan.

6.3.5 Effective scanning also helps avoid “empty − field myopia.” This condition usually occurs when flying above the clouds or in a haze layer that provides nothing specific to focus on outside the aircraft. This causes the eyes to relax and seek a comfortable focal distance which may range from 10 to 30 feet. For the pilot, this means looking without seeing, which is dangerous.

7. Judgment Aspects of Collision Avoidance 7.1 Introduction. The most important aspects of vision and the techniques to scan for other aircraft are described in paragraph 6. above. Pilots should also be familiar with the following information to reduce the possibility of mid − air collisions.

7.2 Determining Relative Altitude. Use the horizon as a reference point. If the other aircraft is above the horizon, it is probably on a higher flight path. If the aircraft appears to be below the horizon, it is probably flying at a lower altitude.

7.3 Taking Appropriate Action. Pilots should be familiar with right − of − way rules so immediate evasive action can be taken if an aircraft is on an obvious collision course. Preferably, such actions will be in compliance with applicable Federal Aviation Regulations.

7.4 Consider Multiple Threats. The decision to climb, descend, or turn is a matter of personal judgment, but one should anticipate that the other pilot may also be making a quick maneuver. Watch the other aircraft during the maneuver and immediately begin your scanning again since there may be other aircraft in the area.

7.5 Target Acquisition. Anticipate the target in the location and ranges you are searching. Locate a sizable, distant object (e.g., a cloud formation, mountain peak, prominent landmark, building or pier) that is within range of the anticipated target, and focus your eyes on it as you begin each scan pattern.

7.6 Collision Course Targets. Any aircraft that appears to have no relative motion and stays in one scan quadrant is likely to be on a collision course. Also, if a target shows no lateral or vertical motion, but increases in size,TAKE EVASIVE ACTION.

7.7 Recognize High Hazard Areas 7.7.1 Airways, and especially VORs, and Class B, C, D, and E surface areas are places where aircraft tend to cluster.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.15 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.7.2 Remember, most collisions occur during days when the weather is good. Being in a “radar environment” still requires vigilance to avoid collisions.

7.8 Cockpit Management. Studying maps, checklists, and manuals before flight, with various other proper preflight planning (e.g., noting necessary radio frequencies), and organizing cockpit materials can reduce the amount of time required to look at these items during flight permitting more scan time.

7.9 Windshield Conditions. Dirty or bug − smeared windshields can greatly reduce the ability of pilots to see other aircraft. Keep a clean windshield.

7.10 Visibility Conditions. Smoke, haze, dust, rain, and flying towards the sun can also greatly reduce the ability to detect targets.

7.11 Visual Obstruction in the Cockpit 7.11.1 Pilots need to move their heads to see around blind spots caused by fixed aircraft structures, such as door posts, wings, etc. It will be necessary at times to maneuver the aircraft (e.g., lift a wing) to facilitate seeing around this structure.

7.11.2 Pilots must insure that curtains and other cockpit objects (e.g., maps on glare shield) are removed and stowed during flight.

7.12 Lights On 7.12.1 Day or night, use of exterior lights can greatly increase the conspicuity of any aircraft.

7.12.2 Keep interior lights low at night.

7.13 ATC Support. ATC facilities often provide radar traffic advisories on a workload − permitting basis. Flight through Class C Airspace requires communication with ATC. Use this support whenever possible or when required.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

1. General 1.1 Introduction to PBN. As air travel has evolved, methods of navigation have improved to give operators more flexibility. PBN exists under the umbrella of area navigation (RNAV). The term RNAV in this context, as in procedure titles, just means “area navigation,” regardless of the equipment capability of the aircraft. (See FIG ENR 1.16 − 1 .) Many operators have upgraded their systems to obtain the benefits of PBN. Within PBN there are two main categories of navigation methods or specifications: area navigation (RNAV) and required navigation performance (RNP). In this context, the term RNAV x means a specific navigation specification with a specified lateral accuracy value. For an aircraft to meet the requirements of PBN, a specified RNAV or RNP accuracy must be met 95 percent of the flight time. RNP is a PBN system that includes onboard performance monitoring and alerting capability (for example, Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM)). PBN also introduces the concept of navigation specifications (NavSpecs) which are a set of aircraft and aircrew requirements needed to support a navigation application within a defined airspace concept. For both RNP and RNAV NavSpecs, the numerical designation refers to the lateral navigation accuracy in nautical miles which is expected to be achieved at least 95 percent of the flight time by the population of aircraft operating within the airspace, route, or procedure. This information is detailed in International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) Doc 9613, Performance − based Navigation (PBN) Manual and the latest FAA AC 90 − 105, Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical Navigation in the U.S. National Airspace System and in Remote and Oceanic Airspace.

FIG ENR 1.16 − 1 Navigation Specifications 1.2 Area Navigation (RNAV) 1.2.1 General. RNAV is a method of navigation that permits aircraft operation on any desired flight path within the coverage of ground − or space − based navigation aids or within the limits of the capability of self − contained aids, or a combination of these. In the future, there will be an increased dependence on the use of RNAV in lieu of routes defined by ground − based navigation aids. RNAV routes and terminal procedures, including departure procedures (DPs) and standard terminal arrivals (STAR), are designed with RNAV systems in mind. There are several potential advantages of RNAV routes and procedures: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.2.1.1 Time and fuel savings; 1.2.1.2 Reduced dependence on radar vectoring, altitude, and speed assignments allowing a reduction in required ATC radio transmissions; and 1.2.1.3 More efficient use of airspace.

In addition to information found in this manual, guidance for domestic RNAV DPs, STARs, and routes may also be found in Advisory Circular 90 − 100, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations.

1.2.2 RNAV Operations. RNAV procedures, such as DPs and STARs, demand strict pilot awareness and maintenance of the procedure centerline. Pilots should possess a working knowledge of their aircraft navigation system to ensure RNAV procedures are flown in an appropriate manner. In addition, pilots should have an understanding of the various waypoint and leg types used in RNAV procedures; these are discussed in more detail below.

1.2.2.1 Waypoints. A waypoint is a predetermined geographical position that is defined in terms of latitude/longitude coordinates. Waypoints may be a simple named point in space or associated with existing navaids, intersections, or fixes. A waypoint is most often used to indicate a change in direction, speed, or altitude along the desired path. RNAV procedures make use of both fly − over and fly − by waypoints.

a) Fly − by waypoints. Fly − by waypoints are used when an aircraft should begin a turn to the next course prior to reaching the waypoint separating the two route segments. This is known as turn anticipation.

b) Fly − over waypoints. Fly − over waypoints are used when the aircraft must fly over the point prior to starting a turn.

NOTE − FIG ENR 1.16 − 2 illustrates several differences between a fly − by and a fly − over waypoint.

FIG ENR 1.16 − 2 Fly − by and Fly − over Waypoints 1.2.2.2 RNAV Leg Types. A leg type describes the desired path proceeding, following, or between waypoints on an RNAV procedure. Leg types are identified by a two − letter code that describes the path (e.g., heading, course, track, etc.) and the termination point (e.g., the path terminates at an altitude, distance, fix, etc.). Leg types used for procedure design are included in the aircraft navigation database, but not normally provided on the procedure chart. The narrative depiction of the RNAV chart describes how a procedure is flown. The “path and terminator concept” defines that every leg of a procedure has a termination point and some kind of path into that termination point. Some of the available leg types are described below.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.16 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 a) Track to Fix. A Track to Fix (TF) leg is intercepted and acquired as the flight track to the following waypoint. Track to a Fix legs are sometimes called point − to − point legs for this reason. Narrative: “direct ALPHA, then on course to BRAVO WP.” See FIG ENR 1.16 − 3 .

b) Direct to Fix. A Direct to Fix (DF) leg is a path described by an aircraft’s track from an initial area direct to the next waypoint. Narrative: “turn right direct BRAVO WP.” See FIG ENR 1.16 − 4 .

FIG ENR 1.16 − 3 Track to Fix Leg Type FIG ENR 1.16 − 4 Direct to Fix Leg Type c) Course to Fix. A Course to Fix (CF) leg is a path that terminates at a fix with a specified course at that fix.

Narrative: “on course 150 to ALPHA WP.” See FIG ENR 1.16 − 5 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 1.16 − 5 Course to Fix Leg Type d) Radius to Fix . A Radius to Fix (RF) leg is defined as a constant radius circular path around a defined turn center that terminates at a fix. See FIG ENR 1.16 − 6 .

FIG ENR 1.16 − 6 Radius to Fix Leg Type e) Heading. A Heading leg may be defined as, but not limited to, a Heading to Altitude (VA), Heading to DME range (VD), and Heading to Manual Termination, i.e., Vector (VM). Narrative: “climb heading 350 to 1500”, “heading 265, at 9 DME west of PXR VORTAC, right turn heading 360”, “fly heading 090, expect radar vectors to DRYHT INT.” 1.2.2.3 Navigation Issues. Pilots should be aware of their navigation system inputs, alerts, and annunciations in order to make better − informed decisions. In addition, the availability and suitability of particular sensors/systems should be considered.

a) GPS/WAAS. Operators using TSO − C129(), TSO − C196(), TSO − C145() or TSO − C146() systems should ensure departure and arrival airports are entered to ensure proper RAIM availability and CDI sensitivity.

b) DME/DME. Operators should be aware that DME/DME position updating is dependent on navigation system logic and DME facility proximity, availability, geometry, and signal masking.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.16 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 c) VOR/DME. Unique VOR characteristics may result in less accurate values from VOR/DME position updating than from GPS or DME/DME position updating.

d) Inertial Navigation. Inertial reference units and inertial navigation systems are often coupled with other types of navigation inputs, e.g., DME/DME or GPS, to improve overall navigation system performance.

NOTE − Specific inertial position updating requirements may apply.

1.2.2.4 Flight Management System (FMS). An FMS is an integrated suite of sensors, receivers, and computers, coupled with a navigation database. These systems generally provide performance and RNAV guidance to displays and automatic flight control systems.

1.2.2.5 Inputs can be accepted from multiple sources such as GPS, DME, VOR, LOC and IRU. These inputs may be applied to a navigation solution one at a time or in combination. Some FMSs provide for the detection and isolation of faulty navigation information.

1.2.2.6 When appropriate navigation signals are available, FMSs will normally rely on GPS and/or DME/DME (that is, the use of distance information from two or more DME stations) for position updates. Other inputs may also be incorporated based on FMS system architecture and navigation source geometry.

NOTE − DME/DME inputs coupled with one or more IRU(s) are often abbreviated as DME/DME/IRU or D/D/I.

1.2.2.7 RNAV Navigation Specifications (Nav Specs) NavSpecs are a set of aircraft and aircrew requirements needed to support a navigation application within a defined airspace concept. For both RNP and RNAV designations, the numerical designation refers to the lateral navigation accuracy in nautical miles which is expected to be achieved at least 95 percent of the flight time by the population of aircraft operating within the airspace, route, or procedure. (See FIG ENR 1.16 − 1 .)

a) RNAV 1. Typically RNAV 1 is used for DPs and STARs and appears on the charts. Aircraft must maintain a total system error of not more than 1 NM for 95 percent of the total flight time.

b) RNAV 2. Typically RNAV 2 is used for en route operations unless otherwise specified. T-routes and Q-routes are examples of this Nav Spec. Aircraft must maintain a total system error of not more than 2 NM for 95 percent of the total flight time.

c) RNAV 10. Typically RNAV 10 is used in oceanic operations. See paragraph ENR 7.4 for specifics and explanation of the relationship between RNP 10 and RNAV 10 terminology.

2. Required Navigation Performance (RNP) 2.1 General. While both RNAV navigation specifications (NavSpecs) and RNP NavSpecs contain specific performance requirements, RNP is RNAV with the added requirement for onboard performance monitoring and alerting (OBPMA). RNP is also a statement of navigation performance necessary for operation within a defined airspace. A critical component of RNP is the ability of the aircraft navigation system to monitor its achieved navigation performance, and to identify for the pilot whether the operational requirement is, or is not, being met during an operation. OBPMA capability therefore allows a lessened reliance on air traffic control intervention and/or procedural separation to achieve the overall safety of the operation. RNP capability of the aircraft is a major component in determining the separation criteria to ensure that the overall containment of the operation is met. The RNP capability of an aircraft will vary depending upon the aircraft equipment and the navigation infrastructure. For example, an aircraft may be eligible for RNP 1, but may not be capable of RNP 1 operations due to limited NAVAID coverage or avionics failure. The Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) or avionics documents for your aircraft should specifically state the aircraft’s RNP eligibilities. Contact the manufacturer of the avionics or the aircraft if this information is missing or incomplete. NavSpecs should be considered different from one another, not “better” or “worse” based on the described lateral navigation accuracy. It is this concept that requires each NavSpec eligbility to be listed separately in the avionics documents or AFM. For example, RNP 1 is Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 different from RNAV 1, and an RNP 1 eligibility does NOT mean automatic RNP 2 or RNAV 1 eligibility. As a safeguard, the FAA requires that aircraft navigation databases hold only those procedures that the aircraft maintains eligibility for. If you look for a specific instrument procedure in your aircraft’s navigation database and cannot find it, it’s likely that procedure contains PBN elements your aircraft is ineligible for or cannot compute and fly. Further, optional capabilities such as Radius − to − fix (RF) turns or scalability should be described in the AFM or avionics documents. Use the capabilities of your avionics suite to verify the appropriate waypoint and track data after loading the procedure from your database.

2.2 PBN Operations 2.2.1 Lateral Accuracy Values. Lateral Accuracy values are applicable to a selected airspace, route, or procedure. The lateral accuracy value is a value typically expressed as a distance in nautical miles from the intended centerline of a procedure, route, or path. RNP applications also account for potential errors at some multiple of lateral accuracy value (for example, twice the RNP lateral accuracy values).

2.2.1.1 RNP NavSpecs. U.S. standard NavSpecs supporting typical RNP airspace uses are as specified below.

Other NavSpecs may include different lateral accuracy values as identified by ICAO or other states. (See FIG ENR 1.16 − 1 .)

a) RNP Approach (RNP APCH). In the U.S., RNP APCH procedures are titled RNAV (GPS) and offer several lines of minima to accommodate varying levels of aircraft equipage: either lateral navigation (LNAV), LNAV/vertical navigation (LNAV/VNAV), Localizer Performance with Vertical Guidance (LPV), and Localizer Performance (LP). GPS with or without Space − Based Augmentation System (SBAS) (for example, WAAS) can provide the lateral information to support LNAV minima. LNAV/VNAV incorporates LNAV lateral with vertical path guidance for systems and operators capable of either barometric or SBAS vertical. Pilots are required to use SBAS to fly to the LPV or LP minima. RF turn capability is optional in RNP APCH eligibility. This means that your aircraft may be eligible for RNP APCH operations, but you may not fly an RF turn unless RF turns are also specifically listed as a feature of your avionics suite. GBAS Landing System (GLS) procedures are also constructed using RNP APCH NavSpecs and provide precision approach capability. RNP APCH has a lateral accuracy value of 1 in the terminal and missed approach segments and essentially scales to RNP 0.3 (or 40 meters with SBAS) in the final approach. (See AIP ENR 1.5 Paragraph 9. RNP AR Instrument Approach Procedures.)

b) RNP Authorization Required Approach (RNP AR APCH). In the U.S., RNP AR APCH procedures are titled RNAV (RNP). These approaches have stringent equipage and pilot training standards and require special FAA authorization to fly. Scalability and RF turn capabilities are mandatory in RNP AR APCH eligibility. RNP AR APCH vertical navigation performance is based upon barometric VNAV or SBAS. RNP AR is intended to provide specific benefits at specific locations. It is not intended for every operator or aircraft. RNP AR capability requires specific aircraft performance, design, operational processes, training, and specific procedure design criteria to achieve the required target level of safety. RNP AR APCH has lateral accuracy values that can range below 1 in the terminal and missed approach segments and essentially scale to RNP 0.3 or lower in the final approach. Before conducting these procedures, operators should refer to the latest AC 90 − 101, Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR. (See AIP ENR 1.5 Paragraph 9.)

c) RNP Authorization Required Departure (RNP AR DP). Similar to RNP AR approaches, RNP AR departure procedures have stringent equipage and pilot training standards and require special FAA authorization to fly. Scalability and RF turn capabilities is mandatory in RNP AR DP eligibility. RNP AR DP is intended to provide specific benefits at specific locations. It is not intended for every operator or aircraft. RNP AR DP capability requires specific aircraft performance, design, operational processes, training, and specific procedure design criteria to achieve the required target level of safety. RNP AR DP has lateral accuracy values that can scale to no lower than RNP 0.3 in the initial departure flight path. Before conducting these procedures, operators should refer to the latest AC 90 − 101, Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR. (See AIP ENR 1.5 Paragraph 9. ) d) Advanced RNP (A − RNP). Advanced RNP is a NavSpec with a minimum set of mandatory functions enabled in the aircraft’s avionics suite. In the U.S., these minimum functions include capability to calculate and Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.16 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 perform RF turns, scalable RNP, and parallel offset flight path generation. Higher continuity (such as dual systems) may be required for certain oceanic and remote continental airspace. Other “advanced” options for use in the en route environment (such as fixed radius transitions and Time of Arrival Control) are optional in the U.S.

Typically, an aircraft eligible for A − RNP will also be eligible for operations comprising: RNP APCH, RNP/RNAV 1, RNP/RNAV 2, RNP 4, and RNP/RNAV 10. A − RNP allows for scalable RNP lateral navigation values (either 1.0 or 0.3) in the terminal environment. Use of these reduced lateral accuracies will normally require use of the aircraft’s autopilot and/or flight director. See the latest AC 90 − 105 for more information on A − RNP, including NavSpec bundling options, eligibility determinations, and operations approvals.

NOTE − A − RNP eligible aircraft are NOT automatically eligible for RNP AR APCH or RNP AR DP operations, as RNP AR eligibility requires a separate determination process and special FAA authorization.

e) RNP 1. RNP 1 requires a lateral accuracy value of 1 for arrival and departure in the terminal area, and the initial and intermediate approach phase when used on conventional procedures with PBN segments (for example, an ILS with a PBN feeder, IAF, or missed approach). RF turn capability is optional in RNP 1 eligibility. This means that your aircraft may be eligible for RNP 1 operations, but you may not fly an RF turn unless RF turns are also specifically listed as a feature of your avionics suite.

f) RNP 2. RNP 2 will apply to both domestic and oceanic/remote operations with a lateral accuracy value of 2.

g) RNP 4. RNP 4 will apply to oceanic and remote operations only with a lateral accuracy value of 4. RNP 4 eligibility will automatically confer RNP 10 eligibility.

h) RNP 10. The RNP 10 NavSpec applies to certain oceanic and remote operations with a lateral accuracy of 10. In such airspace, the RNAV 10 NavSpec will be applied, so any aircraft eligible for RNP 10 will be deemed eligible for RNAV 10 operations. Further, any aircraft eligible for RNP 4 operations is automatically qualified for RNP 10/ RNAV 10 operations. (See also the latest AC 91 − 70, Oceanic and Remote Continental Airspace Operations, for more information on oceanic RNP/RNAV operations.)

i) RNP 0.3. The RNP 0.3 NavSpec requires a lateral accuracy value of 0.3 for all authorized phases of flight.

RNP 0.3 is not authorized for oceanic, remote, or the final approach segment. Use of RNP 0.3 by slow − flying fixed − wing aircraft is under consideration, but the RNP 0.3 NavSpec initially will apply only to rotorcraft operations. RF turn capability is optional in RNP 0.3 eligibility. This means that your aircraft may be eligible for RNP 0.3 operations, but you may not fly an RF turn unless RF turns are also specifically listed as a feature of your avionics suite.

NOTE − On terminal procedures or en route charts, do not confuse a charted RNP value of 0.30, or any standard final approach course segment width of 0.30, with the NavSpec title “RNP 0.3.” Charted RNP values of 0.30 or below should contain two decimal places (for example, RNP 0.15, or 0.10, or 0.30) whereas the NavSpec title will only state “RNP 0.3.” 2.2.1.2 Application of Standard Lateral Accuracy Values. U.S. standard lateral accuracy values typically used for various routes and procedures supporting RNAV operations may be based on use of a specific navigational system or sensor such as GPS, or on multi − sensor RNAV systems having suitable performance.

2.2.1.3 Depiction of PBN Requirements. In the U.S., PBN requirements like Lateral Accuracy Values or NavSpecs applicable to a procedure will be depicted on affected charts and procedures. In the U.S., a specific procedure’s Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) requirements will be prominently displayed in separate, standardized notes boxes. For procedures with PBN elements, the “PBN box” will contain the procedure’s NavSpec(s); and, if required: specific sensors or infrastructure needed for the navigation solution, any additional or advanced functional requirements, the minimum RNP value, and any amplifying remarks. Items listed in this PBN box are REQUIRED to fly the procedure’s PBN elements. For example, an ILS with an RNAV missed approach would require a specific capability to fly the missed approach portion of the procedure. That required capability will be listed in the PBN box. The separate Equipment Requirements box will list ground − based equipment and/or airport specific requirements. On procedures with both PBN elements and ground − based equipment requirements, the PBN requirements box will be listed first. (See FIG ENR 1.5 − 17 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.3 Other RNP Applications Outside the U.S. The FAA and ICAO member states have led initiatives in implementing the RNP concept to oceanic operations. For example, RNP − 10 routes have been established in the northern Pacific (NOPAC) which has increased capacity and efficiency by reducing the distance between tracks to 50 NM. (See AIP Section ENR 7.4.)

2.4 Aircraft and Airborne Equipment Eligibility for RNP Operations. Aircraft eligible for RNP operations will have an appropriate entry including special conditions and limitations in its AFM, avionics manual, or a supplement. Operators of aircraft not having specific RNP eligibility statements in the AFM or avionics documents may be issued operational approval including special conditions and limitations for specific RNP eligibilities.

NOTE − Some airborne systems use Estimated Position Uncertainty (EPU) as a measure of the current estimated navigational performance. EPU may also be referred to as Actual Navigation Performance (ANP) or Estimated Position Error (EPE).

TBL ENR 1.16 − 1 U.S. Standard RNP Levels RNP Level Typical Application Primary Route Width (NM) − Centerline to Boundary 0.1 to 1.0 RNP AR Approach Segments 0.1 to 1.0 0.3 to 1.0 RNP Approach Segments 0.3 to 1.0 1 Terminal and En Route 1.0 2 En Route 2.0 4 Oceanic/remote areas where performance − based horizontal 4.0 separation is applied.

10 Oceanic/remote areas where performance − based horizontal 10.0 separation is applied.

3. Use of Suitable Area Navigation (RNAV) Systems on Conventional Procedures and Routes 3.1 Discussion. This paragraph sets forth policy, while providing operational and airworthiness guidance regarding the suitability and use of RNAV systems when operating on, or transitioning to, conventional, non − RNAV routes and procedures within the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS): 3.1.1 Use of a suitable RNAV system as a Substitute Means of Navigation when a Very − High Frequency (VHF) Omni − directional Range (VOR), Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN), VOR/TACAN (VORTAC), VOR/DME, Non − directional Beacon (NDB), or compass locator facility including locator outer marker and locator middle marker is out − of − service (that is, the navigation aid (NAVAID) information is not available); an aircraft is not equipped with an Automatic Direction Finder (ADF) or DME; or the installed ADF or DME on an aircraft is not operational. For example, if equipped with a suitable RNAV system, a pilot may hold over an out − of − service NDB.

3.1.2 Use of a suitable RNAV system as an Alternate Means of Navigation when a VOR, DME, VORTAC, VOR/DME, TACAN, NDB, or compass locator facility including locator outer marker and locator middle marker is operational and the respective aircraft is equipped with operational navigation equipment that is compatible with conventional navaids. For example, if equipped with a suitable RNAV system, a pilot may fly a procedure or route based on operational VOR using that RNAV system without monitoring the VOR.

NOTE − 1. Additional information and associated requirements are available in Advisory Circular 90-108 titled “Use of Suitable RNAV Systems on Conventional Routes and Procedures.” Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.16 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2. Good planning and knowledge of your RNAV system are critical for safe and successful operations.

3. Pilots planning to use their RNAV system as a substitute means of navigation guidance in lieu of an out − of − service NAVAID may need to advise ATC of this intent and capability.

4. The navigation database should be current for the duration of the flight. If the AIRAC cycle will change during flight, operators and pilots should establish procedures to ensure the accuracy of navigation data, including suitability of navigation facilities used to define the routes and procedures for flight. To facilitate validating database currency, the FAA has developed procedures for publishing the amendment date that instrument approach procedures were last revised. The amendment date follows the amendment number; for example, Amdt 4 14Jan10. Currency of graphic departure procedures and STARs may be ascertained by the numerical designation in the procedure title. If an amended chart is published for the procedure, or the procedure amendment date shown on the chart is on or after the expiration date of the database, the operator must not use the database to conduct the operation.

3.2 Types of RNAV Systems that Qualify as a Suitable RNAV System. When installed in accordance with appropriate airworthiness installation requirements and operated in accordance with applicable operational guidance (e.g., aircraft flight manual and Advisory Circular material), the following systems qualify as a suitable RNAV system: 3.2.1 An RNAV system with TSO − C129/ − C145/ − C146 equipment, installed in accordance with AC 20 − 138, Airworthiness Approval of Global Positioning System (GPS) Navigation Equipment for Use as a VFR and IFR Supplemental Navigation System, and authorized for instrument flight rules (IFR) en route and terminal operations (including those systems previously qualified for “GPS in lieu of ADF or DME” operations), or 3.2.2 An RNAV system with DME/DME/IRU inputs that is compliant with the equipment provisions of AC 90 − 100A, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations, for RNAV routes. A table of compliant equipment is available at the following website: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/afx/afs/afs400/afs410/media/AC90 − 1 00compliance.pdf NOTE − Approved RNAV systems using DME/DME/IRU, without GPS/WAAS position input, may only be used as a substitute means of navigation when specifically authorized by a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) or other FAA guidance for a specific procedure.

The NOTAM or other FAA guidance authorizing the use of DME/DME/IRU systems will also identify any required DME facilities based on an FAA assessment of the DME navigation infrastructure.

3.3 Uses of Suitable RNAV Systems. Subject to the operating requirements, operators may use a suitable RNAV system in the following ways: 3.3.1 Determine aircraft position relative to, or distance from a VOR (see NOTE 6 below), TACAN, NDB, compass locator, DME fix; or a named fix defined by a VOR radial, TACAN course, NDB bearing, or compass locator bearing intersecting a VOR or localizer course.

3.3.2 Navigate to or from a VOR, TACAN, NDB, or compass locator.

3.3.3 Hold over a VOR, TACAN, NDB, compass locator, or DME fix.

3.3.4 Fly an arc based upon DME.

NOTE − 1. The allowances described in this section apply even when a facility is identified as required on a procedure (for example, “Note ADF required”).

2. These operations do not include lateral navigation on localizer − based courses (including localizer back − course guidance) without reference to raw localizer data.

3. Unless otherwise specified, a suitable RNAV system cannot be used for navigation on procedures that are identified as not authorized (“NA”) without exception by a NOTAM. For example, an operator may not use a RNAV system to navigate on a procedure affected by an expired or unsatisfactory flight inspection, or a procedure that is based upon a recently decommissioned NAVAID.

4. Pilots may not substitute for the NAVAID (for example, a VOR or NDB) providing lateral guidance for the final approach segment. This restriction does not refer to instrument approach procedures with “or GPS” in the title when using GPS or Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 WAAS. These allowances do not apply to procedures that are identified as not authorized (NA) without exception by a NOTAM, as other conditions may still exist and result in a procedure not being available. For example, these allowances do not apply to a procedure associated with an expired or unsatisfactory flight inspection, or is based upon a recently decommissioned NAVAID.

5. Use of a suitable RNAV system as a means to navigate on the final approach segment of an instrument approach procedure based on a VOR, TACAN or NDB signal, is allowable. The underlying NAVAID must be operational and the NAVAID monitored for final segment course alignment.

6. For the purpose of paragraph 3.3.1, “VOR” includes VOR, VOR/DME, and VORTAC facilities and “compass locator” includes locator outer marker and locator middle marker.

3.4 Alternate Airport Considerations. For the purposes of flight planning, any required alternate airport must have an available instrument approach procedure that does not require the use of GPS. This restriction includes conducting a conventional approach at the alternate airport using a substitute means of navigation that is based upon the use of GPS. For example, these restrictions would apply when planning to use GPS equipment as a substitute means of navigation for an out − of − service VOR that supports an ILS missed approach procedure at an alternate airport. In this case, some other approach not reliant upon the use of GPS must be available. This restriction does not apply to RNAV systems using TSO − C145/ − C146 WAAS equipment. For further WAAS guidance see ENR 4.1 paragraph 17.

3.4.1 For flight planning purposes, TSO-C129() and TSO-C196() equipped users (GPS users) whose navigation systems have fault detection and exclusion (FDE) capability, who perform a preflight RAIM prediction at the airport where the RNAV (GPS) approach will be flown, and have proper knowledge and any required training and/or approval to conduct a GPS-based IAP, may file based on a GPS-based IAP at either the destination or the alternate airport, but not at both locations. At the alternate airport, pilots may plan for applicable alternate airport weather minimums using: 3.4.1.1 Lateral navigation (LNAV) or circling minimum descent altitude (MDA); 3.4.1.2 LNAV/vertical navigation (LNAV/VNAV) DA, if equipped with and using approved barometric vertical navigation (baro-VNAV) equipment; 3.4.1.3 RNP 0.3 DA on an RNAV (RNP) IAP, if they are specifically authorized users using approved baro-VNAV equipment and the pilot has verified required navigation performance (RNP) availability through an approved prediction program.

3.4.2 If the above conditions cannot be met, any required alternate airport must have an approved instrument approach procedure other than GPS that is anticipated to be operational and available at the estimated time of arrival, and which the aircraft is equipped to fly.

3.4.3 This restriction does not apply to TSO-C145() and TSO-C146() equipped users (WAAS users). For further WAAS guidance see ENR 4.1 paragraph 17.

3.5 General Operational Requirements 3.5.1 Pilots must comply with the guidelines contained in their AFM, AFM supplement, operating manual, or pilot’s guide when operating their aircraft navigation system.

3.5.2 Pilots may not use their RNAV system as a substitute or alternate means of navigation guidance if their aircraft has an AFM or AFM supplement with a limitation to monitor the underlying navigation aids for the associated operation.

3.5.3 Pilots of aircraft with an AFM limitation that requires the aircraft to have other equipment appropriate to the route to be flown may only use their RNAV equipment as a substitute means of navigation in the contiguous U.S. In addition, pilots of these aircraft may not use their RNAV equipment as a substitute for inoperable or not − installed equipment.

3.5.4 Pilots must ensure their onboard navigation data is current, appropriate for the region of intended operation, and includes the navigation aids, waypoints, and relevant coded terminal airspace procedures for the departure, arrival, and alternate airfields.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.16 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − The navigation database should be current for the duration of the flight. If the AIRAC cycle will change during flight, operators and pilots should establish procedures to ensure the accuracy of navigation data, including suitability of navigation facilities used to define the routes and procedures for flight. To facilitate validating database currency, the FAA has developed procedures for publishing the amendment date that instrument approach procedures were last revised. The amendment date follows the amendment number; for example, Amdt 4 14Jan10. Currency of graphic departure procedures and STARs may be ascertained by the numerical designation in the procedure title. If an amended chart is published for the procedure, or the procedure amendment date shown on the chart is on or after the expiration date of the database, the operator must not use the database to conduct the operation.

3.5.5 Pilots must extract procedures, waypoints, navaids, or fixes by name from the onboard navigation database and comply with the charted procedure or route.

3.5.6 For the purposes described in this paragraph, pilots may not manually enter published procedure or route waypoints via latitude/longitude, place/bearing, or place/bearing/distance into the aircraft system.

3.6 Operational Requirements for Departure and Arrival Procedures 3.6.1 Pilots of aircraft with standalone GPS receivers must ensure that CDI scaling (full − scale deflection) is either 1.0 NM or 0.3 NM.

3.6.2 In order to use a substitute means of navigation guidance on departure procedures, pilots of aircraft with RNAV systems using DME/DME/IRU, without GPS input, must ensure their aircraft navigation system position is confirmed, within 1,000 feet, at the start point of take − off roll. The use of an automatic or manual runway update is an acceptable means of compliance with this requirement. A navigation map may also be used to confirm aircraft position, if pilot procedures and display resolution allow for compliance with the 1,000 − foot tolerance requirement.

3.7 Operational Requirements for Instrument Approach Procedures 3.7.1 When the use of RNAV equipment using GPS input is planned as a substitute means of navigation guidance for part of an instrument approach procedure at a destination airport, any required alternate airport must have an available instrument approach procedure that does not require the use of GPS. This restriction includes conducting a conventional approach at the alternate airport using a substitute means of navigation guidance based upon the use of GPS. This restriction does not apply to RNAV systems using WAAS as an input.

3.7.2 Pilots of aircraft with standalone GPS receivers must ensure that CDI sensitivity is 1 NM.

NOTE − If using GPS distance as an alternate or substitute means of navigation guidance for DME distance on an instrument approach procedure, pilots must select a named waypoint from the onboard navigation database that is associated with the subject DME facility. Pilots should not rely on information from an RNAV instrument approach procedure, as distances on RNAV approaches may not match the distance to the facility.

3.8 Operational Requirements for Specific Inputs to RNAV Systems: 3.8.1 GPS 3.8.1.1 RNAV systems using GPS input may be used as an alternate means of navigation guidance without restriction if appropriate RAIM is available.

3.8.1.2 Operators of aircraft with RNAV systems that use GPS input but do not automatically alert the pilot of a loss of GPS, must develop procedures to verify correct GPS operation.

3.8.1.3 RNAV systems using GPS input may be used as a substitute means of navigation guidance provided RAIM availability for the operation is confirmed. During flight planning, the operator should confirm the availability of RAIM with the latest GPS NOTAMs. If no GPS satellites are scheduled to be out − of − service, then the aircraft can depart without further action. However, if any GPS satellites are scheduled to be out − of − service, then the operator must confirm the availability of GPS integrity (RAIM) for the intended operation. In the event of a predicted, continuous loss of RAIM of more than five (5) minutes for any part of the route or procedure, the operator should delay, cancel, or re − route the flight as appropriate. Use of GPS as a substitute is not authorized when the RAIM capability of the GPS equipment is lost.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 1.16 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − The FAA is developing a RAIM prediction service for general use. Until this capability is operational, a RAIM prediction does not need to be done for a departure or arrival procedure with an associated “RADAR REQUIRED” note charted or for routes where the operator expects to be in radar coverage. Operators may check RAIM availability for departure or arrival procedures at any given airport by checking approach RAIM for that location. This information is available upon request from a U.S. Flight Service Station, but is no longer available through DUATS.

3.8.2 WAAS 3.8.2.1 RNAV systems using WAAS input may be used as an alternate means of navigation guidance without restriction.

3.8.2.2 RNAV systems using WAAS input may be used as a substitute means of navigation guidance provided WAAS availability for the operation is confirmed. Operators must check WAAS NOTAMs.

3.8.3 DME/DME/IRU 3.8.3.1 RNAV systems using DME/DME/IRU, without GPS input, may be used as an alternate means of navigation guidance whenever valid DME/DME position updating is available.

4. Recognizing, Mitigating and Adapting to GNSS Jamming and/or Spoofing 4.1 The low − strength data transmission signals from GNSS satellites are vulnerable to various anomalies that can significantly reduce the reliability of the navigation signal. The GPS signal is vulnerable and has many uses in aviation (e.g., communication, navigation, surveillance, safety systems and automation); therefore, pilots must place additional emphasis on closely monitoring aircraft equipment performance for any anomalies and promptly inform Air Traffic Control (ATC) of any apparent GPS degradation. Pilots should also be prepared to operate without GNSS navigation systems.

4.2 GNSS signals are vulnerable to intentional and unintentional interference from a wide variety of sources, including radars, microwave links, ionosphere effects, solar activity, multi-path error, satellite communications GNSS repeaters, and even some systems onboard the aircraft. In general, these types of unintentional interference are localized and intermittent. Of greater and growing concern is the intentional and unauthorized interference of GNSS signals by persons using “jammers” or “spoofers” to disrupt air navigation by interfering with the reception of valid satellite signals.

NOTE − The U.S. government regularly conducts GNSS tests, training activities, and exercises that interfere with GNSS signals.

These events are geographically limited, coordinated, scheduled, and advertised via GNSSS and/or WAAS NOTAMS.

Operators of GNSSS aircraft should always check for GNSS and/or WAAS NOTAMS for their route of flight.

4.3 Manufacturers, operators, and air traffic controllers should be aware of the general impacts of GNSS jamming and/or spoofing which include, but are not limited to: 4.3.1 Inability to use GNSS for navigation.

4.3.2 Inability to use hybrid GNSS inertial systems for navigation.

4.3.3 Loss of, or degraded, performance − based navigation (PBN) capability (e.g., inability to fly required navigation performance (RNP) procedures).

4.3.4 Unreliable triggering of Terrain Awareness and Warning Systems (TAWS).

4.3.5 Inaccurate aircraft position on navigation display (e.g., moving map and electronic flight bag).

4.3.6 Loss of, or erroneous, Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) outputs.

4.3.7 Unexpected effects when navigating with conventional NAVAIDS (e.g., if the aircraft is spoofed from the intended flight path, autotuning will not select the nearby NAVAID).

4.3.8 Unanticipated position − dependent flight management system effects (e.g., erroneous insufficient fuel indication).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 1.16 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.3.9 Failure or degradation of Air Traffic Management (ATM) infrastructure and its associated systems reliant on GNSS, resulting in potential airspace infringements and/or route deviations.

4.3.10 Failure of, or erroneous aircraft clocks (resulting in inability to log on to Controller − Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC).

4.3.11 Erroneous wind and ground speed indications.

4.4 When flying IFR, pilots should have additional navigation equipment for their intended route to crosscheck their position. Routine checks of position against VOR or DME information, for example, could help detect a compromised GNSS signal. Pilots transitioning to VOR navigation in response to GNSS anomalies should refer to the Chart Supplement U.S. to identify airports with available conventional approaches associated with the VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) program. (Reference Aeronautical Information Publication AIP ENR 4.1 − 2.6.3).

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 4.1, Subpara 2.6.3, Using the VOR MON.

4.5 Prior to departure, the FAA recommends operators to: 4.5.1 Be aware of potential risk locations.

4.5.2 Check for any relevant Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs).

4.5.3 Plan fuel contingencies.

4.5.4 Plan to use conventional NAVAIDs and appropriate arrival/approach procedures at the destination.

4.5.5 Follow the detailed guidance from the respective Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM).

4.6 During flight, the FAA recommends operators do the following: 4.6.1 Be vigilant for any indication that the aircraft’s GNSS is disrupted by reviewing the manufacturer’s guidance for that specific aircraft type and avionics equipage. Verify the aircraft position by means of conventional NAVAIDs, when available. Indications of jamming and/or spoofing may include: 4.6.1.1 Changes in actual navigation performance.

4.6.1.2 Aircraft clock changes (e.g., incorrect time).

4.6.1.3 Incorrect Flight Management System (FMS) position.

4.6.1.4 Large shift in displayed GNSS position.

4.6.1.5 Primary Flight Display (PFD)/Navigation Display (ND) warnings about position error.

4.6.1.6 Other aircraft reporting clock issues, position errors, or requesting vectors.

4.6.2 Assess operational risks and limitations linked to the loss of GNSS capability, including any on − board systems requiring inputs from a GNSS signal.

4.6.3 Ensure NAVAIDs critical to the operation for the intended route/approach are available.

4.6.4 Remain prepared to revert to conventional instrument flight procedures.

4.6.5 Promptly notify ATC if they experience GNSS anomalies. Pilots should NOT normally inform ATC of GNSS jamming and/or spoofing when flying through a known NOTAMed testing area, unless they require ATC assistance. (See AIP ENR 4.1 − 22.)

4.7 Post flight, the FAA recommends operators to: 4.7.1 Document any GNSS jamming and/or spoofing in the maintenance log to ensure all faults are cleared.

4.7.2 File a detailed report at the reporting site: Report a GPS Anomaly Federal Aviation Administration, www.faa.gov/air_traffic/nas/gps_reports .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 2. Air Traffic Services Airspace

1. FIR, UIR, TMA and CTA 1.1 US charting data is available for Flight Information Regions (FIRs), Upper Flight Information Regions (UIRs), Terminal Control Areas (TMAs) and Control Areas (CTAs) at 28 Day National Airspace System Resources (NASR) Subscription . Data is updated every 28 days.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 3. ATS ROUTES

ENR 3.1 Lower ATS Routes

See also ENR 1.10, ENR 1.16, ENR 3.3, and ENR 3.5. These routes are available at the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/Part_95_Consolidation/ .

1. Low Altitude ATS Route Structure 1.1 The U.S. does not use the term “Lower ATS Routes.” The published low altitude route structure in the U.S.

consists of VOR Federal airways, L/MF Federal airways and low altitude RNAV routes (T − routes). The low altitude route structure is for use from 1,200 feet above the surface (or in some instances higher) up to but not including 18,000 feet MSL.

1.1.1 Route designators and significant points defining the routes are listed in FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points.

1.1.2 Applicable route tracks, radials, distances between points, changeover points, cruising altitudes for direction of flight, upper and lower limits, minimum flight altitudes and ARTCC boundaries are published on the IFR Enroute Low Altitude − U.S. chart series.

1.1.3 The low altitude routes are designated as Class E airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 3.2 Upper ATS Routes

See also ENR 1.10, ENR 1.16, ENR 3.3, and ENR 3.5. These routes are available at the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/Part_95_Consolidation/ .

1. High Altitude ATS Route Structure 1.1 The U.S. does not use the term “Upper ATS Routes.” The published high altitude route structure in the U.S.

consists of jet routes and high altitude RNAV routes (Q − routes). The high altitude route structure is for use at and above 18,000 feet MSL.

1.1.1 Jet route and Q − route designators and significant points defining the routes are listed in FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points.

1.1.3 The high altitude route structure is contained within Class A airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

These routes are available at the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/Part_95_Consolidation/ .

1. Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes 1.1 Published RNAV routes, including Q − routes, T − routes, and Y − routes, can be flight planned for use by aircraft with RNAV capability, subject to any limitations or requirements noted on en route charts, in applicable Advisory Circulars, NOTAMs, etc. RNAV routes are normally depicted in blue on aeronautical charts and are identified by the letter “Q,” “T,” or “Y” followed by the airway number (for example, Q13, T205, and Y280).

Published RNAV routes are RNAV 2 except when specifically charted as RNAV 1. Unless otherwise specified, these routes require system performance currently met by GPS, GPS/WAAS, or DME/DME/IRU RNAV systems that satisfy the criteria discussed in AC 90 − 100A, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations.

1.1.1 Q − routes are available for use by RNAV equipped aircraft between 18,000 feet MSL and FL 450 inclusive.

Q − routes are depicted on En Route High Altitude Charts.

NOTE − Aircraft in Alaska may only operate on GNSS Q-routes with GPS (TSO-C129 (as revised) or TSO-C196 (as revised)) equipment while the aircraft remains in Air Traffic Control (ATC) radar surveillance or with GPS/WAAS which does not require ATC radar surveillance.

1.1.2 T − routes are available for use by GPS or GPS/WAAS equipped aircraft from 1,200 feet above the surface (or in some instances higher) up to but not including 18,000 feet MSL. T − routes are depicted on En Route Low Altitude Charts.

NOTE − Aircraft in Alaska may only operate on GNSS T-routes with GPS/WAAS (TSO-C145 (as revised) or TSO-C146 (as revised)) equipment.

1.2 Unpublished RNAV routes are direct routes, based on area navigation capability, between waypoints defined in terms of latitude/longitude coordinates, degree − distance fixes, or offsets from established routes/airways at a specified distance and direction. Radar monitoring by ATC is required on all unpublished RNAV routes, except for GNSS − equipped aircraft cleared via filed published waypoints recallable from the aircraft’s navigation database.

1.3 Y − routes generally run in U.S. offshore airspace, however operators can find some Y − routes over southern Florida. Pilots must use GPS for navigation and meet RNAV 2 performance requirements for all flights on Y − routes. Operators can find additional Y − route requirements in ENR 7.9.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 3.4 Helicopter Routes

VFR Helicopter routes are available at the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/vfr/ .

1. VFR Helicopter Routes VFR Helicopter routes are available on Helicopter Route Charts for the following cities: Baltimore/Washington D.C., Boston, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, and U.S. Gulf Coast.

2. Helicopter Route Charts Helicopter Route Charts are three − color charts that depict current aeronautical information useful to helicopter pilots navigating in areas with high concentrations of activity. Information depicted includes helicopter routes, maximum route altitudes at specific points, multiple classes of heliports with associated frequency and lighting capabilities, NAVAIDS, and obstructions. In addition, pictorial symbols, roads, and easily identified geographical features are portrayed. (See FIG GEN 3.2 − 4.)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 3.5 Other Routes

1. Airways and Route Systems 1.1 Three fixed route systems are established for air navigation purposes. They are the Federal airway system (consisting of VOR and L/MF routes), the jet route system, and the RNAV route system. To the extent possible, these route systems are aligned in an overlying manner to facilitate transition between each.

2. VOR and L/MF System 2.1 The VOR and L/MF (nondirectional radio beacons) Airway System consists of airways designated from 1,200 feet above the surface (or in some instances higher) up to but not including 18,000 feet MSL. These airways are depicted on IFR Enroute Low Altitude Charts.

NOTE − The altitude limits of a victor airway should not be exceeded except to effect transition within or between route structures.

2.2 Except in Alaska, the VOR airways are: predicated solely on VOR or VORTAC navigation aids; depicted in black on aeronautical charts; and identified by a “V” (Victor) followed by the airway number (for example, V12).

NOTE − Segments of VOR airways in Alaska are based on L/MF navigation aids and charted in brown instead of black on en route charts.

2.3 A segment of an airway which is common to two or more routes carries the numbers of all the airways which coincide for that segment. When such is the case, pilots filing a flight plan need to indicate only that airway number for the route filed.

NOTE − A pilot who intends to make an airway flight, using VOR facilities, will simply specify the appropriate “victor” airway(s) in the flight plan. For example, if a flight is to be made from Chicago to New Orleans at 8,000 feet, using omniranges only, the route may be indicated as “departing from Chicago − Midway, cruising 8,000 feet via Victor 9 to Moisant International.” If flight is to be conducted in part by means of L/MF navigation aids and in part on omniranges, specifications of the appropriate airways in the flight plan will indicate which types of facilities will be used along the described routes, and, for IFR flight, permit ATC to issue a traffic clearance accordingly. A route may also be described by specifying the station over which the flight will pass but in this case since many VORs and L/MF aids have the same name, the pilot must be careful to indicate which aid will be used at a particular location. This will be indicated in the route of flight portion of the flight plan by specifying the type of facility to be used after the location name in the following manner: Newark L/MF, Allentown VOR.

2.4 With respect to position reporting, reporting points are designed for VOR Airway Systems. Flights using Victor airways will report over these points unless advised otherwise by ATC.

2.5 The L/MF airways (colored airways) are predicated solely on L/MF navigation aids and are depicted in brown on aeronautical charts and are identified by color name and number; e.g., Amber One. Green and Red airways are plotted east and west. Amber and Blue airways are plotted north and south.

CAUTION − Use of adjacently located LF/VHF airways and routes − many locations just outside the contiguous 48 states have two separate airway structures. One structure is made up from VORs and the other from L/MF NAVAIDs (nondirectional radio beacons). In some instances, the different routes appear to overlie each other. The NAVAIDs are sometimes depicted so close to each other that they will have the appearance of being collocated, or nearly so. Substituting a VOR radial for a nondirectional radio beacon bearing could, in many circumstances, cause an excessive “off course” navigational error.

Strict adherence to the color coding of the route structure and NAVAID in use should be maintained. Chart procedures provide an excellent means of route differentiation through the use of color which is defined and explained in the legend.

2.6 The use of TSO − C145 (as revised) or TSO − C146 (as revised) GPS/WAAS navigation systems is allowed in Alaska as the only means of navigation on published air traffic service (ATS) routes, including those Victor, Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.5 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 T − Routes, and colored airway segments designated with a second minimum en route altitude (MEA) depicted in blue and followed by the letter G at those lower altitudes. The altitudes so depicted are below the minimum reception altitude (MRA) of the land − based navigation facility defining the route segment, and guarantee standard en route obstacle clearance and two − way communications. Air carrier operators requiring operations specifications are authorized to conduct operations on those routes in accordance with FAA operations specifications.

3. Jet Route System 3.1 The jet route system consists of jet routes established from 18,000 feet MSL to FL 450 inclusive.

3.2 These routes are depicted on En Route High Altitude Charts. Jet routes are depicted in black on aeronautical charts and are identified by a “J” (Jet) followed by the airway number; e.g., J12. Jet routes, as VOR airways, are predicated solely on VOR or VORTAC navigation facilities (except in Alaska).

NOTE − Segments of jet routes in Alaska are based on L/MF navigation aids and are charted in brown color instead of black on en route charts.

3.3 With respect to position reporting, reporting points are designated for Jet Route Systems. Flights using jet routes will report over these points unless otherwise advised by ATC.

4. Radar Vectors 4.1 Controllers may vector aircraft within CONTROLLED AIRSPACE for separation purposes, noise abatement considerations, when an operational advantage will be realize by the pilot or the controller, or when requested by the pilot. Vectors outside of CONTROLLED AIRSPACE will be provided only on pilot request.

Pilots will be advised as to what the vector is to achieve when the vector is controller initiated and will take the aircraft off a previously assigned nonradar route. To the extent possible, aircraft operating on RNAV routes will be allowed to remain on their own navigation.

5. Changeover Points (COPs) 5.1 COPs are prescribed for Federal airways, jet routes, area navigation routes, or other direct routes for which an minimum en route altitude (MEA) is designated under 14 CFR Part 95. The COP is a point along the route or airway segment between two adjacent navigation facilities or waypoints where changeover navigation guidance should occur. At this point, the pilot should change navigation receiver frequency from the station behind the aircraft to the station ahead.

5.2 The COP is normally located midway between the navigation facilities for straight route segments, or at the intersection of radials or courses forming a dogleg in the case of dogleg route segments. When the COP is NOT located at the midway point, aeronautical charts will depict the COP location and give the mileage to the radio aids.

5.3 COPs are established for the purpose of preventing loss of navigation guidance, to prevent frequency interference from other facilities, and to prevent use of different facilities by different aircraft in the same airspace. Pilots are urged to observe COPs to the fullest extent.

6. Airway or Route Course Changes 6.1 Pilots of aircraft are required to adhere to airways/routes being flown. Special attention must be given to this requirement during course changes. Each course change consists of variables that make the technique applicable in each case a matter only the pilot can resolve. Some variables which must be considered are turn radius, wind effect, airspeed, degree of turn, and cockpit instrumentation. An early turn, as illustrated in FIG ENR 3.5 − 1 , is one method of adhering to airways/routes. The use of any available cockpit instrumentation, such as distance measuring equipment, may be used by the pilot to lead the turn when making course changes. This is consistent Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 3.5 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 with the intent of 14 CFR Section 91.181 which requires pilots to operate along the centerline of an airway and along the direct course between navigational aids or fixes.

6.2 Turns which begin at or after fix passage may exceed airway/route boundaries. FIG ENR 3.5 − 1 contains an example flight track depicting this, together with an example of an early turn.

FIG ENR 3.5 − 1 Adhering to Airways or Routes 6.3 Without such actions, as leading a turn, aircraft operating in excess of 290 knots true airspeed (TAS) can exceed the normal airway/route boundaries depending on the amount of course change required, wind direction and velocity, the character of the turn fix, (DME, overhead navigation aid, or intersection), and the pilot’s technique in making a course change. For example, a flight operating at 17,000 feet MSL with a TAS of 400 knots, a 25 degree bank, and a course change of more than 40 degrees would exceed the width of the airway/route; i.e., 4 nautical miles each side of centerline. However, in the airspace below 18,000 feet MSL, operations in excess of 290 knots TAS are not prevalent and the provision of additional IFR separation in all course change situations for the occasional aircraft making a turn in excess of 290 knots TAS creates an unacceptable waste of airspace and imposes a penalty upon the preponderance of traffic which operates at low speeds. Consequently, the FAA expects pilots to lead turns and take other actions they consider necessary during the course changes to adhere as closely as possible to the airways or route being flown.

7. Minimum Turning Altitude (MTA) 7.1 Due to increased airspeeds at 10,000 ft MSL or above, the published minimum enroute altitude (MEA) may not be sufficient for obstacle clearance when a turn is required over a fix, NAVAID, or waypoint. In these instances, an expanded area in the vicinity of the turn point is examined to determine whether the published MEA is sufficient for obstacle clearance. In some locations (normally mountainous), terrain/obstacles in the expanded search area may necessitate a higher minimum altitude while conducting the turning maneuver. Turning fixes requiring a higher minimum turning altitude (MTA) will be denoted on government charts by the minimum crossing altitude (MCA) icon (“x” flag) and an accompanying note describing the MTA restriction. An MTA restriction will normally consist of the air traffic service (ATS) route leading to the turn point, the ATS route leading from the turn point, and the required altitude; e.g., MTA V330 E TO V520 W 16000. When an MTA is applicable for the intended route of flight, pilots must ensure they are at or above the charted MTA not later than Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 3.5 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 the turn point and maintain at or above the MTA until joining the centerline of the ATS route following the turn point. Once established on the centerline following the turning fix, the MEA/MOCA determines the minimum altitude available for assignment. An MTA may also preclude the use of a specific altitude or a range of altitudes during a turn. For example, the MTA may restrict the use of 10,000 through 11,000 ft MSL. In this case, any altitude greater than 11,000 ft MSL is unrestricted, as are altitudes less than 10,000 ft MSL provided MEA/MOCA requirements are satisfied.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 3.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 3.6 En Route Holding

The United States of America does not delineate a difference between “Holding” and “En Route Holding.” Holding information can be found in Holding Procedures (see ENR 1.5, paragraph 1, Holding Procedures).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

1. Nondirectional Radio Beacon (NDB) 1.1 A low or medium frequency radio beacon transmits nondirectional signals whereby the pilot of an aircraft properly equipped can determine bearings and “home” on the station. These facilities normally operate in a frequency band of 190 to 535 kilohertz (kHz), according to ICAO Annex 10 the frequency range for NDBs is between 190 and 1750 kHz, and transmit a continuous carrier with either 400 or 1020 hertz (Hz) modulation.

All radio beacons except the compass locators transmit a continuous three − letter identification in code except during voice transmissions.

1.2 When a radio beacon is used in conjunction with the Instrument Landing System markers, it is called a Compass Locator.

1.3 Voice transmissions are made on radio beacons unless the letter “W” (without voice) is included in the class designator (HW).

1.4 Radio beacons are subject to disturbances that may result in erroneous bearing information. Such disturbances result from such factors as lightning, precipitation, static, etc. At night radio beacons are vulnerable to interference from distant stations. Nearly all disturbances which affect the aircraft’s Automatic Direction Finder (ADF) bearing also affect the facility’s identification. Noisy identification usually occurs when the ADF needle is erratic; voice, music, or erroneous identification will usually be heard when a steady false bearing is being displayed. Since ADF receivers do not have a “FLAG” to warn the pilot when erroneous bearing information is being displayed, the pilot should continuously monitor the NDB’s identification.

2. VHF Omni − directional Range (VOR) 2.1 VORs operate within the 108.0 − 117.95 MHz frequency band and have a power output necessary to provide coverage within their assigned operational service volume. They are subject to line − of − sight restrictions, and range varies proportionally to the altitude of the receiving equipment.

NOTE − Normal service ranges for the various classes of VORs are given in GEN 3.4, TBL GEN 3.4 − 1, VOR/DME/TACAN Standard Service Volumes.

2.2 Most VORs are equipped for voice transmission on the VOR frequency. VORs without voice capability are indicated by the letter “W” (without voice) included in the class designator (VORW).

2.3 The effectiveness of the VOR depends upon proper use and adjustment of both ground and airborne equipment.

2.3.1 Accuracy. The accuracy of course alignment of the VOR is excellent, being generally plus or minus 1 degree.

2.3.2 Roughness. On some VORs, minor course roughness may be observed, evidenced by course needle or brief flag alarm activity (some receivers are more subject to these irregularities than others). At a few stations, usually in mountainous terrain, the pilot may occasionally observe a brief course needle oscillation, similar to the indication of “approaching station.” Pilots flying over unfamiliar routes are cautioned to be on the alert of these vagaries, and, in particular, to use the “to − from” indicator to determine positive station passage.

2.3.2.1 Certain propeller RPM settings or helicopter rotor speeds can cause the VOR Course Deviation Indicator (CDI) to fluctuate as much as plus or minus six degrees. Slight changes to the RPM setting will normally smooth out this roughness. Pilots are urged to check for this modulation phenomenon prior to reporting a VOR station or aircraft equipment for unsatisfactory operation.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.4 The only positive method of identifying a VOR is by its Morse Code identification or by the recorded automatic voice identification which is always indicated by use of the word “VOR” following the range’s name.

Reliance on determining the identification of an omnirange should never be placed on listening to voice transmissions by the FSS (or approach control facility) involved. Many FSS remotely operate several omniranges which have different names from each other and, in some cases, none have the name of the “parent” FSS. During periods of maintenance the facility may radiate a T − E − S − T code ( - - ) or the code may be removed. Some VOR equipment decodes the identifier and displays it to the pilot for verification to charts, while other equipment simply displays the expected identifier from a database to aid in verification to the audio tones.

You should be familiar with your equipment and use it appropriately. If your equipment automatically decodes the identifier, it is not necessary to listen to the audio identification.

2.5 Voice identification has been added to numerous VORs. The transmission consists of a voice announcement; i.e., “AIRVILLE VOR,” alternating with the usual Morse Code identification.

2.6 The VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON). As flight procedures and route structure based on VORs are gradually being replaced with Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) procedures, the FAA is removing selected VORs from service. PBN procedures are primarily enabled by GPS and its augmentation systems, collectively referred to as Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Aircraft that carry DME/DME equipment can also use RNAV which provides a backup to continue flying PBN during a GNSS disruption. For those aircraft that do not carry DME/DME, the FAA is retaining a limited network of VORs, called the VOR MON, to provide a basic conventional navigation service for operators to use if GNSS becomes unavailable.

During a GNSS disruption, the MON will enable aircraft to navigate through the affected area or to a safe landing at a MON airport without reliance on GNSS. Navigation using the MON will not be as efficient as the new PBN route structure, but use of the MON will provide nearly continuous VOR signal coverage at 5,000 feet AGL across the NAS, outside of the Western U.S. Mountainous Area (WUSMA).

NOTE − There is no plan to change the NAVAID and route structure in the WUSMA.

The VOR MON has been retained principally for IFR aircraft that are not equipped with DME/DME avionics.

However, VFR aircraft may use the MON as desired. Aircraft equipped with DME/DME navigation systems would, in most cases, use DME/DME to continue flight using RNAV to their destination. However, these aircraft may, of course, use the MON.

2.6.1 Distance to a MON airport. The VOR MON will ensure that regardless of an aircraft’s position in the contiguous United States (CONUS), a MON airport (equipped with legacy ILS or VOR approaches) will be within 100 nautical miles. These airports are referred to as “MON airports” and will have an ILS approach or a VOR approach if an ILS is not available. VORs to support these approaches will be retained in the VOR MON.

MON airports are charted on low − altitude en route charts and are contained in the Chart Supplement U.S. and other appropriate publications.

NOTE − Any suitable airport can be used to land in the event of a VOR outage. For example, an airport with a DME − required ILS approach may be available and could be used by aircraft that are equipped with DME. The intent of the MON airport is to provide an approach that can be used by aircraft without ADF or DME when radar may not be available.

2.6.2 Navigating to an airport. The VOR MON will retain sufficient VORs to ensure that pilots will have nearly continuous signal reception of a VOR when flying at 5,000 feet AGL. The service volume of VORs will be increased to provide service at 5,000feet above the VOR. If the pilot encounters a GPS outage, the pilot will be able to proceed via VOR − to − VOR navigation at 5,000 feet above the VOR, either through the GPS outage area or to a safe landing at a MON airport or another suitable airport, as appropriate. Nearly all VORs inside of the WUSMA and outside the CONUS are being retained. In these areas, pilots use the existing (Victor and Jet) route structure and VORs to proceed through a GPS outage or to a landing.

2.6.3 Using the VOR MON.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.6.3.1 In the case of a planned GPS outage (for example, one that is in a published NOTAM), pilots may plan to fly through the outage using the MON as appropriate and as cleared by ATC. Similarly, aircraft not equipped with GPS may plan to fly and land using the MON, as appropriate and as cleared by ATC.

NOTE − 1. In many cases, flying using the MON may involve a more circuitous route than flying GPS − enabled RNAV.

2. Aircraft not equipped with GPS may be limited to a visual approach at the planned destination.

2.6.3.2 In the case of an unscheduled GPS outage, pilots and ATC will need to coordinate the best outcome for all aircraft. It is possible that a GPS outage could be disruptive, causing high workload and demand for ATC service. Generally, the VOR MON concept will enable pilots to navigate through the GPS outage or land at a MON airport or at another airport that may have an appropriate approach or may be in visual conditions.

a) The VOR MON is a reversionary service provided by the FAA for use by aircraft that are unable to continue RNAV during a GPS disruption. The FAA has not mandated that preflight or inflight planning include provisions for GPS − or WAAS − equipped aircraft to carry sufficient fuel to proceed to a MON airport in case of an unforeseen GPS outage. Specifically, flying to a MON airport as a filed alternate will not be explicitly required.

Of course, consideration for the possibility of a GPS outage is prudent during flight planning as is maintaining proficiency with VOR navigation.

b) Also, in case of a GPS outage, pilots may coordinate with ATC and elect to continue through the outage or land. The VOR MON is designed to ensure that an aircraft is within 100 NM of an airport, but pilots may decide to proceed to any appropriate airport where a landing can be made, as coordinated with ATC. WAAS users flying under Part 91 are not required to carry VOR avionics. These users do not have the ability or requirement to use the VOR MON. Prudent flight planning, by these WAAS − only aircraft, should consider the possibility of a GPS outage.

NOTE − The FAA recognizes that non − GPS − based approaches will be reduced when VORs are eliminated, and that most airports with an instrument approach may only have GPS − or WAAS − based approaches. Pilots flying GPS − or WAAS − equipped aircraft that also have VOR/ILS avionics should be diligent to maintain proficiency in VOR and ILS approaches in the event of a GPS outage.

3. VOR Receiver Check 3.1 Periodic VOR receiver calibration is most important. If a receiver’s Automatic Gain Control or modulation circuit deteriorates, it is possible for it to display acceptable accuracy and sensitivity close into the VOR or VOT and display out − of − tolerance readings when located at greater distances where weaker signal areas exist. The likelihood of this deterioration varies between receivers, and is generally considered a function of time. The best assurance of having an accurate receiver is periodic calibration. Yearly intervals are recommended at which time an authorized repair facility should recalibrate the receiver to the manufacturer’s specifications.

3.2 14 CFR Section 91.171 provides for certain VOR equipment accuracy checks prior to flight under IFR. To comply with this requirement and to ensure satisfactory operation of the airborne system, the FAA has provided pilots with the following means of checking VOR receiver accuracy: 3.2.1 FAA VOR test facility (VOT) or a radiated test signal from an appropriately rated radio repair station.

3.2.2 Certified airborne checkpoints and airways.

3.2.3 Certified check points on the airport surface.

3.2.4 If an airborne checkpoint is not available, select an established VOR airway. Select a prominent ground point, preferably more than 20 NM from the VOR ground facility and maneuver the aircraft directly over the point at reasonably low altitude above terrain and obstructions.

3.3 The FAA VOT transmits a test signal which provides a convenient means to determine the operational status and accuracy of a VOR receiver while on the ground where a VOT is located. The airborne use of VOT is Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 permitted; however, its use is strictly limited to those areas/altitudes specifically authorized in the Chart Supplement or appropriate supplement. To use the VOT service, tune in the VOT frequency on your VOR receiver. With the CDI centered, the omni − bearing selector should read 0 with the to/from indicator showing “from,” or the omni − bearing selector should read 180 with the to/from indicator showing “to.” Should the VOR receiver operate a Radio Magnetic Indicator (RMI), it will indicate 180 on any OBS setting. Two means of identification are used. One is a series of dots, and the other is a continuous tone. Information concerning an individual test signal can be obtained from the local FSS.

3.4 A radiated VOR test signal from an appropriately rated radio repair station serves the same purpose as an FAA VOR signal and the check is made in much the same manner as a VOT with the following differences: 3.4.1 The frequency normally approved by the FCC is 108.0 MHz.

3.4.2 Repair stations are not permitted to radiate the VOR test signal continuously, consequently the owner/operator must make arrangements with the repair station to have the test signal transmitted. This service is not provided by all radio repair stations. The aircraft owner or operator must determine which repair station in the local area provides this service. A representative of the repair station must make an entry into the aircraft logbook or other permanent record certifying to the radial accuracy and the date of transmission. The owner/operator or representative of the repair station may accomplish the necessary checks in the aircraft and make a logbook entry stating the results. It is necessary to verify which test radial is being transmitted and whether you should get a “to” or “from” indication.

3.5 Airborne and ground check points consist of certified radials that should be received at specific points on the airport surface, or over specific landmarks while airborne in the immediate vicinity of the airport.

3.5.1 Should an error in excess of plus or minus 4 degrees be indicated through use of a ground check, or plus or minus 6 degrees using the airborne check, IFR flight must not be attempted without first correcting the source of the error.

CAUTION − No correction other than the “correction card” figures supplied by the manufacturer should be applied in making these VOR receiver checks.

3.5.2 Locations of airborne check points, ground check points and VOTs are published in the Chart Supplement.

3.5.3 If a dual system VOR (units independent of each other except for the antenna) is installed in the aircraft, one system may be checked against the other. Turn both systems to the same VOR ground facility and note the indicated bearing to that station. The maximum permissible variations between the two indicated bearings is 4 degrees.

4. Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) 4.1 In the operation of DME, paired pulses at a specific spacing are sent out from the aircraft (this is the interrogation) and are received at the ground station. The ground station (transponder) then transmits paired pulses back to the aircraft at the same pulse spacing but on a different frequency. The time required for the round trip of this signal exchange is measured in the airborne DME unit and is translated into distance (nautical miles (NM)) from the aircraft to the ground station.

4.2 Operating on the line − of − sight principle, DME furnishes distance information with a very high degree of accuracy. Reliable signals may be received at distances up to 199 NM at line − of − sight altitude with an accuracy of better than / mile or 3% of the distance, whichever is greater. Distance information received from DME equipment is SLANT RANGE distance and not actual horizontal distance.

4.3 Operating frequency range of a DME according to ICAO Annex 10 is from 960 MHz to 1215 MHz. Aircraft equipped with TACAN equipment will receive distance information from a VORTAC automatically, while aircraft equipped with VOR must have a separate DME airborne unit.

4.4 VOR/DME, VORTAC, ILS/DME, and LOC/DME navigation facilities established by the FAA provide course and distance information from collocated components under a frequency pairing plan. Aircraft receiving Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 equipment which provides for automatic DME selection assures reception of azimuth and distance information from a common source whenever designated VOR/DME, VORTAC, ILS/DME, and LOC/DME are selected.

4.5 Due to the limited number of available frequencies, assignment of paired frequencies is required for certain military noncollocated VOR and TACAN facilities which serve the same area but which may be separated by distances up to a few miles.

4.6 VOR/DME, VORTAC, ILS/DME, and LOC/DME facilities are identified by synchronized identifications which are transmitted on a time share basis. The VOR or localizer portion of the facility is identified by a coded tone modulated at 1020 Hz or by a combination of code and voice. The TACAN or DME is identified by a coded tone modulated at 1350 Hz. The DME or TACAN coded identification is transmitted one time for each three or four times that the VOR or localizer coded identification is transmitted. When either the VOR or the DME is inoperative, it is important to recognize which identifier is retained for the operative facility. A signal coded identification with a repetition interval of approximately 30 seconds indicates that the DME is operative.

4.7 Aircraft equipment which provides for automatic DME selection assures reception of azimuth and distance information from a common source whenever designated VOR/DME, VORTAC, and ILS/DME navigation facilities are selected. Pilots are cautioned to disregard any distance displays from automatically selected DME equipment when VOR or ILS facilities, which do not have the DME feature installed, are being used for position determination.

5. Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) 5.1 For reasons peculiar to military or naval operations (unusual siting conditions, the pitching and rolling of a naval vessel, etc.) the civil VOR/DME system of air navigation was considered unsuitable for military or naval use. A new navigational system, Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN), was therefore developed by the military and naval forces to more readily lend itself to military and naval requirements. As a result, the FAA has integrated TACAN facilities with the civil VOR/DME program. Although the theoretical, or technical principles of operation of TACAN equipment are quite different from those of VOR/DME facilities, the end result, as far as the navigating pilot is concerned, is the same. These integrated facilities are called VORTACs.

5.2 TACAN ground equipment consists of either a fixed or mobile transmitting unit. The airborne unit in conjunction with the ground unit reduces the transmitted signal to a visual presentation of both azimuth and distance information. TACAN is a pulse system and operates in the UHF band of frequencies. Its use requires TACAN airborne equipment and does not operate through conventional VOR equipment.

5.3 A VORTAC is a facility consisting of two components, VOR and TACAN, which provides three individual services: VOR azimuth, TACAN azimuth, and TACAN distance (DME) at one site. Although consisting of more than one component, incorporating more than one operating frequency, and using more than one antenna system, a VORTAC is considered to be a unified navigational aid. Both components of a VORTAC are envisioned as operating simultaneously and providing the three services at all times.

5.4 Transmitted signals of VOR and TACAN are each identified by three − letter code transmission and are interlocked so that pilots using VOR azimuth and TACAN distance can be assured that both signals being received are definitely from the same ground station. The frequency channels of the VOR and the TACAN at each VORTAC facility are “paired” in accordance with a national plan to simplify airborne operation.

6. Instrument Landing System (ILS) 6.1 General 6.1.1 The ILS is designed to provide an approach path for exact alignment and descent of an aircraft on final approach to a runway.

6.1.2 The basic components of an ILS are the localizer, glide slope, and Outer Marker (OM) and, when installed for use with Category II or Category III instrument approach procedures, an Inner Marker (IM).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.1.3 The system may be divided functionally into three parts: 6.1.3.1 Guidance information: localizer, glide slope.

6.1.3.2 Range information: marker beacon, DME.

6.1.3.3 Visual information: approach lights, touchdown and centerline lights, runway lights.

6.1.4 The following means may be used to substitute for the OM: 6.1.4.1 Compass locator; or 6.1.4.2 Precision Approach Radar (PAR); or 6.1.4.3 Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR); or 6.1.4.4 Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), Very High Frequency Omni − directional Range (VOR), or Nondirectional beacon fixes authorized in the Standard Instrument Approach Procedure; or 6.1.4.5 A suitable RNAV system with Global Positioning System (GPS), capable of fix identification on a Standard Instrument Approach Procedure.

6.1.5 Where a complete ILS system is installed on each end of a runway (i.e., the approach end of runway 4 and the approach end of runway 22), the ILS systems are not in service simultaneously.

6.2 Localizer 6.2.1 The localizer transmitter, operates on one of 40 ILS channels within the frequency range of 108.10 MHz to 111.95 MHz. Signals provide the pilot with course guidance to the runway centerline.

6.2.2 The approach course of the localizer is called the front course and is used with other functional parts; e.g., glide slope, marker beacons, etc. The localizer signal is transmitted at the far end of the runway. It is adjusted for a course width (full scale fly − left to a full scale fly − right) of 700 feet at the runway threshold.

6.2.3 The course line along the extended centerline of a runway, in the opposite direction to the front course, is called the back course.

CAUTION − Unless your aircraft’s ILS equipment includes reverse sensing capability, when flying inbound on the back course it is necessary to steer the aircraft in the direction opposite of the needle deflection on the airborne equipment when making corrections from off − course to on − course. This “flying away from the needle” is also required when flying outbound on the front course of the localizer. Do not use back course signals for approach unless a back course approach procedure is published for that particular runway and the approach is authorized by ATC.

6.2.4 Identification is in Morse Code and consists of a three − letter identifier preceded by the letter I ( ) transmitted on the localizer frequency.

EXAMPLE − I − DIA 6.2.5 The localizer provides course guidance throughout the descent path to the runway threshold from a distance of 18 NM from the antenna between an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest terrain along the course line and 4,500 feet above the elevation of the antenna site. Proper off − course indications are provided throughout the following angular areas of the operational service volume: 6.2.5.1 To 10 either side of the course along a radius of 18 NM from the antenna.

6.2.5.2 From 10 to 35 either side of the course along a radius of 10 NM. (See FIG ENR 4.1 − 1 .)

6.2.6 Unreliable signals may be received outside of these areas. ATC may clear aircraft on procedures beyond the service volume when the controller initiates the action or when the pilot requests, and radar monitoring is provided.

6.2.7 The areas described in paragraph 6.2.5 and depicted in FIG ENR 4.1 − 1 represent a Standard Service Volume (SSV) localizer. All charted procedures with localizer coverage beyond the 18 NM SSV have been Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 through the approval process for Expanded Service Volume (ESV), and have been validated by flight inspection.

(See FIG ENR 4.1 − 2 .)

FIG ENR 4.1 − 1 Limits of Localizer Coverage FIG ENR 4.1 − 2 ILS Expanded Service Volume Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.3 Localizer − Type Directional Aid 6.3.1 The localizer − type directional aid (LDA) is of comparable use and accuracy to a localizer but is not part of a complete ILS. The LDA course usually provides a more precise approach course than the similar Simplified Directional Facility (SDF) installation, which may have a course width of 6 degrees or 12 degrees.

6.3.2 The LDA is not aligned with the runway. Straight − in minimums may be published where alignment does not exceed 30 degrees between the course and runway. Circling minimums only are published where this alignment exceeds 30 degrees.

6.3.3 A very limited number of LDA approaches also incorporate a glideslope. These are annotated in the plan view of the instrument approach chart with a note, “LDA/Glideslope.” These procedures fall under a newly defined category of approaches called Approach with Vertical Guidance (APV) described in ENR 1.5, Paragraph 12. , Instrument Approach Procedure Charts, subparagraph 12.1.7.2 , Approach with Vertical Guidance (APV).

LDA minima for with and without glideslope is provided and annotated on the minima lines of the approach chart as S − LDA/GS and S − LDA. Because the final approach course is not aligned with the runway centerline, additional maneuvering will be required compared to an ILS approach.

6.4 Glide Slope/Glide Path 6.4.1 The UHF glide slope transmitter, operating on one of the 40 ILS channels within the frequency range 329.15 MHz, to 335.00 MHz radiates its signals in the direction of the localizer front course.

CAUTION − False glide slope signals may exist in the area of the localizer back course approach which can cause the glide slope flag alarm to disappear and present unreliable glide slope information. Disregard all glide slope signal indications when making a localizer back course approach unless a glide slope is specified on the approach and landing chart.

6.4.2 The glide slope transmitter is located between 750 and 1,250 feet from the approach end of the runway (down the runway) and offset 250 − 600 feet from the runway centerline. It transmits a glide path beam 1.4 degrees wide (vertically).

NOTE − The term “glide path” means that portion of the glide slope that intersects the localizer.

6.4.3 The glide path projection angle is normally adjusted to 3 degrees above horizontal so that it intersects the middle marker at about 200 feet and the outer marker at about 1,400 feet above the runway elevation. The glide slope is normally usable to the distance of 10 NM. However, at some locations, the glide slope has been certified for an extended service volume which exceeds 10 NM.

6.4.4 Pilots must be alert when approaching glidepath interception. False courses and reverse sensing will occur at angles considerably greater than the published path.

6.4.5 Make every effort to remain on the indicated glide path. Exercise caution: avoid flying below the glide path to assure obstacle/terrain clearance is maintained.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 91.129(e).

6.4.6 A glide slope facility provides descent information for navigation down to the lowest authorized decision height (DH) specified in the approved ILS approach procedure. The glidepath may not be suitable for navigation below the lowest authorized DH and any reference to glidepath indications below that height must be supplemented by visual reference to the runway environment. Glide slopes with no published DH are usable to runway threshold.

6.4.7 The published glide slope threshold crossing height (TCH) DOES NOT represent the height of the actual glide slope on course indication above the runway threshold. It is used as a reference for planning purposes which represents the height above the runway threshold that an aircraft’s glide slope antenna should be, if that aircraft remains on a trajectory formed by the four − mile − to − middle marker glidepath segment.

6.4.8 Pilots must be aware of the vertical height between the aircraft’s glide slope antenna and the main gear in the landing configuration and, at the DH, plan to adjust the descent angle accordingly if the published TCH Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 indicates the wheel crossing height over the runway threshold may be satisfactory. Tests indicate a comfortable wheel crossing height is approximately 20 to 30 feet, depending on the type of aircraft.

NOTE − The TCH for a runway is established based on several factors including the largest aircraft category that normally uses the runway, how airport layout affects the glide slope antenna placement, and terrain. A higher than optimum TCH, with the same glide path angle, may cause the aircraft to touch down further from the threshold if the trajectory of the approach is maintained until the flare. Pilots should consider the effect of a high TCH on the runway available for stopping the aircraft.

6.5 Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) 6.5.1 When installed with an ILS and specified in the approach procedure, DME may be used: 6.5.1.1 In lieu of the outer marker.

6.5.1.2 As a back course final approach fix.

6.5.1.3 To establish other fixes on the localizer course.

6.5.2 In some cases, DME from a separate facility may be used within Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) limitations: 6.5.2.1 To provide ARC initial approach segments.

6.5.2.2 As a final approach fix for back course approaches.

6.5.2.3 As a substitute for the outer marker.

6.6 Marker Beacon 6.6.1 ILS marker beacons have a rated power output of 3 watts or less and an antenna array designed to produce an elliptical pattern with dimensions, at 1,000 feet above the antenna, of approximately 2,400 feet in width and 4,200 feet in length. Airborne marker beacon receivers with a selective sensitivity feature should always be operated in the “low” sensitivity position for proper reception of ILS marker beacons.

6.6.2 ILS systems may have an associated OM. An MM is no longer required. Locations with a Category II ILS also have an Inner Marker (IM). Due to advances in both ground navigation equipment and airborne avionics, as well as the numerous means that may be used as a substitute for a marker beacon, the current requirements for the use of marker beacons are: 6.6.2.1 An OM or suitable substitute identifies the Final Approach Fix (FAF) for nonprecision approach (NPA) operations (for example, localizer only); and 6.6.2.2 The MM indicates a position approximately 3,500 feet from the landing threshold. This is also the position where an aircraft on the glide path will be at an altitude of approximately 200 feet above the elevation of the touchdown zone. A MM is no longer operationally required. There are some MMs still in use, but there are no MMs being installed at new ILS sites by the FAA; and 6.6.2.3 An IM, where installed, indicates the point at which an aircraft is at decision height on the glide path during a Category II ILS approach. An IM is only required for CAT II operations that do not have a published radio altitude (RA) minimum.

6.6.3 A back course marker, normally indicates the ILS back course final approach fix where approach descent is commenced.

TBL ENR 4.1 − 1 Marker Passage Indications Marker Code Light OM BLUE MM AMBER IM WHITE BC WHITE Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7. Compass Locator 7.1 Compass locator transmitters are often situated at the middle and outer marker sites. The transmitters have a power of less than 25 watts, a range of at least 15 miles, and operate between 190 and 535 kHz. At some locations, higher − powered radio beacons, up to 400 watts, are used as outer marker compass locators.

7.2 Compass locators transmit two − letter identification groups. The outer locator transmits the first two letters of the localizer identification group, and the middle locator transmits the last two letters of the localizer identification group.

8. ILS Frequency 8.1 The frequency pairs in TBL ENR 4.1 − 2 are allocated for ILS.

TBL ENR 4.1 − 2 Frequency Pairs Allocated for ILS Localizer MHz Glide Slope Localizer MHz Glide Slope 110.1 334.40 108.10 334.70 110.15 334.25 108.15 334.55 110.3 335.00 108.3 334.10 110.35 334.85 108.35 333.95 110.5 329.60 108.5 329.90 110.55 329.45 108.55 329.75 110.70 330.20 108.7 330.50 110.75 330.05 108.75 330.35 110.90 330.80 108.9 329.30 110.95 330.65 108.95 329.15 111.10 331.70 109.1 331.40 111.15 331.55 109.15 331.25 111.30 332.30 109.3 332.00 111.35 332.15 109.35 331.85 111.50 332.9 109.50 332.60 111.55 332.75 109.55 332.45 111.70 333.5 109.70 333.20 111.75 333.35 109.75 333.05 111.90 331.1 109.90 333.80 111.95 330.95 109.95 333.65 9. ILS Minimums 9.1 The lowest authorized ILS minimums, with all required ground and airborne systems components operative, are: 9.1.1 Category I. Decision Height (DH) 200 feet and Runway Visual Range (RVR) 2,400 feet (with touchdown zone and centerline lighting, RVR 1,800 feet), or (with Autopilot or FD or HUD, RVR 1,800 feet); 9.1.2 Special Authorization Category I. DH 150 feet and Runway Visual Range (RVR) 1,400 feet, HUD to DH; 9.1.3 Category II. DH 100 feet and RVR 1,200 feet (with autoland or HUD to touchdown and noted on authorization, RVR 1,000 feet); 9.1.4 Special Authorization Category II with Reduced Lighting. DH 100 feet and RVR 1,200 feet with autoland or HUD to touchdown and noted on authorization, (touchdown zone, centerline lighting and ALSF − 2 are not required); 9.1.5 Category IIIa. No DH or DH below 100 feet and RVR not less than 700 feet; Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9.1.6 Category IIIb. No DH or DH below 50 feet and RVR less than 700 feet but not less than 150 feet; and 9.1.7 Category IIIc. No DH and no RVR limitation.

NOTE − Special authorization and equipment are required for Category II and III.

10. Inoperative ILS Components 10.1 Inoperative Localizer. When the localizer fails, an ILS approach is not authorized.

10.2 Inoperative Glide Slope. When the glide slope fails, the ILS reverts to a nonprecision localizer approach.

REFERENCE − See the Inoperative Component Table in the U.S. Government Terminal Procedures Publication (TPP) for adjustments to minimums due to inoperative airborne or ground system equipment.

11. ILS Course and Glideslope Distortion 11.1 All pilots should be aware that ILS installations are subject to signal interference by surface vehicles and aircraft (either on the ground or airborne). ILS CRITICAL AREAS are established near each localizer and glide slope antenna. Pilots should be aware of the level of critical area protection they can expect in various weather conditions and understand that signal disturbances may occur as a result of normal airport operations irrespective of the official weather observation.

11.2 ATC is not always required to issue control instructions to avoid interfering operations within ILS critical areas at controlled airports during the hours the Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) is in operation. ATC responsibilities vary depending on the official weather observation and are described as follows: 11.2.1 Weather Conditions. Official weather observation indicates a ceiling of 800 feet or higher and visibility 2 miles or greater, no localizer or glideslope critical area protection is provided by ATC unless specifically requested by the flight crew.

11.2.2 Weather Conditions. Official weather observation indicates a ceiling of less than 800 feet or visibility less than 2 miles.

11.2.2.1 Holding. Aircraft holding below 5,000 feet between the outer marker and the airport may cause localizer signal variations for aircraft conducting the ILS approach. Accordingly, such holding will not be authorized by ATC.

11.2.2.2 Localizer Critical Area. When an arriving aircraft is inside the outer marker (OM) or the fix used in lieu of the OM, vehicles and aircraft will not be authorized in or over the precision approach critical area except: a) A preceding arriving aircraft on the same or another runway may pass over or through the localizer critical area, and; b) A preceding departing aircraft or missed approach on the same or another runway may pass through or over the localizer critical area.

11.2.2.3 Glide Slope Critical Area. ATC will not authorize vehicles or aircraft operations in or over the glideslope critical area when an arriving aircraft is inside the outer marker (OM), or the fix used in lieu of the OM, unless the arriving aircraft has reported the runway in sight and is circling or side − stepping to land on another runway.

11.2.3 Weather Conditions. Official weather observation indicates a ceiling less than 200 feet or runway visual range (RVR) less than 2000 feet.

11.2.3.1 Localizer Critical Area. In addition to the critical area protection described in 11.2.2 above, when an arriving aircraft is inside the middle marker (MM), or in the absence of a MM, ½ mile final, ATC will not authorize: a) A preceding arriving aircraft on the same or another runway to pass over or through the localizer critical area, or; Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 b) A preceding departing aircraft or missed approach on the same or another runway to pass through or over the localizer critical area.

11.3 In order to ensure that pilot and controller expectations match with respect to critical area protection for a given approach and landing operation, a flight crew should advise the tower any time it intends to conduct any autoland operation or use an SA CAT I, any CAT II, or any CAT III line of minima anytime the official weather observation is at or above a ceiling of 800 feet and 2 miles visibility. If ATC is unable to protect the critical area, they will advise the flight crew.

EXAMPLE − Denver Tower, United 1153, Request Autoland (runway) ATC replies with: United 1153, Denver Tower, Roger, Critical Areas not protected.

11.4 Pilots are cautioned that even when the critical areas are considered to be protected, unless the official weather observation including controller observations indicates a ceiling less than 200 feet or RVR less than 2000 feet, ATC may still authorize a preceding arriving, departing, or missed approach aircraft to pass through or over the localizer critical area and that this may cause signal disturbances that could result in an undesired aircraft state during the final stages of the approach, landing, and rollout.

11.5 Pilots are cautioned that vehicular traffic not subject to ATC may cause momentary deviation to ILS course or glide slope signals. Also, critical areas are not protected at uncontrolled airports or at airports with an operating control tower when weather or visibility conditions are above those requiring protective measures. Aircraft conducting coupled or autoland operations should be especially alert in monitoring automatic flight control systems and be prepared to intervene as necessary. (See FIG ENR 4.1 − 3 .)

NOTE − Unless otherwise coordinated through Flight Standards, ILS signals to Category I runways are not flight inspected below the point that is 100 feet less than the decision altitude (DA). Guidance signal anomalies may be encountered below this altitude.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 4.1 − 3 FAA Instrument Landing Systems Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 12. Continuous Power Facilities 12.1 In order to ensure that a basic ATC system remains in operation despite an area wide or catastrophic commercial power failure, key equipment and certain airports have been designated to provide a network of facilities whose operational capability can be utilized independent of any commercial power supply.

12.2 In addition to those facilities comprising the basic ATC system, the following approach and lighting aids have been included in this program for a selected runway: 12.2.1 ILS (Localizer, Glide Slope, Compass Locator, Inner, Middle and Outer Markers).

12.2.2 Wind Measuring Capability.

12.2.3 Approach Light System (ALS) or Short ALS (SALS).

12.2.4 Ceiling Measuring Capability.

12.2.5 Touchdown Zone Lighting (TDZL).

12.2.6 Centerline Lighting (CL).

12.2.7 Runway Visual Range (RVR).

12.2.8 High Intensity Runway Lighting (HIRL).

12.2.9 Taxiway Lighting.

12.2.10 Apron Light (Perimeter Only).

TBL ENR 4.1 − 3 Continuous Power Airports Airport/Ident Runway No.

Albuquerque (ABQ) 08 Andrews AFB (ADW) 1L Atlanta (ATL) 9R Baltimore (BWI) 10 Bismarck (BIS) 31 Boise (BOI) 10R Boston (BOS) 4R Charlotte (CLT) 36L Chicago (ORD) 14R Cincinnati (CVG) 36 Cleveland (CLE) 5R Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) 17L Denver (DEN) 35R Des Moines (DSM) 30R Detroit (DTW) 3L El Paso (ELP) 22 Great Falls (GTF) 03 Houston (IAH) 08 Indianapolis (IND) 4L Jacksonville (JAX) 07 Kansas City (MCI) 19 Los Angeles (LAX) 24R Memphis (MEM) 36L Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Airport/Ident Runway No.

Miami (MIA) 9L Milwaukee (MKE) 01 Minneapolis (MSP) 29L Nashville (BNA) 2L Newark (EWR) 4R New Orleans (MSY) 10 New York (JFK) 4R New York (LGA) 22 Oklahoma City (OKC) 35R Omaha (OMA) 14 Ontario, California (ONT) 26R Philadelphia (PHL) 9R Phoenix (PHX) 08R Pittsburgh (PIT) 10L Reno (RNO) 16 Salt Lake City (SLC) 34L San Antonio (SAT) 12R San Diego (SAN) 09 San Francisco (SFO) 28R Seattle (SEA) 16R St. Louis (STL) 24 Tampa (TPA) 36L Tulsa (TUL) 35R Washington (DCA) 36 Washington (IAD) 1R Wichita (ICT) 01 12.3 The above have been designated “Continuous Power Airports,” and have independent back up capability for the equipment installed.

NOTE − The existing CPA runway is listed. Pending and future changes at some locations will require a revised runway designation.

13. Simplified Directional Facility (SDF) 13.1 The SDF provides a final approach course similar to that of the ILS localizer. It does not provide glide slope information. A clear understanding of the ILS localizer and the additional factors listed below completely describe the operational characteristics and use of the SDF.

13.2 The SDF transmits signals within the range of 108.10 to 111.95 MHz.

13.3 The approach techniques and procedures used in an SDF instrument approach are essentially the same as those employed in executing a standard no − glide − slope localizer approach except the SDF course may not be aligned with the runway and the course may be wider, resulting in less precision.

13.4 Usable off − course indications are limited to 35 degrees either side of the course centerline. Instrument indications received beyond 35 degrees should be disregarded.

13.5 The SDF antenna may be offset from the runway centerline. Because of this, the angle of convergence between the final approach course and the runway bearing should be determined by reference to the instrument Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 approach procedure chart. This angle is generally not more than 3 degrees. However, it should be noted that inasmuch as the approach course originates at the antenna site, an approach which is continued beyond the runway threshold will lead the aircraft to the SDF offset position rather than along the runway centerline.

13.6 The SDF signal is fixed at either 6 degrees or 12 degrees as necessary to provide maximum “fly ability” and optimum course quality.

13.7 Identification consists of a three − letter identifier transmitted in Morse Code on the SDF frequency. The appropriate instrument approach chart will indicate the identifier used at a particular airport.

14. LORAN NOTE − In accordance with the 2010 DHS Appropriations Act, the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) terminated the transmission of all U.S.

LORAN − C signals on 08 Feb 2010. The USCG also terminated the transmission of the Russian American signals on 01 Aug 2010, and the Canadian LORAN − C signals on 03 Aug 2010. For more information, visit http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/.

Operators should also note that TSO − C60b, AIRBORNE AREA NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT USING LORAN − C INPUTS, has been canceled by the FAA.

15. Inertial Reference Unit (IRU), Inertial Navigation System (INS), and Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS) 15.1 IRUs are self − contained systems comprised of gyros and accelerometers that provide aircraft attitude (pitch, roll, and heading), position, and velocity information in response to signals resulting from inertial effects on system components. Once aligned with a known position, IRUs continuously calculate position and velocity.

IRU position accuracy decays with time. This degradation is known as “drift.” 15.2 INSs combine the components of an IRU with an internal navigation computer. By programming a series of waypoints, these systems will navigate along a predetermined track.

15.3 AHRSs are electronic devices that provide attitude information to aircraft systems such as weather radar and autopilot, but do not directly compute position information.

15.4 Aircraft equipped with slaved compass systems may be susceptible to heading errors caused by exposure to magnetic field disturbances (flux fields) found in materials that are commonly located on the surface or buried under taxiways and ramps. These materials generate a magnetic flux field that can be sensed by the aircraft’s compass system flux detector or “gate”, which can cause the aircraft’s system to align with the material’s magnetic field rather than the earth’s natural magnetic field. The system’s erroneous heading may not self-correct. Prior to take off pilots should be aware that a heading misalignment may have occurred during taxi.

Pilots are encouraged to follow the manufacturer’s or other appropriate procedures to correct possible heading misalignment before take off is commenced.

16. Global Positioning System (GPS) 16.1 System Overview 16.1.1 System Description. The Global Positioning System is a space-based radio navigation system used to determine precise position anywhere in the world. The 24 satellite constellation is designed to ensure at least five satellites are always visible to a user worldwide. A minimum of four satellites is necessary for receivers to establish an accurate three − dimensional position. The receiver uses data from satellites above the mask angle (the lowest angle above the horizon at which a receiver can use a satellite). The Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for operating the GPS satellite constellation and monitors the GPS satellites to ensure proper operation. Each satellite’s orbital parameters (ephemeris data) are sent to each satellite for broadcast as part of the data message embedded in the GPS signal. The GPS coordinate system is the Cartesian earth − centered, earth − fixed coordinates as specified in the World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS − 84).

16.1.2 System Availability and Reliability Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 16.1.2.1 The status of GPS satellites is broadcast as part of the data message transmitted by the GPS satellites.

GPS status information is also available by means of the U.S. Coast Guard navigation information service: (703) 313 − 5907, Internet: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/. Additionally, satellite status is available through the Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) system.

16.1.2.2 GNSS operational status depends on the type of equipment being used. For GPS − only equipment TSO − C129 or TSO-C196(), the operational status of non − precision approach capability for flight planning purposes is provided through a prediction program that is embedded in the receiver or provided separately.

16.1.3 Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM). RAIM is the capability of a GPS receiver to perform integrity monitoring on itself by ensuring available satellite signals meet the integrity requirements for a given phase of flight. Without RAIM, the pilot has no assurance of the GPS position integrity. RAIM provides immediate feedback to the pilot. This fault detection is critical for performance-based navigation (PBN)(see ENR 1.16, Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) and Area Navigation (RNAV), for an introduction to PBN), because delays of up to two hours can occur before an erroneous satellite transmission is detected and corrected by the satellite control segment.

16.1.3.1 In order for RAIM to determine if a satellite is providing corrupted information, at least one satellite, in addition to those required for navigation, must be in view for the receiver to perform the RAIM function.

RAIM requires a minimum of 5 satellites, or 4 satellites and barometric altimeter input (baro − aiding), to detect an integrity anomaly. Baro − aiding is a method of augmenting the GPS integrity solution by using a non-satellite input source in lieu of the fifth satellite. Some GPS receivers also have a RAIM capability, called fault detection and exclusion (FDE), that excludes a failed satellite from the position solution; GPS receivers capable of FDE require 6 satellites or 5 satellites with baro − aiding. This allows the GPS receiver to isolate the corrupt satellite signal, remove it from the position solution, and still provide an integrity-assured position. To ensure that baro − aiding is available, enter the current altimeter setting into the receiver as described in the operating manual.

Do not use the GPS derived altitude due to the large GPS vertical errors that will make the integrity monitoring function invalid.

16.1.3.2 There are generally two types of RAIM fault messages. The first type of message indicates that there are not enough satellites available to provide RAIM integrity monitoring. The GPS navigation solution may be acceptable, but the integrity of the solution cannot be determined. The second type indicates that the RAIM integrity monitor has detected a potential error and that there is an inconsistency in the navigation solution for the given phase of flight. Without RAIM capability, the pilot has no assurance of the accuracy of the GPS position.

16.1.4 Selective Availability. Selective Availability (SA) is a method by which the accuracy of GPS is intentionally degraded. This feature was designed to deny hostile use of precise GPS positioning data. SA was discontinued on May 1, 2000, but many GPS receivers are designed to assume that SA is still active. New receivers may take advantage of the discontinuance of SA based on the performance values in ICAO Annex 10.

16.2 Operational Use of GPS. U.S. civil operators may use approved GPS equipment in oceanic airspace, certain remote areas, the National Airspace System and other States as authorized (please consult the applicable Aeronautical Information Publication). Equipage other than GPS may be required for the desired operation. GPS navigation is used for both Visual Flight Rules (VFR) and Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations.

16.2.1 VFR Operations 16.2.1.1 GPS navigation has become an asset to VFR pilots by providing increased navigational capabilities and enhanced situational awareness. Although GPS has provided many benefits to the VFR pilot, care must be exercised to ensure that system capabilities are not exceeded. VFR pilots should integrate GPS navigation with electronic navigation (when possible), as well as pilotage and dead reckoning.

16.2.1.2 GPS receivers used for VFR navigation vary from fully integrated IFR/VFR installation used to support VFR operations to hand − held devices. Pilots must understand the limitations of the receivers prior to using in flight to avoid misusing navigation information. (See TBL ENR 4.1 − 5 .) Most receivers are not intuitive. The Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 pilot must learn the various keystrokes, knob functions, and displays that are used in the operation of the receiver.

Some manufacturers provide computer − based tutorials or simulations of their receivers that pilots can use to become familiar with operating the equipment.

16.2.1.3 When using GPS for VFR operations, RAIM capability, database currency, and antenna location are critical areas of concern.

a) RAIM Capability. VFR GPS panel mount receivers and hand − held units have no RAIM alerting capability.

This prevents the pilot from being alerted to the loss of the required number of satellites in view, or the detection of a position error. Pilots should use a systematic cross − check with other navigation techniques to verify position.

Be suspicious of the GPS position if a disagreement exists between the two positions.

b) Database Currency. Check the currency of the database. Databases must be updated for IFR operations and should be updated for all other operations. However, there is no requirement for databases to be updated for VFR navigation. It is not recommended to use a moving map with an outdated database in and around critical airspace.

Pilots using an outdated database should verify waypoints using current aeronautical products; for example, Chart Supplement, Sectional Chart, or En Route Chart.

c) Antenna Location. The antenna location for GPS receivers used for IFR and VFR operations may differ.

VFR antennae are typically placed for convenience more than performance, while IFR installations ensure a clear view is provided with the satellites. Antennae not providing a clear view have a greater opportunity to lose the satellite navigational signal. This is especially true in the case of hand − held GPS receivers. Typically, suction cups are used to place the GPS antennas on the inside of cockpit windows. While this method has great utility, the antenna location is limited to the cockpit or cabin which rarely provides a clear view of all available satellites.

Consequently, signal losses may occur due to aircraft structure blocking satellite signals, causing a loss of navigation capability. These losses, coupled with a lack of RAIM capability, could present erroneous position and navigation information with no warning to the pilot. While the use of a hand − held GPS for VFR operations is not limited by regulation, modification of the aircraft, such as installing a panel − or yoke − mounted holder, is governed by 14 CFR Part 43. Consult with your mechanic to ensure compliance with the regulation and safe installation.

16.2.1.4 Do not solely rely on GPS for VFR navigation. No design standard of accuracy or integrity is used for a VFR GPS receiver. VFR GPS receivers should be used in conjunction with other forms of navigation during VFR operations to ensure a correct route of flight is maintained. Minimize head − down time in the aircraft by being familiar with your GPS receiver’s operation and by keeping eyes outside scanning for traffic, terrain, and obstacles.

16.2.1.5 VFR Waypoints a) VFR waypoints provide VFR pilots with a supplementary tool to assist with position awareness while navigating visually in aircraft equipped with area navigation receivers. VFR waypoints should be used as a tool to supplement current navigation procedures. The uses of VFR waypoints include providing navigational aids for pilots unfamiliar with an area, waypoint definition of existing reporting points, enhanced navigation in and around Class B and Class C airspace, enhanced navigation around Special Use Airspace, and entry points for commonly flown mountain passes. VFR pilots should rely on appropriate and current aeronautical charts published specifically for visual navigation. If operating in a terminal area, pilots should take advantage of the Terminal Area Chart available for that area, if published. The use of VFR waypoints does not relieve the pilot of any responsibility to comply with the operational requirements of 14 CFR Part 91.

b) VFR waypoint names (for computer entry and flight plans) consist of five letters beginning with the letters “VP” and are retrievable from navigation databases. The VFR waypoint names are not intended to be pronounceable, and they are not for use in ATC communications. On VFR charts, stand − alone VFR waypoints will be portrayed using the same four − point star symbol used for IFR waypoints. VFR waypoints collocated with visual check − points on the chart will be identified by small magenta flag symbols. VFR waypoints collocated with visual check − points will be pronounceable based on the name of the visual check − point and may be used for ATC communications. Each VFR waypoint name will appear in parentheses adjacent to the geographic Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 location on the chart. Latitude/longitude data for all established VFR waypoints is accessible through in FAA Order JO 7350.9, Location Identifiers.

c) VFR waypoints may not be used on IFR flight plans. VFR waypoints are not recognized by the IFR system and will be rejected for IFR routing purposes.

d) Pilots may use the five − letter identifier as a waypoint in the route of flight section on a VFR flight plan.

Pilots may use the VFR waypoints only when operating under VFR conditions. The point may represent an intended course change or describe the planned route of flight. This VFR filing would be similar to how a VOR would be used in a route of flight.

e) VFR waypoints intended for use during flight should be loaded into the receiver while on the ground. Once airborne, pilots should avoid programming routes or VFR waypoint chains into their receivers.

f) Pilots should be vigilant to see and avoid other traffic when near VFR waypoints. With the increased use of GPS navigation and accuracy, expect increased traffic near VFR waypoints. Regardless of the class of airspace, monitor the available ATC frequency for traffic information on other aircraft operating in the vicinity.

See ENR 1.16 , paragraph NO TAG VFR in Congested Areas, for more information.

g) Mountain pass entry points are marked for convenience to assist pilots with flight planning and visual navigation. Do not attempt to fly a mountain pass directly from VFR waypoint to VFR waypoint—they do not create a path through the mountain pass. Alternative routes are always available. It is the pilot in command’s responsibility to choose a suitable route for the intended flight and known conditions.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 5.3, Para 2, Other Potential Hazards, Subpara. 2.7, Mountain Flying.

16.2.2 IFR Use of GPS 16.2.2.1 General Requirements. Authorization to conduct any GPS operation under IFR requires: a) GPS navigation equipment used for IFR operations must be approved in accordance with the requirements specified in Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO − C129(), TSO − C196(), TSO − C145(), or TSO − C146(), and the installation must be done in accordance with Advisory Circular AC 20 − 138(), Airworthiness Approval of Positioning and Navigation Systems . Equipment approved in accordance with TSO − C115a does not meet the requirements of TSO − C129. Visual flight rules (VFR) and hand − held GPS systems are not authorized for IFR navigation, instrument approaches, or as a principal instrument flight reference.

b) Aircraft using un-augmented GPS (TSO-C129() or TSO-C196()) for navigation under IFR must be equipped with an alternate approved and operational means of navigation suitable for navigating the proposed route of flight. (Examples of alternate navigation equipment include VOR or DME/DME/IRU capability).

Active monitoring of alternative navigation equipment is not required when RAIM is available for integrity monitoring. Active monitoring of an alternate means of navigation is required when the GPS RAIM capability is lost.

c) Procedures must be established for use in the event that the loss of RAIM capability is predicted to occur.

In situations where RAIM is predicted to be unavailable, the flight must rely on other approved navigation equipment, re-route to where RAIM is available, delay departure, or cancel the flight.

d) The GPS operation must be conducted in accordance with the FAA − approved aircraft flight manual (AFM) or flight manual supplement. Flight crew members must be thoroughly familiar with the particular GPS equipment installed in the aircraft, the receiver operation manual, and the AFM or flight manual supplement.

Operation, receiver presentation and capabilities of GPS equipment vary. Due to these differences, operation of GPS receivers of different brands, or even models of the same brand, under IFR should not be attempted without thorough operational knowledge. Most receivers have a built − in simulator mode, which allows the pilot to become familiar with operation prior to attempting operation in the aircraft.

e) Aircraft navigating by IFR − approved GPS are considered to be performance − based navigation (PBN) aircraft and have special equipment suffixes. File the appropriate equipment suffix in accordance with Appendix Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1, TBL 1 − 2, on the ATC flight plan. If GPS avionics become inoperative, the pilot should advise ATC and amend the equipment suffix.

f) Prior to any GPS IFR operation, the pilot must review appropriate NOTAMs and aeronautical information.

(See GPS NOTAMs/Aeronautical Information).

16.2.2.2 Database Requirements. The onboard navigation data must be current and appropriate for the region of intended operation and should include the navigation aids, waypoints, and relevant coded terminal airspace procedures for the departure, arrival, and alternate airfields.

a) Further database guidance for terminal and en route requirements may be found in AC 90-100, U.S.

Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations.

b) Further database guidance on Required Navigation Performance (RNP) instrument approach operations, RNP terminal, and RNP en route requirements may be found in AC 90-105, Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical Navigation in the U.S. National Airspace System.

c) All approach procedures to be flown must be retrievable from the current airborne navigation database supplied by the equipment manufacturer or other FAA − approved source. The system must be able to retrieve the procedure by name from the aircraft navigation database, not just as a manually entered series of waypoints.

Manual entry of waypoints using latitude/longitude or place/bearing is not permitted for approach procedures.

d) Prior to using a procedure or waypoint retrieved from the airborne navigation database, the pilot should verify the validity of the database. This verification should include the following preflight and inflight steps: 1) Preflight: (a) Determine the date of database issuance, and verify that the date/time of proposed use is before the expiration date/time.

(b) Verify that the database provider has not published a notice limiting the use of the specific waypoint or procedure.

2) Inflight: (a) Determine that the waypoints and transition names coincide with names found on the procedure chart.

Do not use waypoints which do not exactly match the spelling shown on published procedure charts.

(b) Determine that the waypoints are logical in location, in the correct order, and their orientation to each other is as found on the procedure chart, both laterally and vertically.

NOTE − There is no specific requirement to check each waypoint latitude and longitude, type of waypoint and/or altitude constraint, only the general relationship of waypoints in the procedure, or the logic of an individual waypoint’s location.

(c) If the cursory check of procedure logic or individual waypoint location, specified in [b] above, indicates a potential error, do not use the retrieved procedure or waypoint until a verification of latitude and longitude, waypoint type, and altitude constraints indicate full conformity with the published data.

e) Air carrier and commercial operators must meet the appropriate provisions of their approved operations specifications.

1) During domestic operations for commerce or for hire, operators must have a second navigation system capable of reversion or contingency operations.

2) Operators must have two independent navigation systems appropriate to the route to be flown, or one system that is suitable and a second, independent backup system that allows the operator to proceed safely to a suitable airport and complete an instrument approach, and the aircraft must have sufficient fuel (reference 14 CFR 121.349, 125.203, 129.17, and 135.165). These rules ensure the safety of the operation by preventing a single point of failure.

NOTE − An aircraft approved for multi − sensor navigation and equipped with a single navigation system must maintain an ability Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 to navigate or proceed safely in the event that any one component of the navigation system fails, including the flight management system (FMS). Retaining an FMS − independent VOR capability would satisfy this requirement.

3) The requirements for a second system apply to the entire set of equipment needed to achieve the navigation capability, not just the individual components of the system such as the radio navigation receiver. For example, to use two RNAV systems (e.g., GPS and DME/DME/IRU) to comply with the requirements, the aircraft must be equipped with two independent radio navigation receivers and two independent navigation computers (e.g., flight management systems (FMS)). Alternatively, to comply with the requirements using a single RNAV system with an installed and operable VOR capability, the VOR capability must be independent of the FMS.

4) Due to low risk of disruption or manipulation of GPS signals beyond 50 NM offshore, FAA differentiates between extended and non-extended overwater operations. To satisfy the requirement for two independent navigation systems: (a) For all extended over-water operations (defined in 14 CFR Part 1 as greater than 50 NM from the nearest shoreline), operators may consider dual GPS − based systems to meet the “independent” criteria stipulated by regulation, e.g., §121.349, §135.165.

(b) For all “non-extended overwater” operations, if the primary navigation system is GPS-based, the second system must be independent of GPS (for example, VOR or DME/DME/IRU). This allows continued navigation in case of failure of the GPS or WAAS services. Recognizing that GPS interference and test events resulting in the loss of GPS services have become more common, the FAA requires operators conducting IFR operations under 14 CFR 121.349, 125.203, 129.17, and 135.65 to retain a non-GPS navigation capability, for example either DME/DME, IRU, or VOR for en route and terminal operations, and VOR and ILS for final approach. Since this system is to be used as a reversionary capability, single equipage is sufficient.

16.2.3 Oceanic, Domestic, En Route, and Terminal Area Operations 16.2.3.1 Conduct GPS IFR operations in oceanic areas only when approved avionics systems are installed.

TSO − C196 users and TSO − C129 GPS users authorized for Class A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, or C2 operations may use GPS in place of another approved means of long − range navigation, such as dual INS. (See TBL ENR 4.1 − 4 and TBL ENR 4.1 − 5 .) Aircraft with a single installation GPS, meeting the above specifications, are authorized to operate on short oceanic routes requiring one means of long − range navigation (reference AC 20-138, Appendix 1).

16.2.3.2 Conduct GPS domestic, en route, and terminal IFR operations only when approved avionics systems are installed. Pilots may use GPS via TSO − C129 authorized for Class A1, B1, B3, C1, or C3 operations GPS via TSO-C196; or GPS/WAAS with either TSO-C145 or TSO-C146. When using TSO-C129 or TSO-C196 receivers, the avionics necessary to receive all of the ground − based facilities appropriate for the route to the destination airport and any required alternate airport must be installed and operational. Ground − based facilities necessary for these routes must be operational.

a) GPS en route IFR operations may be conducted in Alaska outside the operational service volume of ground − based navigation aids when a TSO − C145 or TSO − C146 GPS/wide area augmentation system (WAAS) system is installed and operating. WAAS is the U.S. version of a satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS).

1) In Alaska, aircraft may operate on GNSS Q-routes with GPS (TSO-C129 or TSO-C196) equipment while the aircraft remains in Air Traffic Control (ATC) radar surveillance or with GPS/WAAS (TSO-C145 or TSO-C146) which does not require ATC radar surveillance.

2) In Alaska, aircraft may only operate on GNSS T-routes with GPS/WAAS (TSO-C145 or TSO-C146) equipment.

b) Ground − based navigation equipment is not required to be installed and operating for en route IFR operations when using GPS/WAAS navigation systems. All operators should ensure that an alternate means of navigation is available in the unlikely event the GPS/WAAS navigation system becomes inoperative.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 22 United States of America 22 JAN 26 c) Q-routes and T-routes outside Alaska. Q-routes require system performance currently met by GPS, GPS/WAAS, or DME/DME/IRU RNAV systems that satisfy the criteria discussed in AC 90 − 100, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations. T-routes require GPS or GPS/WAAS equipment.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 3.5 , Para 1. , Airways and Route Systems.

16.2.3.3 GPS IFR approach/departure operations can be conducted when approved avionics systems are installed and the following requirements are met: a) The aircraft is TSO − C145 or TSO − C146 or TSO − C196 or TSO − C129 in Class A1, B1, B3, C1, or C3; and b) The approach/departure must be retrievable from the current airborne navigation database in the navigation computer. The system must be able to retrieve the procedure by name from the aircraft navigation database.

Manual entry of waypoints using latitude/longitude or place/bearing is not permitted for approach procedures.

c) The authorization to fly instrument approaches/departures with GPS is limited to U.S. airspace.

d) The use of GPS in any other airspace must be expressly authorized by the FAA Administrator.

e) GPS instrument approach/departure operations outside the U.S. must be authorized by the appropriate sovereign authority.

16.2.4 Departures and Instrument Departure Procedures (DPs) The GPS receiver must be set to terminal ( ± 1 NM) CDI sensitivity and the navigation routes contained in the database in order to fly published IFR charted departures and DPs. Terminal RAIM should be automatically provided by the receiver. (Terminal RAIM for departure may not be available unless the waypoints are part of the active flight plan rather than proceeding direct to the first destination.) Certain segments of a DP may require some manual intervention by the pilot, especially when radar vectored to a course or required to intercept a specific course to a waypoint. The database may not contain all of the transitions or departures from all runways and some GPS receivers do not contain DPs in the database. It is necessary that helicopter procedures be flown at 70 knots or less since helicopter departure procedures and missed approaches use a 20:1 obstacle clearance surface (OCS), which is double the fixed − wing OCS, and turning areas are based on this speed as well.

16.2.5 GPS Instrument Approach Procedures 16.2.5.1 GPS overlay approaches are designated non − precision instrument approach procedures that pilots are authorized to fly using GPS avionics. Localizer (LOC), localizer type directional aid (LDA), and simplified directional facility (SDF) procedures are not authorized. Overlay procedures are identified by the “name of the procedure” and “or GPS” (e.g., VOR/DME or GPS RWY 15) in the title. Authorized procedures must be retrievable from a current onboard navigation database. The navigation database may also enhance position orientation by displaying a map containing information on conventional NAVAID approaches. This approach information should not be confused with a GPS overlay approach (see the receiver operating manual, AFM, or AFM Supplement for details on how to identify these approaches in the navigation database).

NOTE − Overlay approaches do not adhere to the design criteria described in ENR 1.5 Paragraph 12.13, Area Navigation (RNAV) Instrument Approach Charts, for stand − alone GPS approaches. Overlay approach criteria is based on the design criteria used for ground − based NAVAID approaches.

16.2.5.2 Stand − alone approach procedures specifically designed for GPS systems have replaced many of the original overlay approaches. All approaches that contain “GPS” in the title (e.g., “VOR or GPS RWY 24,” “GPS RWY 24,” or “RNAV (GPS) RWY 24”) can be flown using GPS. GPS − equipped aircraft do not need underlying ground − based NAVAIDs or associated aircraft avionics to fly the approach. Monitoring the underlying approach with ground − based NAVAIDs is suggested when able. Existing overlay approaches may be requested using the GPS title; for example, the VOR or GPS RWY 24 may be requested as “GPS RWY 24.” Some GPS procedures have a Terminal Arrival Area (TAA) with an underlining RNAV approach.

16.2.5.3 For flight planning purposes, TSO-C129 and TSO-C196 − equipped users (GPS users) whose navigation systems have fault detection and exclusion (FDE) capability, who perform a preflight RAIM Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 prediction for the apprach integrity at the airport where the RNAV (GPS) approach will be flown, and have proper knowledge and any required training and/or approval to conduct a GPS-based IAP, may file based on a GPS − based IAP at either the destination or the alternate airport, but not at both locations. At the alternate airport, pilots may plan for: a) Lateral navigation (LNAV) or circling minimum descent altitude (MDA); b) LNAV/vertical navigation (LNAV/VNAV) DA, if equipped with and using approved barometric vertical navigation (baro-VNAV) equipment; c) RNP 0.3 DA on an RNAV (RNP) IAP, if they are specifically authorized users using approved baro-VNAV equipment and the pilot has verified required navigation performance (RNP) availability through an approved prediction program.

16.2.5.4 If the above conditions cannot be met, any required alternate airport must have an approved instrument approach procedure other than GPS − based that is anticipated to be operational and available at the estimated time of arrival, and which the aircraft is equipped to fly.

16.2.5.5 Procedures for Accomplishing GPS Approaches a) An RNAV (GPS) procedure may be associated with a Terminal Arrival Area (TAA). The basic design of the RNAV procedure is the “T” design or a modification of the “T” (See ENR 1.5, Paragraph 12.4, Terminal Arrival Area (TAA), for complete information).

b) Pilots cleared by ATC for an RNAV (GPS) approach should fly the full approach from an Initial Approach Waypoint (IAWP) or feeder fix. Randomly joining an approach at an intermediate fix does not assure terrain clearance.

c) When an approach has been loaded in the navigation system, GPS receivers will give an “arm” annunciation 30 NM straight line distance from the airport/heliport reference point. Pilots should arm the approach mode at this time if not already armed (some receivers arm automatically). Without arming, the receiver will not change from en route CDI and RAIM sensitivity of ± 5 NM either side of centerline to ± 1 NM terminal sensitivity.

Where the IAWP is inside this 30 mile point, a CDI sensitivity change will occur once the approach mode is armed and the aircraft is inside 30 NM. Where the IAWP is beyond 30 NM from the airport/heliport reference point and the approach is armed, the CDI sensitivity will not change until the aircraft is within 30 miles of the airport/heliport reference point. Feeder route obstacle clearance is predicated on the receiver being in terminal ( ± 1 NM) CDI sensitivity and RAIM within 30 NM of the airport/heliport reference point; therefore, the receiver should always be armed (if required) not later than the 30 NM annunciation.

d) The pilot must be aware of what bank angle/turn rate the particular receiver uses to compute turn anticipation, and whether wind and airspeed are included in the receiver’s calculations. This information should be in the receiver operating manual. Over or under banking the turn onto the final approach course may significantly delay getting on course and may result in high descent rates to achieve the next segment altitude.

e) When within 2 NM of the Final Approach Waypoint (FAWP) with the approach mode armed, the approach mode will switch to active, which results in RAIM and CDI changing to approach sensitivity. Beginning 2 NM prior to the FAWP, the full scale CDI sensitivity will smoothly change from ± 1 NM to ± 0.3 NM at the FAWP.

As sensitivity changes from ± 1 NM to ± 0.3 NM approaching the FAWP, with the CDI not centered, the corresponding increase in CDI displacement may give the impression that the aircraft is moving further away from the intended course even though it is on an acceptable intercept heading. Referencing the digital track displacement information (cross track error), if it is available in the approach mode, may help the pilot remain position oriented in this situation. Being established on the final approach course prior to the beginning of the sensitivity change at 2 NM will help prevent problems in interpreting the CDI display during ramp down.

Therefore, requesting or accepting vectors which will cause the aircraft to intercept the final approach course within 2 NM of the FAWP is not recommended.

f) When receiving vectors to final, most receiver operating manuals suggest placing the receiver in the non − sequencing mode on the FAWP and manually setting the course. This provides an extended final approach Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 24 United States of America 22 JAN 26 course in cases where the aircraft is vectored onto the final approach course outside of any existing segment which is aligned with the runway. Assigned altitudes must be maintained until established on a published segment of the approach. Required altitudes at waypoints outside the FAWP or stepdown fixes must be considered. Calculating the distance to the FAWP may be required in order to descend at the proper location.

g) Overriding an automatically selected sensitivity during an approach will cancel the approach mode annunciation. If the approach mode is not armed by 2 NM prior to the FAWP, the approach mode will not become active at 2 NM prior to the FAWP, and the equipment will flag. In these conditions, the RAIM and CDI sensitivity will not ramp down, and the pilot should not descend to MDA, but fly to the MAWP and execute a missed approach. The approach active annunciator and/or the receiver should be checked to ensure the approach mode is active prior to the FAWP.

h) Do not attempt to fly an approach unless the procedure in the onboard database is current and identified as “GPS” on the approach chart. The navigation database may contain information about non − overlay approach procedures that enhances position orientation generally by providing a map, while flying these approaches using conventional NAVAIDs. This approach information should not be confused with a GPS overlay approach (see the receiver operating manual, AFM, or AFM Supplement for details on how to identify these procedures in the navigation database). Flying point to point on the approach does not assure compliance with the published approach procedure. The proper RAIM sensitivity will not be available and the CDI sensitivity will not automatically change to ± 0.3 NM. Manually setting CDI sensitivity does not automatically change the RAIM sensitivity on some receivers. Some existing non − precision approach procedures cannot be coded for use with GPS and will not be available as overlays.

i) Pilots should pay particular attention to the exact operation of their GPS receivers for performing holding patterns and in the case of overlay approaches, operations such as procedure turns. These procedures may require manual intervention by the pilot to stop the sequencing of waypoints by the receiver and to resume automatic GPS navigation sequencing once the maneuver is complete. The same waypoint may appear in the route of flight more than once consecutively (for example, IAWP, FAWP, MAHWP on a procedure turn). Care must be exercised to ensure that the receiver is sequenced to the appropriate waypoint for the segment of the procedure being flown, especially if one or more fly − overs are skipped (for example, FAWP rather than IAWP if the procedure turn is not flown). The pilot may have to sequence past one or more fly − overs of the same waypoint in order to start GPS automatic sequencing at the proper place in the sequence of waypoints.

j) Incorrect inputs into the GPS receiver are especially critical during approaches. In some cases, an incorrect entry can cause the receiver to leave the approach mode.

k) A fix on an overlay approach identified by a DME fix will not be in the waypoint sequence on the GPS receiver unless there is a published name assigned to it. When a name is assigned, the along track distance (ATD) to the waypoint may be zero rather than the DME stated on the approach chart. The pilot should be alert for this on any overlay procedure where the original approach used DME.

l) If a visual descent point (VDP) is published, it will not be included in the sequence of waypoints. Pilots are expected to use normal piloting techniques for beginning the visual descent, such as ATD.

m) Unnamed stepdown fixes in the final approach segment may or may not be coded in the waypoint sequence of the aircraft’s navigation database and must be identified using ATD. Stepdown fixes in the final approach segment of RNAV (GPS) approaches are being named, in addition to being identified by ATD. However, GPS avionics may or may not accommodate waypoints between the FAF and MAP. Pilots must know the capabilities of their GPS equipment and continue to identify stepdown fixes using ATD when necessary.

16.2.5.6 Missed Approach a) A GPS missed approach requires pilot action to sequence the receiver past the MAWP to the missed approach portion of the procedure. The pilot must be thoroughly familiar with the activation procedure for the particular GPS receiver installed in the aircraft and must initiate appropriate action after the MAWP. Activating the missed approach prior to the MAWP will cause CDI sensitivity to immediately change to terminal ( ± 1NM) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 sensitivity and the receiver will continue to navigate to the MAWP. The receiver will not sequence past the MAWP. Turns should not begin prior to the MAWP. If the missed approach is not activated, the GPS receiver will display an extension of the inbound final approach course and the ATD will increase from the MAWP until it is manually sequenced after crossing the MAWP.

b) Missed approach routings in which the first track is via a course rather than direct to the next waypoint require additional action by the pilot to set the course. Being familiar with all of the inputs required is especially critical during this phase of flight.

16.2.5.7 Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) a) RAIM outages may occur due to an insufficient number of satellites or due to unsuitable satellite geometry which causes the error in the position solution to become too large. Loss of satellite reception and RAIM warnings may occur due to aircraft dynamics (changes in pitch or bank angle). Antenna location on the aircraft, satellite position relative to the horizon, and aircraft attitude may affect reception of one or more satellites. Since the relative positions of the satellites are constantly changing, prior experience with the airport does not guarantee reception at all times, and RAIM availability should always be checked.

b) Civilian pilots may obtain GPS RAIM availability information for nonprecision approach procedures by using a manufacturer − supplied RAIM prediction tool, or using the Service Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT) on the FAA en route and terminal RAIM prediction website. Pilots can also request GPS RAIM aeronautical information from a flight service station during preflight briefings. GPS RAIM aeronautical information can be obtained for a period of 3 hours (for example, if you are scheduled to arrive at 1215 hours, then the GPS RAIM information is available from 1100 to 1400 hours) or a 24 − hour timeframe at a particular airport. FAA briefers will provide RAIM information for a period of 1 hour before to 1 hour after the ETA hour, unless a specific timeframe is requested by the pilot. If flying a published GPS departure, a RAIM prediction should also be requested for the departure airport.

c) The military provides airfield specific GPS RAIM NOTAMs for nonprecision approach procedures at military airfields. The RAIM outages are issued as M − series NOTAMs and may be obtained for up to 24 hours from the time of request.

d) Receiver manufacturers and/or database suppliers may supply “NOTAM” type information concerning database errors. Pilots should check these sources, when available, to ensure that they have the most current information concerning their electronic database.

e) If RAIM is not available, use another type of navigation and approach system, select another route or destination, or delay the trip until RAIM is predicted to be available on arrival. On longer flights, pilots should consider rechecking the RAIM prediction for the destination during the flight. This may provide an early indication that an unscheduled satellite outage has occurred since takeoff.

f) If a RAIM failure/status annunciation occurs prior to the final approach waypoint (FAWP), the approach should not be completed since GPS no longer provides the required integrity. The receiver performs a RAIM prediction by 2 NM prior to the FAWP to ensure that RAIM is available as a condition for entering the approach mode. The pilot should ensure the receiver has sequenced from “Armed” to “Approach” prior to the FAWP (normally occurs 2 NM prior). Failure to sequence may be an indication of the detection of a satellite anomaly, failure to arm the receiver (if required), or other problems which preclude flying the approach.

g) If the receiver does not sequence into the approach mode or a RAIM failure/status annunciation occurs prior to the FAWP, the pilot must not initiate the approach nor descend, but instead, proceed to the missed approach waypoint (MAWP) via the FAWP, perform a missed approach, and contact ATC as soon as practical. The GPS receiver may continue to operate after a RAIM flag/status annunciation appears, but the navigation information should be considered advisory only. Refer to the receiver operating manual for specific indications and instructions associated with loss of RAIM prior to the FAF.

h) If the RAIM flag/status annunciation appears after the FAWP, the pilot should initiate a climb and execute the missed approach. The GPS receiver may continue to operate after a RAIM flag/status annunciation appears, Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 but the navigation information should be considered advisory only. Refer to the receiver operating manual for operating mode information during a RAIM annunciation.

16.2.5.8 Waypoints a) GPS receivers navigate from one defined point to another retrieved from the aircraft’s onboard navigational database. These points are waypoints (5-letter pronounceable name), existing VHF intersections, DME fixes with 5 − letter pronounceable names and 3-letter NAVAID IDs. Each waypoint is a geographical location defined by a latitude/longitude geographic coordinate. These 5 − letter waypoints, VHF intersections, 5 − letter pronounceable DME fixes and 3 − letter NAVAID IDs are published on various FAA aeronautical navigation products (IFR En Route Charts, VFR Charts, Terminal Procedures Publications, etc.).

b) A Computer Navigation Fix (CNF) is also a point defined by a latitude/longitude coordinate and is required to support Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) operations. The GPS receiver uses CNFs in conjunction with waypoints to navigate from point to point. However, CNFs are not recognized by ATC. ATC does not maintain CNFs in their database and they do not use CNFs for any air traffic control purpose. CNFs may or may not be charted on FAA aeronautical navigation products, are listed in the chart legends, and are for advisory purposes only. Pilots are not to use CNFs for point to point navigation (proceed direct), filing a flight plan, or in aircraft/ATC communications. CNFs that do appear on aeronautical charts allow pilots increased situational awareness by identifying points in the aircraft database route of flight with points on the aeronautical chart. CNFs are random five-letter identifiers, not pronounceable like waypoints and placed in parenthesis. Eventually, all CNFs will begin with the letters “CF” followed by three consonants (for example, CFWBG). This five-letter identifier will be found next to an “x” on en route charts and possibly on an approach chart. On instrument approach procedures (charts) in the terminal procedures publication, CNFs may represent unnamed DME fixes, beginning and ending points of DME arcs, and sensor (ground-based signal i.e., VOR, NDB, ILS) final approach fixes on GPS overlay approaches. These CNFs provide the GPS with points on the procedure that allow the overlay approach to mirror the ground-based sensor approach. These points should only be used by the GPS system for navigation and should not be used by pilots for any other purpose on the approach. The CNF concept has not been adopted or recognized by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).

c) GPS approaches use fly − over and fly − by waypoints to join route segments on an approach. Fly − by waypoints connect the two segments by allowing the aircraft to turn prior to the current waypoint in order to roll out on course to the next waypoint. This is known as turn anticipation and is compensated for in the airspace and terrain clearances. The missed approach waypoint (MAWP) will always be a fly − over waypoint.

A holding waypoint will always be designed as a fly − over waypoint in the navigational database but may be charted as a fly − by event unless the holding waypoint is used for another purpose in the procedure and both events require the waypoint to be a fly − over event. Some waypoints may have dual use; for example, as a fly − by waypoint when used as an IF for a NoPT route and as a fly − over waypoint when the same waypoint is also used as an IAF/IF hold − in − lieu of PT. Since the waypoint can only be charted one way, when this situation occurs, the fly − by waypoint symbol will be charted in all uses of the waypoint.

d) Unnamed waypoints for each airport will be uniquely identified in the database. Although the identifier may be used at different airports (for example, RW36 will be the identifier at each airport with a runway 36), the actual point, at each airport, is defined by a specific latitude/longitude coordinate.

e) The runway threshold waypoint, normally the MAWP, may have a five − letter identifier (for example, SNEEZ) or be coded as RW## (for example, RW36, RW36L). MAWPs located at the runway threshold are being changed to the RW## identifier, while MAWPs not located at the threshold will have a five − letter identifier. This may cause the approach chart to differ from the aircraft database until all changes are complete. The runway threshold waypoint is also used as the center of the Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA) on most GPS approaches.

16.2.5.9 Position Orientation Pilots should pay particular attention to position orientation while using GPS. Distance and track information are provided to the next active waypoint, not to a fixed navigation aid. Receivers may sequence when the pilot is not flying along an active route, such as when being vectored or deviating for weather, due to Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 the proximity to another waypoint in the route. This can be prevented by placing the receiver in the non-sequencing mode. When the receiver is in the non-sequencing mode, bearing and distance are provided to the selected waypoint and the receiver will not sequence to the next waypoint in the route until placed back in the auto sequence mode or the pilot selects a different waypoint. The pilot may have to compute the ATD to stepdown fixes and other points on overlay approaches, due to the receiver showing ATD to the next waypoint rather than DME to the VOR or ILS ground station.

16.2.5.10 Impact of Magnetic Variation on PBN Systems a) Differences may exist between PBN systems and the charted magnetic courses on ground − based NAVAID instrument flight procedures (IFP), en route charts, approach charts, and Standard Instrument Departure/Standard Terminal Arrival (SID/STAR) charts. These differences are due to the magnetic variance used to calculate the magnetic course. Every leg of an instrument procedure is first computed along a desired ground track with reference to true north. A magnetic variation correction is then applied to the true course in order to calculate a magnetic course for publication. The type of procedure will determine what magnetic variation value is added to the true course. A ground − based NAVAID IFP applies the facility magnetic variation of record to the true course to get the charted magnetic course. Magnetic courses on PBN procedures are calculated two different ways. SID/STAR procedures use the airport magnetic variation of record, while IFR en route charts use magnetic reference bearing. PBN systems make a correction to true north by adding a magnetic variation calculated with an algorithm based on aircraft position, or by adding the magnetic variation coded in their navigational database. This may result in the PBN system and the procedure designer using a different magnetic variation, which causes the magnetic course displayed by the PBN system and the magnetic course charted on the IFP plate to be different. It is important to understand, however, that PBN systems, (with the exception of VOR/DME RNAV equipment) navigate by reference to true north and display magnetic course only for pilot reference. As such, a properly functioning PBN system, containing a current and accurate navigational database , should fly the correct ground track for any loaded instrument procedure, despite differences in displayed magnetic course that may be attributed to magnetic variation application. Should significant differences between the approach chart and the PBN system avionics’ application of the navigation database arise, the published approach chart, supplemented by NOTAMs, holds precedence.

b) The course into a waypoint may not always be 180 degrees different from the course leaving the previous waypoint, due to the PBN system avionics’ computation of geodesic paths, distance between waypoints, and differences in magnetic variation application. Variations in distances may also occur since PBN system distance − to − waypoint values are ATDs computed to the next waypoint and the DME values published on underlying procedures are slant − range distances measured to the station. This difference increases with aircraft altitude and proximity to the NAVAID.

16.2.5.11 GPS Familiarization Pilots should practice GPS approaches in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) until thoroughly proficient with all aspects of their equipment (receiver and installation) prior to attempting flight in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). Pilots should be proficient in the following areas: a) Using the receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM) prediction function; b) Inserting a DP into the flight plan, including setting terminal CDI sensitivity, if required, and the conditions under which terminal RAIM is available for departure; c) Programming the destination airport; d) Programming and flying the approaches (especially procedure turns and arcs); e) Changing to another approach after selecting an approach; f) Programming and flying “direct” missed approaches; g) Programming and flying “routed” missed approaches; h) Entering, flying, and exiting holding patterns, particularly on approaches with a second waypoint in the holding pattern; Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 28 United States of America 22 JAN 26 i) Programming and flying a “route” from a holding pattern; j) Programming and flying an approach with radar vectors to the intermediate segment; k) Indication of the actions required for RAIM failure both before and after the FAWP; and l) Programming a radial and distance from a VOR (often used in departure instructions).

TBL ENR 4.1 − 4 GPS IFR Equipment Classes/Categories TSO − C129 Int. Nav Sys. Nonprecision Equipment RAIM to Prov. Oceanic En Route Terminal Approach Class RAIM Equiv. Capable Class A − GPS sensor and navigation capability.

A1 yes yes yes yes yes A2 yes yes yes yes no Class B − GPS sensor data to an integrated navigation system (i.e. FMS, multi − sensor navigation system, etc.).

B1 yes yes yes yes yes B2 yes yes yes yes no B3 yes yes yes yes yes B4 yes yes yes yes no Class C − GPS sensor data to an integrated navigation system (as in Class B) which provides enhanced guidance to an autopilot, or flight director, to reduce flight tech. errors. Limited to 14 CFR Part 121 or equivalent criteria.

C1 yes yes yes yes yes C2 yes yes yes yes no C3 yes yes yes yes yes C4 yes yes yes yes no TBL ENR 4.1 − 5 GPS Approval Required/Authorized Use Installation Operational In Lieu of Equipment IFR IFR IFR Oceanic Approval Approval ADF and/or 1 2 2 3 Type En Route Terminal Approach Remote Required Required DME 4 5 Hand held X VFR Panel X Mount IFR En Route X X X X X and Terminal IFR Oceanic/ X X X X X X Remote IFR En Route, X X X X X X Terminal, and Approach NOTE − To determine equipment approvals and limitations, refer to the AFM, AFM supplements, or pilot guides.

Requires verification of data for correctness if database is expired.

Requires current database or verification that the procedure has not been amended since the expiration of the database.

VFR and hand − held GPS systems are not authorized for IFR navigation, instrument approaches, or as a primary instrument flight reference. During IFR operations they may be considered only an aid to situational awareness.

Hand − held receivers require no approval. However, any aircraft modification to support the hand − held receiver; i.e., installation of an external antenna or a permanent mounting bracket, does require approval.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17. Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) 17.1 General 17.1.1 The FAA developed the WAAS to improve the accuracy, integrity and availability of GPS signals. WAAS will allow GPS to be used, as the aviation navigation system, from takeoff through approach when it is complete.

WAAS is a critical component of the FAA’s strategic objective for a seamless satellite navigation system for civil aviation, improving capacity and safety.

17.1.2 The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has defined Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) for satellite − based augmentation systems (SBAS) such as WAAS. India and Europe are building similar systems: EGNOS, the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System; and India’s GPS and Geo − Augmented Navigation (GAGAN) system. The merging of these systems will create an expansive navigation capability similar to GPS, but with greater accuracy, availability, and integrity.

17.1.3 Unlike traditional ground − based navigation aids, WAAS will cover a more extensive service area.

Precisely surveyed wide − area reference stations (WRS) are linked to form the U.S. WAAS network. Signals from the GPS satellites are monitored by these WRSs to determine satellite clock and ephemeris corrections and to model the propagation effects of the ionosphere. Each station in the network relays the data to a wide − area master station (WMS) where the correction information is computed. A correction message is prepared and uplinked to a geostationary earth orbit satellite (GEO) via a GEO uplink subsystem (GUS) which is located at the ground earth station (GES). The message is then broadcast on the same frequency as GPS (L1, 1575.42 MHz) to WAAS receivers within the broadcast coverage area of the WAAS GEO.

17.1.4 In addition to providing the correction signal, the WAAS GEO provides an additional pseudorange measurement to the aircraft receiver, improving the availability of GPS by providing, in effect, an additional GPS satellite in view. The integrity of GPS is improved through real − time monitoring, and the accuracy is improved by providing differential corrections to reduce errors. The performance improvement is sufficient to enable approach procedures with GPS/WAAS glide paths (vertical guidance).

17.1.5 The FAA has completed installation of 3 GEO satellite links, 38 WRSs, 3 WMSs, 6 GES, and the required terrestrial communications to support the WAAS network including 2 operational control centers. Prior to the commissioning of the WAAS for public use, the FAA conducted a series of test and validation activities. Future dual frequency operations are planned.

17.1.6 GNSS navigation, including GPS and WAAS, is referenced to the WGS − 84 coordinate system. It should only be used where the Aeronautical Information Publications (including electronic data and aeronautical charts) conform to WGS − 84 or equivalent. Other countries civil aviation authorities may impose additional limitations on the use of their SBAS systems.

17.2 Instrument Approach Capabilities 17.2.1 A class of approach procedures which provide vertical guidance, but which do not meet the ICAO Annex 10 requirements for precision approaches has been developed to support satellite navigation use for aviation applications worldwide. These procedures are not precision and are referred to as Approach with Vertical Guidance (APV), are defined in ICAO Annex 6, and include approaches such as the LNAV/VNAV and localizer performance with vertical guidance (LPV). These approaches provide vertical guidance, but do not meet the more stringent standards of a precision approach. Properly certified WAAS receivers will be able to fly to LPV minima and LNAV/VNAV minima, using a WAAS electronic glide path, which eliminates the errors that can be introduced by using Barometric altimetry.

17.2.2 LPV minima takes advantage of the high accuracy guidance and increased integrity provided by WAAS.

This WAAS generated angular guidance allows the use of the same TERPS approach criteria used for ILS approaches. LPV minima may have a decision altitude as low as 200 feet height above touchdown with visibility minimums as low as / mile, when the terrain and airport infrastructure support the lowest minima. LPV minima is published on the RNAV (GPS) approach charts (see paragraph 12. , Instrument Approach Procedure Charts).

17.2.3 A different WAAS-based line of minima, called Localizer Performance (LP) is being added in locations where the terrain or obstructions do not allow publication of vertically guided LPV minima. LP takes advantage Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 30 United States of America 22 JAN 26 of the angular lateral guidance and smaller position errors provided by WAAS to provide a lateral only procedure similar to an ILS Localizer. LP procedures may provide lower minima than a LNAV procedure due to the narrower obstacle clearance surface.

NOTE − WAAS receivers certified prior to TSO − C145b and TSO − C146b, even if they have LPV capability, do not contain LP capability unless the receiver has been upgraded. Receivers capable of flying LP procedures must contain a statement in the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM), AFM Supplement, or Approved Supplemental Flight Manual stating that the receiver has LP capability, as well as the capability for the other WAAS and GPS approach procedure types.

17.2.4 WAAS provides a level of service that supports all phases of flight, including RNAV (GPS) approaches to LNAV, LP, LNAV/VNAV and LPV lines of minima, within system coverage. Some locations close to the edge of the coverage may have a lower availability of vertical guidance.

17.3 General Requirements 17.3.1 WAAS avionics must be certified in accordance with Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO − C145, Airborne Navigation Sensors Using the (GPS) Augmented by the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS); or TSO − C146, Stand − Alone Airborne Navigation Equipment Using the Global Positioning System (GPS) Augmented by the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), and installed in accordance with Advisory Circular (AC) 20 − 138, Airworthiness Approval of Positioning and Navigation Systems .

17.3.2 GPS/WAAS operation must be conducted in accordance with the FAA − approved aircraft flight manual (AFM) and flight manual supplements. Flight manual supplements will state the level of approach procedure that the receiver supports. IFR approved WAAS receivers support all GPS only operations as long as lateral capability at the appropriate level is functional. WAAS monitors both GPS and WAAS satellites and provides integrity.

17.3.3 GPS/WAAS equipment is inherently capable of supporting oceanic and remote operations if the operator obtains a fault detection and exclusion (FDE) prediction program.

17.3.4 Air carrier and commercial operators must meet the appropriate provisions of their approved operations specifications.

17.3.5 Prior to GPS/WAAS IFR operation, the pilot must review appropriate Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) and aeronautical information. This information is available on request from an Automated Flight Service Station.

The FAA will provide NOTAMs to advise pilots of the status of the WAAS and level of service available.

17.3.5.1 The term MAY NOT BE AVBL is used in conjunction with WAAS NOTAMs and indicates that due to ionospheric conditions, lateral guidance may still be available when vertical guidance is unavailable. Under certain conditions, both lateral and vertical guidance may be unavailable. This NOTAM language is an advisory to pilots indicating the expected level of WAAS service (LNAV/VNAV, LPV, LP) may not be available.

EXAMPLE − !FDC FDC NAV WAAS VNAV/LPV/LP MINIMA MAY NOT BE AVBL 1306111330-1306141930EST or !FDC FDC NAV WAAS VNAV/LPV MINIMA NOT AVBL, WAAS LP MINIMA MAY NOT BE AVBL 1306021200-1306031200EST WAAS MAY NOT BE AVBL NOTAMs are predictive in nature and published for flight planning purposes.

Upon commencing an approach at locations NOTAMed WAAS MAY NOT BE AVBL, if the WAAS avionics indicate LNAV/VNAV or LPV service is available, then vertical guidance may be used to complete the approach using the displayed level of service. Should an outage occur during the approach, reversion to LNAV minima or an alternate instrument approach procedure may be required. When GPS testing NOTAMS are published and testing is actually occurring, Air Traffic Control will advise pilots requesting or cleared for a GPS or RNAV (GPS) approach that GPS may not be available and request intentions. If pilots have reported GPS anomalies, Air Traffic Control will request the pilot’s intentions and/or clear the pilot for an alternate approach, if available and operational.

17.3.5.2 WAAS area-wide NOTAMs are originated when WAAS assets are out of service and impact the service area. Area − wide WAAS NOT AVAILABLE (AVBL) NOTAMs indicate loss or malfunction of the WAAS Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 system. In flight, Air Traffic Control will advise pilots requesting a GPS or RNAV (GPS) approach of WAAS NOT AVBL NOTAMs if not contained in the ATIS broadcast.

EXAMPLE − For unscheduled loss of signal or service, an example NOTAM is: !FDC FDC NAV WAAS NOT AVBL 1311160600 − 1311191200EST.

For scheduled loss of signal or service, an example NOTAM is: !FDC FDC NAV WAAS NOT AVBL 1312041015 - 1312082000EST 17.3.5.3 Site − specific WAAS MAY NOT BE AVBL NOTAMs indicate an expected level of service; for example, LNAV/VNAV, LP, or LPV may not be available. Pilots must request site − specific WAAS NOTAMs during flight planning. In flight, Air Traffic Control will not advise pilots of WAAS MAY NOT BE AVBL NOTAMs.

NOTE − Though currently unavailable, the FAA is updating its prediction tool software to provide this site-service in the future.

17.3.5.4 Most of North America has redundant coverage by two or more geostationary satellites. One exception is the northern slope of Alaska. If there is a problem with the satellite providing coverage to this area, a NOTAM similar to the following example will be issued: EXAMPLE − !FDC 4/3406 (PAZA A0173/14) ZAN NAV WAAS SIGNAL MAY NOT BE AVBL NORTH OF LINE FROM 7000N150000W TO 6400N16400W. RMK WAAS USERS SHOULD CONFIRM RAIM AVAILABILITY FOR IFR OPERATIONS IN THIS AREA. T-ROUTES IN THIS SECTOR NOT AVBL. ANY REQUIRED ALTERNATE AIRPORT IN THIS AREA MUST HAVE AN APPROVED INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE OTHER THAN GPS THAT IS ANTICIPATED TO BE OPERATIONAL AND AVAILABLE AT THE ESTIMATED TIME OF ARRIVAL AND WHICH THE AIRCRAFT IS EQUIPPED TO FLY. 1406030812-1406050812EST .

17.3.6 When GPS − testing NOTAMS are published and testing is actually occurring, Air Traffic Control will advise pilots requesting or cleared for a GPS or RNAV (GPS) approach that GPS may not be available and request intentions. If pilots have reported GPS anomalies, Air Traffic Control will request the pilot’s intentions and/or clear the pilot for an alternate approach, if available and operational.

EXAMPLE − Here is an example of a GPS testing NOTAM: !GPS 06/001 ZAB NAV GPS (INCLUDING WAAS, GBAS, AND ADS-B) MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE WITHIN A 468NM RADIUS CENTERED AT 330702N1062540W (TCS 093044) FL400-UNL DECREASING IN AREA WITH A DECREASE IN ALTITUDE DEFINED AS: 425NM RADIUS AT FL250, 360NM RADIUS AT 10000FT, 354NM RADIUS AT 4000FT AGL, 327NM RADIUS AT 50FT AGL. 1406070300-1406071200.

17.3.7 When the approach chart is annotated with the symbol, site − specific WAAS MAY NOT BE AVBL NOTAMs or Air Traffic advisories are not provided for outages in WAAS LNAV/VNAV and LPV vertical service. Vertical outages may occur daily at these locations due to being close to the edge of WAAS system coverage. Use LNAV or circling minima for flight planning at these locations, whether as a destination or alternate. For flight operations at these locations, when the WAAS avionics indicate that LNAV/VNAV or LPV service is available, then the vertical guidance may be used to complete the approach using the displayed level of service. Should an outage occur during the procedure, reversion to LNAV minima may be required.

NOTE − Area − wide WAAS NOT AVBL NOTAMs apply to all airports in the WAAS NOT AVBL area designated in the NOTAM, including approaches at airports where an approach chart is annotated with the symbol.

17.3.8 GPS/WAAS was developed to be used within GEO coverage over North America without the need for other radio navigation equipment appropriate to the route of flight to be flown. Outside the WAAS coverage or in the event of a WAAS failure, GPS/WAAS equipment reverts to GPS − only operation and satisfies the requirements for basic GPS equipment. (See ENR 4.1 paragraph 17. for these requirements).

17.3.9 Unlike TSO − C129 avionics, which were certified as a supplement to other means of navigation, WAAS avionics are evaluated without reliance on other navigation systems. As such, installation of WAAS avionics Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 32 United States of America 22 JAN 26 does not require the aircraft to have other equipment appropriate to the route to be flown. (See ENR 4.1 paragraph 17. for more information on equipment requirements.)

17.3.9.1 Pilots with WAAS receivers may flight plan to use any instrument approach procedure authorized for use with their WAAS avionics as the planned approach at a required alternate, with the following restrictions.

When using WAAS at an alternate airport, flight planning must be based on flying the RNAV (GPS) LNAV or circling minima line, or minima on a GPS approach procedure, or conventional approach procedure with “or GPS” in the title. Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 91 nonprecision weather requirements must be used for planning. Upon arrival at an alternate, when the WAAS navigation system indicates that LNAV/VNAV or LPV service is available, then vertical guidance may be used to complete the approach using the displayed level of service. The FAA has begun removing the NA (Alternate Minimums Not Authorized) symbol from select RNAV (GPS) and GPS approach procedures so they may be used by approach approved WAAS receivers at alternate airports. Some approach procedures will still require the NA for other reasons, such as no weather reporting, so it cannot be removed from all procedures. Since every procedure must be individually evaluated, removal of the NA from RNAV (GPS) and GPS procedures will take some time.

NOTE − Properly trained and approved, as required, TSO-C145 and TSO-C146 equipped users (WAAS users) with and using approved baro-VNAV equipment may plan for LNAV/VNAV DA at an alternate airport. Specifically authorized WAAS users with and using approved baro-VNAV equipment may also plan for RNP 0.3 DA at the alternate airport as long as the pilot has verified RNP availability through an approved prediction program.

17.4 Flying procedures with WAAS 17.4.1 WAAS receivers support all basic GPS approach functions and provide additional capabilities. One of the major improvements is the ability to generate glide path guidance, independent of ground equipment or barometric aiding. This eliminates several problems such as hot and cold temperature effects, incorrect altimeter setting or lack of a local altimeter source. It also allows approach procedures to be built without the cost of installing ground stations at each airport or runway. Some approach certified receivers may only generate a glide path with performance similar to Baro − VNAV and are only approved to fly the LNAV/VNAV line of minima on the RNAV (GPS) approach charts. Receivers with additional capability (including faster update rates and smaller integrity limits) are approved to fly the LPV line of minima. The lateral integrity changes dramatically from the 0.3 NM (556 meter) limit for GPS, LNAV and LNAV/VNAV approach mode, to 40 meters for LPV.

It also provides vertical integrity monitoring, which bounds the vertical error to 50 meters for LNAV/VNAV and LPVs with minima of 250’ or above, and bounds the vertical error to 35 meters for LPVs with minima below 250’.

17.4.2 When an approach procedure is selected and active, the receiver will notify the pilot of the most accurate level of service supported by the combination of the WAAS signal, the receiver, and the selected approach, using the naming conventions on the minima lines of the selected approach procedure. For example, if an approach is published with LPV minima and the receiver is only certified for LNAV/VNAV, the equipment would indicate “LNAV/VNAV available,” even though the WAAS signal would support LPV. If flying an existing LNAV/VNAV procedure with no LPV minima, the receiver will notify the pilot “LNAV/VNAV available,” even if the receiver is certified for LPV and the signal supports LPV. If the signal does not support vertical guidance on procedures with LPV and/or LNAV/VNAV minima, the receiver annunciation will read “LNAV available.” On lateral only procedures with LP and LNAV minima the receiver will indicate “LP available” or “LNAV available” based on the level of lateral service available. Once the level of service notification has been given, the receiver will operate in this mode for the duration of the approach procedure, unless that level of service becomes unavailable. The receiver cannot change back to a more accurate level of service until the next time an approach is activated.

NOTE − Receivers do not “fail down” to lower levels of service once the approach has been activated. If only the vertical off flag appears, the pilot may elect to use the LNAV minima if the rules under which the flight is operating allow changing the type of approach being flown after commencing the procedure. If the lateral integrity limit is exceeded on an LP approach, a missed approach will be necessary since there is no way to reset the lateral alarm limit while the approach is active.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 17.4.3 Another additional feature of WAAS receivers is the ability to exclude a bad GPS signal and continue operating normally. This is normally accomplished by the WAAS correction information. Outside WAAS coverage or when WAAS is not available, it is accomplished through a receiver algorithm called FDE. In most cases this operation will be invisible to the pilot since the receiver will continue to operate with other available satellites after excluding the “bad” signal. This capability increases the reliability of navigation.

17.4.4 Both lateral and vertical scaling for the LNAV/VNAV and LPV approach procedures are different than the linear scaling of basic GPS. When the complete published procedure is flown, ± 1 NM linear scaling is provided until two (2) NM prior to the FAF, where the sensitivity increases to be similar to the angular scaling of an ILS. There are two differences in the WAAS scaling and ILS: 1) on long final approach segments, the initial scaling will be ± 0.3 NM to achieve equivalent performance to GPS (and better than ILS, which is less sensitive far from the runway); 2) close to the runway threshold, the scaling changes to linear instead of continuing to become more sensitive. The width of the final approach course is tailored so that the total width is usually 700 feet at the runway threshold. Since the origin point of the lateral splay for the angular portion of the final is not fixed due to antenna placement like localizer, the splay angle can remain fixed, making a consistent width of final for aircraft being vectored onto the final approach course on different length runways. When the complete published procedure is not flown, and instead the aircraft needs to capture the extended final approach course similar to ILS, the vector to final (VTF) mode is used. Under VTF, the scaling is linear at ±1 NM until the point where the ILS angular splay reaches a width of ± 1 NM regardless of the distance from the FAWP.

17.4.5 The WAAS scaling is also different than GPS TSO − C129 in the initial portion of the missed approach.

Two differences occur here. First, the scaling abruptly changes from the approach scaling to the missed approach scaling, at approximately the departure end of the runway or when the pilot selects missed approach guidance rather than ramping as GPS does. Second, when the first leg of the missed approach is a Track to Fix (TF) leg aligned within 3 degrees of the inbound course, the receiver will change to 0.3 NM linear sensitivity until the turn initiation point for the first waypoint in the missed approach procedure, at which time it will abruptly change to terminal ( ± 1 NM) sensitivity. This allows the elimination of close in obstacles in the early part of the missed approach that may otherwise cause the DA to be raised.

17.4.6 There are two ways to select the final approach segment of an instrument approach. Most receivers use menus where the pilot selects the airport, the runway, the specific approach procedure and finally the IAF, there is also a channel number selection method. The pilot enters a unique 5 − digit number provided on the approach chart, and the receiver recalls the matching final approach segment from the aircraft database. A list of information including the available IAFs is displayed and the pilot selects the appropriate IAF. The pilot should confirm that the correct final approach segment was loaded by cross checking the Approach ID, which is also provided on the approach chart.

17.4.7 The Along − Track Distance (ATD) during the final approach segment of an LNAV procedure (with a minimum descent altitude) will be to the MAWP. On LNAV/VNAV and LPV approaches to a decision altitude, there is no missed approach waypoint so the along − track distance is displayed to a point normally located at the runway threshold. In most cases, the MAWP for the LNAV approach is located on the runway threshold at the centerline, so these distances will be the same. This distance will always vary slightly from any ILS DME that may be present, since the ILS DME is located further down the runway. Initiation of the missed approach on the LNAV/VNAV and LPV approaches is still based on reaching the decision altitude without any of the items listed in 14 CFR Section 91.175 being visible, and must not be delayed while waiting for the ATD to reach zero. The WAAS receiver, unlike a GPS receiver, will automatically sequence past the MAWP if the missed approach procedure has been designed for RNAV. The pilot may also select missed approach prior to the MAWP; however, navigation will continue to the MAWP prior to waypoint sequencing taking place.

18. Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) Landing System (GLS) 18.1 A GBAS ground installation at an airport can provide localized, differential augmentation to the Global Positioning System (GPS) signal − in − space enabling an aircraft’s GLS precision approach capability. Through the GBAS service and the aircraft’s GLS installation a pilot may complete an instrument approach offering Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 34 United States of America 22 JAN 26 three − dimensional angular lateral, and vertical guidance for exact alignment and descent to a runway. The operational benefits of a GLS approach are similar to the benefits of an ILS or LPV approach operation.

NOTE − To remain consistent with international terminology, the FAA will use the term GBAS in place of the former term Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS).

18.2 An aircraft’s GLS approach capability relies on the broadcast from a GBAS Ground Facility (GGF) installation. The GGF installation includes at least four ground reference stations near the airport’s runway(s), a corrections processor, and a VHF Data Broadcast (VDB) uplink antenna. To use the GBAS GGF output and be eligible to conduct a GLS approach, the aircraft requires eligibility to conduct RNP approach (RNP APCH) operations and must meet the additional, specific airworthiness requirements for installation of a GBAS receiver intended to support GLS approach operations. When the aircraft achieves GLS approach eligibility, the aircraft’s onboard navigation database may then contain published GLS instrument approach procedures.

18.3 During a GLS instrument approach procedure, the installation of an aircraft’s GLS capability provides the pilot three − dimensional (3D) lateral and vertical navigation guidance much like an ILS instrument approach.

GBAS corrections augment the GPS signal − in − space by offering position corrections, ensures the availability of enhanced integrity parameters, and then transmits the actual approach path definition over the VDB uplink antenna. A single GBAS ground station can support multiple GLS approaches to one or more runways.

18.4 Through the GBAS ground station, a GLS approach offers a unique operational service volume distinct from the traditional ILS approach service volume (see FIG ENR 4.1 − 4 ). However, despite the unique service volume, in the final approach segment, a GLS approach provides precise 3D angular lateral and vertical guidance mimicking the precision guidance of an ILS approach.

18.5 Transitions to and segments of the published GLS instrument approach procedures may rely on use of RNAV 1 or RNP 1 prior to an IAF. Then, during the approach procedure prior to the aircraft entering the GLS approach mode, a GLS approach procedure design uses the RNP APCH procedure design criteria to construct the procedural path (the criteria used to publish procedures titled “RNAV (GPS)” in the US). Thus, a GLS approach procedure may include paths requiring turns after the aircraft crosses the IAF, prior to the aircraft’s flight guidance entering the GLS approach flight guidance mode. Likewise, the missed approach procedure for a GLS approach procedure relies exclusively on the same missed approach criteria supporting an RNP APCH.

18.6 When maneuvering the aircraft in compliance with an ATC clearance to intercept a GLS approach prior to the final approach segment (e.g. “being vectored”), the pilot should adhere to the clearance and ensure the aircraft intercepts the extended GLS final approach course within the specified service volume. Once on the GLS final approach course, the pilot should ensure the aircraft is in the GLS approach mode prior to reaching the procedure’s glidepath intercept point. Once the aircraft is in the GLS flight guidance mode and captures the GLS glidepath, the pilot should fly the GLS final approach segment using the same pilot techniques they use to fly an ILS final approach or the final approach of an RNAV (GPS) approach flown to LPV minimums. See also the Instrument Procedures Handbook for more information on how to conduct a GLS instrument approach procedure.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 4.1 − 4 GLS Standard Approach Service Volume 19. Precision Approach Systems Other than ILS and GLS 19.1 General Approval and use of precision approach systems other than ILS and GLS require the issuance of special instrument approach procedures.

19.2 Special Instrument Approach Procedure 19.2.1 Special instrument approach procedures must be issued to the aircraft operator if pilot training, aircraft equipment, and/or aircraft performance is different than published procedures. Special instrument approach procedures are not distributed for general public use. These procedures are issued to an aircraft operator when the conditions for operations approval are satisfied.

19.2.2 General aviation operators requesting approval for special procedures should contact the local Flight Standards District Office to obtain a letter of authorization. Air carrier operators requesting approval for use of special procedures should contact their Certificate Holding District Office for authorization through their Operations Specification.

20. Area Navigation 20.1 General Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 36 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20.1.1 Area Navigation (RNAV) provides enhanced navigational capability to the pilot. RNAV equipment can compute the airplane position, actual track and ground speed and then provide meaningful information relative to a route of flight selected by the pilot. Typical equipment will provide the pilot with distance, time, bearing and crosstrack error relative to the selected “TO” or “active” waypoint and the selected route. Several navigational systems with different navigational performance characteristics are capable of providing area navigational functions. Present day RNAV includes INS, VOR/DME, and GPS systems. Modern multi − sensor systems can integrate one or more of the above systems to provide a more accurate and reliable navigational system. Due to the different levels of performance, area navigational capabilities can satisfy different levels of required navigation performance (RNP).

20.2 RNAV Operations Incorporating RNP 20.2.1 During the past four decades, domestic and international air navigation have been conducted using a system of airways and instrument procedures based upon ground − based navigational systems such as NDB, VOR, and ILS. Reliance on ground − based navigational systems has served the aviation community well, but often results in less than optimal routes or instrument procedures and an inefficient use of airspace. With the widespread deployment of RNAV systems and the advent of GPS − based navigation, greater flexibility in defining routes, procedures, and airspace design is now possible with an associated increase in flight safety. To capitalize on the potential of RNAV systems, both the FAA and International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) are affecting a shift toward a new standard of navigation and airspace management called RNP.

20.2.2 Navigational systems are typically described as being sensor specific, such as a VOR or ILS system. By specifying airspace requirements as RNP, various navigation systems or combination of systems may be used as long as the aircraft can achieve the RNP. RNP is intended to provide a single performance standard that can be used and applied by aircraft and aircraft equipment manufacturers, airspace planners, aircraft certification and operations, pilots and controllers, and international aviation authorities. RNP can be applied to obstacle clearance or aircraft separation requirements to ensure a consistent application level.

20.2.3 ICAO has defined RNP values for the four typical navigation phases of flight: oceanic, en route, terminal, and approach. The RNP applicable to a selected airspace, route, or procedure is designated by it’s RNP Level or Type. As defined in the Pilot/Controller Glossary, the RNP Level or Type is a value typically expressed as a distance, in nautical miles, from the procedure, route or path within which an aircraft would typically operate.

RNP applications also provide performance to protect against larger errors at some multiple of RNP level (e.g., twice the RNP level).

20.3 Standard RNP Levels 20.3.1 U.S. standard values supporting typical RNP airspace are as specified in TBL ENR 4.1 − 6 below. Other RNP levels as identified by ICAO, other states and the FAA may also be used.

TBL ENR 4.1 − 6 U.S. Standard RNP Levels RNP Level Typical Application .3 Approach 1 Departure, Terminal 2 En Route 20.3.1.1 Application of Standard RNP Levels. U.S. standard levels of RNP typically used for various routes and procedures supporting RNAV operations may be based on use of a specific navigational system or sensor such as GPS, or on multi − sensor RNAV systems having suitable performance. New RNAV routes and procedures will be FAA’s first public use procedures to include a specified RNP level. These procedures are being developed based on earth referenced navigation and do not rely on conventional ground − based navigational aids. Unless otherwise noted on affected charts or procedures, depiction of a specified RNP level will not preclude the use of other airborne RNAV navigational systems.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20.3.1.2 Depiction of Standard RNP Levels. The applicable RNP level will be depicted on affected charts and procedures. For example, an RNAV departure procedure may contain a notation referring to eligible aircraft by equipment suffix and a phrase “or RNP − 1.0.” A typical RNAV approach procedure may include a notation referring to eligible aircraft by specific navigation sensor(s), equipment suffix, and a phrase “or RNP − 0.3.” Specific guidelines for the depiction of RNP levels will be provided through chart bulletins and accompany affected charting changes.

20.4 Aircraft and Airborne Equipment Eligibility for RNP Operations. Aircraft meeting RNP criteria will have an appropriate entry including special conditions and limitations, if any, in its Aircraft/Rotorcraft Flight Manual (AFM), or supplement. RNAV installations with AFM − RNP certification based on GPS or systems integrating GPS are considered to meet U.S. standard RNP levels for all phases of flight. Aircraft with AFM − RNP certification without GPS may be limited to certain RNP levels, or phases of flight. For example, RNP based on DME/DME without other augmentation may not be appropriate for phases of flight outside the certified DME service volume. Operators of aircraft not having specific AFM − RNP certification may be issued operational approval including special conditions and limitations, if any, for specific RNP levels. Aircraft navigation systems eligible for RNP airspace will be indicated on charts, or announced through other FAA media such as NOTAMs and chart bulletins.

20.5 Understanding RNP Operations. Pilots should have a clear understanding of the aircraft requirements for operation in a given RNP environment, and advise ATC if an equipment failure or other malfunction causes the aircraft to lose its ability to continue operating in the designated RNP airspace. When a pilot determines a specified RNP level cannot be achieved, he/she should be prepared to revise the route, or delay the operation until an appropriate RNP level can be ensured. Some airborne systems use terms other than RNP to indicate the current level of performance. Depending on the airborne system implementation, this may be displayed, and referred to, as actual navigation performance (ANP), estimate of position error (EPE), or other.

20.6 Other RNP Applications Outside the U.S. The FAA, in cooperation with ICAO member states has led initiatives in implementing the RNP concept to oceanic operations. For example, RNP − 10 routes have been established in the Northern Pacific (NOPAC) which has increased capacity and efficiency by reducing the distance between tracks to 50 NM. Additionally, the FAA has assisted those U.S. air carriers operating in Europe where the routes have been designated as RNP − 5. TBL ENR 4.1 − 7 below, shows examples of current and future RNP levels of airspace.

TBL ENR 4.1 − 7 RNP Levels Supported for International Operations RNP Level Typical Application 4 Oceanic/remote areas where performance − based horizontal separation is applied 5 European Basic RNAV (B − RNAV) 10 Oceanic/remote areas where performance − based horizontal separation is applied 20.7 RNAV and RNP Operations 20.7.1 Pilot 20.7.1.1 If unable to comply with the requirements of an RNAV or RNP procedure, pilots must advise air traffic control as soon as possible. For example, “N1234, failure of GPS system, unable RNAV, request amended clearance.” 20.7.1.2 Pilots are not authorized to fly a published RNAV or RNP procedure (instrument approach, departure, or arrival procedure) unless it is retrievable by the procedure name from the current aircraft navigation database and conforms to the charted procedure. The system must be able to retrieve the procedure by name from the aircraft navigation database, not just as a manually entered series of waypoints.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 38 United States of America 22 JAN 26 20.7.1.3 Whenever possible, RNAV routes (Q − or T − route) should be extracted from the database in their entirety, rather than loading RNAV route waypoints from the database into the flight plan individually. However, selecting and inserting individual, named fixes from the database is permitted, provided all fixes along the published route to be flown are inserted.

20.7.1.4 Pilots must not change any database waypoint type from a fly − by to fly − over, or vice versa. No other modification of database waypoints or the creation of user − defined waypoints on published RNAV or RNP procedures is permitted, except to: a) Change altitude and/or airspeed waypoint constraints to comply with an ATC clearance/ instruction.

b) Insert a waypoint along the published route to assist in complying with ATC instruction, example, “Descend via the WILMS arrival except cross 30 north of BRUCE at/or below FL 210.” This is limited only to systems that allow along − track waypoint construction.

20.7.1.5 Pilots of FMS − equipped aircraft, who are assigned an RNAV DP or STAR procedure and subsequently receive a change of runway, transition or procedure, must verify that the appropriate changes are loaded and available for navigation.

20.7.1.6 For RNAV 1 DPs and STARs, pilots must use a CDI, flight director and/or autopilot, in lateral navigation mode. Other methods providing an equivalent level of performance may also be acceptable.

20.7.1.7 For RNAV 1 DPs and STARs, pilots of aircraft without GPS, using DME/DME/IRU, must ensure the aircraft navigation system position is confirmed, within 1,000 feet, at the start point of take − off roll. The use of an automatic or manual runway update is an acceptable means of compliance with this requirement. Other methods providing an equivalent level of performance may also be acceptable.

20.7.1.8 For procedures or routes requiring the use of GPS, if the navigation system does not automatically alert the flight crew of a loss of GPS, the operator must develop procedures to verify correct GPS operation.

20.7.1.9 RNAV terminal procedures (DP and STAR) may be amended by ATC issuing radar vectors and/or clearances direct to a waypoint. Pilots should avoid premature manual deletion of waypoints from their active “legs” page to allow for rejoining procedures.

20.7.1.10 RAIM Prediction: If TSO − C129 equipment is used to solely satisfy the RNAV and RNP requirement, GPS RAIM availability must be confirmed for the intended route of flight (route and time). If RAIM is not available, pilots need an approved alternate means of navigation.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.10 , Para 11.3 , RNAV and RNP Operations.

20.7.1.11 Definition of “established” for RNAV and RNP operations: An aircraft is considered to be established on-course during RNAV and RNP operations anytime it is within 1 times the required accuracy for the segment being flown. For example, while operating on a Q-Route (RNAV 2), the aircraft is considered to be established on-course when it is within 2 nm of the course centerline.

NOTE − Pilots must be aware of how their navigation system operates, along with any AFM limitations, and confirm that the aircraft’s lateral deviation display (or map display if being used as an allowed alternate means) is suitable for the accuracy of the segment being flown. Automatic scaling and alerting changes are appropriate for some operations. For example, TSO-C129 systems change within 30 miles of destination and within 2 miles of FAF to support approach operations. For some navigation systems and operations, manual selection of scaling will be necessary.

(a) Pilots flying FMS equipped aircraft with barometric vertical navigation (Baro-VNAV) may descend when the aircraft is established on-course following FMS leg transition to the next segment. Leg transition normally occurs at the turn bisector for a fly-by waypoint (reference paragraph 1-2-1 for more on waypoints). When using full automation, pilots should monitor the aircraft to ensure the aircraft is turning at appropriate lead times and descending once established on-course.

(b) Pilots flying TSO-C129 navigation system equipped aircraft without full automation should use normal lead points to begin the turn. Pilots may descend when established on-course on the next segment of the approach.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.1 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 21. NAVAID Identifier Removal During Maintenance 21.1 During periods of routine or emergency maintenance, coded identification (or code and voice, where applicable) is removed from certain FAA NAVAIDs. Removal of the identification serves as warning to pilots that the facility is officially off the air for tune − up or repair and may be unreliable even though intermittent or constant signals are received.

NOTE − During periods of maintenance, VHF ranges may radiate a T − E − S − T code ( - - ).

NOTE − DO NOT attempt to fly a procedure that is NOTAMed out of service even if the identification is present. In certain cases, the identification may be transmitted for short periods as part of the testing.

22. User Reports Requested on NAVAID Outages 22.1 Users of the National Airspace System (NAS) can render valuable assistance in the early correction of NAVAID malfunctions or GNSS problems and are encouraged to report their observations of undesirable avionics performance. Although NAVAIDs are monitored by electronic detectors, adverse effects of electronic interference, new obstructions or changes in terrain near the NAVAID can exist without detection by the ground monitors. Some of the characteristics of malfunction or deteriorating performance which should be reported are: erratic course or bearing indications; intermittent, or full, flag alarm; garbled, missing or obviously improper coded identification; poor quality communications reception; or, in the case of frequency interference, an audible hum or tone accompanying radio communications or NAVAID identification. GNSS problems are often characterized by navigation degradation or service loss indications. For instance, pilots conducting operations in areas where there is GNSS interference may be unable to use GPS for navigation, and ADS − B may be unavailable for surveillance. Radio frequency interference may affect both navigation for the pilot and surveillance by the air traffic controller. Depending on the equipment and integration, either an advisory light or message may alert the pilot. Air traffic controllers monitoring ADS − B reports may stop receiving ADS − B position messages and associated aircraft tracks.

22.2 Malfunctioning, faulty, inappropriately installed, operated, or modified GPS re − radiator systems, intended to be used for aircraft maintenance activities, have resulted in unintentional disruption of aviation GPS receivers.

This type of disruption could result in unflagged, erroneous position − information output to primary flight displays/indicators and to other aircraft and air traffic control systems. Since Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) is only partially effective against this type of disruption (effectively a “signal spoofing”), the pilot may not be aware of any erroneous navigation indications; ATC may be the only means available to identify these disruptions and detect unexpected aircraft positions while monitoring aircraft for IFR separation.

22.3 Pilots encountering navigation error events should transition to another source of navigation and request amended clearances from ATC as necessary.

22.4 Pilots are encouraged to submit detailed reports of NAVAID or GPS anomaly as soon as practical. Pilot reports of navigation error events should contain the following information: 22.4.1 Date and time the anomaly was observed, and NAVAID ID (or GPS).

22.4.2 Location of the aircraft at the time the anomaly started and ended (e.g., latitude/longitude or bearing/distance from a reference point), 22.4.3 Heading, altitude, type of aircraft (make/model/call sign).

22.4.4 Type of avionics/receivers in use (e.g., make/model/software series or version).

22.4.5 Number of satellites being tracked, if applicable.

22.4.6 Description of the position/navigation/timing condition observed; and duration of the event.

22.4.7 Consequences/operational impact(s) of the NAVAID or GPS loss.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.1 − 40 United States of America 22 JAN 26 22.4.8 Actions taken to mitigate the anomaly and/or remedy provided by the ATC facility.

22.4.9 Post flight pilot/maintenance actions taken.

22.5 Pilots operating an aircraft in controlled airspace under IFR shall comply with CFR § 91.187 and promptly report as soon as practical to ATC any malfunctions of navigational equipment occurring in − flight; pilots should submit initial reports: 22.5.1 Immediately, by radio to the controlling ATC facility or FSS.

22.5.2 By telephone to the nearest ATC facility controlling the airspace where the disruption was experienced.

22.5.3 Additionally, GPS problems should be reported, post flight, by Internet via the GPS Anomaly Reporting Form at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/nas/gps_reports/ .

22.6 To minimize ATC workload, GPS interference/outages associated with known testing NOTAMs should NOT be reported in − flight to ATC in detail; EXCEPT when: 22.6.1 GPS degradation is experienced outside the NOTAMed area.

22.6.2 Pilot observes any unexpected consequences (e.g., equipment failure, suspected spoofing, failure of other aircraft systems not identified in AFM, such as TAWS).

23. Radio Communications and Navigation Facilities 23.1 A complete listing of air traffic radio communications facilities and frequencies and radio navigation facilities and frequencies are contained in the Chart Supplement U.S. Similar information for the Pacific and Alaskan areas is contained in the Chart Supplements Pacific and Alaska.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

1. Doppler Radar 1.1 Doppler Radar is a semiautomatic self − contained dead reckoning navigation system (radar sensor plus computer) which is not continuously dependent on information derived from ground based or external aids. The system employs radar signals to detect and measure ground speed and drift angle, using the aircraft compass system as its directional reference. Doppler is less accurate than INS, however, and the use of an external reference is required for periodic updates if acceptable position accuracy is to be achieved on long range flights.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

For a complete list and descriptions of elements of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) providing the navigation service, refer to https://www.gps.gov/systems/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 4.4 Name − Code Designators for Significant Points

1. Data Set 1.1 The FAA provides aeronautical data via the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/ .

2. Alphanumeric Waypoints 2.1 In addition to pronounceable five − letter name codes, the FAA uses alphanumeric designators for high en route waypoints as follows: 2.2 Gulf of America Grid System, described in ENR 6.1 .

2.3 National Reference System (NRS). The NRS is a grid of waypoints in the 48 contiguous United States and neighboring offshore airspace where the FAA provides air traffic services. These waypoints are published on the U.S. Government Flight Information Publication, IFR Enroute High Altitude – U.S. Charts. Waypoints are currently spaced every 30 minutes of latitude and every 2 degrees of longitude, and are assigned alphanumeric designators that begin with the letter “K.” 2.3.1 The second character is an NRS letter code that denotes the High Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC), per TBL ENR 4.4 − 1: TBL ENR 4.4 − 1 National Reference System (NRS) High ARTCC Code Listing NRS Location ARTCC High ARTCC Identifier Code Albuquerque ZAB A Atlanta ZTL T Boston ZBW B Chicago ZAU G Cleveland ZOB C Denver ZDV D Fort Worth ZFW F Houston ZHU H Indianapolis ZID I Jacksonville ZJX J Kansas City ZKC K Los Angeles ZLA L Memphis ZME M Miami ZMA R Minneapolis ZMP P New York ZNY N Oakland ZOA O Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.4 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 Salt Lake City ZLC U Seattle ZSE S Washington ZDC W 2.3.2 The third and fourth characters are numbers that denote the latitude. The latitude increment numbers start at the equator, which is designated “00.” Each 10 − minute increment is then identified by a number between “01” and “90.” The latitude numbering sequence repeats each 15 degrees of latitude. TBL ENR 4.4 − 2 shows the third and fourth characters used by the FAA: TBL ENR 4.4 − 2 National Reference System (NRS) Third and Fourth Characters (Latitude) Used by the FAA rd th 3 and 4 Latitude Characters 57 N 24 ° 30’ 60 N 25 ° 00’ 63 N 25 ° 30’ 66 N 26 ° 00’ 69 N 26 ° 30’ 72 N 27 ° 00’ 75 N 27 ° 30’ 78 N 28 ° 00’ 81 N 28 ° 30’ 84 N 29 ° 00’ 87 N 29 ° 30’ 00 N 30 ° 00’ 03 N 30 ° 30’ 06 N 31 ° 00’ 09 N 31 ° 30’ 12 N 32 ° 00’ 15 N 32 ° 30’ 18 N 33 ° 00’ 21 N 33 ° 30’ 24 N 34 ° 00’ 27 N 34 ° 30’ 30 N 35 ° 00’ 33 N 35 ° 30’ 36 N 36 ° 00’ 39 N 36 ° 30’ Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 42 N 37 ° 00’ 45 N 37 ° 30’ 48 N 38 ° 00’ 51 N 38 ° 30’ 54 N 39 ° 00’ 57 N 39 ° 30’ 60 N 40 ° 00’ 63 N 40 ° 30’ 66 N 41 ° 00’ 69 N 41 ° 30’ 70 N 41 ° 40’ 72 N 42 ° 00’ 75 N 42 ° 30’ 78 N 43 ° 00’ 81 N 43 ° 30’ 84 N 44 ° 00’ 87 N 44 ° 30’ 00 N 45 ° 00’ 03 N 45 ° 30’ 06 N 46 ° 00’ 09 N 46 ° 30’ 12 N 47 ° 00’ 15 N 47 ° 30’ 18 N 48 ° 00’ 21 N 48 ° 30’ 2.3.3 The last character is a letter that denotes the longitude. The longitude letters start at the Greenwich meridian and go from west to east around the globe, repeating every 26 degrees. TBL ENR 4.4 − 3 shows the longitude letters used by the FAA: TBL ENR 4.4 − 3 National Reference System (NRS) Longitude Letters Used by FAA Letter Longitude Y W 128 ° A W 126 ° C W 124 ° E W 122 ° G W 120 ° Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.4 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 I W 118 ° K W 116 ° M W 114 ° O W 112 ° Q W 110 ° S W 108 ° U W 106 ° W W 104 ° Y W 102 ° A W 100 ° C W 98 ° E W 96 ° G W 94 ° I W 92 ° K W 90 ° M W 88 ° O W 86 ° Q W 84 ° S W 82 ° U W 80 ° W W 78 ° Y W 76 ° A W 74 ° C W 72 ° E W 70 ° G W 68 ° I W 66 ° 2.3.4 Figure ENR 4.4 − 1 provides a graphical depiction of NRS naming: Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 4.4 − 5 AIP ENR 4.4 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 FIG ENR 4.4 − 1 National Reference System (NRS) Alphanumeric Code Depiction Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 4.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 4.5 Aeronautical Ground Lights — En − Route

Aeronautical ground lights are for each aerodrome are found in the Chart Supplement U.S.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 5.1 Prohibited, Restricted, and Other Areas

1. Special Use Airspace 1.1 General 1.1.1 Special use airspace (SUA) consists of that airspace wherein activities must be confined because of their nature, or wherein limitations are imposed upon aircraft operations that are not a part of those activities, or both.

SUA areas are depicted on aeronautical charts, except for controlled firing areas (CFA), temporary military operations areas (MOA), and temporary restricted areas.

1.1.2 Prohibited and restricted areas are regulatory special use airspace and are established in 14 CFR Part 73 through the rulemaking process.

1.1.3 Warning areas, MOAs, alert areas, CFAs, and national security areas (NSA) are nonregulatory special use airspace.

1.1.4 Special use airspace descriptions (except CFAs) are contained in FAA Order JO 7400.10, Special Use Airspace.

1.1.5 Permanent SUA (except CFAs) is charted on Sectional Aeronautical, VFR Terminal Area, and applicable En Route charts, and include the hours of operation, altitudes, and the controlling agency.

1.2 Prohibited Areas 1.2.1 Prohibited areas contain airspace of defined dimensions identified by an area on the surface of the earth within which the flight of aircraft is prohibited. Such areas are established for security or other reasons associated with the national welfare. These areas are published in the Federal Register and are depicted on aeronautical charts.

1.3 Restricted Areas 1.3.1 Restricted areas contain airspace identified by an area on the surface of the earth within which the flight of aircraft, while not wholly prohibited, is subject to restrictions. Activities within these areas must be confined because of their nature or limitations imposed upon aircraft operations that are not a part of those activities or both. Restricted areas denote the existence of unusual, often invisible, hazards to aircraft such as artillery firing, aerial gunnery, or guided missiles. Penetration of restricted areas without authorization from the using or controlling agency may be extremely hazardous to the aircraft and its occupants. Restricted areas are published in the Federal Register and constitute 14 CFR Part 73.

1.3.2 ATC facilities apply the following procedures when aircraft are operating on an IFR clearance (including those cleared by ATC to maintain VFR − on − top) via a route which lies within joint − use restricted airspace.

1.3.2.1 If the restricted area is not active and has been released to the controlling agency (FAA), the ATC facility will allow the aircraft to operate in the restricted airspace without issuing specific clearance for it to do so.

1.3.2.2 If the restricted area is active and has not been released to the controlling agency (FAA), the ATC facility will issue a clearance which will ensure the aircraft avoids the restricted airspace unless it is on an approved altitude reservation mission or has obtained its own permission to operate in the airspace and so informs the controlling facility.

NOTE − The above apply only to joint − use restricted airspace and not to prohibited and nonjoint − use airspace. For the latter categories, the ATC facility will issue a clearance so the aircraft will avoid the restricted airspace unless it is on an approved altitude reservation mission or has obtained its own permission to operate in the airspace and so informs the controlling facility.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.3.3 Permanent restricted areas are charted on Sectional Aeronautical, VFR Terminal Area, and the appropriate En Route charts.

NOTE − Temporary restricted areas are not charted. For temporary restricted areas, pilots should review the Domestic Notices found in the External Links section of the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search or Air Traffic Plans and Publications website, the FAA SUA website, and/or contact the appropriate overlying ATC facility to determine the effect of non − depicted SUA areas along their routes of flight.

1.4 Warning Areas 1.4.1 A warning area is airspace of defined dimensions, extending from three nautical miles outward from the coast of the U.S., that contains activity that may be hazardous to nonparticipating aircraft. The purpose of such warning areas is to warn nonparticipating pilots of the potential danger. A warning area may be located over domestic or international waters or both.

2. Other Airspace Areas 2.1 National Security Areas 2.1.1 NSAs consist of airspace of defined vertical and lateral dimensions established at locations where there is a requirement for increased security and safety of ground facilities. Pilots are requested to voluntarily avoid flying through the depicted NSA. When it is necessary to provide a greater level of security and safety, flight in NSAs may be temporarily prohibited by regulation under the provisions of 14 CFR Section 99.7. Regulatory prohibitions will be issued by System Operations Security and disseminated via NOTAM. Inquiries about NSAs should be directed to System Operations Security.

2.2 Temporary Flight Restrictions 2.2.1 General. This paragraph describes the types of conditions under which the FAA may impose temporary flight restrictions. It also explains which FAA elements have been delegated authority to issue a temporary flight restrictions NOTAM and lists the types of responsible agencies/offices from which the FAA will accept requests to establish temporary flight restrictions. The 14 CFR is explicit as to what operations are prohibited, restricted, or allowed in a temporary flight restrictions area. Pilots are responsible to comply with 14 CFR Sections 91.137, 91.138, 91.141, and 91.143 when conducting flight in an area where a temporary flight restrictions area is in effect, and should check appropriate NOTAMs during flight planning.

2.2.2 The purpose for establishing a temporary flight restrictions area is to: 2.2.2.1 Protect persons and property in the air or on the surface from an existing or imminent hazard associated with an incident on the surface when the presence of low − flying aircraft would magnify, alter, spread, or compound that hazard (14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1)).

2.2.2.2 Provide a safe environment for the operation of disaster relief aircraft (14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(2)).

2.2.2.3 Prevent an unsafe congestion of sightseeing aircraft above an incident or event which may generate a high degree of public interest (14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(3)).

2.2.2.4 Protect declared national disasters for humanitarian reasons in the State of Hawaii (14 CFR Section 91.138).

2.2.2.5 Protect the President, Vice President, or other public figures (14 CFR Section 91.141).

2.2.2.6 Provide a safe environment for space agency operations (14 CFR Section 91.143).

2.2.3 Except for hijacking situations, when the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1) or (a)(2) are necessary, a temporary flight restrictions area will only be established by or through the area manager at the Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) having jurisdiction over the area concerned. A temporary flight restrictions NOTAM involving the conditions of 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(3) will be issued at the direction of the service area office director having oversight of the airspace concerned. When hijacking situations are Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 involved, a temporary flight restrictions area will be implemented through the TSA Aviation Command Center.

The appropriate FAA air traffic element, upon receipt of such a request, will establish a temporary flight restrictions area under 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1).

2.2.4 The FAA accepts recommendations for the establishment of a temporary flight restrictions area under 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1) from military major command headquarters, regional directors of the Office of Emergency Planning, Civil Defense State Directors, State Governors, or other similar authority. For the situations involving 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(2), the FAA accepts recommendations from military commanders serving as regional, subregional, or Search and Rescue (SAR) coordinators; by military commanders directing or coordinating air operations associated with disaster relief; or by civil authorities directing or coordinating organized relief air operations (includes representatives of the Office of Emergency Planning, U.S. Forest Service, and State aeronautical agencies). Appropriate authorities for a temporary flight restrictions establishment under 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(3) are any of those listed above or by State, county, or city government entities.

2.2.5 The type of restrictions issued will be kept to a minimum by the FAA consistent with achievement of the necessary objective. Situations which warrant the extreme restrictions of 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1) include, but are not limited to: toxic gas leaks or spills, flammable agents, or fumes which if fanned by rotor or propeller wash could endanger persons or property on the surface, or if entered by an aircraft could endanger persons or property in the air; imminent volcano eruptions which could endanger airborne aircraft and occupants; nuclear accident or incident; and hijackings. Situations which warrant the restrictions associated with 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(2) include: forest fires which are being fought by releasing fire retardants from aircraft; and aircraft relief activities following a disaster (earthquake, tidal wave, flood, etc.). 14 CFR Section 91.137 (a)(3) restrictions are established for events and incidents that would attract an unsafe congestion of sightseeing aircraft.

2.2.6 The amount of airspace needed to protect persons and property or provide a safe environment for rescue/relief aircraft operations is normally limited to within 2,000 feet above the surface and within a 3 − nautical − mile radius. Incidents occurring within Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace will normally be handled through existing procedures and should not require the issuance of a temporary flight restrictions NOTAM. Temporary flight restrictions affecting airspace outside of the U.S. and its territories and possessions are issued with verbiage excluding that airspace outside of the 12 − mile coastal limits.

2.2.7 The FSS nearest the incident site is normally the “coordination facility.” When FAA communications assistance is required, the designated FSS will function as the primary communications facility for coordination between emergency control authorities and affected aircraft. The ARTCC may act as liaison for the emergency control authorities if adequate communications cannot be established between the designated FSS and the relief organization. For example, the coordination facility may relay authorizations from the on-scene emergency response official in cases where news media aircraft operations are approved at the altitudes used by relief aircraft.

2.2.8 ATC may authorize operations in a temporary flight restrictions area under its own authority only when flight restrictions are established under 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(2) and (a)(3). The appropriate ARTCC/airport traffic control tower manager will, however, ensure that such authorized flights do not hamper activities or interfere with the event for which restrictions were implemented. However, ATC will not authorize local IFR flights into the temporary flight restrictions area.

2.2.9 To preclude misunderstanding, the implementing NOTAM will contain specific and formatted information. The facility establishing a temporary flight restrictions area will format a NOTAM beginning with the phrase “FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS” followed by: the location of the temporary flight restrictions area; the effective period; the area defined in statute miles; the altitudes affected; the FAA coordination facility and commercial telephone number; the reason for the temporary flight restrictions; the agency directing any relief activities and its commercial telephone number; and other information considered appropriate by the issuing authority.

EXAMPLE − 1. 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1): Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.1 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 The following NOTAM prohibits all aircraft operations except those specified in the NOTAM.

FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS MATTHEWS, VIRGINIA, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UNTIL 9610211200. PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 91.137(A)(1) TEMPORARY FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS ARE IN EFFECT. RESCUE OPERATIONS IN PROGRESS. ONLY RELIEF AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ARE AUTHORIZED IN THE AIRSPACE AT AND BELOW 5,000 FEET MSL WITHIN A 2 − NAUTICAL − MILE RADIUS OF LASER AFB, MATTHEWS, VIRGINIA. COMMANDER, LASER AFB, IN CHARGE (897) 946 − 5543 (122.4).

STEENSON FSS (792) 555 − 6141 (123.1) IS THE FAA COORDINATION FACILITY .

2. 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(2): The following NOTAM permits flight operations in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(2). The on-site emergency response official to authorize media aircraft operations below the altitudes used by the relief aircraft.

FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS 25 MILES EAST OF BRANSOME, IDAHO, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UNTIL 9601202359 UTC. PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 91.137(A)(2) TEMPORARY FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS ARE IN EFFECT WITHIN A 4 − NAUTICAL − MILE RADIUS OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROADS 564 AND 315 AT AND BELOW 3,500 FEET MSL TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR FIRE FIGHTING AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS. DAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT (792) 555 − 8122 (122.9) IS IN CHARGE OF ON-SCENE EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES. GLIVINGS FSS (792) 555 − 1618 (122.2) IS THE FAA COORDINATION FACILITY.

3. 14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(3): The following NOTAM prohibits sightseeing aircraft operations.

FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS BROWN, TENNESSEE, DUE TO OLYMPIC ACTIVITY. EFFECTIVE 9606181100 UTC UNTIL 9607190200 UTC . PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 91.137(A)(3) TEMPORARY FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS ARE IN EFFECT WITHIN A 3 − NAUTICAL − MILE RADIUS OF N355783/W835242 AND VOLUNTEER VORTAC 019 DEGREE RADIAL 3.7 DME FIX AT AND BELOW 2,500 FEET MSL. NORTON FSS (423) 555 − 6742 (126.6) IS THE FAA COORDINATION FACILITY.

4. 14 CFR Section 91.138: The following NOTAM prohibits all aircraft except those operating under the authorization of the official in charge of associated emergency or disaster relief response activities, aircraft carrying law enforcement officials, aircraft carrying personnel involved in an emergency or legitimate scientific purposes, carrying properly accredited news media, and aircraft operating in accordance with an ATC clearance or instruction.

FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS KAPALUA, HAWAII, EFFECTIVE 9605101200 UTC UNTIL 9605151500 UTC. PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 91.138 TEMPORARY FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS ARE IN EFFECT WITHIN A 3 − NAUTICAL − MILE RADIUS OF N205778/W1564038 AND MAUI /OGG/ VORTAC 275 DEGREE RADIAL AT 14.1 NAUTICAL MILES. JOHN DOE 808 − 757 − 4469 OR 122.4 IS IN CHARGE OF THE OPERATION. HONOLULU /HNL/ 808 − 757 − 4470 (123.6) FSS IS THE FAA COORDINATION FACILITY.

5. 14 CFR Section 91.141: The following NOTAM prohibits all aircraft.

FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA, JUNE 21, 1996. PURSUANT TO 14 CFR SECTION 91.141 AIRCRAFT FLIGHT OPERATIONS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN A 3 − NAUTICAL − MILE RADIUS, BELOW 2000 FEET AGL OF N360962/ W970515 AND THE STILLWATER /SWO/ VOR/DME 176 DEGREE RADIAL 3.8 − NAUTICAL − MILE FIX FROM 1400 LOCAL TIME TO 1700 LOCAL TIME JUNE 21, 1996 UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY ATC.

6. 14 CFR Section 91.143: The following NOTAM prohibits any aircraft of U.S. registry, or pilot of any aircraft under the authority of an airman certificate issued by the FAA.

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER SPACE OPERATIONS AREA EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UNTIL 9610152100 UTC.

PURSUANT TO SECTION 91.143, FLIGHT OPERATIONS CONDUCTED BY FAA CERTIFICATED PILOTS OR CONDUCTED IN AIRCRAFT OF U.S. REGISTRY ARE PROHIBITED AT ANY ALTITUDE FROM SURFACE TO Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UNLIMITED, WITHIN THE FOLLOWING AREA 30 − NAUTICAL − MILE RADIUS OF THE MELBOURNE /MLB/ VORTAC 010 DEGREE RADIAL 21 − NAUTICAL − MILE FIX. ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA, /PIE/ FSS 813 − 545 − 1645 (122.2) IS THE FAA COORDINATION FACILITY AND SHOULD BE CONTACTED FOR THE CURRENT STATUS OF ANY AIRSPACE ASSOCIATED WITH THE SPACE SHUTTLE OPERATIONS. THIS AIRSPACE ENCOMPASSES R2933, R2932, R2931, R2934, R2935, W497A AND W158A. ADDITIONAL WARNING AND RESTRICTED AREAS WILL BE ACTIVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OPERATIONS. PILOTS MUST CONSULT ALL NOTAMS REGARDING THIS OPERATION.

2.3 Parachute Jump Aircraft Operations 2.3.1 Procedures relating to parachute jump areas are contained in 14 CFR Part 105. Tabulations of parachute jump areas in the U.S. are contained in the Chart Supplement.

2.3.2 Pilots of aircraft engaged in parachute jump operations are reminded that all reported altitudes must be with reference to mean sea level, or flight level, as appropriate, to enable ATC to provide meaningful traffic information.

2.3.3 Parachute Operations in the Vicinity of an Airport Without an Operating Control Tower. There is no substitute for alertness while in the vicinity of an airport. It is essential that pilots conducting parachute operations be alert, look for other traffic, and exchange traffic information as recommended in GEN 3.3, paragraph 9.2, Traffic Advisory Practices at Airports Without Operating Control Towers. In addition, pilots should avoid releasing parachutes while in an airport traffic pattern when there are other aircraft in that pattern.

Pilots should make appropriate broadcasts on the designated Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF), and monitor that CTAF until all parachute activity has terminated or the aircraft has left the area. Prior to commencing a jump operation, the pilot should broadcast the aircraft’s altitude and position in relation to the airport, the approximate relative time when the jump will commence and terminate, and listen to the position reports of other aircraft in the area.

2.4 Special Air Traffic Rules (SATR) and Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) 2.4.1 Background. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) prescribes special air traffic rules for aircraft operating within the boundaries of certain designated airspace. These areas are listed in 14 CFR Part 93 and can be found throughout the NAS. Procedures, nature of operations, configuration, size, and density of traffic vary among the identified areas.

2.4.2 SFRAs. Airspace of defined dimensions, above land areas or territorial waters, within which the flight of aircraft is subject to the rules set forth in 14 CFR Part 93, unless otherwise authorized by air traffic control. Not all areas listed in 14 CFR Part 93 are designated SFRA, but special air traffic rules apply to all areas described in 14 CFR Part 93.

2.4.3 Participation. Each person operating an aircraft to, from, or within airspace designated as a SATR area or SFRA must adhere to the special air traffic rules set forth in 14 CFR Part 93, as applicable, unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC.

2.4.4 Charts. SFRAs are depicted on VFR sectional, terminal area, and helicopter route charts. (See FIG ENR 5.1 − 1 .)

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.1 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 5.1 − 1 SFRA Boundary 2.4.5 Washington DC Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA) including the Flight Restricted Zone (FRZ). A pilot conducting any type of flight operation in the Washington DC SFRA/FRZ must comply with the requirements in: 2.4.5.1 14 CFR Section 93.339 Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area including the FRZ.

2.4.5.2 14 CFR Section 91.161 Special Awareness Training for the DC SFRA/FRZ, also located on the FAA website at https://www.faasafety.gov/ .

2.4.5.3 Any 14 CFR Section 99.7 special security instructions for the DC SFRA/FRZ published via NOTAM by FAA in the interest of national security.

2.5 Weather Reconnaissance Area (WRA) rd 2.5.1 General. Hurricane Hunters from the United States Air Force Reserve 53 Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (WRS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Aircraft Operations Center (AOC) operate weather reconnaissance/research aircraft missions, in support of the National Hurricane rd Operations Plan (NHOP), to gather meteorological data on hurricanes and tropical cyclones. 53 WRS and NOAA AOC aircraft normally conduct these missions in airspace identified in a published WRA Notice to Airmen (NOTAM).

2.5.2 WRAs. Airspace with defined dimensions and published by a NOTAM, which is established to support weather reconnaissance/research flights. ATC services are not provided within WRAs. Only participating rd weather reconnaissance/research aircraft from the 53 WRS and NOAA AOC are permitted to operate within a WRA. A WRA may only be established in airspace within U. S. Flight Information Regions (FIR) outside of U. S. territorial airspace.

2.5.3 A published WRA NOTAM describes the airspace dimensions of the WRA and the expected activities within the WRA. WRAs may border adjacent foreign FIRs, but are wholly contained within U.S. FIRs. As ATC services are not provided within a WRA, non − participating aircraft should avoid WRAs, and IFR aircraft should expect to be rerouted to avoid WRAs.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 5.2 Military Exercise and Training Areas

1. Military Operations Area (MOA) 1.1 MOAs consist of airspace of defined vertical and lateral limits established for the purpose of separating certain military training activities from IFR traffic. Whenever a MOA is being used, nonparticipating IFR traffic may be cleared through a MOA if IFR separation can be provided by ATC. Otherwise, ATC will reroute or restrict nonparticipating IFR traffic.

1.2 Examples of activities conducted in MOAs include, but are not limited to: air combat tactics, air intercepts, aerobatics, formation training, and low − altitude tactics. Military pilots flying in an active MOA are exempted from the provisions of 14 CFR Section 91.303(c) and (d) which prohibits aerobatic flight within Class D and Class E surface areas, and within Federal airways. Additionally, the Department of Defense has been issued an authorization to operate aircraft at indicated airspeeds in excess of 250 knots below 10,000 feet MSL within active MOAs.

1.3 Pilots operating under VFR should exercise extreme caution while flying within a MOA when military activity is being conducted. The activity status (active/inactive) of MOAs may change frequently. Therefore, pilots should contact any FSS within 100 miles of the area to obtain accurate real − time information concerning the MOA hours of operation. Prior to entering an active MOA, pilots should contact the controlling agency for traffic advisories.

1.4 Permanent MOAs are charted on Sectional Aeronautical, VFR Terminal Area, and the appropriate En Route Low Altitude charts.

NOTE − Temporary MOAs are not charted. For temporary restricted areas, pilots should review the Domestic Notices found in the External Links section of the Federal NOTAM System (FNS) NOTAM Search or Air Traffic Plans and Publications website, the FAA SUA website, and/or contact the appropriate overlying ATC facility to determine the effect of non − depicted SUA areas along their routes of flight.

2. Alert Areas 2.1 Alert Areas are depicted on aeronautical charts to inform nonparticipating pilots of areas that may contain a high volume of pilot training or an unusual type of aerial activity. Pilots should be particularly alert when flying in these areas. All activity within an Alert Area must be conducted in accordance with FAA regulations, without waiver, and pilots of participating aircraft as well as pilots transiting the area must be equally responsible for collision avoidance.

3. Controlled Firing Area (CFA) 3.1 CFAs contain activities which, if not conducted in a controlled environment, could be hazardous to nonparticipating aircraft. The distinguishing feature of the CFA, as compared to other special use airspace, is that its activities are suspended immediately when spotter aircraft, radar, or ground lookout positions indicate an aircraft might be approaching the area. There is no need to chart CFAs since they do not cause a nonparticipating aircraft to change its flight path.

4. Military Training Route (MTR) 4.1 National security depends largely on the deterrent effect of our airborne military forces. To be proficient, the military services must train in a wide range of airborne tactics. One phase of this training involves “low level” combat tactics. The required maneuvers and high speeds are such that they may occasionally make the see − and − avoid aspect of VFR flight more difficult without increased vigilance in areas containing such operations. In an effort to ensure the greatest practical level of safety for all flight operations, the MTR program was conceived.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.2 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.2 The MTR program is a joint venture by the FAA and the DOD. MTRs are mutually developed for use by the military for the purpose of conducting low − altitude, high − speed training. The routes above 1,500 feet above ground level (AGL) are developed to be flown, to the maximum extent possible, under IFR. The routes at 1,500 feet AGL and below are generally developed to be flown under VFR.

4.3 Generally, MTRs are established below 10,000 feet MSL for operations at speeds in excess of 250 knots.

However, route segments may be defined at higher altitudes for purposes of route continuity. For example, route segments may be defined for descent, climbout, and mountainous terrain. There are IFR and VFR routes as follows: 4.3.1 IFR Military Training Routes − IR. Operations on these routes are conducted in accordance with IFR regardless of weather conditions.

4.3.2 VFR Military Training Routes − VR. Operations on these routes are conducted in accordance with VFR except flight visibility must be 5 miles or more; and flights must not be conducted below a ceiling of less than 3,000 feet AGL.

4.4 MTRs will be identified and charted as follows: 4.4.1 Route Identification 4.4.1.1 MTRs with no segment above 1,500 feet AGL must be identified by four number characters; e.g., IR1206, VR1207.

4.4.1.2 MTRs that include one or more segments above 1,500 feet AGL must be identified by three number characters; e.g., IR206, VR207.

4.4.1.3 Alternate IR/VR routes or route segments are identified by using the basic/principal route designation followed by a letter suffix, e.g., IR008A, VR1007B, etc.

4.4.2 Route Charting 4.4.2.1 IFR Enroute Low Altitude Chart. This chart will depict all IR routes and all VR routes that accommodate operations above 1,500 feet AGL.

4.4.2.2 VFR Sectional Aeronautical Charts. These charts will depict military training activities such as IR and VR information. Special Military Activity Routes (SMARs) may also be charted on the VFR Sectional Chart, showing the extent of the airspace allocated to the associated IFR Military Training Routes within which the Department of Defense conducts periodic operations involving Unmanned Aircraft Systems. These aircraft may be accompanied by military or other aircraft that provide the pilots of the Unmanned Aircraft Systems visual observation information about other aircraft operations near them. Further information on SMAR charting can be found on the border of the printed VFR Sectional Chart and in the FAA Aeronautical Chart Users’ Guide available online at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/aero_guide/ .

4.4.2.3 Area Planning (AP/1B) Chart (DOD Flight Information Publication − FLIP). This chart is published by the National Geospatial − Intelligence Agency (NGA) primarily for military users and contains detailed information on both IR and VR routes.

4.5 DoD FLIP − Department of Defense Flight Information Publications describe IR/VR routes through charts and narratives, and the FAA provides information regarding these routes to all users via IFR and VFR charts.

NOTE − DoD users that require copies of FLIP, should contact: Defense Logistics Agency for Aviation Mapping Customer Operations (DLA AVN/QAM) 8000 Jefferson Davis Highway Richmond, VA 23297 − 5339 Toll free phone: 1 − 800 − 826 − 0342 Commercial: 804 − 279 − 6500 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 MTR information from the FLIP is available for pilot briefings through Flight Service. (See subparagraph 4.6.1 below.)

4.6 Availability of MTR information.

4.6.1 Pilots may obtain preflight MTR information through Flight Service. (See paragraph ENR 1.10 − 1. , Preflight Preparation.)

4.6.2 MTR routes are depicted on IFR En Route Low Altitude Charts and VFR Sectional Aeronautical Charts, which are downloaded free and available on the FAA website at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/ .

4.7 Nonparticipating aircraft are not prohibited from flying within an MTR or SMAR; however, extreme vigilance should be exercised when conducting flight through or near these routes. Pilots, while inflight, should contact the FSS within 100 NM of a particular MTR to obtain current information or route usage in their vicinity.

Information available includes times of scheduled activity, altitudes in use on each route segment, and actual route width. Route width varies for each MTR and can extend several miles on either side of the charted MTR centerline. Route width information for IFR Military Training Route (IR) and VFR Military Training Route (VR) MTRs is also available in the FLIP AP/1B along with additional MTR (slow routes/air refueling routes) information. When requesting MTR information, pilots should give the FSS the MTR designation of interest, their position, route of flight, and destination in order to reduce frequency congestion and permit the FSS specialist to identify the MTR or SMAR that could be a factor.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 5.3 Other Activities of a Dangerous Nature and

Other Potential Hazards

1. Other Activities of a Dangerous Nature 1.1 The most current and specific information can be found on the Federal Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) System (FNS) NOTAM Search website: https://notams.aim.faa.gov/notamSearch/ .

1.2 United States International Flight Prohibitions, Potential Hostile Situations, and Foreign Notices are issued by the FAA and are found on the FNS NOTAM Search website under the location designator KICZ. A list of KICZ NOTAMs can be found here: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/us_restrictions .

1.3 For power plant information, see ENR 1.10, Flight Planning (Restriction, Limitation or Advisory Information), TBL ENR 1.10 − 1 .

2. Other Potential Hazards 2.1 Accident Causal Factors.

2.1.1 The ten most frequent cause factors for general aviation accidents that involve the pilot in command are: 2.1.1.1 Inadequate preflight preparation and/or planning.

2.1.1.2 Failure to obtain/maintain flying speed.

2.1.1.3 Failure to maintain direction control.

2.1.1.4 Improper level off.

2.1.1.5 Failure to see and avoid objects or obstructions.

2.1.1.6 Mismanagement of fuel.

2.1.1.7 Improper in − flight decisions or planning.

2.1.1.8 Misjudgment of distance and speed.

2.1.1.9 Selection of unsuitable terrain.

2.1.1.10 Improper operation of flight controls.

2.1.2 The above factors have continued to plague general aviation pilots over the years. This list remains relatively stable and points out the need for continued refresher training to establish a higher level of flight proficiency for all pilots. A part of the FAA’s continuing effort to promote increased aviation safety is the Aviation Safety Program. For information on the FAA’s Aviation Safety Program, readers can contact their nearest Flight Standards District Office’s Safety Program Manager.

2.1.3 Be alert at all times, especially when the weather is good. Most pilots pay attention to business when they are operating in full IFR weather conditions, but strangely, air collisions almost invariably have occurred under ideal weather conditions. Unlimited visibility appears to encourage a sense of security, which is not at all justified. Considerable information of value may be obtained by listening to advisories being issued in the terminal area, even though controller workload may prevent a pilot from obtaining individual service.

2.1.4 If you think another aircraft is too close to you, give way instead of waiting for the other pilot to respect the right − of − way to which you may be entitled. It is a lot safer to pursue the right − of − way angle after you have completed your flight.

2.2 Reporting Radio/Radar Altimeter Anomalies 2.2.1 Background Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.1.1 The radio altimeter (also known as radar altimeter or RADALT) is a safety − critical aircraft system used to determine an aircraft’s height above terrain. It is the only sensor onboard the aircraft capable of providing a direct measurement of the clearance height above the terrain and obstacles. Information from radio altimeters is essential for flight operations as a main enabler of several safety − critical functions and systems on the aircraft.

The receiver on the radio altimeter is highly accurate because it is extremely sensitive, making it susceptible to Radio Frequency Interference (RFI). Harmful RFI in the C − band portion of the spectrum could impact the functions of the radio altimeter during any phase of flight—most critically during takeoff, approach, and landing phases. This could pose a serious risk to flight safety.

2.2.1.2 Installed radio altimeters normally supply critical height data to a wide range of automated safety systems, navigation systems, and cockpit displays. RFI affecting the radio altimeter can cause these safety and navigation systems to operate in unexpected ways and display erroneous information to the pilot. RFI can interrupt, or significantly degrade, radio altimeter functions—precluding radio altimeter − based terrain alerts and low − visibility approach and landing operations. Systems of concern include Terrain Awareness Warning Systems (TAWS), Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning Systems (EGPWS), and Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems (TCAS), to name a few. Pilots of radio altimeter equipped aircraft should become familiar with the radio altimeter’s interdependence with the other aircraft systems and expected failure modes and indications that may be associated with harmful interference.

2.2.2 Actions. Recognizing interference/anomalies in the radio altimeter can be difficult, as it may present as inoperative or erroneous data. Pilots need to monitor their automation, as well as their radio altimeters for discrepancies, and be prepared to take action. Pilots encountering radio altimeter anomalies should transition to procedures that do not require the radio altimeter and inform Air Traffic Control (ATC).

2.2.3 Inflight Reporting. Pilots should report any radio altimeter anomaly to ATC as soon as practical.

2.2.4 Post Flight Reporting.

2.2.4.1 Pilots are encouraged to submit detailed reports of radio altimeter interference/anomalies post flight as soon as practical via the Radio Altimeter Anomaly Reporting Form at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/nas/radalt_reports .

2.2.4.2 The post flight pilot reports of radio altimeter anomalies must contain as much of the following information as applicable: a) Date and time the anomaly was observed; b) Location of the aircraft at the time the anomaly started and ended (e.g., latitude, longitude or bearing/distance from a reference point or navigational aid); c) Magnetic heading; d) Altitude (MSL/AGL); e) Aircraft type (make/model); f) Flight Number or Aircraft number; g) Meteorological conditions; h) Type of radio altimeter in use (e.g., make/model/software series or version), if known; i) Event overview; j) Consequences/operational impact, (e.g., impacted equipment, actions taken to mitigate the disruption and/or remedy provided by ATC, required post flight pilot and maintenance actions).

2.3 VFR In Congested Area 2.3.1 A high percentage of near midair collisions occur below 8,000 feet AGL and within 30 miles of an airport.

When operating VFR in highly congested areas, whether you intend to land at an airport within the area or are Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 just flying through, it is recommended that extra vigilance be maintained and that you monitor an appropriate control frequency. Normally the appropriate frequency is an approach control frequency. By such monitoring action you can “get the picture” of the traffic in your area. When the approach controller has radar, traffic advisories may be given to VFR pilots who request them, subject to the provisions included in ENR 1.1, paragraph 38, Surveillance Systems, subparagraph 38.10.4, Radar Traffic Information Service (RTIS).

2.4 Obstructions to Flight 2.4.1 General.

2.4.1.1 Many structures exist that could significantly affect the safety of your flight when operating below 500 feet above ground level (AGL), and particularly below 200 feet AGL. While 14 CFR section 91.119 allows flight below 500 feet AGL when over sparsely populated areas or open water, such operations involve increased safety risks. At and below 200 feet AGL there are numerous power lines, antenna towers, etc., that are not marked and lighted and/or charted as obstructions and, therefore, may not be seen in time to avoid a collision. NOTAMs are issued on those lighted structures experiencing temporary light outages. However, some time may pass before the FAA is notified of these outages, and the NOTAM issued, thus pilot vigilance is imperative. Additionally, new obstructions may not be on current charts because the information was not received prior to the FAA publishing the chart.

2.4.2 Antenna Towers.

2.4.2.1 Extreme caution should be exercised when flying less than 2,000 feet above ground level (AGL) because of numerous skeletal structures, such as radio and television antenna towers, that exceed 1,000 feet AGL with some extending higher than 2,000 feet AGL. Most skeletal structures are supported by guy wires that are very difficult to see in good weather and can be invisible at dusk or during periods of reduced visibility. These wires can extend about 1,500 feet horizontally from a structure; therefore, all skeletal structures should be avoided horizontally by at least 2,000 feet.

2.4.3 Overhead Wires.

2.4.3.1 Overhead transmission and utility lines often span approaches to runways, natural flyways such as lakes, rivers, gorges, and canyons, and cross other landmarks pilots frequently follow such as highways, railroad tracks, etc. As with antenna towers, these power transmission and/or utility lines and the supporting structures of these lines may not always be readily visible. The wires may be virtually impossible to see under certain conditions.

Spherical markers may be used to identify overhead wires and catenary transmission lines and may be lighted.

In some locations, the supporting structures of overhead transmission lines are equipped with unique sequence flashing white strobe light systems to indicate that there are wires between the structures. The flash sequence for the wire support structures will be middle,top, and bottom with all lights on the same level flashing simultaneously. However, not all power transmission and/or utility lines require notice to the FAA as they do not exceed 200 feet AGL or meet the obstruction standard of 14 CFR part 77 and, therefore, are not marked and/or lighted. All pilots are cautioned to remain extremely vigilant for power transmission and/or utility lines and their supporting structures when following natural flyways or during the approach and landing phase. This is particularly important for seaplane and/or float equipped aircraft when landing on, or departing from, unfamiliar lakes or rivers.

2.4.4 Wind Turbines.

2.4.4.1 The number, size, and height of individual wind turbines and wind turbine farms have increased over time. The locations of wind turbine farms have also expanded to more commonly flown areas by VFR pilots and to all regions of the United States. VFR pilots should be aware that many wind turbines are exceeding 499 feet AGL in height, which may affect minimum safe VFR altitudes in uncontrolled airspace. In addition, many wind turbines are encroaching on the 700 − foot AGL floor of controlled airspace (Class E). Pilots are cautioned to maintain appropriate safe distance (laterally, vertically, or both). Wind turbines are typically charted on Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Sectional Charts and/or Terminal Area Charts. For a description of how wind turbines and wind turbine farms are charted, refer to the FAA Aeronautical Chart User’s Guide.

http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/ Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 5.3 − 4 AIP ENR 5.3 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.4.4.2 Wind turbines are normally painted white or light gray to improve daytime conspicuity. They are typically lit with medium − intensity, flashing red lights, placed as high as possible on the turbine nacelle (not the blade tips), that should be synchronized to flash together; however, not all wind turbine units within a farm need to be lighted, depending on their location and height. Sometimes, only the perimeter of the wind turbine farm and an arrangement of interior wind turbines are lit. Some wind turbine farms use Aircraft Detection Lighting Systems (ADLS), which are proximity sensor − based systems designed to detect aircraft as they approach the obstruction. This system automatically activates the appropriate obstruction lights until they are no longer needed based on the position of the transiting aircraft. This technology reduces the impact of nighttime lighting on nearby communities and migratory birds and extends the life expectancy of the obstruction lights. For more information on how obstructions such as wind turbines are marked and lighted, refer to FAA Advisory Circular 70/7460 − 1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting. Pilots should be aware that wind turbines in motion could result in limitations of air traffic services in the vicinity of the wind turbine farms.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.1, Para 38, Surveillance Systems, Subpara 38.1, Radar.

2.4.5 Meteorological Towers.

2.4.5.1 Meteorological towers are used by wind energy companies to determine feasible sites for wind turbines.

Some of these towers are less than 200 feet AGL. These structures are portable, erected in a matter of hours, installed with guyed wires, and constructed from a galvanized material often making them difficult to see in certain atmospheric conditions. Markings for these towers include alternating bands of aviation orange and white paint, and high − visibility sleeves installed on the outer guy wires. However, not all meteorological towers follow these guidelines, and pilots should be vigilant when flying at low altitude in remote or rural areas.

2.4.6 Other Objects/Structures.

2.4.6.1 There are other objects or structures that could adversely affect your flight such as temporary construction cranes near an airport, newly constructed buildings, new towers, etc. Many of these structures do not meet charting requirements or may not yet be charted because of the charting cycle. Some structures do not require obstruction marking and/or lighting, and some may not be marked and lighted even though the FAA recommended it. VFR Pilots should carefully review NOTAMs for temporary or permanent obstructions along the planned route of flight during their preflight preparations. Particular emphasis should be given to obstructions in the vicinity of the approach and departure ends of the runway complex or any other areas where flight below 500 feet AGL is planned or likely to occur.

2.5 Unmanned Balloons 2.5.1 The majority of unmanned free balloons currently being operated have, extended below them, either a suspension device to which the payload or instrument package is attached, or a trailing wire antenna, or both.

In many instances these balloon subsystems may be invisible to the pilot until his/her aircraft is close to the balloon, thereby creating a potentially dangerous situation. Therefore, good judgment on the part of the pilot dictates that aircraft should remain well clear of all unmanned free balloons and flight below then should be avoided at all times.

2.5.2 Pilots are urged to report any unmanned free balloons sighted to the nearest FAA ground facility with which communication is established. Such information will assist FAA ATC facilities to identify and flight follow unmanned free balloons operating in the airspace.

2.6 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) 2.6.1 UAS (formerly referred to as “Unmanned Aerial Vehicles” (UAVs) and recently referred to as “drones”) are having an increasing operational presence in the NAS. Once the exclusive domain of the military, UAS are now being operated by various entities. (refer to ENR 8. UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS) for additional information) Although these aircraft are “unmanned,” UAS are flown by a remotely located pilot and crew. Physical and performance characteristics of unmanned aircraft (UA) vary greatly and unlike small UAS that typically operate at or below 400 feet AGL, larger Unmanned Aircraft (UA) may be found operating at virtually any altitude. Sizes of UA can be as small as several pounds to as large as a commercial transport aircraft.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 5 AIP ENR 5.3 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UAS come in various categories including airplane, rotorcraft, powered − lift (tilt − rotor), and lighter − than − air.

Propulsion systems of UAS include a broad range of alternatives from piston powered and turbojet engines to battery and solar − powered electric motors.

2.6.2 UAS operations may be approved in either controlled or uncontrolled airspace. In all cases, approved UAS operations must comply with all applicable regulations and/or special provisions specified in the applicable FAA approval documents. At uncontrolled airports, UAS operations are advised to operate well clear of all known manned aircraft operations. Pilots of manned aircraft are advised to follow normal operating procedures and are urged to monitor the CTAF for any potential UAS activity. At controlled airports, local ATC procedures may be in place to handle UAS operations and should not require any special procedures from manned aircraft entering or departing the traffic pattern or operating in the vicinity of the airport.

2.6.3 There are several factors a pilot should consider regarding UAS activity in an effort to reduce potential flight hazards. Pilots are urged to exercise increased vigilance when operating in the vicinity of restricted or other special use airspace, military operations areas, and any military installation. Since the size of a UA can be very small, they may be difficult to see and track. If a UA is encountered during flight, as with any aircraft, never assume that the pilot or crew of the other aircraft can see you, maintain increased vigilance and always be prepared for evasive action if necessary. Always check NOTAMs for potential UAS activity along the intended route of flight and exercise increased vigilance in areas specified in the NOTAM.

2.7 Mountain Flying 2.7.1 Your first experience of flying over mountainous terrain (particularly if most of your flight time has been over the flatlands of the Midwest) could be a never − to − be − forgotten nightmare if proper planning is not done and if you are not aware of the potential hazards awaiting. Those familiar section lines are not present in the mountains; those flat, level fields for forced landings are practically nonexistent; abrupt changes in wind direction and velocity occur; severe updrafts and downdrafts are common, particularly near or above abrupt changes of terrain such as cliffs or rugged areas; even the clouds look different and can build up with startling rapidity. Mountain flying need not be hazardous if you follow the recommendations below: 2.7.1.1 File a Flight Plan. Plan your route to avoid topography that would prevent a safe forced landing. The route should be over populated areas and well − known mountain passes. Sufficient altitude should be maintained to permit gliding to a safe landing in the event of engine failure.

2.7.1.2 Don’t fly a light aircraft when the winds aloft, at your proposed altitude, exceed 35 miles per hour. Expect the winds to be of much greater velocity over mountain passes than reported a few miles from them. Approach mountain passes with as much altitude as possible. Downdrafts of 1,500 to 2,000 feet per minute are not uncommon on the leeward side.

2.7.1.3 Don’t fly near or above abrupt changes in terrain. Severe turbulence can be expected, especially in high wind conditions.

2.7.1.4 Understand Mountain Obscuration (MTOS). The term MTOS is used to describe a visibility condition that is distinguished from IFR because ceilings, by definition, are described as “above ground level” (AGL). In mountainous terrain clouds can form at altitudes significantly higher than the weather reporting station and at the same time nearby mountaintops may be obscured by low visibility. In these areas the ground level can also vary greatly over a small area. Beware if operating VFR − on − top. You could be operating closer to the terrain than you think because the tops of mountains are hidden in a cloud deck below. MTOS areas are identified daily on the Aviation Weather Center website: https://aviationweather.gov/ .

2.7.2 Navigating in confined terrain when flying through mountain passes can be challenging. For high − traffic mountain passes, VFR checkpoints may be provided on VFR navigation charts to increase situational awareness by indicating key landmarks inside confined terrain. A collocated VFR waypoint and checkpoint may be provided to assist with identifying natural entry points for commonly flown mountain passes. Pilots should reference the name of the charted VFR checkpoint, wherever possible, when making position reports on CTAF frequencies to reduce the risk of midair collisions. Pilots should evaluate the terrain along the route they intend Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 5.3 − 6 AIP ENR 5.3 − 6 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 to fly with respect to their aircraft type and performance capabilities, local weather, and their experience level to avoid flying into confined areas without adequate room to execute a 180 − degree turn, should conditions require. Always fly with a planned escape route in mind.

2.7.3 VFR flight operations may be conducted at night in mountainous terrain with the application of sound judgment and common sense. Proper preflight planning, giving ample consideration to winds and weather, knowledge of the terrain, and pilot experience in mountain flying are prerequisites for safety of flight.

Continuous visual contact with the surface and obstructions is a major concern and flight operations under an overcast or in the vicinity of clouds should be approached with extreme caution.

2.7.4 When landing at a high − altitude field, the same indicated airspeed should be used as at low elevation fields.

Remember: due to the less dense air at altitude, this same indicated airspeed results in a higher true airspeed, a faster landing speed, and more important, a longer landing distance. During gusty wind conditions which often prevail at high altitude fields, a power approach and power landing is recommended. Additionally, due to the faster groundspeed, your takeoff distance will increase considerably over that required at low altitudes.

2.7.5 Effects of Density Altitude. Performance figures in the aircraft owner’s handbook for length of takeoff run, horsepower, rate of climb, etc., are generally based on standard atmosphere conditions (59 ° F, pressure 29.92 inches of mercury) at sea level. However, inexperienced pilots as well as experienced pilots may run into trouble when they encounter an altogether different set of conditions. This is particularly true in hot weather and at higher elevations. Aircraft operations at altitudes above sea level and at higher than standard temperatures are commonplace in mountainous area. Such operations quite often result in a drastic reduction of aircraft performance capabilities because of the changing air density. Density altitude is a measure of air density. It is not to be confused with pressure altitude—true altitude or absolute altitude. It is not to be used as a height reference, but as a determining criterion in the performance capability of an aircraft. Air density decreases with altitude. As air density decreases, density altitude increases. The further effects of high temperature and high humidity are cumulative, resulting in an increasing high density altitude condition. High density altitude reduces all aircraft performance parameters. To the pilot, this means that the normal horsepower output is reduced, propeller efficiency is reduced, and a higher true airspeed is required to sustain the aircraft throughout its operating parameters. It means an increase in runway length requirements for takeoff and landings, and a decreased rate of climb. An average small airplane, for example, requiring 1,000 feet for takeoff at sea level under standard atmospheric conditions will require a takeoff run of approximately 2,000 feet at an operational altitude of 5,000 feet.

NOTE − A turbo − charged aircraft engine provides some slight advantage in that it provides sea level horsepower up to a specified altitude above sea level.

2.7.6 Density Altitude Advisories. At airports with elevations of 2,000 feet and higher, control towers and FSSs will broadcast the advisory “Check Density Altitude” when the temperature reaches a predetermined level. These advisories will be broadcast on appropriate tower frequencies or, where available, automatic terminal information service (ATIS). FSSs will broadcast these advisories as a part of airport advisory.

2.7.6.1 These advisories are provided by air traffic facilities as a reminder to pilots that high temperatures and high field elevations will cause significant changes in aircraft characteristics. The pilot retains the responsibility to compute density altitude, when appropriate, as a part of preflight duties.

NOTE − All FSSs will compute the current density altitude upon request.

2.8 Use of Runway Half − Way Signs at Unimproved Airports 2.8.1 When installed, runway half − way signs provide the pilot with a reference point to judge takeoff acceleration trends. Assuming that the runway length is appropriate for takeoff (considering runway condition and slope, elevation, aircraft weight, wind, and temperature), typical takeoff acceleration should allow the airplane to reach 70 percent of lift − off airspeed by the midpoint of the runway. The “rule of thumb” is that should Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 7 AIP ENR 5.3 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 airplane acceleration not allow the airspeed to reach this value by the midpoint, the takeoff should be aborted, as it may not be possible to liftoff in the remaining runway.

2.8.2 Several points are important when considering using this “rule of thumb”: 2.8.2.1 Airspeed indicators in small airplanes are not required to be evaluated at speeds below stalling and may not be usable at 70 percent of liftoff airspeed.

2.8.2.2 This “rule of thumb” is based on a uniform surface condition. Puddles, soft spots, areas of tall and/or wet grass, loose gravel, etc., may impede acceleration or even cause deceleration. Even if the airplane achieves 70 percent of liftoff airspeed by the midpoint, the condition of the remainder of the runway may not allow further acceleration. The entire length of the runway should be inspected prior to takeoff to ensure a usable surface.

2.8.2.3 This “rule of thumb” applies only to runway required for actual liftoff. In the event that obstacles affect the takeoff climb path, appropriate distance must be available after liftoff to accelerate to best angle of climb speed and to clear the obstacles. This will, in effect, require the airplane to accelerate to a higher speed by midpoint, particularly if the obstacles are close to the end of the runway. In addition, this technique does not take into account the effects of upslope or tailwinds on takeoff performance. These factors will also require greater acceleration than normal and, under some circumstances, prevent takeoff entirely.

2.8.2.4 Use of this “rule of thumb” does not alleviate the pilot’s responsibility to comply with applicable Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), the limitations and performance data provided in the FAA approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), or, in the absence of an FAA − approved AFM, other data provided by the aircraft manufacturer.

2.8.3 In addition to their use during takeoff, runway half − way signs offer the pilot increased awareness of his or her position along the runway during landing operations.

NOTE − No FAA standard exists for the appearance of the runway half − way sign. FIG ENR 5.3 − 1 shows a graphical depiction of a typical runway half − way sign.

FIG ENR 5.3 − 1 Typical Runway Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.9 Mountain Wave 2.9.1 Many pilots go all their lives without understanding what a mountain wave is. Quite a few have lost their lives because of this lack of understanding. One need not be a licensed meteorologist to understand the mountain wave phenomenon.

2.9.2 Mountain waves occur when air is being blown over a mountain range or even the ridge of a sharp bluff area. As the air hits the upwind side of the range, it starts to climb, thus creating what is generally a smooth updraft which turns into a turbulent downdraft as the air passes the crest of the ridge. From this point, for many miles downwind, there will be a series of downdrafts and updrafts. Satellite photos of the Rockies have shown mountain waves extending as far as 700 miles downwind of the range. Along the east coast area, such photos of the Appalachian chain have picked up the mountain wave phenomenon over a hundred miles eastward. All it takes to form a mountain wave is wind blowing across the range at 15 knots or better at an intersection angle of not less than 30 degrees.

2.9.3 Pilots from flatland areas should understand a few things about mountain waves in order to stay out of trouble. Approaching a mountain range from the upwind side (generally the west), there will usually be a smooth updraft; therefore, it is not quite as dangerous an area as the lee of the range. From the leeward side, it is always a good idea to add an extra thousand feet or so of altitude because downdrafts can exceed the climb capability of the aircraft. Never expect an updraft when approaching a mountain chain from the leeward. Always be prepared to cope with a downdraft and turbulence.

2.9.4 When approaching a mountain ridge from the downwind side, it is recommended that the ridge be approached at approximately a 45 ° angle to the horizontal direction of the ridge. This permits a safer retreat from the ridge with less stress on the aircraft should severe turbulence and downdraft be experienced. If severe turbulence is encountered, simultaneously reduce power and adjust pitch until aircraft approaches maneuvering speed, then adjust power and trim to maintain maneuvering speed and fly away from the turbulent area.

2.10 Seaplane Safety 2.10.1 Acquiring a seaplane class rating affords access to many areas not available to landplane pilots. Adding a seaplane class rating to your pilot certificate can be relatively uncomplicated and inexpensive. However, more effort is required to become a safe, efficient, competent “bush” pilot. The natural hazards of the backwoods have given way to modern man − made hazards. Except for the far north, the available bodies of water are no longer the exclusive domain of the airman. Seaplane pilots must be vigilant for hazards such as electric power lines, power, sail and rowboats, rafts, mooring lines, water skiers, swimmers, etc.

2.10.2 Seaplane pilots must have a thorough understanding of the right − of − way rules as they apply to aircraft versus other vessels. Seaplane pilots are expected to know and adhere to both the United States Coast Guard’s (USCG) Navigation Rules, International − Inland, and Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 91.115, Right − of − Way Rules: Water Operations. The navigation rules of the road are a set of collision avoidance rules as they apply to aircraft on the water. A seaplane is considered a vessel when on the water for the purposes of these collision avoidance rules. In general, a seaplane on the water must keep well clear of all vessels and avoid impeding their navigation. The CFR requires, in part, that aircraft operating on the water must “ … insofar as possible, keep clear of all vessels and avoid impeding their navigation, and shall give way to any vessel or other aircraft that is given the right − of − way … ” This means that a seaplane should avoid boats and commercial shipping when on the water. If on a collision course, the seaplane should slow, stop, or maneuver to the right, away from the bow of the oncoming vessel. Also, while on the surface with an engine running, an aircraft must give way to all nonpowered vessels. Since a seaplane in the water may not be as maneuverable as one in the air, the aircraft on the water has right − of − way over one in the air, and one taking off has right − of − way over one landing. A seaplane is exempt from the USCG safety equipment requirements, including the requirements for personal floatation devices (PFDs). Requiring seaplanes on the water to comply with USCG equipment requirements in addition to the FAA equipment requirements would be an unnecessary burden on seaplane owners and operators.

2.10.3 Unless they are under Federal jurisdiction, navigable bodies of water are under the jurisdiction of the state, or in a few cases, privately owned. Unless they are specifically restricted, aircraft have as much right to Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 operate on these bodies of water as other vessels. To avoid problems, check with Federal or local officials in advance of operating on unfamiliar waters. In addition to the agencies listed in TBL ENR 5.3 − 1, the nearest Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) can usually offer some practical suggestions as well as regulatory information.

If you land on a restricted body of water because of an inflight emergency, or in ignorance of the restrictions you have violated, report as quickly as practical to the nearest local official having jurisdiction and explain your situation.

TBL ENR 5.3 − 1 Jurisdictions Controlling Navigable Bodies of Water Location Contact Authority Wilderness Area Local forest ranger U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service National Forest USDA, Forest Service Local forest ranger National Park Local park ranger U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI), National Park Service Indian Reservation USDI, Bureau of Indian Affairs Local Bureau office State Park State government or state Local state aviation office for forestry or park service further information Canadian National and Provin - Supervised and restricted on an Park Superintendent in an cial Parks individual basis from province emergency to province and by different departments of the Canadian government; consult Canadian Flight Information Manual and/or Water Aerodrome Sup - plement 2.10.4 When operating a seaplane over or into remote areas, appropriate attention should be given to survival gear. Minimum kits are recommended for summer and winter, and are required by law for flight into sparsely settled areas of Canada and Alaska. Alaska State Department of Transportation and Canadian Ministry of Transport officials can provide specific information on survival gear requirements. The kit should be assembled in one container and be easily reachable and preferably floatable.

2.10.5 The FAA recommends that each seaplane owner or operator provide flotation gear for occupants any time a seaplane operates on or near water. 14 CFR section 91.205(b)(12) requires approved flotation gear for aircraft operated for hire over water and beyond power − off gliding distance from shore. FAA − approved gear differs from that requirement for navigable waterways under USCG rules. FAA − approved life vests are inflatable designs as compared to the USCG’s non − inflatable PFDs that may consist of solid, bulky material. Such USCG PFDs are impractical for seaplanes and other aircraft because they may block passage through the relatively narrow exits available to pilots and passengers. Life vests approved under Technical Standard Order (TSO) C − 13 contain fully inflatable compartments. The wearer inflates the compartments (after exiting the aircraft) primarily by independent CO cartridges, with an oral inflation tube as a backup. The flotation gear also contains a water − activated, self − illuminating signal light. The fact that pilots and passengers can easily don and wear inflatable life vests (when not inflated) provides maximum effectiveness and allows for unrestricted movement.

It is imperative that passengers are briefed on the location and proper use of available PFDs prior to leaving the dock.

2.10.6 The FAA recommends that seaplane owners and operators obtain Advisory Circular (AC) 91–69, Seaplane Safety for 14 CFR Part 91 Operators. For additional information, the USCG Navigation Rules and Regulations Handbook can be found on the following website: https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/ .

2.11 Flight Operations in Volcanic Ash 2.11.1 Severe volcanic eruptions which send ash and sulphur dioxide (SO ) gas into the upper atmosphere occur somewhere around the world several times each year. Flying into a volcanic ash cloud can be exceedingly dangerous. A B747–200 lost all four engines after such an encounter, and a B747–400 had the same nearly Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 catastrophic experience. Piston − powered aircraft are less likely to lose power but severe damage is almost certain to ensue after an encounter with a volcanic ash cloud that is only a few hours old.

2.11.2 Most important is to avoid any encounter with volcanic ash. The ash plume may not be visible, especially in instrument conditions or at night; and even if visible, it is difficult to distinguish visually between an ash cloud and an ordinary weather cloud. Volcanic ash clouds are not displayed on airborne or ATC radar. The pilot must rely on reports from air traffic controllers and other pilots to determine the location of the ash cloud and use that information to remain well clear of the area. Additionally, detecting SO may indicate volcanic activity but may or may not indicate the presence of volcanic ash. Every attempt should be made to remain on the upwind side of the volcano.

2.11.3 It is recommended that pilots encountering an ash cloud should immediately reduce thrust to idle (altitude permitting), and reverse course in order to escape from the cloud. Ash clouds may extend for hundreds of miles, and pilots should not attempt to fly through or climb out of the cloud. In addition, the following procedures are recommended: 2.11.3.1 Disengage the autothrottle if engaged. This will prevent the autothrottle from increasing engine thrust.

2.11.3.2 Turn on continuous ignition.

2.11.3.3 Turn on all accessory airbleeds including all air conditioning packs, nacelles, and wing anti − ice. This will provide an additional engine stall margin by reducing engine pressure.

2.11.4 The following has been reported by flight crews who have experienced encounters with volcanic dust clouds.

2.11.4.1 Smoke or dust appearing in the cockpit.

2.11.4.2 An acrid odor similar to electrical smoke.

2.11.4.3 Multiple engine malfunctions, such as compressor stalls, increasing Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT), torching from tailpipe, and flameouts.

2.11.4.4 At night, St. Elmo’s fire or other static discharges accompanied by a bright orange glow in the engine inlets.

2.11.4.5 A fire warning in the forward cargo area.

2.11.5 It may become necessary to shut down and then restart engines to prevent exceeding EGT limits. Volcanic ash may block the pitot system and result in unreliable airspeed indications.

2.11.6 If you see a volcanic eruption and have not been previously notified of it, you may have been the first person to observe it. In this case, immediately contact ATC and alert them to the existence of the eruption. If possible, use the Volcanic Activity Reporting Form (VAR) (see FIG GEN 3.5 − 31). Items 1 through 8 of the VAR should be transmitted immediately. The information requested in items 9 through 16 should be passed after landing. If a VAR form is not immediately available, relay enough information to identify the position and nature of the volcanic activity. Do not become unnecessarily alarmed if there is merely steam or very low − level eruptions of ash.

REFERENCE − AIP, GEN 3.5, Para 25, PIREPs Relating to Volcanic Ash Activity.

2.11.7 When landing at airports where volcanic ash has been deposited on the runway, be aware that even a thin layer of dry ash can be detrimental to braking action. Wet ash on the runway may also reduce effectiveness of braking. It is recommended that reverse thrust be limited to a minimum practical to reduce the possibility of reduced visibility and engine ingestion of airborne ash.

2.11.8 When departing from airports where volcanic ash has been deposited it is recommended that pilots avoid operating in visible airborne ash. Allow ash to settle before initiating takeoff roll. It is also recommended that flap extension be delayed until initiating the takeoff checklist and that a rolling takeoff be executed to avoid blowing ash back into the air.

2.12 Emergency Airborne Inspection of Other Aircraft Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.12.1 Providing airborne assistance to another aircraft may involve flying in very close proximity to that aircraft. Most pilots receive little, if any, formal training or instruction in this type of flying activity. Close proximity flying without sufficient time to plan (i.e., in an emergency situation), coupled with the stress involved in a perceived emergency can be hazardous.

2.12.2 The pilot in the best position to assess the situation should take the responsibility of coordinating the airborne intercept and inspection, taking into account the unique flight characteristics and differences of the category(s) of aircraft involved.

2.12.3 Some of the safety considerations are: 2.12.3.1 Area, direction, and speed of the intercept.

2.12.3.2 Aerodynamic effects (e.g., rotorcraft downwash).

2.12.3.3 Minimum safe separation distances.

2.12.3.4 Communications requirements, lost communications procedures, coordination with ATC.

2.12.3.5 Suitability of diverting the distressed aircraft to the nearest safe airport.

2.12.3.6 Emergency actions to terminate the intercept.

2.12.4 Close proximity, inflight inspection of another aircraft is uniquely hazardous. The pilot in command of the aircraft experiencing the problem/emergency must not relinquish their control of the situation and jeopardize the safety of their aircraft. The maneuver must be accomplished with minimum risk to both aircraft.

2.13 Precipitation Static 2.13.1 Precipitation static is caused by aircraft in flight coming in contact with uncharged particles. These particles can be rain, snow, fog, sleet, hail, volcanic ash, dust, any solid or liquid particles. When the aircraft strikes these neutral particles, the positive element of the particle is reflected away from the aircraft and the negative particle adheres to the skin of the aircraft. In a very short period of time a substantial negative charge will develop on the skin of the aircraft. If the aircraft is not equipped with static dischargers, or has an ineffective static discharger system, when a sufficient negative voltage level is reached, the aircraft may go into “CORONA.” That is, it will discharge the static electricity from the extremities of the aircraft, such as the wing tips, horizontal stabilizer, vertical stabilizer, antenna, propeller tips, etc. This discharge of static electricity is what you will hear in your headphones and is what we call P − static.

2.13.2 A review of pilot reports often shows different symptoms with each problem that is encountered. The following list of problems is a summary of many pilot reports from many different aircraft. Each problem was caused by P − static: 2.13.2.1 Complete loss of VHF communications.

2.13.2.2 Erroneous magnetic compass readings (30% in error).

2.13.2.3 High pitched squeal on audio.

2.13.2.4 Motorboat sound on audio.

2.13.2.5 Loss of all avionics in clouds.

2.13.2.6 Very low frequency (VLF) navigation system inoperative most of the time.

2.13.2.7 Erratic instrument readouts.

2.13.2.8 Weak transmissions and poor receptivity of radios.

2.13.2.9 “St. Elmo’s Fire” on windshield.

2.13.3 Each of these symptoms is caused by one general problem on the airframe. This problem is the inability of the accumulated charge to flow easily to the wing tips and tail of the airframe, and properly discharge to the airstream.

2.13.4 Static dischargers work on the principle of creating a relatively easy path for discharging negative charges that develop on the aircraft by using a discharger with fine metal points, carbon coated rods, or carbon wicks Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 rather than wait until a large charge is developed and discharged off the trailing edges of the aircraft that will interfere with avionics equipment. This process offers approximately 50 decibels (dB) static noise reduction which is adequate in most cases to be below the threshold of noise that would cause interference in avionics equipment.

2.13.5 It is important to remember that precipitation static problems can only be corrected with the proper number of quality static dischargers, properly installed on a properly bonded aircraft. P − static is indeed a problem in the all weather operation of the aircraft, but there are effective ways to combat it. All possible methods of reducing the effects of P − static should be considered so as to provide the best possible performance in the flight environment.

2.13.6 A wide variety of discharger designs is available on the commercial market. The inclusion of well − designed dischargers may be expected to improve airframe noise in P − static conditions by as much as 50 dB. Essentially, the discharger provides a path by which accumulated charge may leave the airframe quietly. This is generally accomplished by providing a group of tiny corona points to permit onset of corona − current flow at a low aircraft potential. Additionally, aerodynamic design of dischargers to permit corona to occur at the lowest possible atmospheric pressure also lowers the corona threshold. In addition to permitting a low potential discharge, the discharger will minimize the radiation of radio frequency (RF) energy that accompanies the corona discharge, in order to minimize effects of RF components at communications and navigation frequencies on avionics performance. These effects are reduced through resistive attachment of the corona point(s) to the airframe, preserving direct current connection but attenuating the higher frequency components of the discharge.

2.13.7 Each manufacturer of static dischargers offers information concerning appropriate discharger location on specific airframes. Such locations emphasize the trailing outboard surfaces of wings and horizontal tail surfaces, plus the tip of the vertical stabilizer, where charge tends to accumulate on the airframe. Sufficient dischargers must be provided to allow for current carrying capacity which will maintain airframe potential below the corona threshold of the trailing edges.

2.13.8 In order to achieve full performance of avionic equipment, the static discharge system will require periodic maintenance. A pilot’s knowledge of P − static causes and effects is an important element in assuring optimum performance by early recognition of these types of problems.

2.14 Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation (Laser) Operations and Reporting Illumination of Aircraft 2.14.1 Lasers have many applications. Of concern to users of the National Airspace System are those laser events that may affect pilots, e.g., outdoor laser light shows or demonstrations for entertainment and advertisement at special events and theme parks. Generally, the beams from these events appear as bright blue − green in color; however, they may be red, yellow, or white. Some laser systems produce light that is invisible to the human eye.

2.14.2 FAA regulations prohibit the disruption of aviation activity by any person on the ground or in the air. The FAA and the Food and Drug Administration (the Federal agency that has the responsibility to enforce compliance with Federal requirements for laser systems and laser light show products) are working together to ensure that operators of these devices do not pose a hazard to aircraft operators.

2.14.3 Pilots should be aware that illuminations from these laser operations is able to create temporary vision impairment miles from the actual location. In addition, these operations can produce permanent eye damage.

Pilots should make themselves aware of where laser activities are being conducted and avoid the areas if possible.

2.14.4 Recent and increasing incidents of unauthorized illumination of aircraft by lasers, as well as the proliferation and increasing sophistication of laser devices available to the general public, dictates that the FAA, Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 in coordination with other government agencies, take action to safeguard flights from these unauthorized illuminations.

2.14.5 Pilots should report laser illumination activity to the controlling Air Traffic Control facilities, Federal Contract Towers, or Flight Service Stations as soon as possible after the event. The following information should be included: 2.14.5.1 UTC date and time of event.

2.14.5.2 Call sign or aircraft registration number.

2.14.5.3 Type aircraft.

2.14.5.4 Nearest major city.

2.14.5.5 Altitude.

2.14.5.6 Location of event (latitude/longitude and/or fixed radial distance (FRD)).

2.14.5.7 Brief description of the event and any other pertinent information.

2.14.6 Pilots are also encouraged to complete the Laser Beam Exposure Questionnaire located on the FAA Laser Safety Initiative website at https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/lasers and submit electronically per the directions on the questionnaire, as soon as possible after landing.

2.14.7 When a laser event is reported to an air traffic facility, a general caution warning will be broadcasted on all appropriate frequencies every five minutes for 20 minutes and broadcasted on the ATIS for one hour following the report.

PHRASEOLOGY − UNAUTHORIZED LASER ILLUMINATION EVENT, (UTC time), (location), (altitude), (color), (direction).

EXAMPLE − UNAUTHORIZED LASER ILLUMINATION EVENT, AT 0100z, 8 MILE FINAL RUNWAY 18R AT 3,000 FEET, GREEN LASER FROM THE SOUTHWEST.

2.14.8 When laser activities become known to the FAA, NOTAMs are issued to inform the aviation community of the events. Pilots should consult NOTAMs or the Special Notices section of the Chart Supplement for information regarding laser activities.

2.15 Flying in Flat Light, Brown Out Conditions, and White Out Conditions 2.15.1 Flat Light. Flat light is an optical illusion, also known as “sector or partial white out.” It is not as severe as “white out” but the condition causes pilots to lose their depth − of − field and contrast in vision. Flat light conditions are usually accompanied by overcast skies inhibiting any visual clues. Such conditions can occur anywhere in the world, primarily in snow covered areas but can also occur in dust, sand, mud flats, or on glassy water. Flat light can completely obscure features of the terrain, creating an inability to distinguish distances and closure rates. As a result of this reflected light, it can give pilots the illusion that they are ascending or descending when they may actually be flying level. However, with good judgment and proper training and planning, it is possible to safely operate an aircraft in flat light conditions.

2.15.2 Brown Out. A brownout (or brown − out) is an in − flight visibility restriction due to dust or sand in the air.

In a brownout, the pilot cannot see nearby objects which provide the outside visual references necessary to control the aircraft near the ground. This can cause spatial disorientation and loss of situational awareness leading to an accident.

2.15.2.1 The following factors will affect the probability and severity of brownout: rotor disk loading, rotor configuration, soil composition, wind, approach speed, and approach angle.

2.15.2.2 The brownout phenomenon causes accidents during helicopter landing and take − off operations in dust, fine dirt, sand, or arid desert terrain. Intense, blinding dust clouds stirred up by the helicopter rotor downwash during near − ground flight causes significant flight safety risks from aircraft and ground obstacle collisions, and dynamic rollover due to sloped and uneven terrain.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.15.2.3 This is a dangerous phenomenon experienced by many helicopters when making landing approaches in dusty environments, whereby sand or dust particles become swept up in the rotor outwash and obscure the pilot’s vision of the terrain. This is particularly dangerous because the pilot needs those visual cues from their surroundings in order to make a safe landing.

2.15.2.4 Blowing sand and dust can cause an illusion of a tilted horizon. A pilot not using the flight instruments for reference may instinctively try to level the aircraft with respect to the false horizon, resulting in an accident.

Helicopter rotor wash also causes sand to blow around outside the cockpit windows, possibly leading the pilot to experience an illusion where the helicopter appears to be turning when it is actually in a level hover. This can also cause the pilot to make incorrect control inputs which can quickly lead to disaster when hovering near the ground. In night landings, aircraft lighting can enhance the visual illusions by illuminating the brownout cloud.

2.15.3 White Out. As defined in meteorological terms, white out occurs when a person becomes engulfed in a uniformly white glow. The glow is a result of being surrounded by blowing snow, dust, sand, mud or water. There are no shadows, no horizon or clouds and all depth − of − field and orientation are lost. A white out situation is severe in that there are no visual references. Flying is not recommended in any white out situation. Flat light conditions can lead to a white out environment quite rapidly, and both atmospheric conditions are insidious; they sneak up on you as your visual references slowly begin to disappear. White out has been the cause of several aviation accidents.

2.15.4 Self Induced White Out. This effect typically occurs when a helicopter takes off or lands on a snow − covered area. The rotor downwash picks up particles and recirculates them through the rotor downwash.

The effect can vary in intensity depending upon the amount of light on the surface. This can happen on the sunniest, brightest day with good contrast everywhere. However, when it happens, there can be a complete loss of visual clues. If the pilot has not prepared for this immediate loss of visibility, the results can be disastrous. Good planning does not prevent one from encountering flat light or white out conditions.

2.15.5 Never take off in a white out situation.

2.15.5.1 Realize that in flat light conditions it may be possible to depart but not to return to that site. During takeoff, make sure you have a reference point. Do not lose sight of it until you have a departure reference point in view. Be prepared to return to the takeoff reference if the departure reference does not come into view.

2.15.5.2 Flat light is common to snow skiers. One way to compensate for the lack of visual contrast and depth − of − field loss is by wearing amber tinted lenses (also known as blue blockers). Special note of caution: Eyewear is not ideal for every pilot. Take into consideration personal factors—age, light sensitivity, and ambient lighting conditions.

2.15.5.3 So what should a pilot do when all visual references are lost?

a) Trust the cockpit instruments.

b) Execute a 180 − degree turnaround and start looking for outside references.

c) Above all—fly the aircraft.

2.15.6 Landing in Low Light Conditions. When landing in a low light condition—use extreme caution. Look for intermediate reference points, in addition to checkpoints along each leg of the route for course confirmation and timing. The lower the ambient light becomes, the more reference points a pilot should use.

2.15.7 Airport Landings.

2.15.7.1 Look for features around the airport or approach path that can be used in determining depth perception.

Buildings, towers, vehicles or other aircraft serve well for this measurement. Use something that will provide you with a sense of height above the ground, in addition to orienting you to the runway.

2.15.7.2 Be cautious of snowdrifts and snow banks—anything that can distinguish the edge of the runway. Look for subtle changes in snow texture or shading to identify ridges or changes in snow depth.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.15.8 Off − Airport Landings.

2.15.8.1 In the event of an off − airport landing, pilots have used a number of different visual cues to gain reference. Use whatever you must to create the contrast you need. Natural references seem to work best (trees, rocks, snow ribs, etc.).

a) Over flight.

b) Use of markers.

c) Weighted flags.

d) Smoke bomb.

e) Any colored rag.

f) Dye markers.

g) Kool − Aid.

h) Trees or tree branches.

2.15.8.2 It is difficult to determine the depth of snow in areas that are level. Dropping items from the aircraft to use as reference points should be used as a visual aid only and not as a primary landing reference. Unless your marker is biodegradable, be sure to retrieve it after landing. Never put yourself in a position where no visual references exist.

2.15.8.3 Abort landing if blowing snow obscures your reference. Make your decisions early. Don’t assume you can pick up a lost reference point when you get closer.

2.15.8.4 Exercise extreme caution when flying from sunlight into shade. Physical awareness may tell you that you are flying straight but you may actually be in a spiral dive with centrifugal force pressing against you. Having no visual references enhances this illusion. Just because you have a good visual reference does not mean that it’s safe to continue. There may be snow − covered terrain not visible in the direction that you are traveling. Getting caught in a no visual reference situation can be fatal.

2.15.9 Flying Around a Lake.

2.15.9.1 When flying along lakeshores, use them as a reference point. Even if you can see the other side, realize that your depth perception may be poor. It is easy to fly into the surface. If you must cross the lake, check the altimeter frequently and maintain a safe altitude while you still have a good reference. Don’t descend below that altitude.

2.15.9.2 The same rules apply to seemingly flat areas of snow. If you don’t have good references, avoid going there.

2.15.10 Other Traffic. Be on the lookout for other traffic in the area. Other aircraft may be using your same reference point. Chances are greater of colliding with someone traveling in the same direction as you, than someone flying in the opposite direction.

2.15.11 Ceilings. Low ceilings have caught many pilots off guard. Clouds do not always form parallel to the surface, or at the same altitude. Pilots may try to compensate for this by flying with a slight bank and thus creating a descending turn.

2.15.12 Glaciers. Be conscious of your altitude when flying over glaciers. The glaciers may be rising faster than you are climbing.

2.16 Operations in Ground Icing Conditions.

2.16.1 The presence of aircraft airframe icing during takeoff, typically caused by improper or no deicing of the aircraft being accomplished prior to flight has contributed to many recent accidents in turbine aircraft. The General Aviation Joint Steering Committee (GAJSC) is the primary vehicle for government–industry Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 cooperation, communication, and coordination on General Aviation (GA) accident mitigation. The Turbine Aircraft Operations Subgroup (TAOS) works to mitigate accidents in turbine accident aviation. While there is sufficient information and guidance currently available regarding the effects of icing on aircraft and methods for deicing, the TAOS has developed a list of recommended actions to further assist pilots and operators in this area.

2.16.2 While the efforts of the TAOS specifically focus on turbine aircraft, it is recognized that their recommendations are applicable to and can be adapted for the pilot of a small, piston powered aircraft too.

2.16.3 The following recommendations are offered: 2.16.3.1 Ensure that your aircraft’s lift − generating surfaces are completely free of contamination before flight through a tactile (hands on) check of the critical surfaces when feasible. Even when otherwise permitted, operators should avoid smooth or polished frost on lift − generating surfaces as an acceptable preflight condition.

2.16.3.2 Review and refresh your cold weather standard operating procedures.

2.16.3.3 Review and be familiar with the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) limitations and procedures necessary to deal with icing conditions prior to flight, as well as in flight.

2.16.3.4 Protect your aircraft while on the ground, if possible, from sleet and freezing rain by taking advantage of aircraft hangars.

2.16.3.5 Take full advantage of the opportunities available at airports for deicing. Do not refuse deicing services simply because of cost.

2.16.3.6 Always consider canceling or delaying a flight if weather conditions do not support a safe operation.

2.16.4 If you haven’t already developed a set of Standard Operating Procedures for cold weather operations, they should include: 2.16.4.1 Procedures based on information that is applicable to the aircraft operated, such as AFM limitations and procedures; 2.16.4.2 Concise and easy to understand guidance that outlines best operational practices; 2.16.4.3 A systematic procedure for recognizing, evaluating, and addressing the associated icing risk, and offer clear guidance to mitigate this risk; and 2.16.4.4 An aid (such as a checklist or reference cards) that is readily available during normal day − to − day aircraft operations.

2.16.5 There are several sources for guidance relating to airframe icing, including: 2.16.5.1 http://aircrafticing.grc.nasa.gov/index.html .

2.16.5.2 Advisory Circular (AC) 91–74, Pilot Guide: Flight in Icing Conditions.

2.16.5.3 AC 135–17, Pilot Guide Small Aircraft Ground Deicing.

2.16.5.4 AC 135–9, FAR Part 135 Icing Limitations.

2.16.5.5 AC 120–60, Ground Deicing and Anti − icing Program.

2.16.5.6 AC 135–16, Ground Deicing and Anti − icing Training and Checking.

2.16.6 The FAA − Approved Deicing Program Updates is published annually as a Flight Standards Information Bulletin for Air Transportation and contains detailed information on deicing and anti − icing procedures and holdover times. It may be accessed at the following website by selecting the current year’s information bulletins: https://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/deicing/ .

2.17 Avoid Flight in the Vicinity of Exhaust Plumes (Smoke Stacks and Cooling Towers) 2.17.1 Flight Hazards Exist Around Exhaust Plumes.

2.17.1.1 Exhaust plumes are defined as visible or invisible emissions from power plants, industrial production facilities, or other industrial systems that release large amounts of vertically directed unstable gases (effluent).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.3 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 High temperature exhaust plumes can cause significant air disturbances such as turbulence and vertical shear.

Other identified potential hazards include, but are not necessarily limited to: reduced visibility, oxygen depletion, engine particulate contamination, exposure to gaseous oxides, and/or icing. Results of encountering a plume may include airframe damage, aircraft upset, and/or engine damage/failure. These hazards are most critical during low altitude flight in calm and cold air, especially in and around approach and departure corridors or airport traffic areas.

2.17.1.2 Whether plumes are visible or invisible, the total extent of their turbulent affect is difficult to predict.

Some studies do predict that the significant turbulent effects of an exhaust plume can extend to heights of over 1,000 feet above the height of the top of the stack or cooling tower. Any effects will be more pronounced in calm stable air where the plume is very hot and the surrounding area is still and cold. Fortunately, studies also predict that any amount of crosswind will help to dissipate the effects. However, the size of the tower or stack is not a good indicator of the predicted effect the plume may produce. The major effects are related to the heat or size of the plume effluent, the ambient air temperature, and the wind speed affecting the plume. Smaller aircraft can expect to feel an effect at a higher altitude than heavier aircraft.

2.17.2 When able, a pilot should steer clear of exhaust plumes by flying on the upwind side of smokestacks or cooling towers.

2.17.2.1 When a plume is visible via smoke or a condensation cloud, remain clear and realize a plume may have both visible and invisible characteristics. Exhaust stacks without visible plumes may still be in full operation, and airspace in the vicinity should be treated with caution. As with mountain wave turbulence or clear air turbulence, an invisible plume may be encountered unexpectedly. Cooling towers, power plant stacks, exhaust fans, and other similar structures are depicted in FIG ENR 5.3–2.

2.17.2.2 Pilots are encouraged to exercise caution when flying in the vicinity of exhaust plumes. Pilots are also encouraged to reference the Chart Supplement where amplifying notes may caution pilots and identify the location of structure(s) emitting exhaust plumes.

2.17.2.3 The best available information on this phenomenon must come from pilots via the PIREP reporting procedures. All pilots encountering hazardous plume conditions are urgently requested to report time, location, and intensity (light, moderate, severe, or extreme) of the element to the FAA facility with which they are maintaining radio contact. If time and conditions permit, elements should be reported according to the standards for other PIREPs and position reports (see GEN 3.5, paragraph 21, PIREPS Relating to Turbulence.)

FIG ENR 5.3 − 2 Plumes Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.3 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.18 Space Launch and Reentry Area 2.18.1 Locations where commercial space launch and/or reentry operations occur. Hazardous operations occur in space launch and reentry areas, and for pilot awareness, a rocket − shaped symbol is used to depict them on sectional aeronautical charts. These locations may have vertical launches from launch pads, horizontal launches from runways, and/or reentering vehicles coming back to land. Because of the wide range of hazards associated with space launch and reentry areas, pilots are expected to check NOTAMs for the specific area prior to flight to determine the location and lateral boundaries of the associated hazard area, and the active time. NOTAMs may include terms such as “rocket launch activity,” “space launch,” or “space reentry,” depending upon the type of operation. Space launch and reentry areas are not established for amateur rocket operations conducted per 14 CFR part 101.

FIG ENR 5.3 − 3 Space Launch and Reentry Area Depicted on a Sectional Chart Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

1. General 1.1 The Daily Digital Obstacle File describes all known obstacles of interest to aviation users in the United States, with limited coverage of the Pacific, the Caribbean, Canada, and Mexico. The obstacles are assigned unique numerical identifiers, accuracy codes, and are listed in order by state: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/DailyDOF/ .

1.2 Additional information regarding Obstacle Construction Notices: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/ObstConstrNotices/ .

2. Obstructions to Flight 2.1 Many structures exist that could significantly affect the safety of your flight when operating below 500 feet above ground level (AGL), and particularly below 200 feet AGL. While 14 CFR section 91.119 allows flight below 500 feet AGL when over sparsely populated areas or open water, such operations involve increased safety risks. At and below 200 feet AGL there are numerous power lines, antenna towers, etc., that are not marked and lighted and/or charted as obstructions and, therefore, may not be seen in time to avoid a collision. Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) are issued on those lighted structures experiencing temporary light outages. However, some time may pass before the FAA is notified of these outages, and the NOTAM issued, thus pilot vigilance is imperative. Additionally, new obstructions may not be on current charts because the information was not received prior to the FAA publishing the chart.

2.2 Extreme caution should be exercised when flying less than 2,000 feet AGL because of numerous skeletal structures, such as radio and television antenna towers, that exceed 1,000 feet AGL with some extending higher than 2,000 feet AGL. Most skeletal structures are supported by guy wires which are very difficult to see in good weather and can be invisible at dusk or during periods of reduced visibility. These wires can extend about 1,500 feet horizontally from a structure; therefore, all skeletal structures should be avoided horizontally by at least 2,000 feet.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 5.5 Aerial Sporting and Recreational Activities

1. General 1.1 National Airspace System (NAS) users or other interested parties should contact the nearest flight service station, or (in the continental United States (CONUS)) the appropriate Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) for temporary flight restriction (TFR) information.

1.2 Additionally, you can find TFR information at the following: 1.2.1 FAA Order JO 7210.3, Chapter 20, Section 7, Management of Aircraft Operations in the Vicinity of Aerial Demonstrations and Major Sporting Events (14 CFR Section 91.145) 1.2.2 FAA Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) Search: https://notams.aim.faa.gov/notamSearch / 1.2.3 TFR List: https://tfr.faa.gov/tfr3/?page=list 1.2.4 Domestic Notices: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/domesticnotices/ 1.2.5 International Notices: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/internationalnotices/ 1.2.6 Federal Contract Flight Service Station (FCFSS) website: https://www.1800wxbrief.com/ Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 5.6 Bird Migration and Areas

With Sensitive Fauna

1. Migratory Bird Activity 1.1 Bird strike risk increases because of bird migration during the months of March through April and August through November.

1.2 The altitudes of migrating birds vary with winds aloft, weather fronts, terrain elevations, cloud conditions, and other environmental variables. While over 90 percent of the reported bird strikes occur at or below 3,000 feet AGL, strikes at higher altitudes are common during migration. Ducks and geese are frequently observed up to 7,000 feet AGL and pilots are cautioned to minimize en route flying at lower altitudes during migration.

1.3 Considered the greatest potential hazard to aircraft because of their size, abundance, or habit of flying in dense flocks are gulls, waterfowl, vultures, hawks, owls, egrets, blackbirds, and starlings. Four major migratory flyways exist in the U.S. The Atlantic Flyway parallels the Atlantic coast, the Mississippi Flyway stretches from Canada through the Great Lakes and follows the Mississippi River. The Central Flyway represents a broad area east of the Rockies, stretching from Canada through Central America. The Pacific Flyway follows the west coast and overflies major parts of Washington, Oregon, and California. There are also numerous smaller flyways which cross these major north − south migratory routes.

2. Reducing Bird Strike Risks 2.1 The most serious strikes are those involving ingestion into an engine (turboprop and turbine jet engines) or windshield strikes. These strikes can result in emergency situations requiring prompt action by the pilot.

2.2 Engine ingestions may result in sudden loss of power or engine failure. Review engine out procedures, especially when operating from airports with known bird hazards or when operating near high bird concentrations.

2.3 Windshield strikes have resulted in pilots experiencing confusion, disorientation, loss of communications, and aircraft control problems. Pilots are encouraged to review their emergency procedures before flying in these areas.

2.4 When encountering birds en route, climb to avoid collision because birds in flocks generally distribute themselves downward, with lead birds being at the highest altitude.

2.5 Avoid overflight of known areas of bird concentration and flying low altitudes during bird migration.

Charted wildlife refuges and other natural areas contain unusually high local concentration of birds which may create a hazard to aircraft.

3. Reporting Bird Strikes 3.1 Pilots are urged to report any bird or other wildlife strike using FAA Form 5200 − 7, Bird/Other Wildlife Strike Report ( FIG ENR 5.6 − 1 ). Forms are available at any FSS or any FAA Regional Office. Wildlife strikes can also be reported electronically at: https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/wildlife/. The data derived from these reports are used to develop standards to cope with this potential hazard to aircraft and for documentation of necessary habitat control on airports.

4. Reporting Bird and Other Wildlife Activities 4.1 If you observe birds or other animals on or near the runway, request airport management to disperse the wildlife before taking off. Also contact the nearest FAA ARTCC, FSS, or tower (including non − Federal towers) regarding large flocks of birds and report the: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 5.6 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.1.1 Geographic location.

4.1.2 Bird type (geese, ducks, gulls, etc.).

4.1.3 Approximate numbers.

4.1.4 Altitude.

4.1.5 Direction of bird flight path.

5. Pilot Advisories on Bird and Other Wildlife Hazards 5.1 Many airports advise pilots of other wildlife hazards caused by large animals on the runway through the Chart Supplement and the NOTAM system. Collisions between landing and departing aircraft with animals on the runway are increasing and are not limited to rural airports. These accidents have also occurred at several major airports. Pilots should exercise extreme caution when warned of the presence of wildlife on and in the vicinity of airports. If in close proximity to movement areas you observe deer or other large animals, advise the FSS, tower, or airport management.

6. Flights Over Charted U.S. Wildlife Refuges, Parks, and Forest Service Areas 6.1 The landing of aircraft is prohibited on lands or waters administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or U.S. Forest Service without authorization from the respective agency. Exceptions include (1) when forced to land due to an emergency beyond the control of the operator, (2) at officially designated landing sites, or (3) an approved official business of the Federal Government.

6.2 All pilots are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 feet above the terrain of the following: National Parks, Monuments, Seashores, Lakeshores, Recreation Areas and Scenic Riverways administered by the National Park Service, National Wildlife Refuges, Big Game Refuges, Game Ranges, and Wildlife Ranges administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wilderness and Primitive Areas administered by the U.S.

Forest Service.

NOTE − FAA Advisory Circular 91 − 36, Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Flight Near Noise − sensitive Areas, defines the surface of a national park area (including parks, forests, primitive areas, wilderness areas, recreational areas, national seashores, national monuments, national lakeshores, and national wildlife refuge and range areas) as: “The highest terrain within 2,000 feet laterally of the route of flight, or the upper − most rim of a canyon or valley.” 6.3 Federal statutes prohibit certain types of flight activity and/or provide altitude restrictions over designated U.S. Wildlife Refuges, Parks, and Forest Service Areas. These designated areas are charted on Sectional Charts, for example: Boundary Waters Canoe Wilderness Areas, Minnesota; Haleakala National Park, Hawaii; Yosemite National Park, California; and Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, 6.4 Federal regulations also prohibit airdrops by parachute or other means of persons, cargo, or objects from aircraft on lands administered by the three agencies without authorization from the respective agency. Exceptions include: (1) emergencies involving the safety of human life or (2) threat of serious property loss.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 5.6 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 5.6 − 1 Bird/Other Wildlife Strike Report Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 6. Helicopter Operations

ENR 6.1 Helicopter IFR Operations

1. Helicopter Flight Control Systems 1.1 The certification requirements for helicopters to operate under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) are contained in 14 CFR Part 27, Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft, and 14 CFR Part 29, Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Rotorcraft. To meet these requirements, helicopter manufacturers usually utilize a set of stabilization and/or Automatic Flight Control Systems (AFCS).

1.2 Typically, these systems fall into the following categories: 1.2.1 Aerodynamic surfaces, which impart some stability or control capability not found in the basic VFR configuration.

1.2.2 Trim systems, which provide a cyclic centering effect. These systems typically involve a magnetic brake/spring device, and may also be controlled by a four − way switch on the cyclic. This is a system that supports “hands on” flying of the helicopter by the pilot.

1.2.3 Stability Augmentation Systems (SASs), which provide short − term rate damping control inputs to increase helicopter stability. Like trim systems, SAS supports “hands on” flying.

1.2.4 Attitude Retention Systems (ATT), which return the helicopter to a selected attitude after a disturbance.

Changes in desired attitude can be accomplished usually through a four − way “beep” switch, or by actuating a “force trim” switch on the cyclic, setting the attitude manually, and releasing. Attitude retention may be a SAS function, or may be the basic “hands off” autopilot function.

1.2.5 Autopilot Systems (AP), which provide for “hands off” flight along specified lateral and vertical paths, including heading, altitude, vertical speed, navigation tracking, and approach. These systems typically have a control panel for mode selection, and system for indication of mode status. Autopilots may or may not be installed with an associated Flight Director System (FD). Autopilots typically control the helicopter about the roll and pitch axes (cyclic control) but may also include yaw axis (pedal control) and collective control servos.

1.2.6 FDs, which provide visual guidance to the pilot to fly specific selected lateral and vertical modes of operation. The visual guidance is typically provided as either a “dual cue” (commonly known as a “cross − pointer”) or “single cue” (commonly known as a “vee − bar”) presentation superimposed over the attitude indicator. Some FDs also include a collective cue. The pilot manipulates the helicopter’s controls to satisfy these commands, yielding the desired flight path, or may couple the flight director to the autopilot to perform automatic flight along the desired flight path. Typically, flight director mode control and indication is shared with the autopilot.

1.3 In order to be certificated for IFR operation, a specific helicopter may require the use of one or more of these systems, in any combination.

1.4 In many cases, helicopters are certificated for IFR operations with either one or two pilots. Certain equipment is required to be installed and functional for two pilot operations, and typically, additional equipment is required for single pilot operation. These requirements are usually described in the limitations section of the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM).

1.5 In addition, the RFM also typically defines systems and functions that are required to be in operation or engaged for IFR flight in either the single or two pilot configuration. Often, particularly in two pilot operation, this level of augmentation is less than the full capability of the installed systems. Likewise, single pilot operation may require a higher level of augmentation.

1.6 The RFM also identifies other specific limitations associated with IFR flight. Typically, these limitations include, but are not limited to: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.6.1 Minimum equipment required for IFR flight (in some cases, for both single pilot and two pilot operations).

1.6.2 V (minimum speed − IFR).

MINI NOTE − − Instrument flight minimum speed, utilized in complying with minimum limit speed requirements for instrument flight V MINI NOTE − The manufacturer may also recommend a minimum IFR airspeed during instrument approach.

1.6.3 V (never exceed speed − IFR).

NEI NOTE − V Instrument flight never exceed speed, utilized instead of V for compliance with maximum limit speed requirements NEI − NE for instrument flight V Never exceed speed NE − 1.6.4 Maximum approach angle.

1.6.5 Weight and center of gravity limits.

1.6.6 Aircraft configuration limitations (such as aircraft door positions and external loads).

1.6.7 Aircraft system limitations (generators, inverters, etc.).

1.6.8 System testing requirements (many avionics and AFCS/AP/FD systems incorporate a self − test feature).

1.6.9 Pilot action requirements (such as the pilot must have his/her hands and feet on the controls during certain operations, such as during instrument approach below certain altitudes).

1.7 It is very important that pilots be familiar with the IFR requirements for their particular helicopter. Within the same make, model and series of helicopter, variations in the installed avionics may change the required equipment or the level of augmentation for a particular operation.

1.8 During flight operations, pilots must be aware of the mode of operation of the augmentation systems, and the control logic and functions employed. For example, during an ILS approach using a particular system in the three − cue mode (lateral, vertical and collective cues), the flight director collective cue responds to glideslope deviation, while the horizontal bar of the “cross − pointer” responds to airspeed deviations. The same system, while flying an ILS in the two − cue mode, provides for the horizontal bar to respond to glideslope deviations.

This concern is particularly significant when operating using two pilots. Pilots should have an established set of procedures and responsibilities for the control of flight director/autopilot modes for the various phases of flight. Not only does a full understanding of the system modes provide for a higher degree of accuracy in control of the helicopter, it is the basis for crew identification of a faulty system.

1.9 Relief from the prohibition to takeoff with any inoperative instruments or equipment may be provided through a Minimum Equipment List (see 14 CFR Section 91.213 and 14 CFR Section 135.179, Inoperative Instruments and Equipment). In many cases, a helicopter configured for single pilot IFR may depart IFR with certain equipment inoperative, provided a crew of two pilots is used. Pilots are cautioned to ensure the pilot − in − command and second − in − command meet the requirements of 14 CFR Section 61.58, Pilot − in − Com - mand Proficiency Check: Operation of Aircraft Requiring More Than One Pilot Flight Crewmember, and 14 CFR Section 61.55, Second − in − Command Qualifications, or 14 CFR Part 135, Operating Requirements: Commuter and On − Demand Operations, Subpart E, Flight Crewmember Requirements, and Subpart G, Crewmember Testing Requirements, as appropriate.

1.10 Experience has shown that modern AFCS/AP/FD equipment installed in IFR helicopters can, in some cases, be very complex. This complexity requires the pilot(s) to obtain and maintain a high level of knowledge of system operation, limitations, failure indications and reversionary modes. In some cases, this may only be reliably accomplished through formal training.

2. Helicopter Instrument Approaches 2.1 Instrument flight procedures (IFPs) permit helicopter operations to heliports and runways during periods of low ceilings and reduced visibility (e.g. approach/SID/STAR/en route). IFPs can be designed for both public Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 and private heliports using FAA instrument criteria. The FAA does recognize there are non − FAA service providers with proprietary special criteria. Special IFPs are reviewed and approved by Flight Technologies and Procedures Division and may have specified aircraft performance or equipment requirements, special crew training, airport facility equipment, waivers from published standards, proprietary criteria and restricted access.

Special IFPs are not published in the Federal Register or printed in government Flight Information Publications.

2.1.1 Helicopters flying conventional (i.e. non − Copter) IAPs may reduce the visibility minima to not less than one − half the published Category A landing visibility minima, or / statute mile visibility/1200 RVR, whichever is greater, unless the procedure is annotated with “ Visibility Reduction by Helicopters NA .” This annotation means that there are penetrations of the final approach obstacle identification surface (OIS) and that the 14 CFR Section 97.3 visibility reduction rule does not apply and you must take precaution to avoid any obstacles in the visual segment. No reduction in MDA/DA is permitted at any time. The helicopter may initiate the final approach segment at speeds up to the upper limit of the highest approach category authorized by the procedure, but must be slowed to no more than 90 KIAS at the missed approach point (MAP) in order to apply the visibility reduction.

Pilots are cautioned that such a decelerating approach may make early identification of wind shear on the approach path difficult or impossible. If required, use the Inoperative Components and Visual Aids Table provided inside the front cover of the U.S. Terminal Procedures Publication to derive the Category A minima before applying the 14 CFR Section 97.3 rule.

2.1.2 Helicopters flying Copter IAPs should use the published minima, with no reductions allowed. Unless otherwise specified on the instrument procedure chart, 90 KIAS is the maximum speed on the approach.

2.1.3 Pilots flying Area Navigation (RNAV) Copter IAPs should also limit their speed to 90 KIAS unless otherwise specified on the instrument procedure chart. The final and missed approach segment speeds must be limited to no more than 70 KIAS unless otherwise charted. Military RNAV Copter IAPs are limited to no more than 90 KIAS throughout the procedure. Use the published minima; no reductions allowed.

NOTE − Obstruction clearance surfaces are based on the aircraft speed identified on the approach chart and have been designed on RNAV approaches for 70 knots unless otherwise indicated. If the helicopter is flown at higher speeds, it may fly outside of protected airspace. Some helicopters have a V greater than 70 knots; therefore, they cannot meet the 70 knot limitation MINI to conduct these RNAV approaches. Some helicopter autopilots, when used in the “go − around” mode, are programmed with a V greater than 70 knots. Therefore, those helicopters, when using the autopilot “go − around” mode, cannot meet the 70 YI knot limitation for the RNAV approach. It may be possible to use the autopilot for the missed approach in other than the “go − around” mode and meet the 70 knot limitation. When operating at speeds other than V or V , performance data may YI Y not be available in the RFM to predict compliance with climb gradient requirements. Pilots may use observed performance in similar weight/altitude/temperature/speed conditions to evaluate the suitability of performance. Pilots are cautioned to monitor climb performance to ensure compliance with procedure requirements.

NOTE − V − Instrument flight minimum speed, utilized in complying with minimum limit speed requirements for instrument flight MINI V Instrument climb speed, utilized instead of V for compliance with the climb requirements for instrument flight YI − Y V Speed for best rate of climb Y − 2.1.4 TBL ENR 6.1 − 1 summarizes these requirements.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.1 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 6.1 − 1 Helicopter Use of Standard Instrument Approach Procedures Procedure Helicopter Visibility Helicopter MDA/DA Maximum Speed Limitations Minima Conventional The greater of: one half the As published for The helicopter may initiate the (non − Copter) Category A visibility Category A final approach segment at speeds minima, / statute mile up to the upper limit of the visibility, or 1200 RVR highest Approach Category authorized by the procedure, but must be slowed to no more than 90 KIAS at the MAP in order to apply the visibility reduction.

Copter Procedure As published As published 90 KIAS maximum when on a published route/track.

RNAV (GPS) Copter As published As published The maximum speed for a Procedure Copter approach will be 90 KIAS or as published on the chart. Note: Higher approach angles may require a lower approach speed and aircraft V . Military procedures are MINI limited to 90 KIAS for all segments.

NOTE − Several factors affect the ability of the pilot to acquire and maintain the visual references specified in 14 CFR Section 91.175(c), even in cases where the flight visibility may be at the minimum derived from the criteria in TBL ENR 6.1 − 1 . These factors include, but are not limited to: 1. Cockpit cutoff angle (the angle at which the cockpit or other airframe structure limits downward visibility below the horizon).

2 . Combinations of high MDA/DH and low visibility minimum, such as approaches with reduced helicopter visibility minima (per 14 CFR Section 97.3).

3. Type, configuration, and intensity of approach and runway lighting systems.

4. Type of obscuring phenomenon and/or windshield contamination.

2.1.5 Even with weather conditions reported at or above minimums, under some combinations of reduced cockpit cutoff angle, approach/runway lighting, and high MDA/DH (coupled with a low visibility minima), the pilot may not be able to identify the required visual reference(s), or those references may only be visible in a very small portion of the available field of view. Even if identified by the pilot, the visual references may not support normal maneuvering and normal rates of descent to landing. The effect of such a combination may be exacerbated by other conditions such as rain on the windshield, or incomplete windshield defogging coverage.

2.1.6 Pilots should always be prepared to execute a missed approach even though weather conditions may be reported at or above minimums.

NOTE − See Section ENR 1.5 , paragraph 27. , Missed Approach, for additional information on missed approach procedures.

3. Helicopter Approach Procedures to VFR Heliports 3.1 The FAA may develop helicopter instrument approaches for heliports that do not meet the design standards for an IFR heliport. The majority of IFR approaches to VFR heliports are developed in support of Helicopter Air Ambulance (HAA) operators. These approaches may require use of conventional NAVAIDS or a RNAV system (e.g. GPS). They may be developed either as a special approach (pilot training is required for special procedures due to their unique characteristics) or a public approach (no special training required). These instrument procedures may be designed to guide the helicopter to a specific landing area (Proceed Visually) or to a point − in − space with a “Proceed VFR” segment.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.1 An approach to a specific landing area. This type of approach is aligned to a missed approach point from which a landing can be accomplished with a maximum course change of 30 degrees. The visual segment from the MAP to the landing area is evaluated for obstacle hazards. These procedures are annotated: “PROCEED VISUALLY FROM (named MAP) OR CONDUCT THE SPECIFIED MISSED APPROACH.” 3.1.1.1 “Proceed visually” requires the pilot to acquire and maintain visual contact with the landing area at or prior to the MAP, or execute a missed approach. The visibility minimum is based on the distance from the MAP to the landing area, among other factors.

3.1.1.2 The pilot is required to have the published minimum visibility throughout the visual segment flying the path described on the approach chart.

3.1.1.3 Similar to an approach to a runway, the pilot is responsible for obstacle or terrain avoidance from the MAP to the landing area.

3.1.1.4 Upon reaching the published MAP, or as soon as practicable thereafter, the pilot should advise ATC whether proceeding visually and canceling IFR or complying with the missed approach instructions. See Section ENR 1.10 , paragraph 11.2, Canceling IFR Flight Plan.

3.1.1.5 Where any necessary visual reference requirements are specified by the FAA, at least one of the following visual references for the intended heliport is visible and identifiable before the pilot may proceed visually: a) FATO or FATO lights.

b) TLOF or TLOF lights.

c) Heliport Instrument Lighting System (HILS).

d) Heliport Approach Lighting System (HALS).

e) Visual Glideslope Indicator (VGSI).

f) Windsock or windsock light.

g) Heliport beacon.

h) Other facilities or systems approved by the Flight Technologies and Procedures Division (AFS − 400).

3.1.2 Approach to a Point − in − Space (PinS). At locations where the MAP is located more than 2 SM from the landing area, or the path from the MAP to the landing area is populated with obstructions which require avoidance actions or requires turn greater than 30 degrees, a PinS Proceed VFR procedure may be developed. These approaches are annotated “PROCEED VFR FROM (named MAP) OR CONDUCT THE SPECIFIED MISSED APPROACH.” 3.1.2.1 These procedures require the pilot, at or prior to the MAP, to determine if the published minimum visibility, or the weather minimums required by the operating rule (e.g. Part 91, Part 135, etc.), or operations specifications (whichever is higher) is available to safely transition from IFR to VFR flight. If not, the pilot must execute a missed approach. For Part 135 operations, pilots may not begin the instrument approach unless the latest weather report indicates that the weather conditions are at or above the authorized IFR minimums or the VFR weather minimums (as required by the class of airspace, operating rule and/or Operations Specifications) whichever is higher.

3.1.2.2 Visual contact with the landing area is not required; however, the pilot must have the appropriate VFR weather minimums throughout the visual segment. The visibility is limited to no lower than that published in the procedure, until canceling IFR.

3.1.2.3 IFR obstruction clearance areas are not applied to the VFR segment between the MAP and the landing area. Pilots are responsible for obstacle or terrain avoidance from the MAP to the landing area.

3.1.2.4 Upon reaching the MAP defined on the approach procedure, or as soon as practicable thereafter, the pilot should advise ATC whether proceeding VFR and canceling IFR, or complying with the missed approach instructions. See Section ENR 1.10, paragraph 11.2, Canceling IFR Flight Plan.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 6.1 − 6 AIP ENR 6.1 − 6 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.1.2.5 If the visual segment penetrates Class B, C, or D airspace, pilots are responsible for obtaining a Special VFR clearance, when required.

4. The Gulf of America Grid System 4.1 The Gulf of America Grid System navigational route structure is completely independent of ground − based navigation aids (NAVAID) and was designed to facilitate helicopter IFR operations to offshore destinations. The Grid System is defined by over 300 offshore waypoints located 20 minutes apart (latitude and longitude). Flight plan routes are routinely defined by just 4 segments: departure point (lat/long), first en route grid waypoint, last en route grid waypoint prior to approach procedure, and destination point (lat/long). There are over 4,000 possible offshore landing sites (oil rigs, wind turbines, etc.). Upon reaching the waypoint prior to the destination, the pilot may execute an Offshore Standard Approach Procedure (OSAP), a Helicopter En Route Descent Areas (HEDA) approach, or an Airborne Radar Approach (ARA). For more information on these helicopter instrument procedures, refer to FAA AC 90 − 80, Approval of Offshore Standard Approach Procedures, Airborne Radar Approaches, and Helicopter En Route Descent Areas, on the FAA Advisory Circulars website at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/ . The return flight plan is just the reverse with the requested stand − alone GPS approach contained in the remarks section.

4.2 The large number (over 300) of waypoints in the grid system makes it difficult to assign phonetically pronounceable names to the waypoints that would be meaningful to pilots and controllers. A unique naming system was adopted that enables pilots and controllers to derive the fix position from the name. The five − letter names are derived as follows: 4.2.1 The waypoints are divided into sets of 3 columns each. A three − letter identifier, identifying a geographical area or a NAVAID to the north, represents each set.

4.2.2 Each column in a set is named after its position, i.e., left (L), center (C), and right (R).

4.2.3 The rows of the grid are named alphabetically from north to south, starting with A for the northern most row.

EXAMPLE − LCHRC would be pronounced “Lake Charles Romeo Charlie.” The waypoint is in the right − hand column of the Lake Charles VOR set, in row C (third south from the northern most row).

4.3 An infrastructure of ADS − B ground stations, weather stations (AWOS), and VHF remote communication outlets (RCO) exists throughout a large area of the Gulf of America. This infrastructure allows the FAA’s Houston ARTCC to provide “domestic − like” air traffic control service in the offshore area beyond 12 NM from the coastline to hundreds of miles offshore to aircraft equipped with ADS − B. Properly equipped aircraft can now be authorized to receive more direct routing, domestic en route separation minima, and real time flight following.

Operators who do not have authorization to receive ATC separation services using ADS − B, will continue to use the low altitude grid system and receive procedural separation from Houston ARTCC. Non − ADS − B equipped aircraft also benefit from improved VHF communication and expanded weather information coverage.

4.4 Three requirements must be met for operators to file IFR flight plans utilizing the grid: 4.4.1 The helicopter must be equipped for IFR operations and equipped with IFR approved GPS navigational units.

4.4.2 The operator must obtain prior written approval from the appropriate Flight Standards District Office.

4.4.3 The operator must be a signatory to the Houston ARTCC Letter of Agreement.

4.5 Operators utilizing ADS − B − based ATC separation services must meet the following additional requirements: 4.5.1 The Operator’s installed ADS − B must comply with the requirements of 14 CFR sections 91.225 and 91.227.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.1 − 7 AIP ENR 6.1 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 4.5.2 Flight crews must comply with the procedures prescribed in the Houston ARTCC Letter of Agreement dated March 1, 2018, or later.

NOTE − The unique ADS − B architecture in the Gulf of America upon reception of an aircraft’s Mode C in addition to the other message elements described in 14 CFR 91.227. Flight crews must be made aware that loss of Mode C also means that ATC will not receive the aircraft’s ADS − B signal.

4.6 FAA/AIS publishes the grid system waypoints on the IFR Gulf of America Vertical Flight Reference Chart.

A commercial equivalent is also available. The chart is updated annually and is available from an FAA print provider or for free download on the AIS website under “Supplemental Charts/Pubs”: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/productcatalog/supplementalcharts/ .

5. Departure Procedures 5.1 When departing from a location on a point − in − space (PinS) SID with a visual segment indicated and the departure instruction describes the visual segment the aircraft must cross the initial departure fix (IDF) outbound at − or − above the altitude depicted on the chart. The helicopter will initially establish a hover at or above the heliport crossing height (HCH) specified on the chart. The HCH specifies a minimum hover height to begin the climb to assist in avoiding obstacles. The helicopter will leave the departure location on the published outbound heading/course specified, climbing at least 400 ft/per NM (or as depicted on the chart), remaining clear of clouds, crossing at or above the IDF altitude specified, prior to proceeding outbound on the procedure. For example the chart may include these instructions: “Hover at 15 ft AGL, then climb on track 005, remaining clear of clouds, to cross PAWLY at or above 700.” 5.2 When flying a PinS procedure containing a segment with instructions to “proceed VFR,” the pilot must keep the aircraft clear of the clouds and cross the IDF outbound at or above the altitude depicted. Departure procedures that support multiple departure locations will have a proceed VFR segment leading to the IDF. The chart will provide a bearing and distance to the IDF from the heliport. That bearing and distance are for pilot orientation purposes only and are not a required procedure track. The helicopter will leave the departure location via pilot navigation in order to align with the departure route and comply with the altitude specified at the IDF. For example, the chart may include these instructions: “VFR Climb to WEBBB, Cross WEBBB at or above 800.” 5.3 Once the aircraft reaches the IDF, the aircraft should proceed out the described route as specified on the chart, crossing each consecutive fix at or above the indicated altitude(s) until reaching the end of the departure or as directed by ATC.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.1 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 6.1 − 1 Departure Charts Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 6.2 Special Operations

1. Offshore Helicopter Operations 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 The offshore environment offers unique applications and challenges for helicopter pilots. The mission demands, the nature of oil and gas exploration and production facilities, and the flight environment (weather, terrain, obstacles, traffic), demand special practices, techniques and procedures not found in other flight operations. Several industry organizations have risen to the task of reducing risks in offshore operations, including the Helicopter Safety Advisory Conference (HSAC) (http://www.hsac.org), and the Offshore Committee of the Helicopter Association International (HAI) (https://rotor.org/). The following recommended practices for offshore helicopter operations are based on guidance developed by HSAC for use in the Gulf of America, and provided here with their permission. While not regulatory, these recommended practices provide aviation and oil and gas industry operators with useful information in developing procedures to avoid certain hazards of offshore helicopter operations.

NOTE − Like all aviation practices, these recommended practices are under constant review. Any questions or feedback concerning these recommended procedures may be directed to the HSAC through the feedback feature of the HSAC website ( http://www.hsac.org ).

1.2 Passenger Management on and about Heliport Facilities 1.2.1 Background. Several incidents involving offshore helicopter passengers have highlighted the potential for incidents and accidents on and about the heliport area. The following practices will minimize risks to passengers and others involved in heliport operations.

1.2.2 Recommended Practices 1.2.2.1 Heliport facilities should have a designated and posted passenger waiting area which is clear of the heliport, heliport access points, and stairways.

1.2.2.2 Arriving passengers and cargo should be unloaded and cleared from the heliport and access route prior to loading departing passengers and cargo.

1.2.2.3 Where a flight crew consists of more than one pilot, one crewmember should supervise the unloading/loading process from outside the aircraft.

1.2.2.4 Where practical, a designated facility employee should assist with loading/unloading, etc.

1.3 Crane − Helicopter Operational Procedures 1.3.1 Background. Historical experience has shown that catastrophic consequences can occur when industry safe practices for crane/helicopter operations are not observed. The following recommended practices are designed to minimize risks during crane and helicopter operations.

1.3.2 Recommended Practices 1.3.2.1 Personnel awareness a) Crane operators and pilots should develop a mutual understanding and respect of the others’ operational limitations and cooperate in the spirit of safety; b) Pilots need to be aware that crane operators sometimes cannot release the load to cradle the crane boom, such as when attached to wire line lubricators or supporting diving bells; and c) Crane operators need to be aware that helicopters require warm up before takeoff, a two − minute cool down before shutdown, and cannot circle for extended lengths of time because of fuel consumption.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.3.2.2 It is recommended that when helicopters are approaching, maneuvering, taking off, or running on the heliport, cranes be shutdown and the operator leave the cab. Cranes not in use must have their booms cradled, if feasible. If in use, the crane’s boom(s) are to be pointed away from the heliport and the crane shutdown for helicopter operations.

1.3.2.3 Pilots will not approach, land on, takeoff, or have rotor blades turning on heliports of structures not complying with the above practice.

1.3.2.4 It is recommended that cranes on offshore platforms, rigs, vessels, or any other facility, which could interfere with helicopter operations (including approach/departure paths): a) Be equipped with a red rotating beacon or red high intensity strobe light connected to the system powering the crane, indicating the crane is under power; b) Be designed to allow the operator a maximum view of the helideck area and should be equipped with wide − angle mirrors to eliminate blind spots; and c) Have their boom tips, headache balls, and hooks painted with high visibility international orange.

1.4 Helicopter/Tanker Operations 1.4.1 Background. The interface of helicopters and tankers during shipboard helicopter operations is complex and may be hazardous unless appropriate procedures are coordinated among all parties. The following recommended practices are designed to minimize risks during helicopter/tanker operations.

1.4.2 Recommended Practices 1.4.2.1 Management, flight operations personnel, and pilots should be familiar with and apply the operating safety standards set forth in “Guide to Helicopter/Ship Operations”, International Chamber of Shipping, Third Edition, 5 − 89 (as amended), establishing operational guidelines/standards and safe practices sufficient to safeguard helicopter/tanker operations.

1.4.2.2 Appropriate plans, approvals, and communications must be accomplished prior to reaching the vessel, allowing tanker crews sufficient time to perform required safety preparations and position crew members to receive or dispatch a helicopter safely.

1.4.2.3 Appropriate approvals and direct communications with the bridge of the tanker must be maintained throughout all helicopter/tanker operations.

1.4.2.4 Helicopter/tanker operations, including landings/departures, must not be conducted until the helicopter pilot − in − command has received and acknowledged permission from the bridge of the tanker.

1.4.2.5 Helicopter/tanker operations must not be conducted during product/cargo transfer.

1.4.2.6 Generally, permission will not be granted to land on tankers during mooring operations or while maneuvering alongside another tanker.

1.5 Helideck/Heliport Operational Hazard Warning(s) Procedures 1.5.1 Background 1.5.1.1 A number of operational hazards can develop on or near offshore helidecks or onshore heliports that can be minimized through procedures for proper notification or visual warning to pilots. Examples of hazards include but are not limited to: a) Perforating operations: subparagraph 1.6.

b) H S gas presence: subparagraph 1.7 .

c) Gas venting: subparagraph 1.8 ; or, d) Closed helidecks or heliports: subparagraph 1.9 (unspecified cause).

1.5.1.2 These and other operational hazards are currently minimized through timely dissemination of a written Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) for pilots by helicopter companies and operators. A NOTAM provides a written Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 description of the hazard, time and duration of occurrence, and other pertinent information. ANY POTENTIAL HAZARD should be communicated to helicopter operators or company aviation departments as early as possible to allow the NOTAM to be activated.

1.5.1.3 To supplement the existing NOTAM procedure and further assist in reducing these hazards, a standardized visual signal(s) on the helideck/heliport will provide a positive indication to an approaching helicopter of the status of the landing area. Recommended Practice(s) have been developed to reinforce the NOTAM procedures and standardize visual signals.

1.6 Drilling Rig Perforating Operations: Helideck/Heliport Operational Hazard Warning(s)/Proce - dure(s) 1.6.1 Background. A critical step in the oil well completion process is perforation, which involves the use of explosive charges in the drill pipe to open the pipe to oil or gas deposits. Explosive charges used in conjunction with perforation operations offshore can potentially be prematurely detonated by radio transmissions, including those from helicopters. The following practices are recommended.

1.6.2 Recommended Practices 1.6.2.1 Personnel Conducting Perforating Operations. Whenever perforating operations are scheduled and operators are concerned that radio transmissions from helicopters in the vicinity may jeopardize the operation, personnel conducting perforating operations should take the following precautionary measures: a) Notify company aviation departments, helicopter operators or bases, and nearby manned platforms of the pending perforation operation so the Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) system can be activated for the perforation operation and the temporary helideck closure.

b) Close the deck and make the radio warning clearly visible to passing pilots, install a temporary marking (described in subparagraph 1.9.1.2 with the words “NO RADIO” stenciled in red on the legs of the diagonals.

The letters should be 24 inches high and 12 inches wide. (See FIG ENR 6.2 − 1 .)

c) The marker should be installed during the time that charges may be affected by radio transmissions.

1.6.2.2 Pilots a) When operating within 1,000 feet of a known perforation operation or observing the white X with red “NO RADIO” warning indicating perforation operations are underway, pilots will avoid radio transmissions from or near the helideck (within 1,000 feet) and will not land on the deck if the X is present. In addition to communications radios, radio transmissions are also emitted by aircraft radar, transponders, ADS − B equipment, radar altimeters, and DME equipment, and ELTs.

b) Whenever possible, make radio calls to the platform being approached or to the Flight Following Communications Center at least one mile out on approach. Ensure all communications are complete outside the 1,000 foot hazard distance. If no response is received, or if the platform is not radio equipped, further radio transmissions should not be made until visual contact with the deck indicates it is open for operation (no white “X”).

FIG ENR 6.2 − 1 Closed Helideck Marking − No Radio Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.7 Hydrogen Sulfide Gas Helideck/Heliport Operational Hazard Warning(s)/Procedures 1.7.1 Background. Hydrogen sulfide (H S) gas: Hydrogen sulfide gas in higher concentrations (300 − 500 ppm) can cause loss of consciousness within a few seconds and presents a hazard to pilots on/near offshore helidecks. When operating in offshore areas that have been identified to have concentrations of hydrogen sulfide gas, the following practices are recommended.

1.7.2 Recommended Practices 1.7.2.1 Pilots a) Ensure approved protective air packs are available for emergency use by the crew on the helicopter.

b) If shutdown on a helideck, request the supervisor in charge provide a briefing on location of protective equipment and safety procedures.

c) If while flying near a helideck and the visual red beacon alarm is observed or an unusually strong odor of “rotten eggs” is detected, immediately don the protective air pack, exit to an area upwind, and notify the suspected source field of the hazard.

1.7.2.2 Oil Field Supervisors a) If presence of hydrogen sulfide is detected, a red rotating beacon or red high intensity strobe light adjacent to the primary helideck stairwell or wind indicator on the structure should be turned on to provide visual warning of hazard. If the beacon is to be located near the stairwell, the State of Louisiana “Offshore Heliport Design Guide” and FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5390 − 2A, “Heliport Design Guide,” should be reviewed to ensure proper clearance on the helideck.

b) Notify nearby helicopter operators and bases of the hazard and advise when hazard is cleared.

c) Provide a safety briefing to include location of protective equipment to all arriving personnel.

d) Wind socks or indicator should be clearly visible to provide upwind indication for the pilot.

1.8 Gas Venting Helideck/Heliport Operational Hazard Warning(s)/Procedures − Operations Near Gas Vent Booms 1.8.1 Background. Ignited flare booms can release a large volume of natural gas and create a hot fire and intense heat with little time for the pilot to react. Likewise, unignited gas vents can release reasonably large volumes of methane gas under certain conditions. Thus, operations conducted very near unignited gas vents require precautions to prevent inadvertent ingestion of combustible gases by the helicopter engine(s). The following practices are recommended.

1.8.2 Pilots 1.8.2.1 Gas will drift upwards and downwind of the vent. Plan the approach and takeoff to observe and avoid the area downwind of the vent , remaining as far away as practicable from the open end of the vent boom.

1.8.2.2 Do not attempt to start or land on an offshore helideck when the deck is downwind of a gas vent unless properly trained personnel verify conditions are safe.

1.8.3 Oil Field Supervisors 1.8.3.1 During venting of large amounts of unignited raw gas, a red rotating beacon or red high intensity strobe light adjacent to the primary helideck stairwell or wind indicator should be turned on to provide visible warning of hazard. If the beacon is to be located near the stairwell, the State of Louisiana “Offshore Heliport Design Guide” and FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/ 5390 − 2A, Heliport Design Guide, should be reviewed to ensure proper clearance from the helideck.

1.8.3.2 Notify nearby helicopter operators and bases of the hazard for planned operations.

1.8.3.3 Wind socks or indicator should be clearly visible to provide upward indication for the pilot.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.9 Helideck/Heliport Operational Warning(s)/ Procedure(s) − Closed Helidecks or Heliports 1.9.1 Background. A white “X” marked diagonally from corner to corner across a helideck or heliport touchdown area is the universally accepted visual indicator that the landing area is closed for safety of other reasons and that helicopter operations are not permitted. The following practices are recommended.

1.9.1.1 Permanent Closing. If a helideck or heliport is to be permanently closed, X diagonals of the same size and location as indicated above should be used, but the markings should be painted on the landing area.

NOTE − White Decks: If a helideck is painted white, then international orange or yellow markings can be used for the temporary or permanent diagonals.

1.9.1.2 Temporary Closing. A temporary marker can be used for hazards of an interim nature. This marker could be made from vinyl or other durable material in the shape of a diagonal “X.” The marker should be white with legs at least 20 feet long and 3 feet in width. This marker is designed to be quickly secured and removed from the deck using grommets and rope ties. The duration, time, location, and nature of these temporary closings should be provided to and coordinated with company aviation departments, nearby helicopter bases, and helicopter operators supporting the area. These markers MUST be removed when the hazard no longer exists.

(See FIG ENR 6.2 − 2 .)

1.10 Offshore (VFR) Operating Altitudes for Helicopters 1.10.1 Background. Mid − air collisions constitute a significant percentage of total fatal offshore helicopter accidents. A method of reducing this risk is the use of coordinated VFR cruising altitudes. To enhance safety through standardized vertical separation of helicopters when flying in the offshore environment, it is recommended that helicopter operators flying in a particular area establish a cooperatively developed Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for VFR operating altitudes. An example of such an SOP is contained in this example.

1.10.2 Recommended Practice Example 1.10.2.1 Field Operations. Without compromising minimum safe operating altitudes, helicopters working within an offshore field “constituting a cluster” should use altitudes not to exceed 500 feet.

1.10.2.2 En Route Operations a) Helicopters operating below 750’ AGL should avoid transitioning through offshore fields.

b) Helicopters en route to and from offshore locations, below 3,000 feet, weather permitting, should use en route altitudes as outlined in TBL ENR 6.2 − 1 .

TBL ENR 6.2 − 1 Magnetic Heading Altitude 0 to 179 750’ 1750’ 2750’ 180 to 359 1250’ 2250’ c) Area Agreements. See HSAC Area Agreement Maps for operating procedures for onshore high density traffic locations.

NOTE − Pilots of helicopters operating VFR above 3,000 feet above the surface should refer to the current Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 91), and Section ENR 1.4, Paragraph 1.7, Basic VFR Weather Minimums, of the AIP.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 6.2 − 2 Closed Helideck Marking d) Landing Lights. Aircraft landing lights should be on to enhance aircraft identification: 1) During takeoff and landings; 2) In congested helicopter or fixed wing traffic areas; 3) During reduced visibility; or, 4) Anytime safety could be enhanced.

1.11 Offshore Helidecks/Landing Communications 1.11.1 Background. To enhance safety, and provide appropriate time to prepare for helicopter operations, the following is recommended when anticipating a landing on an offshore helideck.

1.11.2 Recommended Practices 1.11.2.1 Before landing on an offshore helideck, pilots are encouraged to establish communications with the company owning or operating the helideck if frequencies exist for that purpose.

1.11.2.2 When impracticable, or if frequencies do not exist, pilots or operations personnel should attempt to contact the company owning or operating the helideck by telephone. Contact should be made before the pilot departs home base/point of departure to advise of intentions and obtain landing permission if necessary.

NOTE − It is recommended that communications be established a minimum of 10 minutes prior to planned arrival time. This practice may be a requirement of some offshore owner/operators.

NOTE − 1. See subparagraph 1.4 for Tanker Operations.

2. Private use Heliport. Offshore heliports are privately owned/operated facilities and their use is limited to persons having prior authorization to utilize the facility.

1.12 Two (2) Helicopter Operations on Offshore Helidecks 1.12.1 Background. Standardized procedures can enhance the safety of operating a second helicopter on an offshore helideck, enabling pilots to determine/maintain minimum operational parameters. Orientation of the parked helicopter on the helideck, wind and other factors may prohibit multi − helicopter operations. More conservative Rotor Diameter (RD) clearances may be required under differing condition, i.e. temperature, wet deck, wind (velocity/direction/gusts), obstacles, approach/departure angles, etc. Operations are at the pilot’s discretion.

1.12.2 Recommended Practice. Helideck size, structural weight capability, and type of main rotor on the parked and operating helicopter will aid in determining accessibility by a second helicopter. Pilots should determine that multi − helicopter deck operations are permitted by the helideck owner/operator.

1.12.3 Recommended Criteria Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.12.3.1 Minimum one − third rotor diameter clearance ( / RD). The landing helicopter maintains a minimum / RD clearance between the tips of its turning rotor and the closest part of a parked and secured helicopter (rotors stopped and tied down).

1.12.3.2 Three foot parking distance from deck edge (3’). Helicopters operating on an offshore helideck land or park the helicopter with a skid/wheel assembly no closer than 3 feet from helideck edge.

1.12.3.3 Tiedowns. Main rotors on all helicopters that are shut down be properly secured (tied down) to prevent the rotor blades from turning.

1.12.3.4 Medium (transport) and larger helicopters should not land on any offshore helideck where a light helicopter is parked unless the light helicopter is property secured to the helideck and has main rotor tied down.

1.12.3.5 Helideck owners/operators should ensure that the helideck has a serviceable anti − skid surface.

1.12.4 Weight and limitations markings on helideck. The helideck weight limitations should be displayed by markings visible to the pilot (see State of Louisiana “Offshore Heliport Design Guide” and FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/ 5390 − 2A, Heliport Design Guide).

NOTE − Some offshore helideck owners/operators have restrictions on the number of helicopters allowed on a helideck. When helideck size permits, multiple (more than two) helicopter operations are permitted by some operators.

1.13 Helicopter Rapid Refueling Procedures (HRR) 1.13.1 Background. Helicopter Rapid Refueling (HRR), engine(s)/rotors operating, can be conducted safely when utilizing trained personnel and observing safe practices. This recommended practice provides minimum guidance for HRR as outlined in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and industry practices. For detailed guidance, please refer to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Document 407, “Standard for Aircraft Fuel Servicing,” 1990 edition, including 1993 HRR Amendment.

NOTE − Certain operators prohibit HRR, or “hot refueling,” or may have specific procedures for certain aircraft or refueling locations. See the General Operations Manual and/or Operations Specifications to determine the applicable procedures or limitations.

1.13.2 Recommended Practices 1.13.2.1 Only turbine − engine helicopters fueled with JET A or JET A − 1 with fueling ports located below any engine exhausts may be fueled while an onboard engine(s) is (are) operating.

1.13.2.2 Helicopter fueling while an onboard engine(s) is (are) operating should only be conducted under the following conditions: a) A properly certificated and current pilot is at the controls and a trained refueler attending the fuel nozzle during the entire fuel servicing process. The pilot monitors the fuel quantity and signals the refueler when quantity is reached.

b) No electrical storms (thunderstorms) are present within 10 nautical miles. Lightning can travel great distances beyond the actual thunderstorm.

c) Passengers disembark the helicopter and move to a safe location prior to HRR operations. When the pilot − in − command deems it necessary for passenger safety that they remain onboard, passengers should be briefed on the evacuation route to follow to clear the area.

d) Passengers not board or disembark during HRR operations nor should cargo be loaded or unloaded.

e) Only designated personnel, trained in HRR operations should conduct HRR written authorization to include safe handling of the fuel and equipment. (See your Company Operations/Safety Manual for detailed instructions.)

f) All doors, windows, and access points allowing entry to the interior of the helicopter that are adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the fuel inlet ports kept closed during HRR operations.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 g) Pilots ensure that appropriate electrical/electronic equipment is placed in standby − off position, to preclude the possibility of electrical discharge or other fire hazard, such as [i.e., weather radar is on standby and no radio transmissions are made (keying of the microphone/transmitter)]. Remember, in addition to communications radios, radio transmissions are also emitted by aircraft radar, transponders, ADS − B equipment, radar altimeters, DME equipment, and ELTs.

h) Smoking be prohibited in and around the helicopter during all HRR operations.

The HRR procedures are critical and present associated hazards requiring attention to detail regarding quality control, weather conditions, static electricity, bonding, and spill/fires potential.

Any activity associated with rotors turning (i.e., refueling embarking/disembarking, loading/unloading baggage/freight, etc.) personnel should only approach the aircraft when authorized to do so. Approach should be made via safe approach path/walkway or “arc” − remain clear of all rotors .

NOTE − 1. Marine vessels, barges etc.: Vessel motion presents additional potential hazards to helicopter operations (blade flex, aircraft movement).

2. See National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Document 407, “Standard for Aircraft Fuel Servicing” for specifics regarding non − HRR (routine refueling operations).

2. Helicopter Night VFR Operations 2.1 Effect of Lighting on Seeing Conditions in Night VFR Helicopter Operations NOTE − This guidance was developed to support safe night VFR helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) operations. The principles of lighting and seeing conditions are useful in any night VFR operation.

While ceiling and visibility significantly affect safety in night VFR operations, lighting conditions also have a profound effect on safety. Even in conditions in which visibility and ceiling are determined to be visual meteorological conditions, the ability to discern unlighted or low contrast objects and terrain at night may be compromised. The ability to discern these objects and terrain is the seeing condition, and is related to the amount of natural and man made lighting available, and the contrast, reflectivity, and texture of surface terrain and obstruction features. In order to conduct operations safely, seeing conditions must be accounted for in the planning and execution of night VFR operations.

Night VFR seeing conditions can be described by identifying “high lighting conditions” and “low lighting conditions.” 2.1.1 High lighting conditions exist when one of two sets of conditions are present: 2.1.1.1 The sky cover is less than broken (less than 5/8 cloud cover), the time is between the local Moon rise and Moon set, and the lunar disk is at least 50% illuminated; or 2.1.1.2 The aircraft is operated over surface lighting which, at least, provides for the lighting of prominent obstacles, the identification of terrain features (shorelines, valleys, hills, mountains, slopes) and a horizontal reference by which the pilot may control the helicopter. For example, this surface lighting may be the result of: a) Extensive cultural lighting (man − made, such as a built − up area of a city), b) Significant reflected cultural lighting (such as the illumination caused by the reflection of a major metropolitan area’s lighting reflecting off a cloud ceiling), or c) Limited cultural lighting combined with a high level of natural reflectivity of celestial illumination, such as that provided by a surface covered by snow or a desert surface.

2.1.2 Low lighting conditions are those that do not meet the high lighting conditions requirements.

2.1.3 Some areas may be considered a high lighting environment only in specific circumstances. For example, some surfaces, such as a forest with limited cultural lighting, normally have little reflectivity, requiring Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 dependence on significant moonlight to achieve a high lighting condition. However, when that same forest is covered with snow, its reflectivity may support a high lighting condition based only on starlight. Similarly, a desolate area, with little cultural lighting, such as a desert, may have such inherent natural reflectivity that it may be considered a high lighting conditions area regardless of season, provided the cloud cover does not prevent starlight from being reflected from the surface. Other surfaces, such as areas of open water, may never have enough reflectivity or cultural lighting to ever be characterized as a high lighting area.

2.1.4 Through the accumulation of night flying experience in a particular area, the operator will develop the ability to determine, prior to departure, which areas can be considered supporting high or low lighting conditions.

Without that operational experience, low lighting considerations should be applied by operators for both pre − flight planning and operations until high lighting conditions are observed or determined to be regularly available.

2.2 Astronomical Definitions and Background Information for Night Operations 2.2.1 Definitions 2.2.1.1 Horizon. Wherever one is located on or near the Earth’s surface, the Earth is perceived as essentially flat and, therefore, as a plane. If there are no visual obstructions, the apparent intersection of the sky with the Earth’s (plane) surface is the horizon, which appears as a circle centered at the observer. For rise/set computations, the observer’s eye is considered to be on the surface of the Earth, so that the horizon is geometrically exactly 90 degrees from the local vertical direction.

2.2.1.2 Rise, Set. During the course of a day the Earth rotates once on its axis causing the phenomena of rising and setting. All celestial bodies, the Sun, Moon, stars and planets, seem to appear in the sky at the horizon to the East of any particular place, then to cross the sky and again disappear at the horizon to the West. Because the Sun and Moon appear as circular disks and not as points of light, a definition of rise or set must be very specific, because not all of either body is seen to rise or set at once.

2.2.1.3 Sunrise and sunset refer to the times when the upper edge of the disk of the Sun is on the horizon, considered unobstructed relative to the location of interest. Atmospheric conditions are assumed to be average, and the location is in a level region on the Earth’s surface.

2.2.1.4 Moonrise and moonset times are computed for exactly the same circumstances as for sunrise and sunset.

However, moonrise and moonset may occur at any time during a 24 hour period and, consequently, it is often possible for the Moon to be seen during daylight, and to have moonless nights. It is also possible that a moonrise or moonset does not occur relative to a specific place on a given date.

2.2.1.5 Transit. The transit time of a celestial body refers to the instant that its center crosses an imaginary line in the sky − the observer’s meridian − running from north to south.

2.2.1.6 Twilight. Before sunrise and again after sunset there are intervals of time, known as “twilight,” during which there is natural light provided by the upper atmosphere, which does receive direct sunlight and reflects part of it toward the Earth’s surface.

2.2.1.7 Civil twilight is defined to begin in the morning, and to end in the evening when the center of the Sun is geometrically 6 degrees below the horizon. This is the limit at which twilight illumination is sufficient, under good weather conditions, for terrestrial objects to be clearly distinguished.

2.2.2 Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations applies these concepts and definitions in addressing the definition of night (Section 1.1), the requirement for aircraft lighting (Section 91.209) and pilot recency of night experience (Section 61.67).

2.2.3 Information on Moon Phases and Changes in the Percentage of the Moon Illuminated From any location on the Earth, the Moon appears to be a circular disk which, at any specific time, is illuminated to some degree by direct sunlight. During each lunar orbit (a lunar month), we see the Moon’s appearance change from not visibly illuminated through partially illuminated to fully illuminated, then back through partially illuminated to not illuminated again. There are eight distinct, traditionally recognized stages, called phases. The Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 10 United States of America 22 JAN 26 phases designate both the degree to which the Moon is illuminated and the geometric appearance of the illuminated part. These phases of the Moon, in the sequence of their occurrence (starting from New Moon), are listed in FIG ENR 6.2 − 3 .

2.2.3.1 The percent of the Moon’s surface illuminated is a more refined, quantitative description of the Moon’s appearance than is the phase. Considering the Moon as a circular disk, at New Moon the percent illuminated is 0; at First and Last Quarters it is 50%; and at Full Moon it is 100%. During the crescent phases the percent illuminated is between 0 and 50% and during gibbous phases it is between 50% and 100%.

2.2.3.2 For practical purposes, phases of the Moon and the percent of the Moon illuminated are independent of the location on the Earth from where the Moon is observed. That is, all the phases occur at the same time regardless of the observer’s position.

2.2.3.3 For more detailed information, refer to the United States Naval Observatory site referenced below.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 6.2 − 3 Phases of the Moon New Moon − The Moon’s unilluminated side is facing the Earth. The Moon is not visible (except during a solar eclipse).

Waxing Crescent − The Moon appears to be partly but less than one − half illuminated by direct sunlight. The fraction of the Moon’s disk that is illuminated is increasing.

First Quarter − One − half of the Moon appears to be illuminated by direct sunlight. The fraction of the Moon’s disk that is illuminated is increasing.

Waxing Gibbous − The Moon appears to be more than one − half but not fully illuminated by direct sunlight. The fraction of the Moon’s disk that is illuminated is increasing.

Full Moon − The Moon’s illuminated side is facing the Earth. The Moon appears to be completely illuminated by direct sunlight.

Waning Gibbous − The Moon appears to be more than one − half but not fully illuminated by direct sunlight. The fraction of the Moon’s disk that is illuminated is decreasing.

Last Quarter − One − half of the Moon appears to be illuminated by direct sunlight. The fraction of the Moon’s disk that is illuminated is decreasing.

Waning Crescent − The Moon appears to be partly but less than one − half illuminated by direct sunlight. The fraction of the Moon’s disk that is illuminated is decreasing.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 12 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.4 Access to Astronomical Data for Determination of Moon Rise, Moon Set, and Percentage of Lunar Disk Illuminated 2.2.4.1 Astronomical data for the determination of Moon rise and set and Moon phase may be obtained from the United States Naval Observatory using an interactive query available at: http://aa.usno.navy.mil /.

2.2.4.2 Click on “Data Services,” and then on “Complete Sun and Moon Data for One Day.” 2.2.4.3 You can obtain the times of sunrise, sunset, moonrise, moonset, transits of the Sun and Moon, and the beginning and end of civil twilight, along with information on the Moon’s phase by specifying the date and location in one of the two forms on this web page and clicking on the “Get data” button at the end of the form.

Form “A” is used for cities or towns in the U.S. or its territories. Form “B” for all other locations. An example of the data available from this site is shown in TBL ENR 6.2 − 2 .

2.2.4.4 Additionally, a yearly table may be constructed for a particular location by using the “Table of Sunrise/Sunset, Moonrise/Moonset, or Twilight Times for an Entire Year” selection.

3. Landing Zone Safety 3.1 This information is provided for use by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) pilots, program managers, medical personnel, law enforcement, fire, and rescue personnel to further their understanding of the safety issues concerning Landing Zones (LZs). It is recommended that HEMS operators establish working relationships with the ground responder organizations they may come in contact with in their flight operations and share this information in order to establish a common frame of reference for LZ selection, operations, and safety.

TBL ENR 6.2 − 2 Sample of Astronomical Data Available from the Naval Observatory The following information is provided for New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana (longitude W90.1, latitude N30.0) Tuesday Central Daylight Time 29 May 2007 SUN Begin civil twilight 5:34 a.m.

Sunrise 6:01 a.m.

Sun transit 12:58 p.m.

Sunset 7:55 p.m.

End civil twilight 8:22 p.m.

MOON Moonrise 5:10 p.m. on preceding day Moonset 4:07 a.m.

Moonrise 6:06 p.m.

Moon transit 11:26 p.m.

Moonset 4:41 a.m. on following day Phase of the Moon on 29 May: waxing gibbous with 95% of the Moon’s visible disk illuminated.

Full Moon on 31 May 2007 at 8:04 p.m. Central Daylight Time.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.2 The information provided is largely based on the booklet, LZ − Preparing the Landing Zone, issued by National Emergency Medical Services Pilots Association (NEMSPA), and the guidance developed by the University of Tennessee Medical Center’s LIFESTAR program, and is used with their permission. For additional information, go to: http://www.nemspa.org/.

3.3 Information concerning the estimation of wind velocity is based on the Beaufort Scale. See http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/beaufort.html for more information.

3.4 Selecting a Scene LZ 3.4.1 If the situation requires the use of a helicopter, first check to see if there is an area large enough to land a helicopter safely.

FIG ENR 6.2 − 4 Recommended Minimum Landing Zone Dimensions 3.4.2 For the purposes of FIG ENR 6.2 − 4 the following are provided as examples of relative helicopter size: 3.4.2.1 Small Helicopter: Bell 206/407, Eurocopter AS − 350/355, BO − 105, BK − 117.

3.4.2.2 Medium Helicopter: Bell UH − 1 (Huey) and derivatives (Bell 212/412), Bell 222/230/430 Sikorsky S − 76, Eurocopter SA − 365.

3.4.2.3 Large Helicopter: Boeing Chinook, Eurocopter Puma, Sikorsky H − 60 series (Blackhawk), SK − 92.

3.4.3 The LZ should be level, firm and free of loose debris that could possibly blow up into the rotor system.

3.4.4 The LZ should be clear of people, vehicles and obstructions such as trees, poles and wires. Remember that wires are difficult to see from the air. The LZ must also be free of stumps, brush, post and large rocks. See FIG ENR 6.2 − 5 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 14 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 6.2 − 5 Landing Zone Hazards 3.4.5 Keep spectators back at least 200 feet. Keep emergency vehicles 100 feet away and have fire equipment (if available) standing by. Ground personnel should wear eye protection, if available, during landing and takeoff operations. To avoid loose objects being blown around in the LZ, hats should be removed; if helmets are worn, chin straps must be securely fastened.

3.4.6 Fire fighters (if available) should wet down the LZ if it is extremely dusty.

3.5 Helping the Flightcrew Locate the Scene 3.5.1 If the LZ coordinator has access to a GPS unit, the exact latitude and longitude of the LZ should be relayed to the HEMS pilot. If unable to contact the pilot directly, relay the information to the HEMS ground communications specialist for relaying to the pilot, so that they may locate your scene more efficiently.

Recognize that the aircraft may approach from a direction different than the direct path from the takeoff point to the scene, as the pilot may have to detour around terrain, obstructions or weather en route.

3.5.2 Especially in daylight hours, mountainous and densely populated areas can make sighting a scene from the air difficult. Often, the LZ coordinator on the ground will be asked if she or he can see or hear the helicopter.

3.5.3 Flightcrews use a clock reference method for directing one another’s attention to a certain direction from the aircraft. The nose of the aircraft is always 12 o’clock, the right side is 3 o’clock, etc. When the LZ coordinator sees the aircraft, he/she should use this method to assist the flightcrew by indicating the scene’s clock reference position from the nose of the aircraft. For example, “Accident scene is located at your 2 o’clock position.” See FIG ENR 6.2 − 6 .

FIG ENR 6.2 − 6 “Clock” System for Identifying Positions Relative to the Nose of the Aircraft Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.5.4 When the helicopter approaches the scene, it will normally orbit at least one time as the flight crew observes the wind direction and obstacles that could interfere with the landing. This is often referred to as the “high reconnaissance” maneuver.

3.6 Wind Direction and Touchdown Area 3.6.1 Determine from which direction the wind is blowing. Helicopters normally land and takeoff into the wind.

3.6.2 If contact can be established with the pilot, either directly or indirectly through the HEMS ground communications specialist, describe the wind in terms of the direction the wind is from and the speed.

3.6.3 Common natural sources of wind direction information are smoke, dust, vegetation movement, water streaks and waves. Flags, pennants, streamers can also be used. When describing the direction, use the compass direction from which the wind is blowing (example: from the North − West).

3.6.4 Wind speed can be measured by small hand − held measurement devices, or an observer’s estimate can be used to provide velocity information. The wind value should be reported in knots (nautical miles per hour). If unable to numerically measure wind speed, use TBL ENR 6.2 − 3 to estimate velocity. Also, report if the wind conditions are gusty, or if the wind direction or velocity is variable or has changed recently.

3.6.5 If any obstacle(s) exist, insure their description, position and approximate height are communicated to the pilot on the initial radio call.

3.7 Night LZs 3.7.1 There are several ways to light a night LZ: 3.7.1.1 Mark the touchdown area with five lights or road flares, one in each corner and one indicating the direction of the wind. See FIG ENR 6.2 − 7 .

FIG ENR 6.2 − 7 Recommended Lighting for Landing Zone Operations at Night NOTE − Road flares are an intense source of ignition and may be unsuitable or dangerous in certain conditions. In any case, they must be closely managed and firefighting equipment should be present when used. Other light sources are preferred, if available.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 16 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 6.2 − 3 Table of Common References for Estimating Wind Velocity Wind Wind Appearance of Wind Effects (Knots) Classification On the Water On Land Less than 1 Calm Sea surface smooth and mirror − like Calm, smoke rises vertically 1 − 3 Light Air Scaly ripples, no foam crests Smoke drift indicates wind direction, wind vanes are still 4 − 6 Light Breeze Small wavelets, crests glassy, no Wind felt on face, leaves rustle, vanes breaking begin to move 7 − 10 Gentle Breeze Large wavelets, crests begin to break, Leaves and small twigs constantly scattered whitecaps moving, light flags extended 11 − 16 Moderate Breeze Small waves 1 − 4 ft. becoming longer, Dust, leaves, and loose paper lifted, numerous whitecaps small tree branches move 17 − 21 Fresh Breeze Moderate waves 4 − 8 ft taking longer Small trees in leaf begin to sway form, many whitecaps, some spray 22 − 27 Strong Breeze Larger waves 8 − 13 ft, whitecaps Larger tree branches moving, whistling common, more spray in wires 28 − 33 Near Gale Sea heaps up, waves 13 − 20 ft, white Whole trees moving, resistance felt foam streaks off breakers walking against wind 34 − 40 Gale Moderately high (13 − 20 ft) waves of Whole trees in motion, resistance felt greater length, edges of crests begin to walking against wind break into spindrift, foam blown in streaks 41 − 47 Strong Gale High waves (20 ft), sea begins to roll, Slight structural damage occurs, slate dense streaks of foam, spray may reduce blows off roofs visibility 48 − 55 Storm Very high waves (20 − 30 ft) with Seldom experienced on land, trees overhanging crests, sea white with broken or uprooted, “considerable densely blown foam, heavy rolling, structural damage” lowered visibility 56 − 63 Violent Storm Exceptionally high (30 − 45 ft) waves, foam patches cover sea, visibility more reduced 64+ Hurricane Air filled with foam, waves over 45 ft, sea completely white with driving spray, visibility greatly reduced EXAMPLE − Wind from the South − East, estimated speed 15 knots. Wind shifted from North − East about fifteen minutes ago, and is gusty.

3.7.1.2 If chemical light sticks may be used, care should be taken to assure they are adequately secured against being dislodged by the helicopter’s rotor wash.

3.7.1.3 Another method of marking a LZ uses four emergency vehicles with their low beam headlights aimed toward the intended landing area.

3.7.1.4 A third method for marking a LZ uses two vehicles. Have the vehicles direct their headlight beams into the wind, crossing at the center of the LZ. (If fire/rescue personnel are available, the reflective stripes on their bunker gear will assist the pilot greatly.)

3.7.2 At night, spotlights, flood lights and hand lights used to define the LZ are not to be pointed at the helicopter.

However, they are helpful when pointed toward utility poles, trees or other hazards to the landing aircraft. White lights such as spotlights, flashbulbs and hi − beam headlights ruin the pilot’s night vision and temporarily blind Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 him. Red lights, however, are very helpful in finding accident locations and do not affect the pilot’s night vision as significantly.

3.7.3 As in Day LZ operations, ensure radio contact is accomplished between ground and air, if possible.

3.8 Ground Guide 3.8.1 When the helicopter is in sight, one person should assist the LZ Coordinator by guiding the helicopter into a safe landing area. In selecting an LZ Coordinator, recognize that medical personnel usually are very busy with the patient at this time. It is recommended that the LZ Coordinator be someone other than a medical responder, if possible. Eye protection should be worn. The ground guide should stand with his back to the wind and his arms raised over his head (flashlights in each hand for night operations.)

3.8.2 The pilot will confirm the LZ sighting by radio. If possible, once the pilot has identified the LZ, the ground guide should move out of the LZ.

3.8.3 As the helicopter turns into the wind and begins a descent, the LZ coordinator should provide assistance by means of radio contact, or utilize the “unsafe signal” to wave off the helicopter if the LZ is not safe (see FIG ENR 6.2 − 8 ). The LZ Coordinator should be far enough from the touchdown area that he/she can still maintain visual contact with the pilot.

3.9 Assisting the Crew 3.9.1 After the helicopter has landed, do not approach the helicopter. The crew will approach you.

3.9.2 Be prepared to assist the crew by providing security for the helicopter. If asked to provide security, allow no one but the crew to approach the aircraft.

3.9.3 Once the patient is prepared and ready to load, allow the crew to open the doors to the helicopter and guide the loading of the patient.

3.9.4 When approaching or departing the helicopter, always be aware of the tail rotor and always follow the directions of the crew. Working around a running helicopter can be potentially dangerous. The environment is very noisy and, with exhaust gases and rotor wash, often windy. In scene operations, the surface may be uneven, soft, or slippery which can lead to tripping. Be very careful of your footing in this environment.

3.9.5 The tail rotor poses a special threat to working around a running helicopter. The tail rotor turns many times faster than the main rotor, and is often invisible even at idle engine power. Avoid walking towards the tail of a helicopter beyond the end of the cabin, unless specifically directed by the crew.

NOTE − Helicopters typically have doors on the sides of the cabin, but many use aft mounted “clamshell” type doors for loading and unloading patients on litters or stretchers. When using these doors, it is important to avoid moving any further aft than necessary to operate the doors and load/unload the patient. Again, always comply with the crew’s instructions.

3.10 General Rules 3.10.1 When working around helicopters, always approach and depart from the front, never from the rear.

Approaching from the rear can increase your risk of being struck by the tail rotor, which, when at operating engine speed, is nearly invisible.

3.10.2 To prevent injury or damage from the main rotor, never raise anything over your head.

3.10.3 If the helicopter landed on a slope, approach and depart from the down slope side only.

3.10.4 When the helicopter is loaded and ready for take off, keep the departure path free of vehicles and spectators. In an emergency, this area is needed to execute a landing.

3.11 Hazardous Chemicals and Gases 3.11.1 Responding to accidents involving hazardous materials requires special handling by fire/rescue units on the ground. Equally important are the preparations and considerations for helicopter operations in these areas.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 18 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.11.2 Hazardous materials of concern are those which are toxic, poisonous, flammable, explosive, irritating, or radioactive in nature. Helicopter ambulance crews normally don’t carry protective suits or breathing apparatuses to protect them from hazardous materials.

3.11.3 The helicopter ambulance crew must be told of hazardous materials on the scene in order to avoid the contamination of the crew. Patients/victims contaminated by hazardous materials may require special precautions in packaging before loading on the aircraft for the medical crew’s protection, or may be transported by other means.

3.11.4 Hazardous chemicals and gases may be fatal to the unprotected person if inhaled or absorbed through the skin.

3.11.5 Upon initial radio contact, the helicopter crew must be made aware of any hazardous gases in the area.

Never assume that the crew has already been informed. If the aircraft were to fly through the hazardous gases, the crew could be poisoned and/or the engines could develop mechanical problems.

3.11.6 Poisonous or irritating gases may cling to a victim’s clothing and go unnoticed until the patient is loaded and the doors of the helicopter are closed. To avoid possible compromise of the crew, all of these patients must be decontaminated prior to loading.

3.12 Hand Signals 3.12.1 If unable to make radio contact with the HEMS pilot, use the signals in FIG ENR 6.2 − 8 .

FIG ENR 6.2 − 8 Recommended Landing Zone Ground Signals 3.13 Emergency Situations 3.13.1 In the event of a helicopter accident in the vicinity of the LZ, consider the following: 3.13.1.1 Emergency Exits: a) Doors and emergency exits are typically prominently marked. If possible, operators should familiarize ground responders with the door system on their helicopter in preparation for an emergency event.

b) In the event of an accident during the LZ operation, be cautious of hazards such as sharp and jagged metal, plastic windows, glass, any rotating components, such as the rotors, and fire sources, such as the fuel tank(s) and the engine.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 6.2 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.13.1.2 Fire Suppression: a) Helicopters used in HEMS operations are usually powered by turboshaft engines, which use jet fuel. Civil HEMS aircraft typically carry between 50 and 250 gallons of fuel, depending upon the size of the helicopter, and planned flight duration, and the fuel remaining after flying to the scene. Use water to control heat and use foam over fuel to keep vapors from ignition sources.

4. Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Multiple Helicopter Operations 4.1 Background. EMS helicopter operators often overlap other EMS operator areas. Standardized procedures can enhance the safety of operating multiple helicopters to landing zones (LZ) and to hospital heliports.

Communication is the key to successful operations and in maintaining organization between helicopters, ground units and communication centers. EMS helicopter operators which operate in the same areas should establish joint operating procedures and provide them to related agencies.

4.2 Recommended Procedures.

4.2.1 Landing Zone Operations. The first helicopter to arrive on − scene should establish communications with the ground unit at least 10 NMs from the LZ to receive a LZ briefing and to provide ground control the number of helicopters that can be expected. An attempt should be made to contact other helicopters on 123.025 to pass on to them pertinent LZ information and the ground unit’s frequency. Subsequent helicopters arriving on scene should establish communications on 123.025 at least 10 NMs from the LZ. After establishing contact on 123.025, they should contact the ground unit for additional information. All helicopters should monitor 123.025 at all times.

4.2.1.1 If the landing zone is not established by the ground unit when the first helicopter arrives, then the first helicopter should establish altitude and orbit location requirements for the other arriving helicopters.

Recommended altitude separation between helicopters is 500 feet (weather and airspace permitting). Helicopters can orbit on cardinal headings from the scene coordinates. (See FIG ENR 6.2 − 9 ) 4.2.1.2 Upon landing in the LZ, the first helicopter should update the other helicopters on the LZ conditions, i.e., space, hazards and terrain.

4.2.1.3 Before initiating any helicopter movement to leave the LZ, all operators should attempt to contact other helicopters on 123.025, and state their position and route of flight intentions for departing the LZ.

4.2.2 Hospital Operations. Because many hospitals require landing permission and have established procedures (frequencies to monitor, primary and secondary routes for approaches and departures, and orbiting areas if the heliport is occupied) pilots should always receive a briefing from the appropriate facility (communication center, flight following, etc.) before proceeding to the hospital.

4.2.2.1 In the event of multiple helicopters coming into the hospital heliport, the helicopter nearest to the heliport should contact other inbound helicopters on 123.025 and establish intentions. Follow the guidelines established in the LZ operations.

4.2.2.2 To facilitate approach times, the pilot − in − command of the helicopter occupying the hospital heliport should advise any other operators whether the patient will be off loaded with the rotor blades turning or stopped, and the approximate time to do so.

4.2.2.3 Before making any helicopter movement to leave the hospital heliport, all operators should attempt to contact other helicopters on 123.025 and state their position and route of flight intentions for departing the heliport.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 6.2 − 20 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 6.2 − 9 EMS Multiple Helicopter LZ/Heliport Operation NOTE − If the LZ/hospital heliport weather conditions or airspace altitude restrictions prohibit the recommended vertical separation, 1 NM separations should be kept between helicopter orbit areas.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7. Oceanic Operations

ENR 7.1 General Procedures

1. IFR/VFR Operations 1.1 Flights in oceanic airspace must be conducted under Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) procedures when operating: 1.1.1 Between sunset and sunrise.

1.1.2 At or above Flight Level (FL) 055 when operating within the New York, Oakland, and Anchorage Oceanic Flight Information Regions (FIRs).

1.1.3 Above FL180 when operating within the Miami and Houston FIRs and in the San Juan Control Area.

Flights between the east coast of the U.S., and Bermuda or Caribbean terminals, and traversing the New York FIR at or above 5,500 feel MSL should be especially aware of this requirement.

1.1.4 At or above FL230 when operating within the Anchorage Arctic FIR.

1.2 San Juan CTA/FIR VFR Traffic.

1.2.1 All VFR aircraft entering and departing the San Juan CTA/FIR will provide San Juan Radio with an ICAO flight plan. All aircraft must establish two*way communications with San Juan Radio on, 122.2, 122.3, or 122.6.

1.2.2 Communication can also be established by transmitting on 122.1 and receive using the appropriate VOR frequency for Borinquen (BQN), Mayaguez (MAZ), Ponce (PSE), and St. Croix (COY). For St. Thomas (STT), transmit on 123.6 and receive on the VOR frequency. If unable to contact San Juan Radio, the pilot is responsible for notifying adjacent ATS units and request that a position report be relayed to San Juan Radio for search and rescue purposes and flight following.

1.3 Non − RVSM aircraft are not permitted in RVSM airspace unless they meet the criteria of excepted aircraft and are previously approved by the ATS unit having authority for the airspace. In addition to those aircraft listed in ENR 1.1 General Rules, paragraph 39., Operational Policy/Procedures for Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) in the Domestic U.S., Alaska, Offshore Airspace, and the San Juan FIR, the following aircraft operating within oceanic and offshore airspace are excepted: 1.3.1 Aircraft being initially delivered to the State of Registry or Operator.

1.3.2 Aircraft that was formerly RVSM − approved but has experienced an equipment failure and is being flown to a maintenance facility for repair in order to meet RVSM requirements and/or obtain approval.

1.3.3 Aircraft being utilized for mercy or humanitarian purposes.

NOTE − These exceptions are accommodated on a workload or traffic − permitting basis.

2. Flight Plan Filing Requirements NOTE − In addition to the following guidance, operators must also consult current Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) and chart supplements (Supplement Alaska, Supplement Pacific) to gain a complete understanding of requirements. NOTAMs and supplements may contain guidance that is short term and/or short notice – i.e., having immediate effect.

2.1 To ensure eligibility for oceanic 50 NM lateral separation, file: 2.1.1 PBN/A1 or PBN/L1 in Field 18.

2.1.2 R in Field 10a.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.1.3 See FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 90-105, Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical Navigation in the U.S. National Airspace System and in Oceanic and Remote Continental Airspace, for guidance on RNP 10 (RNAV 10) authorization.

2.2 To ensure eligibility for oceanic 50 NM longitudinal and lateral separation, file: 2.2.1 PBN/A1 or PBN/L1 in Field 18.

2.2.2 P2 in Field 10a.

2.2.3 D1 in Field 10b.

2.2.4 (J5 or J7) and R in Field 10a. The identifier for Inmarsat is J5 and the identifier for Iridium is J7. If J5 or J7 is not included in the ICAO FPL, then any LOGON attempt will be rejected.

2.2.5 SUR/RSP180 in Field 18.

2.2.6 See FAA Advisory Circular 90 − 117, Data Link Communications, for guidance on Required Communication Performance (RCP) and Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) authorization.

2.2.7 See FAA Advisory Circular 90-105 for guidance on RNP 10 (RNAV 10) authorization.

2.3 To ensure eligibility for 23 NM lateral or 30 NM longitudinal separation, file: 2.3.1 PBN/L1 in Field 18.

2.3.2 P2 in Field 10a.

2.3.3 D1 in Field 10b.

2.3.4 (J5 or J7) and R in Field 10a. The identifier for Inmarsat is J5 and the identifier for Iridium is J7. If J5 or J7 is not included in the ICAO FPL, then any LOGON attempt will be rejected.

2.3.5 SUR/RSP180 in Field 18.

2.3.6 See FAA Advisory Circular 90 − 117 for guidance on RCP and RSP authorization.

2.3.7 See FAA Advisory Circular 90-105 for guidance on RNP 4 authorization.

2.4 Oakland Oceanic FIR 2.4.1 In accordance with ICAO Doc 4444, flight plans with routes entering the Oakland Oceanic FIR (KZAK) must contain, among the estimated elapsed times (EET) in Field 18, an entry point for KZAK and an estimated time. It is not mandatory to file the boundary crossing point in Field 15 of the route of flight, but it is permitted.

2.5 New York Oceanic FIR 2.5.1 North Atlantic (NAT) operators must send preferred route messages (PRMs) for eastbound flights to KZWYZOZX (New York (NY) Oceanic CTA/FIR) no later than 1000 UTC standard and 0900 UTC daylight savings: The following format is to be used for eastbound PRMs: [PRIORITY] [DEST ADDRESS] [DEST ADDRESS] [DATE TIME OF ORIGIN] [ORIGIN ADDRESS] [MESSAGE TYPE] − [3LD] − [EB] − [YYMMDD AT 030 ° W] – [(DEP/ DEST) (INLAND FIX) (OEP) (OCA RPS) (LANDFALL) (LAST UK POINT) (NUMBER OF FLT 01 − 99)] Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 EXAMPLE − FF KZWYZOZX KZNYZRZX 130502 KATLDALA PRM − DAL − E − 250113 KJFK/LPPT HAPIE YAHOO DOVEY 42/60 43/50 44/40 43/30 41/20 ERPES 02 KJFK/LSZH PORTI 47/50 48/40 49/30 50/20 SOMAX ATSUR 03 NOTE − Abbreviations as used in sample PRM are: EB (Eastbound), OCA RPS (Oceanic Control Area Reporting Points), OEP (Oceanic Entry Point), 3LD (Three − letter designator used for company in field 7 of the ICAO FPL) 2.5.2 Operators are encouraged to file in item 15 of the FPL the coordinates of a track in lieu of the track identification letter (e.g., NATU). NAT track identification letters in FPLs can be used only for the whole length of the NAT track, not segments.

2.5.3 Operators are reminded of the requirement to file an FPL and any subsequent changes with New York Oceanic at KZWYZOZX, along with any other ATC facilities that may require such filing.

3. Flight Plan Addressing 3.1 In an effort to eliminate erroneous or duplicate flight plans that may be received from diverse locations, and to increase the safety of flight, operators must adhere to the following procedures when filing flight plans for departing flights from foreign aerodromes entering the United States National Airspace System: 3.1.1 If the filer sends an FPL to an FAA En Route facility in addition to the air traffic service unit (ATSU) responsible for the departure aerodrome, the filer must ensure that the FPL filed is the same as the FPL entered by the ATS unit having authority for the departure aerodrome. Note that per ICAO Doc. 4444, an operator may request that movement messages distributed by the responsible ATS unit be routed to the operator.

3.1.2 Changes to IFR flight plans must be submitted as soon as possible, but no more than 24 hours prior to the flight, to ensure proper processing and distribution before departure.

3.1.3 The FAA expects changes to be transmitted using the DLA and CHG messages as outlined in ICAO Doc.

4444. Transmitting changes to the FAA by canceling (CNL) and refiling an FPL creates the potential for multiple FPLs in the computer system.

3.1.4 If Cancel and Refile is used, it is imperative that the cancellation of the original FPL in the FAA system be verified by computer response or verbal coordination before submitting another FPL.

3.1.5 Changes to an IFR flight plan less than 30 minutes prior to departure must be accomplished via verbal coordination with the ATSU having authority for the departure aerodrome.

NOTE − These references are contained in ICAO DOC 4444 and FAA Order JO 7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration.

Operators should be aware that failure to adhere to these procedures could result in an operational delay or pilot deviation.

3.2 Oakland Oceanic FIR 3.2.1 All flights that will enter the Oakland Oceanic CTA/FIR must address flight plans to KZAKZQZX.

3.3 New York Oceanic FIR 3.3.1 All flights entering the New York Oceanic CTA/FIR must address flight plans to KZWYZOZX.

3.3.2 All flights entering the New York Oceanic CTA/FIR and a U.S. ARTCC (except Boston) and/or Bermuda airspace must address flight plans to both KZWYZOZX and the appropriate U.S. ARTCC. (See TBL ENR 7.1 − 1 ).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.1 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.1 − 1 Airspace to be Entered: Required AFTN New York Oceanic CTA/ Addresses FIR and U.S. ARTCCs New York (NY) Oceanic KZWYZOZX CTA/FIR Boston ARTCC & NY KZWYZOZX only Oceanic NY domestic and/or Ber - KZNYZQZX & muda & NY Oceanic KZWYZOZX Washington (KZDC) & KZDCZQZX & NY Oceanic KZWYZOZX Jacksonville (KZJX) & KZJXZQZX & NY Oceanic KZWYZOZX Miami (KZMA) & NY KZMAZQZX & Oceanic KZWYZOZX San Juan & NY Oceanic TZSUZQZX & KZWYZOZX Houston (KZHU) KZHUZRZX 3.4 Anchorage Oceanic FIRs 3.4.1 All flights that will enter the Anchorage Arctic FIR and/or the Anchorage Oceanic FIR must address flight plans to both PAZAZQZX and PAZNZQZX.

3.5 San Juan CTA/FIR 3.5.1 All aircraft transitioning through San Juan CTA/FIR from a foreign facility that will operate in North Atlantic (NAT) High Level Airspace (HLA) must forward the full route of flight for flight plan verification.

3.5.2 This must be accomplished prior to exiting the San Juan CTA/FIR by one of the following means: 3.5.2.1 Via direct pilot − controller communication; or 3.5.2.2 Via New York Radio, when requested by ATC.

NOTE − This requirement does not apply to aircraft operating outside of NAT HLA.

4. Beacon Code Requirements 4.1 Oakland Oceanic FIR. Upon entering the Oakland Oceanic CTA and after radar service is terminated; all aircraft should squawk code 2000. Aircraft should maintain code 2000 thereafter until otherwise directed by Air Traffic Control (ATC).

4.2 New York Oceanic FIR 4.2.1 New York − East Oceanic CTA. All aircraft should squawk code 2000 10 minutes after entry.

4.2.2 New York – West Oceanic CTA. All aircraft should remain on the last assigned code, except eastbound aircraft transiting Bermuda RADAR airspace should remain on the last assigned code until past 60W, then squawk 2000.

4.3 Anchorage Oceanic FIR. Unless otherwise directed by ATC, all aircraft should remain on the last assigned code, even after radar service is terminated.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.4 Houston Oceanic FIR. All aircraft entering the Houston Oceanic CTA/FIR should remain on the last assigned code.

4.5 Miami CTA/FIR 4.5.1 There are no primary radar or weather returns available from the Grand Turk, Georgetown, and Nassau radar systems. All aircraft within antenna coverage of these systems are required to squawk transponder codes as assigned by ATC, or, if none are assigned, squawk the appropriate stratum code.

4.5.2 Aircraft departing and overflying the Santo Domingo and Port Au Prince FIRs can expect ATC assigned codes from those ATS providers. If a code is not assigned by either Santo Domingo or Port Au Prince, pilots should request a code. The assigned code should be squawked prior to entering the Miami CTA/FIR.

5. Position Reporting in the Oceanic Environment 5.1 Pilots must report over each point used in the flight plan to define the route of flight, even if the point is depicted on aeronautical charts as an “on request” (non − compulsory) reporting point. For aircraft providing automatic position reporting via an Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Contract (ADS − C) logon, pilots should discontinue voice position reports. For aircraft without an ADS − C connection, pilots must provide position reports via CPDLC or voice.

5.2 FAA Oceanic Control Areas (Anchorage, Oakland, and New York) cannot accept CPDLC position reports with 5 − character designators that use the ARINC 424, paragraph 7.2.5 format. The flight crew should use latitudes and longitudes encoded as waypoint names in the ICAO format (for example, 54N150W).

NOTE − ARINC 424 describes a 5 − character latitude/longitude format for aircraft navigation databases (for example, 10N40 describes a latitude/longitude of 10N140W). The ATSU will reject any downlink message containing waypoint names in the ARINC 424 format.

5.3 Oakland Oceanic FIR 5.3.1 Aircraft filed on PACOTS routes within Oakland Oceanic CTA/FIR airspace must make position reports using latitude/longitude coordinates or named fixes as specified in the track definition messages (TDM). Position reports must comprise information on present position, estimated next position, and ensuing position. Reporting points of reference not specified in the TDM and/or rounding off geographical coordinates is prohibited.

5.4 New York Oceanic FIR 5.4.1 Position reports should be made via ADS − C, if the aircraft has ADS − C capability. For aircraft without an ADS − C connection with KZWY, pilots must provide a position report and continue HF or CPDLC position reporting until a KZWY ADS − C connection is established. The three types of ADS − C contracts that will be established with each aircraft are Periodic Contracts at one of the intervals listed in TBL ENR 7.5.2, a five (5) nautical mile (NM) Lateral Deviation Event, and a Level Range Deviation Event. These are in addition to normal Waypoint Change Events. Aircraft cleared to deviate laterally (offset) from a referenced track are assigned more frequent reporting until the aircraft has either returned to centerline and has reported “BACK ON ROUTE” or has been given a route change that removes any offset (e.g., with a clearance to “PROCEED DIRECT TO {position}).

5.4.2 Operators should not use CPDLC for position reports but it should be used for all other ATC communications. Position reports should be made via HF if ADS − C is not available.

5.5 Anchorage Oceanic FIR 5.5.1 All waypoints filed in Field 15 of the ICAO flight plan (route field) must be reported as a position report.

5.5.2 Position reports are to be made via ADS − C, CPDLC or voice communication in that order of preference.

5.5.3 For aircraft with an active ADS − C connection, pilots must make a CPDLC position report when crossing the FIR boundary (inbound) to ensure CPDLC connectivity. Aircraft without a PAZN ADS − C connection must Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.1 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 provide a position report and continue HF or CPDLC position reporting until a PAZN ADS − C connection is established.

5.6 Anchorage Arctic FIR 5.6.1 Flights crossing the Anchorage Arctic FIR along 141W between 72N and 90N must file their 141W crossing point as a route element in field 15 of the ICAO flight plan.

5.6.2 All waypoints filed in Field 15 of the ICAO flight plan (route field) must be reported as a position report.

5.7 Houston Oceanic FIR 5.7.1 Position reports and the ability to communicate at any point of the route of flight is vital to the air traffic safety and control process. When flight planning, users are responsible to ensure that they will be capable of compliance. Inability to comply is in violation of ICAO requirements. The communication requirements for IFR flights within the Houston Oceanic Control Area are: 5.7.1.1 Functioning two − way radio communications equipment capable of communicating with at least one ground station from any point on the route; 5.7.1.2 Maintaining a continuous listening watch on the appropriate radio frequency; and 5.7.1.3 Reporting of mandatory points.

5.7.2 The following describes an area in the Houston CTA/FIR where reliable VHF air − to − ground communications below FL180 are not available: 5.7.2.1 26 30 00N 86 00 00W TO 26 30 00N 92 00 00W; 5.7.2.2 TO 24 30 00N 93 00 00W TO 24 30 00N 88 00 00W to; 5.7.2.3 TO 24 00 00N 86 00 00W TO BEGINNING POINT.

5.7.2.4 Communications within this area are available for all oceanic flights via HF.

NOTE − The attention of pilots planning flights within the Houston CTA/FIR is directed to the communications and position reports requirements specified in the following ICAO Documents: Annex 2, Paragraphs 3.6.3 and 3.6.5; Annex 11, Paragraph 6.1.2; DOC 4444 Part 2 Paragraph 14; and DOC 7030 CAR Paragraph 3.

6. Satellite Voice (SATVOICE) Communication Services for Air Traffic Control (ATC) 6.1 The FAA provides Inmarsat and Iridium SATVOICE services for air − to − ground and ground − to − air calls directly with Oakland, New York, and Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control Centers (ARTCC) and New York and San Francisco RADIO. The FAA’s SATVOICE services are supplemental to HF voice communication services.

6.2 The pilot must limit direct SATVOICE contact with ATC to distress and urgency situations, or when other means are not available, and communication is essential.

6.3 When unable to communicate on HF, the pilot may conduct normal and routine communications with ATC via New York RADIO or San Francisco RADIO on SATVOICE.

6.4 The aircraft SATVOICE equipment must be approved in accordance with Advisory Circular 20 − 150, Airworthiness Approval of Satellite Voice (SATVOICE) Equipment Supporting Air Traffic Service (ATS) Communication.

NOTE − Portable satellite phones are NOT approved for normal and routine ATC communications.

6.5 The operator must use the SATVOICE equipment in accordance with ICAO Doc 10038, Satellite Voice Operations Manual (SVOM), with emphasis on the following: 6.5.1 If the flight intends to use SATVOICE capability, the operator must file the appropriate designator (that is, M1 or M3) in Item 10, and the ICAO aircraft address (that is, hexadecimal code) in Item 18 of the flight plan.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.1 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 REFERENCE − Aeronautical Information Manual, Chapter 5, Air Traffic Procedures.

6.5.2 The operator must establish procedures to ensure the flight maintains voice communications (that may include SATVOICE and any required HF SELCAL checks) with every ATS unit along the route of flight.

6.5.3 When using SATVOICE, the pilot must follow RTF conventions identical to HF/VHF communications in accordance with applicable standards and regulations pertaining to aeronautical communications.

6.5.4 Satellite service providers have assigned ICAO priority level 2/HGH/Q12 Operational high (second highest) to calls between aircraft and Air Navigation Service Providers. The pilot must verify the priority of the call and act only on ATC clearances/instructions from SATVOICE calls with priority level 2/HGH/Q12, and if in doubt terminate the call and initiate a new call for confirmation.

6.5.5 The pilot must answer SATVOICE calls when contacted either by the ARTCC or RADIO facility.

6.6 The SATVOICE short codes for ARTCCs and RADIO are in accordance with TBL ENR 7.1 − 2 .

TBL ENR 7.1 − 2 SATVOICE Short Codes for ARTCCs and RADIO Facilities ATC Direct ATC via RADIO Facility (only for distress, urgency, (when unable to communicate on HF) Oceanic Control other means not available) Area (OCA) SATVOICE SATVOICE ARTCC RADIO Facility Short Code Short Code New York East New York ARTCC 436695 New York RADIO 436623 New York West New York ARTCC 436696 Oakland Oakland ARTCC 436697 San Francisco 436625 RADIO Anchorage Anchorage ARTCC 436602 7. Air − to − Air Frequency 7.1 Houston, San Juan and Miami FIRs 7.1.1 Frequency 123.45 MHz is the approved air − to − air VHF channel within the above FIRs. This frequency will be used for flights operating over remote and oceanic areas out of range of VHF ground stations to exchange necessary operational information and to facilitate the resolution of operational problems.

7.1.2 Frequency 123.45 MHz replaces the previously published frequencies used within the Houston, San Juan, and Miami FIRs. This change is necessary to comply with Amendment 74 to ICAO Annex 10, Volume II, which designated 123.45 as the global standard VHF air − to − air frequency.

8. Strategic Lateral Offset Procedures (SLOP) Within FAA − Controlled Airspace 8.1 These procedures have been developed in accordance with ICAO Document 4444 Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Air Traffic Management, paragraph 16.5.

8.2 The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has determined that allowing aircraft conducting oceanic flight to fly lateral offsets, in increments of 0.1 nautical mile (NM) up to a maximum of 2 NM right of centerline, will provide an additional safety margin and mitigate the risk of conflict when non − normal events, such as aircraft navigation errors, altitude deviation errors, and turbulence − induced altitude − keeping errors occur.

8.3 Pilots are authorized to use SLOP in the Anchorage Oceanic Control Area (OCA), Anchorage Flight Information Region (FIR), New York OCA, Oakland OCA, the airspace surrounding the island of Bermuda, the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.1 − 8 AIP ENR 7.1 − 8 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 airspace controlled by the Honolulu Control Facility (HCF), and the airspace controlled by the Guam Combined Control Facility (CCF).

NOTE − Within New York OCA West, pilots are not permitted to use SLOP on airway M201 between points VIRST and VEGAA, nor on airways Y485, Y488, Y493, and Y494.

8.3.1 Pilots should apply an offset outbound after reaching their cruising flight level and retain the offset until the top of descent unless ATC dictates otherwise.

8.3.2 For flights departing Hawaii, pilots should apply SLOP upon reaching their initial cruise flight level and they are within 70 NM of entering the Oakland Oceanic Control Area.

8.3.3 For flights arriving Hawaii, pilots should discontinue SLOP no later than 70 NM after entering HCF airspace, or when receiving radar vectors from HCF, whichever occurs first. Pilots of Hawaiian inter − island flights must not use SLOP.

8.3.4 Aircraft transiting Bermuda airspace, HCF airspace, or Guam CCF airspace may remain on their established offset.

8.3.5 Aircraft flying in the Anchorage FIR may apply SLOP as follows: 8.3.5.1 Throughout the entire Anchorage Arctic FIR.

8.3.5.2 In those portions of the Anchorage Domestic and Anchorage Oceanic FIRs (including offshore control areas) which are more than twelve miles offshore.

8.3.5.3 Over the land area of the Alaska Peninsula west of 160 ° West longitude.

8.4 Along a route or track there will be 21 positions that an aircraft may fly: on centerline or at increments of 0.1 NM (for example, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4...1.8, 1.9, 2.0) right of centerline out to a maximum offset of 2 NM. Offsets must not exceed 2 NM right of centerline. The intent of this procedure is to reduce risk (add safety margin) by distributing aircraft laterally across the 21 available positions.

8.4.1 Pilots must fly the track centerline if their aircraft does not have automatic offset programming capability.

Pilots of aircraft unable to offset at 0.1 NM increments should fly on the track centerline, or at the 1.0 NM or 2.0 NM positions right of centerline when using SLOP.

8.4.2 Pilots should also fly one of the available offset positions described above to avoid wake turbulence. Pilots should use whatever means available to determine the best offset to fly. An aircraft overtaking a lower altitude aircraft on the same routing should offset within the confines of this procedure, if capable, so as to create the least amount of wake turbulence for the aircraft being overtaken.

8.4.3 Pilots must not offset to the left of centerline nor offset more than 2 NM right of centerline. They may contact other aircraft on VHF frequency 123.45, as necessary, to coordinate the best wake turbulence offset option.

NOTE − Pilots should determine the action most appropriate to any given situation and, as always, have final authority and responsibility for the safe operation of the aircraft.

8.4.4 Pilots do not need ATC clearance to use SLOP nor are they required to inform ATC of their intent to use the procedure within the airspace identified in this paragraph.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 1 AIP ENR 7.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

ENR 7.2 Data Link Procedures

1. Oakland Oceanic Airspace 1.1 Oakland ARTCC has full CPDLC and ADS − C services in the entire Oakland Oceanic FIR for FANS − 1/A capable aircraft. The Oakland Oceanic FIR log − on address is “KZAK;” the facility is “OAKODYA.” CADS LOGON is not supported.

1.2 The use of CPDLC and ADS − C in the Oakland Oceanic FIR (KZAK) is only permitted by Inmarsat and Iridium customers. All other forms of data link connectivity are not authorized. If J5 (Inmarsat) or J7 (Iridium) is not included in the ICAO FPL Item 10a, then the LOGON will be rejected by KZAK and the aircraft will not be able to connect.

NOTE − The CPDLC Message Elements used in oceanic data communications operations are contained in TBL ENR 7.2 − 2 through TBL ENR 7.2 − 26.

1.3 Prior to entering the Oakland Oceanic FIR, contact San Francisco Radio and request a SELCAL check.

NOTE − 1. Expect to receive primary and secondary HF frequency assignments from San Francisco Radio for the entire route of flight within the Oakland Oceanic FIR.

2. Pilots must maintain HF communications capability with San Francisco Radio at all times within the Oakland Oceanic FIR.

1.3.1 Regardless of aircraft ADS − C capability, aircraft without a KZAK ADS − C connection must forward a FIR position report and continue HF or CPDLC position reporting until a KZAK ADS − C connection is established.

1.4 Determine the status of the CPDLC connection. If KZAK is the active center, the pilot must contact San Francisco Radio on HF for a SELCAL check.

1.4.1 If KZAK is not the active center, the pilot must, within 5 minutes after the boundary is crossed, terminate the CPDLC connection, then log on to KZAK, and contact San Francisco Radio on HF for a SELCAL check.

1.5 Flights overflying Honolulu Control Facility (HCF) airspace will receive an END SERVICE message prior to entering HCF airspace that will result in termination of CPDLC. Aircraft must re − log on to CPDLC prior to reentering Oakland Oceanic FIR airspace when HCF advises to contact en route communications or San Francisco Radio.

1.6 Flights overflying Guam Combined Control Facility (CCF) airspace should maintain the CPDLC connection with Oakland ARTCC; however, do not use CPDLC for ATC COM until Guam CCF advises you to again contact en route communications or San Francisco Radio.

2. Anchorage Oceanic Airspace 2.1 Anchorage ARTCC has full CPDLC capability and normal service for FANS − 1/A capable aircraft within INMARSAT or Iridium coverage.

NOTE − The CPDLC Message Elements used oceanic data communications operations are contained in TBL ENR 7.2 − 1 through TBL ENR 7.2 − 26 .

2.1.1 The Anchorage Arctic FIR logon address is “PAZN;” the facility is “ANCXFXA.” CADS LOGON is not supported.

2.1.2 The Anchorage Domestic and Oceanic FIRs (South of N63 and west of W165) logon address is “PAZN;” the facility is “ANCATYA.” CADS LOGON is not supported.

2.2 Prior to entering the Anchorage Oceanic FIR, contact San Francisco Radio and request a SELCAL check.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 2 AIP ENR 7.2 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − 1. HF service in the Anchorage Arctic FIR is provided via Gander Radio. San Francisco Radio maintains an HF Long − Distance Operational Control (LDOC) station at Barrow, Alaska that may be of use when the solar conditions inhibit normal communications via Gander. HF service in the Anchorage Oceanic FIR is provided via San Francisco Radio.

2. Expect to receive primary and secondary HF frequency assignments from San Francisco Radio for the entire route of flight when within the Anchorage Oceanic FIR.

3. Pilots must maintain HF communications capability with appropriate en route RADIO (San Francisco Radio or Gander) at all times within the Anchorage Arctic or Oceanic FIRs.

2.2.1 Regardless of aircraft ADS − C capability, aircraft without a PAZN Anchorage ADS − C connection must forward a FIR position report and continue HF or CPDLC position reporting until an Anchorage ADS − C connection is established.

3. New York Oceanic Airspace 3.1 New York ARTCC provides full CPDLC and ADS − C services throughout its Oceanic Airspace to FANS − 1/A capable flights. The New York Oceanic FIR FANS LOGON address is “KZWY.” CADS LOGON is not supported. Flights should use ADS − C for position reporting and CPDLC for all other ATC communications while in the New York Oceanic Area.

3.2 The use of CPDLC and ADS − C in the New York Oceanic FIR (KZWY) is only permitted by Inmarsat and Iridium customers. Users must ensure that the proper data link code is filed in Item 10a of the ICAO. If J5 (Inmarsat) or J7 (Iridium) is not included in the ICAO FPL, then the LOGON will be rejected by KZWY and the aircraft will not be able to connect.

NOTE − The CPDLC Message Elements used oceanic data communications operations are contained in TBL ENR 7.2 − 1 through TBL ENR 7.2 − 26.

3.3 Prior to entering the New York Oceanic FIR, contact New York Radio and request a SELCAL check.

NOTE − 1. Expect to receive primary and secondary HF frequency assignments from New York Radio for the route of flight within the data link service area.

2. Pilots must maintain HF communications capability with New York Radio at all times within the New York Oceanic FIR.

3. If not filed in the flight plan, NY Radio will request if the flight is CPDLC connected and confirm their exit point from the New York FIR.

3.3.1 Regardless of aircraft ADS − C capability, aircraft without a KZWY ADS − C connection must forward a position report and continue HF or CPDLC position reporting until a KZWY ADS − C connection is established.

3.4 If the flight will exit the New York Oceanic FIR into domestic airspace (including over New York Bermuda RADAR): 3.4.1 Identify the flight as ADS − C and/or CPDLC connected; 3.4.2 If operating on the North Atlantic Organized Track System (OTS), state the track letter; 3.4.3 State the name of the next CTA/FIR to be entered along with the latitude and longitude or waypoint exit point leaving the New York Oceanic FIR; and 3.4.4 Request a SELCAL check.

NOTE − New York Radio may require flights to contact them at 60 West for HF frequency updates.

3.5 Aircraft entering the New York Oceanic FIR from non − data link airspace should: 3.5.1 LOGON to KZWY at least 15 minutes but not more than 45 minutes prior to entering the New York Oceanic FIR.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 3 AIP ENR 7.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 3.5.2 Prior to entering the New York Oceanic FIR contact New York Radio on HF or VHF providing the information as outlined in paragraph 3.3 .

NOTE − Do not send a CPDLC position report to confirm CDA prior to, or upon crossing, the FIR.

3.6 Aircraft entering the New York Oceanic FIR data link service area from adjacent data link airspace should: 3.6.1 Determine the status of the FANS connection when crossing the New York Oceanic FIR boundary. CPDLC and ADS − C services are forwarded automatically between the New York, Santa Maria, Piarco, and Gander OCAs at a pre − determined time (approximately 5 minutes) from CTA/FIR boundary. CPDLC only services are forwarded between New York Oceanic (KZWY) and Moncton ACC. CPDLC connection (via ”Next Data Authority”) is automatically transferred between New York Oceanic (KZWY) and FAA domestic ARTCCs (KUSA).

NOTE − San Juan Center does not have CPDLC implemented.

3.6.1.1 If KZWY is the active connection when crossing the New York Oceanic FIR boundary the pilot must: 3.6.1.2 Contact New York Radio on HF providing the information as outlined in paragraph 3.3 .

3.6.2 If KZWY is not the active center when crossing the New York Oceanic FIR boundary the pilot must: 3.6.2.1 Terminate the CPDLC connection, then log − on to KZWY; and 3.6.2.2 Contact New York Radio on HF providing the information as outlined in paragraph 3.3 .

NOTE − Do not send a CPDLC position report to confirm CDA prior to, or upon crossing, the FIR.

3.7 Aircraft exiting the KZWY data link service area and approaching the New York Center Domestic, New York Center Bermuda RADAR, San Juan, Piarco, Jacksonville, Miami, Moncton, and Gander Domestic can expect a CPDLC uplink message containing the VHF frequency assignment for the next facility. CPDLC End Service will be sent approximately 5 minutes prior to the boundary crossing point.

4. Data Link Failure 4.1 In the event of data link failure or outages, flight crews must contact New York Radio or San Francisco Radio via HF voice for routine communications. When unable to communicate on HF, the pilot may conduct normal and routine communications with ATC via New York Radio or San Francisco Radio on SATVOICE. Direct SATVOICE contact with ATC should be limited to distress and urgency situations or when other means are not available and communication is essential.

5. CPDLC Uplink Message Latency Monitor Function 5.1 Oakland (KZAK), Anchorage (PAZN) and New York (KZWY) request pilots activate the CPDLC uplink message latency monitor function to help prevent pilots from acting on a CPDLC uplink message that has been delayed in the network. When flights enter oceanic data link airspace, or initiate AFN log on within their oceanic data link airspace, equipped flights will receive a message advising crews to set the latency value. “SET MAX UPLINK DELAY VALUE TO 300 SEC” 5.2 When pilots receive the CPDLC uplink message “SET MAX UPLINK DELAY VALUE 300 SEC”, they must acknowledge (”ROGER”) the uplink as prompted by the avionics, regardless of whether the aircraft supports the latency monitor.

NOTE − 1. It is important for pilots to respond to the “SET MAX UPLINK DELAY VALUE TO 300 SEC” uplink message to avoid having open, unanswered CPDLC messages in the system. This also applies to aircraft that have deficient message latency monitor functionality or no such functionality at all.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 4 AIP ENR 7.2 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2. Oakland and Anchorage Oceanic now confirm CPDLC connection by the exchange of the CPDLC messages, “SET MAX UPLINK DELAY VALUE TO 300 SEC”, and “ROGER”. Previously, a CPDLC position report served this purpose.

5.3 If the aircraft is equipped with a correctly functioning message latency monitor, enter the specified uplink delay into the avionics in accordance with the aircraft procedures. Some avionics will automatically set the delay value in accordance with the uplink message and do not allow for a manual input.

NOTE − If an aircraft initiates another AFN log on in mid − flight, ATC may send the message “SET MAX UPLINK DELAY VALUE TO 300 SEC” again, once the log on is completed.

5.4 When pilots receive a latency monitor indication that a CPDLC uplink message has been delayed, the pilots shall: 5.4.1 Revert to voice communications to notify the ATS unit of the delayed CPDLC uplink message received, and to request clarification of the intent of the message.

5.4.2 Respond appropriately to close the message as per the instructions of the controller.

5.4.3 Not act on the delayed uplink message until clarification has been received from the controller.

6. CPDLC Messages In Use in the Oakland, Anchorage, and New York Oceanic Airspace 6.1 The CPDLC messages that are in use and authorized in the oceanic airspace of Oakland, Anchorage, and New York ARTCCs are shown in TBL ENR 7.2 − 1 through TBL ENR 7.2 − 26 .

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 5 AIP ENR 7.2 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 1 Response Attribute of CPDLC Message Element Description Response Attribute For Uplink Message W/U Response required.

FANS 1/A.– WILCO, UNABLE, STANDBY, ERROR, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY.

A/N Response required.

FANS 1/A.– AFFIRM, NEGATIVE, STANDBY, ERROR, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY.

R Response required.

FANS 1/A.– ROGER, STANDBY, ERROR, NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORITY. FANS 1/A aircraft do not have the capability to send UNABLE in response to an uplink message contain - ing message elements with an “R” response attribute. For these aircraft, the flight crew may use alternative means to UNABLE the message. These alternative means will need to be taken into consideration to ensure proper technical and operational closure of the communication transaction.

Y Response required.

Valid responses: Any CPDLC downlink message, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required).

N No response required unless logical acknowledgement is required.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 6 AIP ENR 7.2 − 6 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NE [Not defined in Doc 4444] FANS 1/A.– The WILCO, UNABLE, AFFIRM, NEGATIVE, ROGER, and STANDBY responses are not enabled (NE) for flight crew selection. An uplink message with a response attribute NE is considered to be closed even though a response may be required operationally. Under some circumstances, a downlink error message may be linked to an uplink message with a NE at - tribute.

For Downlink Message Y Response required. Yes Valid responses. Any CPDLC uplink message, LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (only if required).

N Response required. No, unless logical acknowledgement required.

Valid responses (only if LOGICAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT is required). LOGICAL AC - KNOWLEDGEMENT, SERVICE UNAVAILABLE, FLIGHT PLAN NOT HELD, ERROR FANS 1/A.– Aircraft do not have the capability to receive technical responses to downlink mes - sage elements with an “N” response attribute (other than LACK or ERROR for ATN B1 air - craft). In some cases, the response attribute is different between FANS 1/A aircraft and Doc 4444. As an example, most emergency messages have an “N” response attribute for FANS 1/A whereas Doc 4444 defines a “Y” response attribute for them. As a consequence, for FANS 1/A aircraft, ATC will need to use alternative means to acknowledge to the flight crew that an emergency message has been received.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 2 Route Uplink Message Elements (RTEU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) Message Format for Message Element FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Element Message Element Intended Use Identifier Display UM74 PROCEED UM74 PROCEED W/U RTEU − 2 Instruction to pro - PROCEED DI - DIRECT TO DIRECT TO ceed directly to the RECT TO ( posi - ( position ) ( position ) specified position. tion ) UM75 WHEN N/A W/U RTEU − 2 Instruction to pro - PROCEED DI - ABLE PROCEED ceed directly to the RECT TO ( posi - DIRECT TO ( posi - specified position. tion ) tion ) Note – This mes - sage element is equivalent to SUPU − 5 plus RTEU − 2 in Doc 4444.

UM76 AT ( time ) N/A W/U RTEU − 3 Instruction to pro - AT TIME (time) PROCEED DI - ceed, at the speci - PROCEED DI - RECT TO ( posi - fied time, directly to RECT TO (posi - tion ) the specified posi - tion) tion.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 7 AIP ENR 7.2 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM77 AT ( posi - N/A W/U RTEU − 4 Instruction to pro - AT (position) PRO - tion ) PROCEED ceed, at the speci - CEED DIRECT TO DIRECT TO (posi - fied position, direct - (position) tion) ly to the next speci - fied position.

UM78 AT ( altitude ) N/A W/U RTEU − 5 Instruction to pro - AT (level single) PROCEED DI - ceed upon reaching PROCEED DI - RECT TO ( posi - the specified level, RECT TO (posi - tion ) directly to the spec - tion) ified position.

UM79 CLEARED UM79 CLEARED W/U RTEU − 6 Instruction to pro- CLEARED TO (po- TO ( position ) via TO ( position ) via ceed to the speci - sition) VIA (depar - ( route clearance ) ( route clearance ) fied position via the ture data[O]) (en − specified route. route data) UM 80 CLEARED UM 80 CLEARED W/U RTEU − 7 Instruction to pro- CLEARED (depar - ( route clearance ) ( route clearance ) ceed via the speci - ture data[O]) (en − fied route. route data) (arrival approach data) UM83 AT (posi- N/A W/U RTEU − 9 Instruction to pro- AT (position) tion) CLEARED ceed from the speci- CLEARED (en − (route clearance) fied position via the route data) (arrival specified route. approach data) UM85 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A (route clearance) clearance to fly on the specified route may be issued.

UM86 AT ( posi- N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A tion ) EXPECT clearance to fly on ( route clearance ) the specified route from the specified position may be is - sued.

UM87 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A DIRECT TO ( posi - clearance to fly di - tion ) rectly to the speci - fied position may be issued.

UM88 AT ( posi - N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A tion ) EXPECT DI - clearance to fly di - RECT TO ( posi - rectly from the first tion ) specified position to the next specified position may be is - sued.

UM89 AT ( time ) N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A EXPECT DIRECT clearance to fly di- TO ( position ) rectly to the speci - fied position com - mencing at the specified time may be issued.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 8 AIP ENR 7.2 − 8 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM90 AT ( altitude ) N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A EXPECT DIRECT clearance to fly di - TO ( position ) rectly to the speci - fied position com - mencing when the specified level is reached may be is - sued.

UM93 EXPECT N/A R RTEU − 13 Notification that an EXPECT FUR - FURTHER onwards clearance THER CLEAR - CLEARANCE AT may be issued at the ANCE AT TIME ( time ) specified time. (time) UM99 EXPECT N/A R RTEU − 14 Notification that a EXPECT (named (procedure name) clearance may be instruction) issued for the air- Note – Used when a craft to fly the spec- published proce - ified procedure or dure is designated. clearance name.

UM137 CONFIRM N/A Y RTEU − 15 Request to confirm CONFIRM AS - ASSIGNED the assigned route. SIGNED ROUTE ROUTE Note – NE response attribute.

UM147 REQUEST N/A Y RTEU − 16 Request to make a REQUEST POSI - POSITION RE- position report. TION REPORT PORT TBL ENR 7.2 − 3 Route Downlink Message Elements (RTED) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM22 REQUEST DM22 REQUEST Y RTED − 1 Request for a direct REQUEST DI - DIRECT TO (posi - DIRECT TO (posi - clearance to the RECT TO (posi - tion) tion) specified position. tion) DM23 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 2 Request for the REQUEST (named (procedure name) specified route. instruction) DM24 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 3 Request for the REQUEST (route clearance) specified procedure CLEARANCE (de - or clearance name. parture data[O]) (en − route data)(ar - rival approach da - ta[O]) DM25 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 4 Request for the REQUEST (clear - CLEARANCE specified clearance. ance type) CLEARANCE Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 9 AIP ENR 7.2 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 DM26 REQUEST N/A Y N/A Request for a N/A WEATHER DEVI- weather deviation ATION TO (posi- to the specified po - tion) VIA (route sition via the speci - clearance) fied route.

DM40 ASSIGNED N/A Y RTED − 9 Confirmation that ASSIGNED ROUTE (route the assigned route ROUTE (departure clearance) is the specified data[O]) (en − route route. data) (arrival ap - proach data[O]) DM40 ASSIGNED N/A N RTED − 9 Confirmation that ASSIGNED ROUTE (route the assigned route ROUTE (departure clearance) is the specified data[O]) (en − route route. data) (arrival ap - proach data[O]) DM48 POSITION N/A N RTED − 5 Position report. POSITION RE - REPORT (position PORT (position re- report) port) DM51 WHEN N/A Y RTED − 8 Request for the WHEN CAN WE CAN WE EXPECT specified heading. EXPECT BACK BACK ON ON ROUTE ROUTE DM70 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 6 Request for the REQUEST HEAD - HEADING (de - specified heading. ING (degrees) grees) DM71 REQUEST N/A Y RTED − 7 Request for the REQUEST GROUND TRACK specified ground GROUND TRACK (degrees) track. (degrees) TBL ENR 7.2 − 4 Lateral Uplink Message Elements (LATU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM64 OFFSET UM64 OFFSET W/U LATU − 1 Instruction to fly a OFFSET (specified (distance offset) (specified distance) parallel track to the distance) (direc - (direction) OF (direction) OF cleared route at a tion) OF ROUTE ROUTE ROUTE displacement of the specified distance in the specified di - rection.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 10 AIP ENR 7.2 − 10 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM65 AT (posi - N/A W/U LATU − 2 Instruction to fly a AT (position) OFF - tion) OFFSET (dis - parallel track to the SET (specified dis - tance offset) (direc - cleared route at a tance) (direction) tion) OF ROUTE displacement of the OF ROUTE specified distance in the specified di - rection and com- mencing at the specified position.

UM66 AT (time) N/A W/U LATU − 3 Instruction to fly a AT TIME (time) OFFSET (distance parallel track to the OFFSET (specified offset) (direction) cleared route at a distance) (direc - OF ROUTE displacement of the tion) OF ROUTE specified distance in the specified di - rection and com- mencing at the specified time.

UM67 PROCEED N/A W/U LATU − 4 Instruction to rejoin REJOIN ROUTE BACK ON the ROUTE cleared route.

UM68 REJOIN N/A W/U LATU − 5 Instruction to rejoin REJOIN ROUTE ROUTE BY (posi- the BEFORE PASS - tion) ING (position) cleared route be - fore passing the specified position.

UM69 REJOIN N/A W/U LATU − 6 Instruction to rejoin REJOIN ROUTE ROUTE BY (time) the cleared route BEFORE TIME before the specified (time) time.

UM70 EXPECT N/A R LATU − 7 Notification that a EXPECT BACK BACK ON clearance may be ON ROUTE BE - ROUTE BY (posi - issued to enable the FORE PASSING tion) aircraft to rejoin (position) the cleared route before passing the specified position.

UM71 EXPECT N/A R LATU − 8 Notification that a EXPECT BACK BACK ON clearance may be ON ROUTE BE - ROUTE BY (time) issued to enable the FORE TIME (time) aircraft to rejoin the cleared route before the specified time.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 11 AIP ENR 7.2 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM72 RESUME UM72 RESUME W/U LATU − 9 Instruction to re - RESUME OWN OWN NAVIGA - OWN NAVIGA - sume own naviga - NAVIGATION TION TION tion following a pe - riod of tracking or heading clearances.

May be used in conjunction with an instruction on how or where to rejoin the cleared route.

UM82 CLEARED UM82 CLEARED W/U LATU − 10 Instruction allow- CLEARED TO TO DEVIATE UP TO DEVIATE UP ing deviation up to DEVIATE UP TO TO (distance off- TO (specified dis- the specified dis - (lateral deviation) set) (direction) OF tance) (direction) tance(s) from the OF ROUTE ROUTE OF ROUTE cleared route in the specified direc - tion ( s ) .

UM98 IMMEDI - N/A W/U LATU − 11 Instruction to turn TURN (direction) ATELY TURN (di - left or right as HEADING (de - rection) HEAD- specified on to the grees) ING (degrees) specified heading.

Note – This mes - sage element is equivalent to EMGU − 2 plus LATU − 11 in Doc 4444.

UM127 REPORT N/A W/U LATU − 18 Instruction to re- REPORT BACK BACK ON port when the air- ON ROUTE ROUTE craft is back on the cleared route.

Note – R response attribute.

UM130 REPORT N/A W/U LATU − 19 Instruction to re- REPORT PASS - PASSING (posi - port upon passing ING (position) tion) the specified posi - tion.

Note– R response attribute.

UM132 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to re- N/A POSITION port the present po - sition.

UM138 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to con- N/A TIME OVER RE- firm the previously PORTED WAY- reported time over POINT the last reported waypoint.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 12 AIP ENR 7.2 − 12 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM139 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to con - N/A REPORTED firm the identity of WAYPOINT the previously re - ported waypoint.

UM140 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to con - N/A NEXT WAY - firm the identity of POINT the next waypoint.

UM141 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to con - N/A NEXT WAY - firm the previously POINT ETA reported estimated time at the next waypoint.

UM142 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to con - N/A ENSUING WAY - firm the identity of POINT the next plus one waypoint.

UM145 CONFIRM N/A NE N/A Instruction to re - N/A HEADING port the present heading.

UM146 REPORT N/A NE N/A Instruction to re - N/A GROUND TRACK port the present ground track.

UM152 WHEN N/A NE N/A Instruction to re - N/A CAN YOU AC - port the earliest CEPT (specified time when the distance) (direc - specified offset tion) OFFSET track can be ac - cepted.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 5 Lateral Downlink Message Elements (LATD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play N/A Y LATD − 1 Request for a paral - REQUEST OFF - DM15 REQUEST OFFSET (specified lel track from the SET (specified dis - distance) (direc - cleared route at a tance) (direction) tion) OF ROUTE displacement of the OF ROUTE specified distance in the specified di - rection.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 13 AIP ENR 7.2 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 DM16 AT (posi- N/A Y N/A Request that a par- N/A tion) REQUEST allel track, offset OFFSET (specified from the cleared distance) (direc- track by the speci - tion) OF ROUTE fied distance in the specified direction, be approved from the specified posi - tion.

DM17 AT (time) N/A Y N/A Request that a par- N/A REQUEST OFF - allel track, offset SET (specified dis- from the cleared tance) (direction) track by the speci- OF ROUTE fied distance in the specified direction, be approved from the specified time.

DM27 REQUEST DM27 REQUEST Y LATD − 2 Request for a REQUEST WEATHER DEVI - WEATHER DEVI - weather deviation WEATHER DEVI - ATION UP TO ATION UP TO up to the specified ATION UP TO (specified distance) (specified distance) distance(s) off (lateral deviation) (direction) OF (direction) OF track in the speci - OF ROUTE ROUTE ROUTE fied direction(s).

DM31 PASSING N/A N LATD − 8 Report indicating PASSING (posi - (position) passing the speci - tion) fied position.

DM33 PRESENT N/A N N/A Notification of the N/A POSITION (posi - present position.

tion) DM35 PRESENT N/A N N/A Notification of the N/A HEADING (de - present heading in grees) degrees.

DM36 PRESENT N/A N N/A Notification of the N/A GROUND TRACK present ground (degrees) track in degrees.

DM41 BACK ON N/A N LATD − 4 Report indicating BACK ON ROUTE that the cleared ROUTE route has been re - joined.

DM42 NEXT N/A N N/A The next waypoint N/A WAYPOINT (posi - is the specified po - tion) sition.

DM43 NEXT N/A N N/A The ETA at the N/A WAYPOINT ETA next waypoint is as (time) specified.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 14 AIP ENR 7.2 − 14 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 DM44 ENSUING N/A N N/A The next plus one N/A WAYPOINT (posi - waypoint is the tion) specified position.

DM45 REPORT - N/A N N/A Clarification of N/A ED WAYPOINT previously reported (position) waypoint passage.

DM46 REPORT - N/A N N/A Clarification of N/A ED WAYPOINT time over previous - (time) ly reported way- point.

DM59 DIVERT - N/A Y LATD − 5 Report indicating DIVERTING TO ING TO (position) diverting to the (position) VIA (en − VIA (route clear- specified position route data) (arrival ance) via the specified approach data[O]) route, which may Note 1 – H alert at- be sent without any tribute. previous coordina - tion done with ATC.

Note 2 – N re- sponse attribute.

DM60 OFFSET - N/A Y LATD − 6 Report indicating OFFSETTING TING (distance off- that the aircraft is (specified distance) set) (direction) OF offsetting to a par - (direction) OF ROUTE allel track at the ROUTE specified distance Note 1 – H alert at- in the specified di - tribute. rection off from the cleared route.

Note 2 – N re - sponse attribute.

DM80 DEVIAT - N/A Y LATD − 7 Report indicating DEVIATING ING (deviation Off- deviating specified (specified Devia - set) (direction) OF distance or degrees tion) (direction) OF ROUTE in the specified di- ROUTE rection from the cleared route.

Note 1 – H alert at- tribute.

Note 2 – N re - sponse attribute DM67 WE CAN N/A N N/A We can accept a N/A ACCEPT ( direc - parallel track offset tion ) ( distance off- the specified dis- set ) AT ( time ) tance in the speci - fied direction at the specified time.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 15 AIP ENR 7.2 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 DM67 WE CAN - N/A N N/A We cannot accept a N/A NOT ACCEPT ( di - parallel track offset rection ) ( distance the specified dis - offset ) tance in the speci - fied direction.

DM67 WE CAN - N/A N N/A We cannot accept N/A NOT ACCEPT ( al - the specified alti - titude ) tude.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 6 Level Uplink Message Elements (LVLU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Ele - Message Ele - Format for ment Identifier ment Intended Message Ele - Use ment Display UM6 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that N/A (altitude) a level change instruction should be ex - pected.

UM7 EXPECT N/A R LVLU − 1 Notification that EXPECT CLIMB AT an instruction HIGHER AT (time) may be expect - TIME (time) ed for the air - craft to com - mence climb at the specified time.

UM8 EXPECT N/A R LVLU − 2 Notification that EXPECT CLIMB AT (po - an instruction HIGHER AT sition) may be expect - (position) ed for the air - craft to com - mence climb at the specified po - sition.

UM9 EXPECT N/A R LVLU − 3 Notification that EXPECT LOW - DESCENT AT an instruction ER AT TIME (time) may be expect - (time) ed for the air - craft to com - mence descent at the specified time.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 16 AIP ENR 7.2 − 16 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM10 EXPECT N/A R LVLU − 4 Notification that EXPECT LOW - DESCENT AT an instruction ER AT (posi - (position) may be expect - tion) ed for the air - craft to com - mence descent at the specified position.

UM11 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that N/A CRUISE an instruction CLIMB AT should be ex - (time) pected for the aircraft to com - mence cruise climb at the specified time.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units this, element should be avoid - ed .

UM12 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that N/A CRUISE an instruction CLIMB AT (po - should be ex - sition) pected for the aircraft to com - mence cruise climb at the specified posi - tion.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units, this element should be avoid - ed .

UM13 AT N/A R N/A Notification that N/A (time) EXPECT an instruction CLIMB TO (al - should be ex - titude ) pected for the aircraft to com - mence climb at the specified time to the spec - ified level.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 17 AIP ENR 7.2 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM14 AT (po - N/A R N/A Notification that N/A sition) EXPECT an instruction CLIMB TO (al - should be ex - titude ) pected for the aircraft to com - mence climb at the specified po - sition to the specified level.

UM15 AT N/A R N/A Notification that N/A (time) EXPECT an instruction DESCENT TO should be ex - (altitude ) pected for the aircraft to com - mence descent at the specified time to the spec - ified level.

UM16 AT (po- N/A R N/A Notification that N/A sition) EXPECT an instruction DESCENT TO should be ex - (altitude ) pected for the aircraft to com - mence descent at the specified position to the specified level.

UM17 AT N/A R N/A Notification that N/A (time) EXPECT an instruction CRUISE should be ex - CLIMB TO (al - pected for the titude ) aircraft to com - mence cruise climb at the specified time to the specified level.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units, this element should be avoid - ed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 18 AIP ENR 7.2 − 18 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM18 AT (po - N/A R N/A Notification that N/A sition) EXPECT an instruction CRUISE should be ex - CLIMB TO (al - pected for the titude ) aircraft to com - mence cruise climb at the specified posi - tion to the speci - fied level.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units, this element should be avoid - ed.

UM19 MAIN - UM19 MAIN - W/U LVLU − 5 Instruction to MAINTAIN TAIN (altitude) TAIN (level) maintain the (level) specified level Note – Used for or vertical a single level. range.

UM20 CLIMB UM20 CLIMB W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that CLIMB TO TO AND TO (level) a climb to the (level) MAINTAIN specified level (altitude) or vertical range is to commence Note – Used for and once reached is to be a single level.

maintained.

UM21 AT N/A W/U LVLU − 7 Instruction that AT TIME (time) (time) CLIMB at the specified CLIMB TO TO AND time a climb to (level) MAINTAIN the specified (altitude) level or vertical range is to com- Note – A verti - mence and once cal range can reached is to be not be provided. maintained.

Note – This message ele - ment would be preceded with LVLU − 5 MAIN - TAIN (level) to prevent the pre - mature execu - tion of the in - struction.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 19 AIP ENR 7.2 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM22 AT (po- N/A W/U LVLU − 8 Instruction that AT (position) sition) CLIMB at the specified CLIMB TO TO AND position a climb (level) MAINTAIN to the specified (altitude) level or vertical range is to com- Note – A verti - mence and once cal range can reached is to be not be provided. maintained.

Note – This message ele - ment would be preceded with LVLU − 5 MAIN - TAIN (level) to prevent the pre - mature execu - tion of the in - struction.

UM23 DE - N/A W/U LVLU − 9 Instruction that DESCEND TO SCEND TO a descent to the (level) AND MAIN- specified level TAIN (altitude) or vertical range is to commence Note – Used for and once reached is to be a single level.

maintained.

UM24 AT N/A W/U LVLU − 10 Instruction that AT TIME (time) (time) DE- at the specified DESCEND TO SCEND TO time a descent (level) AND MAIN- to the specified TAIN (altitude) level or vertical range is to com- Note – A verti - mence and once cal range can reached is to be not be provided. maintained.

UM25 AT (po- N/A W/U LVLU − 11 Instruction that AT (position) sition) DE- at the specified DESCEND TO SCEND TO position a de - (level) AND MAIN- scent to the TAIN (altitude) specified level or vertical range is to commence Note –A vertical range cannot be and once provided. reached is to be maintained.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 20 AIP ENR 7.2 − 20 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM26 CLIMB UM26 CLIMB W/U LVLU − 12 Instruction that CLIMB TO TO REACH (al - TO REACH a climb is to be REACH (level titude) BY (level) BY completed such single) BE - (time) (time) that the speci - FORE TIME fied level is (time) reached before the specified time.

UM27 CLIMB UM27 CLIMB W/U LVLU − 13 Instruction that CLIMB TO TO REACH (al - TO REACH a climb is to be REACH (level titude) BY (po - (level) BY (po - completed such single) BE - sition) sition) that the speci - FORE PASS - fied level is ING (position) reached before passing the specified posi - tion.

UM28 DE - UM28 DE - W/U LVLU − 14 Instruction that DESCEND TO SCEND TO SCEND TO a descent is to REACH (level REACH (alti- REACH (level) be completed single) BE - tude) BY (time) BY (time) such that the FORE TIME specified level (time) is reached be - fore the speci - fied time.

UM29 DE - UM29 DE - W/U LVLU − 15 Instruction that DESCEND TO REACH (level SCEND TO SCEND TO a descent is to REACH (alti - REACH (level) be completed single) BE - tude) BY (posi - BY (position) such that the FORE PASS - tion) specified level ING (position) is reached be - fore passing the specified posi - tion.

UM30 MAIN - UM19 MAIN - W/U LVLU − 5 Instruction to MAINTAIN TAIN BLOCK TAIN (level) maintain the (level) (altitude) TO specified level (altitude) or vertical range.

Note – Used for a vertical range.

UM31 CLIMB UM20 CLIMB W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that CLIMB TO TO AND TO (level) a climb to the (level) MAINTAIN specified level BLOCK (alti - or vertical range tude) TO (alti - is to commence tude) and once reached is to be Note – Used for maintained.

a vertical range.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 21 AIP ENR 7.2 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM32 DE - UM23 DE - W/U LVLU − 9 Instruction that DESCEND TO SCEND TO SCEND TO a descent to the (level) AND MAIN - (level) specified level TAIN BLOCK or vertical range (altitude) TO is to commence (altitude) and once reached is to be Note – Used for maintained.

a vertical range.

UM33 CRUISE N/A W/U N/A Instruction that N/A (altitude) authorizes a pi - lot to conduct flight at any alti - tude from the minimum alti - tude up to and including the al - titude specified in the clearance.

Further, it is ap - proval for the pilot to proceed to and make an approach at the destination air - port.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units, this element should be avoid - ed.

UM34 CRUISE N/A W/U N/A A cruise climb N/A CLIMB TO (al - is to commence titude) and continue until the speci - fied level is reached.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units, this element should be avoid - ed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 22 AIP ENR 7.2 − 22 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM35 CRUISE N/A W/U N/A A cruise climb N/A CLIMB can commence ABOVE (alti - once above the tude) specified level.

Due to different interpretations between the var - ious ATS units, this element should be avoid - ed.

UM36 EXPE - N/A W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that CLIMB TO DITE CLIMB a climb to the (level) TO ( altitude ) specified level or vertical range Note – This is to commence message ele - and once ment is equiva - reached is to be lent to SUPU − 3 maintained.

plus LVLU − 6 in Doc 4444.

UM37 EXPE - N/A W/U LVLU − 9 Instruction that DESCEND TO DITE DE - a descent to the (level) SCENT TO (al - specified level titude) or vertical range is to commence Note – This and once message ele - reached is to be ment is equiva - maintained.

lent to SUPU − 3 plus LVLU − 9 in Doc 4444.

UM38 IMME - N/A W/U LVLU − 6 Instruction that CLIMB TO DIATELY a climb to the (level) CLIMB TO ( al - specified level titude ) or vertical range is to commence and once Used in combi - nation with reached is to be EMGU − 2 plus maintained.

LVLU − 6 in Doc 4444 as an ur - gent instruction to immediately climb to the specified level.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 23 AIP ENR 7.2 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM39 IMME - N/A W/U LVLU − 9 Instruction that DESCEND TO DIATELY DE- a descent to the (level) SCEND TO (al - specified level titude) or vertical range is to commence Used in combi - and once nation with reached is to be EMGU − 2 plus maintained.

LVLU − 9 in Doc 4444 as an ur - gent instruction to immediately descend to the specified level.

UM40 IMME - N/A W/U N/A Urgent instruc- N/A DIATELY tion to immedi- STOP CLIMB ately stop a AT (altitude) climb once the specified level is reached.

UM41 IMME - N/A W/U N/A Urgent instruc- N/A DIATELY tion to immedi- STOP DE - ately stop a de- SCENT AT (al - scent once the titude) specified level is reached.

UM128 RE - N/A W/U LVLU − 23 Instruction to REPORT PORT LEAV- report upon LEAVING (lev- ING (altitude) leaving the el single) specified level.

Note – R re - sponse attribute.

UM129 RE - N/A W/U LVLU − 24 Instruction to REPORT PORT LEVEL report upon MAINTAIN - (altitude) maintaining the ING (level sin- specified level. gle) Note – R re - sponse attribute.

UM133 CON - N/A NE N/A Instruction to N/A FIRM ALTI- report the TUDE present level.

UM135 CON - N/A Y LVLU − 27 Request to con- CONFIRM AS - FIRM AS- firm the as- SIGNED LEV - SIGNED ALTI- signed level. EL TUDE Note – NE re - sponse attribute.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 24 AIP ENR 7.2 − 24 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM148 WHEN UM148 WHEN Y LVLU − 30 Request for the WHEN CAN CAN YOU AC - CAN YOU AC- earliest time or YOU ACCEPT CEPT (altitude) CEPT (level) position when (level single) the specified level can be ac - Note – NE re- sponse attribute. cepted.

UM149 CAN N/A A/N LVLU − 31 Request to indi- CAN YOU AC - YOU ACCEPT cate whether or CEPT (level sin - (altitude) AT not the specified gle) AT (posi - (position) level can be ac - tion) cepted at the specified posi - tion.

UM150 CAN N/A A/N LVLU − 32 Request to indi - CAN YOU AC - YOU ACCEPT cate whether or CEPT (level sin - ( altitude ) AT not the specified gle) AT TIME ( time ) level can be ac - (time) cepted at the specified time.

UM171 CLIMB UM171 CLIMB W/U LVLU − 18 Instruction to CLIMB AT AT (vertical AT (vertical climb at the (vertical rate) rate) MINI - rate) specified rate or OR GREATER MUM greater.

MINIMUM UM172 CLIMB UM172 CLIMB W/U LVLU − 19 Instruction to CLIMB AT AT (vertical AT (vertical climb at the (vertical rate) rate) MAXI - rate) MAXI - specified rate or OR LESS MUM MUM less.

UM173 DE - UM173 DE - W/U LVLU − 20 Instruction to DESCEND AT SCEND AT SCEND AT descend at the (vertical rate) (vertical rate) (vertical rate) specified rate or OR GREATER MINIMUM MINIMUM greater.

UM174 DE - UM174 DE - W/U LVLU − 21 Instruction to DESCEND AT SCEND AT SCEND AT descend at the (vertical rate) (vertical rate) (vertical rate) specified rate or OR LESS MAXIMUM MAXIMUM less.

UM175 RE - N/A R N/A Instruction to N/A PORT REACH- report when the ING (altitude) aircraft has reached the specified alti - tude.

UM177 AT PI - N/A N N/A Note – To be in - N/A LOTS DISCRE - terpreted as TION “Report reach - ing an assigned altitude.” Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 25 AIP ENR 7.2 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM180 N/A W/U LVLU − 26 Instruction to REPORT REACHING report upon REACHING BLOCK (alti - reaching the BLOCK (level tude) TO (alti - specified verti - single) TO (lev - tude) cal range. el single) Note – R re - sponse attribute .

TBL ENR 7.2 − 7 Level Downlink Message Elements (LVLD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM6 REQUEST DM6 REQUEST Y LVLD − 1 Request to fly at REQUEST (level) (altitude) (level) the specified level or vertical range.

Note –Used for a single level.

DM7 REQUEST DM6 REQUEST Y LVLD − 1 Request to fly at REQUEST (level) BLOCK (altitude) (level) the specified level TO (altitude) or vertical range.

Note – Used for a vertical range.

DM8 REQUEST N/A Y N/A Request to cruise N/A CRUISE CLIMB climb to the speci - TO (altitude) fied level.

Due to different in - terpretations be - tween the various ATS units, this ele - ment should be avoided.

DM9 REQUEST DM9 REQUEST Y LVLD − 2 Request for a climb REQUEST CLIMB CLIMB TO (alti - CLIMB TO (level) to the specified lev - TO (level) tude) el or vertical range.

Note – Use of DM7 REQUEST BLOCK (altitude) TO (alti - tude) to request to climb at a vertical range.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 26 AIP ENR 7.2 − 26 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 DM10 REQUEST DM10 REQUEST Y LVLD − 3 Request for a de- REQUEST CLIMB DESCENT TO (al- DESCENT TO scent to the speci- TO (level) titude) (level) fied level or verti - cal range.

Note – Use of DM7 REQUEST BLOCK (altitude) TO (alti - tude) to request to descend at a verti - cal range.

DM11 AT (posi- N/A Y LVLD − 4 Request for a AT (position) RE - tion) REQUEST climb/descent to QUEST (level) CLIMB TO (alti - the specified level tude) or vertical range to commence at the Note – A vertical specified position.

range cannot be re - quested.

DM12 AT (posi- N/A Y LVLD − 4 Request for a AT (position) RE - tion) REQUEST climb/descent to QUEST (level) DESCENT TO (al- the specified level titude) or vertical range to commence at the Note – A vertical specified position.

range cannot be re - quested.

DM13 AT TIME N/A Y LVLD − 5 Request for a AT TIME (time) (time) REQUEST climb/descent to REQUEST (level) CLIMB TO (alti - the specified level tude) or vertical range to commence at the Note – A vertical specified time.

range cannot be re - quested.

DM14 AT TIME N/A Y LVLD − 5 Request for a AT TIME (time) (time) REQUEST climb/descent to REQUEST (level) DESCENT TO (al- the specified level titude) or vertical range to commence at the Note – A vertical specified time.

range cannot be re - quested.

DM28 LEAVING N/A N LVLD − 8 Report indicating LEAVING (level (altitude) leaving the speci - single) fied level DM29 CLIMBING N/A N LVLD − 13 Report indicating CLIMBING TO TO (altitude) climbing to the (level single) specified level.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 27 AIP ENR 7.2 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 DM30 DESCEND - N/A N LVLD − 14 Report indicating DESCENDING ING TO (altitude) descending to the TO (level single) specified level.

Note – N alert at - tribute.

DM32 PRESENT DM32 PRESENT N LVLD − 19 Notification of the Present level ( sin - ALTITUDE (alti - LEVEL (altitude) present level. gle level ) tude) DM37 LEVEL (al - N/A N LVLD − 9 Report indicating MAINTAINING titude) that the specified (level single) level is being main - tained.

DM38 ASSIGNED DM38 ASSIGNED N LVLD − 11 Confirmation that ASSIGNED LEV - ALTITUDE (alti - LEVEL (level) the assigned level EL (level) tude) or vertical range is the specified level Note – Used for a or vertical range.

single level DM52 WHEN N/A Y LVLD − 6 Request for the ear - WHEN CAN WE CAN WE EXPECT liest time or posi - EXPECT LOWER LOWER ALTI - tion that a descent LEVEL TUDE can be expected.

DM53 WHEN N/A Y LVLD − 7 Request for the ear - WHEN CAN WE CAN WE EXPECT liest time or posi - EXPECT HIGHER HIGHER ALTI - tion that a climb LEVEL TUDE can be expected.

DM54 WHEN N/A Y N/A Request for the ear- N/A CAN WE EXPECT liest time at which CRUISE CLIMB a clearance to TO (altitude) cruise climb to the specified level can be expected.

DM61 DESCEND - N/A N LVLD − 14 Report indicating DESCENDING ING TO (altitude) descending to the TO (level single) specified level.

Note – Urgent alert attribute.

DM67 WE CAN DM81 WE CAN N LVLD − 15 Indication that the WE CAN AC - ACCEPT (altitude) ACCEPT (level) specified level can CEPT (level single) AT TIME (time) AT (time) be accepted at the AT TIME (time) specified time.

Note – A vertical range may be pro - vided.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 28 AIP ENR 7.2 − 28 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 DM67 WE CAN - DM82 WE CAN - N LVLD − 17 Indication that the WE CANNOT AC - NOT ACCEPT (al - NOT ACCEPT specified level can - CEPT (level single) titude) (level) not be accepted.

Note – A vertical range may be pro - vided.

DM67 WHEN N/A N N/A Request for the ear - N/A CAN WE EXPECT liest time at which CLIMB TO ( alti - a clearance to tude ) climb to the speci - fied level can be expected.

DM 67 WHEN N/A N N/A Request for the ear - N/A CAN WE EXPECT liest time at which DESCENT TO ( al - a clearance to de - titude ) scend to the speci - fied level can be expected.

DM72 REACH - N/A N N/A Notification that N/A ING (altitude) the aircraft has reached the speci - fied level.

DM75 AT PILOTS N/A N N/A Used in conjunc - N/A DISCRETION tion with another message to indicate that the pilot wish - es to execute the request when the pilot is prepared to do so.

DM76 REACH - N/A N LVLD − 10 Report indicating REACHING ING BLOCK (alti - reaching the speci - BLOCK (level sin - tude) TO (altitude) fied vertical range. gle) TO (level sin - gle) DM77 ASSIGNED DM38 ASSIGNED N LVLD − 11 Confirmation that ASSIGNED LEV - BLOCK (altitude) LEVEL (level) the assigned level EL (level) TO (altitude) or vertical range is the specified level Note – Used for a or vertical range.

vertical range.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 29 AIP ENR 7.2 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 8 Crossing Constraints Uplink Message Elements (CSTU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM42 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A TO CROSS ( posi - level change in - tion ) AT ( altitude ) struction should be expected which will require the specified position to be crossed at the specified level.

UM43 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A TO CROSS ( posi - level change in - tion ) AT OR struction should be ABOVE ( altitude ) expected which will require the specified position to be crossed at or above the specified level.

UM44 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A TO CROSS ( posi - level change in - tion ) AT OR BE - struction should be LOW ( altitude ) expected which will require the specified position to be crossed at or below the specified level.

UM45 EXPECT N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A TO CROSS (posi - level change in - tion) AT AND struction should be MAINTAIN (alti - expected which tude) will require the specified position to be crossed at the specified level which is to be maintained subse - quently.

UM46 CROSS (po - UM46 CROSS (po - W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT (alti - sition) AT (level) specified position AT (level) tude) is to be crossed at the specified level Note – Used for a or within the speci - single level. fied vertical range.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 30 AIP ENR 7.2 − 30 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM47 CROSS (po - UM47 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 2 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR sition) AT OR specified position AT OR ABOVE ABOVE (altitude) ABOVE (level) is to be crossed at (level single) or above the speci - fied level.

UM48 CROSS (po - UM48 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 3 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR BE - sition) AT OR BE- specified position AT OR BELOW LOW (altitude) LOW (altitude) is to be crossed at (level single) or below the speci - fied level.

UM49 CROSS ( po- N/A W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition ) AT AND specified position AT (level) MAINTAIN ( alti - is to be crossed at tude ) the specified level or within the speci- fied vertical range.

Note 1. – A vertical range cannot be provided.

Note 2. – This mes - sage element is equivalent to CSTU − 1 plus LVLU − 5 in Doc 4444.

UM50 CROSS (po - UM46 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 1 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) BETWEEN sition) AT (level) specified position AT (level) (altitude) AND (al - is to be crossed at titude) the specified level or within the speci- Note – Used for a fied vertical range.

vertical range.

UM51 CROSS (po - UM51 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 4 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT (time) sition) AT (time) specified position AT TIME is to be crossed at the specified time. (time) UM52 CROSS (po - UM52 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 5 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR BE - sition) AT OR BE- specified position BEFORE TIME FORE (time) FORE (time) is to be crossed be - (time) fore the specified time.

UM53 CROSS (po - UM53 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 6 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR AF - sition) AT OR AF- specified position AFTER TIME TER (time) TER (time) is to be crossed af - (time) ter the specified time.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 31 AIP ENR 7.2 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM54 CROSS (po - UM54 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 7 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) BETWEEN sition) BETWEEN specified position BETWEEN TIME (time) AND (time) (time) AND (time) is to be crossed be - (time) AND TIME tween the specified (time) times.

UM55 CROSS (po - UM55 CROSS (po- W/U CSTU − 8 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT (speed) sition) AT (speed) specified position AT (speed) is to be crossed at the specified speed.

UM56 CROSS (po- N/A W/U CSTU − 9 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR specified position AT (speed) OR LESS THAN is to be crossed at LESS (speed) or less than the specified speed.

UM57 CROSS (po- N/A W/U CSTU − 10 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR specified position AT (speed) OR GREATER THAN is to be crossed at GREATER (speed) or greater than the specified speed.

UM58 CROSS (po- N/A W/U CSTU − 11 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT (time) specified position AT TIME AT (altitude) is to be crossed at the specified time (time) AT (level) Note – A vertical and at the level or range cannot be within the vertical provided. range as specified.

UM59 CROSS (po- N/A W/U CSTU − 12 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR BE- specified position BEFORE TIME FORE (time) AT is to be crossed be - (time) AT (level) (altitude) fore the specified time and at the lev- Note – A vertical el or within the ver - range cannot be tical range as speci - provided. fied.

UM60 CROSS (po- N/A W/U CSTU − 13 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT OR AF- specified position AFTER TIME TER (time) AT (al - is to be crossed af - (time) AT (level) titude) ter the specified time and at the lev- Note – A vertical el or within the ver - range cannot be tical range as speci - provided. fied.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 32 AIP ENR 7.2 − 32 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM61 CROSS (po - UM61 CROSS (po - W/U CSTU − 14 Instruction that the CROSS (position) sition) AT AND sition) AT AND specified position AT (level) AT MAINTAIN (alti - MAINTAIN (level) is to be crossed at (speed) tude) AT (speed) AT (speed) the level or within the vertical range, Note 1. – A vertical as specified, and at range cannot be the specified speed.

provided.

Note 2. – This mes - sage element is equivalent to CSTU − 14 plus LVLU − 5 in Doc 4444.

UM62 AT (time) N/A W/U NA Instruction that at N/A CROSS (position) the specified time AT AND MAIN- the specified posi- TAIN (altitude) tion is to be crossed at the specified lev - el and the level is to be maintained.

UM63 AT (time) N/A W/U CSTU − 15 Instruction that the CROSS (position) CROSS (position) specified position AT TIME (time) AT AND MAIN - is to be crossed at AT (level) AT TAIN (altitude) AT the specified time (speed) (speed) at the level or with - in the vertical Note 1. – A vertical range, as specified, range cannot be and at the specified provided. speed.

Note 2. – This mes - sage element is equivalent to CSTU − 15 plus LVLU − 5 in Doc 4444.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 9 Speed Uplink Message Elements (SPDU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM100 AT (time) N/A R SPDU − 1 Notification that a EXPECT SPEED EXPECT (speed) speed instruction CHANGE AT may be issued to TIME (time) take effect at the specified time.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 33 AIP ENR 7.2 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM101 AT (posi - N/A R SPDU − 2 Notification that a EXPECT SPEED tion) EXPECT speed instruction CHANGE AT (po - (speed) may be issued to sition) take effect at the specified position.

UM102 AT (alti - N/A R SPDU − 3 Notification that a EXPECT SPEED tude) EXPECT speed instruction CHANGE AT (lev - (speed) may be issued to el single) take effect at the specified level.

UM103 AT (time) N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A EXPECT (speed) speed range in- TO (speed) struction may be is - sued to be effective at the specified time.

UM104 AT (posi- N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A tion) EXPECT speed range in - (speed) TO (speed) struction may be is - sued to be effective at the specified po - sition.

UM105 AT (alti- N/A R N/A Notification that a N/A tude) EXPECT speed range in - (speed) TO (speed) struction may be is - sued to be effective at the specified lev - el.

UM106 MAIN - UM106 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 4 Instruction to main - MAINTAIN TAIN (speed) TAIN (speed) tain the specified (speed) speed.

UM107 MAIN - UM107 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 5 Instruction to main - MAINTAIN TAIN PRESENT TAIN PRESENT tain the present PRESENT SPEED SPEED SPEED speed.

UM108 MAIN - UM108 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 6 Instruction to main- MAINTAIN TAIN (speed) OR TAIN (speed) OR tain the specified (speed) OR speed or greater. GREATER GREATER GREATER UM109 MAIN - UM109 MAIN - W/U SPDU − 7 Instruction to main - MAINTAIN TAIN (speed) OR TAIN (speed) OR tain the specified (speed) OR LESS LESS LESS speed or less.

UM110 MAIN - N/A W/U SPDU − 8 Instruction to main - MAINTAIN TAIN (speed) TO tain the specified (speed) TO (speed) (speed) speed range.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 34 AIP ENR 7.2 − 34 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM111 IN - N/A W/U SPDU − 9 Instruction that the INCREASE CREASE SPEED present speed is to SPEED TO (speed) TO (speed) be increased to the specified speed and maintained until further advised.

UM112 IN - N/A W/U SPDU − 10 Instruction that the INCREASE CREASE SPEED present speed is to SPEED TO (speed) TO (speed) OR be increased to the OR GREATER GREATER specified speed or greater, and main - tained at or above the specified speed until further ad - vised.

UM113 REDUCE N/A W/U SPDU − 11 Instruction that the REDUCE SPEED SPEED TO (speed) present speed is to TO (speed) be reduced to the specified speed and maintained until further advised.

UM114 REDUCE N/A W/U SPDU − 12 Instruction that the REDUCE SPEED SPEED TO (speed) present speed is to TO (speed) OR OR LESS be reduced to the LESS specified speed or less, and main - tained at or below the specified speed until further ad - vised.

UM115 DO NOT N/A W/U N/A The specified speed N/A EXCEED (speed) is not to be exceed - ed.

UM116 RESUME UM116 RESUME W/U SPDU − 13 Instruction to re - RESUME NOR - NORMAL SPEED NORMAL SPEED sume a normal MAL SPEED speed. The aircraft no longer needs to comply with a pre - viously issued speed restriction.

UM134 CONFIRM N/A Y SPDU − 15 Request to report REPORT (speed SPEED the speed defined types) SPEED by the speed Note – NE response type(s).

attribute.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 35 AIP ENR 7.2 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 UM136 CONFIRM N/A Y SPDU − 16 Request to confirm CONFIRM AS - ASSIGNED the assigned speed. SIGNED SPEED SPEED Note – NE response attribute.

UM151 WHEN N/A Y SPDU − 17 Request for the ear - WHEN CAN YOU CAN YOU AC - liest time or posi - ACCEPT (speed) CEPT (speed) tion when the spec - ified speed can be Note – NE response accepted.

attribute.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 36 AIP ENR 7.2 − 36 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 10 Speed Downlink Message Elements (SPDD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM18 REQUEST DM18 REQUEST Y SPDD − 1 Request for the REQUEST (speed) (speed) (speed) specified speed.

DM19 REQUEST N/A Y N/A Request to fly N/A (speed) TO (speed) within the specified speed range.

DM34 PRESENT N/A N SPDD − 3 Report indicating (speed types) SPEED (speed) the speed defined SPEED (speed) by the specified speed types is the specified speed.

DM39 ASSIGNED N/A N SPDD − 4 Confirmation that ASSIGNED SPEED (speed) the assigned speed SPEED (speed) is the specified speed.

DM49 WHEN N/A Y SPDD − 2 Request for the ear - WHEN CAN WE CAN WE EXPECT liest time or posi - EXPECT (speed) (speed) tion that the speci - fied speed can be expected.

DM50 WHEN N/A Y N/A Request for the ear- N/A CAN WE EXPECT liest time at which (speed) TO (speed) a clearance to a speed within the specified range can be expected.

DM67 WE CAN N/A N SPDD − 5 Indication that the WE CAN AC - ACCEPT (speed) specified speed can CEPT (speed) AT AT TIME (time) be accepted at the TIME (time) specified time.

DM67 WE CAN - N/A N SPDD − 6 Indication that the WE CANNOT AC - NOT ACCEPT specified speed CEPT (speed) (speed) cannot be accepted.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 37 AIP ENR 7.2 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 11 Air Traffic Advisory Uplink Message Elements (ADVU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM123 SQUAWK UM123 SQUAWK W/U ADVU − 9 Instruction to select SQUAWK (SSR (beacon code) (code) the specified SSR code) code.

UM124 STOP N/A W/U AD - Instruction to dis - STOP SQUAWK SQUAWK VU − 10 able SSR transpon - der responses.

UM125 SQUAWK N/A W/U AD- Instruction to in- SQUAWK MODE ALTITUDE VU − 12 clude level infor - C mation in the SSR transponder re - sponses.

UM126 STOP AL - N/A W/U AD - Instruction to stop STOP SQUAWK TITUDE VU − 13 including level in - MODE C SQUAWK formation in the SSR transponder responses.

UM144 CONFIRM N/A Y AD - Request to confirm CONFIRM SQUAWK VU − 14 the Selected SSR SQUAWK CODE code.

Note – NE response attribute.

UM153 ALTIME - UM213 (facility R ADVU − 1 Advisory providing (facility designa - TER (altimeter) designation) AL - the specified al - tion) ALTIMETER TIMETER (altime - timeter setting for (altimeter setting) Note 1. – The facil - ter) the specified facili - ty.

ity designation and the time of mea - Note –The facility surement cannot be designation is al - provided. ways provided and the time of mea - Note 2. – the FAA surement cannot be concatenates provided.

UM169 ’(facility designation) AL - TIMETER (altime - ter setting)’ UM154 RADAR N/A R ADVU − 2 Advisory that the SURVEILLANCE SERVICES TER - ATS surveillance SERVICE TERMI - MINATED service is terminat - NATED ed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 38 AIP ENR 7.2 − 38 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM155 RADAR N/A R ADVU − 3 Advisory that ATS IDENTIFIED (po - CONTACT (posi - surveillance service sition[O]) tion) has been estab - lished. A position may be specified Note – The provi - sion of the position position.

is required.

UM156 RADAR N/A R ADVU − 4 Advisory that ATS IDENTIFICA - CONTACT LOST surveillance con - TION LOST tact has been lost.

UM158 ATIS (atis N/A R ADVU − 5 ATS advisory that ATIS (ATIS code) code) the current ATIS code is as speci - Note – The airport fied.

is not provided.

UM163 (ICAO fa - N/A N/E N/A Notification to the N/A cility designation ) pilot of an ATSU (tp4Table) identifier.

The indicated com - UM168 DISRE - N/A N/E N/A N/A GARD munication should be ignored.

The previously sent uplink CPDLC message shall be ignored. DISRE - GARD should not refer to a clearance or instruction. If DISREGARD is used, another ele - ment shall be added to clarify which message is to be disregarded.

UM179 SQUAWK UM179 SQUAWK W/U AD - Instruction that the SQUAWK IDENT IDENT IDENT VU − 15 ident function on the SSR transponder is to be actuated.

UM182 CONFIRM N/A N/E N/A Instruction to re - N/A ATIS CODE port the identifica - tion code of the last ATIS received.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 39 AIP ENR 7.2 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 12 Air Traffic Advisory Downlink Message Elements (ADVD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM47 SQUAWK - N/A N ADVD − 1 Report indicating SQUAWKING ING (code) that the aircraft is (SSR code) squawking the specified SSR code.

DM79 ATIS (ATIS N/A N N/A The code of the lat - N/A code) est ATIS received is as specified.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 13 Voice Communications Uplink Message Elements (COMU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM117 CON - UM117 CON - W/U COMU − 1 Instruction to es - CONTACT (unit TACT (ICAO unit TACT (ICAO unit tablish voice con - name) (frequency) name) (frequency) name) (frequency) tact with the speci - fied ATS unit on the specified fre - quency.

UM118 AT (posi - N/A W/U COMU − 2 Instruction at the AT (position) tion) CONTACT specified position CONTACT (unit (ICAO unit name) to establish voice name) (frequency) (frequency) contact with the specified ATS unit on the specified frequency.

UM119 AT (time) N/A W/U COMU − 3 Instruction at the AT TIME (time) CONTACT (ICAO specified time to CONTACT (unit unit name) (fre - establish voice con - name) (frequency) quency) tact with the speci - fied ATS unit on the specified fre - quency.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 40 AIP ENR 7.2 − 40 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM120 MONI - UM120 MONI - W/U COMU − 5 Instruction to mon- MONITOR (unit TOR (ICAO unit TOR (ICAO unit itor the specified name) (frequency) name) (frequency) name) (frequency) ATS unit on the specified frequen - cy. The flight crew is not required to establish voice con - tact on the frequen - cy.

UM121 AT (posi- N/A W/U COMU − 6 Instruction at the AT (position) tion) MONITOR specified position MONITOR (unit (ICAO unit name) to monitor the name) (frequency) (frequency) specified ATS unit on the specified frequency. The flight crew is not required to estab - lish voice contact on the frequency.

UM122 AT (time) N/A W/U COMU − 7 Instruction at the AT TIME (time) MONITOR (ICAO specified time to MONITOR (unit unit name) (fre - monitor the speci - name) (frequency) quency) fied ATS unit on the specified fre - quency. The flight crew is not re - quired to establish voice contact on the frequency.

UM157 CHECK UM157 CHECK N COMU − 8 Instruction to check CHECK STUCK STUCK MICRO - STUCK MICRO - the microphone due MICROPHONE PHONE (frequen - PHONE (frequen - to detection of a (frequency) cy) cy) continuous trans - mission on the Note – R response specified frequen - attribute. cy.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 41 AIP ENR 7.2 − 41 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 14 Voice Communications Downlink Message Elements (COMD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM20 REQUEST N/A Y COMD − 1 Request for voice REQUEST VOICE VOICE CON - contact on the CONTACT (fre - TACT specified frequen - quency) cy.

Note – Used when a frequency is not required.

DM21 REQUEST N/A Y COMD − 1 Request for voice REQUEST VOICE VOICE CON - contact on the CONTACT (fre - TACT (frequency) specified frequen - quency) cy.

Note – Used when a frequency is re - quired.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 15 Emergency/Urgency Uplink Message Elements (EMGU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM131 REPORT N/A Y EMGU − 1 Request to provide REPORT EN - REMAINING FU - the fuel Remaining DURANCE AND EL AND SOULS (time) and the PERSONS ON ON BOARD number of persons BOARD on board.

Note – NE response attribute.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 42 AIP ENR 7.2 − 42 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 16 Emergency/Urgency Downlink Message Elements (EMGD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM55 PAN PAN N/A Y EMGD − 1 Indication of an ur - PAN PAN PAN PAN gent situation.

Note – N response attribute.

DM56 MAYDAY N/A Y EMGD − 2 Indication of an MAYDAY MAY - MAYDAY MAY - emergency situa - DAY MAYDAY DAY tion.

Note – N response attribute.

DM57 (remaining N/A Y EMGD − 3 Report indicating (remaining fuel) fuel) OF FUEL fuel Remaining ENDURANCE REMAINING (time) and number AND (persons on AND (remaining of persons on board) PERSONS souls) SOULS ON board. ON BOARD BOARD Note – N response attribute.

DM58 CANCEL N/A Y EMGD − 4 Indication that the CANCEL EMER - EMERGENCY emergency situa - GENCY tion is cancelled.

Note – N response attribute.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 43 AIP ENR 7.2 − 43 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 17 Standard Response Uplink Message Elements (RSPU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM0 UNABLE UM0 UNABLE N RSPU − 1 Indication that the UNABLE message cannot be complied with.

UM1 STANDBY UM1 STANDBY N RSPU − 2 Indication that the STANDBY message will be re - sponded to shortly.

UM2 REQUEST N/A N RSPU − 3 Indication that a REQUEST DE - DEFERRED long − term delay in FERRED response can be ex - pected.

UM3 ROGER UM3 ROGER N RSPU − 4 Indication that the ROGER message is re - ceived.

UM4 AFFIRM UM4 AFFIRM N RSPU − 5 Indication that AFFIRM ATC is responding positively to the message.

UM5 NEGATIVE UM5 NEGATIVE N RSPU − 6 Indication that NEGATIVE ATC is responding negatively to the message.

UM143 CONFIRM N/A N RSPU − 8 Request to confirm CONFIRM RE - REQUEST the referenced re - QUEST quest since the ini - tial request was not understood. The re - quest should be clarified and resub - mitted.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 44 AIP ENR 7.2 − 44 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 18 Standard Response Downlink Message Elements (RSPD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM0 WILCO DM0 WILCO N RSPD − 1 Indication that the WILCO instruction is un - derstood and will be complied with.

DM1 UNABLE DM1 UNABLE N RSPD − 2 Indication that the UNABLE instruction cannot be complied with.

DM2 STANDBY DM2 STANDBY N RSPD − 3 Indication that the STANDBY message will be re - sponded to shortly.

DM3 ROGER DM3 ROGER N RSPD − 4 Indication that the ROGER message is re - Note – ROGER is ceived.

the only correct re - sponse to an uplink free text message.

DM4 AFFIRM DM4 AFFIRM N RSPD − 5 Indication of a pos - AFFIRM itive response to a message.

DM5 NEGATIVE DM5 NEGATIVE N RSPD − 6 Indication of a neg - NEGATIVE ative response to a message.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 45 AIP ENR 7.2 − 45 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 19 Supplemental Uplink Message Elements (SUPU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM164 WHEN N/A NE SUPU − 1 Indication that the WHEN READY READY associated instruc - tion is to be execut - ed when the flight crew is ready.

UM165 THEN N/A NE N/A Used to link two N/A messages, indicat - ing the proper or - der of execution of clearances/ instruc - tions.

UM166 DUE TO N/A NE SUPU − 2 Indication that the DUE TO (specified TRAFFIC associated message reason uplink) is issued due to the specified reason.

UM167 DUE TO N/A NE SUPU − 2 Indication that the DUE TO (specified AIRSPACE RE - associated message reason uplink) STRICTION is issued due to the specified reason.

UM168 DISRE - N/A R N/A The indicated com - N/A GARD munication should be ignored.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 46 AIP ENR 7.2 − 46 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 UM176 MAIN - N/A W/U N/A Notification that N/A TAIN OWN SEP - the pilot is respon - ARATION AND sible for maintain - VMC ing separation from other traffic and is also responsible for maintaining Visual Meteorological Conditions.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 20 Supplemental Downlink Message Elements (SUPD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Ele - Message Ele - Format for ment Identifier ment Intended Message Ele - Use ment Display DM65 DUE TO DM65 DUE TO N SUPD − 1 Indication that DUE TO ( speci - WEATHER WEATHER the associated fied reason message is is - downlink ) sued due to specified rea - son.

DM66 DUE TO DM66 DUE TO N SUPD − 1 Indication that DUE TO ( speci - AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT the associated fied reason PERFOR - PERFOR - message is is - downlink ) MANCE MANCE sued due to specified rea - son.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 47 AIP ENR 7.2 − 47 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 21 Free Text Uplink Message Elements CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play A message or part UM169 (free text) N/A R N/A N/A of a message that does not conform to any standard message element in the PANSATM (Doc 4444).

UM169 (free text) N/A R N/A See Note N/A CPDLC NOT IN USE UNTIL FUR - THER NOTIFICA - TION UM169 (free text) N/A R N/A See Note N/A ”[facility designa - tion]” (for Altime - ter reporting Sta - tion) (free text) ”[facility N/A R N/A See Note N/A designation] AL - TIMETER MORE THAN ONE HOUR” OLD UM169 (free text) N/A R N/A See Note N/A DUE TO WEATH - ER UM169 (free text) N/A R N/A See Note N/A REST OF ROUTE UNCHANGED (free text) TRAF - N/A R N/A See Note N/A FIC FLOW MAN - AGEMENT REROUTE NOTE − These are FAA scripted free text messages with no GOLD equivalent.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 48 AIP ENR 7.2 − 48 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 22 Free Text Downlink Message Elements CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM67 ( free text ) N/A Y N/A N/A N/A Note – Medium (M) alert attribute.

DM68 (free text) N/A Y N/A N/A N/A Note 1. – Urgency or Medium (M) alert attribute.

Note 2. – Selecting any of the emer - gency message ele - ments will result in this message ele - ment being en - abled for the flight crew to include in the emergency message at their discretion.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 49 AIP ENR 7.2 − 49 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 23 System Management Uplink Message Elements (SYSU) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM159 ERROR UM159 ERROR N SYSU − 1 System − generated ERROR (error in - (error information) (error information) notification of an formation) error.

UM160 NEXT UM160 NEXT N SYSU − 2 System − generated NEXT DATA AU - DATA AUTHORI - DATA AUTHORI - notification of the THORITY (facility TY (ICAO facility TY (facility) next data authority designation[O]) or the cancellation designation) Note – Facility pa - thereof.

rameter can specify Note – The facility a facility designa - designation is re - tion or no facility.

quired.

UM161 END SER - N/A NE N/A Notification to the N/A VICE avionics that the data link connec - tion with the cur - rent data authority is being terminated.

UM162 SERVICE N/A NE N/A Notification that N/A UNAVAILABLE the ground system does not support this message.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP E NR 7.2 − 50 AIP ENR 7.2 − 50 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 9 JUL 26 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 24 System Management Downlink Message Elements (SYSD) CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM62 ERROR (er - DM62 ERROR (er - N SYSD − 1 System − generated ERROR (error in - ror information) ror information) notification of an formation) error.

DM63 NOT CUR - DM63 NOT CUR - N SYSD − 3 System − generated NOT CURRENT DATA AUTHORI - RENT DATA AU - RENT DATA AU - rejection of any THORITY THORITY CPDLC message TY sent from a ground facility that is not the current data au - thority.

DM64 (ICAO facil - N/A N N/A System − generated N/A ity designation) notification that the ground system is Note – Use by not designated as FANS 1/A aircraft the next data au - in B1 environ - thority (NDA), in - ments.

dicating the identi - ty of the current da - ta authority (CDA).

Identity of the NDA, if any, is al - so reported.

TBL ENR 7.2 − 25 Additional Uplink Messages CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play UM176 MAIN - N/A W/U N/A Notification that N/A TAIN OWN SEP - the pilot is respon - ARATION AND sible for maintain - VMC ing separation from other traffic and is also responsible for maintaining Visual Meteorological Conditions.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.2 − 51 AIP ENR 7.2 − 51 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL ENR 7.2 − 26 Additional Downlink Messages CPDLC Message Sets Operational Definition in PANS − ATM (Doc 4444) FANS 1/A ATN B1 Response Message Message Element Format for Mes - Element Intended Use sage Element Dis - Identifier play DM74 REQUEST N/A N N/A States a desire by N/A TO MAINTAIN the pilot to provide OWN SEPARA - his/her own separa - TION AND VMC tion and remain in VMC.

DM78 AT ( time ) N/A N N/A At the specified N/A ( distance ) ( tofrom ) time, the aircraft’s ( position ) position was as specified.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.3 Special Procedures for In − Flight Contingencies

in Oceanic Airspace

1. Introduction 1.1 Although all possible contingencies cannot be covered, the procedures in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 6 provide for the more frequent cases such as: 1.1.1 Inability to comply with assigned clearance due to meteorological conditions (see paragraph 4); 1.1.2 En route diversion across the prevailing traffic flow (for example, due to medical emergencies (see paragraphs 2 and 3)); and 1.1.3 A loss, or significant reduction of, the required navigation capability when operating in airspace where the navigation performance accuracy is a prerequisite to the safe conduct of flight operations; or in the event of pressurization failure (see paragraphs 2, 3, and 6).

NOTE − Guidance on procedures to follow when an aircraft experiences a degradation in navigation capabilities can be found in ICAO Doc 4444, Procedures for Air Navigation Services – Air Traffic Management, Chapter 5, section 5.2.2.

1.2 The pilot must take action as necessary to ensure the safety of the aircraft. The pilot’s judgment shall determine the sequence of actions to be taken in regard to the prevailing circumstances. Air traffic control shall render all possible assistance.

2. General Procedures NOTE − FIG ENR 7.3 − 1 provides an aid for understanding and applying the contingency procedures contained in paragraphs 2 and 3.

2.1 If an aircraft is unable to continue the flight in accordance with its ATC clearance, a revised clearance shall be obtained, whenever possible, prior to initiating any action.

2.2 If prior clearance cannot be obtained, the following contingency procedures should be employed until a revised clearance is received: 2.2.1 Leave the cleared route or track by initially turning at least 30 degrees to the right or to the left in order to intercept a parallel, same direction track or route offset 9.3 km (5.0 NM). The direction of the turn should be based on one or more of the following: 2.2.1.1 Aircraft position relative to any organized track or route system; 2.2.1.2 The direction of flights and flight levels allocated on adjacent tracks; 2.2.1.3 The direction to an alternate airport; 2.2.1.4 Any strategic lateral offset being flown; and 2.2.1.5 Terrain clearance; 2.2.2 The aircraft should be flown at a flight level and an offset track where other aircraft are less likely to be encountered; 2.2.3 Watch for conflicting traffic both visually and by ACAS (if equipped), leaving ACAS in RA mode at all times unless aircraft operating limits dictate otherwise; 2.2.4 Turn on all aircraft exterior lights (commensurate with appropriate operating limitations); 2.2.5 Keep the SSR transponder on at all times and, when able, squawk 7700, as appropriate; Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.3 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.2.6 As soon as practicable, the pilot shall advise air traffic control of any deviation from assigned clearance; 2.2.7 Use whatever means is appropriate (i.e., voice and/or CPDLC) to communicate during a contingency or emergency; 2.2.8 If voice communication is used, the radiotelephony distress signal (MAYDAY) or urgency signal (PAN PAN), preferably spoken three times, shall be used as appropriate; 2.2.9 When emergency situations are communicated via CPDLC, the controller may respond via CPDLC.

However, the controller may also attempt to make voice communication contact with the aircraft; NOTE − Additional guidance on emergency procedures for controllers, radio operators, and flight crew, in data link operations can be found in the Global Operational Data Link (GOLD) Manual (Doc 10037).

2.2.10 Establish communications with nearby aircraft by broadcasting at suitable intervals on 121.5 MHz (or as a backup on the inter − pilot air − to − air frequency 123.45 MHz). Also broadcast where appropriate on the frequency in use: aircraft identification, the nature of the distress condition, intention of the person in command, position (including the ATS route designator or the track code, as appropriate), and flight level; and 2.2.11 The controller should attempt to determine the nature of the emergency and ascertain any assistance that may be required. Subsequent ATC action with respect to that aircraft must be based on the intentions of the pilot and overall traffic situation.

2.3 Actions to be Taken Once Offset from Track: NOTE − The pilot’s judgement of the situation and the need to ensure the safety of the aircraft will determine whether the actions outlined in 2.3.2.1 or 2.3.2.2 will be taken. Factors for the pilot to consider when diverting from the cleared route or track without an ATC clearance include, but are not limited to: operation within a parallel track system; the potential for User Preferred Routes (UPR) parallel to the aircraft’s track or route; the nature of the contingency (for example, aircraft system malfunction); and weather factors (for example, convective weather at lower flight levels).

2.3.1 If possible, maintain the assigned flight level until established on the 9.3 km (5.0 NM) parallel, same direction track or route offset. If unable, initially minimize the rate of descent to the extent that is operationally feasible.

2.3.2 Once established on a parallel, same direction track or route offset by 9.3 km (5.0 NM), either: 2.3.2.1 Descend below FL 290, establish a 150 m (500 ft) vertical offset from those flight levels normally used, and proceed as required by the operational situation or, if an ATC clearance has been obtained, proceed in accordance with the clearance, or NOTE − Descent below FL 290 is considered particularly applicable to operations where there is a predominant traffic flow (for example, east − west) or parallel track system where the aircraft’s diversion path will likely cross adjacent tracks or routes.

A descent below FL 290 can decrease the likelihood of conflict with other aircraft, ACAS RA events, and delays in obtaining a revised ATC clearance.

2.3.2.2 Establish a 150 m (500 ft) vertical offset (or 300 m (1000 ft) vertical offset if above FL 410) from those flight levels normally used, and proceed as required by the operational situation, or if an ATC clearance has been obtained, proceed in accordance with the clearance.

NOTE − Altimetry system error may lead to less than actual 150 m (500 ft) vertical separation when the procedure above is applied.

In addition, with the 150 m (500 ft) vertical offset applied, ACAS RAs may occur.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.3 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 7.3 − 1 Visual Aid for Understanding and Applying the Contingency Procedures Guidance 3. Extended Range Operations by Airplanes with Two − Turbine Power − Units (ETOPS) 3.1 If the contingency procedures are employed by a twin − engine aircraft as a result of an engine shutdown or failure of an ETOPS critical system, the pilot should advise ATC as soon as practicable of the situation, reminding ATC of the type of aircraft involved, and request expeditious handling.

4. Weather Deviation Procedures 4.1 General.

NOTE − The following procedures are intended for deviations around adverse meteorological conditions.

4.1.1 When weather deviation is required, the pilot should contact ATC via CPDLC or voice. A rapid response may be obtained by either: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.3 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.1.1.1 Stating, “WEATHER DEVIATION REQUIRED” to indicate that priority is desired on the frequency and for ATC response; or 4.1.1.2 Requesting a weather deviation using a CPDLC lateral downlink message.

4.1.2 When necessary, the pilot should initiate the communications using the urgency call “PAN PAN” (preferably spoken three times) or by using a CPDLC urgency downlink message.

4.1.3 The pilot shall inform ATC when a weather deviation is no longer required, or when a weather deviation has been completed and the aircraft has returned to its cleared route.

4.2 Actions to be Taken When Controller − Pilot Communications Are Established: 4.2.1 The pilot should notify ATC and request clearance to deviate from track or route, advising when possible the extent of the deviation requested. The flight crew will use whatever means are appropriate (i.e., CPDLC and/or voice) to communicate during a weather deviation.

NOTE − Pilots are advised to contact ATC as soon as possible with requests for clearance in order to provide time for the request to be assessed and acted upon.

4.2.2 ATC should take one of the following actions: 4.2.2.1 When appropriate separation can be applied, issue clearance to deviate from track; or 4.2.2.2 If there is conflicting traffic and ATC is unable to establish appropriate separation, ATC should: a) Advise the pilot of inability to issue clearance for the requested deviation; b) Advise the pilot of conflicting traffic; and c) Request the pilot’s intentions.

4.2.3 The pilot should take one of the following actions: 4.2.3.1 Comply with the ATC clearance issued; or 4.2.3.2 Advise ATC of intentions and execute the procedures provided in paragraph 4.3 .

4.3 Actions to be Taken if a Revised ATC Clearance Cannot Be Obtained: NOTE − The provisions of this paragraph apply to situations where a pilot needs to exercise the authority of a pilot − in − command under the provisions of ICAO Annex 2, 2.3.1.

4.3.1 If the aircraft is required to deviate from track or route to avoid adverse meteorological conditions, and prior clearance cannot be obtained, an ATC clearance shall be obtained at the earliest possible time. Until an ATC clearance is received, the pilot shall take the following actions: 4.3.1.1 If possible, deviate away from an organized track or route system; 4.3.1.2 Establish communications with and alert nearby aircraft by broadcasting at suitable intervals: aircraft identification, flight level, position (including ATS route designator or the track code) and intentions, on the frequency in use and on 121.5 MHz (or as a backup, on the inter − pilot air − to − air frequency 123.45 MHz); 4.3.1.3 Watch for conflicting traffic both visually and by reference to ACAS, if equipped; 4.3.1.4 Turn on all aircraft exterior lights (commensurate with appropriate operating limitations); 4.3.1.5 For deviations less than 9.3 km (5.0 NM) from the originally cleared track or route, remain at a level assigned by ATC; 4.3.1.6 For deviations greater than or equal to 9.3 km (5.0 NM) from the originally cleared track or route, when the aircraft is approximately 9.3 km (5.0 NM) from track, initiate a level change in accordance with TBL ENR 7.3 − 1 .

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.3 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 4.3.1.7 If the pilot receives clearance to deviate from the cleared track or route for a specified distance and subsequently requests but is denied clearance to deviate beyond that distance, the pilot should apply an altitude offset in accordance with TBL ENR 7.3 − 1 immediately; 4.3.1.8 When returning to track or route, the aircraft should be at the previously assigned flight level prior to a point 9.3 km (5.0 NM) from the route centerline.

4.3.2 If contact was not established prior to deviating, continue to attempt to contact ATC to obtain a clearance.

If contact was established, continue to keep ATC advised of intentions and obtain essential traffic information.

NOTE − If, as a result of actions taken under the provisions of 4.3.1 above, the pilot determines that there is another aircraft at or near the same flight level with which a conflict may occur, then the pilot is expected to adjust the path of the aircraft as necessary to avoid conflict.

TBL ENR 7.3 − 1 Altitude Offset When Denied Clearance to Deviate 9.3 km (5.0 NM) or More Originally Cleared Track or Deviations Level Change Route Center Line ≥ 9.3 km (5 NM) DESCEND LEFT 90 m (300 ft) EAST (000 − 179 magnetic) CLIMB RIGHT 90 m (300 ft) CLIMB LEFT 90 m (300 ft) WEST (180 − 359 magnetic) DESCEND RIGHT 90 m (300 ft) 5. Houston/Miami/New York Oceanic CTA/FIR National Winter Storm Operations 5.1 During the winter season, the U.S. Air Force Reserves (AFRES), 53 rd Weather Squadron has responsibility for flying winter storm reconnaissance missions. Mission aircraft will fly at altitudes between FL290 and FL350.

At designated points, the aircraft will release dropsondes, 16 − inch cardboard weather cylinders weighing one pound, each with an attached parachute. When in areas with no direct pilot − controller VHF/UHF communications, at five minutes prior to dropsonde release, the mission aircraft commander will broadcast on 121.5 and 243 the time and position of the intended drop. The dropsonde falls at a rate of approximately 2500 feet per minute.

5.2 Aircraft commanders are directly responsible for or the release of any objects from the aircraft. ATC must provide traffic advisories, when feasible, to the aircraft. ATC will provide separation between the mission aircraft and any nonparticipating aircraft. ATC cannot provide separation between aircraft and the dropsonde.

5.3 NOTAMs will be issued as early as possible prior to each mission. Airspace operators should consider any national winter storm operations during flight planning in the affected area(s) and nonparticipating aircrews should be especially alert to pertinent broadcasts on 121.5 or 243.0 during national winter storm operations.

6. Oceanic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/Global Positioning System (GPS) Interference (Jamming/ Spoofing) 6.1 In − flight degradations have been reported in U.S. − controlled oceanic airspace. GNSS failure or malfunction operational impacts include, but are not limited to, incorrect position information, loss of Required Navigation Performance (RNP) 4 or RNP 10 capability, loss of Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC), loss Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.3 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 of Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Contract (ADS − C), loss of Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B), timing errors, spurious insufficient fuel flight management system (FMS) indications, and false traffic/terrain warnings (see ENR 1.16 − 4, Recognizing, Mitigating and Adapting to GNSS Jamming and/or Spoofing). Flight crews who experience or suspect GNSS interference must notify ATC (see ENR 4.1–22) and should receive ATC confirmation that the notification was received.

6.2 Operators must communicate any changes to communications, navigation, and surveillance (CNS) to ATC as soon as practicable. Modern oceanic separation minima rely on a working CPDLC connection, RNP 4 or RNP 10 capability, aircraft transmission and ATC receipt of valid ADS − C data, and reliable ADS − B surveillance data.

6.2.1 Early pilot notification to ATC about possible GNSS interference enables improved ATC mitigation/coordination for oceanic flights.

6.2.2 Late pilot notification to ATC may contribute to increased ATC workload and complexity, possibly resulting in large profile changes, inefficient airspace use, and increased safety risk.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.4 Operational Policy 50 NM Lateral Separation

1. Houston, Miami, and San Juan Oceanic Airspace 1.1 The FAA and the Mexican air traffic services (ATS) providers have implemented 50 NM lateral separation between RNP 10 or RNP 4 aircraft operating in Gulf of America oceanic airspace.

1.2 Fifty (50) NM lateral separation is implemented in the Houston Oceanic CTA/FIR, the Gulf of America portion of the Miami Oceanic CTA/FIR, the Monterrey CTA, and the Merida CTA within the Mexico FIR/UTA.

1.3 RNAV routes within Houston Oceanic airspace are spaced a minimum of 50 NM to support this reduced lateral separation in the Gulf of America.

1.4 Information useful for flight planning and operations within the Gulf of America, under this 50 NM lateral separation initiative can be found in the West Atlantic, Gulf of America and Caribbean Resource Guide for U.S.

Operators located at: https://www.faa.gov/headquartersoffices/avs/wat − gulf − and − caribbean − resource − guide.

The Guide can also be found through a web search for “WAT, Gulf of America, and Caribbean Resource Guide.” NOTE − For information pertaining to the operational policy of 50 NM lateral separation in the Atlantic portion of the Miami Oceanic CTA, or the San Juan CTA/FIR, please review ENR 7.4, paragraph 5., New York Oceanic Airspace.

1.5 The 50 NM lateral separation is applied at all altitudes above the floor of controlled airspace. Lateral separation of 100 NM will continue to be provided in the Houston Oceanic, Monterrey, and Merida CTA/FIRs to aircraft not authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4. Similarly, those aircraft will experience 90 NM lateral separation in Miami Oceanic CTA/FIR.

1.6 Operations on certain routes that fall within the boundaries of affected CTAs are not affected by the application of 50 NM lateral separation. Operation on the following routes is not affected: 1.6.1 Routes that are flown by reference to ICAO standard ground − based navigation aids (VOR, VOR/DME, NDB); and 1.6.2 Special Area Navigation (RNAV) routes Q100, Q102 and Q105 in the Houston, Jacksonville and Miami CTAs.

1.7 Provisions for Accommodation of Non − RNP 10 Aircraft (Not Authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4).

1.7.1 Operators of Non − RNP 10 aircraft must: 1.7.2 Annotate ICAO flight plan Item 18 as follows: 1.7.2.1 “RMK/NON − RNP10” (no space between letters and numbers).

1.7.2.2 Use of flight plan item 18 codes “PBN/A1” or “PBN/L1” are restricted to operators and aircraft specifically authorized for RNP 10 or RNP 4, as applicable.

1.7.3 Pilots of non − RNP 10 aircraft that operate in Gulf of America CTAs must report the lack of authorization by stating “Negative RNP 10”: 1.7.3.1 On initial call to ATC in a Gulf of America CTA; or 1.7.3.2 When approval status is requested by the controller (See paragraph 1.13.1.3).

1.7.4 Non − RNP 10 operators/aircraft may file any route at any altitude in a Gulf of America CTA. They will be cleared to operate on their preferred routes and altitudes as traffic permits. 50 NM lateral separation will not be applied to non − RNP 10 aircraft.

1.7.5 Non − RNP 10 aircraft should plan on completing their climb to or descent from higher FLs within radar coverage, if possible.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.4 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.7.6 In order to maximize operational flexibility provided by 50 NM lateral separation, operators capable of meeting RNP 10 or RNP 4 that operate on oceanic routes or areas in the Gulf of America CTAs should obtain authorization for RNP 10 or RNP 4 and annotate the ICAO flight plan accordingly.

NOTE − RNP 10 is the minimum Navigation Specification (NavSpec) required for the application of 50 NM lateral separation. RNP 4 is an operator option; operators/aircraft authorized RNP 4 are not required to also obtain RNP 10 authorization.

1.8 RNP 10 or RNP 4 Authorization Policy and Procedures for Aircraft and Operators 1.8.1 The following is ICAO guidance on the state authority responsible for authorizations such as RNP 10, RNP 4, and RVSM: 1.8.1.1 International commercial operators: The State of Registry makes the determination that the aircraft meets the applicable RNP requirements. The State of Operator issues operating authority (for example, Operations Specifications (OpSpecs)).

1.8.1.2 International general aviation (IGA) operators: The State of Registry makes the determination that the aircraft meets the applicable RNP requirements and issues operating authority (for example, Letter of Authorization (LOA)).

1.9 Guidance Material.

1.9.1 FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 90 − 105, Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical Navigation in the U.S. National Airspace System and in Oceanic and Remote Continental Airspace, provides operational approval guidance for RNP 4 and 10. It identifies minimum aircraft capabilities and operator procedural and training requirements in order to qualify for RNP 4 and 10. AC 90 − 105 is consistent with the ICAO PBN Manual discussed below. Pertinent FAA and ICAO documents are posted online in the West Atlantic, Gulf of America, and Caribbean Resource Guide for U.S. Operators described in paragraph 1.4 .

1.9.2 ICAO Performance − based Navigation (PBN) Manual (ICAO Doc 9613). Guidance for authorization of RNP 10 and RNP 4 is provided in ICAO Doc 9613. RNP 10 is addressed in Volume II, Part B; Chapter 1. RNP 4 is addressed in Volume II, Part C; Chapter 1.

1.9.3 Operators are encouraged to use the B036/B054 Oceanic and Remote Continental Navigation Application Guide located at: https://www.faa.gov/headquartersoffices/avs/b036b054 - application - guide .

1.10 Qualification of Aircraft Equipped With a Single Long − Range Navigation System (LRNS) for RNP 10 Operations in Gulf of America CTAs.

1.10.1 Single LRNS operations in the Gulf of America, the Caribbean Sea and the other designated areas have been conducted for at least 25 years. Provisions allowing aircraft equipage with a single LRNS for operations in specified oceanic and off − shore areas are contained in the following sections of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): 91.511, 121.351, 125.203 and 135.165.

1.10.2 The FAA worked with State regulators and ATS providers in the Gulf of America and Caribbean areas, and coordinated with the ICAO North American, Central American, and Caribbean office, to implement a policy allowing single LRNS equipped aircraft, which are also qualified for RNP 10, to take advantage of RNP 10 separation criteria in the Gulf of America CTAs identified in paragraph 1.2 above.

1.10.2.1 The factors considered in allowing RNP 10 operations in the Gulf of America CTAs with single LRNS equipped aircraft were: the shortness of the legs outside the range of ground navigation aids, the availability of radar and VHF voice coverage in a large portion of Gulf of America airspace, and the absence of adverse events attributed to single LRNS aircraft in Gulf of America operations.

1.10.2.2 For U.S. operators, operational authorization for both oceanic and RNP 10 operations, when equipped with only a single LRNS, is provided via Operations Specification/Management Specification/Letter of Authorization B054, Oceanic/Remote Continental Airspace Navigation Using a Single Long − Range Navigation System. A U.S. operator must first be issued B054 in order to file a flight plan indicating RNP 10 capability for operations in the Gulf of America CTAs identified in paragraph 1.2 when equipped with only a single LRNS.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.10.3 Operators should review their Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), AFM Supplement or other appropriate documents and/or contact the airplane or avionics manufacturer to determine the RNP 10 time limit applicable to their aircraft. They will then need to determine its effect, if any, on their operation. Unless otherwise approved, the basic RNP 10 time limit is 6.2 hours between position updates for aircraft on which Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) or Inertial Reference Units (IRU) provide the only source of long range navigation. Extended RNP 10 time limits of 10 hours and greater are already approved for many IRU systems. FAA Advisory Circular 90 − 105 contains provisions for extending RNP 10 time limits.

1.11 Flight Planning Requirements 1.11.1 Operators must make ICAO flight plan annotations in accordance with this paragraph and, if applicable, Paragraph 1.7, Provisions for Accommodation of Non − RNP 10 Aircraft (Not Authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4).

1.11.2 ICAO flight plans must be filed for operation on oceanic routes and areas in the Houston Oceanic CTA/FIR, the Gulf of America portion of the Miami CTA/FIR, the Monterrey CTA and Merida High CTA.

1.11.3 To inform ATC that they have obtained RNP 10 or RNP 4 authorization and are eligible for 50 NM lateral separation, operators must: 1.11.3.1 Annotate ICAO Flight Plan Item 10 (Equipment) with the letter “R”; and 1.11.3.2 Annotate Item 18 (Other Information) with, as appropriate, “PBN/A1” for RNP 10 aircraft or “PBN/L1” for RNP 4 aircraft (no space between letters and numbers).

NOTE − The letter “R” indicates that the performance − based navigation specification (for example, RNP 10 or RNP 4) is specified in Item 18 following the indicator “PBN/.” 1.12 Operator Procedures.

1.12.1 Operator procedures regarding RNP 10 and RNP 4 are contained in Advisory Circular 90 − 105 and ICAO PBN Manual, Volume II, Parts B and C, Chapter 1.

1.12.2 ICAO Doc 4444, Procedures for Air Navigation − Air Traffic Management, contains in − flight contingency procedures applicable in oceanic airspace, and is the source document for those procedures given the applicability of ICAO Rules of the Air over the high seas. The FAA publishes substantively identical contingency procedures in ENR 7.3 of the U.S. AIP and in Advisory Circular 91 − 70, Oceanic and Remote Continental Airspace Operations.

1.12.2.1 Contingency procedures include General Procedures, as well as Weather Deviation Procedures. The procedures are applicable to in − flight diversion and turn − back, loss of navigation capability, and weather avoidance scenarios.

1.12.2.2 Oceanic contingency procedures are important components of pilot training programs for oceanic operations.

1.12.3 When pilots suspect a navigation system malfunction, in addition to the actions suggested in ENR 7.3, the following actions should be taken: 1.12.3.1 Immediately inform ATC of navigation system malfunction or failure; 1.12.3.2 Accounting for wind drift, fly magnetic compass heading to maintain track; and 1.12.3.3 Request radar vectors from ATC, when available.

1.13 Pilot Report of Non − RNP 10 Status 1.13.1 The pilot must report the lack of RNP 10 or RNP 4 status in accordance with the following: 1.13.1.1 When the operator/aircraft is not authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 (See paragraph 1.7 .)

1.13.1.2 If approval status is requested by the controller: 1.13.1.3 The pilot must communicate approval status using the following phraseology in TBL ENR 7.4 − 1 .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.4 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 TBL ENR 7.4 − 1 Controller Request Pilot Response [ call sign ] “AFFIRM RNP 10 “CONFIRM RNP 10 APPROVED” OR 4 APPROVED” or “AFFIRM RNP 4 APPROVED” as appropriate; or “NEGATIVE RNP 10” 2. Oakland Oceanic Airspace 2.1 The application of 50 NM lateral separation minima between aircraft authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 is supported.

2.2 RNP 10 is required for all aircraft operating in the Central East Pacific (CEP) fixed track system and Pacific Organized Track System (PACOTS).

2.3 Flight planning guidelines for non − RNP 10 aircraft are published in the Pacific Chart Supplement.

3. Anchorage Oceanic FIR 3.1 The application of 50 NM lateral separation minima between aircraft authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 is supported.

3.2 Non − RNP 10 approved aircraft may file via random track, at any altitude, at least 100 NM from the North Pacific (NOPAC) fixed track system. Aircraft entering the NOPAC should flight plan in accordance with Notices contained in the Alaska Chart Supplement.

4. Anchorage Arctic FIR 4.1 The application of 50 NM lateral separation minima between aircraft authorized RNP 10 is supported.

5. New York Oceanic Airspace 5.1 ATC applies 50 NM lateral separation between aircraft authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 within New York Oceanic West airspace. ATC similarly applies 50 NM lateral separation in the Atlantic portion of the Miami Oceanic CTA as well as the San Juan CTA/FIR. ATC may apply 50 NM lateral separation between aircraft authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 in New York Oceanic East.

5.2 Aircraft authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 will have a better chance of obtaining their preferred routing and altitude in the most densely used airspace (that is, below FL 410) because of their ability to participate in ATC’s use of 50 NM lateral separation. Non − RNP 10 or non − RNP 4 aircraft will be spaced at least 90 NM laterally from other aircraft.

5.3 ATC will not apply 50 NM lateral separation on routes that are within ATC radar and VHF voice radio coverage. New York Oceanic airspace contains the following routes or route segments, which, at and above FL 310, are within ATC radar and VHF radio coverage: 5.3.1 M201 between VIRST and VEGAA.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.4 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.3.2 Y485, Y488, Y493, and Y494. Refer also to ENR 7.9 for guidance on Y − routes.

NOTE − While flying these route segments, pilots communicate directly with ATC using VHF voice radio, and domestic procedures apply. Strategic Lateral Offset Procedures (SLOP) are not to be used. Oceanic data link procedures described in ENR 7.2 (with KZWY log − on) are also not applicable.

5.4 Flight plan filing and addressing requirements are detailed in ENR 7.1 , paragraphs 2. and 3.

5.5 Operators of aircraft not authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4 are expected to follow the procedures in ENR 7.4 paragraphs 1.7 and 1.13 for alerting ATC of the RNP status. Those operators are expected to indicate their “non − RNP 10” status in Item 18 of their ATC flight plan. In addition, pilots are expected to inform ATC of their “non − RNP 10” status on initial call to ATC and when reading back a clearance to descend through FL 410.

5.6 Filing a flight plan for, and conducting operations under, RNP 10 or RNP 4 navigation specifications require the aircraft to be equipped with two operable long − range navigation systems (LRNS). Operators who indicate RNP 10 or RNP 4 capability on their ATC flight plans, and subsequently experience an LRNS failure, must alert ATC to this failure. If the pilot believes the aircraft can continue to navigate along the cleared route with the single LRNS, ATC should be informed; as such, ATC may continue the aircraft on the cleared route.

5.7 In the event of LRNS failure, pilots must inform ATC of the failure and ensure ATC is aware the aircraft is no longer qualified for the RNP level indicated on the flight plan. In addition to this notification, pilots should request ATC amend their flight plan to remove the RNP capability indication in Item 18 of the flight plan.

5.8 Information regarding operations in the New York – West Oceanic CTA, the Atlantic portion of the Miami Oceanic CTA, and the San Juan Oceanic CTA can be found in the West Atlantic, Gulf of America, and Caribbean Resource Guide for U.S. Operators, which is available at: https://www.faa.gov/headquartersoffices/avs/wat − gulf − and − caribbean − resource − guide .

6. Provisions for Accommodation of Non − RNP 10 Aircraft (Not Authorized RNP 10 or RNP 4) The guidance contained in paragraphs 1.7 and 1.13 of this section is applicable to all operations using Non − RNP 10 aircraft throughout the airspace covered by this document.

7. RNP 10 or RNP 4 Authorization Policy and Procedures for Aircraft and Operators The guidance contained in paragraphs 1.8 and 1.9 of this section is applicable to operations throughout the airspace covered by this document.

8. Flight Planning Requirements The guidance contained in paragraphs 1.7 and 1.11 of this section is applicable to operations throughout the airspace covered by this document.

9. Pilot and Dispatcher Basic and In − Flight Contingency Procedures Information and guidance pertaining to in − flight contingency procedures, applicable in all the oceanic airspace covered by this AIP are provided in ENR 7.4 , paragraph 1.12 as well as section ENR 7.3.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.5 − 1 AIP ENR 7.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

ENR 7.5 Operational Policy Performance − Based

Communication and Surveillance (PBCS)

1. Introduction 1.1 Distance − based longitudinal separation minima using ADS − C is implemented in the Oakland Oceanic, Anchorage Oceanic and New York Oceanic airspace as specified in TBL ENR 7.5 − 1.

TBL ENR 7.5 − 1 Minima Minima Standard RNP RCP RSP Maximum ADS − C Periodic Reporting Interval 50 NM 10 240 180 27 minutes 50 NM 4 240 180 32 minutes 30 NM 4 240 180 10 minutes 20 NM 4 240 180 192 seconds 1.2 Aircraft Future Air Navigation System (FANS) 1/A communications, navigation and surveillance (CNS) capabilities, interfaced with Advanced Technology and Oceanic Procedures (ATOP), are required for ADS − C distance based separation to be applied.

NOTE − 1. ADS − C distance based separation standards may not be applied to aircraft utilizing High Frequency Data Link (HFDL).

2. ADS − C distance based separation is not currently authorized in the Anchorage Arctic FIR.

1.3 23 NM lateral separation is applied between RNP 4 aircraft capable of RSP 180 and RCP 240 with ADS − C waypoint change event and 5 NM lateral deviation event contracts established.

2. Application 2.1 Oakland, New York and Anchorage ARTCCs will apply the following policies to the use of ADS − C distance based separation: 2.1.1 The separation will be applied to pairs of suitably equipped pairs of aircraft; 2.1.2 Minimum ADS − C based longitudinal separation between RNP 4 eligible aircraft and RNP 10 eligible aircraft is 50 NM; and 2.1.3 Lateral and longitudinal separation standards applied between RNP 10 and non − RNP 10 aircraft remains unchanged.

3. Aircraft and Operator Eligibility for Performance − Based Separation 3.1 The aircraft and operator must be authorized by the State of the Operator or the State of Registry, as appropriate, for 50 NM: at a minimum, RNP 4 or RNAV 10, RCP 240, and RSP 180; and for 30 NM: at a minimum, RNP 4, RCP 240, and RSP 180 operations; 3.2 The aircraft must be equipped with a minimum of two approved long range navigation systems that will enable the aircraft to maintain RNP 4 for the duration of flight in the applicable airspace; Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.5 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 3.3 The aircraft must be equipped with a FANS1/A package (or equivalent) that includes satellite Controller Pilot Data Link Communication (CPDLC) and ADS − C that meet the standards of RTCA Document 258, Interoperability Requirements for ATS Applications Using ARINC 622 Data Communications; 3.4 Satellite CPDLC communications and ADS − C surveillance must be conducted in accordance with the ICAO Global Operational Data Link Document (GOLD).

3.5 Pilots and dispatchers must be trained on policies and procedures applicable to ADS − C distance based separation, including the use of Satellite CPDLC and ADS − C.

3.6 Operators should use the ICAO GOLD to develop policy and procedures for CPDLC and ADS − C operations.

3.6.1 Operators must use one of the following documents to develop policy and procedures for RNP 4 operations: 3.6.1.1 FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 90-105, Approval Guidance for RNP Operations and Barometric Vertical Navigation in the U.S. National Airspace System and in Oceanic and Remote Continental Airspace; 3.6.1.2 Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Advisory Circular 91U3(0); or 3.6.1.3 ICAO Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) Manual ( ICAO Document 9613), Volume II, Part C, Chapter 1.

3.6.1.4 ICAO Performance − Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) Manual ( ICAO Doc 9869).

4. Flight Planning Requirements See ENR 7.1, paragraph 2, Flight Plan Filing Requirements.

NOTE − Other than the flight plan requirements discussed in ENR 7.1, Paragraph 2, Flight Plan Filing Requirements, application of distance based separation does not affect operator planning processes or procedures for filing flight plans. Operators that have filed and flown User Preferred Routes (UPRs) may continue to do so.

5. In − Flight Contingency Actions/ Procedures and Emphasis on Situational Awareness 5.1 Pilots should be aware that ADS − C distance based separation can be applied to their aircraft. They should use all available tools to maintain an awareness of other aircraft in their proximity in case an inflight contingency occurs (e.g., aircraft or ATC system malfunction).

5.2 Pilots must advise ATC of a loss of CPDLC and/or ADS − C capability or an inability to continue to meet RNP 4. ATC will transition the aircraft to another form of separation as expeditiously as possible.

5.3 ATC will advise pilots if there is a known malfunction of the CPDLC or ADS − C system. If necessary, ATC will apply a different separation standard, which may involve a route or altitude change.

5.4 Pilots should use the guidance in ENR 7.3, Special Procedures for In-flight Contingencies in Oceanic Airspace. This reflects current ICAO guidance calling for a 5 NM track offset when unable to obtain ATC clearance prior to executing maneuvers for contingencies such as rapid descent, turn back, or diversion. This is of particular importance for aircraft to which ADS − C distance − based separation can be applied.

5.5 Pilots are required to maneuver (deviate) around convective weather on a regular basis. The enhanced CNS requirements and capabilities aid pilots and controllers in situations where aircraft are required to maneuver around convective weather. For weather avoidance maneuvers in areas where ADS − C distance based separation is applied, operators should emphasize the following items in pilot training programs: 5.5.1 Pilots should not assume the ATOP system will quickly detect significant changes to the aircraft flight path.

Aircraft position is updated to the ATOP system at intervals of up to 27 minutes.

5.5.2 It is imperative that pilots keep ATC advised via CPDLC (or HF voice, if necessary) of their intentions (including significant airspeed changes) during maneuvers to avoid convective weather. Pilots must inform ATC expeditiously of changes to flight path or airspeed that could erode separation.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.5 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5.5.3 Pilots must be familiar with ENR 7.3 , Special Procedures for In − Flight Contingencies in Oceanic Airspace.

NOTE − In particular, pilots should be aware of the provision to climb or descend 300 feet (depending on the direction of flight and direction of deviation from track) to mitigate the chance of conflict with other aircraft when forced to deviate without a clearance.

5.5.4 It is recommended that ACAS/TCAS be operational for aircraft to which ADS − C distance based separation can be applied. ACAS/TCAS provide a valuable tool to alert the pilot to the presence and proximity of nearby aircraft in weather deviation situations.

5.5.5 In accordance with ICAO Document 4444, pilots are reminded that, regardless of the magnitude of a deviation from assigned route, clearance should be requested in advance from ATC. Prior coordination with ATC will help prevent the aircraft generating unnecessary alerts to ATC for lateral deviation events.

NOTE − This does not apply to SLOP.

5.5.6 Operators should consider adopting guidance for pilots to use heading mode to maneuver around areas of convective weather. Use of heading mode will prevent transmission of unnecessary lateral deviation event alerts that some flight management systems (FMS) automatically transmit to ATC when the FMS automatic lateral offset feature is used for weather avoidance. It should be emphasized that, when using heading mode, pilots should monitor cross track and heading and return to track when weather avoidance maneuvering is complete.

5.5.7 Aircraft navigation errors and system malfunctions will be monitored and documented. Operators should cooperate in follow up investigation of these events.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.6 North Atlantic (NAT) Route Clearance

Procedures

1. Introduction New York ARTCC no longer issues an Oceanic Clearance.

2. Procedures Aircraft entering and operating within North Atlantic portion of the New York Oceanic FIR (KZWY) must always fly their last assigned route, altitude and Mach number (if assigned), regardless of when they were issued.

Note that a “cleared as filed” instruction does not pertain to level changes filed in the ATC flight plan: explicit ATC clearances are required for climbs or descents.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.7 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.7 North Atlantic (NAT) Timekeeping Procedures

1. Prior to entry into NAT High Level Airspace, the time reference system(s) to be used during the flight for calculation of waypoint estimated times of arrival (ETAs) and waypoint actual times of arrival (ATAs) must be synchronized to universal coordinated time (UTC). All ETAs and ATAs passed to air traffic control must be based on a time reference that has been synchronized to UTC or equivalent. Acceptable sources of UTC include: 1.1 WWV National Institute of Standards and Technology (Fort Collins, Colorado). WWV operates 24 hours a day on 2500, 5000, 10000, 15000, 20000 kHz (AM/single sideband (SSB)) and provides UTC voice every minute.

1.2 GPS (corrected to UTC) Available 24 hours a day to those pilots who can access the time signal over their shipboard GPS equipment.

1.3 CHU National Research Council (NRC) Available 24 hours a day on 3330, 7335, and 14670 kHz (SSB). In the final 10 second period of each minute, a bilingual station identification and time announcement is made. Since April 1990, the announced time is UTC.

1.4 BBC British Broadcasting Corporation (United Kingdom). The BBC transmits on a number of domestic and worldwide frequencies and transmits the Greenwich time signal (referenced to UTC) once every hour on most frequencies, although there are some exceptions.

1.5 Any other source shown to the State of Registry or State of Operator, as appropriate, to be an equivalent source of UTC.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.8 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.8 North Atlantic (NAT) Safety Information

1. Report Leaving, Report Reaching 1.1 The early discovery of altitude deviations is extremely important to the overall safety of NAT operations.

Deferring the required reports of leaving and reaching flight levels until the next routine communication may lead to instances where aircraft fly at the incorrect flight level for long durations. This is not acceptable from a system safety standpoint. While the actual number of vertical errors in the NAT Region is relatively small, some of these errors continue undetected (and therefore uncorrected) for long durations.

1.2 In practical terms: 1.2.1 Report leaving a flight level as soon as the aircraft begins climb or descent; 1.2.2 Report reaching a flight level as soon as the aircraft is level; and 1.2.3 In RVSM airspace, provide the reports even if air traffic control has not specifically requested them.

2. Turbulence Impact Assessment 2.1 To help in assessing whether moderate or severe turbulence might have an impact on operations in the NAT Region when reduced vertical separation minimum of 1,000 feet is applied between FL290 and FL410 inclusive, the frequency and magnitude of altitude deviations from assigned FL caused by moderate to severe turbulence needs to be quantified.

2.2 To this end, air crews operating in the NAT Region, are required to include the magnitude of the deviation, in feet, from assigned FL in all required reports of moderate to severe turbulence.

3. Common Procedures for Radio Communications Failure in the North Atlantic (NAT) NOTE − The following procedures are intended to provide general guidance for NAT aircraft experiencing a communications failure.

These procedures are intended to complement and not supersede state procedures/regulations. It is not possible to provide guidance for all situations associated with a communications failure.

3.1 General.

3.1.1 If so equipped, the pilot of an aircraft experiencing a two − way − radio communications failure must operate the secondary radar transponder on identity Mode A (Code 7600) and Mode C.

3.1.2 The pilot must also attempt to contact any ATC facility or another aircraft and inform them of the difficulty and request they relay information to the ATC facility with which communications are intended.

3.2 Communications failure prior to entering NAT oceanic airspace.

3.2.1 If operating with a received and acknowledged oceanic clearance, the pilot must enter oceanic airspace at the cleared oceanic entry point, level and speed and proceed in accordance with the received and acknowledged oceanic clearance. Any level or speed changes required to comply with the oceanic clearance must be completed within the vicinity of the oceanic entry point.

3.2.2 If operating without a received and acknowledged oceanic clearance, the pilot must enter oceanic airspace at the first oceanic entry point, level, and speed, as contained in the filed flight plan and proceed via the filed flight plan route to landfall. That first oceanic level and speed must be maintained to landfall.

3.3 Communications failure prior to exiting NAT oceanic airspace.

3.3.1 If cleared on flight plan route the pilot must proceed in accordance with the last received and acknowledged oceanic clearance to the last specified oceanic route point, normally landfall, then continue on the flight plan Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.8 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 route. Maintain the last assigned oceanic level and speed to landfall. After passing the last specified oceanic route point, conform to the relevant State procedures/regulations.

3.3.2 If cleared on other than flight plan route the pilot must proceed in accordance with the last received and acknowledged oceanic clearance to the last specified oceanic route point, normally landfall. After passing this point, rejoin the filed flight plan route by proceeding directly to the next significant point ahead of the track of the aircraft as contained in the filed flight plan. Where possible use published ATS route structures, then continue on the flight plan route. Maintain the last assigned oceanic level and speed to the last specified oceanic route point. After passing this point conform to the relevant State procedures/regulations.

4. When Able Higher (WAH) Reports 4.1 To ensure maximum use of available altitudes, aircraft entering RVSM airspace in the New York FIR should be prepared to advise ATC of the time or position the aircraft can accept the next higher altitude. WAH reports are also used to plan the altitude for aircraft; therefore, it is important that the altitude capability of the aircraft is known by controllers.

4.1.1 If the aircraft is capable of a higher altitude that is not preferred by the pilot, give the altitude in the WAH report and advise that you prefer not to be assigned that altitude.

4.2 ATC acknowledgment of a WAH report is NOT a clearance to change altitude.

4.3 The procedures will differ for eastbound and westbound aircraft since many of the eastbound aircraft will enter New York RVSM airspace from ATC sectors that have direct controller − pilot communications.

4.3.1 Eastbound aircraft entering RVSM airspace in the New York FIR: 4.3.1.1 Pilots may be requested by ATC to provide an estimate for when the flight can accept the next higher altitude(s). If requested, pilots should provide this information as soon as possible.

4.3.2 Westbound aircraft entering RVSM airspace in the New York FIR: 4.3.2.1 Pilots should include in the initial position report the time or location that the next higher altitude can be accepted.

EXAMPLE − “Global Air 543, 40 north 40 west at 1010, flight level 350, estimating 40 north 50 west at 1110, 40 north 60 west. Next able flight level 360 at 1035.” NOTE − Pilots may include more than one altitude if that information is available.

EXAMPLE − (After stating initial report) “Able flight level 360 at 1035, able flight level 370 at 1145, able flight level 390 at 1300.” Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 7.9 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.9 Y − Routes

1. Introduction 1.1 The FAA has established a network of area navigation (RNAV) routes to enhance efficiency of air traffic flow and control over the West Atlantic, Gulf of America, the Bahamas, and Puerto Rico. These RNAV routes, charted as “Y” routes, exist largely, but not exclusively, within U.S. “offshore airspace.” Operators may find U.S.

offshore airspace labeled as “Atlantic High,” “Atlantic Low,” “Gulf of America High,” etc., on FAA IFR en route charts. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 71, § 71.1, § 71.33, and § 71.71, offshore airspace at and above 18,000 feet MSL is Class A airspace, while that offshore airspace below 18,000 feet MSL is Class E. The FAA normally uses domestic air traffic control procedures, vice oceanic procedures, in offshore airspace. Aircraft flying Y − routes will typically be within signal coverage of U.S. ground navigation facilities and ATC radar. Actual signal reception and radar detection are a function of aircraft altitude. The majority of Y − routes exist only in the upper altitude structure, i.e., Class A offshore airspace.

2. General Requirements 2.1 The Y − routes are designated RNAV 2 with GNSS required. Aircraft flying the Y − routes must be equipped with GNSS and able to meet RNAV 2 performance requirements. RNAV systems relying solely on DME/DME or inertial navigation are not suitable (and therefore not authorized) for use on any Y − route.

2.2 Pilots must indicate on their ATC flight plan at least the minimum equipment and capability required for RNAV 2 with GNSS. Item 10 of the flight plan must indicate G and R. Item 18 must indicate PBN/C2.

3. Operational Requirements 3.1 Pilots are expected to fly the route centerline, as defined by the aircraft RNAV system.

3.2 Operators must check predicted RAIM availability for the expected duration of their flight on a Y − route.

Five (5) minutes is the maximum predicted continuous loss of RAIM allowed for flight on a Y − route.

4. Pilot Knowledge 4.1 Advisory Circular (AC) 90 − 100, U.S. Terminal and En Route Area Navigation (RNAV) Operations, contains pilot knowledge subject matter that is generally applicable to any RNAV operation. General aviation pilots in particular should use the RNAV subject matter contained in AC 90 − 100 in preparation for any flight on an RNAV route, including Y − routes.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.10 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.10 Atlantic High Offshore Airspace Offshore

Routes Supporting Florida Airspace Optimization

1. Introduction 1.1 Atlantic Routes (ARs) are designed to relieve traffic congestion and reduce in − trail delays. The nine offshore Class I area navigation (RNAV) routes, designated AR15, AR16, AR17, AR18, AR19, AR21, AR22, AR23 and AR24, are established between FL240 and FL600 inclusive.

1.2 None of the waypoints will be compulsory reporting points since the new and revised routes are entirely within radar coverage.

1.3 Southbound routes include AR15, AR17, AR19, and AR22, while northbound routes include AR16 and AR18. AR23, AR24 are bidirectional.

1.4 Air traffic control services for these routes in offshore airspace is provided by Washington, Jacksonville and Miami ARTCCs.

2. Filing Routes 2.1 Flights departing from and landing at airports within the domestic U.S. should file to conform with the appropriate Preferred IFR Routes listed in the Chart Supplements. International traffic southbound from the Wilmington VORTAC (ILM) area filing over MCLAW, FUNDI, Fish Hook NDB (FIS), or CANOA should file AR17. International traffic southbound from the ILM area filing over Freeport VOR (ZFP) or URSUS should file AR23 or AR24. Traffic originating south of Miami, Florida, filing over the ILM/DIW area should file AR16, AR18, AR23 or AR24.

3. Operational Requirements 3.1 Operations on these AR routes requires the use of area navigation (RNAV) systems approved for IFR enroute operations and which incorporate GPS and/or inertial system inputs. For U.S. commercial operators, i.e., those operating under 14 CFR part 91 Subpart K, 121, 125, and 135, use of RNAV systems must be authorized by their Operations Specifications, Management Specifications, or Letters of Authorization. For operators flying under part 91, their Airplane Flight Manual, Pilot Operating Handbook, or other manufacturer − provided documentation should indicate that the RNAV system meets the requirements for IFR enroute RNAV operations in Advisory Circular (AC) 20 − 138 or AC 90 − 100, or meets the requirements for inertial navigation systems in 14 CFR part 121 appendix G.

3.2 Pilots should fly the route centerlines at all times and must notify Air Traffic Control (ATC) of any loss of navigation capability that affects the aircraft’s ability to track the route centerline.

3.3 ATC will provide radar separation for these routes. In the event of loss of radar, ATC will advise the aircraft and apply appropriate separation.

3.4 Pilots of aircraft without GPS and who therefore must rely on inertial RNAV systems to fly on these AR routes, are limited to one hour of operation between position updates, e.g., DME/DME update of the position in their RNAV system. This one − hour time period starts when the inertial system is placed in the navigation mode and applies en route between position updates. Pilots unable to obtain a position update for their RNAV system must inform ATC prior to one hour from the last update.

3.5 Some AR routes are co − designated Y routes, e.g., AR19/Y291. The route filed in the flight plan governs the navigation equipment and performance requirements. Filing for Y291 on a route designated AR19/Y291 for example, requires the aircraft to be equipped with GNSS and flown with RNAV 2 performance on that route, in accordance with section ENR 7.9.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.11 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.11 Reduced Separation Climb/Descent

Procedures

1. Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) In − Trail Procedure (ITP) 1.1 The ITP is designed for use in non − surveillance oceanic airspace to enable appropriately equipped ADS − B In aircraft to perform flight level (FL) changes previously unavailable with procedural separation minima applied. The improved traffic information available to ADS − B In − equipped aircraft allows ITP maneuvers to occur safely with reduced separation minima applied. ITP will enable flight crews to execute FL changes to improve ride comfort, avoid weather, or obtain more favorable winds to improve fuel economy and arrival times.

The ITP is only available within the Anchorage, Oakland, and New York Oceanic Flight Information Regions (FIR).

1.2 FAA air traffic procedures for the ADS − B ITP mirror those contained within ICAO Document 4444 (Doc.

4444), Procedures for Air Navigation Service − Air Traffic Management (PANS − ATM), Section 5.4.2.7, Longitudinal Separation Minima Based on Distance Using ADS − B In − Trail Procedure (ITP), with one difference. Section 5.4.2.7.3.2 of Doc. 4444 states, “A controller may clear an aircraft for an ITP climb or descent provided the following conditions are satisfied: d) both the ITP aircraft and reference aircraft are either on; 2) parallel or same tracks with no turns permitted during the manoeuvre.” The FAA’s Advanced Technology and Oceanic Procedures (ATOP) automation platform is designed to ensure that separation will not decrease below required minima for same track aircraft should either the reference or maneuvering aircraft turn during the ITP.

FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, states that an aircraft may be cleared for an ITP climb or descent if both the ITP aircraft and reference aircraft are on the “same tracks with no turns permitted that reduce required separation during the ITP.” 1.3 Equipment specifications and guidance for pilot procedures is available in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 90 − 114, Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B) Operations, Appendix 2, ADS − B In − Trail Procedure.

1.4 Additional information is also available in ICAO Circular 325, In − Trail Procedure (ITP) Using Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Broadcast (ADS − B).

2. Automatic Dependent Surveillance − Contract (ADS − C) Climb Descend Procedure (CDP) 2.1 The ADS − C CDP is designed to improve service to properly equipped aircraft by allowing an oceanic air traffic controller to have an option for granting an altitude change request when other standard separations (such as ADS − C distance − based 30 NM longitudinal separation minima) do not allow for a climb or descent through the altitude of a blocking aircraft. It is an air traffic control tool to be applied between maneuvering and blocking aircraft pairs. The CDP is only available within the Anchorage, Oakland, and New York Oceanic FIRs.

2.2 FAA air traffic procedures, published in FAA Order JO 7110.65, Chapter 8, mirror those in ICAO Document 4444 (Doc 4444), Procedures for Air Navigation Service − Air Traffic Management (PANS − ATM) , Section 5.4.2.8, Longitudinal Separation Minima Based on Distance Using ADS − C Climb and Descend Procedure (CDP), and in ICAO Circular 342, Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Contract (ADS − C) Climb and Descend Procedure (CDP). The FAA’s ATOP automation platform is designed to alert the controller before separation decreases below the required minima. Aircraft pair distance verification is performed by the ground automation system, using near simultaneous ADS − C demand reports.

2.3 The implementation of the ADS − C CDP is intended to facilitate increased access to optimum flight levels for aircraft operating in airspace where no ATS surveillance service is available. It is similar to the ADS − B ITP [see ICAO Circular 325, In − Trail Procedure (ITP) Using Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS − B)] in that it is a climb or descend through procedure. Unlike the ITP, however, the pilots involved in an ADS − C CDP may not be aware of which separation minima a controller is utilizing.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.12 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 7.12 New York Oceanic Control Area (OCA) West

Flight Level Allocation

1. Background 1.1 The primary air traffic flows in the New York OCA West airspace are between Northeast and Mid − Atlantic U.S. airports and Caribbean and South American destinations.

1.2 This primary flow is regularly crossed by the flow of traffic transitioning to and from the Southeast U.S./Caribbean and the North Atlantic and New York OCA East airspace.

1.3 The ATS routes that comprise the West Atlantic (WAT) are bi-directional. Therefore, it is important that the northbound flows are procedurally separated from the southbound flows to the maximum extent possible.

2. Altitude Filing 2.1 A Flight Level schema has been designed as a guide for operators and dispatchers to determine what altitudes to file to transit the OCA West airspace.

2.2 The following aircraft should file ODD flight levels: 2.2.1 Aircraft operating South or Southeast bound on the following routes: L451, L452, L453, L454, L455, L456, L457, L459, L461, and L462; 2.2.2 Northeast bound on M201, M202. M203, M204; and 2.2.3 East or Northeast bound on L375, L435, M325, M326, M327, M328, M329, M330, M331, M593, M594, M595, M596, M597, and M525.

2.3 For aircraft operating opposite direction to that listed above on the same routes – aircraft should file EVEN flight levels.

NOTE − Due to the amount of crossing traffic throughout the region, final altitude assignments will always be determined dynamically by ATC, based on the current traffic and operational conditions.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 7.13 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 ENR 7.13 Gulf of America RNAV Routes Q100, Q102,

and Q105

1. Introduction The three Q routes over the northern portion of the Gulf of America, Q100, Q102, and Q105, are not the same as the RNAV Q routes over the continental United States. There are some differences in operating procedures when flying the Gulf Q routes.

2. Operational Requirements 2.1 Operations on these Gulf Q routes requires the use of area navigation (RNAV) systems approved for IFR enroute operations and which incorporate GPS and/or inertial system inputs. For U.S. commercial operators, i.e., those operating under 14 CFR part 91 subpart K, 121, 125, and 135, use of RNAV systems must be authorized by their Operations Specifications, Management Specifications, or Letters of Authorization. For operators flying under part 91, their Airplane Flight Manual, Pilot Operating Handbook, or other manufacturer − provided documentation should indicate that the RNAV system meets the requirements for IFR enroute RNAV operations published in Advisory Circular (AC) 20 − 138 or AC 90 − 100, or meets the requirements for inertial navigation systems in 14 CFR part 121 appendix G.

2.2 Pilots should fly the route centerlines at all times and must notify Air Traffic Control (ATC) of any loss of navigation capability that affects the aircraft’s ability to track the route centerline.

2.3 Pilots of aircraft without GPS and who therefore must rely on inertial RNAV systems to fly on a Gulf Q route, are limited to 1.5 hours of operation between position updates, e.g., DME/DME update of the position in their RNAV system. This 1.5 − hour time period starts when the inertial system is placed in the navigation mode and applies en route between position updates. Pilots unable to obtain a position update for their RNAV system must inform ATC prior to 1.5 hours from the last update.

2.4 Routes Q100 and Q102 are co − designated Y280 and Y290 respectively. The route filed in the flight plan governs the navigation equipment and performance requirements. Filing for Y280 on the route designated Q100/Y280 requires the aircraft to be equipped with GNSS and flown with RNAV 2 performance on that route, in accordance with section ENR 7.9.

NOTE − ATC normally provides radar monitoring along the three Gulf Q routes. Pilots can expect ATC to advise them when radar monitoring is unavailable and to adjust aircraft separation as necessary.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)

ENR 8.1 General

1. General 1.1 UAS operations are governed by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and the United States Code (USC).

The type of operation, purpose of the flight, and weight of the UAS all factor into the specific rule that governs UAS operations.

1.1.1 14 CFR Part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Examples of 14 CFR Part 107 operations include commercial aerial photography, commercial aerial survey, other operations for hire, and operations that are not conducted purely for pleasure/recreation. These operations will be referred to as Part 107 operations in ENR 8, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). Part 107 operations are limited to small UAS (sUAS) weighing less than 55 pounds.

1.1.2 USC 44809, Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft, Operations.

Recreational flyers operate UAS for pleasure or recreation. These operations will be referred to as Recreational Flyer operations in ENR 8, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). Recreational flyers typically operate UAS or model aircraft, also called radio − controlled (RC) aircraft. Recreational flyers operating UAS weighing more than 55 pounds may operate in compliance with standards and limitations developed by a CBO and from fixed sites, which are described in ENR 8.4, subparagraph 1.3.1, Fixed Sites.

1.1.3 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations. 14 CFR Part 91 operations include public UAS, and civil UAS 55 pounds or more Maximum Gross Operating Weight (MGOW). These operations will be referred to as Part 91 UAS operations in ENR 8, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). For more information on public UAS operations, the requirements for qualification as a public operator, and how aircraft and pilots are certified, refer to AC 00 − 1.1, Public Aircraft Operations, Manned and Unmanned.

NOTE − 14 CFR Part 91 operations can include UAS weighing less than 55lbs.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

49 USC 44809, Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft.

FAA Order JO 7210.3, Chapter 5, Section 5, 14 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations.

AC 00 − 1.1 Public Aircraft Operations, Manned and Unmanned.

2. Access to the National Airspace System (NAS) for UAS Operators 2.1 UAS operations must be integrated into the NAS while maintaining existing operational capacity and safety without introducing an unacceptable level of risk to airspace users or persons and property on the ground. The FAA is committed to striking the appropriate regulatory and oversight balance to ensure that American innovation is able to thrive without compromising the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world.

2.2 UAS operators can access the NAS in multiple ways. Generally, UAS weighing less than 55 pounds MGOW are permitted to operate within Visual Line Of Sight (VLOS) up to 400 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) in Class G airspace. Operations within controlled airspace require specific authorization from Air Traffic Control (ATC).

2.2.1 Part 107 sUAS operators can request airspace authorizations via Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability (LAANC) or DroneZone to fly within Class B, Class C, and Class D or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport. Operations within controlled airspace can be readily approved in accordance with the altitude values indicated on the corresponding UAS Facility Map (UASFM). The UASFM values indicate the maximum altitude at which a sUAS operation can be approved Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.1 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 without any further coordination with the respective ATC facility. Part 107 remote pilots and operators may request “further coordination” for an airspace authorization to operate above UASFM values, up to 400 feet AGL. See ENR 8.4, subparagraph 2.1, for further information regarding Part 107 operations.

NOTE − Emergency airspace authorizations for Special Government Interest (SGI) UAS operations will be addressed in ENR 8.8, paragraph 5.

2.2.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. Recreational flyers may operate in controlled and uncontrolled airspace under specific conditions. In Class B, C, D or the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport. The operator must obtain an ATC authorization prior to operating. In Class G airspace, the aircraft must be flying not more than 400 feet AGL and comply with all airspace restrictions and prohibitions. Recreational flyers may operate at an FAA − recognized fixed site above 400 feet AGL with an FAA − approved letter of agreement with the appropriate ATC authority or up to UASFM altitudes in controlled airspace with an airspace authorization obtained through LAANC.

2.2.3 Part 91 UAS Operations. Public UAS, and civil UAS 55 pounds or more MGOW operate under 14 CFR Part 91, UAS operations. Public UAS operators and civil, non − recreational UAS weighing 55 pounds or more MGOW are provided NAS access by compliance with certain parts of 14 CFR Part 21, experimental certificates, and 14 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations. Part 91 UAS operators require a COA to operate within the NAS. Specific geographic/altitude limitations are prescribed in the COA. Additional pilot and aircraft requirements are applicable to Part 91 UAS operations. See ENR 8.3, Large UAS (MGOW 55 Pounds or More), and ENR 8.4, paragraph 3., Airspace Access for PAO, for further information on Part 91 UAS operations.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 21.191, Experimental Certificates.

FAA Order JO 7210.3, Chapter 5, Section 5, 14 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.2 Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS)

1. Part 107 sUAS and Recreational Flyers 1.1 Part 107 UAS. A regulatory first step for civil non − recreational UAS operations. To fly under 14 CFR Part 107, the UAS must weigh less than 55 pounds and the operator (called a remote pilot) must pass a knowledge test. Also, the UAS must be registered. Part 107 enabled the vast majority of routine sUAS operations, allowing flight within VLOS while maintaining flexibility to accommodate future technological innovations. Part 107 allows sUAS operations for many different purposes without requiring airworthiness certification, exemptions, or a COA for Class G airspace access. Part 107 includes the opportunity for individuals to request waivers for certain provisions of the rules, for example, Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS). Part 107 also has specific restrictions which are not subject to waiver, such as the prohibition of the carriage or transport of Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT).

1.2 Recreational Flyer UAS: 1.2.1 The FAA considers recreational UAS to be aircraft that fall within the statutory and regulatory definitions of an aircraft, in that they are devices that are used or intended to be used for flight in the air. As aircraft, these devices generally are subject to FAA oversight and enforcement.

REFERENCE − 49 USC 40102, Definitions.

14 CFR Part 1, Definitions and Abbreviations.

1.2.2 Recreational aircraft may operate in Class G airspace where the aircraft is flown from the surface to not more than 400 feet AGL, and the operator must comply with all airspace restrictions and prohibitions. The only exception to this altitude restriction in Class G airspace is at FAA − recognized fixed sites and sanctioned events, with specifically approved procedures for flights above 400 feet AGL.

NOTE − Higher altitude airspace authorizations for Recreational Flyers are obtained through the FAA’s DroneZone website at: https://faadronezone.faa.gov/#/ .

1.2.3 The Recreational UAS Safety Test (TRUST) module was developed in consultation with multiple UAS stakeholders and through interested party feedback. TRUST is available electronically, has no minimum age limit, and is provided by volunteer test administrators, vetted by the FAA. See ENR 8.5, paragraph 1., UAS Pilot Certification and Requirements for Part 107 and Recreational Flyers, for further information on TRUST.

Additional information regarding TRUST is available at the FAA’s The Recreational UAS Safety Test website.

NOTE − The FAA’s The Recreational UAS Safety Test website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_fliers/knowledge_test_updates/ .

1.2.4 Recreational UAS weighing more than .55 lbs must be registered. This can be done electronically through the FAA’s DroneZone website. Owners must then label all aircraft with their assigned registration number on the exterior of their aircraft so that the registration can be clearly seen and read from a reasonable distance. For more information on registering UAS See ENR 8.2, paragraph 2. , Registration Requirements, for more information on registering UAS.

NOTE − The FAA’s DroneZone website may be viewed at: https://faadronezone.faa.gov/#/ .

2. Registration Requirements 2.1 Nearly all UAS flown in the NAS are required to be registered in the FAA aircraft registration database. UAS weighing 55 pounds MGOW or more must be registered under 14 CFR Part 47, Aircraft Registration, while UAS less than 55 pounds may be registered under the FAA’s newer 14 CFR Part 48 online system.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.2 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − The FAA’s Aircraft Registration Unmanned Aircraft (UA) website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/air craft_certification/air craft_registry/UA/.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 47, Aircraft Registration.

2.2 Registering UAS under 14 CFR Part 47. For those UAS, which do not meet the weight stipulations for registration under 14 CFR Part 48, registration is accomplished under 14 CFR Part 47. 14 CFR Part 47 registration will result in an “N” − number like those assigned to manned aircraft. To learn more about the process and to register a UAS under Part 47, see the FAA’s Aircraft Registration Unmanned Aircraft (UA) website. If desired by the owner, any UAS may be registered under 14 CFR Part 47.

NOTE − The FAA’s Aircraft Registration Unmanned Aircraft (UA) website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/air craft_certification/air craft_registry/UA/.

2.3 Registering UAS under 14 CFR Part 48. For most operators of sUAS (those UAS weighing less than 55 pounds MGOW), registration under 14 CFR Part 48, Registration and Marking Requirements for Small UA, will be most expedient and the least expensive. 14 CFR Part 48 registrants are those UAS flyers operating under either of the following statutes: 2.3.1 Part 107. Under the provisions of Part 107, all UAS must be registered regardless of weight. Operations under Part 107 are generally those involving commerce, but can be for recreation as well.

2.3.2 Recreational Flyers. UAS that are flown exclusively for recreational purposes must be registered if they weigh more than 0.55 pounds (250 grams).

NOTE − 1. If you are not sure what kind of a drone flyer you are, refer to the FAA’s User Identification Tool at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/user_identification_tool/ , or visit the FAA Getting Started webpage at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/ .

2. Registrations cannot be transferred between 14 CFR Part 107 UAS and 49 USC 44809 UAS.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 48, Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft.

2.4 How to Register a UAS under 14 CFR Part 48: 2.4.1 To register a UAS online under Part 48, refer to the FAA’s DroneZone website. When registering a UAS online under Part 48, you will need to select registration in either Part 107 or the exception for recreational flyers.

2.4.2 Registration fees for Part 107 registration are per sUAS, and the registration is valid for three years. Each Part 107 registered sUAS will receive a different number. Recreational flyer registration fees are per UAS and valid for three years, but the same registration number can be applied to any UAS in the registrant’s ownership.

The recreational flyer will receive one registration number that can be used for all UAS flown by that person.

In order to register, a person must be 13 years of age or older and be a U. S. citizen or legal permanent resident.

If the owner is less than 13 years of age, another person 13 years of age or older must register the UAS and that person must be a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident.

2.4.3 An FAA registration certificate will be issued after UAS registration. The registration certificate (either paper copy or digital copy) must be available for inspection during all flight operations. If an individual other than the registered owner operates a UAS the registration certificate (either paper copy or digital copy) must also be available for inspection during all flight operations. Federal law requires registered UAS operators, if asked, to show their certificate of registration to any federal, state, or local law enforcement officer. Failure to register a UAS that requires registration may result in regulatory and criminal penalties. The FAA may assess civil penalties up to $27,500.

NOTE − The FAA’s DroneZone website may be viewed at: https://faadronezone.faa.gov/#/ .

2.5 Labeling a UAS with a Registration Number. All UAS requiring registration must be marked with a registration number before being flown. The UAS registration number can be applied to the aircraft by Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.2 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 engraving, a permanent label, or written on with a permanent marker. The registration number must be visible and on the outside surface of the UAS.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.3 Large UAS (MGOW 55 Pounds Or More)

1. Large Public UAS Operations 1.1 Large public UAS may have wingspans as large as commercial airliners, and may operate in and out of public/military dual − use airfields. Due to the high altitudes at which these UAS routinely operate, and the means through which they reach and vacate operating altitude, encounters with manned or low − altitude unmanned traffic are rare.

1.2 Public users operating as “public aircraft” retain the responsibility to determine airworthiness and pilot qualifications. Aircraft certification and operating rules apply to the entire UAS, including the aircraft itself, the flight crew with their associated qualifications, the control station, and command and control links.

NOTE − Large UAS operating in controlled airspace generally communicate on radio frequencies or through an ATC − to − PIC ground communications link assigned to that sector, terminal area, or control tower. The UAS PIC is required to comply with all ATC instructions and uses standard phraseology per FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control, and this manual.

REFERENCE − 49 USC 40102, Definitions.

49 USC 40125, Qualifications for Public Aircraft Status.

FAA Order JO 7110.65, Air Traffic Control.

AIP, ENR 8.4, Para 3, Airspace Access for PAO.

1.3 Operating Characteristics of Large Public UAS. To illustrate the sizes and performance of large public UAS, consider the DoD UAS classification system. The categories (see FIG ENR 8.3 − 1 ) are separated based on MGOW, normal operating altitude, and flying speed. These classifications do not apply to non − DoD civil aircraft. Generally, Groups 1 through 3 UAS will operate on and above military bases, in restricted or prohibited airspace. For this reason, these smaller tactical public aircraft will rarely be encountered by civil pilots. Groups 4 and 5 are the largest of DoD UAS, weighing over 1,320 pounds, and operating at all speeds and altitudes. Group 4 aircraft operate at all altitudes, usually below 18,000 feet MSL. Group 5 aircraft typically operate well above 18,000 feet MSL. UAS in Groups 4 and 5 require airfields with specially approved surfaces to safely operate.

For specifications and descriptions of the aircraft types that the DoD operates, refer to military service fact sheets.

NOTE − 1. The category chart does not specify the actual high gross weights at which some DoD UAS actually operate. For instance, the RQ − 4 Global Hawk regularly operates at approximately 32,000 pounds.

2. JP 3 − 30, III 31, Joint Publication 3 − 30, provides the UAS Categorization Chart and may be reviewed at: https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_30.pdf?ver=2019 − 09 − 04 − 142255 − 657 .

3. These websites provide unclassified descriptions, performance, and specifications of the varied UAS in the DoD’s large category fleet: USAF Fact Sheets at https://www.af.mil/About - Us/Fact - Sheets/ and USN Fact Files at https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact - Files/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.3 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 8.3 − 1 DoD UAS Categories 1.4 Large Public UAS Engineering Characteristics and Operating Areas: 1.4.1 Large public UAS may be sharing airspace with civil aircraft in the NAS. A wide variety of aircraft performance, voice radio communications, command and control link architecture, and operating procedures exists throughout the DoD and other large public UAS enterprises. For example, Group 4 DoD aircraft, such as the MQ − 1 Predator and MQ − 9 Reaper, are typically propeller − driven with propulsion units that are internal combustion piston − or turbine − powered. The largest public UAS include single − engine jet aircraft such as the RQ − 4 Global Hawk and MQ − 4C Triton.

1.4.2 VLOS and BVLOS link systems provide command and control for these large UAS operations. Voice communication capability in the largest public UAS is far more extensive than in the smaller aircraft. Many UAS Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.3 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 are limited to a single voice radio transmitter and receiver system for control inside airspace managed by and/or delegated to the DoD.

1.4.3 Many of the larger public UAS are equipped with transponders to assist ATC with position and tracking information. These UAS usually operate under IFR under positive ATC control and will tend to be found at very high altitudes; not likely to be encountered by civil aircraft operators. Launch and recovery operations will be likewise under positive ATC control and these UAS will be separated from any other known aircraft traffic.

Encounters with low − altitude sUAS, being flown in uncontrolled airspace or under low − altitude controlled airspace authorizations, are therefore unlikely. In accordance with 14 CFR Part 91.215(e)(2), ATC Transponder and Altitude Reporting Equipment and Use, no person may operate an unmanned aircraft under Part 91 with a transponder on unless: (1) the operation is conducted under a flight plan and the person operating the unmanned aircraft maintains two − way communications with ATC; or (2) the use of a transponder is otherwise authorized by the Administrator.

NOTE − In accordance with 14 CFR Section 107.52, ATC Transponder Equipment Prohibition, unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate a sUAS under Part 107 with a transponder on.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 91.215 ATC Transponder and Altitude Reporting Equipment and Use.

14 CFR Section 107.52, ATC Transponder Equipment Prohibition.

1.5 Large Public UAS Launch, Recovery, and Operating Areas: 1.5.1 Large public UAS operations are widespread, they are also carefully managed to ensure enhanced safety for other NAS users. For this reason, DoD UAS operate in many types of special use airspace. See FIG ENR 8.3 − 2 for examples of Special Use Airspace (SUA) used by DoD UAS.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.3 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 8.3 − 2 DoD Special Use Airspace 1.5.2 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) are issued for the surrounding UAS operating locations and allow for the launch and recovery of larger UAS. Once outside of the terminal environment, DoD UAS utilize the full range of SUA, including a Military Operating Areas (MOA), restricted areas, warning areas, and alert areas to conduct their missions.

2. Exemptions under 49 USC 44807, Special Authority for Certain Unmanned Systems 2.1 Exemptions are granted to UAS operations which are permitted in accordance with Public Law 115 − 254, 49 USC 44807, Special Authority for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems. The Secretary of Transportation has determined that certain UAS are eligible to operate in the NAS without possessing the airworthiness certification normally required under 49 USC 44807. 49 USC 44807 permits the FAA to use a risk − based approach to determine whether an airworthiness certificate is required for a UAS to operate. Exemptions are generally requested by civil (non − public) UAS operators who fly UAS weighing 55 pounds or more, and thus cannot fly under 14 CFR Part 107. For civil UAS operations conducted under 49 USC 44807 of PL 115 − 254, the Secretary has determined that specific requirements necessary for safe operation can often be addressed in the form of grants of exemption(s). Operators who desire this regulatory relief must petition the FAA for exemption in accordance with 14 CFR Part 11 and the guidance provided on the FAA’s Section 44807, Special Authority for Certain Unmanned Systems website. Examples of petitions that have been granted to conduct civil UAS operations include the following activities: 2.1.1 Closed − set motion picture and television filming.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.3 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2.1.2 Agricultural survey and spraying.

2.1.3 Aerial photography.

2.1.4 Land survey and inspection.

2.1.5 Inspection of structures.

2.1.6 Search and Rescue (SAR) operations.

NOTE − Civil agricultural spraying operations will also require a 14 CFR Part 137 certificate; see ENR 8.4, paragraph 5, Airspace Access for 14 CFR Part 135 and 14 CFR Part 137.

2.2 Exemption Application. Petitioners seeking a grant of exemption should fill out an online application on the public docket located on the FAA’s regulations.gov website.

REFERENCE − 49 USC 44807, Special Authority for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

NOTE − The FAA’s Section 44807: Special Authority for Certain Unmanned Systems website may be reviewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/certification/section_44807/ . The FAA’s Regulations.gov website may be reviewed at: https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/faa_regulations .

3. Emerging Large UAS Civil Operations 3.1 Large civil UAS operations in the NAS are presently considered those UAS weighing 55 pounds or more with or without aircraft airworthiness certification, along with their control stations and radio links operating under 14 CFR Part 91. Examples of current large UAS civil operators include agricultural spraying and operation as radio/telephone airborne relays. Future large UAS operations will include carriage of cargo and passengers, and long − endurance aircraft, staying aloft for extended periods of time.

NOTE − Large is only used as a term to differentiate from those UAS weighing less than 55 pounds. Large UAS is not an FAA − recognized category of aircraft.

3.1.1 Large UAS must meet performance, equipage requirements, and adhere to relevant procedures commensurate with the airspace in which the UAS is operating.

3.1.2 Absent an onboard pilot, large UAS are unable to “see and avoid” other aircraft, as required by regulations governing the general operation of aircraft in the NAS under Title 14 CFR Section 91.111, Operating Near other Aircraft, and 14 CFR Section 91.113, Right of Way Rules: Except Water Operations. As a result, they cannot use on board visual observation to remain “well clear” of other aircraft and avoid collisions. Therefore, an alternate means of compliance is required to remain well clear of other aircraft, surface obstacles, and avoid collisions.

3.1.3 FIG ENR 8.3 − 3 , A Layered Approach for Collision Avoidance, illustrates the different layers used to keep aircraft safely separated, beginning with airspace classification and design, then ending with the responsibility of the pilot to prevent collisions.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.3 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 8.3 − 3 A Layered Approach for Collision Avoidance 3.2 Transition to Full Integration into the NAS. Over time, full integration of large UAS operations in the NAS will be achieved. Current large UAS operations will continue to be dependent on COAs, the issuance of NOTAMs, and possibly other measures (e.g., chase plane, segregated airspace) as currently used for accommodated operations. This integration is evolving with UAS technology advances, FAA regulatory changes, NAS automation, communications improvements, and evolving use cases and demand.

NOTE − Transponder equipped UAS, during lost link events, if capable, will squawk secondary surveillance radar (SSR)/Transponder code 7400. If the UAS is not programmed for use of SSR code 7400, then code 7600 may be used.

3.3 Large Civil Operations. The following are examples of test and evaluation operations being conducted with large civil and commercial UAS: cargo delivery, infrastructure inspection, surveillance, firefighting, environmental observation, signal relay, and atmospheric sampling.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.4 Airspace Access for UAS

1. Recreational Flyers 1.1 Advisory Circular 91 − 57, Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft, provides guidance for recreational flyers. Failure of a recreational flyer to adhere to any of the requirements for recreational status under 14 USC 44809 will result in the flight being considered 14 CFR Part 107 by the FAA, which may result in greater penalties if the operator is found operating in an unsafe manner. Recreational flyers may only operate under the statutory exception if they adhere to all of the conditions listed in the statute.

REFERENCE − AC 91 − 57, Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft.

49 USC 44809, Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft.

14 CFR Part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

1.2 Operations in Class G airspace. Flights in Class G airspace will be the most common environment for many recreational flyers. The upper limit of recreational UAS operations in Class G airspace is 400 feet AGL. When operating in Class G airspace, the recreational flyer must follow the set of safety guidelines outlined and developed by a recognized Community Based Organization (CBO).

1.3 Operations in controlled airspace or uncontrolled airspace above 400 feet AGL. If a recreational flyer desires to operate in class B, C, or D airspace, or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of class E airspace designated for an airport, or in class G airspace above 400 feet, the operator must obtain prior authorization from the Administrator or designee before operating. For the recreational flyer wishing to enter controlled airspace, there are two basic routes: 1.3.1 Fixed sites are flying sites specifically authorized by the FAA, and are posted at the FAA’s interactive map on the UAS Data Delivery System (UDDS). On the map, small blue circles depict the location of these sites in controlled airspace, and the altitude limits imposed on those sites. The altitude restrictions are derived from the UASFM which form the basic structure of LAANC and its operating procedures. Recreational flyers can access site − specific information by clicking on the blue circle.

NOTE − These sites have existing letters of agreement or authorization (LOA) with the FAA. For the CBO to operate in controlled airspace, an airspace authorization agreement between the CBO and the FAA must be in place. Certain sites may have access restrictions or other operating limitations, which are available from the site sponsor.

1.3.2 By request, through the LAANC Application. LAANC provides the recreational pilot with access, when permissible, to controlled airspace at or below posted UASFM altitudes in near − real time. LAANC also gives the recreational flyer the ability to stay notified of airspace restrictions and prohibitions. See ENR 8.8, paragraph 7. , of this chapter for information on downloading the LAANC application.

1.4 CBO Sanctioned Events. Sanctioned events, also called sponsored events are generally of short duration and take place at an existing fixed site or temporary fixed site established specifically for the event.

1.4.1 CBO’s requesting a sanctioned or sponsored event authorization within Class B, C, D, or within the lateral boundaries of the surface area of Class E airspace designated for an airport are obligated to make the location known to the FAA Administrator. Mutually agreed − upon operating procedures must be established with the event organizer. This is accomplished through a fixed site application in DroneZone.

1.4.2 CBO operations and events occurring at 400 feet AGL and below in Class G airspace do not require FAA review, approval or authorization. CBO’s intending to conduct events in Class G airspace that may exceed 400 feet AGL must contact the FAA for further information.

2. 14 CFR Part 107 and Waivers to 14 CFR Part 107 2.1 14 CFR Part 107 was the first rule dedicated to UAS operations. It was designed to provide a path for integration into the NAS for sUAS, flown under VLOS, and operated for non − recreational purposes. Part 107 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.4 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 allows remote pilots to fly for recreation. Part 107 grants certain flight permissions and altitudes in excess of those provided under 49 USC 44809, The Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of UAS, in view of the greater vetting required for 14 CFR Part 107 certification. Eligibility requirements to fly under 14 CFR Part 107, are listed in 14 CFR Section 107.61, Eligibility.

NOTE − The Administrator may issue a certificate of waiver authorizing a deviation from 14 CFR Section 107.31, Visual Line of Sight Aircraft Operation, if the operation can safely be conducted under the terms of a certificate of waiver.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 107, sUAS.

14 CFR Section 107.61, Eligibility.

14 CFR Section 107.31, Visual Line of Sight Aircraft Operation.

2.2 Operations in class G airspace. Part 107 remote pilots may fly in class G airspace up to 400 feet AGL, and within 400 feet of a structure without prior coordination with ATC. Other limitations for Part 107 operators are described in 14 CFR Section 107.51, Operating Limitations for sUAS.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 107.51, Operating Imitations for Small Unmanned Aircraft.

2.3 Operations in controlled airspace through LAANC. LAANC gives the remote pilot the ability to obtain near real − time airspace authorization within UASFM altitudes and stay notified of airspace restrictions and prohibitions. See ENR 8.8, paragraph 7., Resources for UAS Operators, for information on downloading LAANC.

2.4 Waivers to 14 CFR Part 107: 2.4.1 A waiver is an official document issued by the FAA which approves certain operations of UAS outside the limitations of a regulation. These waivers allow UAS pilots to deviate from certain rules under 14 CFR Part 107 by demonstrating they can still fly safely using alternative methods or safety mitigations. 14 CFR Part 107 rules which can be waived are listed in 14 CFR Section 107.205, List of Regulations Subject to Waiver. Any subpart of 14 CFR Part 107 rule which is not specifically listed in 14 CFR Section 107.205, such as the §107.36 prohibition on the carriage or transport of HAZMAT, is not subject to waiver, and would require an exemption under 14 CFR Part 11, General Rulemaking Procedures. See ENR 8.3, paragraph 2, Exemptions Under 49 USC 44807: Special Authority for Certain Unmanned Systems, for guidance on requesting exemptions.

2.4.2 To request a 14 CFR Part 107 waiver, refer to the FAA’s Part 107 Waiver website.

NOTE − The FAA’s Part 107 wavier website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/part_107_waivers/.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 107.205, List of Regulations Subject to Waiver.

14 CFR 11, General Rulemaking Procedures.

3. Airspace Access for Public Aircraft Operations (PAOs) 3.1 General requirements for PAO status. Governmental entities, as defined by federal law 49 USC 40102(a)(41), Definitions, can fly as a public aircraft operation as long as the flight meets the definition of a governmental function 49 USC 40125, Qualifications for Public Aircraft Status. Public aircraft are an aircraft owned and operated by the government of a state, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States, or a political subdivision of one of these governments, except as provided in 49 USC 40125(b), Qualifications for Public Aircraft Status. Public aircraft can also be aircraft exclusively leased for at least 90 continuous days by the government of a state, the District of Columbia, or a territory or possession of the United States or a political subdivision of one of these governments, except as provided in 49 USC 40125(b), Qualifications for Public Aircraft Status.

NOTE − 1. The term “government function” refers to one of several activities undertaken by a government, such as national defense, intelligence missions, firefighting, search and rescue, law enforcement (including transportation of prisoners, detainees, and illegal aliens), aeronautical research, or biological or geopolitical resource management Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.4 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 2. An operation “for the public good” does not necessarily meet the criteria for a public operation. For example, most volunteer fire departments in the United States will not qualify as PAOs.

3. Public safety organizations often conduct operations under 14 CFR Part 107, as well as public aircraft operations.

REFERENCE − 49 USC 40102, Definitions.

49 USC 40125, Qualifications for Pubic Aircraft Status.

3.2 A PAO is conducted under certain 14 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations Rules, with a COA granted to allow access to the NAS. A PAO COA allows blanket UAS operations in Class G airspace throughout the entire continental United States, including operations at night with appropriate lighting and training, for the duration of the COA. Waivers and/or authorizations to the COA can permit operations beyond the basic COA. Operating as a PAO requires adherence to specific conditions as directed in the COA. Operations under the public aircraft statute cannot include purposes that are not governmental functions. For example, a police UAS flying without remuneration to obtain footage for a department promotional video would not be a governmental function.

3.3 COA Application Process: 3.3.1 Public Declaration Letter (PDL). The first step in getting a PAO COA is to be recognized as an authorized government agency by submitting a PDL that shows the organization is indeed a governmental entity as defined by federal law. FAA general counsel reviews this letter, which is usually issued by a city, county or state attorney.

Federal agencies are deemed to be governmental entities without submitting a PDL.

3.3.2 COA Request. If formally recognized as a governmental entity under federal law, entities are given access to the COA Application Process System (CAPS) or DroneZone, where a request for a PAO COA may be submitted. Operating as a PAO requires you to adhere to specific conditions as directed in your COA. Remember that an aircraft described in subparagraph (a), (b), (c), or (d) of 49 USC 40102(a)(41), Definitions, does not qualify as a public aircraft under such section when the aircraft is used for commercial purposes (e.g., performing a non − governmental function).

REFERENCE − AC 00 − 1.1, Public Aircraft Operations—Manned and Unmanned.

49 USC 40102, Definitions.

4. 14 CFR Part 89 Remote Identification and FAA − Recognized Identification Areas (FRIAs) 4.1 Background: 4.1.1 Remote identification (RID) of UAS is crucial to UAS integration.

4.1.2 RID is the ability of a UAS in flight to provide identification and location information that can be received by other parties.

4.1.3 RID allows the FAA, national security agencies, law enforcement, and others to distinguish compliant airspace users from those potentially posing a safety or security risk. It helps these agencies find the control station when a UAS appears to be flying unsafely or where it is prohibited.

4.2 Remote ID Rule: 4.2.1 14 CFR Part 89, Remote Identification (RID) of Unmanned Aircraft, will require most UAS operating in U.S. airspace to have RID capability. UAS not equipped with RID capability will be limited to operating in specific FAA − approved geographic locations, such as FRIA.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 89, Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft.

4.2.2 There are three ways UAS pilots will be able to meet the identification requirements of the RID rule: Standard RID, RID Broadcast Module, and FRIAs.

4.2.2.1 Standard RID. Only standard RID UAS may be manufactured after the September 16, 2022, rule effective date. Unmanned aircraft broadcast the RID message elements directly from the unmanned aircraft from takeoff to shut down. Message elements include: (1) A unique identifier to establish the identity of the unmanned Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.4 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 aircraft; (2) an indication of the unmanned aircraft latitude, longitude, geometric altitude, and velocity; (3) an indication of the control station latitude, longitude, and geometric altitude; (4) a time mark; and (5) an emergency status indication. Operators may choose whether to use the serial number of the unmanned aircraft or a session ID (e.g., an alternative form of identification that provides additional privacy to the operator) as the unique identifier.

4.2.2.2 RID Broadcast Modules. A UAS can be equipped with a RID broadcast module that broadcasts message elements from takeoff to shutdown. Message elements include: (1) The serial number of the broadcast module assigned by the producer; (2) an indication of the latitude, longitude, geometric altitude, and velocity of the unmanned aircraft; (3) an indication of the latitude, longitude, and geometric altitude of the unmanned aircraft takeoff location; and (4) a time mark.

4.2.2.3 FAA − Recognized Identification Area: a) An FAA − Recognized Identification Area (FRIA) is a defined geographic area where persons can operate UAS without remote identification, provided they maintain visual line of sight. Organizations eligible to request establishment of a FRIA include CBOs recognized by the FAA and educational institutions. The latter group includes primary and secondary educational institutions, trade schools, colleges, and universities.

b) To operate in a FRIA according to the 14 CFR Part 89, RID of unmanned aircraft, operators must be physically located within the boundaries of the FRIA, must only operate drones within those boundaries, and must operate within visual line of site (VLOS) at all times. UAS equipped with RID broadcast capability must broadcast continuously even while operating within or transiting a FRIA.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 89, Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft.

c) FIG ENR 8.4 − 1 illustrates the three ways UAS operators can comply with the new RID Rule.

FIG ENR 8.4 − 1 RID Paths to Compliance 5. Airspace Access for 14 CFR Part 135 and 14 CFR Part 137 5.1 14 CFR Part 135, Operating Requirements: Commuter and on Demand Operations and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft: 5.1.1 Civil operators of UAS may conduct commercial package delivery BVLOS, or may transport HAZMAT on an interstate basis (crossing state boundaries), only under 14 CFR Part 135. These types of operations are prohibited for UAS operating under 14 CFR Part 107, sUAS. Legally, these operations must be conducted under 14 CFR Part 91, UAS operations, in accordance with an air carrier certificate issued under 14 CFR Part 135, and an exemption from certain federal aviation regulations granted under 14 CFR Part 11, general rulemaking procedures.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.4 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 135, Operating Requirements: Commuter and on Demand Operations and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft.

14 CFR Part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

14 CFR Part 11, General Rulemaking Procedures.

FAA Order JO 7210.3, Chapter 5, Section 5, 14 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations.

5.1.2 Generally, UAS cannot comply with certain 14 CFR regulations originally written for a manned aircraft environment and therefore require relief. UAS operators obtain relief from the requirements of these regulations through exemptions, waivers, and deviations. The relief document lists conditions and limitations that provide a level of safety at least equal to the rule from which relief is needed. Additionally, UAS operators must obtain a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) from the FAA Air Traffic Organization (ATO). Applicants for 14 CFR Part 135 certification should begin the process by contacting their local FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO).

NOTE − Examples of such regulations include requirements for the provision of seat belts for aircrew and passengers, on − board carriage of an aircraft manual, etc.

5.1.2.1 Application for a 14 CFR Part 135 certificate. Application for a 14 CFR Part 135 air carrier certificate for UAS operations uses the same process as that for manned 14 CFR Part 135 applicants. For information on how to apply for an air carrier certificate issued under 14 CFR Part 135, see the FAA 14 CFR Part 135 Air Carrier and Operator Certification website.

NOTE − The FAA 14 CFR Part 135 Air Carrier and Operator Certification website may be reviewed at: https://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airline_certification/135_certification/ .

5.1.2.2 Advisory Circular 120 − 49A, Parts 121 and 135 Certification, is available to aid an applicant in Part 135 certification.

REFERENCE − AC 120 − 49, Parts 121 and 135 Certification.

5.1.2.3 Exemptions and COAs. Additional information on how to petition for an exemption and obtain a COA is available on the FAA Advanced Operations website.

NOTE − The FAA’s Advanced Operations website may be reviewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/ .

5.2 14 CFR Part 137, Agricultural Aircraft Operations: 5.2.1 Civil and public operators of UAS may conduct agricultural aircraft operations as defined in 14 CFR Part 137.3, Definition of Terms. These operations must be conducted in accordance with an agricultural aircraft operator certificate issued under 14 CFR Part 137, and an exemption from certain federal aviation regulations granted under 14 CFR Part 11, General Rulemaking Procedures. Operators of sUAS weighing less than 55 pounds MGOW may conduct agricultural aircraft operations under 14 CFR Part 107, sUAS, and 14 CFR Part 137. Operators of large UAS weighing 55 pounds or more MGOW may conduct agricultural aircraft operations under 14 CFR Parts 91, UAS operations, and 14 CFR Part 137.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 137, Agricultural Aircraft Operations.

14 CFR Part 11, General Rulemaking Procedures.

14 CFR Part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

FAA Order JO 7210.3, Chapter 5, Section 5, 14 CFR Part 91, UAS Operations.

5.2.2 Generally, as is the case with 14 CFR Part 135 standard cargo operations, UAS cannot comply with certain 14 CFR regulations, and therefore require relief. For example, sUAS require relief from carriage of hazardous material (§107.36), aircraft certification (§137.19(d)), carriage of agricultural aircraft operator certificate (§137.33(a)), and, for large UAS, certain aircraft airworthiness requirements (14 CFR Parts 21 and 91). UAS operators obtain relief from the requirements of these regulations through an exemption. The exemption lists conditions and limitations which provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule. Additionally, large UAS operators must obtain a COA from the FAA ATO.

5.2.2.1 Obtaining an exemption for 14 CFR Part 137 operations. For additional information on how to petition for an exemption and obtain a COA, go to the FAA’s Advanced Operations website.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.4 − 6 United States of America 22 JAN 26 NOTE − The FAA’s Advanced Operations website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/ .

5.2.2.2 Advisory Circular 137 − 1, Certification Process for Agricultural Aircraft Operators, provides additional information on how to apply for an agricultural aircraft operator certificate issued under 14 CFR Part 137.

REFERENCE − AC 137.1, Certification Process for Agricultural Aircraft Operation.

5.3 Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT): 5.3.1 A hazardous material (also known as HAZMAT) or dangerous goods, is any substance or material that is capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property when transported in commerce. See definition of HAZMAT in the Pilot/Controller Glossary. For example, lithium batteries, dry ice, and aerosol whipped cream are considered dangerous goods. These products may seem harmless, however, when transported by air they can be very dangerous. Vibrations, static electricity, temperature and pressure variations can cause items to leak, generate toxic fumes, start a fire, or even explode if these products are not packaged and handled properly. More detailed information is located on the FAA’s What are Dangerous Goods website.

NOTE − The FAA’s What are Dangerous Goods website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/what_is_hazmat/ .

5.3.2 The carriage/transportation of hazardous materials under 14 CFR Part 107, sUAS, is strictly prohibited at all times, and is not subject to waiver. In order to transport hazardous materials, UAS operators must follow the 14 CFR Part 135 certification regulatory path and must develop dangerous goods training programs and manuals as part of the 14 CFR Part 135 Air Carrier and Operator Certificates process, described on the FAA website and ENR 8.4, subparagraph 5.1, 14 CFR Part 135, Operating Requirements. A brief description of applicable regulations as they apply to UAS is found on the FAA’s UAS website.

NOTE − The FAA’s Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/air_carriers/operations/dr ones/.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 107, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

14 CFR Part 135, Operating Requirements: Commuter and on Demand Operations and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft.

6. Airspace Restrictions to Flight 6.1 General. The FAA has the exclusive authority to regulate aviation safety and the efficient use of airspace by aircraft. Attempts by state and local governments to regulate in those areas are preempted. Outside of those areas, the States are generally free to regulate as long as their laws do not conflict with FAA regulations or relate to the prices, routes, or services of commercial air carriers. The NAS extends from the ground to above 60,000 feet MSL and includes various classifications of airspace, both controlled and uncontrolled. sUAS remote pilots and recreational flyers are generally permitted access to uncontrolled airspace without special permission.

However, this changes when access to controlled airspace is desired. All access to controlled airspace by unmanned aircraft must be granted by ATC.

NOTE − 1. While the NAS is divided into controlled and uncontrolled airspace, users must remember that all airspace is regulated, and certain rules apply throughout the NAS.

2. Recreational flyers are limited to no higher than 400 feet AGL in Class G airspace, without prior authorization.

3. sUAS remote pilots operating under 14 CFR part 107 are limited to no higher than 400 feet AGL unless the small UA is (1) Flown within a 400 − foot radius of a structure; and (2) Does not fly higher than 400 feet above the structure’s immediate uppermost limit, or when a waiver has been issued to 14 CFR § 107.51(b).

6.2 Controlled Airspace is a generic term that covers the different classification of airspace (Class A, Class B, Class C, Class D, and Class E airspace) and defined dimensions within which air traffic control services can be provided to Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) flights and to Visual Flight Rules (VFR) flights, in accordance with the airspace classification.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.4 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.3 Special Use Airspace (SUA). SUA consists of that airspace where flight activities must be confined because of their nature, or where limitations are imposed upon aircraft operations that are not a part of those activities, or both. These areas are generally depicted on aeronautical charts and will be indicated on the B4UFly and LAANC applications for UAS.

6.4 Temporary Flight Restrictions: 6.4.1 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) are non − permanent airspace restrictions issued by the FAA via the U. S. NOTAM System and are created to protect persons and property in the air or on the surface from an existing or imminent hazard associated with an incident on the surface, when the presence of low flying aircraft would magnify, alter, spread, or compound that hazard (14 CFR Section 91.137(a)(1)). TFRs can exist to protect aircraft from hazards, and also to protect people/objects on the ground from aircraft hazards. Examples of TFRs include natural disaster areas especially forest fires, floods, congested flight areas, the area around spacecraft launches and recoveries, certain stadium sporting events, and the security of national public figures.

6.4.2 UAS operators should be aware that substantial fines and penalties can be levied on UAS remote pilots or recreational flyers violating a TFR.

6.5 Special Restrictions over Critical Infrastructure: 6.5.1 The FAA restricts UAS operations over certain locations, including military sites and installations, in the interest of national security using special security instructions.

6.5.2 UAS operations may be permitted in these areas under limited circumstances. Operators should review established NOTAMS for permitted operations and to seek authorization prior to operating in these areas.

6.5.3 UAS remote pilots and recreational flyers must carefully consider where they are operating and determine the legality of doing so, infractions may result in fines and legal actions.

6.6 Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA). SFRAs are airspaces of defined dimensions, above land areas or territorial waters, wherein the flight of aircraft is subject to special rules, as established after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Examples include the Washington, DC, Los Angeles, and Hudson River SFRAs. All aircraft are highly regulated within SFRAs. The inner area of some SFRAs, the Flight Restricted Zone (FRZ) is very highly restricted and prohibits all but previously vetted aircrew and aircraft from entering. Refer to VFR Sectional Charts or the FAA’s Restricted Airspace website for information on specific airspace limitations and instructions for requesting entry.

NOTE − The FAA’s Restricted Airspace website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/restricted − airspace − 0 .

6.7 State or local governments may generally enact laws applying to UAS that (1) are aimed at objectives other than aviation safety or airspace efficiency, and (2) do not impair the reasonable use by UAS of the airspace, including laws addressing land use or zoning; harassment of individuals or groups; privacy; voyeurism; photography or imaging from UAS; trespass on property; the exercise of other police powers; reckless endangerment; law enforcement; delivery of prison contraband; and taking photographs or videos. Restrictions on how UAS are utilized (i.e., conduct), instead of where they may operate in the airspace, is more consistent with Federal preemption principles. UAS restrictions applied to the lower UAS altitudes – that would still permit overflight at the higher UAS altitudes – are less likely to raise preemption concerns.

6.8 Other Restrictions & Provisions: 6.8.1 Flight over or near natural habitat or nature preserves. See ENR 8.8, paragraph 6., Environmental Best Practices, for a discussion of UAS flight restrictions over or near wildlife.

6.8.2 “No Drone Zone:” To promote safe and responsible use of UAS, the FAA uses the term “No Drone Zone” to help operators identify areas where they cannot operate UAS. The effort assists landowners (private and public) with designating their land off − limits for UAS take − offs and landings. The outreach allows landowners who wish to avoid UAS interactions on their property to state this preference in advance of UAS take − offs or landings. The “No Drone Zone” concept does not empower State or local governments to enact airspace Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.4 − 8 United States of America 22 JAN 26 restrictions or to regulate the airspace. A “No Drone Zone” sign posted by a State or local government, or private person, only applies to the ground, not the airspace. Furthermore, the sign solely designates an area where UAS may not takeoff or land. Generally speaking, for a “No Drone Zone” in a public place to be legally enforceable, there must exist underlying land use or zoning authority (ordinance, law, etc.). If the property in question is privately − owned, the landowner’s right to prohibit UAS landing areas on their property is generally enforceable through trespass law.

6.8.3 Flight over or near people and manned aircraft. In general, UAS remote pilots and recreational flyers should avoid flying over or near people or manned aircraft operations, and in any manner that could be construed as reckless or dangerous. See paragraph ENR 8.8 − paragraph 3, Precautions: Flight Over or Near People, Manned Aircraft, and Night Flight, for specific information on flight over or near people. See 14 C.F.R. part 107 ( Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems ) and 14 C.F.R. § 107.39 and subpart D ( Operations Over Human Beings ), and 86 Fed. Reg. 4314 (Jan. 15, 2021), Final Rule, Operation of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Over People .

6.8.4 Correctional Institutions. Flight over some federal prisons is restricted under 14 CFR section 99.7, Special Security Instructions. Flight near other correctional institutions may be prohibited by other federal, state or local statutes. ENR 8.4, subparagraph 6.5 , Special Restrictions over Critical Infrastructure, contains additional information regarding restrictions over critical infrastructure.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 99.7, Special Security Instructions.

7. UAS Traffic Management (UTM) 7.1 UTM Operations. UTM is predicated on layers of information sharing and data exchange amongst a range of stakeholders including UAS operators, service providers, and the FAA to achieve safe operations. Operators share their flight intent with each other and coordinate to de − conflict and safely separate trajectories. The primary means of communication and coordination between operators, the FAA, and other stakeholders is through a distributed information network, rather than between pilots and air traffic controllers via traditional voice communications. The FAA makes real − time airspace constraints available to UAS operators, who are responsible for managing their own operations safely within these constraints without receiving ATC services from the FAA. However, the FAA does have access to applicable UTM operational information as necessary.

7.2 UAS operators not receiving ATC separation services are required to participate in UTM at some level using applicable services to meet the performance requirements of their operations. See FIG ENR 8.4 − 2 for UTM in the context of Air Traffic Management operations. The number and type of services required varies based on the type and location of the intended operation and the associated communication, navigation, surveillance (CNS), and other operational needs.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.4 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG ENR 8.4 − 2 UTM Operations in Context of Airspace Classes 7.3 Stakeholders in UTM: 7.3.1 FAA, the federal authority over aircraft operations in all airspace, and the regulator and oversight authority for civil aircraft operations in the NAS.

7.3.2 Operator, the person or entity responsible for the overall management of their operation. The operator meets regulatory responsibilities, plans flight/operations, shares operation intent information, and safely conducts operations using all available information.

7.3.3 Remote pilot − in − command (RPIC), the person responsible for the safe conduct of each UAS flight. An individual may serve as both the operator and the RPIC.

7.3.4 Other stakeholders (e.g., public safety and general public), can access information and/or utilize UTM services via the USS Network.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.5 UAS Pilot Testing, Certification and

Responsibilities

1. UAS Pilot Certification and Requirements for Part 107 Pilots and Recreational Flyers 1.1 General: 1.1.1 Part 107 Operations. Any person who operates a civil sUAS in the NAS, for any operation that is not for recreational/pleasure purposes, must have a UAS pilot’s certificate (also called the “Part 107 Certificate”) with a Small Unmanned Aircraft System Rating.

1.1.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. A person who is flying a sUAS for recreational/pleasure purposes in the NAS must have taken and passed TRUST, as required by 14 USC 44809.

1.2 Eligibility for Testing: 1.2.1 Part 107 operations. Applicants must be at least 16 years of age and be able to speak and understand English. For further information on Part 107 testing see the FAA’s website, Become a Drone Pilot.

NOTE − The FAA’s Become a Drone Pilot website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/become_a_drone_pilot/ .

1.2.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. There are no minimum age or other eligibility requirements for a recreational UAS pilot to take TRUST.

1.3 Initial Testing for Certification: 1.3.1 Part 107 Operations: 1.3.1.1 Current 14 CFR Part 61 Certificate Holder (Online Training). A person who holds a Part 61 manned pilot certificate (other than a student pilot certificate), and who has a current flight review, as per 14 CFR Section 61.56, may complete online training that is offered by the FAA to obtain their 14 CFR Part 107, in lieu of taking the Initial Knowledge Test. However, a Part 61 certificate holder may also take the sUAS Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test for certification.

1.3.1.2 Non 14 CFR Part 61 certificate holder, or 14 CFR Part 61 certificate holder lacking currency (Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test). A person who does not hold a 14 CFR Part 61 manned pilot certificate and/or they do not have a current flight review must take the Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test at an FAA designated Knowledge Testing Center to obtain their sUAS Certificate.

1.3.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. Any person who flies a UA for recreational use under 49 USC 44809 must take and pass TRUST. See the FAA website, The Recreational UAS Safety Test (TRUST).

NOTE − A current 14 CFR Part 107 sUAS certificate holder may fly recreationally under that part, but must adhere entirely to 14 CFR Part 107 rules and requirements. If a Part 107 sUAS certificate holder wishes to fly under 49 USC 44809, they must take and pass TRUST.

NOTE − The FAA’s website, The Recreational UAS Safety Test (TRUST), may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_flyers/knowledge_test_updates .

1.4 Recurrent Training (Testing) Requirements: 1.4.1 Part 107 operations: 1.4.1.1 To exercise the privileges of a sUAS certificate that was issued under 14 CFR Part 107, a person must maintain currency. Therefore, the FAA requires that a person take a recurrent course within 24 months from the month the Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test was passed, or the online training was completed.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.5 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.4.1.2 Recurrent training (online training) is found at the FAA’s Become a Drone Pilot website.

NOTE − The FAA’s Become a Drone Pilot website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/become_a_drone_pilot/ .

1.4.2 Recreational Operations. TRUST is taken on a once − and − done basis; no recurrent testing is required.

1.5 Pre − Test Training Requirements: 1.5.1 Part 107 Operations: 1.5.1.1 No documented pre − test training is required under Part 107 to take the Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test. However, the FAA Remote Pilot Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide is an excellent resource.

NOTE − To view the FAA Remote Pilot – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Study Guide see: https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/remote_pilot_study_guide.p df.

1.5.1.2 Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test subject areas. The testing topics for the sUAS Knowledge Test can be found in 14 CFR Section 107.73, Knowledge and Training.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Section 107.73, Knowledge and Training.

1.5.1.3 Part 107 online training. This online training may be used by those who hold a 14 CFR Part 61 pilot certificate (not including a student pilot certificate) seeking 14 CFR Part 107 remote pilot certification. A person who holds a 14 CFR Part 61 pilot certificate must also show, at the time of certification, a current Flight Review as per 14 CFR Section 61.56.

1.5.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. No pre − test training is necessary to complete TRUST.

1.6 Endorsements and re − testing. Neither the Part 107 Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test nor the Recreational TRUST have any requirements for flight instructor endorsements prior to testing. A person who fails the Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test must wait 14 calendar days before they may retake the test. TRUST may be retaken at any time.

1.7 Registering to Take the Part 107 sUAS Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test: 1.7.1 Before a person can take the sUAS Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test at an FAA − recognized testing center, that person must obtain an FAA Tracking Number (FTN). To obtain an FTN a person must create an account in the Integrated Airman Certification and Rating Application (IACRA) system. For detailed instructions on how to obtain an FTN, see the FAA’s, Airman Certificate Testing Service (ACTS) Contract Briefing.

NOTE − Any person who has any FAA Airman Certificate will already have an FTN.

NOTE − The FAA’s Airman Certificate Testing Service (ACTS) Contract Briefing, may be viewed at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETLsH8BruBM .

1.7.2 Once an applicant has a FTN, they will go to the testing vendor’s website and register for the test. The FAA’s testing vendor is PSI Services LLC.

NOTE − The PSI Services LLC website may be viewed at: https://candidate.psiexams.com/ .

1.8 Applying for a 14 CFR Part 107 sUAS Certificate. The FAA’s Become a Drone Pilot website has instructions on how to obtain the 14 CFR Part 107 Pilot Certificate, following testing or online training completion.

NOTE − The Become a Drone Pilot website may be viewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/commercial_operators/become_a_drone_pilot/ .

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.5 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 1.9 Night Operations and Operations over People : 1.9.1 A person who holds a sUAS Certificate is afforded all of the privileges of the certificate. This includes the ability to operate at night and over people without a waiver, under certain conditions. See ENR 8.8, paragraph 3, Precautions: Flight Over or Near People, Manned Aircraft, and Night Operations, for further information on these operations.

1.9.2 Any remote pilot who holds a 14 CFR Part 107 sUAS certificate issued prior to April 6, 2021, must take the updated recurrent training (online training) to operate at night or over people.

2. Pilot Certification and Requirements for Public Aircraft Operations (PAOs) 2.1 When operating as a PAO, the operator is required to train and the agency will self − certify pilots as competent to safely operate in the NAS.

2.2 For more information and best practices on pilot certification and training within the framework of a PAO, refer to AC 00 − 1.1, Public Aircraft Operations—Manned and Unmanned.

REFERENCE − AC 00 − 1.1, Public Aircraft Operations—Manned and Unmanned.

3. Pilot Certification for 14 CFR Part 135, Part 137, and Large Civil UAS 3.1 Pilot certification for 14 CFR Part 135. Currently, FAA regulations require a commercial pilot certificate for 14 CFR Part 135 Remote PICs.

3.2 Pilot certification for 14 CFR Part 137. For civil UAS agricultural aircraft operations, the 14 CFR Section 137.19(b) & (c) requirement (that the pilot hold a private or commercial pilot certificate) is exempted; only a 14 CFR Part 107 pilot certificate is required. This policy pertains to all UAS regardless of weight. However, all civil pilots conducting agricultural aircraft operations must satisfactorily pass the knowledge and skill test of 14 CFR Section 137.19(e) and 14 CFR Section 137.41(b) or (c).

3.3 Pilot certification for other large civil UAS. Requirements for future large civil UAS operations will be addressed in future rulemaking.

4. Foreign Pilot Certification 4.1 Part 107 Operations: 4.1.1 Foreign national holding a U.S. issued 14 CFR Part 61 certificate. Foreign nationals are eligible for a sUAS certificate in the same way that a U.S. citizen is eligible.

4.1.2 Foreign national not holding a U.S. issued 14 CFR Part 61 certificate. A foreign national who does not hold a U.S. issued 14 CFR Part 61 certificate, must take and pass the Initial Aeronautical Knowledge Test to obtain a sUAS Pilot Certificate in order to operate in the NAS.

4.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. A foreign national is required to have passed TRUST to fly a UAS recreationally under 49 USC 44809 in the United States.

4.3 Security vetting. All applicants, regardless of nationality, must pass a Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Security Threat Analysis (STA) before the FAA will issue a temporary or permanent Pilot’s Certificate, under Part 107.

4.4 Bi − lateral agreements. Currently, the United States does not have any bi − lateral agreements with any other countries that would allow the issuance of a U.S. sUAS certificate that is based on a foreign UAS Pilot’s Certificate.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.6 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.6 Advanced Air Mobility

1. General 1.1 Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) is a rapidly − emerging, new sector of the aerospace industry which aims to safely and efficiently integrate highly automated aircraft into the NAS. AAM is not a single technology, but rather a collection of new and emerging technologies being applied to the aviation transportation system, particularly in new aircraft types. Notional AAM use − cases include Urban Air Mobility (UAM), Regional Air Mobility (RAM), public services, large cargo delivery, and private or recreational vehicles.

1.2 UAM and RAM are subsets of AAM activities occurring in urban environments.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.7 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.7 UAS Operations on Airports

1. UAS Operations on Airports 1.1 Larger public and civil UAS operate from military, civilian, and dual − use airports with set protocols and agreements with local ATC, often operate under IFR.

1.2 sUAS operations on airports require coordination with the airport operator and respective air traffic control facility, Spectrum, the FAA Regional Airport District Office, or the State Department of Aviation, where applicable. Due to the complex nature of these operations, requests for on − airport operations within controlled airspace must be submitted via DroneZone for coordination with the air traffic control facility. On − airport operation requests are evaluated on a case − by − case basis due to the inherent risks associated with operating in close proximity to areas frequented by manned aircraft.

NOTE − The FAA’s DroneZone website may be viewed at: https://faadronezone.faa.gov/#/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.8 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

ENR 8.8 Other Information and Best Practices

1. Best Practices for UAS Operations Responsibility of the UAS pilot. Just as is the case with a manned aircraft, the UAS remote pilot or recreational flyer is responsible for the safe operation of their unmanned aircraft. The remote pilot or recreational flyer must ensure that they are physically ready to fly and knowledgeable of the flight to be performed to include operational parameters, UAS limitations, local weather, and applicable flight rules; that the UAS itself is mechanically ready.

2. UAS Operations and Air Traffic Control (ATC) Coordination and/or communication of airspace authorizations between UAS pilots or operators and ATC are handled within the airspace access processes (e.g., LAANC, DroneZone, CAPS). They are not coordinated extemporaneously and verbally between the UAS operator and ATC. Any requirements for coordination and/or communication between UAS operator and ATC will be contained in individual COAs, which may include operational waivers, development of LOAs, and through other application processes which allow access to controlled airspace. Any air traffic services provided to sUAS operations shall be based upon the type of airspace authorization issued, along with the mitigations and limitations included in that authorization.

NOTE − 1. Small UAS operators should not contact ATC directly by radio or telephone for purposes of airspace access. Also, the use of an aviation radio frequency by the RPIC of a sUAS may constitute a violation of Federal Communications Commission rules. Remote pilots of larger UAS—which are usually under positive control by ATC and flying under Instrument Flight Rules—are an exception to this guideline.

2. Small UAS operators are encouraged to monitor local CTAF radio traffic when operating on or near an airport, for situational awareness.

3. Precautions: Flight Over or Near People, Vehicles, Manned Aircraft, and Night Operations 3.1 Flight over or near people or vehicles: 3.1.1 Remote pilots and recreational flyers should carefully consider the hazards of flight operations over or near people. 14 CFR Part 107, Subpart D, operations over human beings, allows certain Operations Over People (OOP) and vehicles, based upon four different operational categories of UA weight and construction, and the likely severity of injury to people on the ground, in the case of contact. Part 107 operators may request a waiver to these restrictions.

3.1.2 Part 91 remote pilots may refer to restrictions and permissions, regarding flight over people, in their respective COAs.

3.1.3 Recreational flyers should consider the safety of other persons when flying. 49 USC 44809(a)(2), Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft, requires recreational flyers to operate in accordance with the safety guidelines of an accepted CBO; these guidelines will usually include safety precautions for flight near people.

3.1.4 For further information on the rules for flying over people or vehicles, see ENR 8.4, paragraph 6., Airspace Restrictions to Flight.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 107, Subpart D, Operations Over Human Beings.

49 USC 44809(a)(2), Exception for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraft.

3.2 Flight in the Vicinity of Manned Aircraft: 3.2.1 The pilot of any unmanned aircraft operation retains the ultimate responsibility to avoid manned aircraft traffic. UAS operators should remember that manned aircraft may fly below 400 feet AGL; examples include Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.8 − 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 helicopters, agricultural aircraft, light civil aircraft, and military aircraft. UAS pilots must ensure they have unblocked visual access to both their UAS and the airspace around it; not seeing a manned aircraft due to blocked line of sight does not absolve the UAS pilot from responsibility for avoidance.

NOTE − Military aircraft routinely fly low and at very high speeds on low − level Military Training Routes (MTRs). MTR locations can be viewed on the VFR sectional charts. The B4UFly app will also alert the UAS pilot to the location of nearby MTRs.

3.2.2 Should public safety or emergency responder aircraft (e.g., police, fire suppression, helicopter emergency medical services) operations be interfered with by UAS, substantial fines can be levied on the UAS operators involved. Enforcement actions can include revocation or suspension of a pilot certificate, and up to a $20,000 civil penalty per violation.

3.3 Night Operations: 3.3.1 Night operations are permitted under 14 CFR Parts 91, 14 CFR Part 107, and Section 44809. However, requirements for meteorological visibility, and for the operator or visual observer (VO) to maintain VLOS with the UAS at all times, should be considered; see ENR 8.5, subparagraph 1.9.

3.3.2 14 CFR Section 107.29, Operation at Night, requirements include initial pilot training and equipment such as an anti − collision light which is visible for at least three statute miles, with a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision.

3.3.3 Part 91 operators civil and PAO should refer to their specific COAs for any further instructions or limitations on night flight.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR Part 107.29, Operation at Night.

4. Accidents and Incidents: UAS Operator Responsibilities 4.1 Reporting responsibility. A drone crash or malfunction, irrespective of which flight rules govern the flight, may trigger a reporting requirement to either the FAA, the NTSB, or both. The NTSB reporting requirements listed in 49 CFR 830.5, immediate notification, are separate and distinct from the FAA reporting requirements.

All UAS flyers operating in the NAS recreational, civil, and public are encouraged to read and follow NTSB reporting requirements should they experience a crash or malfunction that meets NTSB criteria and triggers NTSB reporting. See NTSB Reporting Requirements and ENR 8.8, subparagraph 4.2, below. A COA issued to Part 91 civil and public operators will contain specific incident/accident reporting requirements for the operator.

4.1.1 Part 107 Operations. Part 107 operators have a reporting requirement described in 14 CFR Section 107.9, Accident Reporting. A remote pilot in command is required to report any sUAS crash that causes serious injury or loss of consciousness, or property damage other than to the UAS of over $500. Property damage refers to any property that is not part of the UA System or attached to the UAS.

4.1.2 Recreational Flyer Operations. Recreational flyers fully complying with the exception listed in 49 USC 44809 are not required to report crashes to the FAA. However, this does not alleviate the recreational flyer from the requirement to report the crash to the NTSB if the crash meets the NTSB reporting requirements.

4.1.3 Part 91 Operations. Part 91 operators typically flown by public aircraft operators, civil aircraft operators, or civil operators flying FAA type certificated UAS have unique reporting requirements delineated in the terms and conditions of their certificate of waiver/authorization and must comply with those specific requirements.

4.2 NTSB Reporting Requirements. The NTSB defines a UAS accident as an occurrence associated with the operations of any public or civil UAS that takes place between the time that the system is activated with the purpose of flight and the time that the system is deactivated at the conclusion of its mission, in which any person suffers death or serious injury, or the UAS holds an airworthiness certificate and sustains substantial damage.

In the case of a midair collision involving a UAS, any midair collision must be reported.

REFERENCE − 14 CFR 830.5, Immediate Notification.

14 CFR Section 107.9, Accident Reporting.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP ENR 8.8 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 5. Emergency UAS Authorizations Through Special Government Interest (SGI) Airspace Waivers 5.1 Background. UAS are used by public safety agencies to respond to emergencies. The SGI process is for any Part 107 or Part 91 operator that either due to time limitations, airspace restrictions or emergency situations that requires expedited authorization by contacting the system operations support center (SOSC) at 9 − ATOR − HQ − SOSC@faa.gov.

5.2 The SGI process, depending on the nature of the operation, can be completed in a matter of minutes. This process enables response to an emergency with UAS in an expeditious manner.

5.3 Public Safety organizations may apply for expedited airspace authorizations through the SGI process. The SGI process is defined in FAA Order JO 7210.3, Facility Operation and Administration.

REFERENCE − FAA Order JO 7210.3, Facility Operation And Administration, 5.4 Additional information regarding SGI authorizations can be located at the FAA’s Emergency Situations webpage.

NOTE − The FAA’s Emergency Situations website may be reviewed at: https://www.faa.gov/uas/advanced_operations/emer gency_situations/ .

6. Environmental Best Practices 6.1 Unmanned aircraft operate in a similar environment to manned aircraft. Since most UAS operations are conducted at low altitude, hazards, risks and potential environment factors may be encountered on a more frequent basis. In addition to the Bird Hazards, Flight over National Refuges, Parks, and Forests, the following factors must also be considered: 6.1.1 Flight Near Protected Conservation Areas. UAS, if misused, can have devastating impacts on protected wildlife. UAS operators may check for conservation area airspace restrictions on the B4UFLY mobile app.

6.1.2 Flight(s) Near Noise Sensitive Areas. Consider the following: 6.1.2.1 UAS operations and flight paths should be planned to avoid prolonged or repetitive flight at low altitude near noise sensitive areas.

6.1.2.2 As described in FAA Order 1050.1, Environmental Impact: Policies and Procedures, an area is “noise sensitive” if noise interferes with any normal activities associated with the area’s use.

REFERENCE − FAA Order 1050.1, Environmental Impact: Policies and Procedures.

6.1.2.3 To the extent consistent with FAA safety requirements, operators should observe best practices developed by the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration when operating above areas administered by those agencies. The National Park Service provides additional guidance at their Unmanned Aircraft Systems website.

NOTE − The National Park Service, Unmanned Aircraft Systems website may be viewed at: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/sound/uas.htm .

6.2 Some bird species have shown the potential to attack UAS that approach their nesting and hunting areas too closely. The type of birds that are most likely to attack sUAS are raptors such as hawks, eagles, and falcons.

However, gulls, geese, and crows have also been known to attack UAS. Aggressive bird attacks may damage UAS propellers or other critical equipment, and may result in sudden loss of power or engine failure. Remote pilots and recreational flyers should consider reviewing engine − out procedures, especially when operating near high bird concentrations.

7. Resources for UAS Operators 7.1 FAA.GOV/UAS . The FAA UAS website, www.faa.gov/uas, is the central point for information about FAA UAS rules, regulations, and safety best practices.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP ENR 8.8 − 4 United States of America 22 JAN 26 7.2 FAA DroneZone. The FAA DroneZone is the Agency’s portal for registering drones, requesting Part 107 airspace authorizations and waivers, registering as a CBO, requesting fixed sites, and other tasks.

7.3 Local FAA Offices. Flight Standards District Offices (FSDOs), can be the best in − person source for UAS information. A list of FSDOs in the United States is at https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/field_offices/fsdo/all_fsdos/ .

7.4 Aeronautical Information. The FAA provides aeronautical information to NAS users, including UAS pilots, through a variety of methods including publications like this manual, other publications, Advisory Circulars (ACs), charts, website and mobile applications, etc. Check https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/ for these items.

7.5 The UAS Support Center. For general question or comment about UAS or drones, the FAA’s Support Center is available at 844 − FLY − MY − UA or UASHelp@faa.gov.

7.6 Clubs and Associations. Local UAS recreational clubs, CBO organizations, and business associations are excellent resources for information and updates on flying in the local region.

7.7 LAANC. LAANC is the Low Altitude Authorization and Notification Capability, a collaboration between FAA and industry. It automates the application and approval process for airspace authorizations. Using applications developed by an FAA − approved UAS service supplier (USS) you can apply for an airspace authorization at over 600 airports. Download the free LAANC app at https://www.faa.gov/uas/programs_partnerships/data_exchange/ .

7.8 B4UFLY. The B4UFLY mobile application is a partnership between the FAA and Kittyhawk. The app helps recreational flyers know whether it is safe to fly their drone, as well as increases their situational awareness.

Download the free B4UFly app at https://www.faa.gov/uas/recreational_fliers/where_can_i_fly/b4ufly/ .

7.9 Weather Sources. Aviation weather services (such as https://www.aviationweather.gov/) are generally targeted towards manned aviation, the FAA is currently working on UAS − specific weather applications.

7.10 NOTAM. The Notices to Airmen (NOTAM) system, like aviation weather sources, remains primarily predicated on manned aviation needs. However, the system provides continual updates on all aviation activity to include UAS flight activities which have been input to the FAA, as well as airport status. The NOTAM system will be of greatest use to larger UAS activities, UAS en route operations in controlled airspace, and those flying to or from airports. NOTAM, temporary flight restrictions (TFRs), and aircraft safety alerts can be accessed at https://www.faa.gov/pilots/safety/notams_tfr/ .

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration

Next: PART III. AERODROMES →

PART III. AERODROMES

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PART 3 AERODROMES (AD)

AIP AD 0.1 − 1 AIP AD 0.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

AD 0.1 Table of Contents to Part 3

AD 1. AERODROMES/HELIPORTS − INTRODUCTION AD 1.1 Aerodrome/Heliport Availability and Conditions of Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 1.1 − 1 AD 1.2 Rescue and Firefighting Service and Snow Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 1.2 − 1 AD 1.3 Index to Aerodromes and Heliports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 1.3 − 1 AD 1.4 Grouping Aerodromes/Heliports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 1.4 − 1 AD 1.5 Status of Certification of Aerodromes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 1.5 − 1 AD 2. AERODROMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 2 − 1 AD 3. HELIPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AD 3 − 1 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 1. AERODROMES/HELIPORTS – INTRODUCTION

AD 1.1 Aerodrome/Heliport Availability and Conditions

of Use

1. General Conditions 1.1 International arrivals with scheduled passenger service are not permitted to land at any aerodrome that does not have customs available except in cases of real emergency or where special permission has been granted.

1.1.1 Permission to land at airports other than “international” and “landing rights” airports may be obtained in some limited cases; however, advance arrangements (preferably in writing) must be made with the U.S. Customs office nearest the airport of intended arrival (see GEN 1, National Regulations and Requirements).

1.1.2 Advance notice of arrival is required as usual. Pilots should be aware that mileage and per diem costs may be accrued in addition to any overtime charges if applicable.

1.1.3 If an emergency landing is made elsewhere than at an international aerodrome or a designated alternate aerodrome, the pilot in command must report the landing as promptly as possible, by telephone or the most convenient means, to the nearest Customs office. He/she should keep all merchandise or baggage in a segregated place and should not permit any passenger or crewmember to depart the place of arrival or mingle with the public without official permission, unless it is necessary for preservation of life, health, or property.

1.2 The conditions under which aircraft may land, be parked, housed or otherwise dealt with at U.S. aerodromes is under the control of the aerodrome owner/operator. Conditions and fees pertaining to landing, parking, or storing are variable from aerodrome to aerodrome and are not published in the U.S. AIP.

1.3 In the United States, some telecommunication companies launched 5G services on January 19, 2022, using frequencies in a portion of the radio spectrum called the C − band. These frequencies can be close to those used by radio altimeters, an important piece of safety equipment in aircraft. The 5G deployment involves a new combination of power levels, frequencies, proximity to flight operations, and other factors. The FAA requires that radio altimeters are accurate and reliable, and therefore imposes restrictions on flight operations using certain types of radio altimeter equipment. These safety restrictions are posted in a 5G C − Band Domestic Notice and could affect flight schedules and operations. All operators (domestic and international) must comply with the guidance and restrictions provided in this Domestic Notice. For Domestic Notice review, visit the following link: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/domesticnotices/ .

2. Use of Military Air Bases 2.1 Except at joint − use airfields, U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard airfields are available for use by civil aircraft only with prior permission or in an emergency. An approved civil aircraft landing permit is required for use at all except Coast Guard airfields. With minor exceptions, authority to use military airfields is granted only to aircraft on official government business.

2.2 An application for a permit must be submitted to the appropriate military department a minimum of 30 days prior to the first intended landing. A permit application consists of 3 Department of Defense Forms listed below: 2.2.1 DD Form 2400, Civil Aircraft Certificate of Insurance found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd2400.pdf; and 2.2.2 DD Form 2401, Civil Aircraft Landing Permit found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd2401.pdf; and 2.2.3 DD Form 2402, Hold Harmless Agre ement found at: https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/forms/dd/dd2402.pdf.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 2 22 JAN 26 United States of America 3. Low Visibility Procedures The lowest authorized ILS minimums for CAT II/III, with all required ground and airborne systems components operative, are: 3.1 Category II. An ILS approach procedure which provides for approach to a height above touchdown of not less than 100 feet and with runway visual range of not less than 1,200 feet (with Autoland or HUD to touchdown and noted on authorization, RVR 1,000 feet).

3.2 Special Authorization Category II with Reduced Lighting. An ILS approach procedure which provides for approach to a height above touchdown of not less than 100 feet and with runway visual range of not less than 1,200 feet with Autoland or HUD to touchdown and noted on authorization (no touchdown zone and centerline lighting are required).

3.3 Category IIIa. An ILS approach procedure which provides for approach without a decision height minimum and with runway visual range of not less than 700 feet.

3.4 Category IIIb. An ILS approach procedure which provides for approach without a decision height minimum and with runway visual range of not less than 150 feet; and 3.5 Category IIIc. An ILS approach procedure which provides for approach without a decision height minimum and without runway visual range minimum.

4. Aerodrome Operating Minima Individual procedure landing minima for each runway are shown vice aerodrome operating minima. Minima can be obtained by reviewing the appropriate U.S. Terminal Procedures Publication volume and Change Notice pertaining to an individual airport by visiting the following website: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/ .

5. Traffic of Persons and Vehicles on Aerodromes 5.1 The grounds of each aerodrome are divided into two zones: 5.1.1 A public zone comprising the part of the aerodrome open to the public; and 5.1.2 A restricted zone comprising the rest of the aerodrome.

5.2 Movement of Persons 5.2.1 Access to the restricted zone is authorized only under conditions prescribed by the rules governing the aerodrome as established by the officials responsible for aerodrome security.

5.2.2 The customs, security, immigration and health inspection offices and areas, and the premises assigned to transit traffic are normally accessible only to passengers, to staff members of the responsible authorities or airlines, and to authorized persons in pursuit of their duties.

5.2.3 The movement of persons having access to the restricted zone of the aerodrome is subject to the conditions prescribed by applicable air traffic and by the security regulations laid down by the person responsible for the management of the aerodrome.

5.3 Movement of Vehicles 5.3.1 The movement of vehicles in the restricted zone is strictly limited to vehicles driven or used by persons having official permission.

5.3.2 Drivers of vehicles, of whatever type, driving within the confines of the aerodrome, must respect the direction of traffic, the traffic signs, and the posted speed limits and generally comply with the provisions of the highway code and with instructions given by the competent authorities.

6. General Information and Aerodrome Lighting and Marking 6.1 Aerodrome lighting information is contained in paragraphs 13. through 17. Information on aerodrome marking aids and signs is contained in paragraph 18.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 6.2 Designated international U.S. aerodromes with scheduled passenger service in large aircraft and certain airports designated as alternate service aerodromes are listed in , Aerodromes.

7. Aerodrome Administration 7.1 The administration of all airports is the responsibility of the aerodrome owner.

7.2 Ownership of aerodromes in the U.S. is vested in three different groups: the Federal Government, non − Federal governments, and private organizations or individuals. It is the policy of the U.S. Federal Government to have its aerodromes comply with ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices. Exceptions are noted as differences below and in GEN 1.7. Aerodromes owned by non − Federal governments and private organizations or individuals are encouraged to comply with International Standards and Recommended Practices in part through the regulation of aircraft operations into the aerodromes and in part through agreements under which Federal aid is made available for aerodrome development or improvement. Further compliance is by voluntary action on the part of the aerodrome owner.

8. Conditions of Availability 8.1 An aerodrome which is open for public use may be used by a particular aircraft upon consideration of the meteorological conditions existing at the time and provided that the aircraft’s performance and load classification (runway weight − bearing classification) is consistent with the physical characteristics of the aerodrome.

8.2 Civil Use of Military Fields 8.2.1 Except at joint − use airfields, U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard airfields are available for use by civil aircraft only with prior permission or in an emergency. An approved civil aircraft landing permit is required for use at all except Coast Guard airfields. With minor exceptions, authority to use military airfields is granted only to aircraft on official government business.

8.2.2 An application for a permit must be submitted to the appropriate military department a minimum of 30 days prior to the first intended landing. A permit application consists of Department of Defense Forms DD Form 2400, Civil Aircraft Certificate of Insurance; DD Form 2401, Civil Aircraft Landing Permit; and DD Form 2402, Hold Harmless Agreement.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 4 22 JAN 26 United States of America 8.2.3 Forms and instructions can be obtained from the following addresses.

Army: Director, USAASA ATTN: MOAS − AS Building 1466 9325 Gunston Road, Suite N319 Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060 − 5582 Telephone: (703) 806 − 4864 Air Force: HQ USAF/XOO − CA 1480 Air Force Pentagon, Room 4D1010 Washington DC 20330 − 1480 Telephone: (703) 697 − 5967 Navy/ Commander Marine Corps: Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Code 141JB 200 Stovall Street, Room 10N45 Alexandria, VA 22332 − 2300 Telephone: (703) 325 − 0475 At Coast Guard airfields, prior permission must be requested from the commanding officer of the airfield to be used.

9. Applicable ICAO Documents ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices contained in Annex 14 are applied with the exceptions noted in GEN 1.7, Differences from ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures.

10. Maintenance of Aerodrome Movement Areas 10.1 It is the responsibility of the relevant aerodrome authority to maintain the aerodrome in a satisfactory condition.

10.2 Clearance of snow and measurement of snow, ice, standing water, braking action, etc., and the reporting of such pavement conditions is within the responsibility of the aerodrome authority.

11. Dissemination of Information on the Condition of Paved Surface 11.1 Information on surface condition of runways, taxiways and aprons will be published, when available and when necessary.

11.2 At aerodromes where an ATS unit is established, if a runway is affected by standing water, snow, slush or ice during the approach of an aircraft for landing, and such conditions are notified by the aerodrome management to the ATS unit, such conditions will be made available to the aircraft.

12. Bird Concentrations in the Vicinity of Aerodromes 12.1 Animal and bird notices are not normally published in aerodrome remarks. Pilots should be aware that animals and birds are frequently found in the vicinity of aerodromes and should exercise due caution. However, selected bird notices may be published, but only after approval by the appropriate Regional Bird Hazard Group.

13. Airport Lighting Aids 13.1 Approach Light Systems (ALS) Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 13.1.1 Approach light systems provide the basic means for transition from instrument flight to visual flight for landing. Operational requirements dictate the sophistication and configuration of the approach light system for a particular runway.

13.1.2 Approach light systems are a configuration of signal lights starting at the landing threshold and extending into the approach area a distance of 2400 − 3000 feet for precision instrument runways and 1400 − 1500 feet for nonprecision instrument runways. Some systems include sequenced flashing lights which appear to the pilot as a ball of light traveling towards the runway at high speed (twice each second).

13.2 Visual Glideslope Indicators 13.2.1 Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) 13.2.1.1 The VASI is a system of lights so arranged to provide visual descent guidance information during the approach to a runway. These lights are visible from 3 − 5 miles during the day and up to 20 miles or more at night.

The visual glide path of the VASI provides safe obstruction clearance within plus or minus 10 degrees of the extended runway centerline and to 4 NM from the runway threshold. Descent, using the VASI, should not be initiated until the aircraft is visually aligned with the runway. Lateral course guidance is provided by the runway or runway lights. In certain circumstances, the safe obstruction clearance area may be reduced by narrowing the beam width or shortening the usable distance due to local limitations, or the VASI may be offset from the extended runway centerline. This will be noted in the Chart Supplement and/or applicable Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs).

13.2.1.2 VASI installations may consist of either 2, 4, 6, 12, or 16 light units arranged in bars referred to as near, middle, and far bars. Most VASI installations consist of 2 bars, near and far, and may consist of 2, 4, or 12 light units. Some airports have VASIs consisting of three bars, near, middle, and far, which provide an additional visual glide path to accommodate high cockpit aircraft. This installation may consist of either 6 or 16 light units. VASI installations consisting of 2, 4, or 6 lights units are located on one side of the runway, usually the left. Where the installation consists of 12 or 16 light units, the light units are located on both sides of the runway.

13.2.1.3 Two − bar VASI installations provide one visual glide path which is normally set at 3 degrees. Three − bar VASI installations provide two visual glide paths. The lower glide path is provided by the near and middle bars and is normally set at 3 degrees while the upper glide path, provided by the middle and far bars, in normally / degree higher. This higher glide path is intended for use only by high cockpit aircraft to provide a sufficient threshold crossing height. Although normal glide path angles are three degrees, angles at some locations may be as high as 4.5 degrees to give proper obstacle clearance. Pilots of high performance aircraft are cautioned that use of VASI angles in excess of 3.5 degrees may cause an increase in runway length required for landing and rollout.

13.2.1.4 The basic principle of the VASI is that of color differentiation between red and white. Each light unit projects a beam of light having a white segment in the upper part of the beam and red segment in the lower part of the beam. The light units are arranged so that the pilot using the VASIs during an approach will see the combination of lights shown below.

13.2.1.5 For 2 − BAR VASI (4 light units), see FIG AD 1.1 − 2 .

13.2.1.6 For 3 − BAR VASI (6 light units), see FIG AD 1.1 − 3 .

13.2.1.7 For other VASI configurations, see FIG AD 1.1 − 4 .

13.2.2 Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI). The precision approach path indicator (PAPI) uses light units similar to the VASI but are installed in a single row of either two or four light units. These lights are visible from about 5 miles during the day and up to 20 miles at night. The visual glide path of the PAPI typically provides safe obstruction clearance within plus or minus 10 degrees of the extended runway centerline and to 3.4 NM from the runway threshold. Descent, using the PAPI, should not be initiated until the aircraft is visually aligned with the runway. The row of light units is normally installed on the left side of the runway and the glide path indications are as depicted. Lateral course guidance is provided by the runway or runway lights. In certain circumstances, Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 6 22 JAN 26 United States of America the safe obstruction clearance area may be reduced by narrowing the beam width or shortening the usable distance due to local limitations, or the PAPI may be offset from the extended runway centerline. This will be noted in the Chart Supplement and/or applicable NOTAMs. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 5 .)

13.2.3 Tri − color Systems. Tri − color visual approach slope indicators normally consist of a single light unit, projecting a three − color visual approach path into the final approach area of the runway upon which the indicator is installed. The below glide path indication is red, the above glide path indication is amber, and the on glide path indication is green. These types of indicators have a useful range of approximately / to 1 mile during the day and up to 5 miles at night depending upon the visibility conditions. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 6 .)

13.2.4 Pulsating Systems. Pulsating visual approach slope indicators normally consist of a single light unit projecting a two − color visual approach path into the final approach area of the runway upon which the indicator is installed. The on glide path indication may be a steady white light or alternating RED and WHITE light. The slightly below glide path indication is a steady red light. If the aircraft descends further below the glide path, the red light starts to pulsate. The above glide path indication is a pulsating white light. The pulsating rate increases as the aircraft gets further above or below the desired glide slope. The useful range of the system is about four miles during the day and up to ten miles at night. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 7 .)

13.2.5 Alignment of Elements Systems. Alignment of elements systems are installed on some small general aviation airports and are a low cost system consisting of painted plywood panels, normally black and white or fluorescent orange. Some of these systems are lighted for night use. The useful range of these systems is approximately / mile. To use the system the pilot positions the aircraft so the elements are in alignment. The glide path indications are shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 8 .

13.3 Runway End Identifier Lights (REIL) 13.3.1 REILs are installed at many airfields to provide rapid and positive identification of the approach end of a particular runway. The system consists of a pair of synchronized flashing lights, one of which is located laterally on each side of the runway threshold facing the approach area. They are effective for: 13.3.1.1 Identification of a runway surrounded by a preponderance of other lighting.

13.3.1.2 Identification of a runway which lacks contrast with surrounding terrain.

13.3.1.3 Identification of a runway during reduced visibility.

13.4 Runway Edge Light Systems 13.4.1 Runway edge lights are used to outline the edges of runways during periods of darkness or restricted visibility conditions. These light systems are classified according to the intensity or brightness they are capable of producing: they are the High Intensity Runway Lights (HIRL), Medium Intensity Runway Lights (MIRL), and the Low Intensity Runway Lights (LIRL). The HIRL and MIRL systems have variable intensity controls; whereas, the LIRLs normally have one intensity setting.

13.4.2 The runway edge lights are white; except on instrument runways, yellow replaces white on the last 2,000 feet or half the runway length, whichever is less, to form a caution zone for landings.

13.4.3 The lights marking the ends of the runway emit red light toward the runway to indicate the end of the runway to a departing aircraft and emit green outward from the runway end to indicate the threshold to landing aircraft.

13.5 In − Runway Lighting 13.5.1 Runway Centerline Lighting System (RCLS). Runway centerline lights are installed on some precision approach runways to facilitate landing under adverse visibility conditions. They are located along the runway centerline and are spaced at 50 − foot intervals. When viewed from the landing threshold, the runway centerline lights are white until the last 3,000 feet of the runway. The white lights begin to alternate with red for the next 2,000 feet, and for the last 1,000 feet of the runway, all centerline lights are red.

13.5.2 Touchdown Zone Lights (TDZL). Touc Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 13.5.3 down zone lights are installed on some precision approach runways to indicate the touchdown zone when landing under adverse visibility conditions. They consist of two rows of transverse light bars disposed symmetrically about the runway centerline. The system consists of steady − burning white lights which start 100 feet beyond the landing threshold and extend to 3,000 feet beyond the landing threshold or to the midpoint of the runway, whichever is less.

FIG AD 1.1 − 1 Precision & Nonprecision Configurations NOTE − Civil ALSF − 2 may be operated as SSALR during favorable weather conditions.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 8 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 2 2-Bar VASI Far Bar = Red Near Bar = White Below Glide Path On Glide Path Above Glide Path FIG AD 1.1 − 3 3-Bar VASI Far Bar Middle Bar Near Bar Below Both On Lower On Upper Above Both Glide Paths Glide Path Glide Path Glide Paths FIG AD 1.1 − 4 VASI Variations 2 Bar 3 Bar 2 Bar 12 Light Units 16 Light Units 2 Light Units On Glide Path on Lower Glide Path On Glide Path Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 5 Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) High Slightly High On Glide Path Slightly Low Low (More Than (3.2 Degrees) (3 Degrees) (2.8 Degrees) (Less Than 3,5 Degrees) 2.5 Degrees) White Red FIG AD 1.1 − 6 Tri-Color Visual Approach Slope Indicator Amber Green Amber Red Above Glide Path On Glide Path Below Glide Path NOTE − 1. Since the tri-color VASI consists of a single light source which could possibly be confused with other light sources, pilots should exercise care to properly locate and identify the light signal.

2. W hen the aircraft descends from green to red, the pilot may see a dark amber color during the transition from green to red.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 10 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 7 Pulsating Visual Approach Slope Indicator NOTE − Since the PVASI consists of a single light source which could possibly be confused with other light sources, pilots should exercise care to properly locate and identify the light signal.

FIG AD 1.1 − 8 Alignment of Elements Above Glide Path On Glide Path Below Glide Path 13.5.4 Taxiway Centerline Lead − Off Lights. Taxiway centerline lead − off lights provide visual guidance to persons exiting the runway. They are color − coded to warn pilots and vehicle drivers that they are within the runway environment or instrument landing system (ILS) critical area, whichever is more restrictive. Alternate green and yellow lights are installed, beginning with green, from the runway centerline to one centerline light position beyond the runway holding position or ILS critical area holding position.

13.5.5 Taxiway Centerline Lead − On Lights. Taxiway centerline lead − on lights provide visual guidance to persons entering the runway. These “lead − on” lights are also color − coded with the same color pattern as lead − off lights to warn pilots and vehicle drivers that they are within the runway environment or instrument landing system (ILS) critical area, whichever is more conservative. The fixtures used for lead − on lights are bidirectional, i.e., one side emits light for the lead − on function while the other side emits light for the lead − off function. Any fixture that emits yellow light for the lead − off function must also emit yellow light for the lead − on function.

(See FIG AD 1.1 − 12 .)

13.5.6 Land and Hold Short Lights. Land and hold short lights are used to indicate the hold short point on certain runways which are approved for Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO). Land and hold short lights Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 consist of a row of pulsing white lights installed across the runway at the hold short point. Where installed, the lights will be on anytime LAHSO is in effect. These lights will be off when LAHSO is not in effect.

REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.1, Para 23, Pilot Responsibilities When Conducting Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO).

13.6 Runway Status Light (RWSL) System 13.6.1 Introduction: RWSL is a fully automated system that provides runway status information to pilots and surface vehicle operators to clearly indicate when it is unsafe to enter, cross, or takeoff from a runway. The RWSL system processes information from surveillance systems and activates Runway Entrance Lights (REL) and Takeoff Hold Lights (THL) in accordance with the position and velocity of the detected surface traffic and approach traffic. REL and THL are in − pavement light fixtures that are directly visible to pilots and surface vehicle operators. RWSL is an independent safety enhancement that does not substitute for or convey an ATC clearance. Clearance to enter, cross, takeoff from, or operate on a runway must still be received from ATC.

Although ATC has limited control over the system, personnel do not directly use and may not be able to view light fixture activations and deactivations during the conduct of daily ATC operations.

13.6.2 Runway Entrance Lights (REL): The REL system is composed of flush mounted, in-pavement, unidirectional light fixtures that are parallel to and focused along the taxiway centerline and directed toward the pilot at the hold line. An array of REL lights include the first light at the hold line followed by a series of evenly spaced lights to the runway edge; one additional light at the runway centerline is in line with the last two lights before the runway edge (see FIG AD 1.1 − 9 and FIG AD 1.1 − 10). When activated, the red lights indicate that there is high speed traffic on the runway or there is an aircraft on final approach within the activation area.

13.6.2.1 REL Operating Characteristics − Departing Aircraft: When a departing aircraft reaches a site adaptable speed of approximately 30 knots, all taxiway intersections with REL arrays along the runway ahead of the aircraft will illuminate (see FIG AD 1.1 − 9 . As the aircraft approaches an REL equipped taxiway intersection, the lights at that intersection extinguish approximately 3 to 4 seconds before the aircraft reaches it. This allows controllers to apply “anticipated separation” to permit ATC to move traffic more expeditiously without compromising safety. After the aircraft is declared “airborne” by the system, all REL lights associated with this runway will extinguish.

13.6.2.2 REL Operating Characteristics − Arriving Aircraft: When an aircraft on final approach is approximately 1 mile from the runway threshold, all sets of taxiway REL light arrays that intersect the runway illuminate. The distance is adjustable and can be configured for specific operations at particular airports. Lights extinguish at each equipped taxiway intersection approximately 3 to 4 seconds before the aircraft reaches it to apply anticipated separation until the aircraft has slowed to approximately 80 knots (site adjustable parameter).

Below 80 knots, all arrays that are not within 30 seconds of the aircraft’s forward path are extinguished. Once the arriving aircraft slows to approximately 34 knots (site adjustable parameter), it is declared to be in a taxi state, and all lights extinguish.

13.6.2.3 What a pilot would observe: A pilot at or approaching the hold line to a runway will observe RELs illuminate and extinguish in reaction to an aircraft or vehicle operating on the runway, or an arriving aircraft operating less than 1 mile from the runway threshold.

13.6.2.4 When a pilot observes the red lights of the REL, that pilot will stop at the hold line or remain stopped.

The pilot will then contact ATC for resolution if the clearance is in conflict with the lights. Should pilots note illuminated lights under circumstances when remaining clear of the runway is impractical for safety reasons (for example, aircraft is already on the runway), the crew should proceed according to their best judgment while understanding the illuminated lights indicate the runway is unsafe to enter or cross. Contact ATC at the earliest possible opportunity.

13.6.3 Takeoff Hold Lights (THL) : The THL system is composed of flush mounted, in-pavement, unidirectional light fixtures in a double longitudinal row aligned either side of the runway centerline lighting.

Fixtures are focused toward the arrival end of the runway at the “line up and wait” point. THLs extend for 1,500 feet in front of the holding aircraft starting at a point 375 feet from the departure threshold (see FIG AD 1.1 − 11 ).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 12 22 JAN 26 United States of America Illuminated red lights provide a signal, to an aircraft in position for takeoff or rolling, that it is unsafe to takeoff because the runway is occupied or about to be occupied by another aircraft or ground vehicle. Two aircraft, or a surface vehicle and an aircraft, are required for the lights to illuminate. The departing aircraft must be in position for takeoff or beginning takeoff roll. Another aircraft or a surface vehicle must be on or about to cross the runway.

13.6.3.1 THL Operating Characteristics − Departing Aircraft: THLs will illuminate for an aircraft in position for departure or departing when there is another aircraft or vehicle on the runway or about to enter the runway (see FIG AD 1.1 − 9 .) Once that aircraft or vehicle exits the runway, the THLs extinguish. A pilot may notice lights extinguish prior to the downfield aircraft or vehicle being completely clear of the runway but still moving. Like RELs, THLs have an “anticipated separation” feature.

NOTE − When the THLs extinguish, this is not clearance to begin a takeoff roll. All takeoff clearances will be issued by ATC.

13.6.3.2 What a pilot would observe: A pilot in position to depart from a runway, or has begun takeoff roll, will observe THLs illuminate in reaction to an aircraft or vehicle on the runway or entering or crossing it. Lights will extinguish when the runway is clear. A pilot may observe several cycles of illumination and extinguishing depending on the amount of crossing traffic.

13.6.3.3 When a pilot observes the red light of the THLs, the pilot should safely stop if it’s feasible or remain stopped. The pilot must contact ATC for resolution if any clearance is in conflict with the lights. Should pilots note illuminated lights while in takeoff roll and under circumstances when stopping is impractical for safety reasons, the crew should proceed according to their best judgment while understanding the illuminated lights indicate that continuing the takeoff is unsafe. Contact ATC at the earliest possible opportunity.

FIG AD 1.1 − 9 Runway Status Light System Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 13.6.4 Pilot Actions 13.6.4.1 When operating at airports with RWSL, pilots will operate with the transponder/ADS − B “On” when departing the gate or parking area until it is shut down upon arrival at the gate or parking area. This ensures interaction with the FAA surveillance systems such as ASDE-X/Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (ASSC) which provide information to the RWSL system.

13.6.4.2 Pilots must always inform the ATCT when they have stopped due to an RWSL indication that is in conflict with ATC instructions. Pilots must request clarification of the taxi or takeoff clearance.

13.6.4.3 Never cross over illuminated red lights. Under normal circumstances, RWSL will confirm the pilot’s taxi or takeoff clearance previously issued by ATC. If RWSL indicates that it is unsafe to takeoff from, land on, cross, or enter a runway, immediately notify ATC of the conflict and re-confirm the clearance.

13.6.4.4 Do not proceed when lights have extinguished without an ATC clearance. RWSL verifies an ATC clearance, it does not substitute for an ATC clearance.

13.6.5 ATC Control of RWSL System: 13.6.5.1 Controllers can set in − pavement lights to one of five (5) brightness levels to assure maximum conspicuity under all visibility and lighting conditions. REL and THL subsystems may be independently set.

13.6.5.2 System lights can be disabled should RWSL operations impact the efficient movement of air traffic or contribute, in the opinion of the ATC Manager, to unsafe operations. Whenever the system or a component is disabled, a NOTAM must be issued, and the Automatic Terminal Information System (ATIS) must be updated.

13.7 Control of Lighting Systems 13.7.1 Operation of approach light systems and runway lighting is controlled by the control tower (ATCT). At some locations the FSS may control the lights where there is no control tower in operation.

13.7.2 Pilots may request that lights be turned on or off. Runway edge lights, in − pavement lights and approach lights also have intensity controls which may be varied to meet the pilot’s request. Sequenced flashing lights may be turned on and off. Some sequenced flashing system also have intensity control.

13.8 Pilot Control of Airport Lighting 13.8.1 Radio control of lighting is available at selected airports to provide airborne control of lights by keying the aircraft’s microphone. Control of lighting system is often available at locations without specified hours for lighting or where there is no control tower or FSS, or when the control tower or FSS is closed (locations with a part − time tower or FSS). All lighting systems which are radio controlled at an airport, whether on a single runway or multiple runways, operate on the same radio frequency. (See TBL AD 1.1 − 1 and TBL AD 1.1 − 2.)

13.8.2 With FAA approved systems, various combinations of medium intensity approach lights, runway lights, taxiways lights, VASI and/or REIL may be activated by radio control. On runways with both approach lighting and runway lighting (runway edge lights, taxiway lights, etc.) systems, the approach lighting system takes precedence for air − to − ground radio control over the runway lighting system which is set at a predetermined intensity step, based on expected visibility conditions. Runways without approach lighting may provide radio controlled intensity adjustments of runway edge lights. Other lighting systems, including VASI, REIL, and taxiway lights, may be either controlled with the runway edge lights or controlled independently of the runway edge lights.

13.8.3 The control system consists of a 3 − step control responsive to 7, 5, and/or 3 microphone clicks. This 3 − step control will turn on lighting facilities capable of either 3 − step, 2 − step or 1 − step operation. The 3 − step and 2 − step lighting facilities can be altered in intensity, while the 1 − step cannot. All lighting is illuminated for a period of 15 minutes from the most recent time of activation and may not be extinguished prior to end of the 15 − minute period (except for 1 − step and 2 − step REILs which may be turned off when desired by keying the mike 5 or 3 times, respectively).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 14 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 10 Runway Entrance Lights FIG AD 1.1 − 11 Takeoff Hold Lights Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 12 Taxiway Lead − On Light Configuration TBL AD 1.1 − 1 Runways With Approach Lights Number of Status During Intensity Step Selected Per Number Intensity Lighting System Nonuse Period of Mike Clicks Steps 3 Clicks 5 Clicks 7 Clicks Approach Lights (Med. Int.) 2 Off Low Low High Approach Lights (Med. Int.) 3 Off Low Med High MIRL 3 Off or Low HIRL 5 Off or Low VASI 2 Off NOTES : Predetermined intensity step.

Low intensity for night use. High intensity for day use as determined by photocell control.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 16 22 JAN 26 United States of America TBL AD 1.1 − 2 Runways Without Approach Lights Number of Status During Intensity Step Selected Per Number Lighting System Intensity Nonuse Period of Mike Clicks Steps 3 Clicks 5 Clicks 7 Clicks MIRL 3 Off or Low Low Med. High HIRL 5 Off or Low Step 1 or 2 Step 3 Step 5 LIRL 1 Off On On On VASI 2 Off REIL 1 Off Off On / Off On REIL 3 Off Low Med. High NOTES : Low intensity for night use. High intensity for day use as determined by photocell control.

The control of VASI and/or REIL may be independent of other lighting systems.

13.8.4 Suggested use is to always initially key the mike 7 times; this assures that all controlled lights are turned on to the maximum available intensity. If desired, adjustment can then be made, where the capability is provided, to a lower intensity (or the REIL turned off) by keying 5 and/or 3 times. Due to the close proximity of airports using the same frequency, radio controlled lighting receivers may be set at a low sensitivity requiring the aircraft to be relatively close to activate the system. Consequently, even when lights are on, always key mike as directed when overflying an airport of intended landing or just prior to entering the final segment of an approach. This will assure the aircraft is close enough to activate the system and a full 15 minutes lighting duration is available.

Approved lighting systems may be activated by keying the mike (within 5 seconds) as indicated in TBL AD 1.1 − 3 .

TBL AD 1.1 − 3 Radio Control System Key Mike Function 7 times within Highest intensity available 5 seconds 5 times within Medium or lower intensity 5 seconds (Lower REIL or REIL-off) 3 times within Lowest intensity available 5 seconds (Lower REIL or REIL-off) 13.8.5 The Chart Supplement contains the types of lighting, runway, and the frequency that is used to activate the system for all public use airports with FAA standard systems. Airports with instrument approach procedures include data on the approach chart identifying the light system(s), the runway on which they are installed, and the frequency that is used to activate the system(s).

NOTE − Although the CTAF is used to activate the lights at many airports, other frequencies may also be used. The appropriate frequency for activating the lights on the airport is provided in the Chart Supplement and the standard instrument approach procedures publications. It is not identified on the sectional charts.

13.8.6 Where the airport is not served by an instrument approach procedure, it may have either the standard FAA approach control system or an independent type system of different specification installed by the airport sponsor.

The Chart Supplement contains descriptions of pilot − controlled lighting systems for each airport having other than FAA approved systems, and explains the type lights, method of control, and operating frequency in clear text.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 14. Airport/Heliport Beacons 14.1 Airport and heliport beacons have a vertical light distribution to make them most effective from one to ten degrees above the horizon; however, they can be seen well above and below this peak spread. The beacon may be an omnidirectional capacitor-discharge device, or it may rotate at a constant speed which produces the visual effect of flashes at regular intervals. Flashes may be one or two colors alternately. The total number of flashes are: 14.1.1 24 to 30 per minute for beacons marking airports, landmarks, and points on Federal airways.

14.1.2 30 to 45 per minute for beacons marking heliports.

14.2 The colors and color combinations of beacons are: 14.2.1 White and Green − Lighted land airport.

14.2.2 *Green alone − Lighted land airport.

14.2.3 White and Yellow − Lighted water airport.

14.2.4 *Yellow alone − Lighted water airport.

14.2.5 Green, Yellow, and White − Lighted heliport.

NOTE − *Green alone or yellow alone is used only in connection with a white-and-green or white-and-yellow beacon display, respectively.

14.3 Military airport beacons flash alternately white and green, but are differentiated from civil beacons by dual − peaked (two quick) white flashes between the green flashes.

14.4 In Class B, C, D, and E surface areas, operation of the airport beacon during the hours of daylight indicates that the ground visibility is less than 3 miles and/or the ceiling is less than 1,000 feet. An ATC clearance in accordance with 14 CFR Part 91 is required for landing, takeoff and flight in the traffic pattern. Pilots should not rely solely on the operation of the airport beacon to indicate if weather conditions are IFR or VFR. At locations with control towers, when controls are in the tower, ATC personnel turn the beacon on. At many airports, the airport beacon is turned on by a photoelectric cell or time clocks and ATC personnel cannot control it. There is no regulatory requirement for daylight operation, and it is the pilot’s responsibility to comply with proper pre − flight planning in accordance with 14 CFR Section 91.103.

15. Taxiway Lights 15.1 Taxiway Edge Lights. Taxiway edge lights are used to outline the edges of taxiways during periods of darkness or restricted visibility conditions. These fixtures emit blue light.

NOTE − At most major airports these lights have variable intensity settings and may be adjusted at pilot request or when deemed necessary by the controller.

15.2 Taxiway Centerline Lights. Taxiway centerline lights are used to facilitate ground traffic under low visibility conditions. They are located along the taxiway centerline in a straight line on straight portions, on the centerline of curved portions, and along designated taxiing paths in portions of runways, ramps, and apron areas.

Taxiway centerline lights are steady burning and emit green light.

15.3 Clearance Bar Lights. Clearance bar lights are installed at holding positions on taxiways in order to increase the conspicuity of the holding position in low visibility conditions. They may also be installed to indicate the location of an intersecting taxiway during periods of darkness. Clearance bars consist of three in − pavement, steady − burning yellow lights.

15.4 Runway Guard Lights. Runway guard lights are installed at taxiway/runway intersections. They are primarily used to enhance the conspicuity of taxiway/runway intersections during low visibility conditions, but Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 18 22 JAN 26 United States of America may be used in all weather conditions. Runway guard lights consist of either a pair of elevated flashing yellow lights installed on either side of the taxiway, or a row of in-pavement yellow lights installed across the entire taxiway, at the runway holding position marking.

NOTE − Some airports may have a row of three or five in − pavement yellow lights installed at taxiway/runway intersections. They should not be confused with clearance bar lights described in paragraph 15.3 above.

15.5 Stop Bar Lights. Stop bar lights, when installed, are used to confirm the ATC clearance to enter or cross the active runway in low visibility conditions (below 1,200 feet Runway Visual Range). A stop bar consists of a row of red, unidirectional, steady − burning in-pavement lights installed across the entire taxiway at the runway holding position, and elevated steady − burning red lights on each side. A controlled stop bar is operated in conjunction with the taxiway centerline lead-on lights which extend from the stop bar toward the runway.

Following the ATC clearance to proceed, the stop bar is turned off and the lead-on lights are turned on. The stop bar and lead-on lights are automatically reset by a sensor or backup timer.

CAUTION − Pilots should never cross a red illuminated stop bar, even if an ATC clearance has been given to proceed onto or across the runway.

NOTE − If after crossing a stop bar, the taxiway centerline lead − on lights inadvertently extinguish, pilots should hold their position and contact ATC for further instructions.

16. Air Navigation and Obstruction Lighting 16.1 Aeronautical Light Beacons 16.1.1 An aeronautical light beacon is a visual NAVAID displaying flashes of white and/or colored light to indicate the location of an airport, a heliport, a landmark, a certain point of a Federal airway in mountainous terrain, or an obstruction. The light used may be a rotating beacon or one or more flashing lights. The flashing lights may be supplemented by steady burning lights of lesser intensity.

16.1.2 The color or color combination display by a particular beacon and/or its auxiliary lights tell whether the beacon is indicating a landing place, landmark, point of the Federal airways, or an obstruction. Coded flashes of the auxiliary lights, if employed, further identify the beacon site.

16.2 Code Beacons and Course Lights 16.2.1 Code Beacons. The code beacon, which can be seen from all directions, is used to identify airports and landmarks. The code beacon flashes the three − or four − character airport identifier in International Morse Code six to eight times per minute. Green flashes are displayed for land airports while yellow flashes indicate water airports.

16.2.2 Course Lights. The course light, which can be seen clearly from only one direction, is used only with rotating beacons of the Federal Airway System; two course lights, back to back, direct coded flashing beams of light in either direction along the course of airway.

NOTE − Airway beacons are remnants of the “lighted” airways which antedated the present electronically equipped federal airways system. Only a few of those beacons exist today to mark airway segments in remote mountain areas. Flashes in Morse code identify the beacon site.

16.3 Obstruction Lights 16.3.1 Obstructions are marked/lighted to warn airmen of their presence during daytime and nighttime conditions. They may be marked/lighted in any of the following combinations: 16.3.1.1 Aviation Red Obstruction Lights. Flashing aviation red beacons (20 to 40 flashes per minute) and steady burning aviation red lights during nighttime operation. Aviation orange and white paint is used for daytime marking.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 16.3.1.2 Medium Intensity Flashing White Obstruction Lights. Medium intensity flashing white obstruction lights may be used during daytime and twilight with automatically selected reduced intensity for nighttime operation. When this system is used on structures 500 feet (153 m) AGL or less in height, other methods of marking and lighting the structure may be omitted. Aviation orange and white paint is always required for daytime marking on structures exceeding 500 feet (153 m) AGL. This system is not normally installed on structures less than 200 feet (61 m) AGL.

16.3.1.3 High Intensity White Obstruction Lights. Flashing high intensity white lights during daytime with reduced intensity for twilight and nighttime operation. When this type system is used, the marking of structures with red obstruction lights and aviation orange and white paint may be omitted.

16.3.1.4 Dual Lighting. A combination of flashing aviation red beacons and steady burning aviation red lights for nighttime operation and flashing high intensity white lights for daytime operation. Aviation orange and white paint may be omitted.

16.3.1.5 Catenary Lighting. Lighted markers are available for increased night conspicuity of high − voltage (69KV or higher) transmission line catenary wires. Lighted markers provide conspicuity both day and night.

16.3.2 Medium intensity omnidirectional flashing white lighting system provides conspicuity both day and night on catenary support structures. The unique sequential/simultaneous flashing light system alerts pilots of the associated catenary wires.

16.3.3 High intensity flashing white lights are being used to identify some supporting structures of overhead transmission lines located across rivers, chasms, gorges, etc. These lights flash in a middle, top, lower light sequence at approximately 60 flashes per minute. The top light is normally installed near the top of the supporting structure, while the lower light indicates the approximate lower portion of the wire span. The lights are beamed towards the companion structure and identify the area of the wire span.

16.3.4 High intensity flashing white lights are also employed to identify tall structures, such as chimneys and towers, and obstructions to air navigation. The lights provide a 360 degree coverage about the structure at 40 flashes per minute and consist of from one to seven levels of lights depending upon the height of the structure.

Where more than one level is used, the vertical banks flash simultaneously.

16.4 LED Lighting Systems 16.4.1 Certain light − emitting diode (LED) lighting systems fall outside the combined visible and near − infrared spectrum of night vision goggles (NVGs) and thus will not be visible to a flightcrew using NVGs.

16.4.2 The FAA changed specifications for LED − based red obstruction lights to make them visible to pilots using certain NVG systems, however, other colors may not be visible.

16.4.3 It is recommended that air carriers/operators—including Part 91 operators—who utilize NVGs incorporate procedures into manuals and/or standard operating procedures (SOPs) requiring periodic, unaided scanning when operating at low altitudes and when performing a reconnaissance of landing areas.

17. Runway Lead − in Light System (RLLS) 17.1 The lead − in lighting system consists of a series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level to describe the desired course to a runway or final approach. Each group of lights is positioned and aimed so as to be conveniently sighted and followed from the approaching aircraft under conditions at or above approach minimums under consideration. The system may be curved, straight, or combination thereof, as required. The lead − in lighting system may be terminated at any approved approach lighting system, or it may be terminated at a distance from the landing threshold which is compatible with authorized visibility minimums permitting visual reference to the runway environment.

17.2 The outer portion uses groups of lights to mark segments of the approach path beginning at a point within easy visual range of a final approach fix. These groups are spaced close enough together (approximately one mile) to give continuous lead − in guidance. A group consists of at least three flashing lights in a linear or cluster Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 20 22 JAN 26 United States of America configuration and may be augmented by steady burning lights where required. When practicable, groups flash in sequence toward runways. Each system is designed to suit local conditions and to provide the visual guidance intended. The design of all RLLS is compatible with the requirements of U.S. Standards for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS) where such procedures are applied for establishing instrument minimums.

18. Airport Marking Aids and Signs 18.1 General 18.1.1 Airport pavement markings and signs provide information that is useful to a pilot during takeoff, landing, and taxiing.

18.1.2 Uniformity in airport markings and signs from one airport to another enhances safety and improves efficiency. Pilots are encouraged to work with the operators of the airports they use to achieve the marking and sign standards described in this section.

18.1.3 Pilots who encounter ineffective, incorrect, or confusing markings or signs on an airport should make the operator of the airport aware of the problem. These situations may also be reported under the Aviation Safety Reporting Program as described in ENR 1.14 Pilots may also report these situations to the FAA regional airports division.

18.1.4 The markings and signs described in this section reflect the current FAA recommended standards.

REFERENCE − AC 150/5340 − 1, Standards for Airport Markings.

AC 150/5340 − 18, Standards for Airport Sign Systems.

18.2 Airport Pavement Markings 18.2.1 General. For the purpose of this section, the airport pavement markings have been grouped into the four areas: 18.2.1.1 Runway Markings.

18.2.1.2 Taxiway Markings.

18.2.1.3 Holding Position Markings.

18.2.1.4 Other Markings.

18.2.2 Marking Colors. Markings for runways are white. Markings defining the landing area on a heliport are also white except for hospital heliports which use a red “H” on a white cross. Markings for taxiways, areas not intended for use by aircraft (closed and hazardous areas), and holding positions (even if they are on a runway) are yellow.

18.3 Runway Markings 18.3.1 General. There are three types of markings for runways: visual, nonprecision instrument, and precision instrument. TBL AD 1.1 − 4 identifies the marking elements for each type of runway, and TBL AD 1.1 − 5 identifies runway threshold markings.

18.3.2 Runway Designators. Runway numbers and letters are determined from the approach direction. The runway number is the whole number nearest one − tenth the magnetic azimuth of the centerline of the runway, measured clockwise from the magnetic north. The letters differentiate between left (L), right (R), or center (C) parallel runways, as applicable: 18.3.2.1 For two parallel runways “L” “R.” 18.3.2.2 For three parallel runways “L” “C” “R.” 18.3.3 Runway Centerline Marking. The runway centerline identifies the center of the runway and provides alignment guidance during takeoff and landing. The centerline consists of a line of uniformly spaced stripes and gaps.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 18.3.4 Runway Aiming Point Marking. The aiming point marking serves as a visual aiming point for a landing aircraft. These two rectangular markings consist of a broad white stripe located on each side of the runway centerline and approximately 1,000 feet from the landing threshold, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 13 , Precision Instrument Runway Markings.

18.3.5 Runway Touchdown Zone Markers. The touchdown zone markings identify the touchdown zone for landing operations and are coded to provide distance information in 500 feet (150 m) increments. These markings consist of groups of one, two, and three rectangular bars symmetrically arranged in pairs about the runway centerline as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 13. For runways having touchdown zone markings on both ends, those pairs of markings which extend to within 900 feet (270 m) of the midpoint between the thresholds are eliminated.

TBL AD 1.1 − 4 Runway Marking Elements Nonprecision Precision Marking Element Visual Runway Instrument Instrument Runway Runway Designation X X X Centerline X X X Threshold X X X Aiming Point X X X Touchdown Zone X Side Stripes X On runways used, or intended to be used, by international commercial transports.

On runways 4,000 feet (1200 m) or longer used by jet aircraft.

TBL AD 1.1 − 5 Number of Runway Threshold Stripes Runway Width Number of Stripes 60 feet (18 m) 4 75 feet (23 m) 6 100 feet (30 m) 8 150 feet (45 m) 12 200 feet (60 m) 16 18.3.6 Runway Side Stripe Marking. Runway side stripes delineate the edges of the runway. They provide a visual contrast between the runway and the abutting terrain or shoulders. Side stripes consist of continuous white stripes located on each side of the runway. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 17 .)

18.3.7 Runway Shoulder Markings. Runway shoulder stripes may be used to supplement runway side stripes to identify pavement areas contiguous to the runway sides that are not intended for use by aircraft. Runway shoulder stripes are yellow. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 15 .)

18.3.8 Runway Threshold Markings. Runway threshold markings come in two configurations. They consist of either eight longitudinal stripes of uniform dimensions disposed symmetrically about the runway centerline (as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 13 ) or the number of stripes is related to the runway width as indicated in TBL AD 1.1 − 5 . A threshold marking helps identify the beginning of the runway that is available for landing. In some instances, the landing threshold may be relocated or displaced.

18.3.8.1 Relocation of a Threshold. Sometimes construction, maintenance, or other activities require the threshold to be relocated towards the rollout end of the runway. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 16 .) When a threshold is relocated, it closes not only a set portion of the approach end of a runway, but also shortens the length of the opposite direction runway. In these cases, a NOTAM should be issued by the airport operator identifying the Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 22 22 JAN 26 United States of America portion of the runway that is closed (for example, 10/28 W 900 CLSD). Because the duration of the relocation can vary from a few hours to several months, methods identifying the new threshold may vary. One common practice is to use a ten − foot wide white threshold bar across the width of the runway. Although the runway lights in the area between the old threshold and new threshold will not be illuminated, the runway markings in this area may or may not be obliterated, removed, or covered.

18.3.8.2 Displaced Threshold. A displaced threshold is a threshold located at a point on the runway other than the designated beginning of the runway. Displacement of a threshold reduces the length of runway available for landings. The portion of runway behind a displaced threshold is available for takeoffs in either direction and landings from the opposite direction. A ten − foot wide white threshold bar is located across the width of the runway at the displaced threshold. White arrows are located along the centerline in the area between the beginning of the runway and displaced threshold. White arrowheads are located across the width of the runway just prior to the threshold bar, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 17 .

NOTE − Airport operator. When reporting the relocation or displacement of a threshold, the airport operator should avoid language which confuses the two.

18.3.9 Demarcation Bar. A demarcation bar delineates a runway with a displaced threshold from a blast pad, stopway, or taxiway that precedes the runway. A demarcation bar is 3 feet (1 m) wide and yellow, since it is not located on the runway. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 18 .)

18.3.10 Chevrons. These markings are used to show pavement areas aligned with the runway that are unusable for landing, takeoff, and taxiing. Chevrons are yellow. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 19 ).

18.3.11 Runway Threshold Bar. A threshold bar delineates the beginning of the runway that is available for landing when the threshold has been relocated or displaced. A threshold bar is 10 feet (3 m) in width and extends across the width of the runway, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 17 .

19. Taxiway Markings 19.1 General. All taxiways should have centerline markings and runway holding position markings whenever they intersect a runway. Taxiway edge markings are present whenever there is a need to separate the taxiway from a pavement that is not intended for aircraft use or to delineate the edge of the taxiway. Taxiways may also have shoulder markings and holding position markings for Instrument Landing System (ILS) critical areas and taxiway/taxiway intersection markings.

REFERENCE − AD 1.1 , Paragraph 20. Holding Position Markings.

19.2 Taxiway Centerline.

19.2.1 Normal Centerline. The taxiway centerline is a single continuous yellow line, 6 inches (15 cm) to 12 inches (30 cm) in width. This provides a visual cue to permit taxiing along a designated path. Ideally, the aircraft should be kept centered over this line during taxi. However, being centered on the taxiway centerline does not guarantee wingtip clearance with other aircraft or other objects.

19.2.2 Enhanced Centerline. At some airports, mostly the larger commercial service airports, an enhanced taxiway centerline will be used. The enhanced taxiway centerline marking consists of a parallel line of yellow dashes on either side of the normal taxiway centerline. The taxiway centerlines are enhanced for a maximum of 150 feet prior to a runway holding position marking. The purpose of this enhancement is to warn the pilot that he/she is approaching a runway holding position marking and should prepare to stop unless he/she has been cleared onto or across the runway by ATC. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 20 .)

19.3 Taxiway Edge Markings. Taxiway edge markings are used to define the edge of the taxiway. They are primarily used when the taxiway edge does not correspond with the edge of the pavement. There are two types of markings depending upon whether the aircraft is supposed to cross the taxiway edge: 19.3.1 Continuous Markings. These consist of a continuous double yellow line, with each line being at least 6 inches (15 cm) in width spaced 6 inches (15 cm) apart. They are used to define the taxiway edge from the shoulder or some other abutting paved surface not intended for use by aircraft.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 19.3.2 Dashed Markings. These markings are used when there is an operational need to define the edge of a taxiway or taxilane on a paved surface where the adjoining pavement to the taxiway edge is intended for use by aircraft (for example, an apron). Dashed taxiway edge markings consist of a broken double yellow line, with each line being at least 6 inches (15 cm) in width, spaced 6 inches (15 cm) apart (edge to edge). These lines are 15 feet (4.5 m) in length with 25 − foot (7.5 m) gaps. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 21 .)

19.4 Taxi Shoulder Markings. Taxiways, holding bays, and aprons are sometimes provided with paved shoulders to prevent blast and water erosion. Although shoulders may have the appearance of full strength pavement, they are not intended for use by aircraft and may be unable to support an aircraft. Usually the taxiway edge marking will define this area. Where conditions exist such as islands or taxiway curves that may cause confusion as to which side of the edge stripe is for use by aircraft, taxiway shoulder markings may be used to indicate the pavement is unusable. Taxiway shoulder markings are yellow. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 22 .)

19.5 Surface Painted Taxiway Direction Signs. Surface painted taxiway direction signs have a yellow background with a black inscription. These signs are provided when it is not possible to provide taxiway direction signs at intersections or when it is necessary to supplement such signs. These markings are located adjacent to the centerline with signs indicating turns to the left being on the left side of the taxiway centerline, and signs indicating turns to the right being on the right side of the centerline. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 23 .)

19.6 Surface Painted Location Signs. Surface painted location signs have a black background with a yellow inscription. When necessary, these markings are used to supplement location signs located along side the taxiway and assist the pilot in confirming the designation of the taxiway on which the aircraft is located. These markings are located on the right side of the centerline. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 23 .)

19.7 Geographic Position Markings. These markings are located at points along low visibility taxi routes designated in the airport’s Surface Movement Guidance Control System (SMGCS) plan. They are used to identify the location of taxiing aircraft during low visibility operations. Low visibility operations are those that occur when the runway visible range (RVR) is below 1,200 feet (360 m). They are positioned to the left of the taxiway centerline in the direction of taxiing. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 24 .) The geographic position marking is a circle comprised of an outer black ring contiguous to a white ring with a pink circle in the middle. When installed on asphalt or other dark − colored pavements, the white ring and the black ring are reversed (i.e., the white ring becomes the outer ring and the black ring becomes the inner ring). It is designated with either a number or a number and letter. The number corresponds to the consecutive position of the marking on the route.

20. Holding Position Markings 20.1 Runway Holding Position Markings. For runways, these markings indicate where aircraft MUST STOP when approaching a runway. They consist of four yellow lines, two solid and two dashed, spaced six or twelve inches apart, and extending across the width of the taxiway or runway. The solid lines are always on the side where the aircraft must hold. There are three locations where runway holding position markings are encountered.

20.1.1 Runway Holding Position Markings on Taxiways. These markings identify the locations on a taxiway where aircraft MUST STOP when a clearance has not been issued to proceed onto the runway. Generally, runway holding position markings also identify the boundary of the runway safety area (RSA) for aircraft exiting the runway. Runway holding position markings are shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 25 and FIG AD 1.1 − 28. When instructed by ATC, “ Hold short of Runway XX ,” the pilot MUST STOP so that no part of the aircraft extends beyond the runway holding position marking. When approaching runways at airports with an operating control tower, pilots must not cross the runway holding position marking without ATC clearance. Pilots approaching runways at airports without an operating control tower must ensure adequate separation from other aircraft, vehicles, and pedestrians prior to crossing the holding position markings. An aircraft exiting a runway is not clear of the runway until all parts of the aircraft have crossed the applicable holding position marking.

NOTE − Runway holding position markings identify the beginning of an RSA, and a pilot MUST STOP to get clearance before crossing (at airports with operating control towers).

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 24 22 JAN 26 United States of America REFERENCE − AIP, ENR 1.1, Para 24, Exiting the Runway After Landing.

20.1.2 Runway Holding Position Markings on Runways. These markings identify the locations on runways where aircraft MUST STOP. These markings are located on runways used by ATC for Land And Hold Short Operations (for example, see FIG ENR 1.1 − 8) and Taxiing operations. For taxiing operations, the pilot MUST STOP prior to the holding position markings unless explicitly authorized to cross by ATC. A sign with a white inscription on a red background is located adjacent to these holding position markings. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 26 .)

The holding position markings are placed on runways prior to the intersection with another runway, or some designated point. Pilots receiving and accepting instructions “ Cleared to land Runway XX, hold short of Runway YY ” from ATC must either exit Runway XX prior to the holding position markings, or stop at the holding position markings prior to Runway YY. Otherwise, pilots are authorized to use the entire landing length of the runway and disregard the holding position markings.

20.1.3 Holding Position Markings on Taxiways Located in Runway Approach Areas. These markings are used at some airports where it is necessary to hold an aircraft on a taxiway located in the approach or departure area of a runway so that the aircraft does not interfere with the operations on that runway. This marking is collocated with the runway approach/departure area holding position sign. When specifically instructed by ATC, “ Hold short of Runway XX approach or Runway XX departure area, ” the pilot MUST STOP so that no part of the aircraft extends beyond the holding position marking. (See Paragraph 22.2.2, Runway Approach Area Holding Position Sign, and FIG AD 1.1 − 27 , Taxiways Located in Runway Approach Area.)

20.2 Holding Position Markings for Instrument Landing System (ILS). Holding position markings for ILS critical areas consist of two yellow solid lines spaced two feet apart connected by pairs of solid lines spaced ten feet apart extending across the width of the taxiway as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 28 . A sign with an inscription in white on a red background is located adjacent to these hold position markings. When instructed by ATC to hold short of the ILS critical area, pilots MUST STOP so that no part of the aircraft extends beyond the holding position marking. When approaching the holding position marking, pilots must not cross the marking without ATC clearance. The ILS critical area is not clear until all parts of the aircraft have crossed the applicable holding position marking.

REFERENCE − AIP ENR 4.1, Para 6, Instrument Landing System (ILS).

20.3 Holding Position Markings for Intersecting Taxiways Holding position markings for intersecting taxiways consist of a single dashed line extending across the width of the taxiway as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 29 .

They are located on taxiways where ATC holds aircraft short of a taxiway intersection. When instructed by ATC, “ Hold short of Taxiway XX, ” the pilot MUST STOP so that no part of the aircraft extends beyond the holding position marking. When the marking is not present, the pilot MUST STOP the aircraft at a point which provides adequate clearance from an aircraft on the intersecting taxiway.

20.4 Surface Painted Holding Position Signs. Surface painted holding position signs have a red background with a white inscription and supplement the signs located at the holding position. This type of marking is normally used where the width of the holding position on the taxiway is greater than 200 feet (60 m). It is located to the left side of the taxiway centerline on the holding side and prior to the holding position marking. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 23 .)

21. Other Markings 21.1 Vehicle Roadway Markings. The vehicle roadway markings are used when necessary to define a pathway for vehicle operations on or crossing areas that are also intended for aircraft. These markings consist of a white solid line to delineate each edge of the roadway and a dashed line to separate lanes within the edges of the roadway. In lieu of the solid lines, zipper markings may be used to delineate the edges of the vehicle roadway.

(See FIG AD 1.1 − 30 .) Details of the zipper markings are shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 31 .

21.2 VOR Receiver Checkpoint Markings. The VOR receiver checkpoint marking allows the pilot to check aircraft instruments with navigational aid signals. It consists of a painted circle with an arrow in the middle; the Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 25 United States of America 22 JAN 26 arrow is aligned in the direction of the checkpoint azimuth. This marking, and an associated sign, is located on the airport apron or taxiway at a point selected for easy access by aircraft but where other airport traffic is not to be unduly obstructed. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 32 .)

NOTE − The associated sign contains the VOR station identification letter and course selected (published) for the check, the words “VOR check course,” and DME data (when applicable). The color of the letters and numerals are black on a yellow background.

EXAMPLE − VOR SIGN DCA 176 − 356 VOR check course DME XXX 21.3 Nonmovement Area Boundary Markings.

These markings delineate the movement area; i.e., area under ATC. These markings are yellow and located on the boundary between the movement and nonmovement area. The nonmovement area boundary markings consist of two yellow lines (one solid and one dashed) 6 inches (15 cm) in width. The solid line is located on the nonmovement area side, while the dashed yellow line is located on the movement area side. The nonmovement boundary marking area is shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 33 .

21.4 Marking and Lighting of Permanently Closed Runways and Taxiways. For runways and taxiways which are permanently closed, the lighting circuits will be disconnected. The runway threshold, runway designation, and touchdown markings are obliterated and yellow crosses are placed at each end of the runway and at 1,000 foot intervals. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 34 .)

21.5 Temporarily Closed Runways and Taxiways. To provide a visual indication to pilots that a runway is temporarily closed, crosses are placed on the runway only at each end of the runway. The crosses are yellow in color. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 34 .)

21.5.1 A raised lighted yellow cross may be placed on each runway end in lieu of the markings described in paragraph 21.5 to indicate the runway is closed.

21.5.2 A visual indication may not be present depending on the reason for the closure, duration of the closure, airfield configuration, and the existence and the hours of operation of an airport traffic control tower. Pilots should check NOTAMs and the Automated Terminal Information System (ATIS) for local runway and taxiway closure information.

21.5.3 Temporarily closed taxiways are usually treated as hazardous areas, in which no part of an aircraft may enter, and are blocked with barricades. However, as an alternative, a yellow cross may be installed at each entrance to the taxiway.

21.6 Helicopter Landing Areas. The markings illustrated in FIG AD 1.1 − 35 are used to identify the landing and takeoff area at a public use heliport and hospital heliport. The letter “H” in the markings is oriented to align with the intended direction of approach. FIG AD 1.1 − 35 also depicts the markings for a closed airport.

21.7 Airport Signs. There are six types of signs installed on airfields: mandatory instruction signs, location signs, direction signs, destination signs, information signs, and runway distance remaining signs. The characteristics and use of these signs are discussed below.

REFERENCE − Advisory Circular 150/5340 − 18, Standards for Airport Sign Systems.

22. Mandatory Instruction Signs 22.1 These signs have a red background with a white inscription and are used to denote: 22.1.1 An entrance to a runway or critical area.

22.1.2 Areas where an aircraft is prohibited from entering.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 26 22 JAN 26 United States of America 22.2 Typical mandatory signs and applications are: 22.2.1 Runway Holding Position Sign. This sign is located at the holding position on taxiways that intersect a runway or on runways that intersect other runways. The inscription on the sign contains the designation of the intersecting runway, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 36 . The runway numbers on the sign are arranged to correspond to the respective runway threshold. For example, “15 − 33” indicates that the threshold for Runway 15 is to the left and the threshold for Runway 33 is to the right.

22.2.1.1 On taxiways that intersect the beginning of the takeoff runway, only the designation of the takeoff runway may appear on the sign (as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 37 ) while all other signs will have the designation of both runway directions.

22.2.1.2 If the sign is located on a taxiway that intersects the intersection of two runways, the designations for both runways will be shown on the sign along with arrows showing the approximate alignment of each runway, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 38 . In addition to showing the approximate runway alignment, the arrow indicates the direction to the threshold of the runway whose designation is immediately next to the arrow.

22.2.2 Runway Approach Area Holding Position Sign. At some airports, it is necessary to hold an aircraft on a taxiway located in the approach or departure area for a runway so that the aircraft does not interfere with operations on that runway. FIG AD 1.1 − 27 depicts common situations. A sign with the runway designation(s) and the protected area(s) will be located at applicable holding positions on the taxiway. For locations protecting only the approach area, the holding position on the taxiway includes a sign identifying the approach end runway designation (e.g., 15) followed by a dash ( − ) and the letters “APCH.” For locations protecting both the approach and departure areas, the holding position on the taxiway includes a sign with the approach end runway designation and the letters “APCH” followed by a dash ( − ), the departure end runway designation and the letters “DEP.” The arrangement of the runway designations and protected areas legends on the sign reflect the orientation of the runway as viewed from the holding position. Holding position markings in accordance with paragraph 20.. Holding Position Markings, are co − located on the taxiway pavement in line with the sign.

Examples of these signs are shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 39 .

22.2.3 ILS Critical Area Holding Position Sign. At some airports, when the instrument landing system is being used, it is necessary to hold an aircraft on a taxiway at a location other than the holding position described in Paragraph 20. Holding Position Markings. In these situations, the holding position sign for these operations will have the inscription “ILS” and be located adjacent to the holding position marking on the taxiway described in paragraph 20. An example of this sign is shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 40 .

22.2.4 No Entry Sign. This sign, shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 41 , prohibits an aircraft from entering an area.

Typically, this sign would be located on a taxiway intended to be used in only one direction or at the intersection of vehicle roadways with runways, taxiways or aprons where the roadway may be mistaken as a taxiway or other aircraft movement surface.

NOTE − Holding position signs provide the pilot with a visual cue as to the location of the holding position marking.

REFERENCE − AIP, AD 1.1 , Para 20. , Holding Position Markings.

23. Location Signs Location signs are used to identify either a taxiway or runway on which the aircraft is located. Other location signs provide a visual cue to pilots to assist them in determining when they have exited an area. The various location signs are described below.

23.1 Taxiway Location Sign. This sign has a black background with a yellow inscription and yellow border, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 42 . The inscription is the designation of the taxiway on which the aircraft is located.

These signs are installed along taxiways either by themselves or in conjunction with direction signs or runway holding position signs. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 43 and FIG AD 1.1 − 47.)

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 27 United States of America 22 JAN 26 23.2 Runway Location Sign. This sign has a black background with a yellow inscription and yellow border, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 44 . The inscription is the designation of the runway on which the aircraft is located.

These signs are intended to complement the information available to pilots through their magnetic compass and typically are installed where the proximity of two or more runways to one another could cause pilots to be confused as to which runway they are on.

23.3 Runway Boundary Sign. This sign has a yellow background with a black inscription with a graphic depicting the pavement holding position marking, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 45 . This sign, which faces the runway and is visible to the pilot exiting the runway, is located adjacent to the holding position marking on the pavement. The sign is intended to provide pilots with another visual cue which they can use as a guide in deciding when they are “clear of the runway.” 23.4 ILS Critical Area Boundary Sign. This sign has a yellow background with a black inscription with a graphic depicting the ILS pavement holding position marking, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 46 . This sign is located adjacent to the ILS holding position marking on the pavement and can be seen by pilots leaving the critical area.

The sign is intended to provide pilots with another visual cue which they can use as a guide in deciding when they are “clear of the ILS critical area.” 24. Direction Signs 24.1 Direction signs have a yellow background with a black inscription. The inscription identifies the designation(s) of the intersecting taxiway(s) leading out of intersection that a pilot would normally be expected to turn onto or hold short of. Each designation is accompanied by an arrow indicating the direction of the turn.

24.2 Except as noted in subparagraph 24.5, each taxiway designation shown on the sign is accompanied by only one arrow. When more than one taxiway designation is shown on the sign, each designation and its associated arrow is separated from the other taxiway designations by either a vertical message divider or a taxiway location sign as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 47 .

24.3 Direction signs are normally located on the left prior to the intersection. When used on a runway to indicate an exit, the sign is located on the same side of the runway as the exit. FIG AD 1.1 − 48 shows a direction sign used to indicate a runway exit.

24.4 The taxiway designations and their associated arrows on the sign are arranged clockwise starting from the first taxiway on the pilot’s left. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 47 .)

24.5 If a location sign is located with the direction signs, it is placed so that the designations for all turns to the left will be to the left of the location sign; the designations for continuing straight ahead or for all turns to the right would be located to the right of the location sign. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 47 .)

24.6 When the intersection is comprised of only one crossing taxiway, it is permissible to have two arrows associated with the crossing taxiway, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 49. In this case, the location sign is located to the left of the direction sign.

25. Destination Signs 25.1 Destination signs have a yellow background with a black inscription indicating a taxi route to a destination on the airport. These signs supplement standard taxiway direction signs to optimize taxi paths to specific areas of the airport.

25.2 Destination signs always have an arrow showing the direction of the taxi route to the destination indicated on the sign. Where the destination sign arrow indicates a turn, the sign location is prior to the intersection. The sign may reside on the opposite side of an intersection for straight ahead paths and for ending taxiway intersections.

25.3 Inbound destination signs identify a taxi path to specific areas of the airport. Sign legends are typically short descriptions or abbreviations of the destination. FIG AD 1.1 − 50 shows examples of typical inbound destination signs. Common sign legends include: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 28 22 JAN 26 United States of America 25.3.1 APRON. General parking, servicing, and loading areas.

25.3.1.1 FBO Apron. An apron where itinerant general aviation operators can park their aircraft and expect to have access to traditional Fixed Base Operator services subject to terms and conditions.

25.3.1.2 GA Transient Apron. An apron where itinerant general aviation operators can park their aircraft without FBO services and subject to terms and conditions.

25.3.1.3 GA Tenant Apron. An area designated for parking of based general aviation aircraft, i.e., tie down area.

25.3.1.4 North/South/East/West Apron. An apron designation describing relative location on the airport.

25.3.2 CARGO. Areas set aside for cargo handling.

25.3.3 CIVIL. Areas set aside for civil aircraft.

25.3.4 FUEL. Areas where aircraft receive fuel or related services.

25.3.5 INTL. Areas set aside for handling international flights.

25.3.6 MIL. Areas set aside for military aircraft.

25.3.6.1 ANG. Area reserved for air national guard.

25.3.6.2 USN. Area reserved for U.S. Navy 25.3.7 PARKING. Alternative name for apron area.

25.3.8 PAX. Areas set aside for passenger handling.

25.3.9 RAMP. Name synonymous with APRON.

25.3.10 TERM. Gate positions at which aircraft load or unload passengers and cargo.

25.4 Outbound destination signs identify the general direction to departure runways. The sign legend consists of direction arrow(s) and the applicable runway designations. FIG AD 1.1 − 51 is an example of a typical outbound destination sign.

25.5 When sign indicates the inscription for two or more destinations having a common taxi route are placed on a sign, the destinations are separated by a “dot” ( ) separates the destinations and one arrow indicates the direction of the taxi path, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 51.

25.6 When a sign shows the inscription for two or more destinations having different taxiing routes, each destination will have its own arrow to indicate the taxi direction. A vertical black message divider separates each destination, as shown in FIG AD 1.1 − 52.

26. Information Signs 26.1 Information signs have a yellow background with a black inscription. They are used to provide the pilot with information on such things as areas that cannot be seen from the control tower, applicable radio frequencies, and noise abatement procedures. The airport operator determines the need, size, and location for these signs.

27. Runway Distance Remaining Signs 27.1 Runway distance remaining signs have a black background with a white numeral inscription and may be installed along one or both side(s) of the runway. The number on the signs indicates the distance (in thousands of feet) of landing runway remaining. The last sign (i.e., the sign with the numeral “1”) will be located at least 950 feet from the runway end. FIG AD 1.1 − 52 shows an example of a runway distance remaining sign.

28. Aircraft Arresting Systems 28.1 Certain airports are equipped with a means of rapidly stopping military aircraft on a runway. This equipment, normally referred to as EMERGENCY ARRESTING GEAR, generally consists of pendant cables Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 29 United States of America 22 JAN 26 supported over the runway surface by rubber “donuts.” Although most devices are located in the overrun areas, a few of these arresting systems have cables stretched over the operational areas near the ends of a runway.

28.2 Arresting cables which cross over a runway require special markings on the runway to identify the cable location. These markings consist of 10 feet diameter solid circles painted “identification yellow,” 30 feet on center, perpendicular to the runway centerline across the entire runway width. Additional details are contained in AC 150/5220 − 9, Aircraft Arresting Systems for Joint Civil/Military Airports.

NOTE − Aircraft operations on the runway are not restricted by the installation of aircraft arresting devices.

28.3 Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) . EMAS, which is constructed of high energy − absorbing materials of selected strength, is located in the safety area beyond the end of the runway.

EMAS will be marked with yellow chevrons. EMAS is designed to crush under the weight of commercial aircraft and will exert deceleration forces on the landing gear. These systems do not affect the normal landing and takeoff of airplanes. More information concerning EMAS is in FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5220 − 22, Engineered Materials Arresting Systems (EMAS) for Aircraft Overruns. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 53 .)

NOTE − EMAS may be located as close as 35 feet beyond the end of the runway. Aircraft and ground vehicles should never taxi or drive across the EMAS or beyond the end of the runway if EMAS is present.

29. Security Identification Display Area (SIDA) 29.1 Security Identification Display Areas (SIDA) are limited access areas that require a badge issued in accordance with procedures in 49 CFR Part 1542. A SIDA can include the Air Operations Area (AOA), e.g., aircraft movement area or parking area, or a Secured Area, such as where commercial passengers enplane. The AOA may not be a SIDA, but a Secured Area is always a SIDA. Movement through or into a SIDA is prohibited without authorization and proper identification being displayed. If you are unsure of the location of a SIDA, contact the airport authority for additional information. Airports that have a SIDA will have a description and map detailing boundaries and pertinent features available. (See FIG AD 1.1 − 54 .)

29.2 Pilots or passengers without proper identification that are observed entering a SIDA may be reported to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) or airport security and may be subject to civil and criminal fines and prosecution. Pilots are advised to brief passengers accordingly. Report suspicious activity to the TSA by calling AOPA’s Airport Watch Program, 866 − 427 − 3287. 49 CFR 1540 requires each individual who holds an airman certificate, medical certificate, authorization, or license issued by the FAA to present it for inspection upon a request from TSA.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 30 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 13 Precision Instrument Runway Markings Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 31 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 14 Nonprecision Instrument Runway and Visual Runway Markings AIMING POINT MARKING DESIGNATION PAVEMENT EDGE THRESHOLD THRESHOLD MARKING MARKINGS NONPRECISION INSTRUMENT RUNWAY MARKINGS AIMING POINT MARKING DESIGNATION MARKING PAVEMENT EDGE THRESHOLD VISUAL RUNWAY MARKINGS FIG AD 1.1 − 15 Runway Shoulder Markings RUNWAY SHOULDER SHOULDER 45° 45° MIDPOINT OF RUNWAY 45° 45° RUNWAY THRESHOLD Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 32 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 16 Relocation of a Threshold with Markings for Taxiway Aligned with Runway Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 33 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 17 Displaced Threshold Markings Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 34 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 18 Markings for Blast Pad or Stopway or Taxiway Preceding a Displaced Threshold Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 35 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 19 Markings for Blast Pads and Stopways Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 36 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 20 Enhanced Taxiway Centerline FIG AD 1.1 − 21 Dashed Markings DOUBLE YELLOW LINES TAXIWAY EDGE TAXIWAY EDGE MARKINGS MARKINGS DASHED CONTINUOUS Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 37 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 22 Taxi Shoulder Markings RUNWAY PAVEMENT EDGE YELLOW STRIPES TAXIWAY EDGE MARKINGS Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 38 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 23 Surface Painted Signs Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 39 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 24 Geographic Position Markings FIG AD 1.1 − 25 Runway Holding Position Markings on Taxiway RUNWAY TAXIWAY/RUNWAY HOLDING POSITION MARKINGS HOLDING BAY TAXIWAY EXAMPLE OF HOLDING POSITION MARKINGS EXTENDED ACROSS HOLDING BAY Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 40 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 26 Runway Holding Position Markings on Runways Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 41 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 27 Taxiways Located in Runway Approach Area and Departure Areas Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 42 22 JAN 26 United States of America NOTE − 1. Refer to Advisory Circular 150/5300 − 13 for additional information on obstruction surfaces.

2. Because Taxiway C does not enter the departure area of Runway 33, the sign on Taxiway C does not include the “33 DEP” legend.

3. The location of a holding position is relative to the point on the aircraft that infringes the surface; for inclining surfaces such as an approach surface, the location of the holdline position may differ from the location of the infringement point.

FIG AD 1.1 − 28 Holding Position Markings: ILS Critical Area Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 43 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 29 Holding Position Markings: Taxiway/Taxiway Intersections TAXIWAY HOLDING POSITION MARKINGS, YELLOW, SEE DETAIL 1

DETAIL 1

FIG AD 1.1 − 30 Vehicle Roadway Markings Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 44 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 31 Roadway Edge Stripes, White, Zipper Style Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 45 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 32 Ground Receiver Checkpoint Markings 1. WHITE 2. YELLOW 3. YELLOW ARROW ALIGNED TOWARD THE FACILITY 4. INTERIOR OF CIRCLE BLACK (CONCRETE SURFACE ONLY) 5. CIRCLE MAY BE BORDERED ON INSIDE AND OUTSIDE WITH 6" BLACK BAND IF NECESSARY FOR CONTRAST FIG AD 1.1 − 33 Nonmovement Area Boundary Markings DASHED LINE ON BOTH LINES MOVEMENT SIDE ARE YELLOW SOLID LINE ON NONMOVEMENT SIDE FIG AD 1.1 − 34 Closed or Temporarily Closed Runway and Taxiway Markings

X

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 46 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 35 Helicopter Landing Areas FIG AD 1.1 − 36 Runway Holding Position Sign FIG AD 1.1 − 37 Holding Position Sign at Beginning of Takeoff Runway Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 47 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 38 Holding Position Sign for a Taxiway that Intersects the Intersection of Two Runways FIG AD 1.1 − 39 Holding Position Signs for Runway Approach and Departure Areas FIG AD 1.1 − 40 Holding Position Sign for ILS Critical Area Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 48 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 41 Sign Prohibiting Aircraft Entry into an Area FIG AD 1.1 − 42 Taxiway Location Sign FIG AD 1.1 − 43 Taxiway Location Sign Collocated with Runway Holding Position Sign Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 49 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 44 Runway Location Sign FIG AD 1.1 − 45 Runway Boundary Sign FIG AD 1.1 − 46 ILS Critical Area Boundary Sign Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 50 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 47 Direction Sign Array with Location Sign on Far Side of Intersection FIG AD 1.1 − 48 Direction Sign for Runway Exit Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 51 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 49 Direction Sign Array for Simple Intersection Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 52 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 50 Inbound Destination Sign Examples FIG AD 1.1 − 51 Destination Sign for Common Taxiing Route to Two Runways Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.1 − 53 United States of America 22 JAN 26 FIG AD 1.1 − 52 Runway Distance Remaining Sign Indicating 3,000 feet of Runway Remaining FIG AD 1.1 − 53 Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS) Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.1 − 54 22 JAN 26 United States of America FIG AD 1.1 − 54 Sample SIDA Warning Sign Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AD 1.2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 1.2 Rescue and Firefighting Service and Snow Plan

1. Rescue and Firefighting Services 1.1 CFR part 139, Certification of Airports, prescribes rules governing the certification and operation of airports in any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States.

1.2 CFR § 139.315, Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting: Index Determination is the methodology for determining a rescue and firefighting index for an airport or heliport. For additional information on the individual index requirements visit the following website at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title − 14/chapter − I/subchapter − G/part − 139/subpart − D/section − 139.315 .

1.3 Adequate rescue and firefighting vehicles, equipment and personnel are provided at aerodromes available for international commercial air transport.

1.4 Temporary interruptions to rescue and firefighting service, or nonavailability of such services, are made known by NOTAM.

1.5 Aerodromes serving certain air carriers under 14 CFR part 139 are indicated by a CFR Index, which relates to the availability of crash, fire, and rescue equipment. (See TBL AD 1.2 − 1.)

TBL AD 1.2 − 1 14 CFR Part 139 Certificated Airports: Indexes and Fire Fighting and Rescue Equipment Requirements Required Number of Aircraft Length Agent & Water for Foam Airport Index Vehicles A 1 < 90’ 500# DC or 450# DC + 100 gal H 0 B 1 or 2 > 90’ & < 126’ Index A + 1500 gal H 0 C 2 or 3 > 126’ & < 159’ Index A + 3000 gal H 0 D 3 > 159’ & < 200’ Index A + 4000 gal H 0 E 3 > 200’ Index A + 6000 gal H 0 > Greater Than; < Less Than; > Equal To or Greater Than; H 0 Water; DC Dry Chemical NOTE − Vehicle and capacity requirements for airports holding limited operating certificates are determined on a case − by − case basis.

2. Snow Plan 2.1 The United States does not publish individual airport/heliport snow plans in the AIP. Snow removal is a standard operation conducted by the aerodrome operators themselves. However, as determined by the Administrator, each certificate holder whose airport is located where snow and icing conditions occur must prepare, maintain, and carry out a snow and ice control plan in a manner authorized by the Administrator. General considerations for the snow and ice plan are found under 14 CFR § 139.313, Snow and Ice Control, found at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title − 14/chapter − I/subchapter − G/part − 139/subpart − D/section − 139.313 .

2.2 Runway closure information and runway snow and ice conditions are disseminated via NOTAM.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 1.3 Index to Aerodromes and Heliports

Aerodrome data is available via online web sources found in the Digital Chart Supplement (Airport Facility Directory), with Graphical portrayals of each airport and heliport are listed with the airport data.

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ .

Additional airport data can be obtained by going to the Electronic National Airspace System Resource (eNASR) at : https://enasr.faa.gov/eNASR/nasr/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.4 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 1.4 Grouping Aerodromes/Heliport

A description of how airports are grouped or categorized in the United States can be found at the FAA’s website for airport categories at: https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/categories .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 1.5 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 1.5 Status of Certification of Aerodromes

The Part 139 Airport Certification list can be obtained at the following website: https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/part139_cert .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 2 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 2. AERODROMES

Aerodrome information can be found on the FAA website at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/Airport_Data/ or the Electronic National Airspace System Resource (eNASR) at: https://enasr.faa.gov/eNASR/nasr/ Airport diagrams can also be found in the Terminal Procedures Publication (TPP) at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dtpp/ . For additional aerodrome informa - tion, see the Chart Supplement at: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AD 3 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26

AD 3. HELIPORTS

Heliport information can be found on the FAA website at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/aero_data/Airport_Data/ or the Electronic National Airspace System Resource (eNASR) at: https://enasr.faa.gov/eNASR/nasr/ . For additional heliport information, see the Chart Supplement at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/dafd/ .

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: APPENDIX →

APPENDIX

AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 1 Appendix 1 − 1 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26

Appendix 1. FAA Form 7233 − 4 − International Flight Plan

a. The FAA will accept a flight plan in international format for IFR, VFR, SFRA, and DVFR flights. File the flight plan electronically via a Flight Service Station (FSS), FAA contracted flight plan filing service, or other commercial flight plan filing service. Depending on the filing service chosen, the method of entering data may be different but the information required is generally the same.

b. The international flight plan format is mandatory for: 1. Any flight plan filed through a FSS or FAA contracted flight plan filing service; with the exception of Department of Defense flight plans and civilian stereo route flight plans, which can still be filed using the format prescribed in FAA Form 7233 − 1.

NOTE − DOD Form DD − 175 and FAA Form 7233 − 1 are considered to follow the same format.

2. Any flight that will depart U.S. domestic airspace. For DOD flight plan purposes, offshore Warning Areas may use FAA Form 7233 − 1 or military equivalent.

3. Any flight requesting routing that requires Performance Based Navigation.

4. Any flight requesting services that require filing of capabilities only supported in the international flight plan format.

c. Flight Plan Contents 1. A flight plan will include information shown below: (a) Flight Specific Information (TBL 1 − 1) (b) Aircraft Specific Information (TBL 1 − 19) (c) Flight Routing Information (TBL 1 − 20) (d) Flight Specific Supplementary Information (Item 19) 2. The tables indicate where the information is located in the international flight plan format, the information required for U.S. domestic flights, and the location of equivalent information in the domestic flight plan format.

3. International flights, including those that temporarily leave domestic U.S. airspace and return, require all applicable information in the international flight plan. Additional information can be found in ICAO Doc. 4444 (Procedures for Air Navigation Services, Air Traffic Management), and ICAO Doc. 7030 (Regional Supplemental Procedures) as well as the Aeronautical Information Publications (AIPs), Aeronautical Information Circulars (AICs), and NOTAMs of applicable other countries.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 2 Appendix 1 − 2 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America TBL 1 − 1 Flight Specific Information Equivalent Item on International Flight Item Domestic U.S. Requirements Domestic Flight Plan Plan (FAA Form 7233 − 4) (FAA Form 7233 − 1) Aircraft Identification Item 7 Required Item 2 Flight Rules Item 8 Required Item 1 Type of Flight Item 8 No need to file for domestic U.S. flight N/A Item 10 Equipment and Capabilities Item 18 PBN/; NAV/; COM/; DAT/; Required Item 3 SUR/ Date of Flight Item 18 DOF/ Include when date of flight is not today N/A Reasons for Special Handling Item 18 STS/; RMK/ Include when special category is applicable Item 11 Remarks Item 18 RMK/ Include when necessary Item 11 Operator Item 18 OPR/ No need to file for domestic U.S. flight N/A Flight Plan Originator Item 18 ORGN/ No need to file for domestic U.S. flight N/A d. Instructions for Flight − Specific Information Items 1. Aircraft Identification (Item 7) Aircraft Identification is always required. Aircraft identification must not exceed seven alphanumeric characters and be either: (a) The ICAO designator for the aircraft operating agency, followed by the flight identification (for example, KLM511, NGA213, JTR25). When in radiotelephony the call sign to be used by the aircraft will consist of the ICAO telephony designator for the operating agency followed by the flight identification (for example, KLM511, NIGERIA213, JESTER25); (b) The nationality or common mark and registration of the aircraft (for example, EIAKO, 4XBCD, N2567GA), when: (1) In radiotelephony, the call sign to be used by the aircraft will consist of this identification alone (for example, CGAJS) or preceded by the ICAO telephony designator for the aircraft operating agency (for example, BLIZZARD CGAJS); or (2) The aircraft is not equipped with radio.

NOTE − 1. Standards for nationality, common and registration marks to be used are contained in Annex 7, Chapter 2.

2. Provisions for using radiotelephony call signs are contained in Annex 10, Volume II, Chapter 5. ICAO designators and telephony designators for aircraft operating agencies are contained in Doc 8585—Designators for Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities and Services.

NOTE − Some countries’ aircraft identifications begin with a number, which cannot be processed by U.S. ATC automation. The FAA will add a leading letter temporarily to gain automation acceptance for aircraft identifications that begin with a numeral. For flight − processing systems (e.g., ERAM or STARS) which will not accept a call sign that begins with a number, if the call sign is 6 characters or less, add a Q at the beginning of the call sign. If the call sign is 7 characters, delete the first character and replace it with a Q. Put the original call sign in the remarks section of the flight plan.

EXAMPLE − 9HRA becomes Q9HRA 5744233 becomes Q744233 2. Flight Rules (Item 8a) (a) Flight rules are always required.

(b) Flight rules must indicate IFR (I) or VFR (V).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 3 Appendix 1 − 3 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 (c) For composite flight plans, submit separate flight plans for the IFR and VFR portions of the flight.

Specify in Item 15 the point or points where change of flight rules is planned. The IFR plan will be routed to ATC, and the VFR plan will be routed to a Flight Service for Search and Rescue services.

NOTE − The pilot is responsible for opening and closing the VFR flight plan. ATC does not have knowledge of a VFR flight plan’s status.

3. Type of Flight (Item 8b) (a) The type of flight is optional for flights remaining wholly within U.S. domestic airspace.

(b) Indicate the type of flight as follows: G − General Aviation S − Scheduled Air Service N − Non − Scheduled Air Transport Operation M − Military X − other than any of the defined categories above 4. Equipment and Capabilities (Item 10, Item 18 NAV/, COM/, DAT/, SUR/) (a) Equipment and capabilities that can be filed in a flight plan include: Navigation capabilities in Item 10a, Item 18 PBN/, and Item 18 NAV/ Voice communication capabilities in Item 10a and Item 18 COM/ Data communication capabilities in Item 10a and Item 18 DAT/ Approach capabilities in Item 10a and Item 18 NAV/ Surveillance capabilities in Item 10b and Item 18 SUR/ (b) Codes allowed in Item 10a are shown in Table 1 − 2. Codes allowed in Item 10b are shown in TBL 1 − 3.

Codes recognized in Item 18 NAV/, COM/, DAT/, and SUR/ are shown in TBL 1 − 4. Note that other service providers may define additional allowable (and required) codes for use in Item 18 NAV/, COM/, DAT/, or SUR/.

Codes to designate PBN capability are described in TBL 1 − 5.

Radio communication, navigation and approach aid equipment and capabilities ENTER one letter as follows: N if no COM/NAV/approach aid equipment for the route to be flown is carried, or the equipment is unserviceable, OR S if standard COM/NAV/approach aid equipment for the route to be flown is carried and serviceable (see Note 1), AND/OR ENTER one or more of the following letters from TBL 1 − 2 to indicate the serviceable COM/NAV/ approach aid equipment and capabilities available.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 4 Appendix 1 − 4 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America TBL 1 − 2 Item 10a Navigation, Communication, and Approach Aid Capabilities A GBAS Landing System J7 CPDLC FANS 1/A SATCOM B LPV (APV with SBAS) (Iridium) C LORAN C K MLS D DME L ILS E1 FMC WPR ACARS M1 ATC SATVOICE (INMARSAT) E2 D − FIS ACARS M2 Reserved E3 PDC ACARS M3 ATC RTF (Iridium) F ADF O VOR G GNSS (See Note 2) P1 CPDLC RCP 400 (See Note 7) H HF RTF P2 CPDLC RCP 240 (See Note 7) I Inertial Navigation P3 SATVOICE RCP 400 (See Note 7) J1 CPDLC ATN VDL Mode 2 (See Note 3) P4 − P9 Reserved for RCP J2 CPDLC FANS 1/A HFDL R PBN Approved (See Note 4) J3 CPDLC FANS 1/A VDL Mode A T TACAN J4 CPDLC FANS 1/A Mode 2 U UHF RTF J5 CPDLC FANS 1/A SATCOM V VHF RTF (INMARSAT) W RVSM Approved J6 Reserved X MNPS Approved /North Atlantic (NAT) High Level Airspace (HLA) approved Y VHF with 8.33 kHz Channel Spacing Capability Z Other equipment carried or other capabilities (See Note 5) Any alphanumeric characters not indicated above are reserved.

NOTE − 1. If the letter “S” is used, standard equipment is considered to be VHF RTF, VOR, and ILS, unless another combination is prescribed by the appropriate ATS authority.

2. If the letter “G” is used, the types of external GNSS augmentation, if any, are specified in Item 18 following the indicator NAV/ and separated by a space.

EXAMPLE − NAV/SBAS 3. See RTCA/EUROCAE Interoperability Requirements Standard for ATN Baseline 1 (ATN B1 INTEROP Standard – DO –280B/ED − 110B) for data link services air traffic control clearance and information/air traffic control communications management/air traffic control microphone check.

4. If the letter “R” is used, the performance − based navigation levels that can be met are specific in Item 18 following the indicator PBN/. Guidance material on the application of performance − based navigation to a specific route segment, route, or area is contained in the Performance − based Navigation (PBN) Manual (Doc 9613) 5. If the letter “Z” is used, specify in Item 18 the other equipment carried or other capabilities, preceded by COM/, NAV/, and/or DAT, as appropriate.

6. Information on navigation capability is provided to ATC for clearance and routing purposes.

7. Guidance on the application of performance − based communication, which prescribes RCP to an air traffic service in a specific area, is contained in the Performance − based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) Manual (Doc 9869).

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 5 Appendix 1 − 5 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL 1 − 3 Item 10b Surveillance Capabilities ENTER “N” if no surveillance equipment for the route to be flown is carried, or the equipment is unserviceable, or ENTER One or more of the following descriptors, to a maximum of 20 characters, to describe the serviceable surveillance equipment and/or capabilities on board.

ENTER no more than one transponder code (Modes A, C, or S) SSR Modes A and C: A Transponder Mode A (4 digits – 4096 codes) C Transponder Mode A (4 digits – 4096 codes) and Mode C SSR Mode S: E Transponder Mode S, including aircraft identification, pressure − altitude, and extended squitter (ADS − B) capability H Transponder Mode S, including aircraft identification, pressure − altitude, and enhanced surveillance capability I Transponder Mode S, including aircraft identification, but no pressure − altitude capability L Transponder Mode S, including aircraft identification, pressure − altitude, extended squitter (ADS − B), and enhanced surveillance capability P Transponder Mode S, including pressure − altitude, but no aircraft identification capability S Transponder Mode S, including both pressure − altitude and aircraft identification capability X Transponder Mode S, with neither aircraft identification nor pressure − altitude NOTE − Enhanced surveillance capability is the ability of the aircraft to down − link aircraft derived data via Mode S transpon - der.

ADS − B: B1 ADS − B with dedicated 1090 MHz ADS − B “out” capability B2 ADS − B with dedicated 1090 MHz ADS − B “out” and “in” capability U1 ADS − B with “out” capability using UAT U2 ADS − B with “out” and “in” capability using UAT V1 ADS − B with “out” capability using VDL Mode 4 V2 ADS − B with “out” and “in” capability using VDL Mode 4 NOTE − File no more than one code for each type of capability, e.g., file B1 or B2 and not both ADS − C: D1 ADS − C with FANS 1/A capabilities G1 ADS − C with ATN capabilities Alphanumeric characters not included above are reserved.

EXAMPLE − ADE3RV/HB2U2V2G1 NOTE − 1. The RSP specification(s), if applicable, will be listed in Item 18 following the indicator SUR/, using the characters “RSP” followed by the specifications value. Currently RSP180 and RSP400 are in use.

2. List additional surveillance equipment or capabilities in Item 18 following the indicator SUR/.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 6 Appendix 1 − 6 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America TBL 1 − 4 Item 18 NAV/, COM/, DAT/, and SUR/ capabilities used by FAA Item Purpose Entry Explanation NAV/ entries Radius − to − Fix (RF) Z1 RNP − capable flight is authorized for Radius to Fix used by FAA capability operations.

Fixed Radius Transitions Z2 RNP − capable flight is authorized for Fixed Radius (FRT) Transitions.

Time of Arrival Control Z5 RNP − capable flight is authorized for Time of Arrival Control.

(TOAC) Advanced RNP (A − RNP) P1 Flight is authorized for A − RNP operations.

Helicopter RNP 0.3 R1 Flight is authorized for RNP 0.3 operations (pertains to helicopters only).

RNP 2 Continental M1 Flight is authorized for RNP 2 continental operations.

RNP 2 Oceanic/Remote M2 Flight is authorized for RNP 2 oceanic/remote operations.

COM/ entries The FAA currently does not use any entries in COM/.

N/A N/A used by FAA DAT/ entries Capability and preference Priority number Entries are combined with a priority number, for example; used by FAA for delivery of pre − depar - followed by: 1FANS2PDC means a preference for departure clearance ture clearance FANS delivered via FANS 1/A; with capability to also receive the FANSP clearance via ACARS PDC.

PDC FANS = FANS 1/A DCL VOICE FANSP = FANS 1/A+ DCL PDC = ACARS PDC VOICE = PDC via voice (no automated delivery) SUR/ entries Req. Surveillance Perfor - RSP180 Aircraft is authorized for Required Surveillance Performance used by FAA mance RSP180 RSP400 Aircraft is authorized for Required Surveillance Performance RSP400 ADS − B A2 Aircraft has 1090 MHz Extended Squitter ADS − B compliant with RTCA DO − 260B (complies with FAA requirements) A2 Aircraft has 978 MHz UAT ADS − B compliant with RTCA DO − 282B (complies with FAA requirements) NOTE − 1. Other entries in NAV/, COM/, DAT/, and SUR/ are permitted for international flights when instructed by other service providers. Direction on use of these capabilities by the FAA is detailed in the following sections.

2. In NAV/, descriptors for advanced capabilities (Z1, P1, R1, M1, and M2) should be entered as a single character string with no intervening spaces, and separated from any other entries in NAV/ by a space.

EXAMPLE − NAV/Z1P1M2 SBAS Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 7 Appendix 1 − 7 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL 1 − 5 Item 18. PBN/ Specifications (Include as many of the applicable descriptors, up to a maximum of 8 entries (not more than 16 characters).

PBN/ RNAV SPECIFICATIONS A1 RNAV 10 (RNP 10) B1 RNAV 5 all permitted sensors B2 RNAV 5 GNSS B3 RNAV 5 DME/DME B4 RNAV 5 VOR/DME B5 RNAV 5 INS or IRS B6 RNAV 5 LORAN C C1 RNAV 2 all permitted sensors C2 RNAV 2 GNSS C3 RNAV 2 DME/DME C4 RNAV 2 DME/DME/IRU D1 RNAV 1 all permitted sensors D2 RNAV 1 GNSS D3 RNAV 1 DME/DME D4 RNAV 1 DME/DME/IRU PBN/ RNP SPECIFICATIONS L1 RNP 4 O1 Basic RNP 1 all permitted sensors O2 Basic RNP 1 GNSS O3 Basic RNP 1 DME/DME O4 Basic RNP 1 DME/DME/IRU S1 RNP APCH S2 RNP APCH with BARO − VNAV RNP AR APCH with RF (special T1 authorization required) RNP AR APCH without RF (special T2 authorization required) NOTE − 1. PBN Codes B1 − B6 indicates RNAV 5 capability. The FAA considers these B codes to be synonymous and qualifying for point − to − point routing but not for assignment to the PBN routes shown in the table.

2. Combinations of alphanumeric characters not included above are reserved.

3. The PBN/ specifications are allowed per ICAO Doc. 4444. The FAA makes use of a subset of these codes as described in the section on filing navigation capability.

(c) The following sections detail what capabilities need to be provided to obtain services from the FAA for : IFR flights (general).

Assignment of Performance − Based Navigation (PBN) routes.

Automated Departure clearance (via Datacom DCL or PDC).

Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (if requesting FL 290 or above).

Reduced Separation in Oceanic Airspace.

(d) Capabilities such as voice communications, required communications performance, approach aids, and ADS − C, are not required in a flight plan that remains entirely within domestic airspace.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 8 Appendix 1 − 8 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America (e) Flights that leave domestic United States airspace may be required to include additional capabilities, per requirements for the FIRs being overflown. Consult the appropriate State Aeronautical Information Publications for requirements.

(f) Include the capability only if: The requisite equipment is installed and operational; The crew is trained as required; and Any required Operations Specification, Letter of Authorization, or other approvals are in hand.

NOTE − Do not include a capability solely based on the installed equipment if an operational approval is required. For example, all U.S. civil operators require either Operations Specification, Management Specification, or Letter of Authorization B036, as applicable, in order to include NAV/M2 (RNP 2 (oceanic/remote)), PBN/A1 (RNAV 10 (RNP 10)), or PBN/L1 (RNP 4) in Item 18.

5. Filing equipment and capability in an IFR Flight Plan. This section details the minimum requirements to identify capabilities in an IFR flight plan for flights in the domestic United States. Other requirements to file a capability are associated with obtaining specific services as described in subsequent sections. The basic capabilities that must be addressed include Navigation, Transponder, Voice, and ADS − B Out as described below.

A designator for “Standard” capability is also allowed to cover a suite of commonly carried voice, navigation, and approach equipment with one code.

(a) Standard Capability and No Capability (Item 10a) Use “S” if VHF radio, VOR, and ILS equipment for the route to be flown are carried and service - able. Use of the ’S’ removes the need to list these three capabilities separately.

Use “N” if no communications, navigation, or approach aid equipment for the route to be flown are carried or the equipment is unserviceable.

When there is no transponder, ADS − B, or ADS − C capability then file only the letter ’N’ in Item 10b.

(b) Navigation Capabilities (Item 10a, Item 18 NAV/) Indicate radio navigation capability by filing one or more of the codes in TBL 1 − 6.

Indicate Area Navigation (RNAV) capability by filing one or more of the codes in TBL 1 − 7.

TBL 1 − 6 Radio Navigation Capabilities Capability Item 10a Item 18 NAV/ VOR O DME D TACAN T TBL 1 − 7 Area Navigation Capabilities Capability Item 10a Item 18 NAV/ SBAS (if WAAS equipped) GNSS G GBAS (if LAAS equipped) INS I DME / DME DR VOR / DME DOR NOTE − 1. SBAS – Space − Based Augmentation System GBAS − Ground − Based Augmentation System Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 9 Appendix 1 − 9 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 2. No PBN/ code needs to be filed to indicate the ability to fly point − to − point routes using GNSS or INS.

3. Filing one of these four area navigation capabilities as shown does not indicate performance based navigation sufficient for flying Q − Routes, T − Routes, or RNAV SIDs or STARs. To qualify for these routes, see the section on Performance Based Navigation Routes.

(c) Transponder Capabilities (Item 10b) For domestic flights, it is not necessary to indicate Mode S capability. It is acceptable to simply file one of the following codes in TBL 1 − 8.

TBL 1 − 8 Mode C Capability Item 10b Transponder with no Mode C A Transponder with Mode C C International flights must file in accordance with relevant AIPs and regional supplements. Include one of the Mode S codes in TBL 1 − 9, if appropriate.

NOTE − File only one transponder code.

TBL 1 − 9 Mode S Aircraft Altitude Item Capability ID Encoding 10b Mode S Transponder No No X Mode S Transponder No Yes P Mode S Transponder Yes No I Mode S Transponder Yes Yes S Mode S Transponder with Extended Squitter Yes Yes E Enhanced Mode S Transponder Yes Yes H Enhanced Mode S Transponder with Extended Squitter Yes Yes L (d) ADS − B Capabilities (Item 10b, Item 18 SUR/ and Item 18 CODE/) Indicate ADS − B capability as shown in TBL 1 − 10. The accompanying entry in Item 18 indicates that the equipment is compliant with 14 CFR §91.227. Some ADS − B equipment used in other countries is based on an earlier standard and does not meet U.S. requirements.

Do not file an ADS − B code for “in” capability only. There is currently no way to indicate that an aircraft has “in” capability but no “out” capability.

For aircraft with ADS − B “out” on one frequency and “in” on another, include only the ADS − B “out” code. For example, B1 or U1, (See TBL 1 − 10).

TBL 1 − 10 ADS − B Capabilities Item Item 18 Capability 10b SUR/ 1090 ES Out Capability B1 A2 1090 ES Out and In Capability B2 A2 UAT Out Capability U1 A2 UAT Out and In Capability U2 A2 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 10 Appendix 1 − 10 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America (e) Voice Communication Capabilities (Item 10a) The FAA does not require indication of voice communication capabilities in a flight plan for domestic flights, but it is permissible. For flights outside the domestic United States, all relevant capabilities must be indicated as follows (See TBL 1 − 11): TBL 1 − 11 Voice Communication Capabilities Capability Item 10a VHF Radio V UHF Radio U HF Radio H VHF Radio (8.33 kHZ Spacing) Y ATC SATVOICE (INMARSAT) M1 ATC SATVOICE (Iridium) M3 (f) Approach Aid Capabilities (Item 10a).

The FAA does not require filing of approach aid capability in order to request a specific type of approach, however any of the codes indicated in TBL 1 − 12 in 10a are permissible.

International flights may be required to indicate approach capability, based on instructions from relevant service providers.

TBL 1 − 12 Approach Aid Capabilities Item Capability 10a ILS L MLS K LPV Approach (APV with SBAS) (WAAS) B GBAS Landing System (LAAS) A 6. Performance − Based Navigation Routes (Item 10a, Item 18 PBN/, Item 18 NAV/) − When planning to fly routes that require PBN capability, file the appropriate capability as shown in TBL 1 − 13.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 11 Appendix 1 − 11 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL 1 − 13 Filing for Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Routes Item 18 PBN/ Item 18 NAV/ Type of Routing Capability Required Item 10a Notes See NOTE 2 See NOTE 3 GR D2 If GNSS RNAV SID or STAR RNAV 1 (See NOTE 1) DIR D4 If DME/DME/IRU RNP 1 GR O2 If GNSS only GNSS RNP SID or STAR (See NOTE 2) RNP 1 If GNSS primary and DGIR O1 GNSS DME/DME/IRU backup RNP 1 GRZ O2 Z1 If GNSS only RNP SID or STAR with GNSS RF required RNP 1 If GNSS primary and (See NOTE 2) DGIRZ O1 Z1 GNSS DME/DME/IRU backup Domestic Q − Route (see GR C2 If GNSS separate requirements for RNAV 2 Gulf of America DIR C4 If DME/DME/IRU Q − Routes) GNSS is required for T − Route RNAV 2 GR C2 T − Routes RNAV (GPS) Approach RNP Approach, GPS GR S1 RNP Approach, GPS RNAV (GPS) Approach GR S2 Baro − VNAV RNAV (GPS) Approach RNP Approach, GPS Domestic arrivals do not GRZ S2 Z1 with RF required RF Capability need to file PBN approach capabilities to request the RNP (Special Autho - RNP AR Approach with approach.

rization Required) RF GR T1 RF Leg Capability RNP AR Approach with - RNP (Special Autho - GR T2 out RF rization Required) NOTE − 1. If the flight is requesting an RNAV SID only (no RNAV STAR) or RNAV STAR only (no RNAV SID) then consult guidance on the FAA website at https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/air_traffic_services/flight_plan_filing .

2. PBN descriptor D1 includes the capabilities of D2, D3, and D4. PBN descriptor B1 includes the capabilities of B2, B3, B4, and B5. PBN descriptor C1 includes the capabilities of C2, C3, and C4.

3. In NAV/, descriptors for advanced capabilities (Z1, P1, R1, M1, and M2) should be entered as a single character string with no intervening spaces, and separated from any other entries in NAV/ by a space.

EXAMPLE − NAV/Z1P1M2 SBAS 7. Automated Departure Clearance Delivery (DCL or PDC). When planning to use automated pre − departure clearance delivery capability, file as indicated below.

(a) PDC provides pre − departure clearances from the FAA to the operator’s designated flight operations center, which then delivers the clearance to the pilot by various means. Use of PDC does not require any special flight plan entry.

(b) DCL provides pre − departure clearances from the FAA directly to the cockpit/FMS via Controller Pilot Datalink Communications (CPDLC). Use of DCL requires flight plan entries as follows: Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 12 Appendix 1 − 12 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America Include CPDLC codes in Item 10a only if the flight is capable of en route/oceanic CPDLC, the codes are not required for DCL.

Include Z in Item 10a to indicate there is information provided in Item 18 DAT/.

Include the clearance delivery methods of which the flight is capable, and order of preference in Item 18 DAT/. (See AIM 5 − 2 − 2) ○ VOICE − deliver clearance via Voice ○ PDC − deliver clearance via PDC ○ FANS − deliver clearance via FANS 1/A ○ FANSP − deliver clearance via FANS 1/A+ EXAMPLE − DAT/1FANS2PDC DAT/1FANSP2VOICE 8. Operating in Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM) Airspace (Item 10a). When planning to fly in RVSM airspace (FL 290 up to and including FL 410) then file as indicated below.

(a) If capable and approved for RVSM operations, per AIM 4 − 6 − 1, Applicability and RVSM Mandate (Date/Time and Area), file a W in Item 10a. Include the aircraft registration mark in Item 18 REG/, which is used to post − operationally monitor the safety of RVSM operations.

Do not file a “W” in Item 10a if the aircraft is capable of RVSM operations, but is not approved to operate in RVSM airspace.

If RVSM capability is lost after the flight plan is filed, request that ATC remove the ’W’ from Item 10a.

(b) When requesting to operate non − RVSM in RVSM airspace, using one of the exceptions identified in AIM 4 − 6 − 10, do not include a “W” in Item 10a. Include STS/NONRVSM in Item 18. STS/NONRVSM is used only as part of a request to operate non − RVSM in RVSM airspace.

9. Eligibility for Reduced Oceanic Separation. Indicate eligibility for the listed reduced separation minima as indicated in the tables below. Full Operational Requirements for these services are found in the U.S.

Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) ENR 7, Oceanic Operations, available at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aip_html/index.html .

TBL 1 − 14 Filing for Gulf of America CTA Flight Plan Entries PBN Re - Dimension PBN in Item 18 Separation ADS − C Surveillance Comm. Re - CPDLC PBN in quirement ADS − C in of Separa - PBN/ Minima Requirements quirement in Item Item 18 tion Item 10b (also File ’R’ in NAV/ 10a Item 10a) Voice comm − HF or VHF as RNP10 N/A required to Lateral 50 NM or (ADS − C not maintain con - N/A N/A A1 or L1 N/A RNP4 required) tact over the entire route to be flown.

NOTE − If not RNAV10/RNP10 capable and planning to operate in the Gulf of America CTA, then put the notation NONRNP10 in Item 18 RMK/, preferably first.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 13 Appendix 1 − 13 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 TBL 1 − 15 Filing for 50 NM Lateral Separation in Anchorage Arctic FIR Flight Plan Entries PBN Require - Dimension Separa - PBN in Item 18 ADS − C Surveillance Comm. Re - CPDLC PBN in ment of Separa - tion Mini- ADS − C in PBN/ Requirements quirement in Item Item 18 tion ma Item 10b (also File ’R’ in 10a NAV/ Item 10a) None be - RNP10 N/A yond normal Lateral 50 NM or (ADS − C not requirements N/A N/A A1 or L1 N/A required) for the RNP4 airspace TBL 1 − 16 Filing for 20 NM, 30 NM and 50 NM Longitudinal; and 23 NM and 30 NM Lateral Oceanic Separation in Anchorage, Oakland, and New York Oceanic CTAs Flight Plan Entries PBN in Item Dimension of Separation ADS − C Surveillance Comm. Re - PBN Require - CPDLC PBN in ADS − C in 18 PBN/ Separation Minima Requirements quirement ment in Item Item 18 Item 10b (also File ’R’ 10a NAV/ in Item 10a) Position report at least every 27 min - J5 and/or utes (at least every 32 50 NM J7 Longitudinal minutes if both air - CPDLC RNP10 D1 A1 N/A craft are approved for RNP − 4 opera - tions) ADS − C position re - J5 and/or Longitudinal 30 NM port at least every 10 CPDLC RNP4 D1 L1 N/A J7 minutes ADS − C position re - J5 and/or Longitudinal 20 NM port at least every CPDLC RNP4 D1 L1 N/A J7 192 seconds Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 14 Appendix 1 − 14 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America ADS − C − based later - al deviation event contract with 5NM J5 and/or lateral deviation RNP4 J7 Lateral from planned routing CPDLC D1 L1 N/A 30 NM set as threshold for triggering ADS re - port of lateral devia - tion event ADS − C − based later - al deviation event contract with 5NM J5 and/or lateral deviation RNP4 J7 Lateral from planned routing CPDLC D1 L1 N/A 23 NM set as threshold for triggering ADS re - port of lateral devia - tion event TBL 1 − 17 Filing for Reduced Oceanic Separation when RSP/RCP Required on March 29, 2018 Flight Plan Entries PBN in Item 18 PBN Require - Dimension of Separation RSP Re - RCP Re - RSP in RCP in CDPLC PBN in PBN/ ment Separation Minima quirement quirement Item 18 Item in Item 18 (also File ’R’ in SUR/ 10a Item10a NAV/ Item 10a) Lateral 180 240 RSP180 P2 J5, L1 55.5 km and/or 30 NM RNP 2 or J6, RNP 4 and/or J7 RNAV 10 Perfor - 5 Minutes 180 240 RSP180 P2 J5, A1 or L1 M2 (RNP 10) mance − and/or RNP 4, or based J6, RNP 2 Longitudinal and/or oceanic/ J7 remote Perfor - 180 240 RSP180 P2 J5, L1 M2 55.5 km RNP 4 or mance − and/or 30 NM RNP 2 based J6, oceanic/ Longitudinal and/or remote J7 Perfor - 180 240 RSP180 P2 J5, A1 or L1 93 km mance − RNAV 10 and/or 50 NM based (RNP 10) or J6, Longitudinal RNP 4 and/or J7 Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 15 Appendix 1 − 15 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 NOTE − 1. Filing of RNP 2 alone is not supported in FAA controlled airspace; PBN/L1 (for RNP 4) or PBN/A1 (for RNP 10) must be filed to obtain the indicated separation.

2. Use of “RNP 2” in NAV/ signifies continental RNP 2 (and means the same as M1). Continental RNP 2 is not adequate for reduced oceanic separation. Descriptor M2 indicates RNP 2 global/oceanic RNP 2 capability.

10. Date of Flight (Item 18 DOF/) Flights planned more than 23 hours after the time the flight plan is filed, must include the date of flight in DOF/ expressed in a six − digit format YYMMDD, where YY equals the year (Y), MM equals the month, and DD equals the day.

NOTE − FAA ATC systems will not accept flight plans more than 23 hours prior to their proposed departure time. FAA Flight Service and commercial flight planning services generally accept flight plans earlier and forward to ATC at an appro - priate time, typically 2 to 4 hours before the flight.

EXAMPLE − DOF/171130 11. Reasons for Special Handling (Item 18 STS/) (a) Indicate the applicable Special Handling in Item 18 STS/ as shown in TBL 1 − 18.

NOTE − Priority for a flight is not automatically granted based on filing one of these codes but is based on documented proce - dures. In some cases, additional information may also be required in remarks; follow all such instructions as well.

TBL 1 − 18 Special Handling Special Handling Item 18 STS/ Flight operating in accordance with an altitude reservation ALTRV Flight approved for exemption from ATFM measures by the appropriate ATS authority ATFMX Fire Fighting FFR Flight check for calibration of NAVAIDS FLTCK Flight carrying hazardous material(s) HAZMAT Flight with Head of State status HEAD Medical flight declared by medical authorities HOSP Flight operating on a humanitarian mission HUM Flight for which a military entity assumes responsibility for separation of military aircraft MARSA Life critical medical emergency evacuation MEDEVAC Non − RVSM capable flight intending to operate in RVSM airspace NONRVSM Flight engaged in a search and rescue mission SAR Flight engaged in military, customs, or police services STATE (b) Any other requests for special handling must be made in Item 18 RMK/.

(c) Include plain − language remarks when required by ATC or deemed necessary. Do not use special characters, for example; / * − = +.

EXAMPLE − RMK/NRP RMK/DVRSN 12. Remarks Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 16 Appendix 1 − 16 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America Include when necessary.

13. Operator (Item 18 OPR/) When the operator is not obvious from the aircraft identification, the operator may be indicated.

EXAMPLE − OPR/NETJETS 14. Flight Plan Originator (Item 18 ORGN/) (a) VFR flight plans originating outside of FAA FSS or FAA contracted flight plan filing services must enter the 8 − letter AFTN address of the service where the flight plan was originally filed. Alternately, enter the name of the service where the FPL was originally filed. This information is critical to locating the FPL originator in the event additional information is needed.

(b) For IFR flight plans, the original filers AFTN address may be indicated, which is helpful in cases where a flight plan has been forwarded.

EXAMPLE − ORGN/Acme Flight Plans ORGN/KDENXLDS TBL 1 − 19 Aircraft Specific Information Equivalent Item on International Flight Plan Item Domestic U.S. Requirements Domestic Flight Plan (FAA Form 7233 − 4) (FAA Form 7233 − 1) Number of Aircraft Item 9 Included when more than one a/c in flight Item 3 Type of Aircraft Item 9 Required Item 3 Wake Turbulence Category Item 9 Required N/A Include when planning to operate in RVSM Aircraft Registration Item 18 REG/ N/A airspace Mode S Address Item 18 CODE/ Not required within U.S. controlled airspace N/A SELCAL Codes Item 18 SEL/ Include when SELCAL equipped N/A Performance Category Item 18 PER/ Not required for domestic flights N/A e. Instructions for Aircraft − Specific Information.

1. Number of Aircraft (Item 9) when there is more than one aircraft in the flight; indicate the number of aircraft up to 99.

2. Type of Aircraft (Item 9) (a) Provide the appropriate 2 − 4 character aircraft type designator listed in FAA Order JO 7360.1, Aircraft Type Designators. FAA Order JO 7360.1 may be located at: Orders & Notices (faa.gov), then enter 7360.1 in the Search box.

(b) When there is no designator for the aircraft type use ’ZZZZ’, and provide a description in Item 18 TYP/.

3. Wake Turbulence Category (Item 9) A Wake Turbulence Category is required for all aircraft types. Provide the appropriate wake turbulence category for the aircraft type as listed in FAA Order 7360.1. The categories include: (a) J − SUPER, aircraft types specified as such in FAA Order JO 7360.1, Aircraft Type Designators.

(b) H − HEAVY , to indicate an aircraft type with a maximum certificated take − off mass of 300,000 lbs. or more, with the exception of aircraft types listed in FAA Order JO 7360.1 in the SUPER (J) category.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 17 Appendix 1 − 17 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 (c) M − MEDIUM , to indicate an aircraft type with a maximum certificated take − off mass of less than 300,000 lbs. but more than 15,500 lbs.

(d) L − LIGHT , to indicate an aircraft type with a maximum certificated take − off mass of 15,500 lbs. or less.

4. Aircraft Registration (Item 18 REG/) The aircraft registration must be provided here if different from the Item 7 entry. The registration mark must not include any spaces or hyphens. Additionally, the actual aircraft registration must also be included if Item 7 would have contained a leading numeric and was modified to be prefixed with the appropriate alphabetic character for U.S. ATC acceptance.

EXAMPLE − U.S. aircraft with registration N789AK REG/N789AK Belgian aircraft with registration OO − FAH REG/OOFAH 5. Mode S Address (Item 18 CODE/) There is no U.S. requirement to file the aircraft Mode S Code in Item 18.

6. SELCAL code (Item 18 SEL/) (a) Flights with HF radio and Selective Calling capability should include their 4 − letter SELCAL code. Per the U.S. AIP, GEN 3.4, Paragraph 9, Selective Calling System (SELCAL) Facilities Available.

(b) The SELCAL is a communication system that permits the selective calling of individual aircraft over radio − telephone channels from the ground station to properly equipped aircraft, to eliminate the need for the flight crew to constantly monitor the frequency in use.

EXAMPLE − SEL/CLEF 7. Performance Category (Item 18 PER/) Include the appropriate single − letter Aircraft Approach Category as defined in the Pilot/Controller Glossary.

EXAMPLE − PER/A TBL 1 − 20 Flight Routing Information Equivalent Item on International Flight Plan Item Domestic U.S. Requirements Domestic Flight Plan (FAA Form 7233 − 4) (FAA Form 7233 − 1) Departure Airport Item 13 Required Item 2 Departure Time Item 13 Required Item 1 Cruise Speed Item 15 Required N/A Requested Altitude Item 15 Required Item 3 Route Item 15 Required N/A Delay En Route Item 15, Item 18 DLE/ Required N/A Destination Airport Item 16 Required Item 11 Total Estimated Elapsed Time Item 16 Required Item Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 18 Appendix 1 − 18 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America Item 16 Item 18 ALTN/ (Destination Alternate). If necessary Alternate Airport N/A RALT/ (En route Alternate); TALT/ No need to file for domestic U.S. flight (Take − off Alternate) Include when filing flight plan with center Estimated Elapsed Times Item 18 EET/ N/A other than departure center f. Instructions for Flight Routing Items 1. Departure Airport (Item 13, Item 18 DEP/) (a) Enter the departure airport. The airport should be identified using the four − letter location identifier accessible through FAA Order JO 7350.9, Location Identifiers, or from ICAO Document 7910. FSS and FAA contracted flight plan filing services will allow up to 11 characters in the departure field. This will permit entry of non − ICAO identifier airports, and other fixes such as an intersection, fix/radial/distance, and latitude/longitude coordinates. Other electronic filing services may require a different format.

NOTE − While user interfaces for flight plan filing are not specified, all flight plan filing services must adhere to the appropriate Interface Control Document upon transmission of the flight plan to the control facility.

(b) When the intended departure airport (Item 13) is outside of domestic U.S. airspace, or if using the paper version of FAA Form 7233 − 4, or DOD equivalent, if the chosen flight plan filing service does not allow non − ICAO airport identifiers in Item 13 or Item 16, use the following ICAO procedure. Enter four Z’s (ZZZZ) in Item 13 and include the non − ICAO airport location identifier, fix, or waypoint location in Item 18 DEP/. A text description following the location identifier is permissible in Item 18 DEP/.

NOTE − Use of non − ICAO identifiers in Item 13 and Item 16 is only permissible when flight destination is within U.S. airspace.

If the destination is outside of the U.S., then both Item 13 and Item 16 must contain either a valid ICAO airport identifi - er or ZZZZ. Use of non − ICAO departure point is not permitted in Item 13 if destination in Item 16 is outside of U.S.

EXAMPLE − DEP/MD21 DEP/W29 BAY BRIDGE AIRPORT DEP/EMI211017 DEP/3925N07722W 2. Departure Time (Item 13) Indicate the expected departure time using 4 digits, 2 digits for hours and 2 digits for minutes. Time is to be entered as Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).

3. Requested Cruising Speed (Item 15) (a) Include the requested cruising speed as True Airspeed in knots using an N followed by four digits.

EXAMPLE − N0450 (b) Indicate the requested cruising speed in Mach using an M followed by three digits.

EXAMPLE − M081 4. Requested Cruising Altitude or Flight Level (Item 15) (a) Indicate a Requested Flight Level using the letter F followed by 3 digits.

EXAMPLE − F350 (b) Indicate a Requested Altitude in hundreds of feet using the letter A followed by 3 digits.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 19 Appendix 1 − 19 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 EXAMPLE − A080 5. Route (Item 15) Provide the requested route of flight using a combination of published routes, latitude/longitude, and/or fixes in the following formats.

(a) Consecutive fixes, lat/long points, NAVAIDs, and waypoints should be separated by the characters “DCT”, meaning direct.

EXAMPLE − FLACK DCT IRW DCT IRW12503 4020N07205W DCT MONEY (b) A published route should be preceded by a fix that is published on the route, indicating where the route will be joined. The published route should be followed by a fix that is published as part of the route, indicating where the route will be exited.

EXAMPLE − DALL3 EIC V18 MEI LGC4 (c) It is acceptable to specify intended speed and altitude changes along the route by appending an oblique stroke followed by the next speed and altitude. However, note that FAA ATC systems will neither process this information nor display it to ATC personnel. Pilots are expected to maintain the last assigned altitude and request revised altitude clearances from ATC.

EXAMPLE − DCT APN J177 LEXOR/N0467F380 J177 TAM/N0464F390 J177 6. Delay En Route (Item 15, Item 18 DLE/) (a) ICAO defines Item 18 DLE/ to provide information about a delay en route. International flights with a delay outside U.S. domestic airspace should indicate the place and duration of the delay in Item 18 DLE/. The delay is expressed by a fix identifier followed by the duration in hours (H) and minutes (M), HHMM.

EXAMPLE − DLE/EMI0140 (b) U.S. ATC systems will accept but not process information in DLE/. Therefore, for flights in the lower 48 states, it is preferable to include the delay as part of the route (Item 15). Delay in this format is specified by an oblique stroke (/) followed by the letter D, followed by 2 digits for hours (H) of delay, followed by a plus sign (+), followed by 2 digits for minutes (M) of delay: /DHH+MM.

EXAMPLE − DCT EMI/D01+40 DCT MAPEL/D00+30 V143 DELRO DCT 7. Destination Airport (Item 16, Item 18 DEST/) (a) Enter the destination airport. The airport should be identified using the four − letter location identifier accessible through FAA Order JO 7350.9, Location Identifiers, or from ICAO Document 7910. FSS and FAA contracted flight plan filing services will allow up to 11 characters in the destination field. This will permit entry of non − ICAO identifier airports, and other fixes such as an intersection, fix/radial/distance, and latitude/longitude coordinates. Other electronic filing services may require a different format.

(b) When the intended destination (Item 16) is outside of domestic U.S. airspace, or if using the paper version of FAA Form 7233 − 4, or if the chosen flight plan filing service does not allow non − ICAO airport identifiers in Item 13 or Item 16, use the following ICAO procedure. Enter four Z’s (ZZZZ) in Item 13 and include the non − ICAO airport location identifier, fix, or waypoint location in Item 18 DEP/. A text description following the location identifier is permissible in Item 18 DEP/.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 20 Appendix 1 − 20 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America EXAMPLE − DEST/06A MOTON FIELD DEST/4AK6 DEST/MONTK DEST /3925N07722W 8. Total Estimated Elapsed Time (Item 16) All flight plans must include the total estimated elapsed time from departure to destination in hours (H) and minutes (M), format HHMM.

9. Alternate Airport (Item 16, Item 18 ALTN/) (a) When necessary, specify an alternate airport in Item 16 using the four − letter location identifier accessible through FAA Order 7350.9 or ICAO Document 7910. When the airport does not have a four − letter location identifier, include ZZZZ in Item 16c and file the non − standard identifier in Item 18 ALTN/.

(b) While the FAA does not require filing of alternate airports in the flight plan provided to ATC, rules for establishing alternate airports must be followed.

(d) Although alternate airport information filed in a flight plan will be accepted by air traffic computer systems, it will not be presented to controllers. If diversion to an alternate airport becomes necessary, pilots are expected to notify ATC and request an amended clearance.

EXAMPLE − ALTN/W50 2W2 10. Estimated Elapsed Times (EET) at boundaries or reporting points (Item 18 EET/) EETs are required for international or oceanic flights when crossing a Flight Information Region (FIR) boundary.

The EET will include the ICAO four − letter location identifier for the FIR followed by the elapsed time to the FIR boundary (e.g., KZNY0245 indicates 2 hours, 45 minutes from departure until the New York FIR boundary).

EXAMPLE − EET/MMFR0011 MMTY0039 KZAB0105 11. Remarks (Item 18 RMK/) Enter only those remarks pertinent to ATC or to the clarification of other flight plan information. Items of a personal nature are not accepted.

NOTE − 1. “DVRSN” should be placed in Item 11 only if the pilot/company is requesting priority handling to their original desti - nation from ATC as a result of a diversion as defined in the Pilot/Controller Glossary.

2. Do not assume that remarks will be automatically transmitted to every controller. Specific ATC or en route requests should be made directly to the appropriate controller.

g. Flight Specific Supplemental Information (Item 19) 1. Item 19 data must be included when completing FAA Form 7233 − 4. This information will be retained by the facility/organization that transmits the flight plan to Air Traffic Control (ATC), for Search and Rescue purposes, but it will not be transmitted to ATC as part of the flight plan.

2. Do not include Supplemental Information as part of Item 18. The information in Item 19 is retained with the flight plan filing service for retrieval only if necessary.

NOTE − Supplemental Information within Item 19 will be transmitted as a separate message to the destination FSS for VFR flight plans filed with a FSS or FAA contracted flight plan filing service. This will reduce the time necessary to conduct SAR actions should the flight become overdue, as this information will be readily available to the destination Flight Ser - vice Station.

3. Minimum required Item 19 entries for a domestic flight are Endurance, Persons on Board, Pilot Name and Contact Information, and Color of Aircraft. Additional entries may be required by foreign air traffic services, or at pilot discretion.

Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 21 Appendix 1 − 21 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 (a) After E/ Enter fuel endurance time in hours and minutes.

(b) After P/ Enter total number of persons on board using up to 30 alphanumeric characters. Enter TBN (to be notified) if the total number of persons is not known at the time of filing.

EXAMPLE − P/005 P/TBN P/ON FILE CAPEAIR OPERATIONS (c) R/ (Radio) Cross out items not carried (d) S/ (Survival Equipment) Cross out items not carried.

(e) J/ (Jackets) Cross out items not carried.

(f) D/ (Life Raft/Dinghies) Enter number carried and total capacity. Indicate if covered and color.

(g) A/ (Aircraft Color and Markings) Enter aircraft color(s).

EXAMPLE − White Yellow Blue 4. N/ (Remarks. Not for ATC) select N if no remarks. Enter comments concerning survival equipment and information concerning personal GPS locating service, if utilized. Enter name and contact information for responsible party to verify VFR arrival/closure, if desired. Ensure party will be available for contact at ETA. (for example; FBO is open at ETA) 5. C/ (Pilot) Enter name and contact information, including telephone number, of pilot − in − command. Ensure contact information will be valid at ETA in case SAR is necessary.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 22 Appendix 1 − 22 3/15/07 7110.65R CHG 2 United States of America 22 JAN 26 9 JUL 26 United States of America FIG 1 − 1 FAA Form 7233 − 4, Pre − Flight Pilot Checklist and International Flight Plan Twenty − Ninth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP AIP Appendix 1 − 23 Appendix 1 − 23 United States of America 22 JAN 26 United States of America 9 JUL 26 NOTE − Current FAA Form 7233 − 4 available at https://www.faa.gov/forms/.

Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Ninth Edition

Next: INDEX →

INDEX

AIP I − 1 United States of America 9 JUL 26

INDEX

[References are to page numbers] Remote Airport Information Service (RAIS),

A

GEN 3.3-25 Remote Airport Information Service (RAIS), Abbreviations, GEN 2.2-1 ENR 1.4-16 Actual Navigation Performance (ANP), ENR 4.1-37 Reservations Procedures, GEN 3.3-33 Airport, Aircraft Arresting Devices, AD 1.1-28 ADS-R. See Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Rebroadcast Airport Lighting, AD 1.1-4 Airport Beacons, AD 1.1-17, AD 1.1-18 Aerodrome Forecast (TAF), GEN 3.5-81 Approach Light Systems, AD 1.1-4 Aeronautical Charts, GEN 3.2-1 LED Lighting Systems, AD 1.1-19 Obstruction Lighting, AD 1.1-18 Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunications Network Pilot-controlled Lighting, AD 1.1-13 (AFTN), GEN 3.4-8 Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI), AD Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) 1.1-5 Publication Schedule, GEN 0.1-2 Runway Lighting, AD 1.1-6 Structure, GEN 0.1-1 Taxiway Lighting, AD 1.1-17 Subscription Information, GEN 0.1-3 Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI), AD 1.1-5 Aeronautical Publications, Distribution of, GEN Airport Markings, AD 1.1-20 3.1-2 Colors, AD 1.1-20 AFTN. See Aeronautical Fixed Telecommunications Holding Position Markings, AD 1.1-23 Network (AFTN) Other Markings, AD 1.1-24 AHRS. See Attitude Heading Reference System Nonmovement Area Boundary Markings, AD 1.1-25 Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC), GEN Temporarily Closed Runways and Taxiways, AD 3.3-2 1.1-25 ARTCC Communications, GEN 3.3-2 VOR Checkpoint Markings, AD 1.1-24 ARTCC Radio Frequency Outage, GEN 3.3-20 Runway Markings, AD 1.1-20 Taxiway Markings, AD 1.1-22 Air Traffic Clearance. See Clearance VOR Checkpoint Markings, AD 1.1-24 Air Traffic Control, Pilot/Controller Roles and Runway Markings, AD 1.1-20 Responsibilities, ENR 1.1-72 Taxiway Markings, AD 1.1-22 Aircraft, Lights, Use of, ENR 1.1-34 Airport Operations, Land and Hold Short , ENR 1.1-24 Airport Airport Advisory/Information Services, ENR Airport Signs, AD 1.1-25 1.4-15 Destination Signs, AD 1.1-27 Fees and Charges, GEN 4.1-1 Direction Signs, AD 1.1-27 Local Airport Advisory (LAA), GEN 3.3-25 Information Signs, AD 1.1-28 Location Signs, AD 1.1-26 Operations, Without Operating Control Tower, GEN 3.3-24, GEN 3.3-34 ILS Critical Area Boundary Sign, AD 1.1-27 Operations, ENR 1.1-1 Runway Boundary Sign, AD 1.1-27 Exiting the Runway after Landing, ENR 1.1-27 Runway Location Sign, AD 1.1-27 Taxiway Location Sign, AD 1.1-26 VFR Flights in Terminal Areas, ENR 1.1-22 Mandatory Instruction Signs, AD 1.1-25 Low Level Wind Shear/Microburst Detection ILS Critical Area Holding Position Sign, AD Systems, ENR 1.1-14 1.1-26 Signals, Hand, ENR 1.1-28 No Entry Sign, AD 1.1-26 Taxiing, ENR 1.1-18 Runway Holding Position Sign, AD 1.1-26 Traffic Pattern, ENR 1.1-1, ENR 1.1-2, ENR Runway Distance Remaining Signs, AD 1.1-28 1.1-7 With Operating Control Tower, ENR 1.1-1 Airport Surface Detection Equipment - Model X Without Operating Control Tower, ENR 1.1-7 (ASDE-X), ENR 1.1-51 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Eighth Edition I − 2 AIP 9 JUL 26 United States of America [References are to page numbers] Airport Surface Surveillance Capability, ENR Instrument Approach, ENR 1.1-73 1.1-51 Instrument Approach Procedure Charts, ENR 1.5-28 See also Aeronautical Charts Airspace, ENR 1.4-1 Minimum Vectoring Altitudes, ENR 1.5-41 Classes, ENR 1.4-1, ENR 1.4-4, ENR 1.4-5 Missed Approach, ENR 1.1-74, ENR 1.5-74 Controlled, ENR 1.4-4 Monitoring of Instrument Approaches, ENR IFR Requirements, ENR 1.4-4 1.5-51 VFR Requirements, ENR 1.4-4 No-Gyro Approach, ENR 1.5-51 Operating Rules and Requirements, ENR Overhead Approach Maneuver, ENR 1.5-77 1.4-5, ENR 1.4-8, ENR 1.4-12, ENR Practice Instrument Approaches, ENR 1.1-23 1.4-13 Precision Approach, ENR 1.5-50 Radar Vectors in, ENR 3.5-2 Side-step Maneuver, ENR 1.5-23 Speed Adjustments in, ENR 1.1-75 Simultaneous Approaches to Parallel Runways, Vectors, ENR 1.1-75 ENR 1.5-53 VFR Corridors, ENR 1.4-16 Simultaneous Close Parallel ILS PRM VFR Transition Routes, ENR 1.4-17, ENR Approaches, ENR 1.5-59 1.4-18 Simultaneous Converging Instrument Approaches, Flights Over Charted U.S. Wildlife Refuges, Parks ENR 1.5-66 and Forest Service Areas, ENR 5.6-2 Surveillance Approach, ENR 1.5-51 National Security Area, ENR 5.1-2 Timed Approaches From a Holding Fix, ENR Parachute Jump Aircraft Operations, ENR 5.1-5 1.5-66 Special Use, ENR 5.1-1 Vertical Descent Angle (VDA), ENR 1.5-43 Alert Areas, ENR 5.2-1 Visual, ENR 1.1-78 Controlled Firing Areas, ENR 5.2-1 Visual Descent Points, ENR 1.5-43, ENR 1.5-73 Military Operations Area (MOA), ENR 5.2-1 Military Training Routes, ENR 5.2-1 Area Navigation (RNAV), ENR 4.1-35, ENR Prohibited Areas, ENR 5.1-1 4.1-37 See also Area Navigation Restricted Areas, ENR 5.1-1 Area Navigation (RNAV) Routes, ENR 3.3-1 Warning Areas, ENR 5.1-2 Temporary Flight Restriction, ENR 5.1-2 ARFF (Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting) Terminal Radar Service Area, ENR 1.1-70 Discrete Emergency Frequency, GEN 3.7-1 Terminal Radar Service Area (TRSA), ENR Emergency Hand Signals, GEN 3.7-1 1.4-19 Radio Call Sign, GEN 3.7-1 VFR Flyways, ENR 1.4-16 ARTCC. See Air Route Traffic Control Center VFR Routes, Published, ENR 1.4-16 (ARTCC) VFR Weather Minimums, ENR 1.4-3 ATS Routes, ENR 3.1-1 Airways and Route Systems. See Navigation Lower ATS Routes, ENR 3.1-1 Altimeter Setting Procedures, ENR 1.7-1 Upper ATS Routes, ENR 3.2-1 Altitude Attitude Heading Reference System (AHRS), ENR High Altitude Destinations, ENR 1.10-18 4.1-16 Mandatory, ENR 1.5-31 Automated Terminal Information Service (ATIS).

Maximum, ENR 1.5-31 See Meteorological Services Minimum, ENR 1.5-31 Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS) .

ANP. See Actual Navigation Performance See AWOS Approach Control Service for VFR Arriving Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Contract Aircraft, GEN 3.3-24 (ADS-C), Climb Descend Procedure (CDP), Approaches, ENR 1.5-11, ENR 1.5-50 ENR 7.11-1 Approach and Landing Minimums, ENR 1.5-23 Automatic Dependent Surveillance (ADS-B), Approach Clearance, ENR 1.5-15 In-Trail Procedure (ITP), ENR 7.11-1 Contact Approach, ENR 1.1-73 ILS Approaches to Parallel Runways, ENR 1.5-57 Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Rebroadcast, ILS Minimums, ENR 4.1-10 ENR 1.1-96 Twenty − Eighth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP I − 3 United States of America 9 JUL 26 [References are to page numbers] Automatic Flight Information Service (AFIS) - Pilot Responsibilities, ENR 1.1-73 Alaska FSSs Only. See AFIS Collision Avoidance, ENR 1.15-8 Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF). See Radio Communications

B

Communications. See Radio Communications Barometric Altimeter Errors and Setting Controlled Airspace. See Airspace, Controlled Procedures, ENR 1.7-1 Controller, Responsibility, ENR 1.5-1 Barometric Pressure Altimeter Errors, ENR 1.7-1 Conversion Tables, GEN 2.6-1 Bird Activity, ENR 5.6-1 Cruising Altitudes, ENR 1.4-3, ENR 1.4-16 Reporting Bird and Other Wildlife Activities, ENR 5.6-1 Reporting Bird Strikes, ENR 5.6-1

D

Data Link Procedures, ENR 7.2-1

C

Declared Distances, ENR 1.1-10 Defense VFR (DVFR) Flights, ENR 1.10-16 Call Signs Departure Control, ENR 1.5-82 Aircraft, GEN 3.4-9 Abbreviated IFR Departure Clearance Ground Station, GEN 3.4-11 Procedures, ENR 1.5-83 Chart Supplement, GEN 3.2-10 Departure Procedures, ENR 1.5-78 Chart Supplement Alaska, GEN 3.2-11 Clearance Void Times, ENR 1.5-81 Chart Supplement Pacific, GEN 3.2-11 Departure Restrictions, ENR 1.5-79, ENR Chart Supplement U.S., GEN 3.2-10 1.5-81 Charts. See Aeronautical Charts Hold for Release, ENR 1.5-81 Instrument Departure Procedures (DP), ENR Class C Airspace, Outer Area, ENR 1.4-8 1.5-84 Clearance Pre-Taxi Clearance Procedures, ENR 1.5-78 Adherence to, ENR 1.1-40 Release Times, ENR 1.5-81 Air Traffic Control, ENR 1.1-35 Taxi Clearance, ENR 1.5-79 Amended, ENR 1.1-37 Departure, Instrument, ENR 1.1-79 Clearance Items, ENR 1.1-36 Differences From ICAO Standards, Recommended Pilot Responsibilities, ENR 1.1-38 Practices and Procedures, GEN 1.7-1 Special VFR, ENR 1.1-37 VFR-On-Top, ENR 1.1-39 Diverse Vector Areas (DVA), ENR 1.5-84 VFR/IFR Flights, ENR 1.1-39 DVFR Flights, ENR 1.10-16 Cold Temperature Airports, ENR 1.8-2 Barometric Altimeter Errors, ENR 1.8-1

E

Calculating Altitude Corrections on CTAs, ENR 1.8-6 EFVS. See Enhanced Flight Vision Systems Cold Temperature Airports (CTA), ENR 1.8-1 ELT. See Emergency Locator Transmitters Effects of Cold Temperature on Baro-vertical Navigation (VNAV) Vertical Guidance, ENR Emergency 1.8-1 Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Planning for Cold Temperature Altimeter Errors, Communications, GEN 3.7-1 ENR 1.8-1 Aircraft, Overdue, GEN 3.6-5 Body Signals, GEN 3.6-6 Cold Temperature Airports (CTA), ENR 1.8-2 Distress and Urgency Communications, GEN Cold Temperature Operations, ENR 1.10-2 3.6-15 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Eighth Edition I − 4 AIP 9 JUL 26 United States of America [References are to page numbers] Ditching Procedures, GEN 3.6-18 GPS IFR Equipment Classes/Categories, ENR 4.1-28 Fuel Dumping, GEN 3.6-23 Obtaining Assistance, GEN 3.6-16 Graphical Forecasts for Aviation (GFA), GEN VFR Search and Rescue Protection, GEN 3.6-6 3.5-9 Emergency Autoland System, GEN 3.6-15 Gulf of America Grid System, ENR 6.1-6 Emergency Descent System, GEN 3.6-15 Gulf of America RNAV Routes Q100, Q102, AND Q105, ENR 7.13-1 Emergency Locator Transmitters, GEN 3.6-2 Enhanced Flight Vision Systems, ENR 1.5-69

H

EPE. See Estimate of Position Error Estimate of Position Error (EPE), ENR 4.1-37 HDTA. See High Density Traffic Airports Helicopter IFR Operations, ENR 6.1-1, ENR 7.1-1

F

Departure Procedures, ENR 6.1-7 Special Operations, ENR 6.2-1, ENR 7.2-1 FAA Form 7233-4, Appendix 1-1 HELIPORTS, AD 3-1 FDC NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-5 High Density Traffic Airports, GEN 3.3-33 Fees and Charges. See Airport Holding Pattern Final Guard, ENR 1.4-15 Airspeeds, ENR 1.5-2 Distance Measuring Equipment (DME), ENR FIS-B. See Flight Information Service-Broadcast 1.5-6 Flight Information Service-Broadcast, ENR 1.1-93 Entry Procedures, ENR 1.5-5 Timing, ENR 1.5-5 Flight Level Allocation, New York OCA, ENR 7.12-1 Holding Position Markings for Instrument Landing Systems, AD 1.1-24 Flight Management System (FMS), ENR 1.16-5 for Intersecting Taxiways , AD 1.1-24 Flight Plan, ENR 1.10-1, ENR 1.11-1 Holding Procedures, ENR 1.5-1 Canceling, ENR 1.10-17 Defense VFR (DVFR) Flights, ENR 1.10-16 IFR Flights, ENR 1.10-11

I

Preflight Preparation, ENR 1.10-1 VFR Flights, ENR 1.10-10 ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Flight Service Station (FSS), GEN 3.1-5 Procedures. See Differences From ICAO Standards, Recommended Practices and Forms, Bird Strike Incident/Ingestion Report, ENR Procedures 5.6-3 Ident Feature, ENR 1.1-54 Frequencies. See Radio Communications IFR, Operations, To High Altitude Destinations, FSS. See Flight Service Station (FSS) ENR 1.10-18 Fuel Advisory, Minimum, ENR 1.1-80 IFR Flights, ENR 1.10-11 Inertial Navigation System, ENR 4.1-16 Inertial Reference Unit (IRU), ENR 4.1-16

G

INS. See Internal Navigation System GBAS Landing System (GLS), ENR 4.1-33 Instrument Departure. See Departure, Instrument Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), ENR Instrument Departure Procedures (DP), ENR 1.10-14 1.5-84 Global Positioning System (GPS), ENR 4.1-16 Instrument Landing System (ILS), ENR 4.1-5 See GLS. See GBAS Landing System also Approaches Twenty − Eighth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP I − 5 United States of America 9 JUL 26 [References are to page numbers] Instrument Landing System (ILS), Holding Position Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Flight, ENR Markings, AD 1.1-24 1.15-5 Course and Glideslope Distortion, ENR 4.1-11 Certification, ENR 1.15-1 Frequency Table, ENR 4.1-10 Decompression Sickness after Scuba Diving, ENR 1.15-5 Inoperative Components, ENR 4.1-11 Effects of Altitude, ENR 1.15-3 Instrument Meteorological Conditions (IMC), ENR Ear Block, ENR 1.15-4 1.5-85 Hypoxia, ENR 1.15-3 Integrated Terminal Weather System, ENR 1.1-14 Sinus Block, ENR 1.15-4 Hyperventilation in Flight, ENR 1.15-5 International Flight Plan, Appendix 1-1 Illusions, ENR 1.15-5 International NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-5 Personal Checklist, ENR 1.15-3 Scanning for Other Aircraft, ENR 1.15-7 IRU. See Inertial Reference Unit Vision in Flight, ENR 1.15-7 ITWS. See Integrated Terminal Weater System Military NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-6 Military Training Routes. See Airspace, Special Use

J

Minimum Safe Altitudes, ENR 1.5-32 Minimum Turning Altitude (MTA), ENR 3.5-3 Jet Route System. See Navigation MSA. See Minimum Safe Altitudes MTA. See Minimum Turning Altitude (MTA)

L

Land and Hold Short Operations. See Airport

N

Operations Lighting. See Airport Lighting National Security, ENR 1.12-1 ADIZ, ENR 1.12-1 Line Up and Wait, ENR 1.5-79 ADIZ Requirements, ENR 1.12-2 LLWAS. See Low Level Wind Shear Alert System Airspace Waivers, ENR 1.12-8 Civil Aircraft Operations, ENR 1.12-4 Local Airport Advisory (LAA), GEN 3.3-25 Defense Area, ENR 1.12-1 Local Airport Advisory (LAA), ENR 1.4-15 ESCAT, ENR 1.12-8 Foreign State Aircraft Operations, ENR 1.12-6 LORAN, ENR 4.1-16 Territorial Airspace, ENR 1.12-1 Low Level Wind Shear Alert System (LLWAS), TSA Aviation Security Programs, ENR 1.12-8 ENR 1.1-14 National Security , Requirements, ENR 1.12-1 Low Level Wind Shear/Microburst Detection Systems, ENR 1.1-14 National Security and Interception Procedures, ENR 1.12-12 Lower ATS Routes, ENR 3.1-1 National Security Area. See Airspace Low Altitude ATS Route Structure, ENR 3.1-1 NAVAID Identifier Removal During Maintenance, LUAW, ENR 1.5-79 ENR 4.1-39 NAVAID User Reports, ENR 4.1-39

M

Navigation See also Global Positioning System (GPS) Adhering to Airways or Routes, ENR 3.5-3 Meteorological Services, Automatic Terminal Airway or Route Course Changes, ENR 3.5-2 Information Service (ATIS), GEN 3.3-32 Airways and Route Systems, ENR 3.5-1 Meteorology, National Weather Service, Aviation Changeover Points, ENR 3.5-2 Weather Service, GEN 3.5-3 LORAN, ENR 4.1-16 Medical Facts for Pilots, ENR 1.15-1 Navigation Aids, ENR 4.1-1 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Eighth Edition I − 6 AIP 9 JUL 26 United States of America [References are to page numbers] Navigation, Radio, GEN 3.4-1 PBCS. See Performance-Based Communication and Surveillance (PBCS) Nondirectional Radio Beacon, GEN 3.4-6 Navigation Specifications (Nav Specs), ENR 1.16-5 PBN. See Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) Navigational, Inertial Navigation System, ENR Performance-Based Navigation (PBN), ENR 4.1-16 1.16-1 NOTAM (D), ENR 1.10-5 Phonetic Alphabet. See Radio Communications, Notice to Air Missions Phonetic Alphabet FDC NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-5 Pilot Visits to Air Traffic Facilities, GEN 3.3-2 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs), ENR 1.10-5 Pointer NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-5 International NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-5 Pre-departure Clearance Procedures, ENR 1.5-78 Military NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-6 NOTAM D, ENR 1.10-5 Position Reporting, GEN 3.3-21 Pointer NOTAMs, ENR 1.10-5 Security NOTAMS, ENR 1.10-6 Position Reporting Requirements, GEN 3.3-21 Notices To Air Missions (NOTAM) Service, ENR Precision Approach Systems, ENR 4.1-35 1.10-3, GEN 3.1-2 Procedure Turns, ENR 1.5-18

O

R

Oceanic Airspace, In-flight Contingencies, ENR 7.3-1 Radar, ENR 1.1-47 Oceanic Operations, ENR 7.1-1 Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System, ENR Air-to-Air Frequency, ENR 7.1-7 1.1-50 Beacon Code Requirements, ENR 7.1-4 Capabilities, ENR 1.1-47 Flight Plan Filing Requirements, ENR 7.1-1 Precision Approach , ENR 1.1-50 Flight Plans, ENR 7.1-3 Surveillance, ENR 1.1-50 IFR/VFR Operations, ENR 7.1-1 NAT Clearance Procedures, ENR 7.6-1 Radar Services Provided by ATC, ENR 1.1-56 NAT Safety, ENR 7.8-1 Aircraft Conflict Alert, ENR 1.1-57 NAT Timekeeping Procedures, ENR 7.7-1 Offshore Controlled Airspace, ENR 1.1-71 Offshore Routes, ENR 7.10-1 Radar Assistance to VFR Aircraft, ENR 1.1-59 Operational Policy Radar Traffic Information Service, ENR 1.1-57 Lateral Separation, ENR 7.4-1 Terrain/Obstruction Alert, ENR 1.1-56 Performance-Based Communication and Radio Communications, GEN 3.4-8 Surveillance (PBCS), ENR 7.5-1 Performance-Based Navigation (PBN), ENR Common Traffic Advisory Frequency (CTAF), 7.5-1 GEN 3.3-24 Position Reporting, ENR 7.1-5 Contact Procedures, GEN 3.4-15 SATVOICE, ENR 7.1-6 Directions, GEN 3.4-13 SLOP, ENR 7.1-7 Failure, GEN 3.4-14, GEN 3.4-20 Y Routes, ENR 7.9-1 For Aircraft on International or Overseas Flights, GEN 3.4-17, GEN 3.4-20 Operational Information System (OIS), ENR Phonetic Alphabet, GEN 3.4-11 1.10-10 Phraseology, GEN 3.4-11 Overhead Approach Maneuver. See Approaches Radio Technique, GEN 3.4-8 Speed, GEN 3.4-13 UNICOM/MULTICOM , GEN 3.3-30, GEN

P

3.3-31 Parachute Jump Aircraft Operations. See Airspace Radio Navigation Aids Twenty − Eighth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP I − 7 United States of America 9 JUL 26 [References are to page numbers] Distance Measuring Equipment, ENR 4.1-4, Special Air Traffic Rules (SATR), ENR 5.1-5 ENR 4.1-9 Special Flight Rules Area (SFRA), ENR 5.1-5 Nondirectional Radio Beacon, ENR 4.1-1 Tactical Air Navigation, ENR 4.1-5 Special Instrument Approach Procedures, ENR 1.5-50 VHF Omni-directional Radio Range, ENR 4.1-1 Special Traffic Management Programs (STMP), Reduced Separation, Climb/Descent Procedures, GEN 3.3-34 ENR 7.11-1 Standard Taxi Routes (STR), ENR 1.1-20 REL. See Runway Entrance Lights Standard Terminal Arrival, ENR 1.5-12 Remote Airport Advisory (RAA), ENR 1.4-15 STAR. See Standard Terminal Arrival Remote Airport Information Service (RAIS), GEN STMP. See Special Traffic Management Programs 3.3-25, ENR 1.4-16 (STMP) Required Navigation Performance (RNP), ENR sUAS. See Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) 4.1-36 Surveillance Services, ENR 1.6-1 Required Navigation Performance (RNP) Operations, ENR 1.10-17, ENR 4.1-37 Reservations. See Airport, Reservations Procedures

T

Responsibility, Controller, ENR 1.5-1 RNAV, ENR 1.10-14 Takeoff Hold Lights (THL), AD 1.1-11 RNAV Routes, Gulf of Mexico, ENR 7.13-1 Taxiway, Holding Position Markings, AD 1.1-24 RNP. See Required Navigation Performance (RNP) TDWR. See Terminal Doppler Weather Radar RNP AR (Authorization Required) Instrument Temporary Flight Restrictions. See Airspace Procedures, ENR 1.5-22 Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs), ENR 1.10-5 Runway Entrance Lights, AD 1.1-11 Terminal Arrival Area (TAA), ENR 1.5-33 Holding Position Markings, AD 1.1-23 Terminal Doppler Weather Radar, ENR 1.1-14 Status Light (RWSL) System, AD 1.1-11 TFRs, ENR 1.10-5 RWSL System, Runway Status Light (RWSL) Sys tem. See Runway Status Light (RWSL) System THL. See Takeoff Hold Lights Time, Conversion from UTC to Standard Time, GEN 3.4-13

S

Tower En Route Control (TEC), ENR 1.1-71 Search and Rescue, GEN 3.6-1 Traffic Advisories, ENR 1.1-76 Security Identification Display Area, AD 1.1-29 Traffic Advisories, At Airports Without Operating Security NOTAMS, ENR 1.10-6 Control Towers, GEN 3.3-24 Separation Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS IFR, Standards, ENR 1.1-42 I & II), ENR 1.1-80 Runway, ENR 1.1-45 Traffic Information Service (TIS), ENR 1.1-81, Visual, ENR 1.1-45, ENR 1.1-78 ENR 1.1-87 SIDA. See Security Identifications Display Area Traffic Pattern. See Airport, Operations Single Flights Conducted With Both VFR and IFR Transponder Operation, ENR 1.1-52 Flight Plans, ENR 1.10-16 Automatic Altitude Reporting, ENR 1.1-53 Slot Controlled Airports, GEN 3.3-33 Code Changes, ENR 1.1-54 Emergency, ENR 1.1-55 Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS), ENR 8.2-1 Mode C Requirements, ENR 1.1-54 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Eighth Edition I − 8 AIP 9 JUL 26 United States of America [References are to page numbers] TRSA. See Airspace, Terminal Radar Service Area Public Aircraft Operations (PAOs), ENR 8.5-3 Precautions, ENR 8.8-1 Flight Near Manned Aircraft, ENR 8.8-1 Flight Over or Near People, ENR 8.8-1

U

Flight Over or Near Vehicles, ENR 8.8-1 Night Operations, ENR 8.8-1 UAS. See Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Resources, ENR 8.8-3 Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Special Government Interest (SGI) Airspace Large UAS, ENR 8.3-1 Waivers, ENR 8.8-3 Emerging Large UAS Civil Operations, ENR Upper ATS Routes, ENR 3.2-1 8.3-5 High Altitude ATS Route Structure, ENR 3.2-1 Exemptions under 49 USC 44807, ENR 8.3-4 Large Public UAS Operations, ENR 8.3-1 U.S. Customs Requirements, Entry, Transit, and Departure of Cargo, GEN 1.4-1 Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS), ENR 8.2-1 U.S. Differences From ICAO Standards. See Part 107 sUAS, ENR 8.2-1 Differences From ICAO Standards, Recreational Flyers, ENR 8.2-1 Recommended Practices and Procedures Registration Requirements, ENR 8.2-1 U.S. Territorial Airspace, GEN 1.2-1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), ENR 8.1-1 Units of Measurement, GEN 2.1-1 Accidents and Incidents, ENR 8.8-2 Advanced Air Mobility, ENR 8.6-1 Air Traffic Control (ATC), ENR 8.8-1

Airspace Access, ENR 8.4-1 V

14 CFR Part 107, ENR 8.4-1 VFR Flights, ENR 1.10-10 14 CFR Part 135, ENR 8.4-4 14 CFR Part 137, ENR 8.4-4 VFR Flyways. See Airspace 14 CFR Part 89, ENR 8.4-3 VFR-on-top, ENR 1.1-79 Airspace Restrictions To Flight, ENR 8.4-6 VHF Omni-directional Range, Minimum FAA-Recognized Identification Area, ENR Operational Network (MON), ENR 4.1-2 8.4-3 FRIAs, ENR 8.4-3 Visual Approach. See Approaches PAOs, ENR 8.4-2 Visual Climb Over Airport, ENR 1.5-88 Public Aircraft Operations (PAOs), ENR 8.4-2 Recreational Flyers, ENR 8.4-1 Visual Meteorological Conditions (VMC), ENR Remote Identification, ENR 8.4-3 1.5-85 UAS Traffic Management (UTM), ENR 8.4-8 Visual Separation, ENR 1.1-78 Waivers to 14 CFR Part 107, ENR 8.4-1 VOCA. See Visual Climb Over Airport Best Practices, ENR 8.8-1 Environmental, ENR 8.8-3 VOR Receiver Check, ENR 4.1-3 Emergency UAS Authorizations, ENR 8.8-3 General, ENR 8.1-1 Access to the National Airspace System (NAS),

W

ENR 8.1-1 Operations on Airports, ENR 8.7-1 Weather Minimums. See Airspace, VFR Weather Pilot Testing, Certification and Responsibilities, Minimums ENR 8.5-1 Weather Reconnaissance Area (WRA), ENR 5.1-6 14 CFR Part 135, ENR 8.5-3 14 CFR Part 137, ENR 8.5-3 Weather System Processor, ENR 1.1-14 Foreign Pilot Certification, ENR 8.5-3 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), ENR Large Civil UAS, ENR 8.5-3 4.1-29 PAOs, ENR 8.5-3 Part 107 Pilots and Recreational Flyers, ENR Wildlife Refuges, Parks, and Forest Service Areas.

8.5-1 See Airspace Twenty − Eighth Edition Federal Aviation Administration AIP I − 9 United States of America 9 JUL 26 [References are to page numbers] WSP, ENR 1.1-14 Federal Aviation Administration Twenty − Eighth Edition

Overview

Key points

AIP Basic with Amd 1 dtd 7/9/26 View in PDF

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

TWENTY-NINTH EDITION

22 JANUARY 2026

CONSULT NOTAM FOR LATEST INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

TWENTY- NINTH EDITION DATED 22 JANUARY 2026

AMENDMENT 1

9 JULY 2026

CONSULT NOTAM FOR LATEST INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

AIP Amendment 1

Page Control Chart

9 JULY 2026

GEN 0.4 Checklist of Pages

GEN 0.5 List of Hand Amendments to the AIP − Not applicable

PART I. GENERAL View in PDF

AIP

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

PART 1

GENERAL (GEN)

GEN 0.6 Table of Contents to Part 1

PART 1 − GENERAL (GEN)

GEN 0.1 Preface

GEN 1. NATIONAL REGULATIONS AND

REQUIREMENTS

GEN 1.1 Designated Authorities

GEN 1.2 Entry, Transit and Departure of Aircraft

GEN 1.3 Entry, Transit and Departure of Passengers and

Crew

GEN 1.4 Entry, Transit, and Departure of Cargo

GEN 1.5 Aircraft Instruments, Equipment, and Flight

Documents

GEN 1.6 Summary of National Regulations and

International Agreements/Conventions

Recommended Practices and Procedures

GEN 2. TABLES AND CODES

GEN 2.1 Measuring System, Aircraft Markings, and

Holidays

Blank Page View in PDF

GEN 2.2 Abbreviations Used in AIS Publications

Blank Page View in PDF

GEN 2.3 Chart Symbols

GEN 2.4 Location Indicators

GEN 2.5 List of Radio Navigation Aids

GEN 2.6 Conversion Tables

Blank Page View in PDF

GEN 2.7 Sunrise/Sunset Tables

Blank Page View in PDF

GEN 3. SERVICES

GEN 3.1 Aeronautical Information Services

GEN 3.2 Aeronautical Charts

GEN 3.3 Air Traffic Services

Blank Page View in PDF

GEN 3.4 Communication Service

Blank Page View in PDF

GEN 3.5 Meteorological Services

3K 3K 3K 3K

No Wind No Wind

3K Wind 3K Wind

0 (3K - 3K) 0 (3K - 3K)

x

Key to Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Aviation

Routine Weather Report (METAR) (Front)

Key to Aerodrome Forecast (TAF) and Aviation

Routine Weather Report (METAR) (Back)

GEN 3.6 Search and Rescue

1 Require assistance Require assistance V

2 Require medical assistance Require medical assistance X

3 No or Negative No or Negative N

AIP Basic with Amd 1 dtd 7/9/26

PART I. GENERAL

Blank Page

Blank Page

Blank Page

Blank Page

Blank Page

Blank Page

PART II. EN ROUTE