Skip to main content

Safety Recommendation 2014-041

Cessna Citation CJ2+ · Other Documents

Free account — keep the POHs & checklists you reference in one place.

Overview

This document contains safety recommendations related to the Cessna Citation CJ2+ aircraft, specifically focusing on the angle-of-attack (AOA) vane units produced by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. The FAA has conducted a thorough review of the performance and reliability of the AOA system installed in the CJ2+ and other Cessna models. The findings indicate that there is no systemic issue with the AOA vanes, and the performance of the system is deemed acceptable. The document outlines the FAA's recommendations for further assessments and reviews of the AOA systems across various Cessna models, including the CJ2+.

  • Cessna Citation CJ2+ is equipped with AOA vane units from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation.
  • The FAA found no systemic issues with the AOA system in the CJ2+ after reviewing service history.
  • Out of 2,537 Cessna aircraft, only 9 reports of AOA vane-related issues were noted over 16 years.
  • The AOA systems can record data for up to 30 hours before overwriting.
  • The FAA recommends further assessment of the CJ2+ stall warning system based on AOA survey results.

Document

Source

Originally published by assets.publishing.service.gov.uk. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.

Report a problem or request removal

Document details

Type
Other Documents
Year
2015
Pages
4
File size
101 KB
Publisher
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
How rare is it?
97Cessna Citation CJ2+ registered worldwide · 0 active

Common. Rarer than 1% of the aircraft models we track.

Documentation completeness
4/7

Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Cessna Citation CJ2+.

More Cessna Citation CJ2+manuals & documents

See all 13
Similar aircraft

If you fly the Cessna Citation CJ2+, you may also be researching these.

In this document

Safety Recommendation 2014-041

The FAA recommends that Cessna conduct a survey of recorded flight data from the AOA vane units to assess the frequency of 'sticking' angle-of-attack data. The FAA's review found the performance of the AOA system in the CJ2+ to be acceptable, with no unsafe conditions identified.

Safety Recommendation 2014-042

The FAA suggests that Cessna use the results from the AOA survey to amend the safety assessment of the CJ2+ stall warning system. The FAA's analysis indicates that there is no need for Cessna to amend the system safety assessment for the CJ2+.

FAA Review Findings

The FAA reviewed service history and compliance documentation for the AOA system in the CJ2+ and found that out of 2,537 airplanes delivered, only 9 reports of AOA vane-related issues were noted over 16 years. The issues were detected by pilots and corrected before subsequent flights.

Performance and Reliability

Cessna has delivered 87 aircraft with similar recording capabilities to the incident aircraft, which can record data for 30 hours. The FAA found no prior reports of performance issues with the AOA system in the CJ2+.

Additional Model Review

The FAA also reviewed AOA vane-related issues in other Cessna models and found a low frequency of such issues, indicating that the AOA system's reliability is generally acceptable across the board.

Safety notes

  • The FAA concluded that an unsafe condition does not exist regarding the AOA vane system.
  • Pilots should remain vigilant for AOA vane-related issues and report any anomalies immediately.

Full document text

1 Cessna 525A, N380CR 5.7 nm north-west of Coventry, Warwickshire 31 December 2013 Accident Safety Recommendation 2014-041 It is recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration requires the Cessna Aircraft Company, as the Type Certificate holder for the Citation CJ2+ aircraft, to conduct a survey of recorded flight data from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation model C-12717-1 angle-of-attack vane units, to determine the frequency of ‘sticking’ (static) angle-of-attack data. Date Safety Recommendation made: 8 January 2015 LATEST RESPONSE Response received: 8 May 2015 The FAA, in coordination with Cessna, conducted a review of the service history and compliance documentation for the angle-of-attack (AOA) vane and system installed in the Cessna Model CJ2+ airplanes and found the performance and reliability of the system to be acceptable. The FAA also conducted a risk assessment and Corrective Action Review Board in accordance with our Monitor Safety/Analyze Data process and concluded that an unsafe condition does not exist. The FAA plans no further action at this time. Cessna has delivered 87 aircraft with recording capability similar to that installed on the incident aircraft. These systems are capable of recording 30 hours before the data is overwritten. Cessna's research indicates they have previously downloaded data from 46 of the 87 airplanes with no prior reports or history of performance issues with the AOA system. The FAA requested Cessna to examine and review all maintenance records for the CJ2+ and other Cessna models. This included Cessna Models 550, 560, 560XL and 525B. Cessna has delivered a total of 2,537 airplanes with over 7,000,000 flight hours with approximately 20 years of service that use the same or a similar AOA vane from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. Their review found 9 reports of AOA vane-related issues over the last 16 years. In each case, the condition was detected and squawked by the pilot and subsequently corrected prior to the next flight. The FAA conducted a review of FAA Service Difficulty Reporting system records for the above listed Cessna models and models that utilize the same or a similar AOA vane from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. These additional models included the Learjet Model 40/45 and Hawker Beechcraft Model 4000. Of the 716 airplanes in service today, we found 4 reports of AOA vane-related issues over 17 years. The information contained in these reports is limited, but seems to indicate that the AOA vane issues were detected by the pilot as well. Based on our review or the Cessna, Hawker Beechcraft, and Learjet service data, there is not a high frequency of 'sticking' AOA vanes. Although the FAA analysis does not indicate a systemic issue with a 'stuck vane' condition, the FAA reviewed the compliance and safety assessment documentation for the Cessna CJ2+ aircraft. Though the CJ2+ certification is based on an earlier amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations § 23.1309, Equipment. System, and Installations, the conclusions from the analysis relative to hazard classification are consistent with later Cessna 525 models that comply with the most current FAA guidance and regulatory requirements. Based on this review, we do not see a need for Cessna to amend the system safety assessment for the CJ2+ s tall warning system. AAIB Assessment – Adequate - Closed RESPONSE HISTORY 2 N/A (SRIS Reference: GB.SIA-2014-041) 3 Cessna 525A, N380CR 5.7 nm north-west of Coventry, Warwickshire 31 December 2013 Accident Safety Recommendation 2014-042 It is recommended that the Federal Aviation Administration requires the Cessna Aircraft Company, as the Type Certificate holder for the Citation CJ2+ aircraft, to use the results of their survey (Safety Recommendation 2014-041) of recorded flight data from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation model C- 12717-1 angle-of-attack vane units to amend the safety assessment of the aircraft’s stall warning system. Date Safety Recommendation made: 8 January 2015 LATEST RESPONSE Response received: 8 May 2015 The FAA, in coordination with Cessna, conducted a review of the service history and compliance documentation for the angle-of-attack (AOA) vane and system installed in the Cessna Model CJ2+ airplanes and found the performance and reliability of the system to be acceptable. The FAA also conducted a risk assessment and Corrective Action Review Board in accordance with our Monitor Safety/Analyze Data process and concluded that an unsafe condition does not exist. The FAA plans no further action at this time. Cessna has delivered 87 aircraft with recording capability similar to that installed on the incident aircraft. These systems are capable of recording 30 hours before the data is overwritten. Cessna's research indicates they have previously downloaded data from 46 of the 87 airplanes with no prior reports or history of performance issues with the AOA system. The FAA requested Cessna to examine and review all maintenance records for the CJ2+ and other Cessna models. This included Cessna Models 550, 560, 560XL and 525B. Cessna has delivered a total of 2,537 airplanes with over 7,000,000 flight hours with approximately 20 years of service that use the same or a similar AOA vane from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. Their review found 9 reports of AOA vane-related issues over the last 16 years. In each case, the condition was detected and squawked by the pilot and subsequently corrected prior to the next flight. The FAA conducted a review of FAA Service Difficulty Reporting system records for the above listed Cessna models and models that utilize the same or a similar AOA vane from Safe Flight Instrument Corporation. These additional models included the Learjet Model 40/45 and Hawker Beechcraft Model 4000. Of the 716 airplanes in service today, we found 4 reports of AOA vane-related issues over 17 years. The information

Show full text

contained in these reports is limited, but seems to indicate that the AOA vane issues were detected by the pilot as well. Based on our review or the Cessna, Hawker Beechcraft, and Learjet service data, there is not a high frequency of 'sticking' AOA vanes. Although the FAA analysis does not indicate a systemic issue with a 'stuck vane' condition, the FAA reviewed the compliance and safety assessment documentation for the Cessna CJ2+ aircraft. Though the CJ2+ certification is based on an earlier amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations § 23.1309, Equipment. System, and Installations, the conclusions from the analysis relative to hazard classification are consistent with later Cessna 525 models that comply with the most current FAA guidance and regulatory requirements. Based on this review, we do not see a need for Cessna to amend the system safety assessment for the CJ2+ s tall warning system. AAIB Assessment – Adequate - Closed RESPONSE HISTORY 4 N/A (SRIS Reference: GB.SIA-2014-042)

1 Cessna Citation CJ2+ parts for sale

See all →

Parts listed for sale by vetted eBay sellers — confirmed on eBay at checkout.