Document
NASA Technical Memorandum 85909 Copy of 80
X-29A Longitudinal and Directional
Force and Moment Supplemental
Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Results
Albion H. Bowers
N87-10861 _NASA-T_-E5909) X-29A LONGI_gDIaAL aND _IRECTIONAL _CBCE AND _CBEN_ SUP_LEMLNTAL IRANSONIC WIND _U_NEi _ES_ BEEUI_S (NASA) 01C Unclas 269 p CSCL G3/05 43651 _2_I 6- n--- August 1984
fU/_$A
National Aeronautics and Space Administration i i i i NASA Technical Memorandum 85909
X-29A Longitudinal and Directional
Force and Moment Supplemental
Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Results
Albion H. Bowers NASA Ames Research Center, Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, California 93523
N/ A
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, California 93523 SUMMARY Aerodynamic data from NASA Ames Research Center's 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel are plotted for the I/8-scale X-29A forward-swept wing aircraft model. Eleven configurations were tested to provide supplemental data to investigate single sur- face failure modes, complex nonlinearities, and model buildup.
These data can be used for control system refinements, pilot training, flight planning, and aerodynamic model validation. Data are presented as corrected wind tunnel data without analysis to document results that are being used for the aero- dynamic model.
INTRODUCTION The X-29A aircraft is a research vehicle that is scheduled to be used for a manned flight demonstration of forward-swept wing technology. Program objectives include advances in aerodynamic, structural, and flight control technologies. This aircraft can provide new design options for future military and commercial aircraft.
In May 1982, a wind tunnel test (number 538-1-11) was conducted in the NASA Ames Research Center's ll-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel (ref. I). This test provided an aerodynamic baseline data set for the X-29A aircraft. To supplement these data, a second test was conducted in July 1983 in the same wind tunnel. A I/8-scale X-29A model was used for both of these tests (ref. 2). Wind tunnel corrections for both tests are identical.
This report documents the second wind tunnel test, number 577-1-11. Pertinent simulation packages and corresponding technical publications tests are detailed in the appendix. Configurations in test 577-I-11 included single control surface failure modes in the flaps, canards, and strakes, and nonlinearities in sideslip and high-angle-of-attack characteristics. Additional information on model buildup was also obtained. These data will be used for control system refinements, pilot training, flight planning, and aerodynamic model validation. Data are presented as corrected wind tunnel data without analysis.
NOMENCLATURE ALPHA angle of attack, deg BETA angle of sideslip, deg BL buttock line CD drag coefficient, stability axis CL lift coefficient, stability axis CLL rolling moment coefficient, body axis
CLMS
pitching moment coefficient, body axis
CLN
yawing moment coefficient, body axis
CYS side force coefficient, body axis
DC canard deflection, deg (both left and right in
unison
DCL left canard deflection, deg
DCR right canard deflection, deg
DF flap deflection, deg
DFIL left inboard flap deflection, deg
DFIR
right inboard flap deflection, deg
DFOL left outboard flap deflection, deg
DFOR
right outboard flap deflection, deg
DR rudder deflection, deg
DS strake deflection, deg
FS fuselage station
RUN wind tunnel run number
waterline
WL
MODEL CONFIGURATIONS Changes in inboard flap, outboard flap, or rudder deflection were considered to be new configurations. The II designated configurations tested are shown on table I. Configurations 1 through 9 are for aerodynamic data, and configurations I0 and II are for model buildup. Independent external control of the model's left and right canards allowed symmetric or asymmetric deflections, or both, during each wind tunnel run. All other control surfaces required stopping the tunnel and manually changing the model.
DATA PRESENTATION All of the figures in this report are grouped according to configuration. The figure number and corresponding configuration, along with the test conditions, are presented in table 2. The run numbers are as specified in wind tunnel test number 577-I-11. For each figure there is an (a), a (b), and a (c) part for one set of wind tunnel runs. The (a) figures contain the llft coefficient (CL) vs. angle of attack (ALPHA) or rolling moment coefficient (CLL) vs. angle of sideslip (BETA) plots; the (b) figures contain the drag coefficient (CD) vs. CL or yawing moment coefficient (CLN) vs. BETA plots; and the (c) figures contain the pitching moment coefficient (CLMS) vs. CL or side force coefficient (CYS) vs. BETA plots. All moments are about fuselage station (FS) 454.27, waterline (WL) 66 and buttock line (BL) O. Aircraft reference wing area, span, and chord were 17.196 m (18ft2), 8.294 m (27 ft), and 2.200 m (7 fc), respectively.
CONCLUDING REMARKS Aerodynamic data from NASA Ames Research Center's 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel are presented for the I/8-scale X-29A forward-swept wing aircraft model. This test, number 577-I-11, was conducted to provide supplementary data to investigate single surface failure modes and complex nonlinearities. Information on model buildup are also presented.
These data can be used for control system refinements, pilot training, flight planning, and aerodynamic model validation.
Ames Research Center Dryden Flight Research Facility National Aeronautics and Space Administration Edwards, California 93523, June 21, 1983 APPENDIX - SIMULATION PACKAGES AND TESTS This report documents the basic force and moment used to supplement the AER05 and AER06 simulation packages. A brief discussion of simulation packages is given below.
AERO 3: This simulation package is dated Oct. 11, 1982 (ref. 3). The data analysis and wind tunnel results are from an early design and have subse- quently been corrected for the current design. The trimmed and linearized derivatives have been previously presented (ref. 4).
AERO 4: This simulation package is dated Sept. 19, 1983 (ref. 5). These data use wind tunnel test results from the current configuration in normal operations.
AERO 4A: This is a Mar. 30, 1984 revision (ref. 6) to AERO 4.
AERO 5: This simulation package is dated Dec. 9, 1983 (refs. 7 and 8). These data detail the flexible, nonlinear aerodynamic math model for canard and strake failure modes.
AERO 6: This simulation package (ref. 9) is dated Apr. 4, 1984. These data detail the flexible, nonlinear aerodynamic math model for flaperon, canard, and strake failure modes.
AERO 6B: This is a Mar. 30, 1984 revision (ref. I0) to AERO 6.
REFERENCES I.
Charletta, R.: Series 1 Transonlc/Supersonlc Doct_nentatlon Testing on a 12.5% Scale Grtmman Design 7i2, X-29A Model in the NASA-ARC II Foot and 9 x 7 Foot Wind Tunnels. AER/T-PT-199, Grumman Aerosp. Corp., Apr. 1982.
e Charletta, R.: Series 1 Transonlc/Supersonlc Testing on a 12.5% Scale Grtmmman Design 712, X-29A Forward-Swept Wing Demonstrator Model in the NASA-ARC II Foot And 9 x 7 Foot Wind Tunnels at Moffett Field, CA. AER/T-AMES-538-1-11, 97, Vols. I, 2, and 3, Grumman Aerosp. Corp., Aug. 1982.
.
Savatterl, C.; and Zigomalas, A.: X-29A Linear Flexlbilized Longltudinal and Lateral-Directlonal Data Package.
712/ENG-M-82-475, Grumman Aerosp. Corp., Oct. 1982.
.
Budd, Gerald D.: Locally Linearlzed Longitudinal and Lateral-Directional Aerodynamic Stability and Control Derivatives for the X-29A Aircraft.
NASA TM-84919, 1984.
.
Frei, D.: X-29 Flexible, Non-Linear Aerodynamic Math Model (AERO 4); Simulator Check Cases. 712/ENG-M-83-475 REV-A, Grumman Aerosp. Corp., Sept. 1983.
e Frei, D.: X-29 Flexible, Non-Linear Aerodynamic Math Model: Equations and Computer Subroutines - AERO 4 - Revision A. 712/ENG-M-83-367 REV A, Grumman Aerosp. Corp., Mar. 1984.
• Salimando, S.C.: X-29 Flexible, Non-Linear Aerodynamic Math Model for Canard and Strake Failure (AERO 5); Data Tables. 712/ENG-M-83-744, Grumman Aerosp.
Corp., Dec. 1983.
.
Sallmando, S.C.: X-29 Flexible, Non-Linear Aerodynamic Math Model for Canard and Strake Failure; Equations and Computer Subroutines - AERO 5.
712/ENG-M-83-739, Grumman Aerosp. Corp.; Dec. 1983.
.
Frei, D.: X-29 Flexible, Non-Linear Aerodynamic Math Model for Flaperon, Canard, and Strake Flap Failure: Limited Flight Envelope Simulator Check Cases - AERO 6. 712/ENG-M-84-106, Grunnnan Aerosp. Corp.; Apr. 1984.
10.
Frei, D.: X-29 Flexible, Non-Linear Aerodynamic Math Model for Flaperon, Canard, and Strake Flap Failure: Equations and Computer Subroutines - AERO 6 - Revision B. 712/ENG-M-84-029 REV B, Grumman Aerosp. Corp., Mar.
1984.
TABLE I. - AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONS Confi- Canard DFOL, DFIL, DFIR, DFOR, DS, DR, guration deg deg deg deg deg deg I on 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 on 15 15 15 15 varied 0 3 on 25 25 25 25 varied 0 on 25 25 -5 -5 0 0 5 on 0 0 -5 -5 0 0 6 on I0 I0 -5 -5 0 0 7 on 15 15 -5 -5 0 0 8 on 0 15 15 0 0 9 on I0 I0 I0 0 I0 -20 I0 on (wings and vertical removed) 11 off (wings removed) I I TABLE 2 - FIGURE CONFIGURATIONS AND TEST CONDITIONS ALPHA BETA DCL DCR DS MACH Figure Config- uration 1 0 varied varied 0 0.6 -4,22 2 4 varied varied 0 0.6 -4,22 3 8 varied varied 0 0.6 -4,22 4 varied varied varied 0 0.9 -4,22 5 varied varied varied varied 0.6 -4,22 6 I0 varied varied varied 0.6 -4,8 7 15 varied varied 0 0.6 -4,8 8 varied varied 0 0.6 18,20 -4,8 0 0 0 0 varied -4,22 I0 0 0 0 0 varied -4,22 II 0 0 0 0 varied -4,22 II varied varied 0 1.2 -4,8 13 16 varied varied 0 1.2 -4,8 0 0 0 1.2 11,21 -4,8 15 0 varied 0 0 0.6 -4,22 16 varied 0 0 0 0.9 -4,22 0 varied 0 0 1.2 -4,22 0 0 0 0.9 -4,22 4,8 19 I0 varied 0 0.6 -4,8 15 varied 0 0 0.6 -4,8 I0 varied 0 0 0.9 -4,8 16 varied 0 0 0.9 -4,8 II varied -4,8 0 0 1.2 24 16 varied 0 0 1.2 -4,8 0 0 0 0.9 18,20 -4,8 ORIGINAL PAGE _ OF POOR QUALITY TABLE 2. - Continued MACH ALPHA BETA DCL DCR DS Config- Figure uration 26 2 0 varied varied 0.6 -4,22 27 0 varied varied 0.6 -4,22 28 varied varied 0.9 2 0 -4,22 varied -5 0.6 29 2 0 varied -4,22 varied 0.9 30 2 0 varied -5 -4,22 varied 0.6 31 2 0 varied 10 -4,22 32 2 0 varied varied I0 0.9 -4,22 varied 33 2 0 0 0 0.6 -4,22 34 2 0 0 0 varied 0.9 -4,22 35 2 I0 varied varied varied 0.6 -6,4 36 2 15 varied varied 10 0.6 -6,4 37 2 varied varied 10 0.6 10,15 -6,4 38 2 II varied varied 10 -6,4 0.9 39 2 16 varied varied 10 0.9 -6,4 40 2 varied varied 10 0.9 11,16 -6,4 41 3 0 varied varied 10 0.9 -4,22 42 3 0 varied varied 10 0.6 -4,22 43 3 varied 0 varied -5 0.9 -4,22 44 3 0 varied varied -5 0.6 -4,22 45 3 0 varied varied 5 0.9 -4,22 46 3 0 varied varied 5 0.6 -4,22 47 3 -4,22 0 varied varied 0 0.6 3 varied -4,22 0 0 0 0.9 49 3 varied -4,22 0 0 0 0.9 50 4 -4,22 0 varied .varied 0 0.6 ORIGINAL pAGE I'_ OF pOOR QUALI'J'Y TABLE e Continued ALPHA BETA DCL Figure DCR DS MACtt Config- uration 51 I0 varied varied 0 0.6 -6,4 52 II varied varied 0 0.9 -6,4 53 15 varied varied 0 0.6 -6,4 16 varied 54 varied 0 0.9 -6,4 55 0 varied varied 0 -1,22 0.6 56 0 varied varied 0 0.9 -1,22 57 5 0 varied varied -1,22 0 1.2 58 5 0 0 0 0 varied -1,22 59 5 I0 varied varied 0 0.6 -6,4 6O 5 15 varied varied 0 0.6 -6,4 61 5 I0 varied varied 0 0.9 -6,4 62 5 15 varied varied 0 0.9 -6,4 63 6 0 varied varied 0 -1,22 1.2 6 0 varied varied 0 -1,22 0.9 6 0 varied varied -1,22 0 0.6 6 0 0 0 -1,22 0 varied 6 II varied -6,4 varied 0 0.9 68 6 I0 varied varied -6,4 0 0.6 6 16 varied varied 0 -6,4 0.9 6 15 varied varied 0 0.6 -6,4 7 0 varied -1,22 varied 0 0.6 7 0 varied varied -1,22 0 0.9 73 8 0 varied -1,22 varied 0 0.6 74 8 0 varied varied -1,22 0 0.9 8 0 -1,22 varied varied 0 1.2 TABLE 2. - Concluded DCR DS MACH ALPHA BETA DCL Config- Figure uration 0 0 0 varied 76 8 0 -1,22 varied varied 0 0.6 8 10 77 -6,4 0 0.6 15 varied varied 78 8 -6,4 varied 0 0.9 10 varied 79 8 -6,4 0.9 16 varied varied 0 80 8 -6,4 11 varied varied 0 1.2 81 8 -6,4 16 varied varied 0 1.2 82 8 -6,4 0 varied varied 0 1.2 83 9 -1,22 0 varied varied 0 0.9 84 9 -1 , 22 0 varied varied 0 0.6 85 9 -1,22 9 0 0 0 0 varied -1,22 varied varied 0 0.9 87 9 11 -6,4 9 16 varied varied 0 0.9 -6,4 9 varied varied 0 0.6 89 10 -6,4 9 varied varied 0 0.6 90 15 -6,4 varied 91 10 0 0 0 -4,22 92 11 0 varied -4,22 ORIGINAL PAGE OF POOR QUALrCY .i•/ $YHBOL RUN
DC
O o 13 -20 & 14 -10 + 15 X 16 ¢3 `4- : • :'- o ,4- t_ (o c) £- c) &- _J u o o e O.
I ! ! I I
.O0 o.oo 6.oo ib.oo lt_.oo _o.oo 2_.oo 3b.oo
RLPHR Figure l(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 1, MACH : 0.6, BETA =
SYMBOL RUN O_
oR'G_NAt- PAC_ i_ OF poOR QUAL|_
[] 12 O
(9 13 -20 ,_ 14 -10 + IB 10 X IB 16 Io ,_, 2B8 10
6"
O &,.,.
W
6"
W Q
G,"
c_ O9
6"
6'
Q
G,"
o . o'.o0" o'.4o o'.eo z'.zo 1'.eo z'.oo
o.eo -'o.6o
CL Figure 1(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA- 0
SYHBOL RUN DC
[] 12 O 13 -20 -10 A 14 + 15 X 16 ORIGINAL PAGE OF POOR QUALI'P/, & c: {::_.
!
J :m {::3.
!
o _r !
- l oflO 1',80 2', O0 CL Figure 1(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration I, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 0
RUN
SYMBOL
DC
rrl -I0 (D 2'7 I0 o OF poOR QU#,L_'i"_' o o o e o £- o c0 e, o ..J (J o o o B° o o o.
I o o I !
I 2b,O0 0'.00 S'.O0 t_.O0 1_.00 30 .CO 20.00 .00 RLPHR Figure 2(a). CL vs ALPHA BETA = 4 Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 26 -10 O 27 10 OR|GINAI_ pAGE _ OF pOOR QUAL|'I_, e° C3 LtJ eo O (--I OJ (D (D I i ! I I I | C°-o .80 I .60 2.00 -0.40 O.O0 0.40 0.80 I .20 CL Figure 2(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, MACH : 0.6, BETA = 4
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 26 -10 0 27 I0
&-
&-
_?-
J &.
I o.
I c3.
I
./
ID
?
.CO -b.40 OloO0 01.40 0'°80 I*.,20 t'.BO 2'1.00 CL Figure 2(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 4
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 24 -tO 0 25 tO OF. POOR QUALIT_, ¢3 ¢D p.
Oa £- GO L3 .q, O.
I GO ! I I
_'o.oo _I_.oo ab.oo
O .00 5.00 1'0.00 1_i .GO .00 ALPHA Figure 3(a). CL vs ALPHA BETA : 8 Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 24 -tO (9 25 tO c_ 6" ORIGINAl.; Pi_=_E '_,.
OF POOR _ "' "_ Q u_,..t i , r_ 6" °'I c_ ¢._ c= c_ c_ o c_ c_ ! !
°-'0.80 JO,40 " 0'.00 0'.40 0',80 t'.20 I ,BO 2.00 CL Figure 3(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 8
DC
SYMBOL RUN
ORIGINAL Pl:_. !_
-tO
[] 24 OF POOR QUALITY
tO
(D 25 ",,1" o
.i y"
¢_ .--I I ¢:} e.,._.
!
c:) c).
!
e-1 I
-b.4o 0%0 o'o4o oleo 1'.zo 1'.so Z'oOO
.80 CL Figure 3(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 8
SYMBOL RUN i'_ IBETQ
[] 32 " ;_' (!) 33 84 OF_GINAL PAGC. _ OF POOR QUAL|T L%/" e-C" 0"
d
.=
C3" C}" 0.
C3 W !
.co o'.oo #.oo tb.oo t_.co _b.oo 21_.0o sb .oo
RLPHR Figure 4(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, DC = 0
BETR
SYtIBOL RUN
.,'rl 32 O 33 o ORIGINAL PAGF. !@ @@ c_" OF POOR QUALIT_ c:) r.- c3 (D c) in o t.)
o c_ e o c) 0" c) c_ ! ! ! ! ! !
°-0.80 -0.40 0.00 0.40 0'.80 I .20 1.60 2.00 CL Figure 4(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, DC = 0
BETA
SYMBOL RUN
m 32 (D 33 ORIGINAL PAGE _& oF POOR QUALITY, o 6" o o ,--I o o o° I o o.
!
o o, !
I i i I i i !
I-O .80 I ,B0 2.00 -0.40 0.00 0.40 0.80 ! .20 CL Figure 4(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, DC = 0 SYMBOL RUN DC BETR [] 24 -t0 4 (!) 25 tO 4 A 26 -I0 8 + 27 tO 8 O ,qp ORIGINAL PAGE _;_ O O OF POOR QUALITY O (D £- O O,I ...;- ! !
O'.O0 5.00 10 ,C0 115,00 _t_.oo 3b.oo RLPHR Figure 5(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration I, MACH = 0.6 ORIGI_;_',L ?._ :_:::! "
BETR
DC
RUN
SYMBOL
OF POOR C'd ,-.L!.'" -I0 rq 25 tO O A 26 -I0 @ I0 + o w 6- 6- o 6" o ,qp 6- C_ (.3 o o e,W 6" o o I I I I :'.20 1'.60 2"_. O0 °-0.80 -0.40 0.00 0.40 0.80 CL Figure 5(b). CD vs CL Configuration I, MACH = 0.6 oRIGINf_-
BETfl
OF poOR (_dALIT'=
SYHBOL RUN DC
[] 24 -t0 (_ 25 tO @ QI o o
g
?-
?.
=.
?.
I •BO -_ .40 0',00 0'.40 0'.80 t',20 1'.60 2'.00
CL
Figure 5(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, MACH : 0.6
ORIGINAL F;;,...; S Y M B 0 L R U N
DC
OF POOR Q'_,_-'.,-.';,_
[] 18
-10
_) 19
O
=.
• I o o.
I !
!
o o I i i ___ I I I 8.00 '-6.00 -4, .00 .00 0.00 2.00 4..00 $ .00 BETA Figure 6(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, ALPHA = 10 OF POOi:_ _,..._,_.,_ z
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 18 -I0 0 19 0 ,_ 20 I0 o (o o o o o c) o B o Z ._1 __) c) c).
I ¢q o o.
I t:) I o I-6.00 I =_ I I I I I -4,00 ,00 0,00 2,00 4.,00 6,00 8,00 BETR Figure 6(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, ALPHA = 10 2?
ORIG4NAL _L..
SYMBOL RUN DC
OF POOR QUA_ ...
m 18 -I0 (D 19 0 _ 20 I0 o &- &£3 6- o &- o 6- o o o.
!
L..)
bO o.
l o l u_ 6.
!
o | I ! I | !
24,00 -'2.00 0.00 2,00 4,00 6.0C 8,00 .00 BETR Figure 6(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration I, MACH = 0.6, ALPHA : 10
DC
ORIGINAL P_,_ i!3 S Y M B 0 L R U N
I0 OF POOR QUALUTY [] 21 O 22 A 23
-I0
ml.
c_"
0")
6"
C_I C_ e.,.,e (:3 ._.1 cJ C_.
!
C3 C_.
I Om ?.
C_ C_ | ! ! !
I-6.00
-_,.oo -_z .oo o'.oo 2.oo ,_.oo
6.00 8.00 BETA Figure 7(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, ALPHA = 15
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 21 10
0 22 0 _' 23 -I0 ml.
6"
(vl ORIGINAL _;!_:;:. ;i: :.:, 6- o 6- ..-I (.J !
o.
!
@r) I ml, o o- ! i II | | @ | | .00 -4.00 "-2.00 0.00 2.00 4,.00 6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 7(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, ALPHA = 15 3o
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 21 10 (9 22 0
23 -10
o
G"
ORIGINAL P'_'_::" _ OF poOR QuAL_I_ I,D
6"
o
G"
¢3
6"
Q Q O, I (/3 (,_ I,D I O 6.
I I,D Q o,I o I 1 I __ ____ = =-- I I 8 QO0 -'4.00 -2.00 0.00 Z .00 4'.00 U'.OU .00 BETR Figure 7(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN ALPHA
[] 28 18 2O 0 29 6" ORIGINAL PAGE £_!'i o OF POOR QUA L_'3-_; 6- o 6" o o 6' _.1 .._1 (.O F= C3.
!
!
| i 0 I B .00 8.00 !
-_: .00 0'.00 2'.00 4.00 •00 .00 BETA Figure 8(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH : 0.6, DC = 0
,,' SYMBOL RUN FILPHFI
[] 28 16 (2) 29 20 .qp ORIGINAL PAG_ _ OF POOR QUALITY /_' t_ C) Q 6- t-4 z / (J 9"4 I 0.
I I 'ql" 0.
I I I I I I I '-6.00 -4.00 -2,00 0.0O 2.00 4.00 6,00 8 oO0 BETR Figure 8(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, DC : 0
ALPHA
SYMBOL RUN
[] 28 2O (9 29 G" ttJ ORIGINAL ..... _._- OF POOR QL_iL.=i:"_ 6" 6" o I (J ItJ o.
I o I I o o I I .00 -4,00 .00 0.00 2.00 4.00 8.00 8'. O0 BETA Figure 8(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, DC - 0 SYMBOL RUN MACH [] 35 I .20 (D 5o 1.40 ,,_ 54 I ,30 + 5?
1.25 ',R =;- ORIGINAL P_C,C o OF POOR QUALITY o'.oo #.oo t'o.oo z_.oo _b.oo 2k.oo ab.oo ALPHR CL vs ALPHA Figure 9(a).
DC = 0 Configuration I, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN
MACH
E] 35 ! .20 (D 50 I .40 A 54 1,30 + ,57 I .25 (:} 4- C_ I'- A- bD 4- 4- t_ (._ 4- c_ (:J !
- ,80 -b,40 0',00 0',40 0*,80 1',20 I',60 2.00 CL Figure 9(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, BETA = O, DC = 0
MRCH
RUN
SYMBOL
I .20 [] 35 I .40 0 50 A I .80 I .25 + 67 iD ORIGINAL _" " : OF POOR QUALi'i"_ O_ =;- O4 =;- ¢:) v-I _r- ._J (.J El C_ I C;I ¢;.
I c3 I C_ er_ ¢:1 L _,80 -b,4o o',oo ob,4o o',ao t',2o t',so 2',oo CL Figure 9(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration I, BETA = O, DC = 0
MACH
RUN
SYMBOL
38 I .20 [] I .40 A I .30 56 I .215 + C} C} ORIGIr_RL P;_GZ_ OF POOR QU;_LI'I'V _ (D £- (:} 3" (3 -J CJ C} C3 C} (3.
I C} I " !
I
_b.oo _.oo ab.oo
o.oo 5.00 Ib.oo _15.oo
.00 ALPHA Figure lO(a). CL vs ALPHA DC = 10 Configuration 1, BETA = O,
8YMI30L RUN MACH
[] 38
I .20
(D I_1
I .40
" 615 I ,30
+ 68 I .2B
&
4-
o &o
4-
4, (0
4"
m-4 o ,8O
-b,4o o'.oo o'._ o'eo I'.,,o r.eo 2;00
CL
Figure 10(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, BETA = O, DC = I0
MACH
6YMBOL RUN
1,20 [] 38 1.40 O) 15I 1.30 ,m, 65 1.25 + 66 ¢:l ID ORIGINAL FAC_ ql" W OF POOR QUAUT_' &- O4 I-t U_¢;- ..J CJ (I ¢::_.
!
& I O4 !
¢3 !
-; ,BD -b,4o o',oo o',4o o',eo 1',v.o 1',so m',oo CL Figure 10(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, BETA = O, DC = I0
RUN
SYMBOL
MRCH
[] 3"/ 1.20 (D 52 ! .40 A 1,30 + 58 1,25
o'.oo s'.oo t'o.oo t's.oo sb.oo
RLPHR Figure 11(a). CL vs ALPHA DC = -10 Configuration 1, BETA = O,
MRCH
SYMBOL RUN
1.20 [] 3"7 1,40 o) 52 1.30 ,_, 53 1.25 + 58
-'0.40 0%0 o'.4o o'.eo t'.zo t',so _',oo
CL Figure ll(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, BETA = O, DC = -10
MACH
SYMBOL RUN
1.20 3?
I .40 A 1,30 1,26 N 68 IJO =;- ORIGINAL PA G_ _::' OF POOR QUALITY ¢O o4 =;- 2i O0 Figure 11(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, BETA = O, DC = -10
SYMBOL RUN OC
[] 40 tO 41 0 ,', 42 -10 D ¢@ ¢3 ORiG_NA_ ?..._,,_i_i _ OF POOR QUALi ';'_7 O ...I ._1 U O (:2.
!
O,I CIL !
¢::i.
!
O 1 l !
!
-4,00 -2,00 0',00 2',00 41,00 6,00 8b,00 ,00 BETR Figure 12(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, ALPHA = 10.9, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 40 I0 E) 4I 0 4Z -I0 I1.
¢:) o g,- z ....I ¢_) t I t !
¢3 t ¢3.
!
¢:) I
-_,oo -t_,oo o',oo e'.oo 4'.oo e',oo e'.oo
-6 • O0 BETR Figure 12(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration I, ALPHA = 10.9, MACH = 1.2
$¥MBOL RUN DC
[] 40 I0 O 41 0 _, 42 -10 rl LD v-4 p_._ _,_ _.._ _':.
ORIGINAL '_'__ ......
OF POOR QU_L_ _ v4 _ B i- tD O CD I tO (D e !
v_ I tO !
CD m (D I
-'4 .oo .-_,oo o'.oo 2'.oo Aoo #,oo e',oo
3,,00 BETR Figure 12(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 1, ALPHA = 10.9, MACH : 1.2
SYMBOL RUN
DC
rn I0 -I0 o OF. pOOR QUAL_T'_' t-i C_ o qe_ __I _J I 0.
I C_ ,e-_ !
c_ I -'4 .oo -_z .oo o*.oo 2=,oo 4'b. oo eb, O0 _,00 3.00 BETR Figure 13(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH : 1.2, ALPHA = 16.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
rq 43 10 44 0 ,4, 45 -10 ORIGINAL P&__i: _: ....
C:3 O4 C) C_ tll Z --J CJ I I C_ C3.
!
!
-4,00 -2,00 0.00 2=.00 4_,00 6'.00 8:.00 ,00 BETA Figure 13(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH : 1.2, ALPHA = 16.2
DC
SYMBOL
RUN
I0 [] 43 A 45 -I0 ORIGINAL P,,_ ii:, OF POOR QUALITY IQ M_ c) c: c3.
I O3 I,O c_ !
g--I t I d.
I I -_. ,00 -_Z ,00 0',00 2',00 4_,, O0 8 i, 0 0 8', O0 - l°O0 BETA Figure 13(c). CYS vs BETA = 16.2 Configuration 1, MACH = 1.2, ALPHA
FILPHFI
SYMBOL RUN
10.9 [] 41 16.2 E) 44 18.8 ,_ 46 21 .4 + 4"1 ¢;- =; ORIGINAL P;,LX: !.::, OF POOR QUALi"_ "'_' ¢N /-t 4- _J (__ /-t_ !
!
(o Q !
I 6(',00 81,00
A,oo .-_.oo o'.oo * °
2,00 4 *00 -B,O0 BETR Figure 14(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 1.2, DC = 0 ORIGINAL. "
SYMBOL RUN RLPHR
OF POOR qUALITY [] 41 10.9 (g 44 16.2 ,_ 46 18,8 + 4? 21,4 c;- C3 Z .--J r..J C_ ,,,_.
!
o,I I t ¢:3.
I ¢:_ ! 6|, O0 8t, O0
3.00 -_.oo -_',oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo
BETR Figure 14(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 1.2, DC = 0 ORiGiNaL _- ALPHA, ,
SYMBOL RUN
10.9 [] 41 IB ,2 18.8 A 46 21,4 + 4'7 tO t 0.
¢__ I or3 LO Q I I LO I ¢q e/ i-B, O0 -_.,00 -'_,00 O',OO 2',00 4',00 61,O0 8t, 0 0 BETA Figure 14(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 1.2, DC = 0
DCL
SYMBOL RUN
-30 O 61 -20 A 62 -15 + 63 -10 X 64 65 10 !
_b.oo 30 .CO
o'.oo 6'.oo _b.oo d_.co _b.oo
FILPHR Figure 15(a). CL vs ALPHA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 0 ORIGINAL C:I
OF POOR _;._ S'fNBOL RUN
DCL
[] 12 0 61 -30 -20 + 63 -15 D X 64 -10 ¢0 0" I0 6- _o B.
C3 6- o ,t 6- LJ o ¢3 ! !
°-0.8C !
-}) .40 0'.00 0.40 0.80 1'.20 % .60 2.00 CL Figure 15(b). CD vs CL, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 0 ORIGINAL P_ '"
OF POOR QUAL_I_Y DCL
$'FHBOL RUN [] 12 -30 o 61 -20 -15 + 63 -10 x 64 Q G- o o 6" o 6" _1 o o.
I o I,-I E,.
!
c_ o.
!
o t I l | 1'.60 2.00 -'0.40 0',00 0.4C 0.80 t .20 i .80 CL Figure 15(c). CLMS vs CL, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH = 0.6, BETA = 0
SYMBOL RUN DCL
[] 78 10 OF POOR QL_L:YZ 0 79 15 A 80 -10 + 81 -15 X 82 -20 o 83 -30 84 -30 o o
g,-
o ...:- o !
! !
o'.oo B.oo _o.oo t'B.oo 26.oo z_.co 30.00
ALPHA Figure 16(a). CL vs ALPHA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, BETA = 0 SYMBOL RUN DCL [] 78 IO OF POOR '._**_"'- 7S 15 80 -10 + 81 -15 X 82 -20 83 -30 + 84 -30 L-w 4- o (:) C:) (.2 4- c_ G,I ,=,.
.80 -b,40 0_,00 01,40 0',80 t'.20 II.60 21.00 CL Figure 16(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, BETA = 0 SYMBOL RUN DCL [] 78 i0 79 15 A 80 -10 + 81 -15 X 82 -20 U_ 83 -30 84 -30 c_ _e &- ¢_ cD c3 C_ (D (D t CD.
!
I C_ e4 CD.
I CD ¢D ] I_ 3,80 -_,40 O',OO 0_,40 0'.80 1',20 1'o60 2,,00 CL Figure 16(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, MACH : 0.9, BETA = 0 D C "'" _' " L., o, _ 1
RUN
SYMBOL
D 85 O 92 -10 + 98 -15 X 99 o -15 o o ORIGINAL P;'/:_ ,::_ -'OF POOR QU_,LJ'_ m
o'.oo s'.oo _.oo t_.oo _b.oo 21B .oo
30.00 RLPHR Figure 17(a). CL vs ALPHA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH = 1.2, BETA = 0 OI_GINAL F_ ¸_:¸_ _ OF PObR _''' :_'_ DCL SYMBOL RUN [] 35 92 15 -10 + 98 -15 X 99 -15 I02 &- A- o IA} (:} cz) o 3,80 -b,4o ol.oo oi,4o oi,8o 1io2O t*.6o 2'.oo CL Figure 17(b). CD vs CL, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH : 1.2, BETA : 0 BYMBOL RUN DCL , [] 35 O A 95 u
=
C)" _ 102 -15 OItlGINAL _:'_I:L.:: i OF POOR Qu_ ;__';_,: o t° o, o=.
o !
!
-b,40 01o00 0'.40 01.B0 1'.£0 I'.60 21,00 - ,80 CL Figure 17(c). CLMS vs CL, DCR = O, Configuration 1, MACH = 1.2, BETA = 0
SYMBOL. RUN BETQ
rq 32 4 0 33 8 ORIGINAL PAGE _S OF POOR QUALITY
oo
c,;-
.-G" !.,.i °
J
C:3"
?-
C_ GO B ¢3 !
3_.00
.oo o'.oo e'. oo t'o.oo tt_ .oo 2b .oo d_.oo
ALPHR Figure 18(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration I, MACH = 0.9, DC = 0
BETA
SYMBOL RUN
[] 32 0 33 ORILI"INAL PA_ _ OF POOR QUALIS7 _ ¢;m ¢D o
=;-
r7 o o3 ¢3 oa 4-
-6.4o o',oo '
).80 o.4o o',eo t',2o _'_,60 2I* O0
CL Figure 18(b). CD vs CL Configuration 1, MACH : 0.9, DC : 0
BETA
SYMBOL RUN
[] 32 (g 33 w._ 4- OF .pOOR QU _.Li'i_ 4- C4 4- ._I c.)
t ¢::)_ !
C¢) Ol | !
!
m .... _,40 0,,,,00 0',,40 0',80 1',20 I',60 2,00 ,80 CL Figure 18(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, DC = 0 ORIGINAL PAGE
OF POOR QUALITY SYMBOL RUN DCL
[] 19 0 0 67 I0 A 68 -10 + 69 -I5 X 75 -I5 O o 76 -I0 77 10 O (:3 O O .-I ._1 I O,I I q') O.
I ! 1 ! i I
-_.oo -'2.oo o.oc 2.oo 4.oo e.oo
I-6.00 8 ,00 BETA Figure 19(a). CLL vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 10, MACH = 0.6
RUN
SYMBOL
Ig [] O A 68 + 69 x 75 O° I ! 1 I 8.00 .oo -4.00 .00 01.00 2'.00 4'.00 6.00 BETA Figure 19(b). CLN vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 10, MACH = 0.6
DCL
SYMBOL RUN
0 67 -tO -t6 + 69 -15 X 75 o -I0 g-¢ o ORIGINAL PAG_ ;J B (D OF poOR QUALi'It' 6- o o o.
I >- (_} _rJ o (D.
I o m-¢ I I I !
- .DO -'_.oo -_ .oo oleo 2'.oo 4'.oo 6 .CO 8 .CO BETR Figure 19(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 1, ALPHA : 10, MACH : 0.6
DCL
SYMBOL RUN
[] 22 -15 -10 A 71 + 72 -10 X 73 11- -15 =;- ORIGINAL P:_L_Z _ OF POOR Qu_-,,Y . ,. • c;- v-O 4- ¢:I 4- ca ¢D.
I (:3 CL I ¢3 e ¢:}.
!
¢3 I
34.oo .z_.oo o'.oo ,;'.oo Aoo 8'.oo ;'.oo
S.O0 BETA Figure 20(a). CLL vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
DCL
SYMBOL RUN
-15 -I0 I0 + 72 -10 X 73 -15 !
I -_,00 -_',00 01,00 2=,00 41,00 6',00 81,00 °00 BETFI Figure 20(b). CLN vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration i, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
DCL
ORIGINAL P_; _ OF POOR CtU;_L'_,%_ -15 A 71 -10 + 72 X 73 -10 O4 -15 &- ,,-4 4" t_ I LO Q ¢3.
!
!
LO 4.
!
o o -_,00 t -_,oo o'.oo m_.oo 4'.oo £.oo a',oo I ,00 BETR Figure 20(c). CYS vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration I, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6 IX_jIIIi'.,_.p..._ _._ .......
OF POOR _L_,L._¥
SYMBOL RUN DCL
[] 8G -15 (!) 88 -10 _' og I0 ,@ c3 o c_ J CJ I o I c_ !
c3 I i • 00 -_.00 -_Zo00 0'.00 2',00 4_.00 al,00 al,00 BETQ Figure 21(a). CLL vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration I, ALPHA = i0, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DCL
[] 86 -15 88 -I0 ,t, 89 I0 O4 C3 Z .--I (.)
e 0.
I ?- I ip o I °00
A.oo ,-_,oo o°.oH 2',oo _,oo e',oo e'.oo
BETR Figure 21(b). CLN vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = I0, MACH = 0.9 ORIGINAL : '__',;:_ OF POOR Q..,r;'=-,,
SYMBOL RUN DCL
[] 85 -15 (D 88 -I0 '_ 89 10 rio to !
Lb LO ¢_.
!
¢::1 d.
I LO I
o
@ !
-W.oo -iz.oo oLoo 2'.oo g.oo e".oo e'.oo
-15.00 BETR Figure 21(c). CYS vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 10, MACH : 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DCL
[] 8B -15 8'7 -10 A 90 OF POOR QU_-/__, _
i
I
?-
I ,,ip O I
A.oo -_.oo o'.oo E.oo 4'.oo e'.oo e'.oo
}.00 BETR Figure 22(a). CLL vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9 "/4
SYMBOL RUN DCL
OF POOR Q _'_LTC_'_ [] 86 -15 (D 87 -10 ,_ 90 10 mr
&-
c_ c_ &- d c_.
!
N C_ !
c) I | • 00 -_,00 -_.00 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 8',00 81.00 BETFI Figure 22(b). CLN vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9 ?5
8YMBOL RUN DCL
[9 BB -15 87 -10 gO 10 ORIQINAL ........ _' OF POOR QiJ_ -_-L_/_*.
G-
ID e_ t O.
I (.# o O.
I C_ I IJD c; I ¢:I L -00 -_.oo .-_.oo o_oo _Loo 4Loo eLoo 8_. O0 BETR Figure 22(c). CYS vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration I, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9 ORIGINAl" PAG_ '_; SYMBOL RUN
DCL
OF POOR QUALFFY E1 94 (!) 9'7 -10 _, 100 -15 + 105 -10 ,qp 6- O3 e 6- 6- =;- ..J _J O.
I O.
I O3 O.
I !
i i i !
I m 3.00 -',;.oo -_ .00 0 .CO 2.00 Z,.00 6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 23(a). CLL vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 1.2 7?
SYMBOL RUI_
DCL
[] 94 I0 (D 97 -10 tO0 -15 + 105 -10 qP o oRIGINAL _:i ,_.
OF poOR QIJ_:.;-' _' (v) Q =;- ¢3 =;- o Z _.J t..3 e=4 _° I I t_ I l I . 11 I I !
I -4.00 -2.00 0'.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 - ;.00 BETR Ftgure 23(b). CLN vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 11, HACH = 1.2 ORIGINAL PA_,-_J _
SYNBOL RUN
DCL
OF POOR Qu,_,, l Y El 94 I0 (3 97 -10 ...-..& I00 -15 + I05 -10 o o,I ,'."-'3q i I >- LJ i/3 i I u3 i o I I I I i
.oo -'4 .oo
-_ .00 0.00 2.00 4..00 8'. O0 6.00 BETR Figure 23(c). CYS vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN
DCL
[] 93 O 96 -10 A ICl -15 + 103 -10 X 104 0 ° OF-'- POOR Q U_Li'i_'i' O.
!
O.
!
!
!
• oo -'( .oo --_z .oo o'.oo £.oo ('.oo
8.00 6.00 BETR Figure 24(a). CLL vs BETA, DCR = O, 1.2 Configuration 1, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 8O _3RIG_NAE T/-
SYMBOL RUN
DCL
OF POOR QU,_,-, _- [] 93 O 96 -10 _, I01 -15 + 103 -10 X 104 I ,it o ¢::_, ! | I -4,00 -2.00 0'.00 2'.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 .00 BETR Figure 24(b). CLN vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DCL
[] 93 I0 0 96 -10 ,_ 101 -16 + 103 -I0 X 104 I0 o o_ 6" t/} 6' ORIGdNAL PA_£ ;_ OF POOR QUALITY bO !
!
O, !
. ! !
e .00 6.00
! -',+.oo -_ .oo o'.oo 2.oo ,.oo
5.00 BETR Figure 24(c). CYS vs BETA, DCR = O, Configuration 1, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 1.2
SYNBOL RUN RLPHR
m 3O 18 0 31 ql"
&-
c_ ORIGINAL PACi_ |_'l OF POOR QUALITY _.1 ¢:3" J c_ e I c;3.
I t i I
-_.oo -_.oo o_oo 2_oo 4',oo eLoo e'.oo
- _,,oo BETR Figure 25(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH = 0.9, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN FILPHFI
m 30 18 (D 3I 21 Z¢::i -_,oo -_z.oo oI.0o 2'.oo 4',oo s',oo sl.O0 BETR Figure 25(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 1, MACH : 0.9, DC = 0 ORIGINAL P_'_:;:_ _ OF POOR QUALITY
8YHBOL RUN
ALPHR
[] 30 (D 31 I.D C3 O- (:} !
O_ >-- (0 (:3.
l !
LO O.
!
¢:3 C} I
_,oo -W,oo -_,oo o'.oo _',0o _'.oo e',oo e'.oo
BETQ Figure 25(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration I, MACH = 0.9, DC : 0 SYMBOL RUN DC .....
[] 107 -10 0 108 0 A 109 10 o OF poOR Q U_L_iTN' o o o 3" o 3- o w 6" ._J f.J o .q.
o o G" .q.
I o w o . !
I
_.co 3_ .CO
0'.00 6.00 ib.oo tl_.co eb.oo
; .CO RLPHR CL vs ALPHA, DS = O, Figure 26(a).
2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6 Configuration
SYMBOL RUN DC
m -10 10'7 _D 0 IOB A IO9 10 c:-- O o t_ & =,
l,eO -b.,,o o'.oo o'.,m o'.eo z'.zo 1'.so z'.oo
CL Figure 26(b). CD vs CL, OS = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
RUN
SYMBOL
DC
El IO?
-10 (D 108 A OF poOR QU/._L_T_ o
&
/
/
e.
I o
_9-
,z- .J L3 0_ Q 0.
I qP
/
I Q I I
-b.4o o'.oo o'.4o oleo tLzo 1'eo zLoo
).80 CL Figure 26(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6 ORIGIN I_L , -.._ OF POOR QUALITY
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-20 -10 O 111 A 112 + 113 o X 114 oJ" o o o (o 3- o oJ L" o _o _J (.J o o o o o.
I o Io o I
•O0 0'. O0 6'. CO tb.00 t_.00 _b.oo _l_.oo 3b.oo
RLPHR Figure 27(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = 5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYHBOL RUN
DC
-20
-10
a 112 + 113 X 114
r
O
g
o m
G-
(.} o o m-g o o
- .80 -b.4o -o,.oo oL,.o o'.eo £._o l'.e,o £.oo
CL Figure 27(b). CD vs CL, DS : B, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6 ORIGqN:_L _ ......
OF POOR QU._L,';;"_Z
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 110 -20 -I0 A + I0 0 X I v-I (: 4- !
¢3 {xl U_- Ir" J 0.
!
I tD i I.
) • eo -b. 4,0 o'.oo o_. 4o o'.eo J'.£o 1 _. eo 2'. oo CL Figure 27(c). CLMS vs CL, DS : 5, Configuration 2, BETA : O, MACH = 0.6
RUN
SYMBOL DC
® I0 A 117 + -10 X -20 3_,00 2_ .00 0'.00 6'.C0 _'o.oo _.oo _b.oo RLPHR CL vs ALPHA, DS = 5, Figure 28(a).
2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9 Configuration
SYMBOL RUN
[] A 11"/ + 118 -10 × 119 -20 &O Q ,q.
(= o w c}
- .80 -b,,m oLoo o'4o o'.eo I'._,o ?.eo 2'.oo
CL Figure 28(b). CD vs CL, DS : 5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9 ORIGINAL PAGE _._/ OF POOR QUALI'_"
SYMBOL RUN DC
II5 20
II6 10
,_ 117 0 + I18 -10
X _-20
&
I u_- =.
fJo ¢3.
o o.
i o ¢i} o I
_.eo -b.4o o'.oo oL4o oleo t',,_'o i'.eo 2'.oo
CL Figure 28(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = 5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 121 -20 0 122 -10 A 123 O
o
ORI_NAL '_L :.
o
o
OF POOR _:;',-:-//_- o L- o o _J (.3 o o o o o.
I o o, I .00
o'.oo s'.oo _b.oo _ii.oo _b.oo
_k.oo
3b.oo
RLPHR Figure 29(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = -5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-20 m 121 -10 _) 122 A 123
&
ORIGINAL PAG_ _;_
&
OF POOR QU ALI_V" W o ql'
=;-
¢.)
o,I & Q O
-b,4o o'.oo 0'.40 d.so 1:2o 1:8o 2',00
- ,110 CL Figure 29(b). CD vs CL, DS = -5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 121 -20
(9 122
ORIGINAL PAGE _ 10 OF POOR QUALITY A - 123/_ 0 o o I,q
&
l {W
/
..J (n {:).
l
0 /'
,t o ¢3.
l o " )-B0
-_.,,o oLoo o:,o oLoo ?.2o I'oo 2:oo
CL Figure 29(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = -5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6 9?
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 124 0 0 126 -I0 ,_ 128 -20 ml" oJ" ORIGINAL PAGE _i'_: o OF POOR QUALITY o o (D c) o w 6- _.J f...,1 c3 o o.
!
o (=1 a_ .00
0'.00 6'.00 lb.00 1_.0o 2b.oo _.00 3b.0o
ALPHR Figure 30(a).
CL vs ALPHA, DS = -5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = o.g
DC
SYMBOL RUN
124 0
125 -10
A 126 -20
ORIGINAL P._ _c.
c _. F_; OF POOR QUALITY " C_ Z,,,,,, O _D
,::;-
O t,_ o
,=;-
c_ O
,80 -b,4o o'.oo o',4o oleo _'.2o l'.BO
2'.00 CL Figure 30(b). CD vs CL, DS = -5, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = o.g
SYMBOL RUN OC
O [] . I24 O I25 -I0 -20 "' I26 O4 ORI_NAL P AG_:! _ / OF PoOR QUALr|'Y /m" C_ e C::).
I ._J (_# I O ,B C__ I C:)_ I m c_ I ).80
-b._o o'.oo o'._o t;%o I'._o _'.eo _'.oo
CL.
Figure 30(c). CLMS vs CL, DS : -5, Configuration 2, BETA : O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
m 127 -20 0 128 -10 A 133 o OF pOOR Q UALt.__; o o o w o o _o ,.-I o o o 6" o o.
I o o.
! !
I
.00 o.co 5.oo t'o.oo tt_.oo _b.oo _t_.oo 3b.co
RLPHR Figure 31(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS : I0, Configuration 2, BETA : O, MACH = 0.6 lOl
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 127 -20 O) 128 -I0 ¢D ORIC_NAL PAC_ i_ _-" ¢,.
OF POOR QUALll'_ g,- kO O r-1 ¢_> ¢D B Q_ .80 -b.40 O',OO 0_°40 O'°8O I_°£0 11o60 2_,00 CL Figure 31(b). CO vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] I27 -20 -10 A I33 13 O N ORIG4NAL PAG_ _ O OF POOR QUALITY (:3 c) C_ I O
_?-
T- --J (J !
O e C__ !
LO C3.
I C:) f.D C3 !
.8O -b.4o oLoo oL4o o_eo t_2o tLeo 2'.00 CL Figure 31(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = I0, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBGL RUN
[] 134 -I0 (!) 139 -20 ± 140 C3 ORIGINAl- PAG_ _ (:3 C3 OF POOR QUALITV OJ" C3 (43 *= 9-i C3 OJ C3 (:3= (_J C3 ,q- (Z>" C3 C3 O0 C_ I i | I I 2B. O0 30.00
to .oo t's .oo 2'o .oo
.oo 0.00 5.00 RLPHR CL vs ALPHA, DS = 10, Figure 32(a).
2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9 Configuration
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 134 (!) 139 -10 ,_ 140 -20 o ¢0 o" ORIGINAL PAG_ _ OF POOR QUALITY t_ &- &- o u) o o o ,t &- (.3 o o" o &- c) ,I,-4 e.
c) (::3 o °-0,80 ' i 0 I. 40 , , , , -0.40 0o00 0.80 I .20 I .60 2.00 CL Figure 32(b). CD vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
DC
RUN
SYMBOL
[g -I0 13B (5 -20 A 140 LO OLO0 OL40 0'.80 I'.ZO 1'.60 Z'I.00 • 80 -_ .40 CL Figure 32(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration O, BETA = O, MACH : 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
D8
[]] 108 0 112 _" 123 -6 + 133 I0 O'.CO 6'.00 1_.00 1_ .00 20,00
3b.oo
RLPHR Figure 33(a). CL vs ALPHA, DC = O, Configuration 2, BETA : O, MACH : 0.6
SYMBOL RUN D8
[] 108 0 0 112 5 m 123 -5 + 133 IO C} OO t" 0" C) (D C)" C) bO C)" C_ r-1 (__) (_" OJ O C)" C) !
J !
2.00 -'0.40 O'.CO 0'.40 Ol. BC I .20 I .60 C_-O.80 CL Figure 33(b). CD vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH : 0.6
8YMBOL RUN
D$
[] t08 0
(B 112 6
z_ 123 -6
+ I33 10
{: ORIGINAL PA_,_E '_'_: OF POOR QU 'AL_'TY .J (J !
I c3.
!
J- .80
-b.,o o'.oo oL,o oleo t',zo
It.80 2',,00
CL
Figure 33(c). CLMS vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH : 0.6
DS
SYMBOL RUN
[] 117 5
-.5
(D 124 ,_ 134 ORIGINAL PAC_._ _ OF poOR QUALiTY' O e e,_,l _ e CD- ..-I U e (:::)_ !
_.oo 3b.oo
'-5.C0 C.00 5.00 t0.00 1_.00 20.00 ALPHA Figure 34(a). CL vs ALPHA, DC = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DS
[] 6 0 -6 1,24 t34 10 o g0 o" ORIGINAL PA_.,_ i,_ o OF POOR QUALi_Y B o (D 6- o it3 6" o 6" r_ L.)
0_ 6- o oJ e o o e-i o o ! ! I I I • c°-o .@C -0.40 0.00 0.40 0.80 1.20 1.60 2.00 CL Figure 34(b). CD vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DS
I17 (Z) I24 -5 ,a 134 I0 tn ORIGINAL _-,,r,.r ,':_ I -z __ <,.,I .,Z ,,,321 OF POOR QUALITY Q 0 ° -.
_O_" _r ._J U o_ I o D.
I o.
!
co ! !
'-0.8C -0.40 0.00 0'. 40 0'.8C 1_. 20 1.60 2.00 CL Figure 34(c). CLMS vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 2, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 129 -I0 0 132 ORIGINAL PA_ ;_ OF POOR QUALt_"_f
oo
o" ._J u 0_ I I 0") C_ = 0.
I C_ _" -'L, I i I , 6'.00 81,00 '-6.00 ,00 -2.00 0,00 2.00 4.OC 8ETR Figure 35(a). CLL vs BETA, DS = 10, 0.6 Configuration 2, ALPHA = 10, MACH =
S'(,'iBOL RUN
DC
[] 129
-lO
(D 132
o
CD ° C_ ORIGINAL PA_ _ OF POOR QUALITY C_ z ._J (.3
?-
?-
?-
] '-6.00 ' ' 0'. O0 ' ' -4.00 -2.00 2'.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 35(b). CLN vs BETA, DC = 10, Configuration 2, ALPHA : 10, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 129 -10 (D 132 ORIGINAL P/:,JI_I_!_ _:_ w-4 OF POOR QUALITY (:} C).
I bO i,-,4 !
C) C:_.
-4.00 .00 O'.O0 2.00 4'.00 6'.00 8'. O0 '-6.00 BETR Figure 35(c). CYS vs BETA, DC = 10, Configuration 2, ALPHA = 10, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-I0 [] 130 D (!) 131
°I
i"ORIG(NAL PAGE OF POOR QUALITY 8 .CO 6.00 B.O0 -4 .CO -2.00 O.O0 2.00 4,00 BETR Figure 36(a). CLL vs BETA, DS = 10, 0.6 Configuration 2, ALPHA = 15, MACH =
S'(,'IBOL RUN
DC
r,-! 130
-I0
(D 131 o ORIGINAL r :_-_- OF pOOR QUALITY o
6-
o i _ I I | | -4.00 - .00 0.00 2.00 4.00 fl'.O0 8.00 BETR Figure 36(b). CLN vs BETA, DS = I0, Configuration 2, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
DC
-10 0 131 PAG;. _':"
om(_N_L "_'
OF POOR QUAL_T=' !
M3, !
C) O,I CI !-6.00
-'4.oc -_ .co o'.co 2'.co 4'.oo s'.co 8'.co
BETR Figure 36(c). CYS vs BETA, DS : I0, Configuration 2, ALPHA : 15, MACH : 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC RLPHR
[] 129 -10 I0 (D 130 0 10 131 -10 15 + 132 0 I5 6- o ORIGINAL PAGE ._ 6" OF POOR Q_JALiTY e_ O, 0.
I i I I I I I I 8.00 -4.00 -2.00 0'.00 2.00 4.00 , 6.00 BETR Figure 37(a). CLL vs BETA, DS = 10, Configuration 2, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUr_ ALPHA
-"q 129 -I0 0 130 0 I0 -_ 131 -I0 + 132 I5 C_ (r3 ORIGINAL PAGE I_ OF POOR QUALIT_ _ I ! !
-'4 .CO -2.00 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 6.00 8 .CO BETA Figure 37(b). CLN vs BETA, DS = 10, Configuration 2, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC FtLPHQ
[] 129 -I0 I0 O 130 0 I0 • -_ 131 -I0 IE; + 132 0 15 =;.
I u_ =;.
I o ¢:), !
I u .00 -4,00 ,00 O,OO 2,00 4.,00 6,00 _.CC BETR Figure 37(c). CYS vs BETA, DS = 10, Configuration 2, MACH : 0.6
DC
RUI_
SYMBOL
1:35 -10 I"38 (2) O0 C_ !
8.00 6.00 4.00 -4.OC -2.00 D.O0 .00 BETR Figure 38(a). CLL vs BETA, DS : 10, Configuration 2, ALPHA = 11, MACH : O.q
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 135 -I0 E) 138 ,ml- ORIGINAL PAGE ig OF POOR QUALITY or# C:) i i 1 !
I
-_.oo 4z.oo o'.oo 2.oo ,.oo
.00 6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 38(b). CLN vs BETA, DS = I0, Configuration 2, ALPHA = II, MACH : 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 135
-10
(D 138 C) OJ O" ORIGINAL PAGE t_ OF POOR QUALITY 0"
?-
C)_ I 0_ I CD_ !
! I ! I
_-6.00 -'4.oo -_.oo o'.oo 2.oo 4.oo
6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 38(c). CYS vs BETA, DS = 10, Configuration 2, ALPHA = ii, MACH = 0.9 12_
SYMBOL RUN DC
(!) 137 -I0 O" ORIGIN/_L P"_-G_ii_ OF pOOR QUALITY w=l C)'
,_-
_jl_" o.
?-
!
0.
I I ! !
= __ = i l .00 -4.00 .00 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 BETr3 Figure 39(a). CLL vs BETA, DS : 10, Configuration 2, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] -I0 0 137 ORIGINAL PAGE _',T OF POOR QUALIT_ _ C_ C:) C_ C:) ! I -'4.00 -_ .00 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 39(b). CLN vs BETA, DS = 10, 0.9 Configuration 2, ALPHA = 16, MACH =
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 136 -IO 0 137 LID ORIGINAL P.,"_,G_ _$ 6" OF POOR QUALITY (:3 !
CD (:3 !
I-6.00 -4.00 .OO 0.00 2'.00 4'.00 6.00 8.00 BETR Figure 39(c). CYS vs BETA, DS = I0, Configuration 2, ALPHA = 16, MACH = o.g
SYMBOL RUN DC ALPHA
[] 135 11 O (D 136 -I0 11 137 0 + 138 -I0 1B -It (:_" ORIGINAL PAG_Z _t!: OF POOR QUALIT# C_" l l
d
C) ?- C) D_ I o'} C) , c__ I C_ C_ !
'-6.00 -'4.00 -'2.00 0'.00 Z'.O0 4'.00 6.00 B .00 BETFI Figure 40(a). CLL vs BETA, DS = I0, Configuration 2, MACH = 0.9
RLPHR
DC
SYMBOL RUN
O
[] 135
-I0
(!) 136 A 137
-10
0" + _ 138 ORI(_NAL PP.G_ i_
o_
6-
0" Z _" o,.
o"
?-
?-
¢3 !
'-s .oo -_, .oo -_ .oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo 6'. O0 8.00 BETR Figure 40(b). CLN vs BETA, DS = 10, Configuration 2, MACH = 0.9
DC RLPHR
SYMBOL RUN
135 11 [] -I0 Ii 0 136 -I0 + 138 16 O ¢,J ORIGINAL PAGE '_ OF POOR QUALITY .-4 O_ I O_ I ! ! ! I 8.00 '-6.00 -'4 .oo -_ .oo o'.oo 2 .oo 4 .oo 6.00 8ETR Figure 40(c). CYS vs BETA, DS = 10, Configuration 2, MACH = 0.9
SYNBOL RUN DC
[] 143 0
(D 144 -10
A 145
-20
o ORIGINAL P,_G_ __ OF POOR QUALITY o o t% ,; o _P o.
I w o I
o'.oo ¢.oo zb.oo zk.co _b.oo _v6 .oo 3b .oo
.00 RLPHFI Figure 41(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = 10, Configuration 3, BETA = 0, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 143 (9 144 -I0 -20 C_ GO o tO a C:) bO (3" C_ (__ c) c3" i 6- C_ C3" C_ C) !
_-0.80 -'0.40 0'.00 0',40 0'.80 " • .20 I .60 2.00 CL Figure 41(b). CD vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
143 0 O I44 -10 _' 145 -20 L'q & ORIGINAL P:S_;£ _ OF POOR Q6ALFFY v-I
&
I1 ill I B
00, _
_l ¢.J !
o.
I @ C_, I !
-_D .40 O'.O0 O'.¢O 0'.@0 I'._0 ),,80 t',eo 2'-00 CL Figure 41(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = o.g
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 146 -20 0 14'7 -I0 O O&" ORK_4NAL PAC_ I_ O OF POOR QUALITY I_ ,r-=I ,,-,I .--I (.J CC)" 0" C) O.
I I I i ! # -S .00 0.00 5.00 10.00 I_.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 RLPHR Figure 42(a).
CL vs ALPHA, DS = 10, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-20 [] I46 O 14'7 -10 A 148 0 o W =;- ORIOINAL PAGE |g OF POOR QUALITY o r'.
6" o (o o I13 =;- o 6- C3 (.3 =;- oa 6- 6- o ! ! ! l !
o 2'. O0 J ,80 -_.40 0.00 0,40 0,80 1.20 1.60 CL Figure 42(b). CD vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL
RUN
DC
[] -20 (b z_ -10 14B O (D Q ORIGINAL PAGE |@ OF POOR QUALITY 0-40 B0 1.20 @O CL OO Figure 42(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = 10, Configuration 3, BETA : 0, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
rq 149 0 O 150 -I0
A 151 -20
ORIGINAL PAGZ ;3 OF POOR QUALITY
o'.oo s'.oo tb.oo zk.oo tb.oo
_t_.oo ab.oo
RLPHR Figure 43(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = -5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 149 0 150
-I0
-20
C) (::)" ORIGINAL pAGF-. _ OF POOR QUALITY C:}- b_ C)- C_ C:)" rm CJ C_ C_ O- t-4 C:}- °-0.80 _b ! I I ! l .40 O'.OO 0.40 0.80 1.20 I .60 2.00 CL Figure 43(b). CD vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
149 0 -10 0 I50 A 15I -20 era" ORIGINAL PAGE |g OF POOR QUALITY o.
,?.
_,o..
._1 ¢_) I ,,IP I t:3,.
I ¢0 ¢= !
-b.,+o o'.oo o'.,+o oleo ?.zo 1'.eo 2:oo
.8O CL Figure 43(.c). CLMS vs CL, DS = -5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 152 -20 0 153 -I0 ,_ 154 0 C_ L'_l" oRIGiNAL PAG_ _ (Z) OF pOOR QUALITY Owl" _0 I GO (J C_ C)" (Z) C_ (Z}_ | (_ CO (Z)
'-5.oo o'.oo 5'.oo _b.oo _is.oo 2b.oo _is.oo 3b.oo
RLPHR Figure 44(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = -5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
DC
._ 152 -20 E) 153 -10 "_ 154 o 6- o ORIGINAL PAGE |_1 OF POOR QUALITY c} ¢D 6" it} =;- c} 6" C_ =;- ¢3 g-q C3 o_ ! I !
I !
u .80 -b.40 0'.00 0.40 0.8C t.20 I .60 2.00 CL Figure 44(b). CD vs CL, DS = -5, 0.9 Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = SYMI_OI.
RUN
BC
[] -20 (5 -I0 (:} ORIGINAL PA_ '_: OF POOR QUALITY &- =_- (:) _=_ =__ !
o_- ..J (__ _r_ I ,¢ I bo (:}.
I (z) (D o '- -80 -b.4o OLDo 0'°40 o'.eo 1_2o 1'.so .00 CL Figure 44(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = -5, Configuration 3, BETA = , MACH : 0.6
DC
RUN SYMBOL -20 [] -10 o A + 2O X
2b .00 3b.oo
o'.oo s'.oo tb.oo tt_.oo zb.oo RLPHR Figure 45(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = 5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 156 -20 0 157 -I O + 159 lO X 160 O CO O" (:D CD" CD (.O (D" I,D (:3,- CD (:3- tm C3 O 0_ (3" O C_ O (:3" O C_ I ! i 1 °-0.8o -'0.40 0'.00 0'.40 0 .BO I .20 I .BO 2.00 CL Figure 45(b), CD vs CL, DS = 5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYHBOL RUN DC
El I56 -20
(9 157 -10
,k I58 0
+ 159 1,0 O
X 160 2O
O O
=;-
!
/,..= 0o9- ._!
(J Q El.
I C:I O.
I ¢:3 ¢3.
I
==
e J ._0 -b.40 0'.00 0'.40 O'.eO t'.£O t_.eo _.00
CL
Figure 45(c). CLMS vs CL, DS = 5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL. RUN DC
r13 161 20 (!) 162 10 163 0 + 164 -I0 X 165 -20 .d" ORIGINAL p_C_ _,_.'
OF POOR QUALIT"/ •.
_-4 O O_ C_ O0 0- (..)
C_ O" C_ C:)" C)_ !
C_ CO C_ 3_3 .CO
o'.oo s'.oo _'o .oo _% .oo 2'o .co 2ks .oo
'-5.00 RLPHR Figure 46(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = 5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 161 0 162 I0 A 163 0 + 164 -I0 o X 165 -20 W 6"
1'
o 6" ¢0 6- U3 6- o _P 6- t_ (J o 6- 6- ¢} Q-q 6- o c} e_ ! ! !
!
- .80 -b .40 0'.00 0'.40 0 .ec z .20 ! .60 2.00 Ct.
Figure 46(b). CD vs CL, DS = 5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 16I I0 I62 D -I0 + I64 X I65 ,4- &- r,, C_ I .
u_'- "s-" d c) r- L I I e O.
I I 21.00 - .80 CL Figure 46(c). CLMS vs CL, DS : 5, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
-I0 m 167 (D 168 A 169 I0 o mi" o o ORIGINAL PAG_ _r_h OF POOR QL_AL_I_f o £- o Q 6- o ml.
6" o o o.
I o w o I ! !
.CO o'.oo 6.oo to.oo tt_.oo 2b.oo
2k.oo
ab.oo
RLPHR Figure 47(a). CL vs ALPHA, DS = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 167
-10
(D 168 ± 169
I0
GO O" ORIGINAL PA_ _t_ OF POOR QUALITY O" C) bO e= O" r-1 O" ¢d 0" e-4 O" ! !
C>-O.80 -'0.40 0'.00 0'.40 O',BC I'.20 1.60 2.00 CL Figure 47(b). CD vs CL, DS = O, 0.6 Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH =
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 16"/ -I0 (D 16B A 169 0 O4 0.
I _r -.J ¢.)
Q 0.
!
(3 I I t_ O.
I
%
).80 -_o40 Oi.oo 01.40 01.80 1_20 t_.eO 2_00 CL Figure 47(c). CLHS vs CL, DS = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
D8
[] 148 0 154 -5 + 168 N" C.} oF pOOR QU_L_'f_;' o=4 9=4 0O C} _J CJ C) CD" C3 E) (12)- (112).
I GO I I l_(_ .00 o'.oo e.oo _b.oo _.oo _b.oo _.oo 30.00 ALPHA Figure 48(a). CL vs ALPHA, DC = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN D$
rq 148 (D 154 -6 -4' 163 + 168 o :o c3 ORIGINAL P_ _; 6" _,._ i_-.
OF POOR QU._L,_f o ¢D 6" o G" o =;- C_ (.3 o e o o 6- o 6- o o o l ! I I I ¢_-0.80 -_.40 0.00 0.40 0.8C 1.20 I .60 2,00 CL Figure 48(b). CD vs CL, DC : O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
D8
[] 0 154 -5 + 168 C3 (3 (3 ORI_NAL PAGE IS OF POOR QUALITY (3 O4 (3 =;- C) (3 coO,.
d o C) &_ I (3 _4 (3 I C:)_ I E) _r E) I ] ,80
-b.4o oLoo o'.4o o'.8o I'.2o I'.6o 2'.oo
CL Figure 48(c). CLMS vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DS
[] 143 10 O 149 -5 " 158 5
o'.oo 5'.oo tb.oo tts.oo _b.oo
2t_.oo 3_.00
RLPHR Figure 49(a). CL vs ALPHA, DC = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DS
[] I0
-s
0 149 158 5 O" O" ORIGINAL PAGE FJ" OF POOR QUALITY o O" O" Q.)
12:1" (::3"
I
°1
°-0.8o -'0.40 0'.00 0',40 0'.80 1'.20 1'.60 2'.00 CL Figure 49(b). CD vs CL : 0.9 Configuration 3, BETA = 0 , MACH
SYMBOL RUN
D8
[] 143
I0
O 149
-5
,_. 158 ORIGINAL PAGE ig OF POOR QUALITY (:3 Q m°,- =, 0.
I m I o ,q.
I -b.4o o'.oo 0'.40 o'.eo t'.zo 1'080 21,00 CL Figure 49(c). CLMS vs CL, DC = O, Configuration 3, BETA = O, MACH = o.g
RUN
SYMBOL. DC
[] 171 -20 1'72 -i0 1"15 + I0 X 181 20 (:3 ¢Xt- OF pOOR QuAL|_' O _O o ¢.3 ¢Xl !.
O (D J C3 CD" (:3 C3- O CD_ I C3.
I !
-5.00 o'.oo 5'.oo i'o.oo I%.oo 2'5. O0 3'0.00
20.00 FILPHFI Figure 50(a). CL vs ALPHA MACH = 0.6 Configuration 4, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN
DC
m 171
-20
(D 172
-I0
A 175 + 178
I0
o
X 181
LO C3 O} C3
.so -b.4o
0',00 0;40 0;e0 z'20 _L_ 2:00
CL
Figure 50(b). CD vs CL Configuration 4, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] t7! -20 -I0 t72 t75 + 178 X 181 20 &- e.
/
t ._1 6.
!
O4 !
I I .80 t'.60 2',00 CL Figure 50(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 4, BETA : O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
OF POOR QU,,",,L;TY -I0 [] I73 O I76 I0 ,_ 179 .J Crj A- '::'- z.oo -_oOO -_ oOO o'.oo z'.oo 4'.oo e'.oo e',oo BETR Figure 51(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = I0, MACH = 0.6 SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 173 -10 (9 176 I0
0ms_L p_s_ __2 /
_ (:D- _'4 C) oo ZO- O.
o,_ o_ , CD.
I (n C_ O.
I (D C) I •00 -_ .OO -h,O0 O',OO 2b.O0 4LO0 8LO0 8'.OO BETA Figure 51(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = I0, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] I73 -I0 (D 176 0 I0 ,_ 179 UD a .'c, • _- -_ ORIGINAL r-:-,_.-.,,:. {_ OF POOR QU,_LITY II ¢:1 !
°00 -_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo 6',00 e'.oo BETR Figure 51(c). CYS vs BETA =0.6 Configuration 4, ALPHA = I0, MACH
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] I82 0 (D I85 -I0 I86 I0 `4- C:3 ,4- ORIGINAL P_3,_'_ t_ OF POOR Q_AL11"%' t...D O o f,.D (:3 `4_ Q ._j`4- --.I t'-,, `4- (:3 -_ Q ,4- `4'"
.oo 4.0o Jz.oo o',oo 2',oo _'.oo _,oo ;'.oo
BETR Figure 52(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = II, MACH = 0.9
OC
SYMBOL RUN
m I82
-I0
I0
Q Z _ .J Q O1 I O4 _o !
0.
I I
.00 -:_ .00 -_z.O0 o'0o _'LoO 4'.00 S'o0 8"00
BETA Figure 52(b). CLN vs BETA Configurati0n 4, ALPHA = ll, HACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
m 182 (D 185 -I0 i0 OF pOOR Q":" :: I.O I oo cn I,D CD_ I • l I tO I I | I '-3.00 -4,00 -2 • O0 0'. O0 2'. O0 4 • O0 0', O0 8 _.O0 BETR Figure 52(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = II, MACH : 0.9
SYHBOL RUN DC
[] 174 -I0 0 177 O ,_ 180 IO ORIGINAL _ _-"_ _ OF POOR QLh_LITY t
-_,,oo -_z.oo o'.oo W.oo 4'.oo s'.oo e'.oo
3,00 BETA Figure 53(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = 15, HACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBSL RUN
[] 174 -10 I0 C_ 6- a I Q Z --J (_) Q 0_ I Q.
!
0_ I ! !
I -4.00 -2,00 01.00 2',80 4'.08 8L O0 81.00 3.00 BETA CLN vs BETA Figure 53(b).
MACH Configuration 4, ALPHA = 15, = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
rn 174 -I0 (9 177 A 180 IO o I I OR;_?T '" _T .... • ' " OF PCJ_:: : .'.
W ¢3
-_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2'oo 4'.oo e',oo e'.oo
BETR Figure 53(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 183 0 O 184 -I0 J', 18"/ tO &- ORIGINAL PAGtE '_>._ OF POOR QUALiT_ q_ .J __J C3 g_ ! !
-4°00 -2.00 0'.00 2°.OO 4'°00 6*°OO 8',00 3,,00 BETR Figure 54(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN 00
m 183 0 184 -I0
• _ 187 10
ORIGINAL PAtS _i, OF POOR QUALii"V c_ D o o I ¢:) Z ._l _.)
Q O_ !
!
O.
!
l -_,.o0 -_z.oo oLoo 2'.oo 4=.oo eJoOO 8'.oo °00 BETA Figure 54(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN 0C
[] 183 0 _D 184 -i0 m, 187 i0 F"a kO m.,,,.m ORIGINAL PA G_£ ;_i,_ OF POOR QUAL:T%" O 0.
I OD (-h l.O !
C_ 0.
I I ¢.# '-6.00 -_.oo -_.oo o'.oo z'.oo 4'.oo 8'.oo s'.oo BETR Figure 54(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 4, ALPHA : 16, MACH : o.g
DC
SYMBOL RUN -20 -I0 o 190 A I0 + 196 2O o X 199 o o ORIGf_,IAL PAGE ._ L OF POOR QUALI'i'_" •I o ._J C.J (;:3 o o -gr c3_ !
o am (__ I I I I .00 o.oo B.oo to.oo _t_.oo 2b.co z_.oo 3b.oo RLPHR Figure 55(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
[] 18g -20 Ig0 -i0 + 196 I0 e-_ X 19g 2O •m ,q =;- r_ =;- -b,40 01,00 0_o40 o'.Bo It,20 I1,60 2}.00 CL Figure 55(b). CD vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
6YMBOL RUN
DC
-20
-I0
&
+
I0
X 199
W
&-
(i)
&-
&-
-J (J 0_ I
&
I ¢_.
I I ].80 0'. 40 0', 80 2t, O0
CL
Figure 55(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 200 -20 (!) 201 -10 206 0 + 207 10 X 210 20 Q ORIGINAL PAGE _ OF POOR QUALITY tO O0 __I (_J (:3 C_ O_ I QO I 1 I 30 .CO
o.co 5.oo _'o,oo ts .oo zb.oo z'5 .oo
'-5.00 RLPHR Figure 56(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = O.g
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-20 -10 A + 207 X 210 ¢o ORIGINAL P_:'=_""_' ¢,.. OF POOR QUALt1Y ¢3 ¢D (:3 r-_ ¢3 ¢3 Q c__ 3.80 -1).4o o*.oo o_.4o o'.eo I'.2o Z'oSO 2'.oo CL CD vs CL Figure 56(b).
=0.9 5, BETA = O, MACH Configuration
SYMBOL RUN
0C
[] 200 -20 -10 + 207 ¢D X 210 2O U3 C_ _D @9 CD (D i.-e _o_- __J CD ¢D_ I CD 6_ I ¢D _4 ¢D_ !
(D (O ¢D J .8O 1J,60 _, O0 CL Figure 56(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = o.g
SYMBOL RUN
DC
m 211 O -I0 A I0 o o o ORIGINAL PAGE i_ OF POOR QUALITY o W £- o _J o .,..I o c) c_ o I o @o c_ !
i .00
d.oo s'.oo tb.oo t_.oo 2b.oo 2_.oo 3b.oo
ALPHA CL vs ALPHA Figure 57(a).
MACH 5, BETA = O, = 1,2 Confi guration
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 211 0 212 -10 _O &- c_ o co c3 t_ c_ c3 sT) t C3 B.
!
w i w t ),80 I', 60 - ,40 O,O0 0.40 0,80 1.20 2.00 CL Figure 57(b). CD vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 211 0 _) 212 -I0 A 213 I0 W ORIGINAL PA.:_ _-c, OF POOR QUALiI'V' ¢3" o Q ¢::J.
!
C_ o ¢:) I ),,BD
-b.4o o'.oo o'.4o O'oeO £.2o ¢.so 2',00
CL Figure 57(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN MIZICH
[] 195 0.6 O Z06 0.9 ." 211 I .2 OJ- OF POOR Q UALilil'_' C_J- OJ C.J C) O" 0- 0_ I l I
o.oo 5.oo _'o.oo _'5.oo 26.oo 2's.oo 3'0.oo
'-5.CO RLPHR Figure 58(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 5, BETA = O, DC = 0 1,32
SYMBOL RUN
MACH
[D 195 0.6 O 206 0.9 & 211 1o2 ¢3 {O ORIGINAL PAC_;Z ;:'3: C) OF POOR QUALI]_ " (D &- c_ u_ =;- _r _3 (J ¢:) &- C:3 w,,,41 &- o_ ),,80
-b.,o o'.oo o'.,o o'.8o £.2o 1*.so W.oo
CL Figure 58(b). CO vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN MRCH
n7 I95 O .8 (!) 206 0.9 '_' 211 I ,2 LO ORIG4NAL PA_'_ ';$ OF pOOR Q UALI_'_t o e_ c_ &- (D ._l C_ I I C_ i CO c_ i ,8O -_0,40 0'.00 0'.40 01.80 t*,20 1_,60 2°,00 CL Figure 58(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 5, BETA = O, DC = 0 18_,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] I9I -10 (D 194 0 A 197 I0 'r_ ORK_AL P_r_ -+, ,.S:
"1 "---.-"-
j°
I O,I e O.
I Q I I
.oo -:_.oo -]z.oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo s'.oo s'.oo
BETR Figure 59(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA = I0, MACH : 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 191 -10 (!) 194 0 ,4, 197 10 _r_
i-
Z _-
?-
?-
J
I I I l •00 -4,00 -2,00 Ot,O0 2'o00 4'.on 8"08 8 i, On BETR Figure 59(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA : 10, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
ORIGINAL P-'_C:';;_-_ _:_: [] 191 -I0 OF POOR QU_LFi-_;; O 194 I0 & 197 o W ¢3 ¢:3 I >- LJ
o=
!
¢3 !
uO Q ¢3.
I &%l J S.O0 -_4,00 -_.00 O'.O0 2'.00 4',00 6'.00 8',00 BETR Figure 5g(c). CYS vs BETA MACH = 0.6 Configuration 5, ALPHA = i0,
SYMBOL RUN
DC
E] t92 -_0 (D t93 t98 _0 I ¢3 !
I I I ' I -4 .OO -2 ,OO Oi.O0 2.00 4_,00 6,00' 8_.00 3.00 BETR Figure 60(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
6YMBOL RUN DC
t'rl 192 -1o
(D I93 0 OR! AG4_,_,_. pAGe. 19Fj 8 10 (:3 ZC_ -
d
?-
¢3.
I ml" ¢:) I
• oo -_.oo Jz.oo o'ooo 2'.oo 4'.oo 8'.oo 8'.00
BETA
Figure 60(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA = 15, MACH _ 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] -10 192.
(!) 193 A I0 I98 ORIGINAL PAGE to OF POOR QUALITY tO ,r,,I ¢3_ I C) ¢,,I C_ !
-_.oo -_z.oo-o'_.oo 6'_o00
|oOO 2', O0 4'. O0 8'. O0 BETA CYS vs BETA Figure 60(c).
MACH =0.6 Configuration 5, ALPHA = 15,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 202 -10 0 204 0 A 208 ORIGqNAL PACE _ OF POOR QUALITY O_ ¢3.
I ¢:}= !
i_
-:4.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2',oo 4'.oo s'.oo e',oo
|.00 BETR CLL vs BETA Figure 61(a).
MACH =0.9 5, ALPHA = 10, Configuration
DC
8'fMBOL RUN
-10 rrl 202 'E) 204 ,_ 208 ORIGINAL PAGE IS OF POOR QUALITY &- (:3 Z -.J I !
!
-_..00 -_2,00 0',00 2',00 4*,00 6',00 °00 8.00 BETR Figure 61(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA = I0, MACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-10 [] 202 (D 204 A, 208 10 ¢: W tQ !
D ¢:) !
R
oOO -_,,oo -_.oo o'.oo 2'.o0 4'.oo
s',oo et.oo BETR Figure 61(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA : 10, MACH = 0.9
RUN DC
SYMBOL
203 -:10 .m 2O9 I0 Q I o-.J I ¢3 Q 81o OO 6',OO
! ' 2',00 4',oo
• 00 -4.00 -_.00 0_,00 BETR Figure 62(a). CLL vs BETA =0.9 Configuration 5, ALPHA = 15, MACH
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 203 -so
205 0 ,_ 209 10 o ORIGINP',L PAGe: _' OF POOR QUALITY I1" o I 3,00
-_.oo -iz,oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo s'.oo e'.oo
BETA Figure 62(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.9
8YMBOL RUN DC
• [] 2O3 -10 205 O ,_ 209 10
i
OF pOOR QUALITY: !
8 ,OO BETA Figure 62(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 5, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 215 -10 0 216 I0 '_ 217 _-_ _.-_.,._ __I OF POOR QUALI_'=_ GO ,mr O.
!
I
.00 o'.oo s'.oo tt_.oo tt_.oo _b.oo
2t_.oo 3b.oo
ALPHR Figure 63(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 6, BETA = O, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL
RUN
DC
_g 0
@ 2t6
-10 A I0 c_ OF POOR QUALF¢'_
/
c_ L) c_ -b -40 0'.00 0'.40 0'-80 .80 t'-2O t'.60 2'.00 CL Figure 63(b). CD vs CL MACH = 1.2 Configuration 6, BETA = O,
SYNBOL RUN DC
[] 215 0
(3 216 -I0
_' 217 10 ¢3 ORIG|NAL ""_ ,¢ OF POOR QUALITY O_
¢;-
rt
¢;-
I: LJ (:)_ I ¢:3.
!
t ¢_.
I ¢:}_ '- ).80 -b.40 0'.00 OL40 0'.80 I.'.20 _'80 2"00
CL
Figure 63(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 6, BETA = 0, MACH = 1.2 SYMBOL. RUN OC m 218 I0 (D 221 15 • ,_ 224 0 + 225 -10 X 228 -20 CAD e_ (-3 O.
I | ! !
t-6.00 o.co 5.oo {o.oo z'z.oo 2o.oo 2!z.OO sb.oo ALPHR Figure 64(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 6, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
218 IO
22I 15
A 224 0
+ 225 -I0
X 228 -20
o"
g
MP t..j L'4 o-# o ).80 -b .40 0'.00 0'.40 0',80 t'20
t',eo 2'.00
CL
Figure 64(b). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 6, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9 oRIGiNAL pAGE Ig
SYMBOL RUN DC
OF pOOR QUALITY [] 218 I0 (D 221 15 z_ 224 0 + 225 -10 ¢:3 X 228 -20 ¢_"- ¢:} C:) .-J C.)
C) t c_ I ¢::} ,,.-__ i ¢,j c)_ I x" ,l¢ !
,eo -b,4o o',oo o'.4o o'.eo I'.2o 1'.so z_.oo
CL Figure 64(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 6, BETA : O, MACH =0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
229 -20 O 230 -I0 A 235 0 + 236 I0 o X 239 15 o o PlU_NAL PAGE ';_ POOR QUALrrY o o o _J (_} o o o ,q.
o.
I o o, ' .00 o'.oo s'.oO tb.oo lb.oo
_b.oo e_.oo ab.oo
ALPHA Figure 65(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 6, BETA : O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 229 -20 0 230 -I0 + 236 X 239 16 ¢3 OD ¢3 C_ ¢3 &- Z3 LO o- "11" &- t-t t.J o _0 ¢3 ol o- c) o .80 -_) .40 0'.00 0".40 O'.SO {.20 t".60 2_.00 CL Figure 65(b). CD vs CL Configuration 6, BETA = O, MACH : 0.6
SYHBOL RUN DC
[] 229 -20 O 230 -10 A 235 0 + 236 10 X 239 15 =;- ¢;- C_ ¢o°, - ._1 C.)
¢;_ I I o I o o ¢:> i _°80 -b,4o 2', O0 CL Figure 65(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 6, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
HRCH
RUN
SYMBOL
O.B m 215 0-9 O 224 1.2 A C_ C_ ORIGINAL PAGE _!; OF POOR QUALITY o C_ B C_ e CJ ql" o- C_ C_ C_ 0.
I C_ I I I I
o.oo 5.oo 1'o.oo ls.oo 2'o.co _%.oo 3o.oo
'-B.00 ALPHA CL vs ALPHA Figure 66(a).
DC = Configuration 6, BETA = 0,
SYMBOL RUN
MRCH
El 216 0.6 0.9 A 235 1.2 ORIGINAL P__:L _ OF POOR QUALITY ¢3 ID ¢3 C3 (J
Iil
N ¢;- ).flO -b.40 0',,00 0'.40 0'.80 I'-20 l'.BO 21-00 CL Figure 66(b). CD vs CL Configuration 6, BETA : O, DC : 0
SYMBOL RUN MFICH
[] 215 0.6 224 0.9 235 I .2 c) to o ORIGINAL PAGE ._,_ OF POOR QUA LII'_/ c_ O'z c,,I _c_" .r .._.1 r...J r,, c:) c).
I c_ i ,,,.-.
c).
I i
.8O -b.4o o'oo oL4o o"eo t'2o ¢.so 2'.oo
CL Figure 66(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 6, BETA = 0, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 219 tO O 223 O 226 -10
i"
¢_" ORK_NAL PAGT- _ OF POOR QUALITY
__I, °
i
&- '3.oo -_4.00 -_ .00 0'.00 2'.00 4',,00 8i.00 8',.O0 BETR Figure 67(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 219 I0 (b 223 0 A 226 -I0 c_ o
]
i
Z ._.1 tJ !
!
.oo -_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo £.oo 4'.00 e'.oo
8'.00 BETA Figure 67(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = II, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
rn 219 I0 (_ 223 O ,'_ 226 -10
o
ORIGINAL _- OF POOR Q_,..j_ ,i LO
=;_
I ¢:) I
-1 .oo -_z .oo o'.oo 2,oo £.oo s'.oo e'oo
.oo BETA Figure 67(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 231 -10 234 0 • _ 237 I0 ORIGI,_,L PAGE P3 OF POOR QUALITY Q o a o ¢:3
- o00 -_,.oo -_,oo o'.oo 2'oo 4'.oo e'.oo e'.oo
BETA Figure 68(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 10, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUtd DC
[] 231 -10
(9 234 0 23'7 10
6-
m.
¢:}" 0"
=;-
z¢_"
d
o.
?-
o'} o ¢:}.
I o ¢3, | | I v_ .00 -_, .oo -_z .oo o'.oo 2 .oo 4 .oo s .oo 8'. O0 BETR Figure 68(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 10, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 231 -10 0 234
-_ 237 10
¢::) i l-,,,# ORIGINAL PAGE ¢D OF POOR QUALI "T'_'; ! ! I !-6.00 -'4.00 -_Z .00 0'.00 2'.C0 4 .DO 6.00 8 .CO BETA Figure 68(c). CYS vs BETA MACH Configuration 6, ALPHA = 10, =0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 220 10 O 222 O & 227 -I0 ORIGINAL PAGE I_ ¢.,,.
OF POOR QUALITY ¢D / O \ ,=;- @ o00 BETA Figure 69(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA : 16, MACH = 0.9
DC
RUN
SYMBOL
I0 [] -I0 22'7 !
",,1" 8'-00
-'4.60 -_.oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo e'.oo
i_ ;.00 BETR Figure 69(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 16, MACH = o.g
SYMBOL RUN DC
ITl 220 I0 0 222 O A 227 -10 ORIGINAL PA_E _' OF POOR QUALITY LO Lo I ¢3 ¢3 I .00
-W .oo -_z.oo o'.(_o 2'.oo ,¢.oo e'.oo e'.oo
BETR Figure 69(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 232 -10 (D 233 0 _, 238 10 f,., t::) ol_l_L PAG_ _3 OF pOOR QUALIT'_ t_ °00 BETA Figure 70(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 15, RACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 232 -10 O 233 0 _, 238 10
=;-
==
@ Z _" -.J q#,,,( I (:3 @ P.._.
I ¢:_.
I Q ¢:3.
I -_..00 -_:.00 0_.00 2'.00 4'.0o 8LOO 8"00 _.00 BETR Figure 70(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 6, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN
0C
[] 232 -I0 (3 233 O
,k 238 10
Cq e ORIGINAl, PAGE rJ' o OF POOR QUALI'FY c_ g- R O" O_ I C_ I !
G o !
-_, .00 -_' .00 0'.00 2'.00 4'-00 8'-00 8".00 .00 BETR Figure 70(c). CYS vs BETA MACH = 0.6 Configuration 6, ALPHA = 15,
RUN DC
SYI'IBO[.
[] 241 242 10 A 0 -I0 + 244 -20 X 245 o ORIGINAL PAG_ _" OF poOR QUALITY E," C2 OJ £- (o _J C.J c} 6- o o ,=;- C2 C2.
I ! !
_b.oo 2_.oo 3b.oo
I-$.00 o.oo s.oo lb.oo d3.oo
RLPHR Figure 71(a). CL vs ALPHA MACH = 0.6 Configuration 7, BETA = O,
DC
RUH
SYMBOL
[] 241 -10 + 244 -20 X 245 GO C) O t"- O C_ I,D C) O B O D (.J O B O w.
O _=_ e C) O I I I ! I I _-o .Bc
-'0.40 o.oo o.4o o.eo 1.60 2.00
:, ,20 eL Figure 71(b). CD vs CL 0.6 MACH = Configuration 7, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 24t 0 242 + 244 -10 c_ X 245 -20 ORIG;NAI/PAGE 19 OF pOOR QUAI.ffY 4c_ c,t
,4-
,=;-
d I c_ c4 .,-% I _c_ c3.
I J- oSO -b .40 I_,60 2_.00
CL
Figure 71(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 7, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
RUN
SYMBOL
-20 [] 246 -10 24?
249 I0
+ x C) (D ORIGINAL PAGE I_" OF POOR QUALITY t=l C) •o _=_ O (O (_- (_J C_ 6- O O C} (_.
I C_ (O I
2_s .oo sb.oo
I-5.00 o.oo _.oo zb.oo 1!s.oo 20.00
ALPHR Figure 72(a). CL vs ALPHA MACH = 0.9 Configuration 7, BETA : 0,
SYMBOL RUN
DC
-20 O 247 -10 A 248 O + 249 X 25O ORIGINAl- PAGE l_' OF POOR QUALITY -b .40 0'.00 0'.40 0'.80 I'.20 1'.80 21,00 CL Figure 72(b). CD vs CL Configuration 7, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9 \
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 246 -20 OF pOOR QUALI'_ -I0 248 0 249 10 X 250 c_ C_l &- c_ o C_ co_- d c_ w c_ !
c_ !
c_ o_ I e-1 I -b,4o o'.oo o',4o o_.eo t'oZO 1'oeO 2_ooo ] ,80 CL Figure 72(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 7, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
on_L PAQ_ _t
El 252 10 POOR QUAL] ,'r_ (D 25? O a_ 258 -10 + 259 -15 X 260 -20 |
o'.oo s'.oo tb.oo tt_.oo 2'o.oo 2_.oo
30.00 RLPHR Figure 73(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 8, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYHBQL RUN
DC
[] I0 -I0 + -I5 X 26O -20 (3O g_ (D =;- Q (D O LID g- r-) (..)
o =;- (:3 C:_" - .80 -b .40 0'.00 0',,4.0 0'.80 1'.20 1'.60 2'.00 CL Figure 73(b). CD vs CL MACH : 0.6 Configuration 8, BETA = 0, L%I Q • m o =.
©?-
-J ¢..)
O o4 O.
I !
I I_
).eo -b .40 0'.00 o'4o oleo {°20 {.eo 2'.00
CL
Figure 73(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 8, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6 :ii,,ii
SYIIBOL RUN DC
rq 265 -20 266 -I6 ± 267 -10 + 268 C) 10 X 273 ,,,¢ OBIGINAL PAGE _ POOR QUALITY
i1
-5.00 o'.oo s'.oo 15.oo tt_.oo sb.oo 2t_.oo sb.oo
RLPHR CL vs ALPHA Figure 74(a).
Configuration MACH =0.9 8, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 265 -20 O 266 -IB A 267 -IO + 268 X 273 I0 O
@
_D U) (D C_ C_ O O I-4 Q_ _- .80 -b .40 0'.00 0'.40 0'.80 I'.20 2=.00 1'.80 CL Figure 74(b). CD vs CL Configuration 8, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 265 -20
(9 286 -I5
,_ 267 -I0 + 268 0
0 X 273 Io
o c_ C) c_ .J G C)_ I C_ !
C).
!
I,D o I_ ).80
_o.4o o'.oo o'.,,o #.eo A2o t'.eo W.oo
CL
Figure 74(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 8, BETA = O, MACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
I0 [] 2?5 O 280 A -I0 -15 + 284 -20
c} X 285
Q
! !
!
.00 zb.oo zt_.oo
0.00 5.00 26.00 3b .00 ALPHA Figure 75(a). CL vs ALPHA MACH = 1.2 Configuration 8_ BETA = O,
DC
SYMBOL RUN
I0 [] 2"/5 0 280 & -I0 -15 + 284 -20 X 285 o _D o" ,,.-..
ORIGINAL PAGe. _ OF POOR QUALITY o &- t'_ tJ, e_ o (:D o o 21.OO -b .40 o'.oo o'.4o o'.flo II. 20 1'.80 - .80 CL Figure 75(b). CD vs CL Configuration 8, BETA : O, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
rrl 278 IO O 280 0 ,k 283 -I0 + 284 -15 o" X 285 , -20 " ORIGINAL P_,G_ ;_ OF POOR QUALITY .=.
0" ==.
Q= =..
(.to: I 0.
I 0.
I ¢} W I.
-b .4o o'oo o'4o oleo t'=zo t'eo =zLoo
) 40 CL Figure 75(c). CLMS vs CL MACH = 1.2 Configuration 8) BETA = O)
SYMBOL RUN MnCH
O.B [g 25?
268 0.9 A 1.2 28C ORIGINAL P_E_ _ OF POOR QUALI'rY C:) tO I ! I
o.oo 5.oo t'o.oo tt_.oo 20.00 30.00
25.00 RLPHR Figure 76(a). CL vs ALPHA DC = 0 Configuration 8, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN MRCH
[] 257 O .6 O 268 0.9 A 280 I .2 O CO ,=;- c:) t', o ¢D etg O e t_ ¢:) O C3 B o .80 -b -40 0'-00 0'.40 O'-flO 1'.20 {.80 2'.00 CL Figure 76(b). CD vs CL Configuration 8, BETA = O, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN
MRCH
[] 25'7 0.6 0 268 8.9 z_ 1.2 tcJ cz_ ORIGINAL PAG_ _ o OF POOR QUALITY cz_ c_ .--I o o_ I &_ !
0- I !
.rio
-b.4o o'.oo o'.4o o'.eo t'.2o t'.6o 2%0
CL Figure 76(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration DC = 8, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN DC
rrl 263 I0 _D Z58 0 26I -ZO 0 ° ORIGINAL PACT _3 OF POOR QUALITY e ¢:)" I I @ I_ 3.00 -_.. O0 -_Z.O0 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 8'.00 @_'.00 BETA Figure 77(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = lO, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 253 I0 266 0 • '_ 261 -20 ,=r c_ ORIGINAL PAGF-. ',_ OF POOR QUALI'P/ -_ -00 -_Z -00 0'.00 2'•00 4'.00 8'.00 8'.00 BETR Figure 77(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 10, MACH =0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 253 I0 (5 266 0 Z_ 26I -20 ID ORIGINAL PAG_ _"
c;-
OF POOR QUALITY I ¢3 I N
-_.oo -_.oo o_oo 2'.oo 4Loo e'.oo 8'.00
1.00 BETR Figure 77(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 10, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 254 I0 ,3 255 O .'_ 262 -20 o o ORIGINAL PAG_ ._- &- OF POOR QUALITY I c:_ o_ I & I -O0 -_1.00 -_Z .OO 0'.0O 2'.00 4'-00 6',, O0 8'.OO BETR Figure 78(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 264 I0 (9 255 0 a, 262 -2O
'I
Q -_ .00 -_.00 0'.O0 2'.00 4'.00 8'.00 eLO0 '-§-00 BETA Figure 78(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
ITI 254 Io
(3 255 O
,_. 262 -20
Q ¢,,I .
I.,o ORIGINAL PAGE _._ OF POOR QUALITY I u3 I I .00 -'4.00 -_ .00 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 6'.00 8L00
BETA
CYS vs BETA Figure 78(c).
MACH =0.6 Configuration 8, ALPHA = 15,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 264 -20 0 269 0 A 2'72 10 0- R .ORIGINAL; PAGE ;;9 o- OF. POOR QUALITY I o g-t =.
I In c:_.
I A I_
•oo -:_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2'.00 4'.oo 8'.oo
s'oo BETA Figure 79(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = I0, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 264 -20 (_ 269 272 10
-_ .oo -_z.oo o'.oo W.oo 4'.OO 8'.00 8'.OO
oOO BETR Figure 79(b). CLN vs BETA =0.9 MACH Configuration 8, ALPHA = 10,
SYMBOL RUN DC
ITI 264 -20 O 269 0 Z_ 272 I0
c;-
ORIGINAL PA_,,_ |9 OE POOR QUALITY !
I &%l ,I I_ -_4• O0 -_ • O0 0'. O0 2 *. O0 4_. O0 8'. O0 8'. O0 I.O0 BETR Figure 79(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 10, HACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 263 -20
(9 Z70 0 z 271 I0 (:3 *i C) d- OF POOR _...,.., i Y (D_ !
-W- I -4.00 .00 0'-00 2'.00 4'-00 6'-00 81.00 B.O0 BETA Figure 80(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
El 263 -20
IO
z_ 271 -_ .00 -_ .00 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 8',00 8'.00 BETR Figure 80(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 16, MACH : 0.9
SYMBOL RUN
DC
[] 263 -20
"_- 271 IO
Q t.D I C) C:b I .oo -W.oo -_.00 0'.00 2'.00 4'.00 8'.00 8'.00 BETR Figure 80(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9 (JRIGINAL '" L_ OF POOR QUALITY SYIIBOL RUN DE [] 276 10 (D 279 O ,_. 28t -I0 + 286 -20 =-.
0" o
?
o.
I O.
I ¢3 r% |m 3.oo -_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2'.00 4'.oo s'.oo fl'.O0 BETR Figure 81(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 276 I0 (9 279 0 "" 281 -I0 + 286 -20 ORIGINAL PAG;_ OF POOR QUALITY !
-_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2:oo 4"00 e'.oo e'.oo
BETR Figure 81(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 11, RACH = 1.2
SYHBOL RUN DC
[] 278 I0 E) 279 0
& 281 -10
+ 286 -20 -_,.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2'.o0 4'.00 e'.oo e*.oo BETR Figure 81(c). CYS vs BETA Configura.tion 8, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 277 I0 (9 278 O ._, 282 -IO -,- + 287 -20 oF poor QuALrr', ED-
?
r-__ I 0- I g.
' .0o -_.oo -_z.00 o'.00 2_.00 4'.0o e'.00 8'.00 BETR Figure 82(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 1.2
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 277 IO
(9 278
-IO
_& 282
-20
+ 287 _P o I u 8'.00 81.00
1.00 -W.oo -Iz.oo o'oo 2"00 4'.oo
BETR Figure 82(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 8, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 2'77 IO 0 Z78 O A 282 -IO + 287 -20 ORIGINAL PAGE 18 OF POOR QUALITY (:3 C:}.
I • O0 -_ .00 -_Z .O0 O'.O0 2'.00 4'.00 8'.00 81.00 BETA CYS vs BETA Figure 82(c).
MACH : 1.2 8, ALPHA : 16, Configuration
DC
SYMBOL RUN
-20 rn 290 (9 291 A, 292 o ORIGINAL P_,GE iS o OF POOR QUALITY o ¢,D o4 (o G- ,.-I (_) ¢3 ,=;- o ¢3 c}.
I o ¢o !
,00 o'.o0 #.oo i'0.oo tt_.o0 2b.oo iTS.00 3b .oo
RLPHR Figure 83(a). CL vs ALPHA MACH = 1.2 Configuration 9, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 290 -20 291 0 ,k 292 CD e_ t", o ORIGINAL PAGE P3 OF POOR QUALITY g- g- <,..)
&- t -_ -40 OI-O0 0'-40 O'.flO 1'.20 II-80 21-00 ) .80 CL Figure 83(b). CD vs CL Configuration 9, BETA : O, MACH = 1.2
SYMBOL RUN DC
El 290 -20 291 0 & 292 I0 I ORIGINAL pP,GE _] OF pOOR QUALITY.
?
0" =..
,=
i
I O lain a. ).80 -b.40 Oe.O0 OT.40 0"80 1'o20 1'.60 9-'.00 CL Figure 83(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 9, BETA = O, MACH = 1.2
SYHBOL RUN DC
[] Io
0 296 -20 C) C%l" ORIGINAL PP.,C,_ _' C_ C) OF POOR QUA!_!'_.
0,I" C:) LO ,-4 C_ o_ i-i C_ ¢0 e_ C3 ...J' (._) C) e C:) C) B ¢::) C).
I C) _0 C_ I i | '-5.00
o.oo 5.00 tb.oo t_.oo 20.00 2b.oo 3b.oo
ALPHA ¢L vs ALPHA Figure 84(a).
= 0.9 MACH 9, BETA = O, Configuration ORIGINAL pA_i_ ;'i; OF POOR Q UALi'_'_
DC
8YMBOL RUN
tO rn 293 E) 296 -20 a, 299 =.
t"-
==
¢: r-., L) P] =;- ¢:3 O4 ¢:) t-I ¢;- l: ¢: e,= m_ -tl.40 0'.00 0'.40 O'.eO I'.20 t'.eO 2'.00 ) .80 CL Figure 84(b). CD vs CL Configuration 9, BETA = 0, MACH = 0.9
SYNBOL RUN IDC
[] 293 I0 E) 296 0 '4' 299 ,20 o ¢3 &%l O o o_°, - z; .._1 o4 ¢Z, I O ¢3_ I !
ID I_ -b .40 0',00 0'.40 _)_@0 1.b.20 i'd.so 2',00 ] .80 CL Figure 84(c). CLMS vs CL MACH = 0.9 Configuration 9, BETA : O,
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 302 -20 O 305 0 ,_, 308
I0
o o ORIGINAL ...... " _
,4-
POOR QUALITY o £- w ...I (.J ¢:3
=;-
C3 ¢=.
I O CO C3 !
.00 o'.oo s'.oo z'o.oo _'s.oo £o.oo 2_ .oo 3_ • O0
RLPHR Figure 85(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration 9, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 302 -20 (!) 305 A 308 I0 c_ OF pOOR Q,jAL_,I_" u_ @ C}" C} m c_ -_! -40 0'.00 0'-40 0'.80 1'.20 ['-60 21.00 } -80 CL Figure 85(b). CD vs CL Configuration 9, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
DC
SYMBOL RUN
0] 302 -20 (D 305 0 A I0
&
&
&
Q
co,:-
..J IN I 0.
I '41"
9-
I m
),00 -b.4o o'.oo o'.4o 0'.e0 _L_ ,'_m 2"00
CL Figure 85(c). CLMS vs CL Configurat.ion g, BETA = O, MACH = 0.6
MACH
RUN
SYMBOL
1.2 [] 291 0.9 O A 0.6 C_ _ _ OF POOR QUALT_'Y C) C) e i _.I CO i_ ¢:) I ! I I
2b.oo _t_.oo ab.oo
5.00 o.oo s.oo lb.oo tt_.oo
RLPHR Figure 86(a). CL vs ALPHA DC = 0 Configuration 9, BETA = O,
SYMBOL RUN MQCH
[] 291 1.2 O 296 0.9 0.6 ,_, 306 ORIGINAL _;"_ _ ;_ OF. POOR Q U;L_-_"
&
r-_ (.3 C_ N c_ es.
¢)- ).eO -b • 40 0'.00 0'. 40 0'. eO 1'. 20 1'.60 2'.OO CL Figure 86(b). CD vs CL Configuration 9, BETA : O, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN MRCH
[] 291 ! .2 CD 296 O.9 ,_ 305 0.6 tO ORIGINAL PAGE |g OF POOR QUALITY t_ o I c_ &.
I t_ o I I }.80 -_).40 0'.00 0'.40 0'.80 t'-20 t'.60 2'.00 CL Figure 86(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration 9, BETA = O, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 294 10 (D 29? 0 -'_ 300 -20
=-
ira m
ORIGINAL i _-_I_-_ i_ O OF POOR QUALiT_ o4 0.
¢3" O |,.
._1 ¢:l
d
o ,?,.
o @ ¢3 '- 3.00 -'4.oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2"oo £.oo eLoo e'.oo BETR Figure 87(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration g, ALPHA = II, MACH = o.g
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 294 10 (9 297 0 .,,, 3DO -20 o00 BETR Figure 87(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 0.9 , 270
BYMBOL RUN DC
[] 294 lO R) 29'7 0 " 300 -20 o tN ORIGINAL PAC_ _ OF. POOR QUALLTY
\
I.O Q
-_.00 -]z.00 o_,oo 2'.oo 4"oo
BETR Figure 87(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration g, ALPHA = 11, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DO
[] 295 10 0 298 0 ., _ 301 -20 o.
O" _, oRIGINAL oPAG'i IS OF POOR UALITY I !
B'. 00 6,,00 I 13 .on A .oo -_z.oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo BETR Figure 88(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
rrl 295 10 (9 298 0 & 301 -20 ORIGINAL PAC_ '_ OF POOR ,,_.......
-_.oo -_z.oo o'.oo z'.oo ,;'.oo e'.oo e'.oo
BETR Figure 88(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
DC
SYMBOL RUN
[] 295 (!) 298 -20 ,_ 30I fD e ORIGINAL PAG-_ ig OF POOR QUALITY LO
\
I O I ¢:) I 6°.00 8.00 I -_' ,00 0',00 2J.O0 4'.00 .00 -4.00 BETA Figure 88(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 16, MACH = 0.9
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 303 -2O 306 0 & 309 I0 =;- ' ORIGINAL PAG_ _1 _ OF POOR QUALITY o 0.
!
e =- 3,00
-_ .oo -_.oo o'.oo 2'.oo 4'.oo e'.oo e:oo
BETR Figure 8g(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 10, MACH : 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 3O3 -20 0 306 0 ,_ 309 I0 C_ C_ C_ Z¢_" __J & C_b C_
_.00 '_.oo -_.oo o'.oo 2',oo ,',oo 6_,oo £,oo
BETA Figure 89(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = IO, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 303 -20 E) 306 0 ,& 309 10 ORIGINAL p_,i_ _ w OF POOR QUALI'TY M • :4.oo -_.oo o'.oo z'.oo , O0 8', O0 BETR Figure 8g(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = I0, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 304 -2.0 307 0 ,', 310 I0 g-
\
\
",II" C_ I 2_ i i ! i i ; ,00 • OO -2,00 0,00 2,00 4,00 6,00 fl',O0 BETR Figure 90(a). CLL vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA : 15, MACH = 0.6 ORIC_NAL PAGE i$ OF POOR QUALITY
SYMBOL RUN DC
[] 304 -20 0 307 0 A 310 _0
-W.oo -_z,oo oLoo :_Loo 4*.00 e'.oo e'.oo
BETR Figure 90(b). CLN vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6 L;YMUUL I,_UN UC El 304 -20 0 307 O ,_ 310 I0 OE. POOR QUALITY I l I I I _,00 -4.00 -2.00 0.00 2,00 4,00 6,00 BETA Figure 90(c). CYS vs BETA Configuration 9, ALPHA = 15, MACH = 0.6
SYMBOL RUN MRCH
ORIGINAL PAGE b_ [] 3 i 2 I. 2 OF POOR QUALITY 0 3 1 3 O. 9 z_ 314 0.6 o o o t_ o o ¢o ..J t..J o ,ql" o o o ,ql'.
o.
!
o ao o !
0'.00 s'.00 tt_.00 tt_ .00 eb .00 _t_.oo 3b.oo
.00 RLPHR Figure 91(a). CL vs ALPHA Configuration i0, BETA = O, DC = 0
SYMBOL RUN MACH
[] 312 1.2 O 313 0.9 ,a 314 0.8 (:D ORIGINAL PAC._ _ OF POOR QUALm'V{ ¢m, O') &-
i
&- c) I ! I !
!
) .80 -0,40 0'.00 0.40 0.80 1.20 1'.60 2.00 CL Figure 91(b). CD vs CL Configuration 10, BETA = O, DC = 0 ORIGINAL PAGE __ OF pOOR QUALITY
MACH
1.2
0.9
0.6
I .=.
co"
==
e_ o
,,?-
.=
I_ 2_.00
_.eo -b.40 0"00 o'40 o'eo z'.20 1"so
CL Figure gl(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration I0, BETA = O, DC : 0
SYMBOL RUN MRCH
[] 316 :J.2
0 31'7 0.9 318 0.6 C) ORIGINAL PAGE IS OF POOR QUALITY (1) o B.
_.J fJ C3 C3 (:3.
I C3 ! !
l_S O0 0.00 B.O0
lb.oo d_.oo 2b.oo 2_.oo 3b.oo
RLPHR CL vs ALPHA Figure 92(a).
Configuration 11, BETA = 0 ORIGINAL P A_:::g {_ OF POOR QUAL!T'Y
SYMBOL RUN
MACH
1.2
m 316
0.8
(9 31"7
0.8
A o O IQ ¢:3 r-i c3 c:3 I,-I
4-
,p o O Q_ -b • 40 0'. O0 O'.4.0 0'. 80 1'. 20 1'. 80 2'. O0 ) ,80
CL
Figure 92(b). CD vs CL Configuration 11, BETA = 0
SYMBOL RUN MACH
[] 316 1.2 (D 317 0 .g ± 318 0.6 URIGINAL PAGE ]]51 OF POOR QUALITY ;zz ...I !
!
Q !
,, :,..
e- t 2_.00 " I'.20 it.60 0_o00 0_.40 0'.fl0
- ,.eo -b.,_o
CL Figure g2(c). CLMS vs CL Configuration ii, BETA = 0 3. Recipient's Catalog No.
1. Report No. 2. Government Acc_sion No.
NASA TM-85909 5. Report Date 4. Titleand Subtitle August 1984 X-29A Longitudinal and Directional Force and Moment 6. Performing Organization Code Supplemental Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Results 8. Performing Organization Report No.
7. Author(s) H-1257 Albion H. Bowers 10. Work Unit No.
9. _rformingOrganizationNameand Addre_ NASA Ames Research Center 11. Contract or Grant No.
Dryden Flight Research Facility P.O. Box 273 Edwards, California 93523 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Technical Memorandum 12. Sponsoring Agancy Nameand Address National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20546 RTOP 533-02-81 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Aerodynamic data from NASA Ames Research Center's ll-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel are plotted for the i/8-scale X-29A forward-swept wing aircraft model.
Eleven configurations were tested to provide supple- mental data to investigate single surface failure modes, complex nonlinearities, and model buildup.
These data can be used for control system refine- ments, pilot training, flight planning, and aerody- namic model validation. Data are presented as corrected wind tunnel data without analysis to docu- ment results that are being used for the aerodynamic model.
18. Distribution Statement 17. Key Words (Sugg_ted by Author(s)) X-29A Wind tunnel force and moment data Forward-swept wing Relaxed static stability 19. Security Classif. (of this report) J 20. Security Classif. (of this paga) I 21. No. of Pages I 22. Price"