States.
United the in E1 protection Center copyright to Forum subject Morelli 20, Research not is SciTech and Gene January Langley AIAA Dr.
Government NASA U.S.
‐ the F of work a is
Determining Aircraft Moments
of Inertia from Flight Test Data
material This
Results
Simulation
Results
Maneuver
Approach
Test
Outline
Test
Nonlinear
Flight
‐
Introduction Modeling Flight F E1 Summary
• • • • • •
LaRC NASA Morelli E1 ‐ F modeling determined data?
be analysis (CAD) test Inertia: of
Introduction
inertia flight Used: Design of aerodynamic consuming ‐ dynamic from and time Moments Aided ‐ testing Methods moments and Aircraft accurately Nondimensional Simulation Ground Computer Costly for aircraft LaRC Can Uses Conventional NASA Morelli power power idle idle for for 0 0 ≈ ≈ r q p p y p p z I
I
I I pq
r r p q
x xz p I I r
z xz y I xz I I
Approach qr I
z I pq x pr I
y y I x I
I
z Motion y I I x of z L I I
Modeling
p N M Equations r q Rotational LaRC Roll: Yaw: NASA Pitch: Nonlinear Morelli
r q p
c p pq r c
c r r q r y z p I I c N xz xz I I e a q 4 q c e c a
Modeling
N M z y I I r q V V
Error
q q y
‐
x r I q I N M x z I I
p V q q c p c N M
Equation
q q o M N q q o LaRC N NASA r Morelli variables significant axis low ‐ surfaces and negligible terms multi explanatory control terms inertia power the aerodynamics idle on automated at linear nonlinear gyroscopic
Maneuver decorrelated
with for inputs the turns for
Test
attack attack make propulsion of of to excitations descending make
Flight
angle rates perturbation angle to into surface angular nominal power Rolls nominal orthogonal High Idle Low Control LaRC NASA Morelli Response Data Aircraft Modeling Control Surface Deflections
Maneuver
Limiters, Actuators Command Ground joystick the
Test
s +
…
from time, Desktop + :
Flight
Control Pilot Simulation Radio deg deg : , , Test Nonlinear LaRC Flight ‐ Inputs F E1 NASA (PTI) Test Programmed Morelli ‐ active F PTI with
Results
turns descending into
Simulation
rolls s s time, time, alternating
Nonlinear
‐
maneuver,
F
Single LaRC NASA 2 2 q r deg / s deg / s Morelli ‐ F
Results
0.40 Error –5.68 –2.41 –5.25 Percent
Simulation
Error ± 0.0234 ± 0.0019 ± 0.0189 ± 0.0011 ± Standard 0.9643 0.0166 0.0147 Estimation –0.7517
Nonlinear
Estimate Linear
‐
F
True 0.9604 0.0176 0.0156 –0.7340 LaRC 4 5 6 c c c c NASA Parameter Morelli deg longitude, E1 deg ≤ deg ft latitude, active, altitude, PTI
Results
with turns
Test
s s
Flight
descending time, time,
E1
maneuvers, Five LaRC NASA 2 2 q r deg / s deg / s Morelli E1
Results
3.01 3.89 Error –0.74 –5.80 Percent
Test
Error 1.002 0.732 0.495 0.107 Estimate ± ± ± ± %
Flight
Test ≤ Estimation 3.053 8.711 0.779
E1
11.036 ± Standard Flight Test uncertainty 2.964 8.776 0.750 Nonlinear 11.716 Estimate* Ground test LaRC y x z xz I I I I Ground NASA Parameter * Morelli results axis ‐ determining avoided multi be can with accurately determining for produced accurate demonstrated power data modeling and idle test at CAD flight accurately formulation or flight E1 for model developed testing and maneuvers informative test error was ‐ method ground flight simulation test produced inertia equation inertia of of piloted consuming flight ‐ nonlinear excitations versatile time ‐ F novel moments and and amplitude A moments ‐ both Findings: LaRC Large orthogonal aircraft Simple for Costly NASA
Summary: Key
Morelli
Questions?
LaRC NASA Morelli
Slides
Backup
LaRC NASA Morelli time in xz z , I , I y contiguous , I x be I not accuracy need elements and
Solution
tensor modeling c , c , c , c for inertia maneuvers
Error
‐
for SIDPAC constants smoothed multiple using are estimation inertia from data for
Equation
solutions selected parameter function be estimation can LaRC Data Linear Nonlinear Modeling Straightforward NASA Morelli sum the of maneuver length, s
Inputs
Hz T amplitude frequency, k peak ‐ k t T to
Multisine
2 ‐ peak k A sin k P ,M
, ,
1 2 minimum k for
Optimized
u tests input ‐ excursions dynamics flight orthogonal optimized k multi past Input in minimal various Test design to Phases Design
Orthogonal
to LaRC (PTI) Time/Frequency Simultaneous Robust Balanced, Easy Successful NASA • • • • • • Programmed Morelli time, s zero phases optimized phases
Optimization
Phase
+ + +
Multisine
time, s LaRC 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 NASA Morelli are inputs conditions the
Inputs
domains trajectory and coverage flight good varied nominal frequency tests and off amplitudes and domain
Multisine
provides flight efficiency time aircraft and high other the robustness for frequency in perturbation move for or many variables not on
Optimized time
excitation content does in minimum orthogonal for input explanatory successful model to frequency mutually – maneuver design, optimized are band ‐ to
Orthogonal
LaRC Flexibility Simultaneous Decorrelates ‐ ‐ ‐ Inputs Phases balanced Wide Easy NASA • • • • Morelli