Skip to main content

AAIB Bulletin: G-CGEI EW/G2012/04/12

Cessna Citation Bravo · Other Documents

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document is an accident report concerning the Cessna 550 Citation Bravo, specifically the aircraft registered as G-CGEI. The report details an incident that occurred on April 30, 2012, during a private flight from Biggin Hill to Gloucester. The aircraft experienced a failure of the nose landing gear to extend, resulting in a landing with the gear retracted and subsequent damage to the fuselage and landing gear doors. The report includes a synopsis of the flight history, investigation findings, and analysis of the incident, highlighting the lack of prior issues with the landing gear and the challenges faced during the investigation.

  • Aircraft involved: Cessna 550 Citation Bravo, registration G-CGEI.
  • Incident date: April 30, 2012, during a private flight.
  • Nose landing gear failed to extend, leading to a landing with gear retracted.
  • Damage sustained to the lower forward fuselage and nose landing gear doors.
  • Hydraulic fluid leak traced to the right main landing gear uplock union.

Document

Source

Originally published by assets.publishing.service.gov.uk. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Other Documents
Year
2012
Pages
2
File size
300 KB
Publisher
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
How rare is it?
108Cessna Citation Bravo registered worldwide · 0 active

Common. Rarer than 1% of the aircraft models we track.

Documentation completeness
3/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Cessna Citation Bravo.

More Cessna Citation Bravomanuals & documents

Similar aircraft

If you fly the Cessna Citation Bravo, you may also be researching these.

In this document

Synopsis

The aircraft, after being repainted, failed to extend its nose landing gear during approach, leading to a landing with the gear retracted. Damage occurred to the forward fuselage and nose landing gear doors, but the crew was unharmed.

History of the Flight

The flight originated from Biggin Hill, where the aircraft had undergone refurbishment. During the approach to Gloucester, the nose landing gear did not extend, and the aircraft landed with the gear retracted.

Investigation

The investigation revealed that considerable force was needed to open the damaged nose landing gear doors. A hydraulic leak was found from the right main landing gear uplock union, but landing gear function checks indicated normal operation despite this leak.

Analysis

The analysis concluded that there was insufficient evidence to determine the cause of the nose landing gear failure, given the satisfactory results of functional tests and the lack of prior issues.

Safety notes

  • Ensure thorough pre-flight checks of landing gear systems to prevent similar incidents.
  • Regular maintenance and inspections are crucial for landing gear functionality.

Full document text

92 © Crown copyright 2012 10/2012 AAIB Bulletin: G-CGEI EW/G2012/04/12 ACCIDENT Aircraft Type and Registration: Cessna 550 Citation Bravo, G-CGEI No & Type of Engines: 2 Pratt & Whitney Canada PW530A turbofan engines Year of Manufacture: 2000 Date & Time (UTC): 30 April 2012 at 1655 hrs Location: Runway 08, Bournemouth Airport Type of Flight: Private Persons on Board: Crew - 3 Passengers - None Injuries: Crew - None Passengers - N/A Nature of Damage: Lower forward fuselage and nose landing gear doors damaged Commander’s Licence: Airline Transport Pilot’s Licence Commander’s Age: 65 years Commander’s Flying Experience: 14,000 hours (of which 6,000 were on type) Last 90 days - 19 hours Last 28 days - 3 hours Information Source: Aircraft Accident Report Form submitted by the pilot Synopsis The aircraft had flown to Gloucester from Biggin Hill after being repainted. During the approach, the nose landing gear failed to extend. The aircraft landed with the nose landing gear retracted, damaging the forward lower fuselage and nose landing gear doors. Tests and inspections were unable to identify a probable cause for the failure of the nose landing gear to extend. History of the flight The aircraft was being flown from Biggin Hill where it had undergone an interior refurbishment and a repaint. During the approach to land at Gloucester the nose landing gear failed to extend using both the normal and emergency systems. The aircraft landed with the nose landing gear retracted, damaging the lower forward fuselage and nose landing gear (NLG) doors. The flight crew were uninjured and exited the aircraft through the main cabin door. Investigation After jacking the aircraft and depressurising the emergency landing gear extension system the nose landing gear doors were opened manually. Considerable force was required to open them due to the damage they had sustained during the landing. When the doors were opened, the NLG extended freely under gravity to the down position. 93 © Crown copyright 2012 10/2012 AAIB Bulletin: G-CGEI EW/G2012/04/12 After recovering the aircraft, hydraulic fluid was found in the underside of the right wing and on the lower rear fuselage. This was traced to a hydraulic leak from the right main landing gear (MLG) uplock union. Landing gear function checks, with the NLG doors disconnected, confirmed that landing gear would extend normally and by use of the emergency landing gear extension system, despite the leak from the right MLG uplock union. The caster angle of the nose landing gear was measured as 4o 30’. The caster angle limit in the aircraft maintenance manual was 4o +/- 15’. It was not possible to measure the rigging of the NLG doors due to the damage they had sustained during the landing. A review of the work carried out a Biggin Hill confirmed that no maintenance had been carried out on the NLG doors and that they had been painted in the closed position. There had been no reported problems with the landing gear prior to the aircraft flying to Biggin Hill, or during its subsequent departure for Gloucester. Analysis In view of the lack of reported problems with the landing gear prior to the incident, the satisfactory results of the functional test of the landing gear extension systems, and the inability to carry out rigging checks of the NLG doors, there is insufficient evidence available at this time to identify the cause for the NLG failing to extend.