Skip to main content

An Online Resource for Flight Test Safety Planning

20070017453 · NASA · 2007

Public domain · NASATechnical Reports

Overview

A viewgraph presentation describing an online database for flight test safety techniques is shown. The topics include: 1) Goal; 2) Test Hazard Analyses; 3) Online Database Background; 4) Data Gathering; 5) NTPS Role; 6) Organizations; 7) Hazard Titles; 8) FAR Paragraphs; 9) Maneuver Name; 10)…

Publisher
NASA
Document
20070017453
Year
2007
Pages
31
Chapters
2

Key points

  • The primary goal of flight test safety planning is to obtain flight test data while minimizing risk.
  • Test Hazard Analyses (THAs) involve analyzing hazards, determining risks, and establishing mitigating procedures.
  • An online Test Hazard Database has been developed to share flight test safety information and lessons learned.
  • Matured THAs have identified six key hazards related to Part 25 stall testing, including loss of control and stall/spin chute failures.
  • Mitigations for flight test safety include establishing minimum altitudes, performing pre-flight checks, and ensuring proper crew safety measures.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main goal of flight test safety planning?

The main goal is to obtain flight test data while being as safe as possible.

What does a Test Hazard Analysis (THA) involve?

A THA involves analyzing hazards, determining risks, and establishing mitigating procedures consistent with the test objectives.

What is the purpose of the online Test Hazard Database?

The database is designed to share flight test safety information and lessons learned with anyone in the aviation business.

What are some identified hazards in Part 25 stall testing?

Six key hazards have been identified, including loss of control and stall/spin chute failures.

What are some examples of mitigations for flight test safety?

Examples include establishing minimum altitudes for maneuvers, performing pre-flight checks, and ensuring crew safety measures like wearing helmets and parachutes.

Part 25 Stall Hazards

Example Maturation

Part 25 Stall Hazards

Organizations

• Six different organizations submitted THA information regarding stall flight testing – Bombardier (12) – Cessna (1) – FAA (5) – Gulfstream (6) – NTPS (26) – Tiger (2)

NTPS

Hazard Titles

• 19 different titles including: – Stalls – Stall Speed – Stall Speed (Ice Shapes Installed) – Stalling Period – Stall Characteristics – Stall Characteristics with Delayed Turn (On Ice Shapes) – Wings level stall – Turning flight and accelerated turning stalls – Position Light System Installation – Demonstration of Misinstalled Thrust Reverser – Rudder Available Determination - A/C with 40% increased PCUs installed

NTPS

FAR Paragraphs

• Seven different Part 25 paragraphs originally had stall related hazards, but the matured data applies to: – 25.103, Stalling Speed – 25.201, Stall Demonstration – 25.203, Stall Characteristics – 25.207, Stall Warning

NTPS

Maneuver Name

• 14 different maneuver names – Stall speed determination – Stall characteristics determination – Stall – Stalls conducted with power on and off – Full stall (straight) – Full stall (turning) – Full stall (accelerated turning) – Straight stalls – contaminated leading edge – TCAS testing – Windshear Testing – Windmill airstart – APU flight test – Rudder available determination with 40%-increased PCUs installed – Simulated rejected takeoffs

NTPS

Identified Hazard

• Most varied field in submitted data • The focus of maturing effort, along with minimizing procedures for the agreed-upon hazard identified • As an example: – Original • “ There is a risk of stall/departure from controlled flight when increasing angle-of-attack at low airspeeds. ” – Became: • “ Loss of control ” • For Part 25 stall tests, we ended up with just six hazards

NTPS

Part 25 stall testing

Matured Hazard Titles

• After submitted by NTPS and reviewed by the FAA and NASA, six hazards were identified with respect to Part 25 stall testing 1. Loss of control 2. Stall/spin chute fails to deploy 3. Stall/spin chute fails to jettison when commanded 4. Departing runway surface (During ground test of stall spin chute) 5. Recovery chute uncommanded deployment 6. Loss of operating engine(s )

NTPS

Loss of Control Causes

• Many contributions of test safety planning did not include the “ causes ” – just the hazards and mitigations • Of the ones submitted, the following were included in the matured THA ’ s 1. Unpredicted aerodynamic response.

2. Stick Pusher fails to prevent aircraft from reaching aerodynamic stall.

3. Improper control inputs.

NTPS

Mitigations

• Literally hundreds of varied mitigations were matured into just twelve – • The matured mitigations include: 1. Do stall testing in a buildup approach : a. from least risk to highest risk i. forward cg, mid cg, aft cg ii. Power off before power on iii. Wings level before turning iv. 1 kt /sec before 3 kt /sec b. terminate buildup if FAR limits on bank angle are exceeded at any point of the buildup

NTPS

Mitigations (continued)

2. Establish minimum altitudes for: a. entry, b. recovery initiation, c. recovery chute deployment and d. manual bailout.

3. Perform pre-flight checks of stall warning and stick pusher, as applicable.

4. Anti-spin chute must be installed, functional and armed. Perform pre-flight and pre-maneuver checks of chute as applicable.

5. Minimum crew onboard.

6. Emergency Egress system must be installed and armed. Perform pre-flight and pre-maneuver checks of egress system as applicable.

NTPS

Mitigations (continued)

7. Crew to wear helmets and parachutes .

8. Surface winds must be less than xx kts (parachute dependent).

9. No aggravated input stalls . All stalls will be ball centered.

10. No asymmetric power stalls.

11. If departing controlled flight retard throttles to idle and centralize controls .

12. Do not add power during recovery until airspeed is increasing above 1.2 Vs.

NTPS

Database Now Open to the Public

http:// pbma.nasa.gov/ftsdb / Look for “ Test Hazard Database ”

NTPS

http:// pbma.nasa.gov/ftsdb /

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

NTPS

In Conclusion

• Database status – Civil Part 25 THA ’ s “ complete ” – Civil Part 23/27/29/31 under construction – Military & research THA ’ s - TBD • The matured THA database is NOT an auto-safety planning device – The matured hazards, causes and mitigations are necessarily generic – Your test will have unique problems and will require unique solutions – The THA database can be an excellent starting point • Lessons learned should be shared – We don ’ t have enough time to learn every lesson firsthand

NTPS

Source & rights

Source: ntrs.nasa.gov. Public-domain U.S. Government work (17 USC §105) — freely reproducible.

Permanent URL — we don’t break links.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Doc number
20070017453
Publisher
NASA
Year
2007
Pages
31
File size
2.5 MB
Chapters
2