Skip to main content

NASA-TM-X-56492 · Materials for the mach 3 supersonic transport

NASA (NTRS) · 1964

Open the PDFPublic domain · NASA (NTRS)Technical Reports

Overview

Materials and alloys for Mach 3 supersonic transport

Pages
·
5

Key points

  • The Mach 3 supersonic transport represents a significant advancement in aircraft technology, tripling the speed of current commercial transports.
  • The estimated cost for each Mach 3 aircraft is around 20 million dollars, with development costs ranging from 500 million to 1 billion dollars.
  • The aircraft is expected to operate at high temperatures, with the nose and leading edges reaching up to 600°F and the hottest parts near the engine exhausts reaching 1200°F.
  • Titanium alloys have been identified as the most promising materials for the aircraft structure due to their low density and strength retention at high temperatures.
  • Corrosion resistance is crucial for the supersonic transport, particularly against sea salt, as it will frequently operate over oceans.
Frequently asked questions
What is the expected speed of the Mach 3 supersonic transport?

The Mach 3 supersonic transport is designed to operate at speeds of Mach 3, which is approximately 2,000 miles per hour.

What materials are being considered for the aircraft structure?

Materials being considered include titanium alloys, superalloys, and various types of stainless steels, with titanium being the most promising due to its properties.

What are the temperature challenges for the Mach 3 aircraft?

The aircraft will experience high temperatures, with the nose and leading edges reaching up to 600°F and the hottest parts near the engines reaching 1200°F.

Why is corrosion resistance important for the supersonic transport?

Corrosion resistance is important because the aircraft will frequently operate over oceans and encounter sea salt, which can cause significant damage.

What is the estimated cost of developing the Mach 3 aircraft?

The development costs for the Mach 3 aircraft are estimated to be between 500 million and 1 billion dollars.

Document

# r .

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20546

H

L o t: i (CATEOORYI Materials f o r t h e Mach 3 Supersonic Transport

t R t R G C 1 George C . Deutsch

Chief, Materials Research Program

LI - - 1 2 I

rn Office of Advaxed Research and Technology M i Z i 5 ;

2 0

0 ; F Presented at the bhterials Division = E Q P

: .Iz American O ~ h m c e Association

o r n I T a + ( 3 0 Dayton, Chici, St.;?tember 23-25, 1964 The program t h a t I w i l l present has b e w - j o i n t e f f o r t of t h e NASA, t h e Air Force, axla the FAA. It i s a l i t t l e ak-bcrdtto diswss t h e Mach 3 supersonic transport at this time b e ~ a ~ r c it seems t o m e t h a t everytime I pick-up a t e z h i c a l magazine they are having a special issue devoted t o t h i s airplane. &en slach p?ablicatior;,s a t Time, Newsweek, t h e Washington Post, and t h e N e w York Times have %&%?ly carried lengthy a r t i c l e s I abmt t h i s airplan,?. This, of C S O ~ S S , mema t h a t what I a m about t o say I s hardly novel. Ho~?vcr, I hope t o EL? some new ideas o r perhaps some I grs&er detail t o what may have beer- said before.

% It may be well to dwell f o r a mimte OE the reasons why t h i s airplane has received so much publlcity. The !These a x dmwn i n my first figure.

first itam is t h a t t h e &ch 3 S.xp?r~mic Warsport represents a major Tx oae step t h i s airplane w i l l more than afivaxe i n a i r c r a f t technology.

t r i p l e the speed of' o'ctr p s e s e ~ thighly developed commercial transports.

This is, I believe, an excitizg pessibflity to contemplate. The second r e t t ~ o i i s that the airplane i s t h e o33ect of much international competition.

W h e z I read abwt t h e i n t e r x k i s c a l competition i n t h e W a l l Street Journal, they p o h t out t h a t t h e sales of t h i s airplane can make as much as nine billion iio33ars difference i n t h e gal? f l o v to o r from t h e United States.

Ircidentally, t o date the foreign m d domestic a i r l i n e s have placed Other publications stress $100,000 deposites f o r 91 of these a i r c r a f t s .

the Imprtm-ce of this a i r p a ? as a psastige item t o c l e a r l y establish The f i n a l item i s the tlle Vr-itsd States as pre-emir,e,r;t ir! techfiology.

hign cost of t h i s airplane. Ekch a i r c r a f t i s estimated t o cost w e l l i n C X ~ C O E H of 20 million dollars--and t o achieve the first one requires a development program that costs betw?eg five hundred miliion and one b i l l i o n dollars. It is, therefore, m t x m 1 t h . t ; t h i s airplane would arouse much comment. I w i l l discuss each of these items i n somewhat greater d e t a i l as ., However, before doing so, I would l i k e t o refresh your memory I gc along.

about what t h e airplane looks l i k e .

Figure 2 is an artist's conception of w h a t t h i s aillplaae might look l i k e .

Many versions have appeared i n print, and t h i s picture i s an a r b i t r a r i l y selected one. It i s introduced t o indicate not w h a t w e believe i s t h e preferred configuration but t o serve as a useful guide on which t o base t h e discussion. The temperatures t h a t w i l l exist i n the various p a r t s of the fuselage when t h e airplane is flying a t a speed three times t h e velocity of sound, about 2,000 miles per hour, a r e shown. It can be seen t h a t t h e nose of t h e airplane and t h e leading edges of the wings and t a i l operate a t temperatures as high as 6 0 0 0 ~ , and the r e s t of t h e fuselage i s 4500F o r higher. The hottest parts of the airplane a r e near the engine exhausts and nacelles where temperatures Yange as high as 1 2 0 0 ' F .

Figure 3 lists t h e goals f o r the performatlce fo7 t h i s airplane. It i s hoped that by about 1970 a preliminary version w i l l be available t h a t w i l l perfcrm s a t i s f a c t o r i l y at a speed of Mach 2.3. It should carry about 150 passengers, and it w i l l be propelled by four turbojet engines of types t h a t e x i s t today. A short time Later t h i s same airplane fuselage i s t o be upgraded t o a speed of Mach 3 by i n s t a l l i n g four engines of types that a r e currently under development. By 1975 w e would l i k e t o make another change i n t h e same fuselage and upgrade its speed t o about 3.5 by i n s t a l l - ing s i x turbojet engines that a r e currently i n t h e i r i n i t i a l phases of development. I have t r i e d t o s t r e s s t h a t t h e aircraft structure t h a t w e w m t t o bulld originally should peyfom s a t i s f a c t o r i l y over the e n t i r e $ range of conditions shown i n the figure. I n additio3 t o t h e specifications In t h e chart, the s i r l i n e s hvve stated tha% f o r t h i s plage t o be com- nerclal3.y a t t r a c t i v e it should have a l i f e of at l e a s t 10 years of tThich 30 t o 50,000 hours a r e t o be a t rated. speed. It i s t h i s last feature _I_ t h a t of having a long iifetime that dif'fezeiitiates t h i s airplane from t h e A - 1 1 and t h e XRB-70. If you stop t o think about the numbers i n the chart you come c p wLth t h e v e r j exciting concepi; of an airplane t'mt w i l l make day, &y a f t e r day.

+'ov.r txa?satlantic crossSngs per To a t t s i n an airplane that will do t h i s job, one can hypothesize with assurance tkt a l l t h e materials for the supersonic transport will present problems. Such items as t i r e s , glazing materials, radomes, and hydraulic fluids and systems a l l have t o be improved before they w i l l perform satis- t h e bulk of t h e effort t o date has gone i n t o t h e study f e c t o r i l y . However, of t h e skin and fuselage materials an6 it i s i n t h i s area that I w i l l principally comment.

of t h e air-

Figure 4 shows t h e effect of a i r c r a f t speed on the temperatu-

c r a f t structure. W e can see t h a t a t the point a t which present a i r l i n e s operate today--just below Mach 1 --there i s very l i t t l e change i n temperature; however, above t h i s speed the temperature r i s e s veAy rapidly so a t Mach 3 Also shown i n t h e figure i s t h e strength it, i s s l i g h t l y i n excess of 500°.

of various mater-tals as a percentage of t h e i r room temperature strengths.

!The lowest cxme i s 2219, a s t r u c t u r a l aluminum alloy. W e can see t h a t i n t h e v i c i n i t y i n which we a r e interested, between Mach 2 and 3 the strength .

of t h i s a loy falls off very rap Ily. The t tanium alloy, 6-4, a l s o decreases i n strength as does the preciptation hardening s t e e l , AM 355, but not so precipitously as does t h e aluminum alloy. The best a l l o y i s the nickel alloy, INCO 718 which i s degraded only s l i g h t l y by t h e tem- perature. On the basis of t h i s figure one can eliminate t h e aluminum alloy. The remaining alloys must then be considered i n greater d e t a i l .

Figure 5 lists the properties that are required t o make f u r t h e r selections.

These properties include the conventional strength, forming, and joining parameters that are considered f o r every airplane. However, because of t h e high operating temperature we a r e also forced t o consider t h e metal- l u r g i c a l s t a b i l i t y of the alloy.

The metallurgical s t a b i l i t y i s t h e a b i l i t y of the a l l o y t o r e s i s t such processes as relaxation and aging, and t o r e t a i n i t s strength and toughness f o r the desired l i f e time.

O n t h e basis of such a list it would appear that t h e selection might be quite easy and it i s only necessary t o turn t o standard handbooks. This is not at a l l t h e case. The use temperatures are outside t h e range f o r which these alloys are normally considered and t h e l i f e times are beyond those used i n design.

Therefore, most of the work accomplished t o date has been t o accumulate the data required f o r selection purposes.

Figure 6 lists the alloys t h a t were considered. Our i n i t i a l job w a s t o survey these alloys t o obtain t h e properties I showed on t h e previous figure. The l i s t contains titaniums, superalloys, and both preciptation hardening and austenitic s t a i n l e s s steels. The titaniums included alpha and t h e alpha-beta alloys with particular emphasis on t h e alpha. A representative selection of iron, nickel, and cobalt-base superalloys were a l s o included. The list of alloys contained 24 candidate materials and when one considers t h e fact that several were considered i n more than one of' heat treatment it becomes apparent that the selection t a s k i s condition indeed formidable.

The data i s presented on a strength- Figure 7 shows some of the results.

to-weight r a t i o basis t o simplify comparisons. A most interesting feature of t h e figure i s that the titanium has proved t o be t h e most promising material. The reason is, of course, the low density of titanium. The two v e r t i c l e shaded bars indicate where t h e British-French Concorde and the United States airplane f a l l . W e can see t h a t the Concorde has been selected t o operate a t a range j u s t below that a t which t h e properties of aluminum This figure also i l l u s t r a t e s the f a c t that t h e Concorde doesn't decreases.

have t h e growth potential that we hope t o incorporate i n our airplane. For exatrple, t h e United States' airplane was set t o operate on t h e flat part of the curves, at temperatures reasonably below t h a t at which t h e s t e e l and titanium lose t h e i r strength.

Many newspaper accounts of t h i s airplane suggest that we a r e a l s o competing with t h e Russians; although, I have seen no definitive material on Russia's airplane, a good guess is t h a t one of the materials t h a t t h e Russians a r e looking at i s dispersion hardened aluminum a l l o y f o r t h e structure of the a i r c r a f t . This w i l l put them i n a temperature range with the United States rather than the Concorde.

Earlier I talked about t h e large volume of data t h a t i s being obtained.

Some of t h i s i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n t h e Figure 8. This data was obtained w i t h specimens t h a t have been suspended i n a furnace f o r very long periods of t i m e . The chage of strength t h a t may have taken place i s measured. W e can see t h a t now data f o r as long as 22,000 hours a r e available and that t h e data iooks very good. N o significant chaxges I n strength can be detected w i t h titanium o r the preciptation hardened s t a i n l e s s s t e e l s . O n t h e other hand, the austenitic s t e e l s that were strengthened by severe cold working have deteriorated badly. It i s only since significant quantities of such data and p a r a l l e l data obtained from loaded specimens a r e available that we f e e l confident i n our a b i l i t y t o build a plane having t h e desired l i f e .

(?ne important consideration that the materials must have is t h e a b i l i t y t o withstand the presence of cracks. This a b i l i t y i s shown i n Figure 9 f o r the three temperatures of i n t e r e s t t r , the airplane. The low temperature (-109°F) i s the ambient temperature at the cruise a l t i t u d e , room temperature t h e temperature a t which t h e airplane w i l l take off, and 55OoF the normal ope;.ating temperature f o r the s t r x - l u r e . As i n t h e pmceeding figure, the strength has been divided by the density t o permit comparisons between alloys.

The sha?.!ed bars give the smooth specimen strength and t h e solid black bars t h e strength i n t h e presence of a one inch crack i n the eight inch wide specimen. Tne 8-1-1 titanium, i n t h e t r i p l i x annealed condition is superior on t h e basis of t e n s i l e and notch strength at every temperature except 55OoF, The design people where t h e same alloy i n the annealed condition excelled.

l i k e t h e type of numbeP"s shown i n this figurs. The titanium i s r e l a t i v e l y insensitive t o cracking and they point out t h a t t h i s amomt of decrease i s less weakening then i s present i n %he aluminum alloys i n some of our present subsonic commercial transports.

Figure 10 a l s o deals w i t h the abi1i';y o f ' a material t o keep operating i n the presence of cracks. O n "cis figure we have plotted t h e r a t e at which a crack w i l l grow under cyclic loading conditions. The figure contains an a1u.num, a s%air,less s t e e l , a i d a titmi- alloy. It can be seen that t h e

m t e s;t which the crack gram is lowest f o r t h e titanium a l l o y - but t o m e

t h e most surprising fea-hre or' the f i g J r e is that t h e r a t e i s considerably l m e r than f o r t h e 2024 alumincm--an alloy we cozlsider t o be of the "fail- s d e " variety.

Thus far we have considered what a r e cmdidate materials f o r the structure of supersonic transport an& how do they stack up with each other. One other factor t o be considered i s corrosion resistmce. The supersonic transport is expected t o operate primaTily from a?rpoi+x i n the v i c i n i t y of t h e oceans and spenl! rrmch of its flyiiig t i m e over these oceans. It appears very l i k e l y it w i l l f r e q u w t l y encounter sea salt. 1% i s of course e s s e n t i a l that it be Figure ll shows t h e able t o resist t h e corrosive effect of t h i s salt.

behavior of titanium i n t h e presence of sea salt as a f'unction of the s t r e s s This figure was prepared from a compilation of a l l and exposure time.

It can be seen that at a published data available t o date and i s at 65OoF.

Stress of about 20,000 p s i t h e titanium alloy i s r e s i s t a n t t o s t r e s s corrosion cracking f o r very long times. It can also be seen t h a t above a stress of about 100,000 p s i f r e c t u r e occurs i n a very short t i m e . A t intermediate n stresses the behavior i s intermediate. It should be recalled t h a t t h i s

figure i s f o r r e s u l t s at 650'~ - a temperatare i n excess of that which w i l l

be encountered by t h e airplane. Unfortunately, a+, t h e Mach 3 operating temperature t h e data i s not yet definitive. Many people, however, f e e l t h a t there i s a threshold f o r corrosion and it i s above t h e temperatures which t h e airframe w i l l see at a speed of Mach 3 . The temperature ( 6 5 0 0 ~ ) shown i n t h e figure w i l l , however, be encountered i n th compresser vanes and disk; and overhaul and inspection procedures w i l l have t o take t h i s i n t o account.

at 550' i s shown i n Figure 12, I n t h i s test, specimens that a r e Some data bowed t o induce s t r e s s a r e held a t 559' f o r up t o three thousand hours a f t e r being l i g h t l y coated with salt. After exposure these specimens a r e compressed and i f cracking has occurred the specimen w i l l f r a c t u r e rather than bend.

The upper curve shows then effect of compression f o r a blank exposed t o tem- perature without salt. The lower curves shows t h e very serious effect of salt. A t the present time the situation with regards t o s t r e s s corrosion is rather confused. Essentially t h e engineers f e e l that t h e s i t u a t i o n i s com- parable t o t h a t which has existed many times before during preliminary that, as i n the past, solutions w i l l planning of the a i r c r a f t and they f e e l be forthcoming. The metallurgist tends t o be more cautious.

To summarize, I have t r i e d t o present some of t h e metallurgical problems that have been encountered w i t h t h e structure of t h e Mach 3 supersonic transport and some of t h e progress that has been made towards solving these problem,. As was stated earlier, t o date most a t t e n t i o n has been placed on ' t h e a i r c r a f t skin, however, programs on materials f o r t h i c k sections com- ponents, t h e engines, and othe? parts are moving rapidly along.

Source & rights

Source: ntrs.nasa.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
·
NASA-TM-X-56492
Publisher
·
NASA (NTRS)
Year
·
1964
Pages
·
5
File size
·
445 KB