Skip to main content

19890005651 · Development and testing of a unique carousel wind tunnel to experimentally determine the effect of gravity and the interparticle force on the physics of wind-blown particles

NASA · 1987

Open the PDFPublic domain · NASATechnical Reports

Overview

In the study of planetary aeolian processes the effect of gravity is not readily modeled. Gravity appears in the equations of particle motion along with the interparticle forces but the two are not separable. A wind tunnel that perimits multiphase flow experiments with wind blown particles at…

Pages
·
6

Key points

  • A unique Carousel Wind Tunnel has been developed to study the effects of gravity and interparticle forces on wind-blown particles.
  • The wind tunnel allows for multi-phase flow experiments at variable gravity, enabling the separation of interparticle forces from gravitational effects.
  • Experiments were conducted using ground walnut shells of different sizes to analyze saltation thresholds under varying gravity conditions.
  • The tunnel's design features two concentric drums that create airflow and simulate gravity through differential rotation.
  • Data collected from the experiments correlated well with theoretical models, confirming the influence of gravity on particle motion.
Frequently asked questions
What is the purpose of the Carousel Wind Tunnel?

The Carousel Wind Tunnel is designed to experimentally determine the effects of gravity and interparticle forces on the physics of wind-blown particles.

How does the Carousel Wind Tunnel simulate gravity?

The tunnel simulates gravity through the differential rotation of two concentric drums, which creates a pseudo-gravity force that holds particles to the surface.

What materials were used in the experiments conducted in the wind tunnel?

The experiments utilized ground walnut shells with median diameters of 700 and 1288 microns due to their non-abrasive nature and existing data on their saltation properties.

What were the limitations faced during the experiments?

Limitations included the inability to rapidly adjust the drum speed during aircraft maneuvers, which affected the accuracy of the saltation threshold data.

What future work is planned following these experiments?

Future work includes further experiments with walnut shells of various sizes and other aeolian materials to explore how interparticle forces vary with particle size.

Document

N89- 15022

DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING O F A UNIQUE CAROUSEL W I N D TUNFiEL TO EXPERIMENTALLY DETEZrlINE THE EFFECT O F GRAVITY AND THE INTZRPARTICLE FORCE ON THE PHYSICS O F WIND-BLOWN PARTICLES R.N. Leacha, R . Greeleya,B. White=,J. Xversen3.

I n t h e study of planetary aeolian processes t h e e f f e c t of g r a v i t y i s n o t r e a d i l y modeled. G r a v i t y appears i n t h e equations of p a r t i c l e mction along w i t h t h e i n t e r - p a r t i c l e f o r c e s b u t t h e two are not separable. A wind tunnel t h a t permits multi-phase f l o w experiments w i t h wind blown p a r t i c l e s a t v a r i a b l e g r a v i t y has been b u i l t and experiments have been conducted a t reduced g r a v i t y . The equations of p a r t i c l e motion i n i t a t i o n ( s a l t a t i o n threshold) w i t h v a r i a b l e g r a v i t y were experimentally v e r i f i e d and t h e i n t e r p a r t i c l e f o r c e was separated.

Wind tunnel s suf f er from several shortcomings i n aeol i an experiments, p r i m a r i l y due t o l i m i t a t i o n s i n s i r e . The Reyr;olds Number t h a t most s t r o n g l y a + f e c t s s a l t a t i o n threshold is b a s 4 a n t h e distance from t h e tunnel entry, and f o r most experiments a long distance i s required t o obtain a s u f f e c i e n t l y l a r g e Reynolds Number t o o b t a i n t h e corresponding f u l l y developed t u r b u l e n t boundary 1ayer.This presents a problem, e s p e c i a l l y when t h e equipment i s t o be f l i g h t or space borne.

A uniquely designed Carousel Wind Tunnel allows f o r t h e long f l o w distance i n a small sized tunnel since t h e t e s t s e c t i n n i s a continous loop ahd develops t h e required t u r b u l e f i t bol;ndar)r layer. The Carousel Wind Tunnel consists o f two concentric drums w i t h t h e t e s t s e c t i o n being t h e e n t i r e space between t h a drum-,.

D i f f e r e n t i a l r o t a t i o n of t h e drums causes an a i r f l o w between t h e drums which e n t r a i n s p a r t i c l e s placed there. Rotation of t h e outer drum produces a pseudo g r a v i t y f o r c e holding t h e p a r t i c l e s t o t h e surface i n t h e same manner t h a t g r a v i t y does. The f o r c e i s p s u e d o i n t h a t t h e p a r t i c l e s f e e l t h e f o r c e o n l y w h i l e i n contact w i t h t h e surface. The tunnel i s t o be used i n a micro g r a v i t y environment such as on t h e space s t a t i o n or i n t h e s h u t t l e .

A prototype model of t h e tunnel where o n l y t h e i a n e r drum r ~ t a t e s has been b u i l t and t e s t e d i n t h e K C 135 "Weightless Wmder I V " zero g a i r c r a f t operated by NASA Johnson Space Center.

Thus f o r these t e s t s t h e g r a v i t y l e v e l was changed by t h e external environment r a t h e r than by t h e r o t a t i o n o f t h e outer driim. Reduced o r z e r o g i s obtained when the a i r c r a f t , a f t e r obtaining a s u i t a b l e excess airspeed, climbs a t a 45O angle and then enters a parabolic or n e a r l y parabolic t r a j e c t o r y which produces t h e reduced o r z e r o g f o r up t o 30 seconds, Figure 1.

The a i r c r a f t i s able t o f l y 40 o r more such t r a j e c t o r i e s i n a s i n g l e f l i g h t .

The wind tunnel, Figure 2, i s b u i l t of c l e a r polycarbonate p l a s t i c and t h e inner drum i s made t o s p i n b y means of a v a r i a b l e speed f r a c t i o n a l horsepower e l e c t r i c motor connected through a b e l t drive. The outer drum i s 60 c m i n diameter and 30 cm wide.

The inner drum i s 40 c m i n diameter and i s s i r e d t o provide a close f i t along t h e s i d e walls. There i s a removable p a n e l i n t h e lower s i d e w a l l f o r i n s e r t i n g and removing aeolian t e s t material.

A-5 3 The d r u m speed i s monitored by an AC voltmeter d r i v e n by a inductance pick-up which is energized by a magnet attached t o t h e motor shaft. T h i s is c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e actual drum r p m as determined w i t h a photo-tachometer. A g r a v i t y meter u t i l i z i n g a s e n s i t i v e accelerometer d i s p l a y s t h e g r a v i t y l e v e l . The rpm, g r a v i t y l e v e l and p a r t i c l e motion are recorded by video camera during t h e t e s t s f o r l a t e r analysis. The tunnel i s mounted on a stand b o l t e d t o t h e f l o o r of t h e KC 135.

The experiments were done i n t h e f o l l o w i n g manner: a small q u a n t i t y of aeolian material was placed i n t h e t e s t s e c t i o n and t h e inner drum was spun a t a speed below t h a t which would cause any p a r t i c l e movement. A s t h e a i r c r a f t entered i t s marieuver t h e g r a v i t y l e v e l a t which s a l t a t i o n threshold occured was recorded along w i t h t h e drum r o t a t i o n speed. The a i r c r a f t d i d both t e r a g and low g manuevers ranging from 0.05 t O 0.5 9. Ey varying t h e drum r o t a t i o n speed f o r subsequent manuevers a matrix o f data p o i n t s were obtained. Often t h e drum speed was e i t h e r t o o h i g h so t h a t a speed much above threshold was obtained o r too low sa t h a t no p a r t i c l e movement took place. The drum s p e e d could not be changed r a p i d l y enough t o t o a d j u s t t h e speed during a maneuver, however as t h e f l i g h t s progressed experience allowed a S e t t e r choice of i n i t i a l drum r o t a t i o n speed, obtaining values clctser t o s a l t a t i o n threshold. The video tape was analysied a f t e r t h e f l i g h t so t h a t data obtained even on those maneuvers t h a t exceeded threshold could b e used by n o t i n g t h e momentary g level at which p a r t i c l e movement began. The t e s t data were p l o t t e d and a reference l i n e drawn through t h e minimum v e l o c i t y where s a l t a t i o n occufed, Figures 3 % 4.

Data were obtained f o r two s i z e s of material. Closely graded ground walnut s h e l l s w i t h median diameters o f 700 and 1288 microns were used i n t h e two experiments conducted. Walnut s h e l l w e r e used instead of sand f o r several reasons: ( 1 ) they are n o t as abrasive as sand and do n o t scratch t h e wind tunnel as sand o r other material does; (2) t h e r e i s a great amount o f of data on t h e s a l t a t i o n p r o p e r t i e s o f walnut s h e l l from previous experiments i n t h e MARSWIT f a c i l i t y 4 and (3) walnut s h e l l d o n o t become as h i g h l y charged by e l e c t r o s t a t i c s as other material, perhaps due t o t h e i r moisture content (about EX by weight).

These data were c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e f r i c t i o n threshold v e l o c i t y a t s a l t a t i o n threshold by c a l i b r a t i n g t h e Carousel Wind Tunnel w i t h a s e r i e s of p a r t i c l e s of known f r i c t i o n thresholds as obtained i n conventional aeolian wind tunnels, thus g i v i n g a curve of u* verses drum r o t a t i o n a l speed, Figure 5.

The f l i g h t data were corrected f o r t h e nominal a i r c r a S t cabin pressure of 12.25 p s i and t h e datum p o i n t s c l o s e s t t o t h e reference l i n e a r e presented along w i t h t h e t h e o r e t i c a l curve Gbtained from t h e equation A-54 The data correlates w e l l w i t h t h e g r a v i t y t e r m f o r v a l u e s o f g l e a s t h a n 1, F i g u r e s 6 t 7. An a t t e m p t w a s also made to a b t a i n v a l u e s of s a l t a t i o n t h r e s h o l d from 1-0 g t o 1.9 g d u r i n g t h e aircraft p u l l u p and p u l l o u t maneuvers. T h i s w a s d o n e by s p e e d i n g up t h e drum d u r i n g t h e maneuver u n t i l s a l t a t i o n occured.

T h e data d i d n o t p r o v e s a t i s f a c t o r y d u e t o t h e slow acceleration of t h e drum mentioned earlier and also d u e to t h e f a c t t h a t there is a l a g t i m e between t h e t i m e t h a t t h e drum r e a c h e s a r o t a t i o n s p e e d and t h e t i m e t h a t t h e air f l o w r e a c h e s a c o n s t a n t v a l u e .

T h e a b o v e e q u a t i o n c a n b e w r i t t e n i n t h e f o r m : If p l o t s are made of r h o u..*= vs. rho,qD, a n d t h e i n t e r p a r t i c l e force ( I , ) is z e r o t h e s e should g o through t h e o r i g i n . T h e s e are p r e s e n t e d i n F i g u r e s 8 and 9. I t a p p e a r s t h a t t h e c u r v e s i n t e r c e p t t h e y - a x i s a t a s m a l l p o s i t i v e v a l u e .

i n d i c a t i n g t h a t t h e i n t e r p a r t i c l e f o r c e h a c been i d e n t i f i e d ar;d s e p a r a t e d from t h e g r a v i t y force f o r t h e s e t w o testc.

F u t u r e work i n c l u d e s f u r t h e r e x p e r i m e n t s w i t h w a l n u t s h e l l i n t h e KC 135 w i t h s h a r p l y g r a d e d p a r t i c l e s o$ w i d e l y v a r y i n g median s i z e s i n c l u d i n g v e r y s m a l l p a r t i c l e s t o see how i n t e r p a r t i c l e force v a r i e s w i t h p a r t i c l e s i z e , and also e x p e r i m e n t s w i t h o t h e r a e o l i a n material.

A r i z o n a State U n i v e r s i t y , Tempe, Az 85257, = U n i v e r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a , D a v i s Ca. 95615,

= Iowa State U n i v e r s i t y , Ames, Id. 50010

4Geophysical R e s e a r c h L e t t e r s , V a l . 3 no. 8 , pp 417-420 Gree?ey.

et.al.

A-55

FLIGHT PATH OF KC135 AIRCRAFT

10,000

45" NOSE LOW

v) 9000

L Q)

+

Q)

E

.

n 8000

I -

REDUCED

-

l -

G R A V I T Y

-I

a 7000

1.8g 7-

1.8g

I 1 1 I

0 20 45 65

TIME, sec

FIGURE 1 A-5 6 RPM SQUARED VS. GRAVITY RPM SQUARED VS. QRAVITY 1080 MICRON WALNUT SHELL 700 MICRON WALNUT SllELL EXPERIMENTAL EXPERIMENTAL FLIGHT DATA FLIGHT D A T A e l.o - 0 PARTICLE MOVEMENT 0 PARTICLE MOVEMENT I 1 0 NOMOVEMENT o NO MOVEMEN r .Q

-

-

2 .8

REFERENCE LINE 1 I I I 0 .2 .4 $0 .8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.8 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.0 l . B GRAVITY. p'i GRAVITY. y'r *IOURi? 4 I( CALIBRATION OF CAROUSEL WIND TUNNEL

1600 -

1000 -

h

600 -

I I 8 I 0 20 4 0 eo 80 u, cmluc t r1WMI 0 A-5 7 FLIGHT DATA COMPARISON FLIGHT DATA COMPARISON 1080 MICRON WALNUT SHELL 700 MICRON WALNUT SHELL

1500 I A F L I G H T D A T A

/

1000 1 A F L I G H T D A T A

NJ 1000

!i

‘=

-

N ; ” 500 I I I I I I u - .2 .4 .6 .8 1 .( .6 .8 1 .o .2 .4 GRAVITY, g’s GRAVITY, g’s FIOURE 7 FLIGHT DATA COMPARISON FLIGHT DATA COMPARISON 700 MICRON WALNUT SHELL 1080 MICRON WALNUT SHELL - 1.5

1.5 -

N ” N ” - >= 1 . 0

-

1.0

- -

a .

F L I G H T D A T A FLIGHT DATA INTERPARTICLE FORCE I I I .20 0 .w .08 .I2 .16 g PP DP F I G L P E E FlOURE 9 A-5 8

Source & rights

Source: ntrs.nasa.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
·
19890005651
Publisher
·
NASA
Year
·
1987
Pages
·
6
File size
·
260 KB