Skip to main content

Operator Survey: Beechjet 400A

Beechcraft Beechjet 400A · Performance Data

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document is an operator survey focused on the Beechcraft Beechjet 400A, a light business jet known for its balance of passenger comfort, performance, and operating costs. The survey compiles feedback from various operators who have flown the aircraft since its introduction. It highlights the aircraft's spacious cabin, impressive cruise speed of over 400 knots, and the advanced Collins Pro Line 4 avionics system. The document also discusses the aircraft's performance in terms of fuel efficiency and operational capabilities, as well as the challenges faced by operators, including maintenance issues and quality control concerns. Overall, the survey provides valuable insights into the operational experience of the Beechjet 400A.

  • Cruise speed exceeds 400 knots, allowing for efficient travel.
  • Typical passenger load factors range from three to seven people.
  • The aircraft can cover distances of over 1,600 nautical miles with reserves.
  • Operators report direct operating costs of $650 to $800 per hour.
  • The Beechjet 400A features advanced Collins Pro Line 4 avionics.

Document

Source

Originally published by d16bsf97ryvc45.cloudfront.net. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Performance Data
Year
1993
Pages
4
File size
22 KB
Publisher
d16bsf97ryvc45.cloudfront.net
How rare is it?
1Beechcraft Beechjet 400A registered worldwide · 0 active

Common. Rarer than 24% of the aircraft models we track.

Documentation completeness
4/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Beechcraft Beechjet 400A.

More Beechcraft Beechjet 400Amanuals & documents

See all 31
Similar aircraft

If you fly the Beechcraft Beechjet 400A, you may also be researching these.

In this document

Comfort and Performance

Operators praise the Beechjet 400A for its spacious cabin, which has been reconfigured for better use of space. The aircraft typically accommodates five to seven passengers on trips averaging 350 to 500 nautical miles, with cruise speeds of 400 to 420 knots. The aircraft can fly over 1,600 nautical miles with reserves, though operators prefer planning trips of 1,200 to 1,350 nautical miles.

Beechjet 400A vs. Competition

The Beechjet 400A competes primarily with the Citation II and V, and 30-series Learjets. Operators often cite cabin volume and speed as key reasons for choosing the 400A. It offers a cruise speed of 400 knots, which allows for significant time savings on typical missions compared to its competitors.

Kudos and Criticisms

While operators commend the Beechjet 400A for its assembly quality and performance, some express concerns about its handling characteristics and roll control, which relies solely on spoilers. The aircraft's stability in IMC conditions is generally praised, but some pilots note a lack of roll authority at slow speeds.

Utility and Operating Cost

Operators report flying their Beechjet 400A aircraft between 350 to 700 hours annually, with direct operating costs ranging from $650 to over $1,000 per hour. The aircraft is sold with a warranty covering five years or 5,000 hours on the airframe and Beech-manufactured components.

Safety notes

  • Operators reported issues with the environmental control system under extreme temperatures.
  • Concerns about the reliability of pitch trim actuators and the aural warning system.

Full document text

COPYRIGHT 1995 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED perator Survey: Beechjet 400A Comfort, speed and Collins avionics earn accolades. Parts costs, quality control growing pains and ECS draw sharp rebukes. O By FRED GEORGE October 1993, Document No. 3304 (4 pages) Business airplanes inevitably are a tradeoff between passenger comfort, airplane performance and operat- ing cost. People who operate Beechjet 400A airplanes generally believe they have opted for the best blend of these qualities in a light jet. Beech Aircraft’s very own, made in Wichita business jet is now more than two years old and the operators with whom we spoke generally accord it high marks. Every-day flyers pointed out that the generous cabin affords passengers more usable room than its competi- tors. They also like its 400-plus-knot cruise speed and its ability to climb directly to FL 410 when fully loaded. Pilots rave about the Beechjet 400A’s Collins Pro Line 4 integrated avionics package, commenting that the large format display tubes and FMS 850 flight manage- ment package make the airplane easier to fly than most other light jets. The refinements found in the Beechjet 400A, though, are the product of many years of honing this jewel-in- the-rough into its present form. The process has been an ongoing challenge, actually having its origins in Beech’s approach to marketing business jet aircraft. Beech wanted a business jet to call its own for more than 25 years. However, the firm elected to concentrate on becoming the dominant manufacturer of turboprops. Therefore, the company decided to look into adopting a jet instead of creating one from scratch. The firm briefly flirted with French and British business jet makers in the 1960s and 1970s before settling into a serious courtship with Mitsubishi in the mid-1980s. The effort culminated with Beech acquiring Mitsubishi’s MU 300 Diamond in 1985. This venture would prove to be quite a challenge for the airplane’s new parent, because the original Dia- mond design didn’t have the range, performance or cabin configuration to be competitive with its cross-town rivals made by Learjet and Cessna. Role reversal between American and Japanese com- panies is most unusual. Usually it’s the Americans who invent some hot new technology that the Japanese sub- sequently wind up perfecting for the consumer. Such was not the case with the Diamond. Mitsubishi had prodigious engineering and heavy manufacturing capa- bilities, but lacked the expertise to build a competitive light business jet. Beech would take on this role, focus- ing its assets and experience on transforming its newly adopted progeny into a mature airplane. How well has Beech done? We talked to about one- third of the firms that have operated Beechjet 400As during the past two-plus years. Here is what operators told us. COMFORT AND PERFORMANCE As previously mentioned, there is near unanimous praise from the Beechjet 400A operators with whom we spoke regarding the generous cabin space for the OPERATOR SURVEY passengers. Beech didn’t make the 400A’s interior any larger than those of previous versions of the airplane, but the firm’s designers reworked the interior to make much better use of the available space. Beech also changed the fuselage fuel tank configuration to create more interior room for the passengers. Earlier Diamond and Beechjet 400 airplanes typical- ly were configured with a three-place aft divan, center club section and a forward lavatory. Beech reconfig- ured the cabin to accommodate club and three-quarter seating, as shown in the interior diagrams and pho- tographs. The lavatory was moved to the aft section of the cabin. The lavatory seat in all 400A airplanes is equipped with a seat belt and certified as a passenger seat. The club and three-quarters is the most popular cabin configuration, according to our survey, but Beech also offers seven and nine passenger seat interiors as well as the popular eight seat floor plan. Operators were quick to comment about the cabin’s oval shape, saying that it provided more room for pas- sengers than the more circular cross section of a Learjet or a Citation. Many operators surprised us with reports of average passenger load factors of five to seven people, an unusually high number for a light jet. Most others report- ed an average load factor of three to four people, about what we expected in this class of aircraft. Beechjet 400A airplanes are used for relatively short trips. Most respondents said they fly 350- to 500-nm legs, with block times of 1+00 to 1+30. On short trips, operators report that they climb into the high 30s for cruise and block the aircraft at 400 knots true. Longer trips allow operators to climb into the low 40s and result in block speeds of about 420 knots. The Beechjet 400A has enough fuel and speed to fly more than 1,600 nm with reserves, but most operators said they are more comfortable planning trips no longer than 1,200 to 1,350 nm. They reported average fuel burns from about 1,250 to 1,350 pph. People who operate the 400A say the airplane lives up to their performance expectations and that the air- craft meets or exceeds the flight manual projections. BEECHJET 400A VS. COMPETITION According to survey respondents, the Beechjet 400A’s main competitors are the Citation II and V, and 30- series Learjets. Cabin volume was most often cited as the reason they bought the Beechjet 400A, but many who looked at the Citation II and even the peppy Cita- tion V wanted more speed. One operator crowed, “The 400A will run the wheels off a Citation.” In truth, a Beechjet 400A saves about eight to 10 minutes on a typical 400-nm mission compared to a Citation II and beats a Citation V by five to seven min- utes over the same distance. Its 400knot cruise speed can shave more than 30 minutes from long-range trips compared to a Citation II and it can arrive as much as 15 minutes sooner than a Citation V. It also burns less

Show full text

fuel than either of the Citations. The Beechjet 400A’s cruise speed is closer to that of a 30-series Learjet, but its Pratt & Whitney Canada JT15D-5 engines burn more fuel than the miserly AlliedSignal TFE731 turbofans of the Learjets. Comments of many operators reflect their previous business aircraft operating experience. Former users of smaller airplanes raved about the 400A’s Collins Pro Line 4 avionics. They especially liked the large format EFIS displays. One said tongue in check, “The [primary flight] display ruins my instrument scan. Everything I need to watch is in one place.” (The Beechjet 400A’s standard avionics package is fitted with a two-tube EFIS that has a combination Elec- tronic Attitude Director Indicator/Horizontal Situation Indicator flanked by separate altimeter and airspeed instruments. The optional three- and four-tube configura- tions come with left- and right-side Primary Flight Dis- plays with integral air data read-outs.) Respondents also liked the Collins FMS 850 flight management system and the hand-eye coordination design of the Pro Line 4 avionics package as config- ured for the Beechjet 400A. Cockpit engineers, accord- ing to Beech, were well aware of the need to place knobs, switches and buttons close to the displays and functions they control. “We just couldn’t get anything like this avionics package in other light jets we consid- ered,” explained one operator. KUDOS AND CRITICISMS Most of these operators also praised Beech for high standards of assembly quality, systems dependability, and climb and cruise performance. One relatively low utilization operator said, “We could fly this airplane 1,000 hours per year.” Operators with larger airplane experience had differ- ent impressions of the 400A. They appreciated its oper- ating economy, high maximum landing weight that permits fuel to be tankered from stop to stop, and over- all aircraft climb and cruise performance. Almost all operators liked the Beechjet’s stability, especially in IMC. Praise for the aircraft’s handling characteristics wasn’t so uniform. “It has bomber-like handling characteristics” said one former Falcon Jet pilot. “It seems to not have enough roll authority at slow speeds in turbulence.” said another. “It’s no Learjet [in roll response],” echoed a third operator. Such comments are to be expected because of the aircraft’s roll control design. It doesn’t have ailerons, Operator Survey COPYRIGHT 1995 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED relying solely on manually actuated spoilers for roll con- trol. Eliminating ailerons reduces adverse yaw tendency during brisk roll maneuvering, but gives the airplane a heavier feel than a combination of ailerons and spoil- ers, or ailerons alone. Beech officials responded that the airplane was designed to have the feel and stability of a larger air- plane. There are no plans to change the flight control system of the airplane. (The spoilers-only roll control sys- tem caused no problems during the original certification of the airplane and no accidents or incidents have been linked to deficiencies in roll control.) Operators lauded Beech for the level of support and service provided by the factory and dealers. That was the good news. Then came the bad news. Some survey respondents thought that such superb support was the minimum necessary to keep their airplanes flying. For example, one operator said, “Our pilots packed overnight bags for one-hour flights. They didn’t know when they next would be stranded because the air- plane might break.” Another operator rebuked Beech for failing to secure the brackets of a bleed air piccolo tube in a wing lead- ing edge. And another said that metal shavings left in the console after manufacturing caused electrical short circuits. Yet another airplane had cockpit switches that were miswired. The operator remarked, “How could the factory test pilot have flown the airplane without noticing such obvious problems?” Beech acknowledged that some early airplanes were the victims of poor quality control. The company responded by reorganizing its manufacturing process into work teams, not unlike quality circles, that have greater autonomy and more power to make changes to iron out such inconsistencies in assembly quality. New airplanes should be much less susceptible to such manu- facturing maladies because of such process changes, claims Beech. INHERENT DESIGN GRIPES Three prominent Beechjet 400A inherent design prob- lems are beyond the control of folks on the assembly line. First, operators reported that hot and cold weather extremes tax the environmental control system beyond its heating and cooling capacity. Additionally, there is insufficient airflow to the cockpit, they griped. Opera- tors also noted that the AlliedSignal air cycle machine (ACM) hasn’t been all that reliable. Beech and AlliedSignal recognize these as legitimate concerns. The companies are looking at reliability enhancements for the ACM. However, Beech has no plans to increase the volume of the air flow by enlarg- ing the air ducts or installing recirculation fans. United Beechcraft, Incorporated (UBI) at Atlanta-Fulton County Airport currently offers Supplemental Type Cer- tificated (STCed) heating and cooling packages for Beechjets. UBI can install an electric cabin heating package and also a vapor cycle (freon) air condition- ing system. Beech will offer an optional vapor cycle air conditioner, similar to the UBI kit, in early 1994. The reliability of pitch trim actuators was a second major concern of operators. Beech now is stocking replacement units with a more robust design, but there is no early exchange program to preempt such failures before they occur. The third frequently heard gripe was the loudness of the cockpit aural warning system. Beech officials com- mented that the high background noise levels in early Diamond and Beech 400 airplanes required relatively loud aural warnings to meet the minimum sound con- trast level for certification. But, Beech installed much more effective soundproofing in the 400A, dropping the interior noise levels by five to eight decibels. That resulted in much more audible aural warnings—from one end of the airplane to the other. Variability in the warning sound volume from system to system is another problem, according to Beech. The firm is exploring changes to the system to resolve the annoyance. Beech responded to operator complaints about the cost of maintaining and repairing the Shinko Electric Company starter-generators that were originally fitted to the Beechjet 400A. Beech switched to a Lucas design that costs less to retrofit than the Shinko units cost to overhaul. UTILITY AND OPERATING COST Most operators in our survey said they fly their Beechjet 400A’s 350 to 400 hours per year, but a few fly 550 to 700 hours annually. The crew multiple for the average operator is 1.0 to 1.5 people. The 600- to 700-hour-per- year operators have a crew multiple of 2.0 or more, which is more appropriate for such high utilization. Most operators thought that the flight manuals and maintenance documents were well-written. A few opera- tors commented that high density altitude airport opera- tions brought out a weakness in the flight manual performance data. If they had their druthers, the flight manual would have included more detailed information on ECS off (environmental control system) on takeoff performance, especially in the second segment climb charts and it would have included flaps up takeoff charts. One previous Beechjet 400 operator remarked that the earlier aircraft’s manuals had more complete performance charts. But, such piqued comments were not heard from most operators. Maintenance people had plenty of opinions about the 400A. The airplane is sold with a one-year subscription Operator Survey COPYRIGHT 1995 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Operator Survey COPYRIGHT 1995 THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED to the Computerized Aircraft Maintenance Program (CAMP) System with which most operators were satis- fied. Some opted not to use a computerized records system and at least one uses a program written by the operator’s own personnel. Mechanics thought the Beechjet 400A could have been better designed for access to parts. They say they bruise knuckles and strain muscles reaching for components and wished for Western logic in the lay- out of systems. Relatively high parts costs was another frequent com- plaint. This was heard from a broad range of opera- tors, including firms that operated fleets with heavy jets. One company said, “We ordered a specially config- ured interior cabinet from Beech’s own supplier and paid $2,600 for it. The factory wanted $12,000 for the original part. Beech said that it is aware of this concern and that an attempt is being made to hold down price increas- es. Company officials, however, have not announced plans to lower the cost of replacement parts. Most Beechjet 400A airplanes are still covered by the factory warranty—five years/5,000 hours on the airframe and Beech manufactured components, two years on the avionics, 1,000 hours on the engines and one year/1,000 hours on other airframe or system parts not made by Beech. Most operators report a direct operating cost of $650 to $800 per hour, although a few boosted this number to more than $1,000 to build a reserve for unforeseen maintenance. PROGRESS VS. PERFECTION Beechjet 400A operators freely expressed their dis- pleasure with some aspects of owning and operating their aircraft, but most of them also were enthusiastic proponents. Would they advise another firm to buy a Beechjet 400A? “You would be hard pressed to beat this airplane,” said one. “We are very pleased,” said another. A half dozen respondents just said, “Buy it!”. Beech faces formidable competition when the Learjet 45 arrives in little more than two years, according to some 400A operators. But, today Beech owns a specif- ic niche in the light jet market that no other manufactur- er can challenge. For now, the Beechjet 400A offers the biggest cabin cross section in its class plus sprightly cruise performance that rivals the most spirited light jet contenders. And as Beech continues to improve the 400A, customer loyalty will only become stronger. B/CA