Skip to main content

Interagency Aviation Lessons Learned 25-02: King Air Pitch Trim Malfunction

· DOI Office of Aviation Services · 2025

Public domain · DOI Office of Aviation ServicesAviation Safety Documents

Overview

The Interagency Aviation Lessons Learned 25-02: King Air Pitch Trim Malfunction () is a public-domain DOI Office of Aviation Services aviation safety document, republished here as a free chaptered HTML edition with a linked table of contents and the official PDF.

Publisher
DOI Office of Aviation Services
Document
Year
2025
Pages
2

Key points

  • A Beechcraft King Air B200 experienced a pitch trim malfunction during an RNAV approach, leading to an uncommanded pitch up movement upon autopilot disconnection.
  • The pilot discovered that both the electronic and manual elevator trim controls were inoperative due to a seized elevator trim.
  • The pilot successfully executed a go-around despite the challenges posed by the untrimmed aircraft.
  • Maintenance later identified a failed pitch trim servo as the cause of the malfunction.
  • Effective crew resource management between the two pilots was crucial for safely managing the situation.
Frequently asked questions
What was the main issue reported in the document?

The main issue was a pitch trim malfunction in a Beechcraft King Air B200, which resulted in uncommanded pitch movements during an approach.

How did the pilots respond to the pitch trim malfunction?

The pilots executed a go-around and managed to regain control of the aircraft after overcoming the challenges posed by the untrimmed condition.

What was determined to be the cause of the pitch trim malfunction?

Maintenance determined that a failed pitch trim servo was the cause of the malfunction, leading to the elevator trim seizing.

What safety measures were highlighted in the document?

The document emphasized the importance of effective crew resource management and the need to climb to a safe altitude in VFR conditions to manage flight control issues.

What should pilots be aware of regarding pitch trim servo failures?

Pilots should be aware that a pitch trim servo failure can manifest as uncommanded pitch movements or a binding elevator trim, which may seize.

Document

OAS-35A (4/18)

Interagency Aviation

Lessons Learned

No. IA LL 25-02 May 1, 2025 Page 1 of 2 Subject : Beechcraft King Air B200 Pitch Trim Malfunction Area of Concern: Flight Controls Distribution: All Aviation Operations.

Discussion: The following lesson was extracted from SAFECOM 25-0282 . Earlier this year, a pilot was repositioning a Beechcraft King Air B200 with a second pilot onboard but not part of the aircrew.

Upon arrival at the destination, the pilot was cleared to descend to 10,000ft MSL and given vectors for the RNAV approach. While on the vector, the pilot noticed a very brief (less than one second) illumination of a yellow "Up Elevator" annunciator indication on the aircraft's Primary Flight Display.

Once cleared for the approach, the pilot proceeded inbound. Upon reaching 500’ Above Ground Level (AGL) and in Visual Meterological Conditions (VMC), the pilot received the aural "500 ft" call out and proceeded to disconnect the aircraft's autopilot with the aircraft being fully configured for landing.

Upon deactivation of the aircraft's autopilot, the aircraft pitched up approximately 5-7 degrees and began to climb. The pilot increased forward pressure on the flight controls in an effort to maintain glideslope and attempted to use the electronic elevator trim to relieve control pressure. As the pilot was pressing forward on the electronic elevator trim buttons, he looked at the elevator trim control wheel and noticed that it wasn't moving as expected. The pilot thought the electronic elevator trim was inoperative so he attempted to manually trim the aircraft using the elevator trim control wheel. It was at this point that the pilot realized the aircraft's elevator trim was completely seized as neither electric nor manual inputs would cause the trim wheel to move.

The pilot then elected to initiate a go around which was performed uneventfully depsite having to overide the control forces of an untrimmed aircraft. Once properly configured, the pilot entered left traffic for landing only to discover that he was still unable to manually manipulate the elevator trim wheel. The pilot continued to apply more force on the pitch trim wheel and after some effort, felt the elevator trim wheel release allowing him to regain control over the aircraft's pitch trim condition. Once satisfied with the controllability of the aircraft, the pilot advised tower that he was ready to accept another attempt at landing and, once cleared to do so, performed an uneventful landing.

Maintenance later determined that a pitch trim servo had failed. A pitch trim servo failure on a King Air B200 can manifest as an uncommanded pitch up movement, a sudden and potentially uncontrolled pitch down, or a binding elevator trim where the elevator trim will seize. Well done to the two pilots that were aboard the aircraft for an excellent job responding to the atypical condition and working through the problem while continuing to safely pilot the aircraft. Exceptional crew resourse management (CRM) between the two pilots was critical to ensure a safe outcome.

No. IA LL 25-02 May 1, 2025 Page 2 of 2 Another consideration for managing flight control issues is to climb in VFR conditions to an altitude that would provide adequate time to resolve any additional degradation that could result in a loss of control.

/s/ Keith C. Raley /s/ Lori Clark Keith C. Raley Lori Clark Chief, Aviation Safety, Training, Program Branch Chief - Aviation Safety Management Evaluation, and Quality Management Systems DOI, Office of Aviation Services USDA, Forest Service

Source & rights

Source: doi.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
Publisher
DOI Office of Aviation Services
Year
2025
Pages
2
File size
215 KB