Skip to main content

RASMAG/30 − WP/03

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne 400 · Service Bulletins

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document is a working paper presented at the Thirtieth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/30). It summarizes outcomes from previous meetings related to Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) monitoring requirements and discusses various topics relevant to aviation safety and monitoring. The paper highlights the addition of the Piper Meridian M700 Fury (PA-46-701TP) to the RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) and outlines new subcategories for lateral deviation reporting. It also includes information on upcoming technical interchange meetings and safety bulletins. The document is intended for aviation authorities, operators, and stakeholders involved in airspace safety monitoring.

  • Piper Meridian M700 Fury (PA-46-701TP) added to RVSM MMR as a new Monitoring Group.
  • New subcategories for Category E LHDs include E-NT, E-LT, E-RI, and E-OT.
  • ASE Technical Interchange Meeting scheduled for September 9-11, 2025, in Seattle, WA.
  • Changes to lateral deviation reporting will align with North Atlantic practices.
  • RASMAG Safety Bulletin focusing on Crew/Team Resource Management scheduled for release in 2025.

Document

Source

Originally published by www.icao.int. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Service Bulletins
Year
2025
Pages
27
File size
6.4 MB
Publisher
www.icao.int
How rare is it?
42Piper PA-42 Cheyenne 400 registered worldwide · 35 active

Common. Rarer than 2% of the aircraft models we track.

Documentation completeness
6/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Piper PA-42 Cheyenne 400.

More Piper PA-42 Cheyenne 400manuals & documents

See all 17

In this document

RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR)

The RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) were reviewed and adopted, including the addition of the Piper Meridian M700 Fury (PA-46-701TP) as a new Monitoring Group. This aircraft has different characteristics compared to older models in the PA-46 series, necessitating its separate categorization.

Subcategory of Category E LHD

The document discusses the introduction of new subcategories for Category E Large Height Deviations (LHDs) to enhance consistency in safety analysis. These include E-NT (No Transfer), E-LT (Late Transfer), E-RI (No or Late Revision of Transfer Information), and E-OT (Any Other Types).

ASE Technical Interchange Meeting

An upcoming ASE Technical Interchange Meeting is scheduled for September 2025, focusing on altimetry system errors and RVSM airspace operation. Topics will include RVSM extension above FL410 and issues with older avionics.

APAC Lateral Deviation Reporting

Proposed changes to lateral deviation reporting requirements in the Asia Pacific Region were discussed, suggesting alignment with North Atlantic practices. The meeting agreed to incorporate a Lateral Infringement Distance (LID) table into the APAC EMA Handbook.

RASMAG Safety Bulletin

The proposal for the content of the third issue of the RASMAG Safety Bulletin, focusing on Crew/Team Resource Management, was presented and scheduled for agreement at RASMAG/30.

Safety notes

  • Operators must ensure compliance with RVSM monitoring requirements to maintain safety in airspace operations.

Full document text

RASMAG/30 − WP/03 14 – 17/07/2025 International Civil Aviation Organization Thirtieth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/30) Bangkok, Thailand, 14 – 17 July 2025 Agenda Item 2: Review Outcomes of Related Meetings OUTCOMES OF RASMAG-MAWG AND RMACG MEETINGS (Presented by the Chairperson) (Prepared by MAAR) SUMMARY This paper presents a brief summary from the 12th Meeting of the Monitoring Agencies Working Group (MAWG/12) from 17 to 20 February 2025 and the 20th Meeting of Regional Monitoring Agencies Coordination Group (RMACG/20) from 19 - 23 May 2025. Specific topics which should be highlighted are: - adoption of the new RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR); - adoption of the subcategory of category E LHD; - invitation for the ASE Technical Interchange Meeting; - reporting criteria for lateral deviation in APAC, and; - RASMAG Safety Bulletin. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Twelfth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group Monitoring Agencies Working Group (RASMAG/MAWG/12) Meeting was held from 17 - 20 February 2025 in Tokyo, Japan. Seventeen (17) participants attended the meetings from Australia, China, Japan, Singapore, Thailand, the United States, and ICAO ATM Officer from the Bangkok Office. Fourteen (14) working papers (WPs) and fourteen (14) information papers (IPs) were reviewed by the meeting. 1.2 The Twentieth Meeting of RMA Coordination Group (RMACG/20) was held from 19 to 23 May 2025 in Bangkok, Thailand, in a hybrid format. Twenty-three (23) in-person participants and five (5) virtual participants from eleven (11) Regional Monitoring Agencies attended the meeting. Twenty-three (23) working papers (WPs), twenty-two (22) information papers (IPs), and three (3) Flimsies (FLs) were reviewed by the meeting. 1.3 Specific topics from MAWG/12 and RMACG/20 meetings which should be highlighted for the RASMAG/30 meeting are detailed in the discussion section of this WP. RASMAG/30 − WP/03 14 – 17/07/2025 2 2. DISCUSSION RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) 2.1 The RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) Version 2025 was reviewed and adopted by the RMACG meeting, which can be found in the Attachment 1 (WP/13 from RMACG/20). The official release version 2025 will be distributed to States once available. The changes to the new version of MMR are as follow: a) Piper Meridian M700 Fury, manufacturer code PA-46-701TP, to be added to the MMR as a new Monitoring Group PA-46-701. While part of the PA-46 series, the new PA- 46-701TP has different characteristics than the older models in the series, including a faster cruise speed and a different SSEC. For this reason, the PA-46-701TP is added to the MMR in a new Monitoring Group, not as an addition to the existing PA-46 group. b) The FA6X is in normal operation. Although there is not a significant number of airframes in service, the available data indicates that the aircraft can be moved into Cat 2. c) The following variants are new military designations which are recommended for addition to the military MMR in Cat 3: E11 (a modified version of the GLEX/Gl6T), E7A (full description E7A- B737 Wedgetail), and E7T (full description E7A- B737 Peace Eagle). Subcategory of Category E LHD 2.2 During the RASMAG/28 meeting, the challenge of determining whether an occurrence considered as an LHD, particularly Category E LHDs, was discussed. To address this challenge, MAAR analyzed the sub-categories of Category E LHDs used by APAC monitoring agencies and proposed the new sub-categories to enhance consistency and harmonize the safety analysis in the Asia Pacific region during the RASMAG MAWG/11 meeting. Later during the RASMAG MAWG/12 meeting, the Asia Pacific Monitoring Agencies had another in-depth discussion and decided to apply the following E sub- categories starting from RASMAG/30: a) E-NT: No Transfer or Negative Transfer; b) E-LT: Late Transfer; c) E-RI: No or Late Revision of Transfer Information; and d) E-OT: Any Other Types 2.3 Southeast Asia Safety Monitoring Agency (SEASMA) presented an assessment tool, the Human Factors Assessment Questionnaire (HFAQ), designed to examine the human factors that may have contributed to Category E Large Height Deviation (LHD). The tool provides a robust framework for developing targeted intervention to mitigate these specific types of errors in ATC coordination. The Chair tasked MAAR to incorporate the HFAQ into the Guidance Material for the Continued Safety Monitoring of the Asia-Pacific RVSM Airspace for States and Air Traffic Service Providers (ATSPs) to analyze human factors issues. The details are provided in a separate working paper. RASMAG/30 − WP/03 14 – 17/07/2025 3 ASE Technical Interchange Meeting 2.4 The FAA and EUROCONTROL planned to jointly host the next Altimetry System Error (ASE) Technical Interchange Meeting during the period of 9 - 11 September 2025 at the Edgewater Hotel in Seattle, Washington, USA. This event was intended to expand its focus on the role of the industry, as well as highlighting new emerging topics relevant to the safe operation of RVSM airspace. Some new topics of discussion were proposed for this event to increase awareness and invite collaboration on solutions. 2.5 The invitation of the ASE Technical Interchange Meeting in the Attachment 2 (IP/21 from RMACG/20) is extended to all RASMAG members. The registration is free of charge. The potential topics of discussion includes: a) The possibility of extending RVSM above FL410; b) Ongoing height monitoring and performance issues; c) ASE trends for specific aircraft types; d) Confusion about Section 9 approvals in the United States; e) Spoofing of ADS-B or GPS; f) Issues with older avionics and work to correct them; and g) Work on avionics for new aircraft to improve RVSM capability upon entry into service. APAC Lateral Deviation Reporting 2.6 During the MAWG/12 meeting, PARMO presented the proposed changes to reporting

Show full text

requirements for LLDs for the Asia Pacific Region that would align with other ICAO regions. PARMO suggested that the MAWG considered the process used in the North Atlantic (NAT) for reporting lateral deviations. The simplest practice for the ATSPs was to record and report all lateral deviations, regardless of the deviation magnitude (except where Strategic Lateral Offset Procedure (SLOP) was correctly applied). The EMA and/or Scrutiny Group would then review and determine whether each reported deviation qualified for inclusion in the risk estimates, based on the information provided in the LLD report. The concept of Lateral Infringement Distance (LID) was introduced as a determining criterion depending on the location of the deviation and filed flight plan information. Using this method, no minimum reporting threshold was required. 2.7 The meeting extensively discussed whether this approach was possible for the applicable portions of the APAC Region. The meeting agreed to ICAO’s suggestion to incorporate the LID table, when finalized, into the APAC EMA Handbook. The meeting also agreed with the Chair’s suggestion for the EMAs to consider the LLD reporting criteria from ATSPs - if the LLD reporting criteria should be any deviations greater than 5NM (previously proposed by JASMA) or deviations of all magnitudes (currently used in the NAT), then submit papers to discuss at RASMAG/30. RASMAG Safety Bulletin 2.8 During the MAWG/12 meeting, JASMA presented the proposal for the content of “Crew/Team Resource Management” as the third issue of the RASMAG Safety Bulletin. It was scheduled to be agreed at RASMAG/30 and released in 2025. The proposed draft was provided in a separate working paper. RASMAG/30 − WP/03 14 – 17/07/2025 4 3. ACTION BY THE MEETING 3.1 The meeting is invited to: a) note the information contained in this paper; b) communicate changes to the new RVSM MMR version 2025 (paragraph 2.1) as detailed in Attachment 1 (WP/13 from RMACG/20) with aircraft operators; c) forward the invitation of the ASE Technical Interchange Meeting in the Attachment 2 (IP/21 from RMACG/20) to any entities which might be interested in attending; and d) discuss any relevant matters as appropriate. — — — — — — — — RMACG/20-WP/13 15/05/2025 International Civil Aviation Organization WORKING PAPER REGIONAL MONITORING AGENCIES COORDINATION GROUP TWENTIETH MEETING (RMACG/20): (Bangkok, Thailand, 19 to 23 May 2025) Agenda Item 3: Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) Monitoring Groups and Minimum-Monitoring Requirements (MMR) 3.1 MMR maintenance management RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements Update (Presented by EUR RMA) SUMMARY The 2024 RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) Chart was reviewed by EUR RMA and NAARMO, who prepared a list of recommended amendments to the MMR for 2025. The MMR table is presented in Attachment A. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The Regional Monitoring Agency (RMA) Manual (ICAO Doc. 9937; 1st ed. 2010) prescribes on- going quality control checks of operator fleets, also known as Long-term Height Monitoring (LTHM) requirements. The instrument which best describes these requirements is the MMR chart, which does appear in the RMA Manual but is also revised when necessary during the RMA Coordination Group meeting. 1.2. The MMR continues to be maintained outside of the RMA Manual, so that any developments such as new aircraft, new avionics, and new insights into improvement or failure in achieving the goals in the MMR can be addressed without engaging the requisite cost and slowness of a publishing cycle for the Manual. All RMAs have access to the MMR via a Knowledge Sharing Network (KSN) available only to RMAs. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1. New entrants to the Civilian MMR RMACG/20-WP/13 - 2 - a) Piper Meridian M700 Fury, manufacturer code PA-46-701TP, to be added to the MMR as a new Monitoring Group PA-46-701. While part of the PA-46 series, the new PA-46-701TP has different characteristics than the older models in the series, including a faster cruise speed and a different SSEC. For this reason the PA-46-701TP is added to the MMR in a new Monitoring Group, not as an addition to the existing PA-46 group. This addition to the MMR is requested by NAARMO. 2.2. Changes to existing Monitoring Groups in the Civilian MMR 2.3. Existing Monitoring Groups investigated to determine if it is appropriate to change their current monitoring category. It is accepted practice to place new aircraft types, or variants, in Category 2 until sufficient data is available to confirm overall group compliance as well as long term ASE stability. This period is generally accepted to be a minimum of two years. It is also possible to demote aircraft groups from Category 1 to Category 2, however this should only be considered if there are clearly identified generic performance problems, with sufficient representative monitoring data to confirm non-compliance with group performance requirements. In these circumstances a formal investigation should first be initiated with the appropriate certification authority as well as the airframe manufacturer. a) At the present time there are no aircraft in Category 1 which are being considered for moving to Category 2. At the present time there are no aircraft in Category 2 which are being considered for moving to Category 1. b) The FA6X was entered as a prototype into Cat 3 at RMACG/16. The aircraft is now in normal operation. Although there is not a significant number of airframes in service, the data available indicates that the aircraft can be moved into Cat 2. 2.4. New entrants to the Military MMR a) The following variants are new military designations which are recommended for addition to the military MMR in Cat 3. E11 (a modified version of the GLEX/Gl6T), E7A (full description E7A- B737 Wedgetail) and E7T (full description E7A- B737 Peace Eagle). 3. ACTION BY THE MEETING 3.1. The Meeting is invited to: (a) note and review the contents of this working paper; (b) review Attachment A, the MMR, for any clarifications needed for RMACG endorsement; (c) agree that Eurocontrol and FAA continue their work on the MMR; (d) agree that all RMAs participate in the annual MMR review session at the RMACG; (e) ask RMAs to contribute monitoring data to the annual review; and (f) discuss any other relevant MMR matters as appropriate. — — — — — — — — Version: 2025.1 1 Date: 23 May 2025 RVSM MONITORING GROUPS AND MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS AS OF: 23 May 2025 Version: 2025.1 1. UPDATE OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS TABLE AND WEBSITE. As significant data is obtained, monitoring requirements for specific aircraft types may change. When Table 1 below, is updated, a letter will be distributed by the Regional Monitoring Agencies (RMAs) to the States concerned. The updated table will be posted on the RMA website being maintained by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The secure website address is: http://portal.icao.int 2. INITIAL MONITORING. All operators that operate or intend to operate in airspace where RVSM is applied are required to participate in the RVSM monitoring program. Table 1 establishes requirements for initial monitoring associated with the RVSM approval process. In their application to the appropriate State authority for RVSM approval, operators must show a plan for meeting the applicable initial monitoring requirements. 3. AIRCRAFT STATUS FOR MONITORING. Aircraft engineering work that is required for the aircraft to receive RVSM airworthiness approval must be completed prior to the aircraft being monitored. Any exception to this rule will be coordinated with the State authority. 4. APPLICABILITY OF MONITORING FROM OTHER REGIONS. Monitoring data obtained in conjunction with RVSM monitoring programs from other regions can be used to meet regional monitoring requirements. The RMAs, which are responsible for administering the monitoring program, have access to monitoring data from other regions and will coordinate with States and operators to inform them on the status of individual operator monitoring requirements. 5. MONITORING PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF RVSM OPERATIONAL APPROVAL IS NOT A REQUIREMENT. Operators should submit monitoring plans to the responsible civil aviation authority and the RMA that show how they intend to meet the requirements specified in Table1. Monitoring will be carried out in accordance with this table. 6. AIRCRAFT GROUPS NOT LISTED IN TABLE 1. Contact the RMA for clarification if an aircraft group is not listed in Table 1 or for clarification of other monitoring related issues. An aircraft group not listed in Table 1 will probably be subject to Category 2 monitoring requirements. 7. TABLE OF MONITORING GROUPS. Table 2 shows the aircraft types and series that are grouped together for operator monitoring purposes. 8. TABLE OF NON-GROUP AIRCRAFT: Table 3 shows the aircraft types and series that are Non-Group aircraft (i.e., Not certified under group approval requirements) for monitoring purposes. 9. TRAILING CONE DATA. Altimetry System Error estimations developed using Trailing Cone data collected during RVSM certification flights can be used to fulfill monitoring requirements. It must be documented, however, that aircraft RVSM systems were in the approved RVSM configuration for the flight. 10. MONITORING OF AIRFRAMES THAT ARE RVSM COMPLIANT ON DELIVERY. If an operator adds new RVSM compliant airframes of a type for which it already has RVSM operational approval and has completed monitoring requirements for the type in accordance with the attached table, the new airframes are not required to be monitored. If an operator adds new RVSM compliant airframes of an aircraft type for which it has NOT previously received RVSM operational approval, then the operator should complete monitoring in accordance with the attached table. 11. FOLLOW-ON MONITORING. Monitoring is an on-going program that will continue after the RVSM approval process. Long term minimum monitoring requirements are established in the Annex 6 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. On a regional basis, a programme shall be instituted for monitoring the height-keeping performance of aircraft operating in RVSM airspace in order to ensure that continued application of this vertical separation minimum meets regional safety objectives. RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 2 Date: 23 May 2025 Table 1: MONITORING REQUIREMENTS TABLE (Civilian) MONITORING IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TABLE MONITORING PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF RVSM APPROVAL IS NOT A REQUIREMENT CATEGORY GROUP DESCRIPTOR MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 1 GROUP APPROVED: DATA INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH THE RVSM MASPS A124, A20N, A30B, A306, A310-GE, A310-PW, A318, A320, A330, A339, A340, A345, A346, A350, A380, A3ST, AVRO, B38M, B39M, B712, B727, B737C, B737CL, B737NX, B747CL, B74S, B744-5, B744-10, B748, B752, B753, B764, B767, B772, B773, B787, B78X, BCS1, BD100, BE40, C25A, C25B, C25C, C510, C525, C550-B, C560, C56X, C650, C680, C750, CARJ, CL600, CL604, CL605, CRJ7, CRJ9, CRJ10, DC10, E135-145, E135BJ1, E135BJ2, E170-190, E290, E295, E545-550, E50P, E55P, F100, F2TH, F900, FA7X, GALX, GLEX, GL5T, GL7T, GLF4, GLF5, GLF6, GLF7, H25B-800, J328, LJ35-36, LJ40, LJ45, LJ60, MD10, MD11, MD80, MD90, PC12, PC24, PRM1, T154, TBM Operators of aircraft types contained in this category shall have a minimum of 2 airframes monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring. Operators with fleets consisting of aircraft from more than one Monitoring Group shall meet this requirement for each group in the fleet. In the event that an operator has a single airframe from a Group, then that aircraft shall be monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring. 2 GROUP APPROVED: INSUFFICIENT DATA ON APPROVED AIRCRAFT Other group aircraft other than those listed above including: A148, A158, A321XLR, A337, AC90, AC95, AJ27, AN72, ASTR, ASTR-SPX, B701, B703, B731, B732, B744-LCF, BE20, BE30, C441, C500, C550-II, C550- SII, C700, C919, D328, DC85, DC86-87, DC91, DC93, DC94, DC95, EPIC, E120, E45X, EA50, F70, FA10, FA20, FA50, FA6X, G150, G280, GLF2, GLF8, GLF2B, GLF3, H25B-700, H25B-750, H25C, HA4T, HDJT, IL62, IL76, IL86, IL96, L101, L29B-2, L29B- 731, LJ23, LJ24, LJ25, LJ28, LJ31, LJ55, MC21, MU30, PA46, PA46-701, P180, P180-II, PAY4, SB20, SBR1, SBR2, SF50, SU95, T134, T204, T334, WW24, YK42 Operators of aircraft types contained in this category shall have a minimum of 60% of airframes monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring, (the number of airframes to be monitored shall be rounded up to the nearest whole integer). Operators with fleets consisting of aircraft from more than one Monitoring Group shall meet this requirement for each Group in the fleet. 3 NON-GROUP Aircraft types for which no generic compliance method exists: A225, AN12, AN26, B190, B462, B463, B74S-SOFIA, BA11, BE9L, GSPN, H25A, L29A, PAY3, R721, R722, SJ30, STAR Operators of aircraft types contained in this category shall have 100% of airframes monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring. RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 3 Date: 23 May 2025 Table 2: MONITORING GROUPS FOR AIRCRAFT CERTIFIED UNDER GROUP APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria A124 A124 AN-124 RUSLAN A148 A148 AN-148 A158 A158 AN-158 A30B A30B A300 A306 A306 A300 A310-GE A310 A310 Series: 200, 200F, 300, 300F A310-PW A310 A310 Series: 220, 220F, 320, 320F A318 A318 A318 A320 A319 A320 A321 A319 A320 A321 A321XLR A21N A21N A321XLR A321neo XLR A20N A19N A20N A21N A21N A319neo A320neo A321neo A321LR A330 A332 A333 A330 A330 A337 A337 AIRBUS BELUGA XL (A330-743L) A339 A339 A338 A330-900neo A330-800neo A340 A342 A343 A340 A340 A345 A345 A340 A346 A346 A340 RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 4 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria A350 A359 A359 A35K A350-900 A350-900 ULR A350-1000 A380 A388 A380 A3ST A3ST A300 600R ST BELUGA AC90 AC90 COMMANDER 690 COMMANDER 840 COMMANDER 900 AC95 AC95 AERO COMMANDER 695 AJ27 AJ27 ARJ21-700 AN72 AN72 AN74 ANTONOV AN-72 ANTONOV AN-74 ASTR ASTR 1125 ASTRA S/n 1-78, except 73 ASTR-SPX ASTR 1125 ASTR SPX, G100 S/n 73, 79-145 S/n > 145 AVRO RJ1H RJ70 RJ85 RJ100 Avroliner RJ70 Avroliner RJ85 Avroliner B38M B38M B38M Boeing 737 MAX 8 B737-MAX8-200 B39M B39M Boeing 737 MAX 9 B701 B701 B707 B703 B703 B707 Series 320, 320B, 320C B712 B712 B717 B727 B721 B722 B727 B727 B731 B731 B737 B732 B732 B737 RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 5 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria B737CL B733 B734 B735 B737-300 B737-400 B737-500 B737NX B736 B737 B738 B739 B739 B737-600 B737-700 B737-800 B737-900 B737-900ER B737-700 including the BBJ B737-800 including the BBJ2 B737C B737 B737-700 Series: 700C B747CL B741 B742 B743 B747-100 B747-200 B747-300 B74S B74S B74R B747SP B747SR B744-5 B744 B74D B747-400 5 inch Probes up to s/n 25350 B744-10 B744 B74D B747-400 10 inch Probes from s/n 25351 B744-LCF BLCF B747-400 B748 B748 B747-8 B752 B752 B757-200 B753 B753 B757-300 B767 B762 B763 B767-200 B767-300 B764 B764 B767-400 B772 B772 B772 B77L B77L B777-200 B777-200ER B777-F B777-200LR RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 6 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria B773 B773 B77W B777-300 B777-300ER B787 B788 B789 B787-8 B787-9 B78X B78X B787-10 BCS1 BCS1 BCS1 BCS3 BCS3 BOMBARDIER CS100 AIRBUS A220-100 BOMBARDIER CS300 AIRBUS A220-300 BD100 CL30 CL35 CHALLENGER 300 CHALLENGER 350 Begins at s/n 20501 BE20 BE20 200 KINGAIR BE30 BE30 B350 B300 SUPER KINGAIR B300 SUPER KINGAIR 350 BE40 BE40 BEECHJET 400 BEECHJET 400A BEECHJET 400XP HAWKER 400XP C441 C441 CONQUEST II C500 C500 C500 C501 500 CITATION 500 CITATION I 501 CITATION I SINGLE PILOT C510 C510 MUSTANG C525 C525 C25M 525 CITATIONJET 525 CITATIONJET 1 525 CITATIONJET PLUS C525-M2 S/n 800 and on C25A C25A 525A CITATIONJET II RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 7 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria C25B C25B CITATIONJET III 525B CITATIONJET III C25C C25C 525C CITATIONJET IV C550-B C55B 550 CITATION BRAVO S/n 550-0801 and on C550-II C550 C551 550 CITATION II 551 CITATION II SINGLE PILOT S/n 550-0001 to 550-0800 C550-SII C550 S550 CITATION SUPER II S/n starts with “S” C560 C560 560 CITATION V 560 CITATION V ULTRA 560 CITATION V ENCORE 560 CITATION V ENCORE PLUS C56X C56X 560 CITATION EXCEL 560 CITATION XLS 560 CITATION XLS PLUS C650 C650 650 CITATION III 650 CITATION VI 650 CITATION VII C680 C680 C68A 680 CITATION SOVEREIGN 680-A LATITUDE “A” in s/n C700 C700 700 CITATION LONGITUDE C750 C750 750 CITATION X C919 C919 COMAC C919 CARJ CRJ1 CRJ2 CRJ2 CRJ2 CRJ2 CRJ-100 CRJ-200 CRJ-440 CHALLENGER 800 CHALLENGER 850 CRJ7 CRJ7 CRJ7 CRJ-700 CRJ-550 RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 8 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria CRJ9 CRJ9 CRJ9 CRJ-705 CRJ-900 CRJ10 CRJX CRJ-1000 CL600 CL60 CL-600 CL-601 S/n < 5000 CL604 CL60 CL-604 CL-601-3A CL-601-3R S/n 5000-5700 S/n 5001-5134 S/n 5135-5300 CL605 CL60 CL60 CL-605 CL-650 S/n > 5700 DC10 DC10 DC-10 D328 D328 328 TURBOPROP DC85 DC85 DC-8 DC86-87 DC86 DC87 DC-8 DC-8 DC91 DC91 DC-9 DC93 DC93 DC-9 DC94 DC94 DC-9 DC95 DC95 DC-9 EPIC EPIC Epic E1000 E120 E120 EMB-120 Brasilia E135-145 E135 E135 E145 EMB-135 EMB-140 EMB-145 Does not contain any EMB- 135BJ (E35L) aircraft E135BJ1 E35L EMB-135BJ Legacy 600/650 All EMB-135BJ aircraft, except those in E135BJ2 RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 9 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria E135BJ2 E35L EMB-135BJ Legacy 600/650 EMB-135BJ aircraft with S/n 586, 1144, 1193, 1219, 1220, 1223 thru 1227, 1229 and on; Any other EMB-135BJ that incorporates Service Bulletin SB145LEG-34-0039. E45X E45X EMB-145 XR E170-190 E170 E170 E75S E75L E190 E190 E170 E175 E170-200 short wing E175 long wing E190 E195 E290 E290 E190-E2 E295 E295 E295 E195-E2 E190-400 E50P E50P PHENOM 100 E545-550 E545 E545 E550 E550 EMB-545 LEGACY 450 EMB-545 PRAETOR 500 EMB-550 LEGACY 500 EMB-550 PRAETOR 600 E55P E55P PHENOM 300 EA50 EA50 ECLIPSE F100 F100 FOKKER 100 F2TH F2TH FALCON 2000 FALCON 2000-EX FALCON 2000LX FALCON 2000-LXS FALCON 2000-S F70 F70 FOKKER 70 RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 10 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria F900 F900 FALCON 900 FALCON 900DX FALCON 900EX FALCON 900LX FA10 FA10 FALCON 10 FA20 FA20 FALCON 20 FALCON 200 FA50 FA50 FALCON 50 FALCON 50EX FA7X FA7X FA8X FALCON 7X FALCON 8X G150 G150 G150 G280 G250 G280 G250 G280 GALX GALX 1126 GALAXY G200 GLEX GLEX GLOBAL EXPRESS CLASSIC GLEX GLOBAL XRS GLOBAL 6000 GLOBAL 6500 BD700 (BD-700-1A10) S/n > 9158 S/n > 9431, and 9313 and 9381 S/n > 60001 GL5T GL5T GLOBAL 5000 GLOBAL 5000-GVFD GLOBAL 5500 BD700 (BD-700-1A11) S/n > 9434, and 9386 and 9401 S/n > 60001 GL7T GL7T GLOBAL 7500 GLF2 GLF2 GULFSTREAM II (G-1159) GLF2B GLF2 GULFSTREAM IIB (G-1159B) GLF3 GLF3 GULFSTREAM III (G-1159A) RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 11 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria GLF4 GLF4 GULFSTREAM IV (G-1159C) G300 G350 G400 G450 GLF5 GLF5 GULFSTREAM V (G-1159D) G500 G550 GLF6 GLF6 G650 GLF7 GA5C GA6C G500 GVII G600 GVII GLF8 GA7C G700 GVIII Begins at s/n 87001 H25B-700 H25B BAE 125 / HS125 Series: 700A, 700B H25B-750 H25B HAWKER 750 H25B-800 H25B BAE 125 / HS125 HAWKER 800XP HAWKER 800XPI HAWKER 800 HAWKER 850XP HAWKER 900XP HAWKER 950XP Series: 800A, 800B H25C H25C HAWKER 1000 HA4T HA4T HAWKER 4000 HDJT HDJT HONDAJET HA-420 IL62 IL62 ILYUSHIN-62 IL76 IL76 ILYUSHIN-76 IL86 IL86 ILYUSHIN-86 IL96 IL96 ILYUSHIN-96 J328 J328 328JET RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 12 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria L101 L101 L-1011 TRISTAR L29B-2 L29B L-1329 JETSTAR II L29B-731 L29B L-1329 JETSTAR 731 LJ23 LJ23 LEARJET 23 LJ24 LJ24 LEARJET 24 LJ25 LJ25 LEARJET 25 LJ28 LJ28 LEARJET 28 LEARJET 29 LJ31 LJ31 LEARJET 31 LJ35-36 LJ35 LEARJET 35, 35A LEARJET 36, 36A LJ40 LJ40 LJ70 LEARJET 40 LEARJET 70 Begins at s/n 2001 Begins at s/n 2134 LJ45 LJ45 LJ75 LEARJET 45 LEARJET 75 Begins at s/n 456 LJ55 LJ55 LEARJET 55 LJ60 LJ60 LEARJET 60 MC21 MC21 IRKUT MC21-300 MD10 MD10 MD-10 MD11 MD11 MD-11 MD80 MD81 MD82 MD83 MD87 MD88 MD-80 MD-80 MD-80 MD-80 MD-80 MD90 MD90 MD-90 MU30 MU30 MU-300 DIAMOND 1A PA46 PA46 PA46-500TP PA46-600TP Not including PA46-701TP RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 13 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria PA46-701 PA46 PA46-701TP P180 P180 P-180 AVANTI S/n < 1105 but not 1002 P180-II P180 P180 P-180 AVANTI II P-180 AVANTI EVO S/n > 1104 and also 1002 PAY4 PAY4 PA-42 Cheyenne 400 Series: 1000 CHEYENNE PC12 PC12 Pilatus PC-12 PC24 PC24 Pilatus PC-24 PRM1 PRM1 PREMIER 1 SB20 SB20 SAAB 2000 SBR1 SBR1 SABRELINER 40 SABRELINER 60 SABRELINER 65 SBR2 SBR2 SABRELINER 80 SF50 SF50 CIRRUS SF50 RVSM-capable s/n 8, 89, and 94 or above SU95 SU95 SUKHOI SUPERJET 100-95 T134 T134 TU-134 T154 T154 TU-154 T204 T204 TU-204 TU-214 TU-224 TU-234 T334 T334 TU-334 TBM TBM7 TBM8 TBM9 TBM-700 TBM-850 TBM-900 TBM8 with winglets, begins at s/n 1000 WW24 WW24 1124 WESTWIND YK42 YK42 Yakovlev YAK-42 Yakovlev YAK-40 RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 14 Date: 23 May 2025 Table 3: Non-GROUP AIRCRAFT (i.e., Not certified under group approval requirements) (Civilian) Non-Group Descriptor A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria A225 A225 ANTONOV AN-225 Non-Group AN12 AN12 ANTONOV AN-12 Non-Group AN26 AN26 ANTONOV AN-26 Non-Group B190 B190 BEECH 1900 Non-Group B462 B462 BAe-146-200 Non-Group B463 B463 BAe-146-300 Non-Group B74S-SOFIA B74S NASA B74SP with Sofia telescope Non-Group: N747NA (s/n 21441) BA11 BA11 BAC-111 Non-Group BE9L BE9L Beechcraft King Air C90GT Beechcraft King Air C90GTI King Air Model 90 except F90 and F90-1 Non-Group FA6X FA6X Falcon 6X Non-Group GSPN GSPN GROB G-180 SPn Utility Jet Non-Group H25A H25A HS125-400, -600 Non-Group L29A L29A L-1329 JETSTAR 6/8 Non-Group PAY3 PAY3 PIPER Cheyenne 3 Non-Group R721 R721 B-727-100: Re-engined Non-Group R722 R722 B-727-200: Re-engined Non-Group SJ30 SJ30 SWEARINGEN SJ-30 Non-Group STAR STAR BEECH 2000 STARSHIP Non-Group RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 15 Date: 23 May 2025 Table 1: MONITORING REQUIREMENTS TABLE (Military) MONITORING IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TABLE MONITORING PRIOR TO THE ISSUE OF RVSM APPROVAL IS NOT A REQUIREMENT CATEGORY GROUP DESCRIPTOR MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 1 GROUP APPROVED: DATA INDICATES COMPLIANCE WITH THE RVSM MASPS C17, C130, KC135 Operators of aircraft types contained in this category shall have a minimum of 2 airframes monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring. Operators with fleets consisting of aircraft from more than one Monitoring Group shall meet this requirement for each group in the fleet. In the event that an operator has a single airframe from a Group, then that aircraft shall be monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring. 2 GROUP APPROVED: INSUFFICIENT DATA ON APPROVED AIRCRAFT Other group aircraft other than those listed above including: A178, A400, C5, C550-552, E3, F18, KC2, KC46, KC39, P1, P8 Operators of aircraft types contained in this category shall have a minimum of 60% of airframes monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours, whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring, (the number of airframes to be monitored shall be rounded up to the nearest whole integer). Operators with fleets consisting of aircraft from more than one Monitoring Group shall meet this requirement for each Group in the fleet. 3 NON-GROUP Aircraft types for which no generic compliance method exists: GLF5-AEW, GLEX-ASTOR Aircraft types for which the compliance method is not known: A30B-M, A310-M, A332-M, ASTR-M, BE30, C12, C21, C32, C35, C37, C40, C550-B-M, C9, CL60-M, E135-M, E4, E6, E7A, E7T, E8, E11, E530, EGRT, FA10-M, FA20-M, FA50-M, GLF3-M, GLF4-M, IL76- M, KC10, KC-390, KC46, P180-M, R135, VC25 Operators of aircraft types contained in this category shall have 100% of airframes monitored every 2 years or 1,000 flight hours., whichever is longer calculated from the date of the last successful height monitoring. RMACG/20-WP/133 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 16 Date: 23 May 2025 Table 2: MONITORING GROUPS FOR AIRCRAFT CERTIFIED UNDER GROUP APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS (Military) Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria A178 A178 Antonov A178 A30B-M A30B A300 B2-100 (Zero-G) A310-M A310 A310 MRT, MRTT A332-M A332 KC30-A KC45-A Voyager KC2, KC3 MRTT A400 A400 A400M ASTR-M ASTR 1125 ASTRA NAV&COM C12 BE20 C-12 C130 C130 C30J C-130 Hercules C-130J Hercules Series: H only C17 C17 C-17 Globemaster III C21 LJ35 C-21 C32 B752 C-32 Series: A, B C40 B737 C-40 Clipper C5 C5 C5 Galaxy C550-552 C550 552 CITATION II (USN) C550-B-M C550 550 CITATION BRAVO C550-M C550 550 CITATION II C35 C560 560 CITATION V UC-35 C37 GLF5 C-37 TP102D Series: A, B Series: C CL60-M CL60 CL604 MPA E135-M E135 EMB-135 MRT E3 E3TF E-3 Sentry RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 17 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria E3CF E4 B742 E-4 E6 E6 E-6 Mercury E7A E7A B737 B737 Wedgetail E7T E7A B737 B737 Peace Eagle E8 B703 E-8 J-Stars E11 GLEX E11 E530 E530 TEXTRON AIRLAND SCORPION FA10-M FA10 FALCON 10 MRT FA20-M FA20 FALCON 20 EW/ELINT, MRT, EXP FA50-M FA50 FALCON 50 MPA/SAR F18H F18H McDonnell-Douglas F/A 18 F/A-18 Hornet GLF3-M GLF3 C-20 Series: A, B, C, D, E GLF4-M GLF4 C-20 S102B TP102 Series: F, G, H IL76-M IL76 IL-76 MRT, T KC2 KC2 KAWASAKI KC2 C-2 RC-2 XC-2 KC10 DC10 KC-10 Extender KDC-10 DC-10 KC46 KC46 Boeing KC46 Boeing KC-46 Pegasus Boeing KC46A or B767-2C KC135 B703 KC-135 Stratotanker RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A Version: 2025.1 18 Date: 23 May 2025 Monitoring Group A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria K35E K35R KC-135 Stratotanker C-135 Stratotanker KC39 KC39 Embraer KC390 P1 P1 Kawasaki P-1 P180-M P180 P-180 AVANTI P8 P8 B738-ERX BOEING P8 POSEIDON R135 R135 RC-135 VC25 B742 VC-25 Abbreviations: EW/ELINT Electronic Warfare/Electronic Intelligence EXP Experimental MPA Maritime Patrol Aircraft MRT Multi Role Transporter MRTT Multi Role Transporter and Tanker SAR Search and Rescue T Transporter Table 3: Non-GROUP AIRCRAFT (i.e., Not certified under group approval requirements) (Military) Non-Group Descriptor A/C ICAO Manufacturer Type Additional Defining Criteria GLEX-ASTOR GLEX Raytheon Sentinel aka RAF’s ASTOR (Airborne Stand-Off Radar) Non-Group GLF5-AEW GLF5 GULFSTREAM G550 Non-Group : AEW Abbreviations: AEW Airborne Early Warning RMACG/20-WP/13 Appendix A RMACG/20-IP/21 15/05/2025 International Civil Aviation Organization INFORMATION PAPER REGIONAL MONITORING AGENCIES COORDINATION GROUP TWENTIETH MEETING (RMACG/20) (Bangkok, Thailand, 19 to 23 May 2025) Agenda Item 8: Any Other Business ALTIMETRY SYSTEM ERROR (ASE) TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETING (Presented by NAARMO) SUMMARY This paper provides a summary of objectives and event details of the Altimetry System Error (ASE) Technical Interchange Meeting scheduled to take place 9-11 September 2025 in Seattle, WA in the United States. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. In recent years, the FAA and EUROCONTROL have hosted a number of ASE Workshop events. In 2016 and 2017 the FAA hosted events at their facility in Atlantic City, NJ. In 2023 EUROCONTROL hosted an event at their facility in Brussels, Belgium. 1.2. The FAA and EUROCONTROL would like to continue to conduct these events, in order to continue dialogue with air traffic service providers and industry on increased general awareness, improved remediation methodologies, and new developments. 1.2.1. The next event is the ASE Technical Interchange Meeting, which will be jointly hosted by the FAA and Eurocontrol during the period of 9-11 September 2025 at the Edgewater Hotel in Seattle, WA. The proposed meeting format will include presentations by government and industry. Extracurricular team- building activities are also planned. Attachment A includes a flyer planned for distribution to invitees. 2. OBJECTIVES 2.1. A list of potential topics of discussion includes: RMACG/20-IP/21 - 2 - • The possibility of extending RVSM above FL410 • Ongoing height monitoring and performance issues • ASE trends for specific aircraft types • Confusion about Section 9 approvals in the United States • Spoofing of ADS-B or GPS • Issues with older avionics and work to correct them • Work on avionics for new aircraft to improve RVSM capability upon entry into service 2.2. Previous events had a greater focus on the roles and responsibilities of governments and Regional Monitoring Agencies, and detailed information about ASE detection, causes, and analysis. This event is intended to invite a greater focus on the role of industry, as well as highlight new emerging topics relevant to the safe operation of RVSM airspace. The new topics of discussion proposed for this event are intended to increase awareness and invite collaboration on solutions. 2.3. Invitations to the event are currently being sent. All RMAs are invited to attend the event, and are requested to forward the information to any entities which might be interested in attending. 3. ACTION BY THE MEETING 3.1. The meeting is invited to note the information in this paper and in Attachment A. — — — — — — — — RVSM A l t i me t r yS y s t e m E r r o r ( A S E ) T ech n i cal I n t er ch an geMeet i n g F L 420 F L 430 F L 440 F L 450 F L 460 Edgewat erHot el 2411Al as kanWay S eat t l e,WA98121 naar mo@f aa. gov Eur RMA. S uppor t @eur ocont r ol . i nt 9t h-11t hSept ember2025 A b o v eF L 4 1 0

Type certificate, explained

What's in the Piper PA-42 Cheyenne 400 TCDS

A Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) is the FAA's record of what an aircraft type was approved as. It is the source of truth for weights, seating, fuel and the rules the design was certified against. Expand any line to see what it means.

TCDS A23SORev 19· Issued 2009
Read the full TCDS