Skip to main content

Cessna 421C Golden Eagle Pilot's Operating Handbook

CESSNA 421 TURBINE · Pilot's Operating Handbook

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

The document is a Pilot's Operating Handbook (POH) for the Cessna 421C Golden Eagle, detailing its operational procedures, specifications, and performance characteristics. It serves as a comprehensive guide for pilots and aviation enthusiasts, providing essential information for safe and efficient flight operations. The handbook covers various aspects of the aircraft, including engine specifications, weight limits, fuel capacity, and recommended speeds for takeoff, climb, cruise, and landing. It emphasizes the importance of transition training for pilots, particularly those transitioning from lighter twin-engine aircraft, due to the unique handling characteristics of the 421C. The document also includes performance data, safety notes, and operational checklists to assist pilots in their flight preparations and in-flight decision-making.

  • Maximum takeoff weight: 7,450 lbs
  • Standard fuel capacity: 206 gallons
  • Best rate of climb speed: 111 knots
  • Recommended takeoff distance: 1,795 feet over 50-ft obstacle
  • Maximum demonstrated crosswind component: 20 knots

Document

Source

Originally published by aeroresourcesinc.com. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Pilot's Operating Handbook
Year
1983
Pages
7
File size
6.5 MB
Publisher
aeroresourcesinc.com

Specifications & performance

Extracted from this document.

Specifications

Engine (hp)
375
Engine model
GTSIO-520-D
Fuel capacity (gal)
170
Max takeoff weight (lb)
7,450

V-speeds

VY
111

Weight & balance

Useful load (lb)
2,890
Max ramp weight (lb)
7,500
Max landing weight (lb)
7,200
Max takeoff weight (lb)
7,450
Documentation completeness
5/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the CESSNA 421 TURBINE.

More CESSNA 421 TURBINEmanuals & documents

See all 20

In this document

Specifications

The Cessna 421C is powered by two Teledyne Continental GTSIO-520-N engines, each producing 375 horsepower at 2,235 RPM. The aircraft has a maximum takeoff weight of 7,450 pounds and a useful load of 2,890 pounds. It features a standard fuel capacity of 206 gallons, with 100 gallons in the tip tanks and 106 gallons in the wing tanks. The aircraft's dimensions include a length of 36 feet 4.6 inches, a wingspan of 41 feet 1.5 inches, and a height of 12 feet 11 inches.

Performance Data

The 421C has a recommended takeoff distance of 1,795 feet over a 50-foot obstacle and a landing distance of 725 feet over a 50-foot obstacle. The best rate of climb speed is 111 knots, and the maximum demonstrated crosswind component is 20 knots. At a pressure altitude of 25,000 feet, the aircraft can achieve a true airspeed of 236 knots while burning 257 pounds of fuel per hour.

Weight and Balance

The maximum ramp weight for the Cessna 421C is 7,500 pounds, with a maximum landing weight of 7,200 pounds. The zero fuel weight limit is 6,733 pounds. Pilots must ensure that the aircraft does not exceed these limits during flight operations.

Engine Start Procedures

To start the engines, the throttle is cracked, and the mixture control is placed in the Ground Start position. The primer is activated for four to eight seconds while the starter is engaged. Once the engine stabilizes, the primer is released, and the mixture control is advanced to full rich. An alternative method involves activating the primer and starter simultaneously with the mixture control full rich.

Safety Notes

Pilots are advised to undergo transition training due to the 421C's handling characteristics, which differ significantly from lighter twin-engine aircraft. Proper power management during approach is critical to avoid excessive sink rates. Regular maintenance and adherence to operational guidelines are essential for safe flight operations.

Safety notes

  • Transition training is essential for pilots transitioning from lighter twins.
  • Proper power management during approach is critical to avoid excessive sink rates.
  • Regular maintenance and adherence to operational guidelines are essential for safe flight operations.

Full document text

• PHOTOGRAPHY BY ART DAVIS Five years ago I would have been willing to place a small wager, a quarter maybe, that Cessna Aircraft's Model 421, the Golden Eagle, the flagship of the general aviation piston fleet, would have been in mothballs by now, swept aside by new technology and ushered into retirement by the heady whines of a new generation of fuel-thrifty propjets. The superior single-engine capabilities of the new propjets and the incredible reliability of their turbine engines should have knocked the proud old bird right off her roost. At least, that is what the propjet salesmen were saying. I would have lost that quarter. The propjets have ruffled a few feathers, but the Golden Eagle still is patrolling its territory, the middle altitudes that suit the needs of many corporate and air-taxi operations. Pound for pound, no other airplane can match the 421 's fuel-efficiency at altitudes in the high teens and low and middle twenties except, perhaps, the Beech Duke. This is not the best place for the propjets; they like higher, thinner air. Getting there costs an extra quarter of a million dollars up front. Indeed, it is the newer propjets that have been feeling the sting of the Golden Eagle's talons. In 1981, for instance, deliveries of Cessna's 421 / cOlltillW"j I \ \ I and Model 425 Conquest I (nee Cor- sair) propjet were matched at 100 each. In comparison, Beech delivered 68 King Air C90s, and Piper shipped 37 Cheyenne Is that yea~ The Golden Eagle is different things to different people, depending on where they sit. Pilots like the airplane's straightforward flying characteristics, the well-appointed office and, when properly equipped, its mission capabil- ity. Passengers like the so-called wide- oval cabin. There is a lot of room to stretch out and no need to shout to get a message across. The geared engines and the slow-turning propellers are quiet and unobtrusive. And there are plenty of options available to keep the passengers happy. The 421 has been in production for more than 16 years and has undergone quite a bit of development. It was the 38. AUGUST 1983 second in Cessna's line of 400-series twins, preceded in 1965 by the 411, an unpressurized, 6,500-pounder powered by 340-hp Teledyne Continental GTSIO-520 engines (geared, turbosu- percharged, fuel injected, opposed, 520 cubic inches displacement). The 421, however, was on the drawing boards before the 411 was unveiled. Pressurization of general aviation airplanes was in its infancy at the time, and Cessna designers came up with a tough pressure vessel. It looks very much like the basic structure of the vessel was bandaged in aluminum by a first-year medica] student. The idea was that, if in the unlikely event the vessel were ruptured, the resulting tear could not progress very fa~ Before giv- ing it their blessing, the vessel was subjected by Cessna engineers to more than 25,000 pressurization cycles simu- lated in a huge water tank, under the watchful eyes of the FAA. The 421 earned its type certificate in May 1967. The airplane weighed 6,800 pounds at gross and was powered by 375-hp GTSIO-520-D engines with recommended time between major overhauls (TBO) of 1,200 hours. Gross weight was 6,800 pounds, and stan- dard fuel capacity was 170 gallons- 100 in the tip tanks and 70 in the wing tanks. Cessna hung a price tag of $160,000 on its new twin (this was $40,000 less than the 421 's nearest pressurized competitor, Aero Com- mander's Lycoming-powered Grand Commander) and sold more than 200 of them during the first 18 months. The A model appeared in 1969 with a slightly higher maximum takeoff weight and useful load. The 421A also had a seventh seat and an overboost relief valve for its turbosupercharger. There were some big changes in store for the airplane the next year, the least of which were a new model des- ignation, 42lB, and the name Golden Eagle. The nose was extended two feet to make more room for baggage and avionics equipment. Wingspan also was increased two feet, and each en- gine was moved 12 inches farther away from the cabin to reduce noise. Max takeoff weight was increased from 6,840 to 7,250 pounds, useful load from 2,588 to 2,890 pounds. The air- plane also received another seat and heavy-duty brakes and wheels. By 1975, maximum cabin pressure differential had been raised from 4.2 to 4.4 and then to 5.0 pounds per square inch. Max takeoff weight had increased to 7,450 pounds, and the cabin had grown 16 inches to sport a fifth side window. That year, the Federal Avia- tion Administration granted approval for flight into known icing conditions should the airplane be equipped prop- erly. Maximum rudder travel was in- creased from 25 to 32 degrees, and Vmc was lowered from 87 to 82 knots. The Golden Eagle emerged the next year without tip tanks. The wing was totally redesigned from the nacelles outboard. The smooth contours of the new wet wing, holding 206 usable gal- lons, were achieved with metal-to- metal bonding. For pilots fond of the familiar, rakish tip tanks, the airplane's new appearance may have been some- what disappointing, but the simplifica- tion of fuel management and the im- proved visibility surely were not. In addition, both the vertical fin and the rudder were lengthened 10 inches to improve single-engine controllability, and the landing gear was rerigged for faster retraction. The C model was introduced in 1978 with published maximum weights for both ramp and takeoff. This allowed operators to load an extra 50 pounds of fuel for starting, taxiing and runup. Two years later the 421C arrived, ever so softly, on trailing-link main landing gear. The recommended TBO

Show full text

of the big, geared engines was raised from 1,200 to 1,600 hours. The fuel-injection system was re- worked in 1981. A seventh nozzle was incorporated to prime the engine for starting, and an oil line was routed through the fuel-injection manifold valve. The oil line warms the manifold cavity and helps to prevent the forma- tion of ice crystals. (Addition of anti- icing compounds such as ethylene gly- col monomethyl ether, which is mar- keted under the trade name Prist, and isopropyl alcohol also is approved. However, recommended mixing proce- dures should be adhered to strictly. If too much alcohol is added to the fuel, for instance, tank sealant materials may begin to deteriorate.) Golden Eagle production was sus- pended for 1983. At this writing, Cessna was considering early introduc- tion of the 1984 model, with produc- tion to be resumed as early as this fall. Our evaluation airplane, N6787L, is a 1982 model and is typically equipped. For starters, it is what Cessna calls a Golden Eagle III, which for a base price of $603,900 includes standard items such as a Cessna ARC 800B inte- grated flight control system; dual 1,000-series communication and navi- gation radios; a I,OOO-series ADF, glideslope receiver, radiomagnetic indi- cator, DME and area navigation sys- tems; an 800-series transponder and encoding altimeter with alerting and preselect features; a radio altimeter; a Bendix RDR-160 weather radar system; and a cabin air conditioner. The list .price (remember, these are 1982 figures) for N6787L was boosted to $662,175 with a seventh seat, a sec- ond transponder, color weather radar display, a known-icing package (heated props, wing and empennage boots, heated windshield and static ports, ice- detection light and fuselage ice-protec- tion plates), a left wing-locker fuel tank, special interior lighting, refresh- ment center, writing tables and a biffy-to name a few of the major op- AOPA PILOT • 39 I continued tions. If someone had handed me a blank check, I would have added a ra- dio telephone, $6,820, and a fire detec- tion and extinguishing system, $4,475. The 421 C is a sophisticated and complicated airplane, and quite a bit of time is required to do a good job in preflight preparation. A mechanical rudder gust lock is optional. The en- gage/disengage handle is mounted on the tailcone, above the stabilizer, and is out of reach for average-size pilots; but the lock pin can be released by lifting the elevator or hauling back on the yoke. The cavernous nose and aft cabin baggage compartments provide loading flexibility, and a thorough weight-and-balance calculation should be accomplished before each flight. A well-equipped Golden Eagle can carry more than 2,OQOpounds of fuel, people and baggage; and the pilot must ensure that the airplane does not exceed the maximum certificated zero-fuel weight (6,733 pounds), maximum ramp weight (7,500), takeoff weight (7,450) or landing weight (7,200 pounds). There are two ways to start the en- gines. Standard procedure employs the seventh nozzle in the fuel-injection system. The throttle is cracked and the mixture control is placed in the aft, Ground Start position. The primer is activated for four to eight seconds and held while the starter is depressed. When rpm and fuel flow stabilize, the primer is released and the mixture con- trol advanced to full rich. This worked well for our evaluation airplane's left engine, but the right one for some rea- son preferred the alternative method. With the fuel mixture full rich, the primer and starter are activated together and released when the engine catches. 40· AUGUST1983 I was surprised by the agility the big airplane demonstrated on the ground: I had to pull the throttles all the way back to idle to avoid riding the brakes. The nosewheel steering system, which is operated by the rudder pedals, was adequate for all but the tightest taxi maneuvers. The pilot's information manual calls for full power, 39 inches and 2,235 rpm, to be applied before brake re- lease. However, when runway consid- erations are not crucial, wear and tear on the brakes and propellers can be avoided by stabilizing power at 32 inches, releasing the brakes and feed- ing in full power slowly and smoothly on the takeoff roll. Acceleration is brisk. An airspeed of 100 knots is recom- mended for the first 50 feet. Best rate- of-climb speed is 111 knots, which also is the best single-engine ROC speed. Recommended cruise-climb speeds are 115 to 140 knots at 32.5 inches and 1,900 rpm. The handbook provides time-, distance- and fuel-to-climb in· formation for 120 knots. I found this provides good performance, adequate engine cooling and good visibility over the sloping nose. Experienced 421 operators say the best way to manage the engines is to treat them with tender, loving care (this includes knowledgeable and re- spectful power management and a comprehensive program of routine maintenance) and to run them hard. Ideally, there should be only four power changes between takeoff and fi- nal approach: full power for initial climb; 32.5/1,900 for climb and cruise; 23/1,800 for descent; and 23/1,900 for initial approach. (According to Flight- Safety International, a propeller speed of 1,800 rpm can interfere with a glideslope signal.) Under standard conditions at a pres- sure altitude of 25,000 feet, 32.5/1,900 provides a true airspeed of 236 knots and a fuel flow of 257 pounds per hour. (Here I must hedge a bit as 1 found 1,800 rpm to provide a smoother and quieter flight with little change in performance.) At Flight Level 250, cabin altitude is maintained at a com- fortable 9,000 feet. With supplemental oxygen aboard, the airplane may be operated up to 30,000 feet. Cabin alti- tude up there is 11,950 feet. At 23/1,800 and 180 knots, the 421C descends about 1,110 fpm while burning about 166 pounds of fuel per hour. Leveling off and dropping 15 de- grees of flap provides an initial ap- proach speed of 120 knots. Pull off two inches of manifold pressure, and the airplane will carry that airspeed right down the glideslope. Standard proce- dure is to use full flaps, some power and 111 knots right into the flare. The importance of transition training cannot be overemphasized, especially to pilots used to flying lighter twins. The 421's handling qualities defy its size, and power management during approach is critical. On one approach, I inadvertently reverted to some Piper Seneca flying habits and bled too much power off too soon. The Golden Eagle acknowledged this indiscretion with a high sink rate. It took a lot of power to straighten things out. Pilot staffers flew N6787L on several trips of various stage lengths, in fair weather and in foul. We found the air- plane capable, comfortable, stable and exciting to fly. (Just walking up to the big, handsome airplane with keys in hand is enough to get the adrenaline pumping.) It also is a demanding air- plane. Taken separately, the various systems are straightforward and rela- tively simple to manage. Taken to- gether, the systems require a lot of thinking and planning. Initial training with FlightSafety comes with the air- plane (see "Dress Rehearsal," p. 42), and we believe strongly that time and money for regular recurrent training should be included in the airplane's operating budget. We have a couple of rather minor nits to pick with the airplane. One is that the otherwise excellent interior lighting system does not include a suitable map light for the pilots. The lights in the Fuel capacity, w/opt tdnks Oil capdcity, ea engine Baggage capacity, std Baggage capacity w /wing locker tdnks J,l00 Ib, 66.6 cu ft Performance Takeoff distance, ground roll Takeoff distdnce over 50-ft obst Accelerate/stop distdnce Accelerdte/go distance Max demonstrated crosswind component Rate of climb, sea level Single·engine ROC, sea level Cessna 421 C Golden Eagle Base price $489,250 Price as tested $662,175 AOPA Pilat Operations/Equipment Category·: IFR $575,000 to $650,000 AII-\\eather $665,000 to $692,000 Specifications 2 Teledyne Continental GTSIO-520-N 375 hp @ 2,235 rpm and 39 in Hg Recommended lBO 1,600 hr 1'IlJpellers McCauley three· blade, constant-speed, full-feathering, 90 in dia 36 ft 4.6 in 12 ft II in 41 it 1.5 in 215.02 sq ft 34.8 Ib/sq ft 9.9Ib/hp 6 to 8 15 ft 9.9 in 4 it 7 in 4 ft 2.9 in 4,668 Ib 5,375 Ib 7,5001b 2,832 Ib 2,1251b 1,5961b 72llb 7,4501b 7,200 Ib 6,733 Ib 1,280.01 Ib (l,236 Ib usable) 213.01 gal (206 gal usable) 1,62L2lb (1,572 Ib usable) 270.2 gal (262 gal usable) 14 qt 1,500 Ib, 82 cu ft 80 KIAS 100 KIAS 88 KIAS III KIAS II] KIAS ]5] KIAS 176 KIAS 146 KIAS 176 KIAS 176 KIAS 176 KIAS 20] KIAS 240 KIAS 86 KIAS 77 KIAS 105 KIAS 20,000 it 25,000 ft 20,000 it 25,000 it All sprcificathms arc based 011 lIlal/u!acturrr's calt-illatiolls. All }'l'rfor1l1aIlCt' fisures arc based tHi stalldard day, standard at1l1osjJhcrc, at sra kl'd al/tl sross l(!c;Sht, twlt'ss otht'nt';Sf I/otrd. 'Opt'ratiolls/Eqllipll/I'llt Catl'!:oril's an' defilled ill/1I111' 1983 Pilot, I'- 96. Tilt' prices rl'fleet the costs for equ;}'fI/t'llt n'C0l1W1Cl/ded to operate iu the listed catt'~or;fs. AOPA PILOT • 41 Crui,>e speed/Rangl' ",/45-min rsv, std fuel (fuel consumption, t"J engine) @70% po\ver, recommended lean 15,000 ft 210 kt/840 nm (246 pph/4J gph) 220 kt/865 nm (246 pph/41 gph) 231 kt/905 nm (246 pph/41 gph) @hOO{) power, recommended lean 15,000 it 196 kt/925 nm (2]4 pph/35.6 gph) 205 kt/960 nm (2]4 pph/35.6 gph) 214 kt/I,OOO nm (2]4 pph/35.6 gph) 1\"" op,'rating altitude 30,000 ft Single·engine sl'n'ice ceiling 14,900 ft Landing distdnce over 50·ft obst 2,300 ft Lan~ing distance, ground roll 725 it Limiting and Recommended Airspeeds Vme (f\.1in control w/ollt.> engine inoperative) Vsse (Min intentional onp· engine ino~ll'rati\'t.·) Vx (B,'st ,mgl,' of climb) Vy (Be'>! rate of climb) Vxse (Best single-engine angle of <limb) VY~l>(Be~t single-engine rate of climb) Va (Dt.'sign mJnl'u\'l'rin~) Vi" (Max thp "xtended) 15° 45° Vie (1\lax gedr extemi,-d) Vlo (M,,, gloM operdting) Extend Retract Vno (Max structural cruising) V,,,, (Never ex,','ed) VSI (Stall clean) Vso (Stdll in landing configuration) 1,795 ft 2,285 ft 3,630 ft 4,960 ft 17 kt 1,950 fpm 345 fpm Po\\'crplallts Length Height \Vingspan Wmg area Wing loading Power loading Seats Cabin length Cabin width Cabin height Empty weight Empty weight, as tested Max ramp weight Useful luad Useful load, as tested Payload w /std fuel Payload w/full fuel, as tested Max takeoff weight Max landing weight Zero fuel weight Fuel capacity, std cOtlti"ued pilots' overhead console are weak and distracting. We would like to see the overhead bulb made smaller and more powerful. Perhaps a smaller light also could be fitted under the yoke. We also did not feel comfortable with the instru- ments provided for leaning engine fueljair mixtures. The 421C has ex- haust gas temperature (EGT) gauges, which simply provide reference points for leaning. Although EGT gauges are less expensive and require less mainte- nance, we would prefer turbine inlet temperature (TIT) gauges, which pro- vide pilots more useful information. We encountered one incident that is worthy of mention. During a low, twi- light approach in a moderate rainfall, water clung to the windshield and se- verely distorted forward vision. Editor Ed Tripp was doing the flying at the time and managed to pick out enough visual cues to complete the circling ap- proach and to land. We suspect that the windshield had not been cleaned nor treated properly and was covered by an oily film (the 421 information manual states that only a cleaning so- lution of isopropyl alcohol and water and an aftertreatment of Turtle Wa~, a liquid automotive wax, should be used on an electric windshield). The chief pilots for two fastidious 421 oper- ators-Cessna's Air Transportation De- partment and Frederick Aviation in Maryland-said their windshields are kept adequately clean simply with wa- ter applied by the palm of the hand or with a clean, soft cloth. This also pre- vents inadvertent application of clean- ing agents and waxing compounds not suitable for the 421's windshield. In the past seven years, seven air- worthiness directives have been issued for the 421 C. The directives required GOLDEN FAGLE: DRESS REHfARSAL When the curtain rises, you'd better be ready. It is an unusually hot night; the OAT indi- cates ISA plus 15°C. The 421C is loaded to gross. The runway is only 4,000 ieet long, and there is a big hangar off the departure end. According to the pilot's iniormation manual. we should be airborne aiter using up about 2,100 feet of concrete. Rotation speed is 95 knots. The charts show 4,010 feet for accelerate/stop and (oh, lordy) 12,210 feet for accelerate/go. The manual indicates that I should be able to coax a 240-fpm climb on one engine. That is, if I do everything exactly right. No promises ex- pressed nor implied. Obstruction lights atop the hangar wink menacingly as I taxi the big piston twin into position on the runway. Okay, if I lose an engine before the gear comes up, I'll put her back down ... somewhere. (The parking lot on the side of the hangar looks to be clear.) If an engine quits after the gear is on its way up, we'll fly. I nudge the throttles forward and let the power stabilize at 32 inches manifold pres- sure. I glance at the instrument gauges. Ev- erything is in the green, so I ease the throt- tles to the stops and release the brakes. The airplane slingshots forward and the airspeed indicator comes alive: 70 ... 80 ... 90. I pull the nose 10 degrees above the horizon and snap up the gear .... The airplane lurches like a drunk and veers to the right. I stomp on the left rudder pedal and bring the nose down to the hori- zon, the wings level. Let's see now, dead foot-dead engine. Yup, it's the right one. I reach for the right throttle .... Too late. My ears are assaulted by the agonized sounds of a propeller ripping into the ground. Lights have stopped flashing by. I've crashed. My palms are sweating, my pulse is rac- ing and my thigh aches where I punched myself in contempt. Other than that, I am all right. I peer imploringly at the indifferent stars above and beg for another chance. A voin' replies, "No sweat. Here we go." I'm back on the runway centerline, and both engines are humming peacefully. The hangar lights are winking. I try again, and this time something in the annunciator panel lights up. No time to figure out what it is. I abort the takeoff with runway to spare. The hangar lights wink. I wink back. The voice is not finished with me yet. Far 42· AUGUST1983 the following: replacement of a fuel hose; inspection and repair of the windshield; reinforcement of seat struc- tures; inspection and repair of seat tracks; replacement of Aerosonic fuel- flow transducers; modification of the ARC 400B autopilot roll and pitch ac- tuators; and resetting the King KFC 200 autopilot roll slip clutch. Service diffi- culty reports during the past five years have cited problems with pressuriza- tion valves; alternators; rudder trim and flap retraction mechanisms; fuel pumps and fuel selectors; wing deice and propeller anti-ice systems; landing from it. The voice gives me a third chance, a fourth chance ... a ninth chance. Each time, I am challenged with unpleasantries. Engines fail before rotation, after rotation and before and after gear retraction. A fuel-flow indi- cator drops to zero. An oil temperature indi- cator zooms beyond red line. The annunci- ator panel lights up like a Christmas tree. Sometimes I do it right. Sometimes I crash. The voice is incessant. "Here we go." By now, I am shaking like an ELI antenna. The airplane is barely five feet above the runway when an engine fails. I fly it out, bring it around and land. The voice says, "Okay, lunch time." I glance at my copilot/training partner, a corporate pi- lot whose firm has traded in a 310 for a 421. My exploration of the period of maxi- mum exposure on takeoff has left him intro- spective. After lunch, it will be his turn. The voice is our simulator instructor. It is our second day in FlightSafety Internation- al's 421C simulator at the Cessna Learning Center if! Wichita. The day before, we prac- ticed steep -turns, stalls, takeoffs and land- ings. There also were a few Vmc demon- strations, as well as instrument approaches to minimums with one turning and one burning. Still to come are icing encounters, pressurization system failures, landing gear glitches, electrical system failures, runaway hydraulic systems and engine fires. Before the flight simulator, though, there is the classroom. For the first three-and-a- half days of the eight-day "Cessna CE-421C Pilot Initial Qualification" course, a cadre of FlightSafety instructors, armed with an arse- nal of visual teaching aids, drilled proce- dures, systems, limitations, systems and sys- tems into our heads. Our class-a corporate pilot from Louisiana, another from Minne- sota, a businessman/pilot from the Nether- lands and me-never was given the chance to become b'ored with Wichita's night life. In FlightSafety Intemational's Cessna Golden Eagle flight simulator, pilots can practice emergency procedures and explore performance limits in ways that would be impossible or potentially lethal to attempt in an airplane. gear; engine valves and rocker arms; magnetos; and exhaust and turbo- charger systems. It is important to mention that several of the reports noted improper maintenance as causes of the problems. More than 1,800 Golden Eagles have been delivered in the past 16 years. The only piston twin that matches the 421's size and performance is the Beech Duke. Out of curiosity, I took both airplanes on a paper 600-mile flight, using performance data from their operating handbooks. The Duke edged out the Golden Eagle by one There was too much homework for that. In addition to the 22 hours of classroom instruction, the four hours of familiarization in the procedures trainer (a mockup of the 421Cs cockpit) and the 15 hours (half in the left seat, half in the right), the course includes actual flight training "to profi- ciency." Most students are cut loose after two or three hours in the air. After the gru- eling sessions in the simulator, flying the real thing with everything working properly is a pleasurable anticlimax. After training with FlightSafety, I flew a 421C about 10 hours. It was a bit disap- oointing that nO glitches occurred, as I was brimming with useful information, spring- loaded and ready for anything. If skills are not used, they fade, however. There are many things that can be practiced safely in the simulator that would prove impossible or fatal to practice in an airplane. If I were flying a 421C regularly, I would visit Flight- minute, but the 421 burned 24 fewer pounds of fuel during the trip. Comparing the 421 with the Duke is an academic exercise, since the air- planes compete in different markets. The 421 is used mostly in corporate operations, while the Duke is a favorite among well-heeled private owners. Since it left the aerie, the Golden Ea- gle has dominated its territory. There are a few invaders in the works, namely Piper's Mojave and Aerostar 700P. ]t should prove to be a good bat- tle, but this time I am keeping that quarter, in my pocket. 0 Safety every six months, at least, to refresh my knowledge and sharpen my reflexes. How much does it cost? If you buy a 421C, Cessna will put you (or your pilot) and your copilot through FlightSafety initial training free of charge. If not; the cost for initial training is $3,350. For an annual con- tract price of $2,795, you can return to Wichita every four or six months for recur- rent training. This' takes three days and comprises nine hours of ground school and six hours in the 421C flight simulator. Taken at face value, these costs may seem high. But if you stack them up against the costs of owning and operating a 421C and the inestimable value of the people and property transported therein, it is very hard, indeed, to come up with a rational argu- ment against signing up. The company has a favorite saying: The best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot. The logic is bulletproof. -MML