Skip to main content

Royal Turbine Conversion for Beechcraft 60 Duke

Beechcraft 60 Duke · Supplemental Type Certificate

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document provides detailed information about the Royal Turbine conversion for the Beechcraft 60 Duke, which replaces the original piston engines with Pratt & Whitney PT6A-35 turbine engines. The conversion significantly enhances the aircraft's performance, reliability, and operational efficiency. It includes specifications on climb rates, fuel consumption, and operational costs, making it a valuable resource for current and prospective Duke owners. The document also discusses the modifications made to the aircraft's systems and instrumentation, emphasizing the benefits of the conversion in terms of safety and performance. Overall, it serves as a comprehensive guide for pilots and aviation enthusiasts interested in the capabilities of the Royal Turbine Duke.

  • Maximum takeoff weight: 7,000 lbs
  • Climb rate: 2,700 ft/min
  • Cruise speed: 275-290 knots
  • Fuel burn: 66 gallons/hour
  • Time between overhauls for PT6: 3,500 hours

Document

Source

Originally published by aeroresourcesinc.com. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Supplemental Type Certificate
Year
2007
Pages
8
File size
6.1 MB
Publisher
aeroresourcesinc.com
Documentation completeness
4/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Beechcraft 60 Duke.

More Beechcraft 60 Dukemanuals & documents

See all 29
Similar aircraft

If you fly the Beechcraft 60 Duke, you may also be researching these.

In this document

Performance Enhancements

The Royal Turbine conversion provides a maximum takeoff weight of 7,000 pounds, an increase from the stock Duke's 6,725 or 6,775 pounds. The aircraft can take off in about 1,000 feet and climb at rates of up to 2,700 feet per minute. In cruise, it can achieve speeds of 275 to 290 knots at 66 gallons per hour, significantly outperforming the stock Duke.

Engine Specifications

The conversion replaces the original Lycoming engines with Pratt & Whitney PT6A-35 engines, providing 1,050 total shaft horsepower. The PT6 engines have a recommended time between overhauls of 3,500 hours, which is more than double that of the stock engines. This contributes to increased reliability and reduced maintenance concerns.

Fuel Efficiency

At maximum cruise altitude, the Royal Turbine can achieve a fuel burn of approximately 66 gallons per hour, with the potential to reduce this to 45 gallons per hour for better efficiency. This allows for a range of about 4.5 hours with reserves, depending on flight conditions.

Operational Costs

Operating costs for the Royal Turbine are estimated at around $200 per hour in fuel alone. The conversion itself costs approximately $930,000, not including the cost of the donor airframe.

Safety and Reliability

The Royal Turbine conversion enhances safety by providing better climb performance on a single engine, with a climb rate of about 900 feet per minute even when one engine fails. The PT6 engines are known for their reliability, which is crucial for twin-engine aircraft.

Safety notes

  • Ensure to monitor torque during takeoff to avoid over-torquing the engines.
  • Maintain awareness of the new maximum structural cruising speed, which is now the never-exceed speed.

Full document text

seemingly adequate 380 horsepower, it quickly becomes apparent on throttle- up that not enough ofthat power makes it to the propellers. As a result, the Duke was never much of a performer. It loves its runway and takes its time gathering up steam to climb. Some speculate that the root of the problem comes from the small-diameter propellers. They are re- quired for adequate ground clearance for the nose-low Duke, but rob the air- AOPA PILOT ·108· AUGUST 2007 plane of its ability to turn horsepower into thrust. In addition, those props spin at a not-too-efficient 2,900 rpm. Besides being big and heavy, the en- gines are surrounded by an equally gar- gantuan cowling that scoops volumes of cooling air for the engines, contributing significant drag to an otherwise slick- looking airframe. Matching the titanic size of the engines and cowlings is the TIO-541s' appetite for fuel. Typical rich- The slim nacelles of the Royal Turbine conversion (above) lower the drag of the Duke significantly allowing it to go faster than the stock airplane at the same fuel flow. The transformation of the Duke (left) is far more than just an engine swap. of-peak cruise power settings yield fuel burns of 40 to 50 gallons per hour. At today's fuel prices, we're talking $200 per hour of operating costs in fuel alone. To add insult to injury, the TIO-541 is some- what of a rare powerplant; therefore, its overhaul costs run about $55,000 each. Looks and brains Those who own Dukes have been pas- sionate and loyal fans who vehemently stick up for their airplanes. Savvy Duke owners are quick to remind the naysay- er that with proper maintenance and care, the so-called troublesome en- gines can easily make time between overhauls and beyond. They're correct, but even the most loyal Duke owner will have to stand up and take notice of Northwest Turbine's Royal Turbine, a supplemental type certificate (STC) that replaces the Duke's 800-pound Ly- comings with lighter-weight, yet far more powerful, Pratt & Whitney PT6A- 35 engines. The result is everything the Duke should have been-not just eye candy for ramp dwellers. Northwest Turbine LLC is an off- shoot of Rocket Engineering Corp. in Spokane, Washington. The company cut its teeth modifying Mooneys into high-performance Rockets and Mis- siles. Today, its bread-and-butter con- version is the popular JetProp PT6 con- version of the Piper Malibu/Mirage. Al- ways on the quest to make good air- planes better is Northwest Turbine Op- erations Director Darwin Conrad. He and Executive Vice President Jeanie Sadler started Rocket Engineering in 1989 and have been awarded their twenty-fifth STC, the Royal Turbine. With 1,050 total shaft horsepower to tap into, the RoyalTurbine is quite a per- former. The flight manual supplement for the conversion states that at its max- imum takeoff weight of 7,000 pounds and standard temperature at sea level, the Royal Turbine can leap off the ground in about 1,000 feet and climb at 2,700 feet per minute. If an engine quits, you'll still climb away (again, fully loaded) at about 900 fpm. Cruise speeds top out in the mid-20,000-foot range, where on cold days the airplane will flirt with 300 TAS.For best efficiency, utilize the airplane's impressive climb rate to go right to Flight Level 280, its limited ceiling because of reduced vertical sep- aration minimums, and enjoy a 275- to 290-knot cruise speed on 66 gallons per hour. Pull the fuel flow back to 45 gph- about what a stock Duke would burn- and watch the speed settle on about 230 KTAS.That's about 10 to 15 knots better than a stock Duke on an optimum day and is mostly the result of the lower- drag nacelles that cover the PT6s. Need to get down? Just pull the power to flight idle, point the nose to the ground, and repeatedly remind yourself that you really can make that runway under your nose-you're going down at 4,000 fpm! On landing, the Royal Turbine needs about the same 1,000 feet of run- way needed for takeoff, thanks to pro- peller reverse. A total package But what makes the Royal Turbine a whole new animal isn't just a swap of recips for turbines. This is a massive conversion that replaces the entire in- strument panel and much of what was in it. The result is not just a better air- plane in terms of performance, but also in terms of safety, reliability, comfort, and convenience. It also explains the $930,000 price tag for the conversion, not including the donor airframe. Well-eared-for piston engines are re- liable, but even the most pampered re- cips can't hold a candle to the reliability of the PT6. Reliability equals safety, es- pecially when discussing twins in which pilots have a hard time coping with a failed engine. There's also the recom- mended time between overhauls of the PT6, which is 3,500 hours, more than double that of the stock Lycomings. Ad- ditionally, pilots of stock Dukes hold their breath after takeoff, praying that AOPA PILOT .110· AUGUST 2007 Wide-chord, four-blade Hartzell propellers (above) provide tremendous thrust and low vibration while maintaining adequate ground clearance. A new Moritz electronic engine instrument cluster (left), a custom annunciator panel, and a Shadin ETM trend monitor/air data computer are a major part of the Royal Turbine treatment. one ofthose big Lycomings doesn't conk out in that no man's land after liftoff but before the airplane actually begins to climb at a rate better than a Cessna 150 loaded with sumo wrestlers. With the Royal Turbine's abundance of power, there's no doubt that the machine will still rocket away from the ground at a good rate on one engine. Even at its higher indicated air- speeds, the Royal Turbine is a quiet ma- chine. With the cabin pumped up at high altitude, headsets are an option in the cockpit. In the back, it's measurably quieter still. This reduced noise level is accompanied by a lack of vibration that simply cannot be found in a stock

Show full text

Duke. The four-blade Hartzell props, even at their highest rpm, are smooth and quiet, negating the need to reduce rpm unless maximum range is needed. On the convenience side, owners of Royal Turbines don't have to fret about thermal shock issues and unrealistic climb or descent requests from con- trollers like owners of stock Dukes do. In addition, engine preheat is simply not an issue with the turbine in all but the most severe climates. Just fire it up and go. One Royal Turbine owner, who is also an airframe and powerplant me- chanic, says his annual inspections are a snap without the piston engines tak- ing up some 80 percent of the labor re- quired to complete the job. Out for a spin I had the pleasure offlying the Royal Tur- bine from Northwest Turbine's home A very special Duke mechanic By Michael Maya Charles At 89, when most octogenarians are choosing the color of their rest home walls, Dane T. Scag is finishing up his Inspection Autho- rization (IA) class at a mechanic school near Nashville. He was the oldest student to ever take the FAA test at the school and scored better than some of the young bucks in his class. Although he holds graduate degrees in both physics and math, Scag says, "I became a mechanic the day I was born." His love of design and engineering, and desire to work on his own airplanes, led him to get his A&P license in 1982. Scag bought his first aircraft, an Ercoupe, in 1946. He used It to cover a huge territory as a product development engineer at Allis Chalmers. He flew the little Ercoupe "everywhere," he says, including over the western mountains. An early Beech Bonanza followed in the early 1950s, followed by a Rajay turbocharged Piper Apache in 1959. Looking for a new challenge after he retired from AC in the early 1970s, he bought a struggling Wisconsin snow thrower com- pany called Bob Cat. "I didn't know anything about manufacturing or snow throwers •••••• But he turned the company around by de- signing a new commercial lawn mower to complement the product line. An English company bought him out several years later. Not happy with Idle hands, Scag started another company, named it Scag Machine, invented a better commercial lawn ma- chine, built the company to $40 million in sales, and sold it, too. Over time, the twin-breasted Piper became a Beechcraft B55 Baron, then a pressurized Baron SSP, and finally, a new Duke In 1982. He owned that airplane for almost 25 years. this long-term ownership ex- perience led to his becoming a technical guru for the Duke Ayers Ass0- ciation, where he offers his vast Duke experience with wit and humor. base at Spokane's Felts Field. The mis- sion of the first flight was to get some photos of the airplane over nearby Lake Pend Oreille in Northern Idaho. With three people and 140 gallons offue!, the Royal Turbine was off the ground in less than 1,000 feet and climbing at about 3,500 fpm. In this airplane, there's no ex- cuse not to go high-even for short trips. The climb rate is so good that you'll be at altitude in no time. The fuel burn drops off precipitously up there while true air- speed increases just as quickly. Finally, with pressurization, nobody's battling the ear-popping climbs and descents that the Royal Turbine is capable of. After a neck-twisting, eyeball-searing job of getting the photos you see with this story, Conrad took over and demon- strated the single-engine capabilities of the Royal Turbine by sliding a power lever to idle and feathering that engine's propeller. Once trimmed up, the autopi- lot was flying the airplane hands- and feet off. At altitude, Conrad says it'll fly at 240 KTASon one engine. At our relatively light weight, the airplane mustered a 1,200-fpm climb on one engine through 8,000 feet. With the engine back online, Conrad demonstrated an approach into a busy airport with a demanding con- troller and flew the airplane at 190 knots indicated to the outer marker and made the first turnoff from the runway without any heroics. One unfortunate drawback of con- verting any piston airplane to a turbine is the fact that the max structural cruis- ing speed (the bottom of the yellow arc The jets will have the speed advantage, but the Royal Turbine will out perform any VLJ in runway performance, opening up thousands more airports for potential use. on the airspeed indicator) becomes the new never-exceed speed (the redline) in a turbine airplane. The Royal Turbine's new redline is 198 KIAS, which is easy to exceed at lower altitudes, reinforcing the need to get the airplane to altitude quickly. Our second flight found me in the left seat of the Royal Turbine for a quick trip to altitude to verify speed claims. Start- up is standard PT6, watching for oil pressure, ignition, fuel flow, and light off while monitor- ing temperatures. On takeoff, like many twin turbo- props, the spool- up time of the Pratts is not at the same rate, so Conrad suggests holding the brakes until at least 400 foot/pounds of torque is reached on both engines. Early in the roll, you'll still need to jab the brakes for directional control as the power is fed in until the rudder becomes effective. Unfortunate- ly,you can't just push the power levers to the stops or you'll over-torque the en- gines. Takeoff power is 1,200 foot! pounds of torque and trying to finesse the power levers while keeping the cen- terline under the nose-as well as sim- ply hanging on for the ride-can be- come a chore for the uninitiated. Things happen very fast in this airplane. In about 900 feet and a scant nine seconds from brake release, the Royal Turbine reaches about 90 knots and is clawing for altitude at a 25-degree deck angle and better than 3,500 fpm. Our uninterrupted climb found us at FL280 in a short 12 minutes, for an aver- age climb rate of 2,200 fpm. Fuel re- quired to climb to FL280 was 16 gallons total, and the density altitude that day was almost 30,000 feet. We topped out at 280 KTASon 66 gph at FL280. Cabin alti- tude at FL280 is a high 12,000 feet, so I wouldn't spend long at that altitude without supplemental oxygen. At FL260, speed was 287 KTASon about 70 gph on this warmer-than-standard day. With cooler temperatures, the magic 300- knot number appears realistic. Following another toss-out-the-an- chor, flight-idle descent, I flew an ILS approach while slowing from the red- line speed back to approach speed. The Duke's high gear and flap operating speeds are complemented by the fact that trim changes are minimal. I couldn't duplicate Conrad's "first turnoff from the runway" trick, but even on my first try, we didn't use more than 1,200 feet of pavement. Unlike in a stock Duke, I'd be com- fortable flying this airplane in and out of 2,500- foot runways-paved or not. Required for the conversion are vor- tex generators, winglets, and aft body strakes made by Boundary Layer Re- search. These items combine to raise the maximum takeoff weight of any Duke to 7,000 pounds from the stock airplane's 6,725- or 6,775-pound MTOW. Since the new engines are lighter than the original Lycomings, the airplane gets a useful - • • load increase of about 350 to 400 pounds depending on the donor airframe. Con- rad says most airframes roll into the shop weighing about 5,000 pounds empty and leave weighing about 4,600 pounds. The test airplane has a useful load of 2,485 pounds and a full-fuel pay- load of 1,782pounds. In a perfect world, one could find a well-cared-for, late-model Duke with low airframe time and run-out engines for $250,000 to $300,000, depending on avionics and equipment. After the con- version, you'll have a 290-knot twin turboprop with new engines for a total investment of about $1.3 million. Cabin size and cruise performance is about on par with an EADS Socata TBM 700, although the Royal Turbine handi- ly outclimbs the single-engine TBM. Comparative twin turboprops would be the Cessna Conquest I, Piper Cheyenne, and Beechcraft King Air C90, all of which are quite a bit slower and use more fuel, but have larger cab- ins. Most interesting is how the eco- nomics of the Royal Turbine will com- pare to the uber-hyped very light jets that are coming to market. If the VLJs can keep prices in the $1.5 million range, it will be an interesting compari- son. The jets will have the speed advan- tage, but the Royal Turbine will outper- form any VLJ in runway performance, opening up thousands more airports for potential use. So far, ] 5 orders have been placed for the Royal Turbine and a few are from folks who've never owned a Duke. Individuals and owners of small businesses are attracted to its small size and economy compared with the larger turboprops like King Airs and Conquests. Owners we talked with have praised the entire operation at Northwest Turbine and report excel- lent post-sale support. They too wish that the pressurization system had a little more oomph and that the air- plane could carry more fuel. For now, the airplane holds 266 gallons of Jet A, which provides about 3.5 hours offuel at high-speed cruise. If you can get a direct climb to altitude, keep the power back in cruise, and start your descent 10 minutes from your desti- nation, the Royal Turbine can stay air- borne for about 4.5 hours with re- serves. Remember, the Duke has no potty, though. There are some flies in the ointment, however. Because it's so new and lacks a history, the insurance for the airplane could be a deal breaker for some pilots lacking in multiengine turbine time. In addition, to maximize its efficiency, the airplane must be flown high. In the Northeast, where controllers and traffic flow determine altitudes to be flown, the Royal Turbine pilot may find him- self stuck at less-than-optimum alti- tudes where the airplane is nudging the airspeed redline and slurping copious amounts of Jet A. In the end, however, Northwest Tur- bine has given the Duke a much-need- ed performance makeover to match its dashing looks. The Royal Turbine is simply a hoot to fly. Its abundance of performance and nimble flying charac- teristics, combined with its comfort and efficiency, make it a superlative turbine airplane for a pilot with a fami- ly or small business. M:a Peter A. Bedell is a first officer for a major airline and co-owner of a Cessna 172 and Beechcraft Baron. CB For more information about the Royal Turbine, /lisit the Web site (www. royalturbine.com) or call Northwest Turbine at 509/535-0187.