Aerobatic Training Syllabus
Cessna 152 Aerobat · Airworthiness Directives
Overview
This document is a training syllabus for aerobatic flight instruction specifically tailored for the Cessna 152 Aerobat. It provides a comprehensive overview of aerobatic maneuvers, safety precautions, and instructional techniques for pilots and instructors. The syllabus emphasizes the importance of understanding the aircraft's capabilities and limitations, particularly in aerobatic flight. It includes detailed descriptions of various maneuvers, such as loops, rolls, and spins, along with guidelines for conducting safe and effective training sessions. The document is intended for flight instructors and students interested in learning aerobatics in the Cessna 152 Aerobat, highlighting the unique features and structural modifications of the aircraft that enable aerobatic flight.
- The Cessna 152 Aerobat has a redline of 172 knots for aerobatic maneuvers, which is 23 knots higher than the standard 152.
- The basic empty weight of the Aerobat is approximately 16 pounds heavier than the standard Cessna 150/152 due to structural reinforcements.
- Aerobatic maneuvers should only be performed in the Aerobat and not in standard Cessna models, as they are not designed for such operations.
- Safety briefings and checklists are mandatory before each flight to ensure all procedures are followed correctly.
- The syllabus includes a variety of maneuvers, such as loops, spins, and rolls, with specific entry speeds and recovery techniques outlined.
Document
Source
Originally published by aeroresourcesinc.com. Sprinkle hosts a reference copy with an added summary, specifications and searchable full text.
Document details
- Type
- Airworthiness Directives
- Year
- 2000
- Pages
- 6
- File size
- 5.8 MB
- Publisher
- aeroresourcesinc.com
Common. Rarer than 4% of the aircraft models we track.
Most owners only have the POH. Here's the essential set for the Cessna 152 Aerobat.
- Pilot's Operating Handbook / AFM
- Checklist
- Maintenance Manual
- Parts Catalog (IPC)
- Systems & Wiring
- Service Bulletins
- Type Certificate (TCDS)
Free — save the A152 Aerobat to your watchlist and track it in one place.
More Cessna 152 Aerobatmanuals & documents
See all 24 →- The Student Pilot’s Flight Manual: From First Flight to Pilot CertificateFlight Manual
- CESSNA 152 NORMAL & EMERGENCY PROCEDURES CHECKLISTChecklist
- Cessna C-152 ChecklistChecklist
- CESSNA 152 PROCEDURES MANUALTraining Manual
- Type Acceptance Report TAR 98/08 – Cessna 150/152Maintenance Manual
- Advisory Circular: Part 141 Pilot Schools, Application, Certification, and ComplianceAirworthiness Directives
- AAIB Bulletin 9/2017Service Bulletins
- The Basic Aerobatic Manual: With Spin and Upset Recovery TechniquesPilot's Operating Handbook
- AIRWORTHINESS BULLETIN Cessna 150/152 Series Aircraft Horizontal Stabiliser Spar CrackingService Bulletins
- AAIB Bulletin: 9/2010Service Bulletins
- Investigation of Factors Affecting Loss of Control of GA AircraftOther Documents
- AAIB Bulletin No: 12/2003Service Bulletins
If you fly the Cessna 152 Aerobat, you may also be researching these.
In this document
Introduction to Aerobatics
The syllabus begins with an introduction to the forces and effects of aerobatics, emphasizing the importance of safety and the unique capabilities of the Cessna 152 Aerobat. It warns against performing aerobatic maneuvers in non-aerobatic aircraft, such as the standard Cessna 150 or 152.
Aerobatic Maneuvers
The syllabus outlines various aerobatic maneuvers to be taught, including loops, aileron rolls, chandelles, and spins. It details the entry speeds and techniques for each maneuver, ensuring that trainees understand the necessary precautions and recovery procedures.
Safety Precautions
Safety is a primary focus throughout the syllabus. It includes warnings about the risks associated with aerobatic flight and emphasizes the importance of thorough pre-flight briefings and the use of checklists. Specific airspeed limits for the Aerobat are provided, such as a redline of 172 knots for aerobatic flight.
Training Units
The syllabus is divided into several training units, each focusing on different aspects of aerobatic flight. The first unit introduces basic maneuvers, while subsequent units build on these skills, incorporating more complex maneuvers and recovery techniques. Each unit is designed to be completed in approximately one hour of flight time.
Conclusion and Further Training
The document concludes with a summary of the training syllabus and encourages pilots to continue their aerobatic training with more advanced aircraft and maneuvers. It highlights the Cessna 152 Aerobat as an excellent platform for introductory aerobatic training.
Safety notes
- Ensure all contaminants are removed from fuel and fuel systems before flight to prevent engine failure.
- Follow all safety instructions and owner advisories prior to flight to avoid bodily injury or death.
Full document text
Loops,• spIns, and rolls Training with Bill Kershner in the Cessna Aerobat BY WILLIAM K. KERSHNER PHOTOGRAPHY BY MIKE FIZER Ifirst heard that Cessna was planning to market an aerobatic version ofthe 150 when I was contacted to work with people there in writing the Cessna 150 Aerobat Train- ing Manual, which was to be used by the flight schools that were setting up an aerobatic pro- gram with the airplane. At the time (July 1969), I was teaching aerobatics in a Beech Musketeer Aerobatic Sport III. • I went to Wichita, Kansas, twice and had the pleasure of working with Bill Thompson, Joyce Case, Ed McKenzie, Jim Kemper, and Milt Adamson and his owners' handbook illustrators. Case and I flew a couple of times in an Aerobat, and I watched the movies of the airplane with Don Pittman flying the maneuvers. After seeing one of Pittman's ultra-short landings, my comment was tlJat I could do the same thing in my Aerobatic Spoi-t- and have it repaired and ready for flying again in less than three months .• In our meetings, AOPA PILOT' 91 • MAY 2000 we all agreed that one maneuver that wouldn't be included in the training manual was the split-S (a half-roll and a half-loop pull- through) because of the danger of the pilot's exceeding the redline if he or she had not slowed the airplane enough during the half-roll. I had already had a student do this to me, resulting in a grounding of the Sport until a mechanic performed the equivalent of an annual inspection on it. However, the reverse Cuban 8, in which the airplane is slowed to 100 knots and the nose then pulled up to a 45-degree pitch before the half-roll and pull-through, is an approved maneu- ver in the Aerobat. I conferred with the pilots and the illustrators, deciding that side and top views of the Aerobat in various banks and views from the rear could be super- imposed on backgrounds of fields below, AOPA PILOT' 92 • MAY 2000 and the horizon, to show the steps of a maneuver. I felt that each view from outside the airplane should be matched by a view from the cockpit as it would be seen by the pilot. I had used this tech- nique before in a couple of my flight instruction manuals. The result was much better than I had anticipated because of the greater skill (than mine) of the illustrators at Cessna. I worked for several weeks, arranging the order of introduction of the maneu- vers and making rough sketches, then went back to Wichita in November 1969 to finalize the order of the chapters in the training manual. I had a most enjoy- able working relationship with the people at Cessna. (Hey, these folks were the enemy when I was working at Piper Aircraft and we were competing for military contracts.) My time with the Aerobat didn't end with writing the syllabus. At this writing, I have 400 hours instructing in a Cessna 150 Aerobat-and approximately 2,500 hours instructing in the 152 Aerobat- and so I have a few comments: The major setback is the rate of climb (or lack of it), particularly at high density altitudes. Of the two, the 152-with its 110 horsepow- er-has a noticeably greater rate of climb during hot summer days than the 150, which puts out only 100 hp. There has been an STC to put a 150-hp Lycoming (272 pounds) in the 150 Aerobat (Conti- nental 0-200, 210 pounds), but (forward) center of gravity limits required that the " battery be taken out of the engine com- partment and put in the tail area. The new mass distribution made for "inter- esting" spins; in one case, an airworthi- ness directive was issued that required '. r· d new placards to be placed in view of the pilot, indicating that with this modifica- tion spins are prohibited and the airplane is to be operated in the Utility category, with only steep turns, chandelles, lazy 8s, and stalls (except whips tails) with slow deceleration allowed. The basic empty weight of the Aerobat is approximately 16 pounds heavier than the standard Cessna 150/152 because of the added structure necessary to put it in the Aerobatic category. When I observed the first ones being made in Wichita, I was impressed at the number of doublers, extra rivets, and other structural additions to the airplane. (The wing struts are larger and the skin is thicker in many areas.) My aerobatic course is primarily for safety, or defensive flying; I prefer to use the Aerobat to introduce pilots to aerobatics and recoveries from unusual _J \Bill Kershner illustrates to stlldent Vickie Cogan how an aileron roll is executed (abolle). Strllctllrally, the Aerobat is replete with extra doublers and rillets. attitude over, say, the Pitts, Extra 300, and others because the Aerobat has a roll and pitch rate similar to those of the general aviation airplanes that the trainee is currently flying. Most have only flown side-by-side wheel-control airplanes (many have flown the stan- dard 152 during their initial training), so there is no culture shock of stick con- trol, tailwheel, and a roll rate that has the airplane 20 seconds ahead of the pilot. In other words, the newcomer makes a transition to aerobatics in a less-than-spectacular way, but I always encourage trainees to move on to high- er-performance airplanes and more complex maneuvers at other aerobatic schools. Some "graduates" have bought Aerobats, flown them awhile, then bought a Pitts, Sukhoi, or Extra 300L and entered competition. Each gradu- ate is given a cap and patch with the Ace Aerobatic School logo of an Aerobat inverted with the motto Non Compos Mentis; one definition is mentally incompetent to stand trial. A disadvantage of the control wheel (versus a stick) is that it has to be turned 90 degrees to get the desired full aileron deflection. This is awkward when attempting to do a left roll using only the left hand. (The right hand is adding full power as the airplane becomes inverted.) The little airplane is forgiving and
Show full textShow less
inexpensive to operate and has compar- atively few airworthiness directives. Some are of the recurring type, such as checking the seat tracks periodically for elongation of the lock-holes or the one- time requirement to change the carbure- tor float (and some apply only to certain airframe or engine serial numbers). Because the Aerobat doesn't have an inverted oil or fuel system, the maneu- vers stay in the positive-G area with the normal range during my course of 0.5 to 3.5 positive Gs, with some possible ranges from zero to plus 4 Gs. Even at that, the engine may hesitate in some of the recoveries from inverted flight. Note to newcomers: One positive G is in effect in straight-and-Ievel, upright flight, and it is what you are experiencing as you read this. If you are reading this while riding a roller coaster or hanging by your heels from the monkey bars, you are not experiencing one positive G-but that's not my problem. When Cessna stopped manufacturing the Aerobat in 1984, I requested permis- sion to obtain the Aerobat Training Man- lIal material to expand the book for intro- ductory aerobatics. This was readily given, and I was sent the material (negatives, drawings, etc.). I used these with the un- derstanding that I would make it clear that the book was no longer a Cessna product (a reasonable request since the company would no longer have control of its contents). I then copyrighted it for publication with my other books at Iowa State University Press as Tile Basic Aero- batic Manllal, which at this writing has sold more than 20,000 copies. A syllabus was included in the earlier training manu- al but the updated version was expanded, based on further experience with instruct- ing in the airplane. I also upped some of the maneuver entry speeds slightly as I gained more experience in the airplane and with training techniques. I wanted to set up my own syllabus so that the trainee would get an intro- duction to aerobatics without significant negative Gs. I chose the Aerobat for the type of introductory training that the nonaero- batic pilot wants for a couple of reasons cited earlier, plus the fact that the airport I fly out of has strong crosswinds on occasion, and the nosewheel is welcome when the crosswinds are strong and gusty. I don't recall canceling flights because of crosswinds, but I'm sure I must have done so on various occasions in the past 35 years here at Sewanee, Tennessee. Having flown 31 types and models of tailwheel airplanes and instructed in 18 of them, I'm sure that there would be days here when I would be hesitant to launch (or recover) in cer- tain tailwheel trainers. Some aerobatic instructors tend to AOPA PILOT' 93· MAY 2000 WARNING ASSURE. fHA t All com AMINA res INCLUDING WAfeR ARE REMOVED FROM FUEL AND FUEL SYSTEM BEfORE FLIGHT FAILURE TO ASSURE CON" AMINATE FREE fUel AND HEED ALL SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS AND OWNER ADVISORIES PRIOR TO fliGHt CAN RESULT IN BODILY INJURY OR Df.A1H Q70~O,.,1 The wing struts are larger on the Aerobat, and the four-point harnesses are appreciated dur- ing aerobatic maneuvers. jettisonable doors and two slip indicators, one on either side of the panel, are also unique features of the aircraft· •..• Links to additional information on U aerobatic flight can be found on AOPA Online (www.aopa.org/pilotllinks. shtml). William K. Kershner, AOPA084901. a flight instructor and writer whose text- books are published by Iowa State Uni- versity Press, has been flying for more than 50 years, has taught 460 students aerobatics, and received the 1992 Nation- al Flight Instructor of the YearAward. sneer at the Aerobat because it is not a "real" aerobatic airplane. I can say from personal experience that the Grumman F8F-l Bearcat would certainly outclimb it, but for my purposes it fits my require- ments. I can do four- and eight-point rolls, square and eight-sided loops, and other more advanced maneuvers. (Don't ask how much altitude is used in the dive to get the entry speeds for some of them.) I bought my Aerobat in 1984 for just under $14,000 when it had 1,056 hours' total time on airframe and engine, and it's paid for itself several times over. You might expect to get a used Aerobat (there are no new ones) in a range from $20,000 (high-time airframe and engine) to maybe $40,000-plus for a cream puff with low time. The attitude indicator in my airplane is still in operation at 3,800 hours, although it's getting slow to re-erect. The heading indicator was overhauled at about 3,100 hours' total time. There have been two vacuum-pump replacements since 1984. The original Lycoming 0-235-L2C engine was traded at 2,000 hours for a factory-remanufactured engine with a 2,400-hour TBO, which now has fewer than 1,800 hours on it. The alternator control unit (voltage regulator) was replaced twice and the alternator once. The shimmy damper has required periodic servicing (a Cessna 150/152 problem) but has not been a major factor. There has been an AD for periodic inspection of the McCauley prop hub; no problems were found. The exhaust stack was replaced once during my 15 years of ownership. In summary, the airplane will, if noth- ing else, teach a pilot the basics of aero- batics and give him or her an apprecia- tion for energy conservation, and maybe give a boost to go on to more complex, high-performance aerobatic airplanes. It is my ambition to compete with my Aerobat in Unlimited competition at Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin, and win over the Extras, Sukhois, Pitts, and other exot- ic competitors. After all, I have 110 horsepower and an NACA2412 airfoil to work with. 0 AOPA PILOT· 94· MAY 2000 Aerobat(ic) training syllabusThe first unit-First aerobatic flight Assuming that the trainee has not performed any aerobatics before, the first unit of ground school has an introduction to the forces and effects of aerobatics, with an overview of the course and the G forces that he or she could expect to encounter. A warning to not do rolls or loops in a standard Cessna 150 or 152 (or any other nonaerobatic airplane) is empha- sized. I mention that I have approximately 12,000 rolls and loops (plus other maneu- vers) in the Aerobat and, after being in Wichi- ta to see the material added to the airplane's structure, I'm not about to do aerobatics in a standard 150 or 152. The redline for the Utili- ty category 152 is 149 kt; for the Aerobat it is 172 kt-23 kt higher. One trainee, who had aspirations for the airlines, asked why he could not roll the Utility category 152 that he was flying. My answer was that it is illegal, and the airlines at that time had their pick of a few from several thousand applications; if he were caught, he wouldn't have a prayer of getting hired. Another reason was that if a maneuver went awry, a split-S and high air- speed could result. One of his rolls did so, and we pulled out at 165 kt-close to my red line but16 kt over that of the regular 152. The trainee is briefed on the maneuvers to be done during the first flight: takeoff and departure stalls, 720-degree power turns, chandelles, wingovers, and aileron rolls. He is admonished to let me know the first signs of NSMFA (not so much fun anymore) so that I can make the proper decisions (stop, go home, etc.). A briefing on exiting the aircraft and use of the chute is given at the airplane. One trainee on his second or third flight was attempting to put the chute on upside down. As I helped him to put on the chute prop- erly, I mentioned that if he bailed out wear- ing a chute upside down, it would cause him to naturally go up and never be seen again. I have trainees review the exit proce- dure if there has been a time gap in the training. Checklists are used for all flights. The second unit This lesson is an introduction to the loop. The aileron roll and other factors of the first flight are reviewed. The loop, loop plus roll, clover- leaf, Cuban 8, reverse Cuban 8, and Immel- mann are discussed in that order, but in most cases the airborne portion will end after a cou- ple of two-parts-of-a-cloverleaf. (The full cloverleaf consists of four loops, each with a quarter-roll when the airplane is pointed straight down so that the four loops, if put 90 degrees to each other, would form a four-leaf clover when viewed obliquely.) The ground instruction is a brief introduction to spin theory, entry, and recovery procedures, so that incipi- ent and developed spins can be practiced at the end of the flight. With approximately 800 spins in the C-150 and nearly 5,500 in the C- 152, I found that the recovery steps cited in the information manual work exactly as described with no problems, whether the spin is entered from the top of a loop (too much back pressure) or from the "delayed" recovery of a snap roll. This has been proven to me with spins up to 25 turns-the recovery is the same as it is at three turns. The third unit The third unit consists of any aerobatic maneuvers that need to be reviewed (ground and flight) and the introduction in flight of the Cuban 8, reverse Cuban 8, Immelmann, and the repeat of spins at the end of the flight. The fourth unit This unit consists of a discussion of wake tur- bulence--its cause and effects-with briefing on recovery procedures. The half-slow-roll (crossed-control initially) recovery is not taught. Instead, the aileron-and-rudder- together method of rolling is taught, as would likely be used by a pilot in an inverted position to get back upright-and damn the resulting heading. (Few would have the presence of mind to cross-control under the stress of a real upset unless they were experienced acro pilots.) I've hinted that perhaps in a real situa- tion it wouldn't be a bad idea during the recovery to head for the tower and let the folks in there get involved. (Just kidding.) At 4,000 feet agl or higher, I roll the air- plane inverted, noting the altitude in that posi- tion, and neutralize the ailerons. The trainee takes over and rolls the airplane upright while adding full power. I then check the altitude lost (from a minimum of 150 feet to 600 feet in some cases). "Push and roll, then pull as the airplane becomes upright!" is the anthem, but I always remind trainees that an aerobatic course or lots of practice still might not pre- vent an accident caused by wake turbulence, and to avoid it if at all possible. The last item during this unit is a spin recovery by reference to instruments (not hooded) after having discussed it in the pre- flight briefing. The fifth unit The fifth flight is a roundup and review, a few additional new maneuvers such as the barrel roll and four-point roll, and more spins. This is the usual syllabus for the course with an hour of flight allowed for each unit, but some may want the course broken down into shorter periods with more flights. Some are ready for loops after the aileron rolls on the first flight, and they move on quickly to four- and eight-point rolls in the later units. Others soldier on, still working at aileron rolls and loops and the contents of the first three units at the end of five hours. As I tell each trainee, "I hope you don't need this [recover- ies from inadvertent inverted flight] but if you do, remember to push and roll, and then pull as the half-roll is completed." -WKK '\ • "\ 12" -, ~;-i ~ ~" - j ~""". l fr't.;;" {\ J . ,.. 't ' :::;:::::... ~ t I j ", " . J"I1<" ut$ of i(O" "fS OF Re•....• AOI'A PILOT· 95. MAY 2000







