Skip to main content

X-57 and Whirl Flutter Discussion

20180002829 · NASA · 2018

Public domain · NASATechnical Reports

Overview

No abstract available

Publisher
NASA
Document
20180002829
Year
2018
Pages
11

Document

X - 57 and Whirl Flutter Discussion

Kia Miller and Roger Truax Aerostructures Branch NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA Aerospace Flutter & Dynamics Council Spring 2018 Savannah, GA

Whirl Flutter Background

• Whirl flutter is most commonly associated with

Lockheed’s Electra fatal mishap

• Research, testing and new analysis techniques

seemed to solve the issue (1960s)

• Propeller propulsion is still an area of interest today

– Advanced propellers a current area of CFD research

– Electrically enhanced propulsion seems to be an area of

interest in the industry

• Whirl flutter research seemed to cap out in the

1960s, yet our computational capabilities have

greatly increased

Photo Credit: NASA

X - 57 Objectives and Tecnam P2006T/Wing Overlay

Primary Objective Cruise Motor • Goal: 5x Lower Energy Use (Compared to Original P2006T @ 175 mph) X - 57 Wing • Internal Combustion Engine vs Electric Ribs/Spars Propulsion Efficiency changes from 28% to 92% (~3.3x) • Synergistic Integration • Propulsion airframe integration provides higher cruise motor efficiency and cruise optimized wing Hi - lift Motors Pod Structure Derivative Objectives • ~30% Lower Total Operating Cost • Zero In - flight Carbon Emissions P2006T Wing Secondary Objectives • 15 dB Lower community noise P2006T Fuselage • Flight control redundancy and robustness (As Delivered) • Improved ride quality X - 57 Key Partners: • Certification basis for Distributed Electric NASA ARFC, NASA LaRC Propulsion (DEP) technologies Empirical Systems Aerospace ( ESAero ) Xperimental LLC, CA.

X - 57 Project Approach

Mod 1 Mod 3 DEP wing development and Mod 2 fabrication Ground validation of DEP high lift system Mod 4 Ground and flight test validation of electric Flight testing of motors, battery, and Flight test electric motors baseline Tecnam Flight test with integrated DEP instrumentation.

relocated to wingtips on P2006T motors and folding props DEP wing including (cruise motors remain in wing - nacelles (but no DEP Goals: tips).

motors, controllers, or Goals: • Establish Baseline folding props).

• Establish Electric Power Tecnam Performance System Flight Safety • Pilot Familiarity • Establish Electric Tecnam Retrofit Baseline Mod 1 Achieves Secondary Objectives Achieves Primary Objective of • DEP Acoustics Testing High Speed Cruise Efficiency Mod 2 • Low Speed Control Robustness • Certification Basis of DEP Technologies Mod 3 Mod 4

Challenges Involving Whirl Flutter

Challenges Involving Whirl Flutter

• Variable prop effects on whirl

modes and flutter margins

• Electric motors have less

vibrations, but motor mount

dampers tend to stabilize whirl

flutter

• Should blade frequencies

effect flutter results?

Challenges Involving Whirl Flutter

• Standard modal testing

acquires pitch and yaw of prop

system

• Gyroscopic whirl modes not

included in ground testing

• Characterizing the damping of

the engine mount requires

environmental chamber testing

Challenges Involving Whirl Flutter

• Flight test planning with

variable speed motors and

variable blade pitch

• Monitoring flight data with

harmonics

• Monitoring flight data with EMI

Challenges Involving Whirl Flutter

• Are there future needs in the

field?

• Can the aircraft industry benefit

from active suppression or

smart materials?

Discussion: Challenges Involving Whirl Flutter

Thank you.

Kia Miller Roger Truax kia.d.miller@nasa.gov roger.a.truax@nasa.gov 661.276.3712 661.276.2230 Aerostructures Branch NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA

Source & rights

Source: ntrs.nasa.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
20180002829
Publisher
NASA
Year
2018
Pages
11
File size
730 KB