Skip to main content

NACA-ACR-242 · Tests If a Highly Cambered Low-Drag-Airfoil Section with a Lift-Control Flap, Special Report

NASA (NTRS) · 1942

Open the PDFPublic domain · NASA (NTRS)Technical Reports

Overview

Tests were made in the NACA two-dimensional low turbulence pressure tunnel of a highly cambered low-drag airfoil (NACA 65,3-618) with a plain flap designed for lift control. The results indicate that such a combination offers attractive possibilities for obtaining low profile-drag coefficients over…

Pages
·
11

Key points

  • Tests were conducted on a highly cambered low-drag airfoil section with a lift-control flap in a low-turbulence pressure tunnel.
  • The results indicate that this combination offers low profile-drag coefficients over a wide range of lift coefficients without significant reductions in critical speed.
  • The flap is effective in shifting the low-drag range to lower lift coefficients with minimal drag increases.
  • Maximum lift coefficients increased by about 0.8 for a flap deflection of 40 degrees.
  • The study suggests that the design of the wing can be optimized for high lift coefficients while maintaining low drag for high-speed flight conditions.
Frequently asked questions
What was the purpose of the tests conducted in the report?

The tests aimed to obtain section characteristics of a highly cambered low-drag airfoil with a lift-control flap.

What were the main findings regarding drag and lift coefficients?

The findings showed that the flap effectively shifts the low-drag range to lower lift coefficients with practically no increase in drag.

How does the flap affect the maximum lift coefficient?

The flap increases the maximum lift coefficient by about 0.8 for a flap deflection of 40 degrees.

What implications do the results have for airplane performance?

The results suggest that the combination of a highly cambered airfoil and a lift-control flap can improve airplane performance, particularly in take-off and climb.

Is there a significant loss in critical speed when using this airfoil design?

The study indicates that there is a loss in critical speed, but it is thought to be of little importance for many airplanes.

Document

Source of Acquisition # CASI Acquired h ' : C ) \ , . Q .

MAT I OBAL ADVISORY COPIII.IITTEI FOR. BZRONAV$I c s ADVANCE CONFIDENT I A L R3PORT = , % " '- * - L * . < . .

.. .. - r , . ) " \

- . a

e . ~ I ~ . I - ~ ( L . L I ~ i L ~ Q ~ * . . ~ , ir

OF A HIGHLY CAl4B3B3D LOW-3RAG-AIRFOIL S E C T I O N WITH k LIFT-CONTROL YLAP

, I

Bg I r a E. h b b o t t a n d R a l p h 3 . > t i l l e r L a n g l e y M e m o r i a l h e r o n a u t i c a l L a b o r a t o r y L a n g l e y F i e l d , Va, Unclassified - Notice remarked 4/17/09

i I December 1 9 4 2

I $ I W A T I O X h L ADVISORY COMMITTEX FOR BZRONAUTICS ADVANCE CONFI DSNT I A L REPORT T3STS OF A HIGHLY CATlIBZRED LOW-DRAG-AIRFOIL SPCTIOM W I T 3 A LIFT-COMTROL FLAP - - By XHa H. A b b o t t and R a l p h B . ' I i l l e r - .

SUMMARY T a * s t s were made i n t h e IqACA t w o - d i m e n s i o n a l low- t u r b u l e n c e p r e s s u r e t u n n e l of a h i g h l y cambered l o w - d r a g a i r f o i l (NACA 6 5 , 3 - 6 1 8 ) w i t h a p l a i n f l a p d e s i g n e d f o r l i f t c o n t r o l . The r e s u l t s i n d i c a t e t h a t s u c h a cambina- t i o n o f f e r s a t t r a c t i v e p o s s i b i l i t i e s f o r o b t a i n i n g a l o w p r o f i l e - d r a g c o e f f i c f e n t s o v e r a wide r a n g e of l i f t c o c f - f i c i c n t s ~ l r i t h o u t l a r g e r e d u c t i o n s of c r i t i c a l s p e e d . . .

INTRODUCT I OR The a b i l i t y of c e r t a i n f l a p s t o s h i f t t h e low-drag h i - r q n g c of t h e NACA low-drag a i r f o i l s s h o u l d h a v e i m p o r t a n t a p p l i - c a t P o n s i n i m p r o v i n g a i r p l a n e performa,nce. Such f l a p 5 . sccm - t o o f f o r adv3nta,ges f o r t a k e - o f f , c l i m b , maneu- v a r i n g , a n d p e r h a p s , c r u i s i n g st h i g h a l t i t u d e s . They a l s o f a c i l i t 8 , t e t h 2 d e s i g n of n o s e a i r - i n t a k e s l o t s t o be e f f i c i e n t f o r b o t h h i g h s p e e d a n d c l i m b .

Such a d v ~ n t a g e s , however, a p p e a r t o be a t l e a s t p a r t - l y depen?-ent upon t h e u s e of f u l l - s p a n f l E p s o r d r o o p e d a i l e r o n s w i t h p a r t i s l - s p a n f l q p s t o a v o i d d r a g i n c r e m e n t s l s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e f l a p e n d s s n d t h e d i s t o r t i o n of t h e s p a n - l o a d d i s t r i b u t i o n . I t was s u g g e s t e d i n r e f e r e n c e 1 t h s t s u c h d i f f i c u l t i e s might b e p a r t l y overcome by d e s i g n - i n g t h e wing i n i t i a l l y f o r t h e h i g h l i f t - c o e f f i c i e n t r a n g e .

The h i g h camber of t h e r e s u l t i n g wing c o u l d t h e n be r e - duced t h r o u g h t h e u s e of upward f l a p d - e f l e c t i o n s s n d n e g a - t i v e a i l e r o n a r b a p f o r t h e l o w - l i f t or high-speecl f l i g h t c o n d i t i o n s . ' The u p w r r d f 1 n p 5 d e f l e c t i o n would a l s o r e d u c e t h e r a t h e r l a r g e mament c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e h i g h l y cam- b e r e d a i r f o i l f o r t h e " high-speefi r a n g e of l i f t c o e f f i - c i e n t s .

The p r e s e n t t - e s t s were t h e r e f o r e made t o o b t a i n s e c - t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of A h i g h l y cqmbercd l o w - d r a g sir- f o i l ( U C k 65,3-618) w i t h s u c h a f l a p , P l a i n f l s p s s u i t - ~ b l e f o r - t h i s ' ~ p p l f c ~ t i 0 n h ~ v e been shown t o be e f f e c t i v e i n s h i f t i n g t h e l o w - d r a g r p n g e , have r e a s o n n b l y good maxi- mum l i f t s f o r mrcny a p p l - i c a t i o n s , 'snd r e q u i r e s mininum of m e c h a n i c n l c o m p l e x i t y . Such f l a p s s l s o e l i m i n q t e t h e n e c e s s i t y f o r d i s c o n t i n u i t f e s a t t h e - f l - a p end f o r s m ~ l l d o f l c c t i o n s when u s s d w i t h d r o o p e d a i l e r o n s , -.

. .

METHODS AIVD APTBRATUS The t e s t $ we're mpde i n t h e NkCA % n o - d i m e n s i o n a l low- t u r b u l e n c e ' p r e s s u r e t C n n e l by t h e niexhods d e s c r i b e d i n re.feren'ce 1. Drag c o e f f i c i e n t s were o b t n i n s d by t h e wake- s u r v e y method aind l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s w e r e o b t a i n e d by meas- u r e m c n t of t h e l i f t r e ' d c t i o n 'on t h e - f l o o r a,nd c e i l i n g of t h e b u n n e l . Nomen% c o e f f i c i e n t s '*ere measured by means' o f n s i m p l e b a l a n c e , A l l r e s u l t s 2 r e f u l l y c o r r a c t e d .

T2e inodel W R S b u i l t o f ' w o o d w i t h a 2 4 - i n c h c h o r d . I t - 1 w q s p~ i n t ed 2nd s2.nded t o p r o d u c e s e r o d y n n m i c a l l y smooth s u r f a , c e s . The model was e q u i p p e d w i t h p r e s s u r e o r i f i c e s f o r tost's rn8,de 3.0 o b t s i n p r e s s u r s d i s t r i b u k i o ' n s , b u t t h e s e - ._

o r i ' f i c e s wero f i l l e d and smoothed far q21 - o t h e r t e s t s . -

Tho f38-p ,~,.rr~ngc%ient i s shown i n figxmo: 1, : Unpublksh'ud t e s t s i n d i - c x t e d t h s t - t h o s k i r t . sh,'ipa u s e d f o r t h e m t o s t s ( f i g . 1) .was s d v ? n t ~ g e ' o u s ili e x t ' o n & i n g t h e - low-drag r a n g e r n d i n o b t a i n i ~ g ' s u i t s b l e hinge-moment c h n r a c t c r i s t i c - s f o r i n t e r n a l l y b a l a n c e d s i l e r o n s . The gap a r o u n d t h e f l q p l e ~ , d i n g c a g e was f i l l e d w i t h m o d e l i n g c l a y v i t h o u t chang- i n g t h e e x t c r n ~ l c o n t o u r . A i r f o i l o r d i n s t o s may be 0%- t ~ i n e d f r o m t h ~ d a t a i n r e f ~ r 2 n c e 1.

RESULTS k J D DISCUSSIOW L i f t c h a r a c t c r i s t i c s f o r t h e combin%-t;ion. a r e p r e s e n t - ed i n f i g u r e 2 f o r a R e y n o l d s number of ~ p p r o x i m a t e l y

6 X 18. The i n c r e m e n t i n maximurn l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t i s

a b o u t 0'.8 f o r a f l a p d e f l e c t i o n of 40'. H i g h e r maximum l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s p r o b a b l y c o u l d be o b t a i n o d by s l i g h t m o d i . f i c a ' t i o n o f t h e s k i r t on t h a 'lower s u r f a c e t o p e r m i t l ~ r g d r f l a p d e f l e c t i o n s . C h a r a c t e r i s t i c j o g s i n t h e l i f t c u r v e s ni3pcnr a t l i f t c o e f f i c i a n t s of a b o u t 1.1 t o 1.3 f o r s i n a l l p o s i t i v e f l a p d e f l e c t i o n s . Those j o g s ~ " r c com- monly f o u n d i n t h c characteristics of n i l c r o n s 2nd p l n i n f l - p s r n d n r c a t t r i b u t e d t o r a t h e r sudden f l o w breskdowns o v e r t h e f l a p . Sneh j o g s do n o t o c c u r a t l a r g e positive, n e u t r a l , o r sma,ll n e g a t i v e f l a p d e f l e c t i o n s .

D r a g a,nd moment c h a r a c t e r 9 s t C c s f o r t h e c o m b i n a t f on a r c presented i n f i g u r e 3. The f l a p i.s v e r y e f f e c t i v e i n s h i f t i n g t h e low-drag r a n g e t o l o w s r l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s w i t h p r a c t i c a l l y no i n c r e a s e i n d r a g a n d t o h i g h e r l i f t c o c f f i c i e n t s w i t h o n l y m o d e r a t e d r a g increases. T h u s , w i t h p r o p e r s e l e c t i o n of f l a p d o f l c c t i o n s , c o n p a r a t i t e l y low s e c t i o n d r a g c o o f f i c i e n t s I r e o b t a i n a b l e o v e r a r a n g e of l i f t c o e f f i c i c n t s from bzlow 0 t o a b o u t 1 . 2 . T h i s r a n g e of l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s i s t h o u g h t t o be s u f f i c i e n t l y b r o ~ , d t o c o v c r t h e most i m p o r t a n t f l i g h t c o n d i t i o n s , ex- c e p t c o n d i t i o n s f o r t s k e - o f f a n d l a n d i n g , f o r most n i r - p l a n o s . A c o m p a r i s o n w i t h t h e d a t a of r e f e r e n c e 1 i n d i - c n t o s t h a t t h e d r a g c o c f f i c i o n t s of t h ~ f l a p p c d a i r f o i l i n t h e low-drag r a n g e a r e p r o b q b l y s l i g h t l y h i g h e r t h a n t h o s e f o r t h e p l n i n n i r f o i l .

- T h o ' r q t h e r 1 2 r g e ?itching-mornont c o e f f i c i e n t s of t h e

* -

p.re r e d u c o d t o v a l u s s 8 f o n l y n i r f o i l w i t h f l a p n e u t r a l

f l a p d e f l e c t i o n of -10 . S m a l l

r b o u t -0.02 ( f i g . 3 ) b y s &+ . p i t c h i n g - g o c q e n t c o e f f i c i e n t s t o g e t h e r w i t h l o w d r a g c o e f - f i c i e n t s a r e t h u s a v s i l n b l c f o r t h e h i g h - s p e e d f l i g h t c o n d i t i o n , Bonc l o s s of c r i t i c a l s p e e d iflust, of c o u r s e p be R C - c e p t c d i n t h e u s e of n n n i r f o i l n o t ~ p e c i f i c ~ l l y d-esigned f o r t h e h i g h - s p e e d c o n d i t i o n . ExZ:xinntion of t h e p r e s - s u r e c o c 9 f i c i e n t s S ( r e f e r e n c e 1 ) p r e s e n t e d i n f i g u r e s 4 t o 7 shows, h o w e v e r , t h n t t h i s l o s s n e e d n o t be v e r y l n r g c . The i ~ a x i n u a p r c s s u r o c o e f f i c i e n t shown i n f i g u r e

5 f o r a f l a p deflection of - l o 0 a n d R l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t

of 0.2 i s s l i g h t l y h i g h e r t h a n t h a t f o r t h e c o n p a s a b l e a i r f o i l c a n b o r c d f o r u s e a t t h e s g n e l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t (wACA 6 5 , s - 2 1 8 ) a s e s t i n a t e d f r o n n e n n - l i n e t h e o r y ( r e f e r - e n c e 1 ) a n d u n p u b l i s h e d p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n s on t h e s y m m e t r i c a l ( N A C A 6 5 , 3 - 0 1 8 ) a i r f o i l . The d i f f e r e n c e c o r - r e s p o n d s t o a l o s s i n c r i t i c a l s p e e d of a b o u t 6 t o 1 0 m i l e s p e r h o u r t o a va,lue of a b o u t 44'7 m i l e s p e r h o u r f o r t h e f l a p p e d a i r f o i l a t a n a l t i t u d e of 2 5 , 0 0 0 f e e t .

While s u c h a l o s s would n o t be t o l e r a t e d f o r a n a i r p l a n e f o r which a h i g h c r i t i c a l Xach number was o f prime i m - p o r t a n c e , such a r e d u c t i o n of c r i t i c a l s p e e d i s t h o u g h t t o be of l i t t l e i m p o r t a n c e f o r many a i r p l a n e s .

CONGLUSI ONS

- A p l a i n f l a p on a h i g h l y cambered NhCA low-drag-

a i r f o i l s e c t i o n a p p e a r s t o o f f e r a t t r a c t i v e p o s s i b i l i - t i e s f o r o b t a i n i n g low p r o f i l e - d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t s o v a r a wide r a n g e of l i f t - c o e f f i c i e n t s w i t h o u t l a r g e r e d u c t i o n s of c r i t i c a l speed - f o r t h e h i g h - s p e e d ' f l i g h t c o n d i t i o n s .

. - . .

". - .

.

L a n g l e y Nemorial A e r o n a u t i c a l ~ a b o r a t o r y , Hat i o n a l Bdyi s o r y Cammitt c e f o r k e r o n 8 u t i c s , Langley F i e l d , Va.

. - " - > ,.

- , 1, J a c o b s , E a s t n a n IT., Abbott , I r a IT., and Davidson, M i l t o n : P r e l i m i n a r y Low-Drag-Airfoil an-d F l a p D a t a from T e s t s a t Large Reynolds Numbers and Low Tur- b u l e n c e , and Supplement. MhCk X.C.R., March 1942, . C., - . . . C . . .

. .

Figs. 2 , 3 NACA Fig. 4 .

x/c

F/yu?-e +. - Press u e d/sf~;bofjum for NACA 6 4 3 - d m g/>fo;/

w i f h //ff-confro/ /r/ap. c/, - 0.

NACA Fig. 5 NACA Fig. T

1 X / c

Figore 7- - P~cssu,~e d k f ~ibuf/bns far NACA 6% 3- 6/8 a;rfbi/

w/fh //pf- C U ~ P Y O / f / ~ p . + = a 6 ,

Source & rights

Source: ntrs.nasa.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
·
NACA-ACR-242
Publisher
·
NASA (NTRS)
Year
·
1942
Pages
·
11
File size
·
582 KB