USMC Concepts & Programs 2011
Beechcraft Premier IA · Other Documents
Overview
The document titled 'USMC Concepts & Programs 2011' provides a comprehensive overview of the Marine Corps' programs and initiatives aimed at enhancing combat readiness and operational effectiveness. It outlines various acquisition programs, their phases, and the equipment being developed or procured to support Marine operations. The content is primarily directed towards military personnel involved in planning, procurement, and operational execution, detailing the specifications and operational impacts of various systems and equipment. While the document is not specifically a training manual for the Beechcraft Premier IA, it does provide insights into the broader context of military aviation and equipment integration, which may be of interest to aviation enthusiasts and professionals.
- The Marine Corps focuses on agility and readiness in its operational strategy.
- Acquisition programs are categorized into ACAT levels based on cost and complexity.
- The acquisition process includes phases from concept development to deployment.
- The Marine Enhancement Program aims to improve individual Marine capabilities with rapid solutions.
- MERS integrates equipment for the Marine rifle squad to enhance overall effectiveness.
Document
Source
Originally published by www.hqmc.marines.mil. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.
Document details
- Type
- Other Documents
- Year
- 2011
- Pages
- 256
- File size
- 5.6 MB
- Publisher
- www.hqmc.marines.mil
Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Beechcraft Premier IA.
- Pilot's Operating Handbook / AFM
- Checklist
- Maintenance Manual
- Parts Catalog (IPC)
- Systems & Wiring
- Service Bulletins
- Type Certificate (TCDS)
More Beechcraft Premier IAmanuals & documents
See all 23 →- ForeFlight Weight and Balance GuideWeight And Balance
- 2026 Alpine Competition GuideTraining Manual
- AIRPLANE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP) MANUALNormal Procedures
- MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDUREOther Documents
- USG Ceilings Solutions CatalogSpecifications
- 2023 CASP SM PRICING GUIDEMaintenance Manual
- FY 2022 Budget JustificationOther Documents
- Business Aircraft Maintenance TrainingPilot's Operating Handbook
- 2021 Fleet UpdateService Bulletins
- ADS-B Out SolutionsTraining Manual
- Beechcraft Premier IA Maintenance ManualMaintenance Manual
- INTEGRATED AVIONICS SYSTEM FOR PREMIER 1/1A®Avionics Manual
In this document
Introduction
The introduction discusses the Marine Corps' role as an expeditionary force, emphasizing the need for agility and readiness in various operational contexts. It highlights the importance of innovation and resource management in maintaining combat capability.
Acquisition Categories (ACAT)
This section categorizes acquisition programs based on cost and testing requirements, detailing ACAT I through IV levels. It explains the significance of these categories in managing oversight and approval processes for military equipment.
Acquisition Phases and Terms
The document outlines the phases of acquisition from initial concept development to production and deployment. Key terms such as Initial Operational Capability (IOC) and Full Operational Capability (FOC) are defined to clarify the stages of equipment readiness.
Marine Enhancement Program (MEP)
The MEP focuses on improving the lethality, comfort, and survivability of individual Marines through low-cost, rapid acquisition of equipment. It emphasizes the importance of addressing the needs of Marines in various operational environments.
Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad (MERS)
MERS aims to enhance the effectiveness of the Marine rifle squad by integrating and optimizing equipment. The program emphasizes the importance of holistic approaches to equipping infantry forces.
Full document text
BANGERAN TAKE Secen Livre STATE & BAK OF CHAPTER 3 LUCHE4 PROGRAMS INTRODUCTION The Marine Corps' primary role in the 21st Century is to be the Nation's "expe- ditionary force-in-readiness" that provides combined-arms operating forces, includ- ing integrated aviation and logistical components, for service as part of naval, joint and combined forces world wide. Marine forces magnify the projection of U.S. forces, ensuring that they remain influential in peacetime, compelling in crisis, and decisive in war. As we look ahead, we will strengthen the roots of a lighter, faster, hard-hitting, ex- peditionary, and sea-based Marine Corps that is reliant on agility, shock and surprise. Innovation and fiscal responsibility continue to be hallmarks of the Marine Corps. We continue to invest limited resources to restore combat capability and enhance our Marines' readiness at home and in overseas operating areas. We are constantly moni- toring our total investment requirements against changing demands. In Marine Corps ground and aviation programs, for example, we continue to test, develop, and procure dual-use systems and employ emerging technology. Throughout, however, our focus remains on the individual Marine's ability to carry out the tasks at hand. Chapter Three of the 2011 edition of Concepts and Programs provides informa- tion on Marine Corps programs of record and major end-item equipment, which will ensure that current and future Marines have what they need to accomplish the mission. CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 57 ACQUISITION CATEGORIES (ACAT) The Department of Defense cat- egorizes acquisition programs into several categories, generally based on their cost or testing requirements. This categorization is then used to identify oversight and approval requirements. A description of the most commonly discussed ACAT levels follows. ACAT I: These are the largest ac- quisition programs and are also known as Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAP) or Major Automated Infor- mation Systems (MAIS). To achieve this level of designation, a program must exceed $365 million in research and development funding, exceed $2.190 billion in procurement funding or be designated as "Special Interest" by Congress. The Marine Corps leads the following ACAT I programs: the MV-22 Osprey Program, the Global Combat Support System, the Ground Aviation Task Oriented Radar, the Me- dium Tactical Vehicle Replacement, the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, and the Common Aviation Command and Control System. The Marine Corps also participates in numerous joint ACAT I programs, including the Global Broad- cast Service and the Joint Tactical Ra- dio System. ACAT I programs have two subcategories: ACAT IC and ACAT ID. ACAT IA: These are the largest au- tomated information system (AIS) ac- quisition programs. There are several cost thresholds for this level, which include AIS programs with single-year funding, in all appropriations, in ex- cess of $32 million; total program cost in excess of $126 million; or total life- 58 USMC CONCEPTS & PROGRAMS 2011 cycle costs in excess of $378 million. ACAT IA programs have two subcat- egories: ACAT IAM and ACAT IAC. ACAT II: These programs do not meet the threshold for ACAT I, but have research and development fund- ing in excess of $140 million or pro- curement funding in excess of $660 million. They are also known as Major Systems. The Marine Corps funds one ACAT II program, the Logistics Vehicle Systems Replacement. ACAT III: Programs that do not meet the cost threshold for ACAT I or II and involve combat capability are designated ACAT III or IV programs. Within the Marine Corps, the desig- nation generally depends on the level of program management and over- sight assigned by Commander, Marine Corps Systems Command. The Marine Corps in early 2011 manages more than 20 ACAT III programs, leads approxi- mately 12 joint ACAT III programs, and participates in another 27 joint ACAT III programs. This level also in- cludes less-than-major AIS programs. ACAT IV: ACAT programs not otherwise designated ACAT I, IA, II or III are designated ACAT IV. ACAT IV programs have two subcategories: ACAT IV(T) programs, which require operational test and evaluation, and ACAT IV(M) programs, which do not. The Marine Corps manages nearly 90 such programs and leads or partici- pates in more than 20 joint ACAT IV programs. ACQUISITION PHASES AND TERMS Material Solution Analysis Phase (Milestone A): This is the pre-system acquisition phase, during which initial concepts are refined and technical risk is reduced. Two major efforts may be un- dertaken in this phase. The first phase consists of short-term concept studies that refine and evaluate alternative solu- tions to the initial concept and provide a basis for assessing the relative merits of these alternatives. The second phase is an iterative discovery and development process designed to assess the viability of technologies, while simultaneously refin- ing user requirements. Engineering and Manufacturing Development (Milestone B): This is the phase in which a system is developed. Work in this phase includes reduction of integration and manufacturing risk, en- suring operational supportability, human systems engineering, design for the ability to produce, and demonstration of system integration, interoperability and utility. Production and Deployment (Mile- stone C): This is the phase in which the operational capability that satisfies mis- sion needs is ensured through operation- al test and evaluation. This evaluation determines a system's effectiveness, suit- ability, and survivability. The designated Milestone Decision Authority may decide to commit to production at Milestone C, either through low-rate initial produc- tion for major defense acquisition pro- grams or full production or procurement for other systems. A Non-Developmental Item (NDI): An NDI is any previously developed item of supply used exclusively for government
Show full textShow less
purposes by a federal agency, a state or lo- cal government or a foreign government with which the United States has a mu- tual defense cooperation agreement. An NDI requires only minor modifications or modifications of the type customarily available in the commercial marketplace in order to meet the requirements of the Marine Corps. Initial Operational Capability (IOC): In general, IOC is reached when some units and/or organizations in the force structure scheduled to receive a system have received it and have the ability to employ and maintain it. The specifics for any particular system IOC are defined. in that system's Capability Development Document (CDD) and Capability Pro- duction Document (CPD). Full Operational Capability (FOC): In general, FOC is attained when all units and/or organizations in the force struc- ture scheduled to receive a system have received it and have the ability to employ and maintain it. The specifics for any particular system FOC are defined in that system's Capability Development Docu- ment (CDD) and Capability Production Document (CPD). CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 59 PART 1: EQUIPPING THE MARINE E INTRODUCTION The "Individual Marine” is the heart and soul of the Nation's Marine Corps. The individual Marine is trained, educated, and equipped to operate across the broadest spectrum of missions and tasks a "middleweight" fighter optimized for crisis re- sponse but equally capable in global engagement, irregular warfare or responding to larger threats worldwide. - Marine ground combat forces will be staffed with disciplined, highly trained, well- educated, superbly led Marines who thrive in uncertainty, exploit chaos, solve complex problems through simple means, and take prudent, ethical, and decisive action. These Marines will be armed with superior weapons and equipment that enhances shared understanding of the battlespace and enables rapid, coordinated action—all without overburdening the individual Marine or compromising our expeditionary agility. While today's Marines are superbly operating in every clime and place, it is a lead- ership obligation to Marines, their families, and the Nation to be prepared for tomor- row with an eye to lightening the current fighting load. With the growth of the Marine Corps to 202,100 Marines, the individual Marine will remain the number-one prior- ity. While a Marine's focus in the field is on excellence and mission accomplishment, the focus of Marine Corps programs is on the “tools” needed for operational success. America's Marines deserve nothing but the best that the Nation can afford. CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 61 INFANTRY AUTOMATIC RIFLE (IAR) DESCRIPTION The IAR program seeks to replace the current M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) in all infantry and light armored reconnaissance squads. The IAR is a non-developmental, 5.56mm automatic rifle that is lighter, more durable, more accurate, and more reliable than the M249 SAW. OPERATIONAL IMPACT Use of the automatic rifle will signifi- cantly enhance the automatic rifleman's maneuverability and displacement speed, while providing the ability to suppress or destroy targets of most immediate con- cern to the fire team. PROGRAM STATUS The IAR program entered the system development and demonstration phase during second quarter FY 2008 following a successful Milestone B decision. A suc- cessful Milestone C decision was achieved in fourth quarter FY 2009 and the program is currently in the production and deploy- ment phase. The Heckler and Koch 416 was selected as the USMC IAR source. The IAR is currently undergoing a Limited User Ev aluation (LUE) with participation by three OEF active duty infantry battalions, a re- serve infantry battalion, and an active duty Light Armored Reconnaissance battalion. Fielding in support of this LUE began in December 2010 and will be complete in April 2011. The LUE assessment collection plan will include a post-EMV assessment, a 100 day assessment, and a post deployment assessment. The results of these assess- ments will support a full fielding decision. Initial feedback from LUE infantry battal- ions currently in combat operations is very positive, and points to the advantages of the automatic rifleman now being a “true” automatic rifleman, rather than a light ma- chine-gunner. Procurement Profile: FY 2011 Quantity: 458 FY 2012 0 Developer/Manufacturer: Heckler and Koch, Newington, NH 62 USMC CONCEPTS & PROGRAMS 2011 MODULAR WEAPON SYSTEM (MWS) DESCRIPTION The M16A4 rifle and an M4 carbine are the two weapons that satisfy the capa- bility requirements of the MWS program. An M1913 Rail Adapter System (RAS) re- places the upper-hand guards and incor- porates a removable rear-carrying handle that were standard on M16A2 rifles. The RAS provides the capability to mount various accessories, including a modified M203 launching system, high-intensity flashlights, infrared laser illuminators, and optics. The MWS M4 carbine vari- ant is selectively fielded to Marines whose billets or missions require the use of the shorter carbine. OPERATIONAL IMPACT The MWS significantly improves the ability to mount various accessories and will enhance accuracy, target detection, and engagement capabilities in day and night conditions. PROGRAM STATUS Fielding of the MWS began in FY2003. An increase in the Approved Acquisition Objective (AAO) due to complete replace- ment of M16A2 rifles Marine Corps-wide has extended fielding through FY2011. The AAO is now approximately 191,372 M16A4 rifles and approximately 83,344 M4 carbines. Procurement Profile: FY 2011 FY 2012 M16A4 5,000 M4 0 19,103 8,333 Developer/Manufacturer: M4: Colt Manufacturing Company, Inc., Hartford, CT M16A4: Fabrique National Military Industries, Columbia, SC CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 63 SEMI-AUTOMATIC SNIPER SYSTEM (SASS) DESCRIPTION The M110 Semi-Automatic Sniper System (SASS) is a 7.62mm semi-auto- matic, precision rifle that is capable of fir- ing on enemy targets out to 800 meters with a precision of 1.3 minutes of angle. The M110 is fielded with the M8541A Scout Sniper Day Scope (SSDS) and is also compatible with the AN/PVS-27 Scout Sniper Mid-Range Night Sight (SSMRNS). The weapon design is based on that of the commercial Stoner SR-25 rifle. The SASS has been fielded within the U.S. Army since 2008, and an identi- cal model, the MK11 MOD 2, has been fielded and in the U.S. Navy's Special Operations Forces (SEALs) since 2006. A similar model, the MK11 MOD1, has been fielded in the Marine Corps since 2006. OPERATIONAL IMPACT The M110 SASS will enable scout snipers to effectively engage enemy per- sonnel with precision, conduct patrols and counter-sniper operations, and ac- curately engage hardened or materiel tar- gets. The SASS will enhance the mobility of scout snipers by providing them with a shorter, lighter system than the current M40A5 Sniper Rifle. The SASS will also allow for rapid engagement of the enemy, which is critical in urban or restrictive environments in which multiple targets offer a very limited time to engage and may suddenly appear at close range. The semi-automatic capability of the SASS will augment the bolt-action M40A5 and will replace the M39 Enhanced Marks- man Rifle (EMR) on a one-for-one basis. PROGRAM STATUS The Approved Acquisition Objec- tive for the SASS is 1,588. Fielding of the M110 SASS will begin during First Quar- ter FY2011. All fielding will be conducted at home station; no in-theater fielding is planned. Fielding for the M110 will pro- ceed in two phases. Phase I will consist of fielding to deploying-units Marine scout snipers, as well as to select schoolhous- es where formal sniper and designated marksmen training takes place. Phase II will consist of fielding to fill deficiencies for deploying infantry battalions that were not fielded during Phase I, and to replace the M39 EMR. Fielding timelines for Phase II will be based on follow-on contract award for the SASS, which is anticipated during the Fourth Quarter FY2011. Procurement Profile: FY 2010 FY 2011 M-110 SASS 803 Developer/Manufacturer: 785 Knight's Armament Company, Titusville, FL 64 USMC CONCEPTS & PROGRAMS 2011 MULTI-SHOT GRENADE LAUNCHER DESCRIPTION The M-32A1 Multi-Shot Grenade Launcher (MSGL) is being fielded to re- place the M-32 that was purchased un- der an Urgent Operational Needs State- ment in support of OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. The M-32A1 is a hand-held, 40mm multi-shot grenade launcher with a six-round capacity fed by a revolving cylinder. This system affords the opera- tor the ability to provide suppressive fires over a minimum area of 20x60 meters, and is accurate for point targets up to 150 meters and area targets up to 375 meters. A trained operator can fire 6 rounds in 3 seconds and sustain 18 rounds a minute. OPERATIONAL IMPACT The M-32A1began fielding in 2010 and will field across I MEF, II MEF, III MEF, and MARFORRES as an additive weapon to enhance small-unit suppres- sive-fires capabilities. PROGRAM STATUS Fielding of the M-32A1 MSGL be- gan in the Third Quarter of 2010 and will continue through June 2011. Procurement Profile: FY 2011 M-32A1 1,659 FY 2012 0 Developer/Manufacturer: Milkor USA, Inc., Tucson, AZ CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 65 SHOULDER LAUNCHED MULTIPURPOSE ASSAULT WEAPON (SMAW II) DESCRIPTION SMAW II is the material solution to the FOTS capability requirement defined in the capability development document. The SMAW II system will consist of a new launcher to replace the existing SMAW MK153 Mod 0 launcher, and a multi- purpose, fire-from-enclosure (FFE) en- cased round. The SMAW II launcher will be functionally and physically compatible with existing SMAW legacy rounds. OPERATIONAL IMPACT The SMAW II provides the Marine Corps Assault Team the ability to engage targets from inside an enclosure or in a confined space (e.g., alleyway), which significantly improves the team's tactical flexibility and survivability. The system provides a lighter, more maintainable, and more reliable launcher, which incor- porates state-of-the art technology not resident in legacy system. PROGRAM STATUS Milestone B was achieved in August 2008 and Milestone C is scheduled for the Fourth Quarter FY2011. Initial Op- erational Capability is planned for the Fourth Quarter FY2012, with Full Opera- tional Capability in the Fourth Quarter FY2016. FY 2012 750 2,500 130 798 Procurement Profile: FY 2011 FFE Rounds Launchers Developer/Manufacturer: FFE Round: Nammo Talley, Incorporated, Mesa, AZ Launcher: Raytheon Missiles Systems, Tucson, AZ 66 USMC CONCEPTS & PROGRAMS 2011 HANDHELD RADIOS FAMILY OF SYSTEMS (FOS) DESCRIPTION The Handheld Radios FoS has sev- eral non-developmental, tactical hand- held, and amplified vehicular radio sets that provide reliable tactical communica- tions, including a retransmission capabil- ity. The Marine Corps has a requirement for two handheld radios: the Integrated Intra Squad Radio (IISR) and the Tactical Handheld Radio (THHR). The IISR is designed to provide small, lightweight, handheld tactical communi- cations to infantry squads and fire teams to facilitate squad command and control, enabling squad members to communi- cate in tactical situations where hand and arm signals and voice communications are not practical. The IISR acts as a wire- less intercom and possesses enough pow- er to provide effective communications in open terrain, heavy vegetation, and urban environments. The IISR operates in the AM and FM bands of the 380-470 mega- hertz (MHz) frequency spectrum. The IISR is capable of both analog and digital operation. The THHR is a secure handheld unit that supports the communications re- quirements of all elements of the MAGTF. The THHR operates in the AM and FM bands of the 30-512 MHz frequency spectrum, contain embedded commu- nications security, and is interoperable with other radio systems and waveforms, such as Single-Channel Ground and Air- borne Radio System (SINCGARS) and HAVEQUICK I/II, in the single-channel mode and frequency-hopping modes. In addition to the THHR, two vehicular amplification kits are included: the Dual Vehicle Adapter (DVA) and the Single Ve- hicle Adapter (SVA). The DVAs/SVAs are vehicular product lines that are fully in- teroperable with the Marine Corps' cur- rent inventory of combat net radios. OPERATIONAL IMPACT Legacy tactical handheld equipment within the Marine Corps exceeded its ex- pected life span and was rarely used. As a result, the handheld units primarily con- sisted of locally purchased, commercially available radios that were not interopera- ble with Marine Corps combat net radios. The Handheld Radios FoS consolidates and exceeds legacy capabilities, lightens the combat load of individual Marines and small units, reduces tactical handheld radio operating costs, and provides line- of-sight radios into every tactical vehicle. The current versions of the Handheld Ra- dios FoS have the expectations to remain CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 67 in the Marine Corps' inventory until the Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS) solu- tion reaches its full operational capability (FOC). PROGRAM STATUS The Handheld Radios FoS is in the post Milestone C phase of the acquisi- tion process. All systems have been pro- cured. Presently, seven end-items are currently in the inventory: AN/PRC-153 (IISR); AN/PRC-148 (THHR), with its associated AN/VRC- 111 DVA and AN/ VRC-113 Small Form Factor -SVA; and the AN/PRC-152 (THHR), with its asso- ciated AN/VRC-110 DVA and AN/VRC- 112 SVA. The Marine Corps' AAOs are for: 51,945 IISRs; 23,003 THHRs;10,246 DVAs; and 15,086 SVAS. Developer/Manufacturer: AN/PRC-152/AN/VRC-110/AN/VRC-112: Harris Corporation, Inc., Rochester, NY AN/PRC-153: Motorola, Columbia, MD AN/PRC-148/AN/VRC-111/AN/VRC-113: Thales Communications, Inc., Clarksburg, MD 68 USMC CONCEPTS & PROGRAMS 2011 MARINE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (MEP) The Marine Corps stood up the Ma- rine Enhancement Program (MEP) in 1989 in response to congressional guid- ance for the Corps to establish programs dedicated to improving the lethality, comfort and survivability of the indi- vidual Marine. The primary focus of the program is on low-cost, low-visibility materiel solutions that can be rapidly fielded and that typically do not compete well against larger, high-profile items in the Department of the Navy's budget. The MEP thus ensures improve- ments for the individual Infantryman are identified and quickly transitioned into practical solutions. This goal is achieved through an accelerated acquisition pro- cess that takes advantage of commer- cially available technologies to provide lighter, more improved "infantry items" to the Marines as quickly as possible. De- pending upon when the item is needed, its complexity, risk, and cost, it can take from 90 days to two years to test, modify as appropriate, procure and field the item to the Marine. Items procured and fielded under the MEP seek to reduce the load, increase the survivability, enhance the safety and im- prove the lethality of the individual Ma- rine Infantryman across the spectrum of operational environments. MEP systems are intended primarily for the Marine Infantryman within the Ground Combat Element. When applicable, MEP items have also transitioned to support other Military Occupational Specialties within the GCE (e.g., Combat Engineers and Artilleryman) and across the Marine Air Ground Task Force (e.g., Supply, Mainte- nance, Administration, and Ordnance). In recent years, the MEP has funded sev- eral critical programs, including: Com- bat Shotgun, Field Tarp, Flame-Resistant Organizational Gear, Modular Tactical Vest, Multi-Purpose Bayonet, Rifle Com- bat Optic, Individual Water Purification Block I (Miox Pen), Enhanced Hearing Protection, Grip Pod for the M16 and M203, Handheld Flashlight, Three Season Sleep System, Pocket Laser Range Finder, Next-Generation ILBE and the Improved Helmet Suspension/Retention System. The MEP Working Group includes core representatives from Plans, Policies and Operations, Marine Corps Combat Development and Integration, and Ma- rine Corps Systems Command. Nomina- tions for the MEP initiatives come from Marines via the website, email and the Advocate, or through review of the U.S. Army's Soldiers Enhancement Program for capabilities matching a Marine Corps need. Nominated capabilities must focus on commercial-off-the-shelf or non-de- velopmental items that can be executed quickly. The potential MEP initiatives for 2011 include: Battery Assist Device, Weapons Compensator, Hearing Armour (hearing protection), SPACES (solar portable power system), and the vehicle mounted battery charger. CHAPTER 3: PROGRAMS | 69 MARINE EXPEDITIONARY RIFLE SQUAD (MERS) The Marine Expeditionary Rifle Squad (MERS) is a program charged with applying an integrated approach to equipping a Marine rifle squad, our most fundamental warfighting unit. The focus of the program is to view the Marine rifle squad in a holistic manner- one in which the squad comprises a whole much more effective than the sum of its individual members. The integration and configura- tion management of all components that are worn, carried, and consumed by the squad will increase lethality, mobility, and flexibility of infantry forces. MERS is the steward of the Marine rifle squad's suite of equipment and works with all the pro- gram managers at Marine Corps Systems Command to optimize and integrate the rifle squad's equipment. 70 USMC CONCEPTS & PROGRAMS 2011 The program has founded the GRUNTWORKS Squad Integration Fa- cility. The facility provides a venue to engineer, evaluate, and try the capabili- ties and limitations of all equipment in development and under consideration for procurement that will be delivered to the infantry squad. This dynamic facil- ity uses a human factors lab, equipment prototyping and modification workshop, a mobility platform integration area, and an infantry immersive environment fo- cused on equipment evaluation in a for- eign environment to accomplish equip- ment modernization and integration initiatives. Human factors and ergonom- ics are applied to the physical integration of the infantry squad's equipment. The physiological and performance impacts of fielding new equipment create sets of trade-offs between weight and volume management, comfort, usability, sim- plicity, lethality, survivability, mobility, sustainment, and training given that it must perform in combat in any clime and place. MERS will highlight these trade offs and refine solutions that incorporate the capabilities of the Marine rifle squad as an integrated system. MERS works closely with the MERS Capabilities Integration Officer and the HQMC Plans Policy and Operations MERS Infantry Advocate. The MERS triad has established an Integrated In- fantry Working Group in order to ensure that the operating forces are equipped with optimal solutions. Infantry Battal- ion surveys are continuously conducted in theater and post deployment in order