Skip to main content

NACA-SR-234 · Tests of an NACA 66,2-420 Airfoil of 5-Foot Chord at High Speed, Special Report

NASA (NTRS) · 1942

Open the PDFPublic domain · NASA (NTRS)Technical Reports

Overview

This report covers tests of a 5-foot model of the NACA 66,2-420 low-drag airfoil at high speeds including the critical compressibility speed. Section coefficients of lift, drag, and pitching moment, and extensive pressure-distribution data are presented. The section drag coefficient at the design…

Pages
·
22

Key points

  • The NACA 66,2-420 airfoil was tested at high speeds, revealing a section drag coefficient increase from 0.0042 at low speeds to 0.0052 at a Mach number of 0.56.
  • The critical Mach number for the airfoil was approximately 0.60, beyond which drag coefficients increased significantly.
  • Tests were conducted in a 16-foot wind tunnel at the Ames Aeronautical Laboratory, measuring lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients.
  • The airfoil's design lift coefficient was 0.4, with actual coefficients ranging from 0.38 at low speeds to 0.48 at critical speed before decreasing.
  • The report indicates that the drag coefficient increased rapidly at Mach numbers above 0.56, attributed to compressibility effects.
Frequently asked questions
What was the purpose of testing the NACA 66,2-420 airfoil?

The tests aimed to provide data on the characteristics of a thick low-drag airfoil at high speeds.

What were the conditions under which the airfoil was tested?

The airfoil was tested in a 16-foot wind tunnel at the Ames Aeronautical Laboratory, covering a Reynolds number range from 4 million to 17 million.

What significant changes occurred in the drag coefficient during the tests?

The section drag coefficient increased from 0.0042 at low speeds to 0.0052 at a Mach number of 0.56, with a rapid increase noted above this speed.

How did the lift coefficient behave during the tests?

The lift coefficient increased from approximately 0.38 at low speeds to 0.48 at the critical speed before decreasing rapidly above that speed.

What was the critical Mach number identified in the report?

The critical Mach number for the NACA 66,2-420 airfoil was identified as approximately 0.60.

Document

L i *

Source of Acqulsltion CASI Acquired U XAT IOITAL ADVISORY C OMNITTEE FOR 8 2 B O N A U T I C S

3 ?

ADVANCE COlTFI3EiYT I A L REPOZT A I R F O I L 0 3 ' 5-FOOT CEOBD AT HIGE SPXXD BY M n n l e y J . Hood and J o s e p h L. A n d e r s o n A m e s A e r o n a u t i c n l Laboratory Moffett F i e l d , Calif.

Unclassified - Notice remarked 4/17/09 September 1942 NATIOBAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AEXOATAU';?ICS ADVANCE C OYJFIDENTIAL REPORT TESTS OF AX NACA 66,2-420 AIRFOIL 03' 5-FOOT CEORD A T EIGli SPEED .

By Planley J . Bood and J o s e p h L. Anderson T h i s r e p o r t c o v e r s t e s t s of a 5 - f o o t model of t h e NACA 66,2-420 l o w - d r a g a i r f o i l a t h i g h s p e e d s i n c l u d i n g t h e c r i t i c a l c o n p r e s s i b i l i t y s p s e d . S e c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t s o f l i f t , d r a g , and p i t c h i n g moment, and e x t e n s i v e p r e s - s u r e - d i s t r i b u t i o n d a t a a r e p r e s e n t e d .

The s e c t i o n d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t a t t h e d e s i g n l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t of 0.4 i n c r e a s e d from 0.0042 a t low s p e e d s t o 0 , 0 0 5 2 a t a Mach number of 0.56 (390 mph a t 2 5 , 0 0 0 f t a l t i t u d e ) . The c r i t i c a l Mach number was a b o u t 0.60.

The r e s u l t s c o v e r a R e y n o l d s number r a n g e from 4 m i l l i o n s t o 1 7 m i l l i o n s .

T e s t s h a v e S e e n madc o f a n 3ACB %6,2-420 n i r f o i l i n o r d e r t o p r o v i d e d a t a on t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of a t h i c k l o w - d r a g a i r f o i l at h i g h s p e e d s . Thc SAGA 66,2-420 a i r - f o i l was c h o s e n a s b e i n g r c p r a s e n t s t i v c of low-drag a i r - . f o i l s of r a t h e r h i g h cam3cr (0.40 d e s i g n l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t ) and t h i c k n e s s (20 p e r c o n t of t h a c h o r d ) . The a i r f o i l . was t e s t e d a t s p e e d s . u g t o and s l i g h t l y a b o v e t h e c r i t i c a l s p e e d .

APPARATUS AND METHO3 The t e s t s were c o n d u c t e d i n t h e NACA 1 6 - f o o t wind t u n n e l a t t h e Ames A e r o n a u t i c a l L a b o r a t o r y , M o f f e t t F i e l d , C a l i f o r n i a . T h i s wind t u n n e l h a s a c l o s e d c i r c u l a , r t e s t s e c t i o n 1 6 f e e t i n d i a m e t e r .

The a i r f o i l was of t h e iTACA 66,2-420, a = 1 s e c t i o n .

I n t h e u s u a l manner t h i s a i r f o i l d e s i g n a t i o n s i g n i f i e s t h a t t h e a i r f o i l i s a low-drag a i r f o i l of t h e 6 f a m P l y , t h a t f a l l i n g p r e & s u r e s e x t e n d f r o m t h e l e a d i n g e d g e t o a p o i n t 60 p e r c e n t of t h e c h o r d from t h e l e a d i n g edge o v e r a w o r k i n g c t r a n g e of a p p r o x i m a t e l y 2 0 . 2 from t h e d e s i g n l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t , t h a t t h e d e s i g n l i f t c o e f - f i c i e n t i s 0 . 4 , t h a t t h e a i r f o i l t h i c k n e s s i s 20 p z r c e n t of t h e c h o r d , and t h a t t h e l i f t a t t h e d e s i g n l i f t c o e f - f i c i e n t i s u n i f o r m l y d i s t r i b u t e d a c r o s s t h e c h o r d . The c o o r d i n a t e s ox t h e a i r f o i l s s c t i o n a r e shown i n f i g u r o I . , : T h e s e c o o r d i n a t e s wcre d e r i v e d from t h e c o o r d i n a t e s of t h e I NACA 6 6 , 2 - 0 1 8 a i r f o i l a s g i v e n i n r e f e r e n c e 1, by t h e " method e x p l a i n e d t h e r e . The a i r f o i l had a , c o n s t a n t c h o r d of 5 f e e t and c o m p l e t e l y s p a n n e d t h e t a s t s e c t i o n a s shown i n f i g u r e 2. Between t h e ends of t h e a 2 r f o i l and t h e t u n - n e l walls t h e c l e a r a n c e y a s a p p r o x i m a t e l y 3 / 1 6 i n c h r The a i r f o i l s p a r e x t e n d a d t h r o u g h o p e n i n g s i n t h e t u n n e l w a l l s t o t r u n n i o n s which s u p p o r t e d t h e a i r f o i l and p e r m i t t e d c h a n g i n g t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k , E x c e p t f o r t h a s t e e l s p a r , t h e a i r f o i l was of wood. The s u r f a c e was p a i n t e d , sand- p a p e r e d s m o o t h , an& p o l i s h e d . A s m o o t h , a c c u r a t e s u r f a c e . * w a s m a i n t a i n a d t h r o u g h o u t t h e t e s t s . The a n g l e of a t t a c k was checked d u r i n g t h e t e s t s by means of a t o r q u e t u b e e x t e n d i n g t h r o u g h t h e a i r f o i l t o t h e c e n t e r of t h e s p a n w h e r e i t was a n c h o r e d . By t h i s means t h e t r u e a n g l e a t t h e c e n t e r of t h e s p a n w a s a l w a y s d e t e r m i n e d a n d e r r o r s due t o e l a s t i c t w i s t i n g of t h e a i r f o i l were e l i m i n a t e d .

A 1 1 d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t s w e r e computed f r o m measurements of t h e momentum l o s s i n t h e wake of t h e a i r f o i l , The meas- u r e m e n t s w e r e made 3 f e e t b e h i n d t h e t r a i l i n g edge a t t h e c e n t e r of t h e s p a n by means of a r a k e of t o t a l - p r e s s u s e a n d s t a t i c - p r e s s u r e t u b c s c o n n e c t e d t o a m u l t i p l e manometer, The p r e s s u - r e s w e r e r e c o r d e d by p h o t o g r a p h i n g t h e manometer.

The d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t s w e r e computed by J o n e s ' method mod- .

i f i e d t o i n c l u d e c o m p r e s s i b i l i t y e f f e c t s .

The s t a t i c - p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n was measured w i t h f l ' u s h o r i f i c e s b u i l t i n t o t h e a i r f o i l 2.5 f e e t t o t h e r i g h t of t h e c e n t e r of t h e s p a n . T h e - p r e s s u r z s w e r e r e c o r d e d by p h o t o g r a p h i n g a m u l t i p l e manometer t o which t h e o r i f i c z s wcre c o n n e c t e d .

B The l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s w e r e d e r i v e d by i n t e g r a t i n g k p l o t s of t h e p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o r t o o b t a i n t h e c o e f f i c i e n t of normal f o r c e , and t h e n r e s a l v i n g t h e normal f o r c e c o e f - A f i c i e n t and t h e d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t i n a c c o r d n n c c w i t h t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k t o o b t a i n t h e l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t . C o e f f i - c i e n t s of p i t c h i n g moment w e r e computed from i n t e g r a t e d moments of chordvrise and s p a n w i s e p r e s s u r e - d i s t r i b u t i o n p l o t s .

F o r n few of t h e t e s t s t h e t r n n s i t i q n p o i n t was a r b i t r a r i l y f i x e d a t 1 0 o r 60 p e r c e n t c h o r d w i s e p s s i t i o n s on b o t h u p p e r and l o w e r s u r f a c e s by s p n n w i s e b a n d s 2f carborundum g r a i n s . The b a n d s o f carborundum were a p p r o x - i m a t e l y 112. i n c h v i d e and t h e g r a i n s i z e was n u n b e r 60.

RESULTS A%D DISCUSSIOW 8 x 1 r e s u l t s a r e shown a s s e c t i o n p r o p e r t i e s of t h e a i r f o i l i n t e r n s of t h e u s u a l n o n - d i m e n s i o n a l c o e f f i c i e n t s , No c o r r e c t i o n s have b e e n made f o r t h e c o n s t r i c t i n g e f f e c t of tile w i n d - t u n n e l walls. I t i s e s t i m a t e d t h a t t h e e r r o r s d u e t o t h e o m i s s i o n of t h e s e c o r r e c t i o n s do n o t e x c e e d 2 p e r c e n t a t low s p e e d s and 4 p e r c e n t ' a t t h e h i g h e s t s p e e d s , These e r r o r s t e n d $0 i n d i c a t e t h e c o e f f i c i e n t s a s t o o l a r g e n u n e r i c a l l y , t h u s g i v i n g c o n s e r v a . t i ~ e v a l u e s f o r most u s e s .

~ h e * c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f t h e a i r f o i l at 0 d e g r e e a n g l e of a t t a c k a x e shown i n f i g u r e s 3 and 4 2 s t h e y v a r y w i t h Mach numbar a n d Re;rnclds number, r e s p e c t i v e l y . The s e c t i o n d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t f o ? t h e smooth a i r f o i l was o n l y 0.0042 a t low s p e e d s a n d i n c r e p - s e d g r a d u a l l y t o 0.0052 a s t h e Mach number and R e y n o l d s number w e r e i i l c ? - ~ a s e d t o 0 , 5 6 a n d 1 6 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 , r e s p e c t i v e l y . The minimum p r e s s u r e c o e f f i c i e n t s p l o t t e d i n f i g u r e 5 i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e c r i t - i c a l Mach number was 0 . 6 , p,nd t h i s v a l u e i s c o n f i r m e d by t h e b r e a k i n t h e c u r v e showing l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t on f i g u r e 3. The d r a g s t a r t e d i n c r e a s i n g r a p i d l y a t Mz.ch numbers a b o v e 0 . 5 6 , h o w e v c r , and a t a @iach number of 0.60 t h e d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t was d o u b l e i t s low-speed v a l u e .

A t a Mach number o f 0 . 6 3 3 t h e d r a g coefficient had i n - c r c a . s e d t o s i x t i m e s i t s low-spoed v ~ l u e . Tho m a j o r p o r - t i o n o f t h i s l a r g e d r a g i n c r a a s e i s b a l i e v o d t o b e t h e r e s u l t of c o m p r e s s i b i l i t y shock. A t t h e h i g h Mrch numbers t h c a d v e r s e p r e s s u r e g r a d i e n t s o v e r t h e e f t e r 40 p e r c e n t of t h e c h o r d become v e r y l a r g e and map h9,ve c a u s e d s e p - a r a t i o n which would c o n t r i b u t e t o t h e i n c r e a s e i n d r a g , A s comp-red t o t h e smogth w i n g , r o n g h n a s s r t t h s 6 0 - p e r c n n t c h o r d s t n t i o n c'-used an ~ l m o s t c o n s t a n t i n - c r e a s e i n t h e d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t , a b o u t 0 , 0 0 0 9 , a t a l l Nach n u n b a r s u p t o 0.56. T h i s c o m p a r i s o n i n d i c a t ~ s t1ic7,t t h e n a t u r a l t r ~ n s i t i o n p ~ i n t ?:?as a f t of t h e 6 0 - p a r c a n t s t a t i o n ( t h e minimum p r e s s u r e p o i n t ) a t l e a s t u n t i l t h e c r i t i c a l Mach number w a s a p p r o a c h e d . The r c s u l t s do n o t show how f a r t h e R e y n g l d s number can b c i n c r e a s e d b e f o r e t h e t r a n s i t i o n p o i n t moves f o r w a r d ~ , n d t h e dr?,g i n c r e a s e s d u e t ? s c a i c e f f e c t . T c s t s o f a l n r g c r c h o r d a i r f o i l 2 f t h e same s e c t i o n a r e t o b e made i n o r d o r t o c v a l u a t e t h e c z p a b i l i t i e s of t h i s a i r f ? i l n t h i g h e r B a y n o l d s numbers.

With t h e smooth a i r f o i l ~t 0 d e g r e c a n g l e of a t t a c k t h e pitching-moment c o e f f i c i e n t r e m a i n e d w i t h i n 0.02 of t h e t h e o r e t i c a l v a l u e of -0.10 t h r o u g h o u t t h e r a n g e of t h e t e s t s .

Only a s m a l l c h a n g e i n o c s u r r e d a t t h e c r i t i c a l speed.

% / 4 The l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t , t h e o r e t i c a l l y 0.40, i n c r e a s e d from ap- p r o x i m a t e l y 0.38 a t low s p e e d s t o 0.48 et t h e c r i t i c a l s p e e d a n d t h e n d e c r e a s e d r a p i d l y a b o v e t h e c r i t i c a l s p e e d . Com- p a r e d t o t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l i n c r e a s e from 0.38 t o 0.48, t h e t h e o r y of P r s n d t l and G l a u e r t t h a t t h e l i f t i n c r e a s e s w i t h Wach number a s l / = would p r e d i c t a n i n c r e a s e t o 0.465.

F i x i n g t h a t r a n s i t i o n p o i n t ~t 6 0 - p z r c e n t c h o r d hnd u n i m p o r t a n t e f f e c t s on t h o l i f t and p i t c h i n g moment. F i x - i n g t h e t r a n s i t i o n p o i n t a t 1 0 - p e r c e n t c h o r d i n c r e a s e d t h e minimum d r a g c o a f f i c i e n t t o 0 , 0 1 0 6 , d e c r e a s e d t h e l i f t Coef- f i c i e n t b y 0.1 o r more, %ad i n c r e a s e d t h e p i t c h i n g moment c o e f f i c i e n t by 0.025 o r more. T h e s e c h z n g e s a r e i n d i c a t i v e of what m i g h t o c c u r i f t h e t r n n s i t i o n t e k e s p l a c e prema- t u r e l y due t o f s u l t y wing c o n s t r u c t i o n , d e t e r i o r a t i o n of t h e wing c o n t o u r o r s m o o t h n e s s i n s c r v i c e , i n t e r f e r e n c e , o r o t h e r c a u s e s .

The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e smooth a i r f o i l a t v a r i o u s a n g l e s of a t t a c k a r e shown i n f i g u r e 6 i n t e r m s of Wach number and i n f i g u r e 7 i n t e r m s of B e y n o l d s number. F i g - u r e 8 p r e s e n t s c r o s s - p l o t s t a k e n from f i g u r e 6 a n d shows, f o r a Hach number of 0 . 4 , t h e v a r i a t i o n of l i f t w i t h a n g l e of a t t a c k a n d t h e v a r i a t i o n of d r a g a n d p i t c h i n g moment w i t h L i f t . These f i g u r e s show t h a t t h e d r a g r e m a i n s low f o r l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s from a p p r o x i m a t e l y 0.35 t o 0 . 5 5 and i n c r e a s e s t o h i g h e r v a l u e s f o r l i f t c o e f f i c i z n t s o u t s i d a of t h i s r a n g e . F o r t h e c o n d i t i o b s of t h c s e t e s t s t h e a i r - f o i l d i d n o t r e t a i n i t s l o w - d r a g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o v e r q u i t e a s w i d e a r a n g e of l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s a s i s i n d i c a t e d by t h e a i r f o i l d e s i g n a t i o n (k0.2) I n p r a c t i c e t h e r a n g e of l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t s o v e r w h i c h t h e low-drag p e r s i s t s c a n be e x t e n d e d by t h e u s c of f l a p s w i t h s m a l l d e f l o c t i o n .

From f i g u r e s 6 e n d 9 i t i s e v i d e n t t h a t t h c c r i t i c a l Xach number i n c r e a s e s s l i g h t l y a s t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k i s de- c r e a s e d t o -2O, and d e c r e a s e s a s t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k i s i n c r e a s e d a b o v e +2O, The r e a s o n f o r t h e c h a n g e i n c r i t i c a l s p e e d w i t h a n g l e of a t t a c k i s e v i a e n t from t h e p l o t s of p r e s s u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n , The v a r i a t i o n of t h e minimum p r e s s u r e c o e f f i c i e n t S w i t h Mach number f o r d i f f e r e n t a i r f ? i l c o n d i t i o n s i s sh3wn i n f i g u r e s 5 and 9, $ T h e r e & r e a l s o shown c u r v e s c~f c r i t i c c l p r e s s u r e coefficients Scr t h a v a l u e s at w h i c h t h e s p e e d of s o u n d - i s r e a c h e d l o c a l l y , The i n t e r - s e c t i o n s of t h e p r e s s u r s - c o e f f i c i e n t c u r v e s w i t h t h e c r i t i c a l c u r v e i n d i c a t e t h e c r i t i c a l M ~ c h numbers a t w h i c h s o n i c v e l o c i t y i s r e a c h e d l o c a l l y . I n f i g u r e 5 t h e r e a r e a l s o shown t w 3 c u r v e s of van ~ k r m A n ' s t h e o - \ r e t i c a l e q u a t i o n f o r t h e r a t e of i n c r e a s e of p r e s s u r e c o c f f i c i c n t w i t h Mach numbar ( r e f e r e n c e 2 ) . With t h e smooth a i r f o i l t h e p r e s s u r e s i n c r e a s e d more r a p i d l y w i t h Mach number t h a n would h ~ v e been p r e d i c t e d from t h e t h e o r y ; c o n s e q u e n t l y , p r e d i c t i o n s b a s e d upon t h e r e s u l t s of l o v - s p e e d t e s t s would o v e r e s t i m a t e t h e c r i t i c a l s p e e d , With t h e t r a n s i t i o n f i x e d by r o u g h n e s s a t 1 0 - p e r c a n t c h o r d , t h e p r e s s u r a s w e r e l e s s t h r o u g h o u t t h e s p e e d r a n g e and i n c r e a s e d l e s s r a p i d l y a s t h e s p e e d was i n c r e a s e d . T h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s p r o b a b l y r e s u l t e d from c h a n g a s i n t h e e f f e c t i v e s h a p e of t h e a i r f o i l c a u s c d by t h e t h i c k a r b o u n d a r y l e y e r w i t h t h e f o r w a r d t r a n s i t i o n , F i g u r e 1 0 shows t h e s e c t i o n n o r m a l f o r c e a n d p i t c h i n g ., m2ment c o e f f i c i e n t s f o r a n g l z s o f a t t a c k from below t h e n e g a t i v e s t a l l t o a b o v e t h e p o s i t i v e s t a l l f o r t h e smooth a i r f o i l a n d a l s o w i t h r o u g h n z s s f i x i n g t h c t r a n s i t i o n a t t h e 1 0 - p e r c e n t c h o r d p o s i t i o n , The m2ximum p o s i t i v e and n e g a t i v e n o r m a l f o r c e c o e f f i c i e n t s were + 1 , 5 0 and -1.35, r e s p e c t i v e l y , and wart u n a f f e c t e d bg t h e r o u g h n s s s .

F i g u r e s 11 t o 17, i n c l u s i v e , p r e s e n t p r e s s u r e - d i s - t r i b u t i o n d a t a f o r var,ious Nach n u m b e r s , a n g l e s of attcxck, and t r a n s i t i o n l o c a t i o n s . T h e s e d a t a a r e u s o f u l f o r com- p u t i n g s t r u c t u r a l l o a d s , and f o r e s t i m a t i n g i n d u c b d v e l o c - i t i e s , p r a s s u r c g r a d i e n t s , a n d c r i t i c a l s p e e d s when t h c a i r f o i l i s combined w i t h o t h e r b o d i s s .

CONCLUSIONS The s e c t i o n d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t of t h e a i r f o i l a t t h e d a s i g n l i f t c o e f f i c i e n t of 0.4 i n c r e a s e d f r c ~ 0.0042 a t low speeds to 0.0052 at 3, Mach number of 0.56, a b o v e which thc drag increased rapidly.

Ames Aeronautical Laboratory, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Noffett Field, Calif.

1 . Jacobs, Eastman N., Abbott, Ira H., and Davidson, Miltoa: ,Preliminary Low-Drag-Airfoil and Flap Data from Tests at Large Reynolds Xumbers and Low Turbulence. A . C.B., NACA, Karch 1942.

2 . von g&rm&n, Th.: CompressiSility Effects in Aerodynamics. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, vol, 8, no. -9, - July 1941, pp. 337-56.

M A C H NWBER, M Figure 5 . - Effect of compressibility and eurface condition on the minimum pressure coefficients. a = 0 ' Figure 3 . - Variation of the section coefficients with Mach number for various surface conditions. a = 00 Figure 4.- Variation of the section coefficients with Reynolds number for various surface oonditione. a n o0 Figure 9 . - Variation of section coefficients with Mach number and angle of attack.

Figure 7.- Variation of section coefficients with Reynolds number and angle of attack.

Figure U.- Effect of compressibility and angle of attack on 'the minimum pressure coefiiolent of the upper surface.

IAOP Pig. l a Figure 1 2 . - Ress e distribution on the airfoil with roughmaeas at 10-pescent *or&. c 4 = 0 T NACA Fig. 13 0 0. / 0.2 0. 3 0.4 0.5 Q6 0 7 X/c Figure 1 3 . - Pressme distribution Q E I the s-th a i r f o i l . a = -2'.

/'

0.8 a9 o 0 . 1 a2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

v c

Figure 1 5 . - Pressure distribution on the smooth airfoil.. a = +bO.

J

Variation of the pressure coefficient for the upper surface with angle Figure 1 6 . - of attack. Mach number = 0.185.

Fig. 17 UACA Figure 17.- Variation of the pressure coefficient for the lower surface with angle of attack. Mach number .: 0.185.

Source & rights

Source: ntrs.nasa.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
·
NACA-SR-234
Publisher
·
NASA (NTRS)
Year
·
1942
Pages
·
22
File size
·
1.1 MB