Skip to main content

Actually Accurate

Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet · Parts Catalog

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document provides an overview of the CiES fuel sender technology specifically designed for the Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet. It discusses the challenges of traditional fuel level indication systems in aircraft and introduces a new, highly accurate non-contact sensor technology developed by CiES. The document highlights the installation process, the reliability of the new system, and its compatibility with existing aircraft instrumentation. It serves as a resource for pilots and aircraft owners interested in upgrading their fuel level sensing technology to improve accuracy and reliability.

  • The CiES fuel sender system provides fuel level accuracy within 0.03 inches, significantly reducing errors in fuel readings.
  • Cirrus SF50 aircraft typically require three fuel senders per tank for optimal performance.
  • Installation of each CiES sensor takes about four hours and requires three electrical connections.
  • The mean time to failure for CiES units is over 90,000 hours, indicating high reliability.
  • CiES technology is designed to be compatible with existing aircraft instrumentation, providing both digital and analog outputs.

Document

Source

Originally published by ciescorp.net. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Parts Catalog
Year
2019
Pages
7
File size
961 KB
Publisher
ciescorp.net
How rare is it?
773Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet registered worldwide · 704 active

Common. One of the most common aircraft types we track.

Documentation completeness
6/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet.

More Cirrus SF50 Vision Jetmanuals & documents

Similar aircraft

If you fly the Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet, you may also be researching these.

In this document

Introduction to CiES Fuel Sender Technology

The CiES fuel sender technology addresses the common inaccuracies found in traditional fuel level indicators. By utilizing a non-contact magnetic field sensor, the system provides precise fuel level readings, significantly improving reliability compared to legacy systems.

Installation and Compatibility

The CiES fuel sender can be installed in various configurations depending on the aircraft's design. For the Cirrus SF50, three senders are typically required per tank. Installation takes approximately four hours per sensor and involves connecting three wires for power, ground, and signal.

Performance and Reliability

The mean time to failure for a CiES unit exceeds 90,000 hours, showcasing its durability and reliability. The technology eliminates issues associated with corrosion and mechanical wear found in traditional fuel senders.

Future Developments

CiES is exploring additional fuel system components and automation technologies that could enhance pilot operations, such as automated tank switching and digital fuel monitoring via mobile applications.

Safety notes

  • Ensure proper installation to avoid electrical issues that could affect sensor performance.
  • Regular maintenance checks are recommended to ensure continued accuracy and reliability of the fuel level sensors.

Full document text

PHOTOGRAPHY BY MIKE SHORE 80 October 2019 www.eaa.org 81 CiES SENSORS PROVIDE RELIABLE FUEL LEVEL READINGS BY BETH E. STANTON In airplanes, fuel sloshes around in long, shallow tanks, creating motion that creates sporadic contact with the sensors in the tank. This results in notorious inaccuracy and the classic windshield wiper motion seen with most fuel gauge needles. “Like your tachometer, the fuel gauge is a component that really ought to work,” he said. “Then we came up with these statements that make no sense, like that it only has to be accurate at zero. Well, if your tachometer were only accurate at zero, it would be a broken tachometer. There were a whole bunch of reasons people dreamed up to say this problem couldn’t be solved, and we, the aviation com- munity, never really did anything about it.” In 2012, Cirrus Aircraft asked Scott to take a shot at the problem of fuel level indication. In response, he developed and patented a relatively simple system using a non-contact position sensor using magnetic field technology. He paired this new technology with the same float mechanism found on many GA aircraft. The system is highly accurate, indicating changes in fuel levels less than 0.03 of an inch, which represents much less than a tenth of a gallon of fuel. “Heads were spinning,” Scott said. “The most hated, reviled, untrusted instrument in the aircraft all of a sudden is now the most reliable instrument in the aircraft. It’s a total phase change.” SOLVING THE PROBLEM TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM, Scott and his team mounted a variety of fuel sender technologies in a wing-shaped Plexiglas tank and motored this contraption around on a boat. These experiments allowed them a clear view of the dynamics that fuel senders endure and why they commonly fail in aircraft. Methodically, they defined the criteria of an ideal sender. After evaluating choices against those criteria, a solution began to emerge. “It was sort of like the old computers from the 1960s that spit out the one final data card that had a single solution on it,” Scott said. After observing its performance, they determined that a float was advantageous in aviation applications in several ways. It reliably found the fuel surface and provided mechanical damping. To more closely sim- ulate the aircraft environment, they simulated prop wash by using a shaker that agitated the volume in the tank. With so many float senders already used in aviation, a retrofit product that matched the geome- try of a replaced sender could be used in many aircraft. “We can use a float, but we wanted to find a better way to measure its position in the tank,” Scott said. “IT’S VERY STRANGE,” SAID SCOTT PHILIBEN, EAA 1148835, CEO AND FOUNDER OF CIES. “THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN AROUND FOR A VERY LONG TIME. PRACTICALLY EVERY MOVIE FEATURING A STRESSED-OUT PILOT INCLUDES THE OBLIGATORY TAPPING OF THE FUEL GAUGE.” Actually Accurate 82 October 2019 FLEXIBLE DESIGN CiES MANUFACTURES its sensors for original equipment manufac- turers, small and medium aircraft, rotorcraft, as well as a small market in marine and specialty automotive applications. They are approved by both the FAA and EASA. CiES holds an STC that applies to large numbers of GA aircraft that weigh less than 12,500 pounds to replace the existing fuel quantity senders in multiple models of Cessna, Beechcraft, Cirrus, Mooney, and Piper, along with about a dozen others. This flexibility is best illustrated in that CiES supported the Ford Tri-Motor application and its three large tanks by adapting senders used for the Airbus AS350 B3 helicopter. “We’re pretty flexible,” Scott said. “We can modify our design to suit any application. Most GA aircraft have wings that are anywhere from 4 to 8 inches deep, and the number of variations is not as great as you would think.” One of the first manufacturers to approach CiES after Cirrus was Britten-Norman looking for a solution for the Islander. “We designed it, and it is funny to us that now about 30 aircraft use the ‘Britten-Norman arm,’” he said. “It’s the running joke around here.” Exploded View MAGNETIC FIELD SENSOR TECHNOLOGY THE CiES magnetic field sensor technology can be described as a compass with the float on the surface of the fuel as magnetic north. Electrical properties of ferromagnetic alloys, in this case, silicon iron doped on a chip, are influenced by external magnetic fields. By including a magnet at a pivot point, this phe- nomenon can be used to measure angles. Wherever the fuel moves in the tank, the fuel level sender always points to the float on the surface of that fuel. This technology uses high-reliability, non-contact sensors that don’t have to touch anything to measure angular position. This feature allows for a safe system that elimi- nates the hazards associated with fuel tank electrical contact. The sensors can measure 180 degrees, as opposed to the 60-to-70-de- gree range of a typical potentiometer used in legacy senders. This full measurement range is controlled by software and allows for a simpler sender configuration. A micropro- cessor provides a digital output to interface with computer-based instrumentation, as well as an analog output to simulate resistive output to analog gauges in the legacy fleet. CiES also sought to fix the problem with legacy senders that use steel in the sender body. When combined with a typical alumi- num tank, steel encourages rust and corrosion after contact with moisture. Not only are corrosion and corrosion particles bad for aircraft fuel systems, but they also can lead to failure or inaccuracies in indi- cated fuel quantities. “Half of the fuel senders we see look like they came from the Titanic,” Scott said. CiES system components are non-corrod- ing Teflon hard coat anodized aluminum composed of an outer housing, circuit card, receptacle cap unit that holds the circuit card in the housing, a rotor with magnets, arm, and float. A stainless pin holds the parts together. “The most hated, reviled,

Show full text

untrusted instrument in the aircraft all of a sudden is now the most reliable instrument in the aircraft. It’s a total phase change.” — Scott Philiben www.eaa.org 83 “You would suspect that new fuel sender technology should look robotic or something. To make it look like the legacy float sender without any of the legacy issues is a little deceptive in some ways, but it’s worked fantastically.” — Scott Philiben CiES stocks arms in half-inch increments and can quickly pro- duce other working variations. A CNC rod bender in the shop whips out new arms in seconds. Senders are built from standard parts. The unit is attached with a basic bolt pattern housing orientation of 12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock used almost universally in aircraft. When an order comes in for a configuration previously produced, it is built to order from parts in stock. For new orders, customers send their current sender and an illustrated parts catalog image or photo. CiES documents the new configuration and submits it to the FAA for the next STC update. “It’s straightforward for us to handle experimental aircraft requests since they typically were designed to use a resistive sender,” Scott said. “Simply making one of the stock configurations is rela- tively straightforward.” CiES is currently supporting Cessna twin-engine aircraft that use the penny cap capacitive system and replacing them with CiES sen- sors that are more straightforward, reliable, and accurate. LOCATION AND INSTALLATION “TELL ME WHERE it needs to go, and we can typically accommodate that,” Scott said. The CiES unit will fit into any aircraft and can be mounted on the top, side, bottom, or interior of a fuel tank. For example, units for Beechcraft Bonanzas and Barons are installed on top while units for Wacos bolt to the bot- tom. Piper Malibu and Cessna TTx aircraft have them mounted on the inside of the tank. A rib side mounting is suggested for new experimental aircraft since it centers the unit on the tank and makes it less pitch sensitive. The number of senders in any given tank depends upon its size and shape. A Baron with its long tanks has three senders. High-wing aircraft with straight wings, such as a Cessna 210, have only one sender per tank whereas a low-wing Bonanza with its higher dihedral for stability has two senders. Cirrus SF50 jet air- craft have three per tank, and other aircraft with even larger tanks have four. Installation takes four hours per sen- sor on average. Three wires for power, ground, and signal are required since the active sensor requires electricity to oper- ate the microprocessor. Actually Accurate Fuel Transducter views 84 October 2019 LEGACY LOOK “YOU WOULD SUSPECT that new fuel sender technology should look robotic or some- thing,” Scott said. “To make it look like the legacy float sender without any of the legacy issues is a little deceptive in some ways, but it’s worked fantastically.” The mean time to failure of a CiES unit is more than 90,000 hours. CiES initially suspected that promoting the benefits of its new system would be a hard sell since it looked very much like the old senders. In the beginning, this proved to be true. “Now that we have been out there and people have been talking about us, it’s almost a religious experience for them having accu- rate fuel level in a GA aircraft, and they spread the word,” Scott said. “It doesn’t mat- ter to anybody what the technology looks like inside doing those things. All that mat- ters is that you get good information in the cockpit.” FIRST RV-10 INSTALLATION WHEN LAYNE BOGULAS, EAA 868068, fin- ished building his RV-10 in 2016, it had a conventional fuel sending unit. When he decided to install the CiES system, in addi- tion to removing the wing tanks and installing the senders, the unit needed to be calibrated and mapped since his was the first RV-10 installation. Due to the dihedral of the RV-10 wing, one fuel sender is on the bottom of the tank and one at the top. Since the top float can only go so high, the sender starts measuring after 7 gallons of fuel has been used and measures from 30 gallons down to zero. The system integrates with his Garmin G3 avion- ics, and he has flown a couple of hundred hours with it. “When you don’t have to second-guess things, it makes it easy not to worry about it,” Layne said. “If it says you’re 10 gallons down, you’re 10 gallons down. If it says 9.8, it’s 9.8. You don’t get erratic fuel sensing when the plane jostles around in rough weather. It’s spot on all the time.” OTHER COMPONENTS IN ADDITION TO accurate fuel level technology, CiES is working on other fuel system components. It has been working with RDD Enterprises in Redmond, Oregon, for automated tank switching for its LX7, which is a modification of the Lancair IV-P with similar speed capacities but more docile handling characteristics and an airframe parachute. Accurate fuel quantity technology makes intelligently automated tank switching feasible. “Now that you have a fuel level system that’s reliable, you can start automating processes that used to rely on the pilot,” Scott said. This system can assist the pilot in automating the selection of a fuel tank, keeping, for example, two LX7 90-gallon wing tanks within 1 gallon of each other throughout a flight. CiES is also working on a prototype app that reports a digital fuel readout to your cellphone. “You can sit in the FBO and watch your airplane be fueled to the level that you specified and see it visually happening in front of you,” Scott said. It’s been more than half a dozen years since Scott started on a quest to solve this age-old aviation problem, and his persistence has finally paid off. “One of the things people warned us about when we started is that you’re going to get your pants sued off, as pilots will find a way to run out of gas,” he said. “Thankfully, with over 29,000 senders in the field right now, we haven’t had, to date, a single pilot starve an engine or run out of fuel with our system onboard.” Beth E. Stanton, EAA 1076326, is a recovering competition aerobatic pilot who is now working on ratings to become a CFI. She can be reached at bethestanton@gmail.com. RV Fuel Sender www.eaa.org 85

Type certificate, explained

What's in the Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet TCDS

A Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS) is the FAA's record of what an aircraft type was approved as. It is the source of truth for weights, seating, fuel and the rules the design was certified against. Expand any line to see what it means.

TCDS A00018CHRev 2· Issued 2017
Read the full TCDS

347 Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet parts for sale

See all →

Parts listed for sale by vetted eBay sellers — confirmed on eBay at checkout.