1 PURPOSE OF THIS ADVISORY CIRCULAR (AC). This AC provides guidance and information for developing a receiving inspection system and for incorporation into a person’s existing receiving inspection system to help prevent the introduction of unairworthy...
2 AUDIENCE. This AC applies to any person who has an existing receiving inspection system for aircraft parts and materials or who is interested in developing a receiving inspection system.
3 WHERE YOU CAN FIND THIS AC. You can find this AC on the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) website at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars and the Dynamic Regulatory System (DRS) at https://drs.faa.gov.
4 WHAT THIS AC CANCELS. AC 20-154, Guide for Developing a Receiving Inspection System for Aircraft Parts and Material, dated December 12, 2005, is canceled.
6 BACKGROUND. The FAA has expressed ongoing concern that unairworthy products and articles, as well as materials, are being installed on type-certificated products. Therefore, the FAA recommends that parts installers, maintainers, manufacturers, and s...
Advisory
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation
Circular
Administration Subject: Guide for Developing a Receiving Date: 7/3/24 AC No: 20-154A Inspection System for Aircraft Parts Initiated by: AFS-300 Change: and Materials 1 PURPOSE OF THIS ADVISORY CIRCULAR (AC). This AC provides guidance and information for developing a receiving inspection system and for incorporation into a person’s existing receiving inspection system to help prevent the introduction of unairworthy articles into inventories. The aim is to establish sufficient traceability to determine that the article(s) were manufactured under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 21 , were previously determined to be airworthy under 14 CFR part 43 , and were produced to established industry or U.S. Government standards or accepted foreign standards. Like all AC material, this AC is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation. It provides guidance and outlines a method of compliance with 14 CFR. This is one means, but not the only means, for developing a receiving inspection system. In lieu of following the method(s) prescribed herein, the applicant may elect to follow an alternate acceptable method that achieves the intended results. The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way, and the document is intended only to provide information to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
2 AUDIENCE. This AC applies to any person who has an existing receiving inspection system for aircraft parts and materials or who is interested in developing a receiving inspection system.
3 WHERE YOU CAN FIND THIS AC. You can find this AC on the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) website at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_cir culars and the Dynamic Regulatory System (DRS) at https://drs.faa.gov .
4 WHAT THIS AC CANCELS. AC 20-154, Guide for Developing a Receiving Inspection System for Aircraft Parts and Material, dated December 12, 2005, is canceled.
5 REGULATIONS, GUIDANCE, AND DEFINITIONS. Related regulations, guidance materials, and definitions are listed in Appendix C .
6 BACKGROUND. The FAA has expressed ongoing concern that unairworthy products and articles, as well as materials, are being installed on type-certificated products.
Therefore, the FAA recommends that parts installers, maintainers, manufacturers, and suppliers establish an enhanced receiving inspection system to help eliminate the safety risk posed by unairworthy components, parts, or materials. A comprehensive network of regulatory controls governs the design, manufacture, installation, and maintenance of aircraft parts. However, whether by inadvertent or deliberate action, products and articles
7 DEVELOPING THE RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM PLAN. This recommended receiving inspection system plan is intended to help prevent the entry of unairworthy and/or ineligible parts into inventories and therefore preclude their subsequent installation. Th...
7/3/24 AC 20-154A have been reported that do not meet regulatory requirements and are not eligible for installation. Maintenance providers should have a procedure describing their processes for procuring, receiving, and inspecting aircraft components, parts, and materials. These procedures will ensure conformity to the type design or specifications to ensure that the product being returned to service conforms to specified airworthiness requirements and is in a condition for safe operation.
7 DEVELOPING THE RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM PLAN. This recommended receiving inspection system plan is intended to help prevent the entry of unairworthy and/or ineligible parts into inventories and therefore preclude their subsequent installation. The plan describing a receiving inspection system should be detailed to the extent that it meets all its objectives and expectations to ensure identification and traceability. A person should consider the scope of their operation’s complexity for the development of and enhancing their receiving inspection system. The system should be commensurate with the privileges and limitations of the operation.
Appendix A contains a suggested receiving inspection system checklist derived from the contents in this AC, and Appendix B provides a sample documentation matrix for making a document requirement determination based on the supplier of the part. Departments within the organization, such as purchasing, auditing, maintenance, etc., should be made aware of the enhanced receiving inspection requirements through training or other documented procedural means. The following paragraphs contain suggested minimum elements that should be considered for incorporation into the written receiving inspection system plan.
Note: Appendices A and B provide a comprehensive overview of the material presented in the body of this AC. Users should modify the checklists (Appendix A) and the sample supplier documentation matrix (Appendix B) to meet the needs of their specific organization. Additionally, AC 00-56 , Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program, appendix 1, contains a documentation matrix based on the class of the part being evaluated.
7.1 Responsible Person(s). The responsible person should ensure that all incoming materials such as standard parts, components, or parts thereof, articles, equipment, and materials are acceptable for use on type-certificated products. In addition, the responsible person(s) should be identified in the plan and given authority for ensuring continuing quality control for all functions of the receiving and inspection written procedures and established standards.
7.2 Internal Quality Audit. Used to evaluate ongoing conformity with the receiving inspection system. Persons performing the quality audit as part of the evaluation program may be employed by, or an agent to, the organization. The objective of the internal quality audit process is to evaluate the effectiveness of the receiving inspection system by ensuring that it continues to follow the organization’s procedures and meet regulatory requirements. AC 145-5 , Repair Station Internal Evaluation Programs, contains information on how to design and implement an Internal Evaluation Program (IEP).
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 7.3 Training. Training of all receiving inspection personnel is to ensure personnel have a thorough understanding of the receiving inspection system. The training syllabus should include, as a minimum, recognition in article identification, determining the current status of the article, conformance determination of the article, regulatory compliance requirements, inspection procedures, handling, storage, ordering procedures, bench or functional testing, and recordkeeping requirements. All training should be documented and personnel training records established and maintained during the period of employment. Recurrent training should be implemented for familiarization of practices and any changes to procedures, regulations, or policies.
7.4 Technical Data. Ensure currency, applicability, and adequacy for making proper evaluations. A procedure should be established to ensure that technical data is current in accordance with the regulations or manufacturer’s recommendations. This includes, but is not limited to, data such as: 1. Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS); 2. Airworthiness Directives (AD); 3. U.S. or industry specifications; 4. Illustrated parts lists or catalogs; 5. Maintenance and/or overhaul manuals; 6. Structural Repair Manuals (SRM); 7. Service Bulletins (SB)/Service Letters (SL), or other manufacturer’s technical information; 8. Parts markings; 9. Engineering drawings; 10. Maintenance records/return to service; 11. Other applicable data for making an airworthiness determination, etc.; 12. Federal aviation regulations; and 13. AC guidance.
7.5 Measurement/Test Equipment. Precision measurement devices, test equipment, and gauges used to verify conformance to the applicable regulations of 14 CFR part 43, § 43.13 and part 145 , § 145.109(b) , industry standards, and specifications must be calibrated in accordance with an effective program to maintain accuracy to the standards of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), manufacturer’s specifications, or the standards of another country that is comparable to NIST.
Calibration records should be maintained, showing established intervals for calibration for each precision measuring device and procedures for taking actions on deficiencies.
This would include having a recall system to prevent inadvertent use of uncalibrated equipment.
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 7.6 Written Receiving Inspection Procedures. Developing a receiving inspection system can be a difficult task, considering the numerous forms and the complexities of the various manufacturers’, repair facilities’, and parts suppliers’ (distributors’) paperwork involved, along with the end user/customer requirements. Written procedures for the receiving and inspection of incoming articles should be developed according to the individual organizations’ complexity and regulatory requirements. As an example, the written procedures could include the following items: 7.6.1 Establish minimum training requirements for receiving inspection personnel. The training curriculum should be based on the complexity of the organization’s needs.
7.6.2 To help minimize confusion, distributors (sellers of parts) should be requested to fill all blank entries with “NA” to signify that the blank box or section is not applicable. The purchasing department should convey its document requirements to all distributors in order to create a smoother flow of articles into inventories.
7.6.3 A checklist should be created for receiving inspectors that would clearly identify the origin and/or traceability “path” of the article. This would help reduce confusion and aid accountability within the receiving inspection department.
7.6.4 A method to identify whether the articles were obtained from the primary or secondary vendor. Primary and secondary vendors are determined by the purchaser on the vendor’s compliance with the organization’s needs and performance for supplying the appropriate articles. At times, it may be feasible to review the required documents before purchase of the item via electronic means.
7.6.5 Means should be created to recognize when parts are to be substituted or substitution parts may be used. The substituted parts should be reflected in the articles’ maintenance records and include substantiating equivalency approval data. The installer is responsible for determining that the substitute part meets all regulatory requirements.
7.6.6 A method should be developed with instructions explaining how to perform comprehensive visual inspections of articles received, including checks for obvious physical damage, defects, and state of preservation, and that appropriate quantities have been received.
7.6.7 A means to verify that all part, model, serial numbers, etc., as appropriate, match the accompanying documentation, such as packing slips, invoices, certificates of conformance, work orders, maintenance release tags, or purchase orders.
7.6.8 To ensure articles are free from contamination or damage, verify that all appropriate plugs, caps, or safety devices are installed as required by the manufacturer and that the shipping container or packing is appropriate for items received or to be shipped.
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 7.6.9 If applicable, a method should be created to identify dangerous goods that are flammable, toxic, or volatile materials received to ensure that they are packaged and stored in a safe manner, either per manufacturer’s recommendations or as specified by regulatory requirements. Segregation procedures should be established for these types of materials and for any other items for which segregation is appropriate.
7.6.10 When applicable, a method should be included to examine materials subject to damage from electrostatic discharge (ESD). Materials should be packaged, handled, and protected in accordance with requirements for handling ESDs. Training for ESD recognition, handling, and processing should be accomplished and records maintained in the receiving inspection training file or the individual employee’s training file. In addition, procedures should be defined, prescribing periodic checks/inspections on ESD mats and wrist straps in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
7.6.11 Procedures explaining how to segregate and identify serviceable parts from unserviceable parts and maintaining documentation for traceability. The storage area for serviceable aircraft parts should be periodically checked (audited) for overall effectiveness of storage and identification methods of parts in inventory. The serviceable parts area should be controlled to prevent unintentional or unauthorized stocking of parts, materials, or components that have not been received through the system. Identified unserviceable (questionable) parts should be properly secured in a segregated area pending proper disposition of the part.
7.6.12 Develop a procedure to control bulk shipments of identical parts to ensure traceability to the producer of the item(s) (i.e., Production Approval Holder (PAH), standard parts, or raw material(s), etc.). Whenever possible, original packaging should remain with the parts or materials for identification purposes. This would be used for identifying the producer and lot or batch number as applicable, until installed or sold.
7.6.13 Develop a procedure to identify and properly store materials with a specified shelf life, life-limited articles, and environmentally sensitive/temperature-sensitive materials such as epoxy resins, prepreg composite materials, or sealants as an example. This procedure should ensure that outdated parts or materials are not inadvertently installed. Procedures should be in place to track the expiration date of and to explain how to segregate or dispose of them once their useful life has expired.
7.6.14 Establish a means to verify whether any ADs are applicable to any of the components or parts thereof received.
7.6.15 When inspection stamps are used, a control system should be established to govern their issuance and use.
7.6.16 Procedures to ensure incoming articles effectively apply to the products being maintained.
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 7.7 Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) (Dangerous Goods Program). HAZMAT (known internationally as dangerous goods) are found in many aircraft parts and in substances used in the aviation industry. Because there have been instances in the past when companies have shipped HAZMAT in violation of the regulations, the regulations require HAZMAT training for certain employees. A company’s HAZMAT program should address the company’s needs for training, as well as its internal procedures for handling and transporting HAZMAT. The principal applicable regulations are found in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR) parts 171 , 172 , 173 , and 175 , which prescribe requirements applicable to aircraft operators, maintenance providers, distributors, and anyone else who may ship HAZMAT. These regulations address a wide range of topics, such as developing a training program, properly identifying HAZMAT, packaging HAZMAT, shipping HAZMAT, and air carrier acceptance of HAZMAT. Additional regulatory guidance on training programs for certain types of certificate holders (CH) can be found in 14 CFR parts 121 , 135 , and 145. At a minimum, any HAZMAT employer should have a program that covers proper packaging, marking, labeling, classification, description, and documentation of shipments of HAZMAT, as well as compliance with the appropriate regulations that apply to the particular HAZMAT-related functions undertaken at the company.
Note: Additional HAZMAT information is available on the FAA website at https://www.faa.gov/hazmat/safecargo . HAZMAT safety recommendations are available from the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) website at https://www.phmsa.dot.gov .
7.8 Article Documentation/Identification. Procedures should clearly state and/or illustrate the documentation or other means of identification that would be acceptable for receiving articles from different types of vendors. The following are possible sources, but not the only sources, for determining airworthiness: 7.8.1 Shipping ticket, invoice, or other documents from the PAH.
7.8.2 Parts markings such as Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA), Technical Standard Order (TSO), data plates, serial numbers, part numbers, manufacturing production numbers, etc.
7.8.3 Letter of Direct Ship Authority, issued to the supplier by the PAH.
7.8.4 Maintenance release document(s) that meet part 43, signed by an appropriately certificated person, qualified for the relevant function, that signifies the item was approved for return to service after maintenance, preventative maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration. Records could also reflect the removal of articles from a type-certificated product.
7.8.5 FAA Form 8130-3 , Authorized Release Certificate, Airworthiness Approval Tag, is used for export approval, conformity determination from the PAH, or approval for return to service after maintenance or alteration by an authorized part 145 repair station or the holder of an air carrier operating certificate issued under part 121 or 135.
8 RECEIVING INSPECTION PROCEDURES FOR PARTS AND MATERIALS TEMPLATE. The following receiving inspection procedures provide information and guidance for developing and/or evaluating a receiving inspection system. These procedures set forth one means, bu...
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 7.8.6 Export Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A), Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) Form 1 (invalid if dated after 11/28/04), Transport Canada Authorized Release Certificate – Form One, and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Form 1 (effective on 11/28/04) provided the United States has a current Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA) and Maintenance Implementation Procedures (MIP) with the exporting country.
7.8.7 Other part or material certification forms, or a material certification form verifying that the standard parts conform to established industry or U.S. specifications, could be provided.
7.9 Part Evaluation. The evaluation should include a review of any usage history supplied with the part at the time of purchase, which could include accumulated time/cycles, remaining time/cycles, alterations, and/or repairs. Part verification could also include part number, serial number, symbols, manufacturing marks, identification stamps, etchings, casting codes, barcodes, dates, or lot numbers. Any item (indicators such as manufacturing numbers) unique to a particular manufacturer could assist in providing traceability to a PAH. The manufacturer’s system for identification during the manufacturing process is not always available to the end user. However, such information is often obtained by contacting the manufacturer.
7.10 Unsalvageable Articles. Establish written procedures for disposing of scrap products and materials. When appropriate, the proper and thorough mutilation of products and articles will ensure they are unusable for their original application and render them incapable of being reworked or camouflaged to provide the appearance of being serviceable. When mutilation is not appropriate, other methods may be used to prevent future representation such as those described in AC 21-43 , Production Under 14 CFR Part 21, Subparts F, G, K, and O, Appendix D, Scrap or Salvageable Aircraft Products and Articles.
7.11 Unserviceable Parts. Parts that may have exceeded approved repair limits, time, cycle limits, etc. If unserviceable parts are to be retained for possible future use, procedures should specify that they are to be segregated from serviceable parts. It is recommended that all documentation remain with these parts for possible later return to service, which could be because new approved repair procedures were later developed or the manufacturer extended time life extensions.
7.12 Segregation. At times, articles received may lack appropriate documentation or other supporting data necessary to show that the regulatory requirements were met. These requirements would include findings to show that the part was produced and/or maintained properly. Segregate those parts of questionable nature from serviceable parts until a sound determination can be made of their status and prevent them from subsequently being installed.
8 RECEIVING INSPECTION PROCEDURES FOR PARTS AND MATERIALS TEMPLATE. The following receiving inspection procedures provide information and guidance for developing and/or evaluating a receiving inspection system. These procedures set forth one means, but not the only means, for receiving parts or materials into inventories.
7/3/24 AC 20-154A Note: Appendices A and B provide a comprehensive overview of the material presented in the body of this AC. Users should modify the checklists (Appendix A) and the sample supplier documentation matrix (Appendix B) to meet the needs of their specific organization. Additionally, AC 00-56, appendix 1, contains a documentation matrix based on the class of the part being evaluated.
8.1 Acceptance of New Parts Manufactured by FAA-Certificated Sources. Receiving personnel should ensure that new parts produced by FAA-certificated sources are accompanied by the referenced documents or other information: 8.1.1 Production Certificate (PC) Holders. Invoice, packing list, or equivalent documentation (normal shipping documents), stating the part number(s) and corresponding quantities in each shipment.
8.1.2 Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) Holder. Normal shipping documents, documentation that identifies the part as an STC part and the production authority under which the part was produced.
8.1.3 Technical Standard Order Authorization (TSOA) Holder. Normal shipping documents, documentation, and/or markings that identify the part as a TSO part.
8.1.4 PMA Holder. Normal shipping documentation and/or markings that identify the part as an FAA-PMA part. The part or packaging must be marked “FAA-PMA” (refer to 14 CFR part 45 , § 45.15 ).
8.1.5 Approved Production Inspection System (APIS) Holder. Normal shipping documents, other documentation, and/or data plates that identify the product as being produced under a type certificate (TC) only with an APIS.
8.1.6 Letter of Direct Ship Authority Authorization. Evidence that authority was given to the supplier from the PAH to ship parts directly to the customer, which may have a statement on the purchase order stating that the part(s) “were produced under FAA-approved manufacturing and quality control systems/methods as set forth in the FAA Production Certificate.” 8.2 Acceptance of New Parts from Non-FAA-Certificated Sources. Receiving personnel should ensure that the distributor (seller) provides sufficient documentation to show traceability to one of the following: 1. A copy of shipping tickets, packing lists, invoices, and/or other documents providing evidence that the origin of the part is from an FAA PAH or that the original acquisition was from an FAA-approved source.
2. A copy of the written letter of direct shipment authorization that includes a statement that those parts were produced in accordance with the PAH quality system.
3. A copy of the Certificate of Conformity (C of C) (i.e., standard parts). This certificate should identify the acceptable standard to which the part was produced.
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 4. A copy of the return to service from FAA-approved foreign repair stations and/or FAA-certificated sources.
5. The return to service entry under part 43 maintenance record entry.
6. A return to service record entry from an FAA-certificated air carrier operating under part 121 or 135.
8.3 Acceptance of Used, Repaired, or Overhauled Parts from FAA-Certificated Sources.
One or more of the following should accompany parts approved for return to service procured from FAA-certificated sources: 1. Repair station work order.
2. FAA Form 8130-3; JAA Form 1 (prior to 11/28/04); EASA Form 1 (after 11/28/04); or Transport Canada Authorized Release Certificate – Form One.
3. Air carriers operating under part 121 or 135 return to service maintenance record entry.
4. Part 145 repair station return to service maintenance record entry that the repair station is authorized to perform.
5. Parts/components maintained under part 43 return to service release.
8.4 Acceptance of Used, Repaired, or Overhauled Parts from Non-FAA-Certificated Sources. Parts procured from non-FAA-certificated sources, such as distributors, should be accompanied by one of the following: 1. A return to service maintenance record entry from an FAA-certificated air carrier operating under part 121 or 135; 2. A return to service maintenance record entry from an FAA-certificated air agency operating under part 145; 3. The return to service entry from the certificated entity that performed the original repair or overhaul under part 43; or 4. For “as-is” articles, documentation that describes the current condition of the article and conveys that the part may not meet airworthiness requirements.
8.5 Acceptance of Parts from Foreign Sources. The need to maintain aircraft and components outside the United States has continued to expand, along with an increase in the rise of foreign-manufactured aeronautical products used by U.S. operators and repair facilities. Receiving personnel should ensure they receive the proper documents with parts that were repaired or manufactured from foreign sources.
8.6 Acceptance of Life-Limited or Time-Controlled Parts from Any Source. Procedures for accepting life-limited or time-controlled used parts into an inventory system require special attention due to safety ramifications. In addition to the documentation listed above, receiving inspection personnel should ensure that life-limited and time-controlled parts are accompanied by the following documentation:
9 SUSPECTED UNAPPROVED PARTS (SUP). SUP reports originate from many different sources, such as being detected during incoming receiving inspections, facility audits or surveillance, complaints, congressional inquiries, or from accident or incident inv...
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 8.6.1 Documentation that substantiates the part number, serial number, and current life status of the part (i.e., the accumulated total time or remaining hours, cycles, and/or calendar time, whichever time limit applies to the part; or any usage/storage history, which may result in an adjustment to the remaining life of the part).
Note: Life-limited parts, when sold or transferred, must include the mark, tag, or other record used to comply with § 43.10 .
8.6.2 Optional additional documentation that can help to establish history and installation eligibility of the article: 1. AD status; 2. Modification status (i.e., SBs, technical bulletins), if applicable; 3. All major repairs, alterations, and modifications accomplished on the article; and 4. Record of work accomplished during the last maintenance, repair, overhaul, or alteration performed.
9 SUSPECTED UNAPPROVED PARTS (SUP). SUP reports originate from many different sources, such as being detected during incoming receiving inspections, facility audits or surveillance, complaints, congressional inquiries, or from accident or incident investigations. The FAA’s policy is to encourage voluntary disclosure of information affecting aviation safety, such as SUPs. Although reports may be made anonymously, the submission of the reporter’s name is requested to enable the FAA to gather additional information if needed and provide confirmation and/or followup to the reporter.
AC 21-29 , Detecting and Reporting Suspected Unapproved Parts, provides updated information and guidance to the aviation community for detecting SUPs and the procedures for reporting them to the FAA. FAA Form 8120-11 , Suspected Unapproved Parts Report, serves as a standardized means of reporting. Additional information and guidance can be found at the following: 1. SUP Program Office website at https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/safety/programs/sups .
2. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Audit and Evaluation 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: AAE-300, Room 911 3. FAA Aviation Safety Hotline at 800-255-1111.
4. Questions or comments regarding a SUP-related issue may also be directed to the SUP Program Office via https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/safety/programs/sups .
9.1 SUPs Procedures. Organizations should incorporate SUPs identification, reporting, and disposition procedures into the receiving inspection system. Procedures should also include a system for reviewing inventory and suppliers when SUP reports have been issued by the FAA.
10 AC FEEDBACK FORM. For your convenience, the AC Feedback Form is the last page of this AC. Note any deficiencies found, clarifications needed, or suggested improvements regarding the contents of this AC on the Feedback Form.
7/3/24 AC 20-154A 9.2 SUPs Training. Organizations should develop and provide training to employees, appropriate to their duties, on the detection of SUPs and on the organizations’ procedures for identifying, reporting, and dispositioning a SUP.
10 AC FEEDBACK FORM. For your convenience, the AC Feedback Form is the last page of this AC. Note any deficiencies found, clarifications needed, or suggested improvements regarding the contents of this AC on the Feedback Form.
Hugh Thomas for Lawrence Fields Executive Director, Flight Standards Service 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix A APPENDIX A. RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM CHECKLIST RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM CHECKLIST RESPONSIBLE PERSON Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Receiving inspection personnel listed on company roster by position and name?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Inspection functions authorized for named individual identified?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Individual trained to perform authorized functions, by name?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Individual issued a letter or stamp for functions authorized to perform?
TRAINING Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Individuals’ training records documented?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Training records on file and subject(s) covered?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Part/material identification procedures?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for identifying current status of part/material?
5. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for making a quality determination of the part/material?
6. [ ] [ ] [ ] Understand regulatory compliance requirements?
7. [ ] [ ] [ ] Inspection procedures for individual’s intended function?
8. [ ] [ ] [ ] Proper handling procedures?
9. [ ] [ ] [ ] Proper storage procedures?
10. [ ] [ ] [ ] Ordering procedures?
11. [ ] [ ] [ ] Functional testing procedures?
12. [ ] [ ] [ ] Inspection procedures (i.e., visual, bench check, etc.) for airworthiness determinations?
13. [ ] [ ] [ ] Recordkeeping requirements?
14. [ ] [ ] [ ] Use of inspection stamps and control procedures?
15. [ ] [ ] [ ] Hazardous materials (HAZMAT) procedures?
TECHNICAL DATA Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Current?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Applicable?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Adequate?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Production Approval Holder (PAH) design data?
5. [ ] [ ] [ ] Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS)?
6. [ ] [ ] [ ] Airworthiness Directives (AD)?
7. [ ] [ ] [ ] U.S. or industry specifications?
8. [ ] [ ] [ ] Illustrated parts lists or catalogs?
9. [ ] [ ] [ ] Maintenance manuals?
10. [ ] [ ] [ ] Structural Repair Manuals (SRM)?
11. [ ] [ ] [ ] Overhaul manuals?
12. [ ] [ ] [ ] Service Bulletins (SB)/Service Letters (SL)?
13. [ ] [ ] [ ] Operator’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-approved maintenance program/requirements?
14. [ ] [ ] [ ] Manufacturer’s specifications?
15. [ ] [ ] [ ] Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)?
A-1 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix A APPENDIX A. RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM CHECKLIST (Continued) 16. [ ] [ ] [ ] Advisory circulars (AC)?
17. [ ] [ ] [ ] Engineering Orders (EO)?
MEASUREMENT/TEST EQUIPMENT Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Calibration to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards or other accredited calibration facilities recognized to follow International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10012, ISO 17025, American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/National Conference of Standards Laboratories (NCSL) Z540.3, or country of type certificate (TC) manufacturer?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Current calibrations specifications for equipment to be calibrated?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Proper storage?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures to prevent past due measuring/test equipment from being used?
RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Written procedures?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Internal quality audit procedures?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Signature procedures?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for checking for physical damage and defects?
5. [ ] [ ] [ ] Preservation procedures?
6. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for quantities received controls?
7. [ ] [ ] [ ] Verification procedures for part/model/serial numbers?
8. [ ] [ ] [ ] Documentation matches part(s)/material(s) received?
9. [ ] [ ] [ ] Storage area for serviceable parts/materials?
10. [ ] [ ] [ ] Is batch segregation maintained to assure traceability to the part/material producer?
11. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for keeping parts/materials with original packaging?
12. [ ] [ ] [ ] Storage area for unserviceable parts/materials?
13. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures to identify serviceable parts from unserviceable parts?
14. [ ] [ ] [ ] Serviceable parts area secured to prevent unauthorized cannibalizing of components?
15. [ ] [ ] [ ] System to assure proper control of shelf life-limited parts/materials?
16. [ ] [ ] [ ] Reference system for determining status of ADs?
17. [ ] [ ] [ ] System to control inspection stamps, if used?
18. [ ] [ ] [ ] Segregation maintained for requiring additional testing (i.e., flammability)?
19. [ ] [ ] [ ] Flammable, toxic, or volatile material procedures for storage, receiving, and appropriate packaging?
20. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for verifying all required plugs and caps, etc., are installed?
21. [ ] [ ] [ ] Shipping container and packaging appropriate for items received?
ORDERING PROCEDURES Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Approved vendor/alternate vendor list as revised?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Special requirements communicated to vendors, such as documents required?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procurement system for ordering FAA-approved parts/materials?
A-2 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix A APPENDIX A. RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM CHECKLIST (Continued) HAZARDOUS MATERIAL Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] HAZMAT advisory publications?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Availability of HAZMAT-related Federal regulations?
DOCUMENTATION IDENTIFICATION Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for determining what types of documentation/identification are acceptable?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Shipping ticket, invoice, or other PAH documents?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Parts marking, such as Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA), Technical Standard Order (TSO), data plates, serial numbers, or manufacturer’s markings?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Maintenance release documents?
5. [ ] [ ] [ ] Airworthiness approval forms (i.e., FAA Form 8130-3)?
6. [ ] [ ] [ ] Export Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A)?
7. [ ] [ ] [ ] Part or material certification?
8. [ ] [ ] [ ] Retention procedures for original documentation?
SEGREGATION Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Area for airworthy parts/materials?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Area for nonaircraft parts/materials?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Area for questionable parts where further determinations must be made (segregation)?
BULK QUANTITIES Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Traceability procedures for same type parts received in large quantities?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for duplicating certificate received with bulk shipment of the same type part?
PART EVALUATION Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Review known history?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Accumulated time?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Accumulated cycles?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Calendar time?
5. [ ] [ ] [ ] Major alterations with supporting documentation?
6. [ ] [ ] [ ] Major repairs with supporting documentation?
7. [ ] [ ] [ ] Part markings could include part number, serial number, casting codes, etc.?
UNSERVICEABLE PARTS/MATERIALS Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Mutilating procedures?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Retention/segregation procedures for unserviceable parts?
3. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for donating to entities, such as schools, to be used for training?
4. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures for turning parts over to non-aviation-related uses?
A-3 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix A APPENDIX A. RECEIVING INSPECTION SYSTEM CHECKLIST (Continued) REPORTING SUSPECTED UNAPPROVED PARTS (SUP) Y N N/A 1. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures outlined for detecting SUPs?
2. [ ] [ ] [ ] Procedures outlined for reporting SUPs?
A-4 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix B APPENDIX B. SAMPLE AIRCRAFT PARTS AND MATERIALS DOCUMENTATION MATRIX This is a suggested matrix for making a documentation determination based on the supplier of the part. AC 00-56 , Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program, appendix 1, contains a documentation matrix based on the class of the part being evaluated.
Rotable, Standard Commercial Repairable, Part Supplier Part Condition Part or Part or Expendable Material Material (Notes 1, 2, & 3) Production Certificate (PC) New/Rebuilt PC PC or CS PS Holder/Licensee Parts Manufacturer New/Rebuilt PS CS PS Approval (PMA), Technical Standard Order Authorization (TSOA) Holder U.S. Air Carrier, Repair New/Rebuilt FL or FR CS PS Station, Repair Station located outside the United States, Production Approval Holder (PAH), Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)/type certificate (TC) only Repaired FR - - Overhauled FL or FR - - Foreign Carrier/ New/Rebuilt JL or JR CS PS Repair Station located outside the United States, Foreign Mfg.
Repaired JR - - Overhauled JL or JR - - Distributor Serviceable PA CS PS “AS IS” PS PS PS Any Source “AS IS” PS PS PS Purpose: To identify the minimum documents that should be provided when receiving parts or materials.
B-1 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix B APPENDIX B. SAMPLE AIRCRAFT PARTS AND MATERIALS DOCUMENTATION MATRIX (Continued) KEY PC Shipping ticket, packing slip, invoice, etc., from the PC holder/licensee with the PC number listed.
Include PAH part number and manufacturer’s name.
Optional: Use FL or JL.
FL Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Form 8130-3 left side signed that lists manufacturer’s name.
FR FAA Form 8130-3 right side signed for return to service. Include approval reference.
XYZ will verify airworthiness and return part to service if form is signed only for work performed.
JL Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) Form 1 (invalid if dated after 11/28/04), European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Form 1 (valid after 11/28/04), Transport Canada Authorized Release Certificate – Form One, or equivalent form from Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA) country with left side signed that lists manufacturer’s name.
JR JAA Form 1 (invalid if dated after 11/28/04), EASA Form 1 (valid after 11/28/04), Transport Canada Authorized Release Certificate – Form One, or equivalent form from BASA country with right side signed for return to service. Include approval reference. Item cannot be accepted without BASA unless the person/organization is authorized by the FAA, and is so indicated on the form. Operator will verify airworthiness and return part to service if form is signed only for work performed.
CS Certification statement on packing slip or attachment that lists manufacturer’s name. The statement must indicate the part or material meets the applicable specifications.
Optional: Use Certificate of Conformity (C of C), material certification, FL, or JL.
PS Packing slip that lists manufacturer’s name.
Unmarked PMA/Technical Standard Order (TSO) piece parts require FL, FR, JL, or JR. Parts procured “AS IS” will be treated as UNSERVICEABLE until conformity is accomplished.
PA Packing slip attachments showing traceability through documentation to an approved source listed in Appendix A . Part markings (i.e., part number, mfg. name, PAH stamp, etc.) may be used in lieu of paper documentation.
Optional: Use FL, FR, JL, or JR.
NOTES for Rotable, Repairable, and Expendable Parts or Components: (1) For life-limited parts, the seller must supply documentation indicating the current status of the part, including items listed in Notes 2 and 3. There must be a sufficient degree of certainty that the parts status is current.
(2) For time-controlled parts, the seller must list hours, cycles, and/or days since last overhaul and the record of work accomplished, with approval references.
(3) Airworthiness Directive (AD) and Service Bulletin (SB) modification status must be provided, if applicable.
B-2 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C APPENDIX C. REGULATIONS, GUIDANCE MATERIAL, AND DEFINITIONS C.1 Related Regulations.
C.1.1 Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR): • Part 1 , Definitions and Abbreviations.
• Part 21 , Certification Procedures for Products and Articles.
• Part 43 , Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration.
• Part 45 , Identification and Registration Marking.
C.1.2 Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR), Transportation.
C.2 Related Guidance Materials (current editions): C.2.1 Advisory Circulars (AC). You can obtain the following documents from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) website at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advi sory_circulars/ .
• AC 00-56 , Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program.
• AC 20-62 , Eligibility, Quality, and Identification of Aeronautical Replacement Parts.
• AC 21-29 , Detecting and Reporting Suspected Unapproved Parts.
• AC 21-43 , Production Under 14 CFR Part 21, Subparts F, G, K, and O.
• AC 21-45 , Commercial Parts.
• AC 23-27 , Parts and Materials Substitution for Vintage Aircraft.
• AC 43-9 , Maintenance Records.
• AC 43-18 , Fabrication of Aircraft Parts by Maintenance Personnel.
• AC 45-2 , Identification and Registration Marking.
• AC 145-5 , Repair Station Internal Evaluation Programs.
• AC 145-9 , Guide for Developing and Evaluating Repair Station and Quality Control Manuals.
• AC 145-11 , Repair Station Guidance for Compliance with the Safety Agreement Between the United States and the European Union.
C.2.2 FAA Orders. FAA employees can obtain the following documents from the MyFAA employee website at https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices and the Dynamic Regulatory System (DRS) at https://drs.faa.gov . Inspectors, operators, and the public can access these documents at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/orders_no tices and DRS.
C-1 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C • FAA Order 8130.2 , Airworthiness Certification of Aircraft.
• FAA Order 8130.21 , Procedures for Completion and Use of the Authorized Release Certificate, FAA Form 8130-3, Airworthiness Approval Tag.
• FAA Order 8900.1 , Flight Standards Information Management System.
C.2.3 European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Documents. You can obtain all related EASA documents on the EASA website at https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library .
C.2.4 Joint Documents. You can obtain the following documents from the FAA website at https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/repair .
• Agreement Between the United States of America and the European Community on Cooperation in the Regulation of Civil Aviation Safety (the Agreement).
• Maintenance Annex Guidance Between the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency of the European Union (the MAG).
C.2.5 FAA Policy Statement PS-AIR-21.8-1602 , Approval of Non-Required Safety Enhancing Equipment (NORSEE).
C.3 Definitions.
C.3.1 Airworthiness Approval. A document that certifies that a product or article conforms to its approved design and is in a condition for safe operation, unless otherwise specified.
C.3.2 Airworthy. The definition of airworthy applies to type-certificated products (e.g., aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller), and parts thereof, and consists of the following two conditions: 1. The product/article must conform to its type certificate (TC). Conformity to type design is considered attained when the product configuration and the components installed are consistent with the drawings, specifications, and other data that are part of the TC, which includes any Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) and field-approved alterations incorporated into the product/article.
2. The product/article must be in a condition for safe operation. This refers to the condition of the product/article relative to wear and deterioration.
C.3.3 Approved Part. The term “part” is contained in the definition of article (“a material, part, component, process, or appliance”), as defined in part 21, § 21.1 . For the purposes of this AC, an approved part, or part thereof, was designed, fabricated, produced, and/or maintained under the appropriate and applicable regulation. This includes being maintained pursuant to part 43 or produced pursuant to § 21.8 or § 21.9 and is not restricted to FAA production approvals (e.g., Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) or Technical Standard Order Authorization (TSOA)). This could include the following: C-2 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C C.3.3.1 Produced in accordance with a PMA issued under part 21 subpart K (§ 21.8(a)).
C.3.3.2 Produced in accordance with a TSOA issued under part 21 subpart O (§ 21.8(b)).
C.3.3.3 Produced during the TC application process under part 21 subpart B , or the STC application process under part 21 subpart E , prior to the issuance of the certificate; subsequently determined to conform to the approved TC or STC (§ 21.8(c)).
C.3.3.4 Produced under a TC without a separate production authorization and an Approved Production Inspection System (APIS), in accordance with part 21 subpart F (§ 21.9(a)(1)).
C.3.3.5 Produced under a Production Certificate (PC) (including production by a “licensee” if produced under PC authority), in accordance with part 21 subpart G (§ 21.9(a)(2)).
Note: A licensee is a person who has exclusive or nonexclusive rights to apply for a PC (refer to § 21.132 ) under a “licensing agreement” if they hold or have been awarded rights to the benefit of a TC holder from the owner of the TC. The term licensing agreement does not imply or infer that a PC holder may grant production approval to any party on behalf of the FAA. Authority granted by a PC holder to a supplier to ship parts directly to a customer of the PC holder is NOT considered to be a licensing agreement.
C.3.3.6 “Standard part.” A part manufactured in complete compliance with an established government or industry-accepted specification that contains design, manufacturing, and uniform identification requirements. The specification must include all the information necessary to produce and conform the part and must be published so any person/organization may manufacture the part.
C.3.3.6.1 In the past, the FAA has applied § 21.9(a)(3) to parts that have specifications when a determination of physical conformity to a design could be made. This application largely excluded classes of parts in which the parts are conformed not on the basis of their physical configuration but by meeting the specified performance criteria. Much of the componentry used in electronic devices are manufactured under standard industry practices, often to published specifications developed by standards organizations such as SAE International (formerly known as the Society of Automotive Engineers), RTCA, Inc.
(formerly known as the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics), ASTM International (formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials), Semitec, the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC), and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Such C-3 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C standards developed by these bodies are overseen by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), the IEEE Standards Committee, as well as the electrical and electronics industry, at large, which depends upon characteristic design standards for consistency in operation and performance.
C.3.3.6.2 The FAA notified the public in the Federal Register (FR) on March 5, 1997 ( 62 FR 9923 ) that the interpretation of an acceptable U.S. Government- or industry-accepted specification may include specifications that may be limited to detailed performance criteria, complete testing procedures, and uniform marking criteria. These parts are best exemplified by discrete electrical and electronic parts, which include resistors, capacitors, diodes, transistors, and nonprogrammable integrated circuits (e.g., amplifiers, bridges, switches, and gates). Conversely, large-scale, application-specific, or programmable integrated circuits, hybrids, gate arrays, memories, central processing units (CPU), or other programmable logic devices would not be considered standard parts and are not discrete.
C.3.3.7 Commercial parts as defined in § 21.1. No Production Approval Holder (PAH) markings should be found on the article (§ 21.9(a)(4)).
C.3.3.8 Parts produced by an owner or operator for the purpose of maintaining or altering their own product (§ 21.9(a)(5)). Owner-produced parts cannot be produced for the purpose of resale.
C.3.3.9 A part that is fabricated by an FAA-certificated repair station or other authorized person and consumed in the repair or alteration of a product or article in accordance with part 43 (§ 21.9(a)(6)). Fabrication and use of these parts are described in AC 43-18. Controls should be in place to prevent separate sales of these specific parts (i.e., sales to other persons independent of the repair). If a certificate holder (CH) desires to sell its fabricated part(s) separately, it must obtain a PMA. The fabrication of multiple parts is not to be used as a means to circumvent the requirements of § 21.9(a).
C.3.3.10 Produced in any other manner approved by the FAA (§§ 21.8(d) and 21.9(a)(7)). For example: C.3.3.10.1 Manufactured in accordance with an approval under a Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA) under part 21 subpart N , approval of engines, propellers, materials, parts, and appliances for import.
C.3.3.10.2 Military surplus parts (defined as parts that have been originally released as surplus by military, even if subsequently resold by manufacturers, owners/operators, repair facilities, or any other suppliers of parts) may fall under this condition providing they meet the airworthiness requirements for the product to be installed on.
C.3.3.10.3 FAA Policy Statement PS-AIR-21.8-1602 contains procedures for obtaining approval of equipment designated as “Non-Required Safety Enhancing C-4 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C Equipment” (NORSEE) that is determined to be a minor change to type design. Specifically, this policy addresses equipment that is not required by any Federal regulation with the intent to measurably increase aircraft safety.
C.3.3.11 Title 14 CFR parts 43 and 145 .
C.3.3.11.1 Articles that have been maintained, rebuilt, altered, or overhauled, and have been approved for return to service in accordance with parts 43 and/or 145, are considered to be “approved parts.” C.3.3.11.2 Articles that have been inspected and/or tested by persons authorized to determine conformity to FAA-approved design data may also be found to be acceptable for installation.
Note: Refer to AC 20-62 for information regarding eligibility and traceability of replacement parts.
C.3.4 Article. A material, part, component, process, or appliance.
C.3.5 Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA). An executive agreement concluded between the United States and a foreign country for the purpose of promoting aviation safety. Also known as an Agreement for the Promotion of Aviation Safety.
C.3.6 Commercial Part. An article that is listed on an FAA-approved Commercial Parts List included in a design approval holder’s (DAH) instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA) required by § 21.50 .
C.3.7 Direct Ship Authority. Suppliers to a PAH may ship replacement and modification parts directly to the end user without the parts being originally processed by the PAH or its associate facility’s receiving inspection facilities only if the PAH or associate facility: C.3.7.1 Authorizes the authority, in writing, to the supplier to ship directly to a user/operator. An individual written authorization is not required for each direct shipment. The authorization may include limitations such as specific part numbers, time periods, or particular users/operators. This authorization will be maintained by the PAH or associate facility for review by the responsible Certificate Management Section/certificate management office (CMO).
C.3.7.2 Includes controls in its FAA-approved quality control or inspection system to compensate for the absence of inspection normally conducted at the PAH’s or associate facility’s location (e.g., receiving inspection and test). Compensating factors should include onsite evaluations of the supplier and the inspection of the part at the supplier by: C-5 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C 1. The PAH or associate facility, or 2. The supplier under a delegated inspection authority from the PAH or associate facility.
C.3.7.3 Ensures that each part shipped is accompanied by a shipping ticket, invoice, or other document containing a declaration that the individual part was produced under the terms of the production approval, and the inspection/acceptance has been accomplished by either the PAH/associate facility or by the delegated inspection authority. The shipping document for parts manufactured under PMA, PC, APIS, and TC should identify the product on which the part is eligible for installation. The shipping document for subcomponents manufactured for Technical Standard Order (TSO) articles should contain the TSO number. When FAA Form 8130-3 is used for this purpose, the direct ship authorization will be annotated in accordance with Order 8130.21.
C.3.7.4 Provides the appropriate part marking information to the supplier.
C.3.7.5 Advises its responsible Certificate Management Section/CMO of each direct ship authorization.
C.3.8 Distributors. Brokers, dealers, resellers, or any person engaged in the sale or transfer of parts for installation on type-certificated products.
Note: In an effort to provide maintenance providers, owners, and operators of aircraft readily available guidance for determining acceptability of components and parts, the FAA published AC 00-56. This AC describes a system for the accreditation of civil aircraft parts distributors on the basis of voluntary industry oversight and provides information that may be used for developing accreditation programs. The FAA strongly endorses participation in such a program to improve the ability of certificated persons to establish the eligibility of parts for installation on type-certificated products. Purchasers conducting business with participants in this program should not be discouraged from implementing their own procurement and acceptance procedures (as outlined in AC 00-56). The Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA) maintains a listing of participants in the voluntary program at the following website: https://www.aviationsuppliers.org .
C.3.9 European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). An agency of the European Union (EU), which has been given specific regulatory and executive tasks in the field of aviation safety and environmental protection. This agency therefore constitutes a key part of the EU’s strategy to establish and maintain a high level of civil aviation safety and environmental protection in Europe. EASA Headquarters is located at D-50668 Cologne, Germany. The postal address is Postfach 10 12 53, D-50452 Cologne, Germany.
Telephone [49 221] 8999 000, facsimile [49 221] 8999 099, or email info@easa.europa.eu.
C.3.10 Export Certificate of Airworthiness (C of A). A certificate issued by the National Aviation Authority (NAA) of the country of export. Acceptable examples of forms, when C-6 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C the country of origin currently has a BASA with the United States that provides for U.S.
recognition of replacement parts produced in that country, include: 1. The Joint Aviation Authority (JAA) Airworthiness Approval Form 1. Valid if dated prior to 11/28/04; 2. EASA Form 1. Valid after 11/28/04. When an EASA Form 1 is used as a dual release, block 12 must be completed in accordance with, and contain the language specified in, the current EASA MAG; and 3. Transport Canada Authorized Release Certificate – Form One.
C.3.11 FAA Form 8130-3, Authorized Release Certificate, Airworthiness Approval Tag.
A recognized industry standard airworthiness approval form. Procedures for the completion and use of FAA Form 8130-3 are contained in Order 8130.21. When using FAA Form 8130-3 as a dual release form, block 12 must be completed in accordance with, and contain the language specified in, the current EASA MAG.
C.3.12 Inspection. The act of testing or checking a product, article, or part thereof against established standards to assure it conforms to its design requirements and is in a condition for safe operation. Inspection could include documentation review, visual inspections, bench or functional tests, preservation (condition), packaging, technical data, or shelf-life limits. Technical data could include, but is not limited to, maintenance manuals, ICA, Structural Repair Manuals (SRM), Type Certificate Data Sheets (TCDS), airworthiness limitations (AL), manufacturer’s service documents, Service Bulletins (SB), or engineering data.
C.3.13 Life-Limited Part. Any article for which a mandatory replacement limit is specified in the type design, the ICA, or the maintenance manual.
Note: An audit trail tracing a life-limited article back to its origin would only be required when the article’s records are not complete enough for an accurate determination of the elapsed time on the article to be established.
C.3.14 Maintenance Implementation Procedures (MIP). Procedures for implementing the provisions of a BASA that applies to maintenance.
C.3.15 Person. An individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint-stock association, or governmental entity. It includes a trustee, receiver, assignee, or similar representative of any of them.
C.3.16 Product. A complete aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller (§ 21.1(b)(6)) that has been type certificated in accordance with the applicable regulations, and for which Federal aviation specifications or TCDSs have been issued.
C.3.17 Production Approval Holder (PAH). A holder of a PC, an APIS, a PMA, or a TSOA, who controls the design and quality of the product, article, or part thereof.
C-7 7/3/24 AC 20-154A Appendix C C.3.18 Receiving Inspection Area. An area where products and articles are initially received and evaluated to determine their airworthiness status and are inspected for conformity prior to acceptance into the serviceable stock area.
C.3.19 Serviceable Stock. Articles that have been evaluated in accordance with the FAA-approved or accepted data and have been determined to be eligible for installation on type-certificated products.
C.3.20 Signature. An individual’s unique identification, used for accepting a product or article received or inspected under its receiving inspection system. A signature may be handwritten, in the form of an inspection stamp, electronic, or any other form specified to be acceptable under the receiving inspection system.
C.3.21 Supplier. A person at any tier in the supply chain who provides a product, article, or service that is used or consumed in the design or manufacture of, or installed on, a product or article (§ 21.1).
C.3.22 Traceability. The ability to establish that a part or material was manufactured under part 21 or was previously determined to be maintained under part 43. Possible sources for making a traceability determination could be shipping tickets, invoices, parts markings (i.e., PMA, TSOA), data plates, serial/part numbers, manufacturing production numbers, maintenance records (which could include logbook entries, serviceable tags, etc.), work orders, or any other means acceptable to make a sound determination of airworthiness.
Note: Caution should be exercised when receiving a “Certificate of Compliance” that has a statement such as “document with traceability to the manufacturer available upon request.” This does not alone establish traceability to the PAH.
C.3.23 Vendor. Any person or business establishment engaged in the sale or transfer of parts for installation in appliances or type-certificated products.
C-8 Advisory Circular Feedback Form If you find an error in this AC, have recommendations for improving it, or have suggestions for new items/subjects to be added, you may let us know by contacting the Flight Standards Directives Management Officer at 9-AWA-AF B -1 2 0-Directives@faa.gov .
Subject: AC 20-154A , Guide for Developing a Receiving Inspection System for Aircraft Parts and Materials Date: _____________________ Please check all appropriate line items: An error (procedural or typographical) has been noted in paragraph ____________ on page _______.
Recommend paragraph _____________ on page __________ be changed as follows: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ In a future change to this AC, please cover the following subject: (Briefly describe what you want added.)
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Other comments: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ I would like to discuss the above. Please contact me.
Submitted by: Date: ______________________